1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:01,760 Speaker 1: Joining me now is my friend David Sachs. 2 00:00:01,800 --> 00:00:04,360 Speaker 2: He's the venture capitalist at Craft Ventures and host of 3 00:00:04,360 --> 00:00:05,160 Speaker 2: the All In podcast. 4 00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:06,720 Speaker 1: David, it's great to step in person, my friend. 5 00:00:06,800 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, good to be here. 6 00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:08,000 Speaker 1: All right. 7 00:00:08,039 --> 00:00:11,119 Speaker 2: So, David, you were the Cassandra on Ukraine. You have 8 00:00:11,240 --> 00:00:14,280 Speaker 2: been now for two years, far before it was in vogue. 9 00:00:14,360 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 2: So day one, the Ukraine War is happening you all 10 00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:20,880 Speaker 2: of a sudden, I mean, in some people's estimation, I think, 11 00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:23,200 Speaker 2: especially for the Neoconzi come out of nowhere and you're 12 00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 2: very counter narrative. 13 00:00:25,079 --> 00:00:26,720 Speaker 1: So where did that come from? Just give us some 14 00:00:26,760 --> 00:00:27,720 Speaker 1: of the background as. 15 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:29,560 Speaker 2: To why you decide to speak out on the conflict 16 00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:32,040 Speaker 2: from very very early days and really be intimately involved 17 00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:34,320 Speaker 2: in trying to help shape the narrative away from the 18 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:37,280 Speaker 2: mainstream on Ukraine eight, on how the Ukrainians were doing, 19 00:00:37,479 --> 00:00:39,839 Speaker 2: and on some of the historical background of the conflict. 20 00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:43,760 Speaker 4: Well, I started paying attention to it in January of 21 00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:47,800 Speaker 4: twenty twenty two because we covered it on our podcast. So, 22 00:00:48,040 --> 00:00:50,080 Speaker 4: like you mentioned, All In as a weekly podcast, we 23 00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:53,159 Speaker 4: do current events, a lot of business and markets. We 24 00:00:53,200 --> 00:00:57,760 Speaker 4: also do geopolitics and politics at any event. In January 25 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:01,080 Speaker 4: of twenty twenty two, the media star reporting that there 26 00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:04,720 Speaker 4: was this conflict that could even become a war, And 27 00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:08,920 Speaker 4: you know, I was a little bit familiar with the 28 00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:13,600 Speaker 4: conflict and with the idea that NATO expansion was something 29 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:18,160 Speaker 4: that the Russians really didn't like, and so I started 30 00:01:18,280 --> 00:01:20,319 Speaker 4: advocating on the pod that just we should just take 31 00:01:20,400 --> 00:01:24,600 Speaker 4: NATO expansion off the table. That's clearly a huge irritant 32 00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 4: here in the situation. And even if you believe that 33 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:31,640 Speaker 4: Putin is just using that as a pretext for whatever 34 00:01:31,680 --> 00:01:33,399 Speaker 4: he's going to do, we should rob him of that 35 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:36,280 Speaker 4: pretext by just saying that, you know, EU Craine's not 36 00:01:36,360 --> 00:01:39,440 Speaker 4: going to become part of NATO. So I started saying 37 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:42,280 Speaker 4: that on the pod before the war broke out, and 38 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:44,640 Speaker 4: then when the war broke out, I gave a talk 39 00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:49,080 Speaker 4: here at an American Moment reiterating that position. And the 40 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:51,880 Speaker 4: more I kind of got into it and the more 41 00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:55,600 Speaker 4: I sort of researched it, the more I realized that 42 00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:57,480 Speaker 4: this was all kind of the result of a deliberate 43 00:01:57,560 --> 00:02:01,520 Speaker 4: US policy, kind of a Neocon policy that either wanted 44 00:02:01,520 --> 00:02:04,520 Speaker 4: this war or certainly wasn't willing to avoid this war. 45 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:07,640 Speaker 4: That NATO expansion they weren't willing to take no expansion 46 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:11,120 Speaker 4: off the table to avoid the war. So so yeah, 47 00:02:11,160 --> 00:02:12,880 Speaker 4: I just started speaking out about it, I guess, using 48 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:16,800 Speaker 4: my channels to talk about it, and the more resistance 49 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:20,720 Speaker 4: I got, I'd say, the more hysterical resistance I got, 50 00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:23,040 Speaker 4: the more that kind of encouraged me. I guess I'm 51 00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:25,880 Speaker 4: just kind of stupid that way. And so here we 52 00:02:25,919 --> 00:02:26,679 Speaker 4: are two years later. 53 00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:30,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, you, in particularly, you drive these people crazy in 54 00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 2: a way that I honestly aspired to. 55 00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:33,760 Speaker 1: I wish I could be in their heads. 56 00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:36,480 Speaker 2: I mean, I guess the criticism that I often see 57 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:38,960 Speaker 2: is like this guy is a sass adventure capitalist. 58 00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:40,560 Speaker 1: I doesn't even know what he's talking about. 59 00:02:41,040 --> 00:02:43,000 Speaker 2: But I mean, in my estimation, youment far more correct 60 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:43,880 Speaker 2: on the conflict than they have. 61 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 1: So then where are getting your information from? 62 00:02:45,680 --> 00:02:46,880 Speaker 2: I mean, this is a question that we get to 63 00:02:46,880 --> 00:02:48,560 Speaker 2: here all the time, like where do you guys get 64 00:02:48,560 --> 00:02:51,880 Speaker 2: this information we talked previously, I know about like Advika others. 65 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:53,720 Speaker 1: You know, we're looking at open source channels. 66 00:02:53,960 --> 00:02:57,000 Speaker 2: Why and where can you look to get the real 67 00:02:57,040 --> 00:02:58,880 Speaker 2: information you can help our audience maybe look in the 68 00:02:58,880 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 2: same places. 69 00:02:59,720 --> 00:03:03,120 Speaker 4: Yeah, so it's a very interesting question. So what you 70 00:03:03,160 --> 00:03:06,960 Speaker 4: do when you're an investor or. When you're an investor, 71 00:03:07,040 --> 00:03:09,000 Speaker 4: you have a track record. It's very easy to size 72 00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:11,919 Speaker 4: up an investor based on their track record. I mean, 73 00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:14,919 Speaker 4: that's all you really have to do with these information 74 00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:17,160 Speaker 4: channels is what do they say was going to happen 75 00:03:17,200 --> 00:03:19,880 Speaker 4: and then what actually happened. Nobody ever does that in 76 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:24,919 Speaker 4: the information space, So you know, I figured out pretty 77 00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:28,000 Speaker 4: early which channels were sort of telling the truth and 78 00:03:28,040 --> 00:03:33,280 Speaker 4: which ones weren't. And the mainstream media in ISW, they 79 00:03:33,320 --> 00:03:36,840 Speaker 4: were always really shading the truth or not telling us 80 00:03:36,880 --> 00:03:39,960 Speaker 4: what was really happening in the war, and independent channels 81 00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:43,280 Speaker 4: were the ones that were giving the information that turned 82 00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:45,840 Speaker 4: out to be accurate. And I think the Battle of 83 00:03:45,960 --> 00:03:48,680 Speaker 4: Bachmot was really a turning point where I could clearly 84 00:03:48,800 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 4: see you had the independent channels I really came to 85 00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:56,680 Speaker 4: rely on saying that the Russians were actually winning, whereas 86 00:03:56,880 --> 00:03:59,440 Speaker 4: IW and the mainstream media were saying that the Russian 87 00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:02,280 Speaker 4: attack had culminated, that was the big word. The independent 88 00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 4: channels were saying, actually, the Russians they created a cauldron, 89 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:07,760 Speaker 4: so it's sort of culmination versus cauldron. Turned out the 90 00:04:07,800 --> 00:04:10,880 Speaker 4: cauldron was exactly correct. That the Ukrainians basically destroyed themselves 91 00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:13,160 Speaker 4: by pouring all these resources in and then with the 92 00:04:13,160 --> 00:04:15,640 Speaker 4: Summer account offensive same thing. So in terms of like 93 00:04:15,920 --> 00:04:17,839 Speaker 4: who do I respect, who do I listen to? I 94 00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:22,799 Speaker 4: mean the Duran as a geopolitics podcast where they summarized 95 00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:25,080 Speaker 4: the war virtually daily. They've turned out to be much 96 00:04:25,120 --> 00:04:29,600 Speaker 4: more accurate than other sources. Stephen Bryan, who's a columnist 97 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:33,239 Speaker 4: for I think Asia Times, who's a former Undersecuary Defense 98 00:04:33,240 --> 00:04:37,240 Speaker 4: so as a weekly call him, he's been very accurate. Daniel, 99 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:42,880 Speaker 4: Colonel Daniel Davis has been very good. There's a Twitter 100 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:48,520 Speaker 4: account called Aiden who has a podcast called Calibrated with 101 00:04:48,560 --> 00:04:52,479 Speaker 4: Scott I think is his actual name, and he's turned 102 00:04:52,480 --> 00:04:56,400 Speaker 4: out to be pretty accurate. I'm probably forgetting there's other 103 00:04:56,400 --> 00:04:57,760 Speaker 4: ones to but yeah, this. 104 00:04:57,720 --> 00:04:59,400 Speaker 1: Is because people ask us the same thing. 105 00:04:59,680 --> 00:05:01,640 Speaker 2: And this is you know, you're someone that I really 106 00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:03,400 Speaker 2: look to, you know, for my information, which I'm sure 107 00:05:03,400 --> 00:05:05,040 Speaker 2: people will call me out on. But I mean, I 108 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:06,960 Speaker 2: guess it gets back to the track rider question and 109 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:09,479 Speaker 2: what you're talking about with the conflict. But at the 110 00:05:09,480 --> 00:05:12,719 Speaker 2: base like passion level, I mean I can assume I 111 00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:15,440 Speaker 2: know I personally, I mean I've spoken out on BLM, 112 00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:17,160 Speaker 2: I'm spoken on COVID a lot of things. I have 113 00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:19,520 Speaker 2: never seen any more pushback, and on NATO expansion on 114 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:22,760 Speaker 2: Ukraine specifically, it might be the single most controversial topic. 115 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:24,240 Speaker 2: So why do you feel passionate about it? Like, why 116 00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:25,760 Speaker 2: do you even care? You know, you've got this investment 117 00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:27,680 Speaker 2: thing going on. I would assume this is probably not 118 00:05:27,800 --> 00:05:29,640 Speaker 2: the best thing for that, you know, in terms of 119 00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:32,280 Speaker 2: some of the people, the milliu that you surround yourself with. 120 00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:33,000 Speaker 1: So why do you care? 121 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:33,800 Speaker 3: Well? 122 00:05:33,839 --> 00:05:35,520 Speaker 4: I just can't believe what a big blunder the United 123 00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:38,960 Speaker 4: States is making. I mean, this was a horrible policy decision. 124 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:42,159 Speaker 4: This is easily the biggest foreign policy mistake by the 125 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:44,960 Speaker 4: US since the Iraq War. It might end up being 126 00:05:45,040 --> 00:05:48,600 Speaker 4: a bigger mistake than the Iraq War. It was entirely avoidable, 127 00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:53,040 Speaker 4: and yet you have the whole mainstream media stampeding us 128 00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 4: into this policy and the sort of the taboo they're 129 00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:00,440 Speaker 4: trying to create around it, where a lot like the 130 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:03,720 Speaker 4: Iraq War, where anyone who opposed it was considered unpatriotic 131 00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:06,039 Speaker 4: or sort of treasonous. That's the argument that you're making 132 00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:08,920 Speaker 4: that is made today. In fact, I think it's even 133 00:06:08,960 --> 00:06:12,560 Speaker 4: worse the sort of the consensus that they're trying to 134 00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 4: manufacture around this. So I think that I guess I 135 00:06:16,760 --> 00:06:18,919 Speaker 4: wouldn't speak out as much about it if I thought 136 00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:22,840 Speaker 4: that the issue is being covered accurately, and it is 137 00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:24,760 Speaker 4: such an important issue. I mean, this could lead to 138 00:06:24,800 --> 00:06:27,320 Speaker 4: World War three, or what I call woke War three, 139 00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:30,840 Speaker 4: if we're not careful. So I think that, you know, 140 00:06:30,920 --> 00:06:34,440 Speaker 4: just again, the magnitude of the policy mistake and the 141 00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:38,120 Speaker 4: importance of the issue relative to how inaccurately it's been 142 00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:41,000 Speaker 4: covered sort of encourages me to kind of keep posting 143 00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:41,359 Speaker 4: about it. 144 00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:43,039 Speaker 1: What do you mean by world War three? Dig into 145 00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:43,640 Speaker 1: that a little bit. 146 00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:45,640 Speaker 4: Yeah, Well, one of the things I noticed early on 147 00:06:45,680 --> 00:06:47,960 Speaker 4: in this war is that there's been a fusion of 148 00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:51,400 Speaker 4: the woke left and the neocon right in supporting this war, 149 00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:55,000 Speaker 4: and they both support the same cancelation tactics. They've both 150 00:06:55,120 --> 00:07:00,280 Speaker 4: tried to make it unacceptable to support the idea of 151 00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:04,320 Speaker 4: a negotiated settlement. Apparently any kind of peaceful resolution in 152 00:07:04,360 --> 00:07:09,400 Speaker 4: the conflict other than total Ukrainian victory is pro Russian 153 00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:14,160 Speaker 4: in their view, And you know, and it's you saw 154 00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:17,360 Speaker 4: this actually, remember when Elon came out pretty early in 155 00:07:17,360 --> 00:07:19,520 Speaker 4: the war with his peace proposal. I think this is 156 00:07:19,560 --> 00:07:23,200 Speaker 4: in I think this must have been around September of 157 00:07:23,400 --> 00:07:24,320 Speaker 4: twenty twenty two. 158 00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:26,480 Speaker 2: That sounds right, Yeah, it was in the height of 159 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:28,040 Speaker 2: the ukn't craze. 160 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:31,520 Speaker 4: Right right, exactly, yeah, And it is a craze. And 161 00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:34,840 Speaker 4: Zelenski himself came out to denounce that Elon's proposal as 162 00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:39,160 Speaker 4: pro Russian and there was this huge pylon. But that 163 00:07:39,520 --> 00:07:41,720 Speaker 4: and that's just one example. But the point is just 164 00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:47,400 Speaker 4: anyone who has contracted the official narrative basically gets demonized 165 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:50,920 Speaker 4: as as pro putin, a puppet for the outside, what 166 00:07:50,960 --> 00:07:52,880 Speaker 4: have you. And the problem with this is that it 167 00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:56,880 Speaker 4: creates a one way ratchet because there's only one acceptable position, 168 00:07:56,920 --> 00:07:59,280 Speaker 4: which is to keep escalating the war. And that is 169 00:07:59,320 --> 00:08:02,440 Speaker 4: in fact what we've seen. I mean, the administration has 170 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:05,840 Speaker 4: continuously escalated the type of support they're going to provide. 171 00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:09,080 Speaker 4: In the beginning, Biden said that providing things like F 172 00:08:09,160 --> 00:08:12,480 Speaker 4: sixteen's or Abram's tanks or long range missiles could start 173 00:08:12,520 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 4: World War three. Now they've done all those things. So 174 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:19,000 Speaker 4: we've seen this pattern where the thing that initially was 175 00:08:19,080 --> 00:08:24,360 Speaker 4: considered to be too risky eventually you know, it becomes normalized. 176 00:08:24,760 --> 00:08:27,720 Speaker 4: And the discussion we're having right now, led by European 177 00:08:27,800 --> 00:08:30,280 Speaker 4: leaders like Macron, is what we send in ground troops. 178 00:08:31,240 --> 00:08:34,920 Speaker 4: And again this has been dismissed now, but the pattern 179 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:36,920 Speaker 4: we've seen is this thing starts to get kind of 180 00:08:36,960 --> 00:08:40,920 Speaker 4: normalized by talking about it, the fearor sort of dies down, 181 00:08:41,400 --> 00:08:43,679 Speaker 4: and then the deep sate kind of does what they want. 182 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:47,920 Speaker 4: So I think it's very important that there is actually 183 00:08:48,679 --> 00:08:50,719 Speaker 4: like a healthy public debate about this question because it 184 00:08:50,760 --> 00:08:54,319 Speaker 4: could lead somewhere even more disastrous than it's already led. 185 00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:55,160 Speaker 1: I totally agree. 186 00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:57,000 Speaker 2: So give us the kind of the forks of the 187 00:08:57,040 --> 00:08:59,240 Speaker 2: decisions where for where we go from here? So as 188 00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:02,120 Speaker 2: you said, you know, we've Macrone and Germany kind of 189 00:09:02,120 --> 00:09:04,320 Speaker 2: in a spat here, and so it's like Macrone and 190 00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:06,480 Speaker 2: the Brits and then Germany kind of weirdly in the 191 00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:08,560 Speaker 2: middle somewhere where do the Europeans do? 192 00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:09,840 Speaker 1: What do you think that they're going to do? What 193 00:09:09,880 --> 00:09:11,000 Speaker 1: do you think the US is going to do? 194 00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:13,880 Speaker 2: Let's say we have two forks here some aid, no aid, 195 00:09:13,960 --> 00:09:16,560 Speaker 2: and then finally the Ukrainians kind of in this question, 196 00:09:16,600 --> 00:09:18,400 Speaker 2: where are some possible like decision trees. 197 00:09:18,400 --> 00:09:20,200 Speaker 1: We could see the conflict going well. 198 00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:24,439 Speaker 4: It's very interesting the debate you're seeing in Europe. The 199 00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:27,480 Speaker 4: pressure is really on o Love Schultz right now to 200 00:09:27,480 --> 00:09:32,760 Speaker 4: deliver these these Taurists missiles, these long range missiles. Jen Stoltenberg, 201 00:09:32,840 --> 00:09:34,800 Speaker 4: the Secretary of General of Natives, already said that it's 202 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:39,520 Speaker 4: now acceptable for the Ukrainians to hit targets inside of Russia. 203 00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:43,560 Speaker 4: And then you've got Macron saying that that he's trying 204 00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:46,079 Speaker 4: to normalize the idea of ground troops. So where all 205 00:09:46,080 --> 00:09:51,160 Speaker 4: of this is headed is World War three if we 206 00:09:51,600 --> 00:09:54,000 Speaker 4: go for it. It's kind of ironic that Macron's the 207 00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:55,560 Speaker 4: one pushing this because he's the one in the past 208 00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:58,640 Speaker 4: he's always talked about strategic autonomy for Europe, that you're 209 00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:01,559 Speaker 4: atuet making its own decisions. Apparently what he means by 210 00:10:01,559 --> 00:10:04,600 Speaker 4: that is that Europe should be even more hawkish than 211 00:10:04,640 --> 00:10:08,760 Speaker 4: the United States, that Europe should adopt the American position, 212 00:10:08,840 --> 00:10:11,720 Speaker 4: but actually push it even further. It's not that Europe 213 00:10:11,760 --> 00:10:14,640 Speaker 4: should rethink whether the American position on this war is 214 00:10:14,640 --> 00:10:17,240 Speaker 4: actually good for them. The American position on this ward 215 00:10:17,240 --> 00:10:20,360 Speaker 4: has been disastrous for Europe. It's basically, especially Germany has 216 00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:22,600 Speaker 4: plunged the europe tribes exactly. 217 00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:24,000 Speaker 3: So in any of. 218 00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:25,800 Speaker 4: That that that's sort of the debate that's been set 219 00:10:25,880 --> 00:10:29,120 Speaker 4: up in terms of where this goes from here. We 220 00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 4: will either escalate or the Ukraine will lose. It's very simple. 221 00:10:33,360 --> 00:10:37,040 Speaker 4: I mean, there's nothing really we can do any more 222 00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:39,800 Speaker 4: to help them. And whether this sixty billion or not 223 00:10:39,880 --> 00:10:43,440 Speaker 4: past this doesn't matter. We're out of ammunition to give them. 224 00:10:43,559 --> 00:10:45,880 Speaker 4: I mean, uless we're going to deplete the stock policy 225 00:10:45,920 --> 00:10:49,040 Speaker 4: at a reserved for our own readiness, which would be 226 00:10:49,200 --> 00:10:52,599 Speaker 4: very dangerous. I would though, yes, it is possible, but 227 00:10:53,080 --> 00:10:55,400 Speaker 4: the bottom line is we don't have the ammunition and 228 00:10:55,440 --> 00:10:59,839 Speaker 4: they don't have the manpower anymore so, and they wasted 229 00:10:59,880 --> 00:11:01,920 Speaker 4: a lot of time when they should have been building 230 00:11:01,920 --> 00:11:06,000 Speaker 4: defensive fortifications. They were sort of charging headlong into the 231 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:10,840 Speaker 4: minefields and during the sum counter offensive. So it's entirely 232 00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:14,560 Speaker 4: too late now I think for Ukraine to be building 233 00:11:14,559 --> 00:11:17,160 Speaker 4: the proper kinds of defensive fortifications that they need. So 234 00:11:17,240 --> 00:11:19,160 Speaker 4: the simple reality is what you're seeing right now is 235 00:11:19,200 --> 00:11:21,600 Speaker 4: it's not a stalemate. It's never been a stale mat 236 00:11:21,679 --> 00:11:24,320 Speaker 4: It's always been a war of attrition. The Ukrainians have 237 00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:28,000 Speaker 4: been at treated the Russians are getting more powerful. They 238 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:33,199 Speaker 4: have more soldiers, are enlisting, more coming out of training, 239 00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:36,800 Speaker 4: and their industrial capacity is really ramping up. They have 240 00:11:36,880 --> 00:11:40,200 Speaker 4: this huge industrial war machine that they inherited from the 241 00:11:40,240 --> 00:11:43,520 Speaker 4: Soviet Union east of the Urals. It's now been fully 242 00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:48,240 Speaker 4: ramped up and is producing more of everything, more of artillery, shells, drones, tanks, planes, everything. 243 00:11:48,360 --> 00:11:49,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, And you know it's interesting because you go back 244 00:11:49,720 --> 00:11:51,040 Speaker 2: to twenty twenty two, I think it fell out for 245 00:11:51,080 --> 00:11:52,719 Speaker 2: some of those two. You're like, man, these Russians, you 246 00:11:52,760 --> 00:11:54,840 Speaker 2: can't even beat the Ukrainians, right, And it's like, wow, 247 00:11:54,960 --> 00:11:57,079 Speaker 2: three years later, you've replaced every single one of these 248 00:11:57,120 --> 00:12:00,240 Speaker 2: dead people with conscripts. Doesn't seem to be that much 249 00:12:00,280 --> 00:12:03,680 Speaker 2: consternation Domestically. You produce in four and a half million shells. 250 00:12:03,720 --> 00:12:06,439 Speaker 2: Europe can barely deliver half a million. If we were 251 00:12:06,480 --> 00:12:09,000 Speaker 2: to get into some port of prolonged conflict Russia, China. 252 00:12:09,280 --> 00:12:10,520 Speaker 1: Whatever, do you think America? 253 00:12:10,559 --> 00:12:12,440 Speaker 2: How long do you think it would take America to 254 00:12:13,000 --> 00:12:16,400 Speaker 2: actually reach full readiness? Because I fear, a truly fear, 255 00:12:16,520 --> 00:12:19,880 Speaker 2: that this war has only exposed and then further depleted 256 00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:21,520 Speaker 2: us to the point where it could take years to 257 00:12:21,559 --> 00:12:23,640 Speaker 2: be able to ramp up production, even if we were 258 00:12:23,720 --> 00:12:25,640 Speaker 2: to really be in a situation where we had a 259 00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:27,560 Speaker 2: genuine strategic interest in front of us and we may 260 00:12:27,640 --> 00:12:29,199 Speaker 2: have to make some serious concessions. 261 00:12:29,400 --> 00:12:31,480 Speaker 4: Yeah, I think the war has really exposed the extent 262 00:12:31,520 --> 00:12:34,760 Speaker 4: to which we've deindustrialized ourselves and how we've hallowed out 263 00:12:34,760 --> 00:12:38,000 Speaker 4: our defense industrial base. If you look at artillery ammunition, 264 00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:40,000 Speaker 4: for example, at the beginning of the war, we were 265 00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:43,040 Speaker 4: producing about fourteen thousand shells a month. We're now what 266 00:12:43,160 --> 00:12:45,400 Speaker 4: two years into it, and they've only as of a 267 00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:47,959 Speaker 4: few months ago, what I saw publicly reported was that 268 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:50,719 Speaker 4: they had roughly doubled production to twenty eight thousand a month. 269 00:12:50,760 --> 00:12:52,960 Speaker 4: That's still only what is that about three hundred thousand 270 00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:54,840 Speaker 4: a year. It's one tenth what the Russians can do. 271 00:12:54,880 --> 00:12:57,480 Speaker 4: It's pathetic, And what the Pentagon has said is that 272 00:12:57,480 --> 00:12:59,080 Speaker 4: we're going to double it this year and then double 273 00:12:59,120 --> 00:13:02,080 Speaker 4: it next year. That's still only gets you to generously 274 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:05,440 Speaker 4: one hundred thousand a month, which is a quarter to 275 00:13:05,559 --> 00:13:08,120 Speaker 4: a third maybe of what the Russians can do now, 276 00:13:08,360 --> 00:13:09,520 Speaker 4: never mind what they're going to be able to do 277 00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:10,200 Speaker 4: in two years. 278 00:13:10,559 --> 00:13:13,280 Speaker 3: So we have figured out or learned. 279 00:13:13,520 --> 00:13:17,520 Speaker 4: I think just how pathetic our dib or has become. 280 00:13:18,080 --> 00:13:20,120 Speaker 4: And the other thing we've learned is that it is 281 00:13:20,120 --> 00:13:23,240 Speaker 4: how inefficient it is. So the Newer Times reported that 282 00:13:23,320 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 4: the cost to the United States are producing one artillery 283 00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:28,640 Speaker 4: shells in the five to six thousand dollars range, it 284 00:13:28,679 --> 00:13:31,599 Speaker 4: costs the Russians six hundred dollars. So now, at the 285 00:13:31,640 --> 00:13:33,559 Speaker 4: beginning of the war, You're right, the Russians were accused 286 00:13:33,600 --> 00:13:38,440 Speaker 4: of being this incredibly inept kleptocracy. The idea is that 287 00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:42,120 Speaker 4: their military was hollow colass because you know, their kleptocracy 288 00:13:42,160 --> 00:13:45,559 Speaker 4: had stolen everything. Well, as it turns out, we're ten 289 00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:47,720 Speaker 4: times more inefficient than they are. So what does that 290 00:13:47,760 --> 00:13:53,200 Speaker 4: make us If they're a acocracy oligarchic kleptocracy, we just 291 00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:54,760 Speaker 4: have a different kind of kleptocracy. 292 00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:56,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, let's say. 293 00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:58,160 Speaker 2: And that's the fascinating part is you know, in many 294 00:13:58,160 --> 00:14:00,400 Speaker 2: ways people part of the case for Ukraine is we 295 00:14:00,440 --> 00:14:03,160 Speaker 2: got to weeken Russia. And I'm like, well, it seems 296 00:14:03,360 --> 00:14:05,240 Speaker 2: as if every step that we've made and by par 297 00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:08,640 Speaker 2: attracting the conflict, you blood the army. It's very key 298 00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:10,600 Speaker 2: if we go in the history of military conflict. We've 299 00:14:10,679 --> 00:14:14,120 Speaker 2: rapidly increased their industrialization for their defense capacity. They have 300 00:14:14,240 --> 00:14:16,960 Speaker 2: become more sanctioned proofd today than ever before. I mean, 301 00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:20,320 Speaker 2: they seem better capable of mounting even more arrest of 302 00:14:20,360 --> 00:14:22,280 Speaker 2: action against the West. I'm not shaying that they want 303 00:14:22,280 --> 00:14:26,360 Speaker 2: to necessarily that before the war had happened. On top 304 00:14:26,400 --> 00:14:28,840 Speaker 2: of adding some eight hundred miles to our NATO border 305 00:14:29,160 --> 00:14:30,760 Speaker 2: with the expansion, which goes to the root of the 306 00:14:30,800 --> 00:14:32,200 Speaker 2: conflict that we began this interview with. 307 00:14:32,640 --> 00:14:34,720 Speaker 3: So I call this Biden's big backfire. 308 00:14:34,880 --> 00:14:36,160 Speaker 4: If you look at all of his claims at the 309 00:14:36,200 --> 00:14:38,360 Speaker 4: beginning of the war, they've all come true in reverse. 310 00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:42,200 Speaker 4: He said that we would weaken Russia in order to 311 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:45,040 Speaker 4: prevent them from waging this type of war again. In fact, 312 00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:49,000 Speaker 4: we've made the Russian military stronger. It's larger, it's larger 313 00:14:49,040 --> 00:14:52,920 Speaker 4: than it was before. It's produced far more weapons, the 314 00:14:52,960 --> 00:14:55,960 Speaker 4: industrial base is ramped up. Plus it's now battle tested 315 00:14:56,000 --> 00:14:59,000 Speaker 4: on battle hardened, especially against Western weapons. So it's a 316 00:14:59,080 --> 00:15:02,320 Speaker 4: much more formidable military Biden has created on the part 317 00:15:02,320 --> 00:15:04,920 Speaker 4: of the Russians than when we started. Meanwhile, it's the 318 00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:09,520 Speaker 4: United States that has seen in stockpiles depleted and hollowed out. 319 00:15:10,160 --> 00:15:12,640 Speaker 4: Then you look at the economic claims that Biden made. 320 00:15:12,720 --> 00:15:16,520 Speaker 4: He said that sanctions would crush the Russian economy. In fact, 321 00:15:16,520 --> 00:15:19,280 Speaker 4: the Russian economy is growing faster than any of the 322 00:15:19,280 --> 00:15:20,280 Speaker 4: G seven economies. 323 00:15:20,280 --> 00:15:21,120 Speaker 3: It's really booming. 324 00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:25,080 Speaker 4: And it's our European allies economies that have been crushed 325 00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:29,000 Speaker 4: by the sanctions. So you know this policy that he's 326 00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:31,960 Speaker 4: pursued has really boomeranged and again come true in reversed. 327 00:15:31,960 --> 00:15:34,400 Speaker 4: Then you take the humanitarian claims he said that we 328 00:15:34,440 --> 00:15:37,560 Speaker 4: would help ease the suffering of the Ukrainians. In fact, 329 00:15:37,560 --> 00:15:40,000 Speaker 4: we've led to I think our support of this proxy 330 00:15:40,040 --> 00:15:43,320 Speaker 4: war and our willingness to fight to the last Ukrainian, 331 00:15:43,400 --> 00:15:45,040 Speaker 4: like Lindsay Graham said, this is the best way we've 332 00:15:45,040 --> 00:15:48,120 Speaker 4: ever spent, using Ukrainians to kill Russians. This has led 333 00:15:48,160 --> 00:15:54,640 Speaker 4: to an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe in Ukraine, where something like 334 00:15:54,760 --> 00:15:57,640 Speaker 4: ten million plus people, mostly women and children, have left 335 00:15:57,640 --> 00:16:01,680 Speaker 4: the country. I think at least half million casualties killed, 336 00:16:01,680 --> 00:16:06,040 Speaker 4: are seriously wounded, and the population of the country has 337 00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:08,800 Speaker 4: reduced from something like forty four million to twenty eight million. Yes, 338 00:16:08,960 --> 00:16:11,520 Speaker 4: and if you look at the demographic pyramid, something like 339 00:16:11,560 --> 00:16:13,119 Speaker 4: ten to twelve million or pensioners. 340 00:16:13,120 --> 00:16:14,080 Speaker 3: They can't really work. 341 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:17,160 Speaker 4: So what we've done is really leading to the demographic 342 00:16:17,720 --> 00:16:18,720 Speaker 4: death in this country. 343 00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:20,120 Speaker 1: So I want to shift gears a little bit. 344 00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:23,240 Speaker 2: In the early days of the war in Gaza, you 345 00:16:23,440 --> 00:16:26,480 Speaker 2: and I, as many others were warning about expanded war 346 00:16:26,520 --> 00:16:28,640 Speaker 2: in the Middle East. So we're several hundred days now 347 00:16:28,720 --> 00:16:31,040 Speaker 2: or whatever into the conflict of Gaza. 348 00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:32,040 Speaker 1: Do you still worry about that? 349 00:16:32,120 --> 00:16:35,120 Speaker 2: In President Biden's handling, how would you rate the handling 350 00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:36,040 Speaker 2: of the conflicts so far? 351 00:16:36,680 --> 00:16:38,800 Speaker 4: Well, what I said about in the wake of October seventh, 352 00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:41,600 Speaker 4: the first thing I said was that it's a little 353 00:16:41,600 --> 00:16:43,760 Speaker 4: bit of reminiscent of nine to eleven, that the purpose 354 00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:48,040 Speaker 4: of an outrageous terrorist attack is usually provoking overreaction. Yes, 355 00:16:48,280 --> 00:16:51,160 Speaker 4: and I hope that the Israelis would react wisely and 356 00:16:51,200 --> 00:16:53,080 Speaker 4: not in the nine to eleven manner like the United 357 00:16:53,120 --> 00:16:55,640 Speaker 4: States did. It's safe to say now that the Israeli 358 00:16:55,720 --> 00:16:58,960 Speaker 4: reaction is exactly it has to be exactly what a 359 00:16:59,080 --> 00:17:05,040 Speaker 4: moas wanted, because they've created this humanitarian crisis in Gaza, 360 00:17:05,080 --> 00:17:09,000 Speaker 4: and it's basically turned the whole Middle East and most 361 00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:12,480 Speaker 4: of the world against israel I mean that I'm actually 362 00:17:12,560 --> 00:17:15,840 Speaker 4: shocked by some of the arguments that I'm seeing now 363 00:17:15,880 --> 00:17:19,199 Speaker 4: that this this sort of decolonization narrative that used to 364 00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:21,200 Speaker 4: really just be in academic circles has now kind of 365 00:17:21,240 --> 00:17:23,960 Speaker 4: gone mainstream, and you're seeing lots of people on social 366 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:29,240 Speaker 4: media take the position that that that the Israel doesn't 367 00:17:29,240 --> 00:17:31,800 Speaker 4: have a right to exist, you know, which I strongly 368 00:17:31,840 --> 00:17:35,160 Speaker 4: disagree with. But I think this has been that reaction 369 00:17:35,240 --> 00:17:37,640 Speaker 4: has been caused by the way that Israel has reacted 370 00:17:37,680 --> 00:17:37,919 Speaker 4: to this. 371 00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:41,879 Speaker 2: Yeah, obviously every reaction is an eco operation, right exactly. 372 00:17:43,359 --> 00:17:46,720 Speaker 4: Well, I think Biden made a huge mistake of basically 373 00:17:47,359 --> 00:17:50,960 Speaker 4: going to the Middle East initially and hugging. 374 00:17:50,840 --> 00:17:52,359 Speaker 3: And Yahoo and giving him a carte blanche. 375 00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:55,199 Speaker 4: I mean, if you look at the history of the 376 00:17:55,280 --> 00:18:00,480 Speaker 4: relationship between American presidents and you know, Israel the prime 377 00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:03,800 Speaker 4: ministers in war, it's usually the American role to pull 378 00:18:03,840 --> 00:18:07,040 Speaker 4: the Israelis back from going too far. Yes, so you know, 379 00:18:07,200 --> 00:18:09,960 Speaker 4: Eisenhower stopped these release from going too far with Suez. 380 00:18:11,359 --> 00:18:13,840 Speaker 4: Let's see, it was Kissinger and Nixon who stoped from 381 00:18:13,840 --> 00:18:16,960 Speaker 4: going too far. In nine seventy three, Reagan called up 382 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:19,240 Speaker 4: Knock and began in nineteen eighty two and said that 383 00:18:19,359 --> 00:18:23,119 Speaker 4: stop bombing Lebanon, you're creating a holocaust, actually use that word. 384 00:18:23,320 --> 00:18:26,439 Speaker 4: So it's historically been the American role not to encourage 385 00:18:26,480 --> 00:18:29,080 Speaker 4: the Israelis to basically go to the limit, but to 386 00:18:29,119 --> 00:18:31,240 Speaker 4: kind of pull them back before they do something that 387 00:18:31,400 --> 00:18:33,879 Speaker 4: frankly is not in their own interests, never mind ours. 388 00:18:34,600 --> 00:18:37,080 Speaker 4: And Biden kind of missed the opportunity to do that, 389 00:18:37,119 --> 00:18:40,320 Speaker 4: to kind of set some boundaries on what America is 390 00:18:40,359 --> 00:18:44,240 Speaker 4: willing to support. And I think it's been disastrous for 391 00:18:44,440 --> 00:18:46,199 Speaker 4: the Israelis. I don't think that what they're doing is 392 00:18:46,240 --> 00:18:50,359 Speaker 4: in their own interest. When they started bombing Gaza, I 393 00:18:50,400 --> 00:18:53,040 Speaker 4: basically tweeted that I also got ratio for this, that yeah, 394 00:18:53,119 --> 00:18:55,639 Speaker 4: Israel has a right to defend itself. What happened on 395 00:18:55,640 --> 00:18:59,560 Speaker 4: October seventh was an outrage and an atrocity. And yet 396 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:04,359 Speaker 4: it's pretty obvious that indiscriminately bombing a civilian population in 397 00:19:04,400 --> 00:19:07,480 Speaker 4: Gauza is going to backfire horribly on them, right, And 398 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:08,840 Speaker 4: that's what I see you happening. 399 00:19:08,920 --> 00:19:10,920 Speaker 2: So I said that the most controversial thing I've spoken 400 00:19:10,920 --> 00:19:13,720 Speaker 2: out on is Ukraine. I think the discussion you and 401 00:19:13,760 --> 00:19:16,040 Speaker 2: I have had, why is this so difficult. So you 402 00:19:16,080 --> 00:19:17,680 Speaker 2: and I swim in right wing circles. I think it's 403 00:19:17,680 --> 00:19:19,040 Speaker 2: fair to say, or at least you have, you know, 404 00:19:19,280 --> 00:19:21,239 Speaker 2: much longer than I have. What you and I are 405 00:19:21,240 --> 00:19:23,679 Speaker 2: saying right here is anathema for a lot of people, 406 00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:26,679 Speaker 2: but it's self evidently obvious, especially if you're going to 407 00:19:26,800 --> 00:19:29,359 Speaker 2: in play, if you were going to embrace a restraint 408 00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:33,119 Speaker 2: philosophy whenever it comes to Ukraine. It equally applies to 409 00:19:33,200 --> 00:19:35,800 Speaker 2: the enmeshment that we've had over some twenty some years 410 00:19:35,840 --> 00:19:38,480 Speaker 2: in the Middle East with respect Israel, and you can 411 00:19:38,560 --> 00:19:41,400 Speaker 2: say that we should, as you said, take a leading 412 00:19:41,480 --> 00:19:44,119 Speaker 2: role and we should try to at least concur some 413 00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:45,919 Speaker 2: restraints for our own sake, if not for you know, 414 00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:48,640 Speaker 2: the survival of the Israeli state. But I don't see 415 00:19:48,640 --> 00:19:50,520 Speaker 2: a lot of the discussion, David, amongst the right wing 416 00:19:50,520 --> 00:19:52,239 Speaker 2: politicians that I am. What explains that? 417 00:19:52,280 --> 00:19:52,840 Speaker 1: What do you think? 418 00:19:53,119 --> 00:19:55,840 Speaker 4: Well, I think a lot of people think that the 419 00:19:55,920 --> 00:19:58,440 Speaker 4: way to be quote pro Israel is just to support 420 00:19:58,480 --> 00:20:00,760 Speaker 4: Israel no matter what they do, ye And I guess 421 00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:03,439 Speaker 4: I don't think that's intellectually honest. I mean, look, I 422 00:20:03,440 --> 00:20:06,760 Speaker 4: want Israel to survive and thrive. I just don't see 423 00:20:06,760 --> 00:20:10,160 Speaker 4: how the current strategy that they're pursuing is in their 424 00:20:10,160 --> 00:20:11,960 Speaker 4: long term interest. I mean, at the end of the day, 425 00:20:12,000 --> 00:20:16,439 Speaker 4: here there's going to be what two million plus Palestinians 426 00:20:16,600 --> 00:20:19,760 Speaker 4: in Gaza. There's another three million plus in the West Bank. 427 00:20:20,560 --> 00:20:21,919 Speaker 4: Where are they going to go? What are you going 428 00:20:22,000 --> 00:20:23,199 Speaker 4: to do with them? I mean, it seems to me 429 00:20:23,359 --> 00:20:26,360 Speaker 4: that you're radicalizing that population even more. I mean by 430 00:20:26,480 --> 00:20:30,879 Speaker 4: again by indiscriminately killing civilians, which I don't think you 431 00:20:30,880 --> 00:20:31,800 Speaker 4: can argue that they're not. 432 00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:32,800 Speaker 3: At this point. 433 00:20:34,080 --> 00:20:38,840 Speaker 4: That you know, again you're turning this whole population, you're 434 00:20:38,880 --> 00:20:41,240 Speaker 4: radicalizing them against you, and then again you're losing the 435 00:20:41,240 --> 00:20:43,800 Speaker 4: support of the world, which you know may not matter 436 00:20:43,920 --> 00:20:46,040 Speaker 4: in the next month or two, but eventually it seems 437 00:20:46,040 --> 00:20:48,040 Speaker 4: like it's going to matter. It seems like you look 438 00:20:48,040 --> 00:20:50,320 Speaker 4: at you look at polling of young people in America, 439 00:20:50,359 --> 00:20:52,840 Speaker 4: like eighteen to twenty four year olds, really crazy poor 440 00:20:52,840 --> 00:20:55,760 Speaker 4: result that of eighteen to twenty four year olds, the 441 00:20:55,800 --> 00:20:58,920 Speaker 4: majority belief that Israel's just be handed over to Hamas. Yeah, 442 00:20:58,960 --> 00:21:02,879 Speaker 4: now I think that's an insane view. I mean, I 443 00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:07,240 Speaker 4: don't score anything like that. But Israel's actions are because 444 00:21:07,280 --> 00:21:10,280 Speaker 4: they're going so far are going to fement that type 445 00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:11,359 Speaker 4: of backlash. 446 00:21:11,440 --> 00:21:11,640 Speaker 1: Yeah. 447 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:13,280 Speaker 2: I mean, look, we saw so much of a different 448 00:21:13,359 --> 00:21:15,800 Speaker 2: after the Iraq War as well, in terms of backlash 449 00:21:15,840 --> 00:21:19,920 Speaker 2: against the United States. It seems again so self evidently obvious. 450 00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:22,399 Speaker 2: And yet, you know, we come back to this restraint 451 00:21:22,440 --> 00:21:24,240 Speaker 2: is philosophy. That's actually something I wanted to talk to 452 00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:26,800 Speaker 2: you a little bit about. I've noticed you. You're one 453 00:21:26,800 --> 00:21:29,680 Speaker 2: of the few people I view as actually principled within 454 00:21:29,720 --> 00:21:31,400 Speaker 2: this discussion. I think a lot of people are very, 455 00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:33,520 Speaker 2: you know, less selectively restrained dis whenever they want to 456 00:21:33,560 --> 00:21:35,639 Speaker 2: be and then not. So who are the people what 457 00:21:35,760 --> 00:21:38,879 Speaker 2: help formed your views? So I've seen you've been attacked previously. 458 00:21:38,920 --> 00:21:40,399 Speaker 2: I think you were on c SPAN in two thousand 459 00:21:40,400 --> 00:21:42,280 Speaker 2: and two advocating for the Iraq War. 460 00:21:42,400 --> 00:21:45,119 Speaker 1: So give us some political philosophy. 461 00:21:44,600 --> 00:21:47,320 Speaker 2: Background of yourself. I you're involved with the teal folks 462 00:21:47,359 --> 00:21:49,159 Speaker 2: and all of that. So what did you read for 463 00:21:49,280 --> 00:21:50,880 Speaker 2: you to arrive at the place that you are today, 464 00:21:50,880 --> 00:21:52,040 Speaker 2: which I think is very unique for a lot of 465 00:21:52,040 --> 00:21:52,720 Speaker 2: people in your position. 466 00:21:52,800 --> 00:21:55,359 Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, so I think the two intellectual giants for 467 00:21:55,520 --> 00:21:59,679 Speaker 4: me are John Meerscheimer and Pappy Buchanan. Yes, absolutely, So, 468 00:21:59,760 --> 00:22:02,960 Speaker 4: you know, pat sort of represents this isolationist school of thought, 469 00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:06,160 Speaker 4: and then Meersteim represents this realist school of thought. When 470 00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:08,080 Speaker 4: the two of them agree, I think you can take 471 00:22:08,119 --> 00:22:09,960 Speaker 4: that to the bank like one hundred percent accurate, and 472 00:22:10,000 --> 00:22:12,320 Speaker 4: then when they disagree, you have to think a little 473 00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:14,159 Speaker 4: bit harder about Yeah. 474 00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:16,720 Speaker 2: So yeah, I mean, well, so what were some of 475 00:22:16,720 --> 00:22:18,680 Speaker 2: the big breaking points for you post Iraq? 476 00:22:18,800 --> 00:22:20,600 Speaker 1: Like what happened? Just take us back to that time 477 00:22:20,640 --> 00:22:22,440 Speaker 1: as somebody who was kind of involved in the discourse. 478 00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:26,800 Speaker 4: Well, I wasn't really involved in the discourse around Iraq. 479 00:22:26,840 --> 00:22:29,320 Speaker 4: I mean, some people doing OPO on me discovered some 480 00:22:29,520 --> 00:22:31,960 Speaker 4: clts that that where I was really promoting a book 481 00:22:32,000 --> 00:22:34,919 Speaker 4: about about political correctness at Stanford at the time, and 482 00:22:34,920 --> 00:22:36,520 Speaker 4: then I got a question by Iraq, and really I 483 00:22:36,560 --> 00:22:39,359 Speaker 4: just repeated the conventional wisdom at the time. And I 484 00:22:39,400 --> 00:22:41,919 Speaker 4: think that when I saw the result of the Iraq 485 00:22:42,040 --> 00:22:44,520 Speaker 4: War and that we had been led into it, I 486 00:22:44,600 --> 00:22:47,640 Speaker 4: mean so egregiously, and I don't think there's any other 487 00:22:47,640 --> 00:22:51,760 Speaker 4: word for the untruth that we were told about it, 488 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:55,080 Speaker 4: that started to really change my point of view on 489 00:22:55,160 --> 00:22:59,760 Speaker 4: this Neokon forum policy. I mean, are going into Iraq 490 00:22:59,760 --> 00:23:01,879 Speaker 4: and the and I mean it wasn't just Iraq who 491 00:23:01,880 --> 00:23:04,440 Speaker 4: was also staying in Afghanistan for twenty years. It was 492 00:23:04,560 --> 00:23:08,639 Speaker 4: the you know, the covert war we waged against Syria, 493 00:23:09,320 --> 00:23:11,080 Speaker 4: what we did in Libya. I mean, these things were 494 00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:15,960 Speaker 4: it was a total fiasco. We unleashed you know, incredible 495 00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:19,159 Speaker 4: amounts of death and destruction, created this huge refugee problem. 496 00:23:19,520 --> 00:23:20,119 Speaker 3: In any event, I. 497 00:23:20,080 --> 00:23:22,439 Speaker 4: Don't need to recite all of that, but yeah, I 498 00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:26,760 Speaker 4: think anybody who lived through that and didn't reconsider American's 499 00:23:26,800 --> 00:23:29,600 Speaker 4: foreign policy and to really start asking questions about the 500 00:23:29,640 --> 00:23:33,680 Speaker 4: foreign policy establishment that gave us those wars, Yes, hasn't 501 00:23:33,720 --> 00:23:34,440 Speaker 4: been paying attention. 502 00:23:35,160 --> 00:23:37,080 Speaker 1: I couldn't agree more. Libya was a big one for me. 503 00:23:37,359 --> 00:23:39,199 Speaker 2: I will say just you know, personally, I want to, 504 00:23:39,240 --> 00:23:40,399 Speaker 2: you know, just shift gears a little bit. 505 00:23:40,400 --> 00:23:41,639 Speaker 1: You talk a lot about free speech. 506 00:23:41,680 --> 00:23:44,280 Speaker 2: You've helped Elon, you know, kind of with the takeover 507 00:23:44,400 --> 00:23:46,600 Speaker 2: of Twitter. So we've been more than a year or 508 00:23:46,600 --> 00:23:48,639 Speaker 2: so in that. Now what's your assessment. Do you think 509 00:23:48,640 --> 00:23:49,760 Speaker 2: free speech is better on Twitter? 510 00:23:49,800 --> 00:23:50,920 Speaker 1: Is it worse? What do you think? 511 00:23:51,200 --> 00:23:54,199 Speaker 4: Oh, it's much better. I mean, thank goodness Elon did that. 512 00:23:54,320 --> 00:23:58,679 Speaker 4: It's the only the fact or the fact that Elon 513 00:23:58,800 --> 00:24:01,680 Speaker 4: decided to acquire Twitter. I think it's the only reason 514 00:24:01,680 --> 00:24:05,159 Speaker 4: we have meaningful free speech online anymore. You have to remember, 515 00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:07,560 Speaker 4: it's not just about the fact that he rolled back, 516 00:24:08,359 --> 00:24:11,520 Speaker 4: you know what Twitter was doing. It's also the fact 517 00:24:11,520 --> 00:24:14,879 Speaker 4: that that censorship movement had a momentum to it, and 518 00:24:14,880 --> 00:24:17,800 Speaker 4: they kept adding new categories of thought and opinion that 519 00:24:17,840 --> 00:24:20,320 Speaker 4: you couldn't you couldn't say. I mean, imagine if we 520 00:24:20,359 --> 00:24:22,959 Speaker 4: had this Ukraine war under the old Twitter management. 521 00:24:23,040 --> 00:24:23,320 Speaker 1: I can't. 522 00:24:23,480 --> 00:24:25,760 Speaker 4: Yeah, remember, like during COVID, there were all sorts of 523 00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:28,240 Speaker 4: positions that we now know are true that you couldn't 524 00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:33,880 Speaker 4: say without getting censored exactly. Look, it's the censorship, it's 525 00:24:34,280 --> 00:24:37,159 Speaker 4: protein and morphs in order to protect official narratives. At 526 00:24:37,200 --> 00:24:39,280 Speaker 4: least that's what it was doing and still does in 527 00:24:39,359 --> 00:24:42,960 Speaker 4: other major tech companies. And so I think that it 528 00:24:42,960 --> 00:24:45,280 Speaker 4: would problem had gotten worse and worse if Elon hadn't 529 00:24:45,400 --> 00:24:48,399 Speaker 4: essentially pulled an intervention by buying Twitter. 530 00:24:48,680 --> 00:24:50,880 Speaker 2: So the other thing is, I know e've ben more 531 00:24:50,880 --> 00:24:54,240 Speaker 2: recently involved in electoral politics. You did this the launch 532 00:24:54,320 --> 00:24:56,840 Speaker 2: with Governor DeSantis, and I know you supported him, or 533 00:24:56,840 --> 00:24:59,080 Speaker 2: at least I think you have something for him. 534 00:24:59,119 --> 00:25:01,879 Speaker 1: So what's your s of what went wrong for that campaign? 535 00:25:01,920 --> 00:25:03,119 Speaker 1: Are you talking a little bit about it? 536 00:25:03,119 --> 00:25:04,639 Speaker 2: But I mean a lot of people pointing to the 537 00:25:04,760 --> 00:25:06,600 Speaker 2: x space that you guys launched on. 538 00:25:06,680 --> 00:25:07,760 Speaker 1: Do you think it was a miss? I mean, not 539 00:25:07,800 --> 00:25:10,200 Speaker 1: your fault. It was good to do, but on his part, 540 00:25:10,200 --> 00:25:11,679 Speaker 1: you know, was it a mistake for him to do that? 541 00:25:11,720 --> 00:25:13,800 Speaker 1: Do you think he was too online? What went wrong 542 00:25:13,800 --> 00:25:14,600 Speaker 1: for him? What do you think? 543 00:25:14,920 --> 00:25:17,000 Speaker 4: You know, I don't think that that Twitter space was 544 00:25:17,000 --> 00:25:18,800 Speaker 4: that big deal. We got started fifteen minutes late, and 545 00:25:18,840 --> 00:25:21,720 Speaker 4: then the people people are always looking for something to 546 00:25:22,680 --> 00:25:26,520 Speaker 4: some fault. Fine, Look, I just think that desantss's main 547 00:25:26,560 --> 00:25:29,760 Speaker 4: problem is that the party wasn't willing or ready to 548 00:25:29,760 --> 00:25:32,840 Speaker 4: move on from Trump. And you know, Trump would have 549 00:25:32,920 --> 00:25:36,680 Speaker 4: to like absolutely botch his campaign, and then the answer 550 00:25:36,680 --> 00:25:39,760 Speaker 4: would be have to be absolutely perfect in order to 551 00:25:39,760 --> 00:25:42,800 Speaker 4: have a chance, and or maybe maybe it might may 552 00:25:42,840 --> 00:25:45,760 Speaker 4: not even work. And the reality is is that Trump 553 00:25:45,840 --> 00:25:48,520 Speaker 4: is still pretty much, you know, at or near the 554 00:25:48,520 --> 00:25:50,160 Speaker 4: top of his game. I mean, I think that when 555 00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:52,680 Speaker 4: Trump did that CNN town hall and he kind of 556 00:25:52,720 --> 00:25:55,560 Speaker 4: walked into the lions Den and he kind of pulled 557 00:25:55,600 --> 00:25:57,920 Speaker 4: out of his pocket the tweets that he said, look, 558 00:25:57,960 --> 00:25:59,639 Speaker 4: I'm January sixth, I tweeted this, this, this. 559 00:26:00,119 --> 00:26:02,480 Speaker 3: He was ready for them, That's yeah, he was. Yeah. 560 00:26:02,760 --> 00:26:04,679 Speaker 4: Kitlyn Collins had the whole C and N studio inter 561 00:26:04,800 --> 00:26:07,280 Speaker 4: ear piece trying to get Trump and they couldn't get him. 562 00:26:07,880 --> 00:26:09,680 Speaker 4: And I think everyone's like, Okay, this guy still on 563 00:26:09,720 --> 00:26:11,160 Speaker 4: the top of his game. I think that was it. 564 00:26:11,359 --> 00:26:14,679 Speaker 4: And and you know, look, Justsances didn't run a perfect campaign, 565 00:26:14,680 --> 00:26:16,320 Speaker 4: but I don't think it mattered. I mean, the reality 566 00:26:16,400 --> 00:26:18,520 Speaker 4: is the Republican Party is still likes Trump. 567 00:26:19,200 --> 00:26:20,960 Speaker 2: So then politically, what do you think is going to 568 00:26:21,000 --> 00:26:23,000 Speaker 2: happen in this election? What's your assessment? 569 00:26:24,680 --> 00:26:27,200 Speaker 4: Well, I mean, if you believe the polling right now, 570 00:26:27,200 --> 00:26:29,920 Speaker 4: Trump's gonna win. So it's gonna be Trump versus Biden. 571 00:26:30,040 --> 00:26:31,639 Speaker 4: It's kind of a you. 572 00:26:31,840 --> 00:26:34,480 Speaker 2: And I are talking onesdays. It's definitely good to be 573 00:26:34,560 --> 00:26:36,360 Speaker 2: Trump versus b controversy. 574 00:26:36,640 --> 00:26:39,040 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, it's funny how we've been talking for 575 00:26:39,160 --> 00:26:41,040 Speaker 4: months and months and months about whether it's going to 576 00:26:41,080 --> 00:26:44,240 Speaker 4: be Trump. You know, it was, it was always inevitable. 577 00:26:45,080 --> 00:26:47,080 Speaker 4: It was sort of unthinkable and yet inevitable at the 578 00:26:47,080 --> 00:26:51,360 Speaker 4: same time. So, you know, I think we really need 579 00:26:51,359 --> 00:26:54,720 Speaker 4: a change an administration in Washington. I get really worried 580 00:26:55,480 --> 00:27:00,760 Speaker 4: about this administration about whether about how objective they can 581 00:27:00,800 --> 00:27:03,159 Speaker 4: be on what our next steps in Ukraine are, because 582 00:27:03,640 --> 00:27:06,680 Speaker 4: just some cost fallacy that they may feel the need 583 00:27:06,720 --> 00:27:10,960 Speaker 4: to protect their previous policy choices avoid having egg on 584 00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:14,720 Speaker 4: their face by continually escalating the situation in Ukraine, and 585 00:27:15,560 --> 00:27:17,920 Speaker 4: Bind by no means has been the craziest on the 586 00:27:18,040 --> 00:27:20,760 Speaker 4: Ukraine War. I mean, there are people in Washington, like 587 00:27:20,840 --> 00:27:24,800 Speaker 4: Lindsey Graham, even like Mitch McConnell who wanted more escalations sooner, 588 00:27:25,280 --> 00:27:28,520 Speaker 4: or like McCrone in Europe. So you know there are 589 00:27:28,640 --> 00:27:31,960 Speaker 4: forces pulling him in a direction of even more escalation. 590 00:27:32,040 --> 00:27:35,880 Speaker 4: And then you know, since he got us into this war, 591 00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:39,119 Speaker 4: this proxy war, he may his administration may have the 592 00:27:39,119 --> 00:27:41,919 Speaker 4: incentive to really keep doubling down. So I think it's 593 00:27:41,960 --> 00:27:43,919 Speaker 4: really important to have a change administration. 594 00:27:44,320 --> 00:27:46,520 Speaker 2: My worry with the Trump administration is I covered it 595 00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:48,680 Speaker 2: extensively at the time. I interviewed him four times at 596 00:27:48,680 --> 00:27:50,520 Speaker 2: that time, as you could always see that he didn't 597 00:27:50,520 --> 00:27:53,199 Speaker 2: particularly care about what was going on. He outsourced, I mean, 598 00:27:53,200 --> 00:27:55,000 Speaker 2: he cared about a few things. We would outsource things. 599 00:27:55,040 --> 00:27:57,399 Speaker 1: John Bolton or you know, whoever was running at h 600 00:27:57,480 --> 00:27:58,920 Speaker 1: r McMaster and these people were nuts. 601 00:27:59,480 --> 00:28:02,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, Pompeia, I mean, these people are more psychotic than 602 00:28:02,280 --> 00:28:04,520 Speaker 2: many of the people in the Biden administration. Do you 603 00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:07,640 Speaker 2: think that Trump has learned his lesson? Do you think 604 00:28:07,640 --> 00:28:10,120 Speaker 2: that things will be different in the Trump too kind 605 00:28:10,160 --> 00:28:12,320 Speaker 2: of policy? Because that's the biggest question to me when 606 00:28:12,400 --> 00:28:14,280 Speaker 2: I want to change the administration two one hundred percent, 607 00:28:14,320 --> 00:28:17,119 Speaker 2: But with him, it genuinely is like I never know 608 00:28:17,160 --> 00:28:18,000 Speaker 2: which way he's going to go. 609 00:28:18,440 --> 00:28:21,480 Speaker 4: Well, I think the biggest knock on the first Trump 610 00:28:21,560 --> 00:28:24,200 Speaker 4: term was personnel, and that Trump ended up choosing a 611 00:28:24,200 --> 00:28:27,200 Speaker 4: lot of people who didn't support either his policy or 612 00:28:27,200 --> 00:28:32,080 Speaker 4: at least his policy instincts, right, And my suspicion is 613 00:28:32,119 --> 00:28:34,199 Speaker 4: he's learned his lesson, if for no other reason than 614 00:28:34,240 --> 00:28:40,840 Speaker 4: all those people betrayed him. So I think that he 615 00:28:41,240 --> 00:28:42,760 Speaker 4: hopefully he's done with all those people. 616 00:28:42,960 --> 00:28:44,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, well I hope So, David, thank you 617 00:28:44,640 --> 00:28:45,560 Speaker 1: so much for joining me, my friend. 618 00:28:45,640 --> 00:28:48,480 Speaker 2: Really appreciate it all in podcasts, you can go and subscribe, 619 00:28:48,560 --> 00:28:50,600 Speaker 2: highly recommend it, and we'll have a link down to 620 00:28:50,640 --> 00:28:52,040 Speaker 2: his Twitter as well where you can go and check 621 00:28:52,120 --> 00:28:52,360 Speaker 2: him out. 622 00:28:52,440 --> 00:28:53,920 Speaker 1: So thank you, David, Thanks for taking the time here. 623 00:28:54,000 --> 00:28:56,000 Speaker 5: Hey, Guys, if you like that video, go to Breakingpoints 624 00:28:56,000 --> 00:28:58,840 Speaker 5: dot com, become a premium subscriber, and help us build 625 00:28:58,840 --> 00:29:01,120 Speaker 5: the best independent media organization on the planet. 626 00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:03,600 Speaker 2: That's right, we're subscriber funded. We're building something new. We 627 00:29:03,640 --> 00:29:06,280 Speaker 2: want to replace these failing mainstream media organizations 628 00:29:06,400 --> 00:29:10,680 Speaker 5: So again to subscribe its Breakingpoints dot com