WEBVTT - How Color Works

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Clark with Charles W. Chuck Bryant and Jerry and it's

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you should Know color and technicolor. Yeah, which is

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>really something. It's tea technical or yeah. Yeah, imagine what

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it was like back then. Oh, Man debut just melting

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>people's eyes out. Bad. Probably good, You're like, wow, how

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? I'm great. I'm glad to hear that. Yeah,

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>how are you going? I'm good. I'm tired, but I'm good.

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I gotta particularly to study. Oh yeah, you get up

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>early to make the cheese? What? Oh? You know, it's

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just a saying kind of make Wait wait, who's saying, yeah,

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>make the cheese, make the sausage, make the doughnuts, of her,

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>make the donuts. You never make the sausage. You don't

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>want to see how the sausage just made. Just pick anything.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Make the cheese. I don't think so. The cheese milk

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>a cow. People get up early for that, so I

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>guess there's that association. Have you ever milk to cow? No?

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Have you know? I was talking to Emily about that

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the other day because uh. We went horse riding, and

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd never ridden a horse before. Oh yeah, it's pretty neat. Huh,

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's my new favorite thing. Yeah, it was amazing, how

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>awesome it was. Did you jump over anything on the horse? No?

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But we like, you know, trotted up a hill. Did

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you shoot a bow and arrow? No? Almost fell off though.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>And yeah when he trotted up the hill, I got

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>like kind of loosened saddle, as they say. I was like, whoa, Okay,

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>well that's exactly what you should have said, is whoa.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Well no, he was going uphill, so I had to

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>just keep on trucking. Really yeah, I didn't want to

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>stop him. Good for you, man, he was carrying a load.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I felt bad for the horse. I'm sure he was fine,

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he was all right. Yeah. What was his name? Um? Oh? Man?

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm kicking myself like a horse because I called

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this horse by his name the whole day and now

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember Calvin. I thought we'd bonded. I guess

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I was just pretending. That's cool. The horse probably can't

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>remember your name either. And he took a big dump

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they do that, right, and then just stopped and I

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>was like, what are you stopping for and I was like, oh, oh,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you're lucky even stop sometimes they just walk and do that. Really,

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>all of the ones on our little ride stopped to poop,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was maybe I'm confusing them with another

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>animal humans just walking poop at the same time. Anyway,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it was my favorite new thing. I loved it. That's cool, man,

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I felt buried at home. What color was the horse?

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the spotted ones, which I love, man. I

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was hoping you're gonna say, like blue or red or

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>something easy. You smashed the table. Let's go with blue. Okay, blue,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a blue horse, So allow me to explain

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>why your horse appeared blue. Okay, As Newton figured out,

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.239
<v Speaker 1>that horse is not inherently blue. There's nothing inherently blue

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>about that horse. It's all in our perception because color

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>technically doesn't exist. It exists in our minds. Well, yeah,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the perception of color does exactly. But like an apple

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't just there's nothing in the apple that's red, exactly chucking.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing in your horse that made it blue. What

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>happens is that color is basically our perception of a

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>specific wavelength of visible light that's right invisible light is

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just part of the electromagnetic spectrum that includes everything from

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>microwaves to radio waves to gamma raise to um ocean waves.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Not quite, but visible light is part of that wave pools. No, no, no,

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>just those things that I said, Ok, so um along

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that spectrum is this very narrow little slice that's visible

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>light and invisible light, which we see as like white light, sunlight. Yeah,

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.119
<v Speaker 1>it is the presence of the rainbow, which are called

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the spectral colors. On one end, you have the short wavelength,

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>which is blue. On the other end, you have the

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>h long wavelengths, which is red technically violet. On the

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the other side, well, red has a bunch of different names.

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>When you start reading in the color, well, no blue

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>on the blue side, it's like starts at violet. But

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't perceive it very well. Oh well, I'm talking

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>about what humans can see. Yeah, and then everything else

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is in between, right, and what's in what's really in

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the middle, like yellow maybe it seems like yellows kind

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of in the middle. Yeah, we just think you tell me, well,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on the other end, beyond violet, you've got ultra violet,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and beyond red you've got infrared. Yeah, these are things

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>we can't see. No, we can't. Some animals can, remember

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they think monarch butterflies are able to migrate all the

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>way to Mexic co Um using ultra violet detecting ultra violet.

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember that. Yeah, man, that was a good episode. Amazing.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>So this, this band of light, this visible spectrum, contains

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the spectral colors which we perceive, right. And for a

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>very long time, everybody just thought, well, that apple's red,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.119
<v Speaker 1>but that horse is blue. That's just how it's born.

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing that can be done about it. And then,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like we said, along came Newton, and Newton said, no,

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>something weird is going on here. Like you said, color

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really exist. It's in the eye of the beholder,

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>almost literally, right, um. And the reason why an apple

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>seems red or your horse seems blue are because of

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>natural chemicals found in say the skin of the apple

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>or the hide of the horse, that are called pigments.

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So in an apple, specifically, it's anthro cyanins that make

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it red. In in the case of a carrot, it's carotenoids.

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>In the case of grass, it's chlorophyll. And these pigments

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>had the cape ability of absorbing some wavelengths of light

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and reflecting others back. And the wavelength that it reflects

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>back are the colors that we perceive. That's right, And

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that's if it's an object that is opaque. Well, yeah,

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a big one right there. Apples are pretty opaque. Yeah,

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say, so that's your Superman maybe yeah, he

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it's invisible see through apple. Oh yeah he can, Candy,

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I get your joke now. So yeah, with an opaque

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>object where light um doesn't pass all the way through,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>some lights reflected back. So in the case of anthra cyanons,

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>this pigment absorbs all the other wavelengths of light except red,

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and it reflects red back, and so red is reflected back.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So what you see when you look at this apple

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>with all the red light reflecting back at you is

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>a red apple. That's how we perceive color in the

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>world around us naturally. And if it's transparent, uh, it's

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>not reflecting that light but transmitting it. So it depends

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>on the color of light that's passing through it instead

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of reflecting back to you. And again it's that chemical makeup.

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it operates in sort of the same way. Um.

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just not like in an apple skin. Let's say, yeah, exactly.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>But it all comes to do It comes down to

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>basically pigments or whatever natural chemical or mineral that either

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>absorbs or reflects certain wavelengths of light. That's right. So

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, though, Chuck, Like that can happen all

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>day long, and as long as there's not a human

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>or a monkey, or a dolphin or a dog, because

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>dogs are not color blind, that's right. They see different

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>colors than we do, but they're not color blind. I

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>always wonder how they do this tests ah, animals. Yeah,

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.679
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. I mean, I'm sure it's pretty

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>easy to find out, but I just didn't have time

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to look into it. I'm with you. Yeah, this is

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>like in massive black hole of information. Like you could

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>just keep going and going and going with colors such

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge expansive topic that we could just do nothing

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>but color episodes for the next several months if we

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do do. You want to kill me, I may

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not make it through today's. So you're doing great. This

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is fine. This is great, Chuck. It is a very

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>like big subject, Yes it is, man, We're just we're

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>providing a brief overview of it. That's right. So um,

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Like I was saying, things can reflect color all the time,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but as long as there's not something there to perceive it,

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is there any Is there really any color there? Well

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a philosophical question, but there's an answer to it,

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and the answer is no. If the tree falls in

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the woods and no one's around to here, it doesn't

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>make annoyance. No. Actually, my my opinion on that one

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is yes, okay, but with color, Um, yeah, it doesn't

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>exist without being perceived. I think it sound to me

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is different things. It's a bit of the brain melter.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>But I see what you're saying. Okay. So um. That

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>leads you to the question of how do we see color?

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And that wasn't figured out until the eighteenth century, and

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't proven, I think, until the sixties. And there

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>were a pair of guys who were a dynamic duo

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>if I've ever heard of one before, And what were

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>their names? Well, Thomas Young he was I thought he

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was kind of the main guy. Had never heard of

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the other guy, Herman von Helmholtz. Yeah, Thomas Young. Um.

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 1>What I read was that he was the first to

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>propose the trichromatic theory basically that we see everything through red, green,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and blue channels because that's how our eyes pick up

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>on color. Yeah, because we have specialized cells in our

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>eyes called cones, right, and I think we have something like, um,

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million or some ridiculous amount of rods. And

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>rods are the things that we see in like fine detail,

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>black and white typically, right, cones are color perceiving sy

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and each cell is specialized. You either attuned to wavelengths

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that red, green, or blue. Yeah, you have way more

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>rods than cones, about a hundred and twenty million rods

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in each eye and only only about six million cones

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in each eye. And those cones are concentrated mostly in

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the front of your retina in the middle, right, which

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is why you don't see color periphetally quite as well,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So, um, these cells are attuned to different wavelengths, right,

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>The long wavelengths are red, medium is green, and short

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is blue. Like you said medium was yellow. No, that's

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>in the middle, okay, right, so medium is not in

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the middle, well as far as our RGB goes, okay, Yeah,

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 1>And so with these cells, chuck, if you're looking at

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>your blue horse. What was his name, Calvin the Blue Horse.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you're looking at Calvin the Blue Horse, you're

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of information on from short wavelength light,

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>not so much at the longer medium wavelengths, right, And

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>so there's probably a little bit it's not a true

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>blue horse, right, which would mean that it was a

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>totally saturated blue, which is only that blue wavelength, true

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>blue wavelength. Coming to your eyes, there's probably a little

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of green, a little bit of red. And so

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>all the cones in your eyes are getting all of

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>this information at once, and they're reporting to your brain

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>via electrical impulses about the quality of the wavelengths of

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>light that they're getting. And so your brain takes it

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and basically becomes a color mixer and creates the color

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>blue that you're seeing. Calvin ass that's how we detect color.

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>And from the R and the G and the B

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you can put together. Supposedly, the Commission on Illumination, a

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>European Commission on illumination back in one determined that humans

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>can see something like two point three eight million colors. Oh,

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's such a hundred million, now, is it? Because I've

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>seen all over the place in this findings are the

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>ones that people say, this has the best science behind it. Yeah,

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>now I'm sorry. Ten million Okay. The other thing about

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the c I E Is that people say, well, this

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was only under certain types of illumination. I think three

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>different types of illumination, so it is entirely possible if

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you change the intensity or whatever, you're going to have

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>brand new colors. So ten millions reasonable. That's a lot

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of colors that we can see all from the red,

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the green, and the blue cones coming together and your

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>brain adjusting them and seeing, oh, well that's um burnt sienna.

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>Did you Yeah, this sort of the go to joke color, right,

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it is a pretty jokey color. It's a good one.

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, it's pretty amazing. Ten million colors, or let's

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>say it's two million, if you're going by you know,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>naming convention. Shall we talk about some of the characteristics

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>of color. Yeah, but let's take a break first. It

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is getting heavy, all right, so if you um actually

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you can do this on your modern television as well.

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But it seemed like most TVs now kind of come

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>fairly set up. But in the old days, when you

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have those little wheels to try and get that color right.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It was. You know, you might have noticed things that

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>said hugh and intensity or value or tone and all

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. Those are all color characteristics, and hugh specifically

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is um. I mean, that's basically what the color is.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not the lightness of the darkness. It's you know,

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the greenness or the redness or the blueness that's

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the hue. Yeah, it's it's what you can interchange that

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>word with color. Yeah, exactly. UM. I like how they

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>refer to as the identity of a color sounds kind

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of personal. Uh. The intensity is how pure it is

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>so um. Like we said, most colors are mixes, you know,

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>they bleed one way or the other on the wavelength.

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But in its purest form a single wavelength um, which

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is really rare, that would be the purity or the

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>intensity of the color. Um. You're not gonna see that

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>very often though. No, And I was wondering, like, that's

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. There's some physics labs somewhere that can produce

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>pure saturated green, like unadulterated green or unadulterated blue. There

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is there has to be. Yeah, probably that is gotta

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>be really something to see to know you're looking at green,

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like think but green, I would like to see that sometime. Yeah,

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have, UM, I'm not color blind, but I

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>have a more difficult time picking out other cues in

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a color, whereas Emily is really good, like when picking

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>out paint colors, like that gray has this and this

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and this and it, and I'm like, really like I

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>see gray. Well, supposedly a lot of people have a

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>color deficiency. I might have a slight color deficiency, and

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't realize that. Well, yeah, so

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't realize that they think that

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this is this color just looks like this and thinks

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody sees it that way and this in the case,

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and then it comes from a conversation where they're like, well,

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, what do you mean you see a

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>distinction between those? Well, but yeah, but in my case,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it's hues. It's not like I see a completely different

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>color or you know, black or everything just looks gray.

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I did UM a brain stuff on color blindness. It

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is pretty interesting. Yeah. I went to UM research that

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>one time for a show, and it would just like

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>bent in my mind so much. I'd quietly file it away,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sure you'll pick it next week. Color blindness, Yeah, Um.

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Value is the lightness or darkness of a color, and

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that's basically has to do with light. Um, the energy

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of the light that makes it up. Yeah, and the

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>value is um, so he was. There's really just kind

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of a finite, very finite number of colors of hues, right. Um.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And you think of like primary colors, which we'll talk

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>about soon. Um. But when you adjust something, when you

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>adjust them the value of it, that just creates a

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>whole new range of colors. So if you add a

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>little black to a color, what you're doing is shading it. Yeah.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>If you add white, you are creating a tint. And

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>then if you add black and white gray, you're toning it. Yeah. Right,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think people interchange those words without understanding what

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they mean. Yeah, but they are definite distinct things, and

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>um that we should probably say. There's a lot of

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>really neat sights on the internet. Pantone is a really

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>good one, um, where you can go look at color

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>wheels and things like that and see the distinction between

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>these things and be like, oh, you mean pastels. That's

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>another word for a tone. Yeah, And it's a lot

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>of people get really get into it because it's the

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>basis of printing and art and photography, and like every

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>every sort of art form, well not every art form,

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but many art forms boil down to color. So if

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you go to art school, you're gonna study color pretty deeply. Yeah,

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, and one of the things you're gonna study

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>is color theory. And color theory is based on the

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that certain colors can contrast one another, certain colors

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>complement one another, certain colors should never be used together.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>And not that it's just you know, um, your instructor

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>says saying these colors don't go together. It's not just

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>search his opinion. These are objective facts as far as

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>color theory goes, and it's all based on um. These

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea that all colors fall into one of two categories.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>You have additive colors and subtractive colors. Yeah, and there's

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>a couple of I mean, there's two distinct applications for

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>both of these. If you're talking about a computer screen

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>or or a television, that's that's using light, so it's additive. Um.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking about paint or photography, that's subtractive, right,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So you can think of it this way. With additive colors,

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you're starting with black and you're adding light to it,

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately, when you add all these additive colors together,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have white. With subtractive colors, you start

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>with white, and when you add all these colors together,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you're ultimately going to have black. And they subtract by

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>absorbing one another's colors. Yeah, that's another color mind bender

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>two because with subtract active color, you're still adding colors,

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's not additive, right to wrap your head around that. Yeah,

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but there's there's subtracting wavelengths by combining colors and absorbing them, right, Yeah,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it takes a hue out. So a really good example

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>of subtractive colors is if you take um cyane. Cyan

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>absorbs orange red, right, So if you take cyane and

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you mix it with yellow, you produce green. And the

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>reason that cyane and yellow produced green, it's because the

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>cyane absorbs the red light and the yellow light. The

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>yellow absorbs blue violet, and so the only color that's

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>not subtracted or absorbed is green. So green is produced

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>from these other pigments absorbing all the other wavelengths, and

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>with an additive coloring, additive pigments, it's it's quite the opposite.

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>You have um light combining to form new colors. Rather

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>than absorbing, you're adding to it. Yeah, and like the

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>apple is an example, like we said earlier, of a

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>subtractive color system um and again, like a TV screen

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>would be additive. I think we I think we got that. Yeah,

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is mine bending a little bit. Some

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff, you know, I have to read like

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ten times and then it sinks in. But the the

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>reason that all colors can be turned into either additive

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>primaries or subtractive primaries is that these are the six colors.

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Of these they're the six spectral colors. They're the rainbow colors, right,

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So additive primaries are what red, green, and blue the

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>correct Yeah, and then the subtractive colors are cyan yellow

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and um magenta ye I was gonna say magenta. They're

0:20:55.680 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>almost like bizarro colors. They're the bizarro world. Primary colors.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>When you think of primary colors, you think of like

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the the what red, yellow, and blue, because ye, red, yellow,

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and blue were the traditional primaries and they still are.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But um when it comes to like painting and printing.

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>They've been replaced with cyan, magenta, yellow and black. K. Yeah,

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>when you go to your clubhouse printer, Yeah, that's what

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be seeing C M K. Or you can

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>select r G B as well, red, green and blue.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>So Crosby stills Nash and Young, right or Crosby Stills

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in Nash. Yeah. Okay, that's the difference. That's a good

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>rule of thumb. Man. All right, So we mentioned primary

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>colors just a second ago, and then we have our

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>secondary colors, green, orange, and purple hues would you get

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>from mixing the primary colors, and then you have something

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>called tertiary colors, which is this furthering the color hues

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>by mixing primary colors with secondary colors. Right, So the

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>six tertiary colors and the two sets of primary colors

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>or the six secondary colors, I think in the two

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sets of primary colors form the color wheelers twelve colors

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in the color wheel, and tertiary colors are the ones

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>that you'll hear like blue, green or red violet. Yeah,

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>it's like literally named the two colors, and color naming

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is another rabbit hole that you can go down. There's

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a site. Um man, I wish I'd written it down,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's if you type in like who names colors

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>or color naming or something like that in Google, like

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the first page entries is

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the site that you go through and um, it shows

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you different colors and you write what you would name

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that color? Interesting, butter yellow or something like that, right,

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>and the whole well that was the as far as

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I got. Mike Well, I would call it butter yellow.

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Hungry had other things to do. But um, you can

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>go through and just I think it's like two enter

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty different shades that they show you, colors that they

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>show you, and the the the whole purpose of all

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>this is to find some sort of commonality to create

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>universal A universal naming convention for colors makes um because

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, there is a lot of distinction among languages

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for naming colors. But at least one study that I

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>found decided that all colors universally for societies that do

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>recognize individual colors, rather than these are just warm colors

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and these are cool colors, which is universal. Um. The

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>more primary the color, the shorter and easier to remember

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the name of it. Is like across culture, so not

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>all cultures will call it blue. But what a culture

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to have like another like short monosyllabic name

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for that color, for the same thing that we would

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>call blue. That's pretty interesting just because it's easier to understand.

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's basic, like colors appear to be basic universally.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, I think we should take another break and

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe come back and talk a little bit about how

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>colors can complement each other and live in harmony and

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what that all means to us. Okay, all right, we're

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>back were Uh So we talked about the different uh

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>primary color, secondary, and tertiary. And there's also something called

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>complementary colors, which are basically contrasting colors that make a

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>neutral color when put together, and they are really far

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>apart and hugh as far apart as they can be.

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>And there if you look at the color wheel there

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on the complete opposite side from one another, right um.

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And when you place them next to each other, then

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>their hue is like, uh, I guess it's just more

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>robust looking. Yeah, because they complement one another, right um. Yeah,

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>complimentary doesn't necessarily mean like, oh, they look great together.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Under all circumstances. So, um, some complementary colors like red

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and green, if you play them next to each other

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in the same intensity and the same size, it's another one.

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>You are going to have what's called an eyesore. I

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>have a shirt like that. It's just too much equal

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>amounts of bright red and bright green. Trying to think

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of that shirt. It's just a Christmas shirt? Is it retired? Well,

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a holiday shirt. Um. But the whole point

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of having colors and using colors together isn't just like, well,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>these two are opposite the color wheel, so I'm gonna

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>use them in equal amounts and equal intensity and everything

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>will be right. You have to achieve what's called color harmony. Um.

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And in doing that, you want to choose different um,

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>different shades or different tones or different tints, and also

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>different amounts at once. So like you're going to use

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of red and a little bit of green

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>as an accent. That would be much more harmonious than

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>equal amounts of intense red and green next to each other. Yeah,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and again this is um. When we say it's not

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a matter of taste, that's like picking something out as

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a matter of taste. But again, these are like scientific rules.

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>You can't just throw two colors together and say that

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>looks great or that they're harmonious. Um. I mean, I

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>guess you could, but you'd be wrong. You would surge

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>would be like, you're wrong. This is objective stuff. And

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>then with complimentary colors. Getting back to that, there's this

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>really cool thing that they bring up called retinal fatigue.

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>So you can do a little experiment at home that's

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of blows your mind, but it really illustrates how

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>color works pretty well. If you look at a bright

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>red spot for about a minute, um, your retinas are

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>going to soak in all that red, all those cones

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>are And then when you go immediately and look at

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a white surface, uh, you're gonna see green briefly, not forever, right,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why is because your red cells have

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>just been basically overstimulated and they're gonna respond weekly to

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the information that they're getting from that white, right, and

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>your blue and green cells are gonna be functioning just fine,

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>so they're gonna easily overwhelm your red cells. And so

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what you'll see is this ghost image of like a

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>cyan square. Yeah, which is why, uh, and the reason

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>why it is because red is the complement of green

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>will always be that opposite. It doesn't just like randomly

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>pick out a color. I know, And if you start

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>adding all this stuff together that there are objectively complementary

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 1>colors that you see when you see too much of

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the opposite one, doesn't it all seem to fit so

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>cleanly together that you're almost like, what is going on here? Like?

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>What is color? Why do we see color? Yeah, it's

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a really good question, and evolutionary biologists have not been

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>able to explain it fully. Yeah, I guess I really

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>never thought about that because there's well, I mean, there's

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.479
<v Speaker 1>probably some evolutionary benefit, right, like green things are generally

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>good to eat. Yeah, but green is also the the

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a universal color for disgust or sickness or illness,

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>like you're green because you're green around the gills or

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Green is often like the color of rot.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's true, I mean, it's both. So how how

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>do we evolve to understand the nuanced And I mean clearly,

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>if we didn't evolve to see in color so that

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.479
<v Speaker 1>we could do this, we have as a byproduct of it.

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But we can very easily tick off whether something is

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>healthy for us dangerous. Um. We we get a lot

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of information about an object in our environments, quality and

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>desirability based on its color. It's almost like a shorthand

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.239
<v Speaker 1>that our brains pick up. Yeah, And part of that

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is because we're conditioned after years of using green for

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>go and green for safe passage, and like red or

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>orange for hazard signs and stop signs. So part of

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that's conditioning. But as far as like going back many

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>many years before we made stop signs, I have no idea. Yeah,

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it really makes you wonder. And even like

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea that pink is for girls and blue is

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for boys, that's a fairly recent development. Prior to I

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>think the early twentieth century, it was the opposite. Did

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we ever do that as a show or didn't? It

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was too short? I think we did, like a video

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one or something. Didn't we maybe I seem to remember that,

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But it was the opposite until like the the interesting Yeah, yeah,

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting totally. Is that's why you rock your pink shirts? Well, yeah, right,

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly why that action. So getting back to harm

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>harmonious colors, uh, if they are side but and This

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is if you're like picking out colors in your house

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. If you're not very good at it, there

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are a few hard and fast rules. Um, colors that

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>are and get your little color wheel out is really handy.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>If they're side by side, Uh, they're gonna harmonize well. Um.

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And like we mentioned, colors directly across from one another.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Complimentary ones also go well in the right proportions because,

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>like you said, the size of it makes a big difference.

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>They point out in the article. I don't if you've

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>ever seen someone who's like painted their room red, like

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in college, you know, some stupid room hate would do that.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>It's an assault on your senses because you're not used

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to seeing that much red. But maybe an accent wall

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in a shade of red matched with a complimentary color,

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you would want it red and green room though it

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>gets green as complimented or red. No, but you could

0:30:56.160 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>conceivably say, um, use the complementary color for like the

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>trim or something like that. Yeah, exactly, Um. And then

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>tents and shades and tones of the same color are

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>always okay together. It's never gonna clash. But um, you're

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>just gonna have to mess around with like how much

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of one compared to the other and what places your

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>eye Yes, no, and so again Surge is is saying like, no,

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>there's objective truth as to complementary colors and harmonious colors,

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>but there is also personal preference. And this is kind

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of like the thorn in the side of the whole

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>idea of color psychology that people use colors to manipulate

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>other people into, like buying a product or whatever. Study

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>after study keeps finding that color preferencing color symbolism is

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>extremely personal. It's based on past experience, on your upbringing,

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on your culture. Like for example, here in the West

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we wear black from mourning. Yeah, well, in the East,

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>white is the color from mourning. So there's a lot

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of culturally bound ideas about color too, which keeps it

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>from being like universally symbolic or whatever. But that being said,

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there are some that just from being exposed to it

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>time and time again, like a red stoplight that you

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>come to um identify symbolically with other stuff. Yeah, and

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>colors will also affect everyone differently mood wise, but there

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.959
<v Speaker 1>are some generalities there too. Um Like blue is generally

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a soothing color that will calm you down. Um too

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>much though could actually have the opposite effect, like too

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>much blue on some people, or can really depress you.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>What blue can I wonder if that's why they say

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you're blue? Yeah? Yeah, I mean think about we describe

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>our world like that, green with envy. Blue means you're

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>down in the dumps. Red means are angry? Yeah, red

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>faced or red neck? Wait, that's different. It's a little different.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Warm colors, reds and yellows. Um can also lift the

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:15.479
<v Speaker 1>spirits if you're less excitable. Um. And they say that

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>most people want to just strike a balance though, between

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the cool and the warm, right, And that's when it

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to like personal preference. Yeah, but the idea behind

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>this is that a lot of people don't realize this

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is going on, that they're being affected by color, even

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>though they are. That it's on a very unconscious level. Yeah.

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And it also depends a lot on light, like how

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>much light a room has coming into it, because you're

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna because sunlight is different than artificial light, your shirt's

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna look at different color outside in the sun as

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it might. Uh. And I remember when we did the

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>TV show, there was a lot of um with colors

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. You know, things would look different outside than

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they would under studio lights. Right. Well, what's neat though,

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is we humans have developed this trick called color constancy, where, um,

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look at something, even if it's in the

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>shadow or in the sunlight, it should conceivably look like

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>different colored things because of the illumination. But to us,

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 1>we're still like, no, that's still green, just because there's

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, shadow blocking it now, I still see it

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>as green. It doesn't make any sense, and it's kind

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of perplexed. Um. I guess, uh biologists for a while

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what this is, or neurologists, and

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>they figured out that yes, it is in the brain. Um.

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.919
<v Speaker 1>And there was this one guy who had some sort

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of brain damage, I think from an electric shock, and

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>he also went for all intensive purposes blind but he

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>could still see color, but he didn't have color constancy.

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So they figured out that this guy was detecting wavelengths

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of light color even though he couldn't see anything. He

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>could see colors still, but color constancy wasn't there. So

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they figured out, well, that means that it's a trick

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of the brain. Very neat, it's very cool um. They

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>also ing up in the in the House of Works

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>article something. I think it's pretty interesting how certain because

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of conditioning, certain colors can just appear to be wrong.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Like if you were to pull up and see a

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>green stop sign, it would freak you out. Or the

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.399
<v Speaker 1>example the Houston here is if you cracked an egg

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and there was a green egg yolk um, that would

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>be really freaky too, because you're just so used to

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that yellow. You know, you'd think, well, this is disease

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>or something, yeah, or dr seust you know, uh what

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>else you got? Did you look at that thing on

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:37.280
<v Speaker 1>pigment I did. There's some wacky ways people have made pigments, yeah,

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean pigment um. As far as making paint in things. Uh, Now,

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they're synthetic, synthetic, you know, like they're synthesizing laboratories, which

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. But throughout all of history, up until they

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>started doing that, they were actual, uh, real things in

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the ground and on the earth that they would grind

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>up into powder. Um. In the case of blue, there

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 1>was a semi precious stone called, or there still is

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 1>called Lepis Lazuli that was found all over the place

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in Afghanistan. And that's how they made blue. Um Azure

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 1>or azure right, is a blue mineral of copper. So

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>all of them, uh, most of them have a few

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>different ways they can make it. Um red. I think

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about cinnabar before. The mineral is where you

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 1>get vermilion red and carmine. Carmine is bright red and

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that comes from aluminum salt of carminic acid. So it's

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>just crazy that they found all these things in the

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>world to make. And I know blue is the toughest

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>one because you don't see blue very much in nature. Um.

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I think blue is the one you will see least

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in the primary colors as far as nature goes, like

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.879
<v Speaker 1>some insects, but like there's no blue food. Um, yeah,

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Blue horses, No, Well, what about mine? My

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite was India Yellow, where they would feed cows nothing

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but mango leaves and then collect their urine and then

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>boil it down, then filter out the concentrated muck and

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>then make balls out of it. And there was the

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>basis of your pigment. It's pretty cool stuff. So those

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>are just a few. If you really get into pigments,

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>and you can like go crazy trying to figure out

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>where they all came from. Definitely, And um, I mean again,

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this is like really just the surface of color. There's

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>so much to it, and um, I strongly advise you

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>to go out and learn more about it. Color it's everywhere.

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>How about the one last factoid? Why is the sky blue? Oh,

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>it's a good one. Guy's not really blue. No, it

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't really have any color. But the angle of the

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sun coming down on the upper atmosphere um encounters things

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like water, vapor, and other tiny particles, and they tend

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>to scatter blue wavelength light more than the other colors, right,

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>so that it's just bouncing around at all points, which

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is why the sky is blue. It's say, like noontime.

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>But while the sky is blue at noontime over here,

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's say sunrise or sunset to the east or the west.

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And since all that blue light is getting scattered over

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you where it's noontime in the in the east of

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the west, those reds and yellows and pinks are making

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it all the way there and the blue is not,

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>which is why sunrise and sunset it tends to appear reddish,

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>whereas like mid day appears blue yeah, which is it

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>makes total sense. And when your kids ask you why

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>is the sky blue? You can tell him. You can

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>tell them like the real reason you can be like

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>color does not actually exist. It's all lie. Good luck

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>with that, go to sleep. If you want to know

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:47.720
<v Speaker 1>more about color, just type that word in your favorite

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>search engine or how stuff works. That common and will

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>take you on a wild ride. And since I said

0:38:53.400 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>wild ride, it's time for listener mail. Uh. I'm to

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>call this something I've never heard of before. Precocious puberty.

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh you ever heard of that? Yeah, we talked about it,

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>did we early puberty? Okay, did we talk about that?

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess this is in girls, So maybe that's why

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>got you surprised me. I'm a long time listener, and

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 1>thanks for helping me in my commute every day. Really

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:23.919
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed and giggled my way through the episode of male puberty. Um,

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for mentioning precocious puberty. Well, there you

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have it. I was diagnosed at age two after my

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>mom came to wake me before school one day. Now

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>before preschool. This is a lady. Uh, And she had

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>started her period at two years old, and as you

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 1>can imagine, my mom was terrified. It took a long

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 1>time to get a correct diagnosis since it is pretty rare.

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>My treatment started out as daily shots that my mom

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>gave me at home UM that then went to weekly, monthly,

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and annually as a year's progressed. I also had intermittent

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>stays in the hospital for testing. Poor kid. I know.

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Treatment was stopped when I reached twelve years old, essentially

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.720
<v Speaker 1>pressing play of my puberty that have been on pause

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for almost in years. Let's let's see that's cool treatment. Yeah,

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's amazing that they figured out how to

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>stall puberty. Yeah, they're like, stay stay, Okay. I have

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>only hazy memories of this, of course, as I was

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a child, but I do remember that missing UM shots

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>caused quite a bit of pain since my body was

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:27.399
<v Speaker 1>growing out of control. Essentially never been able to find

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 1>out what the long term effects might be. But I've

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty decent health into my adult life and

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm now thirty one years old. Awesome, So thanks a lot.

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And that is from Lauren in California. Well, thanks a lot. Lauren.

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate that we love hearing from people with real life

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:46.359
<v Speaker 1>experiences and stuff we just talk about that's right, you know. Uh.

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>If you want to let us know about your real

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 1>life experience, we want to hear it. You can tweet

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>to us at s y s K podcast. You can

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>join us on Facebook dot com, slash stuff you Should Know.

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email to Stuff Podcast, to

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot com, and, as always, joined us

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>at home on the web. Stuff you Should Know dot com.

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics, is

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it how Stuff Works dot com