WEBVTT - Sustainability, Markets, and the Fed in Focus

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple card playing and Broid Auto with the

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 2>So lion Elbasel. If you don't know the company, takers

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>lyb It's basically a chemicals company. It's thirty billion dollar

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.959
<v Speaker 2>chemicals company, think things like plastic. It is also doing

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of shift into sustainability, retrofitting certain plans to

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 2>make greener stuff. And this stuff is important because it's

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>things we use every single day and the most mundane things,

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's difficult to really decarbonize those sectors. Joining us

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>now is Tracy Campbell, Executive VP of Sustainability and Corporate Affairs,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>but she's held many positions within the company.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Tracy, great to see you.

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. It's a pleasure to be here, and who

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 4>doesn't want to be in midtown Manhattan on a day

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 4>like today. Thank you.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>That means it's nice out right. Okay, we'll take your reustry.

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 2>So let's just start with the macro for a second,

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 2>because for those for those viewers who don't know. Devis

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Hell makes all the stuff we need, plastics, ethylene, all

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 2>the things. How's it going, like, what's demand like right now?

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 4>You know, demand has been very steady, certainly in the Americas,

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 4>and I think demand got a bit of a boost

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 4>yesterday the economy did as well. So we're excited about that.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 4>And while yes, some of the global markets are substantially weak. China,

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 4>for example, is an important market, but we're not as

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 4>exposed there as others. And of course you're up's a

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 4>bit slow to recover as well. But no, we're really

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 4>excited about about the demand that we're seeing here in

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 4>the Americas. And I've been in the industry for more

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 4>than thirty five years. I've lived through this cycle of

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 4>low demand and strong demand, and we don't subscribe to

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 4>this doom and gloom that you hear out there. So

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 4>we're excited about the recovery that we're going to see because,

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 4>as you said, Alex, we make the materials that people

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 4>count on every single day, and that's fundamentally not changing.

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 5>How does a company like yours and any global petro

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 5>chemical company, plastics company, how do they balance the business requirements,

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 5>grow the business, invest delivered profits for shareholders, and then

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 5>make this transition to maybe a cleaner business. How do

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 5>you guys balance that?

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 4>In general, we see it as an end When you

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 4>think about the value play that we have for more

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 4>sustainable products, whether they're more circular, perhaps they're low emission products.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 4>We believe that that's a value proposition for the company

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 4>as itself, and we have a play there because we

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 4>can bring these products to market at scale. We're not

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 4>doing it for the greater good of society, while that's

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 4>an added benefit, We're doing it because we believe it's

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 4>a creative to earnings in the long run. So there

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 4>are consumers and brand owners out there that are looking

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 4>for those materials.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>So in what sense does this happen.

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it like we're going to use greener feedstock to

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 2>make stuff, Is it we're going to use alternative energy,

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 2>renewable energy to run our plant? Or is it we're

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 2>going to capture any sort of emissions? And then with it,

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 2>like what's the strategy?

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 4>There are multiple strategies there, and I think you hit

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 4>on quite a few of them. If you think about

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 4>our strategy as a company. We still believe that our

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 4>core petrochemical business is here to stay. However, we can

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>change the way we operate the feedstocks we use the

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 4>type of like you said, renewable energy and things like

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 4>that to lower the emissions that are being generated as

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 4>we make these materials. You know, another core piece of

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 4>our strategy is to really again leveraging our core business

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 4>to fund a much less capital intensive ecosystem for circular products,

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 4>for things waste materials being brought back into our system

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 4>and using those as the feedstocks essentially for the products

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 4>of the future. So really, there is renewable energy, there

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 4>is low carbon emissions, There is technology out there for

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 4>carbon capture and utilization. All of these are part of

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 4>the transition, including hydrogen for example, to bring either fossil

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 4>based materials or renewable and recyclable materials to the market

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 4>that we're looking at all of those.

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 5>I know, I mean, your company is truly a global company.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 5>Roughly half the revenue in the US, half your revenue

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 5>outside the.

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 4>US, roughly, right, How is it?

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 5>How are the requirements or the environments for maybe migrating

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 5>your company to a more eco friendly business model. Is

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 5>it different in the US and it is outside the US?

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 4>I think the pace of change is different in different

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 4>parts of the world, but we see that change happening

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 4>on a global scale. For example, in Europe earlier today,

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 4>fact in Germany you'll see our press release soon. We

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 4>are laying the foundation stone of our advanced, our first

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 4>scalable advanced recycling unit, and we see the Germans sort

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 4>of and the Europeans advancing quickly right with respect to

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 4>embracing circular and low carbon. But it is we are

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 4>seeing the same trends here in the United States and

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 4>even with our joint ventures and our activity in Asia.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 4>So it's just happening at a different time scale, but

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 4>the momentum and energy and the excitement around those products

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 4>is really not different. The policies might be a little

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 4>bit different depending on what country we're operating in, but

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 4>our direction is still the same. So we're very excited

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 4>about that announcement today in Germany.

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 3>So talk me about costs for a second.

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 2>So the working theory is that when you make stuff green,

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 2>it costs more. So a is that even true? And

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 2>if it is, how do you offset those costs? I mean, yeah,

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 2>and how do you offset it? Like do you wind

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 2>up having the cost end user have to pay more,

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>or there are different ways it's offset, even if it's

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>from policy like tax credits.

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, when technology it's new, and when you're transitioning technology,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 4>yes there are investments that need to be made, need

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 4>to be made to accelerate that transition. So you know,

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't think in the long run the materials will

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 4>cost more. But the transition, of course is what where

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 4>the investment is tricky, right, and we need to look

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 4>at that. But if you look at consumer demand for

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 4>these materials, if you look at the governments programs that

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 4>are out there to accelerate the transition. The unit that

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 4>I spoke about that we're laying the foundation stone in

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Germany just this morning was a recipient of a European

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Innovation Fund, you know, millions of dollars to help us

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 4>with transition. But we really see the consumers stepping up,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 4>the brand owners stepping up, and I think over time

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 4>the technology to make this transition. Tax credits for example

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 4>for hydrogen production, for hydrogen consumption are important as well.

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 4>So I really see a lot of activity in that

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 4>space to help us transition.

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 5>Jason from Omaha, Nebraska Rights and how have ocean Freight

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 5>costs affected the US ability to export our cheaper plastics

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 5>to the rest of the world ocean.

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, I'm not an expert on ocean rates anymore. Okay,

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 4>at one point in my career, I can still plan

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 4>on radio. Yeah I can still Yeah, pretend. But you

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:53.119
<v Speaker 4>know what we think about as our company, we really

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 4>focus on differentiating our assets in terms of feedstock advantages,

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 4>technology advantages, scale advantages. So do we have assets in

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 4>regions that depend on ocean freight. Absolutely, we have JVS

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 4>in the Middle East, We're growing there. We have owned

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 4>assets in the United States, and yes, we do export

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.239
<v Speaker 4>these materials and we stay on top and we actually

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 4>have a supply chain organization and is constantly looking at

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 4>the optimization of freight to make sure we can deliver

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 4>those materials to market very competitively.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 2>In terms of all of it, the transition, dealing with

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>current slowdown in Europe and Asia, etc. And this comes

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>from Ryan Hornan. So see, I'm going to ask your question,

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 2>do you think that animal spirits will awaken and we

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>get more M and A in the chemical space with

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 2>those low rates? And I would add on, are you

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of forced to make acquisitions or even boltons as you're.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Also making this energy transition.

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, growth is important to us, and I talked

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 4>about growing and upgrading our core and even growing this

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 4>circular and low carbon economy that we're looking at. So

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 4>I think M and A is always part of our

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 4>part of our optionality.

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 4>You've seen us grow our footprint in the Middle East.

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 4>I lived in Asia recently where we grew some footprints,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 4>we grew some joint venors over there. So I think

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 4>M and A is always going to be in the

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 4>cards for us. And we do see ourselves as a

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 4>consolidator and a very efficient, scalable provider of these circular

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 4>and low carbon solutions. So there's a lot of activity

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 4>that we're doing there to consolidate feedstock acquisition, to build

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 4>these integrated hubs in order to have a very scalable

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 4>and optimized delivery system for these materials of the future.

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 4>So M and A is always an option for companies

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 4>of our size for sure.

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 5>Again, as a global company, I'm guessing you guys have

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 5>a vested interest in all this talk coming into Washington

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 5>to various degrees various parties about tariffs and things like that.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 5>Does that impact your business? Has it impacted your business

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 5>over the last four or five years.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 4>And you know, tariffs to me are I'm a believer

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 4>in a free market economy, right, and I think tariffs

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 4>in the long run tend to hurt to hurt that.

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 4>So you know, we really are positioning our company need

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 4>to be resilient no matter the outcome of any election

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 4>in the world. So you know, we're making sure that

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 4>we've got the right products, the right assets. We have

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 4>that differentiation to really be successful regardless of whether a

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 4>particular person wants to have tariffs or not.

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 3>So that was a very That was an SVP answer.

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 4>I try to be an enterprise thinker.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 3>It's fair.

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>It's fair when we talk about the cost situation. And

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 2>this also plays into Paul's tariff question. Do you secure

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>customers for your products and that then help you build

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the product, or after it's done, you have to go

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 2>out and sell them And what is both?

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 3>What do both of those processes look like?

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 4>We work with brand owners and with customers to build

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 4>the future materials and to help design those applications, so.

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 2>They have to commit to stuff. They have to be

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 2>like we will give you this much money for this

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>much product.

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 4>We work with them right from the early stage of

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 4>concepts through designed through perhaps a long term contract for example.

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, having that being solutions provider requires us to

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 4>really develop those materials together.

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it hard to come up with those numbers right

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>now with your customers in terms of pricing?

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 7>You know?

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so. I think it's always been. We've

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 4>always worked with our customers and with downstream, so the

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 4>entire value chain to really design the materials that you know,

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 4>consumers like ourselves are looking for. So yes, as we

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 4>work through that process, we're looking at our cost to

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 4>deliver the material, the intermediate, the converter costs, the custom

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 4>consumer costs. But I don't think. I don't think the

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 4>uncertainty is any more, you know, is any higher than

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 4>it's ever been. Frankly, I think it's just something that

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.479
<v Speaker 4>we're always making sure that we design for all options

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 4>and we have the flexibility to pivot if we need to.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Tracy, so great.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I've been trying to get Tracy on for like since

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 2>what February March LA here. Yeah, yes, it's great to

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 2>be Thank you so much, really appreciate I know you're

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 2>here for Climate Weeks. I'm looking forward to what will

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 2>come out and yes as well, Tercy Campbell joining us.

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 3>There your titles long is SVP of No, I'm trying

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 3>to find it.

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 5>I've got executive stainability over affairs.

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, come on an email, Alex, come on, all right, trades,

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 2>appreciate that. Joining us from mine elvisl on all things

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 2>energy transition when it comes to petro chemicals.

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Markets at a record there's some serious volume coming into play.

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I was talking to one market technician who was like,

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 2>we get options expiration tomorrow. You gotta reshuffle your delta,

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 2>which I guess is a fancy option word. So that's

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 2>why you're seeing a lot of the flows here. Emily

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Rowland is co chief investment strategist for John Hancock Investment Management,

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and she joins us. Now, Emily, do I just blame

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 2>technicals an options expiration or is this some serious, real fomore.

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 8>No, I think that that's probably some noise that does

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 8>a curve periodically. You know, Look, markets are celebrating today.

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 8>We're near new all time highs or kissing them, as

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 8>you said earlier, and I think there's a lot of

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 8>relief around this Dubvish pivot that the Fed has taken.

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 9>Here.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 8>There was a bit of confusion in the markets yesterday

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 8>after Powell came out and told us not to get

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 8>too excited that more fifty basis point CODs aren't coming.

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 8>But I think overall, it was a Dubvish FED meeting

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 8>and it looks like markets can continue sunning themselves on

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 8>soft Landing Island.

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Very nice Netflix Season one.

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 5>Hey, we've actually got a yield curve that's steepening here.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 5>We got the two year at three point five eight percent,

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 5>ten years three point seven two percent.

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 7>What does that tell you?

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean you're bond yields came a long way

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 8>prior to this Dubvish FED meeting yesterday, So I think

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 8>you're seeing a little bit of repricing there across the curve.

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 8>You know, I think that we could see some chopping

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 8>rates from here as we kind of navigate through this

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 8>environment where there's kind of some better than expected economic data.

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 8>You know, maybe we're continuing to see some broad deceleration,

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 8>but again, this deceleration is happening slowly enough that it's

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 8>sort of providing this perfect backdrop for the Fed to,

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 8>you know, to continue to implement rate cuts amidst a

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 8>decelerating economic environment. It's going to happen in choppy fashion,

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 8>but for now, I think you're kind of going to

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 8>see rates hold steady. As yesterday was a big event.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 8>We've gotten through it and we'll see what happens from here.

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 2>So do you chase here or is there something on

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 2>your shopping list or is it just a rotation at

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 2>this point?

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean we would look at any backup in

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 8>bond yields is a nice opportunity to lean in income.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 3>There is still elevated.

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 8>Of course, yields have come down a lot over the

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 8>course of this summer, but we still don't think that

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 8>bonds have fully sniffed out this disinflationary, lower growth environment.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.719
<v Speaker 8>So we'd like higher quality areas like mortgage backed securities,

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 8>investment great corporate bonds, sprinkle in a little bit of

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 8>treasuries there. So we think there's a buying opportunity there.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, stocks are fully reflective of this soft landing backdrop.

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 8>We continue to embrace higher quality stocks, and we're looking

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 8>for areas that provide quality at a reasonable price as well,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 8>so we would be leaning into things like healthcare stocks.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 8>We're legging into more defensive areas of the market like

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 8>utilities and infrastructure equities. And we continue to see US

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 8>mid cap stocks is a big beneficiar area of onshoring

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 8>activity and the fiscal spending that's still happening against this

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 8>this this decent economic backdrop.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 5>Emily, when you get big moves into market like we're

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 5>seeing today, that kind of just raises the valuation flag

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 5>for a lot of investors. How are you kind of

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 5>thinking about valuation any equity markets?

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean it's not great, I'll tell you. You know,

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 8>certainly with markets you know, bumping up on twenty one

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 8>twenty two times forward earnings, I think are well priced

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 8>for this soft landing scenario that we've been talking about.

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 8>You know, and you look at areas like technology stops

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 8>which are trading at thirty times forward earnings, which is

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 8>about as high as we've gotten over the last cycle.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 8>It's not the fifty times forward earnings that we saw

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 8>in the late nineteen nineties. So I think the froth

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 8>is is a bit of a concern. But I would

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 8>tell you that valuations just simply aren't a catalyst for

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 8>a market rotation. They haven't been historically. I think you'd

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 8>need to really see some kind of shift in the

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 8>economic regime. You'd have to see a big shift in

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 8>earnings trends to really see that market leadership change. And

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, you can blame a lot of things on

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 8>the multiple expansion that we've seen in technology, but you

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 8>can't blame the denominator. The earnings have been there for

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 8>these companies, which makes us continue to be constructive there.

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Which also the reason of the question, how where do

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 2>you go in terms of large, mid small? So I've

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 2>been reading a lot about, particularly from Bank of America,

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 2>how maybe this is the time for midcaps? And mid

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 2>caps hit a record high yesterday, they outro foot today,

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 2>they outperformed yesterday, Like, is not the sweet spot for

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 2>that environment that you're talking about?

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, midcaps are the sweet spot for us. You know,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 8>when you go down into small caps, you're looking at

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 8>companies that are unprofitable, they have higher interest burdens. You know,

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 8>the Rustle of two thousand is comprised about forty percent

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 8>of that index is comprised of companies that don't make money.

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 8>They could do really well in an early cycle environment,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 8>but we just don't think that we're there yet. And

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 8>you see these little rallies in small cap equities based

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 8>on the idea that rates are coming down. But remember

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 8>rates are coming down because there's a challenge with growth,

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 8>and we think that that does not benefit the most

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 8>cyclical areas, namely small caps. Moving up into MidCap equities,

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 8>you get a big overweight to the industrial sector. So

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 8>think about the relative sector composition there, and we think

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 8>mid cap industrials are massive beneficiaries of the spending that's

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 8>happening in the US. There's a manufacturing renaissance happening right

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 8>now in the US Midwest due to onshoring and due

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 8>to things like the Chips Act and the Infrastructure and

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 8>Jobs Act. So we want to look to mid caps

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 8>as a way to capture that. They're also trading at

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 8>the deepest discount to their large cap counterparts since the

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 8>late nineteen nineties, so you're not overpaying for this theme.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 5>Emily, how do you feel about the earnings backdrop here

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 5>for the.

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 8>Market, Well, I love it going into the third quarter

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 8>because the bar is low. It's actually analysts are penciling

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 8>in four point three percent earnings growth as we look

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 8>forward to the next quarter's earning.

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Season, So we love a low bar there.

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 8>I think we should enjoy it while we can because

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 8>Q four earnings growth is penciled in to be about

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 8>fifteen percent, and then analysts are looking at fifteen percent

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 8>into next year. So not only is the market trading

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 8>at an elevated valuation, but that's also against expectations that

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 8>we're going to see about fifteen percent earnings growth next year.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 8>That's probably a bit optimistic, so we may see a

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 8>challenge to that right now. Multiple expansions helping as we

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 8>continue to embrace the fad pivot here and the soft landing,

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 8>but ultimately the earnings need to come through as stock

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 8>prices over time, we're going to follow profits and follow earnings,

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 8>so we think that's going to be critical to watch

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 8>as we look forward.

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 3>Emily, great stuff.

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Really good to see you, Emily Roland, co, Chief Investment

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Strategies for John Hancock Investment Management, joining us.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apocarplaying and Broyd Auto

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a good moment to check in on media stuff

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and media deals. And I read that really interesting article

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in the Wall Street Journal about how there's going to

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>be a show on Amazon where people get to basically

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 2>compete to get a slot in the in their big

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Amazon dot com store. So they're describing it as like

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Shark Tank meets Home Shopping Network, which.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. For me, you would actually watch this

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent? Would you not? Okay, you're not gonna

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 3>watch it. Paul, No, that's not his thing. KEITHA helped

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 3>me out.

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Keithan wrong or not them, Boomberg Intelligence US media analyst.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 2>This sounds brilliant to me. Did you see this article?

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 6>I did not, but it definitely sounds intriguing.

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 2>So it's a new competition show next month. Entrepreneurs are

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 2>going to pitch their products to a studio audience as

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 2>well as to judges including Amazon executives and some celebrities.

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Like Goop founder Gwyneth Paltrow and designer Christian Siriano, and

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 2>then finalists will have their inventions sold in a new

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Buy It Now online store.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 3>That's synergy, That's what I'm saying.

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, whether or not you watch it, that has some synergy.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>So she's not gonna watch it. I'm I the only

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 2>one that gonna watch thinks, So all right, fine, fine,

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 2>all right, you talk now, Paul.

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 5>All right, Keitha, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 5>What I want to talk to you is about is

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 5>just kind of where are we these days, Githa on

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 5>cable networks, staying on cable systems like the old days.

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 5>I know, Warner Brothers Discovery. They have a new deal

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 5>with Charter. Talk to us about that and why it's important.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 6>This was a really big deal for Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 6>And the reason it's such a big deal is, of course,

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 6>one thing is ninety percent of Warner Brothers Discoveries profits

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 6>actually come from its television networks. But the reason it

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 6>was so critical, and especially from a timing perspective, was

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 6>because Warner Brothers has just lost its rights to NBA programming.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 6>And remember NBA is one of the main draws for TNT,

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 6>which is their most expensive channel right now in their

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 6>network lineup, and so there's been a lot of fear,

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 6>you know, amongst investors that Warner Brothers TV revenue, especially

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 6>it's affiliate fee revenues, is going to be a tremendous risk.

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 6>And so this deal actually with Charter, it was actually

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 6>coming up for renewal only next year, but I guess

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 6>David Zaslav wanted to go ahead and assuage investor fears,

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 6>and so he signed this deal a whole year in advance,

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 6>maintaining the same affiliate fee revenue trajectory. So it's kind

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 6>of it's definitely provides some temporary relief from an outlook

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 6>perspective for Warner Brothers.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, fine, see, but you know they're struggling because

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>there's cool shows like this like Shark Tank and a

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 2>home shopping network on Amazon now whatever. Fine, all right,

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>so what are their questions? Are still a bubbling up

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 2>in the media community. There was a great piece on

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 2>By your Succession a couple of weeks ago talking about

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that what else are you focusing on?

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 6>The carriage continues to be a big, you know, a

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 6>big bone of contention across the whole TV space, Alex.

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, yes, we had this Warner Brothers Discovery each

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 6>Other deal, which was somewhat of a low drama deal,

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 6>but there was one that was high drama, and that

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 6>was actually Disney with Direct TV. Those two companies were

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 6>fighting it out. There was a blackout of all Disney

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 6>programming on DirecTV systems for almost two weeks until finally

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 6>both of them caved. And you know, Disney obviously wanted

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 6>to have carriage free increases, which I think at got.

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 6>What Direct TV was really looking for was more flexibility

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.239
<v Speaker 6>and you know, programming and packaging, and they got that.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 6>So we're seeing kind of all these deals become really

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 6>contentious as kind of the whole video A landscape keeps shifting,

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 6>so carriage continues to be a really big thing. And

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 6>then the other thing is, of course, we have you know,

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 6>the M and A chatter coming up every now and then.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 6>The most recent one, of course, was direc TV with

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 6>Dish that will obviously have huge implications for the entire

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 6>TV landscape.

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 5>So let's switch gears a little bit to a business

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 5>that I think is actually investors still like, and that's

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 5>just a theme park business. We think theme parks, we

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 5>think the Walt Disney company. I'll be down a Walt

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 5>Disney World in a few weeks doing some due diligence.

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 5>But Comcast also has a big theme park business. Talk

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 5>to us about their theme park business and the investments

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 5>they're making and how important it is to that company.

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 6>Oh, absolutely so with Comcast. I mean when we think

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 6>of Comcasts, we always think of the cable business, and

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 6>rightly so. Cable actually makes up eighty percent of their ibadah.

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 6>But the one area that has kind of been ignored

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 6>for Comcast I think over the past few years has

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 6>been their NBC division, and NBC through Universal of course,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 6>not only owns TV Networks studios, but also the theme parks.

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 6>And the big thing for Comcasts and its theme parks

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 6>is they're actually opening a whole new theme park next year,

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 6>which is Epic Universe in Orlando. It actually doubles their

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 6>entire Orlando footprints, So they go from about eight hundred

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 6>acres right now in Orlando to almost sixteen hundred acres

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 6>with this park, and it's going to obviously do you know,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 6>so much for their attendance. So right now, Universal attracts

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 6>about thirty million subscribers domestically to their parks. Of course,

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 6>the big behemoth is Disney with about eighty two hundred

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 6>million almost domestically. But with this we think Comcast actually

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 6>kind of gets closer to Disney, right, they can get

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 6>about forty forty five million visitors to their domestic parks

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 6>on an annual basis, so it's going to do a

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 6>whole lot for their attendance. And really, Paul, as we

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 6>kind of see the business going out, we think, you know,

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 6>theme parks almost it used to be a few years ago,

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 6>theme parks was about twenty five percent of NBC's profit.

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 6>In a few years, we think theme parks can actually

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 6>be fifty percent of NBC's profit.

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 3>That's fascinating. Well, it's it is and it's not.

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 5>It's good because the theme bark business is growing, but

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 5>it also reflects the fact that their cable network business

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 5>is declining dramatically and that's the cashal historically.

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 2>A good point, I guess. I wonder though too, that

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>is that also more recession proof or not? Like what

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 2>goes first? Ad spending for a linear TV or people

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 2>not taking their kids to Disneyland.

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 3>Is there an Avengers theme park. Do we note? I

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know why am I asking Paul? All right?

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, thanks Ethan, We appreciate you. Geith the wrong and

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 2>not then. Bloomberg Intelligence US media analysts.

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to David Koodlan now, a founder

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 2>and CEO and chief investment strategist, I should say at

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 2>Mainstay Capital Management, He joins us. Now, hey, David, are

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 2>you buying into this record rally?

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 10>Here?

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 11>We're buying into this record rally.

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 9>I know that there are many who are still concerned

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 9>about a recession, that are worried at that price, the

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 9>price of stocks at these levels, we're at new highs.

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 9>But look what we've seen here now, with this cut

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 9>yesterday and what we have going forward, we're you know,

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 9>if there's such a thing as a Goldilocks scenario, we're

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 9>about as close as we can be to it. So

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, I've had the expression for the last two years,

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 9>the recession that's always six months away. The recession is

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 9>always six months away. GDP now right now Atlanta GDP

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 9>now for the third quarters at two point nine percent.

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 11>We had three percent growth in the second quarter.

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 9>We're looking for We're still looking for that soft landing

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 9>that the FED rarely pulls off, so more of a

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 9>mid cycle slow down and then we slowly reaccelerate and

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 9>we don't get that recession. And if that's the case,

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 9>twelve months later after a first rate cut, stocks are

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 9>higher and significantly higher. If you get a recession after

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 9>a first rate cut, stocks are lower. So that's what

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 9>we're pivoting on. But we're still optimistic and constructive on

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 9>stocks at this point.

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 5>So, David, I think when I listen to some folks

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 5>that are still constructive on the market, they just kind

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 5>of I think they hang their hat on a couple

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 5>of things, which is one, I've got to fed the

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 5>cutting rates, and I've got a pretty decent earnings environment.

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 11>That's pretty good. But one of the things that we.

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 5>Just don't know it's an election year, and I don't

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 5>know what that means for the markets. How do you

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 5>guys talk about that to your clients.

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 11>I'm glad you brought that up.

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, we get preoccupied with politics as it relates

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 9>to our investment strategy. And when I say that, I

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 9>mean at average investors out there. You know, there are

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 9>investors that believe if so and so gets elected, it's

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 9>the We're it's doomsday.

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 11>If so and so gets elected, it's nirvana.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 9>What we find out is, and this is why we'll

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 9>have volatility over the next couple of months until the election,

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 9>is the market's hate uncertainty. So it's about getting that

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 9>uncertainty out of the way. But then it's not as

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 9>much about whether it's Democrat or Republican as far as

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 9>where we invest. As tactical asset allocators, we want to

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 9>look at the difference in policies. There's differences in policies

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 9>and energy and a lot of areas between these two candidates,

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 9>and depending on how the House and Senate go in

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 9>terms of taxes and everything, So that matters as far

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 9>as technically how we invest. But the people that go

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 9>to cash because they're scared, concerned, wait and see end

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 9>up typically in election years, end up suffering an opportunity costs,

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 9>and that's exactly what's happened this year so far for

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 9>people that have stepped to the sidelines.

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Is there a risk by pivot back to the fit

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.959
<v Speaker 2>per second, so put elections on the side. Is there

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 2>a risk that we're going to see kind of more

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 2>growth and demand resurface in a particular way because we're

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 2>in that rate cutting cycle, because we got that jumbo

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 2>rate hike. And is that a risk eventually for resurgence

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and inflation?

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 7>It is.

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 9>It is a risk. But what we've seen so far

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 9>is inflation is on this glide path to the Fed's target.

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 9>If anything, I think with the disinflationary forces that will

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 9>come back into effect as we get by all the

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 9>effects of the pandemic. You know, we may overshoot the

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 9>two percent, but we're certainly on a glide path to

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 9>two percent. And right now, you know where we are

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 9>with the labor market.

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 11>We had some good news today.

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 9>You know, there's still some concern out there about credit

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 9>card debt, credit card industry, auto loan delinquencies, things like that,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 9>But we balance that all out and we think the

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 9>inflation problem is gone. It's now about labor unemployment. We

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 9>get to the point where that needs to be rates

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 9>come down to, you know, if it's the long term

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 9>neut rate of three percent here through twenty twenty five

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 9>for the Fed funds rate. We're in a good environment

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 9>for stockstill. We know they're expensive, but stocks can be

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 9>we know, overvalued or undervalued for a very very long time.

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 5>All right, David, So what sectors are screening well for

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 5>you these days? Again, we've had an S and P

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 5>five hundred index move about twenty percent year today. But

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 5>I know not everybody's participated. So how are you guys

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 5>approaching maybe like sector selection.

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 9>Right, So you know one area for sure that that's

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 9>been troubled for quite a while, you know, especially a

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 9>while back here with some of the a few of

0:29:54.760 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 9>the bank failures. But banks, financial services look very good.

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 9>As the yield curve continues to steepen. NIM improves net

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 9>interest margin for the banks. We're finally getting that yield

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 9>curve steepening. So we like the financials a lot. We

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 9>still like technology a lot, the AI story. But what

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 9>we're able to do now we can broaden into value,

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 9>we can broaden into cyclicals, we can broaden into small

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 9>caps and diverse, diverse fire portfolios from the Magnificent seven

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 9>to these other areas. You know, small cap companies are

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 9>far more reliant on debt and with interest rates coming down,

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 9>their costs of capital coming down, maybe coming down a

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 9>lot over the next year. That's good for small caps

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 9>and that's what we've been seeing recently in IWM or

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 9>the Russell two thousand index.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Mid caps sweet spot.

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 9>You like them mid caps as well. Mid caps the

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 9>same thing. Small and mid caps just become more attractive,

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 9>and mid caps a kind of that sweet spot in between.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's been a large cap dominated stock market

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 9>for quite a while.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 11>We've had a lot of headcake at fakes.

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 9>With small cap in MidCap, but we think they now

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 9>have a runway with raids coming down.

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 5>All right, David, thank you so much for joining us.

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 5>Always appreciate getting a few minutes of your time. David Kudlap,

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 5>he's the founder, he's the CEO, and he's a chief

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 5>investment strategist at Mainstay Capitol Management.

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 11>I call him the boss.

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 7>There.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 5>I guess basically.

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 11>All Right, the FED cuts rates.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 5>One of the beneficiaries I would think.

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 11>Would be real estate people.

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 5>People if you want to build a building, develop a building,

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 5>if you want to rent in a building, buying a building.

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's got to be good for them, right,

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 5>Money's cheaper. Let's talk to somebody who actually does it

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 5>for being. Mickey enough Tally, chairman and Sea of the

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Naught Tally Group, joined by Abigail Dulo, our market's reporter

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 5>for Bloomberg News, got them all here in a Bloomberg

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 5>Interactive Broker studio. Let's talk luxury condos. I'm asking for

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 5>a friend here Mickey talks about the luxury condo business.

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 5>I know that's an area of the market that you

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 5>know very well.

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 7>You're very active.

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 11>It's a sense of how the market is in New

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 11>York City these days.

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 7>Right, So the market is actually good.

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 12>We opened last week three sales offices at the same

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 12>day in the same week, which is the right quote

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 12>for us, and all.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 7>Three so we have three new projects starting three new projects.

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 12>They're already under construction, but we we launched sales Upper

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 12>west Side, Upper east Side, and Williamsburg on the waterfront.

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 7>All three are doing very well.

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 12>There is not much inventory in New York City and

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 12>buyers are looking for the right product.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 10>So the FED cut reads yesterday, of course by fifty

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 10>basis points. That certainly helps you, I imagine with some

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 10>of your carrying costs. But given the fact that you

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 10>are catering to a high net worth individual, how many

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 10>cash deals do you see or does this really help

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 10>you know your buyers as well?

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 12>Right, So it's very interesting the more expensive apartments we

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:15.239
<v Speaker 12>see cash type of deals. But when we do it,

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 12>for example in Williamsburg, we have a lot of the

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 12>inventory trading between two to five million. Those are buyers

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 12>that usually take mortgage and the cut, the rate cut

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 12>is obviously helping them a lot, and I suspect that

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 12>we'll see much more activity in the market in the

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 12>next twelve to eighteen months.

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 2>What is the competition like to get the apartments?

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 10>Like?

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Is there the kind of competition that we would have seen,

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 2>say five years ago for these kind of properties.

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 12>Yes, so there is not much inventory and definitely there

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 12>is not much of quality inventory. The reason is that

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 12>it was very and it's still very difficult to get

0:33:56.320 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 12>construction loans. So for example, developers are just on the

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 12>sideline they can get the construction loans. There are not

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 12>too many projects under construction in New York.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 7>That's number one.

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 12>Number two, construction cost insurance costs are just really almost

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 12>doubled then five years ago, So it's very difficult to

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 12>get to a point that the project make financial sense,

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 12>which means that there is very low inventory.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.439
<v Speaker 10>So you're saying that there's very low inventory. And yet

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 10>I've certainly been a part of the speculation. Other people

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 10>have been part of the speculation that some of these

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 10>massive buildings out here on Billionaire's Row, or even some

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 10>up on the Upper east Side, one of which I

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.399
<v Speaker 10>know for a fact a few years ago, a big

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 10>bulk of it was empty, even though you never would

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 10>have guessed that from the website. So as all that

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 10>inventory that would seem to be floating out there in

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 10>these fancy buildings, has that been eaten up?

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 7>No? So well, no, no, no, yes, But it's all

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 7>about quality. First of all.

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 12>Whatever someone decided to call this fifty seven billionaire Row,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 12>this is a different market, really mainly relying on foreigners.

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 12>How many New Yorkers really want to live on fifty

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 12>seventh Street. Think about schools, think about kindergarten whatever, right,

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 12>you need the infrastructure. It doesn't feel as a residential neighborhood.

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 12>Beautiful views, big buildings, right, So those are cater to foreigners.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 7>So we had the Russians, they're not buying anymore.

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 12>We had the Chinese, they're not buying anymore, and so

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 12>on and so forth. And every time there is a

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 12>wave of foreigners that are coming to New York. Because

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 12>New York is still the capital. I see it as

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 12>the capital of the world, right, but this is a

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 12>very different market.

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 7>It's also about quality.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 12>Yes, there are a couple of buildings that are not

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 12>selling well. But when you dive into the detail and

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 12>you walk those buildings and you look at those apartments,

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 12>they're not good. They're not well designed, they're not well esthetically,

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 12>they are not good, you know whatever. Maybe they're in

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 12>a busy area. So it's all about the buyers are

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 12>very sophisticated. Buyers know what they want and when they

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 12>see a product that is well designed, were located, and

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 12>reasonable price to the market to whatever the market they're buying.

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 7>There's not much inventory in this segment of the market.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 10>That's really interesting to hear about a divergence within the

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 10>high end. There would not have necessarily anticipated that.

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 5>All Right, So you call me up and you want

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 5>a construction loan. Why am I making a loan to you?

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:27.280
<v Speaker 5>And maybe I'm not making them to other people?

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 12>You're right, and I have an answer on the two sides.

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 12>Because part of our business is debt business. We are

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 12>lending to other developers, so we're running also a debt fund.

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 12>And it's all about reputation, and it's all about can

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 12>this developer can really get the project done?

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.879
<v Speaker 7>And the commercial lenders are looking at you.

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 12>Okay, if you ask for a loan and they look

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 12>at your reputation, what you have done? I mean, are

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 12>you capable to do it? Do you have enough equity?

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 12>And if you're underwriting make financial sense? And if you

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 12>are dreaming dreams and the project that you have in

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 12>mind is not going to make financial sense, you're not

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 12>going to get financing, definitely, not from the commercial lenders.

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:14.879
<v Speaker 7>You might be able to.

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 12>Get financing at ten over sofa, right, Okay, you're not

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 12>going to make it right.

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 7>So you really want to be in.

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 12>The mid threes to low force over soffur and that's

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 12>the only way you're going to make it.

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Are there any deals you think to taking office buildings

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 2>and converting them. I know, I feel like this is

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 2>a pretty sensitive topic. Like some are like, yeah, I

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 2>can totally make money up of that.

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Others are like no way, right, So.

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 12>There's a lot of hype about that. And from two

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 12>thousand to two thousand and seven I converted a lot

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 12>of buildings in New York from office to residential, so

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 12>I have a lot of experience doing so.

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 7>Most of the office buildings.

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 12>Their floorplate, each and every floor is just too big,

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 12>too deep. Residential you have for each and every bedroom.

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 12>You have to have light and air. You have to

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 12>have a window, you have to have legal.

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 7>Light and air.

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 12>There's a certain distance that it needs to be from

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 12>the neighbor a building. And when you have a very

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 12>for example, here, this floor is very deep, so it's

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.879
<v Speaker 12>very good for office, it's very good for studios. It's

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 12>not very easy to convert it to residential. So there's

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 12>a lot of five.

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>A really nice floor through the apartment, right, I mean

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 2>from both right.

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 12>So when you are close to the window, right, that's great.

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 12>Here is the problem now when you when you try

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 12>to convert it and you have a lot of space

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 12>that is not usable, what.

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 7>Are you going to do with it?

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 12>So it goes back to yes, you can convert those buildings,

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:54.760
<v Speaker 12>but most of those buildings need some type of incentive,

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 12>either tax or some type of incentive to help the

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 12>developers to convert their And if you really stop for

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 12>a second and you ask yourself, how many of those

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 12>buildings are really being converted versus all the talk around it,

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 12>there are not too many that are doing well.

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.919
<v Speaker 10>Speaking of office in terms of the overall commercial real

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 10>estate space, I know that you don't do office, but

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 10>other developers told us that the weakness from that one space,

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 10>that there is an impact on the rest of commercial

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 10>real estate.

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you feel that at all?

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 12>So I don't do it for a reason because I

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 12>think the residential space, to me, is the most safe

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 12>kind of a space of sector in real estate.

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 7>But what we see in the office space is very interesting.

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 12>The brand new, truly class A office buildings are doing well.

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.800
<v Speaker 12>Those that are new with all the amenities and the

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 12>state of the art systems, mechanical systems, those are doing well.

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 12>But if we look at New York, and not only

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 12>in New York, every major urban city does a lot

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 12>out of inventory of what we call B and C

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 12>type of office buildings, those struggle a lot. Some of

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 12>them will need to be converted from one use to another.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 10>But does that weakness there in the possible the faults

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 10>that could be coming and just everybody's talking about, you know,

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 10>extended pretend values. Does that impact.

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 3>Your area at all?

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 10>Do you see it pushing out in any way, like

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 10>on the financing that sort of right?

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 12>No, because because the residential construction lenders are not they

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 12>mostly focus on the residential sector, the same as when

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 12>we on our that side, we focus.

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 7>Only on the residential sector.

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 12>I don't lend, I don't I don't know enough about

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 12>the office or retail to really make a judgment if

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 12>one location or one building is better than either. I

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 12>have a general review, but you know it's so specific.

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 12>Real estate is so specific, and it's so it's it's

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 12>quite sophisticated. I better know what I'm doing before I

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 12>land money, so much money, before.

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 5>We let you go here. It give us your thoughts

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 5>on South Florida, and you've got experience there as well.

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 5>Is that are we overdone there?

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 10>Is?

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:15.240
<v Speaker 7>It's still right, So so South Florida.

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 12>Let's zero in again, because every every market is different.

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 12>I think Miami is actually doing well. Of course, it's

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 12>all about the very delicate between inventory and demand. But

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 12>Miami mature to a point of no return. There's so

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 12>many great things. This is not only anymore just okay,

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 12>I want to be there a couple of months during

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 12>the winter time. I mean there are amazing restaurants, museums, sports,

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 12>you know, whatever you want is they're not not too

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 12>exactly the level of New York City, but very close

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 12>to it. So the market is doing well. We have

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 12>we have a very big project in Miami. This is

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 12>the fourth sales office that that is open for us

0:41:56.440 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 12>and and and the product is selling well. So what

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 12>we see over there, we see different buyers than we

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 12>see in New York City.

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:06.879
<v Speaker 5>Just for a cookie thirty seconds, who's your buyer?

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 7>Who's your best buyer to walk through the door where?

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean it's not the Russians, it's not the Chinese.

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 11>Who's a good buyer for you?

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 12>Just someone that really wants to buy and really looking

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 12>for for a product in a specific area, and I

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 12>want them to step in and look at my product,

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 12>and if you know, if they like it, that's fifty percent.

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 7>Of the sale. Right.

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 12>They might it might be too expensive for them, it

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 12>might be whatever, not the right size for them. But

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.919
<v Speaker 12>if they step in and they like the product, it's

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 12>fifty percent of the world.

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 5>All right, Mickey, thank you so much for joining. I

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 5>really appreciate it. Love getting your perspective. Mickey Natally, chairman

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 5>and CEO of Naftali Group, talking about the residential real

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 5>estate business in Manhattan.

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 11>Abigail Do, a little.

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Market reporter for Bloomberg News, also joining us, helping us

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.800
<v Speaker 5>kind of spend some more time on the real estate business.

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 5>I find it fascinating and there's a lot of different pockets.

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:59.399
<v Speaker 5>I'm learning some are doing better than others.

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't there you interested in luxury apartment buying in

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 3>his New.

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 5>Jersey those days Thursdays River I sold everything I owned

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.760
<v Speaker 5>and now safely sconced down the Jersey.

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, that's a that's definitely something.

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal