WEBVTT - Libya's Returning Supply, Saudi Output, Pushing Oil Price Down

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Brahmowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Oil trading on then imax below seventy dollars a barrel.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more about oil and fossil fuel

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>is John killed Off. He is the founding partner of

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Again Capital. John always a pleasure. Why do you think

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the price of oil is going lower? Well, there was

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a real sudden development in Libya yesterday morning. It was

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>announced that the two warring factions that had basically in

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the process of stopping or halting Libya's oil exports resolve

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>their differences. There's some actual rumors out there that it

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was spurred a bond by President Trump of all things. Uh.

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And this oil is rapidly coming back to the market.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>We're getting more and more good news almost by the

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>hour here, Pim. And it makes a big difference. You're

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about getting about seven thousand barrels a day back

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>online fairly rapidly. And you add that to the recent

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>increases in production by Saudi Arabia, Russia and some others,

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden that that the dire situation

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that we were looking at UH is not looking so

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>bad all of a sudden. So we're getting some relief here,

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>all right, So John, can you pair that the idea

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that Libya production is increasing and we're getting that into

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the market given that, I mean, is that really what's

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>driving things way more than trade work concerns and an

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>expression of fear that the global economy is going to

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>slow down. Well, I would argue it's a big part

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. But certainly the trade war fears are affecting

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>commodities UH more than anything else. Obviously soybeans and getting

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the headlines on this, but you're seeing copper get hit,

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing gold get hit. Um, you're seeing dollar strength,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>which is driving down these prices as well. And certainly

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we know that although it's not on the official list,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just jet that the Chinese had intimated that crude oil

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>purchases from the US and natural gas l G purchases

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be part of their paraph retaliation. So

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we're front and oil's front and center in that as well,

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>so that that is definitely part of it. And the

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>fears that global demand will take a hit from the

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>reduced economic activity. Right, so these things are all sort

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of coming together as the perfect storm, but really a

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>confluence ys of of elements here. But but to sort

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of counter that, the i e A came out with

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a report today saying that even if the biggest producers

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in Opequ basically produce as much oil as they can

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that space, what would be required to offset potential loss

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>production in other places? So that seems sort of bullish

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>for prices given US applied demand dynamic. Can you square

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>those things? Yeah? I think they had an unfortunate printing

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>deadline this month because, uh, their numbers out this morning

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>about what the deficit supply demand deficit was looking like

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that as a deficit of crude oil production didn't figure

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in this rapid return of Libyan crude oil. Um. I

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>think their numbers on Saudi Arabia were a little low

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, so they were talking about around at one

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>point four million barrel per day deficit later this year.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>That's probably going to be no more than two hundred

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to three hundred now. Um, if things hold up, especially

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in Libby, and we see more of these these gains

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>from Saudi Arabia, who has it was probably on track

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to put up about a million barrels more oil on

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the market. Uh if you measure it from April when

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they were at nine point eight seven. Uh, they're pushing

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>up towards ten point six ten point seven already and

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>may go to eleven over the course the next couple

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of months. So it's it's a lot closer. That's when

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we were surging here recently and we got the Brent

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>towards eighty bucks again and w t I back up

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>towards it's because the math was looking terrible, but the

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Staudies really did step up, the Russians really did step up,

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and this Libya thing was really a bolt out of

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the blue. I can't I can't stay it enough. So

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>where do you think prices are headed in the near

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>term for both of you t I and Brent? Well,

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's a tough slog here for for

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>from a consumer's perspective. Uh, the challenges you know, remain

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in big time in Venezuela. It was more lost production

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>month on month. Again, that's continuing to decline. The Trump

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>administration appears to be hell bent on strangling around economically

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and foreclosing their oil sales. I don't believe for a

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>minute that a single country will get a waiver from

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>from you know, escaping the sanctions that prevent their purchasing

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Bringian oil. So, um, this is probably a buying opportunity,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.559
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, prices more likely towards eighty bucks

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>for Brent, uh will be revisited upon us. I think, uh,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know later in the years. We're not we're not

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the woods yet. Well, although things are looking better,

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>well better for the upside, you mean no, I mean

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>better better for consumers, I mean him, I mean you

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>could have easily have made the argument for barrel oil

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>if the status quo had been maintained here, if we

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>hadn't seen these um rapid changes from from Sadie, from

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Libya and others. Uh that that that that fever really

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>has broken now from given what we're seeing production wise,

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Well that's where I was gonna go with this. When

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned you know, Libya and then you've got Russia.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>You have Saudi Arabia. But let's just put in for

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the sake of argument that Iran, for whatever reason, manages

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>to export more oil, Nigeria continues with its exports, and

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe even Venezuela gets its act together. These countries they

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>can't eat the oil. Uh what that if they all

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>came back online? What do you think the price of

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>oil would be? Give you about twenty seconds. I think

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we'd be trading back down towards fifty barrel if we

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>had all that production online. Plus we'll get the return

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of Canada by the end of September. So um, they said.

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a few couple more months of rough

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>letting PIM, but things can be looking a lot better

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year from a consumers perspective.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So lower. John killed Off, thank you so much for

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Always great to get your perspective. John

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>killed Off is founding a partner of Again Capital in

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>New York, talking about the oil markets. Here with us

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is somebody who has thought a lot about where to

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>produce goods and how to manufacture things efficiently and well.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Joseph of Bood, chief creative director at Men's Warehouse, training

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>us here in our eleven three oh Studios. He's also

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the creator of Joseph A Buddha Manufacturing Corporation, which is

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the largest men's tailored clothing factory in the United States. Joseph,

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it is so good to have you here, and it's

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting because you do most of your business, or do

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>most of your creations here in the US, most manufacturing.

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, given that, do you think that you're

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be somewhat insulated from all of the trade

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>talk or will it somehow come back to you. I

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>really don't know what the ultimate result will be. We've

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>been manufacturing in Massachusetts for thirty one years when I

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>launched the first collection. That's where Joseph Budde Manufacturing is,

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen a steady growth, uh when we've had

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>price increases or price reductions, because we've always tried to

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>price our product fair, so the price value proposition of

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>what we make there. As I had mentioned earlier, we

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>um we our manufacturing in that factory where we have

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred people, is with our custom product and that's

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>where young guys are now starting to come out and

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>buy suits and making an investment. So we haven't seen

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>any of these uh, these issues at the moment really

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>impact us. Speak if you can about the changes in

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the factory and you've added workers there and what you're

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>looking to do, because you know, when you think about

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>custom suits, you don't necessarily think that they can be

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>made in the United States. But that's not the case.

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting we we grew organically since nineteen seven. The

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>first year, we produced about two thousand suits. In the

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>last few years, it's been over three hundred thousand in

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>that thirty year period. And we have increased our workforce.

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>In the last three and a half years, we doubled

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.599
<v Speaker 1>our workforce. UH and New Bedford has a great uh

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a great character for people with a great work ethic.

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>We're so proud, I mean, of all the things I've

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>ever done, I'm so proud of that factory and the

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>people who work there. It's a really feel good moment

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and we do create a great product. So actually speak

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about that because we hear a

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>lot about quote labor shortages, company is having trouble hiring

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>people in the US. Are you experiencing the same? Well,

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. We have a sign out. So one of

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the one of the signs that I love the most

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in our company is there's a sign outside that factory

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that says now hiring, And I really love that we have. UM.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We really tap into the community. We have a training

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>process when people do come in if they aren't skilled

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>in sewing. So we see that we've supported the community,

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they supported us, and we want to continue to do that.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>We have had that growth and we really do see

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it through you know what we're manufacturing through our custom business.

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Use the word community. And I want you to speak

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>if you can about the annual suit drive that put

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>together because you don't just make suits, collect them. Yeah, well,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I think July is our suit Drive month where we

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>basically collect gently worn clothing. We have them come into

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>our seven and fifty men's where house stores and then

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we refurbished them in get them back to folks who

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>might want to re enter the workforce, who might not

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to afford products. And this is our eleventh year.

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>We've raised uh, we've we've collected one point six million

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>garments and we give them to a hundred and fifty nonprofits.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So good things come from good things. And I will

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just say you are dressed phenomenally today. It was you

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>walked in and I thought, Wow, a lot of pressure.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But to say it's a lot of pressure, I I

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>guess I dressed for TV and I didn't dress for radio. No,

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's fabulous. I do want to get back to the

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>idea of you know how difficult it is to hire

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>right now in the tight labor market, and I'm just wondering,

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are you finding that you're having to offer higher and

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>higher salaries and that the increases are accelerating more rapidly. Well,

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.239
<v Speaker 1>we obviously always want to be fair to our employees.

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>We and we have we have a union shop. We

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>have a great relationship with the union. UM. I've always

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>believed that in that area that it's been a great

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>uh uh community of people wanting to work in a

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>great factory. So we've over the years, we've had the

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>highs and lows of increasing the workforce, but we always

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>really want to dedicate dedicate ourselves to the kind of

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>people that we have because they are, in essence, the

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>lifeblood of the business. Now, maybe the other part of

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the lifeblood of the business is the customer. And just

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to continue the theme of the suit drive, uh, if

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you donate a suit, you get a fifty off coupon, yes,

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's also an incentive for people

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to think about cleaning out their closets. How many of

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>us are hoarders. You know, you have a suit that

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe five or six years old or seven years old,

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>probably still in good shape, but are you really going

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to wear it? And do you want to go out

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and get a new one. So it's an incentive, but

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I really think the whole, the very essence is to

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to donate those suits and get them on

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the backs of people who could really use them. Are

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you a hoarder of suits? Well, I I keep a

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of things because they're my archives. So I've got

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>things I probably wouldn't wear from my first collections you

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>would probably love, but I them because you're either a

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>special moment or it's not a closet, it's an archive,

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a museum. Close mum. But I really think, well,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's important to keep those pieces because either

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the historic for the brand, or they would be great

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>design ideas to reinterpret later on. Thank you very much,

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of an archive. Thank you very much

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for dressing up and thanks for coming much appreciate Josepha

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>bood Is the chief creative director of Men's Warehouse. Yes, him,

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm expecting you to come in and fine form tomorrow.

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll do my best. I can't keep up with Josepha Bood.

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>All right. You can follow Joseph Bood on Twitter at

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Josepha Bood and just to mention the Suit drive check

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it out on social media. Just use the hashtag hashtag

0:12:43.520 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>give a suit. As we continue to talk about straining

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>relationships between the US and China, I think it's important

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at, you know, what that relationship

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>actually has been over the past two decades and with

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>us to help us do that. As Brad setser, he

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>is Stephen A. Tannenbaum Senior Fellow for International Economics of

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the Council of Foreign Relations, also formally the Deputy Assistant

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Secretary for International Economic Analysis in the U. S. Treasury

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Department from two thousand and eleven. Brad, always wonderful having

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you on. I wanted just to start with a recent

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>paper that you wrote taking a look at China's trade

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>practices with the US and taking taking a look at

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>where grapes are are legitimate that the US has with China.

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Can you just sort of broadly outline some of those.

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think there are three broad subsets

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of policies where the US can sort of legitimately complain

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>that Chinese actions have undermined the intent, if not the letter,

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>that lay behind China's w T accession. The first is

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the one that gets all the attention, which is forced

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>technology transfer. China, in theory cannot require as a matter

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of government policy that a US company transfer technology to

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese partner as a condition for market entry. However,

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in a state dominated economy China, the the the the

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>viable partners UH to form a joint venture tend to

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be state companies, and the state companies can say, as

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a matter of commercial UH decision making our own commercial interest,

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we will require tech transfer as part of any j V,

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and so the net effect has been a de facto

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>requirement for tech transfer, even though there is no disjure requirement.

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>The second is that China just makes use of domestic

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>subsidies on a scale that no one else does, and

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it has a market distorting effect that goes beyond UH

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that of any other economy. Domestic subsidies are not prohibited

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>by the w T O. You can only bring a

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>w t O case to offset the adverse impact a

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>subsidy has on your your exports, and that processes UH

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is slow, UM, and it just wasn't designed for an

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>economy where pretty much any company that has access to

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the state banking system de facto it has a subsidy

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>because you're the intent was to prove a specific subsidy

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a budget line item, and that's not quite

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how China subsidies work. The third is a bunch of

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>by China policies that UH. You know, since you're selling

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in large measure to large Chinese state companies or companies

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>UH with heavy state or party influence, there can be

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>informal requirements that if you want to sell to China,

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got to produce inside China. And those don't have

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to be explicit procurement rules. They can just be, hey,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to sell to the Chinese railway company to

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>state enterprise, you better produce inside China. The cumulative effect

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>has been I think a set of real impediments two

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>companies that want to produce outside China and sell into China,

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>as well as a set of require a fairly onerous

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>requirements if you want to invest in China to produce

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in China, Brad, do you believe that this is part

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why this seems to be such political

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>frustration with any kind of relationship that's based on quote

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>free trade with China. I mean, I noted your description

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>state dominated economy, and then I also think about all

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of the companies that have participation from let's say, the

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>People's Liberation Army in China. Has the trading system just

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>been set up that doesn't work when you confront that

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of state intervention on such a wholesale level. I mean,

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it works particularly well, uh, in an

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>economy where the party controls the state and the party

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>cann exercise indirect influence over such a large range of

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>state enterprises. It undoubtedly is part of the reason why

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>there's bipartisan frustration at China. But you know, on the

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>flip side of all this is that after the global crisis,

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>China reduced its export dependence through a rather massive domestic stimulus,

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of the uh, you know, the

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>macro economic distortions that China created before the global crisis

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>have to degree faded. So it's it's always a little

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of a mixed bag. So, Brad, this has been

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>an issue for decades. Why hasn't it been dealt with

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>by previous administrations? Well, at every single point in time,

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think people shied away from confrontation. China is a

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>big important player, not just in the global ecou onemy,

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but in the the global security situation. So there's always

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pressure to make sure that China is cooperating in other areas,

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the North Korea set of issues, that kind of thing.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>And then for a long time, you know, there are

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>constituencies in the US that didn't necessarily want to get

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>too tough on China. There are companies that didn't want

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to get too tough on China's currency intervention because they

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>were producing in China for export and a weak currency

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>helped them. There are companies that are much more afraid

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese retaliation because they've developed successful businesses in China

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>through joint ventures. Then they are interested in the potential

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>gains from a more confrontational policy. So at each incremental moment,

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the decision was made to back away from full on confrontation.

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the U s economy now is

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>strong enough that it is a good time to take

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on some of these issues, as President Trump and his

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>UH his cabinet have suggested. Look, I think there's always

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a debate about whether it is better to UH take

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>on a more confrontational approach when your economy is weak

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and when you could really benefits, say from increased exports,

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>when your economy is operating below potential. In theory, the

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>gains from exporting are much larger than they are when

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>your our economies operating at potential. The flip side is

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that we are better uh that you know, and you

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>can analyze the short run drag from the trade war

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>as a reversal of a portion of the fiscal stimulus,

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and since there was probably excessive stimulus in the economy

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, in that sense, it's a way of

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>removing the excess stimulus and therefore won't have tremendously negative effects. Brat,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>give you about twenty seconds here. Um, you've served as

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Deputy assist and Secretary for International Economic Alliance in the U. S.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Treasury just came out for us. What do you believe

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is really going to happen? Well, you know, I was

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a mid ranking official in another administration, UH, and in

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>an administration where trade policy wasn't set in the Oval office,

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>uh directly by the president. UH. So my general's argument

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>now is that take what the President says on trade,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>both literally and seriously, and the best guide to future

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>action is what he has said, and what he has

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>said is that he will continue to escalate. I think

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the interesting question now is how China chooses to respond.

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Were if we go through with the two billion in tariffs,

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>we've exceeded US exports to China, and so China in

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>order to match would have to look at non tariff responses.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for being with us. Brad Setser is

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>from the Council on Foreign Relations and formerly Deputy Assistant

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Secretary for International Economic Analysis in the U. S. Treasury.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Our next guest is a well known name in the

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>real estate industry at Scott Lawler, founder and chief executive

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>officer at Waypoint Residential. Normally he's in Connecticut, but he

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>trecked in here to our eleven three oh studio. Scott.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for being with us. You have

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>decades of experience in the market, and I want to

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>start with a note that that caught my attention, um

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>that Morgan Stanley wrote where they were talking about the

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Ozarks and their weak earning and how some

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of their concern that some of their earnings will raise

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>concerns across the banking industry because of their suggestion that

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>commercial real estate standards were weakening and that the area

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is getting much riskier. What's your take on that. So,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you're saying that there was concerned because

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of Ozarks was a very active construction lender,

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that they might have some difficulty if the cycle turns well,

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and that this signals broader weakness in the commercial real

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>estate market, at least as far as fundamentals versus some

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of the valuations that are being put on them. Okay, yeah,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be a bit of a stretch.

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, um, one thing that's very very different about

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>this cycle versus the last cycle, of course, is leverage levels. Okay,

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and so uh, you know, the Bank of Ozarks, my understanding,

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>would typically play as a first mortgage lender in the

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>construction world, making development loans at reasonable loan to value ratios,

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifty sixty maybe sixty. And to suggest that

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>we have an imminent cycle that's going to impact the

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>performance of that loans of those loans. Excuse me, Um,

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that's tough to see. I mean, we'd have to have

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>something that I think, um exceeded what we experienced ten

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago for a bunch of six d l TV

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>construction loans to jam up Bank of ozarks earnings. If

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that was the implication of the report, I want to

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>ask you about senior housing and what you're seeing there

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the kind of build out that's happening. Well,

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've gotten into that space about a year

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago. We've done a handful of deals.

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>We're very excited about it. There are things to love

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and things to hate. Like anything, the things to love

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>are pretty obvious. Obviously, the demographic sort of tied away

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that's coming represents tremendous demand for the space now, of

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>course everyone knows that, and the upshot is everyone's in

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the business and the challenge we're facing as a tremendous

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>amount of capital in the apartment sector has tried to

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of branch out, if you were, the last couple

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of years from conventional into senior student and so on

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and further geographically, and so the playing field is very crowded.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Senior is a very uh, how to say, you have

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>to be very careful in the senior business. It's not

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>just real estate. In fact, that's only part of the

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>conversation at best. They're all sorts of operating issues. You

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>have to be smart about knowing what you know and

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:50.959
<v Speaker 1>what you don't know, and solving for what you don't know,

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>uh to uh to take on one of these one

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of these assets. So we think we've done that and

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I like the space, but it's something you have to

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>tread cautiously, and you have to be careful when the

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>capital comes in because if you're going to play in

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a space that is a little bit more operating risk,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you ought to be compensated. And what we're seeing or

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of senior housing deals with the returns of

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the same as conventional deals, and that's the result of

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>capital flow, and that's when you can really, you know,

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>get burns. So you have to be very, very careful.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I love the space. I like it long term, big picture,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's a time to proceed questionously. Scott, I'm wondering,

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>inter just since we talked so much here about tariffs

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and cross country capital flows, I'm just wondering, do you

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>see a reduction in investments in US real estate from

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>say Chinese wealthy individuals. Well, you know it's interesting, um,

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>where we played geographically, we went cross paths with that

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>quite as much. You know, historically, foreign capital, whether from China,

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Persian Gulf, Latin America would have you would prefer what

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I would describe as major coastal metro areas. So you

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>cross paths with that capital, either partnering with it or

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>competing against it quite a bit more in New York, DC, Miami,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>l A, San Francisco, VERSUS say around you know, Tennessee

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Carolinas and whatnot where we invest. Um, So

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've observed any difference in our playing field.

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>My understanding, um, from friends who do some of that

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>other investing is that they have observed, you know, maybe

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a fall off, for instance, in Chinese capital coming in

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Um, But again would impact our business

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>directly that much. Mid size cities in the United States.

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about the health of mid sized cities for

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the real estate business, Well, you know, we're obviously a

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>big fan of those markets. I think, Um, you know,

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>those markets represent a little bit more interesting pricing, if

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you will. Then some of the bigger markets because of

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>capital flow. I will say that that dynamic has changed.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was really smart going some of the

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>secondary tertiary markets five years ago, like a Louisville, Kentucky exactly,

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or even smaller you know. Um, we have a lot

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>more friends who have kind of worked their way to

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>those markets. As I was talking about before, the capital

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is drifted out not only by product but by geography.

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So we don't feel quite as you know, nearly as

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>much sort of ahead of the pack, if you will,

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 1>as we did several years ago. Nevertheless, I think on

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a relative basis, it's still fair to say that from

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>our perspective, the risk adjusted opportunity in secondary and tertiary

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>markets is superior to the risk adjusted opportunity and major

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>coastal markets. Now that's a controversial statement many of my

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>institutional friends. You know, I'll get some text saying, how

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>can you sit there and say that? Really, I hear

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that from a lot of people. Okay, well that's what

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. More people are coming our way. But historically, right,

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, cap rates, you know what to say it.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, um, as as we came into this psych

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, cap rates in New York and San Francisco.

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh fell quite a bit faster than cap rates in

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chattanooga and Greenville and whatnot, And there's some

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>logical course to some spread. But my view is I thought,

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>on a relative basis at the origin made more sense

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in the smaller markets. So um, you know, we're big

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 1>believers in in midsize metros. We think they've changed culture.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>We think that changed commercially within your kids getting out

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of college and move into a Louisville, Kentucky is a

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>different conversation than twenty five years ago. And so as

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>a result, we're happy to own apartments that we have

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the same thing. I have to underwrite, you know,

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>our our locations on our sub markets very carefully and

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're comfortable with diverse and deep demand drivers

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and all that relative to the size of the market.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>But tell us it makes terrific sense, and that's very important.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that for our property type. If I was

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>in the office business, I might be a little more

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>cautious in some of those markets. And you know, as

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I used to be Scott Lawler, thank you so much

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>for being with as Scott Lawler as founder and chief

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of Waypoint Residential normally in Connecticut. Be joining

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>us here today in our eleven three oh studios. Right now,

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>let's head over to a D and Win Studios in Washington,

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>d C. Nancy Lines is there with world national headlines. Nancy,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:27:55.480 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio