WEBVTT - Tech News: Going Back to the Moon and Playing D&D in Space

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'mind executive producer with I Heart Radio and

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>how the tech area. It's time for the tech news

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>for Thursday, September one, two thousand twenty two. And since

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do a news episode Tuesday, I missed out

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on talking about how NASA had to scrub the launch

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Artemis one mission on Monday. So Artemis is

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the program that aims to put America back on the Moon,

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>as it were. It's actually a little more than that.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>It includes future lunar lander missions, which would start with

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Artemis three that's currently projected to take place in assuming

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>there are no delays. And also it includes the construction

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of a lunar orbit space station. And it's a somewhat

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>controversial program. Uh. There are critics who questioned whether the

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Artemis program will actually serve its stated purpose, namely to

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>not just gather more information about the Moon, but to

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>serve as kind of a stepping stone towards sending astronauts

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to Mars. But whether you support Artemis or you're critical

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of it, we'll have to wait until Saturday at the

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>earliest for the launch of the Artemis one. This will

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>test NASA's new super heavy launch vehicle, the Space Launch

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>System or s l S, and it will also test

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>an unscrewed Orion spacecraft as and no crew will be

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>aboard this Orion capsule. Uh, it won't have a human

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>crew anyway. There will be some mannequins and a plush

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>stuffed toy in there. The toy is meant to indicate

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>when the the spacecraft encounters micro gravity because it will

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to float freely around the happen. So why

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>was there a delay? Why did they have to cancel

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Monday's launch? Well? On Monday, NASA engineers noted that one

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the engines in the s l S appeared to

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>be failing to reach the proper temperature. There were indications

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that the system that cools the engines with liquid hydrogen

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>had some sort of problem, or that the sensors that

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>detect engine temperature we're having a problem and we're misreading

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the actual temperature of the engines. And that's what prompted

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>NASA to scrub the launch on Monday, as well as

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the planned celebrity appearances like Jack Black who were meant

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to commemorate the historic event whoop see. NASA hopes to

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>launch on Saturday, September three, but there's a chance that

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>weather will force another delay. The next available launch date

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>would be September five. As for my own opinions on

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the Artemis project, well, on the one hand, there's no

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>denying that sending people to the Moon is a t

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>inphant achievement. That's an achievement that doubtlessly inspires countless people

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to pursue an interest in space and engineering and related subjects.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'm certain that along the way, NASA and its

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>partners will develop incredible technologies that will ultimately be able

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to use in other arenas, which is really cool. But

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I am not fully sold on Artemis as a whole,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>though I also sympathize with NASA because the agency has

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>had to grapple with the consequences of the cancellation of

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the old Constellation program, which actually was the source for

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the elements of Artemis, including the Orion spacecraft

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that started off as part of the Constellation program and

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that got the the acts back in the Obama administration

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and other space news. NASA engineers figured out what was

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>going haywire with Voyager one's Attitude Articulation and Control system

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a k A. The A A c S. All right,

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>quick recap So, ag OR one is a space probe

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and it launched way back in nineteen. It is flown

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>by Jupiter and Saturn and then continue to travel out

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>beyond the boundaries of our Solar system, meaning it is

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>now in interstellar space. This spacecraft is almost as old

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>as I am, and it continues to send data back

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to us here on Earth courtesy of the Deep Space Network. However,

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year, the A A c S started sending

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>corrupted messages about the spacecraft's telemetry. Engineers determined that the

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>spacecraft was still operating properly, so nothing was wrong with

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the craft's actual operations, so it was kind of a

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>mystery why these messages were getting garbled. But it turned

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:50.559
<v Speaker 1>out that some subroutine was referencing a computer system aboard

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Voyage or one that has long since been out of service.

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>It stopped working ages ago, and that this is what

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>caused the corruption in commune occasion. So the engineers redirected

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Voyagers A A CS to route the information to the

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>working computer, which is what it was supposed to do

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, and this that did solve the

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>issue that now communications are coming in clearly, but the

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>engineers still need to identify whatever it was that caused

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the issue in the first place, that that prompted the

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a CS to try and reference this computer that hasn't

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>been working for agents, because it's possible that it could

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>happen again and trigger a a CS to start sending

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>out garbled stuff once more. But personally, I just think

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>it's an amazing achievement to have a spacecraft that's almost

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as old as I am to continue to provide us

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>information even as the probe ventures further out from our

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>solar system. Over in the U S State of California,

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there is an energy crisis in full swing. The state

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>expects a nasty heat wave in the very near future

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of days. In fact, that could stretch

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on for several days, and that's probably gonna prompt a

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>large consumer demand for electricity to power stuff like air conditioners.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But the California Independent System Operator had issued a Level

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>one energy emergency alert just yesterday on Wednesday, and that

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>means that on Wednesday, all available power supplies were essentially

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>tapped out, and that would mean that any additional demand

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>would be unmet, and it could mean that the state

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>will have to use things like rolling blackouts. To handle

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>problems like this, the state has authorized fossil fuel power

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>plants to increase production in order to meet demand, and

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>has also granted businesses permission to lean on stuff like

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>backup generators to supply some of their electrical needs, which

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>would relieve the power grid of a little bit of

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the burden. Climate change has truly exacerbated this issue. I mean,

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, heat waves or weather. We're not talking about

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>climate with weather, though you could argue and increase in

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>heat waves is an indication of climate change, and individ

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>dual one is weather, but really climate change. In this case,

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about this massive drought that's happening in the West,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and that has led to decreased production at hydro electric

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>power stations. So you can't rely on hydro electric power

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have enough water to to drive the

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>turbines properly. So the past couple of years have been

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>tumultuous in terms of power production and distribution around the world,

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>not just in California, and that's due to a combination

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of complicated factors. So in some regions

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>cough Texas cough, you have some bad government decisions that

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>have led to energy crises. Uh, you have climate change

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that's impacting power needs and production strategies. You also have

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>big political UH and and social crises like Russia's invasion

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine, which has caused a massive crisis in Europe.

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And while there's an increased move to adopt renewable energy solutions,

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>which in a aisition to cutting back on on carbon

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>emissions also provides more national security because you become more

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>self reliant. That is more of a long term kind

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of commitment. The near term is going to present us

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>with some very tough situations that we're going to have

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to address before we can enjoy the benefits of a

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:26.559
<v Speaker 1>more robust renewable energy strategy. So it's just a harsh

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>reality that we're going to have to continue to deal

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>with over the next few years. Microsoft is facing a

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of opposition in the UK when it comes to

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the company's planned acquisition of Activision Blizzard. So that deal

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is valued at nearly seventy billion dollars all told, and

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it has had no shortage of drama surrounding it. For

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing, Activision Blizzard has been at a high profile

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>controversy regarding corporate work culture, as well as the fact

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that the company has had some pretty well repled ordered

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>instances of resisting employee efforts to unionize and a lot

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>more than that. But the scrutiny in the UK has

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>more to do with anti competitiveness than any alleged toxicity

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in Activision Blizzards work environment. The UK's Competition and Markets

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Authority or c m A maybe dialing up at scrutiny

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>into this deal, asking if perhaps this acquisition would lead

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to reduced competition in the video games market, that it

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 1>could consolidate Microsoft's power in several areas relating to video

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>games and prevent competitors from making an impact. Now, Microsoft

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>reps are proactively arguing that the company isn't going to

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>lock Activision Blizzard titles within the Microsoft ecosystem and prevent

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.119
<v Speaker 1>others from being able to have those titles on their platforms.

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that Microsoft has said that there would be

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>no profit in keeping the titles off of competing platforms

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>like Sony's PlayStation console. Microsoft is a say actually saying

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it would make no sense to keep everything for ourselves

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>because we don't have enough of the market share to

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>make that a profitable business. Whether the regulators in the

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>UK find that answer satisfactory or not remains to be seen.

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, Microsoft is pushing ahead with this deal,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>which should close sometime before the summer of next year,

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>assuming that regulators don't block it. All right, We've got

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more stories to cover before we do that.

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break. The Verge reports it received

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>an internal memo from Meta that says the company is

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>looking into possible paid features for its various platforms like

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and Facebook. To date, Mena has relied almost completely

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>on ad revenues. Something like of the company's revenue comes

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>from ad sales. However, recent developments such as Apple launching

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>its app tracking transparency framework, has had a massively negative

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>impact on Meta's business model. Meanwhile, the company has been

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>spending billions in an effort to define the metaverse, which

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>has not gone completely smoothly. I should add, and there's

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a general downturn in advertising spend due to fears of

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>an economic recession, so it shouldn't come as a surprise

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that Meta would look into alternate ways to generate revenue

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>directly from its users. Some of Meta's products already have

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>some paid features in them, so this would likely be

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>an expansion of that approach. The Verge reports that Meta's

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>VP of Monetization, John Hedgeman, has indicated that the company

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is not looking to offer an ad free experience in

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>exchange for some sort of subscription model. So if you

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>were hoping to totally opt out of ads on Facebook

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>or Instagram or whatever, it looks like that is not

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on the table. It will be interesting to what if

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>any paid features emerge from this and how the users

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on Meta's various platforms receive them. Meta is not the

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>only company looking for more ways to generate cash from

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>its users. Disney, which, let's face it, is top of

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the class when it comes to finding ways to coax

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>more cash from folks, is reportedly looking at ways to

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>entice Disney Plus viewers to buy themed merchandise. So reportedly,

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it's looking at using QR codes and the Disney Plus app,

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>according to The Wall Street Journal, and I guess the

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>idea is that Disney will throw a QR code up

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on screen alongside or before or after some sort of

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>particular programming, and interested viewers can use their Disney Plus

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>app to scan the code and go to a related

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>page on the online Disney store. So one idea is

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to make exclusive merchandise available on this platform, so you

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>can't buy it any other way and you can't get

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to the page without using this kind of QR scanning process.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.599
<v Speaker 1>And Disney definitely knows that if you limit something's accessibility,

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you can really drive consumer interest in a product. See

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>also Disney popcorn buckets. It is wild, y'all. Anyway, That's

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>just one of the strategies that the company is looking into.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's also reportedly considering an Amazon Prime like service that

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>would allow fans to receive certain benefits in return for

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a subscription. I'm not sure what those benefits would be exactly.

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm also not entirely convinced this QR code strategy will

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be a huge success, only because companies have been trying

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to leverage viewers and convert them into active customers for

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a while and it has been met with limited success. Um,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just it's hard to get people to

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>become conversions, right, to convert from viewer to customer, and

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>especially if it's not something like a mobile or or

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, desktop experience. Those are already challenging enough to

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>get people to go from being sort of a passive

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer to an active customer, but it gets even harder

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>when you start stepping away from that particular user experience.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you're watching something like on a television, it's

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>way harder to get people to actively convert into being

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a customer just based upon the experience of watching something

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on a screen. You know, it doesn't mean that this

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is destined for failure. I just mean that it's it's

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to get that to work. Disney might have cracked

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the code on it, I don't know. There are definitely

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>cases where tons of people scanned a QR code that

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>popped up on a screen just to see where it

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>would take them. By the way, I think that's a

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>habit that you should really think about first before you

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>indulge in it, because, I mean, there's nothing stopping someone

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>from putting a QR code up in a prominent place,

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and that cod it leads you to a site where

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it starts a download of malware onto your device. There's

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's an entirely real possibility. It's not likely to pop

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>up in Disney, you know, material, but it's still something

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you should think about. Like a QR code is not

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>just an open invitation. It could have some sinister intent

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>behind it. Just keep that in mind anyway. I think

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the most successful cases I've seen of people scanning QR

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>codes have in cases where people were just curious, what

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the heck is this and was it going to bring

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>me to as opposed to I like what I'm seeing

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on the screen, and I want to buy that T shirt.

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>But maybe I'm just completely out of touch on this one.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.359
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks ago, I mentioned that the FCC negated

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a previous arrangement with space X's satellite based internet service

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Starlink that would have seen Starlink received nearly nine hundred

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in federal aid. Now. The reasons for this

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>annulment range from skepticism Starlink would actually provide services to

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>areas that most need broadband access. That's the whole purpose

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of the program anyway, is to extend broadband access to

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>areas that otherwise lack it, and at least in some

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Starlink use cases, reportedly they were in areas

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that are already very well served by other providers. But

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>another part of skepticism was directed to whether or not

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>starlink service would meet the performance benchmarks when it was

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>at scale as per of the FCCS requirements. In other words,

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that once Starlink hit it's you know, proposed scale, that

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it would actually be able to provide the broadband level

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of service that would qualify it for the grant in

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the first place. So all that money was scrapped for

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Starlink anyway, while Starlink was shown the door. The FCC

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has started to award money to other broadband service providers,

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>six of them right now. So in total, nearly a

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars is going to get divvied up between

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>these six providers to provide broadband service to more than

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>three d fifty thousand homes in the US across nineteen states. Now,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>my state of Georgia is not among them, gosh darn't,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a shame because I know for a fact

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of communities in the state that have

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>no broadband access so far. But really, this is just

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the United States is pushed to extend

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>broadband access to more citizens across the country, particularly in

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>remote and rural areas. Truth Social, the social network most

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>commonly associated with former President Donald Trump after he was

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially booted from all the established platforms like Facebook and Twitter,

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>has consistently failed to get Google to allow the truth

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Social android based app into the Google Play Store. And

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>at issue is truth Social's comment moderation practices, or perhaps

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I should say the lack of those. So Google has

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a policy that any any sort of site that has

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>user generated content, like a social network app, has to

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>have a content moderation policy in place, and it also

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>has to enforce that policy. And while truth social has

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a policy, the proliferation of threats of physical violence and

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>similar content that is reportedly on truth social has not

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>been properly moderated according to Google, and so it has

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not been accepted into the Google Play Store. It has

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>been accepted in the Apple App Store. You can get

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it on iOS. You cannot get on Android, which restricts

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>truth Social's reach considerably since Android is the dominant operating

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>system in the mobile market. Reportedly, truth Social is also

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of of an you with finances right now.

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Right Forge, a web hosting platform known for um hosting

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of right wing services, and Websites says that

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>truth Social currently has about a one point six million

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar bill that it has yet to pay. Okay, we've

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>got a few more stories to go before we get

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to those. Let's take another quick break. Recent restrictions regarding

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>chips sales from the US to China and Russia, really

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>just China, are likely going to cost Nvidia a lot

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of money, according to CNBC, and Video says it received

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>an order from the US government on August that will

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>place a licensing requirement for certain types of exports to

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>China and Russia. Now and Video says, there ain't nobody

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>in Russia who's an invidio paying customer, and to me,

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that implies that in Russia, folks are turning to either

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>aftermarkets or maybe even black markets to get hold of

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in Nvidia tech, but they're not buying it straight from

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the Nvidia. However, China represents around four hundred million dollars

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in potential sales for this quarter alone. The US government

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is concerned that China's military is scooping up in Vidia

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>hardware in order to build out various military based systems

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and in an effort to perhaps pump the brakes a

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>bit on fueling China's military complex. The US has put

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>these new restrictions in place that will slow things down,

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, companies like Nvidia and a m D,

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>which also acknowledged that it received a similar message from

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the U. S government, are going to face challenges because

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>these licensing requirements are going to strike off entire product

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>lines for Chinese markets for these companies, and that represents

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a massive loss in revenue. Uh. Yeah, It's a complicated

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>situation because you can see from a national security standpoint

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>why the US would want to restrict the export of

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of technologies to China, a country that also

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>has a a reputation earned or otherwise of stealing technology

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>by copying it. So yeah, complicated issue. Now. A lot

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of time on this show, I talk about tech and

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>its role in surveillance. I talk about how a lot

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of us are willing participants in that kind of system.

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>A lot of us are providing endless amounts of data

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>about ourselves as we navigate the online world. And then

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>there are other cases where agencies like the military and

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the police are relying upon to be generous questionable technology,

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>supposedly in an effort to protect people and property, but

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>often coming along with it are real world consequences of

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>disproportionate harm to certain populations, mostly the non white ones.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>But what about AI that's looking to see if you

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>have an unreported swimming pool that you should be paying

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>property taxes on? All? Right, now, this story emerges out

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of France, land of croissants and the cone heads, if

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we're to believe their cover story, Shout out if you

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>get that reference. Anyway. In France, there are property tax

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>laws that set tax rates based on a property's rental value.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Meaning if your property has a lot of stuff that

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>would make it an attractive rental, you're gonna have to

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>pay extra taxes on that. Verandah's extra tax an extension

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to your home boom extra tax and swimming pools. Oh yeah,

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that's that's more property tax. But the government suspected that

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>people were being entirely forthcoming when it comes to stuff

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 1>like this, so they tapped a company called cap Gemini

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to scan satellite data and look for signs of unreported

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>architectural enhancements, mostly swimming pools, and the tech, after some

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>tweaking and some learning, uh, ended up returning more than

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand instances of swimming pools throughout France, and that

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>represents about ten million euros worth of untaxed property. So

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, boo for more surveillance, I'm never

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a fan of that. But on the other, boo for

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>tax evasion. I mean, tax evasion is not a good

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>thing either. Though you could argue that the tax law

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in the first place is already dumb or unfair and

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>should be changed, and I could be persuaded to see

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>validity in that argument, but yeah, it's hard for me

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to side with folks who are actively attempting to avoid

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>paying taxes. Our next story takes us to Surrey, a

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>region in the UK that's southwest of Greater London. There,

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>residents are complaining that police are misusing the Ways navigation

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>app Ways allows users to indicate spots where drivers should

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>use extra care, such as areas where they're is an

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>accident or traffic congestion, or you know, where there's a

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>member of the fuzz lying in wait in a speed trap.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So drivers using Ways can set up a little icon

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to indicate that there are coppers up ahead waiting to

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>catch speed demons, and thus when drivers see that icon,

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>they slow down. Now. The complaint is that the Surrey

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>police have been activating this feature as they drive around

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>on patrol, so they're indicating that there's a speed trap

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>when in reality there isn't one. And the feature is

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>meant to indicate, you know, the speed trap, which is

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a stationary thing, right, Like that's where a cop is

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>lying in wait, just ready to pull over someone for

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>going over the speed limit. But in this case, the

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>cops are in cars that are on the move, so

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>they're actually in motion. However, the icon will stay wherever

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>they set it up, because the icon is thought to

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, this is an indication the stationary police unit.

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>So drivers are going to see these icons for speed

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>traps and they slow down, but there's no actual cop there.

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>They were tricked into slowing down and obeying the law.

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>It's unfair that has drivers mad. How dare the police

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>misused tech that is meant to allow speeding drivers to

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>avoid detection. The police have said, look, when we use

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the app, we were at that location. It's just that

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>we happen to move immediately afterwards. And besides, we cannot

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>be everywhere, and this does cut down on people driving

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>beyond the speed limit. So, like the story about France,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this is one where people who want to break the

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>rules are exasperated when the government agency figures out how

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to leverage technology that makes it harder to do that.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And again, it's kind of hard for me to feel

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>sympathy towards the drivers here, largely because speeding often contributes

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to car accidents and moreover, uh two car accidents that

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>result in terrible injury and fatality. So I don't feel

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>terribly bad for the drivers who were tricked into obeying

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the law. That just doesn't strike me as something I

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>should be mad about. Um, I think it's kind of amusing.

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever played the board game Monopoly and encountered

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the community chess card that reads bank error in your favor? Well,

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>in Monopoly, if you get that card, you net a

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>cool two hundred bucks. Well, inject that with steroids and

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you have what happened to a Crypto dot com customer

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>not too long ago. The customer was asking for a

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight dollar refund, but Crypto dot Com made a

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>teen sy weed see little mistake and accidentally gave her

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>seven point to million dollars, And then no one at

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Crypto noticed. For like half a year. I mean, can

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you imagine seeing a seven million dollar plus amount hit

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>your account. Well, Crypto is now going after this customer

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in court, demanding that she payback not just the seven

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>point two million smack aous, but interest on top of that. Yikes.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>At the Colorado State Fair, a digital painting titled Tatra

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Dopora spatial which I know I butchered the French pronunciation,

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>but whatever, it took home the Blue Ribbon first prize

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in the digital category, and a subsequent revelation sparked massive

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>controversy because see the credited artist, Jason Allen, revealed that

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>he had used an AI program called mid Journey to

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>generate this image after giving it a specific prompt that

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't revealed. Then he fed this resulting image into

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Gigga pixel AI in order to upscale them before printing

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the finished work on a canvas and submitting it for

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>a consideration. In other words, this work of art was

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>primarily machine generated, although Alan argues that without his involvement

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there would be no image at all, so there's still

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>some human element to it. But this has really ticked

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>off a lot of artists, and some of them are

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>calling this the death of artistry itself. Now I wouldn't

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>go that far, but it does raise a ton of

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>ethical questions, right, I mean, if we're to celebrate human

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>artistic achievement, then we need the assurances that a work

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>has come from you know, a human. I think that

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is hard to argue against, but we also have to

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge it is an amazing feat to have reached a

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>point where an AI program can generate a work of

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>digital art and a level of sophistication and beauty that

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>can be award winning when placed up against human competitors.

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Like that is a phenomenal thing too, I think if

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's similar to the way of it being amazing once

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 1>we reached a point where we could does I a

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>chess playing program capable of beating a human chess master? However,

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>there are social questions to consider. Could machines ultimately displace

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>creatives in creative jobs? Is the benefit to the general

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>public not great enough to potentially justify wiping out creative professionals,

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know? And what the heck will creative professionals? What

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>will artists do if that happens? I mean, you could

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>argue get a real job, I guess, But that is

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely inhumane and cruel. I mean that's like saying, hey,

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this method of expression that's critical to you and that

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>lets you earn a living doing what feeds your soul. Yeah,

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to do that anymore. Go get a

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>job at a desk. Yeah no, thanks. So, yeah, this

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is a complicated thing. Now. Of course, keep in mind

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I say that as a content creator, right, So clearly

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a vested interest in this kind of thing.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So I admit I have a very strong bias when

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this story because I've got stake in

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>this as well. But ultimately, the argument is we shouldn't

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>reward this process where we're displacing people from work, especially

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>when there's nothing underneath too protect like there's no safety

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>net for people, and that this ultimately could apply to

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>any kind of job, right that this is the fear

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of automation replacing humans, and currently the focus in the

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>industry is to augment human achievement, not to replace it.

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's still this underlying fear that automatic systems, machine learning,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence are ultimately going to displace us. But then

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you follow that up with the question, well, if it did,

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that becomes an unsupportable system, right, because if no one

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>has a job, no one has money to buy the

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's being made, and then the companies that have

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>created all the automated systems in the first place no

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>longer have customers, and the whole thing comes tumbling down

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in itself. So clearly we have to come up with

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a solution that addresses this, whether it's moving away from

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>AI and automation, which seems unlikely, or coming up with

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>an alternative to the old model of do this work

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and we will give you money, which allows you to

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>eat and clothe yourself, etcetera. But that's a whole discussion

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>for another episode. Finally, Dungeons and Dragons recently released a

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>new spell Jammer expansion to D and D. The original

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>spell Jammer rules came out, I believe way back in

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>second edition days, because I owned the original box set

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>back then and I never went beyond second edition rules

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>when I was playing D and D regularly. Now, the

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>rules allow players two board magical ships that ascend into

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the heavens and allow characters to traverse space or the

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>ether itself to visit New World's new planes of existence.

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I've actually heard some fairly harsh criticism about this new

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>generation of spell Jammer rules, but that's not really what

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to chat about here. Instead, in an effort

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to promote the release of the new rules, Wizards of

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Coast inserted a twenty sided die a k a.

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>A D twenty into the model of a spell Jammer

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>ship with a little bubble on top of it to

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>keep the D twenty in place, and then attached the

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>ship to a balloon and released it in the California Desert.

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>The company released a video that spans more than two

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>hours where a camera positioned to look right at this

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>model with the D twenty inside of it shows the

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>ascent and it is titled Launching a Dice to Space,

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and that has at least two errors in that title,

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>at least if you're being super pedantic, because traditionally dice

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is the plural of die. Now, I will admit, in

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>modern vernacular folks will use the word dice to denote

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a single die. So I guess I can let that

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>one slide because language does evolve, and if you argue

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>against it, well you're really just being pedantic for no reason.

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I still use die to refer to a

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>single dice, But I'm a dying breed, so it still

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>irks me. But the other error is the bit about

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>going to space. You cannot get to space on a balloon.

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>You can get super duper high up in the atmosphere.

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You can, you know, get way up there, as bomb

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Gardner showed us. And depending upon whose definition of space

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you're using, you can argue that you're at the edge

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of space. You know, there are different definitions for where

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>space begins. But the fact remains that a helium balloon

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>can only rise as long as the balloon is lighter

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>than the air surrounding it, And eventually you get to

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a point where the air is so thin that the

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>balloon and the air around it are at the same weight,

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>so the balloon can rise no further than that. So

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>really I would argue the D twenty went super duper

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.959
<v Speaker 1>high up in the air way above the clouds even

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:26.959
<v Speaker 1>but space. Nah, it didn't pass that saving throw. That's

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>it for the Tech News for Thursday September one, two

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty two. If you would like to reach out

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with suggestions for topics for me to cover in future

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, you can do that in a

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>couple of ways. One is to download the i heart

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Radio app. It's free to download. Navigate over to the

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff part of the app. There's a little microphone

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>icon there you can click on that leave a message

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>up to thirty seconds in length. The other way is

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to reach out to me on Twitter. The handle for

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the show is tech Stuff H s W and I'll

0:34:56.320 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Yeah. Text Stuff is

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>an i heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.