1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloombergs Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene. Along 2 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:12,520 Speaker 1: with the Jonathan Ferrill and Lisa A. Brownowitz jay Leie, 3 00:00:12,640 --> 00:00:16,160 Speaker 1: we bring you insight from the best and economics, finance, 4 00:00:16,239 --> 00:00:22,440 Speaker 1: investment and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance and Apple Podcast SoundCloud, 5 00:00:22,800 --> 00:00:26,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. 6 00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:31,400 Speaker 1: John A. Guess now it's George Sara Phaelos Globe ahead 7 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:35,560 Speaker 1: of FX research over at Deutsche Bank. George, let's start 8 00:00:35,560 --> 00:00:38,400 Speaker 1: with that dollar strength. What is the number one dominant 9 00:00:38,479 --> 00:00:41,440 Speaker 1: driver of what's taking place not just in Europe but 10 00:00:41,479 --> 00:00:46,280 Speaker 1: across Asia. Two? Hi, John, So it's it's clearly historic 11 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:49,199 Speaker 1: times in effects. And I'd say what's going on is 12 00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:53,559 Speaker 1: that valuate valuation anchors are being lost. So you know, 13 00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:56,480 Speaker 1: you take Europe for example, producer prices are now at 14 00:00:57,760 --> 00:01:00,680 Speaker 1: over the last eighteen months. Um, what does that mean 15 00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:04,679 Speaker 1: for purchasing power parity, for for how much competitiveness has 16 00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:08,240 Speaker 1: been impacted? The market doesn't really know and is trying 17 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:11,399 Speaker 1: to grapple with with that question. Um, you mentioned the yen. 18 00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:14,119 Speaker 1: The b o J has been doing the FED equivalent 19 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:17,160 Speaker 1: of a trillion of quem in recent months, it's now 20 00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:20,440 Speaker 1: starting to pick up again. It's basically following a policy 21 00:01:20,440 --> 00:01:23,160 Speaker 1: of neglect for the end. It hasn't spoken about the 22 00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:26,240 Speaker 1: end m for for the last for the last two months. 23 00:01:26,959 --> 00:01:28,960 Speaker 1: And I think if you add all these things together, 24 00:01:29,760 --> 00:01:33,040 Speaker 1: the dollar is ending up as the safe haven of choice, 25 00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:36,120 Speaker 1: but by default because there's all these issues in the 26 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:38,319 Speaker 1: rest of the world. And I think that the critical 27 00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:41,200 Speaker 1: point is it becomes very difficult to understand and caliber 28 00:01:41,720 --> 00:01:44,880 Speaker 1: fair value. Given these huge moves. We're seeing an energy 29 00:01:44,959 --> 00:01:49,960 Speaker 1: prices um it changes in policy, for example out of Japan, 30 00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:53,120 Speaker 1: and obviously we've got the COVID situation in China. When 31 00:01:53,120 --> 00:01:55,240 Speaker 1: do we reach a breaking point? George and I speak 32 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:58,559 Speaker 1: as we start reaching levels that perhaps were last seen 33 00:01:58,760 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 1: or the pace of which the last scene in two 34 00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:06,840 Speaker 1: thousand twenty which prompted Federals are of intervention. Yeah, so 35 00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 1: there's some currencies we were even exceeding those And going 36 00:02:10,040 --> 00:02:15,200 Speaker 1: back to to the nineteen eighties, the huge four overshoot 37 00:02:15,240 --> 00:02:19,680 Speaker 1: back then kept going. It actually currencies back then, the 38 00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:23,440 Speaker 1: couple from rates, even as Volker stopped. The dollar kept going, 39 00:02:23,600 --> 00:02:26,240 Speaker 1: even as the US ecial accounts turned and it became 40 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:29,399 Speaker 1: a bit of a self fulfilling situation where where again 41 00:02:29,480 --> 00:02:32,200 Speaker 1: valuation anchors were lost, and what it took to turn 42 00:02:32,320 --> 00:02:36,120 Speaker 1: things was coordinated intervention and you had the fetes started 43 00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:38,239 Speaker 1: to sound a bit more jittery, and then obviously the 44 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 1: plaza called UM. I still think we're far away from that, 45 00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:44,440 Speaker 1: not least because dollar strength at the moment is helping 46 00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:48,400 Speaker 1: the US inflation story, and it is very likely the 47 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:51,280 Speaker 1: call goods inflation in the US, I think we'll move 48 00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:54,640 Speaker 1: sharply lower UM. So one thing that will be able 49 00:02:54,639 --> 00:02:56,920 Speaker 1: to shift things is if we get a FED pivot 50 00:02:57,280 --> 00:02:59,959 Speaker 1: that's clearly too early, that's on the U S side, 51 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 1: just an easing of these taflation fears. But then, of 52 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 1: course we've got the issues outside of the US, both 53 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:09,640 Speaker 1: in Europe and Asia. It's very difficult over the next 54 00:03:09,720 --> 00:03:14,080 Speaker 1: few months to see these fundamental issues, this uncertainty go away, 55 00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:17,720 Speaker 1: and as such, I think it's very difficult to call 56 00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:20,760 Speaker 1: for a big turn in the dollar as things stand well. 57 00:03:20,880 --> 00:03:23,839 Speaker 1: Given that, George, what's going to stop the euro from 58 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:27,639 Speaker 1: going to ninety zero point nine on the dollar, what's 59 00:03:27,639 --> 00:03:29,960 Speaker 1: going to stop the yen from going to one fifty? 60 00:03:30,040 --> 00:03:32,240 Speaker 1: As we were talking about yesterday. What's going to be 61 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:35,200 Speaker 1: the pivot point for some of these currencies as there 62 00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:40,000 Speaker 1: is not necessarily some sort of circuit breaker. So I 63 00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:43,720 Speaker 1: think there's two things that can prevent extreme moves. Obviously, 64 00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 1: in Japan you are seeing extreme moves because the Bank 65 00:03:46,360 --> 00:03:50,040 Speaker 1: of Japan vides policies actually encouraging yen weakness. But speaking 66 00:03:50,040 --> 00:03:53,800 Speaker 1: of Europe, there's two things. Number one, the ECB becoming 67 00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:57,360 Speaker 1: more aggressive, becoming more assertive talking about the currency. And 68 00:03:57,400 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 1: I don't agree with this argument that if the ECB 69 00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 1: likes more it's going to be negative for the currency 70 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:04,400 Speaker 1: because it hurts growth. You are actually see the UR 71 00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:08,760 Speaker 1: hold up much better than what one would have expected, 72 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 1: given that we've now started to price seventy bits for example. 73 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:14,440 Speaker 1: So I think the e c B is one and 74 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:17,719 Speaker 1: the right fiscal policy response as far as the energy 75 00:04:17,760 --> 00:04:20,599 Speaker 1: situation goes. And that's why the differences between the UK 76 00:04:20,920 --> 00:04:24,000 Speaker 1: and the UR area become a bit more interesting. For example, Okay, 77 00:04:24,040 --> 00:04:26,640 Speaker 1: so George is essentially what you're saying. The ECB can 78 00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:29,360 Speaker 1: support the Euro by hiking, but that is not necessarily 79 00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:33,159 Speaker 1: the case for the Bank of England. So the CB 80 00:04:33,320 --> 00:04:35,840 Speaker 1: central banks can slow down the moves, but it's not 81 00:04:35,920 --> 00:04:38,600 Speaker 1: interest rate differentials and not the dominant drivers. And we're 82 00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:42,400 Speaker 1: seeing that the ECB is helping slow down the urine depreciation, 83 00:04:42,440 --> 00:04:44,480 Speaker 1: but I think to see a big shift you need 84 00:04:44,520 --> 00:04:47,840 Speaker 1: a resolution on the energy situation. Now if you if 85 00:04:47,880 --> 00:04:51,360 Speaker 1: you go over to the UK, I'm still surprised by 86 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:53,320 Speaker 1: the lack of urgency from the Bank of England in 87 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:56,600 Speaker 1: terms of this communication of how much more they can do. 88 00:04:57,160 --> 00:05:00,559 Speaker 1: You've got an inflation picture that's pretty much the worst 89 00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:03,680 Speaker 1: in the developed world. We are very likely to get 90 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 1: very very sizeable fiscal announcements in place that may help 91 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:10,320 Speaker 1: inflation in the near term, but they're also going to 92 00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:12,960 Speaker 1: be highly stimulative. They're not going to allow for any 93 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:16,200 Speaker 1: correction on the demand side. So I worry in the 94 00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:20,240 Speaker 1: UK policy alignment between the fiscal authorities and montre authorities 95 00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:25,240 Speaker 1: is not there um and this in itself may be 96 00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:28,919 Speaker 1: quite harmful for the currency. How harmful I mean, what 97 00:05:29,040 --> 00:05:34,640 Speaker 1: probability would you put around cable at parody? So we 98 00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 1: wrote a report where we're looking at all these drivers, 99 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:40,000 Speaker 1: were looking at the balance of payments dynamics in the UK, 100 00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:42,840 Speaker 1: and what stands out really is versus ten years ago 101 00:05:43,160 --> 00:05:45,880 Speaker 1: the position is much more vulnerable. You've got a negative 102 00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:49,320 Speaker 1: net international investment position, you've got a very large current 103 00:05:49,320 --> 00:05:52,400 Speaker 1: account deficit, you've got real rates that are still very low. 104 00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:55,120 Speaker 1: But for me, over the next two or three weeks, 105 00:05:55,160 --> 00:05:58,200 Speaker 1: it's all about policy credibility and alignment. And if we 106 00:05:58,279 --> 00:06:01,960 Speaker 1: go down the route of a very large, unfunded, untargeted 107 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,720 Speaker 1: fiscal stimulus and the Bank of England, for example, disappointing 108 00:06:05,760 --> 00:06:09,320 Speaker 1: market expectations and not hiking by seventy five basis points, 109 00:06:09,320 --> 00:06:12,279 Speaker 1: not showing a greater sense of urgency, I do worry 110 00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:15,800 Speaker 1: the funding of this very large deficit um the UK 111 00:06:15,920 --> 00:06:18,200 Speaker 1: has with the rest of the world can be challenged 112 00:06:18,240 --> 00:06:21,479 Speaker 1: and you can see very extreme levels for the pound, 113 00:06:21,520 --> 00:06:23,640 Speaker 1: as you have in the past when the UK has 114 00:06:23,640 --> 00:06:27,560 Speaker 1: struggled to trap form financing. In the euroregion in particular, 115 00:06:27,960 --> 00:06:31,119 Speaker 1: you were talking about how the appropriate fiscal policy could 116 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:33,560 Speaker 1: support the euro and I want to go back to that. 117 00:06:33,800 --> 00:06:36,800 Speaker 1: What does the appropriate policy look like given the fact 118 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:39,080 Speaker 1: that a lot of households are really struggling. This is 119 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:42,239 Speaker 1: not like five dollars barrel of gasoline or five dollars 120 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:44,400 Speaker 1: a gallon gasoline in the United States. This is way 121 00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:47,880 Speaker 1: more extreme way more punitive for households over in Europe. 122 00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:50,840 Speaker 1: Can they not offset it at all, and if they do, 123 00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:53,120 Speaker 1: is there something that's prudent that could still support the 124 00:06:53,120 --> 00:06:57,120 Speaker 1: euro It's a really important question, and what I would 125 00:06:57,160 --> 00:07:00,560 Speaker 1: say is it's a fine needle to threat, so to speak, 126 00:07:00,600 --> 00:07:03,279 Speaker 1: in that Yes, you have to target polity in terms 127 00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:05,880 Speaker 1: of preventing some of the pass through, especially for the 128 00:07:05,880 --> 00:07:08,640 Speaker 1: lower income households, but at the same time you have 129 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:11,800 Speaker 1: to allow price signals to work and demand to drop. 130 00:07:12,320 --> 00:07:15,520 Speaker 1: And I have to say I think the European policy 131 00:07:15,560 --> 00:07:18,160 Speaker 1: response over the last few months has been quite impressive 132 00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:21,400 Speaker 1: in that front, in that you have seen the situation 133 00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:23,720 Speaker 1: is very extreme in terms of the price rises, but 134 00:07:23,840 --> 00:07:27,160 Speaker 1: you are seeing demand management industrial demand in Germany for 135 00:07:27,160 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 1: gases dropped by at the same time the re support 136 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:33,640 Speaker 1: for the low income households, but fiscal policy is not 137 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:38,160 Speaker 1: blowing out in terms of being completely unfunded. We've obviously 138 00:07:38,200 --> 00:07:42,440 Speaker 1: got this very significant energy summit happening on Friday, But 139 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:45,480 Speaker 1: I would say ultimately the policy response that helps is 140 00:07:45,520 --> 00:07:48,400 Speaker 1: one that allows the market signals to work but preventing 141 00:07:48,440 --> 00:07:51,760 Speaker 1: some of the more extreme downside risks, and Europe is 142 00:07:51,760 --> 00:07:54,800 Speaker 1: heading in that direction. Finally, George, if we could leave 143 00:07:54,840 --> 00:07:57,240 Speaker 1: Europe and head back to Asia, because you've mentioned the 144 00:07:57,320 --> 00:07:59,920 Speaker 1: Japanese then a few times, flirting with one forty five 145 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:01,920 Speaker 1: at the dollar this morning, the weakest level we have 146 00:08:01,920 --> 00:08:05,520 Speaker 1: seen going back to August. And you've also alluded to 147 00:08:05,560 --> 00:08:07,880 Speaker 1: the fact that the Bank of Japan is sticking with 148 00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:09,720 Speaker 1: its motto We're going to keep it easy, We're going 149 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:12,040 Speaker 1: to keep yield curve control. Is there a level on 150 00:08:12,160 --> 00:08:14,920 Speaker 1: dollary end that you think would represent a breaking point 151 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:19,640 Speaker 1: for Corona? I don't really think there is. I think 152 00:08:19,640 --> 00:08:22,560 Speaker 1: from a policy making in a macro perspective, what matters 153 00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:25,400 Speaker 1: is the speed um. So if if you get an 154 00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:29,000 Speaker 1: extreme disorderly move, so to speak, then it becomes either 155 00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 1: easier to invoke the G seven and G twenty agreements 156 00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:35,600 Speaker 1: on disorderly market moves. But the reality is, even though 157 00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:39,640 Speaker 1: the end move has been extremely large this year, it's 158 00:08:39,679 --> 00:08:42,719 Speaker 1: actually been fairly orderly, and it's been aligned at the 159 00:08:42,800 --> 00:08:44,120 Speaker 1: end of the day with what the b o J 160 00:08:44,320 --> 00:08:47,520 Speaker 1: has been doing, which is easy policy. So I find 161 00:08:47,559 --> 00:08:50,760 Speaker 1: it very difficult to see a situation where any sort 162 00:08:50,800 --> 00:08:53,959 Speaker 1: of intervention will be credible from a market perspective. At 163 00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 1: the end of the day, what's needed is for the 164 00:08:55,760 --> 00:08:59,080 Speaker 1: b o J to pivot. Now that may happen um 165 00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:02,800 Speaker 1: if Corona, for example, when his term expires, you get 166 00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:05,840 Speaker 1: a governor that's I'm goin to slightly different approach, obviously 167 00:09:05,880 --> 00:09:08,640 Speaker 1: backed by the government, but as things stand, I'm not 168 00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:11,960 Speaker 1: sure intervention will be credible, and the bar for that 169 00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:14,840 Speaker 1: happens is very high in the sense that the moves 170 00:09:14,880 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 1: will need to be highly disorderly, and at the moment 171 00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:21,479 Speaker 1: they're big, but they're not especially volatile. They're highly intuitive. 172 00:09:21,520 --> 00:09:23,480 Speaker 1: It makes perfect sense, and that's why I think we're 173 00:09:23,480 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 1: all struggling with this idea that the PJ has any 174 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:28,720 Speaker 1: grants to complain right now. George, George, thank you for 175 00:09:28,760 --> 00:09:30,680 Speaker 1: your time and what a world you guys are in 176 00:09:30,760 --> 00:09:33,520 Speaker 1: right now. And foreign exchange Jorge Saravelos there of Deutsche 177 00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:47,600 Speaker 1: Bank joining us now. Is Maggie Battel sending, a portfolio 178 00:09:47,640 --> 00:09:51,040 Speaker 1: manager at all Spring Global Investments. Margie, the Nest composites 179 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:53,719 Speaker 1: down almost nine pc over the last seven days, the 180 00:09:53,800 --> 00:09:56,439 Speaker 1: last seven training days. The SMP five over the same 181 00:09:56,480 --> 00:09:59,040 Speaker 1: period is down about seven percent. Are you ready to 182 00:09:59,040 --> 00:10:02,719 Speaker 1: buy the secretary mark it yet? Well? No, I think 183 00:10:02,760 --> 00:10:05,920 Speaker 1: actually what we've had is about reversal about fifty of 184 00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:08,600 Speaker 1: the rise we've had in those indexes since they're lows 185 00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:11,400 Speaker 1: in June. But I think we're really in a trading 186 00:10:11,520 --> 00:10:14,679 Speaker 1: range with a doward bias because of the backdrop the 187 00:10:14,720 --> 00:10:17,800 Speaker 1: FED is very much committed to raising rates. Globally, you 188 00:10:17,840 --> 00:10:20,640 Speaker 1: can see economies all around the world are slowing down, 189 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:22,960 Speaker 1: and that's really not a market that says we're on 190 00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:26,760 Speaker 1: the verge of a dynamic rebound inequities. So are you 191 00:10:26,800 --> 00:10:29,520 Speaker 1: just moving more into cash? How do you manage in 192 00:10:29,679 --> 00:10:32,480 Speaker 1: terms of some of this barishness at a time when 193 00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:35,480 Speaker 1: there still is uncertainty and still a potential investment case. 194 00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:40,199 Speaker 1: I don't think cash is really all that attractive at 195 00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:42,920 Speaker 1: this level because there is a chance to FED might 196 00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 1: realize that they're being too aggressive, in my opinion, and 197 00:10:46,280 --> 00:10:48,880 Speaker 1: that could change things. So really we're just trying to 198 00:10:48,880 --> 00:10:52,559 Speaker 1: find companies that are reasonably priced that have the possibility 199 00:10:52,720 --> 00:10:55,199 Speaker 1: of continued earnings growth, which I think will be pretty 200 00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:57,360 Speaker 1: hard to find. Over the next year. We're thinking earnings 201 00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:00,640 Speaker 1: are going to decelerate a lot, so p easier down. 202 00:11:00,920 --> 00:11:03,320 Speaker 1: But with decelerating earnings that still says a lot of 203 00:11:03,320 --> 00:11:06,120 Speaker 1: stocks could go down. So trying to to see where 204 00:11:06,160 --> 00:11:09,000 Speaker 1: stocks still have a growth path and aren't too puffed 205 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:12,400 Speaker 1: up based on yesteryear's idea of how fast economy is 206 00:11:12,400 --> 00:11:14,280 Speaker 1: going to grow, And how do you factor in the 207 00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:19,880 Speaker 1: strength of the dollar into your thinking about these multinational companies. Um, 208 00:11:19,920 --> 00:11:22,360 Speaker 1: you know, I've never really found that a big help 209 00:11:22,440 --> 00:11:25,240 Speaker 1: in making money in stocks, because often the market will 210 00:11:25,240 --> 00:11:27,720 Speaker 1: look through dollar strength. I think what it really tells 211 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:29,800 Speaker 1: you is that it reflects the strength of the US 212 00:11:29,840 --> 00:11:34,480 Speaker 1: economy compared to Europe, compared to emerging markets, compared to China. 213 00:11:34,840 --> 00:11:36,680 Speaker 1: So it says to me that we're still the best 214 00:11:36,679 --> 00:11:39,880 Speaker 1: place to invest at the dollars really reflection of that. 215 00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:42,200 Speaker 1: Even at our rates today, we still see money coming 216 00:11:42,200 --> 00:11:45,200 Speaker 1: in from foreigners because we're probably still the best economy 217 00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:47,680 Speaker 1: in the world. Buy. What does that become a headwin though, Markie, 218 00:11:47,679 --> 00:11:49,800 Speaker 1: And this is something people are increasingly asking as they 219 00:11:49,840 --> 00:11:53,840 Speaker 1: talk about coordinated intervention to some of the currency differentials. 220 00:11:53,880 --> 00:11:57,600 Speaker 1: When does the dollar become a liability for US companies 221 00:11:57,640 --> 00:12:01,680 Speaker 1: that are trying to sell their goods overseas? Uh? Well, 222 00:12:01,720 --> 00:12:03,600 Speaker 1: I think that's really what you're seeing in a trend 223 00:12:03,640 --> 00:12:06,680 Speaker 1: for slower growth and acknowledgements from any companies of where 224 00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:09,760 Speaker 1: they saw rapid growth, say in emerging market, they're now 225 00:12:09,800 --> 00:12:11,840 Speaker 1: seeing that scale back. So I think it's really part 226 00:12:11,880 --> 00:12:15,440 Speaker 1: of the backdrop of earnings slowing down around the world, 227 00:12:15,800 --> 00:12:18,560 Speaker 1: grow slowing down around the world. So therefore it's going 228 00:12:18,600 --> 00:12:20,319 Speaker 1: to be you're gonna have to be more choosey and 229 00:12:20,400 --> 00:12:23,319 Speaker 1: finding companies that can get through a period of very 230 00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:25,280 Speaker 1: low growth. We haven't had that in quite a while, 231 00:12:25,320 --> 00:12:27,960 Speaker 1: and here we have everything coming together. Uh, and they're 232 00:12:27,960 --> 00:12:30,560 Speaker 1: really all negative as far as future growth. Monkey, the 233 00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:33,480 Speaker 1: bulk of your portfolio is in equities. We used to 234 00:12:33,480 --> 00:12:36,040 Speaker 1: talk to you almost exclusively about fixed income. I wanted 235 00:12:36,040 --> 00:12:38,000 Speaker 1: to squeeze a little bit more in unfixed income if 236 00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:41,000 Speaker 1: we can. We're seeing signs that sovereigns in Europe are 237 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:44,800 Speaker 1: willing to take on uncapped liability and transfer massive risk 238 00:12:44,840 --> 00:12:47,720 Speaker 1: away from the consumer to offset some of the pain 239 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:50,800 Speaker 1: sparked by energy issues across the continent. What do you 240 00:12:50,840 --> 00:12:55,000 Speaker 1: think the consequence of that are going to be? Well, 241 00:12:55,000 --> 00:12:57,800 Speaker 1: when you have that kind of massive innovation, the result 242 00:12:57,880 --> 00:13:00,840 Speaker 1: is always the saying, which is the policies have a 243 00:13:00,840 --> 00:13:03,640 Speaker 1: way of backfiring. For example, I think in England they 244 00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:06,040 Speaker 1: did have some price caps a few years ago under 245 00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:09,560 Speaker 1: Theresa May. That hasn't worked down very well. Uh So, 246 00:13:09,600 --> 00:13:12,599 Speaker 1: I think that it's really a negative for consumers and 247 00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:16,080 Speaker 1: negative for those economies. Again, we're lucky enough that we 248 00:13:16,120 --> 00:13:18,560 Speaker 1: don't have that here. Again, coming back to the case, 249 00:13:18,559 --> 00:13:22,000 Speaker 1: our growth looks better than than worldwide. I've all sprint 250 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:28,840 Speaker 1: Global investments, thank you. So much of the inflation story 251 00:13:28,880 --> 00:13:31,040 Speaker 1: has been oil and gas, and a lot of people 252 00:13:31,040 --> 00:13:33,840 Speaker 1: have been calling for oil prices to surge to new 253 00:13:33,880 --> 00:13:36,760 Speaker 1: record highs earlier this year. One person pushed against them. 254 00:13:36,880 --> 00:13:39,480 Speaker 1: He said, you guys are all wrong. You underestimate the 255 00:13:39,520 --> 00:13:43,400 Speaker 1: power of a lack of demand as the global economy slows. 256 00:13:43,440 --> 00:13:45,920 Speaker 1: That one person was Ed Morrise, City Group, head of 257 00:13:45,960 --> 00:13:49,800 Speaker 1: Commodities research for the for the World, and he came 258 00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:52,440 Speaker 1: out and he said, no prices are going down. Ed Morris, 259 00:13:52,520 --> 00:13:54,360 Speaker 1: you are correct. We have seen that, and we have 260 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:58,120 Speaker 1: seen it steadily going even with a potential supply cut 261 00:13:58,240 --> 00:14:02,640 Speaker 1: from OPEC. Plus. How closely is this particular energy story 262 00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:06,200 Speaker 1: tied to the slowdown that we're seeing in China. Well, 263 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:07,880 Speaker 1: it's got a lot to do with it, but a 264 00:14:07,880 --> 00:14:10,000 Speaker 1: lot less to do with it than people really think, 265 00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:13,600 Speaker 1: because Chinese demand was really peaking and we didn't expect 266 00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:16,000 Speaker 1: it to go anywhere. This year we had a very 267 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:19,440 Speaker 1: low number of modest hundred das in validate UH increased 268 00:14:19,480 --> 00:14:22,400 Speaker 1: in Chinese demand. They came back to where they had 269 00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:25,720 Speaker 1: been through the recovery, and there was no place further 270 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:28,320 Speaker 1: to go. They had already cut back on diesel demand, 271 00:14:28,600 --> 00:14:32,280 Speaker 1: on gasoline demand. That one bright spot was petrochemical pea stock, 272 00:14:32,560 --> 00:14:34,080 Speaker 1: and as we know a lot of that comes from 273 00:14:34,120 --> 00:14:36,880 Speaker 1: the natural gas liquid pool rather than from the oil 274 00:14:36,880 --> 00:14:40,320 Speaker 1: pool or the refinery pool. UH. China has, however, really 275 00:14:40,360 --> 00:14:44,120 Speaker 1: influenced the market. They are so concerned with energy security 276 00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:48,000 Speaker 1: that they basically stopped exports and that has had reverberations 277 00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:50,880 Speaker 1: around the planet. The one thing that that we missed 278 00:14:51,120 --> 00:14:53,280 Speaker 1: UH and the world it's a whole missed was that 279 00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:56,480 Speaker 1: when we have natural gas prices getting as high as 280 00:14:56,480 --> 00:14:59,680 Speaker 1: they had gone on a content to be tou content 281 00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:03,200 Speaker 1: bay is, prices for gas net gas are higher than 282 00:15:03,240 --> 00:15:06,200 Speaker 1: prices for diesel at a time when the world was 283 00:15:06,280 --> 00:15:09,040 Speaker 1: moving closer to diesel, we had demand up about a 284 00:15:09,040 --> 00:15:11,680 Speaker 1: million barrels a day. As a result of that, switched. 285 00:15:11,840 --> 00:15:14,760 Speaker 1: China cut off their exports of about seven barrels a 286 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:17,680 Speaker 1: day of diesel. They did that last September. They haven't 287 00:15:17,720 --> 00:15:20,240 Speaker 1: lifted it at all. So we were having you know, 288 00:15:20,320 --> 00:15:22,720 Speaker 1: some of what's happening in the planet is really result 289 00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:25,280 Speaker 1: of China. But I say it's more China policy, that 290 00:15:25,400 --> 00:15:28,000 Speaker 1: it is a Chinese command. And the fact that you 291 00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:30,120 Speaker 1: say that is less to do with China than people 292 00:15:30,160 --> 00:15:33,040 Speaker 1: think is a pretty dire statement with respect to economic 293 00:15:33,080 --> 00:15:36,200 Speaker 1: activity in the United Kingdom, in the European Union, as 294 00:15:36,200 --> 00:15:38,760 Speaker 1: well as the United States at a time when all 295 00:15:38,840 --> 00:15:42,160 Speaker 1: regions are looking to support households as they continue to 296 00:15:42,280 --> 00:15:45,120 Speaker 1: maintain their demand. So can you explain a little bit 297 00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:47,560 Speaker 1: more why demand is falling off so much more than 298 00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:50,640 Speaker 1: people seem to think from the data at hand. So 299 00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:52,440 Speaker 1: on the we have we have the best day of 300 00:15:52,480 --> 00:15:55,440 Speaker 1: the world from the United States. People started seeing, we 301 00:15:55,480 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 1: started seeing at the end of March beginning of April 302 00:15:58,160 --> 00:16:00,920 Speaker 1: that US demand really had come off and then come 303 00:16:00,960 --> 00:16:02,560 Speaker 1: off as we got out of winter and as we 304 00:16:02,600 --> 00:16:05,320 Speaker 1: got into the driving season, and week after week, and 305 00:16:05,360 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 1: even if you do it on a four week moving 306 00:16:06,920 --> 00:16:11,360 Speaker 1: average basis, from March to today, US demand has gotten 307 00:16:11,600 --> 00:16:14,120 Speaker 1: lower and lower than it was a year ago. Total 308 00:16:14,160 --> 00:16:16,080 Speaker 1: demand in the month of August was close to two 309 00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:20,280 Speaker 1: million barrels a day lower than it was in auguste on. 310 00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:22,160 Speaker 1: One million barrels a day. Of that was in the 311 00:16:22,160 --> 00:16:25,880 Speaker 1: transport fuel business, three hundred thousand in diesel, which reflects 312 00:16:25,960 --> 00:16:29,520 Speaker 1: what's happening volumetrically in the retail market. The rest the 313 00:16:29,600 --> 00:16:32,360 Speaker 1: remaining seven hundred thousand a day was in the gasoline market, 314 00:16:32,400 --> 00:16:35,280 Speaker 1: and that's because people simply decided to drive less. And 315 00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:38,600 Speaker 1: we have survey data that proved that vehicle miles traveled 316 00:16:38,840 --> 00:16:42,400 Speaker 1: have gone down. So you know, get high prices and 317 00:16:42,480 --> 00:16:46,400 Speaker 1: people react to that by not buying as much, and 318 00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:49,480 Speaker 1: that's that's kind of a lesson potentially for Europe. We've 319 00:16:49,480 --> 00:16:53,920 Speaker 1: seen effectively conservation working as a result of consumer response 320 00:16:54,240 --> 00:16:58,440 Speaker 1: to high prices across across the United States without a 321 00:16:58,480 --> 00:17:01,280 Speaker 1: recession other than a technical recession. But you know, we're 322 00:17:01,320 --> 00:17:04,760 Speaker 1: seeing growth in the labor market that's pretty formidable. And 323 00:17:04,840 --> 00:17:08,240 Speaker 1: even so with more money in people's pockets people driving less, 324 00:17:08,280 --> 00:17:10,200 Speaker 1: that is a lesson. If you let the market work 325 00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:13,400 Speaker 1: to some degree, people are going to conserve. So one 326 00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:16,440 Speaker 1: of the big experiments that the world. Europe in particular, 327 00:17:16,520 --> 00:17:19,359 Speaker 1: is could precting is how much will people be allowed 328 00:17:19,400 --> 00:17:22,879 Speaker 1: to conserve? The other experiment is what's going to happen politically, 329 00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:26,639 Speaker 1: is people get more concerned about inflation in their pocketbook 330 00:17:27,040 --> 00:17:31,239 Speaker 1: and jobs than they do about Russia and Ukraine. We 331 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:33,360 Speaker 1: have some elections coming up in a couple of weeks, 332 00:17:33,440 --> 00:17:35,720 Speaker 1: we have an election in Italy and we'll see what 333 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:40,080 Speaker 1: the consumer rebellion might be against where these high consumer 334 00:17:40,119 --> 00:17:43,879 Speaker 1: prices are. Just as you're speaking, we're hearing from the 335 00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:46,919 Speaker 1: EU Commissioned President Ursula v Underline talking about how the 336 00:17:46,920 --> 00:17:49,680 Speaker 1: EU is going to propose a mandatory target for reducing 337 00:17:50,040 --> 00:17:54,960 Speaker 1: peak electricity. Clearly the kind of response from government you're 338 00:17:55,000 --> 00:17:58,560 Speaker 1: alluding to here. Yet, as Europe faces this winter, there 339 00:17:58,640 --> 00:18:00,399 Speaker 1: is a sense that this isn't just going to be 340 00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:04,040 Speaker 1: a this winter problem. We could see years of restricted 341 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:06,400 Speaker 1: supply in Europe. So when you're trying to model out 342 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:09,120 Speaker 1: natural gas prices and what they could look like, how 343 00:18:09,200 --> 00:18:13,000 Speaker 1: persistently higher could they be and is that something ultimately 344 00:18:13,040 --> 00:18:16,320 Speaker 1: that the consumer is just going to have to tolerate. Yes, 345 00:18:16,440 --> 00:18:18,520 Speaker 1: the question is not whether they're going to say these 346 00:18:18,520 --> 00:18:20,560 Speaker 1: prices are going to stay higher, but how much higher 347 00:18:20,800 --> 00:18:24,399 Speaker 1: will they stay. Europe is moving back to therm of 348 00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:29,160 Speaker 1: to two fossil fuels, both to natural gas and coal um. 349 00:18:29,200 --> 00:18:31,560 Speaker 1: They've had a double hit this summer because a lot 350 00:18:31,600 --> 00:18:34,320 Speaker 1: of nuclear reactors, particularly in France, had to be shut 351 00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:37,640 Speaker 1: because of a lack of water for cooling the nuclear plants. 352 00:18:37,920 --> 00:18:41,199 Speaker 1: Those will almost certainly be coming back. But as we 353 00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:43,800 Speaker 1: look at europe move back to natural gas and the 354 00:18:43,920 --> 00:18:47,360 Speaker 1: world's response, it will be somewhere between twenty twenty five 355 00:18:47,359 --> 00:18:52,480 Speaker 1: and that will see the prices in Europe coming back 356 00:18:52,480 --> 00:18:55,440 Speaker 1: to where they were at the beginning. One and one 357 00:18:55,440 --> 00:18:59,440 Speaker 1: of the major difficulties that Europe is confronting is that 358 00:18:59,560 --> 00:19:02,280 Speaker 1: it's done only seeing consumers hit in the pocketbook, but 359 00:19:02,320 --> 00:19:06,120 Speaker 1: as seeing job losses in energy intensive industries. And we're 360 00:19:06,119 --> 00:19:09,880 Speaker 1: seeing those energy intensive industries migrating. Where are they migrating 361 00:19:09,920 --> 00:19:13,119 Speaker 1: to places in the world where energy costs so lower? 362 00:19:13,119 --> 00:19:15,720 Speaker 1: It mainly the United States. You've seen the migration of 363 00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:19,080 Speaker 1: fertilizes into the U S from Europe, and we're seeing 364 00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:23,520 Speaker 1: other energy intensive industries like zinc and aluminum smelting slowing 365 00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:26,720 Speaker 1: down and closing all together. Well. But to that point, 366 00:19:26,800 --> 00:19:29,240 Speaker 1: at about migrating to the United States. What is the 367 00:19:29,320 --> 00:19:32,400 Speaker 1: risk that these higher energy prices in Europe, the crisis 368 00:19:32,440 --> 00:19:34,800 Speaker 1: there is going to bleed through in a material way 369 00:19:34,800 --> 00:19:38,600 Speaker 1: to prices here in the United States. Well, the risk 370 00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:41,000 Speaker 1: is not on the net gas slode directly, it's actually 371 00:19:41,040 --> 00:19:44,400 Speaker 1: through thermal coal and what's happening thermal coal prices. When 372 00:19:44,440 --> 00:19:47,080 Speaker 1: we got to nine dollar and close at a ten 373 00:19:47,080 --> 00:19:50,600 Speaker 1: dollar natural gas prices, again, it wasn't because of our production, 374 00:19:50,640 --> 00:19:53,720 Speaker 1: It wasn't because of our imports from Canada. It was 375 00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:57,479 Speaker 1: because the price of coal had shot up as Europe 376 00:19:57,480 --> 00:20:00,359 Speaker 1: bought more coal as trying to brought more coal. And 377 00:20:00,440 --> 00:20:04,040 Speaker 1: the nine dollar price of natural gas now eight dollars, 378 00:20:04,040 --> 00:20:07,080 Speaker 1: but that was equivalent to where thermal coal prices were. 379 00:20:07,080 --> 00:20:09,960 Speaker 1: And now we're seeing the thermal coal prices coming off 380 00:20:10,000 --> 00:20:12,600 Speaker 1: again for a variety of reasons, and with that, US 381 00:20:12,680 --> 00:20:15,439 Speaker 1: NAT gas, so US not gas is going to be 382 00:20:15,520 --> 00:20:19,400 Speaker 1: seeing a significant increase in supply. We're gonna see some 383 00:20:19,480 --> 00:20:22,159 Speaker 1: boost in our l m G exports, but those are 384 00:20:22,240 --> 00:20:25,480 Speaker 1: cat You can only produce as much of LG as 385 00:20:25,480 --> 00:20:29,000 Speaker 1: you have liquid faction capacity, and it doesn't grow overnight. 386 00:20:29,240 --> 00:20:32,240 Speaker 1: And that's the reason why Europe's gonna have to wait 387 00:20:32,280 --> 00:20:34,960 Speaker 1: till admit or later in the decade to get to 388 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:37,440 Speaker 1: the point where it will be enough NAT gaests, particularly 389 00:20:37,480 --> 00:20:39,960 Speaker 1: from the US and guitar that's going to be able 390 00:20:40,000 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 1: to replace that Russian natural gas. We also have to 391 00:20:43,080 --> 00:20:46,400 Speaker 1: remember that the Russian game plan is not completely over. 392 00:20:46,440 --> 00:20:49,359 Speaker 1: It's not the second guess what Mr Prutin will do 393 00:20:49,480 --> 00:20:53,159 Speaker 1: he said specifically said what they're doing on oil and gas, 394 00:20:53,200 --> 00:20:56,119 Speaker 1: but particularly gas at the moment is a reflection of 395 00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:59,840 Speaker 1: price caps being discussed. Um, Russia is going to be, 396 00:21:00,400 --> 00:21:03,840 Speaker 1: you know, running out of prices to sell gas pretty soon. Uh. 397 00:21:04,160 --> 00:21:08,840 Speaker 1: European destination of gas from Russia, other than a bit 398 00:21:08,840 --> 00:21:12,879 Speaker 1: obliquefied natural gas can't go anywhere else in the world. 399 00:21:12,880 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 1: There's only a certain modest level of switching they can 400 00:21:17,080 --> 00:21:20,480 Speaker 1: do to sell gas by pipeline to other countries, so 401 00:21:20,600 --> 00:21:24,399 Speaker 1: so mostly former Soviet Union countries, and their their demand 402 00:21:24,480 --> 00:21:29,760 Speaker 1: is limited. So the thirty bcm of of knack gas 403 00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:34,320 Speaker 1: that Europe is pretting provided for by by Russia is 404 00:21:34,560 --> 00:21:37,240 Speaker 1: not going to be replaced by another market. So at 405 00:21:37,240 --> 00:21:41,040 Speaker 1: some point Russia might say, hey, we want to maximize 406 00:21:41,040 --> 00:21:43,560 Speaker 1: the revenue we're getting from natural gas. It would not 407 00:21:43,640 --> 00:21:47,000 Speaker 1: be surprising if they turned back the flows on natural 408 00:21:47,040 --> 00:21:49,640 Speaker 1: gas as we got to the end of the injection 409 00:21:49,720 --> 00:21:52,840 Speaker 1: season in Europe. Uh got to the point when Europe 410 00:21:52,840 --> 00:21:55,240 Speaker 1: is going to be drawing storage, when prices will be 411 00:21:55,320 --> 00:21:57,240 Speaker 1: high for the winter, and Russia will make a lot 412 00:21:57,240 --> 00:21:59,680 Speaker 1: of money on it. So that's one thing to watch. 413 00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:01,919 Speaker 1: Fascinating stuff and as we all try and work out 414 00:22:02,000 --> 00:22:04,520 Speaker 1: whether we have to do this again next winter. Ed 415 00:22:04,600 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 1: more a city group ed. Thank you, sir. We get 416 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:19,879 Speaker 1: lucky this morning joining us now. It's Richard has, the 417 00:22:19,960 --> 00:22:23,000 Speaker 1: President of the Council on Foreign Relations and author of 418 00:22:23,040 --> 00:22:26,720 Speaker 1: the book The Bill of Obligations coming out early next year. Richard, 419 00:22:26,720 --> 00:22:28,680 Speaker 1: always great to catch up with you, sir. I've seen 420 00:22:28,720 --> 00:22:32,119 Speaker 1: the latest article in Foreign Affairs magazine the title the 421 00:22:32,240 --> 00:22:35,040 Speaker 1: Dangerous Decade. I think we need to start there, Richard. 422 00:22:35,040 --> 00:22:37,080 Speaker 1: Why is this decade going to be so much more 423 00:22:37,160 --> 00:22:40,800 Speaker 1: dangerous than what we saw in the previous decade? This 424 00:22:40,960 --> 00:22:44,399 Speaker 1: fair question. The short answer is that's it's an imperfect storm. 425 00:22:44,480 --> 00:22:48,520 Speaker 1: You've got three things taking place simultaneously. One, you've got 426 00:22:48,560 --> 00:22:53,080 Speaker 1: the reemergence of large shale, the storage shale, geopolitical tensions 427 00:22:53,560 --> 00:22:55,960 Speaker 1: between Europe and the United States on one hand, and 428 00:22:55,960 --> 00:22:59,919 Speaker 1: then with Russia, with China, also with the Ran circle, 429 00:23:00,200 --> 00:23:03,560 Speaker 1: you've got all sorts of global challenges such as climate change, 430 00:23:04,160 --> 00:23:08,159 Speaker 1: infectious disease, where there's a large gap between the threat 431 00:23:08,240 --> 00:23:11,000 Speaker 1: and the willingness of the world to come together. And 432 00:23:11,040 --> 00:23:14,040 Speaker 1: then thirdly, all of this is taking place against the 433 00:23:14,080 --> 00:23:19,280 Speaker 1: backdrop of a United States that's divided, distracted, both figuratively 434 00:23:19,359 --> 00:23:21,840 Speaker 1: and literally, at war with itself, and there's a real 435 00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:24,280 Speaker 1: question about when the United States will be willing and 436 00:23:24,359 --> 00:23:27,480 Speaker 1: able to play the significant role that it's played for 437 00:23:27,520 --> 00:23:30,160 Speaker 1: the last three quarters of a century. She had those 438 00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:33,200 Speaker 1: string three things up, and I would say anyone watching 439 00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:36,440 Speaker 1: this show has to assume they're going forward, there's going 440 00:23:36,480 --> 00:23:39,439 Speaker 1: to be far more turbulence, far more instability in the 441 00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:43,800 Speaker 1: world than looking backwards. From a business case, what does 442 00:23:43,800 --> 00:23:47,200 Speaker 1: this mean in terms of doing business in China of 443 00:23:47,359 --> 00:23:51,520 Speaker 1: the increasingly tight relationship between China and Russia, and what 444 00:23:51,640 --> 00:23:55,639 Speaker 1: kind of international presence is to be expected given some 445 00:23:55,720 --> 00:23:59,160 Speaker 1: of these backdrops. Well, for Russia, so long as Mr 446 00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:02,760 Speaker 1: Putin's in charge, you've got to assume there's draconian sanctions. 447 00:24:03,160 --> 00:24:05,159 Speaker 1: I think with China you've got to assume at a 448 00:24:05,160 --> 00:24:08,719 Speaker 1: minimum that there's more restrictive sanctions and anything dealing with 449 00:24:08,800 --> 00:24:12,320 Speaker 1: technology in either direction. Plus I also think there's going 450 00:24:12,359 --> 00:24:16,399 Speaker 1: to be a major policy conversation in the West, also 451 00:24:16,760 --> 00:24:19,200 Speaker 1: not just in Europe and in places like Japan, Taiwan, 452 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:22,760 Speaker 1: South Frere of the United States about whether it's wise 453 00:24:23,240 --> 00:24:27,399 Speaker 1: to remain so dependent on the ability to export to 454 00:24:27,680 --> 00:24:30,480 Speaker 1: China and import from China. You would have thought that 455 00:24:30,520 --> 00:24:33,160 Speaker 1: one of the lessons of the of the current conflict 456 00:24:33,200 --> 00:24:36,600 Speaker 1: with Russia is that any form of economic dependence, not 457 00:24:36,680 --> 00:24:41,480 Speaker 1: just any energy dependence, confers leverage on the other side. Well, 458 00:24:41,520 --> 00:24:45,240 Speaker 1: you are now providing China with enormous potential leverage, should, 459 00:24:45,280 --> 00:24:47,399 Speaker 1: for example, over the next few years, there'd be a 460 00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:50,439 Speaker 1: conflict over Taiwan. So I think you've also got to 461 00:24:50,480 --> 00:24:55,159 Speaker 1: expect a slightly more downsized overall economic relationship with China, 462 00:24:55,359 --> 00:24:57,399 Speaker 1: and the sort of thing you're seeing in the United States. 463 00:24:57,400 --> 00:25:02,120 Speaker 1: The Chipsack bringing home certain some productive activity I think 464 00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:06,400 Speaker 1: is a reaction both to the turbulence of supply chains. 465 00:25:06,400 --> 00:25:11,080 Speaker 1: Plus again growing uncertainty about relations with countries like like China. 466 00:25:11,720 --> 00:25:14,080 Speaker 1: Is this a government option or is this something that 467 00:25:14,119 --> 00:25:16,400 Speaker 1: each business has to decide for themselves. And I asked 468 00:25:16,480 --> 00:25:19,040 Speaker 1: this because a lot of people have been surprised that 469 00:25:19,119 --> 00:25:22,800 Speaker 1: there hasn't been more exodus from China from manufacturing there 470 00:25:22,840 --> 00:25:26,600 Speaker 1: by US businesses, given some of the fragilities exposed by 471 00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:30,520 Speaker 1: the pandemic and by some of the increasing tensions. It's 472 00:25:30,520 --> 00:25:32,359 Speaker 1: a good question. I think some businesses are living in 473 00:25:32,440 --> 00:25:36,120 Speaker 1: la la la. They're essentially hoping against hope they don't 474 00:25:36,119 --> 00:25:41,280 Speaker 1: face a much more disturbed environment politically with China that 475 00:25:41,440 --> 00:25:44,359 Speaker 1: China doesn't face all sorts of internal issues. But I 476 00:25:44,359 --> 00:25:48,359 Speaker 1: would think that any business now needs to right size, 477 00:25:48,440 --> 00:25:52,359 Speaker 1: which I need downsize, uh, it's relationship with China. It 478 00:25:52,440 --> 00:25:55,800 Speaker 1: can assume that there's going to be business as usual 479 00:25:56,200 --> 00:25:59,600 Speaker 1: there again, anyone in the technology space, for sure, but 480 00:25:59,720 --> 00:26:03,360 Speaker 1: even those beyond sensitive technologies have to assume that if 481 00:26:03,400 --> 00:26:06,280 Speaker 1: there's geopolitical friction with China, you have to bet there's 482 00:26:06,280 --> 00:26:09,159 Speaker 1: a decent chance there it will be sanctions will be 483 00:26:09,200 --> 00:26:12,280 Speaker 1: introduced that will be broader than technology. So I think 484 00:26:12,320 --> 00:26:15,159 Speaker 1: any business that doesn't have a Plan B and hasn't 485 00:26:15,200 --> 00:26:18,639 Speaker 1: begun to move towards it V c V China is 486 00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:22,960 Speaker 1: putting itself into a position of distinct vulnerability obviously, Richard, 487 00:26:23,000 --> 00:26:24,760 Speaker 1: and it's Kaylee in New York. From the perspective of 488 00:26:24,800 --> 00:26:28,040 Speaker 1: the United States, they are looking outward at China and 489 00:26:28,080 --> 00:26:30,760 Speaker 1: the geopolitical tensions that you are highlighting. At the same 490 00:26:30,760 --> 00:26:32,960 Speaker 1: time that there is a sense that there's a very 491 00:26:32,960 --> 00:26:36,679 Speaker 1: real democratic crisis inward internally in the United States. And 492 00:26:36,680 --> 00:26:40,240 Speaker 1: I'm just wondering if kind of threats to democracy domestically 493 00:26:40,960 --> 00:26:45,280 Speaker 1: hamper the United States ability to tackle those geopolitical challenges 494 00:26:45,320 --> 00:26:47,920 Speaker 1: moving forward, especially when midway through the decade you say 495 00:26:47,960 --> 00:26:49,840 Speaker 1: is going to be so dangerous, we could have a 496 00:26:49,880 --> 00:26:54,160 Speaker 1: new president Inaugradd You're absolutely right, Kayley. You know we're 497 00:26:54,160 --> 00:26:56,800 Speaker 1: going to have a new president at some point. What 498 00:26:56,880 --> 00:26:59,040 Speaker 1: we don't know any longer is what that president is 499 00:26:59,040 --> 00:27:00,840 Speaker 1: going to do when it comes to it's the U 500 00:27:00,920 --> 00:27:03,280 Speaker 1: S relationship with the world. I say that because in 501 00:27:03,280 --> 00:27:05,760 Speaker 1: the old days, no matter who was elected president, we 502 00:27:05,880 --> 00:27:08,679 Speaker 1: had a pretty good sense of the parameters of what 503 00:27:08,800 --> 00:27:11,800 Speaker 1: this individual do. That's not true anymore. We now have 504 00:27:11,880 --> 00:27:15,479 Speaker 1: the potential to learn dramatically. That means our allies are 505 00:27:15,560 --> 00:27:19,640 Speaker 1: much more guarded about being so reliant or dependent on us. 506 00:27:19,960 --> 00:27:22,879 Speaker 1: It means our foes may see may see opportunities. What 507 00:27:22,960 --> 00:27:26,359 Speaker 1: we did in Afghanistan, I expect did influence Mr Putin 508 00:27:26,400 --> 00:27:29,200 Speaker 1: to do what he did in in Ukraine. I think 509 00:27:29,240 --> 00:27:31,800 Speaker 1: it's it could be harder to drum up resources for 510 00:27:31,920 --> 00:27:34,639 Speaker 1: sustained American development in the world because so much of 511 00:27:35,160 --> 00:27:38,520 Speaker 1: our attention is going to be turned inward. I expect 512 00:27:38,600 --> 00:27:42,000 Speaker 1: in certain areas of the partisanship will affect foreign policy 513 00:27:42,000 --> 00:27:44,360 Speaker 1: as it has. You're gonna see, for example, a very 514 00:27:44,440 --> 00:27:48,359 Speaker 1: rough debate over Iran potentially if the United States tries 515 00:27:48,440 --> 00:27:50,960 Speaker 1: to re enter the agreement with it. So going forward, 516 00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:55,360 Speaker 1: it's gonna be harder to conduct uh consistent foreign policy 517 00:27:55,680 --> 00:27:58,920 Speaker 1: against this backdrop, much less promote democracy in the world. 518 00:27:59,080 --> 00:28:01,880 Speaker 1: How are we going to be like us given what's 519 00:28:01,880 --> 00:28:05,200 Speaker 1: happening with our politics, Given the fact that life expectancy 520 00:28:05,280 --> 00:28:07,880 Speaker 1: is going down in the United States, We've had all 521 00:28:07,880 --> 00:28:10,800 Speaker 1: the problems with lost academic time because of how we 522 00:28:10,880 --> 00:28:14,200 Speaker 1: managed COVID. So the American model, shall we say, there's 523 00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:16,240 Speaker 1: not quite the shining city on a hill that we 524 00:28:16,280 --> 00:28:18,280 Speaker 1: would like it to be Richard just to finish up, 525 00:28:18,280 --> 00:28:21,040 Speaker 1: then what's the solution. Do you think we need new 526 00:28:21,080 --> 00:28:24,080 Speaker 1: institutions to come to some kind of collective agreement in 527 00:28:24,080 --> 00:28:25,919 Speaker 1: the Western had to deal with these issues. What is 528 00:28:25,960 --> 00:28:29,280 Speaker 1: the solution? First thing, get that I never ever ever 529 00:28:29,359 --> 00:28:32,000 Speaker 1: used the word solution. These are not problems that we're 530 00:28:32,040 --> 00:28:34,160 Speaker 1: going to be solved or fixed. If we're lucky, we'll 531 00:28:34,200 --> 00:28:37,680 Speaker 1: be able to manage them more than unless and yes, 532 00:28:37,720 --> 00:28:40,360 Speaker 1: to some extent, that might mean new solutions, that might 533 00:28:40,360 --> 00:28:45,440 Speaker 1: mean different new institutions, new policies, new behaviors. But there's 534 00:28:45,440 --> 00:28:49,560 Speaker 1: no solutions. History doesn't doesn't offer those, uh, you know, frequently, 535 00:28:49,560 --> 00:28:51,600 Speaker 1: and we're not going to get solutions now. And that's 536 00:28:51,600 --> 00:28:54,160 Speaker 1: the worrying conclusion to this conversation, Richard, but a bit 537 00:28:54,200 --> 00:28:56,680 Speaker 1: of a reality check for everyone to Richard House, thank you, 538 00:28:56,960 --> 00:29:00,000 Speaker 1: and they cancel on Farmer Nations. This is the blue 539 00:29:00,000 --> 00:29:04,400 Speaker 1: Burg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays 540 00:29:04,400 --> 00:29:07,880 Speaker 1: from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and 541 00:29:08,000 --> 00:29:12,280 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine am 542 00:29:12,320 --> 00:29:16,080 Speaker 1: for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and 543 00:29:16,200 --> 00:29:22,720 Speaker 1: international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, 544 00:29:22,880 --> 00:29:26,480 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm 545 00:29:26,520 --> 00:29:29,160 Speaker 1: Tom Keene and this is Bloomberg,