WEBVTT - Ukraine, Markets, And Climate Disclosures

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. This is the Big Take,

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the best of Bloomberg's in depth original reporting from around

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the globe. This is a really fast moving story that's

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>caused a lot of outrage among investors. This is so fascinating.

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>The market shotdown in a way it's never done before.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna have consequences for years to come. The Big

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Take on Bloomberg Radio. Well night, Paul and I love

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>these Big Take stories every day, but we have an

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>extra special one today because our editor in chief wrote

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>at John Micklethwaite joins us. He wrote this together with

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Adrian wool Ridge old Ridge, which is the West must

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>save Globalization. I how they recommend checking it out on

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>ani Big Take on the Bloomburger Checking it out online. John,

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>great to get you on to talk a little bit

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>about this. One of the things that you um to

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 1>pose it is that there will be a decoupling here,

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a breakup essentially of two but maybe three different blocks,

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but that the autocratic block the Russians and the Chinese

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to accelerate. Past are divided democracies. Why do

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you think that that they all do well after this breakup?

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I say, well, go back a bit. I think that

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the you know that there is already a breakup happening.

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a break you know, there's a straightforward the

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>coupling going on, which I suppose you can argue a

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>mix between China and Donald Trump started, but I think

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 1>is only going to be um increased by what's happening

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Ukraine. Because if you are the Chinese, you

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>look and you quite rationally see what has happened to

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the um Russians in terms of things like foreign reserves

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and all those things, and your desire to be self sustainable,

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're considering anything to do with Taiwan, increases,

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and by the same token, you also see what the

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Americans are also racked up there their

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>desired to decouples. At the moment. The decuping, I think

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is is ongoing in that direction. I do think one

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of the problems on the west is it isn't we're

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>not decoupling into here is China and here is the West.

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Um it's at the moment there aren't enough ties between

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the The EU would seem to be one sort of block,

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 1>and you've got some version of the U S plus

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA on the other. So it's the western side of

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this equation is not well put together. And that's part

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of the piece is to say, look, this thing is

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>happening gear strategically. The world is now decuping or sitting

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>up into these dogs, and business people are thinking about

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the world in that way. I'm intrigued by how many

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>people I've got emails from this morning thing that's exactly

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're thinking about, and that our point about this

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>piece is ready to say to Joe Biden, look, this

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is your opportunity. You can go to the American people

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>now and say we have got to cement our relationships

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with the other democracies around the world, and the best

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and the best way to do that is through trade deals.

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I watched Gina Romando going around Asia last year, and

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you know it was it was so sad she was

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>out there trying to say, we're all democracies, let stick together,

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>let's have a framework, um, And the Asians just looked

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>at her and stuff. Really what we want is a

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>trade deal, and that's what America was. America wasn't the

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>leader those So that's slightly long winded. So John, you

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>know when President Trump and his administration did the America

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>First strategy that marked seemingly the ender a pause in

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what had been seventy years of globalization post war. Where

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was that just an aberration those four years? Because as

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I look at Brussels today, just for example, I see

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a fairly united West. I see a fairly united NATO.

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually optimistic. Or has Trump? Was the election of

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump crossing the rubicon? I mean, is that something that

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Europe can never really forgive us for No? I think, well,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, but we we also it wasn't two thousand

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen. I mean I think two sixteen was one

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of several dates, Um, that you can say that globalization

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>went into reverse two thousand and sixteen. Remember you you

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't just have Trump, you also had the British leaving,

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>who in general have been the most free trading nation

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in history. Type things you had them leaving the biggest

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>free trade pack in the world, which the U. So

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you also had that. I think you could argue in

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>two thousands, arguing against pall in In back when Lehman

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Brothers happened, you had a slight meltdown at global capitalism.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Before that, you had been laden in two thousand and

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>one using the you know, the very symbols of globalization

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>jet plane to attack the World Trade Center, and more

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so we've had COVID. So the way I look at

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it is, I think there is a real difference, and

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we have this in the piece. You know, we use

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the famous example that Domaino Canes have. The Londoner back

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in Super nine. He's sitting there very very similar to

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller on an average day of life in Germany

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>or or need a Swiss gentleman, we know, sitting there,

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>lying in bed, ordering the goods of the whole world

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>from his expansive mansions somewhere Frankfurt, and he is ordering

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>every single bit. He's expecting things to show up. He

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>can travel anywhere he likes, this Londoner back in nineteen.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't need a passport, doesn't need capital controls. You

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>can use gold, sovereigns everywhere. This is a global world

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for him and and things thanks for things like the telephone.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>New technology is making it ever ever smaller, and he

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>fails to notice at the bottom of his paper these

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>small headlines about Sara jov I think the difference between

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that person new Canes was really trying to say, Look,

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that was the world we lost and us is that

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think we've been warned fairly continually in

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty years that globalization is in trouble, free

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>trade is in trouble. We have been laden. We had Trump,

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we had UM that breaks it, we had financial crash,

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we've had COVID in many ways. You know, Ukraine is

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>one of those moments where people suddenly take all those

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>things and think this is this is a big new thing.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>But by the way, I got a listener writing in

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>saying continental Europe has the goal to judge the US.

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>They have single handedly made the Russian situation worse um,

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a big statement. On the other hand, John,

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I was there when you interviewed angela miracle, so you've

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>talked to her at least once. What do you think

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 1>her role? You know, I think I think she she looks,

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>she looks less good and she did. Um. It's quite interesting.

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>That's an old soor of a political stor about all

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>political careers and in failure, and Ang Michael seemed to

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>be the great exception to that. The fact that this

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>crisis has come so soon after she's left, I think

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that there are things that that she did that look

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>much more questionable. The whole sort of policy, which I

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>think you're the listener who was complaining was pointing out,

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was that Europe was sort of doing a bit of both,

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of flirting with Ukraine whilst not actually doing anything

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>really solid to help it, and then building dream too,

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the other gigantic built lauch Um two. And

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>then she also turned off the nuclear power and so

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Germany is now completely health hostage to that. So I

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>think she would she I think a great woman, though

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>she was, she looked slightly less great now than she

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>did then. I wonder what you think John about the

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sanctions on the one hand, seemed to be pushing Beijing

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>even closer to Moscow and not very not very helpful

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to the dollar um. As we see, the Saudis asked

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese that they can say on them oil and

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>un But on the other hand, we're just destroying the

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>sanctity of private property. Right if you're rich and you

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>happen to be from Russia, we're going to take away

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>all your stuff and there's no due processes that. Yeah,

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I do that. What two things on that one? I

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>think the on the firstly, on the on the Chinese stuff,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that China is China seemed to be sort

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of pretty okay with what Putin was doing. As the

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>full kind of blood and horror of it is coming through,

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be reversing a bit. But I do

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>think whatever happens in the short term, whatever she decides

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to do about Putin, I think that's still a little

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of an open question. I think there's no doubt

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that she and the kind of wolf pack around him

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to say, look, this is whether we like

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it or not, the economy is splitting two different blocks.

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>If we want to protect live out, we want to

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to grab our bit and stay self sufficient.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Whin in that bit, I think that's part one. I

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>think in terms of the oligarchs and what we're doing

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>very property, I am a little bit nervous about that.

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest against that it is this is a Russia.

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that it's not the same as this possessing American billionaires.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>At different times all of us have been very annoyed

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with This is a much more hand in glove relationship

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>with government. Most of these people are rich because they

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>have been given natural resources by the government, and the

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>level of interaction between these people and the Kremlin is

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>much much higher. That's Part one and part two. Whatever

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the many things UM that we that we accuse American

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>billionaires of, you don't accuse them of going in the

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>factories and shooting people, which restrict me from pointing out

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>which particular ones fit in that category. But there are

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a number of these oligogus, not by

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>any measure of pleasant people. John, What is the role

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of the UK going forward? You believe? I think the

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>UK is in a UM. I think in terms of

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the Russia, they have they have tried to catch up.

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>London Is style is definitely no longer as easy it

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>used to be. Even Chelsea has past the football club

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>has passed across UM. I think more generally for the UK,

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.599
<v Speaker 1>this I think begins to make a bit of a

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of mockery out of Brexit, and I'm not I'm

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>one of those people who's trying to move on from Brexit.

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>But if this does push forward the idea of trade

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>blocks developing different zones, well, Britain is rather kind of

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>stuck in the middle. Um. You know we we so

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>far Britain's attempts to try and get a trade deal

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>with America have almost completely availed. Um. And there's still

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the rather strange argument, strange policy of paying more attention

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to arguing with the French about fishery rights brackets revenue

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of I think it's million dollars a year, seven hundre

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>million pounds. Yeah. Um, it's spending more time on that

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>than the City of London brackets a hundred and sixty

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars a year. Um. It's coming home to

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>roost that there is no the Bridige have not endeared

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves to the Europeans. Um. And it was noticeable. I

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>was in Paris the week before last and even there

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>talking to French officials, you know that I wondered whether

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the general coming together of the West of the Ukraine

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>has extended to that particular relationship, and the answer was

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the Gray Firm. No, it does seem the music will

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>stop and the UK doesn't necessarily have a chair right now.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, you know, after reading your piece, I was

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about a great um piece of reporting that be

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ended a couple of days ago. I can't remember who

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>else wrote, but Amory Hordon was one of the writers

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of the of the piece on the Biden administration reaching

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>out again to Mohammed bin Salman. And this is like

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>such an important issue because the whole world reserve currency

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>status is so anchored in oil, you know, barrels priced

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in dollars and um. They've been such an important foothold

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for the US in the Middle East. The saudis UH,

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but we're not happy with them right now because of UH,

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the you know, dismantling of Jamaica, Shogi and UM dismembering,

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I should say, and their actions in Yemen. The question

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is what do we do. Do they end up with

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the Autocrat block, do they end up with us where

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess they still are, but that relationship is tenuous.

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>What happens to the saudis my guess, as they end

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>up with us. But I think you have put your

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>finger on the problems at the moment um that they

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that there is very obviously it's the monarchy,

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>their elements of autocracy there but one and secondly they

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have on the issue of natural resources, they often get

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>pushed back towards the with the Russians, or it has

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to be said, a lot of recent Opeic history has

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>been arguments between the Saudis and the Russians, so it's

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>not an easy relationship. I mean, I do, yes, I

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>do think they are one of those those powers out

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>there and it does cause I think, um problems for Saudis.

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It gives them a short term bonus. The price spoilers

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>rocketed up, and that's given them a chance. But it

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>has also I think greatly accentuated the desire of other

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>places around the world to wean themselves off oil and

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>gas or oil particularly um and that you can see

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that already America has a much freer hand than than

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world because America doesn't have to

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>rely on oil from other places. So that is all,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's that's been a useful and very kind

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of UM and I think other people will follow that.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>If you compare whether United States is because of what's

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>happened in Ukraine and where Germany is for all the

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>reasons you just pointed out, America has much greater freedom

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to act. I think America relies on one percent Russian oil.

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Germany relies on an enormous amount of Russian gas. As

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just point out, it's not just the Germans, places like

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Poland which historically and think rather much more aggressive attitude

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>recent history, much more aggressive attitude to the Russians and

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the Germans have done. They are even more dependent on

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the on Russian gas. All right, John, that is great stuff.

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for taking the time. John Michael Waite,

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief of Bloomberg News, joining us with this

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Big Take story today along with the Adrian Woodridge. You

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>can find that at Bloomberg dot com slash Big Take

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in the NI space Big Take go. All right, let's

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>check in with Loreen Gilbert loren Is, founder and CEO

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of wealth Wise Financial Services, joining us from Sunny California.

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe Loreen, what are you telling your clients here

0:14:54.440 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>who may be concerned about rising interest rates, inflation, geo politics?

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you tell them these days? Good morning? Well,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I say, I certainly understand everybody's feeling pain at the pump.

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Everybody feels the pain at the grocery store, and so

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the consumer is starting to feel it, and that means

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>investors are feeling it as well. So it's a it's

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a time when there's so much uncertainty that being a

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit risk off and much more defensive makes sense.

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean putting everything in cash, but it certainly

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>means pulling in maybe a little bit of cash and

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>leaning towards the more conservative areas of the market. So

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>do investors get uh, do they lean towards preserving capital

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>here rather than looking for returns? I think what we're

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>talking to our clients about is looking for areas of

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the market that are value oriented that you know, no

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens. You know, certainly with inflation still being

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>an issue and rising rates being an issue, um, you

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want an overweight and fixed income where you know

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to keep up with inflation. And of

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>course we see the ag is quite negative year today.

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So we still like stocks like equities in the portfolios,

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but like I said, leaning more conservatively towards the value

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>tilt is what I would say, dividend paying stocks that

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>can keep investors comfortable that they are receiving those dividends. Loreen.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of folks these days are saying it is

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a stock pickers market. What does that mean to you? Yeah,

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the markets go in swings from passive

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>investing to active investing, and we've been saying for a

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>while that it's going to be a stock pickers market,

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>which we've seen that certainly year today where active managers

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have outperformed the SMP five D to the highest that

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's been since to the INN eight as far as

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>out performance, and we expect that to continue. Um. So

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's where we can help investors looking for

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>those opportunities and seeing the areas that we do see

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity. He's, like I said, in the value part

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>um more so than the growth part of the market.

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people have been saying, I've been using

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the acronym tina to describe stocks. There's no alternative. And

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I keep looking back at this chart on the Bloomberg

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>at six Paul, if you want to check it out,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>g hashtag b TV six five zero six, and it

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>shows fixed income performance globally over this quarter. It's been

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>horrendous and the Bloomberg Treasuries index has been the worst

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>perform had the worst performing quarter of my lifetime. And

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not young, and it's made it difficult for investors

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>who are in you know, let's say a moderate portfolio

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>equities fixing exactly what I wanted to ask you about,

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>especially people who are retiring are getting close, you know,

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how hard has it been and what do

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they do now? It's been very difficult, and so we're

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>investors were talking a lot about, uh, looking at areas

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in the market, like I said, value stocks that to

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>pay dividends, and then municiple bonds, which has not also

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not been stellar year to day. However, we know that

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 1>those cubone payments are coming and um, you know, when

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>it comes to being conservative, first their treasuries and there's muties.

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So municipal bonds and value stocks right now are still

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>areas that we like quite a bit. Your clients call

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>you up, Lorine and see and say I need an

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>exposure to crypto? Does that happen? Is that happening to you?

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>We certainly get asked the question quite a bit. And

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you right now, with the with the Federal Reserve,

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we with treasury, with our with the United States of

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>America looking at digital currency. I think that the weight

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and see is absolutely important because it could be a

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>zero sum game where digital currencies are established by central

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>banks all over the world China, United States and others.

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that is going to become a standard. Uh.

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I would say to investors to to look

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to the central banks because I don't see central banks

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>allowing truly other currencies that are in the private sector.

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, thanks so much for joining us. Lauren, great

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to get some time with you, and I really appreciate

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>your insight. Laurien Gilbert there, founder and CEO of wealth

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Wise Financial Services, talking to us out of Laguna Beach, California.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>R E s G Environmental social governance. It is a

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>big factor, a growing factor in investors minds these days.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the challenges is incorporating E s G analysis

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>into your securities analysis. Is the data ain't that great?

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And we bring in West Bricker, vice chair US Trust

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Solutions co leader at p WC. West. Thanks so much

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here again. You know when people do

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>their financial analysis and they go to the f A

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>page on the Bloomberg terminal, there's lots of income statement,

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets, cash flow statements and stuff like that. And

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we do have an e s G tab there where

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg brings together a lot of E s G data

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for uh our users. But a lot of folks are saying,

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>just generally speaking, there's not enough good data to do

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>E s G analysis. What's going on there? Well, thank

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you very much for the opportunity to be with you,

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Matt and faulse Um. Here's here's what we see. The

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>SEC has focused on um what's happening in the marketplace

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and eight and investors are asking for more information, more

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>segmentation of important information about the risks I call them

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>pre financial risks. Whether it's carbon, whether it's how my

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>workforce is coming together and innovating and collaborating. Maybe that's

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>how I'm providing access to customers or potential customers into

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>my platform. All of that comes together ahead of the

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>financial effects. And so as you look at the financial content,

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the SEC just recently this week looked at the element

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of carbon and the climate and proposed new rules which

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>require more information in the financial statements in the footnotes

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>about the effect of climate on the financials so that

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>investors can find more relevant information in order to conduct

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>their analysis. Kind of isn't this kind of a moving target? Um?

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.479
<v Speaker 1>In a sense where because you know, last year in

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>front of Congress, all the Wall Street UM CEOs were

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>land bastard for lending money to oil producers, as if

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:15.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were just unbelievable sinners, just this close

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to breaking the law by supporting oil producers. And now

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>um as the price of crude goes to one forty,

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody's like, why aren't they producing more? Uh? Even the

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration is like, damn it, we gave them nine

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand leases. They need to use them. So, you know,

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, it's like their national duty to

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>be pulling more oil out of the ground. How does

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that jibe with an E s G world that is

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>at all you know static? Sure, it's a great question.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It's clear we need energy. Any any developed economy needs energy,

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>needs a diversified set of energy sources. What this proposal

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>is out is how do you really assess the impact

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of something like climate which is also changing? Um, what's

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the impact on the financials and and so the way

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they the information is proposed to be presented here is

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 1>it takes something like a climate risk and then model

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it through the business that you're in, the prospects that

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you have, the performance over time, and the milestones. What

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>would be the financial impact on a growth basis before

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you start offsetting or or figuring in the management actions

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that that might be relevant. Maybe maybe you'll buy carbon oufsets,

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you'll change a business process, maybe you'll alter a

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>product mix. All of that analysis today it is provided

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in bits and pieces, some of it sitting on corporate

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>websites in a sustainability report, maybe some of it in

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>an investor survey on a biolateral basis between a company

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and their capital providers, with the SEC is saying, well,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>let's set a mandatory bar for all companies that enables

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace to see more consistent, comparable, and decision useful

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>information to help investors really understand where companies are and

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the nature of risks that impact performance over time. What

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think of the pushback that there is out

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>there that some folks are saying that the SEC is

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>overreaching here they're trying to dictate climate policy. Um, what

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>about that kind of pushback? What's your sense there's, uh,

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>there's there's really a robust dialogue about a couple of

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>big concepts of the economy, social policy that's traditionally Congress, right,

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's an important place for Congress. The S you

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>see is focused on disclosure policy of consistent with his mission,

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>which is getting good information into the markets to protect investors,

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>so the investors understand the nature of their investment, the risks,

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities of it. UH, companies get the capital that

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>they need in order to operate, grow, compete, and in

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the middle we have fair inefficient markets. So of course

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>there's there is a continuum between the point where UH

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>economic policy social policy hands off into business and and

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the way they source capital and convey information through disclosures.

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd expect that debate to continue. But but I guess

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what what I would say is, UH, the the SEC,

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I think has has very rightly been focused on the

0:25:54.480 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>voluntary reporting of climate information. They've been focus on concerns

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>about greenwashing, so a lack of confidence in that information. UH.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>They've they've put a proposal on the table that that

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>business industry groups should rightly read, consider and provide input

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.719
<v Speaker 1>where at the final stage, and I think it, I

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>think the SEC got it well, important to do that,

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>all right? What's good stuff there? West Bricker, vice chair

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>US Trust Solutions co leader at p WC talking about

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>e s G, the need for more data, the need

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for better data again the f a function on the

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomber terminal. How's your E s G? All right, let's

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to Barry Ridholtz. He's a founder of rid Hults

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Management, Bloomberg opinion columnists and host of Masters in Business. Here, Barry,

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we've had it, you know, continued wild several days here,

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>several weeks. We've got a hot war in Europe, We've

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>got the rising interest rates, we've got inflation. Where do

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we begin? What do you do? How do you look

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for context? How do you put this all together? So

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you always have to have a plan. You know, you're

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the old joke, is you you those who failed to plan,

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>plan to fail? And it really is true. If you're

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>relying on your gut instinct, if you're sort of taking

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it headline by headline, that's a recipe for disaster. So

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, somebody who says my plan is that at

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of two I'm pulling this money out of

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the market and buying a house or paying for kids college. Hey,

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>those folks should really have been throttling back there um

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>risk exposure. But for the average investor who's got a

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>timeline that's not measured in months but is years off

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in the future or even decades off in the future,

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, what happens in two isn't relevant to to

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>when they're gonna need the money. So have a plan,

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 1>stick with it and and stay long term. Uh, don't

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>get distracted by the barrage of news each day. You

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>know the Mike Tyson quote. I think it's Mike Tyson.

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Sure everybody has a plan until they get punched in

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the mouth. Yeah, no, that's can I tell you that's

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true. And and it's funny because you know the

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>other day I was talking to Tom Keane and and

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we and and uh, Lisa brom Winson and Kaylee and

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the conversation was, well, why shouldn't you know you follow

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Muhammed Alarian's advice and go risk off and and move

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>out and and the answer is, it's an easy decision

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to hit the cell button, but when do you buy?

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you disert time when to buy? And I

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>made the argument that it's really really challenging to get

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>back in and I got an email from an advisor

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>who said, I worked with a lot of clients. I'm

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>sympatica with your view. I only wish there was some

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>data to back it up. So I went out and

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>did some research. There was a re since study. I

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>love this title quote, when do investors freak out? Machine

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>learning predictions of panic selling? And to me, the most

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>shocking data point in the study is that investors who

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>panic sell thirty one percent of them never reinvest in

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>risky assets. They panic out of equities and they're scared

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>from that. And that is very similar to what we

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>saw following oh eight or nine, people panicked out of

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the market in the bottom and failed to get back

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in in any reasonable period of time. Barry, Masters in Business,

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you're widely successful podcasts. It our most popular podcast, by

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the way. I'll go there. I believe so, but you

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>know there are other folks who have podcasts more frequently,

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and so they might see different numbers. I think it's

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the most popular long term and the most popular on

0:29:54.080 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a weekly basis. But Masters in Business of course and

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Tracy have Odd Lots which is also very popular, and

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Joel Weber has trillions. Yeah, who do you got this week?

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>So this week is Samara Cohen. She is black Rocks

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Chief Investment Officer for e t f s and index investments.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And of the ten trillion and I have to repeat

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's trillion with a t of the ten trillion

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that black Rock manages, she's responsible for about a third

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. Uh. I think she is in finance the

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>woman woman with the most amount of assets under management.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone is even close. Uh. It might

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>be the CEO of UM, Edward Jones, which is about

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars and that's a woman. So so she

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>all ETFs, all index funds are under her per view

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>with black Rock, that's a lot of how do you

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>get these people? Barry, you always every week have some

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>really big names. Well, you know for so Rhodes and

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>eight years in it's become a lot easier. The beginning

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it was my friends and Rollo Decks. But at a

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>certain point, you know, the the I give a lot

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of credit to Bloomberg Radio and the whole platform we have.

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not just on Spotify and iTunes, it goes out

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>over Bloomberg Radio, Act, some satellite, all of the affiliates

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg, so it gets in addition to the downloads,

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it gets a massive audience, you know, on a m

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.959
<v Speaker 1>or from radio with the group and and very often,

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one thing I hear from the guests

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>more than anything else is we really enjoy the opportunity

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to have an in depth conversation, not four minutes and

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>then a commercial. A lot of these things are complicated

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and nuanced. They don't lend themselves to to the shorter format.

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Well we listen, yep, good stuff. All right, Batty Hults,

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. That's your four minutes

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and now we'll go to a spot. Batty Hults, founder

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Rod Hult's Wealth Management, Bloomberg Opinion columns and again host

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of Master's in Bisy this podcast. I recommend you check

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that out. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three on Fall Sweeney, I'm

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio