WEBVTT - Sen. Rand Paul - December 20th, Hour 3

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Peter Schweitzer. I'm here with Eric Eggers. We

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>are filling in for Sean on the Sean Hannity radio show.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>He's getting some well deserved rest, and we are tracking

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>events on Capitol Hill where it is Christmas chaos in

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol. They are apparently right now getting ready to vote.

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>They may already have started to vote on the third

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>version of this bill. The first two, of course, were

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>shot down. This is planed C and Eric, this third

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>version apparently is going to provide government funding through March,

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to provide disaster relief and pharm assistance. It

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is not going to get rid of the debt ceiling issue,

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>which was the problem with the previous bill. So we're

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>going to track that and in a couple of minutes

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have on Senator Rand Paul, who is

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of all of that chaos and craziness.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 2>You talk about Christmas chaos in the Capitol, which I

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 2>just want to point out. You know, you're a best

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>selling author and you and I host the podcast together

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 2>called The Drill Down with Peter Schweitzer, so you do

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>have some broadcast experience, but to drop the triple alliterative

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>on national radio Triple c An. It's impressive, and I

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 2>just want to acknowledge that in front of everybody. But

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>it is actually quite chaotic. You know, you're the one

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>that pointed out we're actually in a weird spot where

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>last night with the vote, you had Elizabeth Warren agreeing

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 2>with Donald Trump. Yeah, you had thirty eight members of

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>the House disagree, and that's one of the reasons why

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>we're having a new vote. One of the members of

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Congress that disagreed Nancy Mace, we spoke to last hour,

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>and she said that one of the problems that they

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 2>have is that they are actively lied to. Those are

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>her words about what the US Senate can and cannot

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>do in terms of the House. Can they take up

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 2>these single subject bills? She says, we are told that

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 2>they cannot do that. So one thing we will ask

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Rand Paul about is, hey, are you prepared to take

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>more than one vote to keep the government open if

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 2>it means that, you know, we don't have to pass

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>a bill that increases spending, no matter how many pages,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 2>whether it's a fifteen hundred and forty seven or one

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred and sixteen. Nancy Mace's point was the pages went down,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the spending stayed the same. Seems to be the sticking point.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>What I want to know from you, Peter Schwatzer, You've

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>spent a career documenting the ways in which members of

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Congress use positions of public power for personal financial gain.

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Of all the things that were in that fifteen hundred

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>page bill, the thing that jumped out to both of

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>us was the idea that Congress was trying to vote

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 2>itself a pay raise. What was your reaction to that?

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it's not surprising. I mean, and this

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is the problem. There are no incentives, really no incentives

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for a member of Congress to limit the federal budget,

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>federal spending, and there are very few incentives to avoid

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out creative ways to self and enrich. Now,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to do it in public, they want

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to hide it. They embed it, and they

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>do it in a way that is hard to track.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>So it's not going to necessarily say a forty percent

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>pay raise. What it's going to say is this law

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is this legislation is going to amend a previous issue

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to how much members of Congress are

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>paid and that's how they get the pay raise, and

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that is the inherent problem. So I applaud Nancy Mace,

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I applaud Chip Roy and some of the other people

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>who set on principle you know what, No, we have

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to stop spending money. And this is going to be

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the challenge, I think for Donald Trump, because every American president,

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>even Ronald Reagan, who was the president I grew up on,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the president that I love very hard to get presidents

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to stop spending money because it helps you look good,

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>You're helping your constituency, you're helping the country, It sort

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of helps the economy boom. The problem is you are

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>passing down debt for the next generation. So this is

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be an early indication of how much progress

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of any we're gonna make on that topic.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>So it's interesting that you use that metaphor, because, yeah,

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 2>you've made the point, and we've made the point on

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>our podcast and elsewhere. That's spending, largely government spending, our money,

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>tax dollar spending is on autopilot, right And part of

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the problem with that is there are very few incentives

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to keep you from doing it, Like zero who's in

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>favor of you not spending money It's the example I

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>like to use is if you decide to pay off

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 2>your house, ye what you know, no one makes more money.

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>If you decide to pay off your house, pay off

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>your mortgage. You know, the bank wants you to have

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the loan, your financial advisor wants you to keep the

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 2>money in the market. So no one's making money if

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 2>you do that. And what's interesting now about this moment

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 2>is the reaction on social media to what they try

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to do actually suggests that there might be an incentive

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>to rain down spending because for the first time the

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 2>American people via social media channels, because of Elon Musk

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 2>and because of the mandate that we now have with

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>him and Vivicrimswami, there is a political incentive to do

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 2>it because that seems to be what the American people

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 2>are supporting.

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>There is, there is, and look, I think dose is great.

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I think having two outsider smart businessmen who are running

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>this is a great way to do it. Here's the

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>fundamental problem, though, Eric, if you look at the numbers

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of our federal budget, if you were to cut the

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>work of the federal government in half, which is probably

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen, it's going to be more like

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty percent. Even if you cut the federal

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>workforce in half, it's going to put a minor dent

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the deficit. The vast majority of spending by our

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>federal government is on entitlement programs. It's fixed. And while

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, Donald Trump has come out in

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>favor of it, Elizabeth Warren has come out in favor

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of getting rid of the debt ceiling. And it seems

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>this ridiculous, archaic thing that every once in a while

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to vote to raise the debt ceiling. It's

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>literally the only time members of Congress actually have to

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about federal spending. The rest of the time they don't.

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not in favor of getting rid of it.

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>It seems ridiculous. It's just kind of is the government

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>going to shut down? Is it not going to shut down?

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous, it seems, but it's the only time they

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>actually have to address the fact that they are spending

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>us into oblivion.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 2>Are you concerned that Donald Trump seemed to support something

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>that would have suspend that discussion, that one kind of

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 2>crux where you actually have to have a hard conversation

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 2>for the next two years and given his track record previously. Look,

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump did a lot of things really well. You

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>and I were both very supportive of the idea of

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 2>his reelection. But the reality is is that if there's

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 2>one thing that maybe wasn't great under Donald Trump, and

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 2>it's consistent with every president, spending did not go down.

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean that the deficit did not go down, the

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 2>debt did not go down. This is a moment to

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 2>have a hard conversation with the American people. But what

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 2>is positive is we seem to be having it together.

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 2>And you know, you use the word chaos. We made

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 2>the point in the first hour. Chaos is a good thing.

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 2>This is a healthy thing. This is actually what democracy

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 2>is supposed to look like. We were told that democracy

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>was on the ballot, and we vote for Joe, we

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 2>vote for Donald Trump, and you know, that's the actual threat.

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden is the one that was going to save democracy.

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 2>And then unfortunately he like had to take a nap,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>and so he went away, and then here comes Kamala

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Harris and then somehow the person who received no primary

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 2>votes was the one that was going to defend democracy.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 2>And so unfortunately, right or actually fortunately, Donald Trump did

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 2>win and as a result, we actually this is what

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>democracy and action really looks like.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, you're exactly right. And look, I mean I

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>think Donald Trump wants to get rid of the debt

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>ceiling because he's a businessman, and he says, this is inefficient.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Why do we need to do this? This is kind

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of a rote thing for us to be doing. But

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that rote thing is absolutely necessary. I hope

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to reverse course because when he announced

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>his support for that, Ye, those on the left, Elizabeth Warren,

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the Americans Prospect, which is a very left wing publication,

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>they said Trump is offering us the deal of a lifetime.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>They have wanted to get out from under the debt

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>ceiling forever because they don't believe that debts and deficits matter,

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course it does. All you have to do

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is look at our federal budget. We are now going

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to be get set next year to be spending more

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>money as a federal government on paying interest on our

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>debt than we're paying on national.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Defense, which is not a thing you hear. And that's

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>another thing that unfortunately the American people are lied to.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's another thing that we have spent time talking

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 2>about in this program. There's reported in the Wall Street

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Journal that showed how extensively the Biden administration efforted to

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 2>lie to us about how weak Joe Biden was. You

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and I our last podcast episode, which you can find

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 2>at the drill down dot com, was about Bill Clinton

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and Bill Clinton's new memoir and the lies he's telling,

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah in his book about kind of actually you because

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 2>some of your great reporting was in this book, Clinton Cash,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 2>and it was about how much money Bill Clinton made

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 2>and how much you know, how much money that don't

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the foundation raked in when Hillary was Secretary of State,

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 2>And like there's a Washington Post review that says, oh no,

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 2>there's all been debunked. And even though donations to the

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 2>Clinton Foundation dropped ninety three percent after she stopped becoming

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 2>to presidential candidate and was no longer secretary of State.

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 2>So you know, we've been lied to on a regular basis,

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and unfortunately, you know, that's actually the fight it needs

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 2>to happen. It's not about the dead ceiling, it's not

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 2>about spending. It's about can you continue to lie to

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the American people. And that's where we have a brand

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>new tool at our disposal. And I do think it

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 2>is the new Trump administration with Elon Musk's support, because,

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to quote him, the media is no longer the gatekeepers

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>like everyone else at the media, and each lie gets

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 2>called out for the falsehood that it is.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, what do all these stories have in common?

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Clinton and the Clinton scandals, what happened

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Bidens, the issue of Joe Biden's cognitive ability

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>or lack thereof. In every single case, you had mainstream

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>media acting as gatekeepers, trying to prevent people from having actual,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>real information that they have a right to know about,

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>that they deserve to know about. And the news organizations

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to report on those days I think are gone.

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>You now have with Twitter acts. The debate over this

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>budget is the one that is absolutely at the center

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>point of the conversation. That's a Twitter acts.

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 2>So, Rand Paul, we thought we were going to have

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 2>it five ten. It turns out there's an other debate happening,

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 2>not just on this program, but there's a debate happening

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>on the Senate floor, and Rand Paul is actually in

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 2>the middle of it right now.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So he you mean, he's picking sitting on the Senate

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>floor to talking to me. I'm shocked.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I often am shocked. Ironically, we talked about Clinton cash.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to give Rand Paul a hard time for

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>getting us in trouble by leaking some of those revelations.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, we are talking about the federal spending

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 2>and the efforts of Dog and we have a caller,

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>a John, who wants to talk about what exactly that

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>could look like. John from Pittsburgh.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 3>There, Hey, fellows, I really hope when they're tankering the

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 3>budget they're not going to take away those critical tax

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>deductions for our sex club sees.

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, Well everybody's got their pet project, right.

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Hey, it's the holiday season, John, you know, and everybody's

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 2>got unwined a little bit.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly. I mean, but here's the thing when

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to all these debates, and this is the

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>problem why cutting money is so difficult. It's cutting money

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because everybody has a constituent, see right. And so when

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you say we're going to cut this program and it's

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be two point five billion dollars, whether it's

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>what John wanted or something else, you are now going

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to have that industry rising up and all they have

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to do is pick up a few powerful members of

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Congress to make that sort of go away. So the

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>exciting thing about the conversation with Doge, with the Veck

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and with Elon Musk is that we are having this

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>conversation that going to come up with really smart ideas

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and smart solutions. The reality is they're very easy. There

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>are very few easy solutions that can just take effect

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>without Congress having to vote for it. So you're gonna

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have to get this through Congress. There's a razor thing

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican majority, and we've already seen there's some Republicans that

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>are willing to, you know, let's say, go off the reservation.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>So it's not going to be as easy as it sounds.

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>But you've got to keep fighting the fight because it's

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>worth fighting for.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 2>Is that another Elizabeth Warren reference? Just checking anyway, We're

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 2>going to continue to have the difficult conversations, sometimes about

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 2>topics like John Ray, sometimes about other people you know,

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and other compromising positions. Let's just say, but that's a

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 2>conversation we continue to like to have with you. Thank

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you for joining us on your Friday, the last Friday

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>before the Christmas holiday, and we appreciate Sean giving us

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a chance to talk about the work we've done on

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 2>our drill Down podcast. We'll be right back after this.

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 2>He's Peter Schweitzer. I'm Eric Eggers. You can find our

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>work at the drill Down dot com. And we're back

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>on the Sean Handy Show after this break.

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Peter Schweizer. I'm here with Eric Eggers. We

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are filling in for Sean Hannity. We do the drill

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Down podcast. We would love for you to check it out.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>We are tracking a number of stories, including the vote

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill. We're going to be joined by Senator

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>rand Paul we hope at the bottom of the hour.

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>He's actually on the Senate floor right now. Also tracking

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the story in Germany, this horrific story in maud dee

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Burgh where apparently a car was driven through a Christmas market.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>There are numerous fatalities, eighty people injured. It was an

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>attack and they have now apparently arrested a Saudi man

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>who is fifty years old. He's apparently a doctor who

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>was there on a permanent residence permit and they believe

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that he is the individual that's behind this attack. They

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>are saying it is a loan attack. That's what they

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>believe at this point.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>And to me, one of the startling things about this

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 2>story is apparently there was some disturbance yesterday. There was

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 2>tension between people in the German market and a group

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 2>of migrants, and there was you know, some a public

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 2>a fray if you like. And the point that people

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>are making who are commenting on this tragedy, because you've

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 2>got anywhere from two to eleven people being reported dead,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>eighty people injured, as you noted, But while we in

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>America can see videos of the car which is grotesque

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>and horrific, just careening through this crowd of people, people

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>in Germany and in Europe could not share this same

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 2>video wow, because of censorship laws in case it was

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>presented or portrayed as something as being anti migrant. And

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 2>we've seen other reports of censorship law keeping people from

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 2>commenting and people are being held accountable for social media

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 2>posts in Europe. It's a very different experience there than

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 2>it is for us in the United States, where you

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and I can sit here and host the program and

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 2>criticize the President of the United States and talk about

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 2>how many migrants might be deported. Moving forward, on Trump administration.

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Those are freedoms we enjoy still in this country that

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>others in the world do not.

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here's the other thing that strikes me in this

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And of course this is one individual. It's not indicative

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of everybody. But you know, apparently there was this issue

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that happened yesterday and we don't know who started and

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>what happened, and it's terrible, but one individual decides that

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going to take it out on a bunch of

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>other innocent people that were probably not even involved in

0:14:55.000 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that confrontation. And it just speaks to what is evil.

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, they are terrible things going on in

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East right now, innocent people that are dying.

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>But you look at what the Israelis do to They

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>target the perpetrators, the individuals that are the terrorists, the

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>people that are actually victimizing and killing people. They go

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to great lengths to avoid tangential casualties they do, unfortunately

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>happen when these perpetrators hide behind innocent people. But in

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>this case, the guy is looking to take out as

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>many innocent people as possible. It's terrible.

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 2>As an excellent point, it's an excellent point about horrific tragedy.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 2>And the loss of human life. Unfortunately, that is a

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>profound distinction that is oftentimes not made in the way

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>those issues are covered by the media. We're going to

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 2>continue to try to make more excellent points. In the

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>last thirty minutes of the show. He's Peter Schweizer on

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Americ Eggers This Sean Handy Radio show'll be right back.

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the Sean Handy Radio Show. My name

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 2>is Eric Eggers. I'm joined by author Peter Schweitzer. We

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>co host a podcast called The Drill Down with Peter Schweitzer.

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about lots of different stories, the things that

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 2>are happening right now, and we're very excited right now

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>to be joined by US Senator Rand Paul, who just

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 2>came from i think, giving a speech on the Senate floor.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Senator Paul, can you give us the latest in this

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>ongoing discussion over whether or not and how we should

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>continue to fund the United States government?

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, you know, I was proud of conservatives

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 4>yesterday stood up in the House and said that an

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 4>unlimited debt ceiling where you can spend as much as

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 4>you want with no dollar limit for two years. So

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 4>that's just not fiscally conservatives. So most of these guys

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 4>and men and women were in the Freedom Caucus, but

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 4>they stood up, they were fiscally conservative and said we

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 4>won't vote for that. So they voted down the unlimited

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 4>debt ceiling idea. But today there's still another vote going

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 4>on and it'll be coming over to the Senate soon

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 4>and it'll be a continuing resolution that means we will

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 4>continue to spend money at the same rate as we

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 4>have been all year. But that same rate has led

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 4>to a two trillion dollar deficit this last year. So

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 4>I think continuing spending at the same rate without reducing

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 4>spending it's a terrible idea. But it's worse than that.

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 4>They added one hundred billion dollars that they will borrow

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 4>for disaster. They added another thirty billion they're going to

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 4>borrow for farmer subsidies. And then they also this week

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 4>in the Senate voted for an expansion of Social Security

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 4>by two hundred billion dollars, even though so Security is

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 4>on its way to bankruptcy and actually currently spends more

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 4>than it takes in. So it isn't a good week

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 4>to be for fiscal conservativesm Yes, conservatives are standing up

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 4>and fighting, but we're losing. The swamp is winning the

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 4>big government, Republicans are spending and borrow more money, and

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 4>the Democrats are happily going along with all of it.

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the thing, Senator for Paul that I've always

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>appreciated about you, which is what you say is what

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you vote. And the problem is there are a lot

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of people in the Republican Party who talk like they

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>are fiscal conservatives, but they don't actually end up doing that.

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to get easier when we have a

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Republican House and a Republican Senate and Donald Trump is

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the presidency or are we going to have this continued

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>problem with Republicans failing to actually live up to what

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they promised the American people they would do.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, in many ways, we've met the enemy, and

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 4>it's to us. I mean it's within the Republican Party.

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 4>The Democrats are of no value. They will not lie

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 4>to you. Though they don't care about the debt. They

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 4>believe in this modern monetary theory that you can just

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 4>print money at the Fed forever and buy whatever you want.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Republicans go home to the Rotary and the Chamber of

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Commerce and Lions Club, and they tell you how they

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.959
<v Speaker 4>hate big government and they want to balance the budget,

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 4>and they vote for all the spendings. So it's about split.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 4>This week we had to vote on expanding soial Security,

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 4>but SOID Security this year lost forty billion. So you know,

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 4>all the payroll taxes we pay, and we pay a

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 4>ton of payroll taxes, we spent forty billion more giving

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 4>soci security benefits than we brought in in taxes. So

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 4>what we did is this bill. Not me, I voted

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 4>against it, but about half of the Republicans. I think

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 4>twenty four of us voted against No. Twenty five of

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 4>us actually voted against us. In twenty four voted for him.

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 4>But by expanding so security by two hundred billion, that

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 4>means the deficit yer this year, instead of being forty billion,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 4>will be sixty. So they've increased the social security and

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 4>deficit by fifty percent, and it's running out of money

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 4>and we'll be out of money by twenty thirty three.

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 4>So it's a perpetual fight, and it really is people

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 4>need to identify, and in Republican states they need to say,

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, is my senator, is my congressman conservative? Or

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 4>is he really part of this wall.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned that it's not been a good week to

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 2>be a fiscal conservative, and I say this sort of

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 2>tongue in cheek, but sort of seriously, is it ever

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 2>a good week to be a fiscal conservative? I mean,

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Mitt Romney ran on this platform to you know, to

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 2>bring back fiscal restraint in twenty twelve, and he lost soundly,

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't seem like we've kind of taken that

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>issue seriously since then. It is this something that you

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.479
<v Speaker 2>think we have given up on as a country or actually,

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 2>do you feel like the fact that in the last

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 2>week people started to point out some of the ridiculous

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 2>spending measures that were in that original bill, that fifteen

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty seven page bill, and they highlighted how

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>bad that was. Did that give you any hope at all?

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, Vivek and Elon had brought a lot

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 4>of attention to government waste. I've been talking about it

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 4>for a decade and it's easy to find the waste.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 4>But they're drawing good attention to it. But that the

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 4>battle's just getting started, so we have to get rid

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 4>of it. And I'll give you another example. So a

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 4>lot of the science way, so called science. Let's say

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 4>a million dollars spent studying Japanese quail to see if

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 4>you give them cocaine, are they more sexually promiscuous on cocaine.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 4>That usually draws laughter because people said, that's ridiculous. You

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 4>had to make that up. Now it was a million dollars.

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 4>It came to the National Science Foundation. Well about a

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 4>year ago, big government Republicans passed a bill called the

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Chip Sacked, which subsidizes big chip manufacturers like Intel. So

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Intel's a probably nearly a trillion dollar company and it's

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 4>getting government subsidies. But it also doubled the size of

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 4>the National Sizence Foundation that has studies on the Panamanian

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 4>frog to see if the country frogs have a maten

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 4>called in the you know, the city frogs. I mean

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 4>it goes on and on. I mean, it's it's just

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 4>insane that a million point five spent on If you

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 4>take a selfie of yourself while smiling and then look

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 4>at it later in the day, will that make you happy?

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 4>My favorite one is from a while back where they

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 4>wanted to find out what makes you more aggressive tequila

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 4>or gin? And you all know the answer. Come on.

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 4>But they had an experiment and they said codfish gin

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 4>and they said the other half of the codfish tequila. Now,

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how you get a codfish to drink tea.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 4>They did.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 2>It happen very carefully.

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 4>And you are right at tequila tequilax ressive than people too.

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 4>But you know it's just that insanity. But then Republicans

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 4>go along with doubling the size of that. That's the downside.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 4>You want to hear the plus side, We do lower taxes.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 4>We agree on this regulation. We most of us appreciate

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 4>of the power of capitalism and appreciate the wealth and

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.719
<v Speaker 4>prosperity that is dragging everybody up. I mean, the statistics

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 4>are amazing. How even despite the inflation of the last

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 4>three or four years, the overall historical trend is that

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 4>the middle class is moving up and moving up even

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 4>into the upper class. So there is good news about

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 4>capitalism that we need to talk about. But there's some

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 4>you know, we have to keep our eyes open and

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 4>not take her eye off the ball as far as

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 4>the spending goes.

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I agree with you on that. We want

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to play a clip for you. We had Nancy Mason

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>earlier and this is what she was told by the

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>leadership in the House as far as what the Senate

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>could or couldn't do involving the spending legislation that's coming

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for Just listen to Nancy Mace and give us your

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>thoughts whether this is true or not true.

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 5>I said in Eating Sick with groups of every public

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 5>where the lie was stated that if we do single

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 5>subject bills tonight, do a clean CR, do a separate

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 5>a disaster relief fill in, a separate farm extension or

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 5>farm type bill, that the Senate could only take up

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 5>one bill. That is a lie. There is nothing limiting

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 5>the Senate from taking up three bills. We also as

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 5>a House could do three separate single subject bills and

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 5>then do what's called a mervh a erv. And what

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 5>the merv would do is we would do this three

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 5>separate voats and then combine the bills together as they

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 5>were sent over to the Senate, so they only have

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 5>one vote. So like, there are many options in vehicles

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 5>in ways that we can go about this. But again

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 5>Republicans are lied to. Because they were lied to, they

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 5>got scared, and so it sounds like we're going to

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 5>do the CR again. The cr that we did last night,

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 5>but no debt ceiling. So it's just the same thing

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 5>a different year.

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So Senator Paul, is that true? The Senate can only

0:23:58.000 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>handle one bill at a time.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 4>The rules in the Senate are are Caine byzantine and

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 4>hard to understand. But without consent, and I'm one of

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 4>the ones who is flying the ointment off often. If

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't consent to let them bring up three bills tonight,

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 4>they can't because it takes a while, you have to

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 4>go through several votes, procedural votes. It slows things down,

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 4>and that can be good if you're preventing bad stuff,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 4>and most of the stuff where they're passing is bad.

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 4>But there's a chance I will give them consent tonight.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 4>And the leverage I have of blocking these bills is

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 4>that I have two amendments that they'll defeat me on,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 4>but I will bring forward the American people will know

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 4>that we care some of us. I will put forward

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 4>something called the Government shut Down Prevention Act, and if

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 4>I get a vote on that, and they let them

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 4>bring all the bills up tonight, even though I will

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 4>vote against the bills. The Government shut Down Prevention Act

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 4>says when there's not an agreement. When there's an impass

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 4>and government's going to shut down, it doesn't shut down.

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 4>It just continued funding, but with six percent less funding.

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 4>And that's a pretty significan and cut and would probably

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 4>draw people back to the negotiating table because they don't

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 4>like the idea of cutting. For me, it would be

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 4>great because we're at impasse all the time, and I

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 4>think cutting six percent would be a good idea, which

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 4>is consistent with my penny plan, which would balance the

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 4>budget in five years. I have another bill that says,

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 4>for this two hundred billion dollar expansion of Social Security,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 4>that you could pay for it by gradually raising the

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 4>age of eligibility three months per year for twelve years,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 4>so by the time you get to twenty thirty six,

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 4>it would be it would go from sixty seven to seventy.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 4>And people like, oh, you don't like old people too.

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 4>It's like, no, I aspire to be an old person.

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 4>I want to save it for what I am there.

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 4>I want to save it for all the rest of

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 4>the next generation. And you can't save it if you

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 4>don't fix it, and you can't just keep adding expenses.

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 4>So this will be the first time if we get

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 4>this vote tonight on raising the age that this will

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 4>have been offered maybe ever on the Senate floor, maybe

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:56.719
<v Speaker 4>since nineteen eighty three and eighty three. I think they

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 4>did it too legislation, so it must have come up

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 4>in a This may be the first time we voted

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 4>on it since eighty three, and I will lose, but

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 4>it'll be it'll presage or give for notice to the

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 4>people what's coming into this vote will have to happen again.

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Eventually we'll have to be done well.

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the things I appreciate about you,

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Senator Paul. You really come up with some amazing policy ideas.

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So instead of doing the same thing over and over

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>again and expecting a different result, you come up with

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>some amazing reform ideas. I know you're a supporter of

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea of single subject bills, so you don't get

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>these monstrous trains that kind of go through the legislative

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>process where they add a lot of pork. Another great

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>idea that I don't know if you actually introduced legislation,

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>but you talked about the fact of having transparency if

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>an amendment is offered to a bill, actually have some

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>explanation of who actually wrote the bill? Was that a lobbyist?

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Who was it that actually wrote that regislation? And that

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to me seems to be the path we have to

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>go forward to in a Trump term, where you have

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the House and Senate actual structural reform, because if we

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>keep doing the same thing, the Democrats at some point

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>are probably going to come to power again and we're

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>going to keep having these same problems over and over again.

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>How optimistic are you with the new administration, with the

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>new House and Senate, that we're actually going to get

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>changes to the manner in which we do things, not

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>just the cuts, which of course are important as well.

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Well. I think you bring out a good point as

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 4>far as that the process makes a difference in what

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 4>ultimately the result is. For example, our founders intended that

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 4>they're in history suggests that there would be individual appropriation bills.

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 4>There's twelve different departments of government, there's twelve different spending bills.

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 4>If you pass eleven of them and then the twelfth

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 4>one is the Treasury, and you say, I don't want

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 4>eighty thousand new RS agents. We control the House of Representatives,

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 4>why wouldn't they pass ten or eleven of these? That

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 4>way ten to twelve of government is still open, and

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 4>say to the Department of Treasury, you can rot in

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 4>hell if you don't get rid of these IRS agents

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 4>are people for this, and we're going to fund you

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 4>at eighty percent of the level. We're going to retrench

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 4>all that money for RS agents and we're not going

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 4>to do it. Pick some one item you're going to

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 4>win on instead. That never happens. We never win, We

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 4>never exert the power of the purse because what happens

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 4>is the Democrats the Republicans will put something forward of

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 4>the Democrats will say we don't like that, and then

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 4>the Democrats say, you shut down the government, and the

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 4>repuman say, we're afraid to do that. But the thing is,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 4>you don't have this big sort of cataclysmic shutdown of

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 4>government if you can pass some of the spending bills,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 4>get them off the table. So what you're discussing is

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 4>one twelfth of the government coming to a halt for

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 4>a while while we forced to compromise. But the way

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 4>I perceive what happens is even when we take over

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.479
<v Speaker 4>the House, like right now we have the House, how

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 4>much what percentage of the power of the person we're

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 4>using zero, not ten percent. We're not getting fifty percent

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 4>of it want so the bill that put forward this

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 4>continued resolution one hundred billion for disasters, thirty billion for farmers,

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 4>and another two hundred billion for SOB security. That's not

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 4>a compromise. They've already sold themselves out before we even

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 4>get to the Senate. So it's not like they're waiting

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 4>in the Senate wants something worse. They've already produced something

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 4>so bad, so big in spending and so much debt,

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 4>that the Senate's going to pick it up in overpass

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.959
<v Speaker 4>it tonight. Also, not me, the Democrats and the big

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 4>government Republicans will.

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 2>It's really fun to hear you, Senator Paul, because you

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>know you're just coming off the Senate floor. You're talking

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 2>to the American people. You're telling them what votes are

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 2>going to happen. You're saying we're going to lose. But

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 2>here's why we're doing it. I think, to be honest,

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 2>this is exactly the kind of transparency and invitation to

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 2>the American public into the process that I do think

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 2>our founding fathers wanted in our country is better because

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 2>of it. So thank you for taking the time to

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 2>join us and giving people some insight into the process,

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>not just today but moving forward. Thank you very much

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.719
<v Speaker 2>for the time today, sir, Thank you as Senator Ran

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Paul he is author Peter Sweitzer, I am Eric Eggers.

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Together we host the podcast called The Drill Down, which

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 2>you can find at the drill down dot com. And

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 2>we'll be right back on the Sean Handity Radio Show

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 2>right after this.

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And Eric Eggers, we've been covering for Sean Hannity on

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Seawan Handerity Radio Show. We thank you Sean for

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>giving us the opportunity to sit in front of this

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>microphone and talk to your audience. We hope you're having

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a RESTful time over the holidays. And thank you Linda,

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>producer Linda for guiding us every step of the way.

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We have done this, I think now five times, and

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate it every single time we have a chance

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to do.

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, farbait for me to correct you my boss here

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 2>at the Government Accountability Institute, But this is actually our

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 2>sixth time doing it, and each and every time we

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.719
<v Speaker 2>really cherish the opportunity to speak directly to the American

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 2>people about like really important issues. And today we talked

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.959
<v Speaker 2>about this pending fight over how to fund the government.

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 2>We also talked about the way that the government's gotten

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 2>used to being able to lie to us, the American people.

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 2>One point to make in all the discussion about hey, hey,

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 2>what's the House doing, what's the Senate doing? And we

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 2>know what Donald Trump supports, you know who, we haven't

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 2>heard from who Joe Biden.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's just the real thing. And that's because we

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know what he's doing where he is, and that

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 2>continues to be a massive scandal American history, one that

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 2>we were happy to be able to experience with you,

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 2>with the American people today.

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, Merry Christmas, Happy Hontike and everybody. We appreciate you

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>taking the time to listen to us. God bless and

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>happy New Year.

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Merry Christmas, America. Thanks again, Sean Handy Show is over.