1 00:00:00,640 --> 00:00:03,920 Speaker 1: Hello, Odd Latch listeners, This is Joe Wisenthal. You are 2 00:00:03,960 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 1: listening to an emergency episode of the podcast. It was 3 00:00:07,800 --> 00:00:12,680 Speaker 1: recorded at ten a m. Monday morning, February third. The 4 00:00:12,720 --> 00:00:15,760 Speaker 1: reason I am telling you this is because markets and 5 00:00:15,840 --> 00:00:19,080 Speaker 1: news are moving very fast, and so by the time 6 00:00:19,200 --> 00:00:21,560 Speaker 1: you listen to this, parts of it may already be 7 00:00:21,680 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 1: out of date. But the context for the discussion was 8 00:00:25,720 --> 00:00:29,520 Speaker 1: over the weekend, Trump announcing twenty five percent tariffs against 9 00:00:29,560 --> 00:00:33,800 Speaker 1: Canada and Mexico, ten percent tariffs on oil, another ten 10 00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:37,839 Speaker 1: percent tariffs on China. Since we recorded this, about a 11 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:42,000 Speaker 1: minute after we got out of the studio, Mexican President 12 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:45,839 Speaker 1: Claudia Schinbaum announcing that the tariffs had been delayed on 13 00:00:45,960 --> 00:00:48,879 Speaker 1: Mexico for a month. We're still waiting to hear if 14 00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:53,280 Speaker 1: something similar happens in Canada. Other than that, take a listen. 15 00:00:56,680 --> 00:01:10,640 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts News. 16 00:01:12,160 --> 00:01:15,399 Speaker 3: Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. 17 00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:17,000 Speaker 3: I'm Tracy Alloway. 18 00:01:16,720 --> 00:01:17,959 Speaker 1: And I'm Jill Wisenthal. 19 00:01:18,240 --> 00:01:21,000 Speaker 3: Joe, how many of these emergency episodes do you think 20 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:23,480 Speaker 3: we're going to need to do over the next four years? 21 00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 1: Oh my god? 22 00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:25,520 Speaker 2: You know. 23 00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:28,040 Speaker 1: Well, anyway, I don't know, but this is two weeks 24 00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:30,039 Speaker 1: in a row. A week ago. You know, we had 25 00:01:30,040 --> 00:01:33,399 Speaker 1: to rustle up a deep seek expert last Monday, this 26 00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:35,280 Speaker 1: time a trade expert. 27 00:01:35,319 --> 00:01:37,080 Speaker 3: That's all right, I feel like we might as well 28 00:01:37,120 --> 00:01:40,280 Speaker 3: just preemptively convert the show into a daily because I 29 00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 3: feel like there's going to be a lot of newsflow. 30 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:46,399 Speaker 3: But anyway, as you mentioned, over the weekend, President Trump 31 00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:51,000 Speaker 3: basically confirmed that the US would be imposing twenty five 32 00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:54,560 Speaker 3: percent tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, which are, 33 00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:58,680 Speaker 3: of course, you know, massive US trading partners. He's also 34 00:01:58,720 --> 00:02:01,920 Speaker 3: implementing a ten percent tariff on China. All of this 35 00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:06,480 Speaker 3: is being done via the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 36 00:02:06,880 --> 00:02:10,880 Speaker 3: and the tariffs are supposed to become effective as of Tuesday, 37 00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:13,600 Speaker 3: February fourth, And of course, you know, a lot of 38 00:02:13,600 --> 00:02:18,079 Speaker 3: stuff can change. The news cycle is very compressed at 39 00:02:18,080 --> 00:02:21,520 Speaker 3: the moment, it feels like, and we're recording this Monday morning, 40 00:02:21,600 --> 00:02:23,840 Speaker 3: so we'll see what happens overnight by the time this 41 00:02:23,919 --> 00:02:27,320 Speaker 3: episode comes out. But in the meantime, there are a 42 00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 3: lot of questions, and who better to ask than Paul Donovan. 43 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:34,280 Speaker 3: He is, of course chief economist over at Ubs Global 44 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:37,440 Speaker 3: Wealth Management, someone we've had on the show quite a lot, 45 00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:39,840 Speaker 3: and someone who's been following the ins and outs of 46 00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:42,680 Speaker 3: the tariffs, including some of the technicalities of how they 47 00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:45,240 Speaker 3: actually work, where I think there is quite a bit 48 00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:48,000 Speaker 3: of confusion. So, Paul, thank you so much for coming 49 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:50,080 Speaker 3: on Odd Blots at short notice too. 50 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:52,040 Speaker 4: No, thank you for having me on. 51 00:02:52,400 --> 00:02:55,040 Speaker 3: Why don't we just start with I guess there's a 52 00:02:55,160 --> 00:02:57,560 Speaker 3: question that a lot of people have been asking. There's 53 00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:00,000 Speaker 3: a lot of confusion, as I mentioned, about who exactly 54 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:03,320 Speaker 3: actly is paying these tariffs and when? And the Trump 55 00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:07,200 Speaker 3: administration initially seemed to suggest that foreign countries were going 56 00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:09,560 Speaker 3: to pay, and that they were going to set up 57 00:03:09,560 --> 00:03:13,360 Speaker 3: this external revenue service to collect the income. Now though, 58 00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:15,560 Speaker 3: there seems to be a lot more talk about Americans 59 00:03:15,600 --> 00:03:18,760 Speaker 3: having to accept short term pain for longer term gain. 60 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:23,440 Speaker 3: A twenty five percent tariff on Mexican or Canadian goods, 61 00:03:23,960 --> 00:03:28,000 Speaker 3: Where is that money actually collected and who is paying 62 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:28,480 Speaker 3: for it? 63 00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:32,680 Speaker 4: So the US consumer is paying, there is no question 64 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:36,160 Speaker 4: about this. We have over four thousand years of economic 65 00:03:36,240 --> 00:03:40,120 Speaker 4: history on tariffs. There are literally clay tablets from ancient 66 00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 4: Mesopotamia detailing this. Consumers pay tariff's end of discussion. The 67 00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:49,440 Speaker 4: point at which the tariff is collected, though, is very important. 68 00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:54,040 Speaker 4: The point of entry, when the goods arrive physically in 69 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:57,200 Speaker 4: the United States, that's when the tariff is paid. And 70 00:03:57,240 --> 00:04:00,720 Speaker 4: that's why a twenty five percent tariff does not fully 71 00:04:00,800 --> 00:04:04,400 Speaker 4: equate into a twenty five percent consumer price increase. Twenty 72 00:04:04,440 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 4: five percent tariff would mean about a ten percent consumer 73 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:07,960 Speaker 4: price increase. 74 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:09,280 Speaker 1: Explain that further. 75 00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 4: So essentially, if you think about it, the goods arrive 76 00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:16,160 Speaker 4: in the United States, your television has arrived from China 77 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:19,280 Speaker 4: in the port of Los Angeles. That's the point at 78 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:21,000 Speaker 4: which you have to pay the tariff. So you pay 79 00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:22,920 Speaker 4: it on the value of the television at the point 80 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:27,120 Speaker 4: of Los Angeles. But after that point, the consumers still 81 00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:30,640 Speaker 4: got to pay for transporting that television around the country, 82 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:33,080 Speaker 4: for the advertising, for the whole sale of the retail costs. 83 00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:35,640 Speaker 4: Retailers take a quarter of your money to cover their 84 00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 4: costs and profit margins. So of course all of those 85 00:04:38,560 --> 00:04:41,359 Speaker 4: costs add up to about sixty percent of the consumer price. 86 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:44,960 Speaker 4: The import price on average is about forty percent. 87 00:04:45,640 --> 00:04:49,560 Speaker 3: Okay, so maybe prices on maple syrup or avocados or 88 00:04:49,600 --> 00:04:52,920 Speaker 3: whatever don't automatically translate to a twenty five percent price 89 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:55,280 Speaker 3: increase because of the dynamics. 90 00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:56,159 Speaker 1: That you just laid out. 91 00:04:56,240 --> 00:04:59,159 Speaker 3: But I guess the other question that's floating around in 92 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:01,880 Speaker 3: terms of the impact on the broader economy is are 93 00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:07,280 Speaker 3: these types of tariffs, you know, net inflationary or net deflationary, 94 00:05:07,279 --> 00:05:09,839 Speaker 3: Because on the face of it, it seems like prices 95 00:05:09,880 --> 00:05:13,400 Speaker 3: will go up that would add to inflation, But there's 96 00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:17,880 Speaker 3: this sort of contextual impact as well, where you could see, 97 00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:21,600 Speaker 3: you know, maybe there are fewer jobs and slower economic 98 00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:25,440 Speaker 3: growth as the US economy has to adjust to a 99 00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:30,720 Speaker 3: new trade dynamic, and maybe that exerts downward pressure on prices. 100 00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:34,880 Speaker 3: Net net, do you see this as inflationary or deflationary? 101 00:05:35,400 --> 00:05:37,279 Speaker 4: So in the short term, by which I mean the 102 00:05:37,320 --> 00:05:40,000 Speaker 4: next year, this is going to add to inflation in 103 00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:43,279 Speaker 4: the United States because you know, it's it's a sales tax, 104 00:05:43,320 --> 00:05:46,520 Speaker 4: it's like a VAT tax increase or a consumer tax increase. 105 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:48,719 Speaker 4: And if you look at Japan when it's ready to 106 00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:51,839 Speaker 4: consumer taxes or the UK when it's really value added tax, 107 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:55,279 Speaker 4: you see inflation coming through in the in the first instance, 108 00:05:55,400 --> 00:05:57,320 Speaker 4: and this is just the same it's a sales tax 109 00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:00,880 Speaker 4: under a pseudonym, so you will see inflation in the 110 00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:03,720 Speaker 4: first instance. But then you're right. The question is do 111 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:08,159 Speaker 4: we then see jobs being lost, Particularly because these taxes 112 00:06:08,520 --> 00:06:12,800 Speaker 4: are a lot more focused on complicated supply chains than 113 00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:15,840 Speaker 4: was the case back in twenty eighteen, that may be 114 00:06:15,960 --> 00:06:19,200 Speaker 4: a lot more disruptive to the economy and potentially could 115 00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:23,679 Speaker 4: create unemployment or just fear of unemployment, which would lower demand, 116 00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:27,159 Speaker 4: and that would then be a disinflation force, but not now, 117 00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:32,200 Speaker 4: a disinflation force in the future accompanied by significantly lower growth. 118 00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:36,320 Speaker 1: One of the arguments made by advocates of terrorists from 119 00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:38,880 Speaker 1: time to time is that the US is still by 120 00:06:39,080 --> 00:06:42,040 Speaker 1: far and away the biggest consumer market in the world, 121 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:44,360 Speaker 1: and it's sort of a privilege to be able to 122 00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:45,919 Speaker 1: sell to US. So if you want to sell to 123 00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:49,840 Speaker 1: US and there's the tariff, just eat the cost yourself, 124 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:52,720 Speaker 1: lower your prices by ten percent or twenty five percent 125 00:06:52,800 --> 00:06:55,279 Speaker 1: or whatever so that you could still sell into the 126 00:06:55,360 --> 00:06:58,360 Speaker 1: US market competitively. Does that logic fly? 127 00:06:58,960 --> 00:07:02,279 Speaker 4: Not really one thing. The debatable point is whether the 128 00:07:02,360 --> 00:07:04,479 Speaker 4: US is the largest consumer market in the world. The 129 00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:07,359 Speaker 4: Europe is the largest middle income consumer market in the world, 130 00:07:07,760 --> 00:07:10,920 Speaker 4: so it's not all about the United States. The other thing, 131 00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:14,120 Speaker 4: of course, is that the US is generally a relatively 132 00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:16,920 Speaker 4: competitive market. So in other words, you know, it's not 133 00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:20,840 Speaker 4: that consumers are making super normal beta partment producers are 134 00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:24,120 Speaker 4: making super normal profits when they're selling into the United States, 135 00:07:24,120 --> 00:07:25,680 Speaker 4: and we're just chipping away at those. 136 00:07:25,880 --> 00:07:26,040 Speaker 2: No. 137 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:29,000 Speaker 4: You know, exporters to the United States are very efficient. 138 00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:31,760 Speaker 4: They're operating on thin margins. They don't have the room 139 00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:33,640 Speaker 4: to do this. And if you look back at what 140 00:07:33,800 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 4: happened in twenty eighteen, there was no change in import 141 00:07:38,800 --> 00:07:44,080 Speaker 4: prices trends pre tariff, so import prices are the price 142 00:07:44,200 --> 00:07:46,560 Speaker 4: before the tariff is applied. There was no change in 143 00:07:46,600 --> 00:07:49,000 Speaker 4: those trends when tariffs were applied, you know, because the 144 00:07:49,680 --> 00:07:52,640 Speaker 4: exporters to the United States just basically don't have the 145 00:07:52,680 --> 00:07:53,560 Speaker 4: room to cut the margin. 146 00:07:54,560 --> 00:07:57,200 Speaker 3: The other thing that you sometimes hear is that, Okay, 147 00:07:57,400 --> 00:08:00,520 Speaker 3: maybe this means prices go up for American can consumers, 148 00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 3: but some of that price increase could in theory be 149 00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:06,960 Speaker 3: offset by a stronger dollar. And we have seen the 150 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 3: dollar rallying in recent weeks. And I have a twofold 151 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:14,480 Speaker 3: question on this, so one, you know, how valid is 152 00:08:14,520 --> 00:08:18,600 Speaker 3: that particular argument the dollar offset idea. But then, secondly, 153 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:21,400 Speaker 3: why is it that the dollar actually goes up when 154 00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:25,200 Speaker 3: the US announces additional trade measures. I've kind of taken 155 00:08:25,240 --> 00:08:27,560 Speaker 3: that for granted and I've never stopped to actually think 156 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:28,880 Speaker 3: about why that's happening. 157 00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:33,000 Speaker 4: Well, let's start with the second part first. So essentially, 158 00:08:33,200 --> 00:08:36,440 Speaker 4: I think what is happening is traders are assuming that 159 00:08:36,720 --> 00:08:41,240 Speaker 4: because the tariffs will raise consumer prices over a period 160 00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:43,960 Speaker 4: of time, not all at once, that will then lead 161 00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:47,120 Speaker 4: to a more cautious approach on the part of the 162 00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:50,440 Speaker 4: Federal Reserve with regards to policy interest rates. If interest 163 00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:52,920 Speaker 4: rates don't go down so much, or indeed start to 164 00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 4: go up, that tends to be supportive for the dollar 165 00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:58,480 Speaker 4: at a time when other countries are still on an 166 00:08:58,559 --> 00:09:03,600 Speaker 4: easing trajectory. So it's an interest rate differential expectation. Generally speaking, 167 00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:07,640 Speaker 4: does a stronger dollar help offset the tariffs? I mean, 168 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:10,240 Speaker 4: to a very minor extent, a stronger dollar will tend 169 00:09:10,280 --> 00:09:15,440 Speaker 4: to lower commodity prices that are globally denominating dollars. But 170 00:09:15,480 --> 00:09:19,440 Speaker 4: the issue here is that ninety five percent of US 171 00:09:19,679 --> 00:09:24,719 Speaker 4: imports are priced in US dollar terms, and so what 172 00:09:24,760 --> 00:09:27,760 Speaker 4: that means is that if the dollar is strengthening, there's 173 00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:31,720 Speaker 4: no automatic response in terms of the price of those things. 174 00:09:31,760 --> 00:09:34,760 Speaker 4: Because the contract specifies UO as one hundred dollars for 175 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:37,840 Speaker 4: this product, doesn't matter what the exchange rate is. That's 176 00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:40,920 Speaker 4: what the US has dictated. And again, when we look 177 00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:45,640 Speaker 4: at what happens historically, you know, for example, China's twenty 178 00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:49,560 Speaker 4: eighteen devaluation of the rnimbi against the dollar, that didn't 179 00:09:49,640 --> 00:09:54,920 Speaker 4: change the trend in prices to the United States because effectively, 180 00:09:55,559 --> 00:09:58,960 Speaker 4: the exporters to the United States were just grateful to 181 00:09:58,960 --> 00:10:01,000 Speaker 4: get a little bit more proper a margin coming out 182 00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:03,719 Speaker 4: of that process, and the dollar didn't really have a 183 00:10:03,720 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 4: big effect in terms of offset. 184 00:10:21,559 --> 00:10:23,920 Speaker 1: As of right now, by the way, it's now ten 185 00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:28,280 Speaker 1: twelve am Monday, the third markets following a little bit more, 186 00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:31,120 Speaker 1: nazdak down two point three percent s and P five 187 00:10:31,559 --> 00:10:34,760 Speaker 1: down one point seven eight percent. You know, this is 188 00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:37,679 Speaker 1: not a gigantic sell off by any stretch. On the 189 00:10:37,720 --> 00:10:41,200 Speaker 1: other hand, it's significant. So it does seem to be 190 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:44,800 Speaker 1: a surprise. One of the things you heard the people 191 00:10:44,800 --> 00:10:47,200 Speaker 1: love to say it, Oh, take don't take Trump literally, 192 00:10:47,200 --> 00:10:49,439 Speaker 1: take him seriously. But as far as I'm concerned, it's 193 00:10:49,440 --> 00:10:52,840 Speaker 1: not clear that anyone is taking him literally or seriously. 194 00:10:52,840 --> 00:10:54,560 Speaker 1: When it came to tariff, people were just sort of 195 00:10:54,960 --> 00:10:56,679 Speaker 1: I don't think they really think about it at all. Well, 196 00:10:56,720 --> 00:10:58,520 Speaker 1: you know, when you talk to clients, when they ask 197 00:10:58,559 --> 00:11:02,199 Speaker 1: you questions, how much surprise is there, how much do 198 00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:06,120 Speaker 1: you how different is this versus say, what basically would 199 00:11:06,120 --> 00:11:06,880 Speaker 1: people were expecting? 200 00:11:07,960 --> 00:11:10,120 Speaker 4: I think it very much depends on who you ask. 201 00:11:10,320 --> 00:11:13,480 Speaker 4: I think that quite a lot of clients in Asia 202 00:11:14,200 --> 00:11:17,480 Speaker 4: had been expecting quite an aggressive tariff response, because of 203 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:20,040 Speaker 4: course they bore the brunt of the tariffs in Trump's 204 00:11:20,040 --> 00:11:22,920 Speaker 4: first term, whereas I don't think that that has been 205 00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:26,640 Speaker 4: such an expectation in North America and Europe is a 206 00:11:27,040 --> 00:11:31,400 Speaker 4: bit mixed on this particular point overall, I think as well. 207 00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:36,240 Speaker 4: I mean, the president trides themselves on their unpredictable management style, 208 00:11:36,559 --> 00:11:38,400 Speaker 4: which you know makes my job as somebody who has 209 00:11:38,400 --> 00:11:40,839 Speaker 4: to predict for a living a lot more difficult. But 210 00:11:40,880 --> 00:11:43,720 Speaker 4: it also of course means that if we look at 211 00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:47,760 Speaker 4: what happened with Columbia, where Trump retreated, you know, within 212 00:11:47,840 --> 00:11:51,160 Speaker 4: hours from threats of tariff, but you know, Columbia didn't 213 00:11:51,160 --> 00:11:53,680 Speaker 4: really do anything. No, all of a sudden, we're backtracking 214 00:11:53,720 --> 00:11:55,640 Speaker 4: because we can't have the price of coffee going up. 215 00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:58,320 Speaker 4: That sort of thing, I think means that there is 216 00:11:58,360 --> 00:12:03,480 Speaker 4: still this lingering hope that there will be some sort 217 00:12:03,520 --> 00:12:08,120 Speaker 4: of Columbia style reversal coming out of the administration on 218 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:10,800 Speaker 4: the tariffs. We've not seen it yet and the clock sticking, 219 00:12:11,080 --> 00:12:14,360 Speaker 4: but I think there's that sort of background belief still 220 00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:15,800 Speaker 4: in the minds of many investors. 221 00:12:16,520 --> 00:12:18,800 Speaker 3: This is actually the other thing I wanted to ask you, 222 00:12:18,840 --> 00:12:22,240 Speaker 3: which is we have seen Trump historically use the threat 223 00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:26,120 Speaker 3: of tariffs as a negotiating tool, right, so hopefully he 224 00:12:26,200 --> 00:12:28,880 Speaker 3: gets at least some of what he wants before the 225 00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:32,880 Speaker 3: tariffs actually have to come into effect. But I feel 226 00:12:32,880 --> 00:12:36,760 Speaker 3: like the more he does this, the less impact or 227 00:12:36,800 --> 00:12:38,959 Speaker 3: the less bang for his buck he's going to be 228 00:12:39,040 --> 00:12:41,760 Speaker 3: able to get, because at some point people are going 229 00:12:41,800 --> 00:12:45,360 Speaker 3: to start calling his bluff. I guess all of this 230 00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:48,640 Speaker 3: is a way of asking, like, how many times can 231 00:12:48,679 --> 00:12:51,160 Speaker 3: he do this with the same impact. 232 00:12:52,679 --> 00:12:56,400 Speaker 4: Well, it's more than just sort of you know, crying 233 00:12:56,440 --> 00:12:59,400 Speaker 4: wolf all the time, which is part of what we're seeing. 234 00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:03,600 Speaker 4: Actually some quite serious long term implications from this, because 235 00:13:04,000 --> 00:13:08,040 Speaker 4: of course, you know, Trump in their first term renegotiated NAFTA, 236 00:13:08,080 --> 00:13:11,120 Speaker 4: and you know, within days of taking office in their 237 00:13:11,120 --> 00:13:15,040 Speaker 4: second term has torn up nafter. So if you do 238 00:13:15,120 --> 00:13:19,120 Speaker 4: a trade deal with the US in a year's time, 239 00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:21,720 Speaker 4: how much confidence have you got that trade deal still 240 00:13:21,760 --> 00:13:23,480 Speaker 4: going to be operable in two years time or three 241 00:13:23,559 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 4: years time. And so that's going to make doing deals 242 00:13:26,400 --> 00:13:29,280 Speaker 4: actually more difficult over the longer term. So I think 243 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:33,199 Speaker 4: that's a particular challenge that we are facing here. I 244 00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:36,000 Speaker 4: would also say, though, that the rhetoric from the Trump 245 00:13:36,080 --> 00:13:40,320 Speaker 4: administration does seem to have shifted, and I think that 246 00:13:40,920 --> 00:13:44,960 Speaker 4: President Trump believes that tariffs are a good thing all 247 00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 4: in capital letters, and not just a bargaining tool. That 248 00:13:49,240 --> 00:13:52,200 Speaker 4: they think that tariff's can be useful for revenue raising, 249 00:13:52,240 --> 00:13:54,880 Speaker 4: which I personally would disagree with, but it doesn't matter 250 00:13:54,920 --> 00:13:56,960 Speaker 4: what I think. That's what the president seems to believe. 251 00:13:57,200 --> 00:13:59,880 Speaker 4: So I think there has been a break from the 252 00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:04,000 Speaker 4: very clear bargaining tool position of the first term, that 253 00:14:04,040 --> 00:14:07,600 Speaker 4: there is sort of a larger role for tariffs in 254 00:14:07,679 --> 00:14:09,760 Speaker 4: Trump's mind in the second term. 255 00:14:10,400 --> 00:14:12,960 Speaker 1: I just have one last question. Explain to us you 256 00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 1: said it earlier, on the disruptive potential of tariffing intermediate goods. 257 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:19,800 Speaker 1: One of the things we know, for example, about the 258 00:14:19,800 --> 00:14:22,720 Speaker 1: auto industry, whether we're talking about the Canadian border or 259 00:14:22,720 --> 00:14:25,600 Speaker 1: the Mexican border, or maybe both. You see parts and 260 00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:30,680 Speaker 1: you see component crisscross the border several times along the way. 261 00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:34,440 Speaker 1: Talk to us about how this potential intersects. 262 00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:37,680 Speaker 4: I think one of the problems that we have is 263 00:14:38,360 --> 00:14:40,680 Speaker 4: a number of people, including I would suggest some people 264 00:14:40,680 --> 00:14:43,400 Speaker 4: in the administration, are sort of stuck in the early 265 00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:47,040 Speaker 4: nineteen seventies in an imperial model of trade. You import 266 00:14:47,120 --> 00:14:50,240 Speaker 4: raw materials, everything is manufactured at home, you export the 267 00:14:50,240 --> 00:14:52,960 Speaker 4: finished product. And that's sort of the state of play 268 00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:55,840 Speaker 4: when Nixon did universal tariffs back in nineteen seventy one. 269 00:14:56,640 --> 00:14:59,520 Speaker 4: But that's not how the world works now. A majority 270 00:14:59,600 --> 00:15:03,920 Speaker 4: of globe mobal trade is a company shuffling goods between 271 00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:07,360 Speaker 4: its subsidiaries. So a majority of global trade takes place 272 00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:12,800 Speaker 4: inside companies as part of complicated supply chains within a firm. 273 00:15:13,240 --> 00:15:15,640 Speaker 4: So when you start to impose these tariffs, if you've 274 00:15:15,640 --> 00:15:17,760 Speaker 4: got an auto part in the United States, in a 275 00:15:17,800 --> 00:15:20,440 Speaker 4: car made in the United States crossing the border with 276 00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:25,160 Speaker 4: Mexico twelve fourteen times, if every single time it comes 277 00:15:25,160 --> 00:15:27,080 Speaker 4: back into the United States, you're slapping a twenty five 278 00:15:27,120 --> 00:15:29,880 Speaker 4: percent tax on it that very very quickly becomes on 279 00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:33,760 Speaker 4: an uneconomic proposition, and that's the real risk. So that's 280 00:15:33,800 --> 00:15:36,520 Speaker 4: where the disruption comes through. Supply chains were a lot 281 00:15:36,600 --> 00:15:38,800 Speaker 4: more complicated than they were fifty years ago. This ain't 282 00:15:38,840 --> 00:15:40,120 Speaker 4: nineteen seventy one anymore. 283 00:15:40,680 --> 00:15:43,080 Speaker 3: We sort of touched on this earlier, but I think 284 00:15:43,120 --> 00:15:45,760 Speaker 3: it's an important point to hammer home and is the 285 00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:49,880 Speaker 3: proximate source of the market's confusion at the moment. And 286 00:15:49,960 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 3: also we would be remiss if we didn't ask Paul 287 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:56,200 Speaker 3: to do his impression of a central banker. But how 288 00:15:56,240 --> 00:15:59,600 Speaker 3: do you expect central bankers to react to all of this? Because, 289 00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:01,880 Speaker 3: as we spoke about earlier, on the one hand, you 290 00:16:01,880 --> 00:16:04,760 Speaker 3: would expect this to be inflationary in the short term, 291 00:16:04,800 --> 00:16:08,640 Speaker 3: so maybe they might raise rates to try to offset. 292 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:08,600 Speaker 4: Some of that. 293 00:16:08,720 --> 00:16:11,880 Speaker 3: But at the same time, you would expect this to 294 00:16:12,160 --> 00:16:16,760 Speaker 3: slow GDP in one way or another. Eventually, central banks 295 00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:19,880 Speaker 3: like being ahead of the curve, or at least they 296 00:16:19,920 --> 00:16:23,560 Speaker 3: say they do. Would they perhaps try to lower rates 297 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:26,960 Speaker 3: in order to offset that contraction? Which way are they 298 00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:27,600 Speaker 3: going to go here? 299 00:16:28,280 --> 00:16:32,119 Speaker 4: So, like most questions and economics, the answer is it depends. 300 00:16:32,600 --> 00:16:35,920 Speaker 4: So if we just get first round effects. If all 301 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:39,800 Speaker 4: you see is the tax being paid by US consumers 302 00:16:39,840 --> 00:16:43,560 Speaker 4: pushing up prices, central banks should ignore that. Central banks 303 00:16:43,560 --> 00:16:46,480 Speaker 4: should not respond to a one off tax increase, which 304 00:16:46,520 --> 00:16:48,840 Speaker 4: is a one off price increase, because there's nothing they 305 00:16:48,880 --> 00:16:52,160 Speaker 4: can do about it. However, if we see second round effects, 306 00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:54,440 Speaker 4: and this is where it starts to get very problematic. 307 00:16:54,880 --> 00:17:00,000 Speaker 4: If we see, for example, retailers expanding profit margins, again 308 00:17:00,040 --> 00:17:06,280 Speaker 4: another profit led inflation episode. If we see US companies saying, well, 309 00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:08,760 Speaker 4: you know, our competitors' goods are now being TechEd, so 310 00:17:08,800 --> 00:17:11,000 Speaker 4: why don't we raise our own prices? Has happened with 311 00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:13,960 Speaker 4: the washing machine tariff? Why you slap attacks on imported 312 00:17:14,080 --> 00:17:18,040 Speaker 4: washing machines? And domestic manufacturers raise their prices because they 313 00:17:18,080 --> 00:17:22,120 Speaker 4: can because there's less competition that the central bank needs 314 00:17:22,119 --> 00:17:24,679 Speaker 4: to respond to. That then becomes a problem, and then 315 00:17:24,680 --> 00:17:27,400 Speaker 4: there's sort of associated second round effects. Do you see 316 00:17:27,440 --> 00:17:31,080 Speaker 4: wage pressures coming through in certain sectors? I think that's unlikely, 317 00:17:31,200 --> 00:17:33,640 Speaker 4: but if you do, the FED would have to respond. 318 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:37,160 Speaker 4: If you see, for example, higher auto prices, that could 319 00:17:37,240 --> 00:17:40,480 Speaker 4: lead to higher second hand auto prices, which would lead 320 00:17:40,480 --> 00:17:43,600 Speaker 4: to higher insurance costs for auto and that sort of 321 00:17:43,760 --> 00:17:46,600 Speaker 4: chain effect is something the FED needs to start paying 322 00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:49,679 Speaker 4: attention to. So the direct effect of the tariff I 323 00:17:49,680 --> 00:17:52,840 Speaker 4: think the central banks should ignore, and indeed the FED 324 00:17:52,920 --> 00:17:56,120 Speaker 4: could conceivably continue to cut rates. But if you see 325 00:17:56,160 --> 00:17:59,800 Speaker 4: those second round effects coming through, that is a five 326 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:03,880 Speaker 4: lom bell warning. That's where the Federal Reserve or any 327 00:18:03,920 --> 00:18:06,040 Speaker 4: other central bank needs to stop paying attention. 328 00:18:06,640 --> 00:18:09,720 Speaker 3: All right, Paul Donovan from UBS Wealth Management, thank you 329 00:18:09,760 --> 00:18:12,119 Speaker 3: so much for coming on odd lots for what is 330 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:15,639 Speaker 3: probably going to be the first of many impromptu episodes 331 00:18:15,680 --> 00:18:18,240 Speaker 3: I mentioned. Thank you, Paul, Thank you. 332 00:18:31,400 --> 00:18:31,560 Speaker 2: Joe. 333 00:18:31,640 --> 00:18:34,200 Speaker 3: I'm really glad we could do that at short notice. 334 00:18:34,320 --> 00:18:36,800 Speaker 3: It answered a lot of questions for me and also 335 00:18:36,960 --> 00:18:39,439 Speaker 3: kind of contextualized a lot of the big questions. I 336 00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:42,840 Speaker 3: will just say on that second order effect point that 337 00:18:42,840 --> 00:18:46,200 Speaker 3: Paul made at the very end, already I'm looking at 338 00:18:46,240 --> 00:18:49,119 Speaker 3: my inbox right now at a note from Bank of 339 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:53,320 Speaker 3: America saying they expect US car insurance rates to go 340 00:18:53,480 --> 00:18:55,919 Speaker 3: up as a result of the tariffs, so you know, 341 00:18:56,440 --> 00:18:58,000 Speaker 3: sort of already in motion. 342 00:18:58,480 --> 00:19:00,960 Speaker 1: The two big things for me are the sort of 343 00:19:01,000 --> 00:19:03,480 Speaker 1: real risk of the second order effects, all these other 344 00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:06,080 Speaker 1: things that could happen the more persistent. And then this 345 00:19:06,200 --> 00:19:09,240 Speaker 1: idea I like what he called, you know, the imperial 346 00:19:09,320 --> 00:19:12,520 Speaker 1: model of trade, where one the old style, you're importing 347 00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:14,879 Speaker 1: raw goods, you build it all here, you export it, 348 00:19:14,960 --> 00:19:18,960 Speaker 1: you capture that value ad versus these really complex supply 349 00:19:19,119 --> 00:19:22,560 Speaker 1: chains where something goes across the border multiple times. And 350 00:19:22,600 --> 00:19:25,040 Speaker 1: then to your point, to your question, I thought this 351 00:19:25,240 --> 00:19:27,840 Speaker 1: was key, Like, even if these get reversed really quickly, 352 00:19:28,400 --> 00:19:30,439 Speaker 1: the idea of like, well, what does that mean for 353 00:19:30,480 --> 00:19:34,119 Speaker 1: the prospect of any sustained sort of free trade block 354 00:19:34,240 --> 00:19:38,000 Speaker 1: or free trade zone that it's also rip up able, 355 00:19:38,119 --> 00:19:39,000 Speaker 1: I think is really key. 356 00:19:39,080 --> 00:19:42,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, lots of questions. Time to start brushing up on 357 00:19:42,600 --> 00:19:46,240 Speaker 3: our tiff and trade history. So shall we leave it there? 358 00:19:46,280 --> 00:19:46,960 Speaker 1: Let's leave it there. 359 00:19:47,040 --> 00:19:49,680 Speaker 3: This has been another episode of the ad Thoughts podcast. 360 00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:53,240 Speaker 3: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway. 361 00:19:52,960 --> 00:19:55,840 Speaker 1: And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart. 362 00:19:56,119 --> 00:19:59,720 Speaker 1: Follow our producer Carman Rodriguez at Carman Ermann, Dashel Bennett 363 00:19:59,720 --> 00:20:03,159 Speaker 1: at kill Brooks Killbrooks. From all odd lotscontent, go to 364 00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com slash odd lots. We have transcripts the 365 00:20:05,880 --> 00:20:08,119 Speaker 1: blog in a newsletter, and you can chat about all 366 00:20:08,160 --> 00:20:10,560 Speaker 1: of these topics twenty four to seven in our discord 367 00:20:10,960 --> 00:20:14,119 Speaker 1: Discord dot gg slash od Lots and if. 368 00:20:14,000 --> 00:20:16,199 Speaker 3: You enjoy odd Lots, if you like it when we 369 00:20:16,280 --> 00:20:19,560 Speaker 3: do these emergency episodes, then please leave us a positive 370 00:20:19,600 --> 00:20:23,080 Speaker 3: review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you 371 00:20:23,119 --> 00:20:26,199 Speaker 3: are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of 372 00:20:26,200 --> 00:20:29,239 Speaker 3: our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need to do 373 00:20:29,359 --> 00:20:32,560 Speaker 3: is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow 374 00:20:32,600 --> 00:20:35,600 Speaker 3: the instructions there. If you're a subscriber, you'll also get 375 00:20:35,640 --> 00:20:39,159 Speaker 3: access to our daily Odd Lots newsletter. Joe and I 376 00:20:39,200 --> 00:20:41,080 Speaker 3: are going to have some thoughts on the tariffs in 377 00:20:41,119 --> 00:20:42,840 Speaker 3: there as well. Thanks for listening