WEBVTT - SHARP NFL Week 3 Bets - Patriots-Jaguars, Texans-Colts and more

0:00:00.870 --> 0:00:04.650
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharper Square. We are brought to you by Polymarket,

0:00:04.670 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and we are part of the Volume Podcast Network. This

0:00:08.940 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is the show that makes the squares sharper and makes

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.500
<v Speaker 1>the wise guys pay attention. I am Chad Millman. I

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>am joined, as always, by my BFF, my companion, my compadre,

0:00:18.180 --> 0:00:23.669
<v Speaker 1>my co-host, professional better, Simon Hunter. Hello, Simon.

0:00:24.430 --> 0:00:25.510
<v Speaker 2>Chad, how we doing?

0:00:26.890 --> 0:00:30.910
<v Speaker 1>Look, we get into Thursday. And what we thought was

0:00:31.030 --> 0:00:36.550
<v Speaker 1>true earlier in the week is changing rapidly. Caleb Williams,

0:00:37.250 --> 0:00:44.269
<v Speaker 1>because he is Wolverine and can miraculously recover, he might

0:00:44.900 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>still play on Monday. Jackson Dart, who went out of

0:00:48.140 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the game, was standing on the sideline. John Harbaugh is saying, oh,

0:00:53.220 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's going to be fine, or at least not catastrophic.

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Now out for the season. Jaden Daniels, Man, that was ugly.

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:08.500
<v Speaker 1>That's where we stand right now with quarterback injuries. But

0:01:08.540 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this game, man, it's tough. Tough game. Hard to bet

0:01:15.220 --> 0:01:15.620
<v Speaker 1>this game.

0:01:16.260 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Tough game, but it makes you question a lot of

0:01:18.380 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 3>stuff the Giants did where I feel like Mahomes set

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.340
<v Speaker 3>the standard, the template for what you should do, right?

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.910
<v Speaker 3>He got the surgery that night, so he didn't want

0:01:28.110 --> 0:01:30.569
<v Speaker 3>to let it get inflamed, his knee to– blow up.

0:01:30.970 --> 0:01:33.730
<v Speaker 3>He went and got the surgery that night, and now

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 3>he was back playing, starting the season, literally nine months

0:01:36.660 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>to the date, and winning, running on it. I mean,

0:01:38.740 --> 0:01:42.060
<v Speaker 3>scored a running touchdown. People are already knocking the dart,

0:01:42.300 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 3>walked off the field on it, was walking around on it,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 3>and people say, well, you can't do any more damage

0:01:46.620 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to it. That's not true at all. You have torn

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 3>a ligament in your knee, and now you're walking around

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.410
<v Speaker 3>on it. So, I get the whole tough guy thing

0:01:55.430 --> 0:01:58.130
<v Speaker 3>when we talk about the Caleb and everything, but my God.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.460
<v Speaker 3>That whole scenario with Dart of him just walking around

0:02:01.740 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 3>with his knee bending like it was.

0:02:03.820 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And then standing on the sidelines.

0:02:05.500 --> 0:02:08.990
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, standing on the sideline. Just no one could tell

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.290
<v Speaker 3>me logically why that made any sense in any way.

0:02:11.370 --> 0:02:15.250
<v Speaker 3>So I feel like teams going forward will just continue

0:02:15.270 --> 0:02:17.870
<v Speaker 3>to try to handle these things differently. And like I said,

0:02:17.889 --> 0:02:20.330
<v Speaker 3>the Mahomes thing, that just makes the most sense to me.

0:02:20.770 --> 0:02:23.260
<v Speaker 3>If you can get the surgery done that night, go

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.190
<v Speaker 3>get it done. These are billion-dollar teams. They can– pay

0:02:26.210 --> 0:02:27.489
<v Speaker 3>whatever they need to pay for the doc to get

0:02:27.510 --> 0:02:29.350
<v Speaker 3>out of bed and go do a midnight surgery on

0:02:29.370 --> 0:02:29.950
<v Speaker 3>someone's knee.

0:02:30.010 --> 0:02:32.290
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, brutal, brutal.

0:02:32.330 --> 0:02:35.170
<v Speaker 3>If you're a Giants fan, now they're, what, hoping for

0:02:35.190 --> 0:02:38.410
<v Speaker 3>a Mac Jones trade? I mean, there's just, there's guys

0:02:38.530 --> 0:02:40.250
<v Speaker 3>out there. Your season's not totally lost.

0:02:40.380 --> 0:02:41.620
<v Speaker 1>A J.J. McCarthy trade?

0:02:42.700 --> 0:02:45.980
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that just, it really does feel like they

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 3>were at the high of highs on Monday, and now

0:02:47.900 --> 0:02:51.340
<v Speaker 3>it's just gone. I mean, just a week later, it's

0:02:51.380 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 3>totally over. I mean, I think they're now 1,000, yeah.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 3>I think there are 10 to one or 11 to

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.340
<v Speaker 3>one right now to win NFCs. So the books are just, they're,

0:02:59.380 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>they're just saying they're done.

0:03:00.900 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:02.900
<v Speaker 3>Even though they, they're wanting to know in the division.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.650
<v Speaker 3>So really, really brutal for a Giants fan. Like we

0:03:06.690 --> 0:03:07.340
<v Speaker 3>talk all the time.

0:03:07.410 --> 0:03:09.490
<v Speaker 2>It's Eli Manning.

0:03:09.510 --> 0:03:11.669
<v Speaker 3>You can say he's not the best quarterback and, you know,

0:03:11.710 --> 0:03:13.950
<v Speaker 3>went to the playoffs twice, won two Superbowls, but he

0:03:14.130 --> 0:03:15.230
<v Speaker 3>never missed a game.

0:03:15.669 --> 0:03:17.090
<v Speaker 2>And same could go with Brett Favre.

0:03:17.130 --> 0:03:20.030
<v Speaker 3>Brady missed one season, but you just, when you have

0:03:20.070 --> 0:03:21.990
<v Speaker 3>these guys who can play for you every week and

0:03:22.010 --> 0:03:23.950
<v Speaker 3>don't miss games or something special about it. And then,

0:03:24.630 --> 0:03:26.669
<v Speaker 3>um a lot of these teams out there with I

0:03:26.710 --> 0:03:29.630
<v Speaker 3>mean it's fair to say not great quarterbacks have had

0:03:29.669 --> 0:03:31.329
<v Speaker 3>tons of injuries this year and it's just been brutal

0:03:31.380 --> 0:03:32.750
<v Speaker 3>as a fan base I'm sure where it's like you

0:03:32.790 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 3>have hope it's early in the year you want to

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>see what your guy can do I'm sure you're in

0:03:36.580 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 3>the same boat right now where it's like you want

0:03:37.940 --> 0:03:40.020
<v Speaker 3>to see Caleb take that next step in the season

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:42.660
<v Speaker 3>now it's all off to a rough start it's like

0:03:42.700 --> 0:03:45.500
<v Speaker 3>he's got to come off he's coming off an injury

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 3>now you don't know he's going to be in that

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 3>injury he's going to be more timid to run it's

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.260
<v Speaker 3>just it's the worst I mean we're all fans of

0:03:50.300 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 3>this we all know the deal the quarterback so I

0:03:52.540 --> 0:03:54.820
<v Speaker 3>think we're the same boat. We're all just disgusted right now.

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:55.620
<v Speaker 3>We're just so mad.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:56.260
<v Speaker 2>Disgusting.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.260
<v Speaker 3>These injuries are happening. The grass, just get the grass fields.

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.410
<v Speaker 3>I don't get it. We've had all these injuries with

0:04:02.430 --> 0:04:06.970
<v Speaker 3>these players. Just please, NFL, we're begging. No more turf.

0:04:07.010 --> 0:04:08.410
<v Speaker 3>Just get these grass fields, man.

0:04:09.450 --> 0:04:12.050
<v Speaker 1>If FIFA can find the money, the NFL can find

0:04:12.070 --> 0:04:14.500
<v Speaker 1>the money. I mean, look, there's no league in the

0:04:14.530 --> 0:04:17.700
<v Speaker 1>world that cares less about anything than FIFA, and they

0:04:17.740 --> 0:04:19.540
<v Speaker 1>still care enough about their players to put them on

0:04:19.580 --> 0:04:24.210
<v Speaker 1>grass fields. This is our Thursday NFL Week 3 show.

0:04:24.529 --> 0:04:28.810
<v Speaker 1>You'll hear sharp calls, brass balls, our underdog and favorite

0:04:28.870 --> 0:04:33.070
<v Speaker 1>round robins, Simon's biggest bet, sharp versus square picks, our

0:04:33.190 --> 0:04:36.860
<v Speaker 1>discord grouper of the week. We're going to narrow down

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:41.820
<v Speaker 1>the field to our favorite five picks. And by the way,

0:04:41.900 --> 0:04:45.860
<v Speaker 1>you can compete against us in our free sharper square

0:04:45.860 --> 0:04:51.239
<v Speaker 1>$ 25, 000 pro football pick'em Contest. We only launched the contest

0:04:51.300 --> 0:04:53.980
<v Speaker 1>last week in week two. So we also will be

0:04:54.020 --> 0:04:59.230
<v Speaker 1>dropping everyone's lowest score after week five. So if you

0:04:59.290 --> 0:05:03.270
<v Speaker 1>have not signed up, you aren't too late. You're still

0:05:03.430 --> 0:05:06.229
<v Speaker 1>in the running for the prize pool of $ 25, 000 in cash.

0:05:07.310 --> 0:05:12.859
<v Speaker 1>Sign up now. Start or square.thevolume.com. Top 10 finishers get paid.

0:05:12.940 --> 0:05:16.300
<v Speaker 1>First place gets $ 10, 000. It's totally free. You're competing against

0:05:16.339 --> 0:05:19.119
<v Speaker 1>me and Simon. We haven't started off very well so far,

0:05:19.220 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>so very good chance to wipe the floor with us.

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:29.830
<v Speaker 1>Sharp or square.thevolume.com. All right, Simon. Every week, we're going

0:05:29.850 --> 0:05:32.710
<v Speaker 1>to discuss our picks on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and then

0:05:32.730 --> 0:05:35.969
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get some calls from your fellow professional bettors,

0:05:36.029 --> 0:05:39.660
<v Speaker 1>and they are going to tell us what they think

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.140
<v Speaker 1>it's time for. Sharp calls.

0:05:43.110 --> 0:05:43.589
<v Speaker 2>Who's there?

0:05:43.650 --> 0:05:49.210
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking. Ring, ring, telephone ring. Somebody say it. Baby,

0:05:49.230 --> 0:05:50.310
<v Speaker 1>what you doing?

0:05:51.910 --> 0:05:55.030
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I read in the Thursday night game probably wouldn't

0:05:55.050 --> 0:05:57.870
<v Speaker 3>be my biggest bet of the season if there just

0:05:57.930 --> 0:06:00.849
<v Speaker 3>wasn't so much hesitation with the fact that it's Penick's

0:06:00.930 --> 0:06:03.529
<v Speaker 3>first start back from the injury. It's all lined up

0:06:03.570 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 3>right now for Atlanta. It's like the perfect spot trend-wise, right?

0:06:06.940 --> 0:06:09.779
<v Speaker 3>0-2 team, 0-2 straight up, on the road, big dog.

0:06:10.140 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 3>No one believes him. No one's betting on him. But

0:06:12.779 --> 0:06:15.220
<v Speaker 3>I think the public, not that they're getting wiser to it,

0:06:15.220 --> 0:06:17.900
<v Speaker 3>but they're seeing what's happening. They're seeing all the professional

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.780
<v Speaker 3>money coming in on the Atlanta side and the PennX

0:06:20.860 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 3>news and the number being driven down. So, yeah, it

0:06:23.540 --> 0:06:25.820
<v Speaker 3>would have been great if it stayed at seven, went

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.820
<v Speaker 3>to five and a half on the theory that PennX

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 3>is going to be back. Now it's down to four

0:06:29.060 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>and a half. So that's probably the biggest talk about game.

0:06:33.020 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, another one really talked about, which isn't our

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 3>lane technically, is the Ole Miss Florida game, which was a.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:40.340
<v Speaker 2>College game, if you don't know.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.620
<v Speaker 3>Basically, Ole Miss, Coming off the biggest win of possibly

0:06:45.660 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the college history against LSU, now is on the road

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 3>playing Florida. And it's a weird spot. Ole Miss, who's

0:06:52.820 --> 0:06:57.849
<v Speaker 3>ranked way higher, is a three-and-a-half-point dog. And talk to markets,

0:06:58.410 --> 0:07:01.710
<v Speaker 3>guys predict their markets. You talk to bookmakers. It is

0:07:01.730 --> 0:07:05.810
<v Speaker 3>all Ole Miss money. And every pro I know is

0:07:05.850 --> 0:07:10.270
<v Speaker 3>just hammering Florida. So if people want a college bet, Florida–

0:07:10.660 --> 0:07:13.500
<v Speaker 3>It's going to look like an obvious pick, but it's not.

0:07:13.620 --> 0:07:14.670
<v Speaker 2>The public is just.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.910
<v Speaker 3>Hammering Ole Miss. They don't know anybody. They can't help themselves.

0:07:16.930 --> 0:07:19.530
<v Speaker 3>They're just getting a three-and-a-half-point dog on a team that

0:07:19.570 --> 0:07:22.670
<v Speaker 3>just beat LSU. They just love that spot. So that's

0:07:22.710 --> 0:07:26.850
<v Speaker 3>another big, tall conversation this whole week, really. Those two

0:07:26.890 --> 0:07:29.290
<v Speaker 3>games just stick out of what we're going to see

0:07:29.310 --> 0:07:32.250
<v Speaker 3>earlier on Thursday and Saturday, obviously, of just the public

0:07:32.310 --> 0:07:35.710
<v Speaker 3>is all over this one side and professionals are all

0:07:35.750 --> 0:07:37.580
<v Speaker 3>over the other side. Like, I don't know a pro

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 3>on Green Bay. Green Bay– we're going to dive into

0:07:40.020 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 3>the route there without their right tackle. So, um, hot topic.

0:07:44.020 --> 0:07:44.940
<v Speaker 2>It's, it's fun too.

0:07:44.980 --> 0:07:47.140
<v Speaker 3>Cause I do bet a little bit of college obviously,

0:07:47.180 --> 0:07:50.300
<v Speaker 3>but the fact that this is just such an obvious one,

0:07:50.660 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's so rare.

0:07:51.810 --> 0:07:53.830
<v Speaker 2>You see a team lower ranked a three and a

0:07:53.830 --> 0:07:54.590
<v Speaker 2>half point favorite.

0:07:54.630 --> 0:07:56.470
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, Florida Ole Miss is going to be really

0:07:56.510 --> 0:07:59.430
<v Speaker 3>talked about back to NFL chargers game. We're going to

0:07:59.470 --> 0:08:02.290
<v Speaker 3>dive into tons of love by the pros, Miami, ton

0:08:02.330 --> 0:08:05.570
<v Speaker 3>of love by the pros, Cleveland, ton of love by

0:08:05.610 --> 0:08:08.500
<v Speaker 3>the pros. Um, I should have gave it out. We talked,

0:08:08.540 --> 0:08:10.300
<v Speaker 3>I talked Tennessee being Simon says, cause it was three

0:08:10.310 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and a half. Probably market already moved at two and

0:08:12.660 --> 0:08:15.620
<v Speaker 3>a half. That's why I didn't. And most books now

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 3>it's down to three, two and a half. So I, I,

0:08:19.180 --> 0:08:20.820
<v Speaker 3>I assume that we'll be able to stay away now

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 3>from Tennessee cause I'm not going to put that in

0:08:22.700 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 3>a half such a bad number. You know, big one

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.220
<v Speaker 3>we talked about that's really split between pros is that

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.250
<v Speaker 3>Vikings bucks game.

0:08:32.780 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 2>And, You know, everyone's got different opinions, different reasonings.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.540
<v Speaker 3>Like, you know, Kyler coming back is obviously going to

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 3>be an upgrade you expect to that Minnesota offense. And

0:08:42.660 --> 0:08:45.530
<v Speaker 3>I think there's some crazy stat going around. KOC is basically,

0:08:46.150 --> 0:08:48.570
<v Speaker 3>as a road favorite in his career, 13-0 on the

0:08:48.610 --> 0:08:52.189
<v Speaker 3>money line. So technically it's a great spot for the Vikings.

0:08:52.210 --> 0:08:55.590
<v Speaker 3>They just, you know, usually if they're favored on the

0:08:55.610 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 3>road against a team, there's very good reason. But we're

0:08:58.250 --> 0:08:59.780
<v Speaker 3>going to dive into the Bucs. A lot of pros

0:08:59.820 --> 0:09:01.900
<v Speaker 3>like them because it's just like you can't be more dill.

0:09:02.450 --> 0:09:04.470
<v Speaker 3>And all the trends love them, right? The 0-2 against

0:09:04.490 --> 0:09:07.650
<v Speaker 3>the spread 0-2. Oh, yeah. At home as a dog.

0:09:08.190 --> 0:09:09.329
<v Speaker 3>There's going to be a lot of trends that point

0:09:09.350 --> 0:09:11.470
<v Speaker 3>to that. So a lot of fun phone calls about

0:09:11.510 --> 0:09:14.809
<v Speaker 3>that one. And I would say the biggest bet people

0:09:14.830 --> 0:09:16.490
<v Speaker 3>are trying to bully me out of this week is

0:09:16.510 --> 0:09:20.050
<v Speaker 3>definitely my love for Seattle. So we can dive into

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.770
<v Speaker 3>that one more. Like Seattle, depends on your contest. There's

0:09:22.790 --> 0:09:25.020
<v Speaker 3>some out there that has six and a half. It's

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:26.740
<v Speaker 3>going to be hard to pass on that come Sunday morning.

0:09:26.780 --> 0:09:28.059
<v Speaker 3>Like if you're trying to find a fifth one to

0:09:28.100 --> 0:09:31.260
<v Speaker 3>put in, Seattle– we've talked about there 14 and three

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.860
<v Speaker 3>for McDonald in his career on the road against the spread.

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.350
<v Speaker 3>Like there's so many crazy stats to back up backing

0:09:38.370 --> 0:09:41.390
<v Speaker 3>this team. And I know people always worry about West coast,

0:09:41.550 --> 0:09:43.950
<v Speaker 3>West coast team going East. There's trends at point. That's

0:09:43.990 --> 0:09:46.109
<v Speaker 3>not true at all. Like their favorite of six points

0:09:46.150 --> 0:09:50.490
<v Speaker 3>or more 20 and 10 since 2020 of West coast

0:09:50.510 --> 0:09:54.020
<v Speaker 3>teams going East. It's just, it's not, you know, the eighties,

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.620
<v Speaker 3>these aren't uncomfortable flights. It's not, you know what people

0:09:56.660 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 3>think it used to be. So, Yeah, it was really

0:09:59.300 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 3>not a busy week. for sharp calls but it was

0:10:00.980 --> 0:10:04.500
<v Speaker 3>definitely a week of uh agreeance like a lot of

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 3>people are agreeing with us about a lot of the

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.780
<v Speaker 3>dogs you like like we even talk about cleveland a

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:09.810
<v Speaker 3>lot of pros on that one as well but it's

0:10:09.830 --> 0:10:11.429
<v Speaker 3>another one that's kind of split as well as same

0:10:11.470 --> 0:10:12.949
<v Speaker 3>as that vikings bucks game so.

0:10:13.190 --> 0:10:14.829
<v Speaker 2>A lot of a lot of games to dive into here.

0:10:15.510 --> 0:10:18.990
<v Speaker 1>Well that's good i'm surprised um looking at the very

0:10:19.050 --> 0:10:23.829
<v Speaker 1>first one New England at Jacksonville. Jacksonville is now a

0:10:24.030 --> 0:10:28.250
<v Speaker 1>three-point favorite at home. It opened at two and a half.

0:10:28.490 --> 0:10:34.950
<v Speaker 1>This was Chad's choice. I will say, in a surprise vote,

0:10:36.150 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>this was the winning vote-getter in the Discord grouper. It

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>beat out some really gross, gnarly contenders, one of which

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I will discuss later. Truly, Matt Mitchell... Just should be

0:10:51.780 --> 0:10:56.430
<v Speaker 1>so proud of the other suggestion. Don't forget, you can

0:10:56.470 --> 0:11:00.470
<v Speaker 1>join our betting community. We are sharing the latest news

0:11:01.150 --> 0:11:04.849
<v Speaker 1>on what we hear, alerting folks to line moves, voting

0:11:04.910 --> 0:11:07.980
<v Speaker 1>on bets. I'm going to make all season long. Plus,

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.339
<v Speaker 1>we're raising money for St. Jude Children's Hospital. Join the

0:11:11.380 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Discord by going to readthenumber.com. The Jags will be two

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.790
<v Speaker 1>and a half in the contests. I'd still take it

0:11:21.850 --> 0:11:24.710
<v Speaker 1>at two and a half. Um, and we're going to

0:11:24.750 --> 0:11:28.890
<v Speaker 1>bet Jags on the money line through the discord grouper. Um,

0:11:30.950 --> 0:11:33.429
<v Speaker 1>it didn't come up in sharp calls. You liked it

0:11:33.510 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>with me the other day. Have your feelings changed as

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.420
<v Speaker 1>it moved down the list? Where's your head on that?

0:11:41.500 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. If you want to put this one as one

0:11:42.900 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 3>of your picture, we could do it. I just, I

0:11:45.059 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 3>have no real read on it where I'm, I'm on

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:51.820
<v Speaker 3>the Jags, but, um, The more I dive into the Jags,

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.829
<v Speaker 3>it's not an easy-as-match-up I thought it was going to

0:11:55.850 --> 0:11:58.469
<v Speaker 3>be for them defensively. I thought there was just a

0:11:58.470 --> 0:11:59.890
<v Speaker 3>lot of ways they could exploit the Patriots. Like we

0:11:59.910 --> 0:12:02.770
<v Speaker 3>talked about, the Patriots are a different team without A.J.

0:12:02.809 --> 0:12:03.069
<v Speaker 2>Brown.

0:12:03.090 --> 0:12:05.630
<v Speaker 3>They just went really heavy into one receiver, and without him,

0:12:06.350 --> 0:12:07.990
<v Speaker 3>you can just tell it shifted their offense.

0:12:08.030 --> 0:12:10.970
<v Speaker 2>They're playing way more conservative, and we've talked this.

0:12:12.230 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 3>It's not that it's on Drake May, but through two weeks–

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:16.660
<v Speaker 3>He's not looked like Drake May from last year.

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:17.670
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's fair to say.

0:12:17.830 --> 0:12:19.270
<v Speaker 3>But it's tough because it's like, all right, we went

0:12:19.290 --> 0:12:23.290
<v Speaker 3>against Seattle and then Pittsburgh, two really good defenses. So,

0:12:23.970 --> 0:12:25.930
<v Speaker 3>is this a nice bounce back spot for him, everything

0:12:25.950 --> 0:12:28.270
<v Speaker 3>like that? But, yeah, two and a half. Like you said,

0:12:28.309 --> 0:12:29.670
<v Speaker 3>if you want to Sunday morning put it in, I'm

0:12:29.700 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 3>not going to fight you on it. It's a good number.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Jack's team is right now a more complete, better team, healthier. So,

0:12:36.140 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 3>you expect them to bounce back. And this Patriots team,

0:12:39.540 --> 0:12:41.730
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you're taking them at the three or

0:12:41.780 --> 0:12:43.069
<v Speaker 3>three and a half, if it ever gets there, I

0:12:43.070 --> 0:12:45.970
<v Speaker 3>don't hate it. I just– prefer the side we're on

0:12:46.010 --> 0:12:48.270
<v Speaker 3>at two and a half on the jags all.

0:12:48.210 --> 0:12:50.969
<v Speaker 1>Right jags two and a half i like it a

0:12:51.010 --> 0:12:54.150
<v Speaker 1>lot it was chad's choice uh jags on the money

0:12:54.210 --> 0:12:58.790
<v Speaker 1>line is the discord grouper join it read the number.com

0:12:59.170 --> 0:13:02.550
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned tennessee for a second uh we talked about

0:13:02.580 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it on tuesday i've never liked it so i'm glad

0:13:07.260 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of we have come to a consensus like

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.140
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad number so we don't have to I'm

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.140
<v Speaker 1>glad that it's not to be something we debate on

0:13:16.179 --> 0:13:19.870
<v Speaker 1>Sunday as being in there because the number has now moved.

0:13:20.470 --> 0:13:22.150
<v Speaker 1>Any value in the number is gone. It's down to

0:13:22.170 --> 0:13:23.890
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. Tennessee is a two and a

0:13:23.890 --> 0:13:28.050
<v Speaker 1>half point favorite. On the road, Cam Ward at the Giants,

0:13:29.090 --> 0:13:33.510
<v Speaker 1>feeling sad with Jameis Winston. But that also makes me

0:13:33.550 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 1>a little nervous because Jameis is a gunslinger. You never

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.540
<v Speaker 1>know what you're going to get. And in a week

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:45.420
<v Speaker 1>of preparation against a– still a bad team he could

0:13:45.470 --> 0:13:49.210
<v Speaker 1>just easily light it up for a miracle as crap

0:13:49.230 --> 0:13:49.610
<v Speaker 1>the bed.

0:13:49.510 --> 0:13:53.870
<v Speaker 3>Again yeah you're just you're overthinking if it's three and

0:13:53.890 --> 0:13:55.870
<v Speaker 3>a half it's a no-brainer play in tennessee it doesn't

0:13:55.890 --> 0:13:57.780
<v Speaker 3>matter if you dislike it or not jamis winston's 10

0:13:57.780 --> 0:13:59.739
<v Speaker 3>and 20 against the spread is a favorite it's just

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 3>it's a nor'eastern we we have a tsunami coming with

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.780
<v Speaker 3>it's jamis winston playing it's what a dream and what

0:14:07.830 --> 0:14:10.150
<v Speaker 3>a treat so unfortunately yeah the number moved too much

0:14:10.270 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 3>but The 3.5 was a gift.

0:14:12.700 --> 0:14:14.460
<v Speaker 2>I think it opened at like 6.5 and it was

0:14:14.500 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be dart.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:16.300
<v Speaker 1>It did.

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:17.660
<v Speaker 3>They tried to move it to 3.5, and it just

0:14:17.700 --> 0:14:20.020
<v Speaker 3>kept getting hammered, and they moved it to just a

0:14:20.060 --> 0:14:21.820
<v Speaker 3>nice spot now where it's like, sure, if you want

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 3>to bet the Giants, go at it. I don't know

0:14:24.020 --> 0:14:26.300
<v Speaker 3>who's really taking Tennessee at plus 2.5 now. You've already

0:14:26.340 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 3>missed the best of it. So definitely a game if

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.130
<v Speaker 3>you missed that number. I would either be patient on it,

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe tease up Tennessee if you want, but I'm not

0:14:33.710 --> 0:14:35.210
<v Speaker 3>going to take them at plus 2.5 for the worst

0:14:35.230 --> 0:14:36.050
<v Speaker 3>of the number of the week.

0:14:37.350 --> 0:14:40.970
<v Speaker 1>We're being very disciplined. We're being focused. I like it.

0:14:40.980 --> 0:14:45.500
<v Speaker 1>We're not getting bullied. We're not, you know, kowtowing to

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:50.020
<v Speaker 1>everything we're hearing or stats that we're seeing. We're making

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:55.370
<v Speaker 1>sound betting decisions. Will that continue with Seattle as now

0:14:55.730 --> 0:15:00.730
<v Speaker 1>a seven-point favorite over Washington? It kind of moves across

0:15:00.770 --> 0:15:03.710
<v Speaker 1>the board from six and a half to seven yesterday.

0:15:03.770 --> 0:15:08.390
<v Speaker 1>There's actually some seven and a halves popping up. In

0:15:08.410 --> 0:15:12.510
<v Speaker 1>the contest, it'll probably be seven and a half. On

0:15:12.550 --> 0:15:15.210
<v Speaker 1>the field, it's hard to see how Washington covers this game.

0:15:15.790 --> 0:15:19.070
<v Speaker 1>But as you said, you're getting feedback about why you

0:15:19.110 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like Seattle. The professionals are definitely going to be on

0:15:22.660 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the commanders. The history and the betting logic says be

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on the commanders.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.020
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, last week on Thursday, I was going

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>to take a pretty big position on Arizona, and luckily...

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.660
<v Speaker 3>you know, smarter minds reach out to him and just like, dude, stop,

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.660
<v Speaker 3>stop going against Seattle, pick, pick other spots, which I

0:15:42.740 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 3>obviously did.

0:15:43.340 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's all about their head coach. I mean, he's just,

0:15:47.860 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 2>he's so good. He's the best right now.

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.140
<v Speaker 3>And the spread reflects that he is since the beginning

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.859
<v Speaker 3>of last season as a favorite, they are 14 and

0:15:56.940 --> 0:16:00.900
<v Speaker 3>four against the spread on the road as a favorite.

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 3>He is nine and one against the spread. So it's,

0:16:05.350 --> 0:16:07.530
<v Speaker 3>It's insane numbers. It's just, you can't get over how

0:16:07.550 --> 0:16:10.210
<v Speaker 3>good of a coach he is. And like we talked about,

0:16:10.230 --> 0:16:11.870
<v Speaker 3>there is a Nor'eastern coming, so this could be a

0:16:11.910 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 3>sloppy weather game. Well, then you slip, then you slop,

0:16:17.940 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 3>then you slip, slop, slip, slop, slop.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.820
<v Speaker 2>Oh, baby, come on, let's do the slop.

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.620
<v Speaker 3>And Washington, they fits the bill of an 0-2 team

0:16:30.020 --> 0:16:32.410
<v Speaker 3>this season. Now, at home is a big dog, but

0:16:32.790 --> 0:16:35.710
<v Speaker 3>factoring in, it's Mariota, who... you can say he came in,

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 3>he didn't play terrible last week. Like he did have

0:16:37.620 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>some good deep throws and overall, if you go through

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.460
<v Speaker 3>his career as a backup, he's not the worst option, right?

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 2>He's still mobile. He's a good runner.

0:16:45.460 --> 0:16:48.500
<v Speaker 3>Um, the, the, the big hangup for him is he's inconsistent,

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 3>especially on deep throws where it's like, he's going to

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 3>put you in 50, 50 balls. And against Seattle who

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 3>haven't given up a completion yet of over 20 yards,

0:16:57.500 --> 0:16:58.060
<v Speaker 3>you're in hell.

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.140
<v Speaker 2>Like this is a incredible shutdown defense.

0:17:01.300 --> 0:17:04.580
<v Speaker 3>So, um, yeah seven and a half obviously it's not

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 3>the best feeling in the world but first stuck come

0:17:08.140 --> 0:17:10.020
<v Speaker 3>Sunday morning like I said they're a nice fifth option

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.300
<v Speaker 3>and it's just if we even even if we get

0:17:12.340 --> 0:17:14.980
<v Speaker 3>burned here you just can't let that dictate your feelings

0:17:15.020 --> 0:17:17.780
<v Speaker 3>of Seahawks going forward it's just the numbers prove it

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 3>out they're a very consistent covering team on the road

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.979
<v Speaker 3>it's for this exact reason it's like the number gets

0:17:23.020 --> 0:17:24.500
<v Speaker 3>so big like this you can think of a million

0:17:24.540 --> 0:17:27.060
<v Speaker 3>reasons why to take Washington but at the end of

0:17:27.100 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 3>the day the game will finish and they'll probably win

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.869
<v Speaker 3>28 to 10 it's just what Seattle does so.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:33.850
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you.

0:17:33.900 --> 0:17:35.850
<v Speaker 3>It's a tough one to swallow when it's 7.5. Like

0:17:35.869 --> 0:17:38.410
<v Speaker 3>I said, in my other contest for big money, it's 6.5.

0:17:38.410 --> 0:17:41.230
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be an easy play most likely Sunday

0:17:41.250 --> 0:17:43.710
<v Speaker 3>morning where 7.5 does make you pause and think about

0:17:43.730 --> 0:17:47.090
<v Speaker 3>it because a seven-point game, backdoor, it's always going to

0:17:47.109 --> 0:17:47.830
<v Speaker 3>be there when you're at 7.5.

0:17:47.810 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 2>That's the part with it.

0:17:50.109 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Two touchdowns, winning by a touchdown or more in the

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL is hard. It just is. There's always an opportunity,

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:04.889
<v Speaker 1>even if they're up 27-10. In the fourth quarter, like,

0:18:05.590 --> 0:18:08.450
<v Speaker 1>fluky things happen when the game is out of reach

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.500
<v Speaker 1>and one team is still playing and one team is

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.699
<v Speaker 1>taking their foot off the gas. They're not incentivized to

0:18:14.740 --> 0:18:19.700
<v Speaker 1>continue scoring more and really put the game out of reach. Simon,

0:18:20.869 --> 0:18:27.030
<v Speaker 1>it's time for our Brass Balls Rate of the Week.

0:18:28.530 --> 0:18:31.110
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a surprise for a lot of people.

0:18:31.450 --> 0:18:38.430
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles... chargers plus seven and a half currently trading

0:18:38.490 --> 0:18:44.449
<v Speaker 1>at 52% on Polymarket. You know what it takes? It

0:18:44.510 --> 0:18:53.250
<v Speaker 1>takes brass balls. Look, this thing has been bouncing between

0:18:53.490 --> 0:18:57.410
<v Speaker 1>seven and seven and a half all week. It'll certainly

0:18:57.490 --> 0:19:00.859
<v Speaker 1>land at seven and a half in the contest. And

0:19:01.570 --> 0:19:03.230
<v Speaker 1>You and I sort of came to a consensus at

0:19:03.270 --> 0:19:05.990
<v Speaker 1>least this morning and when we were discussing this, it

0:19:06.050 --> 0:19:08.550
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really a game that was on our radar on Tuesday.

0:19:09.390 --> 0:19:14.870
<v Speaker 1>And then for me, I'm looking at Justin Herbert getting dragged,

0:19:15.690 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>questions about his leadership, Jim Harbaugh getting dragged, Mike McDaniel

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>getting dragged. Things couldn't be worse for a team that

0:19:26.100 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>not us, but a lot of people had very high

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.389
<v Speaker 1>expectations for. Don't forget- The Chargers had shorter odds to

0:19:32.430 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>win the division than the Broncos. And they've just been terrible, right?

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You had the stat the other day. What was it?

0:19:39.500 --> 0:19:44.290
<v Speaker 1>The first team to lose at home to two teams

0:19:44.350 --> 0:19:51.429
<v Speaker 1>with sub 200 winning percentage the previous season since like 1929.

0:19:51.430 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So things couldn't be worse. And are we not at

0:19:55.580 --> 0:19:57.980
<v Speaker 1>peak bills right now? Are they not like a team

0:19:58.020 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that everyone is just absolutely in love with, with the

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.899
<v Speaker 1>way they beat the Texans in week one, the way

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.820
<v Speaker 1>they dominated against the Lions in prime time in week two.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.010
<v Speaker 1>So of course we have to take the charters. in

0:20:09.030 --> 0:20:10.850
<v Speaker 1>this spot, especially if we're getting the hook.

0:20:12.630 --> 0:20:14.570
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it stinks because I wanted to be so badly

0:20:14.590 --> 0:20:16.310
<v Speaker 3>on the Bills, especially if they're going to be at

0:20:16.310 --> 0:20:18.580
<v Speaker 3>6.5 or 7. But like you said, the fact that

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.060
<v Speaker 3>it's now up to 7.5, it's way too many points.

0:20:22.140 --> 0:20:24.140
<v Speaker 2>There's too much hate and doubt on Herbert.

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.780
<v Speaker 3>And just matchup-wise, like we've talked about the questions we

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.100
<v Speaker 3>have about the Bills' defense, you're relying on Josh Allen

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.850
<v Speaker 3>once again to put up 35, 40 points in this matchup.

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.530
<v Speaker 3>That's really what you're betting on here, which can anyone

0:20:36.570 --> 0:20:39.699
<v Speaker 3>do it? Yeah, he's... a freak he's literally broke his

0:20:39.740 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 3>own record i think through two weeks he had like

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:43.900
<v Speaker 3>nine or ten touchdowns then he did it again which

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.460
<v Speaker 3>hadn't been done in like 50 years he's just one

0:20:46.510 --> 0:20:49.070
<v Speaker 3>of a kind josh allen so i i understand people's

0:20:49.090 --> 0:20:51.530
<v Speaker 3>hesitation but that's why this takes some balls it really

0:20:51.550 --> 0:20:54.169
<v Speaker 3>does and the trends will point out to herbert you

0:20:54.190 --> 0:20:56.490
<v Speaker 3>want to fade herbert as a big favorite which we've

0:20:56.510 --> 0:20:59.870
<v Speaker 3>seen through two weeks but as a dog herbert three

0:20:59.890 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 3>and a half or more he's 13 and two against

0:21:02.100 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the spread in his career so he tends to do

0:21:04.700 --> 0:21:06.859
<v Speaker 3>really well especially as he gets bigger as a dog

0:21:07.100 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 3>and Hardball, shockingly, has done really well when he plays

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.140
<v Speaker 3>against a team that has way more rest than him. So, obviously,

0:21:13.780 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Bills played on a Thursday. They have an extra three

0:21:16.220 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 3>days of rest compared to the Chargers. Now the Chargers

0:21:17.820 --> 0:21:19.830
<v Speaker 3>are going on the road all the way from West

0:21:19.850 --> 0:21:22.409
<v Speaker 3>Coast to East. Hardball has been great in this exact scenario.

0:21:22.650 --> 0:21:25.130
<v Speaker 3>We're also getting probably an extra one or two points

0:21:25.150 --> 0:21:27.310
<v Speaker 3>because Chad just talked about public perception where it's like

0:21:28.130 --> 0:21:29.109
<v Speaker 3>everyone's left in for dead.

0:21:29.830 --> 0:21:30.990
<v Speaker 2>They have to win this game.

0:21:31.070 --> 0:21:34.419
<v Speaker 3>I don't think people realize how desperate the head coach is,

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 3>everyone in the locker room is.

0:21:35.500 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Like, the NFL.

0:21:37.270 --> 0:21:39.340
<v Speaker 3>everyone knows oh and three is truly a death sentence

0:21:39.410 --> 0:21:41.189
<v Speaker 3>like in their own and they know especially in their

0:21:41.230 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 3>division they say no nfc south like this is a

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 3>12 13 win division like you're gonna have to win

0:21:47.220 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 3>that many games to win it have to get at

0:21:49.940 --> 0:21:52.340
<v Speaker 3>least 11 or 10 wins then get the wild card

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.179
<v Speaker 3>so they know like this is everything for the chargers

0:21:55.220 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 3>so yeah it's a game i think both of us

0:21:58.180 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 3>were not too high on as the week has gone

0:22:00.740 --> 0:22:02.899
<v Speaker 3>longer it's just too big of a number to avoid

0:22:02.940 --> 0:22:05.390
<v Speaker 3>and It was this or Miami, and I think they

0:22:05.410 --> 0:22:07.830
<v Speaker 3>both qualified for taking some big balls here. So I'm

0:22:07.850 --> 0:22:10.389
<v Speaker 3>happy we settled the Chargers. Herbert, bounce back spot.

0:22:11.230 --> 0:22:13.389
<v Speaker 1>We talked about Miami on Tuesday. I did bet the

0:22:13.410 --> 0:22:19.490
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins at 11.5. But that's just sort of you have

0:22:19.530 --> 0:22:22.570
<v Speaker 1>to take the number. As we got through the week,

0:22:23.130 --> 0:22:26.980
<v Speaker 1>the factors lining up for the Chargers, all of the

0:22:27.020 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>ways in which a good team is being dragged consistently–

0:22:31.380 --> 0:22:34.410
<v Speaker 1>shows that they are just in the supreme buy low

0:22:35.109 --> 0:22:37.989
<v Speaker 1>spot compared to the bills. I'm kind of glad we

0:22:38.010 --> 0:22:41.350
<v Speaker 1>landed on this one. I'm glad we avoided Cleveland and

0:22:41.410 --> 0:22:45.389
<v Speaker 1>Tampa as the brass balls too. So we are going

0:22:45.430 --> 0:22:49.470
<v Speaker 1>with the Los Angeles Chargers, the brass balls trade of

0:22:49.490 --> 0:22:54.389
<v Speaker 1>the week presented by Polymarket. They're currently trading at 52%

0:22:54.390 --> 0:22:56.750
<v Speaker 1>at seven and a half. I do need to tell

0:22:56.790 --> 0:23:00.830
<v Speaker 1>you about the new prediction market called Polymarket. It's the

0:23:00.970 --> 0:23:04.710
<v Speaker 1>best new way to trade in sports in the past.

0:23:05.350 --> 0:23:07.370
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted action on the game, you'd put some

0:23:07.410 --> 0:23:09.750
<v Speaker 1>money in. And if your team was doing well and

0:23:09.790 --> 0:23:12.429
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to cash out, they'd lock the trade or

0:23:12.470 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>take a huge fee. But Polymarket is a prediction market.

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.139
<v Speaker 1>It's a stock exchange for sports, buying in and selling

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.540
<v Speaker 1>out on your terms. When your team goes down to 20%,

0:23:24.540 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you can buy in and sell it off at 40%.

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.700
<v Speaker 1>when they come back to double your money. I've tried

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.419
<v Speaker 1>them all and Polymarket is simply the best prediction market.

0:23:34.460 --> 0:23:37.460
<v Speaker 1>They're so confident you'll never go back to the other guys.

0:23:37.500 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>They're giving you a free $ 50 on your first trade

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.790
<v Speaker 1>when you deposit just $ 10. And now they've launched a

0:23:43.850 --> 0:23:46.910
<v Speaker 1>new feature called Squaz, a group chat where you can

0:23:46.990 --> 0:23:50.830
<v Speaker 1>see what everyone is trading on. So download the Polymarket

0:23:50.869 --> 0:23:52.969
<v Speaker 1>app today and use code SHARP when you sign up.

0:23:53.010 --> 0:23:57.190
<v Speaker 1>That's code SHARP to get $ 50 free After you trade

0:23:57.230 --> 0:24:02.270
<v Speaker 1>just $ 10. I just talked about Cleveland. They're two and

0:24:02.290 --> 0:24:04.889
<v Speaker 1>a half point underdogs at home. We're not going to

0:24:04.930 --> 0:24:08.450
<v Speaker 1>make them the brass balls. But I mentioned earlier, Simon,

0:24:08.470 --> 0:24:10.510
<v Speaker 1>you're going to like this. There are a bunch of

0:24:10.630 --> 0:24:14.470
<v Speaker 1>sickos in the betting discord. And the Browns were a

0:24:14.550 --> 0:24:17.369
<v Speaker 1>very hot topic of discussion this week. And when I

0:24:17.490 --> 0:24:21.790
<v Speaker 1>asked for submissions for what we should vote on for

0:24:21.810 --> 0:24:28.550
<v Speaker 1>the bet of the week, at telling... Fern raised the

0:24:28.609 --> 0:24:35.620
<v Speaker 1>topic of what if Watson is actually good again? Dude,

0:24:35.660 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>it's the eternal question, right? Didn't we talk about that

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>all offseason? What if Deshaun Watson is actually Deshaun Watson

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.060
<v Speaker 1>and his team is better than everyone thinks? That led

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.619
<v Speaker 1>to a movement in the discord of a vote on

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:52.820
<v Speaker 1>Watson anytime touchdown props in the game. I'm glad to

0:24:52.859 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>report that it did not win the vote, but I

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.620
<v Speaker 1>do love the creativity and people putting themselves out there.

0:24:57.660 --> 0:25:01.220
<v Speaker 1>So we will be doing a second grouper for a

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>very small bet on Watson's anytime touchdown at plus 330.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.820
<v Speaker 1>That said, I'm still on the Browns. I like him

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in the contest here.

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:14.699
<v Speaker 3>Chad, I don't want to do this to you. I

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 3>might have to make you do one segment per show

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.290
<v Speaker 3>on your Discord, and that's it. I can't let this pass.

0:25:19.869 --> 0:25:23.070
<v Speaker 3>run into chat talking about him and five guys talking

0:25:23.090 --> 0:25:23.770
<v Speaker 3>to some group chat.

0:25:24.070 --> 0:25:26.229
<v Speaker 2>We don't care. The group doesn't care.

0:25:26.690 --> 0:25:29.890
<v Speaker 1>It's more than five guys. Hey, listen, you know what?

0:25:30.210 --> 0:25:31.030
<v Speaker 1>You know what, Simon?

0:25:31.790 --> 0:25:32.010
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:25:32.090 --> 0:25:35.940
<v Speaker 1>This is a good opportunity. If I reach a certain

0:25:35.980 --> 0:25:38.900
<v Speaker 1>number of books sold pre-order, I will never talk about

0:25:38.940 --> 0:25:40.420
<v Speaker 1>it again. How about that?

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind talking about your book forever. I don't

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 2>mind about that.

0:25:44.220 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 3>It's just if I hear the word Discord one more time,

0:25:46.660 --> 0:25:48.810
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to start bashing this computer and I'm not.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:49.180
<v Speaker 2>Going to lie.

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.330
<v Speaker 1>People fucking love discords.

0:25:51.930 --> 0:25:52.889
<v Speaker 2>I can't stand the word.

0:25:52.910 --> 0:25:55.430
<v Speaker 1>They love it. Guess what? Guess what? You know what?

0:25:55.990 --> 0:25:58.210
<v Speaker 1>Everyone go pre-order the book and I'll never mention any

0:25:58.250 --> 0:26:00.310
<v Speaker 1>of it again. That's it.

0:26:00.369 --> 0:26:03.990
<v Speaker 2>Uh, yeah, the Browns, read the number.com.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:05.740
<v Speaker 1>Oh, pre-order the book and read the number.com.

0:26:05.780 --> 0:26:09.340
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead. I think we're both on the same page

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:09.980
<v Speaker 2>with the Browns.

0:26:10.020 --> 0:26:13.939
<v Speaker 3>It's just, it's crazy to think that Panthers are on

0:26:14.100 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 3>back to back road games as favorites with Bryce Young.

0:26:17.220 --> 0:26:21.730
<v Speaker 3>And it, it, Maybe we're overthinking it because it just

0:26:21.770 --> 0:26:24.150
<v Speaker 3>feels so easy to take the Browns here. I know

0:26:25.430 --> 0:26:27.909
<v Speaker 3>there's some crazy stat. I think it's since 2022 that

0:26:27.950 --> 0:26:32.820
<v Speaker 3>they're 6-17 the Browns straight up after a win. Like

0:26:32.859 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 3>they had been absolutely dreadful. But like you said, that's

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:40.100
<v Speaker 3>not really been with this coaching staff, this team, and

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.740
<v Speaker 3>obviously Watson. You say he's been part of some of that,

0:26:42.780 --> 0:26:44.340
<v Speaker 3>but not really. We've talked about it. The guy has

0:26:44.380 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 3>just not been on the field.

0:26:45.220 --> 0:26:48.070
<v Speaker 2>He's been hurt. So could he have played back into form?

0:26:49.050 --> 0:26:49.650
<v Speaker 2>He could.

0:26:49.770 --> 0:26:52.590
<v Speaker 3>We really don't know, though, because he looks so abysmal

0:26:52.609 --> 0:26:55.130
<v Speaker 3>against the Jaguars where it's like, what's real and what's not?

0:26:55.250 --> 0:26:57.530
<v Speaker 3>Is it really about Todd Bowles being a horrible defensive

0:26:57.590 --> 0:27:00.780
<v Speaker 3>coordinator and how bad that Bucs defense looked?

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how many times did he check it down

0:27:03.100 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 2>and it worked out for him?

0:27:03.859 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 3>How many times did he throw deep and his guys

0:27:06.700 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 3>broke two or three tackles and took it for a touchdown?

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.609
<v Speaker 2>It's like the Bucs were so bad. Carolina, say what

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:13.139
<v Speaker 2>you want.

0:27:13.830 --> 0:27:16.070
<v Speaker 3>They played hard in that Atlanta game and they did

0:27:16.109 --> 0:27:18.830
<v Speaker 3>bounce back there, but it's once again, is that a

0:27:18.869 --> 0:27:20.930
<v Speaker 3>Cooper rush got thing where he fumbled? I think it

0:27:20.950 --> 0:27:23.409
<v Speaker 3>was his first rush of the game. I mean, it

0:27:23.430 --> 0:27:25.530
<v Speaker 3>just went all downhill from there. Like you said that

0:27:26.030 --> 0:27:29.470
<v Speaker 3>that really set the tone for that game. And the

0:27:29.510 --> 0:27:31.130
<v Speaker 3>amount of people I heard from talking about Bryce Young

0:27:31.150 --> 0:27:32.750
<v Speaker 3>was shocking too. They're like, you guys got to give

0:27:32.770 --> 0:27:35.580
<v Speaker 3>more respect to him. We're a Carolina podcast.

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me?

0:27:36.820 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I was like, who says that?

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, also it's just, what do you guys want us

0:27:40.980 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 3>to do? Like celebrate him being Atlanta. It's, it's, it's

0:27:44.500 --> 0:27:45.060
<v Speaker 3>a little tough.

0:27:45.100 --> 0:27:48.420
<v Speaker 1>So, um anyone who says that we don't celebrate Bryce

0:27:48.460 --> 0:27:52.460
<v Speaker 1>Young has maybe listened to one episode well.

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:53.750
<v Speaker 3>We did I mean we didn't talk much about but

0:27:53.770 --> 0:27:55.990
<v Speaker 3>like I said it's he beat Atlanta I don't know

0:27:56.150 --> 0:27:57.649
<v Speaker 3>how much they want us to go crazy for him

0:27:57.890 --> 0:28:00.889
<v Speaker 3>but um yeah this is just a game that it's

0:28:00.910 --> 0:28:04.129
<v Speaker 3>like a couple of plus threes have popped up so

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 3>it is interesting there are pros obviously taking positions on

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.540
<v Speaker 3>Panthers so two and a half yeah it's another number

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.929
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't recommend but if you can get plus three.

0:28:13.090 --> 0:28:14.909
<v Speaker 3>And if this does start trading, I'm probably market a

0:28:14.950 --> 0:28:16.650
<v Speaker 3>plus three and a half. It's like, Oh my God,

0:28:17.090 --> 0:28:21.020
<v Speaker 3>you got it. It's a no brainer, but it's another number.

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:22.100
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to force people to take.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.020
<v Speaker 1>I did. Uh, I should caveat. I took the Browns

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:27.939
<v Speaker 1>at plus three. I haven't taken them at two and

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:29.740
<v Speaker 1>a half. It was a three earlier in the week.

0:28:29.780 --> 0:28:33.180
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it on Tuesday. Um, Oh, and to

0:28:33.260 --> 0:28:38.330
<v Speaker 1>Houston at Oh, and to Indianapolis, you just said it

0:28:38.490 --> 0:28:41.390
<v Speaker 1>like you go. Oh, and three in the AFC, uh,

0:28:42.270 --> 0:28:47.890
<v Speaker 1>Forget about the AFC South, but AFC Conference, you got

0:28:47.910 --> 0:28:50.770
<v Speaker 1>to win your division. Otherwise, you're not getting into the playoffs.

0:28:51.470 --> 0:28:53.890
<v Speaker 1>And right now, Jacksonville is starting to look a little

0:28:53.910 --> 0:28:57.820
<v Speaker 1>bit better. Both of these teams are struggling. Alec Pierce

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:59.979
<v Speaker 1>is going to be out for a significant amount of time.

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones has not looked as explosive, obviously because of

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>his Achilles, but just the downfield passing because Alec Pierce

0:29:07.580 --> 0:29:10.990
<v Speaker 1>has barely played has not been great. And this Houston

0:29:11.030 --> 0:29:13.310
<v Speaker 1>defense is just giving up so many points. And even

0:29:13.370 --> 0:29:16.740
<v Speaker 1>if C.J. Stroud has looked good, this game just feels

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>wonky all the way around. I know the Colts are

0:29:19.980 --> 0:29:24.100
<v Speaker 1>the side we should be playing, but like on a

0:29:24.180 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>scale of confidence, if we've got to choose five, I

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is going to be in my

0:29:28.660 --> 0:29:31.030
<v Speaker 1>top five or most confident picks.

0:29:33.410 --> 0:29:35.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pretty interesting futures markets.

0:29:35.790 --> 0:29:39.030
<v Speaker 3>Uh afc south winter jags right now is plus 125

0:29:39.030 --> 0:29:42.700
<v Speaker 3>houston is plus 140 and then all the way down

0:29:42.740 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 3>at plus 510 is the colts so pretty telling what

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.100
<v Speaker 3>the the books really think about this colts team and

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 3>how this is going to go like it's just.

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:54.740
<v Speaker 2>Another number though it hasn't really budged.

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Like i thought by time we'd come on today most

0:29:56.940 --> 0:29:59.980
<v Speaker 3>books would be at three I mean, they could still

0:30:00.020 --> 0:30:01.740
<v Speaker 3>get there by the time people hear this because we're

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.020
<v Speaker 3>obviously doing this in the morning. But, like, that Jags

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.610
<v Speaker 3>number moved up to three. Like, that makes sense, right?

0:30:07.630 --> 0:30:09.989
<v Speaker 3>It's like, okay, that money's coming in. This has just

0:30:10.010 --> 0:30:11.630
<v Speaker 3>been sitting at two and a half, which is starting

0:30:11.650 --> 0:30:14.050
<v Speaker 3>to make me like the Colts even more. Because, like

0:30:14.070 --> 0:30:16.630
<v Speaker 3>you said, they're now down their number one receiver. Their defense,

0:30:16.670 --> 0:30:19.670
<v Speaker 3>I tell you, they've given up 1,000 yards. Who is

0:30:19.730 --> 0:30:22.380
<v Speaker 3>backing this Colts team other than Sharps? And that's all

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 3>it is. Pros like me are going to take a

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.870
<v Speaker 3>position on it because it's a home divisional dog that's 0-2.

0:30:28.850 --> 0:30:31.330
<v Speaker 3>How did they not find a way? So I get

0:30:31.370 --> 0:30:32.490
<v Speaker 3>why we're all on Houston.

0:30:33.390 --> 0:30:35.450
<v Speaker 2>Look at this. I got a live movement chat. Why

0:30:35.470 --> 0:30:36.230
<v Speaker 2>are we doing this live?

0:30:36.810 --> 0:30:37.410
<v Speaker 1>Live move.

0:30:38.090 --> 0:30:40.490
<v Speaker 3>One of the more public books in all of America

0:30:41.070 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 3>has just moved the Colts down to plus one and

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:43.410
<v Speaker 3>a half.

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 2>So that's a big move.

0:30:45.140 --> 0:30:45.580
<v Speaker 1>Interesting.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:46.940
<v Speaker 2>That's huge.

0:30:47.780 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 3>But the fact that it's such a public book took

0:30:51.300 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 3>money from a professional and moved it a full point.

0:30:53.580 --> 0:30:56.540
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Yeah, it was another line. I'm just trying to

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 2>be patient waiting to get the three.

0:30:57.660 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 3>But as soon as we get off this call, obviously,

0:30:59.140 --> 0:31:01.230
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to take a position here on the Colts

0:31:01.290 --> 0:31:02.890
<v Speaker 3>at plus three or plus two and a half, whatever

0:31:02.910 --> 0:31:06.510
<v Speaker 3>I can get. But Houston, I understand why people are

0:31:06.530 --> 0:31:10.270
<v Speaker 3>backing them. But to me, their defense is still questionable.

0:31:10.570 --> 0:31:12.670
<v Speaker 3>And like there's some things I went back and watched

0:31:12.690 --> 0:31:14.890
<v Speaker 3>with that Bengals game. And like we said, you're going

0:31:14.910 --> 0:31:16.830
<v Speaker 3>to have a step down, obviously, from Chase and T.

0:31:16.870 --> 0:31:21.300
<v Speaker 2>Higgins. But. they were wide open across that defense.

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 3>They don't look like they're in shape, honestly, that Houston defense,

0:31:25.340 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 3>not prepared-wise either. It's going to be a great matchup,

0:31:29.220 --> 0:31:32.460
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you that much, where it's like Houston's offense,

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.709
<v Speaker 3>how much people want to bash C.J. Stroud, he's been

0:31:35.730 --> 0:31:37.650
<v Speaker 3>putting up stats. The guy's been passing like crazy. They

0:31:37.670 --> 0:31:40.170
<v Speaker 3>just can't run the ball, which is what their weakness

0:31:40.210 --> 0:31:43.210
<v Speaker 3>was last year. So it seems like there's still another

0:31:43.270 --> 0:31:46.290
<v Speaker 3>way for this Colts defense to beat this Houston offense.

0:31:46.310 --> 0:31:47.790
<v Speaker 3>They just take away their run once again and put

0:31:47.810 --> 0:31:51.370
<v Speaker 3>it on C.J., make them beat you. And you expect,

0:31:51.810 --> 0:31:54.430
<v Speaker 3>like I said, this number to stay two and a half,

0:31:54.540 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 3>but if it's already moving to one after a couple

0:31:56.660 --> 0:31:58.860
<v Speaker 3>of shops, if you're hearing this now and you want

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 3>to take a position like I am with the Colts,

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.460
<v Speaker 3>I would grab it now. It could easily drop or

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:06.700
<v Speaker 3>flip possibly the Colts being favored.

0:32:06.820 --> 0:32:09.940
<v Speaker 1>Well, then that changes things a little bit because if

0:32:09.980 --> 0:32:11.620
<v Speaker 1>we feel like we're getting the best of the number

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:13.330
<v Speaker 1>in the contest and we can still get her to

0:32:13.390 --> 0:32:16.610
<v Speaker 1>two and a half, we might want to lock something

0:32:16.690 --> 0:32:22.060
<v Speaker 1>in now. and give ourselves some options come Sunday. So

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we should think about that, if that's going to end

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.630
<v Speaker 1>up being something that we decide to do. New York

0:32:27.750 --> 0:32:32.650
<v Speaker 1>Jets at Detroit, minus six and a half. I mean, look,

0:32:32.970 --> 0:32:35.850
<v Speaker 1>the pros are on the Jets here. You know, the

0:32:35.870 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>real question is, can they sustain? Can Geno keep up

0:32:40.910 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Lions offense? That's really what it's going to

0:32:42.860 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>be about. We know Jared Goff is going to get his.

0:32:45.500 --> 0:32:48.300
<v Speaker 1>We know they're more talented across the board. we've been

0:32:48.340 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>playing with fire with the jets. Uh, we were on

0:32:51.540 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>them in week one. We weren't on them in week two.

0:32:55.140 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Now we go back to them in week three. Um,

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.660
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm on the jets, but not with conviction.

0:33:05.310 --> 0:33:05.850
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I get it.

0:33:05.850 --> 0:33:08.810
<v Speaker 3>It's you're asking them to cover three, three straight games.

0:33:09.090 --> 0:33:12.410
<v Speaker 3>You have that whole stat there. They played an overtime game.

0:33:12.770 --> 0:33:17.410
<v Speaker 3>Obviously lions coming off extended rest. Um, It's just so tempting.

0:33:17.430 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 3>We know how bad this Lions defense is, where it's

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 3>like they're plus 250 money line, the Jets. It's like,

0:33:23.860 --> 0:33:25.260
<v Speaker 3>I have to take a taste of that. I can't

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 3>help it. I see the scenarios of them winning this,

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:32.510
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, bad loss for the Lions, right? Double-digit loss

0:33:32.790 --> 0:33:35.710
<v Speaker 3>against a great Bills team. You expect them to come home,

0:33:35.770 --> 0:33:37.750
<v Speaker 3>extend a rest, and just beat the crap out of

0:33:37.770 --> 0:33:38.290
<v Speaker 3>this Jets team.

0:33:38.310 --> 0:33:38.890
<v Speaker 2>So I'm with you.

0:33:38.910 --> 0:33:41.230
<v Speaker 3>We can avoid it, but I've already taken positions on

0:33:41.250 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 3>the Jets. I'm going to bet the Jets, but yeah,

0:33:43.710 --> 0:33:45.300
<v Speaker 3>I'm not in love with it because the number has moved.

0:33:46.300 --> 0:33:49.510
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota, Tampa Bay, we talked about this in Sharp Calls,

0:33:49.690 --> 0:33:52.810
<v Speaker 1>a lot of split. I did bet the bucks at

0:33:53.210 --> 0:33:56.070
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. In our convo, you seem to

0:33:56.190 --> 0:33:59.770
<v Speaker 1>favor the Vikings. From Sharp Calls, it feels like it's

0:33:59.910 --> 0:34:03.460
<v Speaker 1>very split. Kevin O'Connell, as you mentioned, very good on

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.540
<v Speaker 1>the road against the spread. Kyler Murray coming back. At

0:34:06.580 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, we're betting the 0-2 logic here, right?

0:34:10.140 --> 0:34:14.710
<v Speaker 1>This is another one where you can't go 0-3. This

0:34:14.770 --> 0:34:17.230
<v Speaker 1>is a team that to me is in as bad

0:34:17.270 --> 0:34:21.270
<v Speaker 1>a shape and getting as much bad juju as the

0:34:21.310 --> 0:34:26.590
<v Speaker 1>Chargers are. They need to turn something around here. And Minnesota, meanwhile,

0:34:27.310 --> 0:34:31.690
<v Speaker 1>like the way they've won this season has been super,

0:34:31.750 --> 0:34:36.870
<v Speaker 1>super ugly and a little bit fluky. So can the

0:34:36.950 --> 0:34:41.330
<v Speaker 1>Bucs against a defense that is blitzing 82% of the

0:34:41.370 --> 0:34:46.310
<v Speaker 1>time find a way to combat that for one game

0:34:46.890 --> 0:34:49.910
<v Speaker 1>and right the ship? Because otherwise, Todd Bowles is probably

0:34:49.930 --> 0:34:53.150
<v Speaker 1>getting fired, and the only conversation is, wow, did the

0:34:53.190 --> 0:34:58.810
<v Speaker 1>Bucs just give Baker Mayfield $ 55 million a year, and

0:34:58.870 --> 0:35:02.930
<v Speaker 1>are they going to go down with the ship? Yeah.

0:35:03.170 --> 0:35:05.370
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, though, people are saying to themselves, well,

0:35:05.390 --> 0:35:09.029
<v Speaker 3>they can't go 0-3. They can't start 0-3. Like hell

0:35:09.070 --> 0:35:09.490
<v Speaker 3>they can.

0:35:09.510 --> 0:35:11.489
<v Speaker 2>I mean, them and the Chargers are the same boat.

0:35:11.510 --> 0:35:12.410
<v Speaker 2>The Chargers could.

0:35:12.390 --> 0:35:14.500
<v Speaker 3>Easily get blown out by the Bills and be 0-3,

0:35:14.489 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 3>and we honestly wouldn't be that shocked. They're just, just

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:21.390
<v Speaker 3>like the books, they've looked underprepared and played very sloppy

0:35:21.410 --> 0:35:23.910
<v Speaker 3>football for through the first two weeks. And yeah, if

0:35:23.950 --> 0:35:25.569
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to take Minnesota as a money line,

0:35:26.210 --> 0:35:28.190
<v Speaker 3>go bet. Todd Bowles be first coach fire. You're getting

0:35:28.230 --> 0:35:31.489
<v Speaker 3>way better odds. And this, I mean, if they have

0:35:31.550 --> 0:35:33.630
<v Speaker 3>a pulse, the ownership, why would they not? I mean,

0:35:33.650 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 3>they just, the fact that they let out a guy

0:35:36.540 --> 0:35:39.580
<v Speaker 3>like Dave Canales and then like Liam Cohen walk to

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.580
<v Speaker 3>offensive geniuses and seeing what their offense are doing. And

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:44.020
<v Speaker 3>then on this flip side, you see what this team

0:35:44.060 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 3>has become in the bucks. Like, It's just, man, it's tough.

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 3>If you have bad ownership, it's just tough. And obviously,

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.690
<v Speaker 3>it's not bad ownership. I mean, they got Brady. They

0:35:52.710 --> 0:35:55.169
<v Speaker 3>won that Super Bowl during the COVID year. Props to them.

0:35:55.230 --> 0:36:00.150
<v Speaker 3>But they've been able to sustain since Brady left with Baker.

0:36:00.170 --> 0:36:04.030
<v Speaker 3>So they obviously have a lot of love for Baker

0:36:04.090 --> 0:36:07.620
<v Speaker 3>as an organization. I think they're going to put the

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:09.219
<v Speaker 3>blame quicker on Todd Bowles than they will on.

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:13.259
<v Speaker 2>Baker, honestly. Oh, yeah. To me, it's been Baker's fault.

0:36:13.739 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 3>The defense also has been horrible, like going through the tape,

0:36:16.460 --> 0:36:20.219
<v Speaker 3>especially last weekend's Cleveland. So I totally get why you

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.420
<v Speaker 3>want to bounce back here. But, yeah, that stat, you know,

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:25.739
<v Speaker 3>if it's a total under 45 and they're on the

0:36:25.780 --> 0:36:28.940
<v Speaker 3>road as a favorite on the Vikings, Kevin O'Connell, KOC,

0:36:29.620 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 3>he is 13-0 straight up. So it's like he wins

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 3>these ugly low total games. That's what this is going

0:36:35.739 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 3>to be. I mean, that's what the book's at least saying.

0:36:37.140 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the total is 42.5. with Baker, you expect

0:36:41.340 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 3>that to go over, right? The guy always gives either

0:36:43.380 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 3>short field turnovers or it goes boom or bust touchdown.

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:47.810
<v Speaker 3>So I just thought that was interesting. The books hung

0:36:47.850 --> 0:36:49.549
<v Speaker 3>that because we've talked about, they have a little bit

0:36:49.570 --> 0:36:51.150
<v Speaker 3>of a weird weather pattern down there too. It might

0:36:51.170 --> 0:36:53.830
<v Speaker 3>have some bad rain again, which, you know, both these

0:36:53.850 --> 0:36:56.310
<v Speaker 3>teams literally just playing that same exact weather last week,

0:36:56.750 --> 0:37:00.170
<v Speaker 3>both went to the under. So it's another week of like,

0:37:00.310 --> 0:37:02.190
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we've been a ton of rain unders

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:04.180
<v Speaker 3>and betting these gross dogs.

0:37:04.219 --> 0:37:05.860
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, I get where you're coming from the bucks.

0:37:05.940 --> 0:37:07.330
<v Speaker 2>I just, It's the same thing.

0:37:07.350 --> 0:37:08.489
<v Speaker 3>I wish it was still two and a half or

0:37:08.530 --> 0:37:10.310
<v Speaker 3>closer to three. Then I could have been convinced of

0:37:10.330 --> 0:37:11.750
<v Speaker 3>the Bucs. I'm the same boat as you where it's

0:37:11.790 --> 0:37:15.870
<v Speaker 3>like we know the trends. The 2-0 Vikings, 2-0 against

0:37:15.890 --> 0:37:18.910
<v Speaker 3>the spread, this is such a letdown spot. They're supposed

0:37:18.930 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 3>to win, especially after a divisional win against the Bears.

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:26.540
<v Speaker 3>But it's really just my– about this Bucs team. Even

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:27.959
<v Speaker 3>when you talk about putting them as our big balls,

0:37:28.020 --> 0:37:29.379
<v Speaker 3>it's like, man, can we do something else?

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:29.860
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to.

0:37:30.450 --> 0:37:32.589
<v Speaker 3>Invest this team right now so that's probably another reason

0:37:32.610 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 3>why we should but there's just a lot of underlining

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:36.780
<v Speaker 3>trends right now that point to the vikings are actually

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.060
<v Speaker 3>a much better team and they're just so much well

0:37:39.340 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 3>more well coached it's like if if this is the

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.210
<v Speaker 3>type of matchup the bucks need to win it's you

0:37:45.230 --> 0:37:46.830
<v Speaker 3>couldn't have picked the worst defense to go against the

0:37:46.850 --> 0:37:47.530
<v Speaker 3>top bulls.

0:37:49.050 --> 0:37:50.989
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny that we have that feeling about the

0:37:51.030 --> 0:37:53.990
<v Speaker 1>bucks uh i feel i always feel like we've traded

0:37:54.030 --> 0:37:57.500
<v Speaker 1>roles here Because normally I'd be getting the ick about

0:37:57.540 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the Bucs, even though we know it's the exact right

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:04.339
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. The fact that you're getting the ick

0:38:04.390 --> 0:38:09.569
<v Speaker 1>about the Bucs gives me tremendous pause. Also the number.

0:38:10.090 --> 0:38:11.830
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be one and a half

0:38:11.870 --> 0:38:15.450
<v Speaker 1>when it comes time to play it. And we're just

0:38:15.489 --> 0:38:16.810
<v Speaker 1>not getting the best of it. And I think this

0:38:16.850 --> 0:38:20.010
<v Speaker 1>is a game where the number, it could potentially matter,

0:38:20.820 --> 0:38:22.900
<v Speaker 1>especially the way the Vikings have been playing just sort

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of some fluky, fluky football. Arizona at San Francisco. San

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:30.660
<v Speaker 1>Francisco is an eight and a half point favorite. You

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>raised this on Tuesday. I hadn't considered it at the time,

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.020
<v Speaker 1>but it totally makes sense, right? Buy low, sell high

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in the division. 80% of the bets are on the Niners.

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:43.420
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the PMs, the price is 50

0:38:43.420 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>cents on either side. That tells you at least some

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>pros are on Arizona. We've seen some places take it

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.879
<v Speaker 1>down to eight. Not afraid of the Cardinals in this spot.

0:38:56.540 --> 0:38:59.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, our only fear is, are the Cardinals a smoke

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:02.090
<v Speaker 3>and mirrors team? Are they that team we saw in

0:39:02.150 --> 0:39:04.450
<v Speaker 3>week one? Or are they closer to the team we

0:39:04.469 --> 0:39:06.710
<v Speaker 3>saw against Seattle in week two? And it's like, I

0:39:06.750 --> 0:39:09.790
<v Speaker 3>have to believe that Seattle just makes everyone look like that.

0:39:09.810 --> 0:39:10.549
<v Speaker 1>They're closer to.

0:39:10.570 --> 0:39:11.390
<v Speaker 2>The week one team.

0:39:11.430 --> 0:39:16.380
<v Speaker 3>So the 49ers, Brock Purdy, deservedly so. Should be getting

0:39:16.390 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 3>tons of love and hype right now. I mean, he's played...

0:39:19.100 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 3>You could say he's been the best quarterback statistically through

0:39:22.020 --> 0:39:22.540
<v Speaker 3>two weeks.

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 2>He just.

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:26.990
<v Speaker 3>completing the ball at a high rate, incredible on third downs,

0:39:27.070 --> 0:39:28.859
<v Speaker 3>just makes all the right decisions in the red zone.

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.859
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Purdy is playing great football right now, but

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:38.419
<v Speaker 3>it's a huge number for a divisional game. And for

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 3>what I don't know, right, about the jet lag stuff,

0:39:41.540 --> 0:39:44.380
<v Speaker 3>what I've heard from people is this is the week

0:39:44.780 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 3>or the next two weeks where it's supposed to really

0:39:46.660 --> 0:39:49.879
<v Speaker 3>start hitting this 49ers team, right? Who have been back now.

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 3>So it's like, is that game against Miami? They didn't

0:39:52.380 --> 0:39:55.020
<v Speaker 3>look at jet lag at all. They beat them. They

0:39:55.060 --> 0:39:56.740
<v Speaker 3>beat the crap out of Miami from the first snap.

0:39:56.780 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 3>The defense was flying over the place. And we've talked,

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.580
<v Speaker 3>my question about this 49ers team is yes, Fred Warner's back, Bosa's.

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:03.220
<v Speaker 2>Back, studs.

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 3>The secondary can be attacked and they've heard it all week.

0:40:07.300 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Percent's heard it all week. What is wrong with Marvin

0:40:09.420 --> 0:40:13.109
<v Speaker 3>Harrison and junior? And it's like, what is wrong with

0:40:13.150 --> 0:40:15.009
<v Speaker 3>putting the ball downfield? And it's like, how are we

0:40:15.030 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 3>not getting this guy more involved in, I think everyone

0:40:17.500 --> 0:40:20.220
<v Speaker 3>would tell you, people that like scouting players in college,

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:22.410
<v Speaker 3>I'm like everyone else, where I was so wrong on

0:40:22.430 --> 0:40:24.569
<v Speaker 3>this kid, where it's like, I thought he was going

0:40:24.590 --> 0:40:28.850
<v Speaker 3>to come in, Marvin, and just be at minimum of

0:40:28.850 --> 0:40:31.750
<v Speaker 3>50 to 60 yards per game, five, six receptions per game,

0:40:31.790 --> 0:40:33.310
<v Speaker 3>just a safety valve.

0:40:33.410 --> 0:40:34.450
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he was ever going to be

0:40:34.469 --> 0:40:36.610
<v Speaker 2>a Hall of Famer like his dad, obviously, but I

0:40:36.610 --> 0:40:38.580
<v Speaker 2>thought he would be a good pro. He thought he'd

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:39.259
<v Speaker 2>be pro-ready.

0:40:39.500 --> 0:40:41.700
<v Speaker 1>Everyone thought he would be pro-ready.

0:40:42.420 --> 0:40:42.819
<v Speaker 2>He is.

0:40:44.430 --> 0:40:46.930
<v Speaker 3>He is dying to get somewhere new. Cause it just

0:40:46.950 --> 0:40:48.670
<v Speaker 3>looks like his total, his career is just going to

0:40:48.690 --> 0:40:49.650
<v Speaker 3>be a total waste in Arizona.

0:40:49.670 --> 0:40:51.609
<v Speaker 2>He just looks unmotivated.

0:40:51.630 --> 0:40:53.860
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's tape of him last week, not blocking.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.700
<v Speaker 3>And as someone that watches tape, their coaches obviously see

0:40:57.739 --> 0:41:01.060
<v Speaker 3>the same thing. There's nothing that makes me angrier than

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:02.620
<v Speaker 3>a wide receiver doesn't block for the running back.

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Cause it's, it takes the whole team. The running back

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:06.379
<v Speaker 2>will never be able to break a run.

0:41:06.820 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 3>If the wide receivers is letting a free cornerback get

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 3>a free, free hit on them.

0:41:10.739 --> 0:41:13.450
<v Speaker 2>It's just like, I saw him do that on multiple plays.

0:41:13.530 --> 0:41:14.410
<v Speaker 2>It's like, oh, my God.

0:41:14.830 --> 0:41:16.230
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what the coaching staff can do to

0:41:16.250 --> 0:41:19.430
<v Speaker 3>get in this kid's head. But, yeah, for Arizona, this number,

0:41:19.469 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 3>it's like this is insane to have the 49ers be

0:41:22.660 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 3>favored this much in divisional games. So another game where

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>it's like upset alert. If you're going to bet Arizona here,

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:31.299
<v Speaker 3>you have to put a little on the money line

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:31.860
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:41:32.620 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 2>It's obviously a long shot.

0:41:33.700 --> 0:41:35.720
<v Speaker 3>We're really banking on the back door here with Brissette,

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.060
<v Speaker 3>who even last year he was good to us in

0:41:38.100 --> 0:41:38.500
<v Speaker 3>the season.

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.020
<v Speaker 2>He had always put up a lot of points in

0:41:40.060 --> 0:41:40.500
<v Speaker 2>junk time.

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:43.260
<v Speaker 3>Not only do I think they don't have the secondary

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.700
<v Speaker 3>to hold on to a lead this big, the Niners, yeah,

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:47.980
<v Speaker 3>they beat up Miami last week.

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Miami could stop turning the ball over. The Cardinals aren't

0:41:50.500 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 2>that same type of team.

0:41:51.460 --> 0:41:54.870
<v Speaker 3>So just to spread this big, yeah, I'm just not

0:41:54.910 --> 0:41:56.770
<v Speaker 3>shocked to hear, like you said, that 80% of the money, 80%

0:41:56.770 --> 0:41:58.549
<v Speaker 3>of the bets are on the Niners. It's just going

0:41:58.570 --> 0:42:00.810
<v Speaker 3>to be all pros taking up this on the Cardinals.

0:42:01.330 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what your next game on your list is,

0:42:02.630 --> 0:42:04.310
<v Speaker 3>but I do want to talk Miami Chiefs.

0:42:05.410 --> 0:42:07.330
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about it. I didn't put them

0:42:07.370 --> 0:42:09.910
<v Speaker 1>on the list because I felt like when I mentioned

0:42:09.950 --> 0:42:14.469
<v Speaker 1>it the other day, you were so against it after

0:42:14.530 --> 0:42:16.870
<v Speaker 1>I had taken an 11 and a half, but if

0:42:17.010 --> 0:42:20.350
<v Speaker 1>feelings have changed, let's talk about it. Let's talk it out.

0:42:21.670 --> 0:42:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, really. I want to be on it.

0:42:22.810 --> 0:42:25.350
<v Speaker 3>Cause it's just, I just think Miami team has nothing.

0:42:25.630 --> 0:42:28.939
<v Speaker 3>And the more I look into them, it's like, they're

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 3>not as terrible as I perceive them.

0:42:31.180 --> 0:42:32.899
<v Speaker 2>They've had, they have had a rough go through to

0:42:33.020 --> 0:42:34.060
<v Speaker 2>the first two weeks here.

0:42:34.140 --> 0:42:37.340
<v Speaker 3>And it turns out maybe the Raiders are a little

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 3>better than I've given them credit for. And, last week

0:42:40.500 --> 0:42:42.219
<v Speaker 3>like i talked about everything just went wrong from that

0:42:42.260 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 3>game against the 49ers and that was just me viewing

0:42:44.820 --> 0:42:46.859
<v Speaker 3>them as just being unprepared which they did in some

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:51.410
<v Speaker 3>sense they were unprepared but it really is what i

0:42:51.430 --> 0:42:55.930
<v Speaker 3>was getting earful about is we we've been riding a

0:42:55.989 --> 0:42:58.529
<v Speaker 3>group right now on the chiefs and they are two

0:42:58.590 --> 0:43:01.690
<v Speaker 3>and oh on on positions they've taken in chiefs games

0:43:02.390 --> 0:43:04.270
<v Speaker 3>and they're back again this week taking a large position

0:43:04.330 --> 0:43:07.930
<v Speaker 3>on miami and The stats they're throwing out at me is,

0:43:08.010 --> 0:43:13.590
<v Speaker 3>which makes total sense. Miami was a double-digit dog, lost

0:43:13.650 --> 0:43:17.109
<v Speaker 3>last week. Now they're a double-digit dog again. Just doesn't

0:43:17.130 --> 0:43:18.630
<v Speaker 3>even matter. This isn't even a week three stat. This

0:43:18.670 --> 0:43:22.509
<v Speaker 3>is just in general. They are 58 and 25 against

0:43:22.550 --> 0:43:25.069
<v Speaker 3>the spread. So they're hitting at a 67% when they're

0:43:25.090 --> 0:43:27.810
<v Speaker 3>a double-digit dog again, which that's what Miami is.

0:43:28.450 --> 0:43:31.509
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes is a double-digit favorite in his career. Oh, four

0:43:31.530 --> 0:43:32.510
<v Speaker 2>and one against the spread.

0:43:32.590 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:43:33.390 --> 0:43:37.420
<v Speaker 3>So it's like, The stats pan it out, the trends

0:43:37.500 --> 0:43:39.540
<v Speaker 3>pan it out, and you look at the matchup where

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:43.580
<v Speaker 3>this Chiefs team we've talked about a little bit, not

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:48.969
<v Speaker 3>that they're overrated, but Mahomes has had to, especially Kenneth Walker,

0:43:48.989 --> 0:43:50.970
<v Speaker 3>have had to play at such an insanely high level

0:43:51.710 --> 0:43:53.870
<v Speaker 3>for them to be 2-0 right now. Not that we're

0:43:53.890 --> 0:43:56.469
<v Speaker 3>expecting a letdown spot here, but you've already seen Andy

0:43:56.510 --> 0:43:59.330
<v Speaker 3>Reid say, Kenneth Walker's leading the league in touches right now.

0:43:59.350 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 3>We're going to give him way less touches. So it

0:44:01.660 --> 0:44:03.819
<v Speaker 3>just feels like this game is going to be not

0:44:03.860 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 3>a slowdown rehab game, but they're off a Monday night

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:08.420
<v Speaker 3>game and then a Sunday night game.

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:10.020
<v Speaker 2>Now they're on the road to Miami.

0:44:10.140 --> 0:44:14.060
<v Speaker 3>Like this just feels like a sleepwalk that we were

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:15.060
<v Speaker 3>going to easily win this.

0:44:15.060 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 2>One type of game. And all of a sudden they

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:17.140
<v Speaker 2>find themselves in a.

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:20.219
<v Speaker 3>7.3 point final game where it's like, they're not going

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:22.940
<v Speaker 3>to blow this team out here in Miami. So the

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 3>more I thought about the more calls I got about,

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.620
<v Speaker 3>it's like, you're right. I'm, I'm, I'm passing an opportunity

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 3>here on Miami where who knows how many times we're,

0:44:29.350 --> 0:44:30.910
<v Speaker 3>how many opportunities we're going to have to really back

0:44:30.969 --> 0:44:34.810
<v Speaker 3>Miami this season and, and actually feel good about it. But,

0:44:35.260 --> 0:44:37.180
<v Speaker 3>I feel pretty good here now about Miami taking a

0:44:37.219 --> 0:44:40.130
<v Speaker 3>position on them. It all matches up of a Chiefs

0:44:40.190 --> 0:44:41.430
<v Speaker 3>team kind of let down here.

0:44:42.270 --> 0:44:46.029
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, the other thing is that Andy Reid has

0:44:46.150 --> 0:44:48.950
<v Speaker 1>shown a tendency, if he's got a lead in the

0:44:48.989 --> 0:44:53.009
<v Speaker 1>second half, he's going as slow as possible and playing

0:44:53.070 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>as conservative as possible. And if there's four minutes left

0:44:58.020 --> 0:45:00.540
<v Speaker 1>in the game and they have the ball, he's going

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>to do everything he can to hold onto that ball

0:45:02.260 --> 0:45:05.060
<v Speaker 1>until the end of the game. There's less of a

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:08.820
<v Speaker 1>risk of sort of a front door cover with the

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:12.219
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs if they're up by seven at the end of

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:17.770
<v Speaker 1>the game because he's less likely to try to put

0:45:17.810 --> 0:45:21.260
<v Speaker 1>the final nail in the coffin. Great. I love it.

0:45:21.810 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I love taking Miami in this spot. What do you

0:45:26.660 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think if it's a 10 and a half? Doesn't matter. No.

0:45:30.469 --> 0:45:31.660
<v Speaker 2>Anything above 10 is nice.

0:45:31.700 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 3>We want to stay in the double-digit dog. Some books

0:45:34.980 --> 0:45:37.700
<v Speaker 3>have already moved to 10.5. I would be shocked if

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 3>they drop below 10, just because it's all Chiefs money.

0:45:41.380 --> 0:45:42.660
<v Speaker 3>Everyone I talk to, it's all Chiefs money. People are

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 3>doing the same thing I thought I was going to do,

0:45:43.820 --> 0:45:45.900
<v Speaker 3>which is just tease the Chiefs down. That just feels

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.130
<v Speaker 3>like the safest option here. Now, I'm just going to

0:45:48.140 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 3>take a position on Miami, and that'll be it.

0:45:50.350 --> 0:45:56.870
<v Speaker 1>Simon says, was the Raiders at plus 3.5 at New Orleans?

0:45:56.930 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 1>That's trading at 53 cents on PolyMarket. on when it

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:05.340
<v Speaker 1>was Simon Says on Tuesday, it's now 54 cents. So

0:46:05.500 --> 0:46:09.750
<v Speaker 1>it's getting more expensive to trade the Raiders on Polymarket.

0:46:10.230 --> 0:46:13.930
<v Speaker 1>That tells you what people think about this opportunity that

0:46:13.969 --> 0:46:19.170
<v Speaker 1>they like the Raiders here. Do we like the Raiders

0:46:19.270 --> 0:46:21.690
<v Speaker 1>enough to keep them on the list?

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:25.620
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for Sunday, I still love him.

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 3>It's really, it really is about the Saints team has

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.180
<v Speaker 3>had a bunch of injuries this year and now they've

0:46:30.219 --> 0:46:34.009
<v Speaker 3>lost their best tackle. It's can't, can't say how much

0:46:34.050 --> 0:46:35.970
<v Speaker 3>of that's a big deal when you're facing Max Crosby.

0:46:36.090 --> 0:46:38.530
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you just saw what he did last week against,

0:46:38.710 --> 0:46:40.430
<v Speaker 3>you know, you could say Joel, it's not that great

0:46:40.469 --> 0:46:41.969
<v Speaker 3>of a tackle. He's, he's better than what the Saints

0:46:42.010 --> 0:46:43.590
<v Speaker 3>are going to be throwing out there this, this Sunday.

0:46:43.610 --> 0:46:47.240
<v Speaker 3>I tell you that much. So matchup wise, Kirk Cousins

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:50.020
<v Speaker 3>right now, crazy to say, but he's playing at a

0:46:50.020 --> 0:46:52.710
<v Speaker 3>very high level. He's, I think he's, tied the League

0:46:52.750 --> 0:46:56.029
<v Speaker 3>League in touchdown passes right now with Bryce Young. That's

0:46:56.050 --> 0:46:59.050
<v Speaker 3>without Brock Bowers. Like, he just looks very comfortable in

0:46:59.070 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 3>this Kubiak offense. And you saw Kubiak last year with

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.100
<v Speaker 3>Sam Darnold. He tends to get the best and kind

0:47:05.140 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 3>of exploits other team weaknesses defensively. Like, he can adjust

0:47:10.140 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 3>and make that team whatever they need to be defensively.

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 3>So I look at this offense of the Raiders as

0:47:17.110 --> 0:47:19.250
<v Speaker 3>not being as bad as still I think the public

0:47:19.290 --> 0:47:22.910
<v Speaker 3>perceives and defensively. I think the Raiders are, are, are

0:47:22.989 --> 0:47:24.540
<v Speaker 3>much better than they were last year. Like I've talked about,

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.460
<v Speaker 3>I know Kobe Dean has come in and he's really

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 3>done something that linebacking core and really shaken up this

0:47:28.660 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 3>Raiders team. So, um, another line that's honestly pretty split chat.

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Like I know, I know some really smart pros right

0:47:36.540 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 3>now on the saints. So it's one where it's like,

0:47:39.739 --> 0:47:42.300
<v Speaker 3>I'm not as banging the table as confident as I

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:43.819
<v Speaker 3>was just because I like being on the same side

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 3>as a lot of the smart groups. But just like

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:47.620
<v Speaker 3>I said, there's plenty of guys like me right now

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 3>back in this Raiders team, especially when it was plus

0:47:49.500 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 3>that three and a half. So, um, Another number I

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.410
<v Speaker 3>think you can be patient. I just think come Sunday,

0:47:55.620 --> 0:47:59.890
<v Speaker 3>the public, their last memory is this Saints team beating

0:47:59.930 --> 0:48:03.590
<v Speaker 3>Lamar Jackson. And as much as we want to say,

0:48:03.710 --> 0:48:06.489
<v Speaker 3>Kirk Cousins did have a big time win against the Chargers.

0:48:07.390 --> 0:48:08.969
<v Speaker 3>I feel like most of us is still putting that

0:48:09.010 --> 0:48:13.370
<v Speaker 3>on the Chargers offense where it's like, you know, pick sixes, safeties,

0:48:13.469 --> 0:48:16.170
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff. Like they just looked so lost offensively.

0:48:18.230 --> 0:48:20.830
<v Speaker 3>I'm really shocked that this number is held. at 3.5

0:48:20.830 --> 0:48:22.569
<v Speaker 3>and down to 3 now at some books. I really

0:48:22.590 --> 0:48:23.950
<v Speaker 3>thought this would be 2.5 by the time it came

0:48:24.050 --> 0:48:26.420
<v Speaker 3>today because it's like I didn't think any pros would

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:29.399
<v Speaker 3>be on the Saints team. So, yeah, they really love

0:48:29.420 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 3>and respect Shuck, which we did too coming into the season.

0:48:31.540 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah.

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.259
<v Speaker 3>I am upset that we've missed it. It's like he's

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:37.190
<v Speaker 3>been a big dog two straight weeks. This guy we

0:48:37.210 --> 0:48:38.370
<v Speaker 3>were high on coming into the year, and we didn't

0:48:38.390 --> 0:48:41.890
<v Speaker 3>play him either weeks in the contest. So I hate

0:48:41.910 --> 0:48:45.270
<v Speaker 3>to be fading Shuck here, but it's all about the number.

0:48:45.610 --> 0:48:47.300
<v Speaker 3>A plus 3, plus 3.5, I wouldn't be on the

0:48:47.340 --> 0:48:47.839
<v Speaker 3>Raiders side.

0:48:48.590 --> 0:48:52.779
<v Speaker 1>Brock Bowers was limited in practice yesterday. I think they're

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>hopeful he's going to play, which would also make a

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:01.100
<v Speaker 1>huge difference. I mean, what Kirk Cousins has done without

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:03.590
<v Speaker 1>Brock Bowers and what Klikubiak has done with that offense

0:49:03.610 --> 0:49:07.350
<v Speaker 1>without Brock Bowers, having Brock Bowers plays perfectly into what

0:49:08.150 --> 0:49:11.890
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins is really, really good at right now, which

0:49:11.950 --> 0:49:15.779
<v Speaker 1>is getting the ball in the middle, short passes to

0:49:16.060 --> 0:49:20.430
<v Speaker 1>people he's comfortable throwing to. That's getting brought back. back

0:49:20.469 --> 0:49:26.630
<v Speaker 1>could be hugely instrumental for the Raiders. Two games I

0:49:26.650 --> 0:49:28.529
<v Speaker 1>want to do quickly because I feel like they're not

0:49:29.770 --> 0:49:34.410
<v Speaker 1>raising up to the level where we're going to consider them.

0:49:34.489 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But the Rams are two and a half point dogs

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:40.489
<v Speaker 1>at the Broncos on Sunday night. I'm still kind of

0:49:40.530 --> 0:49:46.170
<v Speaker 1>torn on this game. The Broncos are missing three starting

0:49:46.230 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>running backs or three running backs. I'm not sure that

0:49:49.890 --> 0:49:53.460
<v Speaker 1>really matters in my analysis of this game. It's really

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:57.180
<v Speaker 1>going to come down to does Bo Nix end up

0:49:57.219 --> 0:50:01.880
<v Speaker 1>throwing some kind of piss missile interception at some point,

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>usually early in the game? the Rams are looking so

0:50:06.180 --> 0:50:08.320
<v Speaker 1>good after last week, but I still think they left

0:50:08.660 --> 0:50:12.020
<v Speaker 1>opportunities on the table. I'm going to say much, much

0:50:12.060 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 1>better defense in the Broncos in altitude. So I don't like,

0:50:16.860 --> 0:50:20.100
<v Speaker 1>I haven't bet this game. Don't really have a strong

0:50:20.140 --> 0:50:23.420
<v Speaker 1>opinion on this game. Yeah.

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:25.859
<v Speaker 3>It's, it's honestly not ideal that these running back truck

0:50:25.900 --> 0:50:27.839
<v Speaker 3>is that's a way you can attack this Rams team.

0:50:27.860 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 2>We've seen, you can run it up, run it up again.

0:50:29.540 --> 0:50:30.710
<v Speaker 1>They're not very good against the.

0:50:30.640 --> 0:50:35.089
<v Speaker 3>Run as great as Aaron Donald is. He's great because

0:50:35.110 --> 0:50:37.590
<v Speaker 3>what he can do with pass rush against the quarterback.

0:50:37.750 --> 0:50:40.589
<v Speaker 3>He's never been– I mean, he's good against the run. Obviously,

0:50:40.610 --> 0:50:43.890
<v Speaker 3>it's Aaron Donald. But now, at 35 years old, I

0:50:43.910 --> 0:50:45.250
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen anything on tape to be like, oh, this

0:50:45.290 --> 0:50:47.510
<v Speaker 3>guy's an absolute game wrecker against the run. It's like,

0:50:47.969 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 3>to me, Aaron's still playing himself into shape. I know

0:50:51.140 --> 0:50:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Eastman gave him that one pressure, whatever it was. The

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:56.100
<v Speaker 3>NFL gave him that one pressure. But he went back

0:50:56.140 --> 0:50:57.980
<v Speaker 3>and watched the game. He was just eating doubles. I mean,

0:50:58.000 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 3>that's what Aaron does. He used to beat doubles. Now

0:51:00.620 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 3>he just eats them, which– You know, the Rams are

0:51:02.620 --> 0:51:05.030
<v Speaker 3>more than happy that when Myles Garrett comes back, you

0:51:05.070 --> 0:51:06.469
<v Speaker 3>won't be able to double both of them. One of

0:51:06.489 --> 0:51:07.670
<v Speaker 3>them is going to get singled up, and that was

0:51:07.710 --> 0:51:10.390
<v Speaker 3>the whole point of Aaron coming back. So the Rams

0:51:10.410 --> 0:51:12.910
<v Speaker 3>just feel like you're getting a great time to fade

0:51:12.930 --> 0:51:15.469
<v Speaker 3>this Rams team. There's no Puka, no Myles Garrett, and

0:51:15.489 --> 0:51:19.810
<v Speaker 3>you have not 100% Aaron Donald. It's like there's every

0:51:19.890 --> 0:51:22.810
<v Speaker 3>time to keep fading this team, especially on a short

0:51:22.870 --> 0:51:26.259
<v Speaker 3>week now on the road in altitude. It's probably the Broncos.

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:27.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm like you where it's like I don't feel great

0:51:27.820 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 3>about it. I wish I did feel better about it.

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 2>I wish there was more.

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 3>More trends and things I can hang on to here,

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 3>but across the board, it's pretty split. I would say professionally,

0:51:36.219 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 3>but I would say more pros obviously take a position

0:51:38.020 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 3>on this Broncos team.

0:51:40.620 --> 0:51:42.609
<v Speaker 1>Monday night football. I just want to say it because

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:44.210
<v Speaker 1>it's the Eagles and the bears. And we've talked a

0:51:44.250 --> 0:51:47.230
<v Speaker 1>lot about it this week. To me, it's come completely

0:51:47.270 --> 0:51:48.969
<v Speaker 1>off the board. I had bet the bears at four

0:51:48.989 --> 0:51:51.969
<v Speaker 1>and a half last week. We don't really know at

0:51:51.989 --> 0:51:53.810
<v Speaker 1>this point who the QB is going to be for

0:51:53.830 --> 0:51:56.270
<v Speaker 1>the bears, probably going to be case Keenan, but we

0:51:56.290 --> 0:51:59.130
<v Speaker 1>don't know for sure. The line has jumped all around

0:51:59.170 --> 0:52:02.970
<v Speaker 1>in the past 48 hours because of the Tyson Bajent

0:52:03.050 --> 0:52:06.800
<v Speaker 1>news that he was in the concussion protocol. So the line,

0:52:06.860 --> 0:52:10.180
<v Speaker 1>which had been at 4.5 and then dropped down to 3,

0:52:10.180 --> 0:52:15.380
<v Speaker 1>has now gone back up to 4.5. Some places it's 5, 5.5.

0:52:15.380 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm off this game as sort of a contest play.

0:52:21.070 --> 0:52:21.610
<v Speaker 2>It's fair.

0:52:21.810 --> 0:52:24.270
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, I also bet the Bears 4.5, and

0:52:24.290 --> 0:52:26.330
<v Speaker 3>it was just the hope that it was going to

0:52:26.370 --> 0:52:28.900
<v Speaker 3>be The backup quarterbacks, like I've said, I don't want

0:52:28.940 --> 0:52:30.580
<v Speaker 3>it to be Caleb. I know Bears fans probably want

0:52:30.600 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Caleb coming back, but to me, it's just a game

0:52:34.580 --> 0:52:36.540
<v Speaker 3>they could win without him, right? This Eagles team is

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 3>still trying to work things out offensively and defensively, and

0:52:40.550 --> 0:52:42.970
<v Speaker 3>the Bears could easily steal this game with their backup quarterback,

0:52:43.010 --> 0:52:44.370
<v Speaker 3>but they also could easily get blown out of here,

0:52:44.390 --> 0:52:46.910
<v Speaker 3>like I've talked about. They have a horrible defense. You're

0:52:46.950 --> 0:52:49.290
<v Speaker 3>now on your third string quarterback, and you're going to

0:52:49.310 --> 0:52:51.930
<v Speaker 3>be facing a stack box. They're going to be more

0:52:51.950 --> 0:52:54.830
<v Speaker 3>than happy to have Case Keenum throwing that ball.

0:52:54.969 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'd have to look up the last time

0:52:57.440 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 2>he started in a game, but.

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:03.370
<v Speaker 3>We know that he has talent, but he's older now.

0:53:03.530 --> 0:53:05.810
<v Speaker 3>Like he's not what made him so good was he

0:53:05.830 --> 0:53:07.930
<v Speaker 3>was great in the pocket. He was able to escape

0:53:07.969 --> 0:53:11.650
<v Speaker 3>the pocket as well. So yeah, brutal, brutal, brutal. If

0:53:11.690 --> 0:53:14.070
<v Speaker 3>you're a Bears fan, like the fact that, you know, Bayesian,

0:53:15.010 --> 0:53:17.930
<v Speaker 3>a guy that if you're a national fan, you probably

0:53:17.969 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 3>don't care much about, but Bears fans, like most fan bases,

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 3>everyone loves the number two quarterback. They paid him a

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:25.879
<v Speaker 3>bunch of money. Ben Johnson's talk highly about this kid.

0:53:26.550 --> 0:53:28.130
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he got a concussion. I think it was

0:53:28.150 --> 0:53:30.410
<v Speaker 3>like three or four plays into that Vikings game. He

0:53:30.430 --> 0:53:33.150
<v Speaker 3>finished the game, but he never looked right, never played well.

0:53:33.950 --> 0:53:36.069
<v Speaker 3>You definitely don't want a guy not taking zero reps

0:53:36.110 --> 0:53:37.230
<v Speaker 3>now coming back from a concussion.

0:53:37.950 --> 0:53:39.810
<v Speaker 2>It would be male practice to put him out there.

0:53:39.870 --> 0:53:41.270
<v Speaker 2>So I think you're right.

0:53:41.530 --> 0:53:44.219
<v Speaker 3>It's either Keenum or it's going to be a miracle

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 3>somehow he gets back and you have your number one

0:53:47.420 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 3>quarterback back here. But I just– the more we think

0:53:51.060 --> 0:53:52.640
<v Speaker 3>about it, it's like is Caleb really going to be

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 3>back out there? That would just be so shocking. Even

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:57.730
<v Speaker 3>if it's a grade one hamstring, the odds of re-injured

0:53:57.770 --> 0:54:00.370
<v Speaker 3>are just so high right now. It's like, is it

0:54:00.410 --> 0:54:02.649
<v Speaker 3>worth derailing four to six weeks having to come back

0:54:03.110 --> 0:54:05.790
<v Speaker 3>a week too soon? So I think we both agree

0:54:05.810 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be Case. And where would you see

0:54:09.260 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 3>this line going? For me, I would be shocked if

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:13.900
<v Speaker 3>it gets– like I've said, the Eagles have struggled. I'd

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 3>be shocked if it gets up to six and a

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:17.980
<v Speaker 3>half or seven. And another game that could have bad weather,

0:54:18.100 --> 0:54:21.750
<v Speaker 3>like they're predicting some rain for this game on Monday night. So, yeah,

0:54:21.910 --> 0:54:24.589
<v Speaker 3>if it did jump way up there– I would, once again,

0:54:24.670 --> 0:54:26.650
<v Speaker 3>double down on the Bears. Just take it at a

0:54:26.690 --> 0:54:29.770
<v Speaker 3>better number. And like I said, if Caleb does come

0:54:29.810 --> 0:54:31.549
<v Speaker 3>back too early and this drops down to three, three

0:54:31.570 --> 0:54:33.130
<v Speaker 3>and a half, I'm going to buy out and take

0:54:33.150 --> 0:54:35.650
<v Speaker 3>a position on the Eagles. So it really is one

0:54:35.670 --> 0:54:37.490
<v Speaker 3>of those where I'm hoping they stick with the backups

0:54:37.510 --> 0:54:39.930
<v Speaker 3>because I think the Bears could, even if the Eagles

0:54:39.950 --> 0:54:42.370
<v Speaker 3>stack the Bucs, I still think there's ways for Ben

0:54:42.910 --> 0:54:45.010
<v Speaker 3>to scheme around it. Like he loves these type of challenges.

0:54:45.050 --> 0:54:46.669
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it's going to be a really fun game

0:54:46.690 --> 0:54:47.969
<v Speaker 3>whether Caleb plays or not.

0:54:48.650 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I haven't come close to buying out of the

0:54:50.780 --> 0:54:52.779
<v Speaker 1>Bears at four and a half, partially because I'm just

0:54:52.820 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see who the quarterback is. But I agree

0:54:55.140 --> 0:54:57.799
<v Speaker 1>with you. It's really going to be Bears at four

0:54:57.820 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and a half and I just hold on to the

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:02.860
<v Speaker 1>ticket and white knuckle it through the game. Or if

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:06.330
<v Speaker 1>it goes higher, then I'm just buying more Bears and

0:55:06.370 --> 0:55:11.390
<v Speaker 1>it'll be an ugly, ugly Monday night. Simon, what should

0:55:11.469 --> 0:55:24.009
<v Speaker 1>our underdog round robin money line look Parlay B. I

0:55:24.050 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>wrote down New York Jets. I wrote down Arizona. I

0:55:30.780 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 1>wrote down Indianapolis, Cleveland. We could put Denver in there.

0:55:36.700 --> 0:55:40.870
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we could start with Denver. That's a nice one.

0:55:41.489 --> 0:55:46.190
<v Speaker 3>It's so tempting to put the Colts in culture plus 115. Yeah.

0:55:47.070 --> 0:55:48.090
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised you're struggling.

0:55:48.110 --> 0:55:49.569
<v Speaker 3>We're just going to take all these short home favorites

0:55:49.590 --> 0:55:52.230
<v Speaker 3>because Cleveland's also plus 130.

0:55:52.230 --> 0:55:54.890
<v Speaker 1>Well, you could do Indy, Cleveland, Denver, but I would

0:55:54.910 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 1>also do maybe the Jets.

0:55:58.180 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, throw the Jets in.

0:55:59.739 --> 0:56:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And then to me, it's either Arizona or Las Vegas.

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:04.580
<v Speaker 2>Let's do Vegas.

0:56:04.600 --> 0:56:10.690
<v Speaker 1>Okay. So, underdog, money line, round robin, parlay is going

0:56:10.710 --> 0:56:16.660
<v Speaker 1>to be Jets, Vegas, Indy, Cleveland, Denver. What about our favorites?

0:56:17.780 --> 0:56:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Our faves? Seattle?

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:24.860
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I do Seattle.

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:27.319
<v Speaker 3>Again, I would do adjusted lines here that I wouldn't do.

0:56:27.340 --> 0:56:29.310
<v Speaker 3>There are many lines if possible. You can take Seattle

0:56:29.350 --> 0:56:30.890
<v Speaker 3>down to two and a half or one and a half.

0:56:31.430 --> 0:56:33.689
<v Speaker 3>Save some on the juice. Same goes to the Chiefs.

0:56:33.730 --> 0:56:36.589
<v Speaker 3>If you want to take the Chiefs down, the money

0:56:36.630 --> 0:56:41.270
<v Speaker 3>line is minus 650. If you can do minus two

0:56:41.310 --> 0:56:43.390
<v Speaker 3>and a half, maybe it's only minus 550.

0:56:43.390 --> 0:56:44.950
<v Speaker 2>You're saving yourself a lot there.

0:56:45.590 --> 0:56:48.390
<v Speaker 3>So it's like I want to give out the Chiefs,

0:56:48.410 --> 0:56:49.410
<v Speaker 3>but I don't want to give out their money line

0:56:49.430 --> 0:56:52.850
<v Speaker 3>because it's such an insane number. You've got to do

0:56:52.870 --> 0:56:58.340
<v Speaker 3>your Jaguars. That's a team you're pretty locked in on. Ravens,

0:56:58.480 --> 0:57:04.880
<v Speaker 3>minus 175. Yeah. And for our last one, I guess Cincy.

0:57:05.060 --> 0:57:07.279
<v Speaker 3>I've fallen a little bit out of love with it,

0:57:07.320 --> 0:57:10.989
<v Speaker 3>which I wish I hadn't, but that's still a nice

0:57:11.130 --> 0:57:13.210
<v Speaker 3>minus 185 for Cincy just to win that game.

0:57:14.430 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 1>All right. We normally only do three anyways for the

0:57:19.410 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 1>round robin, for the money line. But we can give

0:57:22.080 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>people the options. Take Seattle down to two and a

0:57:26.180 --> 0:57:28.420
<v Speaker 1>half or one and a half. Take Kansas City down

0:57:28.540 --> 0:57:32.150
<v Speaker 1>if you can. And then we'll go with the Jags,

0:57:32.970 --> 0:57:38.990
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, and the Ravens. What are your biggest bets?

0:57:39.910 --> 0:57:40.570
<v Speaker 2>Pull up those.

0:57:40.530 --> 0:57:42.150
<v Speaker 1>Pants and be a man!

0:57:42.910 --> 0:57:46.410
<v Speaker 3>The city right now, definitely Atlanta. Even four and a half,

0:57:46.490 --> 0:57:51.090
<v Speaker 3>I still invested pretty heavy into it. Talked about it

0:57:51.110 --> 0:57:53.730
<v Speaker 3>at that college game, Florida Ole Miss. I'm pretty heavily

0:57:53.750 --> 0:57:56.630
<v Speaker 3>invested in Florida at minus three. If you're stuck at

0:57:56.670 --> 0:57:57.110
<v Speaker 3>minus three and.

0:57:57.070 --> 0:57:59.010
<v Speaker 2>A half, I would still take it. I mean, if

0:57:59.030 --> 0:58:00.919
<v Speaker 2>you have to buy it, you can.

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.580
<v Speaker 3>If you're one of those people, you don't mind betting

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:07.640
<v Speaker 3>minus 125 or minus 122, sure. But I wouldn't let

0:58:07.660 --> 0:58:09.220
<v Speaker 3>the three and a half scare you off. There's a

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:11.760
<v Speaker 3>reason the books are giving the hook. To the Ole

0:58:11.780 --> 0:58:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Miss dog. I mean, it's just such a sucker bet

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:21.920
<v Speaker 3>this week. NFL-wise, yeah, still heavily invested. I mean, we

0:58:21.960 --> 0:58:25.030
<v Speaker 3>didn't talk much about it. Ravens, they were minus three.

0:58:25.510 --> 0:58:27.130
<v Speaker 3>I bet really having to do that one now, it's

0:58:27.170 --> 0:58:28.810
<v Speaker 3>at minus three and a half at a lot of books,

0:58:28.930 --> 0:58:32.430
<v Speaker 3>which another number where I get if it scares you off, right?

0:58:33.150 --> 0:58:34.710
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of questions about who the receivers are

0:58:34.730 --> 0:58:35.110
<v Speaker 2>going to be.

0:58:35.870 --> 0:58:38.610
<v Speaker 3>For the Ravens, it's just– All the data just shows

0:58:38.640 --> 0:58:42.620
<v Speaker 3>it's an amazing bounce back spot for Lamar. Lamar, after losing,

0:58:43.020 --> 0:58:45.560
<v Speaker 3>when he's a seven-point favorite and he loses the following week,

0:58:46.140 --> 0:58:49.380
<v Speaker 3>he's like 80% cover rate. He's like an incredible bouncing

0:58:49.400 --> 0:58:51.140
<v Speaker 3>back after an embarrassing loss like that.

0:58:52.020 --> 0:58:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, we should say, like, we didn't talk

0:58:54.100 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 1>about the Ravens because in a lot of places, it's

0:58:56.300 --> 0:58:58.730
<v Speaker 1>moved up to three and a half. And there's questions

0:58:58.750 --> 0:59:01.950
<v Speaker 1>about the field, the international game. There's just some quirkiness there.

0:59:02.010 --> 0:59:05.390
<v Speaker 1>But on Tuesday, we love the Ravens when we could

0:59:05.410 --> 0:59:06.850
<v Speaker 1>still get them at two and a half or three.

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:09.970
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And that's that's the thing is like I'm still betting.

0:59:10.090 --> 0:59:11.810
<v Speaker 3>To him like I've still bet the minus three and

0:59:11.830 --> 0:59:14.050
<v Speaker 3>a half but obviously we always feel better not getting

0:59:14.090 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 3>hooked like it was a it was a nice treat

0:59:16.300 --> 0:59:21.380
<v Speaker 3>at minus three but yeah I'll have more more calm

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Sunday more because right now like people aren't gonna win

0:59:23.140 --> 0:59:26.360
<v Speaker 3>my biggest bets like honestly I've really invested in Atlanta

0:59:26.380 --> 0:59:30.370
<v Speaker 3>Miami like it's just That's not going to really make

0:59:30.390 --> 0:59:32.530
<v Speaker 3>people want to go run to the window right now

0:59:32.550 --> 0:59:34.630
<v Speaker 3>and make those bets. But that's just the truth of

0:59:34.650 --> 0:59:36.830
<v Speaker 3>the city on Thursday. I'm sure I'll have more Sunday morning,

0:59:36.870 --> 0:59:40.210
<v Speaker 3>but we'll see how this Atlanta goes. I do think

0:59:40.230 --> 0:59:41.490
<v Speaker 3>this Atlanta one is going to set the tone where

0:59:41.530 --> 0:59:45.100
<v Speaker 3>it's like, if Green Bay wins, that's going to be

0:59:45.120 --> 0:59:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a huge win for the public. Because I just know

0:59:46.560 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 3>it's all professional money right now to take a position

0:59:48.600 --> 0:59:49.440
<v Speaker 3>on Atlanta and Pennix.

0:59:50.580 --> 0:59:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So, sharp versus square. I won in week one. You

0:59:56.120 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 1>won in week one. I won in week two with

0:59:58.800 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans plus eight and a half. You lost in

1:00:01.220 --> 1:00:03.860
<v Speaker 1>week two with the cards plus four and a half.

1:00:04.320 --> 1:00:13.180
<v Speaker 1>So I get to go first. Um, you know what?

1:00:14.080 --> 1:00:18.410
<v Speaker 1>Miami was the first bet I made this week. I'll

1:00:18.450 --> 1:00:23.130
<v Speaker 1>take Miami plus 11. There you go.

1:00:23.810 --> 1:00:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Um, I guess because I can't do Atlanta because no

1:00:27.540 --> 1:00:28.780
<v Speaker 3>one's going to hear it in time.

1:00:30.700 --> 1:00:32.490
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll go Atlanta on the Ravens. Give me the

1:00:32.510 --> 1:00:34.510
<v Speaker 2>Ravens minus three and a half. Raven.

1:00:34.630 --> 1:00:37.330
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's a good one, too. That's a really good one.

1:00:37.670 --> 1:00:40.230
<v Speaker 1>I like that. All right. We got to pick a survivor. Like,

1:00:40.410 --> 1:00:42.130
<v Speaker 1>in theory, we're out because.

1:00:42.630 --> 1:00:43.950
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm not going to do a bunch.

1:00:44.690 --> 1:00:46.510
<v Speaker 3>I talked about last week. The coward move was to

1:00:46.550 --> 1:00:49.410
<v Speaker 3>go half and half. I went half on. Obviously, we

1:00:49.430 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 3>just fade to Miami. So I did 49ers last week.

1:00:52.260 --> 1:00:53.340
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to do the same this week with the

1:00:53.380 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs if people want to join me on that one.

1:00:55.640 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>um it's just you really can't go wrong going against

1:00:59.240 --> 1:01:01.260
<v Speaker 3>my aim you expect my homes to win this type

1:01:01.300 --> 1:01:02.660
<v Speaker 3>of game and i don't know when else i'm going

1:01:02.680 --> 1:01:04.260
<v Speaker 3>to use my homes it just feels like a nice

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:07.660
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to use the chiefs and um yeah if you're

1:01:09.110 --> 1:01:11.990
<v Speaker 3>looking for other other options i know people have put

1:01:12.010 --> 1:01:14.890
<v Speaker 3>out seattle which is a fair one but like we

1:01:14.910 --> 1:01:16.770
<v Speaker 3>talked about that could be in a tsunami like it

1:01:16.810 --> 1:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>could be truly insane weather um those are just the

1:01:21.580 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 3>only other option really is the lines. So it's, it's

1:01:23.580 --> 1:01:25.740
<v Speaker 3>just a tough week where it feels like I have

1:01:25.760 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 3>to use the chief. So yeah, it's, I get people

1:01:28.360 --> 1:01:29.620
<v Speaker 3>are going to shop around a lot. I'm just going

1:01:29.640 --> 1:01:31.800
<v Speaker 3>to try to go safe route, which wish we had

1:01:31.820 --> 1:01:33.490
<v Speaker 3>just done and avoided the bucks last week and just

1:01:33.510 --> 1:01:35.130
<v Speaker 3>going against Miami and just taking the chiefs.

1:01:37.370 --> 1:01:38.810
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. It, for me, it was going

1:01:38.830 --> 1:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to be chiefs or Niners. So that's where we'll be.

1:01:43.660 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Cause I do have, I do have one remaining survivor

1:01:46.760 --> 1:01:50.850
<v Speaker 1>pool entry. All right. On Sunday, I think we're going

1:01:50.870 --> 1:01:53.010
<v Speaker 1>to have an interesting conversation. There's a lot of games

1:01:53.030 --> 1:01:55.810
<v Speaker 1>that we still need to narrow. I think we got

1:01:55.850 --> 1:02:00.410
<v Speaker 1>like eight games and we got to choose five. So

1:02:00.430 --> 1:02:04.090
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting conversation on Sunday. That's our show. We

1:02:04.150 --> 1:02:07.950
<v Speaker 1>will return on Sunday morning with our final NFL week

1:02:08.270 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>three bets. We'll give out our official five picks in

1:02:12.120 --> 1:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>our free $ 25, 000 pick them contest. You're not too late.

1:02:15.740 --> 1:02:21.870
<v Speaker 1>Sign up now, sharp or square. www.thevolume.com. This has been

1:02:21.890 --> 1:02:24.170
<v Speaker 1>a Sharper Square sponsored by Polymarket, part of the Volume

1:02:24.250 --> 1:02:27.530
<v Speaker 1>Podcast Network. Watch or listen on YouTube at Sharper Square.

1:02:28.250 --> 1:02:31.090
<v Speaker 1>Like the video, subscribe to the channel, download us from Spotify,

1:02:31.270 --> 1:02:35.190
<v Speaker 1>Apple Pods, wherever you get your podcasts, rate, review, subscribe,

1:02:35.230 --> 1:02:38.330
<v Speaker 1>leave us five stars, say whatever you want. If you

1:02:38.430 --> 1:02:42.010
<v Speaker 1>want me to stop talking about the Discord, pre-order the

1:02:42.070 --> 1:02:46.220
<v Speaker 1>book at readthenumber.com. Feedback is a gift. Until Sunday morning,

1:02:46.740 --> 1:02:47.220
<v Speaker 1>love you.

1:02:48.380 --> 1:02:50.940
<v Speaker 2>With his face stitched and bandaged, Kilmer threw a perfect

1:02:51.000 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>strike to Mike Thomas to win the game.

1:02:53.180 --> 1:02:55.170
<v Speaker 1>The blood was in my eyes and in my mouth.

1:02:55.230 --> 1:02:57.090
<v Speaker 1>And I told him, I said, you got to stop

1:02:57.110 --> 1:02:58.190
<v Speaker 1>this bleeding. And he went over there.

1:02:58.210 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>He was better than any cut man in pro boxing.

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:01.940
<v Speaker 1>He got that.

1:03:01.840 --> 1:03:03.100
<v Speaker 2>Thing all stopped up.

1:03:03.160 --> 1:03:05.520
<v Speaker 3>And from there, it was just a matter of being

1:03:05.540 --> 1:03:06.100
<v Speaker 3>able to connect.