1 00:00:02,960 --> 00:00:06,360 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. 2 00:00:06,800 --> 00:00:09,320 Speaker 1: So it's New Year's Eve, the final day of trading 3 00:00:09,320 --> 00:00:12,480 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four across the Eightpac region, and when 4 00:00:12,480 --> 00:00:15,800 Speaker 1: markets return from the holiday, there will be no shortage 5 00:00:15,840 --> 00:00:18,560 Speaker 1: of new forces to confront. Joining me now for a 6 00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:22,120 Speaker 1: look ahead is Vishnu Varathan, head of Economics and Strategy 7 00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:26,520 Speaker 1: at Misoho Securities, joining us from Singapore. Vishnu, Happy New 8 00:00:26,560 --> 00:00:29,160 Speaker 1: Year to you. It's always a pleasure to benefit from 9 00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:32,800 Speaker 1: your insight. I think we can agree that right across 10 00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:35,839 Speaker 1: the APAC, twenty twenty four has been a year of 11 00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:39,440 Speaker 1: dramatic events, and certainly when you look at things like 12 00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:42,160 Speaker 1: the end carry trade, when you look at what happened 13 00:00:42,200 --> 00:00:45,720 Speaker 1: in China, a struggling economy, additional stimulus, and a lot 14 00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:48,800 Speaker 1: of equity market volatility, I'm curious as to whether you 15 00:00:48,880 --> 00:00:51,680 Speaker 1: think twenty twenty five will be a similar story. 16 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:55,160 Speaker 2: At twenty twenty five has the potential to be just 17 00:00:55,200 --> 00:00:59,360 Speaker 2: as dramatic. Maybe the reasons for that might differ, but 18 00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:02,280 Speaker 2: I think you know, if someone thought that this is 19 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:06,479 Speaker 2: just platooing off, then that's probably not going to play out. 20 00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:09,680 Speaker 2: And one example, and I won't drawn on about this 21 00:01:09,760 --> 00:01:12,760 Speaker 2: is the Japanese ye and I think for a while 22 00:01:12,800 --> 00:01:18,360 Speaker 2: their markets thought we're over the carry trade volatility, primarily 23 00:01:18,400 --> 00:01:22,479 Speaker 2: because there would be greater convergence between you know, US 24 00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:26,560 Speaker 2: and Japanese raids. Whereas two big things have changed. One 25 00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:32,040 Speaker 2: is the FED is now far less dubbish, you know, 26 00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:35,680 Speaker 2: the delta there has been hawkish, whereas in contrast, the 27 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:39,960 Speaker 2: BOG is far more guarded about tightening, and the tariffs 28 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:43,440 Speaker 2: will have a negative impact on the end, which might 29 00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:47,520 Speaker 2: induce more on and off territory and certainly volatility around it. 30 00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:48,720 Speaker 2: So that's that's one example. 31 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:51,280 Speaker 1: So do you think in both of those cases maybe 32 00:01:51,280 --> 00:01:55,840 Speaker 1: they share in common the possibility of a minor policy error. 33 00:01:56,160 --> 00:01:58,200 Speaker 1: In the case of the FED that maybe that first 34 00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:00,520 Speaker 1: rate cut was too generous, and in the case of 35 00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:03,320 Speaker 1: the Bank of Japan, maybe the boj has waited too 36 00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:04,040 Speaker 1: long to titan. 37 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:08,600 Speaker 2: I think in many cases the trouble is if we 38 00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:11,239 Speaker 2: were to, you know, in isolation, look at each of 39 00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:14,760 Speaker 2: the central banks, the moves appear to be reasonable, but 40 00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:18,080 Speaker 2: the dilemma for them is their policy moves are not 41 00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:22,560 Speaker 2: in a vacuum and certainly depend a lot on what 42 00:02:22,639 --> 00:02:26,640 Speaker 2: goes on elsewhere, primarily driven by the FED. So the 43 00:02:26,760 --> 00:02:30,679 Speaker 2: moment the FED started on you know, much earlier, the 44 00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:34,040 Speaker 2: Cocomo rate hikes, you know, get their fast, take it slow, 45 00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:41,440 Speaker 2: after which, you know, US exceptionalism persisted, that inherently created 46 00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:44,800 Speaker 2: you know, huge policy dilemmas for central banks elsewhere. The 47 00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:48,440 Speaker 2: only question is the positioning that allowed them to stand that. 48 00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:52,800 Speaker 2: And I think for the BOJ, markets are going to 49 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:56,200 Speaker 2: continue to have a problem because the boj's time horizon 50 00:02:56,200 --> 00:02:58,919 Speaker 2: when they give signals and references are far longer than 51 00:02:58,919 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 2: what markets perceive uh and and you know take it 52 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:05,880 Speaker 2: to be elsewhere uh in the developed world, And I 53 00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:09,399 Speaker 2: think that's going to lead to a lot more miscommunication, 54 00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:12,480 Speaker 2: which translates into mispricing from policy. 55 00:03:12,760 --> 00:03:16,120 Speaker 1: Well, does that necessarily mean that we'll see persistent dollar 56 00:03:16,240 --> 00:03:19,040 Speaker 1: strength and a much weaker Japanese currency going forward. 57 00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:22,920 Speaker 2: It certainly is the far greater risk for the first 58 00:03:22,960 --> 00:03:26,320 Speaker 2: half of the year, at least, beyond which I think 59 00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:31,520 Speaker 2: a lot will come down to a whether you know, 60 00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:37,800 Speaker 2: US exceptionalism continues to defy gravity. Our side bet is 61 00:03:37,840 --> 00:03:41,320 Speaker 2: it might not because of consumer strains uh and and 62 00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:45,600 Speaker 2: how a lot of the policies may not be unequivocally 63 00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:49,080 Speaker 2: reflationary to the point where it's it's super good for 64 00:03:49,160 --> 00:03:51,280 Speaker 2: growth and and for that reason, we do see a 65 00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:54,640 Speaker 2: case to be made whether the FED could start cutting 66 00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:57,520 Speaker 2: back and that could allow the dollar to mellow at 67 00:03:57,560 --> 00:04:01,000 Speaker 2: most of a soft lending but not crash. The yen 68 00:04:01,200 --> 00:04:05,400 Speaker 2: is going to hinge a lot more on a fat convergence, 69 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:07,520 Speaker 2: so they're going to wait for the you know, the 70 00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:10,240 Speaker 2: yen's problem has always been it's it's a bog problem, right, 71 00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:12,560 Speaker 2: but it's got a fat solution. And so the fat 72 00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:16,720 Speaker 2: solution will start taking shape, but that the tariff outcomes 73 00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:21,080 Speaker 2: will have a huge bearing, and so it necessarily needs 74 00:04:21,080 --> 00:04:22,520 Speaker 2: to be the case that the bite is you know, 75 00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:25,280 Speaker 2: the bark is worse than the bite, and we end 76 00:04:25,360 --> 00:04:28,400 Speaker 2: up with a negotiated outcome rather than going nuclear on it. 77 00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:32,440 Speaker 2: And that's where I think we could see that narrative 78 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:35,320 Speaker 2: changing and a lot more relief coming for the bog 79 00:04:36,040 --> 00:04:39,360 Speaker 2: as things start to converge globally rather than you know, 80 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:41,240 Speaker 2: apprasively diverge. 81 00:04:41,400 --> 00:04:43,480 Speaker 1: Well, let's take a closer look at what that means 82 00:04:43,480 --> 00:04:47,479 Speaker 1: for China, especially whether or not tariffs are ultimately kind 83 00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:50,359 Speaker 1: of a bargaining ploy here, a way to get what 84 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:54,720 Speaker 1: the US, specifically the Trump administration would like to extract 85 00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 1: from Beijing. Talk to me about how you're viewing the 86 00:04:58,600 --> 00:05:01,120 Speaker 1: macro picture in China right now now, especially when you 87 00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:05,200 Speaker 1: begin to discount the impact of potential potential tariffs. 88 00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:09,279 Speaker 2: Well, I think the tariff situation for for China, there 89 00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:10,320 Speaker 2: are two thoughts around it. 90 00:05:10,400 --> 00:05:13,799 Speaker 3: One is, China has you know, done its homework. 91 00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:17,880 Speaker 2: They've watched this, they've watched the prequel, and so they're 92 00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:20,880 Speaker 2: in a far stronger position to negotiate. And I also 93 00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:24,080 Speaker 2: think the current administration is not just going to roll 94 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:27,200 Speaker 2: over and concede all ground. As much as they are 95 00:05:27,240 --> 00:05:32,080 Speaker 2: intent on and on you know, coming to a negotiated compromise, UH, 96 00:05:32,120 --> 00:05:34,320 Speaker 2: they're not going to do this in a fashion that 97 00:05:34,360 --> 00:05:37,159 Speaker 2: looks like they've you know, thrown in the towel either. 98 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:41,080 Speaker 2: So China will have a lot more to negotiate with UH. 99 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:43,200 Speaker 2: And they also have got Plan B in place already. 100 00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:46,000 Speaker 2: They've already started diversifying, which is why if you look 101 00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:49,600 Speaker 2: at China's share of global exports, it's not declined. And 102 00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:54,800 Speaker 2: for that reason, I think that is where UH the 103 00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:57,800 Speaker 2: execution on the part of the US administration. 104 00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 3: Can you know and and and the thought behind. 105 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:04,039 Speaker 2: And it will be very important. I think to a 106 00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:10,200 Speaker 2: large extent, the ability to strike particular compromises is silver 107 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 2: lining here. I think China is willing to concede a 108 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:14,640 Speaker 2: lot of grounds, but they're very clear on their strategic 109 00:06:14,720 --> 00:06:18,479 Speaker 2: goals and objectives which they probably will not relent on. 110 00:06:18,880 --> 00:06:23,040 Speaker 1: So if Beijing is surprised, let's say, by a deterioration 111 00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:29,120 Speaker 1: further deterioration in the domestic economy, does that necessarily erode 112 00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:32,919 Speaker 1: some of the leverage that you perceive authorities in China 113 00:06:32,960 --> 00:06:33,800 Speaker 1: may have at the moment. 114 00:06:34,320 --> 00:06:36,640 Speaker 3: That's That's a wonderful question and something that bugs me. 115 00:06:37,720 --> 00:06:43,360 Speaker 2: So, you know, the basic premise of economics is to oversimplify. 116 00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:45,680 Speaker 3: Something has got to give, And. 117 00:06:47,200 --> 00:06:49,680 Speaker 2: If you want to look at it that way, my 118 00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:53,680 Speaker 2: sense is what has got to give is Beijing needs 119 00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 2: to really lower his hurdles in terms of their worries 120 00:06:56,600 --> 00:07:02,040 Speaker 2: about moral hazards, competing factions in the political sphere, so 121 00:07:02,120 --> 00:07:04,640 Speaker 2: on and so forth. And to some extent, I think 122 00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:07,800 Speaker 2: the central government needs to almost issue a blank check. 123 00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:11,880 Speaker 2: Does that create problems for the future, you bet, But 124 00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:14,480 Speaker 2: does it then stop the wolf at the door. It 125 00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:18,400 Speaker 2: gives them a lot more breathing space where they need it. 126 00:07:18,920 --> 00:07:21,640 Speaker 2: And I think this is where the prioritization of key 127 00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:27,080 Speaker 2: tech industries, the new engines of growth will probably start 128 00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:29,240 Speaker 2: to reveal itself whether it has really got the kind 129 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:33,200 Speaker 2: of prominence that people make it out to have from 130 00:07:33,280 --> 00:07:34,280 Speaker 2: China's growth mantra. 131 00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:38,360 Speaker 1: So, do you think authorities in China are misjudging the 132 00:07:38,440 --> 00:07:41,560 Speaker 1: impact that deflation is having and what a problem it 133 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:45,640 Speaker 1: is and how difficult it is to kind of extract 134 00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:47,400 Speaker 1: an economy from that state. 135 00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:55,160 Speaker 2: At the risk of sounding almost disrespectful, that's my fear. 136 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:59,240 Speaker 2: I think they do, because my sense is that they're 137 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:01,840 Speaker 2: looking back and saying, look, we need to put an 138 00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:06,600 Speaker 2: x amount of fiscal stimulus, X amount of money to stimulus, 139 00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:08,760 Speaker 2: and then these would be the economic outcomes based on 140 00:08:08,800 --> 00:08:13,840 Speaker 2: our models before. However, given the chronic confidence deficit after 141 00:08:13,880 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 2: the wealth destruction and the huge income shocks from local 142 00:08:17,720 --> 00:08:20,720 Speaker 2: governments being unable to pay, and you know, the whole 143 00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:26,480 Speaker 2: slew of things from conspicous consumption being knocked back in 144 00:08:26,560 --> 00:08:28,200 Speaker 2: terms of bankers base on and so forth. 145 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:28,960 Speaker 3: So if you've got. 146 00:08:28,800 --> 00:08:32,960 Speaker 2: Both a simultaneous income and balance sheet shock. Then my 147 00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:37,400 Speaker 2: postulation is the growth multipliers have been decimated far beyond 148 00:08:37,559 --> 00:08:41,880 Speaker 2: what the historical models will lead us to believe, so Beijing, 149 00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:45,600 Speaker 2: and that that might partly explain why Beijing continues to 150 00:08:45,640 --> 00:08:48,480 Speaker 2: disappoint with the drip feed of stimulus, because at each 151 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:51,520 Speaker 2: point they think this should lift it sufficiently such that 152 00:08:51,600 --> 00:08:53,480 Speaker 2: we balance all our constraints and it doesn't. 153 00:08:53,960 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 1: Bishnu, before I let you go, if we can take 154 00:08:56,080 --> 00:08:58,559 Speaker 1: a step back and look at the global economy right now, 155 00:08:58,559 --> 00:09:02,360 Speaker 1: I'm curious about the risk, the greatest risk that you 156 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:05,240 Speaker 1: perceive globally as we look to twenty twenty five. 157 00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:10,160 Speaker 2: For me, one of the greatest risks is a further 158 00:09:10,280 --> 00:09:15,240 Speaker 2: breakdown of diplomacy and trust, which would then lead to 159 00:09:15,400 --> 00:09:18,640 Speaker 2: far worse fiscal outcomes all over because governments would need 160 00:09:18,679 --> 00:09:23,800 Speaker 2: to placate the social fabric and so on and so forth, 161 00:09:24,160 --> 00:09:26,800 Speaker 2: and that's going to lead us down a far greater 162 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:29,360 Speaker 2: economic turmoil down the road. 163 00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:31,920 Speaker 1: Vishnu, it's always a pleasure. Thank you for being with 164 00:09:32,040 --> 00:09:35,560 Speaker 1: us on this special edition of the Daybreak Asia podcast. 165 00:09:35,559 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 1: Happy New Year two. Vishnu Verarathan, head of Economics and 166 00:09:39,080 --> 00:09:42,880 Speaker 1: Strategy at Misoho Securities, joining from Singapore. Here on the 167 00:09:42,920 --> 00:09:53,840 Speaker 1: Daybreak Asia Podcast. Welcome back to a special New Year's 168 00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:57,360 Speaker 1: Eve edition of the Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. 169 00:09:57,760 --> 00:09:59,840 Speaker 1: We want to end the year with a look at Japan. 170 00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:03,560 Speaker 1: The latest inflation ratings for the month of December really 171 00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:06,240 Speaker 1: support the case for a January rate hike by the 172 00:10:06,280 --> 00:10:09,320 Speaker 1: Bank of Japan. For more, we heard from Ed Rodgers. 173 00:10:09,440 --> 00:10:12,800 Speaker 1: He is the CEO and Chief Investment Officer at Rogers 174 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:16,440 Speaker 1: Investment Advisors. He spoke with bloomberg'shust Linda Ahman. 175 00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:19,360 Speaker 4: Let's take a water perspective of the Japanese market. We 176 00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:22,280 Speaker 4: had Goldman coming out to say that given the en 177 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:25,600 Speaker 4: way it is hovering close to one sixty, it is 178 00:10:25,679 --> 00:10:28,520 Speaker 4: probably a sweet spot for investors to be buying into 179 00:10:28,559 --> 00:10:31,000 Speaker 4: Japanese stocks. Do you agree? I do. 180 00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:34,600 Speaker 5: We think everything's on sale in Japan. As you say, 181 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:37,520 Speaker 5: as you're closing it on one sixty, you know, we've 182 00:10:37,559 --> 00:10:39,280 Speaker 5: got a little ways to go. We've got a month 183 00:10:39,360 --> 00:10:42,320 Speaker 5: to wait and see what the BOJ does in January. 184 00:10:42,360 --> 00:10:45,320 Speaker 5: But the impact of a FED rate cut in the 185 00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:48,440 Speaker 5: Bank of Japan holding SETI is clear. Get impact on 186 00:10:48,600 --> 00:10:52,360 Speaker 5: FX is There's just no way you can deny it, 187 00:10:52,760 --> 00:10:56,200 Speaker 5: so everything's on sale. Will rates normalize? Are we going 188 00:10:56,240 --> 00:10:58,840 Speaker 5: into the Are we finally going into the sort of 189 00:10:58,840 --> 00:11:02,440 Speaker 5: post two thousand and eight financial crisis mode of central 190 00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:06,320 Speaker 5: banks all working in unison and having similar policies. I 191 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:11,960 Speaker 5: think absolutely we've reached a point where regionalization and specific 192 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:15,360 Speaker 5: countries are going to be responding according to their specific needs. 193 00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:18,760 Speaker 5: There is not a global approach. There's not a G 194 00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:23,120 Speaker 5: seven approach to interest rates. Central banks are not capable 195 00:11:23,320 --> 00:11:27,560 Speaker 5: given the current global environment, frankly, of working together the 196 00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:32,080 Speaker 5: way they did for much of the last fifteen, ten 197 00:11:32,160 --> 00:11:32,960 Speaker 5: twelve years. 198 00:11:33,520 --> 00:11:37,720 Speaker 4: What's the approach of the boj It's been sounding davish 199 00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:40,600 Speaker 4: and just wondering if it could be under a lot 200 00:11:40,640 --> 00:11:43,880 Speaker 4: of pressure to make that move given where the yen 201 00:11:44,040 --> 00:11:44,520 Speaker 4: is headed. 202 00:11:45,840 --> 00:11:48,600 Speaker 5: Absolutely there's pressure to make a move, There's no doubt 203 00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:51,120 Speaker 5: about that. I think the biggest if you were to 204 00:11:51,160 --> 00:11:56,079 Speaker 5: prioritize the pressures, though, is to understand what is the 205 00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:59,080 Speaker 5: Federal reserve US Federal reserve policy going to be. The 206 00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:03,880 Speaker 5: sort of hawkish tone of that recent cut of twenty 207 00:12:03,960 --> 00:12:07,360 Speaker 5: five business points, I think many many folks in the 208 00:12:07,360 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 5: market who've been in the space for a few decades, 209 00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:12,960 Speaker 5: are really wondering when we're going to have serious dialogue 210 00:12:12,960 --> 00:12:15,840 Speaker 5: about rates going back up again in the United States. 211 00:12:15,840 --> 00:12:19,679 Speaker 5: I know we're expecting two more cuts, but it's hard 212 00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:23,320 Speaker 5: not to view current US policies and what we expect 213 00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:26,120 Speaker 5: over the next one to two three years to not 214 00:12:26,280 --> 00:12:31,000 Speaker 5: be inflationary. So there's a, if you will, a looming 215 00:12:31,920 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 5: challenge of Jerome Powell versus the incoming administration, and it's 216 00:12:38,720 --> 00:12:40,640 Speaker 5: hard not to see rates going back up in the 217 00:12:40,720 --> 00:12:43,880 Speaker 5: United States at some point, and maybe sooner rather than later. 218 00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:46,600 Speaker 4: So having said that, Adam, what do you see the 219 00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:50,320 Speaker 4: BOJ doing? How soon do you see that hike coming? 220 00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:52,559 Speaker 4: And what does it mean for the end? 221 00:12:52,960 --> 00:12:56,480 Speaker 5: So we think that there will be a January a 222 00:12:56,559 --> 00:12:58,760 Speaker 5: move in January. I think that rate will go up 223 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:02,560 Speaker 5: in the in Japan, and I think the BOJ again, 224 00:13:02,920 --> 00:13:05,960 Speaker 5: the Japanese interest in the Japanese economy versus US interest 225 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 5: in US economy, and the political convergence, if you will, 226 00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:12,600 Speaker 5: that created a global zero interest rate environment. It's gone. 227 00:13:13,640 --> 00:13:17,439 Speaker 5: There has been significant inflation in Japan, some bit good inflation, 228 00:13:17,559 --> 00:13:20,240 Speaker 5: some ait bad inflation. The good inflation is wage inflation. 229 00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:25,920 Speaker 5: We have seen significant rise in wages, which makes the 230 00:13:25,960 --> 00:13:30,200 Speaker 5: BOJ very happy. Some of the external factors over energy 231 00:13:30,240 --> 00:13:32,920 Speaker 5: prices and other things that the bad inflation, if you will, 232 00:13:33,240 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 5: is also clearly still present. The consumer driven recovery driven 233 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:43,160 Speaker 5: by wage increases has not played out fully. We think 234 00:13:43,200 --> 00:13:45,400 Speaker 5: there is more of that to come, and we think 235 00:13:45,440 --> 00:13:48,520 Speaker 5: that Japan will certainly raise rates once and then they'll 236 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:52,559 Speaker 5: sort of wait and see. The incoming Trump administration will 237 00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:57,640 Speaker 5: take office in January twentieth, the power will change, and 238 00:13:57,679 --> 00:14:01,040 Speaker 5: then we'll start to see what policies really get enacted 239 00:14:01,080 --> 00:14:04,600 Speaker 5: at the US at the national level, We'll see what 240 00:14:04,720 --> 00:14:08,319 Speaker 5: happens in Congress. It's very murky right now. There have 241 00:14:08,360 --> 00:14:12,000 Speaker 5: been a number of appointees that would seem very sort 242 00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:14,920 Speaker 5: of if you're middle of the road and traditionalists in 243 00:14:14,960 --> 00:14:17,560 Speaker 5: their approach to certain things, and there are a number 244 00:14:17,600 --> 00:14:20,880 Speaker 5: of appointees from the Trump administration that might seem to 245 00:14:20,920 --> 00:14:24,640 Speaker 5: be a bit more radical and implementing change. It's a 246 00:14:24,640 --> 00:14:26,400 Speaker 5: little bit hard to tell who's going to win out 247 00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:31,880 Speaker 5: and specifically in this economic policy space where the US 248 00:14:31,920 --> 00:14:32,440 Speaker 5: will land. 249 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:36,000 Speaker 4: Yeah, despite the markets and the uncertainty in the US, 250 00:14:36,040 --> 00:14:40,040 Speaker 4: I mean, US exceptionalism has continued and people say it 251 00:14:40,040 --> 00:14:42,960 Speaker 4: will continue to persist back in the year ahead in 252 00:14:42,960 --> 00:14:46,160 Speaker 4: twenty twenty five. Given that scenario, AD I mean, I'm 253 00:14:46,240 --> 00:14:51,440 Speaker 4: wondering if how you're assessing the foreign interest in the 254 00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:56,160 Speaker 4: Japanese market in comparison, I mean, if US exceptionalism were 255 00:14:56,160 --> 00:14:58,800 Speaker 4: to continue, I mean, how much interest is there in 256 00:14:58,920 --> 00:15:00,760 Speaker 4: Japan the US side there. 257 00:15:01,320 --> 00:15:03,600 Speaker 5: I said, there's a significant amount of optimism in the 258 00:15:03,640 --> 00:15:08,120 Speaker 5: economic and business space with the incoming administration. But I'd 259 00:15:08,120 --> 00:15:10,560 Speaker 5: also say, as an investor, you look at markets, you 260 00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:13,520 Speaker 5: look at the run up, the significant run up in 261 00:15:13,880 --> 00:15:16,760 Speaker 5: US prices and the leadership, if you will, of the 262 00:15:17,360 --> 00:15:22,120 Speaker 5: Magnificent seven. Japan remains significantly undervalued and on sale the 263 00:15:22,200 --> 00:15:25,240 Speaker 5: United States. It's hard to imagine the next couple of 264 00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:30,600 Speaker 5: years performance mimicking mirroring the last couple of years of performance, 265 00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:33,680 Speaker 5: and the chickens will come home to roost on inflation 266 00:15:34,400 --> 00:15:36,800 Speaker 5: in the United States, and the chickens will come home 267 00:15:36,840 --> 00:15:39,600 Speaker 5: to roost on a what might turn out to be 268 00:15:39,640 --> 00:15:44,880 Speaker 5: a very challenging Congress with regards to well as we 269 00:15:45,000 --> 00:15:48,720 Speaker 5: just recently saw frankly in the what's the debt ceiling 270 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:51,280 Speaker 5: going to be? What sort of legislation is going to 271 00:15:51,280 --> 00:15:55,200 Speaker 5: get pass the Continuing Resolution to fund the US government. 272 00:15:55,840 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 5: It seems there's going to be a significant amount of 273 00:15:58,080 --> 00:16:01,600 Speaker 5: controversy there. So final policy will look like in the 274 00:16:01,680 --> 00:16:04,480 Speaker 5: United States is still very much up in the air 275 00:16:05,240 --> 00:16:09,040 Speaker 5: in our opinion, So until there is clarity on that 276 00:16:09,280 --> 00:16:12,960 Speaker 5: it actually becomes, it would be very unusual for the 277 00:16:13,120 --> 00:16:17,680 Speaker 5: Japanese to make precipitous moves at the boj and responding 278 00:16:17,720 --> 00:16:19,960 Speaker 5: to a policy that they don't even know exactly what 279 00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:22,720 Speaker 5: the policies will look like. You know. A good example 280 00:16:22,720 --> 00:16:25,680 Speaker 5: would be tariffs, you know, and how will tariffs be applied? 281 00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:28,880 Speaker 5: Will will China and Japan be all in the same bucket, 282 00:16:29,080 --> 00:16:32,440 Speaker 5: or will there be some preferential treatment for some allies 283 00:16:32,840 --> 00:16:35,040 Speaker 5: used to be tariffs? This is this is all very 284 00:16:35,120 --> 00:16:36,040 Speaker 5: unclear right now. 285 00:16:36,400 --> 00:16:39,600 Speaker 4: If Japan is under owned, what your investors been looking at? 286 00:16:39,920 --> 00:16:42,440 Speaker 4: What must you own in Japan in twenty twenty five. 287 00:16:42,640 --> 00:16:46,360 Speaker 5: So I think there's some areas that are clear and obvious. 288 00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:48,960 Speaker 5: You know, what's important to the Japanese. What is the 289 00:16:49,040 --> 00:16:53,000 Speaker 5: Japanese government going to support. There's a huge moment of 290 00:16:53,040 --> 00:16:55,400 Speaker 5: opportunity right now in Japan, and I think many many 291 00:16:55,480 --> 00:16:58,400 Speaker 5: people at the Japanese government level and many people at 292 00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:03,160 Speaker 5: the Japanese business level see a potential pivot. We've already 293 00:17:03,640 --> 00:17:06,720 Speaker 5: for the first time in over almost twenty years. Twenty 294 00:17:06,840 --> 00:17:11,040 Speaker 5: years ago, China became Japan's largest trading partner in the world, 295 00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:16,200 Speaker 5: replacing the United States as Japan's largest trading partner. Given 296 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:19,600 Speaker 5: the geopolitical realities of the day, we think that we 297 00:17:19,680 --> 00:17:21,560 Speaker 5: have now reached the pivot point where we're going to 298 00:17:21,560 --> 00:17:23,560 Speaker 5: go back to seeing the United States as the largest 299 00:17:23,840 --> 00:17:27,440 Speaker 5: trading partner for Japan, and that has some enormous implications. 300 00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:30,960 Speaker 5: How did the United States economies, not just the economies, 301 00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:36,440 Speaker 5: but the political economy work together. What are the very targeted, 302 00:17:36,520 --> 00:17:39,480 Speaker 5: specific goals of the Japanese government in the science and 303 00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:42,560 Speaker 5: technology space in many of the areas where they want 304 00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:46,680 Speaker 5: to exploit certain research and development advantages, in certain areas 305 00:17:46,720 --> 00:17:50,360 Speaker 5: where they've maintained, if you will, significant R and D 306 00:17:51,080 --> 00:17:56,000 Speaker 5: technological innovation leadership, other areas where they've fallen behind semiconductors 307 00:17:56,040 --> 00:17:59,479 Speaker 5: is an obvious example, and then other areas where we 308 00:17:59,520 --> 00:18:03,320 Speaker 5: see explosion of interests, such as in the venture capital, 309 00:18:03,880 --> 00:18:08,600 Speaker 5: early stage risk taking investment space. We think the Japanese 310 00:18:08,640 --> 00:18:13,320 Speaker 5: government is very, very focused and committed to improving the 311 00:18:13,440 --> 00:18:18,199 Speaker 5: overall ecosystem and environment for in making risky investment. So 312 00:18:18,280 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 5: in our world, what do we think about venture capital, 313 00:18:21,119 --> 00:18:25,280 Speaker 5: hedge funds, private equity, everything called alternatives. We think is 314 00:18:25,320 --> 00:18:29,639 Speaker 5: going to be dramatically different the opportunity set in Japan 315 00:18:30,040 --> 00:18:32,159 Speaker 5: over the next five to ten years. We also think 316 00:18:32,240 --> 00:18:35,600 Speaker 5: in certain sectors it's clear and obvious where there's Japanese 317 00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:40,480 Speaker 5: government interests, all these interests are converging and creating opportunity 318 00:18:40,520 --> 00:18:41,280 Speaker 5: for investors. 319 00:18:41,840 --> 00:18:45,359 Speaker 1: That was Ed Rogers, the CEO and CIO of Rogers 320 00:18:45,440 --> 00:18:50,280 Speaker 1: Investment Advisors, in conversation with Bloomberg's Hustlinda Ahman, And as 321 00:18:50,320 --> 00:18:53,040 Speaker 1: twenty twenty four comes to a close, we want to 322 00:18:53,040 --> 00:18:56,159 Speaker 1: thank you for listening to the Daybreak Asia podcast. It 323 00:18:56,240 --> 00:18:59,360 Speaker 1: certainly was a year chocked full of consequential stories right 324 00:18:59,359 --> 00:19:03,280 Speaker 1: across the region, and we hope you found our storytelling 325 00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:07,479 Speaker 1: and conversations interesting, perhaps even useful. From all of us 326 00:19:07,480 --> 00:19:11,160 Speaker 1: here at Bloomberg Radio and especially the Daybreak Asia podcast team, 327 00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:14,639 Speaker 1: we wish you a happy, healthy, and prosperous twenty twenty 328 00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:14,920 Speaker 1: five