WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - December 30th, 2022

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news as it happened. Sloomberg

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim Stentovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone, Happy New Year. Welcome to our holiday weekend

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week, and Happy New Year to

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>your too, Carol, you too. Over the next two hours,

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>look back at the year that was, from the NonStop

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>discussion over inflation and monetary policy globally to the crypto

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>collapses and undoing of the individual considered that you know,

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jp Morgan of crypto, we're talking about Sam Bankman Freed.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>We are indeed so important was crypto This year, Business

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Week devote an entire issue to delve into the Crypto story,

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>what it's all about. It's a must read. Other issues

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>took deep dives into the undoing of Roe, v Wade,

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the New Economy, good business, and more. A many stories

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>this year. We're about the world's second biggest economy, though, Carroll,

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it a lot, and it's constant impact

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on everything we're talking about. China that's right more in

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a moment, and let's not forget the gift that keeps

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>on giving this year. Elon Musk and Twitter top tech

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>stories in our Business Week Pursuits team, they talk about cars,

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>they talk about museums. That's in our second hour. But

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>on this New Year's weekend, we begin with a thoughtful

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>and an omniscition to editor behind it all. He joins

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>us every day on our daily broadcast and podcast. We're

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about Joel Weber, the editor of Bloomberg Business Week,

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>along with another key member of the team driving coverage

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at the magazine, Jim Ellis, Assistant managing editor. Alright, guys,

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on. A busy year. Hard to believe

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we're at the end of it. So, Joel, when you

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>look back at this year, how do you think about

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it in your coverage? Well, there were a couple big

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>themes and and you hit on a few of them.

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 1>They're really eloquently. Kind of was preparing for this little

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>conversation with you. Um. I looked back and one of

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the first covers of the year actually was about the

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Winter Olympics, and that was the cover line was China's Games.

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And we had a really clever podium arrangement where g

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>was at the top podium, and it really did speak

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to how much the world has changed since the last

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>time the Olympics were in China. Back then it was

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the Summer Olympics, and that story spoke to how much

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the global dynamics have changed from the Summer Games to

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>these Winter Games, and um, it also speaks to uh China,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and that was a bigger story that I wanted to

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>take a couple of minutes and and talk through all

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the various facets of what the Chinese economy has been

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>going through, what the people there have lived through, what

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the companies with global exposure and are rooted

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>there um faced this year, and also what that means

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is we start to kind of look ahead. Let's do

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that with a Jim Ellis, He's assistant managing editor of

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the magazine. Jim, it's pretty incredible to think about, you know,

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>not just the impact that China has on our economy globally,

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but the key things driving our cover of China this year.

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>If we start with the Olympics is sort of one

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of the book ends. What's the other book end at

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of two But at the end of two.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the idea that after a year of of following

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a COVID zero policy where they they've been willing to

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>effectively shut down their economy at off and on throughout

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the year, and um, and since they're the world's factory

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>shutdown factories for the rest of the world, they've suddenly decided, Okay,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>we're we're cool, We're gonna go ahead and open up.

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's turning out that the reopening of China after

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>COVID is going to be just as difficult as dealing

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>with COVID. I don't think people really understood that. They

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't expect that, and it's sort of turned out to

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>be sort of a shock. It means that three is

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to be this sort of joyous sort of

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>bounce back, you know, in China, and for all the

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>people around the world, the companies around the world to

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>depend on them to do manufacturing, are still going to

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>have a hell of a time next year. One of

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that surprised me was, um, you know, just

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, we always talked about if China

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>ever sees growth go below seven, oh my god, you know,

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the world, I mean, China this

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>year is probably gonna do about three point five. That

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. I mean you've basically seen the growth there

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>slow dramatically over the last four years and they're not

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>ready for that. But we're probably not ready for that either. Well,

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>you know what it's and it's interesting too. And I

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think about, you know, coming off the pandemic, globalization, pushback,

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>supply chains, like, there's so many issues that go back

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to China. Uh. And I think about also something that

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the magazine covers so well, and that's Tesla and specifically

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's exposure to China and what that means going forward.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, China if the economy opens up good but

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>also bad because of concerns about global inflationary pressures. But

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't, what that does to global demand and

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>global growth? Like It's investors have already sort of sort

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of awakened to this when they've been pulling Tesla's share

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>price down in part because of of danger of Chinese

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>business they're dropping. I mean we've seen um I guess

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>recently Tesla saying that it might lower production at the

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Shanghai plant. By this is the first time this plant

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>has ever gone down from its maximum capacity. Other than

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>when they shut Shanghai down for two months. I mean,

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this is an amazing thing to see this happen. And

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>after months of basically having to wait forever to get

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>your Tesla, Tesla is able now to provide you a

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Tesla within thirty days in China, there is no backlog.

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the business that is, you know, for

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>them in their second most important market is truly slowing

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>down and we haven't seen that before. Something is going

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on there. And because they depend so heavily on China,

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>not just for serving the Chinese market but also for

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>exporting to Europe, this is a bad thing for Tesla.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>What about when it comes to competitors to Tesla in China.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>We often talk about them in the context of hundreds

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of different companies, but one of them in particular that Uh.

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>You a story that you edited this year about out

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>by d R b y D, which is broader than

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just electric vehicles, but it's a massive producer of electric vehicles.

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It is um you know, Virtual Halfway supports it, a

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>big investor in it, and it is Uh. It's turned

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>out to be a very big supplier. They're a real

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>competitor too, but also an exporter of cars to Europe

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of Asia. We normally don't think about

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>China as this giant car exporter. But the strange thing,

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>quietly because they don't export here to the US, but quietly,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.559
<v Speaker 1>China is going to surpass the US in the coming

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>year as an exporter of cars. I wouldn't have thought

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that was possible five years ago. You know, one of

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the things that distinguishes b y D to GYM is

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>their emphasis on batteries. Right this, right this is a

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>battery company that happened to become a car company, and

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a really interesting place for us

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to think about the rest of what the auto industrys.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But all of these American companies are are They're coming

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>out of slightly differently than the Chinese have. And the

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Chinese have a huge advantage in terms of having so

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>much of their infrastructure already in this electric already there,

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and also having access to all sorts of you know,

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of medals, precious metals that are needed to actually

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>build batteries, and um, what it's doing now is it's

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>uh forcing American companies to think differently. For example, GM

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and Ford now are talking about being willing to actually

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>go into deals with um lithium producers, which is something

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that Tesla had not been willing to do, to go

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in and put money into these companies. They want to

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>buy from them, but it didn't want to basically be

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on the hook for helping support their development. This is

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a real change, but it's an opportunity that the US

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>has now to grab a bigger piece of that business,

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't control batteries, you don't control the

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>future of evs well, and China still want to be

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a big part of tourism, and you guys certainly did

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>dug into that as well, and we've been watching it

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to some of the gambling names, the

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>US gambling names. But with incredible exposure to macau Um,

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what are we seeing when it comes to tourism and travel,

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's something you guys certainly covered. It's been a

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>really tough time because of COVID zero. People have been

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>unable to travel. There's been all sorts of restrictions to

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the typical places that Chinese tourists would go to. People

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>forget that Chinese tourists had become the number one travelers

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in Asia, but they were also extremely important travelers in Europe,

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>especially for luxury brands. They love to travel to shop,

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's that was all cut off. International air travel

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for most people was cut off during the pandemic. Even

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>when it came back for places like Hong Kong, you

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>still had the quarantine, so people didn't take advantage of it. Moreover,

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Intra China travel, which had been the largest single domestic

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Arab market in the world, you know before the pandemic,

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that has gone down dramatically. We're only now up to

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>about thirty percent of what it was before the pandem

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>m that's a huge drop for a very large market.

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Um people are afraid to travel. They hadn't been allowed

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to travel. Now they're afraid to travel because by ending

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>COVID zero, you've let people jump on planes, You've let

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>people sort of go outside their neighborhoods, but they're not

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>testing anymore. They got rid of the mandatory testing and

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>for masses, and they also are letting people sort of

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>go out without any sort of fix on where they go.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>They got rid of the tracking system. But what that

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>means is this is a country where only one percent

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of the people have had COVID. There's no herd immunity

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>built in there. So that's the reason why all of

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you're saying, oh, nine thousand new cases a day,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>because this is virgin territory for the virus. This is

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to end well, right, Hey, jo is there

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>some company or some CEO that came up in almost

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>all of your planning meetings when it comes to when

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>you think about companies in business in general, I mean,

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>can stop making news? Truthfully? I mean it started earlier

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the year when we revealed that he actually had

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a massed a position in Twitter, and then uh, he

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>became he acknowledged that and like put forward that he

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>was going to buy it, and forty four billion dollars

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>seemed like a lot of money, And then it really

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>seemed like a lot of money a couple of months later,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as the market sort of started to melt down and

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>he tried to get out of that, and then we

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>had a very entertaining process that ended up eventually with

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>him acquiring the company and tweeting. And maybe you've noticed

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like he keeps tweeting, Joel. Entertaining is one word. Hey,

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>here's a hint. I have a feeling you're gonna be

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. We're not going to stop, al right, everybody,

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, appreciate it. That's Joel Webber, the

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>editor of bloom Brig Business Week, along with another key

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>member of the magazine driving coverage this year, Jim Alice,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>He's assistant managing editor. Coming up, he delved into the

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>major financial headlines of two and the Crypto story that

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>just keeps on adding chapters. You're listening to bloom business Week.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Please sees Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Tim Stinevic from Bloomberg Radio. For just the

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>second time ever in an entire issue of Bloomberg Business

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Week magazine was dedicated to a single topic from a

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>single writer, Paul Ford's What is Code? You might recall

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the first That was a few years ago.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>This time around Bloomberg Opinions, Matt Levine gave us forty

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>thou words on digital assets, a primer on the innovation

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that could forever change the way that we transact and

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>how we view the world of finance. The October thirty

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>one issue was dubbed The Crypto Story, Your Guide to

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>What it Does, What it Means? And why it still matters.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Matt did have a helping hand on his way to

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>compiling his definitive Digital Asset God, and that came courtesy

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week Markets and Finance editor Pat Regnar,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and Pat joins us now to reflect on that journey,

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps he can also try to help us make

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>some sense of the saga that we're continuing to see

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in this space, headlined, of course by none other than

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman freed and is now bankrupt Crypto Exchange f

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>t X. So Pat, let's take a look back on

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on how this came together, because here we are at

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of two How did you guys approach this

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of an actual takeover and how did you settle

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>on You know, Matt Lavine, who I know is familiar

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to pretty much everybody who's listening right now. Yeah, well,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>with things like this, it really started with what does

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt want to do? Um, we we were really thinking

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>about how to really get something out of him that

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>people would want to read. He has such a huge

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>following and he's so crisp and clear on so many issues,

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>from elon to sort of strange quarters of corporate finance,

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and here we have this topic crypto, where he was

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>so often writing columns we would read every day and

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you would just go, oh, wow, this thing that I

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand, Now I get it. Because crypto has just

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>been this thing that's lose so quickly that I think

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>people have been kind of like chasing to sort of

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>understand like all of the things that are happening. And

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>so what he did was really kind of explain it

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>from the ground up, and I think in a lot

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of ways he ended up foreshadowing a lot of the

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>things that we're talking about now. What's amazing, you know,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to pat when I think about it, we all often said, oh,

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the crypto world, crypto, crypto, and we like kind of

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>throw everything in one basket. And what Matt did is

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>really pull apart the details, dig into everything specifically, provide

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>the transparency. I feel like we all needed to kind

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of understand the relationships and truly what it all meant. Yeah,

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean he really starts with kind of explaining like

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>what a blockchain is, which you know, I'm often surprised

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you can talk to somebody for quite a long time

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be speaking to very authoritively about blockchain, and

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>then you might stop and ask a very basic question

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know what, I'm not actually under percent

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for I understand that part of it myself. So you know,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it was like very refreshing, Like you know, you've been

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the desert and somebody gives you a glass of water,

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>so sort of just like somebody finally explained to you

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>some of these fundamentals which can often be hard to

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>tease out when reading things like white papers that you'll

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>see online or somebody's proposing something, and like, you know,

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, a lot of what Matt saw was that

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>underlying a lot of this jargon and talk were you know,

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>scams and things that would be best described as Ponzi schemes.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean that seems incredibly prescient with what happened, you know,

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of weeks after the issue came out,

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and then what happened in December as well, with the

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of Sam Bankman freed, and of course the collapse

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of of f t X. How do you view the

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>crypto issue in the context of what continues to happen

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>with crypto news that we read about and news that breaks, Like,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is this some sort of reference guide for people to

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>go back to and and understand current events. Yeah, I mean,

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope that when people look at it they'll see

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like, okay, so here's a way to think clearly

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>about all of the things that have happened and all

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of the little kind of um corners and side roads

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know, this story is going to go into.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, you look at what s N Free is

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>accused of doing, and you know some of it. There's

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a simple way of telling the story, and the simple

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>thing is customers sending money. He took the money, and

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>he moved it over to the hedge fund, and then

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>he lost the money, right Like, So at one level

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to think about it too hard. But

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>then when you go a little deeper into what he's

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>accused of doing, it gets a lot more complicated and

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>mechanical more quickly. And so, for example, it has to

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>do with well, what does it mean for something to

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>be a crypto exchange? And how was this exchange using

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>margin and things like that. And the reason that stuff

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is important to understand is that, um, you know, Sam

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>bank and Free has been laying the groundwork of a

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>defense of what he's been doing. Um, and it kind

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of depends a little bit on people being I think,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe overwhelmed by some of the detail. And one of

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the things I hope is that you could you could

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>read this and then you would have a firm enough

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>grasp on the detail to see through why some of

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the things that he's saying are just mistakes maybe could

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>be characterized as something considerably worse than a mistake. I

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta say, Pat and nothing against boring white papers, but

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>they're boring. And Matt tells this in such a wonderful read. Um,

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and then the way you and your team, the graphics,

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the pictures, the quote, the polls, like, it's just it's

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>really pretty incredible to go through and and um, I'm

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say it's like reading a novel because it's reality,

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>but it really was, um a treat and enjoy to read.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And I have to say, you know, we get the

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>magazines in the newsroom, and it was hard to find this.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>This is one that everybody was like, do you have

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the crypto issue? Do Matt's crypto Issie do the business

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>with crypto issue? Because everybody took it because they wanted

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to read it and understand it. And I'm curious what

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of response have you guys gotten from the bigger,

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>broader crypto world or just the world in general. People

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>would be very positive about it. God, as you know,

0:16:57.680 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they liked it a lot. But I've even heard from

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>people who are some of the strongest crypto critics. You've said, oh,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we really like Matt in the way that

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>he explains to these things. Um, that that's been kind

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of pardning that. Uh, it seems to be well received

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>across people with different opinions about this space which is

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.479
<v Speaker 1>now so very much on ourline. Okay, what's the future here?

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about it? You know, I think

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that what's happened with SPX is a really existential crisis

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for crypto I think, Um, you know, one of the

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>things that Matt lays out at the end of his

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>piece is like, you know, they've they've built this large,

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>complicated financial system, and the question is is it all

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a ponzi? Um? And or are they going to build something?

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know we're now looking at massive uh

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, alleged fraud at the heart of crypto markets.

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not the first one, um, and we still you know,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not just that's not only pushing prices down. It's

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>really raising questions about like, you know, why would why

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>would you put your money into this? Like the the

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>simplest ways to invest are very you know, nervous making

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>uh for people and um, you know, and then we

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>still haven't addressed the question of what what are you building?

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>What what are you making? UM? I think that's gonna

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>be really really tough on um, especially because you know,

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what's going on with FBX is about

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that people thought was building. You know. UM,

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>people would say, well, bitcoin, like, you know, it doesn't

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have any intrinsic value. It's just sort of a bet.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of like a token price going up or down.

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's you know, that's just like kind of

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the simple economics of bitcoin. It's just it's just a

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>pure bet on adoptions. Then, but like maybe the next

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that will happen is people will come up with

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>tokens that give people, you know, util be and kind

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of represent um, you know, some kind of piece of

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the growth of a company. Well, what's name Like one

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of those tokens, Well, one of those tokens was the

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>token that that f t x UH issued for itself

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>and actually seemed to be a very big part of

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>its lab right that it's like what, you know, what

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually here that people want? And I think like

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>people in the crypto community are going to have They've

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of work to do, um to to

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>prove that this isn't just a place to speculate. Pat,

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hear you use the term magic internet money

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>when you were describing that. Oh, that's for all right,

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the next full issue, um. Incredible work, Pat, Thanks

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Happy New Year, Thank you.

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Bloomberg business Week. Markets and Finance editor Pat Rignier

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>still had on the New year's weekend edition of Bloomberg

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, where U S monetary policy goes from here

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>as a year full of wallet breaking inflation and jumbo

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>interest rate hikes comes to a close, or does it?

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>That's the big question. Well, from pandemic labor constraints to

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the reversal of Roe v. Wade, US women have lost

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>decades worth of progress in just a matter of months,

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's costing the entire country dearly. We're gonna explain next.

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg broadcasting from the financial capital of the world.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleve in Frio in New York to Washington, d C.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one oh six one to San Francisco,

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine six to the country Sirius XM Chanel one

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>nine team, and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Massier and Tim Stenove from Bloomberg Radio. In

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>mid December, we saw Wall Street's hopes for a loosening

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy take a big hit. The Federal Reserve did

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>dial back a bit when it raised interest rates by

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis points that followed four consecutive seventy five point hikes. However,

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>fits you J Powell saying officials were not close to

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>ending their aggressive campaign of rate increases and signaled borrowing

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>costs Wood had higher than expected. J. Powell also saying

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Central Bank would not cut rates until it's

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>confident that inflation is moving back towards its stated two

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>percent inflation goals. Higher interest rates and rising prices have

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>been the prevailing economic themes in America over the past

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>year and really throughout much of the world. To help

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>put it all in context as we head into the

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>new year, let's bring in Bloomberg Business Week Economics editor

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Christina Lynn Blad Christie and I feel like it's been

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the story that keeps on giving. We just constantly talk

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about monetary policy in the US and globally. Um, how

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>do you think about the coverage that you guys have

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>done over the year and kind of where we are

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>ending up. I think about a word that Powell used

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot at the beginning, which is humble, and how

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the macroeconomics profession has been humbled because nobody really saw

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this coming and the persistence of it, if you be bowl,

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess said they would. But um, but here we are,

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and we have a cause like a glimmer of good

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>news this week with the CPI print, you know, we're

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>core inflation. I just you know, November that was the

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>smallest print we've had since August. So maybe the medicine

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is starting to work, and I think that's what everyone's hoping.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be the big thing to

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>watch in well. Speaking of themes, right, like, I do

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>feel like the FED is for the most part had

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>one message of like, you know, it's about getting inflation guys,

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you know down and that's what we're focusing on. But

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, another theme has been consistently when

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the US economy is the strength of

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the labor market, and and that I guess gives the

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>FED some wiggle room, but it's also kind of worrisome,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to the wage pressures. Worrisome. I

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's one of the parts of the puzzle that

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>people can't really figure out. I was saying to somebody

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>that when after the COVID recession, every job support, you know,

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>it was amazing. You just couldn't believe house as it

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>was coming back, especially compared to the previous recession after

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis, which we had a long, grinding recovery,

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.239
<v Speaker 1>right jobless recovery was called, and this was just like,

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, boom, these jobs are coming back. And now

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>though we're in this place where when those right A

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>report come and they're strong, you know you avert your eyes.

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, you know, because you know that it means

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that rates will stay higher for longer. You know, there's

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>still a real, really high level of job openings. Companies

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>are still creating jobs that they say they can't fill.

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Um and that and wage pressure is strong and at

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this point now we're seeing real wage gains because inflation

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is starting to trend down, but wage growth is still strong.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's also going to be one of the things

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that everyone's going to be looking at going into next year.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It feels like, you know, there's data points for everybody,

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. Meantime, you know, strong market that's out there,

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but we've seen housing sloaded like it's just it's very

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>difficult to make sense of it. Having said that, do

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you feel like, like like you mentioned the last recession coming

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>out of the financial crisis. I think about how the

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>magazine Business Week and you and your team have covered

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of going back to the past, and we have

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about Paul Bulker during the seventies and

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>his inflation fight and what that might mean for what j.

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Powell has to do and the FED. I think that

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>has been a big shadow, right, a larger than life

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>shadow that has you know, loomed over Powell in the

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>whole f O m C. There are many similarities but

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>also many differences in the way everything played out. Then

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I think now what haunts them is, you know, the

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>ghost of Arthur Burns really who was the said chief

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>who who thought he'd beaten inflation, and then you know,

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>started listening too fast. And you know, we see that

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is perennially hopeful that this pivot will come

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and they want the pivot to come

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in they want the said to start cutting rates. Powell

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>push back on that, you know, saying the most likely,

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we see from the new economic projections that

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the cuts will not happen until well, I know we're

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about this a lot in the new year,

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. I want to get to another

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 1>critical development that took place in two and that was

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the major setback for women's reproductive rights we saw take

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>place with the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade.

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>It's a very personal story, but it also made us

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>take a look more broadly at women and their place

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in their economy and really just kind of the setbacks. Christina,

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you've been one of the key voices as we unpacked

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the sweeping economic implications of that decision, as is Bloomberg

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>News Equality team leader Rebecca Greenfield, and Rebecca, I want

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to bring you into this conversation as well. Tell us

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>about this issue where you guys did UM some really

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>deep diving and some deep coverage of what had happened. Yeah,

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Supreme Court made a huge decision and

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>overturned UM, what was almost fifty years of president and

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Roe v. Wade. And it really felt like a very

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>big moment in US history, specifically for women who have

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of progress economically, UM, and otherwise in

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the US that seems to be slipping and this moment,

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the decision really felt kind of like a big turning

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>point in the wrong direction for rights and in the economy.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>So UM, we put this breaking point issue where we

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>took the moment to step back and say, what is

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>happening two women in the US? What I have to say?

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, you guys included in this coverage in the

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>magazine This is Back in August, some numbers thirty three

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>million women of child bearing age living in twenty six

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>U states expected to institute abortion bands twenty four out

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred thousand. The US has the highest maternal

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>mortality rate ratio of any industrialized country. And then a

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars projected increase in US g d P over

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a decade resulting from narrowing the gender divide in labor

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>participation rates to levels prevailing in Europe. Wait very personal,

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>very individual in terms of the impact you think about it,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and but it's also there's business implications, economic implications for

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the setbacks of women that we've seen as of late

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Christina also equality. We did a piece in which we

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>looked at decades worth of economic studies that looked at

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the impact of abortion access and people have been able

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to get some very granular information and they looked at

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>women who were not able to access abortion, you know,

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>had higher chances of being poor, falling into debt, children

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that were also going to be poor. So it's the

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>impact extends across generations. The Supreme Court decision came at

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the end of two very trying years for women. Right.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>We had something that people called like this she Session,

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>because when schools and childcare closed, some women had to

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>quit working, right, And then we had lots of other

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>things we had, you know, the we had a formula

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>shortages in the US. I mean, who thinks that, you know,

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>a major industrialized, one of the world's top economy you

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>cannot get formula for your child. There were just kind

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of these like drip drip, drip drip, and then came

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court thing, which is something that you know,

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people had positive for a while and there was even

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>this League decision, but it was still was a shock, Rebecca,

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>as you guys rolled out the coverage, I mean, what

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>just kind of stood out for you in doing this

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>series of stories. Yes, I think the biggest thing that

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>has to have re since the decision and was a

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>big part of the coverage is that the way that

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the decision has played out is that it's really not

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>solely about abortion and safe abortion and economic implications of that,

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.479
<v Speaker 1>but it's really becoming an issue of fave pregnancy and

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>maternal health, and that really seems to be the really

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>big risk that women place. There are safer ways for

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>women to get abortions in places where it's not legal

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>than fifty years ago. That's true. We've written about that,

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and even in the places that have these near total

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>abortion bands, but they're having these ripple effects on women

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>who have wanted pregnancies that need to get medical care

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that that is an abortion but is not technically legal

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>or it's not clear of its legal And we ran

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a big story by clear said it's about maternal mortality

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>rate there, which are very high in the US for

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a developed country, and particularly high in parts of the

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>U S and she irrid in on this um rural

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>area in Texas, But we've seen so many more stories

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>since then in places that aren't you know, completely in

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the middle, you know, very with very little healthcare, where

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>people who want to have children that are running up

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>against these laws and it's very scary. Yeah, it's pretty incredible.

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And I have to say with something that I always

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>find Bloomberg Business Week does so well, Like you'll tell

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the big macro story UM and the data or the

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.959
<v Speaker 1>research behind it, but you also always have individuals so

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's so easy to get lost in

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the data, Rebecca, but I feel like when you drill

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>down and you tell individual stories, like we all can

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>relate to it. That was the year that was for women.

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It led to the breaking point Business Week cover story

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that was out back in August. We're going to continue

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with Christina and Rebecca about what three may have in

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>store when it comes to women getting back some of

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>their lost prosperity of more when our New Year's holiday

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week continues. This is Bloomberg.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio, continuing our important discussion about

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what's next for women in the United States following the

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>landmark reversal of Roe v. Wade earlier this year, we

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>spent it forward and we're still talking with Bloomberg News

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Equality Team leader Rebecca Greenfield and Bloomberg Business Week Economics

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>editor Christina Lynn Blad. Guys, you know, coming off the

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>mid terms, I think we were all just kind of

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>watching so closely to see how it played out. Um,

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder mid term outcome and then thinking ahead

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to the next presidential election. Rebecca, let me start with you,

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think things could change for the better when

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to women? Great question, so we hope so. Um.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I told the election was super interesting because abortion ended

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>up being such a big issue for voters. There were

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of referendums and some days but specifically ask

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>voters what they thought about an abortion of it wanted

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it to be legal. All of them indicated yes, people

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>want abortion protections. That also helped some Democratic candidates in

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>those days and in other places when in a year

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of people expected, you know, just the

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>usual things to happen, where the other party does not

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>empower the Republicans to get more votes. So it was

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a really big galvanizing issue. So the election and of

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>itself was super interesting from that. Absolutely, Christina, come on

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in on it, you know, as you it's what we want, right,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We want to quotify them to law. For years, we

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>lived this time waiting for a challenge to this precedent

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that might bring it down, right, it was always a possibility.

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So I am heartened. But yeah, by the results of

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the midterms that showed that reproductive rights were an issue

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in voters mind. So yeah, yeah, I was very heartened

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>by that. As we know, politics can go a lot

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of different ways in funny ways. When you look at

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>three and I do feel like there's a lot of

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the issues that we talked about that will obviously continue

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>into the new year. But Rebecca, what's kind of front

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and center for you? Definitely still abortion things I really

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>shaking out even in states where you you know, we've

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>had predicted that there were these trigger band laws. There's

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of lawsuits, there's a lot of challenges and

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>balot measures even in very deep red states that's going

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.959
<v Speaker 1>to continue to play out. And then I think that

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:47.959
<v Speaker 1>there's this like three year long fatigue of especially working

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>parents and working months that has not been any solution

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to that that nothing has been floated. I think that

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I've moved floateded have fallen through. So it's just something

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>we're always looking for and seeing if if it will happen,

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>if they'll bring anything back or can get anything past

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>help working parents. Christina, what's kind of front and center

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for you as you think about Well, I think for

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>me it's it's looking at this this possibility of recession,

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>but also a job market that has defied expectations. Um

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>stories that we've done talking to employers and which companies

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that had trouble staffing up after the COVID lockdowns are

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.959
<v Speaker 1>saying we're going to think twice and three times before

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>laying off people in a downturn, you know what I mean.

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Not not so fast, of course, it gets to happen,

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but I mean I think that sort of people look

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>at their sort of inputs of production, they really realize

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>how important labor is in the equation. And you know,

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>now as we have an economy, it's kind of skewed

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>highly towards services, so recession and yeah, and for me

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and and the labor market and and just to also

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>dial back to what Rebecca was saying in terms of childcare,

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we have something looming that's a negative, which is money

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that was in the Biden stimulus for daycare centers and

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 1>there was quite a chunk uh that money is going

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>to dry up going into like at the end of

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, in the beginning of the year, and you know,

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>we've talked to some childcare providers and they're saying they

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know how, you know, they gave their staff wage

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>increases to hang on to them because they were losing

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>them to warehouse jobs and the you know, higher paying jobs,

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and they say, we don't know how we're going to

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 1>be able to cope without this aid. And that has

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge impact, and you think about the implications of that. UM.

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I know we could talk a lot longer on this,

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and looking forward to your coverage, both of you when

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Business Week's coverage in Thank you so

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 1>much and Happy New Year. Bloomberg business Week Economics editor

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Christina Lynn Blad and Bloomberg News Equality Team leader Rebecca

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Greenfield always appreciate their thoughtful coverage and reporting. And that

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>wraps up the first hour of the weekend edition of

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol Masser, substad

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Eva back with me as we take a dive in

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the next hour down the big tech rabbit hole. Head

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>in our next hour, Elon and Tesla Metta and Mark

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Ev explosions and a museum in the desert for the

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>lucky few tech in pursuits. They're coming up next in

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>our holiday weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg.

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine. Plus

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news as it happened Sloomberg

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim Stinebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of in our second hour of this holiday weekend

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week, including the electric vehicles that

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are just so cool and so expensive they just aren't

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>mad for the masses, They're just not for you. And

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>meet him not yet, That's part of the issue. Plus

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>fine art from the Nevada desert and all the way

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Canals of Venice, and plenty of glitz and

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>glamor in between. We celebrate the best of Bloomberg pursuits.

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>In first Up this hour, we mentioned Evis Earlier the

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.879
<v Speaker 1>last hour we spoke about them at the top with

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber and Jim Elis, and Joel mentioned the man

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that may be most synonymous with electrified transport on this planet.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>You know what we're talking about, Elon Musk. Except Musk's

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 1>ultra valuable e V Empire at Tesla did not appear

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>at the top of his agenda for much of the

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>past year. Instead, it was his forty four billion dollar

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>purchase of the social media platform Twitter. Tell us make

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of what Musk really accomplished with his takeover, as

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>well as some other key takeaways from the world of

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>technology over the past twelve months. Let's bring in Bloomberg

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Business Week columnist Max Chafkin. Max, I feel like there

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>was so much to cover this past year, but a

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of it did. It did feel like every day

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 1>there was something with Elon Musk. Yeah, you know, we've

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>been writing stories uh here and other publications have two

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>over the last almost like a decade about how poorly

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>run Twitter has been. You know, it's this, um, incredibly

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>culturally salient service. You know, obviously we love that's the

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>news agenda, journals are addicted to it. But but it

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>has really struggled for a very long time to to

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 1>turn himself into a successful business. And I guess over

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the last year we've just seen maybe you know, comparatively,

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they were doing actually a pretty good job because Elon Musk,

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, world's greatest entrepreneur according to many people's you know,

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>super respective innovator, has for for whatever reason, maybe these

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>are problems of his own making, or maybe these are

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 1>actually some of the challenges with Twitter has really really

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>really struggled to run this thing. And we have just

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>watched kind of this rolling series of kind of media

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>circus slash disaster. It almost feels like, you know, the

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>political version of like the first six months of the

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump presidency or something, where um, you kind of can't

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>look away. He's just dominating conversation. But it's also not

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>totally clear, um, what exactly been accomplished. You kind of

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>took the words right out of my mouth because in

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>reading your columns over the past few months, as Elon

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Musk has spent more time on Twitter. One thing that

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind is the way that acts with people

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>tweeting about him, and it actually is similar to what

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw from President Trump when he was on Twitter.

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us a little bit about this idea that

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk is kind of like amplifying his own

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.800
<v Speaker 1>voice in several different ways through fan accounts on Twitter. Yeah.

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>So Musk has long had this kind of army of followers,

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 1>but as he's become more active on Twitter, um and

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>as he's sort of I think like leaned into this

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>mode of conversation which involves, as you said, interacting with

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>these fan accounts. Also, you know he talks to kind

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of his these these quote bought accounts that that post,

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, notable things. He said, it's it's a quote

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for me, Elon Musk. Elon Musk times in and says,

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>well said um and um. And you know, fans, anyone

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>who comes in and says you know, you're a genius,

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>or you're being persecutor or any number of things, you know,

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Musk is right there to buck them up. Now. That's

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>why I think actually a pretty good strategy from a

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of marketing perspective. Musk is I think, even still,

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>even with all the challenges at Tesla and Twitter, a

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:00.959
<v Speaker 1>really great marketer, kind of within a suitive marketing sense,

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of like I would argue Trump, but stuck in

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the kind of bubble of Twitter. We've sort of seen

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of things that I think happened to a

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of us if we spend too much time on Twitter,

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of happened to Elon Musk, where where it almost

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>feels like he's consumed with this ultimately meaningless conversation and

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe taking his eye off some more important issues, you know,

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 1>one of which is, uh, this rocket company that he's

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:24.800
<v Speaker 1>he's running that's trying to get to Mars and the

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>other courses. Is this electric car company that you know

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>faces some some serious challenges, and I think we're seeing

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>investors um and maybe even car buyers react to that.

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I always feel like when there's a headline on Elon Musk,

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm always like, oh, Ellen, because it's like this weird

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>individual who you have to give him his props in

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of pushing e vs out into the market much

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sooner than everybody thought. That the way he thinks, whether

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it's SpaceX, whether it's the boring company. He really moves

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the needle on things and really thinks in a different way.

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I've never seen a CEO of

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>a publicly held company go out on Twitter and say

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>things that could financially impact you know, his company, like

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.439
<v Speaker 1>how do you get your head around this? Well. Musk,

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, has always had this larger than life persona

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 1>has given him a lot of power, and over the

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>years we've seen that sometimes create controversy. You know, with Tesla,

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>when Tesla bought Solar City, like there was a bunch

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of lawsuits. It kind of looked like self dealing. You

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have a situation where Elon Musk can basically do whatever

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the heck he wants at these companies, which is something

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you see across you know, other tech companies. Now it

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>almost feels like with Twitter he reached escape Velocity or whatever,

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>where it's not only does he have complete control, not

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>only does he own it, but he's sort of operating

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>with no kind of controls at all, where you know,

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>where he came in with basically a bunch of his

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>friends as his you know, executive team, and it really

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>looked kind of like an army of basically Elon fanboys,

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know that is not even even the greatest executives,

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>even the greatest marketers. Um I think need good advice

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and maybe need to hear criticism, and I think that

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is has been a place where Musk struggled. Can I

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about for Elon Musk? Well? I

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>think there are a couple of questions, Like one is,

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you want Twitter to survive and thrive,

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of hoping he loses interest he you know,

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe he likes seed some day to day control

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to people who actually know what they're doing. Or maybe

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he just kind of takes his foot off the gas

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and just instead of trying to constantly

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>stir the pot, just tries to run this thing more efficiently.

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, he is capable of that, and I think

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, one thing we have seen at Twitter is that, yes,

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 1>like he's laid off huge numbers of people, have been

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>huge lots of resignations, but some people have stuck around

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>because even for all the craziness, Elon Musk is still

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>a business hero and people want to want to work

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>for him even with all the downsides. And the other

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think is probably the more important question

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is Tesla, because you know Tesla, for years and years

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>people have been talking about these other car companies are

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna have evs that are gonna be just as good

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 1>as Tesla. You know, other car companies have advantages that

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Tesla does not have service marketing, and you have these

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>competitive car companies coming, You have China being a huge

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>source of uncertainty, China super important to Tesla. And then

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you have Elon Musk lighting basically his main asset on fire,

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>which is his reputation as brand, and that I think

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to create real challenges for Tesla and could

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.400
<v Speaker 1>lead to some disruption in the EV market if if

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk doesn't find a way to kind of grab control.

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He said, you said Meta, so we got to go there,

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't say Facebook, which I thought was really

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting and also telling for one of your recent columns

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>about how mark it is. But I mean, for anyone

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>who's covered this company for its its entire existence, you

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>understand that the core business is still the business that

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>makes money, and it's still the business that investors are

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>are punishing right now. Well, I mean it's like speaking

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>of potential CEO and competence. I mean, the crazy thing

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>about the Elon Musk tenure is he's kind of made

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg look good. And I feel like, if if

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk had not, you know, been had such a

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>crazy two we to be talking about Mark Zuckerberg. How

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>could somebody take this amazing asset. Facebook is an amazing service.

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, three billion people a day are using this thing.

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like half the world's population. It is a marketing

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>engine like nothing the world has ever seen. And Zuckerberg

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>basically about a year ago, decided no, no no, no, I'm

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>done with that. We're gonna have you know, meeting rooms

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>with no avatars and no legs. We're gonna have you know,

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>second life, but Facebook version. And you know, people have

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>responded to that kind of the way that you would

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.399
<v Speaker 1>expect them to respond to that, which is they don't care.

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Facebook spent all this money, you know

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on Super Bowl ads. They ran a Super Bowl ad.

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>In February, Zuckerberg goes on the Joe Rogan podcast, you know,

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest podcast in the world, one of the most influential

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>radio shows. There is no one cares um and we're

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:46.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about you know, hundreds of thousands of people using

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>this thing called Horizon Worlds, despite the fact that Facebook

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>has spent you know, something like thirty billion dollars and

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 1>that of course has severely damaged the stock um. You know,

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's led to all sorts of questions about Mark

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>zuckerberg leadership ability because again, just like with Musk, you

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>have this guy who is basically the absolute ruler of

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the company and suddenly, you know, maybe for the first

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>time ever, seems not up to the task. And that

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is I mean that maybe that's one of the big

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 1>themes of two. We've seen these kind of you know,

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:18.839
<v Speaker 1>great leaders stumble in ways that they haven't stumbled before. Max.

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Another theme of this past year has been, you know,

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the slump that we've seen in digital advertising, is that

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem. If we weren't in that slump,

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in the economic conditions that have created that slump, that

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe Meta wouldn't be in such a tough place that

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it would be better and we'd be all kind of

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 1>more willing to deal with Zuckerberg kind of chap the company.

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And there are other factors here. Of course, you mentioned

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the slow down digital advertising. Uh, you know, if if

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg right here, he'd be you know, saying, you know,

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook and coughing. Because of course, Apple has changed

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of the rules around digital advertising ways of

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>impacted Facebook business now. I do think the broadly speaking, though,

0:44:57.000 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 1>what is happening is during COVID, during the pandemic, there

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was a lot more usage of these of these digital

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 1>services and digital advertising you know, spiked, you know suddenly,

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>probably because people are spending more time, probably because there

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>was more money to be you know, people were just

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>spending their you know, stimulus checks or whatever, and and

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that has gone away. We're going back to something that

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 1>looks like the way it was before. But like if

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you're Mark Zuckerberg, the way it was before was pretty good.

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at Facebook in twenty nineteen, and

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that was a dominant, successful company. And I think the

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>argument that you know, maybe they should have instead of

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>investing or losing really billions of dollars in the metaverse,

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe they could have just tried to show up the

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>core business. That that's something that that you're seeing investors

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>increasingly kind of bring up. Although again, you know, people

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:44.439
<v Speaker 1>still do believe in Mark Zuckerberg, and you do still

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>hear people talking about the promise of the metaverse, so

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you know it's possible that that this thing will eventually

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>come to fruition. Although it has not been a good

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>year for for Zuckerberg. I'm cloe with the metaverse. As

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>long as I have my avatar has legs. That's all

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. I like my legs right. Also, check out

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Max has had some great reporting on Sam Bateman fried

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:05.280
<v Speaker 1>f t X, including the food behind the Crypto collapse.

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>That was a really great story. Um Max Chapkin calumnist

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 1>for the magazine, covering so many different things and of

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>course all things tech. Max, thank you so much, thanks

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for having me. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week coming up,

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we hit the road with our Bloomberg Pursuits team and

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>check out some sweet rides and amazing, aren't we do? Indeed,

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. Please sees Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Tim Stinevic from Bloomberg Radio. Alright, time for

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>babbles and Bugatti's, museums and Maserati's and many inspiring and

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>just really cool things in between. You like what I

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>did there, didn't you? It's Chris Rouser. Chris Rouser is

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the editor of Bloomberg Pursuits. You can hear him chuckling

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:53.840
<v Speaker 1>at the great writing that Carol just read. He's our

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>We also joined Literation Writing one oh one. We're also

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:01.280
<v Speaker 1>joined by our intrepid auto columnist Han to Elliott. Every

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>week a trip into the world of wow and wonderful.

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>We do that in the world of Bloomberg Pursuits. So, Chris,

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 1>how you know, going into the end of the year

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>thinking about everything that Hannah has done throughout the year,

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 1>throughout well, I mean, I don't want to put too

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 1>much Hannah her career. Are you thinking about the end

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 1>of the year issue? You know, Hannah has maybe the

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>coolest job of anyone in there. You know, we're talking

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:29.440
<v Speaker 1>about world Hannah, I'm talking about right in front of her.

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, she test drives all these incredible cars,

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 1>but she also has like a bird's eye view into

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole industry, especially when it comes to luxury cars,

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>uh and where the industry is going electric vehicles. And

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, she was talking about the cars that she

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>reviewed this year, and she was talking about how she

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>crab walked with like the electric hummer through the Desert

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and she drives these incredible Porsche's and and it was

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>just so fun to think about everything that she's tried

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 1>out um and everything that she's seen this year. So

0:47:57.520 --> 0:47:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we had a lot of fun looking back at the

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>year with her favorite cars. Well, speaking of cars, I mean,

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like evs are there's gonna be a

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of buying next year. But how do you think

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>about it from your advantage point? Hannah, Well, I have

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to say I was so happy this year with the

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>offerings from the e V world. I mean, for so long,

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, it's been Tesla and then you know, we

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:22.439
<v Speaker 1>had like a Prius as a hybrid and some other

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of minor things. But this is the first year

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that really the luxury automakers gave us some real options

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in the e V world. I mean, Audie has their

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Etron line, which include a small sedan and then like

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a hatchback thing and an SUV. BMW gave us multiple

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sedan and SUV e vs. We're seeing a whole EQ

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>line from Mercedes of evs. So this is the first

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>year where it has really felt like, wow, we have

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of options, and I think it's been really

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting that is. You know, we start to hear some

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>people say, I'm not feeling so hot about Tesla cars.

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, for many reasons, people are kind of ready

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to like what else is there? And finally, we actually

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>do have a lot of things to choose from. And

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:09.919
<v Speaker 1>we talk about this all the time in pursuits because

0:49:10.000 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>luxury people don't always realize the way that luxury can

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.799
<v Speaker 1>define the rest of an industry. You may remember Miranda's

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>cerulean monologue from The Devil Horse product Um, but Tesla really,

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it taught people that an e V doesn't

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>have to look like a Lodgins, doesn't look like have

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>to look like a toaster that you're driving, you know,

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and and we're hoping that people are learning about that

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this year. You know, Hannah has all these prescriptions that

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:36.279
<v Speaker 1>she thinks that should happen in the next year. So

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 1>not only like electric cars are gonna look better, they're

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna drive better, they're gonna have better luxury quality, but

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 1>also they need to be cheaper, right Hannah, Yeah, you

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 1>know I remember writing that story. And you know, the

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:49.800
<v Speaker 1>average price of an evy is almost seventy thou dollars,

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 1>where the average price of a regular non e electric

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 1>new car is closer to forty eight thousand dollars, so

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>there's still a really big price disparity. And it is

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>true at the omit that typically evs are driven by

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:04.520
<v Speaker 1>weth your people. Well, if evs are going to save

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the world, they need to be driven by a wide

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 1>range of people. It's not just about getting more high

0:50:10.040 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>priced evis in the market, even though personally that's what

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:15.799
<v Speaker 1>that's what I love, um, it is really about, you know,

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>giving a broad range from very affordable to of course

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of options. Is this the one with a

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 1>refrigerated champagne cooler. I think many of them have nothing

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to drive a wagon, I know, standard issue rolls, Royce

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:37.279
<v Speaker 1>paraphernalia right there. It's interesting because you you don't you know,

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people who don't drive evs, I

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>think are worried about range. They have range anxiety. But

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>as you write in one of your recent pieces, most

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Americans are only driving what fewer than forty miles a day,

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:52.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's not necessarily that you need a longer range.

0:50:52.280 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But you still write that you need charging to be better.

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean by that? Right, that's a great point.

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I think, um Now, really, what I hear and what

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I experienced when I drive these vvs is not really

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>range anxiety. It's more about charging anxiety. And what I

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>mean by that is the availability of chargers once you

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 1>get there, that they're not broken, they're not occupied, and

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to take the twelve hours to charge.

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>All of those are things that um, yes, have to

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>do with the network, the charging network that we need

0:51:23.719 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to improve, but also with charged times that these evs

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:30.240
<v Speaker 1>can have. Once they can charge quicker and quicker and quicker,

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that will really alleviate a lot of the anxiety that

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>consumers have around evs, not just with range, but also

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>with what is very valuable time. Yeah, and that's also

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 1>an access thing, right, I mean, that's also more more

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>people can have it when that it's that's that's more robust. Now.

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Something we also talk about a lot is that the

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>most green thing you can do is not even buy

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a new car. It's by an old car, which brings

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:57.239
<v Speaker 1>up is my favorite thing, which is which brings up

0:51:57.239 --> 0:51:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one of me and Hannah's favorite websites, which is bringing

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 1>trailer dot com You, Hannah and my dad. Yeah, there's

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 1>probably lots of Dad's right. Not a week that goes

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>by that Hannah doesn't send me a listing of a

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeep Grand Wagon. Here, you need this, and it's down

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>incredibly well this year, right, Hannah, it has done insane.

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Bring a Trailer was formed about ten years ago. This

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>year they already clelled cleared one billion dollar in sales

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and they are on track to do about one point

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars in sales this year, which is astounding. Now.

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Bring a Trailer, of course, is the online auction website

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>where you can search for any car basically and you

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>can join a live auction and see bids put in

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>real time and quotes, uh comments and and people talking

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>about the car in real time. It's really addictive and

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it's really fun. And the beauty of it is the

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>fees are so low, so it's really beat this old

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 1>auction model of selling cars live, you know, under auction tens.

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:08.319
<v Speaker 1>It's really fast, it's cheap, and it's really fun. I

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>think people have, you know, this idea that the types

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of cars available and Bring a Trailer are those really

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:15.920
<v Speaker 1>inaccessible vehicle stuff that's super expensive. But you write that

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>there's really you know, it really runs the gamut Oh,

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there's something for everyone. I mean, I get on and look.

0:53:22.239 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Chris knows, I've I've been a little bit

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with old corvettes, like C three corvettes. You can

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:29.319
<v Speaker 1>you can get on and find, you know, an old

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>corvette for ten thousand bucks. You can look for old broncos.

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You can look for old BMW wagons which actually are

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of going up in value. Um, you can. There's

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:41.919
<v Speaker 1>there's something for everyone again, And I think that's why

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's so popular. Even if you're not actively fitting, you

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:48.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of think you could because not everything is that expensive,

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's really fun to get on and just live

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:55.839
<v Speaker 1>vicariously through whatever auction you're following at the moment. What's

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 1>really cool is it sounds like that's why this individual, right,

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the founder of the making right the Bloomberg fifty on

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the list this year. Yeah. I'm really happy that he

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:08.360
<v Speaker 1>has been on the list because the point of the

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg fifty is to really highlight people who have up

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:14.279
<v Speaker 1>ended their industries, and Randy really did that. You know,

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he comes from uh he worked at a BMW dealership

0:54:18.560 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 1>UM in northern California, and he and some friends were

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of just trading car listings back and forth to

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:26.959
<v Speaker 1>each other, which is kind of how this idea was born.

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And he has really transformed, uh, the industry. Like I said,

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>with something that is really accessible, easy, you get instant gratification.

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And it has forced the other auction houses like Gooding,

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>r M, Southby's, Bottoms to come up with their own

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ways of selling cars online. He he really showed this

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is a lucrative endeavor and it's forced the other guys

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to kind of follow, hurry up and and follow follow suit,

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, rap and around? Uh yes or no? How

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 1>do you buy in a car this year? This coming year? No?

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:03.359
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I already bought two. I bought one last year.

0:55:03.880 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris Rouser, No, no I need. I just need a

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 1>vehicle that can transport a toddler and I already have that.

0:55:09.640 --> 0:55:15.400
<v Speaker 1>To no way, I'm happy with this. Sad, I don't know.

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got a nineteen year old is like I got

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 1>my license, It's time for a car. So well, thine

0:55:19.320 --> 0:55:22.760
<v Speaker 1>she should buy the car. Tv D t B D guys,

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Happy New Year, Happy holidays. I

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:29.399
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Bloomberg Pursuits auto commist Hannah Elliott for all

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of our great work. We love reading our columns this year,

0:55:31.760 --> 0:55:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and we look forward to what's to come in still

0:55:34.719 --> 0:55:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to come on Bloomberg Business Week, Chris Rouser sticking with us,

0:55:37.400 --> 0:55:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to dive into the even pricier world

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of fine art. This is Bloomberg Broadcasting from the financial

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>capital of the world, Bloomberg. He Love the Frio in

0:55:50.520 --> 0:55:55.040
<v Speaker 1>New York to Washington, d C. Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg

0:55:55.080 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 1>one O six one does San Francisco, Bloomberg nine six

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to the country, Sirius xm chenal one Mine Team and

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 1>around the globe the Bloomberg Business and Bloomberg Radio dot Com.

0:56:05.719 --> 0:56:09.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Stenova from Bloomberg Radio. It wouldn't be a best of

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Pursuits discussion if we didn't highlight some of the

0:56:17.960 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 1>work and travel of our great arts columnist James Army.

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He is pretty incredible, You know that? Are you just

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:25.759
<v Speaker 1>saying that because he's with us right now? Kind of okay? Well,

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:28.839
<v Speaker 1>he is with love, I love you know. Just keep

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:31.719
<v Speaker 1>it coming please. In addition to James, we were also

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>really pleased to have back with us Bloomberg Pursuits editor

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris Rouser. He's gonna take us inside some of the

0:56:36.840 --> 0:56:40.160
<v Speaker 1>most exclusive places in the art world and beyond time

0:56:40.200 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to go mind some art, Chris, I want to I

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:44.760
<v Speaker 1>want to start with you because you oversee the Pursuits

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>section and kind of just how your approach this year

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 1>when in the context of what James does in art, Well,

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the amazing thing about the Pursuits team is they have

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 1>an incredible level of access um. So when James goes

0:56:56.680 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to art fairs, for example, he knows all of the

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:01.960
<v Speaker 1>gallery and he knows some of the artists, and he

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:04.840
<v Speaker 1>gets invited into everything um. And one of the coolest

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:07.880
<v Speaker 1>things he did this year was he was the second

0:57:07.920 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 1>journalist to go into the city, which is this giant,

0:57:11.520 --> 0:57:15.279
<v Speaker 1>incredible art creation and then the Nevada Desert um and

0:57:15.320 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 1>he was really the first journalist to go around and

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about what it was like to be there. So

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we have all these incredible opportunities for coverage because James

0:57:21.840 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is such an expert and know so many people. Was

0:57:23.600 --> 0:57:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that like your favorite moment of the year? Really, it

0:57:25.800 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was one of these singular bucket list experiences that I

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.240
<v Speaker 1>had obviously known about for a while, because so what

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about is this art installation in the Nevada

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 1>desert that has been under construction for fifty years, so

0:57:37.120 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not exactly a secret, but something that no one was

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 1>allowed into, at least professionally for a really, really long time.

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So it had been on my radar and basically this

0:57:47.720 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 1>year they have finally started allowing people inside and I

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:54.439
<v Speaker 1>had been dying to go and managed to actually make

0:57:54.760 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the make the trek. So what was it like? So

0:57:58.000 --> 0:58:01.040
<v Speaker 1>getting there is a whole thing. You know, it's around

0:58:01.280 --> 0:58:05.240
<v Speaker 1>three hours from Las Vegas, but the first hour and

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a half you're on highway, find smooth sailing. But then

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you get to this town of Alamo and you get

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 1>into this kind of tricked out suv and you spend

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the next hour and a half driving through the desert

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you sort of appear at this massive installation,

0:58:21.200 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 1>which at first you don't realize that it's there because

0:58:24.160 --> 0:58:27.600
<v Speaker 1>most of it is excavated underground. So then you kind

0:58:27.600 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of get into it and all of a sudden you

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:32.880
<v Speaker 1>realize that you're in something that doesn't look like anything

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you've ever seen before. Basically, it's utterly quiet because you're

0:58:36.360 --> 0:58:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there totally by yourself. While I was walking through it,

0:58:39.680 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I began to figure out what the artist was trying

0:58:42.480 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to do, which is create a maximalist form of minimalism,

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:49.520
<v Speaker 1>which sounds sort of abstract, but in reality he was

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:52.600
<v Speaker 1>able to take the contours of the earth and create

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:55.720
<v Speaker 1>this kind of exquisite, almost three dimensional painting out of it.

0:58:55.760 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about the artists and and his history and

0:58:58.160 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 1>land art. Yeah, so he is a progenitor of this.

0:59:01.360 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Michael. This is Michael Heiser. He is sort

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of a like a cowboy. A whole part of land

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>art was like saying that New York gallleries were way

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:12.680
<v Speaker 1>too fancy and pop art with way too glitzy, and

0:59:12.680 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to kind of go back into nature and

0:59:14.240 --> 0:59:17.240
<v Speaker 1>impress themselves upon the land. So, of course the New

0:59:17.280 --> 0:59:19.479
<v Speaker 1>York galleries are paying for all of this, but let's

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not focus too much on that. But he dug these

0:59:22.160 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>huge trenches in a mesa, and he's done these kind

0:59:26.680 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of concrete indentations in California. He's very much a person

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>who not only places his own idea of minimalism on

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the land, but he gets people behind it, and he

0:59:38.360 --> 0:59:40.880
<v Speaker 1>gets people to kind of get extremely excited about it

0:59:40.960 --> 0:59:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and fund all of his crazy endeavors, and this is

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:47.000
<v Speaker 1>really the craziest of them all. Was there any risk

0:59:47.120 --> 0:59:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that once you you took the trip, that there's a

0:59:48.960 --> 0:59:50.720
<v Speaker 1>chance that you couldn't have gone to see it or

0:59:50.760 --> 0:59:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't have let you in the end. Actually, I

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 1>was delayed a couple of days because it rained, which

0:59:57.400 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is an unusual thing, um, and it washed out the

1:00:01.520 --> 1:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>road and made it totally impassable. But no, once I

1:00:05.200 --> 1:00:08.919
<v Speaker 1>had been kind of locked into going, it was all

1:00:09.120 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>pre arranged. The thing was that they kept saying no

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for a really, really really long time until they finally

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>said yes, and I called up Chris and I was like,

1:00:17.840 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting on a plane. Can we go now? Or no?

1:00:20.640 --> 1:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Good luck? Well. And so it costs very little, I

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>think around a hundred and fifty dollars, and that's just

1:00:27.240 --> 1:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for the cost of transportation that they provide for you. Um,

1:00:30.040 --> 1:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's assumes that you're in Las Vegas, which is

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the case. When it was announced that it

1:00:34.640 --> 1:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>was open to the public, around ten thousand people applied

1:00:38.000 --> 1:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to visit in the first week. Um. It is very

1:00:42.160 --> 1:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>very sought after thing, and their whole attitude about it

1:00:45.560 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is that people should be able to have the experience

1:00:47.400 --> 1:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that I had, which is this kind of quiet, solitary,

1:00:50.720 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>multi hour long experience in it. And that means that

1:00:53.000 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they're really limiting how many people can come in at

1:00:55.160 --> 1:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>any time. Moreover, they don't let people in when it's

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>bad weather, when it's raining, because they just can't get there.

1:01:00.800 --> 1:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So you can go, but there's a bit of weight

1:01:04.080 --> 1:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that you'll have to expect to be able to make.

1:01:05.880 --> 1:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But the good news is it's there and it's not

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>going anywhere. Well, speaking of something that's there, and finally

1:01:10.200 --> 1:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>back is the Venice bien l A. The long delay

1:01:13.760 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>due to COVID, you got to go there as well.

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>How were the themes this year in terms of, you know,

1:01:18.880 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>how they're thinking about the year. Let me just say

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Venice bion l A is why I have

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>stayed an art journalist. It is absolutely the most funds

1:01:28.000 --> 1:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>because they turn over the entire city of Venice to art.

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So you get to go into these private homes, you

1:01:36.480 --> 1:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>get to see all of the most cutting edge artworks

1:01:39.880 --> 1:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which countries from around the world have brought. Um. You

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>get to kind of trapes through the Jardini looking at

1:01:46.440 --> 1:01:51.439
<v Speaker 1>these different pavilions filled with different national efforts. Um. It's

1:01:51.600 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge deal. And beyond it simply being fun, it's

1:01:55.040 --> 1:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>actually super, super, super important because what it does is

1:01:59.360 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it charged arts basically the way that the rest of

1:02:02.320 --> 1:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the art world is going to go for the next

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>several years. Um. It's a it's a way of seeing

1:02:07.640 --> 1:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be next. So for a while, the

1:02:10.800 --> 1:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>art world had been really inward looking, or maybe not

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>even inward looking in the art world itself, but inward

1:02:15.720 --> 1:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>looking on the people who are making the art. Very

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>much about identity, politics, very much about nationality and background

1:02:23.840 --> 1:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and biography. That has really begun to change, first to

1:02:28.200 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>be kind of change in Venice, and now we're actually

1:02:29.920 --> 1:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing it change in the art market itself. In Venice,

1:02:32.400 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it was all about the future. What it was about ecology,

1:02:36.240 --> 1:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It was about climate change, very very interesting because it

1:02:39.800 --> 1:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>was trying to take an artistic perspective and really apply

1:02:43.280 --> 1:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it to something that affects everyone. Um. And sometimes it

1:02:46.480 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>was successful and sometimes it wasn't. But it was very

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>different than what we've been seeing for a while. There

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is one story I want to get to that you did. Um.

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>This past year, James, and I feel like this is

1:02:55.200 --> 1:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>near and dear also to Chris, and this has to

1:02:58.040 --> 1:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>do with watches, Southbyes, Pablo Picassos. So Chris, first of all,

1:03:02.800 --> 1:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this story, I mean watches, you guys do a lot

1:03:05.440 --> 1:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of coverage. We know you love them, um, but they

1:03:07.960 --> 1:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>have become quite the investment. Watches have had a kind

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of up and down year this year. Um. They became

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>huge in the past couple of years on the secondary market,

1:03:15.280 --> 1:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>which is people buying pre owned watches online or at auction,

1:03:18.800 --> 1:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and that was partially fueled by like the crypto craze.

1:03:21.240 --> 1:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It was very much like a speculation sting and also

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a pride thing. Um. And prices have softened in the

1:03:25.800 --> 1:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year, which is which is good,

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think. But Christie's and Sotheby's and the other auction

1:03:30.400 --> 1:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>houses have really started focusing on luxury because the whole

1:03:33.440 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>secondhand market, from bags to cars to watches to jewelry

1:03:37.480 --> 1:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>has really really boomed. And there you know, they don't

1:03:40.200 --> 1:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>make as much money on a particular piece, like a

1:03:42.160 --> 1:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Protech is not going to go up for as much

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>as a Picasso, but there's a lot more protexts out

1:03:47.160 --> 1:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there than there are picassos, and it's easier to play

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a volume game with them. So James talked to the

1:03:51.480 --> 1:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Southebys about their whole luxury strategy, which has

1:03:54.480 --> 1:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>really evolved in the past couple of years. It's interesting

1:03:57.400 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>because for a while, quote unquote, luxury was something that

1:04:01.200 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>was very much less than less prestigious, less interesting, less volume,

1:04:06.480 --> 1:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>less room for growth than art for a lot of

1:04:08.360 --> 1:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>these auction houses. And they realized relatively recently that actually

1:04:12.400 --> 1:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this was a huge growth market that they could really

1:04:15.080 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>tap into. And that coincided with, of course, a lot

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of people board at home during COVID buying stuff, and

1:04:22.000 --> 1:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there was a supply shock. Right If everyone all of

1:04:24.960 --> 1:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a sudden has extra money because they're not spending it

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on travel or restaurants, and everyone decides that, you know,

1:04:29.600 --> 1:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to treat themselves to a fancy watch, well

1:04:31.720 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>there's only a finite number of fancy watches out there,

1:04:33.840 --> 1:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>as Chris can talk about. So ultimately auction has become

1:04:37.200 --> 1:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a major beneficiary of people realizing that if they wanted

1:04:40.520 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a fancy watch, they were going to have to buy

1:04:42.040 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a used one, and that has become not only a

1:04:46.880 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>source of growth for these auction houses, but a a

1:04:49.600 --> 1:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>real strategy for the way that these auction houses are

1:04:52.760 --> 1:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>charting their course over the next couple of years. You

1:04:55.400 --> 1:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>got to say, I can't wait for the coverage Pursuits

1:04:57.960 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>coverage in the coming year. It's always a fun thing

1:04:59.800 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and love kind of sitting in here and just chatting

1:05:01.840 --> 1:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with you guys all about it to looking forward to it.

1:05:03.680 --> 1:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having us, Yeah, thank you. Happy New Year.

1:05:06.200 --> 1:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>That's Bloomberg Pursuits editor Chris Rouser, along with arts columnists

1:05:09.480 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>James Tarmy. Another amazing year of work from the entire team, guys,

1:05:13.080 --> 1:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and we really barely scratched the surface. Carrol, Yeah, so

1:05:15.800 --> 1:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>much there to cover. Check it all out online at

1:05:18.360 --> 1:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash business Week. Our deepest thanks to Chris,

1:05:21.760 --> 1:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>James and all the other great individuals we get to

1:05:24.040 --> 1:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>work with. Jim Gaddy, Kate Crater, Hannah Elliott of course,

1:05:27.040 --> 1:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>are undercover reporter Brandon press Or, just to name a few.

1:05:29.880 --> 1:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He's always worth a read, always worth of giggle. Uh

1:05:33.600 --> 1:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And we just love reading your work and being able

1:05:35.800 --> 1:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to bring it out to the world. You're listening to

1:05:37.920 --> 1:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week coming up We wrap up our New

1:05:40.440 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Year's weekend programming with some final thoughts from the editor

1:05:43.080 --> 1:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine, Joe Weber. This is Bloomberg. You're listening

1:05:54.240 --> 1:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim Stinovic

1:05:58.520 --> 1:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. We brought up our New Year's holiday

1:06:03.000 --> 1:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Weekend. With it, we want

1:06:05.680 --> 1:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring back the editor of Bloomberg Business Week, Joel Weber.

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Joel so much. We talked about the Top China, we

1:06:11.520 --> 1:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about Ellen, a lot of important stories from the

1:06:13.800 --> 1:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>past year. That wholely issue devoted to crypto. How are

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you thinking about three already? Look, I think we spent

1:06:20.240 --> 1:06:23.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time talking about crypto this year, and

1:06:24.240 --> 1:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that story is over. You know an

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing here. There was a cover story we did

1:06:29.280 --> 1:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the year about the Lehman Brothers saga.

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>We are more than a decade after Lehman, We're still

1:06:35.600 --> 1:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>unwinding Lehman. And that story was about the consultants who

1:06:38.520 --> 1:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>come in and basically are squeezing every last dime out

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of the state of Lehman Brothers. Right, and here we

1:06:43.440 --> 1:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are with Crypto. I don't know if it's gonna last

1:06:45.240 --> 1:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>ten more years to squeeze everything out that that was there,

1:06:48.680 --> 1:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but we are going through something. This Crypto winter that

1:06:51.280 --> 1:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we've been documenting all year culminates with the Crypto story

1:06:54.680 --> 1:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>by Matt Levin and the magazine covered cover issue, and

1:06:58.120 --> 1:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in that time since then, look you've got the ft

1:07:00.760 --> 1:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>X implosion, You've got more quakes, and it just feels

1:07:04.960 --> 1:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like this industry that has been growing for a decade,

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but now it sort of feels on far shakier ground.

1:07:12.200 --> 1:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think we're nearly done covering crypto. Next year.

1:07:15.080 --> 1:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>As a business journalist, it excites me because there's gonna

1:07:18.000 --> 1:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>be much more to say, many more developments, and I

1:07:19.960 --> 1:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>don't begin to have a clue what those could look like,

1:07:22.280 --> 1:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but we'll be there. But that also ties into I

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>think another big topic here, which is the global economy

1:07:27.280 --> 1:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and the American economy and what we're now living through

1:07:31.360 --> 1:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of interest race increases. It just speaks to

1:07:35.320 --> 1:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what the economy we're all going to be talking about

1:07:38.000 --> 1:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>this more next year. And the R word recession is

1:07:41.600 --> 1:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>one that we've been talking about a lot, but like

1:07:44.000 --> 1:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>whether or not America falls into recession, if it manages

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to stay out of it, if there's the soft landing, Like,

1:07:49.880 --> 1:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not nearly done talking about j PAL and the

1:07:52.400 --> 1:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>FED or inflation, right, So so that's gonna be a

1:07:55.600 --> 1:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>topic of conversation. And boy, I hope we get to

1:07:57.520 --> 1:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about markets going up rather than down, because that

1:08:00.680 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was all we got to really do this year. So

1:08:02.720 --> 1:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the short seller's calling and they're really ticked off

1:08:04.800 --> 1:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>at you. Well, that's I mean, that's my question though,

1:08:06.680 --> 1:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and specifically about technology because if we think about sort

1:08:09.640 --> 1:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of one change that we saw in two it was

1:08:12.880 --> 1:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>layoffs and Silicon Valley, the potential that tech sort of

1:08:16.200 --> 1:08:18.559
<v Speaker 1>loses its mantle as being, you know, one of the

1:08:18.600 --> 1:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>main drivers and engines of this economy. And I'm not

1:08:21.840 --> 1:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>saying it's gonna necessarily lose that, but it's it's not

1:08:24.400 --> 1:08:26.679
<v Speaker 1>what it was in the era of low interest rates.

1:08:26.960 --> 1:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Look like, I think we are having an existential moment

1:08:30.360 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. I don't think that the tech industry is

1:08:33.439 --> 1:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>going away anytime soon, but I do think the valuations

1:08:37.080 --> 1:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that we saw, the lack of profitability that a lot

1:08:39.960 --> 1:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of these companies have had, We're in a moment now

1:08:42.439 --> 1:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>where the when the cost of money becomes exponentially greater,

1:08:46.680 --> 1:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the appetite for risk comes down, and our alli becomes

1:08:50.360 --> 1:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a consideration that probably hasn't been when money was free.

1:08:53.640 --> 1:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're just in a tough spot for

1:08:56.320 --> 1:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>a second, and it's going to challenge a lot of

1:08:59.680 --> 1:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>very smart people to really really push for things that matter.

1:09:05.080 --> 1:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think the it's going to be an exciting

1:09:07.400 --> 1:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>time to watch. We're not nearly done with it. You

1:09:09.439 --> 1:09:11.519
<v Speaker 1>think about some of the strides that had been made

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and where things like artificial intelligence could or could not go.

1:09:15.160 --> 1:09:17.639
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a wonder It's a really exciting time

1:09:17.680 --> 1:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to be alive and see where some of this stuff goes.

1:09:20.120 --> 1:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And in general, I am an optimist, so I hope

1:09:23.280 --> 1:09:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that we can have more sun and less clouds next year.

1:09:26.760 --> 1:09:28.479
<v Speaker 1>But it also does speak to like back to the

1:09:28.479 --> 1:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>crypto idea um something that largely like what's it for again?

1:09:32.320 --> 1:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, like, is that is that going to be

1:09:34.200 --> 1:09:37.479
<v Speaker 1>a thing that can continue tender or are we in

1:09:37.520 --> 1:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a much more rational, tangible version of reality. Well, one

1:09:41.720 --> 1:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of the best parts of our job is getting to

1:09:43.280 --> 1:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>work with you each and every day. That's Bloomberg business.

1:09:45.640 --> 1:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We get her Joel Weber, who is with us once again,

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a constant for us and the head of one of

1:09:50.160 --> 1:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the best business publications in the world. I'm gonna go

1:09:52.240 --> 1:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead and say the best business publication. We love working

1:09:55.320 --> 1:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>with you and the team, and thank you so much

1:09:56.880 --> 1:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining us this year. Happy New Year, Joel, Thank you.

1:09:59.040 --> 1:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up the weekend edition, our holiday weekend edition,

1:10:02.080 --> 1:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>our New Year's edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio.

1:10:05.160 --> 1:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us. I'm Carol Masser

1:10:07.040 --> 1:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Tim Stanovik. Be sure to tune into Bloomberg

1:10:09.080 --> 1:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Monday through Friday, starting at two pm Wall

1:10:11.400 --> 1:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Street Time on Bloomberg Radio. You can also watch our

1:10:13.720 --> 1:10:16.599
<v Speaker 1>daily broadcast. Check us out on YouTube just search Bloomberg

1:10:16.600 --> 1:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Global News, and check out our Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

1:10:19.400 --> 1:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You can find that at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcast. Bloomberg Business Week available on

1:10:24.120 --> 1:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>newsstands now at Bloomberg dot com, slash business Week, and

1:10:27.160 --> 1:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal. You can also check us

1:10:29.280 --> 1:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>out on Bloomberg Quick Take, available at Bloomberg dot com,

1:10:31.880 --> 1:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>slash Qt, and streaming platforms like Roku, Apple, TV, Samsung

1:10:35.360 --> 1:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>TV and more. Happy New Year. Everyone, be well world.

1:10:38.240 --> 1:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg.