WEBVTT - Silicon Valley's Toxic Bro Culture

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Brian, Hi Katie, Well, I think it's safe to

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.239
<v Speaker 1>say that we've never seen a year like the one

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we've witnessed over the last what six to nine months

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of women's empowerment in this country. I've been

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>working for a long time, and I remember so many

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>instances when we declared it the Year of the Woman,

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>or when we thought everything was going to change, and

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of course nothing really did. And now there's some serious

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>soul searching going on about Hollywood, about Silicon Valley, and

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about every business in between. And Katie, you know what

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>really staggered me to watch your hour on nat Gio.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we've promoted your hour on nat Gio enough? Anyway?

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>The effect of sexism in Silicon Valley and Hollywood isn't

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just in those industries. It's on all of us who

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are consumers of those industry. For example, there's research that

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>you brought out that the more hours of TV a

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>girl watches, the fewer options she believes she has, and

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the more hours of TV a boy watches, the more

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>sexist he actually becomes. And so this is a contagion.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not just a problem relegated to these industries. Absolutely,

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we asked folks to share their experiences with gender bias

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and discrimination at work. People like Dr mommy Kay that's

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>her display name on Twitter wrote in medicine, it is

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>very common to be seen as a nurse if a

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>female physician doesn't put on her white coat, and even

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>then it's not presumed. But most men in scrubs are doctors.

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So many inequities in medicine. Hashtag too much to tweet That,

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of course is true. You know, there's that old riddle

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that I used to hear as a kid, and it

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>goes along these lines of father and his son are

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in a car accident. The doctor comes in and exclaim animes,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't operate on this child. Why not, the nurse asked,

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.559
<v Speaker 1>because he's my son. The doctor responds, how is this possible?

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And of course, still in two thousand eighteen, people are

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>left scratching their heads. Okay, everyone, how is it possible?

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>The doctor is the mother? Hello, everybody, the doctor is

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a woman. But it just shows how deeply ingrained these

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>gender biases are in US even today. Yeah, I have

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.399
<v Speaker 1>to admit it took me a few seconds to get that, so,

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, shame on me. Katie. Also on Twitter, someone

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>named Kristin Malloy wrote, I was the only female in

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>management in twenty two local locations of a restaurant was

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 1>told I wasn't bubbly enough to be GM. Pretty sure

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>bubbly was not a qualification for all the males, and

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I've never been criticized for my lack of bubblinus,

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think I'm particularly bubbly, and I'm nothing.

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Men are ever called perky either, Brian, Just to pick

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a random example, Yeah, exactly. We also got a male

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>perspective from Joe and Can Dada, who works in healthcare.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>He emailed us saying he feels he's held to a

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 1>different standard of behavior than his female colleagues. He writes,

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I cannot and would not make comments about a particularly

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>attractive nurse or visitor, But when, for instance, the firefighters

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have to come in the building, the women go wild

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and make all sorts of sexual comments. I hear the

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>same comments from them about attractive doctors. I feel like

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>if I said half of what came out of their

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>amounts at a nurse's desk, at best, I would be

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>looked at like a pervert. At worst, I would lose

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>my career. I mean, I think that's actually a very

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting and somewhat valid point. There is a bit of

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a double standard that I think women need to be

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>aware of when they're hyper sexualizing men in the office

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or making sort of loot or sexual comments. Um, what's

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>good for the goose should be good for the gander.

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>What are your views on this, Brian, Um, I agree

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>with that. That said, the overwhelming problem here is a

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lack of opportunity for women in the workplace and a

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>lack of flexibility for women who are still the primary parents. Um.

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, I think this is true, but

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to me, this doesn't seem like the brunt of the problem. Now,

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree, but it's something just to be cognizant of,

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think. But all I have to say is go

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Rustle and Karen Goldsmith. You have officially raised a feminist here.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>But it's true. I think we're talking about opportunities. Obviously

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is about behavior in the tone set,

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but how do these translate into doors closing or opening

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>for everyone, not just for women, but for more diversity.

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think I hope that things are changing. In

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>today's show, we're delving into gender inequality and bias, specifically

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in the tech industry. Of course, Silicon Valleys generated headlines

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>about sexual harassment and pay in equity for some time.

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Our guest today is journalist Emily Chang. She's one of

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the most respected interviewers in the tech industry, and she's

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>out with a new book called ro Topia, which is

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>all about the boys club culture of Silicon Valley. We

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>talked with Emily about the dam stats when it comes

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to diversity and inclusion in tech, the Czech glitterati she

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>interviewed for her book, and the shocking sex parties attended

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>by Silicon Valley big wigs, which really, honestly sound like

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>such a throwback to Mad Men days. I mean, I

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to grab a bottle up Purel while she

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>was even talking about these things. Yeah, I felt pretty gross.

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And folks, if you don't tune in about wild Silicon

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Valley sex parties, don't you what we can do? Anyway.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Today's conversation is actually an extension of an episode of

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Katie's nat GEO doc series called The Revolt, where she

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>looked into gender inequality, or as some might call it,

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the hostile male culture in both Hollywood and Silicon Valley.

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So you kick things off, Katie by asking, are we

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>paying too much attention to these two arenas tech and entertainment. Certainly,

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>sexism and sexual harassment exists everywhere, It's in every industry,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know, these are the industries where women have

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>been the loudest, and Hollywood much more so than Silicon Valley.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But I sort of like to think of the me

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>too movements starting in Silicon Valley with Ellen Powe, you know,

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>five six years ago when she sued her venture capital firm,

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Kleiner perkins Um, and she lost in court, but over time,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>she's sort of won in the court of public opinion.

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if she had filed her suit today,

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>would the outcome have been different? And I actually I

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>asked her this question, and she said, you know, there's

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>no way to answer that question. But I almost think

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't be here if I hadn't done it when

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I did, and she helped open the doors for so

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>many others. I did her first interview. I was just

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>over and it was fascinating to me because so much

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of it was sort of intangible things that Ellen experienced

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>when she was working at Kleiner Perkins for example, really

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>being excluded being marge a lies, not being part of

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the quote unquote boys club, not getting to go on

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>ski weekends or golf outings, and things like that. You

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>also talked to her boss for your book. What was

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>his take, because I did not get the opportunity to

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>do that, right. I spoke with John Doer, who hired

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>her and was in his view her champion um and

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>really gave her an opportunity when some of the other

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>partners didn't want her to have that opportunity. And you

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>know what's interesting is Kleiner Perkins was actually kind of

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>at the forefront in venture capital when it came to

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>hiring women. There are so many firms who still don't

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have any women, and he made a concerted effort to

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>bring women into the fold. What they did wrong is

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't make the environment inclusive enough for them, and

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they didn't create a place where women could really thrive

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and and really succeed. And so it was kind of

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a case of where good intentions aren't enough, you know,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and good intentions aren't enough, and Ellen experienced so many

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of those things that are just so much more difficult

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to pinpoint and call out, you know, it's a lot

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>easier to talk about these egregious forms of sexual harassment,

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and I agree that that is a huge problem. But

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually think the bigger problem is, you know, the

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>systemic forces that are really working against all women that

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are so hard to describe and also hard to fix,

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>which is why you know it was worth writing a

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>three page book about Emily. You wrote that Silicon Valley

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>has become increasingly toxic for women. Do you think the

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>problem is actually getting worse and not better? M um?

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, in some ways I think it is getting worse,

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and in some ways I think it's getting better. Um.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And by getting worse, I mean the fact that we

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>just haven't seen movement for so so long has led

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>so many people to believe, you know, this is just

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>how it is, or it's not my problem. This is

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a pipeline problem. This has to do with how many

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>women are studying computer science or how many resumes I

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>get in my inbox. And you know what, that's an excuse.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I argue in my book that the tech

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>industry created the pipeline problem by having such a narrow

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>idea of who could do this job. And you know,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>they were doing these personality tests and these aptitude tests

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties and seventies to find good engineers, and

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they decided that good engineers quote don't like people. Well, um,

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence to support this idea that people who

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like people are better at this job than people

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>people do. People who don't like people have a little

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of a tradition, Emily of Katie singing in every episode.

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, so I don't really want to get into

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we can have like a sing off Emily. Anyway, this

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is a stereotic. This is a stereotype that shuts out

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>more than half the population. And you know, there's a

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>great argument to be made that we need people who

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>do like people and care about people who understand the

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>users whose problems they are trying to solve to be

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>doing this job. And so, in my i view, the

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>tech industry created the pipeline problem, but also is reinforcing

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that problem today by you know, it's not just about hiring,

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it's about retention, it's about progression. It's about making sure

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the women that are already working in this industry want

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to stay, because women do leave tech at twice the

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>rate as men. And it's not because what we would

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think maybe issues with work life balance. It's actually because

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of toxic cultures. And why is the culture so toxic?

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you hit on some of it in the book.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of these crazy parties that people have. Is it

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>because it feels so uncharted in a way innovative, and

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>so they feel they have to be risk takers, not

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>only in business but in every aspect of their lives.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>So there's this idea that Silicon Valley and everyone there

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is changing the world and making the world a better place,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and so much wealth and power has been amassed in

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 1>such a short span of time that it has unfortunately

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>led to a sense of entitlement and quite frankly arrogance

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and this sort of unwillingness to admit that they're part

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. Um and I think that that has

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>honestly gone on too long. And you do have a

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who are very young. We've made a

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of money very fast, and it comes without the

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>same sort of socialization that would happen over a longer career,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and not a lot of emotional intelligence. If they're hiring

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>people based on sort of the fact that their nerds,

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>they don't like people, they're super analytical, it would only

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>make sense that those people are not necessarily really great

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>at interpersonal skills or emotional intelligence, reading a room, understanding

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>how their behavior affects others. Right, And if you were

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>stuffed in your locker as a kid, it can be

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to admit that you're discriminating against someone today. And

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>it's not just about having one kind of intelligence or

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>having people who don't like people who want to be

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>alone coding in a room. You need all kinds of people. Well,

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you do need that emotional intelligence because billions and billions

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of people are using these products. And by the way,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>half of them are women. And so you know, this

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>isn't just Silicon Valley's problem. This isn't just a problem

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for people who want to work in tech. This is

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>everybody's problem. This is my problem, your problem, this is

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>our children's problem. I mean, these are products that are

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>changing our lives every day. This is an industry that

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is inventing the future. In fact, let's talk about artificial intelligence.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things that Kara Swisher said,

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and she was featured in my hour on this is

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that the people who are programming the content for the

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>future and what's going to be on our screens, Like

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>nine of the people in artificial intelligence are men. Can

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you explain in Layman's terms how that influences how that

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>gender bias plays into content creation online and really in

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>product creation as well. So AI and machine learning, these

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>things aren't biased. Algorithms are the products of the people

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 1>who created them and the people who use them and

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the people who use that. Right, because isn't often it

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's called from a set of information that is pulled

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>from how frequently people use information. Does that make in

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a way it's crowdsourced, right, But if it's better for

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>certain people, then it is for others. That's also crowdsourced.

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And so I think about face i D facial recognition technology,

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>which is the way that you get into your iPhone. Well,

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition technology is already sexist and racist and doesn't

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>recognize women and people of color as easily as it

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>does white men, in part because you have mostly men

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>who are designing these who are not aware of their biases.

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the problems. So they're not actually it's not,

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not. They're not compensating for the implicit bias that

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they might have in creating this equipment. For example, Siri

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't recognize women's voices as much as men, and that's

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>not accidental. It's a perfect example. Maybe it is talking

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>about Well, that's the thing is. I don't think it

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is malicious, but at a certain point, ignorance can only

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>be willful. And we know that diverse teams create better products.

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>We know that, you know, having a women on your

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>team when you're building voice assistance and facial recognition technology

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of good sense. So at a certain point,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're not doing that, if you're not building teams

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that have people from a variety of backgrounds, then maybe

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it does become intentional and you can't say this is

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not my problem. I didn't create this problem. You have

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a responsibility if you're creating these products that are used

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>by billions and billions of people, to make sure that

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they can actually serve billions and billions of people. You know,

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is you know equally as male dominated as Apple,

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and women drive sevent of consumer purchases. Don't they want

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to reflect their customer base? Um, you know this is

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>about not just equality, and I think equality is important.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It's about com it's about commerce, it's the smart thing

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to do and not just the right thing to do.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, they're not reflecting that customer base

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at all. Today. Here's some of the stats from Katie's

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>show to really back that up. Of board seats at

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the Unicorn companies, the companies valued at more than a

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars are men. Sixty percent of Unicorns have no

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>women board members at all, and of course goes without

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>saying most of the executive leadership positions are held by men.

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't necessarily know this because the media focuses on,

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, two or three very prominent women in the valley,

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but the vast majority are men and white men. And

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Katie had struck me when Karas Swisher said to you

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in Your Hour, the tech companies think they're meritocracies, but

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they're more like mirror autocracies. They reflect the people who

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>are making hires are the people who have already been

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>successful in the valley, and so Emily, how do you

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>think that can change? Well, first of all, I think

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we need to acknowledge that a true meritocracy is impossible

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to achieve. And I love Kara's term mirror autocracy because

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it's so perfectly encapsulates this idea that we are people

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>who look like us. Um. You know, the reality is

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that we all come to the plate with different kinds

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of privileges and access, and the escalator of life is

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>moving far faster for some than it is for others.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, when you believe that you are operating

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in a meritocracy, you can actually be more anti meritocratic.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>And s already use that kind of jargon, but that's

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the best way to put it. Well, actually,

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a study that shows people who believe they work

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in a meritocracy or the least meritocratic of all because

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they're not. They don't acknowledge their biases. And everybody, what

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is the avenue queue. Everyone's a little bit racist. I mean,

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody has these biases and if you're not cognizant of them,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>then you can't compensate for them. And by the way,

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a fun fact about meritocracy, um it actually originated in

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the Han dynasty, but the actual word meritocracy was coined

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>by a British sociologist named Michael Young in the nineteen

0:16:55.840 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>fifties to warn about a future in which people use

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>their success to justify their success essentially, and so um,

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the success in the education of the winners comes becomes

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of reason to dismiss the forces that are

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>working against everyone else. And fifty years later he actually

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>wrote an op ed in The Guardian and said, I've

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>been very disturbed by this use of the word meritocracy.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Um that I meant as a warning, when in fact

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been It's been used to propagate the very problems

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that I was so very worried about. So how do

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you improve the numbers? Is it a leadership issue? Is

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that the problem? I mean, I can't believe that sixty

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of unicorns have zero women on their boards.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>That is outrageous, including air B and B and we

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>work it is it is outrageous. We should be protesting

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the streets about this, to be honest, or not

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>using their products. Um. Look, you know, I do think

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>leadership is incredibly important. And I like to point to

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the example of Slack, where you've got a white male

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO who's had sort of every door opened for him

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that you could possibly imagine, and he recognizes that. You know,

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't use words like meritocracy, but he has made

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>hiring and promoting women and underrepresented minorities a top priority.

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just you know, something he said at

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, it's something he talks about all the time,

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>lip service. It's not like we have a diversity task

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>force and everybody knows this is something he cares about.

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 1>So they have diversified their recruiting teams, they're sourcing from

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>underrepresented schools, they're going to new regions. They've you know,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>standardized their interview questions, they standardized their feedback and review systems.

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, they're beating the pipeline. So they

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>just came out with new numbers. Forty four percent of

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>workers at Slack are women and they started with a

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>company of like fifty men, and so they were starting

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>at at a disadvantage. Um forty eight percent of managers

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are women, thirty some percent. Uh, women count for thirty

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>percent of technical worlds, and so you know, they have

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>proven that you can do this if you commit to it.

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's really that commitment that is so important.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And so many of these companies, you know, and it's

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, not only they're not only mostly many of

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>them young founders, but it's just it's not a priority,

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's about growth. It's about raising that next round, it's

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>about getting that next product launch. It's rushing to fill

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the seats that are empty. And you know, one of

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the things that I like to preach is having a

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>little patients and taking a little bit more time to

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>find someone who believes in your mission but doesn't necessarily

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>look like you, because it's about diversity of thought and

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>diversity of experience, and we all bring different experiences to

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the table, and sometimes that is a result of what

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>we look like and how we have um lived in

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this world. And if you don't have a diverse team

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, it gets so much harder as you

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>get bigger. But you will have blind spots, you will

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>make mistakes, you will miss things. And if you take

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the time to be more thoughtful about how you're building

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the team in the beginning, you will be able to

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>move so much faster a few years from then when

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you have that diverse team in place, it's time to

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. We're going to be right back

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>with Emily Chang, and now back to our conversation with

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>journalist Emily Chang, author of pro Topia. So, Emily, you've

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of attention when the first excerpt for

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>bro Topia was released in Vanity Fair. You wrote about

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>wild monthly sex parties attended by the tech elite. The

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>subhead of the piece was the guys got laid, but

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the women get screwed, which I thought was clever and

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>also a bit depressing. And can you explain these parties?

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>How important are they and what the effect is for

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>women in tech? So, for of all, one of the

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting things about Silicon Valley that may set it apart

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>from some other industries is that work bleeds into life.

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, life is work and that's just the way

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>things go. Um. And so you know, if you're working

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>at one of these companies, you're going out for drinks

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>after work, maybe for drinks in the middle of the day. Um.

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's this implicit pressure to be one

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 1>of the cool kids. And you know, there is a

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>subset of people in Silicon Valley who believes they're not

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just changing the world when it comes to the products

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're building. They're challenging social morais and challenging traditional morality,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>challenging monogamy and that's all great. The Bay Area has

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>been um, you know, this this this hotbed of sexual

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>exploration and liberation for so so long. But if you

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>look at actually how some of this socializing happens, and

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I am quite descriptive about some of these

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>parties where you have powerful men inviting women two to

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>one so that the odds are in their favor. It's

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>not challenging traditional morals at all. In fact, it's a

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>tale as old as time. You know, these women who

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>participate are discredited and disrespected, when for the men it's

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>like a networking opportunity, even though they're not trying to

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>do business. Business gets done. And so women sort of

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like they're damned if they do and damned if

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't. And for some people, this lifestyle was ever

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>present and they felt like they could not escape it.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>And especially um some women entrepreneurs that I spoke with,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, they had to leave Slicon Valley moved to

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>New York to get away from Not to all, not

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to be too purient, but tell us about these parties

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>and and who are these women? Would they hire prostitutes?

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Would they bring in women from the office? I mean,

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>set the scene for us if you could. It sounds

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like Plato's retreat or something. It's a range of of women.

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes they are women who work in the

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>industry and entrepreneurs, and sometimes they'll bring in UM women

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>for from l A or or women who they've met

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>via adjacent industries UM in San Francisco, UM. And the

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>idea is that these are women who can hang and

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>want to party UM, and you know, some of them

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>are also just exploring their sexuality. UM. The problem is

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that you know, they're not sort of afforded the same

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 1>freedom to explore that sexuality as the men are. And

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>for men it's cool, and for women, you know, it

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of doesn't get them anywhere. In fact, they end

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>up moving backwards. And so I spoke to one woman,

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, who was part of a co founding team

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with with another woman, and and one of the women

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.239
<v Speaker 1>got very involved in these parties and the other just

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't want a part of it, but wanted to try

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 1>to get access to some of the men who were

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>part of the scene, and they essentially got shut out.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Whereas all of these men we're obviously doing business together,

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>any names that we would recognize that part took in

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>these kind of activities. So, you know, the chapter is

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>very largely anonymous sources for obvious reasons. You know, I

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>do talk about one party that was hosted at the

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>home of Steve Jervidson, who's a very prominent venture capitalist,

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and it was actually the official after party of the

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>d f J Big Think Conference, so the official after

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>party for his VC firm. Um, and I never said

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this was a sex party. But later in the evening

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there was some behavior that made people uncomfortable. Um. There

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>was cuddle puddling, and there were drugs, and there was um,

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>well it's sort of like do you know, Brian lying

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>together in a pretty boring life. It's sort of you know,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>lying together, uh, in a group on the floor, on

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the couch or overlapping from the couch onto the floor.

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>And um, there's some heavy petting involved, and it can

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>be a very as I understand it, you know, an

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>emotional and connective experience. Um, but it's not necessarily something

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to do at a company party. And the

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>point is this was aut of a company party, and DFJ,

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the venture capital firm, apologized right away and said we

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>are so sorry if anyone was made to feel uncomfortable.

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>This is not behavior that we support. But the fact

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is I met they didn't support getting caught, but it

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>was clearly behavior they supported because they were doing it.

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Um, when people apologize, I do like to

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>think that there is some meaning there and and and

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they didn't expect the party would take

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that term. Maybe some people at the firm didn't expect

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the party to take that that turn, but it did.

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this venture capitalist and question no longer

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>works at the firm. So um on there. You know,

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I have been told that there has been a bit

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of a pause in some circles, that people are asking

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>about this in board rooms. Is this happening at our company?

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Do you know? Um? Do we need to discuss this?

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 1>And so? Um what my hope is that is that

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>if this behavior is could you need to happen, that

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>it happens more thoughtfully, um, and that work boundaries and

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>professional boundaries aren't getting crossed. Let's talk about this lunch

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>spot sometimes called Conference Room G. Can you describe that place?

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Conference Room G is a nickname that was given by

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Yelp employees to the local strip club, which is actually

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>called the Gold Club in Soma, the tech heavy part

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of San Francisco where a lot of the startups are

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>right next to the Moscony Center where you've got all

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the big tech conferences. And I went in with one

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of my female colleagues am on a Friday, and there

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>was a line out the door for lunch in the

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>middle of the day. And you walk in and you

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>knows your typical strip club, except you know, the clientele

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>are you know, the vast majority of these people are

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly tech workers. And you know, they've got their oodies

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>or their T shirts. And there's an all you canet buffet.

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 1>It's actually the cheapest lunch in San Francisco. Mean, it's

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>five dollars for so much food. UM. So I'm sure

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that is some part of the attraction. I'm sure they

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>could go to a Bob's Big Boy if they wanted,

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and all you could eat the fat. But you know,

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>really it's the you know, it's it's the topless entertainment

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and um, and women go there and men go there.

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I saw very few women. I saw very few women. Um.

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, right away, we you know, we started talking

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to one of the women who worked there, and you know,

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I confessed right away, like I'm a reporter, um, doing

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some research. Can you tell me a little bit about

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this place, and she was really helpful, Um, and she

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about how she sees, you know, groups

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of men coming in with their bosses. They're talking about

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>deals or you know, some exact walks in the door

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's flocking around him. Maybe they go up to

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a private room together, and this is set lunch, you know. Um.

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>But again this brings me back to my question about

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of the tone the leadership at the top sets.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that without being too pure botanical and

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like no fun at all, is it because they're super young,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>these guys who are running these places. It just so young.

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But and so I do think part of the problem

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is that the behavior has been normalized and it becomes acceptable.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I had women at uper who told me

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they were invited to go to the Gold Club in

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the day by their male bosses and

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it was no big if they didn't come back until

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>three three am, as long as they got their work done.

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, they're putting this. First of all,

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>people are going to strip clubs in the middle of

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the day, which I still don't get. But you know,

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>for women especially, you're put in this super awkward position

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>where you know, are you the woman who goes along

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and sort of um, you know, put yourself in this

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>really uncomfortable territory or do you not go and then

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you miss out on work talk and maybe someone gets

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>an assignment or they decide this new feature to work on. Um,

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's this impossible catch twenty two, you know, similar

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to the parties that we were talking about earlier. And

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this is an organization if you look at Uber in particular,

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>just one example where you saw the CEO going to

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>an escort bar in South Korea. And so if this

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing is happening at all the way to

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the very top, just think about the fires that this

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hr organization is trying to put out, and the things

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like Susan Fowler's experience of being hit on over the

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>chat by her male manager becomes, you know, far less

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of an emergency than the fact that your CEO is

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>at an escort bar in South Korea with his colleagues.

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>The number of women getting computer science degrees has steadily

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>declined since the mid eighties. And I'm wondering about the

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>pipeline problem because yes, you do need different skills, but

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you also do need some people who have those basic

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>engineering skills to work at some of these technology companies.

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So is there you know, I talked to some women

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>from Silicon Valley in my the hour that I did

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for Nacio, and they said, there are many men who

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have computer science degrees who get hired. So is

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>there a double standard when it comes to the quote

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>unquote you know CS degree? There absolutely is a double standard.

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And one example is if you look at the Forbes

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Midas list of the top venture capitalists, UM, the vast

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>majority of women have STEM backgrounds and a significant percentage

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of men do not, which shows that the standards are

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>different for men and women. UM. And you'll see a

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>lot more men on that list like Peter Thiel and

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Peter Fenton who have philosophy backgrounds, or Mike Morritts of Sequoia,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>who was a journalist. And yet Mike morrets is the

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>very person who told me, and this is when Sequoia

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>had no women in their US investing business, that not

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>enough women were studying STEM and that they were not

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>prepared to lower their standards. And so, yes, the standards

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>are different. That said, there is a pipeline problem. And

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, as I mentioned earlier, My argument is the

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>tech industry created the pipeline problem. But there is a

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of hard work and had done and how the

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>tech industry, because it's such a toxic culture, people don't

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>gravitate towards that. So, going back to the forties and fifties,

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>women actually were there. They were programming computers. Men were

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>predominantly the hardware makers, but women were actually well represented

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>among software programmers right, which we saw hidden figures hidden

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>figures is real. This was industry wide. They were programming

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>computer for the military, programming computers for NASA, and then

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>as the industry was starting to explode in the sixties

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and seventies, the tech industry was so desperate for new

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>talent that they were doing these personality tests and aptitude

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>tests to find good programmers. Hence the tests where they

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>decided that good programmers don't like people. Well, the research

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>tells us that people who quote unquote don't like people.

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking for those kinds of people, you'll hire

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>far more men than women. And again, there's no research

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to support the idea that men are better at this

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>job than women, but it's a stereotype that's been held

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for decades. I mean, we're talking about companies as big

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as IBM that using these tests, and fast forward fifty years,

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got people like James Demore, that Google engineer who's

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>repeating the very same toxic assumptions. He is the guy

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>who wrote a memo who said that men are biologically

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>more suited to this. I interviewed him. I interviewed him,

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and then I interviewed a neuroscientists who analyze his research

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.959
<v Speaker 1>from Bernard to refute his claims. But he said, not

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that women have less capacity to perform these jobs, but

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they're less interested in these jobs because of prenatal testosterone,

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>which was totally refuted and is considered really junk science, right.

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed James to Moore as well, and he says

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>his paper has all these citations, but even the people

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>he's citing disagree with how he uses the data. And

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what is unfortunate is I think he's repeating

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>an assumption that many people have and is more widely

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>held than we would like to believe. And that's the

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of stereotype that we need to break down if

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to fix the type blind problem. And the

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>tech industry has a responsibility there well, if he blames

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:08.239
<v Speaker 1>it on prenatal testosterone, then there's no onus on the

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>industry to change things because it can't be fixed ostensibly.

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's but and so it's a cop out in

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of taking any proactive measures as well. And in fact,

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there's new research. There was just a great Harvard Business

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Review article about this that shows that men and women

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>are far more alike than they're just as ambitious. Justice

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>driven Emily that said, do you think the more should

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>have been fired? Yes? And I think Google also could

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have done some things better in that situation as well.

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>First of all, that memo was out and about hanging

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>around and you know Google, Google Or's email boxes for

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>like a month before anyone said anything, and it was

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>not until it leaked to the press that it became

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a company emergency. But you know, companies do have a

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>right to decide what values they have, and you cannot

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>write a memo like that that makes fifty of people,

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>well actually thirty some percent because it's Google and women

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are underrepresented. But that makes all of your female colleagues

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.959
<v Speaker 1>feel like they don't belong or don't deserve to be there,

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>or are constantly questioning when they speak up in a room.

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You know how they're being constantly being questioned? Right, you

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>cannot you know, freedom of speech is one thing, but

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it can't come at the expense of the freedom of

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>speech of others. And so to play Devil's advocate for

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a second. Um, does everybody working at Google, the thousands

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of people working at Google, do they all have to

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>share Google's ideology and views on every issue? Um? I

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>understand if somebody is, you know, outright racist. I mean,

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe you would argue that Demoor is outright sexist.

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 1>But where do you draw the line between unpopular views

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and views so awful that we have to get rid

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of this person. I do think we need to create

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>safe spaces for people to talk about this and if

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>we want people to listen, if I want people to

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to me, I have to be willing to listen

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to them. Um. But I don't think at necessarily sharing

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of views in a company wide memo is

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the best approach, Emily. In your book, you tell one

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>other instructive story about Google that in its early years, Uh,

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Sergey and Larry, the founders, hired lots of women for

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>leadership positions. Marissa Meyer, Cheryl Sandberg, Susan Wichitski. But now

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>women make up only about of the key tech positions there.

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So what happened, well, they lost focus. But the really

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>important lesson that I wanted to tell, or that I

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to share, is that they in the early days

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>put this emphasis on hiring women and got these incredible

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 1>women who you know. Susan conceived the ad business, Cheryl

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>scaled the ad business, Marissa Meyer designed the minimalist you

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>know user interface that we all use when we interact

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>with Google to this day. And they were critical to

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>making Google a success. We sort of think Google was

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>destined to succeed because it was the first to future,

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but in fact, there were like a dozen or more

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>other search engines at the time line that we're competing

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to be that one, and Google broke away from the

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>pack in part because of the diversity that they had

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>at the table. But that's not the story that is told,

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And so what is unfortunate about it is that Larry

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and Sergey didn't continue to make it a priority year

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>after a year after a year and communicate that same

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>commitment that they felt to other managers in the organization.

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And as Google was exploding in size. After the I

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>p O. It became much more about filling the seats

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>as fast as possible. It also became very elitist. Um.

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, after the financial crisis, which actually

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Google did feel the brunt of like everybody else, because

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>their customers are advertisers, they sort of picked their heads

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>back up and said, oh my gosh, where are all

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the women? Like what happened? And so it's another example

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>of good intentions just not being enough. Did you talk

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to people like Marissa Meyer, Cheryl Samberg and Susan Wojitsky

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of YouTube and what did they have to say? I

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>talked to all of them, and it's really interesting because

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>they all have completely different views about these subjects. But

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that is so great because not all women

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.399
<v Speaker 1>are the same. In fact, we need more female role

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>models so we can see that women can and do

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>lead differently and give you know, our young women more

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>more examples. UM. You know, they all think it's a problem. Um.

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>They all think it's a systemic issue. And UM, it

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to just do with with women leading in Um.

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the really interesting things about Marissa and I

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>know that you know you've worked with Merissa closely is

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't like to talk about this. She doesn't like

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the woman's CEO. She wants to be the CEO,

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>and I completely understand that. But I do think that

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I got her to open up about this particular topic,

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>um more than I've seen her her do in the past.

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And one of the lessons that I really want people

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to take away from the Cheryl and Marissa stories that

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>these are women who are incredibly successful yet faced outsized

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.799
<v Speaker 1>criticis si ism for things that, in my view, we're

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>only because they were women, and we're not fair game.

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, people debating the length of Marissa myers maternity leave,

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>or that she had a nursery in her office, or

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that she ended work from home. I mean, if she

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 1>were a man who was about to have a child,

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>no one would have even known. If she were a

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>man who ended the work from home policy, no one

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>would have blinked any And so you know, there was

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>this one headline our Cheryl Sandberg and Marissa Meyer setting

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>back the cause of working moms, and I was like, what,

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is just it's it is just so unfair.

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>We should be critical of them. They are business leaders,

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they are running, you know, businesses worth you know, millions

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>or billions and billions of dollars. But let's be fair

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about how we critique our leaders and the stories we

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>tell about them. You know, I look at someone like

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Susan Wijitski, who built Google's ad business. Uh, she led

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the acquisitions of double click and YouTube. She has five children,

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and yet so many people don't even know her name,

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and she is a visionary and a genius, just like

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>you know. We use these words to describe men over

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and over again. We don't use them to describe women.

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But she just doesn't fit that sort of picture perfect

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of the young male entrepreneur in a hoodie. And

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a tragedy. We need to change the way we're

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.240
<v Speaker 1>telling the stories about these women, because they are equally

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>important to building our future. I understand the complaint of

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>women getting a separate kind of scrutiny, certainly, I've experienced

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that in my professional life as well. On the other hand,

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if it is such a huge problem and there's such

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>an epidemic of this broke culture, you can understand how

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>people would look to the female leaders for setting a

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>tone that would open the doors of opportunity to other women.

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So it is kind of a double edged sword, don't

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you think. Well, I mean, I understand Marissa and and

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, she's like, look, I plan to take a

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>six months maternity leave at Google. It would have been glorious.

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But when I got to Yahoo, like, I couldn't. I

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.479
<v Speaker 1>couldn't take that much time. I don't even mean about

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>her personal thing, and and and some of it, of course,

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>is all about how it's communicated. But changing the work

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>from home policy, which I apparently you know, I read

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot about that a lot of people weren't being

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>productive at home. It wasn't really an effective thing. But

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that some of it is on in the

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>telling of a policy change. And I think you have

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to be out front on some of these issues because

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you're under greater scrutiny and you're expected to set a

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>more positive tone for other working women, right, And maybe

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't communicate that well to be honest, Um, and

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying certainly, you know, Yahoo wasn't perfect, and um,

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, some people don't think the result was so great,

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and some people don't think she did did a good job.

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's necessarily because they ended the work

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>from home right when she took a short maternity leave.

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But those are the things that people remember about her tenure.

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, she's starting a new uh incubator UM

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and there was just a story about it in the

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, and people are calling her a loser,

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and I just I just think it's so unfair. I

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 1>just think it's the kind of outsized, overly negative criticism

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that just I don't know. I don't know if she

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>was a man, I don't even maybe people wouldn't pay attention,

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's another another problem. But you know, people

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>want to know what she's what she's doing. But let's

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>give her a chance. Emily. This may take us a

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:29.280
<v Speaker 1>little further afield from what we're discussing, but I can't

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>have this conversation with you without asking about the relationship

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>between Silicon Valley and Donald Trump. UM. We talked to

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Tristan Harris, who said definitively that Trump and his view

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been elected without Facebook. How is Silicon Valley,

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>both the women and the men, how are they reacting

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to the election of Donald Trump, the presidency of Donald Trump,

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and their role in all of that. Well, obviously Trump's

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>election surprised a lot of people, include the President himself, UM,

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and many people in Silicon Valley, and I think most

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of Silicon Valley was not happy to see Trump elected, which, um,

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know is unfortunate because Silicon Valley and the White

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>House had made a lot of progress. And we need

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the government and the tech industry to be talking to

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>each other because the tech industry really is inventing the

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.800
<v Speaker 1>future and hugely influential. And as we've seen with Facebook,

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>things can go wrong, and so I hope that there

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>is some sort of dialogue. I mean, I know that

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>there have been some meetings and some attempts to communicate,

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:38.439
<v Speaker 1>but in general, and this is not just about President Trump,

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>but I do think our lawmakers need to better understand

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>what these companies are doing. You know, if we saw,

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if any of one saw Mark Zuckerberg's testimony on Capitol Hill,

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and I was in that room, you know, some of

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the questions from the senators were really disappointing. They just

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know how Facebook works, UM, and we need our

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 1>government to understand or these things aren't going to get fixed.

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we talk a lot about regulation, but

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the tech industry has proven that it can't

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>necessarily regulate itself. But we need the right regulation. We

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want another election to be swayed. We don't want

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>our information stolen by you know, foreign governments. We all

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:23.399
<v Speaker 1>want our privacy, you know. I think that Facebook has

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 1>responded as they should in a way, it's it's too little,

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>too late, But I am glad that there they are

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>reacting to it, and I I hope they get it right.

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>How do you think that Silicon Valley differs from what's

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>going on in Hollywood? Hollywood, of course, has its own problems,

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not only with sexual harassment, sexual misconduct, but also just

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>playing opportunity. And of movie directors or men, eight three

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of TV directors or men eight percent of entertainment executives

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>are mail. So which is worse, Silicon Valley or Hollywood?

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, aren't you guys surprised that Wall

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Street has gone gotten away relatively scott free in this

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>whole conversation totally, I cannot get over that. Um I

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>keep asking what's happening on Wall Street? But okay, so

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>before we talk about Hollywood, actually, on Wall Street, if

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 1>you look at the top banks, they're about fifty fifty. Um,

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of work to do when it

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to women in leadership positions, but in a way,

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they did a lot of the hard work in the

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties, and you know, they've gotten to a

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>better place, which is certainly an example that Silicon Valley

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and Hollywood can do it too. I mentioned at the

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>beginning that I think some of the courage from the

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Me Too movement started with Allan pow And in Silicon Valley,

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:43.879
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, we saw Susan Fowler and women entrepreneurs

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>coming forward in Silicon Valley months before the Harvey Weinstein

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>story broke. But Hollywood really like picked up the ball

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and ran with it. And you know, I've been so

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>inspired by all of these women in Hollywood telling their stories,

0:44:57.480 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and I've been a little bit disappointed that I feel

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>like the momentum there's been a loss of some of

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 1>that momentum in Silicon Valley. Um. You know, I do

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 1>think the reality is when you can have Reese Witherspoon

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about it at the Golden Globes, that has a

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:12.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of impact and a lot of people see it

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and it raises awareness, and you know, these women in

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley are often working at companies where they've signed

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 1>an n DA. They can't talk about it. They're scared

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for their jobs. And so, you know, I really hope

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that we will see some of the more shaking up

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that's been happening in Hollywood happen in Silicon Valley, even

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>without you know, potentially the role models like Reese Witherspoon, Um.

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But I've been, you know, I've been down in Hollywood.

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 1>There's there's some folks there that are really interested in

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the book, and I've I've spoken to um, the people

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>involved in the Times Up movement, and I'm really really

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>inspired by what they're doing. But obviously the need is there,

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:53.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just in Hollywood. It's it's farmers, it's

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 1>flight attendants, it's you know, all different kinds of women

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and all all different walks of life they need help. Well,

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:01.839
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the hath Forward. One woman in the

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 1>hour I did on this subject, Emily talked about the

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Rooney Rule, which was started by Dan Rooney, who owned

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers, and they wanted to have more diversity,

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 1>more racial diversity among coaches and management positions. So the

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Rooney Rule requires that you interview one minority candidate, and

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I think they increased to seventy minority positions as a

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 1>result of implementing the Rooney rules. So A, do you

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good idea? And B they also suggested

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>many of the people on the show blind resumes, which,

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, as have been very successful in integrating national

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>symphonies all over the country. So what other measures can

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 1>be taken to fix this? I think the Rooney rule

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is great, And you know, I've heard some companies that

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.319
<v Speaker 1>won't even start an interview process until they have at

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>least two qualified female candidates and two candidates of color,

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and they have to be qualified candidates, like Real Canada.

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>It's um. It goes back to this idea that if

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we just focus on unconscious biased training or raising awareness

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>about our bias, that won't necessarily have a lot of impact.

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's really hard to tell someone just change

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the way you think about women. I mean, these are

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 1>so deeply rooted. These are biases that, as you said,

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we all have. But if you give people the tools

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 1>to combat their bias, that can have a lot of impacts. So,

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of the problem is there's not enough research,

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough people who have tried blind resumes um

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to prove like, oh, this works, but it's certainly worth

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a try. Another woman in the hours suggested for dealing

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:39.800
<v Speaker 1>with the pay and equity problem is more transparent, Like

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the earliest thing to solve more transparency, but no negotiations.

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Once suggested that you have a job, you get paid

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>what you get paid for that job, almost like, I

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>guess if you're in the civil service, right, I've heard

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>no negotiation. I've heard, well, if you're going to do negotiation,

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>make sure that women are negotiating or encouraging them to negotiate,

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and that every one is negotiating. I mean, look, either way,

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you might lose some people, you might gain some people. Um.

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But I also think just being aware of it is important.

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And for these companies, they all see the data even

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 1>though it it these companies that love data, but yet

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they ignore it um when it doesn't work in their favor.

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you see what people get paid, and to me,

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the easiest thing to solve, especially when you're making

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. You know, pay people fairly, pay

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>people what they're worth, and you know, I'm sure you

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>know Mark Benny Off, the CEO of Salesforce, who's they

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:35.919
<v Speaker 1>did a two year comprehensive pay review and it took

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work, because you know, by that point

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Salesforce was a big organization. But now they can probably

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 1>say we don't have a pay gap, and I'm sure

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that's attracting a lot of potential candidates. I guess. Bottom line, Emily,

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>are you optimistic about the future. I am, and I

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:54.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think I could be doing this whole book tour

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:57.840
<v Speaker 1>thing if I wasn't. Um. I believe that the people

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>who are changing the world and taking us to Mars

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and building self driving cars and have given us rides

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>at the push of a button and connected the world,

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:10.720
<v Speaker 1>they can hire more people, hire more women, pay them fairly,

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 1>fund their ideas. Like this is not too hard of

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a problem from Silicon Valley to solve. A lot of

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 1>it is setting a tone, isn't it. You have to

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>make it a priority. It can't be sort of like yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>lip service. Oh yeah, we have this group of people

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 1>and they're responsible. Oh yeah, and they're mostly women and okay, whatever, yeah,

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>pat them on the head, go about and do your

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>altruistic work. Absolutely, it is about CEO is making this

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a priority. Explicitly, it's about investors making this a priority

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to funding and then the port Some

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>companies are demanding it um Upfront Ventures, which is a

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:47.759
<v Speaker 1>venture capital firm based in l A, when they give

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 1>an entrepreneur term sheet. On that term sheet, they are

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 1>committing to building a diverse team. And I've talked to

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the entrepreneurs who say, look, we're small, but

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's working. We're six people, two women, to people of color.

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Like this matters. And the earlier you do it, the

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:04.960
<v Speaker 1>easier it will be, and the better your company will

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 1>be for it, the better we all will be for it.

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>If we solve this problem, that will have the biggest

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 1>impact of any So is your next book going to

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>be Systopia? I've been thinking a lot about what does

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 1>utopia look like? Where is it working um and across industries,

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, some of the bright spots can be

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to find because you know, not a lot of

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 1>people have gotten this right. But I do think we

0:50:29.719 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have a lot to learn from the people who are

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:36.280
<v Speaker 1>doing good things. And these are the workplaces of the future,

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's looking for a competitive edge. We all want

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to build the best businesses and be as productive as possible.

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's about building a workforce that can do all

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of those things, and a workforce that we can also

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:50.719
<v Speaker 1>be proud of. The millennials and Gen zs are demanding it,

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't they right. People care about this. Young people care

0:50:53.680 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>about this. Old people care about this. We all care

0:50:56.640 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>about this, So let's do something about it. Emily Shang,

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:03.360
<v Speaker 1>author of bro Topia, breaking Up the Boys Club of

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. So great to have you. Thank you so much.

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And also you're the host of Bloomberg Technology, which is

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:13.280
<v Speaker 1>every day on Bloomberg Television at two am two pm.

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean not two am, that would really be the

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 1>grave two pm Pacific, five pm Eastern streaming live. We're

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. You can get us a lot of different ways. Emily,

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:24.799
<v Speaker 1>so great to have you here and so nice to

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:28.279
<v Speaker 1>meet you. Thank you. It's an honor, honestly for me

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 1>as a journalist, you are always one of my role models.

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So um, thank you for having me. Thank you, and

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry to hear that. That does it for

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:44.520
<v Speaker 1>today's episode. Everyone. Next up on the podcast will be

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 1>diving into the age of Outrage. I'm talking political correctness, microaggressions,

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:55.240
<v Speaker 1>trigger warning, safe spaces, cultural appropriation. As usual, we really

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 1>want to hear from you. What do you think. Are

0:51:57.200 --> 0:52:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we in the midst of a long overdue course direction

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>or have we simply become too sensitive? So you tell us.

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Call and leave us a message as always at nine

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to nine to two four for six three seven, or

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 1>shoot us an email at comments at currect podcast dot com.

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>As usual. Our thanks to the team that puts this

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 1>podcast together, Gianna Palmer, Jared O'Connell, Nora Richie over at Stitcher,

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and Alison Bresnick, Bethams and Emily Beana my posse over

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 1>at Katie correct Media. Thanks also today to the invisible

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:32.280
<v Speaker 1>studios here in West Hollywood who helped with today's recording.

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Mark Phillips wrote Artneme Music, and Katie and I are

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the show's executive producers. For better or for worse, find

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 1>me on social media under Katie Currict. You know by

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:44.280
<v Speaker 1>now that I'm addicted to Instagram, so follow me there

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and give me your comments and criticisms, but mostly your comments.

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Brian tweets from the handle Goldsmith b. Please subscribe to

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>our show if you haven't already, and for those of

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you who've taken the time to leave us a review

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, we thank you. We're very grateful it

0:52:59.320 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 1>helps other people to find the show. And for the

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:04.359
<v Speaker 1>rest of you, if you're listening at this point, what

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 1>are you waiting for? Please subscribe and leave us a review. Meanwhile,

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for listening as always, and you'll be

0:53:11.120 --> 0:53:12.479
<v Speaker 1>hearing from us next week.