WEBVTT - Could Elon Defy the Court?

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm Emily Changes San Francisco and this is

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. How a

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Delaware court could force Musque to seal the deal. From

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>daily fines to allowing Twitter to seize his assets, we

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>will talk about all the ways Musk could be held

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to his word if he loses what is shaping up

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to be an epic legal battle. Plus, Pinceresque gets a

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>big boost from Elliott Management after the activist investor takes

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a nine percent stake in the company. Shares jumping after hours,

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon how to surprisingly strong friend day sales jump

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>with an eight percent from last year and even help

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>rivals get a little more online traffic. Will break down

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>all the data. All that in a moment. But first,

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, known for his delight in defying authorities, ordered

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to complete his forty four billion dollar purchase of Twitter,

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and he refuses. How could a Delaware court force his hand.

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>That's something that we've been exploring. I want to bring

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomber's Kurt Wagner now to discuss Kurt. If you

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>go through a Twitter's complaint, they come out swinging they

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>want to do this forty four billion dollar deal. This

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is not posturing or ceremony. They want their forty four billion.

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Can apport really force Elon Musk to pay up? It

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the answers yes. And thankfully our colleagues, who

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know cover the cord are are much closer to this,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and they had a story today that said there's a

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>few things they could do. They could uh slap a

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>big fine on Elon Musk could right, so the richest,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>even the richest man in the world might not want

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to pay a fine every single day. They could seize

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>his assets was another thing, and obviously that would include

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Tesla stock um. So I think those are the main

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>probably motivators if you will to do a deal like this,

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>on top of of course actually paying the money, that

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>he also could allow Twitter to seize his assets, which

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I found interesting. I'm not sure if Twitter would want

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>to seize his assets at this point. They're trying to

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>make him seize their assets, right, But I find this

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.559
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, you know, to be incredibly interesting and complicated

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>because think about this, Emily for sixty pages, Twitter was saying,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>here's a guy who's acting in bad faith. Here is

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>someone who is who's lying, who's misrepresenting, and now we

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>want him to own the company and be everybody's boss. Right.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a very complicated issue. We pulled some quotes

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>from those sixty pages, and it's actually kind of a

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>riveting read written in a more conversational complaint to be

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>here's one Musk apparently believes that he, unlike every other

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>party subject to Delaware contract law, is free to change

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>his mind, trash the company, disrupt its operations, destroy shareholder value,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and walk away. His exit ategy is a model of hypocrisy.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there's this that he exhibited little interest in

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>understanding Twitter's process for estimating spam accounts. In a June

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>thirtie conversation with Twitter CFO Net Siegel, he acknowledged he

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>hadn't even read the detailed summary of twitter sampling process

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>provided back in May. Siegel offered to spend time with

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk once again to review it. That meeting never happened

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>despite Twitter's best efforts. What do you make of that?

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Twitter went out of its way to show

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and paint a picture of someone who has lost interest

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in this deal. Right, Basically from about June twenty three

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>when Bob Swan, the former i d M CEO who

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>was leading the Musk deal team, he left. From then

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on through the fourth of July, the company basically said

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we had trouble getting in touch with him. We tried

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to have meetings, he wouldn't show up. When he did

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>show up, he wasn't prepared. They're really trying to convey

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 1>that Ellen really stepped back from this deal, and that's

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>why it's fallen apart, not because of anything that Twitter did.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing. Elon Musk doesn't shy away from

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a fight, and just even with major regulators, so we're

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>not expecting him to just back down. No. And and

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've seen some people speculate, well, why don't

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>they come to a settlement, Why doesn't Eilon pay half

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the price? And and everyone walks away. It's like, can

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you imagine Elon Musk voluntarily saying, here's twenty billion dollars, Sure,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll be the loser in this situation. I just have

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>a tough time imagining that. So it does really feel

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>like it's either going to be forty four billion or nothing.

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I know that sounds extreme, but it's just hard to

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>imagine a middle ground right now. All right, well, certainly

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>something we slash you will continue to follow, Thank you,

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Wagner. Meantime, payments company Stripe has told staffers the

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>private market valuation of the company has dropped more than

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Stripe's new implied valuation is about seventy four billion dollars,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>down from billion and its most recent fundraising. This as

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the stock prices of Stripes publicly traded Peers continue to plummet.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Since the overturning of Roe versus Wade, an employee benefit

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>package might be the only way women seeking abortions can

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>even afford it. Tech giants have responded to the ruling

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>by pledging their support and financial assistance. But how is

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this all playing out in the aftermath? Joining is now?

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Kate Writer, CEO of Maven, a women's and family health

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>clinic that partners with companies like Microsoft, Loreale, and A

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>T and T. Kate, thank you so much for joining us.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>So look, in one ruling, the rules changed for women

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>across the country. What's happened in the aftermath? What have

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>you seen? You know? Um? We knew this was coming, uh,

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, ever since XDA in the fall. I think

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in the medical community, um, you know,

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we're predicting this, and I think what we've heard is

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>we work with a lot of leading health plans and

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>employers with for the ribbons and family health benefits from

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>fertility and maternity, and a lot of them didn't know

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what to kind of make of it. The second that

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court decision was kind of struck down and

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>brought down even the most conservative clients that previously didn't

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>want to take a position stood up and designed kind

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>of employee benefit packages through mayven and other services to

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>support travel across state lines, to support pregnancy options, counseling,

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know a lot of other things. So that

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>was encouraging. So what kind of demand are you and

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>requests are you seeing from MAVEN members. Are you seeing

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>a surge in requests for reproductive help? I think anxiety,

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>our mental health is up, but I think it's not

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>just MAYVEN members right now. We're also paying attention to

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe providers. So, you know, one of the things that

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we've been hearing is there's about of US counties don't

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>have an OB G U, I N and a lot

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of those are in states where they're restricting abortion access.

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of our clinicians are are are really concerned.

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're hearing people of that are going to

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>move and so that's going to create even more provider shortages.

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's it's both the members but also

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the providers themselves. Hang on, did you just say of

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>US counties don't have an O, B, G, Y N

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>p US. Isn't that just a basic level of care

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>for any kind of women's health needs? You know, I

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>think one of the reasons I started maybe eight years ago,

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>if because women's health has always been underserved. A lot

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of these statistics kind of people didn't really pay as

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>much attention to, but you know, technically are called matrinity care,

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>desserts and um. And you know, I think the the

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a hog and the medical community is afraid that is

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be even more exacerbated um with you know,

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>with this ruling. So here's the question. There are companies

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and and and startups like yours that are now potentially

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>serving women in states where abortion is illegal. How are

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you navigating that? Well? I think you know what we

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>always think about is the well being of the members

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>or providers or clients is always first and foremost. And

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we also, of course will always be in compliance with

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the laws, and so our legal team are the law

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that's still really uncertain is working over time. I'm to

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>try to understand this, and so you know, we have

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to obviously be in compliance. But um, but you know,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the well being of a many of our members in

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>those states is uh. You knows, as evidenced by a

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, increase acts for support around emotional

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>well being, around just the uncertainty of even bringing kids

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>up in this world. You know, what what do you say?

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you explain what's going on? Um, you know,

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing all in that on our platform. Meantime, you've

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>got a number of companies that have come out and

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>said we're going to cover travel benefits for employees who

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>need to cross state lines to get an abortion. So,

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, Ubert, Lift, Door, Dash have said they would

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>do this for their employees, But Bloomberg has a story

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>out today saying, well, they're not doing this for their shoppers,

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>or their drivers, or for all of the contractors on

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>their platform. What do you think the responsibility of these

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>employers are well, I think that we're living in a

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>world where as we see it, it's it's part of

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>by the employee benefits industry at central robust industry. As

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>we see the less and less services kind of offered

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>by the government companies you know, may even included UM,

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of our clients are stepping up to

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>fill a lot of those gaps because at the end

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of the day, UM, you know, your people are everything

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're growing your business, and so not only are

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you helping your people, but you know, there is an

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>economic argument for employer, you know, talent attraction and retention

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of creating a good culture so that

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>your you know, your people can be their most productive

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>and their happiest at work. Meantime, there are some states

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking right now about Kentucky that are considering laws

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>that would define life right after fertilization, which would potentially

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>put IVF and fertility treatments in danger. And you're seeing patients,

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing that, you're seeing some patients try to move

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.719
<v Speaker 1>their embryos for example, out of those states. Are you

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing this? Yes, UM, we do supports the financials around

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>moving the embryos across state lines through you know, our

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>our maybe and wall of benefit. But you know, I

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>think that what we hear of the fertility and community

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>is that that there is still so much uncertainty UM,

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of people just you know, don't

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on and are are taking via the embryo. UM.

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, transfer is precaution. But you know, I will

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>say that hopefully UM that you know, as a lot

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of this data comes out where this is bad for

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>business and a lot of these states, it's bad for people,

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>it's bad for families, it's bad for women. That UM

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that that hopefully some of these more extreme bills that

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 1>are in the state sentence will not get past one

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of your biggest fears though, I mean, there are so

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>many cascading issues here. What do you worry about the most? Yeah,

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen, I think that the saddest thing about

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this is that this just disproportionately affects um you know,

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>already vulnerable patients, right, so lower income women, black women.

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>There's already a maternal health crisis in this country. When

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at even the data coming out of a

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of the states with these trigger laws that are

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have more restrict of abortion access. The maternal

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>mortality rate is two times that of other states, and

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>so you know already when we are the highest maternal

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>mortality rate in the developed world, and we're restricting access

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>even more in in women's health where abortion about one

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>out of four women get abortion in their lifetime. It's

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a very common procedure and part of standard healthcare in

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>women's health. That this is just you know, this is

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>going to make our our our our outcomes even worse.

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna hurt women, it's gonna hurt families. And I

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>hope that you know that we that quickly states will

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>will get on the right side of this and recognize

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that this is just healthcare. All right, Kate Writer, CEO

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>of Maven Clinic. Appreciate you sharing your perspective here today

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for having me all right. Coming up, Amazon pushing to

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>end to antitrust investigations by the European Union. Could this

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>be a blueprint for big tech compromises around the world.

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll discuss this is Bloomberg Pinters shares jump more than

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in late trading after Dow Jones reported activist investor Elliott

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Management has taken a nine percent stick in the company

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>our very own Alex Brenka joins us now to discuss.

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So why are shares jumping on this news? Yeah, shares

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>are probably jumping on this news because investors are looking

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for something to happen at pinterest. Pinterests has had an

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting go of it the last couple of years. Both financially,

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing strong at sales um but they're seeing users

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>fall off to the tune of nine percent decline in

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>monthly active users in the last quarter. So this is

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a company that's kind of been around for a while.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of questions as to where does

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>growth come next. You'll recall not too long ago there

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>were those talks with PayPal for a potential deal. The

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>company has been trying to kind of expand into some

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>more arenas, like into et commerce UM. But between that

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and UM the longtime CEO stepping back from that role, Uh,

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it seems like Elliott um sees an opportunity to kind

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of shake some things up and maybe push for some

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>changes that it's looking for at this business. Interesting. Yeah,

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>huge Shacob from with Ben Silverman leaving after all those years.

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ready, long time former payments executive, who you know

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>worked at brain Tree, which got bought by PayPal um

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>for for many many years taking over. Do we know

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>yet what Bill Ready's plans are. We don't know yet.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is a guy who, as you mentioned, comes

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.599
<v Speaker 1>from Google, comes from the ad side, So this is

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy who has spent a lot of his time

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to make money online. So that would

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be the era that I would expect this company just

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>continue to focus on. It's also, frankly, again the area

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen some pressure on this company and some

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>questions on this company from the analyst and investor commun

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>unity up until now. So, um, whether or not Elliott

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>is on the same kind of brain length as Bill

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Ready as he takes the helm at Pinterest, I guess

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a place we will have to see. Um.

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But if I were looking at his background and saying, hey,

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the most kind of opportune place for him to

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>lean in, it is to try to counteract that user

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>decline with juicing up revenue even more than we saw

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in the eight percent increase that we saw in the

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>past quarter. All Right, Alex Sparenka, thank you for giving

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>us that context from l A. Appreciate it. Meantime, Amazon

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is a step closer to settling to EU antitrust investigations

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>concerning whether the company uses sales data of its own

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>third party sellers to unfairly favor its own products. The

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>European Commission is now asking Amazon's competitors for feedback on

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a proposed settlement. Amazon says it's engaging constructively. Bloomberg's mat

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Day covers all things Amazon and joins us. Now, So

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>how big are the compromises that am Amazon is actually

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>proposing here, Matt, I think they're meaningful. One of the

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>things that opposing is offering kind of a second option

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to buy a product, you know, not just what am unrecommends,

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>which the vast majority of people just clicked through, but

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>offering a second tier. But I think if you win

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>inside a Seattle and Amazon's office today, they'd say they're

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>fine with this. This doesn't dismantle their marketplace. They can

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep doing business as usual. They just have

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to promise they're not gonna not gonna break the rules

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>off for sellers another option to get seen. Obviously big

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>tech is facing antitrust regulatory scrutiny around the world. Is

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>what Amazon is doing here potentially a harbinger of compromises

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to come from others. It's certainly the compromise they'd like

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to see. They like this a whole lot more than

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they would like, UM the antitrust bills being kicked around

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and in the US Congress, which strike them as much

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>more structural risk for them. They don't want to have

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to do anything that kind of changes how they run

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>their marketplace UM and their retail websites at its core.

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think this EU think kind of threads that

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>needles for them. Meantime, you're also reporting today that Union

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Nation efforts at Amazon warehouses in New York are kind

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of losing momentum. This after a major victory at least

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>one warehouse in New York. What's happening. Yes, So, the

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Labor Union and Upstart Union in Staten Island, they

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>were on top of the world if you go back

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to April when they won and they got the rights

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to bargain for workers at one facility. You know, since then,

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>they've lost their second election and they've paused efforts to

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>organize two more places. UM. So a lot of what

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>they're doing these days is really playing defense. They're trying

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to kind of hold onto their win in labor board hearings.

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Amazon it's challenged that first result. So basically, this this

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>outfit that you look like they could do no wrong

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago, and it's it's kind of gotten

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to the hard part of that to put the work

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in to defend their early games. Chris Mall's who we

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>just saw popping some champagne there, who's been leading this effort.

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>He also testified, uh at peerings where Amazon has been

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>protesting the win. What happened there? Yeah, he came on.

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He testifying from a hotel room. He's kind of on

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a permanent were of other labor groups and and speaking engagements.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon works real hard to kind of you know, peg

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>him as as a rule breaker, saying he was on

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>company property and trespassing and all these things, and Smalls

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of it is his best efforts to keep that

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>at arm's length. It's been a really contentious process so far,

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of kind of snipping back and forth from

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the union's lawyers and Amazons what about unionization? Elsewhere? Are

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>we seeing any you know, efforts gaining momentum? There are

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>certainly glimmers. Just in the last couple of weeks, a

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of outfits, one and Upstate New York and one

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in Kentucky have said they're going to affiliate with the

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Labor Union. Kind of remains to be seeing how

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>far that's gonna go. And there's there's definitely popping up

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in other places in the country. North Carolina. We've heard

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>about a new effort in the last few weeks. And

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>there's still that race that is too close to call

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>um that an Amazon Union drive in best Mer, Alabama.

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So definitely still something taking up a lot of tea,

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>sex time and cel Alright, Bloomberg's Matt Day, thanks much

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>well and other Amazon news. It is official. Jeff Bezos

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>has tweeted the trailer for Amazon's long anticipated Lord of

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the Ring series coming September. Prime Video will release the

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>drama to subscribers in more than two countries and territories worldwide.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 1>The streaming service will upload weekly episodes throughout the season.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>We will see if it lives up to the hype.

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Wellcome back to Bloomer Technology and Emily Chang in San Francisco.

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to get back to the markets and shares

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese tech companies dropped after a flood of news,

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>leaving them poise for their steepest weekly losses since March

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this after report Ali Baba is facing an inquiry in

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>China and connection with a data theft and renewed regulatory concerns.

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now a young general partner at Race Capitals.

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So what's your take on this kind of fresh round

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese regulatory scrutiny on big tech giants which has

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>been ebbing and flowing for the last several years now.

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think all tech companies and founder has been basically

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>walking on eggshells, and there's a lot of different changes

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of there's different security law, privacy regulatory it's just been very,

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>very tough, um, not just for the Ali Baba and

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>tens and of the world, but also for earlier stage

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>many of them been waiting to get listed in the US.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But all this a lot of the companies that I'm

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>aware of either wanted to go through respect the Chinese

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>company now is changing the course, thinking about Hong Kong,

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about Shanghai. So it's been really really tough for

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry in China. So there are two narratives

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>going on here. One is that you know, China tech

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is so competitive could supersede the United States. And the

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>other is that the Chinese regulatory crackdown could destroy some

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of these Chinese tech companies, which is true. Well, I

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>think that first and foremost, some of the biggest Chinese company,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>including Ali Baba, like most of their business actually are

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>not even in the US. Many of my friends don't

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>even know what we chat is or Ali pays is

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>all about. So I would say, you know, the big

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>tech giants, the core business still in mainland China is

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely a parallel universe in terms of tech. Having said that,

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I think every single new companies are thinking this is

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>not going overseas. This is about global markets. Similar to

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>buy dance. From day one, they wanted to be international,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but the international Chinese version of TikTok is doyene um

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is a completely different way of operating in terms of product.

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the Chinese company want to do

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>respect international market, comply with international law, but they definitely

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>have the ambition to be global companies from day one. Well,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>that brings me to the TikTok that we in the

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 1>United States now, which is constantly brought up, you know,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>as you know, doing things better than Facebook and Google

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know all of these US based tech companies,

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what do you think, Um, there's no better or worse.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And obviously in China, UM there's not much of a

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>data privacy as such, so they for in terms of AI, definitely.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the ability of machine learning in China is insane.

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is not just for social network in fact,

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>UM for electronic vehicle there's just crazy growth. UM. I

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>saw the news that br D B I D actually

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>now in terms of number of ev s has more

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>than Tesla in some sense. So UM, there's no competition.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Just the way you do machine learning in English versus

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Chinese is quite different. So I don't think it's a

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's not a win lose situation. Is really

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>just a parallel universe. In terms of the Internet. What

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>about Web three, What who's winning? Um, it's definitely not

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in China. UM there's no no n f T, no

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin mining, no crypto trading. UM. It cannot be offered

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to Chinese citizens. So a lot of many many of

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>my friends in China who is in with three have

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>moved to countries like Singapore or the U a E.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Those are some of the hot spot UM. And I

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>think for racing in China could get left behind in

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>some sense. I think in Risk Capital we certainly meet

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of founders UM that left China but now

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in Singapore, so they're single boring company UM, but they

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>want to continue to the company like stepand which fill

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.479
<v Speaker 1>on salona Um. Many of these changes from the buying US.

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>That's in some sense why f t X have moved

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>from Hong Kong to the Bahamas for similar reason. What

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the crypto volatility right now? We

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>just had a headline cross that coin base is now

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>dropping out of the top ten exchanges in the world

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>by value, and if you look at like the top

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>ten in the world, many of them actually originally native

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>from from China. Regardless the buying US will be okay, Yes,

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>of course f t X, and I think coin bays

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>from to start with less f t X actually started

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. The world in terms of trading users

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and volume outside the US is actually much larger than

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the US, so it's not surprising coin Base sooner or

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>later we'll sort of drop below. But having said that

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>top five in terms a number of users, coin basest

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely still top three, but just just in general I

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>saw before I came over. I think the total come

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>by market A trading volume is now back to over UM,

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's not as bad as thirty days ago UM.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>But still I think, you know, the rest of the world's,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>particular in Asia, is now catching up, like beyond just

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a U S trading volume. Right the question is how

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>long does the winter last? Who knows? All? Right? Edith

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Young raised capital. Great to have you here and see

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you in person. Thank you Edith for stopping by. Alright,

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>coming out. Policymakers are rethinking crypto energy rules this amid

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>record high temperatures in Europe and heat waves across the

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>United States. Our crypto report is coming up to school work.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin miners in Texas are taking the week off to

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>keep the state's energy grid intact. Right now, Western Europe

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is undergoing record high temperatures, and most of the US,

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly the South, is preparing for a triple digit heat

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>wave this weekend. Hot weather, the war in Ukraine, supply

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>chain bottlenecks are sending energy costs higher, and that's beginning

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to impact bitcoin mining. Bloomberg Shonali Bosti joins US now

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>from New York. How exactly shanally. Is this energy crunch

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>impacting them, Yeah, it's very simple. If they turn off

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the machines, it's impacting their profit profitability. And remember this

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is already in a tough year for bitcoin in general,

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.239
<v Speaker 1>so you have bitcoin related stocks taking a hit just

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>due to the price volatility. Some of them are bouncing back.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>As you can see though, Ryant Blockchain is one of

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>those companies very highly tied to mining, and the drop

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is steeper than you see it a lot of other companies,

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>more than seventies six per cent of a drop there

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just this year alone, and if you look at Core Scientific,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 1>the drop is even bigger. It's a six percent for

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the year. Just to give you a sense of how

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>big the mining load in Texas is. Over one percent

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the total grid capacity being pushed back, represents all

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of the industrial scale bitcoin mining. It represents a significant

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of a household worth of energy usage. So it's

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a very significant movie you've seen here, as we've seen

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a number of companies moved to Texas to really take

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>advantage of that energy system of the power grid over there,

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and you are now seeing what that strength can look

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>like when critical infrastructure only comes under pressure all right,

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>so now I stay with us. I want to bring

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in Kathleen Brightman. She is the co founder of the

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 1>blockchain platform Tazos. And Kathleen, I'm so curious how this

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is playing out from your perspective. You're seeing these minors

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>shutting down their operations in Texas. You know, what does

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this what does this look like from inside the industry? Well? Um,

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the issue of mining in Texas has been

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of fraught in both ways. As you might remember. Unfortunately,

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of people who um nearly frost

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to death in Texas earlier this year because of similar

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>issues with their energy grid. And I guess the Quinn

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Myers and promoters who tout the you know, greatness of

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of proof of work tend to argue that this is

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>like a battery UM, and it's really, you know, not

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the case. Like a one way battery is not a

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>battery UM. And a lot of the strength that has

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been argued about Bitcoin's proof of work UM is that

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of this source that can be tapped into,

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>but in fact it's just you know, kind of a

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>massive suck on on the grid. How do you see

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this playing out? I mean, I wonder if there's an

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>upside forcing minors just to think about how to make

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the process more sustainable. Well Um, I co founded a

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurracy called teas, which is proof of stake. Most cryptocurrencies

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that have launched in the last few years used proof

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of steak, mostly because it's the best technology in class UM.

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the arguments about Bitcoin and its energy

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>uses are mostly because it's kind of like this weird

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>bestigial organ that has been attached to Bitcoin that has

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a sort of reverence for no good reason um from

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the people who usually own too much Bitcoin to think

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>about it otherwise. It's interesting because you see the proof

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of state concept as it pertains to the ethereum merge

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, and I'm wondering some of the complications around that.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>How does that complicate this kind of struggle between proof

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of state versus proof of work and the reliance on

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>energy as it pertains to it. Well, Um, if you

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>look back at the original working materials for the Etherory

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Foundations fundraiser, and she has a four team they advertise

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>themselves as imminently transitioning to proof of stake UM, so

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they've really been talking out of both sides of the

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>mouth of the last few years um when they when

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they discussed their eminent transition and the virtues and benefits

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>of of you know, versus proof of worth um. What's

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting actually is ties into sort of the recent market

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>crash in cryptocurrencies, is that there's been this sort of

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>token called state ethereum that's run for the last year.

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It's from the Ethereum Foundation on what's called a beacon chain,

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is meant to be some sort of test

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for proofuge stake um. So you can convert your ethereum

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>too if you're in on this chain the state ethereum,

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>but all the other way around. So in theory it

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of had this ciplationary reward, and so people would

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>borrow ethereum um and by state ethereum uh, and that

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>took a lot of the theory amount of circulation, which

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>arguably increase the price or at least had some sort

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of positive effect on the price um. But in reality

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it's really no different than something like hex, which is

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of a Ponzi scheme that's crashed in

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks, which is just a token that

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>basically pays you for freising at the longer you've reason

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the where you receive so and so earth. But it's

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>just it's all eflation. That's a really big statement, actually, Kathleen,

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you think about that inflation within ethereum?

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And then also kind of the distortion and prices you've

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>seen when you think about what's happening with state ethereum

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and the broader ramifications that has for the system. Well,

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>if you look at like the last few weeks, there

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>have been a number of different system of crasies UM.

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>We sort of have the cryptocurrency's own version of three hours.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Three hours capital is long term capital management basically, but

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>with crypto UM, a lot of the reason that there's

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>so much contagion in the cryptocurrency space and there's been

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of I guess bad deliterious effects UM has

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>been largely because they sort of saw things like state

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the THEORYUM as a sure bet. So it's not dissimilar

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>from this, you know, smartest people in the room having

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>models that are basically predicated no nonsense. You know, how

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>are you watching the market fall out? Obviously we saw

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Celsius bankruptcy filing. We're seeing you know, the crypto

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>winter get colder and colder. You know, what is your

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of prediction about how this continues to play out? Well,

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>as your Bloomberg colleague Joe Wisenthal always says, it can

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>always go down by um. But you know, for those

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of us who've been in this industry for quite some time,

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, completely unsurprising that something like Celsius would

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>go big grub because you know, economics does have laws

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that transcend you know the word blockchain. Uh, you know,

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>contra popular belief by some people who monitors and stuff

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and analyze it. But I do think that, you know,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>there are some things that were predictable, there are some

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>things that were less predictable. For example, apparently three Hours

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Capital made a number of equity investments, and as part

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of there, um I guess equity investments, they would often

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>offer to manage the treasury for for for some cats.

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And so that's that's unexpectedly bad. Um, uniquely bad, I

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>would say, um. But yeah, I mean, I think you've

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>just seen a lot of shakeout from things that just

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have worked, and you really can't make a sustainable

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>protocol or business based on the theory that number will

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>always go up right, which was the most people's risk

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>model going into this all right while we all love

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>quoting Joe Wisenthal Tees US co founder Kathleen Brighten In

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and our own Sonali Basic Thank you. This week was

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Prime Day, and Amazon says that overall savings for members

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>topped to one point seven billion dollars, making it the

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest Prime Day to date. Amazon Prime Day is a

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>two day shopping event here towards Amazon Prime subscribers, where

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the company and many of its resellers give some of

0:30:59.920 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the best discounts of the year on many of their

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>most popular products. Amazon says that over a hundred thousand

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>items were bought per minute during the two day event,

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>topping three million items in total. The best sellers over

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the period were premium beauty products Rachel Ray kitchen accessories,

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>car wash accessories, pet products like Greenings, Crest toothpaste and

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>oral By Electric toothbrushes, clothing for kids, and items from

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Levi's air purifiers, kids lunch boxes, Shark vacuums, and Leandro

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>sets for the summer. Of course, sunglasses and swimsuits were

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>also very popular for US tech fans. There were also

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>some strong deals leading to a notable number of Apple

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Watch Series seven and Beats by Dre headphone purchases. This

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>comes as Apple and its retail partners looked a clear

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>inventory for three new Apple Watches coming this fall, and

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of course Apples Beats by Dre is always working on

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>new headphones and earbuds. For its part, Amazon also said

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>its own Consume andmer Deck devices were strong sellers during

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the event. It particularly pointed out the fire TV Echo

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>speakers with Alexa in blank home security devices as doing well.

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>If you missed out on this one's Prime Day, there

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>are early indicators that the company will hold the rare

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>second Prime event this fall, so stay tuned for more

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>details on that. I'm Mark German. This is power On.

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Mark. I want to stick with Amazon's Prime

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>event and bringing Melissa Verdeck pack few president in a

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>tenure Amazon a veteran, So Melissa, anecdotally, I feel like

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I got a few more things on Prime Day than usual.

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that is an example of a

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>broader trend. But how did it stack up for you? Yeah? Well,

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>if you notice what he was just talking about in

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of what people are buying, it was different this year.

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>There is a bigger focus on household essentials and home

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Usually Prime Day is a big consumer electronics event, they

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>take an item event, But this year I think that

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of inflationary impact where you know,

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>food prices are over twelve percent versus the inflation average

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of nine percent, so people were coming in looking for deals.

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Deals were at least thirty percent off in the food space,

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and so top Items Day won where things like free

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.959
<v Speaker 1>delay chips, Amazon Basic trash bags, Cascade dish pods. This

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is a different year for things like that, So I

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>think that what we're seeing is just the different category

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>shift of what people are actually buying this year. Why

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>did it take so long for Amazon to get it right?

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like we've talked about so many

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Prime Days over the years that we're underwhelming, you know.

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, honestly, Amazon did not lead as much

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>with their electronic items or brand when they had heavily

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>steeply discounted products. Their products were um discounted up to

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>forty eight percent off, so they definitely had a good

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>year with their own private label products in the past.

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>To me, I always thought in simpot I Robot twenty

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>three and media na kits. Those were kind of the

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>big products that they were always pushing. But this year

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they did a couple of different things. One was they

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>had better personalization widget, so when you logged into Amazon,

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you had more personalized UM items that were for you,

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>so that might have been a way that you found things.

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>They also had a better emphasis on influencer marketing UM.

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, that had a hit in the miss.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So the hit was they did a much better job

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of priming influencers off Amazon to drive travic to Amazon UM.

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>The miss that I saw this year that has just

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>been a continuation of Amazon livestream, So that's kind of

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>their QBC like influencers talking about products and UM. Some

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 1>of the chatter that I've heard about is you know,

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>people you know didn't really find it productive or engaging,

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.399
<v Speaker 1>although it was something Amazon called out today and their

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>notes that they had a hundred million views of their

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>live streams. So continues to be something that they focus

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>on UM. But you know, hopefully they will get a

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 1>better for Prime Day B two coming in the fall.

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about V two. What do you think they'll

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>learn from this and what are you expecting this fall?

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's the beauty of the Amazon. It's this

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>constant hotbed of tests and learns and so um, you know,

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>this personalization, this influencer marketing, the ways that people are

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>buying more products, they're going to learn from that and

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they're going to focus on a YouTube. One of the

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>other things I like about the Prime Day in October.

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>They did this in twenty when they moved Prime Day

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic from the summer to the fall, and

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>they moved demand forward and that really spread out, you know,

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the demand during the whole Q four and the kind

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of set up, uh, you know, people buying things earlier

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in Q four. So it has a lot of benefits

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>for Amazon. And something that we haven't talked about as

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>much is advertising on Amazon. I understand that that was

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a more interesting story this Prime Day around well every

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Prime Day, Um, people always spend more money. It was

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a question because itation or raising

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>costs with advertisers come in, but they absolutely did. We

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>actually did a study a sample science a sample sizes

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>some of our clients, and we saw that CPM increased

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty six to semi five percent above normal levels. But

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>also there were millions more impression volumes. That means it

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>just so much traffic that they're able to take advantage of.

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Amazon also has this great metric for especially CpG UM

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>companies called new to Brand that that metrics shows, you know,

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>incremental people are coming in and buying their brand. And

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that was hundreds of basis points. So they don't maybe

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's certain. Maybe it's not just that the deals were better,

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>it's that the advertising was also more effective. Yeah, and

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it was just a great opportunity. Amazon has a self

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>serve ad platform, so they make it very easy for

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>brands to come in and bid on their keywords on

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>their competitors keywords. Um, so it's a very it's a

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.720
<v Speaker 1>great way for brands to be able to take advantage

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of the traffic and be able to drive people to

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 1>their products. All well, adheres to the insta pot Eliza Bernic,

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Pact View President, thank you as always for joining us.

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Well that doesn't For the sedition of Bloomberg Technology tomorrow,

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be chatting with blockchain guru Anthony pomp Leiano

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about his employment training business, specifically for crypto. They just

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>raised some new cash and don't forget to check out

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>our podcast You can find it everywhere you get your podcasts,

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course, at bloomberg dot com. This is Bloomberg