WEBVTT - Will Eric Adams’s Exit Change the NYC Mayoral Election? 

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:29.004
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:29.044 --> 0:00:32.524
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova and I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:33.484 --> 0:00:35.564
<v Speaker 2>Today in the show, look, we're both in New York

0:00:35.604 --> 0:00:38.484
<v Speaker 2>City at least part time. We're going to talk about

0:00:38.484 --> 0:00:41.124
<v Speaker 2>the New York mayor all raise Eric Adams, the current

0:00:41.244 --> 0:00:43.564
<v Speaker 2>mayor incurment mayor of New York dropped out this weekend.

0:00:43.764 --> 0:00:45.924
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about the implications for the race, talk about

0:00:45.964 --> 0:00:48.684
<v Speaker 2>the game theory behind Eric adams decision, and also a

0:00:48.684 --> 0:00:51.724
<v Speaker 2>little bit about this vacuum of leadership that has kind

0:00:51.724 --> 0:00:54.684
<v Speaker 2>of compelled a surprising candidates or I'm I'm doning to

0:00:54.724 --> 0:00:57.484
<v Speaker 2>be the very likely in my opinion, next mayor of

0:00:57.604 --> 0:00:58.004
<v Speaker 2>New York.

0:00:58.324 --> 0:01:01.204
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and well we'll, obviously, because this is Risky Business,

0:01:01.284 --> 0:01:03.164
<v Speaker 1>get some game theory in there, the game theory of

0:01:03.164 --> 0:01:07.044
<v Speaker 1>the decision, the timing, all of those fun things. So yeah,

0:01:07.164 --> 0:01:15.324
<v Speaker 1>well we're going to have politics centric show for you today.

0:01:15.364 --> 0:01:18.844
<v Speaker 1>Before we do that, though, Nate Happy Fall. It is

0:01:19.004 --> 0:01:22.844
<v Speaker 1>officially autumn, by the way, so now we're recording this Monday,

0:01:22.884 --> 0:01:25.484
<v Speaker 1>September twenty ninth. It is hot as fuck in New

0:01:25.564 --> 0:01:28.124
<v Speaker 1>York City. It is muggy, it is.

0:01:28.164 --> 0:01:30.924
<v Speaker 2>Great I mean here in Manhattan, Maria, it's a whole

0:01:30.924 --> 0:01:34.524
<v Speaker 2>different micro climate than your neck of the woods. But yeah,

0:01:34.524 --> 0:01:35.564
<v Speaker 2>it's been a little muggy.

0:01:35.724 --> 0:01:39.964
<v Speaker 1>It's muggy, it's sticky, but yet it's officially fall. I

0:01:40.124 --> 0:01:44.924
<v Speaker 1>was in Vermont this weekend leaf watching. That was beautiful.

0:01:45.204 --> 0:01:48.404
<v Speaker 1>But I have to say, you know, whatever, whatever the causes,

0:01:48.484 --> 0:01:51.524
<v Speaker 1>climate change, et cetera, the leaf colors are much more

0:01:51.604 --> 0:01:53.924
<v Speaker 1>muted this year, and by the end of the weekend

0:01:54.004 --> 0:01:57.164
<v Speaker 1>they started almost like everything started falling. I was like, wait,

0:01:57.164 --> 0:01:59.564
<v Speaker 1>this isn't supposed to be peak leafs yet, and yet

0:01:59.644 --> 0:02:01.364
<v Speaker 1>here we are. But it was still beautiful.

0:02:01.644 --> 0:02:05.204
<v Speaker 2>What if climate change made like fawful each better, would

0:02:05.244 --> 0:02:05.684
<v Speaker 2>you favor it?

0:02:05.764 --> 0:02:09.084
<v Speaker 1>Then? Yes? Absolutely? No, please please?

0:02:09.204 --> 0:02:13.364
<v Speaker 2>Does it like pollution make sunsets better? Is that a thing?

0:02:14.324 --> 0:02:19.004
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Yes, mog makes uh smog makes sunsets more beautiful

0:02:19.044 --> 0:02:23.564
<v Speaker 1>because it filters the colors in a funny way, and

0:02:23.684 --> 0:02:28.204
<v Speaker 1>so so yes, absolutely, we have we have some silver

0:02:29.524 --> 0:02:35.084
<v Speaker 1>Nate in terms of risky business business. On the drive

0:02:35.484 --> 0:02:39.684
<v Speaker 1>back from Vermont, driving down this bucolic road you know

0:02:39.964 --> 0:02:43.484
<v Speaker 1>about to like exit and get on the highway, open

0:02:43.564 --> 0:02:48.244
<v Speaker 1>windows because it's nice fall weather. A fucking wasp flies

0:02:48.404 --> 0:02:51.404
<v Speaker 1>into the car, straight into my arm and bites me.

0:02:52.564 --> 0:02:55.404
<v Speaker 1>I got stung for the first time, and I.

0:02:55.324 --> 0:02:56.004
<v Speaker 2>Don't know how long.

0:02:56.044 --> 0:02:58.644
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea I was while I was watching,

0:02:58.684 --> 0:03:00.164
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I have no idea. If I'm allergic,

0:03:00.204 --> 0:03:01.564
<v Speaker 1>I had better drill because I have a lot of

0:03:01.564 --> 0:03:04.804
<v Speaker 1>other allergies. So I was like, okay, I'm ready. And

0:03:04.844 --> 0:03:07.564
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the middle of nowhere, Vermont with no cell reception.

0:03:07.684 --> 0:03:10.244
<v Speaker 1>So I was like, I sure, hope I'm not because

0:03:10.764 --> 0:03:14.284
<v Speaker 1>this ain't good anyway, I'm not allergic. Everything's good. It

0:03:14.444 --> 0:03:17.804
<v Speaker 1>just there was swelling. It really hurt, but so yeah,

0:03:17.884 --> 0:03:19.804
<v Speaker 1>wasps stung me and I thought flew out of the

0:03:19.844 --> 0:03:23.804
<v Speaker 1>car about two out hours later on the highway in

0:03:23.844 --> 0:03:26.444
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the highway, no rest stops in sight.

0:03:27.084 --> 0:03:30.204
<v Speaker 1>The fucker starts buzzing around in the car. The wasp

0:03:30.284 --> 0:03:33.244
<v Speaker 1>did not leave the car. So nay, risky business question,

0:03:33.444 --> 0:03:36.724
<v Speaker 1>risk calculus. What do you do you are on a

0:03:36.804 --> 0:03:39.724
<v Speaker 1>highway driving like seventy five eighty miles an hour and

0:03:39.764 --> 0:03:43.084
<v Speaker 1>there's a wasp flying around like you can't turn off

0:03:43.164 --> 0:03:45.284
<v Speaker 1>because you're on a highway. What are you supposed to do?

0:03:45.324 --> 0:03:48.524
<v Speaker 1>Because that is you know it can't just go on.

0:03:48.844 --> 0:03:51.364
<v Speaker 2>Okay, first of them, Ma, Ria, it's Vermont, right, you're

0:03:51.404 --> 0:03:55.964
<v Speaker 2>not like, it's not like multiple fucking gas station with me.

0:03:56.524 --> 0:03:58.564
<v Speaker 1>This is no, no, no, This is now two hours later.

0:03:58.644 --> 0:04:00.884
<v Speaker 1>This is now on the highway and either Connecticut. I

0:04:00.924 --> 0:04:02.884
<v Speaker 1>think it's in Connecticut. Let's call it Connecticut.

0:04:03.004 --> 0:04:06.044
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pull over to the nearest gas station.

0:04:06.684 --> 0:04:09.044
<v Speaker 1>There was none. Yeah, the nearest gas station was in

0:04:09.164 --> 0:04:11.844
<v Speaker 1>like twenty miles Connecticut.

0:04:12.564 --> 0:04:15.604
<v Speaker 2>It's the most densely populated state pretty much.

0:04:15.684 --> 0:04:18.004
<v Speaker 1>Right. There's a part where it says like this is

0:04:18.044 --> 0:04:21.324
<v Speaker 1>the last rest stop for the next whatever many miles.

0:04:21.364 --> 0:04:24.284
<v Speaker 1>That's we had passed that point, no.

0:04:25.404 --> 0:04:27.164
<v Speaker 2>End of the road. Put your hazards on and wait

0:04:27.164 --> 0:04:29.684
<v Speaker 2>for the right Yeah. Is that more risky than a

0:04:29.804 --> 0:04:32.444
<v Speaker 2>wasp sting? I think it's probably a close call. I

0:04:32.444 --> 0:04:33.804
<v Speaker 2>think it's a close I was trying to.

0:04:33.724 --> 0:04:36.404
<v Speaker 1>Do the risk calculus. I was like, this thing is terrifying,

0:04:36.484 --> 0:04:38.964
<v Speaker 1>like if it flies at you, the risk of swerving

0:04:39.004 --> 0:04:42.764
<v Speaker 1>and getting into an accident anyway, ended up yet being

0:04:42.804 --> 0:04:46.004
<v Speaker 1>able to pull over and get the Wasp out of

0:04:46.044 --> 0:04:50.964
<v Speaker 1>the car. Superhero moment, Nate superhero moment. But that was actually,

0:04:51.004 --> 0:04:52.284
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's one of those things you don't really

0:04:52.324 --> 0:04:55.004
<v Speaker 1>think about in your risk calculus when you're talking about

0:04:55.444 --> 0:04:57.364
<v Speaker 1>driving in all of these things. But that was my

0:04:57.924 --> 0:05:00.004
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. Maybe Vermont got mad that I

0:05:00.044 --> 0:05:02.044
<v Speaker 1>didn't love its leaves this year, but it was kind

0:05:02.044 --> 0:05:04.284
<v Speaker 1>of a final fucking from Vermont on my way out

0:05:04.284 --> 0:05:05.284
<v Speaker 1>of the stay.

0:05:06.764 --> 0:05:10.244
<v Speaker 2>Rank the New England states from one to six in

0:05:10.324 --> 0:05:12.484
<v Speaker 2>terms of what goodness?

0:05:13.844 --> 0:05:16.204
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, Well, I don't know. I'm from Massachusetts. You know,

0:05:16.244 --> 0:05:19.484
<v Speaker 1>I grew up there, So I'm gonna put Massachusetts first

0:05:19.604 --> 0:05:23.884
<v Speaker 1>because my family is there. I went to school there.

0:05:24.164 --> 0:05:26.804
<v Speaker 1>You know. There are lots of things about Massachusetts I

0:05:26.804 --> 0:05:29.764
<v Speaker 1>don't like. I think that the term masshole is very apt.

0:05:30.124 --> 0:05:32.004
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of things about Boston I don't like,

0:05:32.004 --> 0:05:34.524
<v Speaker 1>and yet Boston's a beautiful you know, it's a city. Still,

0:05:35.604 --> 0:05:39.924
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna put let me see Maine. I

0:05:39.924 --> 0:05:43.084
<v Speaker 1>think maybe number two. All the mosquitoes might put Maine

0:05:43.084 --> 0:05:44.124
<v Speaker 1>at number three. I don't know.

0:05:45.084 --> 0:05:47.364
<v Speaker 2>Maine is such a fucking clear number one, Like, what

0:05:47.404 --> 0:05:48.244
<v Speaker 2>are you even talking about?

0:05:49.524 --> 0:05:52.524
<v Speaker 1>Maine is gorgeous, But the mosquitoes killed me, So I'm

0:05:52.524 --> 0:05:55.924
<v Speaker 1>gonna put at number two with an asterisk. Fucking the Mosquitoes.

0:05:56.964 --> 0:06:00.764
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, I would put Rhode Island probably number three.

0:06:00.884 --> 0:06:01.644
<v Speaker 1>It's small, but.

0:06:01.684 --> 0:06:04.844
<v Speaker 2>Mighty weird, weird state. Yes, it's a weird set.

0:06:05.044 --> 0:06:06.844
<v Speaker 1>It is a weird state, but it's it has a

0:06:06.844 --> 0:06:10.004
<v Speaker 1>lot of really beautiful stuff, lots of interesting things. Providence

0:06:10.004 --> 0:06:12.324
<v Speaker 1>in Newport. You know, I'm a I'm a fan.

0:06:12.724 --> 0:06:18.204
<v Speaker 2>Let's see Connecticut, New Hampshire, Vermont, so Vermont. Maybe Vermont's

0:06:18.244 --> 0:06:18.724
<v Speaker 2>number four.

0:06:18.884 --> 0:06:21.564
<v Speaker 1>I guess no, No, I love Vermont. I think it's beautiful.

0:06:21.644 --> 0:06:23.884
<v Speaker 1>I think they are people there can be like. It's

0:06:23.884 --> 0:06:27.124
<v Speaker 1>a really weird state as well, and obviously I have

0:06:27.164 --> 0:06:31.684
<v Speaker 1>a personal family connection to Vermont and like for that reason,

0:06:31.724 --> 0:06:33.404
<v Speaker 1>I do love it. So maybe we put Maybe I

0:06:33.404 --> 0:06:37.004
<v Speaker 1>actually put Vermont before Rhode Island. New Hampshire is going

0:06:37.044 --> 0:06:39.124
<v Speaker 1>to be dead last. I hate New Hampshire and I

0:06:39.124 --> 0:06:41.764
<v Speaker 1>hate Connecticut. Connecticut and New Hampshire I kind of tied

0:06:41.764 --> 0:06:42.204
<v Speaker 1>for last.

0:06:44.324 --> 0:06:47.284
<v Speaker 2>What about you day, Yeah, look, Maine Maine is number one.

0:06:47.404 --> 0:06:49.764
<v Speaker 2>Then it gets more difficult. I mean, I like, I

0:06:49.804 --> 0:06:54.844
<v Speaker 2>agree that the bottom tier has to be Connecticut, and

0:06:55.284 --> 0:06:57.244
<v Speaker 2>I think has to be Connecticut. I like, I don't

0:06:57.284 --> 0:07:00.524
<v Speaker 2>dislike Connecticut. In fact, my fucking family, my dad's like

0:07:00.564 --> 0:07:03.084
<v Speaker 2>from Connecticut. So maybe I'm gonna put Yeah, I just

0:07:03.084 --> 0:07:05.324
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be insulting. I mean, maybe put my

0:07:05.604 --> 0:07:06.124
<v Speaker 2>I mean I have.

0:07:06.084 --> 0:07:08.684
<v Speaker 1>Family in Connecticut too. My sister, whom I love dearly,

0:07:08.724 --> 0:07:12.044
<v Speaker 1>were very close. You know. She teaches and her labs

0:07:12.044 --> 0:07:15.324
<v Speaker 1>at Yale, so her family lives in Connecticut. So you know,

0:07:15.444 --> 0:07:19.924
<v Speaker 1>I obviously am not going to be anti Connecticut. I'm

0:07:19.924 --> 0:07:22.524
<v Speaker 1>not anti any state. We're all inclusive here. On the

0:07:22.604 --> 0:07:24.684
<v Speaker 1>Risky Essing the podcast, there's.

0:07:24.484 --> 0:07:26.764
<v Speaker 2>A criteria where if you had to live in a state,

0:07:26.844 --> 0:07:28.204
<v Speaker 2>Let's see, you have to live in that state for

0:07:28.284 --> 0:07:31.844
<v Speaker 2>eleven months out of twelve per year. You're madded thirty

0:07:32.324 --> 0:07:34.964
<v Speaker 2>travel days or whatever, right, and you had to pick

0:07:34.964 --> 0:07:38.404
<v Speaker 2>in New England state. Okay. By that criteria, mass choosets

0:07:38.404 --> 0:07:38.924
<v Speaker 2>would be.

0:07:38.844 --> 0:07:40.804
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to Massachusetts.

0:07:40.244 --> 0:07:43.524
<v Speaker 2>First or second for me? Right, by just overall sentiment, though,

0:07:43.564 --> 0:07:46.444
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't really you know, Boston is like

0:07:46.604 --> 0:07:49.804
<v Speaker 2>a charming European city without the charm, you know what

0:07:49.844 --> 0:07:51.364
<v Speaker 2>I mean. I like the layout of Boston.

0:07:51.604 --> 0:07:54.444
<v Speaker 1>Hey, I told you I'm not I'm not a Boston apologist.

0:07:54.644 --> 0:07:56.964
<v Speaker 2>I like the sports and I don't like the sports teams,

0:07:56.964 --> 0:07:58.964
<v Speaker 2>but like you know, I would just go and be

0:07:59.004 --> 0:08:01.084
<v Speaker 2>a fucking I would just watch so much fucking sports

0:08:01.084 --> 0:08:03.884
<v Speaker 2>if I lived in Massachusetts and go to the Encore

0:08:04.364 --> 0:08:05.004
<v Speaker 2>play poker.

0:08:05.324 --> 0:08:07.484
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, I think that Boston would actually be a

0:08:07.524 --> 0:08:09.404
<v Speaker 1>good place for you, for like, if you were forced

0:08:09.524 --> 0:08:11.844
<v Speaker 1>to live somewhere for a little while, I think you'd,

0:08:11.964 --> 0:08:15.124
<v Speaker 1>you know, because of the sports, and it has good sushi. Nate,

0:08:15.364 --> 0:08:18.924
<v Speaker 1>you know, no, Maria, I would, Maria, Maria.

0:08:20.404 --> 0:08:24.524
<v Speaker 2>The food in New England is a problem. Literally, fucking

0:08:24.884 --> 0:08:26.484
<v Speaker 2>who is a Graham, you know, the guy who had

0:08:26.524 --> 0:08:28.724
<v Speaker 2>been in the gram Cracker. He lives like, we don't

0:08:28.724 --> 0:08:32.484
<v Speaker 2>want to have food with fucking flavor in it, right food?

0:08:32.524 --> 0:08:35.524
<v Speaker 1>And the food in New England is, yes, an absolute

0:08:35.524 --> 0:08:39.964
<v Speaker 1>problem everywhere, but at least, you know, at least we

0:08:40.004 --> 0:08:42.524
<v Speaker 1>can get decent sushi and Boston. Like in Vermont, I

0:08:42.564 --> 0:08:45.844
<v Speaker 1>really wanted sushi, like you do not get sushi anywhere

0:08:45.884 --> 0:08:48.924
<v Speaker 1>near where I was in Vermont. Want to die, I

0:08:49.004 --> 0:08:51.484
<v Speaker 1>just I was in a sushi mood. I didn't want

0:08:51.484 --> 0:08:54.644
<v Speaker 1>sushi and Vermont. I wanted sushi in the abstract and

0:08:54.684 --> 0:08:58.724
<v Speaker 1>that's not possible anyway. My WASP staying is getting better.

0:08:59.084 --> 0:09:03.684
<v Speaker 1>Fuck wasps. I hate them. I hope I never see

0:09:03.724 --> 0:09:09.244
<v Speaker 1>one again, although obviously I will. Let's move on to politics.

0:09:09.604 --> 0:09:12.844
<v Speaker 1>So we had some news over the weekend, and again

0:09:12.844 --> 0:09:14.684
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this on Monday. You're going to hear it

0:09:14.724 --> 0:09:17.484
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, so if there are any developments in the meantime,

0:09:17.484 --> 0:09:21.084
<v Speaker 1>we will not have caught them. But Eric Adams announced

0:09:21.124 --> 0:09:25.764
<v Speaker 1>that he was dropping out of the race for mayor

0:09:25.924 --> 0:09:28.564
<v Speaker 1>of New York City. And he did this just a

0:09:28.564 --> 0:09:31.884
<v Speaker 1>few days before, you know, the race already passed the

0:09:31.924 --> 0:09:35.404
<v Speaker 1>deadline for his name to be removed.

0:09:34.724 --> 0:09:36.924
<v Speaker 2>So passed like a while ago.

0:09:36.804 --> 0:09:40.364
<v Speaker 1>A while ago, Okay, So Mayor Adams announced that he

0:09:40.524 --> 0:09:43.324
<v Speaker 1>was dropping out long after the deadline to take his

0:09:43.444 --> 0:09:47.044
<v Speaker 1>name off of the ballot. And it's a pretty historic

0:09:47.124 --> 0:09:50.604
<v Speaker 1>moment because he is going to be then just the

0:09:50.644 --> 0:09:54.404
<v Speaker 1>second mayor to not win re election.

0:09:55.404 --> 0:09:56.964
<v Speaker 2>And is that true because you think of New York

0:09:56.964 --> 0:10:00.484
<v Speaker 2>mayors as having had problematic careers, but I guess they

0:10:00.484 --> 0:10:02.004
<v Speaker 2>tend to I guess they tend to get the re

0:10:02.044 --> 0:10:03.284
<v Speaker 2>election thing, right.

0:10:03.804 --> 0:10:07.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. David Dinkins, who was the city's first black mayor,

0:10:07.724 --> 0:10:11.244
<v Speaker 1>lost his reelection bid, and that was the only other

0:10:11.364 --> 0:10:12.964
<v Speaker 1>mayor who did not serve a second.

0:10:12.724 --> 0:10:15.844
<v Speaker 2>Tim Bloomberg changed the rules to run a third time,

0:10:16.804 --> 0:10:20.204
<v Speaker 2>and one actually close than you might have expected. But yeah,

0:10:20.244 --> 0:10:25.404
<v Speaker 2>I guess I mean the Blasio Bloomberg, Rudy Dinkin's one term,

0:10:26.124 --> 0:10:30.844
<v Speaker 2>Ed Katsch, who is Abraham Beam. I was not aware.

0:10:31.684 --> 0:10:34.204
<v Speaker 2>I You're named Abraham Beam.

0:10:34.924 --> 0:10:37.724
<v Speaker 1>Wait, okay, Nate, So if I'm understanding you correctly, Bean

0:10:38.124 --> 0:10:39.564
<v Speaker 1>also didn't win re election.

0:10:40.404 --> 0:10:43.204
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he left office in nineteen seventy seven. There's no

0:10:44.244 --> 0:10:49.044
<v Speaker 2>Bean Street, I guess anywhere, not well remembered. And there

0:10:49.044 --> 0:10:50.324
<v Speaker 2>are a couple of others in the past.

0:10:50.684 --> 0:10:53.884
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So Adams is the third in modern New York

0:10:53.924 --> 0:11:00.404
<v Speaker 1>City history who has not won reelection. Very small group that,

0:11:00.684 --> 0:11:03.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, seems like it's an accomplishment of a sort

0:11:03.124 --> 0:11:04.804
<v Speaker 1>negative accomplishment in its own right.

0:11:04.844 --> 0:11:06.044
<v Speaker 2>Modern or contemporary.

0:11:06.084 --> 0:11:10.684
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, it's something contemporary contemporary New York City. But yeah,

0:11:10.844 --> 0:11:14.484
<v Speaker 1>it is very notable that he dropped out, and the timing, Nate,

0:11:14.524 --> 0:11:19.204
<v Speaker 1>I think is quite notable as well, because, well, what

0:11:19.364 --> 0:11:22.044
<v Speaker 1>happens now with the votes, Right, we talked in the

0:11:22.084 --> 0:11:26.644
<v Speaker 1>primaries that the primaries were rank choice voting. That is

0:11:26.764 --> 0:11:30.724
<v Speaker 1>not the case right with the general mayoral election. So

0:11:30.804 --> 0:11:33.444
<v Speaker 1>it's not the case that you know, oh you know,

0:11:33.484 --> 0:11:35.564
<v Speaker 1>if you don't get fifty percent, now we're going to

0:11:35.964 --> 0:11:38.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, your your votes are going to go down

0:11:38.284 --> 0:11:40.724
<v Speaker 1>to the next candidate, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

0:11:40.844 --> 0:11:43.564
<v Speaker 1>And Adams when he was stepping down announcing that he

0:11:43.684 --> 0:11:45.804
<v Speaker 1>was going to be withdrawing from the race also did

0:11:45.844 --> 0:11:49.204
<v Speaker 1>something notable, I think when he did not endorse any

0:11:49.284 --> 0:11:52.044
<v Speaker 1>other candidate. Right, normally, when people drop out of a

0:11:52.164 --> 0:11:54.804
<v Speaker 1>race close to the election, when it's you know, an

0:11:54.804 --> 0:11:58.604
<v Speaker 1>election that has so many political spirits inflamed, you want

0:11:58.604 --> 0:12:01.164
<v Speaker 1>your votes to go to someone, right, you want to

0:12:01.244 --> 0:12:03.644
<v Speaker 1>actually make a statement, and you say, you know, I'm

0:12:03.724 --> 0:12:06.564
<v Speaker 1>dropping out, but I think you know Nate Silver is

0:12:06.604 --> 0:12:10.484
<v Speaker 1>your best choice for mayor. And instead he's like, fuck

0:12:10.564 --> 0:12:12.964
<v Speaker 1>Nate Silver, Fuck all these guys. You know, this guy's

0:12:12.964 --> 0:12:16.284
<v Speaker 1>a snake. This Maria person that can't be trusted, she

0:12:16.404 --> 0:12:19.804
<v Speaker 1>changes her mind. You know, everyone sucks. That was kind

0:12:19.844 --> 0:12:24.644
<v Speaker 1>of his speech, not literally but figuratively speaking. And that

0:12:24.764 --> 0:12:26.964
<v Speaker 1>was another interesting choice. So if we're talking about kind

0:12:27.004 --> 0:12:30.244
<v Speaker 1>of the game theory of his decision, what it means

0:12:30.284 --> 0:12:34.484
<v Speaker 1>other than just like I'm out, this is the timing

0:12:34.844 --> 0:12:36.644
<v Speaker 1>and a big fuck you, it's it is a very

0:12:36.724 --> 0:12:39.484
<v Speaker 1>I think he's made some interesting choices. Yeah.

0:12:39.564 --> 0:12:42.524
<v Speaker 2>Look, I've actually tried to model in the context of

0:12:42.564 --> 0:12:47.604
<v Speaker 2>presidential primaries when candidates drop out, and it's fairly product

0:12:47.684 --> 0:12:50.764
<v Speaker 2>They basically drop out when they have no shot, right,

0:12:51.044 --> 0:12:52.524
<v Speaker 2>and then more likely to drop out if they were

0:12:52.524 --> 0:12:54.364
<v Speaker 2>once perceived to have a shot, meaning that they have

0:12:54.524 --> 0:12:59.084
<v Speaker 2>some type of future, but then they fall far behind

0:12:59.204 --> 0:13:01.524
<v Speaker 2>enough in the polls the fundraising guys up. But yeah,

0:13:02.164 --> 0:13:08.244
<v Speaker 2>he had opportunities allegedly to take various lucrative jobs associated

0:13:08.244 --> 0:13:10.644
<v Speaker 2>with the Trump administration. Maybe you'll take one of those eventually,

0:13:10.684 --> 0:13:15.564
<v Speaker 2>but like he was gonna lose, probably finish in fourth place, right,

0:13:16.964 --> 0:13:19.764
<v Speaker 2>and that would have been embarrassing. So that's that's you know,

0:13:19.884 --> 0:13:23.684
<v Speaker 2>he's trying to preserve credibility for whatever future endeavors that

0:13:23.764 --> 0:13:26.844
<v Speaker 2>he has. I mean with most canistates of the incentive,

0:13:26.884 --> 0:13:30.964
<v Speaker 2>with Eric Adams, I'd say, who knows what's happening in

0:13:31.044 --> 0:13:33.164
<v Speaker 2>terms of you know, look, you know it's New York City.

0:13:33.204 --> 0:13:36.404
<v Speaker 2>You know, maybe you turn a blind eyed stuff. But

0:13:36.444 --> 0:13:39.084
<v Speaker 2>that would be the logical reason he wasn't gonna win, right,

0:13:39.124 --> 0:13:40.964
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't gonna win. He was at oh, zero percent

0:13:40.964 --> 0:13:44.204
<v Speaker 2>in polymarket. He was at eight percent in the polls,

0:13:44.244 --> 0:13:46.404
<v Speaker 2>and so yeah, the game theory is just that, like

0:13:47.964 --> 0:13:49.964
<v Speaker 2>there's a non zero cost to embarrassment.

0:13:50.644 --> 0:13:55.524
<v Speaker 1>So Nate, uh, polymarket, how long has he been close

0:13:55.564 --> 0:13:57.124
<v Speaker 1>to zero on polymarket?

0:13:57.324 --> 0:14:01.204
<v Speaker 2>So according to polymarket, we're full disclosure. I'm an advisor.

0:14:02.444 --> 0:14:04.724
<v Speaker 2>It looks like they may be disabled. It's actually hard

0:14:04.764 --> 0:14:07.164
<v Speaker 2>to find the Eric Adams graph where it's it's like

0:14:07.284 --> 0:14:10.164
<v Speaker 2>now it's zero, but let me take a look here. Yeah,

0:14:10.284 --> 0:14:15.324
<v Speaker 2>so it became clear that the next most viable alternative

0:14:15.524 --> 0:14:20.724
<v Speaker 2>was Andrew Cuomo fairly early, right, I mean Adams is yeah,

0:14:20.804 --> 0:14:22.844
<v Speaker 2>I mean if you're looking back here, yeah, yeah, it's

0:14:22.884 --> 0:14:23.684
<v Speaker 2>hard to even find.

0:14:23.764 --> 0:14:25.484
<v Speaker 1>The reason I asked that question, she got a little.

0:14:25.284 --> 0:14:27.404
<v Speaker 2>Brad lander back in the day. You know, you got

0:14:27.404 --> 0:14:28.004
<v Speaker 2>a lander.

0:14:28.644 --> 0:14:30.964
<v Speaker 1>But the reason I asked the question, right, is that

0:14:31.444 --> 0:14:35.324
<v Speaker 1>it was very clear I think to everyone, as you say,

0:14:35.404 --> 0:14:37.084
<v Speaker 1>that's why I asked how long his poly Market had

0:14:37.164 --> 0:14:39.044
<v Speaker 1>him ut close to zero, that he wasn't going to

0:14:39.084 --> 0:14:41.924
<v Speaker 1>win for a long time, and he made a decision

0:14:41.964 --> 0:14:44.884
<v Speaker 1>to wait until now to drop out, and not earlier.

0:14:45.324 --> 0:14:48.164
<v Speaker 1>Now we could say that, oh, he's just a hubriistic,

0:14:48.404 --> 0:14:51.324
<v Speaker 1>you know, person with head in the clouds and just

0:14:51.364 --> 0:14:54.644
<v Speaker 1>assumes that he can make changes and that eventually.

0:14:54.364 --> 0:14:56.084
<v Speaker 2>He's harek Adams. We're talking about Maria.

0:14:56.364 --> 0:14:58.444
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, I know, I'm sorry, I'm sorry,

0:14:59.684 --> 0:15:03.124
<v Speaker 1>and that he just thought that he could somehow pull

0:15:03.164 --> 0:15:05.124
<v Speaker 1>a win out of his ass, but that that is

0:15:05.244 --> 0:15:08.764
<v Speaker 1>what it seems like, or or he decided, you know what,

0:15:08.884 --> 0:15:12.364
<v Speaker 1>I want to screw over, like I don't like Cuomo

0:15:12.684 --> 0:15:15.004
<v Speaker 1>enough that like I don't want him to have time

0:15:15.084 --> 0:15:18.204
<v Speaker 1>to consolidate support, right, and so I'm going to spite

0:15:18.324 --> 0:15:22.324
<v Speaker 1>weight until much longer so that he doesn't have time

0:15:22.324 --> 0:15:24.804
<v Speaker 1>to do the fundraising and kind of no, I'm serious,

0:15:24.844 --> 0:15:27.404
<v Speaker 1>like what what are the calculations going through your mind?

0:15:27.844 --> 0:15:31.124
<v Speaker 1>Because it's clear and yes, we know that allegedly he

0:15:31.324 --> 0:15:34.004
<v Speaker 1>had been in talks to become the ambassador to Saudi

0:15:34.004 --> 0:15:38.524
<v Speaker 1>Arabia and that that had fallen through Saudi Arabia, and

0:15:39.684 --> 0:15:43.244
<v Speaker 1>so you know, he's been mulling an exit strategy for

0:15:43.324 --> 0:15:47.444
<v Speaker 1>a while and the announcement only comes now when there's

0:15:47.564 --> 0:15:50.604
<v Speaker 1>not much time to do any to do much of anything.

0:15:50.884 --> 0:15:52.804
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, obviously the other part of it is

0:15:52.924 --> 0:15:55.124
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have that many votes. I think he's consistently

0:15:55.164 --> 0:15:59.524
<v Speaker 1>pulled in the single digits. Yeah, not like, so even

0:15:59.604 --> 0:16:01.884
<v Speaker 1>if all of his votes go to one single candidate,

0:16:01.924 --> 0:16:05.484
<v Speaker 1>which again he didn't endorse anyone, so that is probably

0:16:05.484 --> 0:16:07.644
<v Speaker 1>not happening. But if that were to happen, that still

0:16:07.644 --> 0:16:10.524
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be enough to change the outcome of the election.

0:16:11.004 --> 0:16:13.044
<v Speaker 1>So maybe he did that calculus and was like, you

0:16:13.124 --> 0:16:14.444
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'm going to do this in the most

0:16:14.484 --> 0:16:17.244
<v Speaker 1>fuck you way possible, like I said, Or maybe he

0:16:17.324 --> 0:16:19.284
<v Speaker 1>was just hubristic and up until the very end, up

0:16:19.324 --> 0:16:22.204
<v Speaker 1>until this past weekend, thought hey, maybe I can actually

0:16:22.244 --> 0:16:23.004
<v Speaker 1>have a chance.

0:16:23.364 --> 0:16:27.244
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, Kenna, in multi way races, you can't have

0:16:28.524 --> 0:16:34.124
<v Speaker 2>interesting dynamics right where you basically have castating effects, where like,

0:16:34.164 --> 0:16:37.244
<v Speaker 2>if one candy is rising the polls and a voter

0:16:37.404 --> 0:16:39.684
<v Speaker 2>is in different between them, then that voter might gravitate

0:16:39.724 --> 0:16:42.564
<v Speaker 2>toward whichever candy seems to have the most chance, right Like,

0:16:42.644 --> 0:16:47.284
<v Speaker 2>there is some evidence that like Zoren has his voters

0:16:47.324 --> 0:16:51.484
<v Speaker 2>and then Cuomo curtisiwa who's the Republican, and Eric Adams

0:16:52.204 --> 0:16:56.084
<v Speaker 2>are kind of competing for the rest of the electorate,

0:16:56.124 --> 0:16:58.444
<v Speaker 2>and whether that's fifty percent or not can be can

0:16:58.484 --> 0:17:01.724
<v Speaker 2>be debated potentially, right, So it's not crazy for somebody

0:17:01.724 --> 0:17:03.004
<v Speaker 2>to think that, Like, by the way it happened in

0:17:03.044 --> 0:17:09.604
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic primary, where like, you know, Zoran was polling

0:17:10.124 --> 0:17:14.524
<v Speaker 2>in a you know, respectable second place in most of

0:17:14.564 --> 0:17:17.044
<v Speaker 2>the polls, and originally he was pulling at one percent, right,

0:17:17.084 --> 0:17:20.764
<v Speaker 2>And I think Eric Adams even like cited Polymarket at

0:17:20.764 --> 0:17:23.924
<v Speaker 2>one point to say, hey, people discounted Zoram before. I

0:17:23.964 --> 0:17:27.844
<v Speaker 2>mean's a little flipped around because they underestimated Zoram. Maybe

0:17:27.844 --> 0:17:29.324
<v Speaker 2>they will again and have win by any of a

0:17:29.324 --> 0:17:31.444
<v Speaker 2>bigger margin than polls show. I don't know, but like,

0:17:31.604 --> 0:17:36.004
<v Speaker 2>it's not it wouldn't be crazy for Eric Adams to

0:17:36.124 --> 0:17:39.244
<v Speaker 2>think this race could you know, have some unexpected turns

0:17:39.724 --> 0:17:43.404
<v Speaker 2>if he didn't have so many hard negatives. Right, his

0:17:43.444 --> 0:17:47.204
<v Speaker 2>approval ratings in New York are quite low. The fact

0:17:47.244 --> 0:17:49.724
<v Speaker 2>that he's buddy buddy with Trump. There are some Trump

0:17:49.764 --> 0:17:51.284
<v Speaker 2>oters in New York more than they used to be,

0:17:51.444 --> 0:17:53.764
<v Speaker 2>but does not help him unbalanced with what's going to

0:17:53.844 --> 0:17:58.204
<v Speaker 2>be probably a fairly young liberal electorate. Right, So those

0:17:58.244 --> 0:18:00.764
<v Speaker 2>hard negatives really because you know, he's had opportunities, you know,

0:18:00.884 --> 0:18:04.084
<v Speaker 2>and also he wasn't is the incumbent he was not

0:18:04.164 --> 0:18:09.644
<v Speaker 2>intimidating enough to deter Cuomo from running, even when Alma

0:18:09.924 --> 0:18:13.564
<v Speaker 2>was frankly embarrassed already in the primary. Is a glutton

0:18:13.604 --> 0:18:15.924
<v Speaker 2>for more punishment apparently clearly.

0:18:16.564 --> 0:18:21.164
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And uh, it's interesting because you know Cuomo

0:18:21.364 --> 0:18:24.324
<v Speaker 1>has you know, I think all of the other candidates

0:18:24.404 --> 0:18:29.724
<v Speaker 1>except for Sila have considered potential deals, right, and Curtis

0:18:29.764 --> 0:18:34.964
<v Speaker 1>Sila says, you know, I'm not Sliwa. Sorry, I yes, Sliwa.

0:18:35.404 --> 0:18:38.764
<v Speaker 1>This is this is one of those that I my

0:18:38.884 --> 0:18:44.124
<v Speaker 1>dyslexia definitely kicks in. So Curtis Sliwa has said repeatedly

0:18:44.204 --> 0:18:46.004
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I'm not dropping out and I'm not

0:18:46.044 --> 0:18:50.084
<v Speaker 1>given my votes to anyone else, and he's been pretty

0:18:50.324 --> 0:18:55.004
<v Speaker 1>i think, consistent about that. And that is the one

0:18:55.044 --> 0:18:58.564
<v Speaker 1>candidate who could have probably moved the needle right if

0:18:58.564 --> 0:18:59.804
<v Speaker 1>he dropped out.

0:19:03.644 --> 0:19:05.524
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break.

0:19:21.004 --> 0:19:23.764
<v Speaker 1>One of the things you mentioned, Nate earlier in the

0:19:23.804 --> 0:19:26.484
<v Speaker 1>episode was kind of this democratic power vacuum and this

0:19:26.924 --> 0:19:30.764
<v Speaker 1>lack of kind of focused direction, consensus on the future

0:19:30.764 --> 0:19:32.484
<v Speaker 1>of the party. Now. You and I talked about this

0:19:32.524 --> 0:19:35.924
<v Speaker 1>briefly back in the primary, right after zora On had won,

0:19:36.284 --> 0:19:39.524
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's even more true. Now. It's

0:19:39.564 --> 0:19:42.364
<v Speaker 1>interesting when the Democratic Party is trying to reach the

0:19:42.404 --> 0:19:46.204
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to try to take votes away from a Democrat, right,

0:19:46.284 --> 0:19:50.364
<v Speaker 1>Like that doesn't happen that often when they say, Okay,

0:19:50.364 --> 0:19:54.404
<v Speaker 1>this Democrat is a little too democratic for us, and

0:19:54.444 --> 0:19:57.764
<v Speaker 1>so maybe we want to reach out to our Republican

0:19:57.844 --> 0:20:02.364
<v Speaker 1>counterparts to prevent him from becoming mayor. That's an interesting

0:20:02.684 --> 0:20:03.884
<v Speaker 1>playbook page.

0:20:04.764 --> 0:20:08.084
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, I don't think it's helped I don't think

0:20:08.084 --> 0:20:12.004
<v Speaker 2>it's hurt Zora much. That Like there's such explicit attempts

0:20:12.004 --> 0:20:14.204
<v Speaker 2>at coordination, where like every week a new hedge from

0:20:14.244 --> 0:20:16.644
<v Speaker 2>billionaireuld be like, we can't let this socialist wait, and

0:20:16.724 --> 0:20:19.524
<v Speaker 2>let's get all the conservatives together, right, And it's like

0:20:19.924 --> 0:20:22.244
<v Speaker 2>you kind of are making the point for Zoren, like

0:20:22.244 --> 0:20:24.364
<v Speaker 2>it's a bunch of billionaires trying to crowd him out

0:20:24.764 --> 0:20:29.044
<v Speaker 2>of the mayorship, right, and like it's you know, look,

0:20:29.124 --> 0:20:37.204
<v Speaker 2>I think a non scandal plagued and actually interested in

0:20:37.244 --> 0:20:40.244
<v Speaker 2>being there of New York Andrew Cuomo might have been

0:20:40.244 --> 0:20:45.324
<v Speaker 2>a better can eight. I don't know, right, but yeah,

0:20:45.364 --> 0:20:48.684
<v Speaker 2>you got locked into some very flawed alternatives early in

0:20:48.724 --> 0:20:50.404
<v Speaker 2>New York. It does have fairly strict ballot laws. It

0:20:50.484 --> 0:20:53.284
<v Speaker 2>was not possible to get like a a a new

0:20:53.364 --> 0:20:55.684
<v Speaker 2>name on the ballot without signatures because the primary was

0:20:55.724 --> 0:20:57.924
<v Speaker 2>back in June. And so I know, I have a

0:20:57.964 --> 0:21:04.444
<v Speaker 2>lot of respect for Zoran's political talent. But yeah, and

0:21:04.524 --> 0:21:05.684
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. What do you think about what do

0:21:05.684 --> 0:21:06.444
<v Speaker 2>you think about Cuomo?

0:21:10.444 --> 0:21:13.164
<v Speaker 1>I have not. I am not a huge fan.

0:21:13.404 --> 0:21:16.964
<v Speaker 2>Did you watch the pandemic briefings?

0:21:16.404 --> 0:21:20.364
<v Speaker 1>I tried. I started out watching the pandemic briefings.

0:21:20.404 --> 0:21:21.524
<v Speaker 2>There wasn't much else to do.

0:21:22.284 --> 0:21:25.164
<v Speaker 1>This is true, This is true. We were all stuck.

0:21:26.164 --> 0:21:29.164
<v Speaker 1>I was stuck in my eight hundred square foot apartment

0:21:29.364 --> 0:21:30.564
<v Speaker 1>in Brooklyn at the time.

0:21:30.684 --> 0:21:34.124
<v Speaker 2>No I remember like going to like was it New

0:21:34.204 --> 0:21:38.004
<v Speaker 2>Year's twenty twenty and I was twenty twenty? Is COVID year?

0:21:38.044 --> 0:21:41.644
<v Speaker 2>It's all it seems like happily so long ago now, Maria, right,

0:21:41.684 --> 0:21:45.244
<v Speaker 2>And like we were in some fucking restaurant and Brooklyn

0:21:45.284 --> 0:21:48.204
<v Speaker 2>outdoors and like a close like the minute at mint anyway,

0:21:48.244 --> 0:21:50.644
<v Speaker 2>all these fucking rules about outdoor dying. It just kind

0:21:50.644 --> 0:21:52.644
<v Speaker 2>of brings back those people who have like, oh I have,

0:21:53.044 --> 0:21:55.764
<v Speaker 2>I kind of have nostalgia for COVID. Fuck you, you know,

0:21:55.844 --> 0:21:58.284
<v Speaker 2>I don't know it was you know, maybe if you

0:21:58.284 --> 0:22:00.204
<v Speaker 2>were in a warm state, right, but not that winter

0:22:00.284 --> 0:22:03.884
<v Speaker 2>in New York. But yeah, look, you know, I think

0:22:03.924 --> 0:22:07.804
<v Speaker 2>zarn't also been to the fact that like the establishment

0:22:07.844 --> 0:22:11.684
<v Speaker 2>and the Democratic Party has been kind of discredited. Right people,

0:22:11.684 --> 0:22:15.124
<v Speaker 2>for better or worse, don't really believe that it's going

0:22:15.204 --> 0:22:18.964
<v Speaker 2>to win elections. And also you have all these leaders

0:22:18.964 --> 0:22:22.204
<v Speaker 2>who are either you know, neo babies is NEPO or

0:22:22.244 --> 0:22:30.564
<v Speaker 2>nepo I guessmotism either babies, Oh, really fucking old, you

0:22:30.604 --> 0:22:35.764
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean? Babies? Yeah, and like and like

0:22:35.844 --> 0:22:40.044
<v Speaker 2>people are are tired of that, and like the left

0:22:40.444 --> 0:22:43.124
<v Speaker 2>has the kind of you know, I mean, I guess

0:22:43.124 --> 0:22:45.204
<v Speaker 2>the left gained a lot of cultural power in some ways,

0:22:45.204 --> 0:22:49.604
<v Speaker 2>like a certain kind of maybe more cultural woke left,

0:22:49.604 --> 0:22:51.324
<v Speaker 2>which I don't consider really the true left. I think

0:22:51.364 --> 0:22:53.524
<v Speaker 2>they're just kind of this other thing that's kind of

0:22:53.524 --> 0:22:57.484
<v Speaker 2>correlated with the left. But you know, why not why

0:22:57.524 --> 0:22:59.964
<v Speaker 2>not give why not give socialism a trimary? We've tried

0:22:59.964 --> 0:23:01.244
<v Speaker 2>everything else and we're out of ideas.

0:23:03.084 --> 0:23:06.484
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, I think that it's a you know,

0:23:06.564 --> 0:23:11.644
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting and pivotal moment in the Democratic

0:23:11.684 --> 0:23:15.124
<v Speaker 1>Party because I mean, we've talked about this to death,

0:23:15.284 --> 0:23:18.364
<v Speaker 1>but there is this major power vacuum and lack of

0:23:18.444 --> 0:23:24.204
<v Speaker 1>direction and lack of understanding of how to win votes.

0:23:24.644 --> 0:23:27.844
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's mind boggling to me that a party

0:23:27.884 --> 0:23:31.404
<v Speaker 1>that used to be able to organize so effectively, I mean,

0:23:31.444 --> 0:23:34.924
<v Speaker 1>New York was the center of democratic political organization for

0:23:34.924 --> 0:23:39.724
<v Speaker 1>so long with you know, Tammany Hall is a drag queen. No, yes,

0:23:40.004 --> 0:23:42.684
<v Speaker 1>I mean, actually, Nate, I'm pretty sure there's there must

0:23:42.724 --> 0:23:44.964
<v Speaker 1>be a drag queen out there whose name is Tammany Hall.

0:23:45.484 --> 0:23:47.964
<v Speaker 1>And if there's not drag queens, if you're listening to this,

0:23:48.204 --> 0:23:50.684
<v Speaker 1>please can we have a Tammany Hall drag queen? But

0:23:50.884 --> 0:23:53.444
<v Speaker 1>the particular one I am referring to it would be

0:23:53.444 --> 0:23:56.964
<v Speaker 1>such a great name. Was a New York political machine

0:23:57.764 --> 0:24:03.164
<v Speaker 1>which had influence on a national scale. Started in in

0:24:03.204 --> 0:24:05.844
<v Speaker 1>the late seventeen hundreds, had a ton of influence in

0:24:05.884 --> 0:24:11.844
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen hundreds, basically engineered, manipulated, did a lot of stuff,

0:24:12.444 --> 0:24:16.524
<v Speaker 1>some good old fashioned politics, some more mobby and strong hand,

0:24:16.844 --> 0:24:20.444
<v Speaker 1>strong handed to basically control New York for a very

0:24:20.484 --> 0:24:23.444
<v Speaker 1>long period of time. I'm not nostalgic for Tammany Hall.

0:24:23.524 --> 0:24:27.164
<v Speaker 1>That was you know, we're talking that was corrupt party

0:24:27.204 --> 0:24:30.404
<v Speaker 1>politic bosses, et cetera, et cetera. But they knew how

0:24:30.404 --> 0:24:32.444
<v Speaker 1>to mobilize votes. They knew how to get to people,

0:24:33.244 --> 0:24:37.764
<v Speaker 1>not in the mob way, but in the actual, you know,

0:24:37.884 --> 0:24:44.164
<v Speaker 1>mobilizing support way. And you know, I think that we

0:24:44.284 --> 0:24:49.324
<v Speaker 1>are now in this moment where there seems to be

0:24:49.964 --> 0:24:52.244
<v Speaker 1>just a lack of clear direction of how to get

0:24:52.244 --> 0:24:56.244
<v Speaker 1>that popular appeal and what direction to take to actually

0:24:56.924 --> 0:24:59.764
<v Speaker 1>be able to attain the levels of popularity that are

0:24:59.844 --> 0:25:04.004
<v Speaker 1>needed to win elections, to get candidates who are then

0:25:04.084 --> 0:25:07.524
<v Speaker 1>viable not just on a state but on a national level,

0:25:07.884 --> 0:25:11.444
<v Speaker 1>right to actually kind of create the next generation of

0:25:11.844 --> 0:25:14.044
<v Speaker 1>party leaders and figure out, you know, what does the

0:25:14.084 --> 0:25:18.364
<v Speaker 1>future of the party actually look like. And you know,

0:25:18.404 --> 0:25:22.044
<v Speaker 1>we've talked a lot about how the Kamala Harris campaign

0:25:22.124 --> 0:25:25.524
<v Speaker 1>just completely failed to do this, and U Nate actually

0:25:25.604 --> 0:25:29.244
<v Speaker 1>just had a newsletter out last week, I believe about

0:25:29.244 --> 0:25:34.484
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Pete and his appeal or lack thereof among different demographics.

0:25:34.844 --> 0:25:38.444
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there is a vacuum there. And if

0:25:38.444 --> 0:25:40.524
<v Speaker 1>you remember, you know, when we talk about the future

0:25:40.564 --> 0:25:43.044
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party, the person who we're talking about

0:25:43.084 --> 0:25:47.284
<v Speaker 1>today well, partially Eric Adams. He was once that face, right,

0:25:47.324 --> 0:25:50.324
<v Speaker 1>people thought that someone like Adams could be the future

0:25:50.484 --> 0:25:53.764
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party. People were so excited when he

0:25:53.884 --> 0:25:57.564
<v Speaker 1>was elected, and like that didn't go over so well.

0:25:57.804 --> 0:25:59.684
<v Speaker 1>How long did it take for him to appoint his

0:25:59.724 --> 0:26:02.924
<v Speaker 1>brother to the police, Like less than twenty four hours,

0:26:02.964 --> 0:26:04.604
<v Speaker 1>not literally, but it was just like a few days

0:26:04.644 --> 0:26:07.444
<v Speaker 1>after he'd gotten elected. I mean the corruption stuff started

0:26:07.484 --> 0:26:13.564
<v Speaker 1>happening just immediately immediately upon election, and that did not

0:26:13.764 --> 0:26:16.844
<v Speaker 1>go the way that the Democratic Party thought that it would.

0:26:17.204 --> 0:26:20.724
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if people don't remember, like Eric Adams

0:26:20.804 --> 0:26:24.004
<v Speaker 1>was not always a disgraced politician. There was like a

0:26:24.124 --> 0:26:27.684
<v Speaker 1>history of a lot of support and enthusiasm and excitement

0:26:27.804 --> 0:26:29.284
<v Speaker 1>about him as a candidate.

0:26:29.684 --> 0:26:32.324
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wrote a tweet that people like the resurface

0:26:32.364 --> 0:26:34.764
<v Speaker 2>in times about like, oh, I think Eric Adams is

0:26:34.804 --> 0:26:38.004
<v Speaker 2>one of the one of the five or ten people

0:26:38.084 --> 0:26:41.724
<v Speaker 2>most likely to have a bright future in the president

0:26:41.764 --> 0:26:43.964
<v Speaker 2>and the Democratic Party, Right, And then the next tweet

0:26:44.164 --> 0:26:46.364
<v Speaker 2>was like, by the way, it's because he's Hiberia, so

0:26:46.364 --> 0:26:47.884
<v Speaker 2>it might not work out, but it might work out.

0:26:48.564 --> 0:26:50.524
<v Speaker 2>People love throwing that back, right, and it's like they

0:26:50.684 --> 0:26:52.644
<v Speaker 2>actually they don't actually quote the second tweet, it's all

0:26:52.644 --> 0:26:55.444
<v Speaker 2>out of context, but you know whatever, It's the fucking Internet,

0:26:55.564 --> 0:26:57.284
<v Speaker 2>so who cares. But yeah, I was one of those

0:26:57.324 --> 0:27:01.164
<v Speaker 2>people who thought that, like, Okay, this is interesting because

0:27:01.204 --> 0:27:08.524
<v Speaker 2>you have a black candidate who was pretty moderate, especially

0:27:08.564 --> 0:27:13.204
<v Speaker 2>on issues like policing where Democrats had moved too far

0:27:13.244 --> 0:27:14.804
<v Speaker 2>to the left of New York has never been quite

0:27:14.844 --> 0:27:18.124
<v Speaker 2>as woke about police stuff as some other cities. Right,

0:27:19.484 --> 0:27:22.924
<v Speaker 2>So I had this template was interesting, right that, like,

0:27:23.164 --> 0:27:25.924
<v Speaker 2>you know, given that kind of like the two major

0:27:26.204 --> 0:27:30.444
<v Speaker 2>constituencies in the Democratic Party were are voters of color.

0:27:30.484 --> 0:27:32.084
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how I feel about that term, but

0:27:32.124 --> 0:27:36.444
<v Speaker 2>black what is especially Hispanic Asian American right? And then

0:27:36.724 --> 0:27:41.124
<v Speaker 2>progressive liberals within this house, we believe yard science as

0:27:41.164 --> 0:27:44.484
<v Speaker 2>the other major coalition partner. Like I thought, maybe like

0:27:44.524 --> 0:27:47.684
<v Speaker 2>a minority candidate who's more moderate could interestingly kind of

0:27:47.724 --> 0:27:51.924
<v Speaker 2>like appeal to to both and might also you know

0:27:52.124 --> 0:27:54.124
<v Speaker 2>one thing that I think is born out by the

0:27:54.164 --> 0:27:58.284
<v Speaker 2>literature but by anecdotal experience, who is that like a

0:27:58.324 --> 0:28:01.124
<v Speaker 2>woman or a minority candidate tends to read as being

0:28:01.164 --> 0:28:04.924
<v Speaker 2>more liberal than they are. Right, people are applying priors

0:28:04.924 --> 0:28:06.964
<v Speaker 2>and Adams kind of overcame that with the x cop

0:28:07.004 --> 0:28:09.724
<v Speaker 2>thing and just like like no would mistake although he

0:28:09.764 --> 0:28:12.764
<v Speaker 2>had pronouns in his bio on Twitter, but no one

0:28:12.764 --> 0:28:16.604
<v Speaker 2>would mistake him for like a far left Yeah, okay, right,

0:28:16.644 --> 0:28:18.444
<v Speaker 2>And I thought that was an interesting combination for a

0:28:18.484 --> 0:28:23.484
<v Speaker 2>party looking for, uh, for moderates. Aren't this kind of

0:28:23.484 --> 0:28:26.324
<v Speaker 2>cookie cutter, white person type of thing?

0:28:27.284 --> 0:28:29.604
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Absolutely? And then he had you know, he also

0:28:29.644 --> 0:28:32.564
<v Speaker 1>always stressed that he had working classroots, right, which he did,

0:28:33.604 --> 0:28:37.404
<v Speaker 1>so that was kind of another appealing thing where it's like,

0:28:37.844 --> 0:28:41.804
<v Speaker 1>you know, X cop more more towards the conservative side,

0:28:41.924 --> 0:28:43.924
<v Speaker 1>but man, you know, man of the people, kind of

0:28:43.964 --> 0:28:47.004
<v Speaker 1>more populist some of the appeals that we see working

0:28:47.084 --> 0:28:51.444
<v Speaker 1>from you know, Donald Trump, right, and and the kind

0:28:51.444 --> 0:28:54.644
<v Speaker 1>of the the maga like appeals he had that he

0:28:54.764 --> 0:28:58.244
<v Speaker 1>had the police, he had the minority. And yes, Nate,

0:28:58.284 --> 0:29:02.244
<v Speaker 1>there actually are some good data points, there's good literature

0:29:02.284 --> 0:29:06.844
<v Speaker 1>on this that people do make certain assumptions about how

0:29:06.924 --> 0:29:10.804
<v Speaker 1>liberal or conservative you are based on how you look.

0:29:11.204 --> 0:29:12.684
<v Speaker 1>So if people looked at the two of us and

0:29:12.724 --> 0:29:15.804
<v Speaker 1>just saw photographs of us and didn't know anything about us,

0:29:15.844 --> 0:29:18.004
<v Speaker 1>they would assume that you were much more conservative than

0:29:18.084 --> 0:29:21.404
<v Speaker 1>I am. That's not right, like it's it doesn't. Actually,

0:29:21.804 --> 0:29:24.364
<v Speaker 1>these are not things that are born out in reality.

0:29:24.444 --> 0:29:28.044
<v Speaker 1>But people use incorrect data assumptions all the time, right,

0:29:28.204 --> 0:29:31.684
<v Speaker 1>snap judgments when you see someone and so yes, your

0:29:31.764 --> 0:29:34.804
<v Speaker 1>your your point about the fact that that made him

0:29:34.844 --> 0:29:38.764
<v Speaker 1>seem like he'd be more liberal, more attractive to liberals,

0:29:38.764 --> 0:29:40.004
<v Speaker 1>is correct? You know who was?

0:29:40.444 --> 0:29:42.524
<v Speaker 2>Who was? I another you would have a weak spot

0:29:42.604 --> 0:29:46.764
<v Speaker 2>for Turkish airlines air mile. I mean, like, I look,

0:29:46.804 --> 0:29:49.044
<v Speaker 2>I would hold out for I've never found trinket airlines.

0:29:49.084 --> 0:29:51.484
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure it's nice, right, I would hold out for

0:29:51.644 --> 0:29:55.124
<v Speaker 2>fucking Emirates or Qatar or something, right. I mean you're

0:29:55.164 --> 0:29:56.404
<v Speaker 2>selling you a little cheap there.

0:29:57.324 --> 0:30:01.844
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've never I've never flown Emirates, but I

0:30:01.884 --> 0:30:04.884
<v Speaker 1>have heard that it's really really nice. And I almost

0:30:04.924 --> 0:30:10.324
<v Speaker 1>flew in Emirates once to a speaking engagement, and I

0:30:10.444 --> 0:30:12.884
<v Speaker 1>was I didn't really want to do the speaking engagement

0:30:12.924 --> 0:30:14.484
<v Speaker 1>and it was going to be really disruptive, but I

0:30:14.524 --> 0:30:17.324
<v Speaker 1>was really excited about flying Emirates first class.

0:30:17.764 --> 0:30:20.404
<v Speaker 2>I got upgraded. When tim on Emirates they upgrade, they're like,

0:30:20.444 --> 0:30:24.924
<v Speaker 2>here's a I know, maybe they're trying to improve relations

0:30:24.924 --> 0:30:25.804
<v Speaker 2>with the Jews or some.

0:30:25.844 --> 0:30:28.124
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it. Maybe you and I would be Maybe

0:30:28.164 --> 0:30:30.484
<v Speaker 1>you and I would make corrupt politicians. Maybe all it

0:30:30.484 --> 0:30:33.564
<v Speaker 1>would take would be a few upgrades, and all of

0:30:33.604 --> 0:30:37.404
<v Speaker 1>a sudden we'd have corruption scandals of our own as

0:30:37.444 --> 0:30:40.964
<v Speaker 1>we took the mayoral office. But yeah, what do we

0:30:41.204 --> 0:30:44.284
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that if we're if we're talking about,

0:30:44.444 --> 0:30:47.004
<v Speaker 1>you know, back back to kind of the decision to

0:30:47.084 --> 0:30:50.444
<v Speaker 1>drop out. Now, I you know, my gut feeling is

0:30:50.484 --> 0:30:53.244
<v Speaker 1>that this really isn't going to change the race much, right,

0:30:53.324 --> 0:30:56.644
<v Speaker 1>that it was. The timing of the exit and the

0:30:56.684 --> 0:31:02.044
<v Speaker 1>tenor of the exit makes it seem that it is

0:31:02.204 --> 0:31:06.364
<v Speaker 1>basically not consequential in terms of the eventual results of

0:31:06.404 --> 0:31:08.964
<v Speaker 1>the election. Do you agree with that or do you

0:31:08.964 --> 0:31:11.444
<v Speaker 1>think that I'm under selling it a little bit. That's

0:31:11.484 --> 0:31:13.844
<v Speaker 1>just my gut reaction based on everything we've talked about.

0:31:14.044 --> 0:31:16.444
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you're understand I mean, look the math,

0:31:16.844 --> 0:31:21.964
<v Speaker 2>Zoraim's ahead about twenty points with everybody running, right, Adams

0:31:22.004 --> 0:31:25.364
<v Speaker 2>had about nine percent, right, So if you take the

0:31:25.444 --> 0:31:28.964
<v Speaker 2>whole nine and give it to Quormo, then that closes

0:31:29.004 --> 0:31:30.964
<v Speaker 2>the guests steps at two eleven, which would start to

0:31:31.004 --> 0:31:35.244
<v Speaker 2>be a more manageable gap. Right. However, I'll probably get

0:31:35.284 --> 0:31:37.244
<v Speaker 2>two thirds of it, So it winds up like reducing

0:31:37.924 --> 0:31:41.844
<v Speaker 2>zornzly to fifteen points, and like fifteen points is a

0:31:41.884 --> 0:31:45.364
<v Speaker 2>sizable edge. We still have as of the time we're speaking, Maria,

0:31:45.444 --> 0:31:48.644
<v Speaker 2>we still have five and a half weeks to go.

0:31:49.004 --> 0:31:51.244
<v Speaker 2>The whole World Series of Poker is almost as long, right,

0:31:51.284 --> 0:31:56.124
<v Speaker 2>there's still there's still a while, yes, but yeah.

0:31:55.644 --> 0:31:57.244
<v Speaker 1>There's a time for a one outer night.

0:31:57.844 --> 0:32:00.844
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I think he's trying to an inside straight.

0:32:00.884 --> 0:32:03.124
<v Speaker 2>I think we're using that fucking correctly. That analogy, I

0:32:03.164 --> 0:32:06.164
<v Speaker 2>mean has odds at polemarker to fourteen percent, and my

0:32:06.244 --> 0:32:09.084
<v Speaker 2>newsletter day I said I probably tweaked those down to

0:32:09.124 --> 0:32:09.844
<v Speaker 2>ten percent.

0:32:10.524 --> 0:32:10.764
<v Speaker 1>There.

0:32:10.844 --> 0:32:13.244
<v Speaker 2>I think prey dependent on Sleiwad dropping out or something.

0:32:13.244 --> 0:32:15.604
<v Speaker 2>We're at the zone where like this is not in

0:32:15.644 --> 0:32:19.844
<v Speaker 2>the statistical or practical margin of error, right, if Sleeva

0:32:19.924 --> 0:32:23.564
<v Speaker 2>drops out, then it becomes actually close. Okay, but you

0:32:23.644 --> 0:32:26.164
<v Speaker 2>need like a change in the narrative or something that

0:32:26.324 --> 0:32:31.164
<v Speaker 2>like you know, if there were you know, I don't know.

0:32:32.204 --> 0:32:33.524
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the problem is like a lot of things

0:32:33.564 --> 0:32:37.484
<v Speaker 2>that would be like October surprises would be like like

0:32:37.524 --> 0:32:41.724
<v Speaker 2>what if Trump sends the National Guard to New York.

0:32:43.284 --> 0:32:45.204
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that would help Cuomo, right, I think

0:32:45.244 --> 0:32:47.564
<v Speaker 2>that Zori, You're like, this is bad blahlah blah. Resistance

0:32:47.644 --> 0:32:50.404
<v Speaker 2>hashtag help him potentially, you know what I mean?

0:32:50.844 --> 0:32:53.204
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was actually gonna ask, like, you know, do

0:32:53.244 --> 0:32:55.244
<v Speaker 1>we do we think, like, can there be an X

0:32:55.284 --> 0:32:58.044
<v Speaker 1>fact or October surprise type of thing that changes the odds?

0:32:58.084 --> 0:33:02.164
<v Speaker 1>Obviously this is speculative, but what are polymarkets odds of

0:33:02.324 --> 0:33:03.844
<v Speaker 1>SLIWA dropping out?

0:33:04.124 --> 0:33:06.444
<v Speaker 2>About sixteen percent? I mean, there's no real reason to

0:33:06.524 --> 0:33:09.044
<v Speaker 2>drop out. He won the it was uncontested domination. He

0:33:09.084 --> 0:33:10.844
<v Speaker 2>won there a nomination far and square.

0:33:11.564 --> 0:33:14.684
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he won. And he said that he's not like

0:33:14.724 --> 0:33:17.084
<v Speaker 1>he has said multiple times that he has not dropped.

0:33:17.284 --> 0:33:18.804
<v Speaker 1>He is not going to drop out. I mean that

0:33:18.884 --> 0:33:20.884
<v Speaker 1>said so did atoms up until the point where he

0:33:20.924 --> 0:33:21.364
<v Speaker 1>dropped out.

0:33:21.404 --> 0:33:23.004
<v Speaker 2>Well, his sons are different. He gets to be on

0:33:23.084 --> 0:33:25.524
<v Speaker 2>TV a whole bunch, and he's run for many things

0:33:26.044 --> 0:33:27.924
<v Speaker 2>many times. He's a founder of the Guardian Angels. I

0:33:27.924 --> 0:33:30.284
<v Speaker 2>guess he's trying to build support for his cause. Actually

0:33:30.364 --> 0:33:33.764
<v Speaker 2>kind of an interesting guy, uh, not as conservatives you

0:33:33.844 --> 0:33:37.044
<v Speaker 2>might expect. I mean, he's kind of a typical New

0:33:37.124 --> 0:33:40.044
<v Speaker 2>Yorker and like on some of like the LGBTQ rights,

0:33:40.164 --> 0:33:42.964
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of slightly woke combined with being quite

0:33:42.964 --> 0:33:46.284
<v Speaker 2>conservative on crime and other subjects. Right, it's a certain

0:33:46.284 --> 0:33:49.324
<v Speaker 2>type of New Yorker and he I don't think he

0:33:49.364 --> 0:33:52.924
<v Speaker 2>beats orin, but like he's been overshadowed by the Cuomo

0:33:52.964 --> 0:33:54.044
<v Speaker 2>Adams drama.

0:33:54.524 --> 0:33:58.244
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it seems to me that his calculus is very,

0:33:58.364 --> 0:34:01.884
<v Speaker 1>very different from Adams's in the sense that, as you

0:34:02.004 --> 0:34:05.764
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, and you know, for Adams, being defeated can

0:34:05.844 --> 0:34:10.164
<v Speaker 1>cause embarrassment and can potentially, you know, for his future

0:34:10.204 --> 0:34:14.564
<v Speaker 1>political prospects. Not the corruption or bribery or those charges,

0:34:15.164 --> 0:34:19.124
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that he you know, lost the election

0:34:19.324 --> 0:34:22.444
<v Speaker 1>is what's going to do him in politically. So for him,

0:34:22.484 --> 0:34:25.204
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's that kind of calculus. But for Sliwa,

0:34:25.364 --> 0:34:29.364
<v Speaker 1>the calculus is actually mostly upside right right now, he's

0:34:29.404 --> 0:34:33.404
<v Speaker 1>getting media exposure. It's not negative media exposure. He's getting

0:34:33.444 --> 0:34:37.084
<v Speaker 1>to speak, he's getting to voice opinions. Like, it's actually

0:34:37.084 --> 0:34:41.004
<v Speaker 1>completely different up until you know, he probably knows he's

0:34:41.044 --> 0:34:43.084
<v Speaker 1>not going to win, and it doesn't matter, right because

0:34:43.124 --> 0:34:46.204
<v Speaker 1>he is setting up for a better political future for

0:34:46.284 --> 0:34:49.684
<v Speaker 1>himself by staying in the race. And so the game

0:34:49.724 --> 0:34:52.364
<v Speaker 1>theory I think just is not there for him. Why

0:34:52.404 --> 0:34:54.484
<v Speaker 1>in the world would he drop out and give his

0:34:54.564 --> 0:34:58.844
<v Speaker 1>votes to Cuomo or to anyone else. That being said,

0:34:58.884 --> 0:35:02.084
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't drop out, then Adams's decision to drop

0:35:02.084 --> 0:35:06.284
<v Speaker 1>out basically changes nothing in terms of you know, in

0:35:06.364 --> 0:35:08.844
<v Speaker 1>terms of our calculus of who is going to win

0:35:08.884 --> 0:35:10.724
<v Speaker 1>the race. Again, we don't know if there's going to

0:35:10.764 --> 0:35:13.884
<v Speaker 1>be an X factor. Maybe someone is busy out there,

0:35:14.284 --> 0:35:20.444
<v Speaker 1>you know, preparing to drop a bomb bombshell news item.

0:35:20.684 --> 0:35:22.564
<v Speaker 2>You already would have dropped you I would have dropped

0:35:22.604 --> 0:35:25.244
<v Speaker 2>it though, right in a two can eight race it's

0:35:25.244 --> 0:35:27.964
<v Speaker 2>a little different, right, but you would have dropped the bombshell.

0:35:28.004 --> 0:35:29.604
<v Speaker 2>And also you have the primary, and like ran in

0:35:29.604 --> 0:35:35.364
<v Speaker 2>the primary, Zoran kind of came not quite out of nowhere, right,

0:35:35.364 --> 0:35:37.884
<v Speaker 2>but it was a relatively quick rise. But like it's

0:35:37.924 --> 0:35:39.724
<v Speaker 2>been a fucking slow Like, why we have this fucking

0:35:39.724 --> 0:35:42.364
<v Speaker 2>primary in June for a general election in November. I'm

0:35:42.404 --> 0:35:44.644
<v Speaker 2>not sure I understand that you need that much time

0:35:44.684 --> 0:35:48.084
<v Speaker 2>to campaign anyway, It's crazy. You know, the June timing

0:35:48.124 --> 0:35:50.724
<v Speaker 2>is supposed to help incumbents because all the rich people

0:35:51.044 --> 0:35:54.724
<v Speaker 2>are out in the Hampton's or Vermont Maria, for example.

0:35:57.004 --> 0:35:59.404
<v Speaker 1>Wait, is that true? Is that the reason for.

0:35:59.364 --> 0:36:02.204
<v Speaker 2>The June I believe that's that's something that people who

0:36:03.764 --> 0:36:07.684
<v Speaker 2>have knowledge about city politics tend to believe, is my understanding.

0:36:08.284 --> 0:36:09.284
<v Speaker 2>I phrase that oddly.

0:36:09.524 --> 0:36:12.644
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, No, I get what you were trying to say.

0:36:12.844 --> 0:36:15.044
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that. I was always curious about

0:36:15.044 --> 0:36:17.884
<v Speaker 1>why the timing was what it was. But I guess

0:36:17.884 --> 0:36:23.884
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. And we'll be back right after this.

0:36:37.724 --> 0:36:40.564
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Yeah, you alluded to before, like Cuomo

0:36:41.564 --> 0:36:45.924
<v Speaker 2>Adams were kind of counting on the machine type turnout

0:36:45.964 --> 0:36:48.444
<v Speaker 2>where where you're good at getting your voters out. The

0:36:48.444 --> 0:36:51.964
<v Speaker 2>problem actually for Cuomo in the primary was that like

0:36:52.004 --> 0:36:55.964
<v Speaker 2>turnout was quite high relative to mayoral primaries, right, So

0:36:56.004 --> 0:36:58.124
<v Speaker 2>he probably got the voters he expected to get. But

0:36:58.964 --> 0:37:02.084
<v Speaker 2>Zorin brought up people that had not voted in these

0:37:02.124 --> 0:37:03.124
<v Speaker 2>primaries before.

0:37:03.364 --> 0:37:05.724
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Zarn in a way was able to activate

0:37:05.724 --> 0:37:10.124
<v Speaker 1>that machine better than the old Democratic as stafleablishment could.

0:37:10.324 --> 0:37:12.484
<v Speaker 2>Well, But like the machine is, the machine is kind

0:37:12.484 --> 0:37:13.924
<v Speaker 2>of fucking, kind of fucking.

0:37:13.684 --> 0:37:17.524
<v Speaker 1>Broken, exactly. No one likes the exactly. That's that's the point.

0:37:17.804 --> 0:37:21.204
<v Speaker 1>So you know Zora as the individual.

0:37:20.684 --> 0:37:23.284
<v Speaker 2>He is one of those McDonald's ice cream makers. It's like, oh,

0:37:23.324 --> 0:37:25.844
<v Speaker 2>you've always broken broken, except there's no scam to get

0:37:25.844 --> 0:37:26.604
<v Speaker 2>the repair guy in.

0:37:26.644 --> 0:37:30.844
<v Speaker 1>Apparently there's a website that actually tracks those McDonald's machines

0:37:30.884 --> 0:37:33.204
<v Speaker 1>and you can see where the ones, you know, it's

0:37:33.244 --> 0:37:36.644
<v Speaker 1>basically all broken, but where the functioning ones are. I

0:37:36.924 --> 0:37:40.324
<v Speaker 1>found that quite amusing. Never tried the ice cream at McDonald's,

0:37:40.364 --> 0:37:43.804
<v Speaker 1>but I for some reason know this little bit of

0:37:43.844 --> 0:37:46.444
<v Speaker 1>information and find it very funny. But yes, that's a

0:37:46.444 --> 0:37:49.524
<v Speaker 1>good analogy. I think that the you know, the ice

0:37:49.564 --> 0:37:53.844
<v Speaker 1>cream machine is definitely broken in most locations in New York,

0:37:54.204 --> 0:37:56.404
<v Speaker 1>and Zoron was able to come out with his you know,

0:37:56.484 --> 0:38:02.164
<v Speaker 1>mister softy little cart and blare his song. If we're gonna,

0:38:02.564 --> 0:38:04.164
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to continue this analogy.

0:38:04.204 --> 0:38:06.604
<v Speaker 2>Do you ever eat chain fast food?

0:38:07.324 --> 0:38:13.444
<v Speaker 1>No? I don't often. The only so I've never I've

0:38:13.484 --> 0:38:16.844
<v Speaker 1>had McDonald's fries. That's the only thing I've ever eaten

0:38:16.924 --> 0:38:17.644
<v Speaker 1>at McDonald's.

0:38:17.644 --> 0:38:18.524
<v Speaker 2>You've never had a big mac.

0:38:18.604 --> 0:38:21.564
<v Speaker 1>No, I've never had a big mac, and I've never American.

0:38:22.244 --> 0:38:25.324
<v Speaker 1>I am, I am what I've never You've never had

0:38:25.364 --> 0:38:26.884
<v Speaker 1>a big Mack. I've never had a big mac.

0:38:26.964 --> 0:38:32.124
<v Speaker 2>Nate would you have one, can still be friends? Would

0:38:32.164 --> 0:38:32.684
<v Speaker 2>you have one?

0:38:32.884 --> 0:38:35.124
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if forced to, I might try a bite

0:38:35.164 --> 0:38:37.244
<v Speaker 1>just to say I've tried it, but no, I don't's kind.

0:38:37.084 --> 0:38:38.124
<v Speaker 2>Of a good sandwich, I don't.

0:38:38.164 --> 0:38:40.004
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want one.

0:38:40.564 --> 0:38:41.644
<v Speaker 2>I like it's pretty good.

0:38:41.804 --> 0:38:44.164
<v Speaker 1>I like burgers, but you know, I'm more of like

0:38:44.204 --> 0:38:47.404
<v Speaker 1>a Minetta Tavern, black Pipelburger type of person.

0:38:48.004 --> 0:38:50.164
<v Speaker 2>So you've never been like an airport where like because

0:38:50.164 --> 0:38:52.164
<v Speaker 2>they always have the fucking like they have the local

0:38:52.244 --> 0:38:56.044
<v Speaker 2>fucking concession. That's some terrible fucking airport specific version, right,

0:38:56.244 --> 0:38:58.724
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big fan of You got the McDonald's, You've

0:38:58.764 --> 0:38:59.964
<v Speaker 2>got the Wendy's at the airport.

0:39:00.044 --> 0:39:02.564
<v Speaker 1>I've never been to Days. I've never been inside a Wendy's.

0:39:02.604 --> 0:39:03.844
<v Speaker 1>I've never been to Burger King.

0:39:04.004 --> 0:39:05.644
<v Speaker 2>You've never been inside a wedding.

0:39:05.764 --> 0:39:07.764
<v Speaker 1>I've never been inside a Burger King. I've never eaten

0:39:07.764 --> 0:39:10.684
<v Speaker 1>anything from either one of those establish men's never been

0:39:10.724 --> 0:39:14.684
<v Speaker 1>to Arby's. I have been to In and Out. I've

0:39:14.684 --> 0:39:18.444
<v Speaker 1>eaten an In and Out Burger, and I've eaten shake Shack.

0:39:18.884 --> 0:39:21.564
<v Speaker 1>But I went to shakeshaf course back when Shakeshack was

0:39:22.124 --> 0:39:24.644
<v Speaker 1>in the park. You know when the line was like

0:39:24.684 --> 0:39:28.244
<v Speaker 1>all all the way around. I you know, I still did.

0:39:28.484 --> 0:39:32.484
<v Speaker 1>That was before I lived in New York, you know,

0:39:32.524 --> 0:39:35.244
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was a teenager when it opened, and

0:39:35.284 --> 0:39:37.564
<v Speaker 1>I remember being so excited. I came to New York

0:39:37.884 --> 0:39:40.404
<v Speaker 1>and I stood in that line for I don't know

0:39:40.444 --> 0:39:44.124
<v Speaker 1>how long to get a shake shack, burger and concrete

0:39:44.644 --> 0:39:47.684
<v Speaker 1>and that was I think, yeah, that and in and

0:39:47.724 --> 0:39:49.924
<v Speaker 1>out is an in and out is I think more

0:39:50.604 --> 0:39:53.124
<v Speaker 1>more fast foody. That is the closest that I have

0:39:53.244 --> 0:39:57.604
<v Speaker 1>come to trying fast food burgers night five guys. I

0:39:57.644 --> 0:40:00.124
<v Speaker 1>tried five guys when five guys first came to New York.

0:40:00.124 --> 0:40:00.724
<v Speaker 1>Does that count?

0:40:01.724 --> 0:40:03.844
<v Speaker 2>It's the higher end you got to get into, like

0:40:03.924 --> 0:40:08.724
<v Speaker 2>the like anything beyond like Wendy's is too high end. Right,

0:40:08.924 --> 0:40:12.284
<v Speaker 2>by the way, my own stock in Shake Shock because

0:40:12.324 --> 0:40:14.644
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, they get people, They get people like you,

0:40:14.724 --> 0:40:18.004
<v Speaker 2>Maria to eat fast food, and that seems like a

0:40:18.044 --> 0:40:20.924
<v Speaker 2>good business model, you know what I mean. People would

0:40:20.924 --> 0:40:23.964
<v Speaker 2>never be caught dead sitting foot to McDonald's, right, They're like, oh,

0:40:24.004 --> 0:40:26.484
<v Speaker 2>Shake Shock, this is this is premium. This is premium.

0:40:26.564 --> 0:40:27.484
<v Speaker 2>Have you had Chipotle?

0:40:27.844 --> 0:40:29.164
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I have had Chippotle.

0:40:29.204 --> 0:40:32.644
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, I mean that's that's in the premium zone, sill,

0:40:32.764 --> 0:40:34.564
<v Speaker 2>I think, But like, yes, anyway.

0:40:34.524 --> 0:40:38.564
<v Speaker 1>I have had Chipotle, uh, and it was actually I

0:40:38.564 --> 0:40:40.964
<v Speaker 1>think Chipotle would be my go to if I had

0:40:40.964 --> 0:40:43.724
<v Speaker 1>to go to, like if I had to pick a

0:40:43.764 --> 0:40:48.004
<v Speaker 1>fast food place, I think Chipotle has the highest quality,

0:40:48.004 --> 0:40:50.324
<v Speaker 1>freshest ingredients out of out of the things, that.

0:40:50.604 --> 0:40:52.924
<v Speaker 2>Chipotle is the restaurant I've probably eaten at the most

0:40:52.924 --> 0:40:55.964
<v Speaker 2>times really in my life, right, yeah, because like I

0:40:56.044 --> 0:40:59.364
<v Speaker 2>used to like fucking play you know, when I left

0:40:59.364 --> 0:41:02.924
<v Speaker 2>my consulting job, I played poker online for a few years, right,

0:41:02.964 --> 0:41:04.564
<v Speaker 2>and I'd always, I don't know, I'd stay up all

0:41:04.644 --> 0:41:08.164
<v Speaker 2>night and then be like fucking famished in the afternoon.

0:41:08.244 --> 0:41:11.124
<v Speaker 2>I live like equidistant Chicago between like three Chipotles, and

0:41:11.164 --> 0:41:13.924
<v Speaker 2>so I would like diversify which are the three Chipotles

0:41:13.924 --> 0:41:16.444
<v Speaker 2>I went to? Just like going there so often that

0:41:16.564 --> 0:41:19.524
<v Speaker 2>it felt like a little bit, a little bit embarrassing.

0:41:19.084 --> 0:41:21.404
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we went from atoms to our fast

0:41:21.404 --> 0:41:23.164
<v Speaker 1>food ratings, from.

0:41:23.044 --> 0:41:24.884
<v Speaker 2>Our New England ratings to our fast food rating.

0:41:25.084 --> 0:41:29.364
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's give Eric Adams a rating if you

0:41:29.404 --> 0:41:32.524
<v Speaker 1>were a fast food chain, what would be oh to

0:41:32.604 --> 0:41:33.404
<v Speaker 1>wrap this up.

0:41:35.404 --> 0:41:37.604
<v Speaker 2>Like what's I mean, maybe like a little So here's

0:41:37.684 --> 0:41:43.124
<v Speaker 2>here's irony. I don't think that New York City is

0:41:43.164 --> 0:41:47.644
<v Speaker 2>doing so badly at all, really, right, Our crime is

0:41:47.684 --> 0:41:52.204
<v Speaker 2>lower than incomparable cities. People have left. That part's not great,

0:41:52.204 --> 0:41:54.404
<v Speaker 2>but they've kind of left most of these cities. We

0:41:54.524 --> 0:41:58.804
<v Speaker 2>have a couple of new airports that have come online.

0:41:58.844 --> 0:42:00.604
<v Speaker 2>We got a congestion pricing and a lot of this

0:42:00.684 --> 0:42:04.844
<v Speaker 2>is not Adams is doing right, but you know, property

0:42:04.924 --> 0:42:08.244
<v Speaker 2>values are doing more than fine. Right, there are still

0:42:08.284 --> 0:42:12.284
<v Speaker 2>housing stortages. But like, yeah, if you ask people kind

0:42:12.284 --> 0:42:13.724
<v Speaker 2>of how is New York doing? I mean, people are

0:42:13.724 --> 0:42:16.644
<v Speaker 2>inherently grumpy in the United States, right, But like so

0:42:16.724 --> 0:42:20.004
<v Speaker 2>if people are punishing him for the for the corruption, yeah,

0:42:20.004 --> 0:42:23.564
<v Speaker 2>as a mayor, I don't know, it seems okay, right

0:42:23.804 --> 0:42:29.364
<v Speaker 2>if people people have trouble decoupling the personal stuff from

0:42:29.404 --> 0:42:33.404
<v Speaker 2>like the legislation government stuff, understandably all.

0:42:33.364 --> 0:42:35.764
<v Speaker 1>Right, So in total, then what would he be? Is

0:42:35.804 --> 0:42:38.684
<v Speaker 1>he a McDonald's, Is he a Wendy's? Is he at Chipotle?

0:42:38.964 --> 0:42:43.404
<v Speaker 2>No, he's like a little you know, little mom and

0:42:43.484 --> 0:42:47.124
<v Speaker 2>pop Italian American place where they're still you know, they're

0:42:47.124 --> 0:42:49.604
<v Speaker 2>not gonna take credit cards still, Maria, Why why not? Well,

0:42:50.364 --> 0:42:52.764
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe they're not paying their full a lotment

0:42:52.804 --> 0:42:56.244
<v Speaker 2>of taxes. Yeah, they have loyal customers. There's some special

0:42:56.324 --> 0:42:58.804
<v Speaker 2>rooms in the back. We're not quite sure what's going

0:42:58.844 --> 0:43:01.084
<v Speaker 2>on there. Right. The food's pretty good. You gotta stick

0:43:01.124 --> 0:43:03.044
<v Speaker 2>to the basics. You gotta stick to the chicken parm

0:43:03.444 --> 0:43:06.324
<v Speaker 2>you gotta get the fried netballs and things like that. Right.

0:43:06.484 --> 0:43:07.924
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to a venture too far, I feel,

0:43:07.964 --> 0:43:09.044
<v Speaker 2>but it's pretty good.

0:43:09.484 --> 0:43:11.044
<v Speaker 1>So if we were going chain, then he would be

0:43:11.044 --> 0:43:13.564
<v Speaker 1>closest to like a siborro anti.

0:43:13.924 --> 0:43:16.524
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I've never eaten a fucking saborro. Well

0:43:16.764 --> 0:43:24.564
<v Speaker 2>it's Italian, Maria. I am a respector of Italian American cuisine.

0:43:24.684 --> 0:43:27.164
<v Speaker 2>Saborro is not meaningfully Italian.

0:43:27.244 --> 0:43:29.964
<v Speaker 1>Okay, okay, fair enough, All right, Well you heard it

0:43:29.964 --> 0:43:33.924
<v Speaker 1>here first, guys, Eric Adams, small mob and pop Italian.

0:43:34.124 --> 0:43:35.924
<v Speaker 1>Definitely not Soborro siborro.

0:43:47.324 --> 0:43:47.644
<v Speaker 2>Let us.

0:43:47.684 --> 0:43:49.444
<v Speaker 1>Know what you think of the show. Reach out to

0:43:49.524 --> 0:43:53.764
<v Speaker 1>us at Risky Business at pushkin dot fm. Risky Business

0:43:53.804 --> 0:43:56.524
<v Speaker 1>is hosted by me Maria Kanakova.

0:43:55.884 --> 0:43:58.604
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show was a cool

0:43:58.644 --> 0:44:02.604
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:44:02.604 --> 0:44:06.964
<v Speaker 2>by Isaac Carter. Our associate producer is Sonya gerwit Lydia,

0:44:07.044 --> 0:44:09.964
<v Speaker 2>Jean Kott and Daphne Chen are our editors, and our

0:44:09.964 --> 0:44:13.804
<v Speaker 2>executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Bruger.

0:44:14.364 --> 0:44:16.604
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:44:16.604 --> 0:44:19.284
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too, But once again,

0:44:19.404 --> 0:44:21.204
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:44:21.244 --> 0:44:23.444
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.