WEBVTT - Pay Dirt! Elon's Pay Package, X's Payments Plan

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, guys, welcome, Welcome to the Tesla shareholder meeting. And

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I just want to start up by saying, hot, damn,

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I love you guys. Yeah, we have the most awesome

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>shareholder base. I mean, it's just incredible. Any public company,

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, Elon Musk is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 2>controlled by one man.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Starting his own artificial intelligence company.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, he's a legitimate, super genius, legitimate, he says.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.319
<v Speaker 6>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 6>be different.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>He'll vote Republican.

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 7>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 7>on him.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 8>Alon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 9>Anything he does is fascinating to people.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Elon Am Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk.

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>It's Tuesday, June eighteenth. I'm your host, David Popadopoulos. This week,

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>we've got money on our minds, specifically Elon's victory. His

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>pay package of some fifty billion dollars was approved by

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Tesla's shareholders last week. We'll dig into what that does

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>and doesn't mean for his fortunes and for the company,

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 2>plus imagine if X became the new Venmo. Friend of

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the show, Kurt Wagner has a scoop on Elon's plans

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to morph x into a payments platform and some early

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 2>steps the company has taken. And we'll also dig into

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>another ex development, the disappearance of users liked posts on

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the platform and what's behind it. To talk about all

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 2>things Tesla, we have our expert muscologists, Max Chapkin, BusinessWeek

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>senior reporter, he Loo Max, Hot, damn.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 8>I love you guys.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>You know you beat me to that. So I was

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna say that here at the end I should clearly

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't be at the beginning you said, hot damn.

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>You love us all, and we all love you back.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Dana Hull, our Elon Musk correspondent, Hello, Dana.

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 10>Awesome to be here.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 2>And we have Jeff Feely, who covers Delaware courts for

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 2>us here at Bloomberg. Hello Jeff Mooring. Later on the

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 2>show to talk Ax, we'll have Kurt on and we're

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna have a special guest, Max Reid, who writes the

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 2>Read Max newsletter and his covered tech for many years. Okay, Dana,

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 2>So the shareholder vote or votes. There were actually multiple votes,

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 2>but the biggest one on Elon's pay package took place

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>last week. He won. What was the margin of the vote.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 2>Was it similar to his victory way back when when

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>this thing was approved in eighteen? Big or smaller? What

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 2>did it look like?

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 10>It was roughly the same. Seventy two of voting shareholders

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 10>vote to reratify Musk's twenty eighteen pay package. And what

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 10>was super interesting was that going into the shareholder meeting

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 10>like the day before, I thought the vote was very close.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 10>I mean, Tesla had been running this very aggressive campaign

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 10>to engage retail shareholders. All of these people like Tesla,

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 10>Boomer Mama and others were like urging everyone to vote.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 10>There was this huge, huge get out the vote effort.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 10>Optimists was urging people to vote, and the sense was

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 10>that they didn't have the institutional shareholders. But then on Wednesday,

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 10>Elon Musk, who has a penchant for front running, basically

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 10>ran the big revealed He posted on Twitter that the

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 10>vote that he was winning by a wide margin. And

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 10>we came to learn after the fact that Vanguard, the

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 10>largest shareholder in the company after Elon himself voted yes.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 10>For the pay package, and that was a bit of

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 10>a surprise because they were a no in twenty eighteen.

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 2>So Max, I guess I wonder if at some level

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>it shows that his get out the vote campaign was affected.

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Danna says, And this is for a company that is,

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, sort of famously against spending money on marketing

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 4>and pr and on on these kinds of things. They

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 4>went all out on this, on this effort, So in

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 4>other words, spending it seemed more energy and even maybe

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 4>more thought and time and so on into marketing. Elon Musk,

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 4>as a guy worth really.

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Wanted that money. I guess that included, of course, the

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>slightly strong arm tactics of calling up Tesla employees who

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>owned the stock and urging them to vote. You know,

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 2>he was pretty pumped up about winning this vote. You

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 2>guys heard at the outset his greeting the assembly meeting there.

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 2>We have another clip of him here talking about where

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 2>he sees the company and it's valuation going.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 9>I think, just based on vehicle autonomy, we can we

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 9>can ten x one ten x the value of the company.

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 9>I believe that's what will happen, and it's just what

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 9>what do you know? It's it's four twenty pm. Just

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 9>noticed that.

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.119
<v Speaker 2>I assume those pauses there are for the bong hits.

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I get it in contact high, you know,

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>listening to.

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Him a little bit as well.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 4>Uh, you know, we talk a lot about on this

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 4>podcast about how, you know, there's sort of what Elon

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 4>says and then how he says it. And he's saying

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 4>pretty much the same things he's been saying for a

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 4>long time, although the mood was you know, even loopier,

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 4>even more sort of ebuliant.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 8>Did I say that right than usual?

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 4>And and you know, full on loopy and and you know,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 4>investors historically have kind of responded to that if if

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Elon must seems like he's in a good mood, even

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 4>if he's making weed jokes and awkwardly pausing and using

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 4>a weird voice to say hot, damn, I love you guys,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 4>investors are sort of okay with it.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Dan. At that point, the stock actually did pop

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 2>both that day and the next day, So even though

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>it was sort of expected, I guess it was a

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 2>bit of a reassurance for those.

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 10>Tesla has always struggled with key man risk, and the

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 10>key man risk in this case, was that if the

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 10>package didn't pass, that Elon was gonna get pissed off

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 10>and quit and walk away and take his like AI

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 10>and robotics toys elsewhere. So it was like reassuring to

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 10>investors to sort of see him in this happy, expansive,

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 10>dopamine fueled kind of mood, you know, talking about not

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 10>just like the next chapter of Tesla's history, but he

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 10>claimed that they are writing a new book. And then

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 10>he threw out like all kinds of crazy numbers about

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 10>how the valuation is just gonna skyrocket. I mean, they're

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 10>gonna ten x, they're gonna see two hundred to three

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 10>hundred percent year over year growth, and the energy storage

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 10>they've got, the cyber trucks, they're going to optimize optimists.

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 10>And then he thinks that it's possible for Tesla to

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 10>achieve evaluation ten times that of the most valuable company today,

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 10>which would be a valuation of thirty three trillion. So,

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 10>you know, we talk about Elon's moods. He was expansive Elon,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 10>And you know, these shareholder meetings are like religious revival events.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean, people are so grateful to have a ticket

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 10>to be able to say that they were in the

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 10>room with this guy. But this doesn't mean that it's over. Like, yes,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 10>the shareholders voted to reratify the package, but the judge

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 10>in Delaware still has to sort of sign off on that,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 10>and that is far from certain.

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Jeff, give us the next legal steps here.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So these guys have tried to do basically a

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>redo over the original package to fix the flaws that

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Judge McCormick pointed out in January. Nobody's tried to ever

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>try to do this before. The section of the law

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 3>they're using, lots of people say was set up for

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 3>technical fixes, not substantive changes like this. So Judge Katie

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 3>that's her local nickname, is not required to take notice

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 3>at all of the shareholder vote. She has to find

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot to issue a final ruling in the case,

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>and that includes deciding how much the winning shareholders lawyers

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 3>get in legal fees. There's a hearing July eighth to

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 3>hear arguments on the legal fees. And I guess on

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's argument that they can, you know, now, they should

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>be able to just reinstate its package because they've fixed

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>all the you know, they've plugged all the holes the

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 3>general belief in the bar around here is that this

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 3>is not going to affect her ruling. She's ruled on

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 3>the package, she's found the flaws. They really didn't address

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the flaws. They made some weak attempts at trying to

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 3>remove the conflicts, but having one person serve as the

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 3>special committee is not what you would call best practices

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 3>in good governance world.

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And that's the thing, But Jeff, one of her concerns,

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>if I'm remembering correctly, was that they kind of smooth

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 2>played this one over on the shareholders and who weren't

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>quite aware of what they were actually voting for when

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 2>they voted for his pay package. And certainly, I would

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>think no one can make that argument now. I think

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 2>everyone was eminently aware of what they were voting for.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, although they basically they being TESLA, were not very

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 3>transparent about the idea that this didn't have any binding

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 3>effect on the judge. Okay, They led folks to believe

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 3>that if you vote yes, that Elon's going to get

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 3>his dough, and that ain't.

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>So okay, right true, So they voted yes, he doesn't

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 2>get his dough. Yet they're waiting for the judge now,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>to respond. Now, Dan, what happens if the judge says

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 2>no yet again, is there any pay package in effect

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 2>that all for him ers are essentially going unpaid in

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>the horror of it, you know, a guy with whatever

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty billion dollars or so going unpaid?

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>But what is the current pay package in place?

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 10>So there's a couple avenues. I mean, Tesla will undoubtedly

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 10>appeal if the judge says no, screw you. I'm not

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 10>taking this like redo vote into account. My opinion from

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 10>January still stands.

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 2>She's definitely saying screw you if she votes now.

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Tesla can appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court. They so,

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, keep your eye out for a filing on

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 10>that after they have this hearing in July. But now

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 10>Tesla has moved its legal incorporation to Texas. I mean,

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 10>that's the other significant vote that happened at the shareholder meeting.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 2>They are now.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 10>Domiciled in Texas. It's where their headquarters has been for

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 10>a couple of years now. But now they have another

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 10>avenue because they could I mean, Jeff correct me if

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 10>I'm wrong here, but they could do yet another revote

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 10>in Texas and then only Texas law would apply. So

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 10>that's sort of the endgame here. I mean, they're doing

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 10>an end run around the Delaware court system.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 4>This is going to go on and on though, because

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 4>you have, first of all, I'm pretty sure that Texas

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 4>has to respect Judge McCormick's ruling, or it should respect.

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 8>Judge McCormick's ruling, so they have to do a new

0:10:58.920 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 8>pay package.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, you've got all of these lawsuits that were filed,

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, just under the wire, to all these shareholders

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 4>who want to have cases in Delaware court. So this

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Delaware is going to have something to say about Elon

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Musk for some time.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, let's remember if Texas's business courts

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 3>aren't even set up yet, they will not be set

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 3>up until September.

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean Texas has no business courts at all?

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 3>No, No, they have no court equivalent to Delaware's chancery court,

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 3>which is the primary premier venue for corporate litigation in

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 3>the country. They are trying to set up a competing

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 3>court to the Delaware court, and their legislature enabled it

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 3>in the last session, but they have not been able

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 3>to hire judges, they don't have stuff codified. It's a

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 3>we're a fair distance away from anybody being able to

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 3>navigate a lawsuit in those particular courts. So that's number one.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Number two, we live in a rule of law the

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.599
<v Speaker 3>last time I checked here in country, and being a

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 3>disappointed litigant and being unhappy about a court system is

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 3>one thing, But you know, switching your state of incorporation

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 3>because a judge ruled against you on one thing is

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 3>so Elon, it's almost hilarious, Danna.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Before we move on, though, let me ask you this

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>last question. Out of this shareholder vote or the shareholder meeting,

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>were there any other votes of import that our listeners

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 2>should know about.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So two directors were up for re election, James

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 10>Murdoch and Kimball Musk. They've both been on the board

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 10>for a while. Kimball is obviously Elon's younger brother. Both

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 10>of them them were re elected to the board with

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 10>like pretty flying colors, So no surprises there. And I

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 10>think it was just like a chance for Elon to

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 10>take this big victory lap and for the retail shareholders

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 10>who really came all out and got engaged in an

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 10>active in.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 8>A way that you.

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean, frankly, retail shold shareholders typically do not vote

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 10>in proxy fights. I mean, every once in a while

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 10>you might have like a big proxy battle where there's

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 10>like an activist shareholder trying to take over a stake

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 10>in the company, But in general, like people own shares

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 10>via their like mutual funds or in their retirement counts,

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 10>and they're not like active participant in I guess what

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 10>you could call shareholder democracy. But this was a real

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 10>I mean, this was a real sense that they were.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:24.359
<v Speaker 8>And so going.

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 10>Forward, I'm curious to see how active these shareholders will

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 10>be and if they will there will ever come a

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 10>time where they're actually like opposed to what the company

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 10>is saying.

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Jeff Feely, before we let you go, sir, any

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:37.599
<v Speaker 2>final words of wisdom.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would not go to Vegas and put money

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 3>down on Judge Katie allowing them to do a.

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Right Well, I do gamble a fair amounts, hold on,

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 2>do not go to Vegas and bet again.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, I'd put some money on the Eagles,

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 3>but not.

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Don't you know I could talk about the Mets on

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 2>this show and mock Max about the Mets. We don't

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 2>talk about the Philadelphia Eagles on the show. Jeff Feely,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much for joining us.

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 5>All right, guys, see you take.

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Care, Dana. Thank you for joining us.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 10>Always the pleasure.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 2>All right Now, Max, Chafkin and I are joined by

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Kurt Wagner, who covers tech for us here at Bloomberg. Hello, Kurt, hey, Hey,

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 2>and Max read the author of the Read Max Substack newsletter.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 6>Welcome Max, Thanks for having me.

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so for the purposes of this, so we don't

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 2>get confused here, we're gonna go with Max, Reid and Chafkin.

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Does that work? By the way, Max is a fantastic name.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if we if our if we had another child,

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>there was a boy we were gonna name h Max,

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 2>just Maximilian Papadopolis. The kid would have achieved incredible things.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Kurt Wagner, let's start with you and your and your

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 2>scoop this morning that you head out with your colleague

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Aisha Counts, Elon and co. There X are advancing on

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 2>their plan for their Venmo like payments feature. We've known

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 2>about this for a while, but you've encountered a bunch

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 2>of new information. Tell us what you learned.

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we submitted public records requests in all fifty states

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 7>because what X is doing right now is they're trying

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 7>to get payments licenses in these states, and so we

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 7>just you know, sent the regulatory agencies are r foyas

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 7>and in eleven cases actually we got documents back and

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 7>it gave us a nice glimpse into what it is

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 7>they're doing. So we've got some business plans, financial statements

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 7>or charts, things like that that we're helpful not just

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 7>to paint a picture of what they're doing on payments,

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 7>but also just give us a bit of a sneak

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 7>peek into X more broadly, because it is a private

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 7>company now and we don't really get those updates like

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 7>we used to when Twitter was public. But the short

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 7>version is they are trying to build a payments like

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 7>feature where you would, you know, log into a dashboard

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 7>on x dot com or the app, you could pay people,

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 7>you could pay businesses, you could store money. The fees

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 7>would be very minimal, so it would it wouldn't be

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 7>you know, passed on the business aspects of this wouldn't

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 7>be passed on to consumers, and you know, as you mentioned, David,

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 7>like this this plays into this everything app idea that

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 7>Elon has talked about. You can't be in everything app

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 7>if you can't use it for finances and money, and

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 7>so they are very much in the process of trying

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 7>to make this a reality. And even though Elon's sort

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 7>of hinted at it and talked about it, I think

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 7>these documents confirmed a lot of the progress and ambitions that.

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>They have now Max read the Everything app and in

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 2>particular leaning into the financial parts of it, something that

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Elon has really kind of obsessed about for a long

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 2>long time, you know, way back to his prior to

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 2>his acquisition of Twitter.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 6>Right, yeah, I mean twenty five years after he sold

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 6>his first company, Zip to Go Zip two in the nineties,

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 6>he wanted to launch an online bank, which he purchased

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 6>the RX dot com for his URL in particular, maybe

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 6>even more than the business plan has been a real

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 6>white whale for him. But I mean, this is a

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 6>sort of famous story. He launched X around the same

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 6>time that Peter Teal and company launched what was going

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 6>to become PayPal Confinity. They were in this really cutthroat

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 6>competition and eventually merged and Teal famously pushed Musk out

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 6>PayPal became, you know, the leader at the time of

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 6>payment apps, and Musk, I mean, depending depending on how

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 6>you look at at Musk has perhaps been stewing for

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 6>decades hoping to get peg into the world of online payments.

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 6>He bought back the x dot com URL from PayPal

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 6>twenty seventeen, I think, and you know, this was one

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 6>of the first things he was talking about when he

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 6>was buying X. I think even before he bought X,

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 6>he was talking up we Chat, the Chinese chat app.

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 5>A app that's as good as we Chat in China,

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.479
<v Speaker 5>and like in China you like live on we Chat. Basically,

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 5>it's like yeah, everyone, everyone's like, like, you live on

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 5>we Chat, you do payments, you do everything. It's like, yep,

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 5>it's great. Basically we chats kick ass, and we don't

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 5>have anything like we Chat outside of Taina. So I

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 5>was like, my idea would be, like, how about if

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 5>we just copy we Chat.

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Honestly, the assent is more interesting in that clip

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 4>than the substance.

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 4>One thing that Max left out of that story is

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 4>that and I learned this when I was reporting my

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 4>book about TIL. Some people think that the final straw

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 4>for Elon Musk getting pushed out was an attempt to

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 4>rename Among the things he did and PayPal was kind

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 4>of a mess back then before before he got pushed out,

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 4>was to try to rename PayPal, which at that point

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 4>had a brand and a decent following and so on.

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 4>He tried to rename it X so so kind of

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 4>exactly the same move we saw with Twitter when he

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 4>did the renaming there.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 8>He just loves, just loves that letter.

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 2>So, Kurt, best case scenario for Elon and the X crew,

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>when is this feature being rolled out? What's their timeline? Like,

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I know that Elon's always wildly optimistic on his timelines,

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 2>but what are they talking about?

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean they wanted it or want it by

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 7>the end of this year. They had said in some

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 7>of the emails we read that they were hoping to

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 7>do someonce they had the majority of state. You know,

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 7>they had payments licenses in the majority of states. They

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 7>now have twenty eight, so technically they do have more

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 7>than half. My guess is they would want more than

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, much closer to fifty so that people are

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 7>able to actually send money.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 2>But could they do They absolutely need all fifty to

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 2>start or could you start with forty two.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 7>You could start with forty two, but then you know

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 7>there are people in eight states who can't participate, and

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 7>it kind of.

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 2>What they are going to be losing out on. Jesus.

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, yeah, but you know, imagine you have a friend

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 7>there you want to send money to and you can't.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 7>It sort of limits the the you know, user experience,

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 7>and I I think that's really the key, right, Like

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 7>building this getting the approval is sort of the easy

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 7>part in my opinion. I actually think the hard part

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 7>here is going to be convincing people to use X

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 7>in a way that they have never used it before.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 7>Not only are there a bunch of existing competitors like

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 7>Venmo out there that have market share, but it's a

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 7>user behavior issue, Like how many people are going to

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 7>suddenly say, yes, this app that I've used to you know,

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 7>dunk on politicians or get my news for the past

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 7>twenty years is suddenly going to be my bank. Like

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 7>that's just not a logical jump for most people. And

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 7>I think that's going to be the bigger hurdle than

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 7>actually building the product.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Quick shraphole here, which of the I want to ask

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the two max is and Kurt, if you indeed, would

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, try this out, assuming, by the way, I'm

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 2>going to throw in one hundred dollars for X. I'm

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 2>going to give you all three hundred dollars because I'm

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 2>sure they're going to do something like that. They're going

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>to slip you a C note or something. They slip

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>you a cnoe and say, hey, we want you to

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 2>use it. Stop using venmo use X Max.

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Jeff, Well, I'm going to look at what the interest

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 4>rates are, you know, really very closely studied offering.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 8>No, I'm not going to use the app that I

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 8>doom scroll to do banking.

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 2>No next season, No, Max read.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 6>Take the one hundred dollars and I'd make the minimum

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 6>number of payments to get the hundred dollars out, and

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 6>then I would never use it again.

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a good answer, Kurt.

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I do the same. I mean, I'm not even

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 7>comfortable really using Twitter DMS right now for privacy reasons,

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 7>So I'm not going to be using Twitter for my banking.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Reading Kurt story and reminded it was like reading I

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 4>feel like there's a really good illustration of how easy

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 4>it is when you're very wealthy to like spend money

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 4>on dumb things. Because clearly Elon Musk told a bunch

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 4>of people, and I think there's some reporting to this

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 4>effect as well. Like said, you know, essentially ordered his

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 4>team to secure these permits. They're doing so at probably

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 4>absurd expense.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Why is that? Why is why is securing permits incredibly expensive?

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 4>You have a bunch of you know, high priced lawyers,

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 4>and you know it has taken years, and like, at

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 4>the end of the day, even if they get all

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 4>these permits, like Kurt says, you know, this is not

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:08.719
<v Speaker 4>going to be a big business.

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Right. Let's even pretend, Kurt that it is a big

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 2>business for the sake of argument. Let's say this thing

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 2>takes off and holy smokes, everyone stops using Zel, stops

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 2>using Venmo. They are xing exing money across the globe

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>as they see it. Does it generate a lot of

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 2>revenue for them? As they've laid out their model and

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 2>the documents you've looked at.

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 7>They haven't put revenue projections into the documents we've seen.

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 7>They have said that the fees are not really the

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 7>main purpose here. Again, they wouldn't they wouldn't do fees

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 7>for consumers. They would do a fee for a business.

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 7>So if I buy something from you, David, you as

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 7>the retailer might have to you know, pay one, two,

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 7>three percent or whatever to X because the sale came

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 7>through their platform. For them. What they've said is the

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 7>bigger businesses this idea that people will find X more valuable.

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 7>Therefore they will spend more time on X, and that

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 7>will make X a better advertising business, which is what

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 7>they already do.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 4>So the idea is that you buy your Cheech and

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Chung gummies with this with this payment platform, right, and

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 4>that will cause Cheech and Chong to pay more money

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 4>to X to advertise.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, let's go back to our hundred dollars example here.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 7>You know, Max, you have your hundred bucks sitting in

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 7>your X account, and chich and Chong suddenly says, well,

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 7>you're a more valuable target for them because you could

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 7>make a purchase with one click right there in the feed, right,

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 7>you can make an impulse buy, Oh this looks cool,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 7>and I already have the money sitting my account. Boom,

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 7>buy right there right. It just eliminates these steps that

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 7>get to a sale, and their hope is that that

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 7>will make X a more valuable advertising business.

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Now, Kurt in doing the digging for this story,

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I believe you guys, you also uncovered some financials in

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 2>the filings, right, a bit of a better look inside

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 2>how the company is doing and what did you learn there?

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 7>No shock to focus on this pod because we've talked

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 7>about this, but the business was not doing well last year.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.719
<v Speaker 7>The numbers we got were from Q one and Q

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 7>two of twenty three, so about a year ago, basically

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 7>the first you know, full six months of Elon in charge,

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 7>and X's revenue was about forty percent lower than the

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 7>year prior when he took over. They lost almost five

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 7>hundred million dollars in the first quarter alone, And I

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 7>think for me, not only did it confirm a lot

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 7>of things that we've been hearing and trying to report

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 7>right sort of around the company, but I think that

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 7>it just sort of explains why this everything app idea

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 7>is so important to Elon, because the current business plan

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 7>that they have is just not working. It's not big enough.

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 7>And so if you are sitting there saying, hey, you know,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 7>we have a business that's half the size of what

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 7>I acquired, you got to fill that in somehow. And

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 7>so I think That's why this everything app and these

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 7>payments are such a priority for them is because they're

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 7>sitting there going we need to figure out how to

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 7>make money from this thing.

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 2>But I guess Max read My question for you would be,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>this is in some little startup company now, I mean

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 2>X formerly Twitter's been around for a while. You are

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 2>now losing a half a billion dollars a quarter. At

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 2>what point do you just say, all right, we're just

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 2>throwing good money after bad here. This ain't working.

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 6>Are you asking me or are you asking hypothetical Elon Musk,

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 6>because I'm not sure Elon Musk ever quite hits that point.

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, for me, I would have said that nineteen

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 6>months ago, but I also wouldn't have bought x Twitter

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 6>or whatever. I mean, this is the funny thing about

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 6>the everything app. And you could even hear it in

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 6>that clip, which I believe was from before even bought Twitter.

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 6>The idea. I don't know if you're thinking we need

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 6>to make this company really big if you just say

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 6>the words everything app, that's the biggest thing there is.

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 6>Everything is everything. But it's not precisely a business plan,

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 6>is it?

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 9>You know?

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 6>We Chat is what it is because of a pretty

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 6>specific situation about Chinese finance and banks and payments, and

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 6>it evolved into that after a bunch of decisions made

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 6>over the course of a couple decades. And it's really

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 6>not the kind of thing that you can just walk

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 6>in and say, if we if we crobe our payments

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 6>into the uh you know, as we say the the appword,

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 6>Cheach and Shong are selling me gummies and where camgirls

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 6>have all kinds of things in their bios. It doesn't

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 6>strike me as as a natural fit. And I don't

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 6>think it's the kind of thing that's suddenly can to

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 6>leverage you into a Facebook sized company.

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 4>We know that this everything app thing is is, like

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Max is saying, like an uphill battle because every other

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 4>tech company has in the US has tried it. Facebook

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 4>has tried it. You know, they all this is not

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 4>like this is not like this is like the most

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 4>obvious thing you could possibly think if you owned a

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 4>social media But it's not some kind of this was

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 4>real great epiphany, right, And they've all tried it and

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 4>they've all basically failed for the reasons I'm Max saying,

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 4>like the Internet is, it's a thing.

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 8>It's like a living thing. That's evolved.

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 4>You can't just sort of like snap your fingers and

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 4>swallow you know, a whole section of the of the

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Internet where people have sort of locked in relationships with companies.

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 4>But you know, one thing I've noticed as we've had

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 4>this conversation, I mean, this thing with the everything app.

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 4>Just take it seriously for a second. It's kind of

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 4>similar to optimists, right, It's just like Elon Musk picking

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 4>the biggest possible thing. So like, what if I owned

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 4>the means of production for everything in the entire world?

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 4>Like he's basically said that, what if I own the

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 4>entire Internet? That would be great? And you know he's

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 4>this is where he's honestly very good. I mean, as

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 4>outlandish as those ideas are, and as outlandish it is

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 4>for Elon to sit up at the Tesla annual meeting

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 4>when Tesla is you know, worth five hundred billion dollars

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 4>and is like, you know, way over valued relative to

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 4>every other car company, to say, oh, we're going to

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 4>be worth you know, thirty trillion, and people kind of

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 4>take that no seriously.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 2>But on that going back to that shareholder meeting, because

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 2>actually that that's where my mind was going a little bit, Kurt.

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I know you were listening in early and you heard

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the clips, the raucous clips of the crowd egging him

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 2>on and cheering him. You can't tell me that you

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 2>can't take some of those enthusiastic Tesla shareholders and Tesla

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 2>owners and get them on this everything app Come on,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 2>you can.

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 7>There were what three hundred people in that room? Sure users, right,

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 7>I feel.

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 2>Like there were at least you know, five hundred, come on,

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 2>at least five.

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is this is sort of the the

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 7>subscription product that X launched on, you know, right after right, Like,

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.199
<v Speaker 7>you look at who kind of is subscribed to that,

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 7>and I think for the most part it's people who

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 7>believe in Elon and people who are Elon fans, and

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 7>that is a small business for them. That is not

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 7>a big enough business for this to work. So there's

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 7>always going to be people no matter what he does.

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 7>He sold he sold flamethrowers for God's sake, right, and

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 7>like people bought those. So like, no matter what he does,

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 7>there will be an audience for it. But I think

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 7>the question is is it at scale? And I don't think,

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, I think this will be tough to get

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 7>to scale.

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I got your currently everything app is going to be

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 2>as important to X as the flamethrower was to test on.

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 2>So some iteration of zero point zero zero zero zero

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>one percent of revenue max read and other ex news

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the company has begun to hide to a certain degree

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 2>your likes on posts. Tell us a little bit more

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 2>about it and how we should interpret this.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so last week some people poking around on Twitter

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 6>realized that they were piloting a program where likes would

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.719
<v Speaker 6>be hidden. So classically, there are three actions you can

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 6>do with a tweet. You can retweet or quote tweet it,

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 6>you can reply to it, or you can like it,

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 6>which has an ambiguous meaning. Let's say, but it's saved

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 6>in a big list that is public or was until

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 6>recently publicly accessible on your profile. So if you're out

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 6>there liking Cheech and Chong tweets, then anybody who goes

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 6>to your profile can see all the Cheech and Chong

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 6>tweets you liked. And similarly, I could click on a

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 6>Cheech and Chong tweet and see everybody who liked that tweet.

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 6>And when it was discovered that they were sort of

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 6>figuring out how to hide these or they were playing

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 6>around with hiding them. Twitter's head of engineering tweeted that

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 6>they were doing this because they felt like people were

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 6>afraid of liking I believe the phrase he used was

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 6>edgy content, that trolls would attack people who liked edgy content,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 6>that it would be used to damage them in some way.

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 2>You're not buying it, I take it.

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think that's actually I buy that. That

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 6>is the literal reason that many of the people who

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 6>work at Twitter right now want to do this. It's

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 6>hard for me not to associate a particular kind of

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 6>political valance to that statement, by which I mean, I

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 6>think there are people, maybe who work at Twitter, but

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 6>a lot of people who use Twitter who are under

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 6>the impression that there's all these kind of right wing

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 6>statements that are getting made that people would like if

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 6>they knew it would be hidden, but they can't like

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 6>them because that edgy content is going to get them

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 6>attacked by trolls. Practically speaking, I think maybe what they're

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 6>talking about is a kind of dynamic where prominent people politicians,

0:30:55.480 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 6>hedge fund managers, celebrities are under you know, are engaged

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 6>in a kind of constant back and forth. Let's say

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 6>with the non prominent, non famous people on Twitter, and

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 6>if you like something in err and cy I mean,

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 6>I'm thinking, for example, of when Ted Cruise's account, Oh yes,

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 6>accidentally liked a still from a porno. This was back

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 6>in twenty eighteen or whatever.

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 8>It was all time greatest moment in Twitter history.

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 2>I think yeah.

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean, look from a pure traffic perspective, it's obviously

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 6>hugely profitable to Twitter to allow likes to be open,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 6>because stuff like that is just going to generate all

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 6>kinds of attention to traffic. But if part of what

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 6>you want to do is protect your most prominent users,

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 6>you might want to reduce the you know what you

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 6>would call their attack surface like you don't you want

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 6>to reduce the number of ways that people can as

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 6>Kurt was saying before, dunk on politicians, dunk on on

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 6>prominent people. And to me, that's the sort of the

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 6>kind of consistent thread through a lot of the product

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 6>changes that Elon has brought through x Chafkin.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Beyond the great Ted Cruise example, do any other big

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 2>ones come to mind over the years of celebs mean

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 2>or Kurt?

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, Max is saying, first of all,

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Max he wrote about this in his newsletter, which was

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 4>great and really well argued.

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 8>I think he's totally right.

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 4>It's mostly about politics and this perception of essentially right

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 4>wing content. But I will say I think a lot

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 4>of this comes up with porn, and it's a lot

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 4>of people, you know, liking content that's edgy in a

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 4>in a sort of sexual way, because often I think

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.479
<v Speaker 4>because they don't quite realize that the likes are are public,

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Like like there's like in certain cases I think a.

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Genuine oh wait a minute, you mean they are, But

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 4>I also think, you know, just to play devil's advocate

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 4>the light, Like I went back and looked at my

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 4>likes from.

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 2>The last Do you like your likes now? No?

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 8>I hate them?

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 4>And it made and it just made me think, like

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 4>mostly the way I was using this was kind of

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 4>just to express what amounts to like a pro I

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 4>have it, thank you or something for somebody. It's like

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 4>really embarrassing. All my likes are like self praise. It's

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 4>like they're really lame.

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 2>And it just made me feel.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 4>It really like going back, it just made me feel

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 4>really bad about myself, Like I probably only out of

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 4>for every twenty likes only one what one out of twenty.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 8>Was like a good joke, which I think is the

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 8>way you're supposed to use it.

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, Kurt Max is feeling a little bad about himself.

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Can do you have anything encouraging or positive to say him?

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Can you like him right now? In fashion? Yeah?

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 7>I like Max. I wouldn't obviously display that publicly on

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 7>my Twitter. I'll say it here to you guys.

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to ask Max read though another question

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>on this, the you know, question of whether a legitimate

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:46.719
<v Speaker 2>argument can be made for it or not. I know,

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, you feel at some level that this is

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 2>also just potentially cover for people liking outright racist sort

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 2>of tweets and or x'es and that sort of thing.

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>But is it possible that something like, hey, I want

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to be supportive of the kind of anti woke types,

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 2>who are you know again some sort of corporate diversity initiative?

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 2>But god, I can't quite get myself to do that publicly.

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that not potentially a thing? Yeah? Totally?

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 6>And I think, you know, we probably don't have to

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 6>go all the way into racism or hard right whatever

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 6>to sort of acknowledge that there's like Twitter is a

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 6>complicated social space, and there's all kinds of trouble you

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 6>can get into, varying degrees of real life trouble versus

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 6>just sort of having your Twitter experience be ruined. And

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 6>I can recognize the value the user experience value to

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 6>sort of feeling a little bit more free to lend

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 6>your support to tweets, though you know, it's the kind

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 6>of thing when you say that out loud, it feels

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 6>a little bit ridiculous that this is like a user priority.

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 6>Is that you want to make sure they're able to

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 6>click the heart button as many times as possible, you know,

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 6>under anti woke posts. But I think the other sort

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 6>of the other, the thing that this cuts again just

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 6>to defend public likes, is I think that, you know,

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 6>Twitter is not a particularly transparent social network. Social networks

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 6>in general are not particularly open or transparent. But I

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 6>think that kind of transparency is really valuable, even to

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 6>the limited extent that it exists in this specific case,

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 6>not just for say journalists like me, who are you know,

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 6>naturally just looking for ways to take down prominent politicians

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 6>for liking you know, big butts posts or whatever it

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 6>is that they're liking. But in a sort of broader sense,

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 6>to have a sense of who on Twitter is looking

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 6>at what and how they're looking at it.

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:33.919
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, what was cool about the likes is there's

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 4>a cost to liking something, which is that you have

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 4>to you know, there's a cost of retweeting, which is

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 4>that you know you're gonna I'm gonna blast my followers

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 4>with this, like that would be the maximal way to

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 4>show approval or whatever, and alike, although it's not, you're

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 4>not you're not spamming your feed, it's still there. And

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 4>and now in a situation where you can just you know,

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 4>like willy nilly, and you're never gonna have to defend

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 4>your your likes and like, you know, you're just gonna

0:35:59.080 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna get liking.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 8>I feel like it's, you know.

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Just one more kind of inflation that we have to

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 2>deal with now. Max reading Kurt, you heard that Max

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Chafkin is essentially embarrassed by almost all the likes he's

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 2>ever put up there over the past.

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 4>I only went back to like two early twenty one.

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Maybe you're like pre twenty one, Maybe might.

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 8>Scrolled further back.

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 4>There were cool likes back there, but I don't know,

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 4>just not enough funny jokes and just too much, you know, professional, Thanks.

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 2>For the support give us. For each of you the

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 2>most embarrassing, like in hindsight, that you've encountered.

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 6>Max read You know, I have to I don't want

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 6>to ruin the game, but I have to say I

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:42.839
<v Speaker 6>don't think anybody should be embarrassed by their likes. I'm

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 6>here to preach a gospel of non shame and unembarrassedness

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 6>about what you're doing online. I think if you're liking

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 6>stuff that people that people praising you, if your mom

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.720
<v Speaker 6>is on Twitter sharing your articles, you should be liking that. Frankly,

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 6>it's it speaks poorly of you that you're not liking

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 6>those things.

0:36:58.239 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's poorly of you.

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 6>Max, you better be You better be liking those So

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 6>that's that's all.

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 2>This is good. This is good. So Max Chafkin is

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 2>embarrassed by everything he's ever liked. Max Reid is embarrassed

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 2>by nothing that he's ever like, or at least nothing

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 2>that he'll admit to you here in front of all

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of us, Kurt Wagner, what is your answer, sir?

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 7>You know I didn't go back as far as Max did.

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 7>That's dedication to go all the way to twenty twenty

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 7>one or whatever it is. I noticed two themes. The

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 7>first is, unfortunately, just like our friend Max Chafkin, I

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 7>really basically you even look my direction and boom, I'm

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 7>liking that thing. Like if you comment about my book,

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 7>even if it's not a nice comment, boom, you get.

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 2>A like definitely thanks doing a lot of that.

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. And then and then I also have a ton

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 7>of likes from around the time when Elon took over Twitter,

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 7>because I was using the like at that point sort

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 7>of as like a bookmark, right, like, oh, I want

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 7>to come back to this tweet. So I got a

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 7>ton of Elon tweets. I got the sleeping bag tweet

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 7>from that executive who slept in the office. You know. Yeah,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 7>it was good, No, it was good. I mean, I'm

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 7>not I'm actually with Max Reid here, like I'm not.

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 7>I wasn't embarrassed by my likes necessarily. I just noticed

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 7>that they fell into a couple buckets. It was like,

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.359
<v Speaker 7>I want to remember this for later for work, or

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 7>you looked my way and boom, thanks for the attention,

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 7>Like you get a life. So those were those were

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:19.760
<v Speaker 7>the buckets.

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 2>That's a bit much getting so are going forward? Are

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 2>you gonna stop doing that? No, not at all.

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 7>Now you can't see now, you can't even see.

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 2>It probably doesn't matter, but you just like everything exactly. Okay, No, No,

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 2>very good, Max read thank you very much for joining us.

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me, Kurt as always, Thank you as always.

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 7>I had a great time.

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Max Chafkin did. This episode was produced by

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Stacey Wong. Naomi Shaven and Rayhan Harmancier are senior editors.

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 2>The idea for this very show also came from Rayhon

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Wait Maples handles engineering, and we get special editing assistants

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 2>from Jeff Grocott, Antonio Muffarech and Arafat Jalasho Perry. Our

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 2>supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson. The Elon Inc. Theme is

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 2>written and performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sudijura. Brendan

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Francis Newnham is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman is

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the head of Bloomberg Podcast. A big thank you to

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 2>our supporter Joel Weber. I'm David Papadopoulos. If you have

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 2>a minute, rate and review our show. It'll help other

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 2>listeners find us, see you next week.