WEBVTT - Shameful Secret Heart

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>H Matt, it's nice to be back in studio with you.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we've we've we've each had a series of adventures. Yeah,

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the car crashed into my house. You went to Ireland's insane.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Those two events are not related.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>No, it would be rader they were.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm a year older, two.

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Weeks old there, but yeah, across the mouse A happy birthday.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. It was last Monday.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>My birthday is, it's around, it's coming weird, it's fine,

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>social Security number is.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 2>Some people are so caged about their birthdays.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess I shouldn't be. It's like, don't don't be ashamed. Birthday, Katie,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Everyone's on your birthday is just Katie.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah for me and Matt, just you can send.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Them to we have We have a close to overlapping birthday.

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>You and I had like birthday parties a day apart once, right.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I went to your birthday party.

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say the number leap the number.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 2>That was fun. Okay, I didn't go.

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>To yours because I was like in the far reaches

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of New Jersey, but I heard it was a wild time.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>You should have gone, I should have gone. Well, my

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 2>baby showers there, so you should go to that.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, wild fire trucks.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 2>No, maybe, I don't know, depending.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>On depending how he Wow and Welcome to The Money

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Podcast, new weekly podcast where we talk about stuff

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>related to money. I'm Matt Levine and I write the

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Money Stuff Call for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I got so many emails from people being like, are

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you on vacation, because it's like a bit yea that

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>every time I go ahead becation, Elon Musk does some

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>wild thing and it's not like literally only when I

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>go on vacation. And in fact, I was not on

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>vacation last week, but you were.

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you were ready and waiting to.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>To write about the SpaceX ip Yeah, which they made

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the public filing for an IPO that is supposed to

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>go in like a.

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Couple of weeks like mid June. Yeah, there's a it

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>was interesting to see all the different numbers. Is you said,

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>it seems like the AI is taking up a lot

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 2>of cash.

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Right. The basic financial situation here is like they have,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a kind of goodish business of flinging satellites

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>into space and more importantly like charging people for satellite service.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>They have had until recently a sort of money pit

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>for building a front of your AI lab that is

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the most renovator generating front of youer AI lab.

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But now they've sort of switched, like like a little

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>too late for the IPO filing. They're now like a

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>AI infrastructure company that basically rents data centers through anthropic

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever. Yeah, they've spent a lot of money

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on AI. They've made more of their money on space.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>But to me, the interesting thing is that sort of

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>projections they talk about their total addressable market, which is

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>a number you throw around for here is like where

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we could make money, and you know, they say, we've

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>idented about the largest dam and human history or whatever,

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight trillion dollars. But almost all of that is

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>enterprise AI. Right. The perspective begins with twelve pages of

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>photos and illustrations of rocket launches and Mars colonies, and

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>then it's like we're gonna do enterprise AI. Yeah, and

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>there's like a near term play of we make money

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>actually sending rockets into space. And then there's like a

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>medium term play We're gonna make trillions of dollars doing

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>enterprise AI, even though we just started that a couple

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of months ago. And then there's like a long term

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>planet we're gonna build Mars colonies. Right, it's like a strange,

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, U shaped curve of space and then

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>AI and then more space. There are projections of like

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>how we're going to make money. It's like this is

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>an AI company, and I don't know if that's the

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>story that investors are hearing are interested in, but it

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the when they look around to be

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>like how can we justify a two trillion dollar valuation,

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, we're gonna sell a lot of enterprise

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>AI software.

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is what we're going to do in the meantime.

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Before before the.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Mars colony becomes vilt that in orbital data centers, which

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>are now like they have gone from like a glimmer

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and Elon Musk's side to everyone being like, oh yeah.

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Urbal data center like a thing that you say with

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the straight yeah.

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Exactly exactly, like I have laughed the first time.

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, of course, where else would you do with them?

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>It makes sense. Yeah, it's gonna be interesting. This is

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 2>also something else we've talked about on the podcast is

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the Elon Musk premium that Tesla shares enjoy and I

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if that's going to transfer to SpaceX.

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>They have, you know, like a eighteen billion annual revenue

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>run rate lose money, like then like all of the

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers that are being talked about for the IPI or

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>load a mid one trillions to like two trillions to there,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>that's a hundred times revenue for a money losing company.

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an Elon Musk premium.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like it quite a large one. Yeah, that's fair.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I make fun of Elon Musk, but like if you

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>put money into SpaceX, you have more money now like

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>necessarily on a like profit basis, but on a valuation basis.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Like people have made a lot of money with the

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk and so there's a reason that people keep

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>putting a premium on investing with them, and like you know,

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like like will that eventually run out? Will people like

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>who buy on the IPO be disappointed that like it

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't justify a two trillion dollar valuation like Marrie, I

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but there's going to be an Elon Musk premium.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Even if this is a super disappointing IPO, It'll be

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>an Elon Musk premium.

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 2>And it'll also be in a bunch of indexes and

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 2>be in a bunch of it. There's a lot of consternation.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about this, Like I had an email

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>from one person, you know, like a regular retail investor.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I put money at the SMP. Is there anyway for

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>me to short Elon Musk And the answer is like, sure,

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>short space AX if you want to get your you know,

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and then it goes up to and you lose your shorts.

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I totally understand, and I think I'm more sympathetic than

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>most people to the idea that, like the big indexes

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>have to include SpaceX on an accelerated basis. Like I

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's right. Like I think when you're like the

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>S and P or the Russell three thousand or even

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>the Nasdaq one hundred, like you are more or less

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>saying we are the stock market, right, or at least

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>we're the large cap companies, or like in the ass case,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>we're like the big tech companies. Listen, on ethic, Like

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it would be a dereliction of their job to not

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>include in their index a gigantic return driving, super high

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>profile company that is a public company, Like they just

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>have to include SpaceX, Like I totally get it. And

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>people are mad because they're like waving their rules and

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like they're waving their rules. They're really mad and

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>they're waving their rules to include this giant company. And

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm very sympathetic to it, but I will say that

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>so many people are mad about it that there should

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>be a competitor index that's just like the S and

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>P five hundred without Elon Mosk. Right, my general view

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is like if you are a passive index investor, you

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>can't like have standards. You can't be like, oh but

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>this company is bad, Right, that's not how it works.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Like you're you're taking the market's judgment. That's the market's judgment.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that SpaceX is worth two trillion dollars, then, like

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the markets.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 2>So you signed up, that's what you sign up for.

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But like just empirically, a lot of people don't want

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to sign up for that, and so you should give

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>them the other thing, Like it doesn't matter, Like it's

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>like esthetically displeasing to be like, wow, that's an index

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fund with that Elon mus but the best people want

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>give it to.

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 2>It's like ex China, you know exactly.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like ESG indexes where it's like most of the

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>s and P five hundred but not the bad companies, right,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Like you do the same thing with Elon Musk. Yeah,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it would sell like hotcakes.

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, and if it didn't, that also too would be interesting.

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Like all of this hand ringing.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Was just that, right. Part of the hand ring is

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>people are mad about like their index funds being invested

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in Elon Musk. Yeah, this drives me a little nuts.

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But like part of it is active manager being like, well,

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we're benchmarked to these indexes, and SpaceX is going to

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>be a huge driver of under or over performance, right,

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Like either it'll go up a lot or it won't, right,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And the only way for us to be safe in

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>keeping our jobs is to like, I don't know, hug

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the index on that one, right, and if like we

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>buy no SpaceX and ten xes, then we will look

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>terrible against the index that we're benchmarked too. Yeah, your

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>job is to actively manage when they're supposed to get

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it right. But then unless people are really mad about it,

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be the most like attention getting

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>company in the index until it open a goes public.

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting to point out that we also saw Russell, Yeah,

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 2>make the decision to fast track sure SpaceX, Like.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like the Russell three thousands. Every company they have

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to it's crazy.

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 2>But it's probably worth pointing out that Nasak did win

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 2>the listing for the SpaceX IPO after they agreed to

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 2>let SpaceX in early to the NASAQ one hundred.

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, but I don't like, I don't think that

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>these index providers, I mean, like maybe past that because

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>playing three dimensional chests or whatever. Like, I don't think

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>these index providers are, oh we have to kiss up

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to Elon Musk. I think they are consulting with the

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>users of the indexes, index ones and investors generally, and

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>they're like, is this a public company? Yes, well then

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it should be in the list of public companies. I

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, the fact that it isn't just nastact is yeah,

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>add credence to that.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>People are mad about indexes monking with their float requirements,

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and in fact it looks like SpaceX's float will be

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it's actually available, free float will be pretty low for

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the first six months or so, like a lot of

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>shares will be subject to lock up, and so only

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in the order of five percent of shares will trade.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And so if you force all the index ones to

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>squeeze into that five percent of shares are going to

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>push out the price a lot. I don't know how

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>binding that is. A lot of the indexes have like

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>float adjustments where it's not like you have to buy

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the entire free float. And also the biggest index of

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 1>the S and P which is not going to add

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it for six months or Yeah, so it'll be they'll

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have more free float by then because the lock ups

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>will explare. But yeah, like the there's gonna be a

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of index or day five in the case of

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the Rustler, day fifteen in the case of the NAZAC,

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>which is when these when that will be eligible for

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the index. There'll be a lot of like index demand

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and not a lot of supply, and that could be

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have weird dynamics for prices.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you pointed this out in one of your columns.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 2>But fifteen days, I mean fine, five days does seem

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>a little quick, like it'll it feels like it'll still

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 2>be funky at that point.

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>When a company goes public like s and P five

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>hundred funds are not buying in the IPO because who knows,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'll be added to the SMP. There's gonna be significant,

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like Russell and Nazac, index demand for this company very

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>predictably within three weeks after, you know, one to three

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks after the IPO, and so you know, like we'll

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds be buying in the IPO to deliver in

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>their index arm strategy. Yeah, and so there's going to

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>be essentially index demand for these shares in the IPO,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's like a little unusual, right. I don't really

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>know the numbers, but like people have said, seventy five

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of stock coming in the IPO, which is

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a giant IPO. Yeah, the valuation is one thing, but

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>then the amount of stock being issued is huge, and

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>some of that is going to go to institutional investors

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>who like the stock and go to meetings and build

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>some valuation model and come to some price and put

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in an order at a price and get allocated the stock.

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But some of it is going to come from really

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>like price in sensitive demand, which is like, you know,

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent or whatever the deal is going to retail,

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and retail is like generally in offerings is assumed to

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>be priced and sensitive, right, Like the retail just prices

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>at what the institutional prices. And so if you have

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent going to retail, you have a lot of

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>price and sensitive demand, and then some of it is

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>going to effectively go to index funds, which are like

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>effectively priced and sensitive.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, we brought up with the seventy five billion dollars,

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 2>and definitely the amount of the float that's available is

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 2>also one of the reasons why people are upset about

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of the rules being bent here because I think

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>that's like five percent. Yeah, but think about that absolute number,

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 2>like seventy five billion dollars. I feel like the percent

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 2>becomes a little bit less meaningful.

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Well depends if there were eighty billion dollars of index demand.

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>That would be a big deal, I don't think, because

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not. The S and P day one and the

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>indexes all have like adjustments. The index inclusion is not

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>based on the entire market gap, but it's based on

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>some multiple of the.

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Foot something I was just thinking about. So this IPO

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>is expected by June eleventh, it's expected on a Thursday.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 2>What are we going to do well? I don't know,

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>live podcast. Yeah, we should come out with a really.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Strong start trading as we walk in here.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Jeese Louise.

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we can get them to move it up.

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, just tom him a.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Price on a Thursday. I think so, and then I'll

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>trade on Friday, so it doesn't matter.

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I need to think about this. We were trying to

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 2>plan it for television.

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I have a governance a little bit. The governance is crazy.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not that crazy because you know, we talked about

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Elon Musk prenant. It's like the governance of this

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>company is Elon Musk can do whatever he wants, right,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>he has eighty five percent voting control his super voting stock.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>He also gets to a point more than you know,

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>fifty one percent of the directors regardless of his voting power.

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Because he has the special stock, he doesn't have to

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He's no obligations to like give the SpaceX any corporate opportunities.

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So if he wants to start a new AI company

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>or a new space company, you just do it, and

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>he can't be sued for like preaching his fidy SIA duties.

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>He can basically not be sued for securities fraud. If

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you super securities fraud, you have to do it in

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Texas State court. And there's all this stuff and you

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>really can't sue for like preaching forty sharded is you

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>need to have three percent of the stock to do that,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>which like there's tens of billions of dollars, and you

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do that if you didn't like Elon Musk. So

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really just there's no checks on him whatsoever. And

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think that that is how SpaceX has been

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>run up till now. He has worked out well for shareholders.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the sholders of SpaceX are

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>There's some quibbles about the ex high merger or whatever,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>but the most the shareholders of SpaceX are pretty happy

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>with how Elon Musk is round the place. Yeah, And

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that Elon Musk and a lot of investors like, yeah,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>just letting Elon Musk do whatever he wants is the

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>right way to run this company. And the stuff that

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>happened to Tesla in Delaware where he got sued for

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>getting paid too much. Was not the right way for

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk to be governed, and he should get to

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>do what he wants. And they are fixing the mistakes

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla by going public this way with SpaceX. I

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's a reasonable analysis. But I also think that

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>as we just talked about, a lot of people who

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>will buy the stock in the near term are index funds, Yes,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and they don't like that. No, that's not their kind

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of thing.

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 2>If you don't want SpaceX exposures, just buy an ESG fund.

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>It seems neat.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>The ESG and Elon Musk relationship is interesting, right because

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like, you know, he has in many ways very

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>environmentally friendly and in other way is not so ESG.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much there's this really bizarre precedence setting

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>management friendly governance of this company. And they were like, yeah,

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what people want investing in SpaceX. That's what you

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be. Like, what about the index ons, index ones?

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Like the deal with indix ons is they don't get

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>what they want, they get what the market wants, right,

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's the deal they're signing up for. But

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it is a real new president now public companies are

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>governed and if it goes well, what we saw with

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the Elon Musk like Winshot pay package is that every

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>other texto is like, I want a trillion dollars if

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the people copy the Elon mus president because everyone wants

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to be Elon Musk. And so I think you'll see

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>other companies go public with no constraints on their CEOs

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and like not all old Elon Musk. So Robin Hood

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like announced they're gonna let you like hook up your

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>AI agents to our trading account and you'll have a

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>special sandbox where they can't lose all of your money,

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but they can lose as much money as you give them. Yeah,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you can like type in a box like

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>they have some examples, like an active trader can backtis

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the mean reversion strategy to see how it performed historically

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and to play it automatically buy over sold stocks and

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>so when they revert to the means, So stuff like that,

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you can like type in a box like, hey, here's

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a trade idea, and then your bot will do it

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for you. And I read about this this week, and

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I what I said was like you and I have

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>talked and I've written about how eventually every trade will

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>be an ETF. Yes, and like the ETF will be

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>like the universal rapper for trade ideas. And now I'm like,

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>now I'm wrong. It's not that it's agents. Agents will

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>be the universal rapper because like you'll be able to

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>think up whatever trade the idea you want, and instead

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of like laboriously piecing together stocks and options and what

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not to implement it, you'll just type the idea and

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>then your agent will do the laborious piecing together.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it makes sense for trades. But and

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 2>if you're just you want to buy indexes.

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Indexes, fine, yeah, yeah, but what has happened in the

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>last few years is that like ETFs have been not

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>just a rapper for index fund buy on hold ownership,

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but also long short pair trade.

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Strategy, stock auto call, all.

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Sorts of nonsense. Yeah, and all that nonsense is going

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to just be agentic AI and ETFs will be index

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fense again. And like, you know, it's a little.

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Sad for me, but I mean this is in your

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 2>for you, this isn't your vision of the world. There's

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of steps to make that happen.

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're early days of agent Rabinhood trading. In fact,

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't. They only have stocks right now, Like eventually

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it will be your agent can do options and crypto

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and prediction markets and then all the reil fund will happen,

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>but for not stocks.

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And uh, it's also credit cards, right, like you can

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 2>instruct the agent to make purchases.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which it was just not a thing that only

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Robinhood has been working on. But neither is the record

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff like public had a Bignoun's been about agentic brokerage stuff.

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But bid Yeah, like your credit card. You can like

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>type in a box like buy me these sneakers if

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>they get cheap, and then it'll do.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just fun. I feel like you can imagine a

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 2>myriad of ways where this goes wrong. Yeah, sure, especially

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean trading, yes, but also with the credit card.

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I think like you can set like hard limits

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>on which the bot can spend.

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 2>That's true, But even still I could see the bots

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 2>being like, I don't know, this is a really good deal,

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe we should just go for it.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the idea is that the limits are

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>not internal to the bot. They're on the credit card. Yeah,

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we're on the broker's account. If you say the bot

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>can have ten thousand dollars on my robin Hood account,

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>then like in theory, if your robin that if that

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>pot gets to zero, then the bot has to stop.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I do like your your vision of the world where

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 2>this replaces all these one click trade ETFs. It seems

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 2>like for the time being that Robinhood itself has less

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 2>ambitious desires here, they think. The write up by Bloomberg's

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Page Smith quotes their vice president of product management for

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Brokerage saying that you know, they're looking forward to learning

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 2>how different people use the product, which will inform how

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the team develops it.

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm always exaggerating here, like probably like twenty

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Like really you know, hardcore sophisticated people will use it

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to like fairly sophisticated trades, right, and then like will

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>someone be like hey, if there's a dip by the dip, yeah, sure, yeah.

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Like one thing that might happen is like there might

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>be like just sort of like emergent like common behavior

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>mm that that's codified, right, Like if everyone sort of

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>wakes up and like, oh I have a bot, what

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>should I have to do it? By the dip or

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>like whatever then like you might see I don't know,

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you might see like different developments in the market where

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>like instead of instead of like retail traders all having

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of random reactions than it is, they can all

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of pre program the same reactions, and like they

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>might have more coordinated behavior. The other thing I want

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to say is I wrote about this is this thing

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>only makes sense. It doesn't. It's not just a matter

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>of AI. It only makes sense because hood is offered

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>free trading for a long time. Right, I you know

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>was writing a financial column before free trading was a thing. Right, Like,

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>free trading is a development of the last eleven or

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>eight years. And in a world without free stock trading,

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you'd tell you're bot like automatically buy

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>over sold stocks and sell when they revert to the

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>mean is crazy. It's like nine ninety five each time

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you do that trade. And in a world where there

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are no visible transaction costs, and like, there are definitely

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>invisible transaction costs, right, because you're definitely like dealing with

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a market maker and paying a spa at each time

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you trade that. In a world no visible transaction costs,

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you can be like, yeah, do you like one hundred

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>trades a day, no problem. Right, So this is like

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a technology that exists because Robinhood innovated in free trading.

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's also a technology that is very lucrative for

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Robinhood and for its like market maker partners, because it'll

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>if people use this, this is even more trades, right, Like,

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>if people use it, they're going to program a bot

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that will do one hundred trades a day to take

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>advantage of some technal the they think of, and then

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>that'll generate a lot of revenue for the market makers

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>who fill orders on robinin everyone wins perhaps, yeah, I

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>mean like right, Like.

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 2>You might lose as the trade if you're.

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Doing those hundred trades a day, Like, what are the

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>odds that you and your bot have come up with

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a with a trade idea that not only beats the

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>market on a back desk, but that beats the market

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>after the actual transaction costs of trading.

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>On robin The dozen or so people who take up

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 2>this tool.

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Someone's going to do great on it.

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Also it's going to be sports betting.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.959
<v Speaker 2>But well, it just feels like you know the arc

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 2>of humanity sports.

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Best the credit card, Like the first idea they have

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>for the credit card is like by this like cool

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>sneaker when it goes below whatever price. And it's like

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>lad Zenda has talked about like democratizing finance by like

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>introducing the new asset class, which is sports betting. I

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>mean sorry, pre sports betting. And it's funny to think of,

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>like like rob had started as like a stock brokerage,

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and there's a world of asset classes out there, some

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of which are like sneakers and sports bets, and yeah,

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>if you want it to be and like between the

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 1>credit card and the brokerage, soon all of the like

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>retail phasing asset classes will be sort of like fungibly

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>tradable and you can be like I mean trade you know,

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean you tell your agent if these sneakers get

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>cheap by them, but if the stock gets cheap by that,

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and if the sports bet gets you just have a

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of like fungible dashboard of bets that you can make.

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 2>I do want to call out a line in your

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>column about this that I just really loved this sentence

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 2>that if in your shameful secret heart, what a beautiful

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 2>phrase you want to do a trade like by every

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 2>stock whose ticker begins with C, so out of the

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 2>money call options on every stock who sticker begins with D.

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Nobody will sell you an ETF like that, and you'd

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>be too embarrassed to ask. I love thinking about like

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the human psychology element, right.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I probably could have come up with a more shameful idea,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But then I was like, I'm really going to spend

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like ten minutes sitting here like the most shameful.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 2>What's the most embarrassing trade I could ask to be

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 2>packaged into an ETF?

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I did.

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 2>I did love that, though, I will say I was

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 2>sitting on the path this morning reading that, thinking about

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 2>my own shameful secret heart, and like, I don't know,

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I didn't get very far. I didn't come up with

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 2>a shameful trade, but it's fun to imagine.

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about your sci fi novel, Yeah.

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we aired it well.

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't want anyone to see you told.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Me about it extensively on MIC and then we cut

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it all that.

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 2>It's all about blood anyway and space. But listen, we'll

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 2>come out by twenty thirty and then everyone could buy it.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about this.

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to really lock in finally and write this

0:23:48.119 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 2>GD book. Do you want to start with baseball or

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 2>do you want to start with drugs?

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>You're like, round to go with drugs.

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about drugs because longtime listeners of

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 2>the Money Stuff podcast will remember me talking about like

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 2>the drug Olympics that I wanted to happen, where like

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>all the athletes are on drugs and we just let

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 2>them battle to the death alone.

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>No, brothers also want that.

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Peter Tile apparently yikes. So the Enhanced Games

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>that was exact. That was exactly their idea as well.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 2>They had their first event Sunday in this past Sunday

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 2>in Las Vegas, and uh.

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a bit of a bus we've talked about

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they're like, Onion, sorry about doping and tressage?

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Have we have we not bring me back up to speed.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>There's like a truly insanely funny, like long form Onion,

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>sorry about doping and dressage. That's hope.

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've read this one of.

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>The funniest Onion things that it might be quick, but

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>its the Onion franchise.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 2>What's the thrust of it that they gave the horses drugs? Yeah, yeah,

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 2>oh well, yeah, well there is a lot of you know,

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:21.959
<v Speaker 2>athleticism involved anyway, don't drug your horses. Okay, So there

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 2>were some technical glitches in the Enhanced Games. Apparently the

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 2>live stream froze for more than ten minutes during the

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>first competition. The bigger thing was that you had three

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 2>athletes who were described by the organizers as clean. They

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 2>didn't take any drugs, they won their events. There was

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 2>only one world record set in the entire games. I

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 2>think it was in swimming.

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Record is pretty good. It's better than nowhere, Like for

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>your first for your first outing, to set a world

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>record is pretty good because.

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I feel like people wanted and I

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 2>think the event itself also said that you know, we're

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 2>going to see like we're going to break all the records.

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I feel like you're not going to get the

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>very top tier of Olympic level athletes to compete in

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the Drug Games, but you get the next tier or

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>three tiers down, and then if taking drugs allows them

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to break our world record, like that's a pretty good

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>case for drugs.

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get here like kids take drugs.

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>That's Peter till Job like I'm persuaded, I'm going to

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>go take some steroids.

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, you can also sort of take the other side

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 2>of this trade going on, because enhanced group shares fell

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 2>to an all time low after the event. I didn't

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 2>know that this was publicly listed. It is. It was

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 2>down like forty I think on Tuesday, which is nuts.

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting though, I feel like we did prove something,

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 2>which is that it takes more than drugs.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>No, it took it. They got a world record in

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>one event. How many did they do?

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 2>They did a bunch like how many Okay, I don't

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>have the number in front of me.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 1>But they run a whole Olympics, did they?

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 2>They did a lot of different stuff.

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Come on.

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.479
<v Speaker 2>The thing that I cared, the thing that I care

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 2>about is of course the sprints as a runner myself.

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>The one hundred meter dash. The winner was Fred Curley.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 2>He's an actual Olympian. He was one of the clean ones,

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>and I mean he won the field clean sure, which

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I just I feel like we proved

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 2>that you need more than drugs you need in.

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>One hundred meter dash. Well the first time, like if

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this thing like we're real and ten years later it

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>has like a big prize pool. Then like somebody who's

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>going to finished seventh in the Olympics, he'll be like, yeah,

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what, screwt, I'll set a world record in

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the handscams and win a prize pool. Like, I don't know,

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>it was a good start. Actually, I have bush on

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the drug games.

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 2>The payout does look pretty good. I think the world

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 2>record that was said, I think the winner got like

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 2>a million dollars.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, I don't know what the general payouts for

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>like it really.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Not a million dollars. I take the more like human

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 2>optimists then, which is like, you need god given talent

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>really hard drugs.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>But but surely their point is that is that people

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 1>who have that plus drugs, you know what that's worth it.

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>What we really need is to, as you said, take

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 2>the absolute best athletes from the Olympics and give them

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 2>drugs and then we'll really.

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the seventh best, like that's that's who they're going for, right.

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The person is not going to win a medal, but

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like with drugs.

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, with drugs, you could I feel like I've been

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>we really got to look into your shameful secret heart.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, speaking of people who have taken performance and had

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>some drugs to play sports. Yes, it's true.

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know anything about baseball. So so.

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Tatis Junior is a guy I've written about a

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>few times because he's involved in a fascinating piece of

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.959
<v Speaker 1>financial structuring. He was a minor league baseball player in

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like twenty seventeen who was wined and dined by this

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>company called Big League Advance, and they were like, we'll

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>give you two million dollars right now in exchange for

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of your future earnings in Major League Baseball

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>if you make it to the majors. And if you're

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a minor league player, you live on peanuts and your

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>chances of making it to the majors are slim. And

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>so he took the money and gave up ten percent

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of his future earnings, and then he made it to

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the majors in fairly short order and did really well

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and fairly quickly, and then pretty quickly assigned a fourteen year,

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and forty million dollar contract with the Padres

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and was like, wait a minute, I'm giving up thirty

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>four million dollars, you know, a two million dollar advance

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>three years ago or whatever. Yeah, and so he sued.

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>He waited a while to suit, like this is this

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>all happened? And he signed as the the Padres twenty

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>one or something, and he sued last year saying, this

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was a you serious loan, This was you loaned me

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>two million dollars and you're charging me one thousand percent interests.

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Just predatory.

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It's predatory. And he's like, I was a naive seventeen

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>year old kid. There's some quotes in the story. He's like,

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to protect those young players who

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>don't yet know how to protect themselves from these predatory

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>lenders and illegal financial schemes. Baseball should be about our

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>passion for the game, not dodging shady businesses driven only

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>by profit and greed. Okay, so he lost last week, Yeah,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>basically because he didn't object to arbitration soon enough, and

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>so he still has to pay big league advance. They

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are millions of dollars. I have a couple of views

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on this. One is that I read all the time

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>about businesses that by equity and people. I'm like, yeah,

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the trade, right. Sometimes you invest in a

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>minor league player, you give them an advance, they never

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>make the majors, you can get zero dollars back. Right.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like a venture capital portfolio. Right. Sometimes you invest

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in a minor league player and you give thellion dollars

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and they sign a gigantic contract and get thirty. You know,

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's a portfolio. And if you are the players,

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're the minor league player who takes in advance

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and then doesn't make it to the majors, that was

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a good trade for you, for sure, But you're sad

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>because you would have rather made the majors. If you're

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Tettis Junior, on the one hand, you are paying

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>back a very large multiple of the money you got.

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you make three hundred and forty

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Fine. But so also, every time I write

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>about this, I get several emails from people and they

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>all say the same thing. They say, Fernando Tuttis Junior

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is a junior. His father is Fernando Tuttis's And they

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>always say that Fernando Tuttis is the only person to

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>hit two Grand slams in the same inning of a

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Major League baseball And this is the most notable fact

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>about the Tuttis family apparently, But they also say, look,

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he was doing fine. He was a successful major leaguer.

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>His son was, first of all, not like some hopeless prospect.

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>He was like the top prospect in baseball. He knew

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>he was going to have a major league career. And secondly,

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't like broke, no like.

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 2>So I went on a real educational journey here because

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know anything about baseball. But you linked to

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the New York Post story about this, which anytime I

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 2>don't think we often discuss like New York Post stories

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 2>on this podcast. But I didn't realize who his dad was.

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Twenty million dollars in career earnings. Why on earth would

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 2>his son need a two million dollar advance, asked the

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 2>New York Post, Which is a good question. But they

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 2>also say, and again, I don't know anything about baseball,

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just believing them that anyone with two eyes

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 2>could see that he would one day become a star,

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 2>and baseball's bloated contracts in a league without a salary cap,

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 2>ten percent of his future earnings was going to be

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 2>much greater than a two million dollar upfront payment. Yeah,

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 2>you lay it out like that.

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>No, so right, Like one thing is maybe it's evaluation playing.

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's like, ah, I'm gonna suck. Like one thing

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that has happened is he had a great start to

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>his career and let people are a little mad at

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>him now because he's stopped to home runs.

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 2>And also, well he got his money.

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he got his money, but also he was suspended

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>for eighty ams for performance enhancing drug finding and he

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>was injured. He's been less successful in recent years then

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in the years and forty million dollar contract. But anyway,

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have the same reaction as the post,

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>which was like he didn't need this two million dollars

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>so much that he was making a good financial decision

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>signing away. Yeah, Like it's a good hedge, right, it's

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, depending on you know how much money his

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.239
<v Speaker 1>father still has. It's a good hedge. Right, you get

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>two million dollars. Now if it doesn't work out, people

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>get injured. Even doesn't work out and you don't get

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the three hundred and forty million dollar contract, then like

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you have the money now, and like when you enter

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.239
<v Speaker 1>into a hedge and then things work out great, their

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>hedge is a waste.

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 2>But it's like you know, sometimes you lose money on

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 2>a hedge.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's good.

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you want that as opposed to the thing where

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the hedge pays off, because like the good thing didn't

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>pay off.

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I hope he's listening, you know, maybe that would make

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 2>him feel better me saying I don't know anything about this,

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 2>but this guy.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast. I'm Matt Levine and.

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to The Money

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Dot com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 2>every day on the Clothes between three and five pm Eastern.

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 1>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net ask us the

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>question and we might answer it on the air.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:42.479
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamazarakis, Moses andm

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and Alexis HoTT Our.

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Amy Keen is our executive producer. Thanks for listening to

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be back next week.

0:34:58.640 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 2>With the more stuff