1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:06,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:15,440 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along 3 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:18,680 Speaker 2: with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day 4 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:22,239 Speaker 2: for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics 5 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:24,880 Speaker 2: from our global headquarters in New York City. We are 6 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine 7 00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:31,280 Speaker 2: am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or 8 00:00:31,280 --> 00:00:33,919 Speaker 2: anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg 9 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:37,239 Speaker 2: Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. We begin this hour 10 00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:40,479 Speaker 2: with stocksliding after their worst quarter in nearly three years. EDGYR, 11 00:00:40,520 --> 00:00:42,600 Speaker 2: Danny if Youandenny Research cind Of gives us sm P 12 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:46,879 Speaker 2: five hundred price target to six k from sixty four hundred, 13 00:00:47,080 --> 00:00:49,720 Speaker 2: writing the expected fallout from trump two point zero s 14 00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:53,720 Speaker 2: ign of tariffs undercuts our former bullishness and dims the 15 00:00:53,760 --> 00:00:58,160 Speaker 2: prospects of our base case roaring twenty twenties scenario. Ed 16 00:00:58,240 --> 00:00:59,120 Speaker 2: joined us now for more. 17 00:00:59,320 --> 00:01:00,480 Speaker 3: Edward Morning in the Morning. 18 00:01:00,800 --> 00:01:03,120 Speaker 2: Second change for you in a number of weeks. 19 00:01:03,240 --> 00:01:05,480 Speaker 4: I hope you're not looking for clarity for me, because 20 00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:11,640 Speaker 4: I'm struggling with all the confusing information coming out of Washington. 21 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:16,360 Speaker 4: As you said, you're getting different messages from different people 22 00:01:16,760 --> 00:01:18,839 Speaker 4: in the administration, and at the end of the day, 23 00:01:18,880 --> 00:01:22,400 Speaker 4: it'll all depend on what the President concludes he wants 24 00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:25,080 Speaker 4: to do that day, and he can change his mind. 25 00:01:25,080 --> 00:01:25,360 Speaker 1: Again. 26 00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:27,800 Speaker 2: How much damage do you think the accumulating uncertainty is 27 00:01:27,840 --> 00:01:29,920 Speaker 2: doing already to the underlying economy. 28 00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:33,160 Speaker 4: Well, if you look at all the soft data, which 29 00:01:33,200 --> 00:01:37,160 Speaker 4: is very much forward looking, it's not looking good. The 30 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:40,640 Speaker 4: current data, the present data looks pretty good. The labor 31 00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:44,559 Speaker 4: market is doing fine. I think we had some really 32 00:01:44,600 --> 00:01:48,480 Speaker 4: cold weather in January and February that depressed consumer spending. 33 00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:50,960 Speaker 4: So I think we're going to have this really bizarre 34 00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:54,400 Speaker 4: scenario where the first quarter is we got real GDP 35 00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:57,280 Speaker 4: up one percent. I know others have it even lower 36 00:01:57,280 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 4: than that. Then it could be something like three percent 37 00:02:00,400 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 4: in the second quarter, because you could really have a 38 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:06,800 Speaker 4: nice rebound in consumer spending and consumers could be running 39 00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 4: to buy cars before the prices go up, which will 40 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:14,080 Speaker 4: be kind of another possibility. And then in the second 41 00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:16,240 Speaker 4: half of the year we could have stagflation with the 42 00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:20,880 Speaker 4: economy in a growth recession, maybe very little growth, if any, 43 00:02:21,240 --> 00:02:24,720 Speaker 4: maybe even a shallow recession. And so that's the way 44 00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:27,480 Speaker 4: I've kind of seen this thing playing out in terms 45 00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 4: of its impact on the economy. 46 00:02:29,080 --> 00:02:30,880 Speaker 5: And right now you and the market are focusing on 47 00:02:31,080 --> 00:02:34,440 Speaker 5: the reign of tariffs. What happens when we're focusing every 48 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:37,760 Speaker 5: day on this potential extension of TCGA and other tax 49 00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:39,679 Speaker 5: cuts that we may get, and they're focused on having 50 00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 5: this done before September. 51 00:02:41,040 --> 00:02:42,840 Speaker 4: Yeah, well it's going to be you know, if you 52 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:45,079 Speaker 4: think it's messy now, it's going to get even messier 53 00:02:45,120 --> 00:02:47,639 Speaker 4: if you on top of the whole tariff issue, which 54 00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:50,840 Speaker 4: isn't going to go away just because they announced what 55 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:53,880 Speaker 4: they mean by reciprocal tariffs. I mean, the twenty percent 56 00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:57,320 Speaker 4: number that's out there basically suggests that now the President 57 00:02:57,440 --> 00:03:00,880 Speaker 4: is looking to raise revenues and Navirus saying six trillion 58 00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:04,040 Speaker 4: dollars is what he claims that this could could raise. 59 00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:07,160 Speaker 4: And now off on top of that, we start to 60 00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:10,359 Speaker 4: try to extend the tax cuts, and an extension of 61 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:14,040 Speaker 4: tax cuts, it's not stimulative, it'll be very negative if 62 00:03:14,040 --> 00:03:16,480 Speaker 4: they don't get the tax cuts extended. 63 00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:19,079 Speaker 5: Well, try sactory last night's talking about that they want 64 00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:20,960 Speaker 5: to get done. No tax on tips, no tax on 65 00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:23,920 Speaker 5: Social Security, no tax on overtime, and also purchasing an 66 00:03:23,919 --> 00:03:27,120 Speaker 5: American car making that tax deductible. Again, if you have 67 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:29,200 Speaker 5: even one of those sweeteners, would that be bullish for 68 00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:29,720 Speaker 5: the market. 69 00:03:30,520 --> 00:03:34,800 Speaker 4: Well, I don't know that that'll make it that much 70 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:38,080 Speaker 4: easier to get it through Congress. I mean that it 71 00:03:38,160 --> 00:03:41,680 Speaker 4: is a vowful situation in Congress. The margin that the 72 00:03:41,720 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 4: Republicans have is very narrow, and the Republicans always don't 73 00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 4: always stay united. So no, I don't know that those 74 00:03:48,920 --> 00:03:53,440 Speaker 4: particular issues are going to be market moving at all. 75 00:03:53,920 --> 00:03:56,080 Speaker 3: At a certain point. If people are talking about the 76 00:03:56,120 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 3: likelihood of recession, what gives you the idea that this 77 00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:02,920 Speaker 3: is going to be more stagflationary than just traditionally recessionary. 78 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:05,760 Speaker 4: Well, the thing that we all have to worry about, 79 00:04:05,760 --> 00:04:08,600 Speaker 4: of course is the consumer and the consumer confidence numbers 80 00:04:08,640 --> 00:04:13,400 Speaker 4: have all been depressed. The animal spirits that we all 81 00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:16,760 Speaker 4: were kind of counting on to keep the stock market 82 00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:20,240 Speaker 4: going and consumers going is kind of fizzled away here, 83 00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:22,200 Speaker 4: And a lot of it has to do, obviously, with 84 00:04:22,880 --> 00:04:26,800 Speaker 4: the kind of disappointment consumers were expecting that the administration 85 00:04:26,839 --> 00:04:31,520 Speaker 4: would focus on somehow lowering prices and instead now we 86 00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 4: may we will have higher auto prices if we're going 87 00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:39,640 Speaker 4: to have a twenty percent permanent tariff on autos, and 88 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:41,840 Speaker 4: of course if we have a twenty percent tariff across 89 00:04:41,839 --> 00:04:47,400 Speaker 4: the board, prices are going to go up. So that's disconcerting. 90 00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:49,000 Speaker 3: I guess that the reason why I ask this is 91 00:04:49,040 --> 00:04:51,800 Speaker 3: because Daniel dots point a one time price adjustment. But 92 00:04:51,839 --> 00:04:53,920 Speaker 3: if you have less demand, you'd imagine that would be 93 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:55,760 Speaker 3: a one time price adjustment, and then you won't be 94 00:04:55,760 --> 00:04:58,600 Speaker 3: able to have the ability to really raise that, especially 95 00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:01,360 Speaker 3: at a time where potentially the labor market could come 96 00:05:01,440 --> 00:05:04,080 Speaker 3: under some stress. So what is giving people the sense 97 00:05:04,120 --> 00:05:06,200 Speaker 3: that this time is different, that there could be a 98 00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 3: prolonged inflationary type of bent that raises questions about US treasuries. 99 00:05:10,839 --> 00:05:12,919 Speaker 3: It raises questions about what the FAT can do. 100 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:14,800 Speaker 4: Sure, I mean, it's not likely to be a one 101 00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:17,680 Speaker 4: month event where you know, you raise the tariff and 102 00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:20,240 Speaker 4: the CPI goes up to one level and it's a 103 00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:23,000 Speaker 4: bad month for the CPI and then it comes back down. 104 00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:25,800 Speaker 4: As a matter of fact, we raised our inflation outlook 105 00:05:25,839 --> 00:05:28,240 Speaker 4: for the rest of the year from two to three 106 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:31,040 Speaker 4: percent to three to four percent. I think it's going 107 00:05:31,040 --> 00:05:33,560 Speaker 4: to show up that quickly, and I think it's not 108 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:35,640 Speaker 4: going to be that transitory. It's not going to be 109 00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:38,680 Speaker 4: one or two months. It's going to last for several months. 110 00:05:39,760 --> 00:05:42,360 Speaker 4: And again, this is an ongoing, dynamic process. We don't 111 00:05:42,400 --> 00:05:45,920 Speaker 4: know whether more tariffs will be added or reduced. It's 112 00:05:45,960 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 4: just kind of confusing. But I think companies have already 113 00:05:50,120 --> 00:05:53,320 Speaker 4: anticipated that their costs are going to go up. Certainly, 114 00:05:53,320 --> 00:05:55,480 Speaker 4: if you're in manufacturing, your costs are going to go 115 00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:58,360 Speaker 4: up from all the parts. And as a result of that, 116 00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:03,760 Speaker 4: we're seeing price kind of forward indicators of inflation showing 117 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:07,520 Speaker 4: that there's a problem, and so the regional business surveys, 118 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:11,400 Speaker 4: for example, also showing that prices paid are going up. 119 00:06:11,760 --> 00:06:13,760 Speaker 2: Thanks the question ed, why do you think stocks are 120 00:06:13,760 --> 00:06:15,560 Speaker 2: going higher by year, Rent. 121 00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:21,000 Speaker 4: Well, I'm kind of counting on the market to look 122 00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:25,159 Speaker 4: forward as it typically does, and I'm kind of hoping 123 00:06:25,200 --> 00:06:30,839 Speaker 4: that all these issues get somewhat resolved by the end 124 00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:32,479 Speaker 4: of the year, and I think the market starts to 125 00:06:32,520 --> 00:06:35,680 Speaker 4: look ahead into twenty twenty six. I haven't given up 126 00:06:35,960 --> 00:06:38,880 Speaker 4: on'm i roaring twenty twenty scenario, sticking with it. I'm 127 00:06:38,920 --> 00:06:44,160 Speaker 4: sticking with it. I think it's got temporarily waylaid, all 128 00:06:44,160 --> 00:06:48,039 Speaker 4: this tariff issues and all these policy balls that are 129 00:06:48,720 --> 00:06:51,920 Speaker 4: up in the air. But I think the you know, 130 00:06:52,600 --> 00:06:56,280 Speaker 4: I guess my underlying thesis is, look how well the 131 00:06:56,279 --> 00:07:00,440 Speaker 4: economy has done in the past despite Washington and so 132 00:07:00,680 --> 00:07:02,000 Speaker 4: I'm hoping that will work again. 133 00:07:02,640 --> 00:07:05,440 Speaker 2: We've continued to underestimate the performance of this economy over 134 00:07:05,440 --> 00:07:07,640 Speaker 2: the last several years. That's certainly been a feature, which is. 135 00:07:07,640 --> 00:07:09,479 Speaker 3: The reason why a lot of people are saying that 136 00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:12,280 Speaker 3: actually you could see gains and you could actually see 137 00:07:12,280 --> 00:07:15,760 Speaker 3: ongoing inflation, because if you are underestimating the power of 138 00:07:15,800 --> 00:07:18,200 Speaker 3: the consumer, they will be able to absorb some of 139 00:07:18,200 --> 00:07:20,680 Speaker 3: this and they will keep spending. And companies know this. 140 00:07:20,960 --> 00:07:22,280 Speaker 3: You know that they don't have a sense of that 141 00:07:22,320 --> 00:07:24,320 Speaker 3: price target as much as pre pandemic. 142 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:26,240 Speaker 2: The could is right now on ES ANDP negative by 143 00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:28,280 Speaker 2: four tenths of one percent, just a little bit softer. 144 00:07:28,440 --> 00:07:41,720 Speaker 2: Ed of theardenty research in our nation's capital just moments ago. 145 00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:43,960 Speaker 2: If you aren't just joining us and welcome to the program. 146 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:46,280 Speaker 2: The Washington Post reporting the White House aides have drafted 147 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:49,680 Speaker 2: a proposal to impose tariffs of around twenty percent on 148 00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:52,400 Speaker 2: at least most imports into the United States. It's according 149 00:07:52,400 --> 00:07:55,120 Speaker 2: to three people familiar with the matter. There's an additional 150 00:07:55,120 --> 00:07:56,840 Speaker 2: dimension to this story on the tag site that I 151 00:07:56,840 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 2: think is worth highlighting that a president's team is exploring 152 00:07:59,560 --> 00:08:02,080 Speaker 2: using true millions of dollars in new import revenue for 153 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:04,560 Speaker 2: a tax dividend LISA or refund. 154 00:08:04,680 --> 00:08:07,080 Speaker 3: So this would be the sweetener on the flip side 155 00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:09,120 Speaker 3: of some of these tariffs. That would be, as some 156 00:08:09,160 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 3: people are saying, the worst case scenario in terms of 157 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:15,440 Speaker 3: the most maximalist in terms of terriffs. A big question 158 00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:17,160 Speaker 3: here of the timeline of how hard it would be 159 00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:19,960 Speaker 3: to get those through. And I will just say bonds 160 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:22,720 Speaker 3: are still rallying on the margin, but not nearly as 161 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:25,240 Speaker 3: much as you'd expect if you think about some of 162 00:08:25,280 --> 00:08:28,880 Speaker 3: the projections from Mark Zandy from Parthenon talking about the 163 00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:31,920 Speaker 3: likelihood of recession and unemployment rising to as much as 164 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:33,880 Speaker 3: seven percent by twenty twenty seven. 165 00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:36,920 Speaker 2: Tobermarcus of Wolf Research joins us now to extend the conversation. 166 00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 2: Topin good morning, and welcome to the program. How about 167 00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:42,920 Speaker 2: that twenty percent on all imports, Now, this can change, 168 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:44,600 Speaker 2: As we always say on this program, I said just 169 00:08:44,600 --> 00:08:47,080 Speaker 2: moments ago. Situations very very fluid. But how does that 170 00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:49,920 Speaker 2: snack out relative to what you're expecting for tomorrow? 171 00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:54,520 Speaker 1: Well, happy Liberation Day, Eve to use Well, Jonathan, Look, 172 00:08:54,559 --> 00:08:56,120 Speaker 1: that's certainly at the high end of the range that 173 00:08:56,160 --> 00:08:59,360 Speaker 1: we've been contemplating, even when you throw in gross value 174 00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:01,760 Speaker 1: add a tax into the calculations of these numbers, which 175 00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:04,600 Speaker 1: are the real big thing that drives them higher twenty 176 00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:07,320 Speaker 1: percent as an average rate or rate that applies to 177 00:09:07,440 --> 00:09:09,560 Speaker 1: many or most of the countries that are being here, 178 00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:11,400 Speaker 1: that's definitely at the high end of the range that 179 00:09:11,440 --> 00:09:14,839 Speaker 1: we've been contemplating. I think, even relative to a consensus 180 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:19,320 Speaker 1: among investors that's moved towards everyone expecting higher numbers tomorrow 181 00:09:19,320 --> 00:09:20,960 Speaker 1: over the course of the past week or two, that 182 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:23,280 Speaker 1: would definitely be a surprise to the high end. 183 00:09:23,480 --> 00:09:25,720 Speaker 5: Right now, the Washington Post is saying, this is just 184 00:09:25,840 --> 00:09:28,320 Speaker 5: one proposal on the table, Tobin, Do you get a 185 00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:29,959 Speaker 5: sense that the White House has actually made up their 186 00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:30,679 Speaker 5: mind yet? 187 00:09:31,960 --> 00:09:34,280 Speaker 1: By all accounts they have not. It sure seems like 188 00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:38,200 Speaker 1: deliberations are ongoing. As recently as this weekend, it seemed 189 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:40,840 Speaker 1: like there were multiple reports that the idea of a 190 00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:43,959 Speaker 1: flat across the board universal tariff in that twenty percent 191 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:46,400 Speaker 1: range had resurfaced. I do think they're going to end 192 00:09:46,480 --> 00:09:49,360 Speaker 1: up with more individualized country by country numbers in this 193 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:52,160 Speaker 1: reciprocal framework. But exactly where those numbers come down does 194 00:09:52,160 --> 00:09:53,240 Speaker 1: still seem to be up in the air. 195 00:09:53,520 --> 00:09:55,720 Speaker 5: Is twenty percent here to stay if they go with 196 00:09:55,840 --> 00:09:58,720 Speaker 5: that proposal, or is this the opening of a negotiation? 197 00:10:00,200 --> 00:10:01,920 Speaker 1: So at some level, I do think that this is 198 00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:05,000 Speaker 1: the opening of a negotiation. Certainly there will be negotiations. 199 00:10:05,040 --> 00:10:06,720 Speaker 1: I fully expect that there will be talks with many 200 00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:09,360 Speaker 1: our biggest trading partners, and I think there's probably room 201 00:10:09,400 --> 00:10:11,120 Speaker 1: for the numbers to come down somewhat. But I think 202 00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:13,760 Speaker 1: I am more concerned than a lot of the cell 203 00:10:13,840 --> 00:10:16,200 Speaker 1: side about the durability of these tariffs. And I think 204 00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:18,600 Speaker 1: it's really notable. In the past week, you had both 205 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:21,200 Speaker 1: Trump and Peter Navarro talk about six hundred billion dollars 206 00:10:21,240 --> 00:10:24,440 Speaker 1: a year in tariff revenue, not you know, a week 207 00:10:24,480 --> 00:10:26,520 Speaker 1: before that, you had a lot nick talking about one 208 00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:28,760 Speaker 1: trillion dollars target for a revenue from tariff's as well 209 00:10:28,760 --> 00:10:30,880 Speaker 1: as things like the new Trump Gold card. Those are 210 00:10:30,960 --> 00:10:33,520 Speaker 1: numbers that you can only achieve if you actually keep 211 00:10:33,520 --> 00:10:35,920 Speaker 1: these tariffs in place, not briefly threaten them and then 212 00:10:35,960 --> 00:10:38,240 Speaker 1: quickly negotiate them away. And I do think there's an 213 00:10:38,240 --> 00:10:41,840 Speaker 1: aspiration to fundamentally redirect the global trade system. So you know, 214 00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:42,880 Speaker 1: I think a lot of this is going to be 215 00:10:42,880 --> 00:10:45,000 Speaker 1: here to say, you know, from a negotiation perspective. Also, 216 00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:47,600 Speaker 1: it's notable if that's are the thing driving this value 217 00:10:47,600 --> 00:10:49,600 Speaker 1: add attackses, countries are not going to be able to 218 00:10:49,640 --> 00:10:51,840 Speaker 1: negotiate those away. So this talk about if they drop 219 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:54,920 Speaker 1: their tariff barriers, will drop hours doesn't really work that way. 220 00:10:54,960 --> 00:10:57,960 Speaker 1: If tariffs themselves are not the things driving these ostensibly 221 00:10:58,000 --> 00:10:59,160 Speaker 1: reciprocal rates. 222 00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:01,560 Speaker 3: Toobin, how long would it take to pass some of 223 00:11:01,559 --> 00:11:04,800 Speaker 3: these other sweetener proposals that could potentially offset the growth 224 00:11:04,840 --> 00:11:07,520 Speaker 3: hit from these tariffs to the United States. I'm talking 225 00:11:07,520 --> 00:11:09,480 Speaker 3: about certain tax rebates. 226 00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:09,840 Speaker 2: Or tax cuts. 227 00:11:10,920 --> 00:11:12,640 Speaker 1: I think the tax bill is probably going to be 228 00:11:12,760 --> 00:11:15,800 Speaker 1: enacted in a July type of timeframe. Certainly they are 229 00:11:15,800 --> 00:11:17,559 Speaker 1: trying to get it done before the debt sealing X 230 00:11:17,600 --> 00:11:19,480 Speaker 1: stage because of the plan in Congress at the moment 231 00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 1: is to include a dead sealing increase in reconciliation to 232 00:11:22,640 --> 00:11:24,400 Speaker 1: have that be the vehicle. So that would mean they 233 00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:27,040 Speaker 1: need to get it done before, probably roughly mid August, 234 00:11:27,520 --> 00:11:29,720 Speaker 1: so that late summer timeline is what we've been circling. 235 00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:34,360 Speaker 1: Sometime in Q three. It will be certainly better news 236 00:11:34,400 --> 00:11:36,079 Speaker 1: for markets than the tariffs have been. But I think 237 00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:39,000 Speaker 1: from a scale perspective, what's currently on the table does 238 00:11:39,040 --> 00:11:41,120 Speaker 1: not look like it comes close to fully offsetting the 239 00:11:41,200 --> 00:11:43,240 Speaker 1: hit from the tariffs. Like there are good things in there, 240 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:45,959 Speaker 1: both individually and in terms of corporate tax cuts on 241 00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:48,240 Speaker 1: things like bonus appreciation, but it really is at a 242 00:11:48,280 --> 00:11:49,560 Speaker 1: significantly smaller scale. 243 00:11:49,760 --> 00:11:51,839 Speaker 2: I type an appreciate good time, I'm reaction to the 244 00:11:51,880 --> 00:11:54,600 Speaker 2: break in news and a happy Liberation Day gave to 245 00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:57,320 Speaker 2: you as well. Set type of Marcus the before free set. 246 00:12:07,400 --> 00:12:11,440 Speaker 2: Let's turn back to commodities. Gold continuing its record breaking rally. 247 00:12:11,480 --> 00:12:14,720 Speaker 2: Bank for America suggesting the precious metal could reach thirty 248 00:12:14,760 --> 00:12:18,120 Speaker 2: five hundred, driven by central bank buying and haven demand 249 00:12:18,280 --> 00:12:22,040 Speaker 2: a bit rising geopolitical and macro uncertainties. Francisco Blanche and 250 00:12:22,040 --> 00:12:24,680 Speaker 2: Bank for America joint just now for more, Francisco, Welcome 251 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:28,000 Speaker 2: to the show. A nineteen percent move in the first quarter, 252 00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:32,679 Speaker 2: the biggest quarterly game going back to nineteen eighty six. Francisco. 253 00:12:32,720 --> 00:12:34,880 Speaker 2: Let's talk about the drivers of the first three months 254 00:12:34,880 --> 00:12:37,160 Speaker 2: of this year before we get into the next nine 255 00:12:37,160 --> 00:12:40,440 Speaker 2: months of twenty twenty five. What got us to this place. 256 00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:45,679 Speaker 6: Thank you for having me again, John. So, look, I 257 00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:51,320 Speaker 6: think gold this has been really drifted up by essentially 258 00:12:51,920 --> 00:12:55,240 Speaker 6: we started with center back buying in the the last 259 00:12:55,240 --> 00:12:57,960 Speaker 6: three years, but I think investors have started to accumulate 260 00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:01,320 Speaker 6: it as well. Saving what's really change this has been 261 00:13:01,920 --> 00:13:06,440 Speaker 6: more investor buying, whether it's through ETFs other instruments, but 262 00:13:06,480 --> 00:13:11,160 Speaker 6: also we are seeing asset managers and insurers starting to 263 00:13:11,240 --> 00:13:15,280 Speaker 6: pile in. So so that's that's been the change. Remember, 264 00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:18,960 Speaker 6: we've seen a weekending US war. We've also seen following 265 00:13:19,080 --> 00:13:23,520 Speaker 6: interest rates at least on on ten year yields in 266 00:13:23,559 --> 00:13:28,040 Speaker 6: the US, and that's kind of led to incremental demand 267 00:13:28,200 --> 00:13:31,200 Speaker 6: for gold. Plus, of course there's an issue of tips 268 00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:33,880 Speaker 6: and the potential implications that may have in the economy. 269 00:13:33,960 --> 00:13:36,040 Speaker 6: So I thing all of that has come together. But 270 00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:38,640 Speaker 6: gold's not alone. I mean, we've seen a big rally 271 00:13:38,679 --> 00:13:43,559 Speaker 6: across the commodity complex. We've seen also coffee moving up, 272 00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:48,040 Speaker 6: We've seen you know it's in silver. Actually, commodities are 273 00:13:48,120 --> 00:13:51,400 Speaker 6: up almost nine percent in the first quarter, John, I 274 00:13:51,400 --> 00:13:54,000 Speaker 6: mean it, it's been a really strong run, maybe a 275 00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:57,680 Speaker 6: little bit of unexpected run, and and and the sector 276 00:13:57,679 --> 00:14:00,120 Speaker 6: has helped pace bonds and equities across the board. 277 00:14:00,400 --> 00:14:04,080 Speaker 3: Francisco, Before we dive into just generally the commodity rally, 278 00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:08,360 Speaker 3: how distinct is gold given its hedge factor as well 279 00:14:08,400 --> 00:14:11,360 Speaker 3: as increasing concerns as we were speakingly towards cervellus earlier 280 00:14:11,720 --> 00:14:14,440 Speaker 3: by diversifying away from the US dollar. 281 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:20,960 Speaker 6: Well, so I think there is an element here of verification, 282 00:14:21,080 --> 00:14:23,520 Speaker 6: no doubt. I mean, central banks are now holding out 283 00:14:23,600 --> 00:14:26,560 Speaker 6: ten percent of their reserve assets in gold, and that 284 00:14:26,680 --> 00:14:29,280 Speaker 6: number is likely to continue to increase at an annual 285 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:32,160 Speaker 6: pace of one to two percent, probably as far as 286 00:14:32,240 --> 00:14:34,480 Speaker 6: I can see. Remember, one of the things that the 287 00:14:34,520 --> 00:14:38,240 Speaker 6: Trump administration is trying to do is to rebalance the 288 00:14:38,440 --> 00:14:42,600 Speaker 6: US twin deficits, and that rebalancing of the twin deficits 289 00:14:42,640 --> 00:14:46,680 Speaker 6: by definition implies that there is a lower desire bio 290 00:14:46,720 --> 00:14:51,480 Speaker 6: Trump administration to continue to supply this reserve asset that 291 00:14:51,560 --> 00:14:53,880 Speaker 6: the world has been caring for for a long time, 292 00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:56,680 Speaker 6: which is which is US streacheries. Right, So if you 293 00:14:56,880 --> 00:15:00,600 Speaker 6: reduce the deficit, if you're redeal the budget defici If 294 00:15:00,600 --> 00:15:03,800 Speaker 6: you reduce the current count deficit and the trade deficits, 295 00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:08,000 Speaker 6: by definition, there's going to be less treasure is available 296 00:15:08,160 --> 00:15:13,040 Speaker 6: for central banks around to hold. And then there is 297 00:15:13,080 --> 00:15:15,800 Speaker 6: the whole sanctions and tirets over that here that's also 298 00:15:15,960 --> 00:15:19,480 Speaker 6: driving the demand for gold. 299 00:15:19,680 --> 00:15:21,920 Speaker 3: So I guess my question for you is, have we 300 00:15:21,960 --> 00:15:24,080 Speaker 3: seen the book of it? Why isn't your target higher? 301 00:15:24,120 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 3: You see thirty five hundred as a recent target. We 302 00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:28,720 Speaker 3: were just talking to Eddie ar Denny who left the 303 00:15:28,920 --> 00:15:31,120 Speaker 3: office saying four thousand by the end of this year 304 00:15:31,120 --> 00:15:33,160 Speaker 3: and five thousand by the end of this year, and 305 00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:34,640 Speaker 3: it seems like people can't get enough. 306 00:15:36,440 --> 00:15:38,920 Speaker 6: Well, I mean there's a little bit of that right now. 307 00:15:38,960 --> 00:15:42,480 Speaker 6: But also remember gold is a pretty good, pretty large 308 00:15:42,480 --> 00:15:47,440 Speaker 6: market already, right It's over ten trillion dollars and in value, 309 00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:49,680 Speaker 6: so of course you can you can put any number there, 310 00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:53,160 Speaker 6: because there is no there's no such things as intrinsic 311 00:15:53,280 --> 00:15:55,200 Speaker 6: value in something like gold. I mean, there is, of 312 00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:58,240 Speaker 6: course a cost of production, but as we know, mining 313 00:15:58,800 --> 00:16:01,160 Speaker 6: increases the stoke gold by all one and a half 314 00:16:01,160 --> 00:16:04,000 Speaker 6: percent a year. But the real story here is how 315 00:16:04,080 --> 00:16:07,280 Speaker 6: much investment can you drive in of course gold could 316 00:16:07,320 --> 00:16:09,440 Speaker 6: spike a or higher, but you would need to see 317 00:16:09,680 --> 00:16:12,360 Speaker 6: a much worse economic outcome than what the market is 318 00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:14,960 Speaker 6: currently pricing in our view, right, So it's going to 319 00:16:14,960 --> 00:16:18,200 Speaker 6: be a steady grind higher as opposed to a big 320 00:16:18,280 --> 00:16:20,680 Speaker 6: jump unless something grammatic happens. 321 00:16:21,400 --> 00:16:23,000 Speaker 5: There's a lot of research that all this has to 322 00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:25,840 Speaker 5: do a lot with the uncertainty about the trade and 323 00:16:25,840 --> 00:16:28,000 Speaker 5: the terrors with the announcement we're going to get tomorrow. 324 00:16:28,120 --> 00:16:29,760 Speaker 5: But how much is it just driven by the fact 325 00:16:29,800 --> 00:16:33,080 Speaker 5: that it is uncertain and most people are projecting the 326 00:16:33,080 --> 00:16:35,400 Speaker 5: next year to just remain uncertain. So the safest thing 327 00:16:35,440 --> 00:16:36,560 Speaker 5: is to just go into gold. 328 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:41,880 Speaker 6: Well again, just mentioned that earlier. It's a combination of 329 00:16:41,920 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 6: factors when you look at a goal. Historically it used 330 00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:49,040 Speaker 6: to be race, it used to be effects, but now 331 00:16:49,120 --> 00:16:53,640 Speaker 6: we have this uncertainty, which is of course triggering the purchases. 332 00:16:54,000 --> 00:17:00,280 Speaker 6: But again, the uncertainty is really impacting all investors across 333 00:17:00,280 --> 00:17:03,520 Speaker 6: the spectrum. As I said, we are seeing retail investors, 334 00:17:03,520 --> 00:17:07,480 Speaker 6: we are seeing asset managers and insurers, pensions. We're seeing 335 00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:12,879 Speaker 6: also center bank so and and again is it the 336 00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:16,840 Speaker 6: safest bed here? I don't know, right, But are we 337 00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:20,720 Speaker 6: going to continue to see interest across the board most likely, yes, 338 00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:23,439 Speaker 6: Now order the downside risks, well, downside risks is that 339 00:17:23,480 --> 00:17:28,760 Speaker 6: the Trump administration is successful at rebalancing it's it's accounts 340 00:17:28,800 --> 00:17:30,960 Speaker 6: and we end up having a very strong US economy 341 00:17:31,800 --> 00:17:36,440 Speaker 6: with relatively limited deficits, and therefore the US becomes a 342 00:17:36,520 --> 00:17:39,720 Speaker 6: very attractive place to investiga in. Right. I mean a 343 00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:42,680 Speaker 6: big part of the rotation to gold is also related 344 00:17:42,720 --> 00:17:45,320 Speaker 6: to the drop in inequity markets, to drop in the 345 00:17:45,359 --> 00:17:47,840 Speaker 6: MAC seven. Right, So let's say that we started to 346 00:17:47,880 --> 00:17:50,320 Speaker 6: see against strong growth and strong rebalancing in the US 347 00:17:50,359 --> 00:17:53,480 Speaker 6: as a result of all these policies, maybe gold isn't 348 00:17:53,520 --> 00:17:57,040 Speaker 6: ass attractive anymore in that in that context, right, So, 349 00:17:57,040 --> 00:17:59,520 Speaker 6: so I think we also have to consider the downside risks, 350 00:17:59,640 --> 00:18:01,520 Speaker 6: not just the upside risks. Is never going to be 351 00:18:01,560 --> 00:18:02,520 Speaker 6: a straight line for any. 352 00:18:02,359 --> 00:18:04,840 Speaker 2: Accident, Francisco, I just want to finish on the availability 353 00:18:04,880 --> 00:18:08,320 Speaker 2: of gold and maybe lean on your conversations with clients 354 00:18:08,640 --> 00:18:10,800 Speaker 2: so you can avoid offer in your opinion unless you've 355 00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:13,080 Speaker 2: got one bio made share it. Do you think that 356 00:18:13,320 --> 00:18:16,560 Speaker 2: losing confidence about that gold availability in places like the 357 00:18:16,600 --> 00:18:19,879 Speaker 2: Bank of England is that behind some of the speculative 358 00:18:19,960 --> 00:18:24,880 Speaker 2: drive we saw into gold over the past few months, I. 359 00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:27,720 Speaker 6: Don't think there's as much like a confidence in terms 360 00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:29,399 Speaker 6: of what the stocks of gold being there. I think 361 00:18:29,440 --> 00:18:32,640 Speaker 6: it's been more about the movement of gold to Europe 362 00:18:32,680 --> 00:18:35,919 Speaker 6: into the US ahead of potential tires. Remember, there's a 363 00:18:35,920 --> 00:18:37,840 Speaker 6: lot of instruments in the US that are issued. There 364 00:18:37,840 --> 00:18:41,680 Speaker 6: are instruments that may have a gold physical backing. And 365 00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:46,400 Speaker 6: if you've promised investors on any kind of note with 366 00:18:46,720 --> 00:18:50,280 Speaker 6: a structure note or an ETF or some kind of fund, 367 00:18:50,440 --> 00:18:52,480 Speaker 6: that that goal is going to be physically available for 368 00:18:52,920 --> 00:18:56,520 Speaker 6: the investor to take to take hold in the US, 369 00:18:57,280 --> 00:18:59,919 Speaker 6: you're probably shipping gold out right just in case that 370 00:19:00,040 --> 00:19:02,560 Speaker 6: those times go up and suddenly you face a big 371 00:19:02,600 --> 00:19:05,800 Speaker 6: dislocation between the promote in the US and the product 372 00:19:05,800 --> 00:19:07,920 Speaker 6: the world. And some extent we've seen that in other 373 00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:13,520 Speaker 6: commora instruments like copper and a bit less so in 374 00:19:13,640 --> 00:19:16,920 Speaker 6: the energy space is a little more fungible. But investors 375 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:19,320 Speaker 6: are rushing to bring stuff into the US ahead of 376 00:19:20,160 --> 00:19:24,080 Speaker 6: this so called liberation day tomorrow in the rose gardens. 377 00:19:24,080 --> 00:19:26,480 Speaker 6: So what is the impact of those times is going 378 00:19:26,560 --> 00:19:29,040 Speaker 6: to be Well, again, you'd rather have your product in 379 00:19:29,080 --> 00:19:32,240 Speaker 6: the US of a ahead of that potential price change, 380 00:19:32,280 --> 00:19:37,840 Speaker 6: because unlike currencies and legal instruments, komoris are going to 381 00:19:37,840 --> 00:19:40,600 Speaker 6: suffer the tires directly, right, So it's a direct play 382 00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:43,560 Speaker 6: on the tires, and you'd rather be in than out 383 00:19:43,680 --> 00:19:46,199 Speaker 6: when those tireff walls go up. 384 00:19:46,280 --> 00:19:49,160 Speaker 2: Another record hunt of the pounds away Francisco Prety second 385 00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:52,120 Speaker 2: time breaking down Cade Francisco plunge to Bank America. 386 00:19:59,680 --> 00:19:59,960 Speaker 4: Around. 387 00:20:01,600 --> 00:20:03,720 Speaker 2: We begin this now with stock study has traded away 388 00:20:03,760 --> 00:20:07,600 Speaker 2: President Trump for reciprocal tariffs. Emily Rowland of John Hancock writing, 389 00:20:07,680 --> 00:20:10,600 Speaker 2: there is still a broad based global economic cycle that 390 00:20:10,640 --> 00:20:14,360 Speaker 2: will drive earnings and valuations on stocks. Overall. This cycle 391 00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:19,480 Speaker 2: maybe borrow time. As recent economic does start to show cracks, 392 00:20:19,760 --> 00:20:23,680 Speaker 2: we would consider further pruning risk and portfolios. Emily. John, 393 00:20:23,760 --> 00:20:25,960 Speaker 2: just now for more, Emily, welcome to the program. We've 394 00:20:26,000 --> 00:20:28,280 Speaker 2: seen some major moves in this stock market through the 395 00:20:28,320 --> 00:20:34,040 Speaker 2: first quarter. Do you see some big opportunities opening up now? Yeah, John, So. 396 00:20:34,040 --> 00:20:37,040 Speaker 7: We are actually going to be moving to neutral on 397 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:41,119 Speaker 7: US large cap equities and actually allocating those assets to credit. 398 00:20:41,920 --> 00:20:45,480 Speaker 7: And really it's not necessarily about the policy uncertainty. It's 399 00:20:45,520 --> 00:20:49,240 Speaker 7: really just about the starting point. US stops have handily 400 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:53,840 Speaker 7: outperformed credit really since the stimulus boom in response to COVID, 401 00:20:53,880 --> 00:20:57,119 Speaker 7: and we've seen a couple of exceptional years where earnings 402 00:20:57,320 --> 00:21:01,280 Speaker 7: have been phenomenal. We've seen massive moldable expansion, back to 403 00:21:01,359 --> 00:21:04,439 Speaker 7: back twenty five plus percent returns for the S and 404 00:21:04,480 --> 00:21:06,920 Speaker 7: P five hundred. So we're looking to where we can 405 00:21:07,040 --> 00:21:09,280 Speaker 7: prove a little bit of risk off the top there, 406 00:21:09,880 --> 00:21:13,160 Speaker 7: and global equities are really what's benefiting from this rotation. 407 00:21:13,359 --> 00:21:16,760 Speaker 7: It is amazing to see what the leadership has been. 408 00:21:16,840 --> 00:21:22,760 Speaker 7: It's German industrial companies, it's European banks, it's Chinese technology companies. 409 00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:26,680 Speaker 7: That's a really odd mix in our mind, especially as 410 00:21:26,680 --> 00:21:30,199 Speaker 7: we think about the potential for tariffs to create this 411 00:21:30,359 --> 00:21:33,840 Speaker 7: negative growth environment. We would actually be looking to look 412 00:21:33,840 --> 00:21:37,160 Speaker 7: at income as a more important component of a portfolio 413 00:21:37,200 --> 00:21:41,080 Speaker 7: than capital appreciation. So actually looking again to go a 414 00:21:41,160 --> 00:21:44,639 Speaker 7: neutral on credit and neutral on US large caps. 415 00:21:44,720 --> 00:21:47,640 Speaker 2: You mentioned the performance we've seen abroad, the performance we've 416 00:21:47,640 --> 00:21:49,680 Speaker 2: seen in places like Europe and we ne do you 417 00:21:49,720 --> 00:21:52,040 Speaker 2: think some pain might be install for some of those 418 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:54,480 Speaker 2: European lungs going into tomorrow's announcement. 419 00:21:55,520 --> 00:21:57,879 Speaker 7: I think they could be challenged just because of the 420 00:21:58,000 --> 00:22:00,480 Speaker 7: velocity of the move that we've seen there. Again, if 421 00:22:00,480 --> 00:22:03,760 Speaker 7: you guys remember that Sesame Street Show where it was 422 00:22:03,760 --> 00:22:05,720 Speaker 7: like one of these things is not like the other. 423 00:22:05,840 --> 00:22:08,280 Speaker 7: That's what we keep thinking about as it relates to 424 00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:12,119 Speaker 7: the cross asset performance profile in the wake of this 425 00:22:12,200 --> 00:22:18,000 Speaker 7: policy uncertainty. US small cap sucks. Theoretically should be benefiting 426 00:22:18,080 --> 00:22:21,200 Speaker 7: from the potential for these America first policies. We should 427 00:22:21,200 --> 00:22:25,560 Speaker 7: see the US dollar strengthening. Theoretically, that's not happening. Instead, 428 00:22:25,600 --> 00:22:29,879 Speaker 7: we're seeing this massive sentiment driven rotation into these cyclical 429 00:22:30,359 --> 00:22:33,960 Speaker 7: areas of the globe. Typically, cyclical assets should do best 430 00:22:34,040 --> 00:22:37,600 Speaker 7: coming out of a global economic downturn, and we're actually 431 00:22:37,640 --> 00:22:40,959 Speaker 7: seeing them out performing in a late cycle environment. So 432 00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:43,719 Speaker 7: I think that sentiment could shift rapidly here. We have 433 00:22:43,760 --> 00:22:47,360 Speaker 7: to remember that this is a global economy. If US 434 00:22:47,480 --> 00:22:51,720 Speaker 7: exceptionalism is at risk, if US equity exceptionalism is at risk, 435 00:22:52,080 --> 00:22:55,280 Speaker 7: broad equity exceptionalism here is likely at risk as well, 436 00:22:55,440 --> 00:22:57,560 Speaker 7: which is another reason we think that income is going 437 00:22:57,600 --> 00:23:00,959 Speaker 7: to be a more important return driver than capital appreciation. 438 00:23:01,080 --> 00:23:02,720 Speaker 3: Emily, that is the line that I want to pick 439 00:23:02,800 --> 00:23:06,720 Speaker 3: up on. If US accepts equities have lost their exceptional exceptionalism. 440 00:23:06,760 --> 00:23:10,480 Speaker 3: The rest of the world's equities have also lost their exceptionalism, 441 00:23:10,480 --> 00:23:12,960 Speaker 3: which is the reason why you see a good place 442 00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:16,359 Speaker 3: for income producing assets. I wonder do you see bonds 443 00:23:16,359 --> 00:23:20,439 Speaker 3: as actually outperforming equities this year amid this focus on 444 00:23:20,560 --> 00:23:24,520 Speaker 3: income and not necessarily equity premium. 445 00:23:25,400 --> 00:23:28,080 Speaker 7: Yeah, we do, actually, Lisa, And some of the reasons 446 00:23:28,080 --> 00:23:31,040 Speaker 7: that we've made this decision is kind of just thinking 447 00:23:31,119 --> 00:23:35,320 Speaker 7: about that potential you mentioned before. US high yield bonds 448 00:23:35,320 --> 00:23:38,360 Speaker 7: are yielding almost eight percent. Yes, there may be some 449 00:23:38,400 --> 00:23:40,840 Speaker 7: spread widening, so we've come off the lows of about 450 00:23:40,840 --> 00:23:44,040 Speaker 7: two hundred and fifty basis points over treasuries to a 451 00:23:44,080 --> 00:23:46,400 Speaker 7: little bit over three hundred. Now, maybe you could see 452 00:23:46,440 --> 00:23:48,880 Speaker 7: a bit more spread widening here, but now the income 453 00:23:48,960 --> 00:23:53,000 Speaker 7: is enough in our view to overcome that. You look 454 00:23:53,040 --> 00:23:55,679 Speaker 7: at standard deviation over the last ten years for the 455 00:23:55,760 --> 00:23:58,840 Speaker 7: S and P five hundred, about eighteen, we're looking at 456 00:23:58,880 --> 00:24:03,399 Speaker 7: about five percent standard deviation on high yield bonds, and 457 00:24:03,400 --> 00:24:06,400 Speaker 7: then finally looking back over the last decade, the maximum 458 00:24:06,480 --> 00:24:09,080 Speaker 7: draw down that we've seen and stopped through about thirty 459 00:24:09,080 --> 00:24:12,720 Speaker 7: three percent, and it's twenty one percent in high yield, 460 00:24:12,760 --> 00:24:15,600 Speaker 7: so it's not that we love credit. Within the context 461 00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:18,639 Speaker 7: of fixed income, we actually still have an overweight to 462 00:24:18,720 --> 00:24:23,160 Speaker 7: higher quality bonds over credit. But within the entire portfolio, 463 00:24:23,680 --> 00:24:27,000 Speaker 7: we think being able to maximize or to minimize draw down, 464 00:24:27,040 --> 00:24:29,520 Speaker 7: to be able to lower standard deviation, and to be 465 00:24:29,520 --> 00:24:31,960 Speaker 7: able to get nearly an eight percent income on high 466 00:24:32,040 --> 00:24:34,560 Speaker 7: yield is a decision that makes a lot of sense. 467 00:24:34,600 --> 00:24:34,919 Speaker 6: Emily. 468 00:24:34,920 --> 00:24:37,840 Speaker 3: When we started though, or John talked about how sentiments 469 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:40,320 Speaker 3: never been lower, at least not in the recent past, 470 00:24:40,560 --> 00:24:43,479 Speaker 3: even though we haven't seen an even bigger bear market 471 00:24:43,520 --> 00:24:46,440 Speaker 3: and broader stocks. And then I started to list off 472 00:24:46,480 --> 00:24:49,520 Speaker 3: this recession called this recession call this person has gotten 473 00:24:49,560 --> 00:24:51,560 Speaker 3: graded five times, And I was thinking to myself, I 474 00:24:51,560 --> 00:24:54,000 Speaker 3: sound really bearish, and I sound as though we're heading 475 00:24:54,040 --> 00:24:57,040 Speaker 3: into armageddon. And is that a contrarian indicator? You know, 476 00:24:57,080 --> 00:24:59,880 Speaker 3: the idea that we have discussed all of these worse 477 00:25:00,080 --> 00:25:02,680 Speaker 3: case scenarios at a time where the consumer's talent seat 478 00:25:02,720 --> 00:25:05,680 Speaker 3: is still pretty good. You do have companies that are 479 00:25:05,760 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 3: still performing, Okay, Is there a sense that maybe we've 480 00:25:09,840 --> 00:25:13,720 Speaker 3: gone too far and equities can reverberate back, especially lead 481 00:25:14,040 --> 00:25:14,760 Speaker 3: by big tech. 482 00:25:15,840 --> 00:25:17,680 Speaker 7: There is I mean, at the end of the day, 483 00:25:17,840 --> 00:25:20,920 Speaker 7: it's not that bad as it relates to the hard data. 484 00:25:21,000 --> 00:25:24,520 Speaker 7: We watch things like initial claims really closely on Thursday mornings. 485 00:25:24,760 --> 00:25:27,119 Speaker 7: We've been in the low two hundred thousands. There are 486 00:25:27,160 --> 00:25:30,640 Speaker 7: some cracks forming there, Continuing claims are elevated. We've seen 487 00:25:30,720 --> 00:25:34,240 Speaker 7: job opening slowing. We'll get another read on that this week. 488 00:25:34,320 --> 00:25:36,959 Speaker 7: But the hard data are holding in really well, especially 489 00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:39,600 Speaker 7: as it relates to the labor market. The challenge is 490 00:25:39,640 --> 00:25:44,919 Speaker 7: the soft data is horrible. Consumer expectations hitting a twelve 491 00:25:44,920 --> 00:25:48,640 Speaker 7: month low, University of Michigan Sentiment Index declining. You all 492 00:25:48,920 --> 00:25:51,520 Speaker 7: have talked a lot about that on the show. We've 493 00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:53,679 Speaker 7: got to be mindful of that. First of all, those 494 00:25:53,960 --> 00:25:57,560 Speaker 7: that soft data just soared after the election. We saw 495 00:25:57,680 --> 00:26:02,560 Speaker 7: just massive optimism, things like home sentiment and HB Again, 496 00:26:02,680 --> 00:26:06,159 Speaker 7: some of the sentiment surveys around expectations soaring, especially on 497 00:26:06,200 --> 00:26:09,119 Speaker 7: the Republican side. So we've seen a little bit of 498 00:26:09,160 --> 00:26:10,879 Speaker 7: a give back there. And then we also have to 499 00:26:10,920 --> 00:26:14,399 Speaker 7: remember that businesses and consumers sometimes say one thing and 500 00:26:14,440 --> 00:26:17,880 Speaker 7: do another. I think durable goods coming in solid last 501 00:26:17,920 --> 00:26:20,359 Speaker 7: week was another example of that. So we've got to 502 00:26:20,400 --> 00:26:23,080 Speaker 7: be mindful. I'm not saying completely ignore the soft data. 503 00:26:23,400 --> 00:26:25,680 Speaker 7: But we're watching the hard data for signs that a 504 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:29,280 Speaker 7: contraction is happening or something more nefarious is going on, 505 00:26:29,359 --> 00:26:30,480 Speaker 7: and we're just not seeing it. 506 00:26:30,600 --> 00:26:33,040 Speaker 2: Emily appreciate the update. As always, it's good to see you, 507 00:26:33,080 --> 00:26:37,480 Speaker 2: Emily Rowland of John Hancock. This is the Bloomberg Sevenans podcast, 508 00:26:37,600 --> 00:26:41,160 Speaker 2: bringing you the best in markets, economics, an gio politics. 509 00:26:41,440 --> 00:26:43,919 Speaker 2: You can watch the show live on Bloomberg TV weekday 510 00:26:43,960 --> 00:26:47,199 Speaker 2: mornings from six am to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to 511 00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:50,440 Speaker 2: the podcast on Apple, Spotify or anywhere else you listen, 512 00:26:50,720 --> 00:26:53,320 Speaker 2: and as always, on the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg 513 00:26:53,359 --> 00:26:53,960 Speaker 2: Business app