WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2020 NFL MegaPod Week 14 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Check it down Man, No down Man, Thursday morning to

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>number ten, beating the book Podcast Mega Pod for a

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>week number fourteen. Can't believe that. For the National Football League,

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, thanks for tuning in once again. I've had

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a ball with this all season long. We continue to

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>have a blast with us. I haven't seen a penny

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Mikey with the good folks over, haven't. We haven't. That's right,

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we haven't. I'm sorry I say that out loud ready

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>with the Vaga Pod. I appreciate it. I think I

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>had a big week last week, tod It's gonna update

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that momentarily, as always the regulars on the show. What

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm dejected now, I'm blown the lead. You're you zoom

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>past me. I can't beat one into one and two

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for like four straight weeks. I know. I'd like to,

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to brag, but I'm like twenty seventeen and

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>two or something, so it's not that much to brag about.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the voice of Mike Palm, the the conciliary to

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Derek Stevens here at Circuit Sports, Vice President of Operations.

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Mikey for having us at the d where

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we are live each and every week. It's exciting, exciting

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to be at bar Canada, exciting to have a Canadian on. Yes,

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>an actual Canadian, real life Canadian. Let's say hello to

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Todd Wishing at first tailor staple of the show. Hello Todd,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>how are you? Todd? Hi? Mike, how are you start

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the showtime Action? Our docuseries Action And the actual Canadian

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>that you're talking about, because we're coming from bar Canada

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>air at the day, I believe it's in Alberta, Canada,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Am correct in that? Is that correct? Adam Alberta, Canada. Yes, indeed,

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the great Adam Churnoff, who I have never had the

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>pleasure of meeting before. I've never had the pleasure of

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>having him on the podcast. Uh. He is the host

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of The Simple Handicap. Wherever podcasts are distributed, Uh, it

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is a must listen, especially in the year of COVID,

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to have updates on a daily basis. You do a

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>spectacular job with that. You do a spectacular job on

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Visa on Follow the Money, Adam, thank you for doing

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this man, thanks for having me on. It's the megaput.

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to it. Thank you. I appreciate it. Um. So,

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the three best bets and our

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>teaser legs, uh Survivor thoughts, and of course the final

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>two questions about which big favorite is most likely lose

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>out right? Which game you want no part of? Mikey

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a Circus Survivor and if you want to a circum

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Millions update if you'd like, well the millions everybody, how

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>could you pick a loser? I mean, we're a hundred

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and fifty people went five and oh and I managed

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to eight hundred and eighty one. People are four and

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>one are better to start out the fourth quarter? So

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm like Cramer on the on the final quarterly, I'm like,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm out. So yeah, that's where that stands. And the

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 1>presence the guy that has three entries, he's in first

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>third and died for ten Adam, are you in Circle Millions?

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I am not not involved in any content. If I

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>if I lived a little bit closer, potentially that would change. Yes.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Now in the Survivor, we went from one oh three

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>down to eighty nine, with twelve entries going the way

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Dodo on the Seahawks who are upset by

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, and another two on Monday with your football

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>team rallying from fourteen nothing down with the help of

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a missing Caball to upset the Steelers and end there

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and then and then their undefeated season. So we're down

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to eighty nine, of which two have the Seahawks available

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this week laying fourteen against the Jets at home. Yes,

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>so this week comes down this was so I look

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>at it this way as one of the final eighty

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>nine people in there, or it's actually eighty four people

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but eight um five with two. This is the This

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is the final week where there is either no carnage

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>at all because everybody's going to take the Seahawks and

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they end up winning, which is very possible to be

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, or it's supreme carnage in that everybody takes

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks and somehow they managed to lose that game.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is the final week where I think it.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the last week where everybody's got the

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>obvious team available. After this, it's going to get very interesting.

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Three and a half still my over under on the chop.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I like my number to twenty nine and a half

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>todds going under on both of us. James Salinas, your

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>friend and professional contest player and a co host of

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the Mike Pritchard Power Hour on Visa and UH said

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>that my number was super sharp, that he put it

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>right at thirty. Uh, and it was based on seven

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>people last week having two entries still Uh, the multiple

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>entries um all is convinced at sixty now he went

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>out from fifty to sixty five after last. People don't

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>understand there's still a quarter of the season left. After

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this week, it's going to go. Week seventeen will be

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>very difficult because you have to assess who's trying to play. Correct,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing, and hopefully you're down to you know,

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 1>few enough people. If you're still in that your headge

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>can be pretty obvious. And circummillions Uh, Las Vegas Chris,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>who was a it was nice enough to get a

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>guest on the megapod last week, mentioned to me that

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>people should know because he's got two entries in contention.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're at the top of circum millions, know that

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the tiebreaker is the last quarter and so you've kind

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of already virtually lost a half game before you even

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>start here. Correct, Yeah, there's tiebreakers. There are no tiebreakers

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>and survivor why did you decide on that tiebreaker, by

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, because we wanted one person to win a

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Yeah, we wanted to give a check for

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a million. Uma there was I I understand why you

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>survived with the and that's why I have this background

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>up for you in the Raiders game. I thought about

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it long and hard, and now I finally realized what

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>happened last week. I was winning every single early game bet,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>which I did win except for one, which was the

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Houston Texans plus three against the Colts. And the Texans

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>were inside the five yard line late in the game.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>All they have to do is punch it in. They

0:05:57.839 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>go up by one, they end up losing by two

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and a OG or they end up winning the game.

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And I cover every single game now because Hashem doesn't

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like me, he won't let me get a full slate

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of bets all to win. So and then the law

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of physics says that energy cannot be you know, lost

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>or gained. It can only be transformed. So the energy

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that was being used to wipe me out in that

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>football game was then no longer available when Greg Williams's

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>brain needed to tell them to be in pre event. Therefore,

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>allowing for the most ridiculous ending in the history of

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a football game, and you surviving in Survivors. So that

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>was probably the only I wish you had a camera

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on me. When my eye saw Henry Ruggs go past

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson at that ball was in the air, I

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>went ballistic by two things. One for those who are like,

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 1>what is Hashem? Hashem again the Hebrew for the name,

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>which is what orthodox use. Todd was one of them,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>once upon a time called God, and Todd believes that

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Hashem has a lifelong fan dead against him. I don't

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:07.559
<v Speaker 1>believe in the old man with a scoreboard type of God.

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But I just do it as a joke because we

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>always joke around about how I find a way to

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>lose to an earthquake. It's only you who gets bad beats,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not only you, know, it is only let's put it

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>this way, everyone gets a certain percentage of bad beats.

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I get fifth standard deviation. Okay, I don't know about that. Uh.

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>This is where I go to Adam though, because on

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the simple handicap Adam. Adam has done a spectacular job

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of out of laying out what happened at the end

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of that game, and I think it was in the prison.

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>You correct me if I'm rolling adam of people who

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a tank. You you had a whole

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>thing about this. Yeah. So I'm lifelong Jets fan from Saskatchewan, Canada,

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>which makes a lot of sense, but they've always in

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>my but like Greg Williams has a history of doing this,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and he essentially did it the entire two thousand's seventeen

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>season with the Browns, who also happened to have sort

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of a similar record to the Jets, which hopefully I

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>don't they don't finish with. But like, remember when he

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>did that whole angel safety thing where he was playing

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy like thirty yards off the line of scrimmage

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>up a touchdown against Darren Rodgers and thought it was

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a good idea and he just let the Packers walk

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>down the field twice in the fourth quarter and overtime

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't really there was nobody was talking about

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>panking like we are now um at that time, and

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>he sort of got a pass for it. And so

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>like I think now he's doing essentially or was doing

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the exact opposite with the Jets when he's bringing zero

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>blitz against the Raiders, in that situation against Derek Carr,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>who's like the last quarterback you're gonna do that against.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>But like, what's the benefit of him was getting a salary,

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Like it's likely going to be his last DC job,

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>He's making a million and a half and he's going

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to throw it away all for the better of the

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Jets franchise, who were gonna get Trevor Lawrence next year

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>when he's not even involved, Like, I just I don't

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>see the upside for him just doing doing the Jets

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of solid and thinking about the great of the franchise

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>long term. I think it was just him being an

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>incompetent defensive coordinator and actually thinking that it was a

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>good idea. So um for me, I'm not a huge

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>tanking guy, especially in the NFL where it's so physical

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of money at stake for these

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>guys and jobs. I think it's just that there's a

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of incompetent defensive and offensive coordinators head coaches too,

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and we sort of lose track of that and think

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>there's something bigger going on. And arrogance, right, just complete

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>arrogance on his part and especially from him and what

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he's done over the last decade in the NFL. I

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't believe it when when Car overthrown I don't

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>really know if it was an overthrown, but when he

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>had Agalore the previous play open and he overshot him,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I immediately, as a guy who had the raiders and survivor,

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, that was the chance, that was

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the play. Oh, I can't believe I had a shot

0:09:54.520 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>at this. And then explain it happens again, and it's amazing.

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>The one thing, poor Lamar Jackson on an island bit

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on a fake they have no time out. He bites

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>inside and Rugs, who does one thing better than any

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>other human on the planet or most humans, is run

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>by You did just that and Car hits him. I'll

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>if I get to the end, I will remember that

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for a lifetime. And I'm going in. If you don't

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>get to the end, you'll remember it. That's true. That ridiculous.

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna send Rugs and Car something in the

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>mail if that happens. When Um Glennon when they were

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>up nine nothing the Jags and they had a first

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>down round of the Vikings thirty and they got a

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>false start, so it was first and fifteen and then

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Glennon through an interception. Yes, I got a text from

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>someone who's still in the survivor and he said, when

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone when everyone is chopping up their checks at the

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>end of the year for a survivor, they'll be talking

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>about where they were when Glennon through this interception. That's

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>nothing compared to the who knew who knew that that

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>would happen at the end. Compared to that, Yeah, I

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>wonder who that was. If you want me to give

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you the for the for the record, let's up the record.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Before I do that, I'll just say, you know, I

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>grew up in Pittsburgh, but I'm a huge Moose, just

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Saskatchewan Warriors fan for many many years. I'm just I

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>looked that up at him anyways, uh uh the uh Okay,

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So gilly Ice, it's what they call him. Gilly Ice

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>went three and oh last week outstanding. Now there was

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>another person that also happened to go three and oh.

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's me too, baby, three and oh for me

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>as well, and might eat palm right down the drain

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>with a one in two including by the way, you

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>lost that same um I had the plus three in Houston.

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You had the over, which was a horrible beat. It

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was at the half and somehow goes under final scor.

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>That's incredible beat, Mike, that's incredible. I couldn't get over

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>seven in the second half. That's what essentially my bet

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was unbelievable. It is what it is. But I don't

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>think God had anything to do with it. You're not

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>blaming God? No, no, okay, well, I mean, ultimately I

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>don't really believe in that type of God either, But

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just a funny thing to say. Now. Gil is

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>now seventeen and two, which in first place, mikey at

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>eighteen nineteen and two and me right on his heels

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>at eighteen twenty and one. In the teaser category, I

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>am still the leader at nine and four Gil and

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike was solid eight and five numbers. So though, that

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is the year. Little update from last weekend for the season,

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you, and now we can commence with Thursday Night Football.

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Court stenographer Todd wishne um I failed to mention Adam

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts on Thursday Night Football. Maybe it's one of

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>your best bets, maybe it's not, but just a few

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>words if it's done. Uh, nothing for me on this one.

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I see that Pat's money continues to come in. He's

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>even as we're talking. But um, I guess the only

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that I sort of came to mind when I

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>saw this game and the number, which I thought was

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>right when it opened, now getting a little bit shorter.

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>But um, obviously the Patriots have that blueprint to beat

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff. They have the quarters defense in their back

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>pocket that they threw at him in the Super Bowl.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>We saw floor As do it with Miami against them

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>this year as well, and so the game plan for

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>them is certainly there. But this is the Pat's defense

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that is trending towards one of the worst seven or

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>eight in the league, and it's the defense I've been

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>very much down on. So my sort of trust in

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>them executing that and being able to generate pressure on

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.599
<v Speaker 1>golf is not very high. So it's it's going to

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>be a stay away from me. This is actually a

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>pick for me. Is it for you or or you Todd?

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Anybody think for you? It must be the Patriots. No,

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not. You like the Rams tonight especially it's going

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the other way. It just warn you that in the

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter you're gonna be rooting for Jared Goff, now continue,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you for that. R mind. I will

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>remember that when the fourth quarter starts being oh yeah,

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about this. I like the Rams. It's four

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half now, by the way, it just keeps coming.

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I wish it was four by the time we had

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>done this, but I'll take I'll lay the four and

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a half. Agree with everything that Adam just said about

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots defense trending the wrong way. For me, this

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is this is more the other side of the ball,

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to which is Jalen Ramsey and Darius Williams. And Darius Williams,

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>who's not as big of a household name as Jalen

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey is, actually ranks higher, like in Pro Football Focus

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>corner ratings, like fourth in the league. I think Jalen's

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>like sixties or seventeen. Those guys. The luxury of having

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>those guys on an island against Cam Newton, who, by

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, in the forty five and nothing win over

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. As Aaron Shots told me, his second worst

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>special teams the Chargers second word special teams. In the

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>last thirty five years, he hasn't ranked um but but

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton through for sixty nine yards, Jalen Ramsey and

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Darius Williams. The thought of them, like Jalen Ramsey having

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to cover Jacoby Myers like doesn't really scare me that much.

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how the Rams score it, excuse me

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>how the Patriots score in this game. So I really

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Rams tonight for all for both of those reasons,

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the ball. Um, and I'll lay

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the four and a half. That's my number two pick

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of the week. Okay, let me ask you a few questions.

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>If the a line we're six, would you lay six?

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not? Maybe? Maybe not? Yeah, but four and a half?

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean they feel a begging me. How do you

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>feel about a total of forty four? If you think

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots will really struggle to score? Well, the Patriots

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>path to victory is just like how they did it

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>last week. You know, it's like the races, like the

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Ravens and the Cowboys the other night, right, the Cowboys

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>get ten points based on a pick in a short

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>field on a Pollard big kickoff return. I don't know

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>how the Cowboys score otherwise if they don't get the help. Um,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that's how I feel about the Patriots tonight. Well, the

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Rams are number one in yards per play at four

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>point six per given up. The closest person to them

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>or team is New Orleans at four point nine. And

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>now what we all know, I am a big proponent

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of stats, Lie and Atlanta Falcons are thirty one at

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>six point two yards per play given up. And they

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are not, I repeat, they are not the thirty first

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>worst defense in the National Football League. There probably somewhere

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in the mid teens. So of course the stats lie,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but the Rams are definitely an elite defense in today's NFL.

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with you. It's gonna be very tough

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for for New England to score in this game. The

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>only thing is you have to root for Jared Goff

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and his look of deer in the headlights late in

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball game when it's four and a half, and

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be crying later because you're gonna be like,

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I have everything based on this guy. Come on, and

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have to throw too because they can't run

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I didn't know that. I didn't know that

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>my pick has to withstand cross examination, but I appreciate it.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>That the the the the thing about Jared Pick, whoever

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you want we're you know, and you'll probably win. I'm

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>just saying, you know, no, no no, no, if if it's

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a good point though, if Jared Goff, we're playing a

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>primetime game in Chicago, do you remember that gaming played

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago a couple of years ago? Nothing or something?

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>It was it was thirty two degrees Fahrenheugh Adam. I

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that is in celsius for you Canadians,

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what it is, but it's it's exactly

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>warm summer day. I think it's zero degrees, right, because

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty two is freezing. Zero is freezing celsius, right, so

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's zero, so it's not that old. It's just kind

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of cold. But the kid from the West Coast, he like,

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he looked like it was thirty two below the way

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>he was playing that. But it's in l a subtract

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>thirty two times by nine divide by five zero right,

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty correct? Very good, uh formula. What about Michael Lombardi's

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>theory boy Todd's Todd's good friend Michael Lombardi and Michael

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Lombardi did something very nice in helping Dianna get tickets

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to go to the Patriots pregame season game, and then um,

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know after that, who knows what? Yeah, who knows? Continue?

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Who says you should never pre flop a RAMS game?

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>You should always wait and read Jared Goff's body language

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>because you can tell by the end of the first

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>quarter what his mental state is by his body language.

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Advice not bad advice. Well, he's almost right. You should

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>never pre pre flop an NFL game, period. Why would you? Yeah,

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of true too. What do we do in here?

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>He's all right, that's the end of the show. Everybody

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>right at the foundations of the meg there goes to

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>just pars just right right when he was within a

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>half game of second. My brand is honesty. Your brand,

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Your brand is a little bit more you know, spin

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>oriented more akin with two thousand twenty. You're more of

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>a spinning type of guy. I'm more of a truth

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>in your face guy. Talking to you. You're talking to

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>or me? Yeah, first of all, were talking that you, Mikey,

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know I was That was a toss up,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so I leaned to you the whole time. I'm not

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>a spinster, I'm a Spence. You're the ultimate spinster. You

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>are Mr spin spin Spinster. All right, let's start with

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the best bets. For God's sakes, let's go to Adam

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>churt Off again, the host of The Simple Handicap Available.

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>We're all podcasts are distributed, yes, Adam, Yeah, Primary, Apple

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and Spotify if you can. If you can find podcasts,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll find it. How many times a week do you

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>put these these out? Every day? Every morning? It's was correct?

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>You think of it like a ten of fifteen minute

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>briefing on the market where prices are moving. And it's

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like people say, they listen to it

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>walking the dog on the way to work, in the train,

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in the car. So it's just a quick morning pot

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>every day. And let me just say before I put

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in my Survivor pick, this is a true story. One

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of the last things I consulted. Did could Adam give

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>me something in the injury report that I've missed? So

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely give it a listen before putting it in.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I love I love your podcast. What is your first

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>best bet? Sir? It's probably going to be viewed as

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the squarest bet on the board, and people listening to

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the show, very intelligent listeners are probably gonna gock at it.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But I have to lay seven and a half with

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the Packers on the road versus the Lions, and I

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much longer this number is going to

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>be available for. But like, it's great that the Lions

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 1>get Patricia out of there. It great they get to

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>come back against the Bears. The comments were fantastic about

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the new energy with Bevil, but let's be honest. Bevil

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is not fixing this defense for the Lions anytime soon.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure that there's the worst secondary in

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the NFL right now. Then the Detroit Lions, and this

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>goes back to mid season when they were primarily a

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>man defense team. They struggled some injuries, but then Patricia

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>was actually smart enough to realize, Okay, we can't continue

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to play man coverage because we just don't have the

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>talent on this roster. And so like Week six, they

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>made the switch to zone and they've sort of been

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>increasing their zone usage rate every single week since. But

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not working in their favor. Right. You look at

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>some of these quarterbacks in their yards protempt and success.

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan through for eight yards per pass, Philip Rivers

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>through for eight yards per pass, Kirk Cousins through for

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>eleven yards per pass, Alex Smith through for seven and

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a half, p J Walker XFL product through for seven

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half, Watson through for twelve and a half

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on Thanksgiving, then Trubisky twice this season eight yards per

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>passed against the Lions. And so now they get Aaron

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers and the Packers. I look through Aaron Rodgers just

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to sort of look at his season. I think we

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>remember the Tampa Bay game where he was ugly and

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>strewing picks. Believe it or not. His second worst performance

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>this season in terms of like yardage output passer rating

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was against the Lions in Week two, the Packers one

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>forty two to twenty one. And so this is a

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Packers team that's already moved the ball on the Lions.

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>This is a team I think they can move the

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>ball on the Lions again. And just from sort of

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the market perspective, we didn't see this number adjust despite

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the Packers dominating the Eagles, and then we saw the

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Lions get that win late, so there wasn't really much

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>credit given to them. Two books on the board have

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>gone from seven and a half to eight, and they

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>were Chris and circa and so you know who's moving

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>those numbers, and you know what type of bettors are

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>playing into those markets. Early you compared to some of

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the other books on the board, maybe a little more

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>recreational focused. Still sitting at seven and a half. I

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think with a favorite a big which usually sort of

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>taboo to let as many points, you're getting the high total,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's not as relevant. But it's a big price

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that I don't usually lay, but I'm pretty happy to

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>lay it here with the packers Green Bay Adam's first

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 1>pick of the week. Yes, geniuses are not always right

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, so no need to apologize for standing

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.959
<v Speaker 1>up to their snob snobbery in telling in making you

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>feel bad about your pick, you like your pick. And

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they're wrong all the time. They were

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>wrong on the Tampa Bay overs every single week last year. Okay,

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>so take that snobbery, idiot analytic jerk offs, Thank you, Adam.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I just want to apologize in it. Fans are you're

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about? Who is she talking about? Who are they?

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who are they talking Adam? Because Bernie

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Harrowite like really smarty pants people are gonna not like

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>his pick. He doesn't have to apologize for his pick.

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>His pick is goddamn good and f them. Who are

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>these smarty pants? Is though whoever Adam was concerned about.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, it's not a concern about them. But

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>I think, like anyone who's done this long and like

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>laying more than a touchdown on the road typically, Um,

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>not the most ad advantageous spot to get your money

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL pregame, but we understood the total. With

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the total this high, it's sort of the values that

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But that's just sort of what I

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was putting up. Of course I took the incoming you know.

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, so Green Bay pick number one from Adam

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Churnoff mikey Well Todd referenced this game last week in Houston, Uh,

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Colts over, and um, I'm not going to

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>get off it. I'm going back to Colts Raiders over

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty and hand is that the numbers? You've got fifty one? Todd? Damn.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm not going to get a Colts over

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>week this week, well, you know, the original, the original

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Rudyard Kipling, you know, wrote there are only four

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>things Rudy, Rudy imperialist Rudy didn't know. There are only

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 1>four things certain since social progress began. That the dog

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>returns to his vomit, the pig returns to her meyer,

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and the burnt fool's bandaged finger goes wobbling back to

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the fire. And I'm going right back to the fire

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Colt silver look that games should have went

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>over ten times last week. This Raiders defense is not good,

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>not good, They're just not good. Do you know my

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>internal thoughts? My well, I was hoping to get them

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>through Survivors, like God, get me through this. This defense

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>is atrocious, atrocious, It's atrocious, and yet Bruden calls a

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>good game and they're able to use the tight end

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>and they missed the running back last week obviously. But

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>again the number is short to me. I think this

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>number should be fifty four or fifty three and a half.

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's my best, what neuse, that's what I have mostly,

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. There's some fifty and a half talking here,

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas, part Vegas, your Vegas Raiders. I'm sorry, I

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>have it on spreads. Hope, please hope, please not prepared

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>for the question. Apologies, um the internet here at the

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>at Bar Canada is fabulous, though fifty one is what

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:06.959
<v Speaker 1>I have. There have secondary issues for the Raiders. You

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>want to work and the favorite that over for sure

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>serious secondary issues. Yeah, our net has the concussion. There's

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other sort of depth corners who are

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>not practicing so far. So it certainly makes that Raiders

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>defense a lot worse. I will say Cleland to Cleveland.

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Farrell had a couple of strip sacks in that game

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets which were huge, but you know, offensively

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders just a brief aside I said before that game,

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I was like, why don't the Raiders I'm no football genius,

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but but why don't they just go to Waller every

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>single place? Like It's just amazing. It's so simple with them, um,

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and you would think defenses would figure out a way

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to do this. Maybe some have kind of this year.

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>The Jets certainly didn't figure that out. No, they did not.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Waller is just a beast. Todd, I'm sorry, God wishing

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>of everybody from Pittsburgh. My first pick is going to

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>be if it ain't broke, don't fix it type of thing. Here.

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>The Tennessee Titans are nine and two to the over

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>this year nine overs and two unders. The first under

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>was the first game of the year and since then

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>eight overs. Since then, every game pretty much goes over.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>The Bears game didn't go over, but the Bears don't

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>really have an offense. Other than that, every single game

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>goes over. With the Tennessee Titans now Jacksonville the last

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks has shown a propensity to be able

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 1>to move the ball a little bit. So maybe you know,

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Glennon or whoever they've got starting a quarterback is you know,

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>passable and he could probably get some points against Tennessee.

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>We know Tennessee is going to score like crazy because

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>every week that's what happens. So how can you go

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>under in this game? The team's played the like second

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>week of the season, sixty three points I believe was

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the final. It's only over fifty three, um, I mean,

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee is just an over monster of a team. They

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>can't stop anybody, and you can't stop them. So as

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>long as Jacksonville can get you twenty four points, boom,

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you're in without without even a sniff. So give me

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>over fifty three in Tennessee against the Jacksonville Jaguars, please.

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And Aaron Shots from Football Outsiders on a numbers game

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this morning and uh the quarter pole appearance on the

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>show and asked him who were the teams that they're

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>most volatile performances from week to week, and he said

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, Cleveland and Jacksonville, which had always concerned survivor

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>players that when they faced Jacksonville and the two teams

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that he said were the most consistent from week to week.

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And he guesses, tell me if they're top tier middle

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>tier teams. One is top tier and the other is

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>middle the middle to bottom. So it's not the one

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking. Kansas City is the top tier team

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Chicago Bears really just every week, saying I

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>couldn't say the Washington football team. They're pretty consistent. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Shots, I make him minus one eighty to be

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 1>a megapodcast before the season. It's over. Okay, what do

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that I don't um? Alright, So here's uh

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>so I already gave you my number two picks. So

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>this is my number one pick and this was your

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>number two pick. That is correct my number and I

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. The order doesn't really matter, right, doesn't not

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at all, not at all, So just make this my

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>number two pick. And this falls under the category of

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>bets you have to make or you have to be

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>willing to lose tip of the cap if the Philadelphia

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Eagles can beat me. So I'm taking the New Orleans Saints.

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it was six and a half this morning. Now

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's back to seven. I see tons of seven place.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's seven, but it was six and a

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>half earlier, So so let's say minus seven reduced shoes. Obviously,

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it as much at seven as I

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>did at six and a half. But Jalen Hurts was

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>was wonderful filling in for Carson wentz Uh nice performance,

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>nice spark, But this is his first game as a starter,

0:28:55.440 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and this New Orleans defense is four reels. And I

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't understand the money coming I didn't understand the

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>money coming in on the Patriots, not I don't understand

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the money coming in on the Eagles. I must be

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>missing something. Um. I'm not a huge tastom Hill guy,

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>so I will say that. Um. But it's just again,

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it's this. It's if a rookie quarterback playing in his

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>very first start can come in and cover that number

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>against that good of a defense. Um tip of the cap.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking New Orleans. I'm not thinking about it too hard.

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans minus seven is my second pick. Why isn't

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton getting more credited or love for Coach of

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the Year He should I said, I said it a

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>month ago. What he's doing with this team, what he's

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>doing using multiple quarterbacks, another team consistent weekend and week

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>out with what they've done. I mean, Flores has probably

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know your leader, but to have Peyton still at

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>seven to one, it doesn't make sense to me. Think

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>about has there ever been a year where there have

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>been so many poor coaching performances in so many great ones?

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's reflective of the what I call the

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>ever widening chasm of the haves and have nots in

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. But O'Brien, quinn and Patricia already gone, Lynn,

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Naggie Gaze, Taylor Morone. Maybe I'm forgetting somebody you could

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>make a case for firing, even though the Chargers saying

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>not so fast with Anthony Lynn. But then on the

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>other side, Flores read Tomlin Belichick with this group Rivera

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>taking cancer treatments at halftime earlier in the year, Judge Stefanski,

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:34.719
<v Speaker 1>we never say McDermott, we should and Peyton, there's so

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>many How about Anthony lynnon comparing this season to Pearl Harbor?

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Where are we going? Didn't he do that on the

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.239
<v Speaker 1>anniversary of Pearl Harbor? The day after? He said it

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>was just Pearl Harbor? Did It's sort of like if

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we could come back from Pearl Harbor. You know what

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>he's saying. Nobody has died this year. Boy, he's a

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>special teams coach. He's three years with the Broncos. That's

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>how he broke in as a special teams coach. I

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that today and the put team is just so bad.

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>They get a pot blocked every week now one returned

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown, another one returned sixty one yards last week,

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the second. We're special teams through three quarters through the

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in the last thirty five years, according to d b

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>O a pretty strong number two. Number two Adams, sorry, Adam,

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>our guest. Adam turned off everybody. Well, I think it's

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 1>a double down on the Saints, like you just mentioned,

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and I like it. And to men to sort of

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>follow up on Peyton. He did this last year when

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater came in, like they didn't miss a beat and

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it was like a much more comparable quarterback style wise debrees.

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>But what he's done with Hill this year has been

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>really good. But this is now the fourth consecutive week

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with Hill as the starter where there's been money coming

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in against the Saints. And even there was that COVID

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.719
<v Speaker 1>move against the Broncos with the QB situation, but that

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>number was going towards Denver as it was, so there

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was just people that are betting against the Saints and Hill.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think the thing that's sort of being missed

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>within this is like, obviously, Hill is a less explosive

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback option for the Saints to have, if you can

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>even say less explosive relative to Breeze, but he reduces

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the variance of the offensive game plan too. Essentially nothing right.

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's so conservative, it's so safe, but it's very effective.

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And in this handicap against the Eagles, Philadelphia one of

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the better front sevens in football, fifth in rushing success

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>rate defense for the season, but the couple of games

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>where they've really struggled twice against the Giants and then

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>once against the Baltimore Ravens. What both of those teams

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>have in common, and it's a mobile quarterback, and specifically

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens well, but the Packers more so, like not

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>as this power, read, running blocking team like the Ravens were,

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but certainly the Packers had success, but it's essentially the

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>same scheme that they faced with Baltimore that they just

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't stop. And I would argue that the way the

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>season is trending with Hill, the Saints are a little

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>bit more effective, get healthier on the offensive line this week,

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>healthier on the defensive side as well, And like I

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was looking at this number, so like the market sort

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of established itself early last week with the look Ahead,

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>which was six and a half. Obviously smaller limits and

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>smaller beds, but like that number was made before this

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Hurts news was really made public, and so a lot

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of that I think was priced in mind with Wentz

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>as the starter, and we haven't seen a huge adjustment.

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's one bad quarterback to relatively an unknown, but um

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>around seven that you're not gonna see a huge move.

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.479
<v Speaker 1>But I think like the downside with Hurts as a rookie,

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>who's going to make the Eagles more run orientated against

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the Saints defense. It's very good. The downside with Hurts

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is much greater than the downside with a really bad

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>game from Wentz, and so I don't think that that's

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily fully priced into this number. And that's why I

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think there's value, certainly at six and a half with

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the Saints this morning, I like it. We should just

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>let Adam talk rather than three of us probably on

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>so number two is is my number two as well

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Saints. I like it Adam when we're on

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the same side here, Mike Palm, everybody. I'm gonna take

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd's favorite team, the Atlanta Falcons, against Brother Lynn's pathetic Chargers.

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That's my number three, all right. I just I just

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to point out I can't pack the Chargers here,

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think Todd is right. The Falcons defense is improving.

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>They were competitive in this game with the Saints. Now

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the missfield goal, I thought they could have opened the

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>game up the Saints and they didn't, and they let

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta hang around there. But look at I'll take I'll

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>take Matt Ryan and that offense and an improving defense

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and the special teams. That's not going to kill you.

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Against the Chargers team where the players just have to

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>be shaking their heads, asked and where are we at?

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>How are we any good? That we continued that we

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>lost forty five to nothing in the game. We were

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>a point and a half favorite at home. There could

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>be a checkout factor. That's what I'm thinking, I really am.

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's my number two. Did you see boss quote? Oh?

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I think what reminds us again? What it was? Bosa

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>came out and he said, well, I'm going to be

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>playing hard this We we can, but I'm not sure

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone else is. I didn't hear that. That's that's amazing

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 1>to come out and say that. Uh. And I can't

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>speak for the guy next to me, but I am wow. Um,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that was that one nipped? Another one for my for

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>my number three, uh dot number two. My number two

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to be done in the voice of a

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned We are in a lot of trouble here people.

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I know people think eleven and oh, we can't be

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>beating at But let me tell you. If Pittsburgh Stollars

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>have some problems in running a football, we can't run

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the football from don Kown East Liberty, We're gonna have

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a big problem. If we think we're gonna go up

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas City Chiefs or even the Buffalo Bills

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>this week and think we're just gonna get W after

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>W after w we can't do it just throwing the ball. Look,

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I love Big Ben, He's fucking fantastic. But here's the deal.

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>We can't run the football. And if you can't run

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the football, the other team can key on what you're doing.

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what the Washington Redskins did and the Worhington

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>football team did do us and gave us no opportunities

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to win a football game we had no business losing.

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really concerned about my Pittsburgh Stellers and I'm

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna go against them because I figure, look if I

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>go against them, at least I make some money. If

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 1>they lose the ball game, I don't feel that bad,

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and then I can go have a big milk with

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 1>my family. So here's the deal. I'm taking the Bills,

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills against the Pittsburgh Stellers, and I'm gonna

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 1>lay the minus two and a half. I think that

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen guy is gonna give us all kinds of

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>trouble all kinds of trouble that Josh Allen and uh,

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't think we can run the football.

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Bottom line is we're not that great. What's that? What's

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that thing you do a bottom line? I don't get

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that part. That's part of the Pittsburgh stiller's voice. And

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Myron Cope used to do that. If you remember him,

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>he's the one he used to tell you, Jerome Bus

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Battis is running down the field, you can't stop stop Bus.

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That was an excellent, excellent you can only do that

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>growing up where you did, that's outstanding. Let me ask

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you a question. Big Ben literally has it in his nickname,

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the word big. Does he not sneak anymore either? On

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>fourth and one with just under five minutes left in

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a tie game, what is that? Adam? I always talk

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>about this with Philip Rivers. Ben doesn't do it either.

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Now while on the play call and electing to go

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>where they did with that pass was just bizarre. But

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it just picking up five yards for the Steelers passing

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and just seems so strenuous, like it's just it's so simplistic,

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>an elementary and the rubs that they're running, it's just

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to watch. I saw your tweet. Non creative.

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>That's the exact word to use. It's completely non creative.

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it. I don't I don't know the

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>deal with big but I said that the Lombardi Lombardi said,

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Gilly doesn't want to get hurt. I'm like, at a

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>tie game with less than five minutes to get to

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it once. But how are you going to get hurt

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.439
<v Speaker 1>on it? On a quarterback keeper? What's so dangerous about

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback keeper? You take the ball, you lunge forward.

0:37:57.800 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unless the guys are gonna like grab your

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:01.320
<v Speaker 1>balls or something, how are you going to get into it?

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean Patrick Mahomes got hurt doing it? Right. So

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>there is that bitty itty bitty Breeze sticks the ball

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like this, He takes any just sticks it over. What

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Breeze does that way? Breeze the smallest dude out there, right,

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>and he does that way? Why can't big men do that? Well?

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I got I got one other problem.

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You can't win in the NFL throwing every single down.

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>You have to be able to run a little bit.

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't you just even a little taste of the run.

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>To give the other team maybe the idea that there's

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna be something else besides just the seven yard pass.

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you do every play? It's not gonna work. Listen,

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Todd. Look at how Kansas City

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 1>missed Hilaire Sunday night. That was definitely took some dynosaism

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 1>away from their offense in that game and made them

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>very vulnerable at home against against the Broncos. Yeah. I'm

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not one of these guys that preaches, oh, you have

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 1>to have balance and you have to do this. Look,

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Bill Belichick whin running the ball a hundred

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>times in a row and throwing the ball hundred times

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in a row. I have no problem if it's done strategically,

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but if it's done because because we cannot run the ball,

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>which the Washington football team figured out very quickly, you're

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>going to have a problem. And look the Steelers, Let's

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>be honest. The Steelers had a bunch of really close

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>calls early in the year against Denver with Driscoll in there.

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Against Houston. I mean, they're not really an eleven and

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>O football teach you all. You all made fun of

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>me when I said Kansas City will be minus five

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>if they come to Pittsburgh in the a f C

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Championship Game. Everyone's like, Oh, that's ridiculous. No, wait, they

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>could easily. We both three Chris from Las Vegas, a

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>man named Michael Palm who slightly wrote Tuned, and another

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>man named Gilly Ice all said I was a lunatic

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>for saying that Kansas City couldst not have it. No,

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.359
<v Speaker 1>but he said that we agreed with you. We didn't

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>agree with him. We didn't agree with I didn't agree

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>with Chris is going down to the bet with the

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 1>book right now to bet against that idea. That's exactly

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>there was right, Well done to checkmates. Yeah, can we

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>stop with this star? Was the star of Action? That's

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>disrespectful to crack Wins. Todd was featured in Action. Okay,

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Todd was one of the four major players of Action.

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>They plucked him out of a room of people at

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the South Points. What's interesting is they picked me to

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>be on the Showtime show when I wasn't even planned

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to be on because I'm not really that entertaining. As

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>most media companies in the sports gambling business, No, Todd,

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you always have a home right here on the megapod

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 1>because I know talent and I see it and I'm

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at talent. Damn it, you might be the best

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 1>scout of talent since Bill ad Let's not get crazy. Okay,

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>now we're getting two inside jokey and everyone's gonna complain

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>because Mikey and Gil do too too many inside jokes.

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I I that people do people of the inside jokes. Yeah, No,

0:40:57.239 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it's annoying. It's annoying. We have inside jokes and no

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>one gets it. That's not fun. It's not fun. There's

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>no inside jokes. That was more fun when I make

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>really obvious jokes or you sing. Yes, we haven't. We

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten to the singing portion of the show yet.

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Where are we? Number three from Adam? Number two? I'm sorry, Todd.

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 1>That was my pick minus two and a half. Because

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I was listening for the accident. I had no idea

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what the pick was, Alright, Adam was the Bills? Was

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bills minus two and a half because the Steelers

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are very concerning to me, and uh, I think the

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Bills can beat the Steelers minus two and a half.

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Anthony McFarland had no idea. That was a back shoulder

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>throw by the way did you have do you have

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>last thing about this? Did you have problems getting it?

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I was so frustrated that I could not get this

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>game on the local Fox affiliate TMZ showed it. I

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>have Direct TV, and it did. I couldn't get it

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>on my phone or on my laptop. Really couldn't get it.

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You have the package, yeah, and but but apparently it

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>was NFL Sunday ticket to everybody. I couldn't get it. No,

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hear that, so I had to drive to

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the South Point. I didn't get it because I have cocks.

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I do too, but I thought it was going to

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:11.280
<v Speaker 1>be on Fox five, so I didn't make an effort

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to be somewhere to watch it right the whole Well,

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that was the problem. They didn't communicate that only the

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>country was getting The phone was blowing up at two

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>oh three with people saying, where the hell is this game?

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted, I said, anybody else infuriated anyway? Adam number three, sir,

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't bet it yet and so we don't

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have to count it for the pot. But like six

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half that I think turns into seven for

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers is way too high. Against the Vikings, and

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>so like I'm looking at that one a lot closer

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to three and a half. There's other ratings that will

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>make that a lot closer, Like this is this is

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Buck's territory when they were favorite against the Panthers. This

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was Bucks with the price they were against the Broncos

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think that this is out of line.

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Vikings going to overtime and playing

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>essentially a full extra ten minutes against the Jags looking

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>as bad as they did, um is is sort of

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 1>fueling this move that's going up a little bit. But

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting for this one to get the seven. I'll

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>bet it when it gets there. If I have to

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 1>buy it because it's not gonna move, I'm going to

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:13.720
<v Speaker 1>do that as well. But I think the Vikings getting

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 1>points here um certainly worth a look. I think it's

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 1>a terrific game for Zimmer and now he sets up

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 1>like Brady under pressure. It's been a decline the last

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>three years. It's very noticeable this year. Um And when

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you're facing a guy like Zimmer who's just so creative

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 1>and and the game plans he puts together, how he

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>disguises his blitz is. I think it's just a perfect

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:35.359
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to him for just to have a sort of

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 1>his best game plan of the year and sort of

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>an all in spot for the Vikings. Do you want

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to attribute what they sort of made everyone sweat who

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:45.919
<v Speaker 1>had them and survivor last year last week potentially sort

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of a look ahead spot for them in this in

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. So for me, I think that this number

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>is way out of line. I'm happy to wait it

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>out and see if it gets the seven. But if

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I have to buy it, I'll certainly buy the six

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.839
<v Speaker 1>and a half of the seven two out of three

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>remaining survivor entries that had to sweat out Minnesota UH

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and the h and the Jaguars last week. Minnesota, really

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Dan Bailey missed two extraployers. He missed a field goal.

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That first Jacksonville touchdown literally bounced off the back of

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>a Vikings defender. There was a pick six, like the

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Vikings should have won that going away. Um. Just to

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>add to that, UM, Mikey, since I've already done three,

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>because I'm on your Atlanta Falcons is number three? What's

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>your number three? I'm gonna play over Monday night in

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens Browns Game seven. I'm saying, over that's fine,

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, okay, look at that. But you know, I

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.279
<v Speaker 1>think Mayfield's improving. I think they move them around. They

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>can run the ball. Think about Baltimore is that their

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>running game is dynamic, right, and they have these burst

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:53.720
<v Speaker 1>runs they don't take for a team that's a predominant

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>running team. They don't have seventeen play drives, right, they

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>have eight play drives and nine play so they don't

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>choose the clock like a tradition running team would. Uh.

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And also interesting, when Jackson throws the ball, there's a

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of incompletion, so the clock stops. Right. There's the

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 1>very few short games for that team. They either hit

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they hit a play action play that goes for twenty.

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 1>They bust a run for seventeen, so they moved the

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>ball quickly. The Browns can run the football, which sets

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>up Baker. Look, Tennessee last week said we're gonna pack

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the box that make Baker beat us, And

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that's what he did. I mean, they were guys were

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>running wide open because they had everybody up front. So

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a low total for the NFL forty seven relatively

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this year, and so I'm over they well thought out pick.

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had thought of that well, thank you,

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson was so inaccurate the other day. It's harm

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean not even close. Yeah, Like at forty seven

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 1>over from Mikey Baltimore in Cleveland, dot. Um from my

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>last pick, I am going to go with the under

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in the Washington football team against the forty Niners. Um.

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I the under I see as forty three? Is that

0:45:58.400 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>what is correct? For three? I'm gonna go under. And

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the reason I'm gonna go under is I think Nick

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Mullins is not an NFL starting quarterback. Uh So, I'm

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 1>not really too concerned about the Redskins scoring a lot

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>against a Washington defense, by the way, quietly is a

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>very good defense. Their fourth in the league in yards

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 1>per play. The Washington defense. Now, granted, the Steelers can't

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>run the ball, but the Steelers do move the ball

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>against most teams, and the Redskins were really giving them

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trouble. The Washington football team, I think

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is a very good defensive football team. I think they're

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten, I really do. It shouldn't be

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:40.359
<v Speaker 1>quiet because they've had so many high draft picks on defense, right,

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Chase Young and Darn Payne and Montez Sweat. Jonathan Ellen

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even on the field against the Steelers. Karrogan is

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 1>still an old veteran top pick. I mean, they are

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>littered with top defensive draft choices. It would better be

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.000
<v Speaker 1>good by this point. Well, I just think it's a

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn good defense, and I think they're gonna be

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 1>able to handle Nick Mullins, who I does not you know,

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>impress me? Uh. For San Francisco. On the other hand,

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco's positives on their side of the ball is

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>defense as well. And it's not like Alex Smith to

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>mckissic is gonna work as well as it did against

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers late in the game when they just saw, oh,

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>here's the idea, let's just throw Tomkissic for six yards

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 1>every single play. So uh, I have a feeling that

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the smart coaching staff for the Niners will cook up

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>some defensive goo losh from Mr Alex Smith, and it's

0:47:28.120 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be maybe seventeen points from him, twenty points

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>from one of the other teams we're looking at. I

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I just like under forty three in this. I think

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>both team strengths are on defense, and while forty three

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is a low number in the National Football League nowadays,

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I could totally see this as both coaches just being

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>super conservative. Let's just play, you know, ground and pound,

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>and let's go under forty three. That's the other thing

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>thought about your Stiller's concern. The Skins did that with

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Washington Football team did that with Antonio Gibson getting turf

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 1>toe with the first quarter, never came back and Terry

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>McLaurin two catches for fourteen yards. He's by far their

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>biggest playmaker, and Washington still beat them down fourteen. They

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 1>had to kiss it and no one could guard the kissing.

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, stealers didn't realize that if you run

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the exact same play over and over and over and

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 1>it gets eight in nine yards every single play, that's

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna win you a football game. It's weird

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 1>being a Washington football team fan because the quarterback of

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the future is not on that roster, but there with

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith. And I can't believe I'm saying this because

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I was only please don't get back on the field.

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm terrified for you that, like he's clearly the best

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that they could have had. But Gil Alex Smith

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 1>was a decent Let's call him a slightly above average

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback when he was on Kansas City. Maybe I think

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>he was better than that. Okay, so I was being conservative.

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's call him solidly above average quarterback when he was

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on Kansas City. Solidly he got Kapper nicked and he

0:48:56.640 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>got Mahomes, right. I mean, that's that's his career, right. So,

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>but what I'm saying is, why are we so surprised

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that Alex Smith is No, We're not surprised. I just

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't want the guy to get out on the field

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>because I was terrified for him. We're not surprised. But

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I'm saying is this is the best

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>version of Washington that you may get until they find

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy, you know, whether in this draft or otherwise.

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what my point was. I thought he

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:20.399
<v Speaker 1>was good at Utah. He was the number one pick

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the draft, for goodness, very good at Utah. Remember

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>he was he was the guy that was picked first,

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>while Aaron Rodgers just sat there for twenty some picks

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and then sat there for another few years in Green Bay.

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 1>True Dad. Alright, teaser, guys, our favorite two leg six

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:39.440
<v Speaker 1>point teaser of the week. You're allowed to use sides

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or totals. Mr Churnoff, Well, I think I'm always sort

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of opposed to teasing down big the big numbers with

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:53.200
<v Speaker 1>big totals, But I think I absolutely have to bring

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay down below the six to four and the three,

0:49:57.360 --> 0:50:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and then I think naturally pair that with um the

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Saints if they're at seven, bringing them down to one

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I would go, I would go Green

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Bay and the Saints. He's down, packers, chiefs, packers chiefs. Okay, Todd,

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:18.880
<v Speaker 1>hang on stenographizing here. So we got minus one and

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a half for Green Bay for Mike and Kansas City.

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Where's Kansas City again? All Right, I'll just I'll just

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>do I'm just gonna do the round robbin with these guys.

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:33.839
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. Kansas City is actually mine, Okay, I'm gonna

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>go with your Okay, New Orleans for gil New Orleans

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 1>minus one in Kansas City minus one and a half, right, correct,

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Well it kind of looks kind of minus oneing now,

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, minus one and a half. Okay, So I'm

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:53.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with um Green Bay minus one and a

0:50:53.880 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>half as well, and um, just so that we're not

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 1>all doing exactly the Saints be authentic, dude, what it

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:04.120
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be? Don't just makes all up? Well, I

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really do a good job with my teaser

0:51:06.320 --> 0:51:08.880
<v Speaker 1>preparation today. It wasn't really positive. Who I wanted to

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>get with the teaser question every week anyway, I just

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to do something different this week. I want to go

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Browns plus eight. How about that Brown's plus eight? Yeah, okay,

0:51:23.800 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>if Baltimore wins, that game looks like a five and

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>oh very well possible five and oh finish for Baltimore

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a f C price is awfully I right now, Yeah,

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>what is it? Eighteen to one? What is it? Before

0:51:37.160 --> 0:51:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas game? It was eighteen. It's come down right

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:42.839
<v Speaker 1>around fourteen to one now. But like you consider, if

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they if they get through Cleveland, like you said, that's

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>probably they're running the table and finishing with eleven wins.

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 1>They probably get the five seed. And then outside of

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:54.879
<v Speaker 1>k C, who are they more than a three point

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 1>underdog at most within the a f C. I don't

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think anyone so Like from a Hedge perspective, if you

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:04.760
<v Speaker 1>want to go that way. You're probably working back against

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:07.439
<v Speaker 1>that once they get into playoffs, never really laying more

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 1>than one minus one forty against. That's a that's a

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 1>big number. I gotta get it before this game though,

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:17.120
<v Speaker 1>before the clean because that's where the EU. But I

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think Baltimore. I mean, I understand from a price perspective,

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Adam, but from a are they the

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>same Ravens. They're not the same Ravens. People have figured

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:28.800
<v Speaker 1>out Lamar Jackson. No no, no, no, no, no, Todd,

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry to interrupt, Okay, but they figured out Greg Roman.

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg Roman is a one hinted wonder. He had Kaepernick

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>great for a year, second year, figured him out, Lamar

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Jackson great for a year, second year, figured him out.

0:52:41.600 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't know how to run the four. He's not creative enough.

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:47.439
<v Speaker 1>They should hire Kubiak. Kubiak would be a much better

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>coordinator for the Ravens. I stand corrected by Michael Palm.

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to argue with him about who is

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the person that we should be saying they figured out.

0:52:57.800 --> 0:52:59.919
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to stay it's Greg Roman. That's

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>mine to the bottom line is Baltimore is not the

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>same football ball team on offense. Regardless of who they

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.279
<v Speaker 1>figured out, they figured out something and it's just not

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the same team. The name Lamar Jackson has taken enough

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:12.840
<v Speaker 1>guff for one week. It doesn't need to be to

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson's. But I will say this about Baltimore and

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 1>agree or disagree that they are I mean, I guess

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you could say this about a lot of teams in

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the history of the NFL, but they feel to me

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the poster child of this. If they get ahead,

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they are so much more dangerous than when they fall behind,

0:53:32.080 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a It just feels like game script for

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:37.520
<v Speaker 1>them is everything, because if they fall behind and they

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:40.759
<v Speaker 1>have to throw the football, you're like, they're they're I

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:42.879
<v Speaker 1>feel great being on the other side. If they get ahead,

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 1>let's just say a f C championship game, and they

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:47.720
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of the Chiefs, Hey you got a game,

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a in a way that you might

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:52.960
<v Speaker 1>not otherwise with some other team. I don't overstate it,

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:54.239
<v Speaker 1>but that's how it feels to me. Does that make

0:53:54.280 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>any sense for the It's like the worst opponent for

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs to face. Gommatically two if they fall behind

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, right, that's right. They're great from ahead. By

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the way, you get aside from Kansas City. You can

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>throw all the rest of the playoff teams in the

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a f C in one big jumble, and who knows

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna win any game Pittsburgh, Indianapolis, Indianapolis versus Tennessee,

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee against the Browns can Miami. Maybe Miami's a slightly

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 1>below the other ones, But the rest of them, if

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you just throw them all in a big bunch, who

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:31.439
<v Speaker 1>who the hell knows who's gonna be the right team.

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>The a f C playoffs, though, seven deep is gonna

0:54:33.719 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 1>be awesome because those are seven teams. Yeah, if the

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Raiders don't get in there, for instance, But like the NFC,

0:54:40.920 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be one or two or even three crap

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 1>teams in there for sure, including the NFC East winner.

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Although I don't know if you want to play Washington now,

0:54:48.480 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy to say, I don't want to play

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that deep. Well, do you play with mckissic or without mckissic,

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>because you can't stop him the MS By the way,

0:54:56.840 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a platoon between mckissic and Barber as Bryce sits

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines like let me. I want to play.

0:55:03.040 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 1>No one can stop in the kissing. He's he's like

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan. You can only hope to contain him. Um, okay,

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what was your so? What was your teaser in the end? Cleveland?

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And who was Green Bay? Minus one and a half

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and I'm concerned about it because everyone likes it and

0:55:15.840 --> 0:55:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland plus eight? Okay, so Survivor. Before we get to

0:55:19.560 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the final two questions, eighty nine entries left, eight two

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of whom have Seattle available. Seattle is the biggest favorite

0:55:28.640 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on the board, close to a two touchdown favorite against

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. This is uh. I believe this is the

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:39.160
<v Speaker 1>last week where the quote unquote obvious pick is still

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 1>available to most. After this week it will get Nutso.

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>But this week the question becomes, do you just take

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks and say, you know what, let's just forget

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:55.799
<v Speaker 1>about this week, will resume play next week? Or do

0:55:55.880 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you say to yourself because as I've said many times,

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Survivor is a misnamed game. By the way, you you

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:03.920
<v Speaker 1>quoted a name one of our named one of the

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 1>visa hosts. Because I know you're not allowed to say

0:56:07.120 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>my name apparently on that show. But you said uh,

0:56:09.880 --> 0:56:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, it's a misname game, right, it should be

0:56:11.480 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>called winner, not survivor. Um, Gil, why isn't Mike allowed

0:56:16.160 --> 0:56:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to say your name? Because I didn't know that he wasn't.

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:20.359
<v Speaker 1>But the other day he's on there and he's like

0:56:20.480 --> 0:56:24.600
<v Speaker 1>another host on this network, said one of our hosts.

0:56:24.920 --> 0:56:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't say my name that the contest don't know

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>what it is. But I don't, Mike, why aren't you

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:36.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed to say his name? Gil is making an assumption. Um,

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it might be wrong, it might be right, to be right.

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I don't say other host names.

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? I don't know. I don't

0:56:43.680 --> 0:56:47.479
<v Speaker 1>bring up Donna, Danny Burke on their show. Wait this,

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this is across the board post. You don't say any

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 1>host name. It has nothing to do with I don't

0:56:53.480 --> 0:56:55.399
<v Speaker 1>know if they know there are any other hosts. That's true.

0:56:55.520 --> 0:56:58.399
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. They may not be aware. They

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:02.879
<v Speaker 1>may not be aware. You say Lombardi's name, don't you? Yes,

0:57:02.960 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 1>he does, I do, but he's on their show every week.

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Is a spinster. I'm a spinster. A spinster, Mikey. I'm

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:13.160
<v Speaker 1>not judging you in any way. I'm just trying to

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:15.359
<v Speaker 1>understand whose name you're allowed to say and whose name

0:57:15.360 --> 0:57:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you're not allowed. That's all I'm not allowed to say

0:57:17.520 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Todd W on one of the weekend shows that I

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was chance received that please do not say Todd W's

0:57:27.560 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 1>name had finishing the thought. So the question becomes, do

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you just take Seattle and act like you know what

0:57:37.240 --> 0:57:40.440
<v Speaker 1>will resume real survivor play next week? Or do you

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>play to win? And first of all, if you have

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:45.440
<v Speaker 1>two entries, maybe you definitely do this. But if you

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have one entry, do you have the cajones the onions

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to play another team and hope for a Seattle Seahawks calamity,

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>at which point you will rise to the mountain test?

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:58.440
<v Speaker 1>You have to assess your belief in the Jets ability

0:57:58.480 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to win that game. Yes, that that's what it comes

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>down to. Here's the question, let's do another over under

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:08.640
<v Speaker 1>how many of the two use Seattle. Well, that's kind

0:58:08.640 --> 0:58:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of the question asking well, what do you think I

0:58:11.840 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 1>will do? My numbers? My number is seventy two and

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a half. I said, seventy five was the first number

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that came into my head. Not everyone will do it.

0:58:19.080 --> 0:58:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Not ever, the five entries with two the five guys

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 1>with two, Well, there's an argument, did you want to

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:25.800
<v Speaker 1>move both of them on because you have a big

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:29.120
<v Speaker 1>advantage for sure, or you take the shot. But I'm

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:31.000
<v Speaker 1>just glad that this is the last week where that's

0:58:31.000 --> 0:58:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the chimp. Then there will be the picks are going

0:58:33.120 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to be scattered the last three weeks. Absolutely, Um, did

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you like last thing? Did you like like my discussion?

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're aware of until I sent

0:58:39.920 --> 0:58:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it to you, but Las Vegas, Chris and I had

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 1>this ongoing debate and there's no right answer. What would

0:58:46.160 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you rather have right now? A circuit survivor entry that

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is still alive one of the last eighty nine, or

0:58:51.920 --> 0:58:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be in contention in circummillions? Keep in mind, as you

0:58:55.960 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 1>very well know, fifty places get cash and millions and

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:02.880
<v Speaker 1>survive or is chop or zero? But to me, it's

0:59:02.880 --> 0:59:05.880
<v Speaker 1>not even close. For you, it's it's survivor. I mean,

0:59:05.920 --> 0:59:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the whole thing, the whole too, it's the whole

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 1>experience you've had, right gil, and to get to and

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to this point, and let's face it, and

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I brought it up, uh you know, or or Todd

0:59:15.560 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>brought it up. This picking five games against the number

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of Oh god, is this hard? I mean, this is

0:59:20.960 --> 0:59:22.919
<v Speaker 1>really it's hard enough to find two games each week

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:25.320
<v Speaker 1>or three that we try to do. So, I mean,

0:59:25.320 --> 0:59:27.120
<v Speaker 1>even if I was in like tenth place, I would

0:59:27.160 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not feel any sort of confidence that I could maintain

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and not slip way down to only getting three thousand back?

0:59:32.480 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Or can I get a commitment from you? You may

0:59:35.080 --> 0:59:37.240
<v Speaker 1>have already promised this is somebody else? Can I get

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a commitment from you that I get to interview the

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 1>person who finishes last in millions first? Sure? Because you

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:53.680
<v Speaker 1>should get somebody first. I mean turn off? Oh yeah, right, yeah,

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like that's the way it flows. Yeah, okay, right? Um?

0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>That say that is a that person is the most

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:07.959
<v Speaker 1>amazing person in all of this. How they could overcome

1:00:08.680 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>even quarterlies to suck so consistently And you can't try

1:00:14.280 --> 1:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to suck? Can you know? They have to? These people

1:00:16.560 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that have been at the bottom have been there since

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like week four and five. It's the same twenty people.

1:00:20.880 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>But how can you, like, if you're if you're that

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>good at sucking, why didn't you just try to win

1:00:24.560 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the thing? True? But you you started out bad for

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>three weeks and then you said let's just go against

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it was that. But the mirror is the guidance in

1:00:31.880 --> 1:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>first is forty five and fifteen, and the three way

1:00:34.880 --> 1:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>tie for last is fifteen and forty five. How many

1:00:39.120 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>weeks is it, sorry, and twenty and on the opposite

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>side it's twenty and forty five. But that's just that's

1:00:48.280 --> 1:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>just that's just a distribution issue. I always gonna be Pete.

1:00:52.520 --> 1:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Todd, I agree to costco issue. No,

1:00:56.800 --> 1:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to. You're always going If you have a

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>pool of people, there's gonna be people like, for instance,

1:01:01.800 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in my example of the bad beats, I am in

1:01:04.200 --> 1:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the fifth standard deviation for bad beats, and there's somebody

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>else who's in the fifth standard deviation for good beats.

1:01:10.160 --> 1:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And that is always going to be the scenario. If

1:01:12.640 --> 1:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you put a blanket over a large group of anything,

1:01:15.640 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>there's always gonna be people on one side of the

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>standard beach and people on the other side. So those

1:01:20.040 --> 1:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>people soon like five of those people will go five

1:01:22.840 --> 1:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and oh. This week, you know somebody will go five.

1:01:25.040 --> 1:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And you can't guarantee that you'll stay bad, is what

1:01:27.960 --> 1:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. People went five and oh. But you see,

1:01:33.280 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>if people went oh in five. But what I'm saying

1:01:36.080 --> 1:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is the people, if you just take the people are

1:01:37.920 --> 1:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in the worst, they'll probably be close to from here

1:01:40.760 --> 1:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on out. That's all I'm trying to say. I agree,

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree. These people don't have a special talent at sucking.

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing that they were able to suck as well

1:01:48.360 --> 1:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>as they have through through Quarterly's right, because if you're middling,

1:01:52.520 --> 1:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>every time a quarterly comes up, you're like, hey, I

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>can I'm back to zero and zero. But they have

1:01:57.800 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>managed somehow too over come good, you know, positive variants.

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just like in a in a basketball game, if

1:02:05.040 --> 1:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a team makes six three pointers in a row, you

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>know they're going the point spread is gonna go up,

1:02:09.920 --> 1:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but it still has to reflect the rest of the game.

1:02:12.480 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean they're going to continually hit the next

1:02:15.040 --> 1:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>six three pointers in a row. By the way, Mikey

1:02:17.080 --> 1:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about flow, Mike, everything that comes out of easy mouth,

1:02:19.560 --> 1:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you're like his mouth piece. Now on, now, come on, now,

1:02:23.200 --> 1:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's accurate. It might it. I didn't.

1:02:28.400 --> 1:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>As long as you're hurling takes some incoming while you're

1:02:30.640 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>at it. I didn't go to a pack twelve school.

1:02:35.360 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I did not. You have to respect him for for

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>what he's accomplished. All right, Final two questions, guys, Final

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>two questions, Uh, the large favorite, most likely to lose? Outright,

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we will give you the candidates. The candidates are Tampa

1:02:51.640 --> 1:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Bay six and a half point favorites, hosting Minnesota, Tennessee

1:02:55.680 --> 1:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half point favorites at Jacksonville. Not really

1:02:59.000 --> 1:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>sure how much home field means in any of this anymore,

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City seven and a half point favorites or seven

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in that pocket. Don't think it's seven and a

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>half consensus produced us at Miami. Uh, Seattle, of course,

1:03:10.920 --> 1:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest favorite on the board, thirteen and a half

1:03:12.840 --> 1:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>point favorites hosting the Jets, Green Bay seven and a

1:03:15.680 --> 1:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites at Detroit. Let's see what else, New Orleans.

1:03:20.240 --> 1:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Now it's six and a half as we did this podcast,

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it's down the six and a half point favorites at Philadelphia,

1:03:25.400 --> 1:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>toggling between the two. Those are your candidates of all

1:03:28.200 --> 1:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of those, Adam, and I think you might have already

1:03:29.920 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>hinted at who you would pick here. Who's the most

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>likely to lose? Outright? Yeah, I think it's Tampa Bay.

1:03:36.480 --> 1:03:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Part of me sort of went to Tennessee. But it's

1:03:39.120 --> 1:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that's I think that the Titans look a lot better

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this week than then did last week. But I think

1:03:42.920 --> 1:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's certainly Tampa Bay in this spot. I agree.

1:03:46.640 --> 1:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're the most vulnerable and they've shown the

1:03:48.600 --> 1:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>most regression that I want to see Tennis Tennessee. But

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't sing yet, I'm gonna go with the

1:03:57.680 --> 1:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins. Miami Dolphins. Mess with that team and their

1:04:03.120 --> 1:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>coach will be your ass. Miami Dolphins. Miami Dolphins, they're

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>going to the playoffs this year. Wow, well done crow

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>barring it in before the end of the show. Well,

1:04:15.680 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>if you don't crow bar it in, then people get mad.

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>They're like, where was the Miami Dolphins song? Most asked

1:04:20.320 --> 1:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>question of the podcast this year? All about Miami Dolphins

1:04:24.080 --> 1:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>songs from Todd You're mad at me? No, oh, I'm

1:04:27.880 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>not mad at you. People love to hear him sing

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and they love the new thing will be the Pittsburgh accent.

1:04:32.800 --> 1:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's even better than the Dolphins. You're like,

1:04:37.160 --> 1:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you're look if youns Ever went down and for Manny

1:04:41.160 --> 1:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Brothers and had a giant mill. Let's say it was

1:04:43.320 --> 1:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday you were in a Pirate game or at

1:04:45.160 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a Penguin game, or maybe even a story game. You

1:04:47.480 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>could have been in any of those kind of games,

1:04:49.560 --> 1:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even Panthers. Youns love the college sports, that's

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>all good too. Whatever it iss, are gonna want to

1:04:56.600 --> 1:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>watch sports in Pittsburgh. That's what we do here in

1:04:59.720 --> 1:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>pitt We love sports. What is where? What happens is

1:05:02.920 --> 1:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that an r that that happens on No, it happens

1:05:06.360 --> 1:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>on els Like if I said I have you, you

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>have to say, properly interesting, what's with the French fries

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in the sandwiches? Who's the genius behind that? That's the

1:05:17.560 --> 1:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>greatest Pittsburgh thing ever well being is that I wasn't

1:05:21.400 --> 1:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a typical unser and that I wasn't allowed to go

1:05:23.640 --> 1:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to for Manny Brothers when I was a youngster because

1:05:26.080 --> 1:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I was an Orthodox Jew and that and they didn't

1:05:28.200 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>let me go to non Kosher restaurants in that so

1:05:30.560 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that was a big problem for me. I had to

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the goddamn kosher restaurant was just like horrible,

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And I would have loved to have a sandwich with

1:05:36.840 --> 1:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>some French fries. One of the one of the saddest things.

1:05:39.280 --> 1:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Todd not to be labored. This one of the saddest

1:05:41.520 --> 1:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>things you ever told. Man. You were sort of joking

1:05:43.440 --> 1:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>about it. Maybe you weren't choking, but I like wanted

1:05:45.400 --> 1:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to cry after you told me this. The notion of

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you wearing the full Orthodox thing on a Saturday having

1:05:52.120 --> 1:05:56.439
<v Speaker 1>to look through the store window to watch college football. Oh,

1:05:56.600 --> 1:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this no, the saddest that that was the saddest ever.

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I was still talks. I was about seventeen. I was

1:06:02.600 --> 1:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>going to Yeshiva University at the time. I was about

1:06:06.040 --> 1:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>seventeen or eighteen years old, and I was still Orthodors

1:06:10.040 --> 1:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and I was a huge college basketball fan.

1:06:13.200 --> 1:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And Pitt was playing Georgetown in a huge Saturday afternoon game.

1:06:18.040 --> 1:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>And so I walked over to like St. Nicholas, which

1:06:21.080 --> 1:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it was like a huge Dominican street. And I was terrified,

1:06:23.960 --> 1:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, because we were taught to be very very

1:06:25.800 --> 1:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>terrified of the other people. You know, they were going

1:06:27.480 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to hurt us, you know, God forbid. So I walked

1:06:29.880 --> 1:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>over to St. Nicholas and I looked through the the

1:06:33.120 --> 1:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>window of the TV store where they had pit against Georgetown,

1:06:37.520 --> 1:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was the game where there was a big

1:06:39.200 --> 1:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>fight at the end of the game. Do you remember

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that game? There was like a giant fight with like

1:06:42.760 --> 1:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>five seconds, like Jerome Lane and Charles Smith, and we

1:06:46.840 --> 1:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>had an Austin team pit against Georgetown, and you know

1:06:49.640 --> 1:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I had to watch it through the window. I mean

1:06:51.200 --> 1:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it was a very very but but the biggest thing

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm really most upset about it, and this will be

1:06:55.560 --> 1:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in my class action suit against my mother and all

1:06:57.680 --> 1:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the other mothers in the community. I am Harry Barry

1:07:00.680 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>upset that I didn't get to be the quarterback at

1:07:02.880 --> 1:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>alder Dicearts alma mater. And I was better than the

1:07:07.960 --> 1:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>kid who played quarterback. His name was tator On, a

1:07:10.520 --> 1:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>great kid. Used to play basketball and football with him

1:07:12.840 --> 1:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>all the time up in the j c C. I

1:07:14.480 --> 1:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>was much better than him. He was the starting quarterback

1:07:16.920 --> 1:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and I would have been the starting quarterback. Can you

1:07:19.080 --> 1:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine my mother taking that opportunity away from me. She

1:07:23.320 --> 1:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>deserves to lose every asset she ever had in a

1:07:26.760 --> 1:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>class action suit child abuse. Where would you go live

1:07:30.880 --> 1:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>if she lost her house? That would be a problem,

1:07:34.000 --> 1:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure you would might be a problem. But

1:07:38.640 --> 1:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you would take in because you were a

1:07:40.680 --> 1:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>man of the you know, do you try to help

1:07:42.640 --> 1:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the poor and the wounded and anything like that. You know,

1:07:46.520 --> 1:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you're a big believer in you know, whatever you do. Alright.

1:07:49.680 --> 1:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The final question, because we're over time here seven minutes.

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Final question. If we lived in a bizarro world and

1:07:55.120 --> 1:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we had to bet on a side on each and

1:07:57.440 --> 1:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>every one of the sixteen games. Remember no more buys.

1:08:00.120 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's playing starting tonight. But you were allowed one free

1:08:03.720 --> 1:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>pass one game you had to you could make fifteen.

1:08:06.400 --> 1:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>You had to make fifteen bets. But there was one

1:08:08.400 --> 1:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>game on the side where you're like, you know what,

1:08:09.800 --> 1:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the game I would not touch. Ever? What

1:08:13.640 --> 1:08:18.439
<v Speaker 1>game would that be? Adam h The Dallas Cowboys because

1:08:18.479 --> 1:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it looks so tempting to bet against the Bengals with

1:08:20.800 --> 1:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Allen. They just look horrendous offensively, But how can

1:08:24.280 --> 1:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you trust Dallas in any game the rest of the season.

1:08:27.000 --> 1:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So I, even though that number looks a little short,

1:08:29.120 --> 1:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I just I couldn't do it. By the way, my

1:08:30.800 --> 1:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>pick for the big favorite most likely loser oute out

1:08:33.120 --> 1:08:35.599
<v Speaker 1>right if anyone cares was Tampa Bay as well. Uh,

1:08:35.760 --> 1:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike game I don't know what to make of that game.

1:08:39.240 --> 1:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I just I, uh, I can't play the Bengals, and

1:08:43.080 --> 1:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>yet I can't play the Cowboys either. I what are

1:08:45.320 --> 1:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you going to get out of either side? The Yeah,

1:08:49.160 --> 1:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know it's I tell you if you if you

1:08:52.439 --> 1:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>held a gun into my head, I'd probably take Cincinnati,

1:08:54.640 --> 1:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not playing it. No one uses that phrase anymore.

1:08:57.439 --> 1:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Have you noticed everybody stopped at the same time come

1:08:59.840 --> 1:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to the head thing? Yeah, socially because everyone's walking around strapped,

1:09:04.000 --> 1:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But most people have nives, knives, ships, ships, Todd. Alright, Todd,

1:09:10.000 --> 1:09:14.479
<v Speaker 1>what is your's your pick? I would probably go with

1:09:14.520 --> 1:09:17.599
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals against the Giants. I'm not sure what's happened

1:09:17.600 --> 1:09:20.599
<v Speaker 1>to my boy, uh Kyler. He doesn't want to run anymore.

1:09:20.680 --> 1:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>That was what was making him so dynamic, his ability

1:09:23.320 --> 1:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to run and also throw the football. So I'm a

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>little worried about that team. On the other side, I

1:09:27.960 --> 1:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have the Giants who been playing well defensively, but Colt

1:09:31.040 --> 1:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>McCoy is still the quarterback. Who you know, he's a

1:09:33.600 --> 1:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>good game manager and all. But I'm not really sure

1:09:35.960 --> 1:09:37.639
<v Speaker 1>what to make of this football game. So I'm gonna

1:09:37.640 --> 1:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>stay away. Uh It was a toss up for me

1:09:40.280 --> 1:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>between Cardinals Giants in Denver and Carolina. But I think

1:09:43.600 --> 1:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's Cardinals Giants. I don't I don't know if Kyler

1:09:46.320 --> 1:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Murray is hurt or not, and so for that reason

1:09:50.160 --> 1:09:52.519
<v Speaker 1>might be heard. Also that's the other thing. Yeah, that's

1:09:52.920 --> 1:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>what we tell us. Adam is he hurt, He's got

1:09:56.000 --> 1:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder issue, but he's I've never seen someone downplaying

1:09:58.880 --> 1:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>injuries consistently. He has, and he says the defenses have

1:10:01.760 --> 1:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>just figured out Kingsbury and they're making him hand the

1:10:04.240 --> 1:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ball off. But that seems like a odd excuse that

1:10:07.200 --> 1:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, with this offensive genius as the coordinator, would

1:10:09.880 --> 1:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to figure out. But I think there's something

1:10:11.960 --> 1:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>more to it. Yeah, I'd say that game because of

1:10:14.120 --> 1:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that Arizona Giants. By the way, James Connor is back

1:10:16.760 --> 1:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for your stillers. Todd just want to point that out

1:10:19.160 --> 1:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for this game. Never think. I was never a big

1:10:22.400 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>fan of his, and I don't think the running back,

1:10:24.439 --> 1:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>unless you're a superstar running back, the running back is

1:10:27.600 --> 1:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>not the key to the the offensive the run game.

1:10:30.560 --> 1:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>The key of the run game is the offensive line.

1:10:32.840 --> 1:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>If you can't open holes, it doesn't matter who you

1:10:35.360 --> 1:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have back there. Unless you have like Barry Sanders. If

1:10:37.960 --> 1:10:41.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't have something like special, you can't run the ball.

1:10:41.720 --> 1:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>If you can't open holes, there are no holes. Would

1:10:45.840 --> 1:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you say, Mike, I can't hear Mike, can't hear you. Mike. Oh,

1:10:51.439 --> 1:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>what did you say, Mike? Go ahead? Go ahead? No? No,

1:10:54.400 --> 1:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>what did you say? Nothing? Go ahead? Edited? Just just

1:10:58.439 --> 1:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>go Todd, what do you want to say? Nothing? I

1:11:00.640 --> 1:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>was just saying, if there's no holes to run through,

1:11:02.479 --> 1:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't run. So it doesn't matter if James Conner,

1:11:04.280 --> 1:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>whoever comes up, Franco Harris could come back, you can't run,

1:11:08.360 --> 1:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, lend it on that anything to say, Mike,

1:11:11.600 --> 1:11:13.519
<v Speaker 1>it was really nice to have Adam on. It was

1:11:13.560 --> 1:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a terrific job, not just on the NFL but on

1:11:16.439 --> 1:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a variety of sports. And you know, he's had a

1:11:19.360 --> 1:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a tough season with a big bounce

1:11:21.479 --> 1:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>back here. But people have to understand that this is

1:11:24.280 --> 1:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be ebbs and flows even for the best,

1:11:26.880 --> 1:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the best in the world of doing this, and you

1:11:28.640 --> 1:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to understand that and get yourself

1:11:30.960 --> 1:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>through it and not change the way um that you

1:11:33.400 --> 1:11:35.799
<v Speaker 1>approach or manage your money or look at these games.

1:11:35.840 --> 1:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Adam. You do a tremendous job with the podcast.

1:11:40.240 --> 1:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>When you named it, I was when you named it

1:11:42.200 --> 1:11:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the Simple Handicap. There must have been a reason for

1:11:44.680 --> 1:11:49.519
<v Speaker 1>that title specifically, what was it um? It was actually

1:11:50.479 --> 1:11:52.519
<v Speaker 1>a whole article series that I was doing, and I

1:11:52.520 --> 1:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>originally put it on like the Amazon Alexa devices. But

1:11:55.720 --> 1:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the premise was it was going to be just a quick,

1:11:58.400 --> 1:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>concise podcast every morning that and it was it was

1:12:01.400 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>just explaining the the easiest way for both of the

1:12:04.200 --> 1:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>teams to win or what their success was within the handicaps.

1:12:07.000 --> 1:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So it was the most simplistic handicap of each game

1:12:10.600 --> 1:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>which people could use because I think that sports betting

1:12:13.400 --> 1:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>media in general does like an unfortunate job of making

1:12:16.960 --> 1:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone really overthink a lot of games. And so the

1:12:19.120 --> 1:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>premise was that it was just going to be a

1:12:20.960 --> 1:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>spot where you could listen every morning and sort of

1:12:22.720 --> 1:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>focus on the simplest handicap for each game. Love and

1:12:25.400 --> 1:12:28.599
<v Speaker 1>that sort of built into an article series in the podcast. Well, Adam,

1:12:28.640 --> 1:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I had the idea that I was going to do

1:12:30.240 --> 1:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe like a fifteen minute at night recap of like

1:12:33.160 --> 1:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in game bets and stuff like that now it was

1:12:35.200 --> 1:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>too lazy to do it, of course, but um, have

1:12:38.439 --> 1:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you found like success with that, like you know, getting

1:12:41.320 --> 1:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>people to you know, do your downloads every day like

1:12:44.479 --> 1:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>habitually kind of Yeah, they say it just becomes a

1:12:47.960 --> 1:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>part of their day or routine, and like it's it's

1:12:50.479 --> 1:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>growing each day and every week. Not at a spectacular rate,

1:12:54.120 --> 1:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>but the retention from people has been really really good

1:12:57.400 --> 1:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the last three seasons. So it's

1:13:00.040 --> 1:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of become its own little community and it's pretty

1:13:01.840 --> 1:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>neat to see people hang onto it. At What time

1:13:03.920 --> 1:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of day is it available? Typically? Um? I posted every

1:13:07.720 --> 1:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>morning before six am Eastern, so pretty much anyone who's

1:13:11.120 --> 1:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>waking up and on their way to work gets the

1:13:12.680 --> 1:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>full report every single morning, just to sort of a

1:13:15.080 --> 1:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>little quick briefing to stay in touch with the markets.

1:13:18.160 --> 1:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Just NFL, Just NFL. I'm always thought about doing something

1:13:22.600 --> 1:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for basketball as well, but I've just always done it

1:13:24.680 --> 1:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for an NFL. NFL is king, no matter how good

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the other sports are. It's amazing. I can do the

1:13:31.160 --> 1:13:34.879
<v Speaker 1>best baseball show in the history of mankind. Ceiling of listeners.

1:13:35.120 --> 1:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>We heard that one time and I wanted to do one.

1:13:37.280 --> 1:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>What's that and I wanted to do a baseball show

1:13:39.280 --> 1:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and we were told, nobody gives, nobody cares. It's really true.

1:13:42.880 --> 1:13:45.479
<v Speaker 1>If you if you whisper the word football, it's soars

1:13:45.600 --> 1:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>over over what you could. Don't know why they don't

1:13:47.600 --> 1:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>like college basketball because it's an amazing sport. And if

1:13:50.200 --> 1:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>you just watch I mean, it's ridiculous college basketball whatever.

1:13:54.760 --> 1:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You can start your college basketball podcast, then I know.

1:13:57.400 --> 1:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But then I would have to work and do something,

1:13:59.200 --> 1:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, effort. It would be effort. You know,

1:14:02.240 --> 1:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>there is that effort in my life. And I'm on

1:14:05.200 --> 1:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the downside. I'm a retired kind of guy. Adam, Adam,

1:14:09.200 --> 1:14:11.479
<v Speaker 1>sure enough, everybody. Adam, thank you so much for doing this. Man.

1:14:11.520 --> 1:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it so much. Keep the good word goes

1:14:14.439 --> 1:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of fun. I appreciate it again for the

1:14:16.240 --> 1:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunity simple handicaps name of the podcast for Mike Palm,

1:14:19.080 --> 1:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Mikey, Thank you for having us at the

1:14:21.040 --> 1:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>d Thank you, thank you. Todd wishdev from the Cork

1:14:24.280 --> 1:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Attic in Pittsburgh, p A appreciate it. Thank you all

1:14:27.880 --> 1:14:30.519
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening. Good luck with all your Week

1:14:30.560 --> 1:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>four teen bets in the NFL. Survivor and beyond