Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe, Kaddy Armstrong and Jettie
Speaker 1: and he Armstrong and Yetty.
Speaker 2: So we got some good stuff to talk about this hour.
Speaker 2: Last hour we talked about this. The CEO of bed
Speaker 2: Bath and Beyond put out a letter on how they
Speaker 2: can't operate stores in California anymore because of all the problems.
Speaker 2: The tax is, the regulation, the crime, everything else. Nick
Speaker 2: Gillispie of Reason magazine says, this is the culmination of
Speaker 2: what they had written about several years back. Is California
Speaker 2: over because of all its problems? So we can talk
Speaker 2: about that a little bit later. Good luck running on that,
Speaker 2: Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 3: Wow wow, So my investigative journalism has paid off yet
Speaker 3: another key fact that makes the hot, self important drunk
Speaker 3: chicks in Rhode Island story even more hilarious. Oh okay,
Speaker 3: I wasn't sure in what order to list those adjectives hot, drunk,
Speaker 3: self important chicks.
Speaker 2: I think the hot part because you only get traction
Speaker 2: at all because you're a hot chick with this sort
Speaker 2: of behavior, right, militant, loud, nasty looking chick or exhibits
Speaker 2: this sort of behavior too.
Speaker 1: In political settings.
Speaker 3: Lately, it's the angry grad school lunatic screaming at the cops, what.
Speaker 4: Are you doing?
Speaker 1: What are you doing?
Speaker 2: Are you're arrested?
Speaker 1: That's some you know, pro Hamas rally or something like that.
Speaker 3: It's kind of a cousin to the drunk, self important
Speaker 3: hot chick syndrome.
Speaker 1: Anyway.
Speaker 3: Uh So, here's here's a question for you. First of all,
Speaker 3: you know more about drunks in general than I do.
Speaker 3: These women, particularly the special Assistant Attorney General name of
Speaker 3: Devon Hogan Flanagan. Who is who is busted by the cops?
Speaker 3: You know what, I'll ask my question after we replay
Speaker 3: the tape. Go ahead, Michael, this is what it sounded
Speaker 3: like the cops trying to get them to leave a restaurant.
Speaker 2: You're a trust mess.
Speaker 1: We gotta leave now.
Speaker 2: Number one, you're not gonna arrest us. Number two, we
Speaker 2: gotta go. I'm an aging good for you. Let's go.
Speaker 1: We're leaving.
Speaker 5: Put your hands off.
Speaker 3: The fact that she apparents. Can I buy those cops
Speaker 3: drink place? I would like to sit down and enjoy
Speaker 3: a libation with you, fellas well done.
Speaker 2: The fact that she literally seems to believe that as
Speaker 2: the attorney general, the top.
Speaker 1: Bestal assistant attorney general.
Speaker 2: But well, she's saying, I'm the I'm an age anyway,
Speaker 2: you're part of the top cop office, that the laws
Speaker 2: don't apply to you. I mean, that's what you're saying.
Speaker 2: That's it's a heck of a thing to say out loud.
Speaker 3: Well, and here's my favorite part of it, other than
Speaker 3: that they tried to show that they indeed were the
Speaker 3: reasonable ones by trying to kick out the windows in
Speaker 3: the cop car. The cops had told them repeatedly, I
Speaker 3: don't want to arrest you. All you have to do
Speaker 3: is go. They've asked you to leave, Just go. I
Speaker 3: don't want to arrest you. You're not going to arrest us. Okay,
Speaker 3: so let's leave. We gotta go, We gotta go. The
Speaker 3: officer replies, no, you can't make us. You can't arrest us.
Speaker 3: I don't want to arrest you.
Speaker 6: Just leave.
Speaker 1: See that, No, they had to sit there.
Speaker 2: The normal drunken reaction to that would be, WHOA, I
Speaker 2: have really lucked out here that all they're doing is
Speaker 2: asking me to leave. I am going to get out
Speaker 2: of here to avoid any further problems.
Speaker 3: Well, and just to give you a sense of how
Speaker 3: it was inside the restaurant, the following exchange took place.
Speaker 3: The cop can be heard on the camera asking a
Speaker 3: restaurant employee do you just want them out? Do you
Speaker 3: want them trespassed? The employee says, anything we can do trespass.
Speaker 1: Yes. So here's a question for you.
Speaker 3: As a guy who's somewhat familiar with over empuibers, these
Speaker 3: two hobbies will take complete responsibility quote unquote, and say
Speaker 3: I have a problem with alcohol.
Speaker 1: I am an alcoholic. It is a disease. You would
Speaker 1: you wouldn't fire somebody for having a disease? Would you?
Speaker 1: If I had COVID? Would you fire me? No, it's
Speaker 1: a disease.
Speaker 3: Is the primary problem that they're drunks? Or is it
Speaker 3: hard to say separate?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 2: No, No, it's not.
Speaker 1: Or is it that they're a holes?
Speaker 2: It's their a holes. I've known thousands of drunks, and
Speaker 2: I've been around thousands of drunks thousands of times. There's
Speaker 2: only a certain personality that ever.
Speaker 3: Acts like that right right, right, well and part of
Speaker 3: his hot chick syndrome or and or be an a
Speaker 3: whole I mean, because it may shock you to hear
Speaker 3: I have actually been over served at times, and I
Speaker 3: have filed the appropriate lawsuits against the Pasterns who did it.
Speaker 2: You should they should have recognized it and stopped serving you.
Speaker 3: But I think those of us who have been in
Speaker 3: that unfortunate, regretful position, I think might have muttered this
Speaker 3: is blessed, but then left.
Speaker 1: Right. Look, I don't want to arrest you. You just
Speaker 1: have to leave. You can't arrest me. What the reaction
Speaker 1: is that?
Speaker 2: And like, well, to me, worst case scenario, this is
Speaker 2: bull as well. Okay, I'll go. Or I knew we
Speaker 2: had the music up really loud in our house really late,
Speaker 2: and I knew the cops are going to come at
Speaker 2: some point, So yes, I'm turning it down.
Speaker 3: Yeah, sorry, dude, Sorry you had to come up. Yep, Yeah,
Speaker 3: we're gonna we'll.
Speaker 1: Turn it down of course. All right.
Speaker 3: Speaking of crime, the fabulous David Spunt of Fox News
Speaker 3: here specifically crime in the district.
Speaker 7: The Department of Justice investigating whether someone or multiple people
Speaker 7: may have manipulated Washington DC crime stats. Two sources briefed
Speaker 7: on the matter tell Fox News DC police statistics show
Speaker 7: violent crime down twenty six percent from last year. The
Speaker 7: members of the Trump administration and local police union dispute
Speaker 7: the data.
Speaker 8: This is something that's been unfortunately part and parcel of
Speaker 8: the police department for some time, and we're very skeptical
Speaker 8: that these crime stats are accurate.
Speaker 7: President Trump posted about the allegations of number tampering on Monday,
Speaker 7: writing it was done quote to create a false illusion
Speaker 7: of safety. A DC police commander involved in compiling numbers
Speaker 7: was reportedly put on leave earlier this year, pending an
Speaker 7: investigation into changing statistics.
Speaker 1: ABC News.
Speaker 3: I believe it was last night at New York Times
Speaker 3: at all, still reporting just that crime is actually down
Speaker 3: starkly in DC.
Speaker 1: It's a lie that it's a dangerous place with lots
Speaker 1: of crime.
Speaker 3: And nobody is mentioning the lawsuit that was quietly settled
Speaker 3: just a couple of weeks ago by the DC Department,
Speaker 3: that the Free Beacon report an end chapter and verse,
Speaker 3: all the particulars, all the exhibits from the trial that
Speaker 3: this cop was saying. No, they systematically are telling all
Speaker 3: of us, you've got to misreport crimes in a specific
Speaker 3: way to make the stats look better. So that's our
Speaker 3: lead into the fabulous Nelly bowls of the free press.
Speaker 3: Who's talking about this? Trump is sent in the National
Speaker 3: Guard to tamp down crime in d C. Is it
Speaker 3: a symbolic overreaction theater, Yes and yes, but from the left.
Speaker 3: That's not the The critique from the left, and by
Speaker 3: that I mean our mainstream newspapers, the critique is that
Speaker 3: DC has.
Speaker 1: No crime problem, no issue at all. It's perfect here.
Speaker 3: How could anyone dishornor our completely safe in pristine capital.
Speaker 3: That sound you heard was definitely not a gun, she writes.
Speaker 3: Here's the New York Times chief White House correspondent quote,
Speaker 3: citing a non existent crime crisis. Trump plans to take
Speaker 3: over the Washington, d C Police and put troops in
Speaker 3: the streets of the nation's capital. Is the crime crisis
Speaker 3: non existent, as the old gray lady said? Yeah, the
Speaker 3: homicide rate may be falling, but d C still has
Speaker 3: a very high crime rate. She goes into the stats.
Speaker 3: Then she says, but cars are being stolen because they're
Speaker 3: wearing short skirts. Car stealing is in anyone's fault by
Speaker 3: the cars? You think I'm joking? And then she shows
Speaker 3: the big headline stolen kias and hyundais or Kia and
Speaker 3: Hyundai have contributed to the car theft rings they should
Speaker 3: be forced to pay to New York Times story saying
Speaker 3: that because Kias and Hyundai's are slightly more thievable than others,
Speaker 3: that they should be forced to pay back law enforcement
Speaker 3: for the costs of dealing with car thieves. Hence ms
Speaker 3: Bowle's reference to rape that cars are just stolen because
Speaker 3: they're wearing short skirts. They asked for it, and then
Speaker 3: she says this one was a classic stolen Kias and
Speaker 3: Hundais have been involved in numerous crashes, armed robbery sprees,
Speaker 3: and other crimes across the country. We're recovering guns out
Speaker 3: of a lot of Kias that are stolen, said Seattle's
Speaker 3: police chief. The Kias are armed. The DC Police released
Speaker 3: a simple guide to avoid carjackings. This is in a
Speaker 3: city that the New York Times Chief White White House
Speaker 3: correspondent said a nonexistent crime crisis.
Speaker 1: Here's what the city tells.
Speaker 6: You.
Speaker 3: Drive in the center lane to make it harder for
Speaker 3: potential carjackers to approach you car, avoid driving alone. Travel
Speaker 3: with someone whenever possible, especially at night. Wow, when you
Speaker 3: are not coming to us, When you are coming to
Speaker 3: a stop, leave enough room to maneuver around other cars,
Speaker 3: especially if you sense trouble and need to get away,
Speaker 3: So Nelly writes, easy, pasy, I just remember to get
Speaker 3: my kids in their car seats, put snacks in the
Speaker 3: cup holders, and leave enough room between other cars and
Speaker 3: me for tactical maneuvers. And if the kiak pulls out
Speaker 3: a gun, my CRV does too.
Speaker 1: Oh, and she says a final DC police nugget.
Speaker 3: DC's crime lab lost its accreditation four years ago and
Speaker 3: only this year received permission, but just to analyze fingerprints.
Speaker 2: And no other evidence. Marine Dowd, who lives in Washington,
Speaker 2: d C. Writing over the week and writing over the
Speaker 2: weekend for The New York Times. And she's a liberal
Speaker 2: and she couldn't hate Trump more and she talks about
Speaker 2: being hit learn all this different sort of stuff. But
Speaker 2: she also talks about how many DC residents are secretly
Speaker 2: glad to see more uniforms on the street no matter
Speaker 2: what statistics say, they don't feel safe. Maureen Dowd writing this,
Speaker 2: I find myself packing pepper spray again. I feel more
Speaker 2: wary about walking around the city. It's disturbing to ask
Speaker 2: someone to unlock the clariton at CBS because the police
Speaker 2: don't lock up the smash and grabbers anymore. That's Marine
Speaker 2: Dowd writing in the New York Times, right, And but basically,
Speaker 2: the chief correspondent of the White the chief White House
Speaker 2: correspondent of the New York Times, you are among the
Speaker 2: elite of the elite of American journalism, and you are
Speaker 2: writing with a straight face that it's a non existent
Speaker 2: crime problem.
Speaker 1: Crime's way down.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 2: Her point is, as is true with a lot of
Speaker 2: your mainstream Democrats, is you're handing Trump a win. They
Speaker 2: hate Trump, and what they're mad about is that you're
Speaker 2: handing them a win by claiming DC is fine. Her
Speaker 2: last paragraph is, even if Trump is being diabolical because
Speaker 2: she doesn't like his methods, Democrats should not pretend everything
Speaker 2: is fine here because it is not right. Wow, We've
Speaker 2: been talking about this like the whole day, because the
Speaker 2: front page story in the New York Times is how
Speaker 2: the Democrats are bleeding members in their party and it's
Speaker 2: because of stuff like this.
Speaker 1: What what?
Speaker 2: How are you pretending this isn't true.
Speaker 3: I've got another example of that. It's going to blow
Speaker 3: your mind. Cool, how nutty has the Democratic party become
Speaker 3: ask their first transgender congress person, because.
Speaker 1: They will tell you believe it or not.
Speaker 2: Stay cool, that's interesting stuff. A lot on the way,
Speaker 2: stay here. And what we're hearing, of course, Martha, is
Speaker 2: that people are terrified by what has happened with.
Speaker 1: Some of these venezuela and gangs.
Speaker 9: I'm going to stop you because I know exactly what happens.
Speaker 9: I'm going to stop Yous were limited to a handful
Speaker 9: of apartment conflex apartment complexes, and the mayor said, our
Speaker 9: dedicated police officers have acted on those concerned a handful
Speaker 9: of problems.
Speaker 1: Do you hear yourself?
Speaker 7: Only a handful of apartment complexes?
Speaker 1: Remember that directly?
Speaker 3: Yeah, Martha raddits as mainstream as can be, saying, yeah,
Speaker 3: trendy Iragua was in charge of a handful of apartment
Speaker 3: complexes in Colorado.
Speaker 1: But let's not overreact.
Speaker 2: Well, she had to interrupt jd Vance. She wasn't gonna
Speaker 2: let him get away with that, right.
Speaker 1: What are you talking about?
Speaker 2: By the way, you got to throw this in Elon Musk.
Speaker 2: According to uh Mark, alprin is headed towards spending hundreds
Speaker 2: of millions of dollars to elect jd vance President Andy's.
Speaker 3: Shelves plan to start his own political party. Two for
Speaker 3: that threes of millions of dollars.
Speaker 1: Yeah, wow wow.
Speaker 3: So headline in the New York Times, the Jack referenced
Speaker 3: a couple of minutes ago the Democratic already faces a
Speaker 3: voter registration crisis, and just in the first three little paragraphs,
Speaker 3: they say the Democratic Party is hemorrhaging voters, and voters
Speaker 3: are stampeding to the Republican Party, some sort of bloody
Speaker 3: stampede apparently, oh my god.
Speaker 2: Some sort of stampede where you cannot stop the bleeding.
Speaker 3: And as we discussed in our two of the show,
Speaker 3: I think we kicked off our two of the show
Speaker 3: with this in detail. But of the thirty states that
Speaker 3: track voter registration by political party, Democrats lost ground or
Speaker 3: Republicans in every single one of them, and often buy
Speaker 3: a lot and a lot of it's young voters and
Speaker 3: certainly male voters.
Speaker 1: But it is disaster for the Democratic Party.
Speaker 9: And.
Speaker 3: The obvious diagnosis I think was exemplified there by Martha
Speaker 3: Ratitts and some of the other stuff we've been talking
Speaker 3: about to say, hey, your apartment complexes are run by
Speaker 3: murderous Venezuelan gangs could be in such a baby or Washington,
Speaker 3: d C.
Speaker 1: Is perfectly safe. There's no crime there.
Speaker 3: I mean, that is so wildly outside the actual mainstream
Speaker 3: of America.
Speaker 1: A handful of problems.
Speaker 3: The mainstream media might think that's reasonable, but humans don't.
Speaker 2: And apartment complexes need to be taken over by gangs
Speaker 2: before it's newsworthy.
Speaker 3: Martha right, handful of problems. What an insane thing to say.
Speaker 3: But anyway, I turn it into the free press. And
Speaker 3: this story is kind of the crystallization of the Democratic
Speaker 3: parties problem. And if they can come to terms with this,
Speaker 3: take a deep breath, and like I did when my
Speaker 3: arthritis was so bad, I realized I need surgeries and
Speaker 3: it would hurt real bad and it would be expensive,
Speaker 3: and I couldn't do stuff I liked for a real
Speaker 3: long time.
Speaker 1: But I had no choice.
Speaker 3: They have got to have surgery to remove the radical
Speaker 3: left from their party.
Speaker 1: Listen to this.
Speaker 3: Sarah McBride, quote unquote, Delaware's Democratic representative and the first
Speaker 3: openly transgender member of Congress, did an interview with Politico's
Speaker 3: Dasha Burns earlier this month.
Speaker 1: In the interview, McBride very gently.
Speaker 3: Through some of the extremist center Party under the bus quote,
Speaker 3: the reality in today's environment is that your party ecosystem
Speaker 3: is defined not just by politicians or the party, but
Speaker 3: also by some of the loudest voices online that in
Speaker 3: the voter's minds reflect and represent that broader coalition, meaning
Speaker 3: the movements being ruined by our radicals. She was murdered
Speaker 3: on Blue Sky, torn apart. Don't even google Sarah McBride
Speaker 3: Blue Sky unless you want obscenities and threats and horrors.
Speaker 3: This is the first brands gender member of Congress saying, Yeah,
Speaker 3: the Democratic Party has been ruined by her radicals, and
Speaker 3: the radicals wanted to rip his her throat out.
Speaker 2: And Elon's going to spend hundreds of millions to help
Speaker 2: Jade Vance get elected president in twenty hundreds of.
Speaker 1: Dollars left hour.
Speaker 6: When it comes to security, they're willing to put people
Speaker 6: on the ground, We're willing to help them with things,
Speaker 6: especially probably if you could talk about Bay Air, because
Speaker 6: there's nobody has the kind of stuff we have.
Speaker 2: So yeah, that was Trump yesterday making it clear no
Speaker 2: US boots on the ground, but we would help with
Speaker 2: our air force. But you know, obviously if.
Speaker 1: We were attacking or something.
Speaker 2: Well, that's a good question.
Speaker 3: Michael Trumps franctured syntax. It's syntax. It's always a little
Speaker 3: challenging to figure out what he actually means.
Speaker 2: Sometimes he does that on purpose, or all politicians do
Speaker 2: that on purpose to leave things vague. But and then
Speaker 2: and then sometimes you fill in the blanks the way
Speaker 2: you want them filled in. But they didn't actually commit
Speaker 2: to that. Everybody does that in politics. But John Bolton
Speaker 2: said the other day, you know, we if you got
Speaker 2: French and British troops on the ground and they start
Speaker 2: getting hammered by Russia, we're in it. I mean, even
Speaker 2: if we don't put US boots on the ground, we've
Speaker 2: got our air force coming to their defense obviously, so
Speaker 2: and everything that goes from there. So a couple of
Speaker 2: different things. I suppose we'll get into the longer conversation
Speaker 2: about this. Our current thinking, well my current thinking. I
Speaker 2: think our current thinking is starting with I don't know yesterday,
Speaker 2: a couple of days ago. Has anybody asked Putin if
Speaker 2: he has any interest in this. I feel like this
Speaker 2: is an entirely one sided conversation.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they the Kremlin and Putin and Lavrov have given
Speaker 3: every signal that no, I'm not meeting with Zelenski.
Speaker 1: Absolutely not.
Speaker 2: Well, here's a little more on that. Here's a report
Speaker 2: from CNN.
Speaker 8: Yesterday, the Russian Foreign minister came out and he said, look,
Speaker 8: the Russians are not against any sort of format per se,
Speaker 8: whether it's bilateral or trilader, but they also say that
Speaker 8: any sort of meeting would have to be well prepared
Speaker 8: and takes time to prepare. So so far, the Russians
Speaker 8: have not confirmed whether or not Vladimir Putin is even
Speaker 8: up for a meeting with voladimirs Lenski, and whether he
Speaker 8: has confirmed that that such a meeting will actually take place.
Speaker 2: Of Trump does what a lot of salespeople do, the
Speaker 2: presumptive closed thing, where you just you state something as
Speaker 2: if it's already been agreed upon and then hope that
Speaker 2: momentum or your embarrassments. It's saying, wait a second, I
Speaker 2: don't remember agreeing to that, or something will carry it forward,
Speaker 2: but it's not gonna work in this case. Another quick
Speaker 2: report from CNN.
Speaker 10: Putin can't go just anywhere. There is a warrant out
Speaker 10: for his arrest by the international courts. That was from
Speaker 10: two thousand and three because of the Ukrainian War. So
Speaker 10: that's why he has ruled out almost all European countries.
Speaker 10: But there have been a number of countries that have
Speaker 10: been floated that it would include Switzerland, Hungary. But right
Speaker 10: now it doesn't appear as though Putin has firmly said
Speaker 10: a time, which is obviously going to impact where exactly
Speaker 10: this is. I have been told that most of the
Speaker 10: planning on the trilateral has been put on hold till
Speaker 10: they figure out that first meeting.
Speaker 2: Well, the Wall Street Journal is writing today that they
Speaker 2: think it's very unlikely that there is a Putin Zelensky
Speaker 2: meeting with or without Trump.
Speaker 1: Ever, right, I would agree.
Speaker 2: I'm starting to think this is gonna nothing is going
Speaker 2: to come out of all of this, and then we're
Speaker 2: going back.
Speaker 1: Go ahead.
Speaker 2: Then we're going to be back to is Europe willing
Speaker 2: to go to war against Russia with Ukraine or not?
Speaker 3: So I don't remember if it was Prague or Romania
Speaker 3: because people have been throwing it around. But you want
Speaker 3: to hear how calculating and cloaked but mean Putin and
Speaker 3: the Kremlin are. They threw out a suggestion for well,
Speaker 3: you know if we did meet, how about this location
Speaker 3: and it was and I can't remember if it was
Speaker 3: Progu or Roumini or whatever, but the very location where
Speaker 3: Ukraine agreed to give up its nuclear arms in return
Speaker 3: for the Brits and US, the United States assuring their
Speaker 3: defense and their sovereignty.
Speaker 2: That's where Budapest comes from. So the famous Budapest right,
Speaker 2: the famous Budapest Agreement for nineteen ninety four, which is
Speaker 2: horrifying in retrospect, where the world basically said, you bring
Speaker 2: give up your nuclear weapons, Ukraine, we got your back,
Speaker 2: with your on this paper right here, will sign the
Speaker 2: Budapest Agreement, which obviously hasn't helped them much as they've
Speaker 2: been invaded multiple times and now currently are at war
Speaker 2: with Russia and nobody has really really stepped up to
Speaker 2: help them.
Speaker 1: So why would they think?
Speaker 3: So Putin says, hey, why don't we go back to
Speaker 3: Budapest to sign another agreement with the West.
Speaker 1: Wow? Do you think that was an accident?
Speaker 2: Wow? Okay, I see what you're saying here. So he's
Speaker 2: saying to Ukraine, Noah, agreement they make for you means anything. Yeah,
Speaker 2: And that's the reasonable point. I mean, it's not it's
Speaker 2: not not a reasonable point.
Speaker 3: Right, And he's practically saying, and I'm gonna attack you anyway.
Speaker 3: I attacked you over that, after that agreement, I'll attack
Speaker 3: you over the next one, after the next one. You
Speaker 3: want to sign three more, that's fine. Can I give
Speaker 3: you a hint what I'm gonna do?
Speaker 1: So?
Speaker 2: Are you up on this story of this, all of
Speaker 2: the the whole last two weeks originates from a miscommunication
Speaker 2: or a mistranslation. Are you up on that story? It
Speaker 2: doesn't I've only heard it reported so the London Telegraph,
Speaker 2: they talk about it regularly, and the London Telegraph doing
Speaker 2: tremendous reporting on this whole war at the very beginning.
Speaker 2: When when the very beginning two weeks ago, when Witkof
Speaker 2: went over and met in Russia with Lav Robert, did
Speaker 2: he meet with Putin directly? It doesn't make any difference.
Speaker 2: He either misheard, mis wrote down, got mistranslated that Putin
Speaker 2: had agreed to security forces being in Ukraine, European forces,
Speaker 2: European forces. Yeah, and he hadn't. And it was a
Speaker 2: miss It was a mistake. But all of this, and
Speaker 2: and so Whitcoff came back and told Trump, Yeah, Putin
Speaker 2: has agreed, he's okay with some uh you know, uh
Speaker 2: security forces on the ground as part of the deal,
Speaker 2: and everything is emanated from that belief. That was a
Speaker 2: mistake from the very beginning. Have you heard that anywhere
Speaker 2: other The Telegraph has talked about it, and then I
Speaker 2: heard it one other place over the weekend.
Speaker 3: That is bizarre and troubling in rings one hundred percent true.
Speaker 3: I think I remember hearing that repeatedly and thinking.
Speaker 1: Wait, no, he didn't. Putin wouldn't agree to that, And
Speaker 1: sure enough he hasn't.
Speaker 2: Well, and it explains how Trump got so far out
Speaker 2: over his skis of you know, let's meet, let's blah
Speaker 2: blah blah, because he thought had already agreed to I mean,
Speaker 2: if he's gonna agree to troops on the ground, then
Speaker 2: obviously he's on board with some peace there.
Speaker 3: And remember Putin's the master manipulator, so I can actually
Speaker 3: another possibility to contradict myself. But another possibility was he
Speaker 3: might have said to Whitkough, you know what, there are
Speaker 3: circumstances where I could see that, Yeah, that it's certainly
Speaker 3: something we could talk about, just to delay, just to obfuscate,
Speaker 3: just to confuse just to cloud.
Speaker 2: The waters, and Putin had in the last twenty four
Speaker 2: hours one of the biggest attacks on Ukraine in the
Speaker 2: last month.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, and it's close to breakthroughs.
Speaker 3: You know, it'll cost some another fifty thousand men, but
Speaker 3: close to breakthroughs and some fairly significant sectors.
Speaker 1: So on he goes.
Speaker 2: You know, if the peace talks peace talks? Are they
Speaker 2: even peace talks? Is that the right word? Arm?
Speaker 1: But if the peace.
Speaker 2: Talks don't amount to anything, Trump's gonna get hammered by
Speaker 2: the mainstream media. I don't think you should get hammered
Speaker 2: for trying. It's the downside. But we're gonna be back
Speaker 2: to square one.
Speaker 1: Is the world.
Speaker 2: Willing to help Ukraine push Russia out of there? Or
Speaker 2: does Ukraine need to say we're never getting that land back?
Speaker 2: How do we stop this war?
Speaker 3: I feel like there's going to be one more big push.
Speaker 3: Europe will say we're gonna give you all the weapons
Speaker 3: you need. We're gonna buy him from the United States.
Speaker 3: Because Trump is obsessed with getting good deals. He say, yeah,
Speaker 3: we're not giving them, we're selling them. This is gonna
Speaker 3: support our great arms manufacturers. The US is gonna make
Speaker 3: them mint and they will sell them quote unquote to
Speaker 3: the European slash Ukrainians. Those debts will be forgiven in
Speaker 3: future days, by the way, and Ukraine will make with
Speaker 3: European arms, one more big push to push Russia back
Speaker 3: as far as they possibly can.
Speaker 1: That's what I would guess.
Speaker 2: So do you think that this becomes evident Putin's not
Speaker 2: interested in a ceasefire or piece in any way whatsoever?
Speaker 2: Trump think, well, I did all I could and we
Speaker 2: just kind of go with status quo. Or does he
Speaker 2: hit the sanctions and the arming Ukraine to a greater
Speaker 2: extent than we have in the past. That's what Mark
Speaker 2: Alpurn thinks is going to happen.
Speaker 3: Right right, Yeah, Like I said, I think it will
Speaker 3: go that way.
Speaker 1: I could see him washing his hands of it.
Speaker 3: Saying, it's not our fight, it's not our problem, it's
Speaker 3: Europe's fight. If they want to buy arms, we'll sell
Speaker 3: them to them, but not with the kind of behind
Speaker 3: the scenes encouragement. We're on your team. Aid that I
Speaker 3: think would make a difference, but he'll still sell.
Speaker 2: Him Arms's not an unreasonable conclusion to say, hey, Europe,
Speaker 2: you want to really fight Russian and push him out.
Speaker 2: Go ahead, we'll help you a little bit again, We'll
Speaker 2: say you stuff and maybe some intelligence or whatever. But
Speaker 2: what an interesting situation for the world. Mike makes right
Speaker 2: is just a fact.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's.
Speaker 2: Horrible the only time. Well, no might always makes right.
Speaker 2: Sometimes the good guys have the most might, So you
Speaker 2: get to kind of claim that might didn't make right.
Speaker 2: But the reason the world order exists the way it
Speaker 2: does now is not because we're more moral than China.
Speaker 2: It's because we've had more might than everybody else.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that the might makes right.
Speaker 3: That sounds like a bit of a moral judgment, and
Speaker 3: I think that confuses people, right, I prefer the ancient
Speaker 3: saying that strong countries do what they will, weak countries
Speaker 3: do what they must.
Speaker 2: What an interesting situation?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Putin is not meeting with Selenski. It's not happening.
Speaker 2: I don't think he has the slightest interest in.
Speaker 1: Stopping correct Why I thought that all along?
Speaker 2: Why is it that somebody should ask me? Why isn't
Speaker 2: that more evident to more people?
Speaker 1: I really don't know when he got off that thinking.
Speaker 1: I doubt he would.
Speaker 2: You assume that he didn't know this until he landed,
Speaker 2: and he looked out the window and saw the red
Speaker 2: carpet that that was gonna happen. Oh, but he didn't
Speaker 2: know that was gonna happen. So the plane lands, rolls up,
Speaker 2: he probably sees the red carpet and thinks this is unbelievable.
Speaker 2: He walks across the red carpet, Trump waves him over
Speaker 2: into the beast and he had to be thinking this
Speaker 2: is really amazing. Wait, they're treating me here whatever?
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, and putin being putin. I'm sure he was thinking,
Speaker 3: I wonder what cards they're gonna play? This is interesting?
Speaker 2: Why do you people think I'm willing to quit? Okay,
Speaker 2: I'll play along if you want.
Speaker 3: Cool flyover? Yeah, cool planes. Wow that was fun. Thanks
Speaker 3: for doing that.
Speaker 2: Uh, there's another chapter eight to be written to this story.
Speaker 2: No doubt we will finish strong next farm strong Yetie.
Speaker 1: I found some models online.
Speaker 5: After a variety of failures, I found one that actually
Speaker 5: printed and it sounded good. It's a great start for
Speaker 5: kids that smile that comes out as they're starting to play,
Speaker 5: and they create that sound themselves, that love of music
Speaker 5: for their entire life. If that sticks with them, then
Speaker 5: to me, it's worth it.
Speaker 2: It makes me feel more confident in school because I'm like,
Speaker 2: I can play this instrument.
Speaker 1: I can do anything.
Speaker 2: Children they're so stupid. That's a they're little happy about getting.
Speaker 2: So there are three D printing violins. They couldn't afford
Speaker 2: violins for the school, and they three D print them,
Speaker 2: which was a really cheap way to make violence. Which
Speaker 2: is kind of interesting because I know some about what
Speaker 2: that's they're doing in the guitar world with stuff like that,
Speaker 2: with the synthetic materials and stuff in a way that
Speaker 2: they never have in the past. You can make instruments
Speaker 2: that sound pretty decent for really real, really cheap, and
Speaker 2: they also don't like get ruined by weather. So at
Speaker 2: least the availability of instruments is becoming much much, much,
Speaker 2: much much.
Speaker 3: Easier, right right, And this gal took this on on
Speaker 3: her own. You know, we rail a lot about the
Speaker 3: state of American education, which is horrible and Marxist and
Speaker 3: doctrination blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: But this gal is a hero.
Speaker 3: She came across the idea of three D printing from
Speaker 3: the Ottawa Symphony Orchestra and Washington must have stuff online,
Speaker 3: started tinkering, found some models online and just thought, Hey,
Speaker 3: this is a chance to get our kids to be
Speaker 3: able to play in a very very low income, rural
Speaker 3: Pennsylvania school district. Really cool, it's a nice story. Music
Speaker 3: is so good for kids and their brains. Oh can't
Speaker 3: be beat.
Speaker 2: Yeah, my son's taking guitar lessons. I really hope he
Speaker 2: sticks with it, partially because I keep telling him, dude,
Speaker 2: chicks digging you. You play a song and sing chicks
Speaker 2: ticket man.
Speaker 3: Even in this era pre fab you know, computerized music. Yeah,
Speaker 3: if you can play something very impressive.
Speaker 2: Do you know who David Mammeett is. He's a playwright.
Speaker 2: He did most famously Glen Gary Glenn Ross, which is
Speaker 2: maybe my in my top five movies of all time screenwriter.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I really like him.
Speaker 2: He's got a piece in the Free Press today. It's
Speaker 2: called back when we gave an F. And it's the
Speaker 2: actual word, back when we gave it F. And the
Speaker 2: subheadline is profanity was once a useful weapon. Now it's
Speaker 2: a dull blade. Profanity has lost its punch. I'll bet
Speaker 2: I haven't read it, but i'll bet it's out of
Speaker 2: the Trump and then now the Democratic Party thinking the
Speaker 2: way to fight back is to cuss and it's just
Speaker 2: so okay, then it's meaningless. Yeah yeah, so Jivy and
Speaker 2: I guess the history of language would be the younger
Speaker 2: working class is gonna have to invent some new words
Speaker 2: or sounds that are extra dirty that we don't think
Speaker 2: we should say in public to shock us, to shock us,
Speaker 2: because that has to exist in language.
Speaker 3: We did one of my favorite podcasts we've ever done,
Speaker 3: and I'm sure some of you geniuses can figure out
Speaker 3: which one it is. Let us know and we'll repost
Speaker 3: it or something. But it was about the nature of
Speaker 3: obscenity through the centuries and how back in the day
Speaker 3: in your village people pooped and had sex, like in
Speaker 3: front of each other.
Speaker 1: There's no privacy, there was no room.
Speaker 3: And so the obscenities that we use that a reference
Speaker 3: sex or poop or whatever, they were unknown. It was
Speaker 3: all religious references that were the obscenities of the day.
Speaker 2: Why'd you have to put those together. I'd much rather
Speaker 2: see my neighbors have sex than poop.
Speaker 1: You don't get a choice.
Speaker 2: You don't get a choice, and they both.
Speaker 1: Wake up and well, you know, I.
Speaker 2: Suppose it depends on the neighbors them over there, not
Speaker 2: so much them over there, sure absolutely, and find myself
Speaker 2: will wander and buy their hut semi frequently.
Speaker 1: Who here's your.
Speaker 2: Host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.
Speaker 3: Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew
Speaker 3: to wrap up show. There he is our technical director,
Speaker 3: Mike Langelo Michael final thought.
Speaker 1: Yeah, today is.
Speaker 4: National Radio Day, and I would say my radio career
Speaker 4: began when I was five years old. I'd use my
Speaker 4: tinker toys to build radio towers up to the ceiling,
Speaker 4: and I even put little lights up at the top
Speaker 4: to make sure the planes.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't hit my tower.
Speaker 3: Wow, that's sensible precaution there in your living room, Katie
Speaker 3: Green and are esteemed Newswoman.
Speaker 11: As a final talk, Katie Jack, warning for your son
Speaker 11: or for anybody else's whose kids are getting braces afterwards
Speaker 11: where your retainers or else, your bottom teeth will look
Speaker 11: like mine fighting for your spot in their mouth.
Speaker 2: They get crooked again real fast. It's a man yesterday
Speaker 2: at the doctor.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it took a couple of years.
Speaker 2: They said all your time and money will be wasted
Speaker 2: if you don't keep wearing your retainer. I didn't know
Speaker 2: that m hm.
Speaker 1: He Jack final thought for us.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're gonna talk about it on National Radio Day.
Speaker 2: We're gonna talk about radio. Some in the One More
Speaker 2: Thing podcast have some stories to tell. I'm sure Joe
Speaker 2: does too, I'm sure Katie does. That'll be entertaining. So
Speaker 2: that's the One More Thing Podcast.
Speaker 1: My final thought.
Speaker 3: I was thinking about some of the things we discussed today,
Speaker 3: including the transgender congress person who like dared to say, hey,
Speaker 3: maybe our radical left is hurting the party and got
Speaker 3: murdered for it.
Speaker 1: It's one of the best things about being a conservative.
Speaker 1: We disagree all the time.
Speaker 3: You don't have to stay to the specific party doctrine
Speaker 3: every single day.
Speaker 1: It's it's cool. It's liberating.
Speaker 2: Armstrong and Getty pooping and having insects in front of
Speaker 2: their neighbors and wrapping up another grueling for our workday.
Speaker 3: So many people, thanks so little time ago to Armstrong
Speaker 3: getdy dot com. A lot of great hot links for you.
Speaker 3: Drops an oat mail bag at armstrong getty dot com.
Speaker 3: Pick up a hat or a T shirt or a hoodie.
Speaker 2: See you tomorrow. God bless a America. I'm Strong and
Speaker 2: Gettym's face the crisis.
Speaker 1: A legend falls in Hard.
Speaker 3: Times bad trucker with a Lison bad therapy and a
Speaker 3: mouthy Wench.
Speaker 1: They covered it all this morning, and tomorrow.
Speaker 2: They'll do even more with the arms Strong and Getty Show,
Speaker 2: The Conscience
Speaker 1: Savany Armstrong and Getty