WEBVTT - Autocallable ETFs

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Loker trillions. I'm Joe Webber and.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm Eric Balchernas.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Eric, you sent a note that caught my attention because

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 3>you were like, it's the wave of the future. Manufactured

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 3>high yield gonna be a big category. I was like,

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>that's like Eric Balchina's at his finest. Let's unpack those three.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 3>The category a new one Auto callables. Yeah.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I honestly I'd heard the word a couple of times,

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't know what it meant. This is part of a

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 2>bigger theme that we call yield three point zero where

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>manufactured yield. We used to use the meme of the

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 2>breaking bad where using the lab making the meth. They

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>are making yield that isn't from like bonds or stoughts.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 2>They're just making it and it's very popular, especially if

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>it's a big yield.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 4>So auto callibles are.

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>One of the latest areas that has a big yield,

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>usually thirteen fourteen percent at least in the colum most

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 2>etf that I looked at, And there is a huge

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 2>demand for this. People love income. I've been to the

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Money Show several times, especially older people. They just go

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 2>crazy for income. So these products are quite complicated. In

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>my opinion. I used to say VIX and China were

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the two most complicated areas of ETFs. This is more complicated.

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>So I want to make sure that we understand this

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 2>and that we could explain it to you know, our

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>aunt or uncle, like just somebody in our lives.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna try, but we can't.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 2>End this podcast until we both understand it. I think

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 2>I get it, but I get it on a very

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>superficial level that I just learned it quickly for the note,

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 2>but I really want to get it, and also want

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that people are aware of like the

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 2>pros and cons of these, because Joel, they're going to grow.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 2>This thing came out. This calumost One already has four

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred million, and for something complex to come out, it's

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty good money for that, so I would suspect. And

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm hearing a lot of other issuers are going to

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 2>launch these, And it's a word I hear when I

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 2>travel around, including from our index team. They bring up

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>auto callables all the time. So it's a word you're

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna hear more and more. Might as well get get

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 2>our heads around it.

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm surrounded by papers trying to make sense of this,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of hilarious.

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh I don't think I understand it.

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 3>So I'll be the litmus test and to help us

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 3>make sense of this, we're gonna be joined by Matt

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Kaufman Global ahead of ETFs at Klamos Investments First market

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 3>or this year with a UTF in this space, this

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 3>time my trillions auto callibles.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt, welcome jillions.

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Joel, thanks for having me. Great to be here.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>How does this stuff work?

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 4>We are going to hopefully get off of the meth analogy. Yeah,

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 4>that was We'll move toward first step something.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Listen, Matt, Matt goes to work every day in like

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>this white suit. Then he's in there testing different things. Yes,

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>that was the hollow costing this year, so you might

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 4>You already have ramid lab.

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 3>But Colam Moos came out with a ticker ce ai E.

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 3>That's the ticker if you want to look into this more.

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 4>That is the ticker Auto Callable Income ETF. So let's

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 4>take our minds from the equity markets and move it

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 4>toward the fixed income market. So think like a bond

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 4>that will pay you a monthly income and return your principle.

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 4>As long as the equity markets don't fall too far.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 4>If you can understand that, you can understand an auto callable.

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 4>So it's a lot like a bond that pays a

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 4>monthly income and delivers your principle back to you either

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 4>at maturity or if you're called away early. That is

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 4>the auto call feature. And it's tied to the equity markets.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 4>So bonds are usually tied to duration and credit. This

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.839
<v Speaker 4>is tied to the equity markets. That's essentially it.

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 3>That was a really great way of breaking it down.

0:03:57.800 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 3>It's also a quote that you had in the story

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Waltree Cream's more auto callables into ETFs and race for

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>yield by our colleagues at Bloomberg News.

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Matt, though I got that part. Where does the

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>yield come from? The income? Where am I getting? Where

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are you getting that income to give it to me from?

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, great question. I think one of the easiest ways

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 4>to think about this is to you know, normally you

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 4>would frame it around a covered call so that covered

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 4>call space, as Eric was talking about, is a massive market.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 4>It's one hundred and fifty billion dollar market. I was

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 4>fortunate enough to be at Power Shares in early two thousands.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 4>We built the first buy right ETF in two thousand

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 4>and seven. I think it was a little before it's time.

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, nobody really bought it back then. Now that

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 4>space is one hundred and fifty one hundred and sixty

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 4>billion in assets. It's a massive market. And you know,

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 4>what are you doing with a covered call? You're selling

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 4>off your upside. It's a by right strategy. Twenty years ago,

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 4>very few people understood that term. Today it's commonplace. There's

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 4>equity premium income strategies. You're selling off upside collecting an

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 4>income payment, and auto callable is a long dated put

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 4>right stra strategy. So take the other side of the trade.

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 4>It's a long dated, say five year put right with

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 4>a call feature, and that's it. That's all. You're collecting.

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 2>What he just said, and he goes, that's it. You

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>come on, dude, it's okay.

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 4>You want it simple. So we're starting simple.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna break this down. Okay, I have ten thousand dollars.

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I give you ten thousand dollars to this. So first

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 2>of all, who makes the auto callable? Like is it

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 2>a bank? And this is like what like a swap

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 2>contract or? Like whom I am I doing? It's just

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 2>like Michael Burry where I'm walking into Goldman and I

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>say I have this idea and the bank just says, okay,

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll make a thing for you. Is that what we're

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 2>doing here?

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 4>So you can't go to the market and you can't

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 4>go to the listed options market and find an auto

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 4>callable yield, you know, option that does not exist. You

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 4>can go to the listed options markets and do put

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 4>writing strategies, you can call writing strategies. But what we've

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 4>done is we've partnered with JP Morgan. There you go,

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 4>biggest bank in the world. So yes, it is a

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 4>bank strategy. You cannot do this with listed options. So

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 4>we've partnered with JP Morgan. We took their auto callable

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 4>pricing methodology and we built a laddered version of this hold.

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 2>On, hold on. What is JP Morgan's auto callable pricing methodology?

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>So the first of all, what is the index that

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>were based? What's the equity index?

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so let me let me explain this to you

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 4>in a way that we can we can understand. So,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, you talked about you know what happens if

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 4>you have ten thousand dollars. So I brought monopoly money,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 4>you did I did. Yeah, I actually brought monopoly money

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 4>here before, so we can we can play with this.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 4>So here, Eric, I'll give you one hundred dollars monopolyous.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>He just gave you a hundred back.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 4>It's easy. He would be a bad banker, and it's

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 4>easier to think about that because it's a Let's let's

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 4>pretend like that hundred dollars is the par amount.

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Okay, So.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I get nothing. I don't like this game.

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 4>You're going to be the Joel. You're going to be

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 4>the market. You're going to go to the market here,

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 4>all right, So Eric's gonna buy an auto callable. Note,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 4>I'll be the bank. So you're going to invest in

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 4>an auto call but note, so give me your hundred

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 4>oct here's sliding it across the table. Okay, now that's.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Stuck in the middle. I'm moving it across.

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Let's put it.

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 2>We don't want it in free parking.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Sure, So let's put some terms to this note. Let's

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 4>say it has a five year life, it has a

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 4>sixty percent principal coupon barrier. So we're gonna pay you

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 4>monthly income as long as an equity index does not

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 4>fall by forty.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Percent during what time period?

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Every month?

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a monthly look, so if the S and P.

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's say it's the SMP index. If it doesn't fall

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 2>forty percent a month.

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 4>In a month while a starting date, so then I

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 4>get a little a little something. Yeah, that's right, and

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 4>then there's so and then there's the same thing at maturity.

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 4>So let's just play this out.

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 2>But hold on, does the forty percent restart in the

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>second month. Uh, it's from the starting point we're starting

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 2>for interception. And let's say the first month the SMP

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.559
<v Speaker 2>is down two percent. I get I get paid.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 4>So Joel, Joel gets to decided he's going to be

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 4>the market here. Okay, okay, So let's say this pays

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 4>twelve percent annualized income every month. So I've got you

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 4>one hundred dollars safe here. So Joel, let's go thirty

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 4>days in the future. What is the market going to do?

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Pick a number up or down?

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 3>This year, I'm gonna say, if we're if we're playing

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>this from the beginning of the year, market gove up.

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let's say you're up five percent. So market's of

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 4>five percent in a month, Eric, you get a dollar

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 4>you're good.

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You're good.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay. Next month, let's say the market.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Well it happened, okay, kind kind of was a little chaotic.

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let's say it happens.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's say market went down.

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Market goes down how much? Ten percent? All right, Eric,

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 4>you still get a dollar. Market's down ten. It's not

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 4>down forty, it's down ten.

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>It resets every month.

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Uh, it's not, it's it's from the inception of the

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 4>note to that month.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 2>So because it went up and down. Now year to date,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 2>what do we down six percent or something?

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>We were up five, Now we're down ten, So down

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>five so far? Yeah.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Right, So let's let's just keep playing out. Let's say

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 4>the market is down forty percent the next month from

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 4>inception no dollar for you.

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, stop real quick. So we're down five percent,

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 2>so the market would have to go down like another

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 2>thirty five percent. Then, so it hits forty percent year

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>to date. Correct that month, I don't get a dollar.

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 4>That's correct.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>And then because this got called in other.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>Words, the whole getting called yet.

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, so don't get a dollar.

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Correct.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Now the next month it goes up five percent.

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Your dollar kicks back in.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I get another dollar, You get a dollar. Okay, what

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>if it goes down another twenty percent from.

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 4>The forty then you do not get your dollar, gotcha?

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 2>So in other words, as long as it doesn't come

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 2>above the forty percent watermark, I get no dollars. If

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>it comes up above the forty percent of water mark,

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I start.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Getting my dollars again, exactly.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>And the one hundred you just hold on to.

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Who How is this a good deal for JP Morgan?

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>It seems a little too good, Like I feel like

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the number should be ten percent. That'd be fair for

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan.

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Sure, No, that's a good question. So let's keep playing

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 4>this out. So now you've got your hundred dollars still here.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 4>So five years from now, let's say the market is

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 4>down twenty percent, you are maturing at par. You get

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 4>your hundred dollars back. If the market is down forty

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 4>percent or more, that's when you have principle at risk.

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 4>So let's say the market is down forty percent five

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 4>years from now. If I can make the sound in

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 4>the in the mic, we're gonna tear your one hundred

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 4>dollars bill by forty percent. You're gonna get sixty percent

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 4>of your principle back. Oh, that is the risk that

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 4>you're taking on.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But he's collected income along the way. Correct if if it.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 2>So after five years, if I collected a dollar every

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 2>month minus say like five months, that would be fifty

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 2>five dollars against my sixty forty percent that I lost.

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 2>So it would cush it in a little bit. That's

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 2>like a cover call. Okay, yes, exactly.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So that's how a single auto call of works.

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 4>The call feature then would be if the market is positive,

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 4>usually after a non call period like one year, then

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 4>you are called away. JP gets the money back, your prince,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 4>you get your principal, you get your hundred dollars back,

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 4>you get your final coupon payment. Good job shows over,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 4>everyone goes home, you have to go buy a new note.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>That's how it works.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Wait, wait, that's that's when it gets called. I thought

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 2>it got called if it goes down too much, No

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>one goes up. Correct, So so when does it get

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 2>called again?

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so you're getting called when the market is positive

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 4>after a one year nine all period.

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 2>So if the market's up seven percent after like the

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 2>market is up this year, it's up fourteen percent, so

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 2>let's just say correct the year under. Now we're up

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 2>fourteen percent in twenty twenty five, and therefore I would

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>get the one hundred dollars back correct, and then I

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>would have my twelve dollars because it every went down

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 2>below forty exactly, so I would have So at that

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 2>point the fund would automatically reinvest in.

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 4>A new auto callable. That's correct.

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>So now in that getting on the hundred dollars back,

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 2>big reset, Well right now, a loss of money in

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>that one hundred dollars getting called.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Back or not?

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Those resets correct and you you reset it automatically.

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, so I'm teaching you about an auto callable, so

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 4>we know how the auto callable works.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 4>So what we have done with CIE is we've laddered

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 4>exposure to fifty two or more of these. It's a

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 4>weekly ladder, a laddered portfolio of auto callables. So now

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 4>at week fifty three, if the market's down, you might

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 4>lose coupon on one, I say, but you have fifty

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 4>one others in the portfolio. So it's highly diversified.

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Wow, And the answer is in reality, in this fun CIAE,

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 2>it is forty percent. That's the number. You don't want

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the market to go down below.

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 4>For a severe and sustained time period.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>That's correct, Like, what's that mean?

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 4>So we built all of this with JP Morgan and Mercube,

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 4>a custom indexing provider, and this is all built inside

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 4>of an index that we trade on swap with JP Morgan.

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 4>So the risk would be a severe sustained market decline

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 4>that never recovers, and that in five years your autocollables

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 4>start to mature below the barrier.

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's back test it.

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 3>What happened, What happens at the if March twenty twenty happens,

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>we're back in the pandemic.

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, use one hundred dollars, put one hundred dollars in.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's say I get Let's say for a year it's fine,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 2>so I got twelve dollars back, but then this next

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 2>year it's like a twenty Let's say it's a two

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight where the market, well, the market wasn't

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>even down forty percent. It was down thirty three percent,

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>thirty five percent in two thousand and eight, right, So

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 2>way it's down forty five percent that year, Yeah, and

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>it stays down. What happens?

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 4>So, because this is an index. We can look at

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 4>that history. We go back to two thousand and five,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 4>and you would have lost on two point eight percent

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 4>of those autocollables. Historically, it would have equated to a

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 4>seventeen percent principle impairment. That was the only time you

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 4>would have lost money. Again, you did not lose that

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 4>forty percent.

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 2>So you don't lose everything. You lost seventy percent, So

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 2>you basically you bet a seventeen percent loss on something

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 2>that's almost not never gonna happen because the Fed's going

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to step in and start buying assets if a go

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>that low again.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Probably I think you're right.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why I don't get I look, it's in this

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>for JP Morgan.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this sounds like genius from your point of view,

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 2>But it feels like JP Morgan is pretty smart, Like

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 2>we had them on, they're pretty smart people. I feel

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>like they could almost get you to do this deal

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>at like fifteen percent. What do you mean, like if

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 2>if the market goes down below fifteen percent, that's the threshold,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Like going down forty seems like almost like beyond a

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 2>tail risk event. I feel like they could do the

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 2>same deal with you at fifteen percent like that would

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 2>be almost pretty good deal because I don't even mark

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 2>go down. We'll go down fifteen percent before the government

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>starts buying up assets.

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Sure, I think when you're trying to build something with

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 4>risk management, you know, Calamos is a risk manager who's

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 4>been doing this for nearly fifty years. We want to

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 4>give people the risk managed exposure. We want to give

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 4>them a high stable tax efficient income. If there is

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 4>a payoff that we are after, it's that it's high

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 4>stable tax efficient income. So when you take this and

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 4>ladder it out fifty two or more times, you put

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 4>forty percent principal barriers on it, you get this really

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 4>high stable taxificient income.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Just jpen working consider this like issuing a bond on

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 2>their port, where it's a high yield bond, but with

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 2>this tail risk possibility. Therefore, that's why they're giving you

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a higher yield.

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, they're issuing the auto callables, so they're the issuer

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 4>of the auto callables, so they're going to take a

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 4>spread on that note. They're going to make money on

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 4>the on the swap that we're trading, so we trade

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 4>so for plus ten basis points. It's much more efficient

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 4>for JP Morgan to trade swap with us than it

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 4>is for somebody to go buy a note from JP Morgan,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 4>where you tie up all of their balance sheet, tie

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 4>up all their capital. You've got a subordinated debt structure

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 4>to that note, whereas here, if you build it synthetically

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 4>and just trade on swap, well, ninety five percent of

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 4>the assets in the ETF are in treasuries, so that

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 4>money is sitting at State Street at the custodian. There's

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 4>no real credit risk from that perspective. And then post

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Dodd Frank, JP Morgan has got to pay variation margin

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 4>on the swap, so the whole structure is nearly one

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent collateralized. So go back to eight. You know,

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 4>when a couple banks went under, you're on the hook

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 4>for a lot of that. Hopefully you get some of

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 4>your money back if you're a note issue or if

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 4>you're a note buyer, who's here.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 2>You don't have that whose money is in collateral? Does

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>JPM Moore can get a cut of the interest from

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the collateral.

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 4>No, it's the investor. So we pay JP Morgan SOFA

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 4>plus ten bases points.

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, They in turn give us the performance of that

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 4>auto callable index that we've created with Sofa overnight rate, so.

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>You pay I see. So they get a little interest

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>from you plus ten BIPs correct, and they feel like

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 2>that's what they get out of it. That's right, and

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 2>that balances out the income they have to give you.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>But they also have this like sort of you know,

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>fine print that if it goes down for forty percent,

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 2>they really wine that's right.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 4>They're taking the other side of the trade.

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 3>I feel a little bit like the guy at the

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 3>craps table that's like, now, I'm gonna just watch that

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 3>game play out.

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 2>What well I mean, I mean here, I'll if you

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 2>yield is twelve is well, if you get a dollar

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 2>a month, that's twelve percent, but this is like fourteen

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 2>percent a little more of a dollar.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 4>The average weighted coop on which is based on that

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 4>par amount of your note, is fourteen point four percent.

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 4>Right now. Okay, So the thing that we did not

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 4>get into yet, which we have to build a base

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 4>understanding of auto callables. It's a one hundred billion dollar

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 4>market in the United States. You know, as you alluded

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 4>to the structured note world, Well, let me back up

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 4>the cover call space. You know, he said is one

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifty billion dollar market. Derivative income is dominating

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 4>the ETF landscape. If you go to the other side

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 4>of the house, the structured note house, derivative income dominates

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 4>there as well, but it's through the auto call. The

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 4>auto callable is one hundred billion dollar market in the

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 4>United States alone, multiples of that globally. People love this

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 4>type of exposure.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's never been in an ETF until this show.

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 4>We built the first ETF correct.

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 2>This is really interesting. You know that when he talks

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 2>about people wanting income that is derivatives based. If you

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>look at all the flows into income ETFs that would

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 2>be equity, including which we've talked about before, that could

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 2>be divid in ETFs which a plane vanilla or these

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 2>derivative yield three point zero, over eighty percent goes into

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the derivative ones, which again would include the covered call.

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 2>So this is again that the ones the stock ETFs

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 2>that pay dividends like those old school, they're less than

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent of the flow. So this yield three point

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 2>zero is taking the lion's share of all the income

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 2>seeking money in the equity space. And I'm not counting

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 2>bonds but.

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>You were talking about since the CTF has come out.

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about this year, so this is TF came

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 2>out after this year. So like the thing is to me,

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to put this into a category with JEPY.

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 2>This is a little more complex than JEPY, but the

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 2>covered call space is huge now.

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 4>But I might push back on you a little bit

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 4>if you look at equity premium income strategies. You know,

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 4>again another JP Morgan, you know tide product, but JEPI

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 4>and JEFQ will hold actual equity linked notes and then

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 4>deliver you know, that income which is somewhat tax inefficient,

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 4>but you don't really know what's going on side those notes.

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 4>Like you, you have to look at what they're publishing,

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 4>which a lot of times they do it late and

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 4>so there's there's not a lot of transparency all those.

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>To be fair to them, though, in the yield that

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 2>you get like that we display on the des is

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. I mean, I think what's like nine ten percent?

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think to some degree, like some of these

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 2>products I've seen over the years, you just either trust

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the issue or you don't because correct a lot of advisors,

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to get what you're selling, they're gonna say, Matt,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I trust you, You're a good guy. Calamos has a reputation.

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I also think the target altcome ETFs. The buffers are

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 2>also like I just trust Innovator and Bruce Bond or

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 2>I trust black Rock, because these are very complicated. The

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 2>good news is the ETF industry does have this like

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>really good track record, and from what you're describing it

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 2>does seem like a pretty good bet to me. I'm

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 2>not really seeing anything too outrageous, except the fact that

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 2>obviously if there's somebody very bearish, this might not be

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the product for them.

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 3>So who who was doing it before the ETF going

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 3>to a bank and saying I want.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>That autocullable, autocullable thing that you guys have told me about.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>And then how is that changing now that it's you know,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>potentially retail friendly.

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned the buffer at ETF, so I had a

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 4>hand in building though, so if you trust the bus

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 4>buffer ETF SO, those have been working phenomenally for nearly

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 4>a decade. It's a very big space. Now that model

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 4>is very commoditized. Everybody who builds buffers tends to do

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 4>it closely the same way, So yeah, if you understand

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 4>that space or that was something that was mildly confusing.

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Back then, people had to get their heads around it.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 4>It was new. Now it's not. Most people understand it.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 4>The same is going to happen with auto calls. It's

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 4>a new space for ETFs. People are going to wrap

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 4>their heads around it. They're going to understand it, you know.

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 4>But what we did with the buffers was largely disruptive

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 4>to the banks. They did not really appreciate that there

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 4>were flex options being built around this. It wasn't a

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 4>bank driven product, whereas here this is collaborative with the banks.

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, we're seeing a tremendous amount of demand to

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 4>actually bring in those structured note strategies and do that

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 4>inside the ETF world. That's going to be a massive space.

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 4>We've opened this huge gate where we can now partner

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 4>with banks and bring their structured strategies into a liquid,

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 4>transparent and ETF ETF wrapper. I'd say it's also tax efficient.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 4>So most large banks around the world have an equity

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 4>derivatives desk, they have an autocallable business JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, RBC,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 4>like you name it, SoC Chan, Barclays, They all have

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 4>these types of products that they issue, and it's on

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 4>a massive scale, hundreds of billions of dollars. And so

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 4>we've taken one of the most popular versions, laddered it together,

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 4>did it in swap form, and did it in a

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 4>way where we can deliver really high stable income in

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 4>a very tax efficient way. Most derivative income products are

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 4>a little less tax efficient. They'll give you either ordinary

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 4>income or they'll give you maybe sixty four already treatment

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 4>if it's index options. Here the coupon that we're delivering,

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 4>about eighty to ninety percent of it will be treated.

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Our expectation is that it'll be return of capital, so

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 4>that will be tax deferred until you sell, and then

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 4>if you held for a year, it'll be long term

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 4>capital gains.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 3>So his ten thousand spits out this income for the

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 3>duration and then you give up whatever the market gains.

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But you're going to get your principle back.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 4>That's correct.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 3>And at what percentage of the time do you get

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 3>your principle back when you did this.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 4>If you look historically, it would have been ninety seven

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 4>point two percent of the time for our our US

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 4>large cat version. We're launching a NASDAK version that historically

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 4>had never breached principle. Yeah, so I know, I know

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 4>what you're saying. It sounds too good to be true.

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 4>So the piece that we have not unlocked yet now

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 4>that we know understand auto calls is the reference index.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 4>So if you just tied this to the S and

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred, you would get a low coupon. You'd

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 4>get maybe seven eight percent something like that, a little

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 4>bit over risk free. If you're familiar with covered call strategies,

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 4>the income that you collect changes with market parameters, it

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 4>changes with volatility, interest rates, dividends. So what we have

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 4>done is we've built an equity index that has been

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 4>customized for auto callables. So it's an S and P

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 4>five hundred base and it has a high volatility target.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 4>It's a stable vault target of thirty five percent, so

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 4>that every week when we write a new auto callable

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 4>inside that index, the volatility is the same. So that's

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 4>how I can come here confidently and say you're going

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 4>to get a high stable income because we've stabilized the

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 4>parameter inside that options pricing model. I know we're getting

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 4>really deep. But then when you compile all that together,

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 4>the VALL of the strategy historically has been around eighteen percent.

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But what happens in those moments where the volatility spikes.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 4>Then your VALL will come down in the VALL target.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned twenty twenty, so I put that on

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 4>pause for a reason. So in twenty twenty, what was

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 4>equity market volatility sixty seventy percent, So you're at thirty five.

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 4>So in that environment you're defending the barrier. Not only

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 4>do you now have a forty percent barrier, but it's

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 4>even more powerful because your VALL is at thirty five

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 4>while the SMP is at seventy.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 2>But in twenty twenty.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Only that was like when Eric's quite it that long,

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 3>He's like, it's like next level, We've done it.

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 4>We have never made Eric Roy too like.

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 2>A physics conversation you can have in like our podcast.

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>This is.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're about to get into black holes and

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 2>like dark matters.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, black shoals, not black holes.

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 2>But in twenty twenty, you still got your thing. You

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 2>still got the there was no call. It didn't get called.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Over the last ten years, you would have gotten every

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 4>single coupon and you never would have breached barrier.

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is something When you go talk

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 2>to advisors and people about this, it sounds like you're

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna get interest. But I'm assuming they put like two

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>percent to.

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Three percent of the portfolio.

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't go too crazy and where do you put it?

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 2>What do you ad this?

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 4>This has equity market like volatility. So think of fifty

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 4>two auto callables like rubber bands that will trade at par.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 4>And as the market goes down, the rubber bands will

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 4>start to stretch. You'll trade at a discount to par.

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 4>And as long as they don't break, then you're going

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 4>to snap back to par. Those rubber bands will go

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.719
<v Speaker 4>back to par. So we want to make sure that

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 4>people are comfortable with equity market like volatility. If you're

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 4>comfortable with that, you can exchange it for a high, stable,

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 4>tax efficient coupon.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 2>So if the markets go down, say twenty percent, and

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing a discount in these, there's a certain kind

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>of trader who may think that's the braid yeah, Versus

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>in the flip side, if the market keeps going up,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 2>a trader may be like, you know what, let me

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 2>not buy that right now because it's looking a little pricey.

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean we have so let me.

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Ask you this. Are these used mostly by buy and

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 2>hold with a little traders if it gets into a discount,

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 2>like what's the buy and hold trader ratio here for

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 2>something like this?

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 4>It's both early adopters. There's more than ten thousand shareholders

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 4>in KAI right now. Let's what we're calling ci E KAI.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 4>A lot of them are financial advisors who use auto

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 4>callable notes. They said, we've been using these for decades.

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 4>We get called away after you know, six months to

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 4>a year, we have to go buy a new note

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 4>of all changes on us. The parameters are different, might

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 4>not be able to get the same terms. I've got

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 4>a hundred of these things on the books, one for

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 4>every different client. I can't keep it all straight. One

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 4>advisor that we were talking to said, I go to

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 4>New York every quarter, meet with the banks, find good

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, good products. He said, I'm canceling my flights

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 4>to New York. I've got this. This ETF gives me

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 4>what I'm looking for. It's an evergreen solution. I'm going

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 4>to play golf and this makes things easy for me.

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Where does he live?

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 4>He's out West.

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's it. That's a long flight. Yeah, well this

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 2>is the this is what ETFs do, drool. They take complicated, messy,

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 2>institutional type stuff and they just make it simple, fast,

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 2>good cheap.

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so fast, good cheap. How do you what color

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of uh light do you give this?

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 4>We have what we do.

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe if we.

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 2>Could dress this one yet, I think, hold on, hold on,

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 2>what do you give?

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 4>What do you give? Covered? Call ETFs? What light do

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 4>they get?

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 2>I gotta look. I believe they're green. They might get

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 2>dinged once for using derivatives. Okay, so maybe you'd be

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 2>the same green, but one little note for like the

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.479
<v Speaker 2>fact that it uses derivatives. But I guess that's it.

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's no leverage thet there's no rolling of commodities,

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 2>and there's no hidden fees. Correct, those would be the

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>things we ding them. But I'd have to look deeper.

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 2>But I would to me, these feel you know, between

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 2>PG and PG thirteen somewhere.

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 3>So the risk really is I'm not going to get

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 3>my principal back if there's some you know, real big downturn,

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 3>or I'm going to give up some upside.

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, your risk is largely to the other side.

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I.

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Don't get like, if I'm in the VU, right, I'm

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 2>a SAP five hundred, and I get Oh, I know

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>why you don't get the return of the index.

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You just get the Yeah. Yeah, the principle just comes back. Yeah.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 2>So in the end, VU could be up twenty percent

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>that would outperform this. This is more like just getting

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 2>a little income based on VU not going down a

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>super amount, which I feel like is a sort of

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the words. This would be kind of a little less

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 2>risky than VU in a way.

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 4>At times it could be forget volatility. Yeah, if you're

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 4>looking for income, yeah, or if you don't think the

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 4>market's going up fourteen and a half percent next year,

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 4>then this would be a way to essentially lock that

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 4>in as long as you're not going to fall by

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:07.719
<v Speaker 4>that barrier.

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So maybe instead of buying a.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Rental property real estate property like this, this is in

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 3>that category if you're thinking about it from like what

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 3>a financial advisor would tell a client.

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's an interesting here.

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 2>It is. It's a rental property in Florida. But you've

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 2>got to pray there's nothing once everything in your hurricane.

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what it is.

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 4>It is your God kind of like that. Yeah, so

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 4>let's pretend like you are the insurer and you are

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 4>collecting premiums from people all over the country.

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>It was way more fun when we were doing it

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a way.

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm an insured I think we nailed it, and that's

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you're can improve on it though.

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 4>No, I say, if you're an insurer, you're collecting premiums,

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe there's a storm in Florida, but everyone else is

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 4>still paying you.

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but aren't you doing these fifty or so all

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 2>are on equity indexes, right, I mean one of them.

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Insures got out of not but there's fifty starting in

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 5>the starting You're right, I say, Oh, I say, okay,

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 5>so it's like all over the country, but there's one

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 5>hurricane in Miami.

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Correct. You're diversified by time instead of geography.

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot of work. Yeah, Like do you have

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 2>like associates that like do all this like keep up

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Kai take like an army of people like putting these

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.959
<v Speaker 2>new notes on like just seems like a lot of effort.

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 4>The beauty of KAI is that it's all swap based.

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 4>So we built everything.

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan is the rest. It's all in them.

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, we built everything inside that Mercube index. And so Mercube, Yeah.

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like like matrix or something that sounds like

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 2>what's that sounds too much? Merkcube? Who is that somebody's

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 2>last name?

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 4>Mercube is an indexing provider that was ok yeah, founded

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 4>by the former head of custom indexing at S.

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 2>And P the Mercube theory.

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you're not alone anymore?

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 3>You got Kai was out there first. Yeah, you got

0:30:57.760 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 3>some competition. What does the competition look like?

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Can I backup for thirty seconds? And we're going to

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 4>spend a while on this. So on the ETF side,

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 4>the last point here, because we did this index based

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 4>it trades extremely tight. We don't have to post Greeks

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 4>to the website. There's not a lot of active management here.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 4>So we take this index by Greeks.

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Ajoul, he doesn't mean Athnosios. He means

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 2>like formulas like Vega, Gamma, Kalamos. He's picturing Athnosios and

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 2>John Stamos on your website and.

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 4>That's not true, that's right. Not yet. We do have

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Yanis though. Yeah, yeah, so where was I We take

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 4>that index, We give that price almost like an intra

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 4>day nave to the market makers, so they are very

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 4>tight to that index level. JP Morgan is trading swap

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 4>on the index. It is trading at one to three

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 4>cents wide every day, and that's largely because of that index.

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 4>So it's extremely operationally light.

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, now my question, yes, oh yes, you were first.

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Now there's some competition. Yes, how do you feel about

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the competition?

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 4>I think it's great. Competition is good for the market.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 4>It's going to grow. We're not going to raise you know,

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 4>one hundred billion dollars all by ourselves. I hope we do,

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 4>but I know it's going to be because a rising

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.239
<v Speaker 4>tide is lifting all boats. If there's an encouragement, I

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 4>hope that it's done correctly. The covered call space took

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 4>fifteen twenty years to grow and then become more risky.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 4>You've got weekly daily single stock. My fear is the

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 4>auto call space does that too fast, and you go

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 4>into this risky stuff and then people get hurt and

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 4>they get burned, and like I thought, I had a barrier,

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 4>I was tied to a single stock. It went down fast.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 4>That's what we don't want.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, because somebody filed for single stock auto call

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah you too. I see so that well, let's go

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I know you don't do those, but like let's say

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 2>you're doing Navidia. Let's say you did Navidia single stock

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 2>auto call Well, what would.

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The barrier be?

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 4>You think, Well, the volatility would be you know, fairly

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 4>high higher, but it comes at it.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Could the barrier be sixty?

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 4>It depends. You know, you can pull those levers and

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 4>change your coupon.

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 2>So what you're worried about is somebody going for the

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>jacked up yield with a lower barrier and people being

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 2>like not understanding the auto callable. Correct, yeah, and then

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 2>it changed the whole camera and you know the industry

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 2>is going to do this and you and they like

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 2>to push the envelope.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh for sure, for sure and you and we've seen

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 4>this in Korea. We've seen this in other markets where

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 4>folks these are big. In South Korea, I extremely they

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 4>love risk, they love risk.

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Going theo is it's a gen per capita in South

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Korea is like off the charts.

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 3>The the Calamost strategy is we're just going to go

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 3>to indexes S and P five hundred.

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's build an index that is customized for auto

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 4>callables to give you the best chance of getting a high, stable,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 4>tax efficient coupon.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 2>By the way, has have you talked to Bruce Bond regularly?

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 4>I have you talked to him in about this strategy?

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he's an eye in this. I don't know,

0:33:57.640 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like this is Bruce bondish.

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's funny. You know Innovator brought out were First Trust.

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I feel like they might just.

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Like, so we all filed around the same time. Okay,

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Innovator brought out some single stock products. I don't know

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 4>how well those that have done, like you do the

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 4>research on that, and then the other competitors have not

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 4>come to market yet. There's about four or five in

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 4>the market. So you know why you probably feel that way.

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Is because you guys all live in the same town

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 2>and what and Illinois?

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Wow, this is true?

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Like by the way, in Wheaton, like where he lives,

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 2>he has like a cul de sac. His next door

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 2>neighbor is Innovator and this other nextraor neighbor is First

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 2>Trust and all their kids are friends. But they hate

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:34.399
<v Speaker 2>each other at work?

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that true?

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Something like that hate each other?

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, but just confront of me, are you

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 3>on the same kids baseball teams.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 4>It is a small town, and well, we have seven kids,

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 4>so there's a good chance that we're on everybody's baseball team.

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, you have seven kids. We do? Wow? Yeah,

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we do.

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, that's going. Wow, that must be you're wow.

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 2>You look pretty good for seven kids.

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't sit down. You just got to keep keep

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:56.479
<v Speaker 4>on going.

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's your exercise, I guess. But I think the

0:34:58.960 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 2>reason amazing.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 4>I think the reason you are thinking that way is,

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, the buffers at the time replicated the largest

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 4>structured note market, and in a zero rate environment, buffers

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 4>were the king. When rates rose to five percent, what

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 4>are people doing. They're buying fixed indexinuities. They're buying capital

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 4>protected notes. So that was what we brought at Calamos,

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent protected products. I helped Bruce build innovator

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 4>when I was at Milliman. I was there for twelve years.

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 4>So what are people doing now? They won income? You know,

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 4>rates are coming back down, they're chasing that, you know,

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 4>high stable income. The forty year run in bonds is over.

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 4>You cannot get ballast and income from bonds anymore, and

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 4>so they're parsing it out and so the auto call

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 4>space was always the golden goose. We happened to win

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 4>the race this time.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, he Matt comes from that world. This is

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 2>organic to because I've known him for quite a while

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:56.280
<v Speaker 2>and his work on the early days of the target outcome,

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>having worked in an options industry. But what you will

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 2>find is a lot of the issuers who don't normally

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 2>do this are going to get involved. That's just the

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 2>way it goes, but it is I also think ETFs

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 2>everybody who's seen the Big Short and then Mayor Michael

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Burry going over to Goldman and JP Morgan and being like,

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to make this specific bet against the housing market,

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and at first JP More they're like laughing at them.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 2>They're like, no problem. That idea of a swap contract

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 2>with a bank. People don't realize, like the levere ETFs,

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 2>like so many ETFs are basically just democratizing what you

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 2>saw in the Big Short, and that's kind of cool

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 2>as long as it's done responsibly. Obviously, some of the

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 2>leverage that are they're trying to file his five X

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 2>where you're gonna get like irresponsible. But for the most part,

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 2>you know those two guys who are waiting the lobby

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 2>of JP Morgan in the beginning that this is what Matt.

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Matt has access to those desks that those guys were

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to get access to. These are just customized contracts

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 2>with a big bank. It's almost like a high roller

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 2>to casino. Who can get a special table.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'm at that special table just watching it happen.

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 2>I know now you now you can just get the

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 2>for twenty five dollars that can be Let me ask

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 2>you this, you have seven kids, you have other film members.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Would you feel safe putting your own family in here?

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Is this more for a sophisticated investor?

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 4>No, I would what we've done here, you know, going

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 4>all the way back to the beginning, if you tie

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 4>all of your money or tie your money to a

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 4>single auto callable, you have single point coupon risk, single

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 4>point maturity risk where you can lose forty percent or

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 4>more of your money when you ladder that out fifty

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 4>two or more times and do it weekly. Now you've

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 4>got an opportunity to diversify out that risk. You've got a

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 4>product that looks a lot like the equity markets, but

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 4>delivers that high stable coupon, So you know, I own

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 4>this in my account, you know, not to create suitability.

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 4>My parents, you know, are doing similar. They own a

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 4>lot of buffers. They own this for income. When you

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 4>can tie your money to the equity markets, now you

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 4>can keep pace with inflation. You can do remarkably better

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 4>than your fixed income, which would be inversely correlated to inflation.

0:37:58.440 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 4>So there's a lot of ways to think about it.

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Best time we talked about this space, boomer candy was

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:04.439
<v Speaker 3>the phrase that came out of your mouth.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Is this boomer candy?

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think so, because it's a way

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to participate boomer's love income. But then again, sort of

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 2>the gen z ers too, So I would say the

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 2>only thing that doesn't make this boomer candy is that

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 2>there isn't a protection element. I mean, you're betting the

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 2>market won't get on forty percent, and that actual income

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 2>can be a buffer if it does go down. But

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, I don't know. It might be like half

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 2>boomer candy. I consider boomer candy something that helps you

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 2>sleep at night and cures anxiety.

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>This is angiin boom boomer candy.

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, or I don't know, it's just it's ancillary, but

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I could see this appealing, especially we like guy from

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Texas who's a YouTube star. I could see the other

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 2>younger investors actually getting into this because it does have

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's a pretty big yield. I mean, that's

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 2>going to excite some people. Although some of the yield

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 2>max field like eighty to one hundred percent. But with those,

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 2>you're giving up so much much total return.

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 4>What makes me nervous with those? Well, so you, if

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 4>I remember correctly, you came up with the boomer candy

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 4>term after we launched the one hundred percent protected ETFs.

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it was that I camera when I camp

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 2>with it, but it was that it was the buffers

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 2>combined with the cover calls. Yes, those are both. I

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 4>They just feel it as a specific protection amount. Yes,

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 4>here you're taking diet market correct. Here you're taking on

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 4>tail risks. So there's a chance some of those coupons.

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 2>That's why it's a little.

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Bit I would agree with you. You got to be

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 4>comfortable with equity market like volatility, the single stock covered

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 4>call ETFs as a risk manager, you know, coming from

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 4>an actuarial consulting firm, not something we would build Calamos. As

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 4>a forty five year old risk manager, we would not

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 4>build those. But the yield that those are stating is

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 4>not a yield that you will likely get.

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:52.319
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 4>It's if it's a daily by ride or a weekly

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 4>by right, they'll take that number that they've collected and

0:39:57.760 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 4>they'll annualize it. So if it's a daily buy right

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 4>and the market's volatile, I'm going to get a good

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 4>coupon today and now times that by two hundred and

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 4>fifty two trading days, and it looks like this massive number.

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 4>The odds of you actually achieving that are next to zero.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, Matt, I have one final question for you,

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 3>which is what is your favorite ETF ticker other than

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 3>any of your own.

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's a good question. A Power Shares product. I

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 4>don't work there anymore. We launched food and Beverage ETF. Eric,

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 4>do you remember the ticker PBJ.

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Here you go, Yes, that is a good one. Yeah,

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 2>no one's ever picked it.

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 3>And it really PBJ protein beverage, I know, healthy fads.

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, nice kicker, that's a good one PBJ.

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Koffman, thanks so much for joining us on trillions.

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me.

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to Trillions until next time. You can

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 3>find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you'd like to listen. We'd love to hear

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:03.919
<v Speaker 3>from you. Hit us up on social I'm at Joel

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 3>Weber Show, He's at Eric Balcino's. Trillions is produced by

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Magnus Hendrickson. Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcast