1
00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:08,559
Speaker 1: Hi everyone. I'm Katie Couric and this is next question.

2
00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:17,520
Speaker 2: My name is Jennifer Adkins. I am from Caldwell, Idaho,

3
00:00:18,120 --> 00:00:21,920
Speaker 2: and in early twenty twenty three, we discovered that we

4
00:00:21,920 --> 00:00:25,880
Speaker 2: were pregnant with our second child, and at our twelve

5
00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:30,920
Speaker 2: week appointment, we got the devastating news that our fetus

6
00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:35,080
Speaker 2: was not viable, that the baby had Turner syndrome, which

7
00:00:35,120 --> 00:00:39,599
Speaker 2: means she was missing an X chromosome, and that not

8
00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:42,720
Speaker 2: only was she not likely to survive the pregnancy, but

9
00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:47,160
Speaker 2: that I was at risk of developing life threatening complications

10
00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:51,360
Speaker 2: on top of that. Because we live in Idaho and

11
00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:55,520
Speaker 2: this was at a time after Roe versus Wade was overturned,

12
00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:58,840
Speaker 2: we were unable to terminate the pregnancy in the state

13
00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:03,800
Speaker 2: of Idaho, and our physicians were unable to refer us

14
00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:07,560
Speaker 2: out of state, so we were forced to find that

15
00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:11,080
Speaker 2: appointment on our own and find a clinic willing to

16
00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:14,160
Speaker 2: do the procedure and travel out of state in order

17
00:01:14,200 --> 00:01:19,960
Speaker 2: to terminate our very wanted but not viable pregnancy. So

18
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:23,240
Speaker 2: we went to Portland, and even though they provided the

19
00:01:23,240 --> 00:01:26,080
Speaker 2: best possible care that they possibly could, and they were

20
00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:29,720
Speaker 2: lovely and they took excellent care of us. It's still

21
00:01:30,880 --> 00:01:34,000
Speaker 2: hard to not be surrounded by the people that you

22
00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:37,759
Speaker 2: love and trust and care about and that love you

23
00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:41,840
Speaker 2: and care about you, and to meet all new providers,

24
00:01:42,120 --> 00:01:45,200
Speaker 2: a whole new doctor nurse team, and have to go

25
00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:51,720
Speaker 2: through this alone with strangers. Losing a child is devastating

26
00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:55,280
Speaker 2: for any family and to put that out for the

27
00:01:55,320 --> 00:02:00,080
Speaker 2: world to kind of scrutinize and make judgment on and

28
00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,320
Speaker 2: you know, say mean things about us. But we knew

29
00:02:03,320 --> 00:02:06,240
Speaker 2: it was also necessary because we knew we had the

30
00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:08,160
Speaker 2: capability to do it, and there are.

31
00:02:08,080 --> 00:02:09,640
Speaker 3: So many people that don't.

32
00:02:09,960 --> 00:02:13,320
Speaker 2: And if we can help use our voice to help

33
00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:17,880
Speaker 2: protect those people and to protect future families from this

34
00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:20,200
Speaker 2: happening to them, that's what we want to do.

35
00:02:22,240 --> 00:02:23,720
Speaker 3: My name is Samantha Casiano.

36
00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:27,280
Speaker 4: I'm twenty nine years old and I'm originally from Houston, Texas.

37
00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:30,240
Speaker 4: When I became pregnant, this was not my first baby.

38
00:02:30,280 --> 00:02:32,960
Speaker 4: This is actually my fifth child. When I went in

39
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:35,600
Speaker 4: for my twenty week scant, you know, they pick up

40
00:02:35,639 --> 00:02:37,920
Speaker 4: your shirt, they rub the gel on your belly, and

41
00:02:37,960 --> 00:02:40,800
Speaker 4: everything goes well. We're having a conversation and then all

42
00:02:40,840 --> 00:02:43,560
Speaker 4: of a sudden, it goes quiet. They go on to

43
00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:45,800
Speaker 4: tell me that they were sorry to tell me, but

44
00:02:45,919 --> 00:02:49,280
Speaker 4: my daughter has been diagnosed with pennaceph lee, which means

45
00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:52,280
Speaker 4: that my daughter'skull is not fully developed and her brain

46
00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:53,360
Speaker 4: is not fully developed.

47
00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:57,040
Speaker 3: And I felt like this has to be a dream,

48
00:02:57,360 --> 00:03:02,400
Speaker 3: this is not right, with no way, and I immediately.

49
00:03:02,120 --> 00:03:05,120
Speaker 4: Just start to cry. After I spoke to my doctor,

50
00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:07,400
Speaker 4: I just kind of thought, what do I do? What

51
00:03:07,480 --> 00:03:10,560
Speaker 4: can I do? Like, what options do I have? My

52
00:03:10,600 --> 00:03:12,560
Speaker 4: doctor just told me I don't have any options after

53
00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:13,160
Speaker 4: be pregnant.

54
00:03:13,320 --> 00:03:18,400
Speaker 3: There has to be something. And afterwards I go on to.

55
00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:20,079
Speaker 4: See if I can maybe go out of state, but

56
00:03:20,880 --> 00:03:24,840
Speaker 4: the cost was crazy and childcare and I work, my

57
00:03:24,919 --> 00:03:28,919
Speaker 4: husband works. It just didn't work for us, which is

58
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:31,560
Speaker 4: sad because you know, you would think in your hometown

59
00:03:32,120 --> 00:03:34,360
Speaker 4: you'd be able to get the healthcare that you need,

60
00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:38,240
Speaker 4: and that wasn't there for us. And after I gave birth,

61
00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:40,560
Speaker 4: she was with us for four hours and when I

62
00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:43,920
Speaker 4: told you she was grasping for air, she was just

63
00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:46,520
Speaker 4: just like using her whole mouth was open and she

64
00:03:46,640 --> 00:03:49,840
Speaker 4: was grasping for air, and they gave her morphine, and

65
00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:52,360
Speaker 4: that hurt even more because you know, to see your

66
00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:55,800
Speaker 4: little baby get morphine MORPHINEUS. It's morphine.

67
00:03:56,320 --> 00:03:58,840
Speaker 3: So it was heartbreaking.

68
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:03,080
Speaker 4: At the very beginning, I wanted to be anonymous, and

69
00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:04,680
Speaker 4: that changed as soon as.

70
00:04:04,520 --> 00:04:07,720
Speaker 3: I met my daughter and saw how she suffered.

71
00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:10,560
Speaker 4: I am going to do whatever I can to make

72
00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:12,880
Speaker 4: sure that no mother, no other baby has to go

73
00:04:12,960 --> 00:04:16,600
Speaker 4: through this ever again. My daughter died in her father's hands,

74
00:04:17,160 --> 00:04:21,960
Speaker 4: and it took him an emotional roller coaster to have

75
00:04:22,080 --> 00:04:25,359
Speaker 4: to go through that no family should have to go

76
00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:25,800
Speaker 4: through that.

77
00:04:30,200 --> 00:04:32,240
Speaker 1: This is what it was like for these women who

78
00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:35,800
Speaker 1: tried to get an abortion last year. How did we

79
00:04:35,920 --> 00:04:40,600
Speaker 1: get here? This month marks fifty one years since Roe v.

80
00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:45,640
Speaker 1: Wade enshrined the federal right to abortion. In twenty twenty two,

81
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:48,880
Speaker 1: as we all know, that right was abolished by the

82
00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:53,960
Speaker 1: US Supreme Court. The ruling, driven by Justice Samuel Alito,

83
00:04:54,360 --> 00:04:57,159
Speaker 1: took away the constitutional right to choose to have an

84
00:04:57,200 --> 00:05:01,600
Speaker 1: abortion and gave that authority to the people and their

85
00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:08,080
Speaker 1: elected representatives. Now, doctors are afraid, and as we just heard,

86
00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:12,480
Speaker 1: the consequences for women looking to terminate a pregnancy has

87
00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:17,119
Speaker 1: often been herowing. Today, New York Times Pulitzer Prize winning

88
00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:21,680
Speaker 1: investigative reporter Jody Canter explains what was really going on

89
00:05:21,920 --> 00:05:27,080
Speaker 1: inside the Supreme Court when Roe was overturned. Jody is

90
00:05:27,120 --> 00:05:31,160
Speaker 1: a top notch reporter responsible for breaking many me too

91
00:05:31,200 --> 00:05:35,920
Speaker 1: stories alongside her colleague Megan Tuey. Now she's teamed up

92
00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:39,920
Speaker 1: with another colleague, Adam Liptak, and the result is an

93
00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:46,960
Speaker 1: astonishing feat of meticulously sourced reporting with surprising details. Here's

94
00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:52,120
Speaker 1: my conversation with Jody Canter. Jody, I am so thrilled

95
00:05:52,160 --> 00:05:55,680
Speaker 1: to have you on the podcast. You are such an intrepid,

96
00:05:56,080 --> 00:06:00,839
Speaker 1: excellent reporter, and your piece on how the Supreme Court

97
00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:07,080
Speaker 1: overturned ro V Wade was I think a masterclass in reporting.

98
00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:10,279
Speaker 1: First and foremost, How did you get the idea to

99
00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:13,560
Speaker 1: really dig into this because it was no easy task.

100
00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:17,039
Speaker 5: Well, thank you so much, Katie. Adam Liptak and I

101
00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:19,760
Speaker 5: just wanted to understand what had really happened. This is

102
00:06:19,920 --> 00:06:23,160
Speaker 5: one of the most consequential decisions of our time. You know,

103
00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:26,880
Speaker 5: you're talking today about the effect on women's lives, on

104
00:06:26,920 --> 00:06:30,160
Speaker 5: whether or not they have children, but also it's transformed

105
00:06:30,440 --> 00:06:35,720
Speaker 5: who's elected in this country, how medicine is practiced, and

106
00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:39,200
Speaker 5: the court is pretty opaque. You know, on the one hand,

107
00:06:39,279 --> 00:06:43,640
Speaker 5: they have oral arguments, the issue written opinions, so we

108
00:06:43,680 --> 00:06:46,800
Speaker 5: can understand some of their thinking, but the question of

109
00:06:47,279 --> 00:06:52,160
Speaker 5: how is the law, and especially something this epic really

110
00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:55,920
Speaker 5: decided is often a mystery, And in fact their papers

111
00:06:56,480 --> 00:07:00,440
Speaker 5: stay sealed for so long that the written records may

112
00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:02,839
Speaker 5: not come out until some of us are dead. So

113
00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:06,240
Speaker 5: Adam and I plunged in and just ask the basic questions.

114
00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:08,920
Speaker 5: You know, how do the nin injustices go about doing

115
00:07:08,960 --> 00:07:09,920
Speaker 5: something so big?

116
00:07:10,240 --> 00:07:13,640
Speaker 1: How challenging was that? Jody? I mean, I can't imagine

117
00:07:14,160 --> 00:07:19,680
Speaker 1: being tasked with really unraveling every aspect of this decision.

118
00:07:20,160 --> 00:07:23,200
Speaker 1: So how did you go about reporting this? And how

119
00:07:23,240 --> 00:07:26,880
Speaker 1: many foyas did you have to do? It's a great question.

120
00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:30,480
Speaker 5: We did zero foyas because the Supreme Court is exempt

121
00:07:30,480 --> 00:07:33,760
Speaker 5: from foya. Foya, of course, is the usual means by

122
00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:36,560
Speaker 5: which the public, including journalists, can find out what's what

123
00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:37,480
Speaker 5: the government is doing.

124
00:07:37,480 --> 00:07:39,160
Speaker 1: Why don't you explain what foyas are?

125
00:07:39,360 --> 00:07:42,960
Speaker 5: It's basically a written request to a government entity saying

126
00:07:43,160 --> 00:07:45,880
Speaker 5: will you please show us these emails or these records

127
00:07:45,920 --> 00:07:48,760
Speaker 5: because the public has a right to know. The Supreme

128
00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:52,920
Speaker 5: Court is exempt from that. So there were some public

129
00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:56,320
Speaker 5: records that we could rely on, and every case is

130
00:07:56,360 --> 00:08:01,679
Speaker 5: a story, right, litigation is an narrative, and the Dobbs

131
00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:06,080
Speaker 5: litigation is especially interesting because, Katie, I'm going to say

132
00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:09,560
Speaker 5: it a little impolitely, this case was a nothing burger

133
00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,640
Speaker 5: when it first emerged. It was this Mississippi law that

134
00:08:13,760 --> 00:08:18,680
Speaker 5: was blatantly unconstitutional when it was passed because it contradicted Roe,

135
00:08:18,920 --> 00:08:21,600
Speaker 5: it didn't look like it had a chance, especially because

136
00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:23,920
Speaker 5: Justice Ginsburg was still on the court.

137
00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:26,560
Speaker 1: Tell us a little more about the Mississippi law and

138
00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:27,680
Speaker 1: what it stated.

139
00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:33,000
Speaker 5: So basically, what Mississippi wanted to do is they wanted

140
00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:39,160
Speaker 5: to permit women to have abortions only before fifteen weeks.

141
00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:42,320
Speaker 5: So it doesn't sound that controversial on the face of it, right,

142
00:08:42,480 --> 00:08:47,120
Speaker 5: because most abortions do occur before fifteen weeks. But the

143
00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:50,840
Speaker 5: reason why it was so provocative is that the Supreme

144
00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:54,680
Speaker 5: Court for many, many, many years had held that you

145
00:08:54,760 --> 00:08:59,720
Speaker 5: can't restrict abortion before viability, before say twenty three weeks,

146
00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:03,360
Speaker 5: and that had been secret for a long time. So

147
00:09:03,480 --> 00:09:07,000
Speaker 5: really what they were saying was, we want to change

148
00:09:07,040 --> 00:09:12,960
Speaker 5: the rules of when abortion restrictions are permitted. So two

149
00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:16,360
Speaker 5: federal courts said no, said you can't do this, and

150
00:09:16,400 --> 00:09:19,680
Speaker 5: they made a last ditch appeal to the Supreme Court

151
00:09:20,280 --> 00:09:23,760
Speaker 5: when Justice Ginsburg was still alive and it looked like

152
00:09:23,760 --> 00:09:27,439
Speaker 5: they had no chance, and then Justice Skinsburg died and

153
00:09:27,480 --> 00:09:28,439
Speaker 5: everything changed.

154
00:09:28,720 --> 00:09:33,559
Speaker 1: In fact, that was a huge turning point for really

155
00:09:33,640 --> 00:09:36,080
Speaker 1: the ethos of the Court. Before we get into that,

156
00:09:36,160 --> 00:09:38,840
Speaker 1: I just wanted to ask you a couple of other

157
00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:44,319
Speaker 1: quick questions about the actual reporting. You had a difficult

158
00:09:44,360 --> 00:09:49,600
Speaker 1: time finding sources because everything is so tightly held there.

159
00:09:49,679 --> 00:09:53,760
Speaker 1: It's like a secret society in a way, right, Jody,

160
00:09:53,920 --> 00:10:00,160
Speaker 1: And anyone who kind of shares information is shun and

161
00:10:00,520 --> 00:10:03,400
Speaker 1: if it's discovered who they are. Right, Can you talk

162
00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:06,080
Speaker 1: about kind of the culture of the Supreme Court, because

163
00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:07,840
Speaker 1: it's so fascinating.

164
00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:09,920
Speaker 5: It's correct to work there is pretty much to take

165
00:10:09,960 --> 00:10:13,599
Speaker 5: a vow of silence. So it's a pretty dramatic situation

166
00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:16,640
Speaker 5: because no matter who you are at the Court, if

167
00:10:16,679 --> 00:10:21,959
Speaker 5: you have access to the deliberative process, you are confronting

168
00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:24,880
Speaker 5: some of the hardest issues in American life. That's what

169
00:10:24,960 --> 00:10:27,600
Speaker 5: the Court is doing right now. They're taking on all

170
00:10:27,640 --> 00:10:31,200
Speaker 5: of these very controversial, hot button topics, and yet you

171
00:10:31,240 --> 00:10:35,120
Speaker 5: can't tell anybody what you've seen. And also there's no

172
00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:40,160
Speaker 5: accountability for these nine people, they have lifetime appointments, and

173
00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:44,920
Speaker 5: nobody is anybody else's boss there among the justices. Meaning

174
00:10:45,559 --> 00:10:48,040
Speaker 5: we look at Chief Justice John Roberts and he looks

175
00:10:48,080 --> 00:10:50,720
Speaker 5: like he's in charge in many ways, but he's really not.

176
00:10:51,320 --> 00:10:53,840
Speaker 5: He's really not. He's the administrator of the court and

177
00:10:53,960 --> 00:10:56,120
Speaker 5: of the federal courts, but he really doesn't have a

178
00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:59,559
Speaker 5: lot of leverage over the other justices. And so then,

179
00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:02,520
Speaker 5: to make things even more difficult, Adam and I were

180
00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:06,280
Speaker 5: reporting in the shadow of a leak investigation, of course.

181
00:11:06,160 --> 00:11:09,640
Speaker 1: Right, so they were even more paranoid to talk to you, right,

182
00:11:10,080 --> 00:11:12,280
Speaker 1: anyone associated with the court.

183
00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:15,800
Speaker 5: It was very difficult. But as you know, that's why

184
00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:19,480
Speaker 5: we do. We weren't doing it just for the sake

185
00:11:19,679 --> 00:11:22,720
Speaker 5: of breaking open the silence. We were doing it to

186
00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:27,839
Speaker 5: try to illuminate the court, to help us understand this

187
00:11:27,920 --> 00:11:32,800
Speaker 5: critical institution, and to provide some function of accountability. I mean,

188
00:11:33,440 --> 00:11:35,640
Speaker 5: as you know, we've both done this our whole lives.

189
00:11:35,679 --> 00:11:39,120
Speaker 5: In journalism, probably the most basic function of journalism in

190
00:11:39,160 --> 00:11:42,120
Speaker 5: a democracy is to just keep an eye on elected officials.

191
00:11:42,480 --> 00:11:45,800
Speaker 5: It's why in a small town you want a journalist

192
00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:49,120
Speaker 5: sitting there at a school board meeting or watching the mayor,

193
00:11:49,559 --> 00:11:52,440
Speaker 5: because you want to say, a representative of the people

194
00:11:52,960 --> 00:11:58,520
Speaker 5: is independently, not with government support, watching these government officials

195
00:11:58,559 --> 00:12:00,560
Speaker 5: to be able to see what they do. And so

196
00:12:00,760 --> 00:12:03,559
Speaker 5: in some ways we were just fulfilling that very basic function.

197
00:12:03,920 --> 00:12:07,000
Speaker 1: Getting back to the Mississippi long curious Jody, and this

198
00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:10,720
Speaker 1: is a bit of a quick left turn. Has viability

199
00:12:10,920 --> 00:12:14,199
Speaker 1: changed with technology? I guess that's one of the questions

200
00:12:14,559 --> 00:12:18,480
Speaker 1: if in fact this twenty three week window has been

201
00:12:18,520 --> 00:12:21,160
Speaker 1: protected for a long time by the Supreme Court, Has

202
00:12:21,240 --> 00:12:26,440
Speaker 1: technology and modern medicine in fact allowed fetuses to live

203
00:12:26,960 --> 00:12:31,080
Speaker 1: even if they are less than twenty three weeks old.

204
00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:32,600
Speaker 1: I don't even know the answer to that.

205
00:12:32,760 --> 00:12:34,520
Speaker 5: I mean, I'm not a doctor, but I can tell

206
00:12:34,559 --> 00:12:38,320
Speaker 5: you that Roe has always been a controversial decision, even

207
00:12:38,520 --> 00:12:41,319
Speaker 5: among liberals, and as you know, the fights about abortion

208
00:12:41,400 --> 00:12:44,200
Speaker 5: are just epic. And I think there has been some

209
00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:47,680
Speaker 5: legal wrangling over whether the viability rule is smart because

210
00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:52,960
Speaker 5: viability can change, right, But the I don't think that

211
00:12:53,080 --> 00:12:56,480
Speaker 5: was really what was happening with Dobbs. What happened with

212
00:12:56,640 --> 00:13:00,560
Speaker 5: Dobbs is that the composition of the court change and

213
00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:03,000
Speaker 5: big time. Yeah, I mean often you have a Supreme

214
00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:05,640
Speaker 5: Court that's stable for years and years at a time

215
00:13:05,720 --> 00:13:10,199
Speaker 5: because of these lifetime appointments. But very quickly, from Justice

216
00:13:10,200 --> 00:13:14,360
Speaker 5: Scalia's death in twenty sixteen up until very recently, you're

217
00:13:14,400 --> 00:13:17,560
Speaker 5: looking at a court that's been repopulated and mostly with

218
00:13:17,640 --> 00:13:18,800
Speaker 5: conservative justices.

219
00:13:19,000 --> 00:13:23,400
Speaker 1: Well, let's pick up with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg's death.

220
00:13:24,080 --> 00:13:28,040
Speaker 1: She was sort of a firewall in terms of a

221
00:13:28,120 --> 00:13:33,760
Speaker 1: case like this, even being heard. She passes away. What happens,

222
00:13:35,080 --> 00:13:36,160
Speaker 1: She passes.

223
00:13:35,800 --> 00:13:38,480
Speaker 5: Away just as the justices are about to take their

224
00:13:38,520 --> 00:13:41,680
Speaker 5: first preliminary look at Dobbs. And as you know, the

225
00:13:41,720 --> 00:13:45,720
Speaker 5: Supreme Court operates in two phases. The first level of

226
00:13:45,760 --> 00:13:48,679
Speaker 5: discussion is about whether the justices should take the case

227
00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:52,199
Speaker 5: at all. The second level of discussion is if they

228
00:13:52,240 --> 00:13:56,120
Speaker 5: take it is actually about deciding the case. So, in

229
00:13:56,400 --> 00:14:00,920
Speaker 5: very quick succession, Dobbs goes on the discussion list. Justice

230
00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:05,439
Speaker 5: Ginsburg dies with weeks until the twenty twenty presidential election,

231
00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:11,680
Speaker 5: in the final days really of President Trump's term. He

232
00:14:11,920 --> 00:14:17,160
Speaker 5: replaces Justice Skinsburg with Amy Coney Barrett, who is known

233
00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:21,400
Speaker 5: to disagree with abortion. She's basically a favorite of the

234
00:14:21,440 --> 00:14:25,240
Speaker 5: anti abortion movement and young and young and shuffled on

235
00:14:25,280 --> 00:14:30,840
Speaker 5: the Court in record time, a very quick nomination process.

236
00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:35,360
Speaker 5: So she's coming onto the scene even as President Trump

237
00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:39,480
Speaker 5: is being shuffled out of the White House and then.

238
00:14:39,440 --> 00:14:41,360
Speaker 1: The Court they're trying to shuffle him out.

239
00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:44,360
Speaker 5: Of the well exactly as he loses the presidential election,

240
00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:46,720
Speaker 5: is a better way to say it. And so the

241
00:14:46,800 --> 00:14:50,080
Speaker 5: Court is sitting there with this very hot button case.

242
00:14:50,480 --> 00:14:54,240
Speaker 5: And then it's in January of twenty twenty one, in fact,

243
00:14:54,280 --> 00:14:59,040
Speaker 5: two days after the January sixth insurrection, that the justices

244
00:14:59,120 --> 00:15:03,800
Speaker 5: have the first conversation about whether to take Dobs or not.

245
00:15:04,200 --> 00:15:07,600
Speaker 5: And this very new justice, Justice Barrett, has to decide

246
00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:07,960
Speaker 5: what to.

247
00:15:07,920 --> 00:15:10,800
Speaker 1: Do, and she doesn't want to take it. She's very

248
00:15:10,840 --> 00:15:13,560
Speaker 1: hesitant at first. What we were able to report is

249
00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:16,480
Speaker 1: that she initially votes to grant that means to give

250
00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:19,840
Speaker 1: it the green light, but she voices some objections, some concerns,

251
00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:22,640
Speaker 1: you know, and she says, I'm really new here.

252
00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:26,040
Speaker 5: I just got here. The composition of the court just changed.

253
00:15:26,120 --> 00:15:29,520
Speaker 5: That will change. And she says at that point Justice

254
00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:32,120
Speaker 5: Alito and a few of the others want to hear

255
00:15:32,160 --> 00:15:34,760
Speaker 5: the case very soon. They want to hear it that

256
00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:38,520
Speaker 5: term meaning a year before it was actually held, so

257
00:15:38,560 --> 00:15:42,640
Speaker 5: they are ready to move with those justices with this

258
00:15:42,760 --> 00:15:46,880
Speaker 5: colossal president. Justice as Alito, Thomas, and Gorsich all wanted

259
00:15:46,880 --> 00:15:49,640
Speaker 5: to hear it very quickly, and she says, if you

260
00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:52,760
Speaker 5: go and do that, I'm going to change my grant

261
00:15:52,880 --> 00:15:56,800
Speaker 5: vote to a deny. And then weeks later that's what

262
00:15:56,840 --> 00:15:59,880
Speaker 5: she actually does, she votes against taking the case. So

263
00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:03,720
Speaker 5: it's important to remember when we look at it. To

264
00:16:03,760 --> 00:16:06,520
Speaker 5: go back to your original question, Katie, how did this happen?

265
00:16:07,480 --> 00:16:09,520
Speaker 5: One of the key facts I'm going to tell you

266
00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:13,920
Speaker 5: is that this case was greenlighted by a minority.

267
00:16:13,400 --> 00:16:14,000
Speaker 1: Of the court.

268
00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:18,360
Speaker 5: Two conservative justices did not want to take it, Justice

269
00:16:18,440 --> 00:16:22,600
Speaker 5: Roberts and Justice Barrett, and it was all men who

270
00:16:22,640 --> 00:16:28,040
Speaker 5: greenlighted this case, and they overrode the objections of every

271
00:16:28,080 --> 00:16:30,840
Speaker 5: woman on the court, conservative and liberal.

272
00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:35,320
Speaker 1: What was Justice Kavanaugh's role in this, because he was

273
00:16:35,560 --> 00:16:37,840
Speaker 1: a bit of a fly in the ointment for the

274
00:16:37,880 --> 00:16:42,320
Speaker 1: conservative justices, right, Well, or is that overstating it?

275
00:16:42,440 --> 00:16:45,160
Speaker 5: Well, I think it's open to interpretation. Let's see what

276
00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:47,600
Speaker 5: happened and then we can interpret it. So they're sitting

277
00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:52,240
Speaker 5: there on January eighth, two days after this rupture in

278
00:16:52,280 --> 00:16:57,520
Speaker 5: American democracy, they have to decide whether to take the

279
00:16:57,560 --> 00:17:00,240
Speaker 5: case or not. It seems like they have the votes

280
00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:03,640
Speaker 5: to go ahead. But then at a subsequent meeting soon afterwards,

281
00:17:03,800 --> 00:17:07,040
Speaker 5: Justice Kavanaugh says, we should relist this case.

282
00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:08,160
Speaker 1: What does that mean?

283
00:17:08,320 --> 00:17:11,960
Speaker 5: It means we should just punt or pretend that we're

284
00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:15,760
Speaker 5: punting because we have the votes to go ahead, but

285
00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:19,000
Speaker 5: the time, like Justice Barrett has already said, the timing

286
00:17:19,280 --> 00:17:22,840
Speaker 5: wasn't right for her. So what he's suggesting is just

287
00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:26,200
Speaker 5: keep it on like a TBD list in.

288
00:17:26,160 --> 00:17:28,280
Speaker 1: The double put it on the docket if you will

289
00:17:28,400 --> 00:17:31,280
Speaker 1: keep it on the docket because as on me or

290
00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:35,840
Speaker 1: don't say that we're going ahead even though we privately

291
00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:38,600
Speaker 1: know that we have the votes to grant.

292
00:17:38,920 --> 00:17:41,640
Speaker 5: And he says, this will allow us to watch cases

293
00:17:41,720 --> 00:17:47,440
Speaker 5: play out in the lower courts. And so that's what happens,

294
00:17:47,480 --> 00:17:50,000
Speaker 5: and that also opens, you know, a kind of window

295
00:17:50,040 --> 00:17:53,119
Speaker 5: of persuasion. Some of the justices who don't want to

296
00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:55,880
Speaker 5: take it go to work on Justice Barrett and Justice Kavanaugh,

297
00:17:56,119 --> 00:17:59,040
Speaker 5: and as we know, Justice Barrett changes her vote. So

298
00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:02,480
Speaker 5: what was he really doing there? Was he saying? I

299
00:18:02,480 --> 00:18:06,800
Speaker 5: think the most obvious interpretation is that he really wanted

300
00:18:06,880 --> 00:18:09,040
Speaker 5: to take this case. He was in favor of it,

301
00:18:09,359 --> 00:18:12,080
Speaker 5: but he wanted more time. He wanted it to look

302
00:18:12,520 --> 00:18:15,480
Speaker 5: as if they were moving more slowly than they really were.

303
00:18:16,280 --> 00:18:19,920
Speaker 5: I guess there's another you know, there's another possible interpretation,

304
00:18:20,640 --> 00:18:23,679
Speaker 5: but it's hard to know what he really thought. I

305
00:18:23,720 --> 00:18:27,560
Speaker 5: guess there's an interpretation also that he was buying time. Well,

306
00:18:27,640 --> 00:18:30,600
Speaker 5: that makes sense to me now, you know, the reporting

307
00:18:30,680 --> 00:18:34,200
Speaker 5: indicates that he wanted to go ahead. But we can't

308
00:18:34,200 --> 00:18:37,480
Speaker 5: read the Justice's minds. We don't know what they were thinking,

309
00:18:37,560 --> 00:18:40,080
Speaker 5: and it's all a game of poker inside that building.

310
00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:46,439
Speaker 1: We have to take a quick break, but when we

311
00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:49,439
Speaker 1: come back, we'll dig deeper into the dynamics of the

312
00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:53,439
Speaker 1: court and the details of two cases that affected the

313
00:18:53,640 --> 00:19:01,120
Speaker 1: Justice's decision to reconsider Row. If you want to get

314
00:19:01,160 --> 00:19:03,880
Speaker 1: smarter every morning with a breakdown of the news and

315
00:19:04,040 --> 00:19:07,920
Speaker 1: fascinating takes on health and wellness and pop culture, sign

316
00:19:08,040 --> 00:19:10,600
Speaker 1: up for our daily newsletter Wake Up Call by going

317
00:19:10,600 --> 00:19:25,640
Speaker 1: to Katiecouric dot com. Is Justice Alito sam Alito kind

318
00:19:25,640 --> 00:19:31,879
Speaker 1: of the leader of this whole movement to overturn Roe v. Wade,

319
00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:35,160
Speaker 1: Because I know Neil Gorsich decided he agreed with him

320
00:19:35,160 --> 00:19:39,439
Speaker 1: only ten minutes after right, talk about the timing and

321
00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:43,560
Speaker 1: how those two were really important figures and all this.

322
00:19:43,920 --> 00:19:48,480
Speaker 5: So Justice Alito absolutely really propelled the court. He's one

323
00:19:48,480 --> 00:19:51,640
Speaker 5: of nine justices. But when you look at the role

324
00:19:51,680 --> 00:19:55,320
Speaker 5: he played first in rescheduling the case in the fall

325
00:19:55,400 --> 00:19:59,200
Speaker 5: of twenty twenty, he wrote the majority opinion, it appears

326
00:19:59,240 --> 00:20:02,919
Speaker 5: that he preservedulated it. We've seen evidence of some of

327
00:20:02,920 --> 00:20:06,120
Speaker 5: the arguments he was making internally, and if you read

328
00:20:06,160 --> 00:20:09,280
Speaker 5: his opinion, it's clear that he really wanted this to happen.

329
00:20:09,960 --> 00:20:15,399
Speaker 5: So it's interesting he first shared his famous draft, the

330
00:20:15,480 --> 00:20:17,520
Speaker 5: draft that made the law. This is also the draft

331
00:20:17,800 --> 00:20:22,280
Speaker 5: that leaked in February of twenty twenty two. This is

332
00:20:22,320 --> 00:20:24,880
Speaker 5: now the second phase, the phase where they're actually deciding

333
00:20:24,920 --> 00:20:28,600
Speaker 5: the case. And he shared it with the full court

334
00:20:28,840 --> 00:20:33,399
Speaker 5: one morning, and Justice Gorsuch did an interesting thing, which

335
00:20:33,440 --> 00:20:35,760
Speaker 5: is he said, yes, I'm signing on to this, I've

336
00:20:35,840 --> 00:20:40,080
Speaker 5: no changes, ten minutes after Justice Alito sent it around

337
00:20:40,400 --> 00:20:44,880
Speaker 5: and it was a ninety eight page opinion. So does

338
00:20:44,920 --> 00:20:47,720
Speaker 5: that mean he never even read the opinion before saying yes,

339
00:20:48,400 --> 00:20:50,400
Speaker 5: I don't think so, we don't think so.

340
00:20:50,400 --> 00:20:51,520
Speaker 1: So were they in kahoots?

341
00:20:51,720 --> 00:20:56,080
Speaker 5: Well, it appeared that Justice Alito pre circulated the opinion

342
00:20:56,640 --> 00:21:00,800
Speaker 5: among the majority before sharing it with the full which

343
00:21:00,840 --> 00:21:04,000
Speaker 5: is not that unusual a thing to do. When you

344
00:21:04,080 --> 00:21:06,119
Speaker 5: do that, you're trying to get buy in from the

345
00:21:06,160 --> 00:21:10,440
Speaker 5: other justices. So he shared it with we think, we

346
00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:14,320
Speaker 5: don't know exactly potentially, but it appears that he shared

347
00:21:14,359 --> 00:21:18,840
Speaker 5: it with Justices Gorsage, Barrett at Kavanaugh, Thomas. Let's talk

348
00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:22,760
Speaker 5: about the period of time between when the court agreed

349
00:21:22,760 --> 00:21:25,080
Speaker 5: to hear the case and when they made the decision.

350
00:21:25,600 --> 00:21:28,879
Speaker 5: Can you take people through sort of what happened, because

351
00:21:28,920 --> 00:21:31,879
Speaker 5: I think it still is such a mystery for people

352
00:21:31,960 --> 00:21:33,320
Speaker 5: how the court operates.

353
00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:34,040
Speaker 1: Sure.

354
00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:37,320
Speaker 5: Well, two, there's the thing that sort of was like

355
00:21:37,640 --> 00:21:40,520
Speaker 5: expected and routine, and then there was a real wild

356
00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:43,639
Speaker 5: card in there as well. So the routine thing is that,

357
00:21:44,920 --> 00:21:48,920
Speaker 5: you know, okay, the justices are taking the case. There

358
00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:52,320
Speaker 5: are months and months of planning and build up. Both

359
00:21:52,359 --> 00:21:56,440
Speaker 5: sides are filing briefs. They're amicus briefs being filed by

360
00:21:56,880 --> 00:21:59,720
Speaker 5: people who you know, agree with one side or the other.

361
00:22:00,080 --> 00:22:01,800
Speaker 1: That's like friend of the court friends.

362
00:22:01,640 --> 00:22:04,439
Speaker 5: Yeah, exactly, they're saying the court must do this. You know,

363
00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:09,120
Speaker 5: for this reason, the lawyers are preparing their oral arguments

364
00:22:09,200 --> 00:22:12,600
Speaker 5: because they're about to argue a historic case. So all

365
00:22:12,640 --> 00:22:18,959
Speaker 5: of that is proceeding when boom, this Texas case comes along.

366
00:22:19,040 --> 00:22:23,560
Speaker 5: That is extremely unorthodox. Here you have Mississippi trying to

367
00:22:23,600 --> 00:22:27,080
Speaker 5: overturn Row. And by the way, during this time, Mississippi

368
00:22:27,200 --> 00:22:31,200
Speaker 5: expanded its question. Its first brief early in the process

369
00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:34,720
Speaker 5: said it's not necessary for the court to overturn Row

370
00:22:35,119 --> 00:22:38,040
Speaker 5: to go ahead with this fifteen week rule by Mississippi.

371
00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:42,240
Speaker 5: During this time period that we're talking about now they say, actually,

372
00:22:42,640 --> 00:22:46,280
Speaker 5: we're trying to overturn all of Row. And this is

373
00:22:46,359 --> 00:22:49,040
Speaker 5: kind of an unorthodox thing to do because they're changing

374
00:22:49,080 --> 00:22:52,199
Speaker 5: the question. And Adam and I point out that there

375
00:22:52,200 --> 00:22:56,360
Speaker 5: are other cases where the court is actually rejected the

376
00:22:56,520 --> 00:22:59,240
Speaker 5: entire thing by saying to the lawyers, hey, you changed

377
00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:00,960
Speaker 5: the question, it's cool.

378
00:23:00,760 --> 00:23:01,439
Speaker 1: But they didn't.

379
00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:02,040
Speaker 5: They didn't.

380
00:23:02,119 --> 00:23:04,600
Speaker 1: So wait, let me just go back real quickly. They

381
00:23:04,680 --> 00:23:07,399
Speaker 1: tried to change it from the fifteen week rule to

382
00:23:07,480 --> 00:23:10,800
Speaker 1: what so Mississippi, when they pose the case say we're

383
00:23:11,080 --> 00:23:14,280
Speaker 1: just trying to do this fifteen week cut off for abortions.

384
00:23:14,280 --> 00:23:18,440
Speaker 1: We are it is not necessary to overturn Row. Then,

385
00:23:19,200 --> 00:23:24,200
Speaker 1: during the merits phase, they file another brief saying, Justices,

386
00:23:24,720 --> 00:23:28,840
Speaker 1: you've got to go all the way here an overturn row.

387
00:23:29,160 --> 00:23:33,360
Speaker 1: It's like they sends to opportunity and expanded their question. Now, normally,

388
00:23:33,560 --> 00:23:35,919
Speaker 1: I feel like I'm going on Michael Barbara on you.

389
00:23:36,080 --> 00:23:39,840
Speaker 1: Normally you can't do that. You're saying that. A lot

390
00:23:39,880 --> 00:23:43,600
Speaker 1: of times if it changes midstream, the justices or the

391
00:23:43,640 --> 00:23:45,719
Speaker 1: court will say, no, you can't do that.

392
00:23:46,200 --> 00:23:51,120
Speaker 5: You risk the justices dismissing the case as improvidently granted

393
00:23:51,160 --> 00:23:54,040
Speaker 5: if you do that. However, in this case, it's at

394
00:23:54,080 --> 00:23:56,639
Speaker 5: the justice's discretion, and in this case they went ahead.

395
00:23:56,800 --> 00:23:59,920
Speaker 5: So what about this Texas law? So, even as mississid

396
00:24:00,119 --> 00:24:06,600
Speaker 5: be is on its way to turn truro, Texas steps

397
00:24:06,600 --> 00:24:12,639
Speaker 5: in with a much more provocative law than Mississippi's. Texas

398
00:24:12,720 --> 00:24:17,000
Speaker 5: has what's called a heartbeat bill, banning abortion around the

399
00:24:17,080 --> 00:24:20,600
Speaker 5: time you hear a heartbeats, which is six seven weeks.

400
00:24:21,080 --> 00:24:21,399
Speaker 1: Now.

401
00:24:21,560 --> 00:24:23,400
Speaker 5: The funny thing is that a lot of women don't

402
00:24:23,440 --> 00:24:25,679
Speaker 5: know they're pregnant. Then you can't even do an abortion

403
00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:29,280
Speaker 5: if it's too early. But not only that, the law

404
00:24:29,359 --> 00:24:36,639
Speaker 5: has this incredibly unusual structure where regular people, uber drivers,

405
00:24:36,800 --> 00:24:41,200
Speaker 5: doctors can be sued for helping to provide the abortion,

406
00:24:41,840 --> 00:24:45,520
Speaker 5: and by doing that, the drafters of the law actually

407
00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:49,520
Speaker 5: made it immune from review by the federal courts. They

408
00:24:49,560 --> 00:24:53,920
Speaker 5: found this kind of loophole that said, the Supreme Court

409
00:24:54,080 --> 00:24:57,800
Speaker 5: actually can't rule on whether this law is constitutional or not,

410
00:24:58,480 --> 00:25:04,000
Speaker 5: even though this this law it contravenes Row. And so

411
00:25:04,800 --> 00:25:08,440
Speaker 5: this case comes to the Supreme Court in an emergency application.

412
00:25:08,960 --> 00:25:11,720
Speaker 5: This is totally different than the Court's regular procedures. It's

413
00:25:11,760 --> 00:25:14,320
Speaker 5: like a last minute thing. This is the Texas Law.

414
00:25:14,560 --> 00:25:17,199
Speaker 5: Two days before the Texas Law is supposed to go

415
00:25:17,280 --> 00:25:21,439
Speaker 5: into effect, more or less overturning Row in the second

416
00:25:21,480 --> 00:25:26,359
Speaker 5: most populous state in the entire country. Abortion providers in

417
00:25:26,400 --> 00:25:29,200
Speaker 5: Texas come to the Supreme Court and say, you've got

418
00:25:29,240 --> 00:25:33,239
Speaker 5: to stop this. This is illegal, this is improper. And

419
00:25:33,640 --> 00:25:36,439
Speaker 5: the Court becomes kind of frozen over what to do.

420
00:25:36,520 --> 00:25:39,080
Speaker 5: And this was part of our reporting as well. It's

421
00:25:39,119 --> 00:25:43,000
Speaker 5: this last minute application. It's August thirty first. Four of

422
00:25:43,040 --> 00:25:45,800
Speaker 5: the justices, led by Justice Alito, want to go ahead.

423
00:25:46,240 --> 00:25:49,640
Speaker 5: Four of the justices, led by Justice Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts,

424
00:25:49,640 --> 00:25:54,639
Speaker 5: want to stop it, and Justice Gorsitch doesn't vote in time.

425
00:25:55,200 --> 00:25:58,040
Speaker 5: So the Court doesn't make a decision or announce anything

426
00:25:58,080 --> 00:26:01,960
Speaker 5: before the law goes into effect, goes into effect, and

427
00:26:02,040 --> 00:26:05,280
Speaker 5: then only the next day does the court issue a

428
00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:08,960
Speaker 5: decision allowing it to go ahead. Says we're not we're

429
00:26:08,960 --> 00:26:09,880
Speaker 5: not intervening.

430
00:26:10,119 --> 00:26:12,800
Speaker 1: And by the way, the Texas law would even make

431
00:26:12,880 --> 00:26:16,359
Speaker 1: it a crime to Let's say I had a friend

432
00:26:16,400 --> 00:26:19,240
Speaker 1: who needed an abortion, and we both lived in Texas,

433
00:26:19,880 --> 00:26:23,000
Speaker 1: and I drove her to a nearby state where she

434
00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:30,160
Speaker 1: could terminate her pregnancy. I could be charged with criminal activity. Right.

435
00:26:30,640 --> 00:26:32,840
Speaker 5: It's not like you're not going to be put in

436
00:26:32,920 --> 00:26:35,880
Speaker 5: jail for, you know, a criminal offense, but you can

437
00:26:35,920 --> 00:26:39,520
Speaker 5: be subject to a lawsuit. And so there is this

438
00:26:40,080 --> 00:26:45,040
Speaker 5: feeling that like, wait a second, things are moving even

439
00:26:45,240 --> 00:26:48,600
Speaker 5: more quickly than people even realized.

440
00:26:48,200 --> 00:26:50,480
Speaker 1: And more severely and maybe more right.

441
00:26:50,840 --> 00:26:53,640
Speaker 5: And also it doesn't look good for Roe at that point.

442
00:26:53,840 --> 00:26:57,080
Speaker 5: You know, people are starting to say, if the court

443
00:26:57,119 --> 00:26:59,359
Speaker 5: is allowing this Texas law to go ahead, they're not

444
00:26:59,400 --> 00:27:00,680
Speaker 5: going to stop Mississippi.

445
00:27:01,200 --> 00:27:04,240
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the leak, because that is a big

446
00:27:04,280 --> 00:27:07,320
Speaker 1: part of your reporting. Yeah, who do you think leaked

447
00:27:07,320 --> 00:27:07,920
Speaker 1: the decision?

448
00:27:08,119 --> 00:27:10,000
Speaker 5: And why I you know, I don't know, and I

449
00:27:10,040 --> 00:27:13,280
Speaker 5: can't tell you it's going to be it's going to

450
00:27:13,320 --> 00:27:16,640
Speaker 5: be interesting to see Kiti, whether history ever figures it out,

451
00:27:16,760 --> 00:27:23,040
Speaker 5: or whether anybody ever comes forward absent photographic evidence, it

452
00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:26,919
Speaker 5: is really really tough to say. I think the question

453
00:27:27,240 --> 00:27:30,520
Speaker 5: that is almost more interesting is, and this is what

454
00:27:30,560 --> 00:27:35,280
Speaker 5: Politico never told us, what was the motive? What was

455
00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:38,160
Speaker 5: the motive? Because you know, there are two sides here,

456
00:27:38,280 --> 00:27:41,120
Speaker 5: right There are people who were outraged that the right

457
00:27:41,160 --> 00:27:44,320
Speaker 5: to abortion was overturned, and there are people who saw

458
00:27:44,359 --> 00:27:49,480
Speaker 5: it as a must, a necessity, the crowning achievement of

459
00:27:49,560 --> 00:27:54,320
Speaker 5: the conservative legal movement. And so there are essentially two theories.

460
00:27:54,440 --> 00:27:57,399
Speaker 5: There's this theory that a liberal did it to raise

461
00:27:57,440 --> 00:28:00,920
Speaker 5: alarm bells about what was about to happen, and then

462
00:28:00,920 --> 00:28:04,680
Speaker 5: there's a theory that a conservative did it in order

463
00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:08,000
Speaker 5: to make it a runaway train, in order to help

464
00:28:08,160 --> 00:28:11,080
Speaker 5: lock in the votes and prevent a compromise. And one

465
00:28:11,119 --> 00:28:14,359
Speaker 5: of our discoveries in our reporting was that the compromise

466
00:28:14,480 --> 00:28:19,040
Speaker 5: efforts underway at the court were more extensive than anybody knew.

467
00:28:19,200 --> 00:28:22,440
Speaker 1: Let's talk about that, because I haven't mentioned just a

468
00:28:22,640 --> 00:28:26,199
Speaker 1: Briar's role in all this exactly, and tell us what

469
00:28:26,359 --> 00:28:27,760
Speaker 1: was going on behind the scenes.

470
00:28:28,200 --> 00:28:31,320
Speaker 5: Well, listen, I don't know how people listening and hearing

471
00:28:31,359 --> 00:28:35,080
Speaker 5: this today would feel about this. But what if the

472
00:28:35,119 --> 00:28:37,320
Speaker 5: court had stopped at fifteen weeks? What if we were

473
00:28:37,320 --> 00:28:39,920
Speaker 5: living in a reality today that said you can have

474
00:28:40,000 --> 00:28:44,160
Speaker 5: an abortion up until fifteen weeks. That's what Chief Justice

475
00:28:44,240 --> 00:28:48,040
Speaker 5: Roberts wanted to do. I mean, he basically said, this

476
00:28:48,080 --> 00:28:52,520
Speaker 5: is the rule in a lot of other democracies, you know,

477
00:28:53,400 --> 00:28:55,920
Speaker 5: he wanted His position was that he wanted to allow

478
00:28:56,000 --> 00:29:00,440
Speaker 5: Mississippi to go forward with its law, but essentially stop

479
00:29:00,520 --> 00:29:05,040
Speaker 5: there at least for the time being. And part of

480
00:29:05,040 --> 00:29:08,719
Speaker 5: what's interesting is that it turns out that Justice Bryer,

481
00:29:08,880 --> 00:29:14,320
Speaker 5: a lifelong liberal, was considering joining that position, which only

482
00:29:14,320 --> 00:29:17,320
Speaker 5: would have had symbolic value. It wouldn't have been legally,

483
00:29:17,840 --> 00:29:20,920
Speaker 5: it wouldn't have changed the legal outcome. But what would

484
00:29:20,960 --> 00:29:23,440
Speaker 5: have changed it is that, because of the Court's kind

485
00:29:23,440 --> 00:29:27,240
Speaker 5: of unusual mass, the Chief Justice only needed one vote

486
00:29:27,280 --> 00:29:31,200
Speaker 5: from the conservative side to make that the law. So

487
00:29:31,360 --> 00:29:34,720
Speaker 5: if he had been able to win over Justice Barrett

488
00:29:34,840 --> 00:29:38,240
Speaker 5: or Justice Kavanaugh, say, we would be living with the

489
00:29:38,240 --> 00:29:43,320
Speaker 5: fifteen week rule today and Roe would still be partially intact.

490
00:29:43,400 --> 00:29:46,320
Speaker 5: It would be sort of smaller and more limited, but

491
00:29:46,600 --> 00:29:47,520
Speaker 5: it would still exist.

492
00:29:48,000 --> 00:29:50,280
Speaker 1: I'm curious, and I know you're not a doctor, neither

493
00:29:50,320 --> 00:29:55,120
Speaker 1: am I of course, but don't most women get abortions

494
00:29:55,360 --> 00:29:58,000
Speaker 1: in that time tame? Anyway, I think that's absolutely so

495
00:29:58,120 --> 00:30:03,120
Speaker 1: much misinformation about quote unk quote late term or even worse,

496
00:30:03,320 --> 00:30:10,960
Speaker 1: partial birth abortions that compromise. So few abortions that take

497
00:30:11,000 --> 00:30:13,440
Speaker 1: place in this country, and when they do, it's usually

498
00:30:13,480 --> 00:30:15,560
Speaker 1: because the life of the mother is in danger and

499
00:30:15,640 --> 00:30:20,800
Speaker 1: there's something seriously wrong with the fetus. Yeah, and so

500
00:30:21,040 --> 00:30:24,480
Speaker 1: that would have precluded all these states from enacting much

501
00:30:24,520 --> 00:30:25,959
Speaker 1: more draconian laws.

502
00:30:26,120 --> 00:30:28,760
Speaker 5: Correct, Yeah, I think the states would have continued to

503
00:30:28,880 --> 00:30:31,840
Speaker 5: challenge a fifteen week rule. You know, there's one theory

504
00:30:31,880 --> 00:30:33,960
Speaker 5: that says that a fifteen week rule was only a

505
00:30:34,000 --> 00:30:36,080
Speaker 5: gateway to a ten week rule, which would have been

506
00:30:36,080 --> 00:30:37,560
Speaker 5: an eight week rule, which would have been a six

507
00:30:37,600 --> 00:30:38,720
Speaker 5: week rule, and then you have no.

508
00:30:38,720 --> 00:30:42,920
Speaker 1: Right then abortion after that law. Right exactly, But maybe not.

509
00:30:43,240 --> 00:30:47,960
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe that would have play came maybe or not.

510
00:30:49,440 --> 00:30:54,240
Speaker 1: It's so hard to talk in hypotheticals. And also, the

511
00:30:54,320 --> 00:30:57,840
Speaker 1: abortion debates in this country are so thunderous that it

512
00:30:57,920 --> 00:31:01,800
Speaker 1: seems like wishful thinking that you know, after all these years,

513
00:31:01,840 --> 00:31:05,040
Speaker 1: this country could just you know, say, okay, fifteen weeks.

514
00:31:05,080 --> 00:31:08,239
Speaker 1: You know, the referee is blowing the whistle, like you know,

515
00:31:08,320 --> 00:31:10,320
Speaker 1: the this is done and we're moving on to the

516
00:31:10,360 --> 00:31:11,200
Speaker 1: next issue.

517
00:31:11,720 --> 00:31:14,400
Speaker 5: But we don't know. I mean, look at what's changed

518
00:31:15,040 --> 00:31:19,560
Speaker 5: with politics in this country since Roe was overturned. You

519
00:31:19,600 --> 00:31:23,200
Speaker 5: know what would have been the political after effect of

520
00:31:23,240 --> 00:31:26,320
Speaker 5: a fifteen week rule. We can't you know, we can't know.

521
00:31:26,760 --> 00:31:30,720
Speaker 1: Talk about the leak and how that basically nullified any

522
00:31:30,760 --> 00:31:37,240
Speaker 1: attempts at the compromise that Justice Roberts and Brier were

523
00:31:37,280 --> 00:31:39,480
Speaker 1: considering this fifteen week ban.

524
00:31:39,840 --> 00:31:43,320
Speaker 5: So the reason why these votes are secret is so

525
00:31:43,520 --> 00:31:46,400
Speaker 5: justices can change their minds. It's to preserve their privacy.

526
00:31:46,520 --> 00:31:50,640
Speaker 5: I mean, it's the deliberative process is supposed to have

527
00:31:50,720 --> 00:31:55,560
Speaker 5: a sanctity to it because, no matter our political backgrounds,

528
00:31:55,600 --> 00:31:59,160
Speaker 5: we really want the justices to be engaged in thoughtful

529
00:31:59,200 --> 00:32:02,920
Speaker 5: contemplation and debate and to really do what they feel

530
00:32:03,520 --> 00:32:06,640
Speaker 5: is right. And sometimes that can mean changing your mind

531
00:32:06,720 --> 00:32:10,080
Speaker 5: or shifting your position. So this was a really grave

532
00:32:10,160 --> 00:32:13,960
Speaker 5: breach for that reason. You know, the Court has called

533
00:32:13,960 --> 00:32:16,920
Speaker 5: it an assault on the deliberative process, and I think

534
00:32:16,960 --> 00:32:21,080
Speaker 5: that's right. Because it wasn't just the outcome that was leaked.

535
00:32:21,120 --> 00:32:24,400
Speaker 5: It wasn't like somebody said, Katie Rowe is going to

536
00:32:24,400 --> 00:32:30,520
Speaker 5: be overturned. The entire opinion was leaked. I mean, that

537
00:32:30,680 --> 00:32:37,000
Speaker 5: is so unthinkable. And what happened is that it rendered

538
00:32:37,000 --> 00:32:40,680
Speaker 5: the efforts to compromise kind of hopeless. Now, who knows

539
00:32:40,760 --> 00:32:43,200
Speaker 5: how much hope they had to begin with. We really

540
00:32:43,200 --> 00:32:46,200
Speaker 5: can't say, because you know, it would require a kind

541
00:32:46,240 --> 00:32:48,520
Speaker 5: of like truth serum. I think for one of the

542
00:32:48,680 --> 00:32:51,640
Speaker 5: justices to know every thought that was going through their minds.

543
00:32:52,080 --> 00:32:54,840
Speaker 5: But we do know that some of the justices were

544
00:32:54,840 --> 00:32:58,320
Speaker 5: trying to persuade others and that just didn't work once

545
00:32:58,400 --> 00:33:00,400
Speaker 5: everything became public.

546
00:33:00,520 --> 00:33:01,840
Speaker 1: Why, I mean, why for.

547
00:33:01,840 --> 00:33:06,240
Speaker 5: A justice to change their minds after the votes and

548
00:33:06,320 --> 00:33:09,400
Speaker 5: the opinion had become public. It would have looked like

549
00:33:09,440 --> 00:33:12,000
Speaker 5: they were bowing to public pressure, which they never want

550
00:33:12,040 --> 00:33:12,920
Speaker 5: to look like they're doing.

551
00:33:14,040 --> 00:33:21,680
Speaker 1: So the decision had them pretty much boxed into their view. Right,

552
00:33:21,920 --> 00:33:25,080
Speaker 1: I would say, it's solidified what already seemed to be happening.

553
00:33:25,840 --> 00:33:29,360
Speaker 1: So this term, the Supreme Court is going to decide

554
00:33:29,360 --> 00:33:33,440
Speaker 1: whether to limit access to a key abortion drug. What

555
00:33:33,440 --> 00:33:34,560
Speaker 1: do you think is going to happen.

556
00:33:35,040 --> 00:33:38,320
Speaker 5: I can't tell you exactly, but it's very dramatic, and

557
00:33:38,360 --> 00:33:41,200
Speaker 5: I'm glad you mentioned it, because what we have to

558
00:33:41,280 --> 00:33:44,320
Speaker 5: understand is that this is now the most common method

559
00:33:44,520 --> 00:33:48,120
Speaker 5: of abortion in this country. Our old image of you know,

560
00:33:48,160 --> 00:33:51,960
Speaker 5: going to a clinic and priasurgery is somewhat.

561
00:33:51,880 --> 00:33:55,360
Speaker 1: Is antiquated at this point, although I think it's only

562
00:33:55,720 --> 00:33:58,680
Speaker 1: it still happens, but I think more than fifty percent

563
00:33:59,200 --> 00:34:03,320
Speaker 1: of abortion use a pill that will terminate the pregnancy.

564
00:34:03,480 --> 00:34:06,400
Speaker 5: And so now this question is back with the justices,

565
00:34:06,800 --> 00:34:09,960
Speaker 5: which is not what they said would happen in his

566
00:34:10,040 --> 00:34:14,640
Speaker 5: majority opinion from Dobbs, just as Alito says, we're throwing

567
00:34:14,680 --> 00:34:17,160
Speaker 5: this back to the States. The people are going to

568
00:34:17,200 --> 00:34:21,879
Speaker 5: decide we are washing our hands of abortion dissians. Well,

569
00:34:21,960 --> 00:34:23,880
Speaker 5: I think they, I mean, they chose to take the

570
00:34:23,920 --> 00:34:26,600
Speaker 5: case because I think they essentially have to. You know,

571
00:34:26,680 --> 00:34:31,799
Speaker 5: this is really controversial. There's a lot of disagreement. So

572
00:34:31,920 --> 00:34:36,760
Speaker 5: basically the Supreme Court has to decide whether these really

573
00:34:37,360 --> 00:34:40,040
Speaker 5: strict restrictions on these abortion drugs that were put in

574
00:34:40,080 --> 00:34:42,560
Speaker 5: place by a lower court are going to stand or not.

575
00:34:44,040 --> 00:34:46,840
Speaker 5: And remember that this is a different set of legal issues.

576
00:34:46,960 --> 00:34:50,160
Speaker 5: This is about the FDA and what drugs were approved.

577
00:34:50,520 --> 00:34:54,360
Speaker 5: So it's you know, the Court said that it was

578
00:34:54,840 --> 00:34:58,239
Speaker 5: wanted to get less involved in abortion questions, but it

579
00:34:58,320 --> 00:35:00,280
Speaker 5: appears to be getting more involved.

580
00:35:02,520 --> 00:35:05,040
Speaker 1: After this break. Jody's take on what the outcome of

581
00:35:05,080 --> 00:35:08,600
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty four presidential election could mean for the

582
00:35:08,640 --> 00:35:21,280
Speaker 1: future of the Supreme Court and of course, abortion rights.

583
00:35:25,760 --> 00:35:30,000
Speaker 1: I shudder to think about the composition of the Supreme

584
00:35:30,040 --> 00:35:36,440
Speaker 1: Court if Donald Trump is re elected, because that means

585
00:35:37,320 --> 00:35:44,120
Speaker 1: even more conservative justices. Who is the next to retire, Jody,

586
00:35:44,200 --> 00:35:49,560
Speaker 1: and how could his reelection impact the composition of the court.

587
00:35:50,160 --> 00:35:52,640
Speaker 5: You know, it's a really interesting question, in part because

588
00:35:52,680 --> 00:35:57,279
Speaker 5: of the very complicated and not straightforward question of what

589
00:35:57,400 --> 00:36:01,320
Speaker 5: happened with the first three judges he appointed. President Trump

590
00:36:01,800 --> 00:36:04,680
Speaker 5: said that he was going to put in place justices

591
00:36:04,680 --> 00:36:10,000
Speaker 5: who would automatically overturn Row. I mean, he did, But

592
00:36:10,120 --> 00:36:12,560
Speaker 5: did they do it automatically or not? I don't know.

593
00:36:12,840 --> 00:36:15,200
Speaker 5: That's part of why it's so interesting that Justice Barrett

594
00:36:15,239 --> 00:36:19,640
Speaker 5: didn't vote to take the case, and in general, they

595
00:36:19,680 --> 00:36:24,520
Speaker 5: didn't take his marching orders. Remember that this court reviewed

596
00:36:24,560 --> 00:36:28,960
Speaker 5: a lot of election cases in which President Trump wanted

597
00:36:29,000 --> 00:36:33,560
Speaker 5: them to stand by the idea that he had really

598
00:36:33,600 --> 00:36:37,080
Speaker 5: won the twenty twenty election. They didn't do that. They

599
00:36:37,160 --> 00:36:40,520
Speaker 5: rejected his ideas over and over again. And of course

600
00:36:40,880 --> 00:36:44,800
Speaker 5: now they're about to face an even more dramatic, arguably

601
00:36:44,880 --> 00:36:50,520
Speaker 5: set of election cases. And so he appointed very conservative justices,

602
00:36:50,560 --> 00:36:54,879
Speaker 5: but not justices who took his dictates in an edge

603
00:36:54,960 --> 00:36:57,279
Speaker 5: to his chagrin. Prom but much to his chagrin, and

604
00:36:57,320 --> 00:37:01,120
Speaker 5: on January sixth, he actually gave a speech saying, I

605
00:37:01,200 --> 00:37:04,359
Speaker 5: regard these justices as disloyal to me. I fought for them.

606
00:37:04,400 --> 00:37:07,960
Speaker 5: He was especially talking about Justice Kavanaugh because of the

607
00:37:08,120 --> 00:37:13,239
Speaker 5: sexual misconduct allegations during his nomination. So your question is

608
00:37:13,280 --> 00:37:15,480
Speaker 5: a great one, but before we get to that, I

609
00:37:15,560 --> 00:37:18,160
Speaker 5: kind of think we need to focus on this earlier

610
00:37:18,239 --> 00:37:20,040
Speaker 5: question of b what are the.

611
00:37:20,040 --> 00:37:22,680
Speaker 1: Justices going to do with these elections? Well, says, let's

612
00:37:22,719 --> 00:37:26,080
Speaker 1: backtrack and actually talk about that, Jody, because that's certainly

613
00:37:26,160 --> 00:37:28,640
Speaker 1: something I wanted to discuss with you, knowing what you

614
00:37:29,280 --> 00:37:32,800
Speaker 1: and Adam uncovered about the inner workings of the Supreme Court,

615
00:37:33,840 --> 00:37:36,040
Speaker 1: what do you think they are going to do when

616
00:37:36,040 --> 00:37:42,320
Speaker 1: they hear in February this Colorado case that, says Donald Trump,

617
00:37:42,760 --> 00:37:48,040
Speaker 1: because of Article fourteen, Section three of the Constitution about

618
00:37:48,360 --> 00:37:51,600
Speaker 1: dealing with insurrectionists, that he cannot be on the state

619
00:37:51,760 --> 00:37:54,160
Speaker 1: ballot for president of the United States. You know, a

620
00:37:54,160 --> 00:37:57,040
Speaker 1: lot of people say, if they're the strict constructionists they

621
00:37:57,040 --> 00:38:00,239
Speaker 1: claim to be or originalists, right, and they follow the

622
00:38:00,320 --> 00:38:03,040
Speaker 1: letter of the law when it comes to the Constitution,

623
00:38:03,600 --> 00:38:07,920
Speaker 1: they will agree with Colorado. What's your sense.

624
00:38:08,440 --> 00:38:12,000
Speaker 5: Nobody knows. It's a great question, because it is pretty

625
00:38:12,000 --> 00:38:14,839
Speaker 5: clear that January sixth was an insurrection.

626
00:38:14,880 --> 00:38:17,279
Speaker 1: And there's no requirement to be convicted of that.

627
00:38:17,680 --> 00:38:22,759
Speaker 5: Well, so what Adam Adam Leptak has written is that,

628
00:38:22,840 --> 00:38:26,560
Speaker 5: of course it's impossible to know, but based on his

629
00:38:26,640 --> 00:38:29,719
Speaker 5: reading of the law and his knowledge of the justices,

630
00:38:30,400 --> 00:38:33,600
Speaker 5: he's indicated that he thinks it's a little He thinks

631
00:38:33,640 --> 00:38:39,200
Speaker 5: the justices may be reluctant to keep a candidate off

632
00:38:39,280 --> 00:38:42,640
Speaker 5: the ballot, really just on the principle that it's the

633
00:38:42,640 --> 00:38:46,920
Speaker 5: people who are supposed to decide elections. However, it's one

634
00:38:46,960 --> 00:38:50,320
Speaker 5: of the other cases, this immunity case, in which President

635
00:38:50,400 --> 00:38:51,800
Speaker 5: Trump is.

636
00:38:51,600 --> 00:38:55,000
Speaker 1: If you're president, you're immune to criminal prosecution.

637
00:38:55,239 --> 00:38:58,239
Speaker 5: Adam thinks the justices may not go for that. So

638
00:38:58,680 --> 00:39:01,960
Speaker 5: we'll see, We'll we'll say well, we'll see. But for

639
00:39:02,000 --> 00:39:04,840
Speaker 5: the first time since Bush v. Gore, it really looks

640
00:39:04,840 --> 00:39:07,680
Speaker 5: like a presidential electionist in the justices' hands.

641
00:39:07,800 --> 00:39:11,200
Speaker 1: It's going to be so interesting to watch. And one

642
00:39:11,280 --> 00:39:15,279
Speaker 1: last question, Jody, because it really has to do with

643
00:39:15,480 --> 00:39:19,120
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court and the lack of transparency or as

644
00:39:19,200 --> 00:39:22,040
Speaker 1: you said, the opacity I guess, of the of the

645
00:39:22,120 --> 00:39:27,400
Speaker 1: High Court. There have been a lot of questions about

646
00:39:28,160 --> 00:39:31,920
Speaker 1: the behavior of one particular Supreme Court justice, and that

647
00:39:32,080 --> 00:39:37,480
Speaker 1: is Clarence Thomas. And if he has made too many compromises.

648
00:39:37,560 --> 00:39:39,920
Speaker 1: We don't have to get into all the details here,

649
00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:44,200
Speaker 1: but gifts and whether or not he's been influenced by

650
00:39:44,280 --> 00:39:48,240
Speaker 1: certain outside interests, et cetera, et cetera. What is happening

651
00:39:48,280 --> 00:39:52,440
Speaker 1: in terms of making sure the Supreme Court had and

652
00:39:52,800 --> 00:39:55,120
Speaker 1: by the way, in public opinion polls, views of the

653
00:39:55,200 --> 00:39:59,120
Speaker 1: High Court have declined, right and approval ratings, if you will.

654
00:39:59,719 --> 00:40:05,600
Speaker 1: What happening in terms of ensuring that the justices are ethical?

655
00:40:06,400 --> 00:40:09,000
Speaker 5: So there's a new ethics code, but it's soft. On

656
00:40:09,040 --> 00:40:12,000
Speaker 5: the one hand, it's a real change, it's a real advance.

657
00:40:12,120 --> 00:40:16,279
Speaker 5: They put out something publicly and remember that you know,

658
00:40:16,360 --> 00:40:18,920
Speaker 5: part of what is really surprising about the Supreme Court

659
00:40:19,080 --> 00:40:22,959
Speaker 5: is that they're actually bound by fewer rules than other

660
00:40:23,000 --> 00:40:27,080
Speaker 5: federal judges, which kind of makes no sense because you say,

661
00:40:27,239 --> 00:40:31,960
Speaker 5: how could the people with the highest responsibility have a.

662
00:40:32,040 --> 00:40:34,160
Speaker 1: Lost amount of safeguard lower standard?

663
00:40:34,280 --> 00:40:37,200
Speaker 5: That's right, and so there is an ethics code now,

664
00:40:37,719 --> 00:40:41,520
Speaker 5: but it lacks an enforcement mechanism. Some of the language

665
00:40:41,600 --> 00:40:45,600
Speaker 5: is open to interpretation. It's still basically an honor system

666
00:40:45,760 --> 00:40:51,000
Speaker 5: and a voluntary basis. But listen, this is why reporting

667
00:40:51,000 --> 00:40:54,279
Speaker 5: on the court is so important, and Pro Publica has

668
00:40:54,320 --> 00:40:56,200
Speaker 5: done so much work on this issue at the times

669
00:40:56,280 --> 00:40:59,880
Speaker 5: other publications, and I think there's just a renewed feeling

670
00:41:00,239 --> 00:41:04,520
Speaker 5: that we have to watch and understand the justices because

671
00:41:04,600 --> 00:41:08,000
Speaker 5: they have so much power, and even in our system

672
00:41:08,040 --> 00:41:12,080
Speaker 5: of checks and balances, their power is that their power

673
00:41:12,160 --> 00:41:13,880
Speaker 5: lacks a lot of the usual checks.

674
00:41:14,520 --> 00:41:18,520
Speaker 1: For people watching or listening to this who believe in

675
00:41:18,560 --> 00:41:21,840
Speaker 1: a woman's right to choose, do you see this Ever

676
00:41:22,719 --> 00:41:28,440
Speaker 1: sort of turning around. Do you see something akin to

677
00:41:28,680 --> 00:41:31,280
Speaker 1: row Ever being reinstated.

678
00:41:32,160 --> 00:41:34,400
Speaker 5: It's a better question for a legal expert, but I

679
00:41:34,400 --> 00:41:36,680
Speaker 5: think we're seeing it on the political side. I mean,

680
00:41:36,719 --> 00:41:40,000
Speaker 5: look at what happened in Ohio. You know, there were

681
00:41:40,040 --> 00:41:45,040
Speaker 5: just massive efforts, you know, to also Kansas. Yeah, exactly.

682
00:41:45,120 --> 00:41:48,799
Speaker 5: I mean we're just seeing that. You know, Adam and

683
00:41:48,800 --> 00:41:51,920
Speaker 5: I never really talked about politics and he was elected

684
00:41:52,040 --> 00:41:55,359
Speaker 5: and ballot referendums and stuff during our reporting because we

685
00:41:55,360 --> 00:41:58,520
Speaker 5: were entirely focused on the court. But you could argue that,

686
00:41:58,719 --> 00:42:04,160
Speaker 5: you know, would just Alito and his colleagues did succeeded legally,

687
00:42:04,520 --> 00:42:09,279
Speaker 5: of course, but members of the Republican Party. I'd be

688
00:42:09,440 --> 00:42:14,720
Speaker 5: fascinated to talk to a Republican political official and here

689
00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:18,319
Speaker 5: his or her response to our story and what the

690
00:42:18,360 --> 00:42:22,120
Speaker 5: court did, because there are some Republicans who feel this

691
00:42:22,160 --> 00:42:23,400
Speaker 5: has been a disaster.

692
00:42:23,080 --> 00:42:27,440
Speaker 1: For them right politically, and yet I think it's also

693
00:42:27,600 --> 00:42:31,400
Speaker 1: been seen as a huge triumph exactly that took years

694
00:42:31,480 --> 00:42:34,880
Speaker 1: and years and years for the anti abortion movement in

695
00:42:34,920 --> 00:42:35,480
Speaker 1: this country.

696
00:42:35,600 --> 00:42:37,919
Speaker 5: Yeah, I think that's right.

697
00:42:38,440 --> 00:42:45,200
Speaker 1: So maybe they're reaping what they sewed politically. These Republican officials,

698
00:42:45,640 --> 00:42:50,520
Speaker 1: they wrote on the wins of anti abortion quote quote

699
00:42:50,600 --> 00:42:55,880
Speaker 1: unquote pro life advocates, and now maybe be careful what

700
00:42:55,960 --> 00:42:59,040
Speaker 1: you wish for, because I think it's so extreme and

701
00:42:59,080 --> 00:43:02,600
Speaker 1: it's going so ex dream that now there's a backlash

702
00:43:02,680 --> 00:43:05,760
Speaker 1: to that whole movement, I think, I hope anyway.

703
00:43:06,200 --> 00:43:08,759
Speaker 5: I think that's part of why it's so important and

704
00:43:08,800 --> 00:43:12,400
Speaker 5: fascinating to understand the history, because you say, to yourself, Okay,

705
00:43:13,160 --> 00:43:17,880
Speaker 5: look at Chief Justice Roberts's fifteen week compromise. He looked lonely.

706
00:43:18,360 --> 00:43:21,400
Speaker 5: It looked like a losing proposition. What would this country

707
00:43:21,440 --> 00:43:24,479
Speaker 5: look like if it had prevailed. I don't know. Hard

708
00:43:24,480 --> 00:43:26,800
Speaker 5: to say, but we probably wouldn't see the political reaction

709
00:43:26,880 --> 00:43:27,359
Speaker 5: we have seen.

710
00:43:27,800 --> 00:43:32,719
Speaker 1: Jody, Thank you so much. Thank you explaining this complicated

711
00:43:32,800 --> 00:43:36,719
Speaker 1: topic in such an understandable way. It's so important that

712
00:43:36,800 --> 00:43:41,920
Speaker 1: Americans pay attention and understand how government works, so I

713
00:43:41,960 --> 00:43:43,480
Speaker 1: hope they'll listen and learn from this.

714
00:43:43,760 --> 00:43:57,880
Speaker 5: Thank you for your great questions, Katie, Thanks for listening.

715
00:43:57,920 --> 00:44:01,280
Speaker 1: Everyone. If you have a question for me, a subject

716
00:44:01,320 --> 00:44:03,479
Speaker 1: you want us to cover, or you want to share

717
00:44:03,520 --> 00:44:07,439
Speaker 1: your thoughts about how you navigate this crazy world, reach out.

718
00:44:07,800 --> 00:44:10,319
Speaker 1: You can leave a short message at six oh nine

719
00:44:10,600 --> 00:44:14,080
Speaker 1: five point two five five five, or you can send

720
00:44:14,080 --> 00:44:16,680
Speaker 1: me a DM on Instagram. I would love to hear

721
00:44:16,760 --> 00:44:20,560
Speaker 1: from you. Next Question is a production of iHeartMedia and

722
00:44:20,680 --> 00:44:24,760
Speaker 1: Katie Kuric Media. The executive producers are Me Katie Kuric

723
00:44:24,880 --> 00:44:29,480
Speaker 1: and Courtney Ltz. Our supervising producer is Ryan Martx, and

724
00:44:29,560 --> 00:44:34,720
Speaker 1: our producers are Adriana Fazzio and Meredith Barnes. Julian Weller

725
00:44:34,840 --> 00:44:39,480
Speaker 1: composed our theme music. For more information about today's episode,

726
00:44:39,640 --> 00:44:42,040
Speaker 1: or to sign up for my newsletter, wake Up Call,

727
00:44:42,480 --> 00:44:45,400
Speaker 1: go to the description in the podcast app, or visit

728
00:44:45,480 --> 00:44:48,680
Speaker 1: us at Katiecuric dot com. You can also find me

729
00:44:48,719 --> 00:44:52,439
Speaker 1: on Instagram and all my social media channels. For more

730
00:44:52,520 --> 00:44:57,840
Speaker 1: podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

731
00:44:57,880 --> 00:45:01,200
Speaker 1: wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Two