WEBVTT - Broadcom Hits $1T Valuation, Bezos Looks For Trump Help

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news from.

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 2>The Heart where Innovation, money and power. Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbon.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:32.639
<v Speaker 3>live from New York.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tim Steneveeck in for Caroline Hyde. This is Bloomberg

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Technology coming up. Cloud nine. Broadcom up around twenty percent,

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>soaring the most going all the way back to twenty

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty and topping one trillion dollars in valuation after posting

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 2>it better than expected results. Plus Jeff Bezos looks to

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>President Elect Trump to help with his space ambitions against

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>yes Elon Musk and San Francisco's incoming mayor Daniel Lurie

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>certainly wants to take advantage of the AI boom for

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the revival of the city, but for him it's more

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>than just AI. More on that later this hour. First off, though,

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>let's get a check on it Broadcom with Bloomberg's abigailty

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Do a little Hey I we.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 4>Go, Hey Tim, Yeah, this is a really impressive rally.

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Take a look at the shares of Broadcom, up about

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 4>nineteen percent on the day right near session hives. This

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 4>is a two day chart so that you can really

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 4>see today's spike HIRER. That tells you that investors were

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 4>surprised by the degree of the positivity.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 2>Coming out of the quarter.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 4>Now, the quarter they reported was sort of mixed, but

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 4>what investors love it's all about AI. They are saying

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 4>that they can grow AI, their AI part of the

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 4>business in the first quarter by sixty five percent. They're

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 4>also saying by twenty twenty seven, they see that the

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 4>AI components market could be ninety billion dollars. So investors

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 4>absolutely loving this. But this is not the only positive

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 4>day for Broadcom this year. Let's put Broadcom in context

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 4>of one of the most well known AI chip companies,

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 4>and that of course is in Vidia, and then the

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 4>SMP five hundred, excuse me, the socks that chips over

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 4>all index just to see, and here's Broadcom's big spike

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 4>record high today. I think tim based on my work

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 4>in the Bloomberg, I think it may actually be the

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 4>best day ever going back to two thousand and nine,

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 4>and it is trading at a record high. There's NVIDI

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 4>and there's the SMT five hundred. Not so shabby for

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Broadcom this year at all. Today a big piece of

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 4>the rally.

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're right, most since going all the way back

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:22.839
<v Speaker 2>to two thousand and nine. Thanks so much, Av Gail

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.119
<v Speaker 2>do a little appreciate that. Let's get a deeper dive

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 2>into Broadcom with Kun John Sabani of Bloomberg Intelligence. Kuonjohn,

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 2>you joined us live on a Bloomberg BusinessWeek just yesterday.

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>As Broadcom's numbers broke, shares bounced around up two percent

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 2>even when negative. What happened on the earnings call that

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>gave investors the conviction to send shares hired by twenty percent,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 2>giving Broadcom a market cap of a trillion dollars for

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the first time ever.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it was really that massive sixty to ninety billion

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 5>sam by twenty twenty seven, just across three of its

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 5>largest hyper sale customers. That's about three to four times

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 5>fold growth in over the three years. So what it

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 5>did is give investors there is a clear, quantifiable target

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 5>to focus on over the next three years instead of

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 5>constantly worrying about the near term. How's the next water

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 5>going to look like? How's the next year going to

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 5>look like?

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Kunjohn. Ai revenue grew two hundred and twenty percent during

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the year. It was fueled by demand for processors and

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 2>networking components. Hottan said that on the call, demand for

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 2>non AI chips, though we'll be down in the first quarter,

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 2>our investors should investors just kind of right off non

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>AI chips at this point.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 5>At this point they should, especially given the growth rates

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 5>he is given for the AI business. I mean, look,

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 5>the AI business is going to grow to be the

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 5>majority of portion. I think the non AI business right

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 5>now sort of twenty percent of that will continue even

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 5>shrinking down. So if we didn't have those massive temps, yes,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 5>people would have looked at what's happened in wireless, what's

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 5>happening with software, what's happening in one que slowing down?

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 5>But at this point all of those worries are out

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 5>the window.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Kun John Sabani of Bloomberg Intelligence out there in San Francisco,

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much from more on broad in the company's

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>nearly one hundred percent rallies so far this year. We're

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 2>joined by Bloomberg's Ian King Ian. One of the ways

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>that hog ten has been able to build Broadcom into

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 2>one of the most valuable companies in the chip industry

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>is through acquisitions. Does this trend continue? I mean, he

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>was asked about that.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 6>He said he was asked, look, hey, Hawk, you've got

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 6>a lot of cash. Does that mean you're getting ready

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 6>to do another big one? And they said no, no,

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 6>we're going to focus on bringing down our debt. But

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 6>then later on in Nicoll he was asked, well, does

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 6>this mean your your strategy of making acquisitions is the

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 6>thing of the past, that you're going to focus on

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 6>organic growth in AI And he was like, oh no,

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 6>we're still looking so kind of beast message there.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So what kind of companies have they acquired in

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the past and what kind of companies could potentially be

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:43.559
<v Speaker 2>on their radar?

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean they've they've gone through the whole Panoplio

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 6>that they started off in semiconduct has he acquires what

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 6>he calls franchises. These are really sort of long standing,

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 6>important parts of the industry that he believes are kind

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 6>of undervalued, and then he kind of strips out, makes

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 6>them sort of lean and mean again, and that's been

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 6>a really successful policy. And then he took that strategy

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 6>and spun it into software and most recently he went

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 6>for VMware. And what he's going to do next, who knows.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 6>He said he's open to software and semiconductor. Obviously, all

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 6>eyes are on Intel right now and whether this is

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 6>something which might figure into his calculations.

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well that's a perfect segue. Let's go to Intel

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 2>right now, because CFO Dave Disner said that a formal

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>separation of the company's factory and product development divisions is

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 2>an open question. It'll be decided by the next leader

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>of the company. Ian I thought that this had been

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 2>kind of put to bed and Intel was going to

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>stay the type of company that it's been for over

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of years. What's the latest time in it.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, No, it had been put to bed by Pat Gelsinger.

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately for him, he's not in that job anymore. Right,

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 6>he's not in a position to say he said, stronger together,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 6>better together. One of the co CEO replacements, Michelle Johnson

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 6>hold House, who was on stage as well, said yeah, no, yeah,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 6>we think we're matched together. But both her and Dave's instner,

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 6>the CFO and COCO said yeah, but you know, it's

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 6>not our call. We'll see what happens, And that, really,

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 6>I guess in Wall Street's minds kind of opened the

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 6>door to this being a much more firm possibility.

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So what part of the company could be spun off?

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Where could that company go? Would it be a public company,

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 2>would Broadcom be interested in part of the company? What

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 2>do you see? Yeah?

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the focus was on what happens to the

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 6>product side of the company and the manufacturing side of

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 6>the company, that perhaps these two entities become something separate. Frankly,

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 6>the manufacturing side right now is piling on the losses.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 6>It's really not in a financial position that would make

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 6>an IPO even a vague possibility right now and probably

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 6>not for you know, a matter of years while it

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 6>tries to build up its presence with outside customers. That's

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 6>not really an option. That would have to be new ownership,

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 6>new ownership with very deep pockets. Whether that's Broadcom or

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 6>anybody else, we don't know. The product side is arguably

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 6>a bit more healthy, particularly in PCs. It might be

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 6>something that somebody like Qualcom or Broadcom might.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 2>See a useful Okay, well, certainly, busy days ahead for

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Ian King and for all of us. Ian King certainly

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you joining us. Thanks so much. Let's continue the

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 2>conversation with epac Oscar Deshkai, a senior analyst over at

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Swiss Code. It's a banking group specializing in providing online

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 2>financial and trading services. EPEC record highs for Broadcom, our

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Bel Technology, and this week for meta platforms, Apple, Alphabet, Tesla,

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 2>the names continue. What inning are we in in your

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 2>view when it comes to this megacap tech bull.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 7>Run, Well, absolutely well, good news keep coming in and

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 7>they actually fund this rally and extend. Really they do

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 7>justify the extension of the rally for Broadcom, for example, Well,

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 7>they actually announce a revenue growth for the AI business

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 7>of two hundred and twenty percent. They are looking for

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 7>sixty five percent growth in their revenue in the first quartum.

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 7>Those are the big, big numbers that we are used

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 7>to that we like, especially in the AI and technology stock.

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 7>So that's actually giving a boost to the companies and

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 7>to Com today.

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, we are also.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 7>Very much impressed by cooms projection of a boom in

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 7>their AI business, especially the custom AI chips in the

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 7>next few years. That actually fits exactly right in the

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 7>middle of this narrative that's unfolding right now that the

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 7>big technology companies are actually building their own chips, so

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 7>that means that they are going to be users and

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 7>they're going to be winners. So we expect to see

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 7>still a little change of the scenery when twenty twenty

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 7>five begins.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you mentioned there will be winners and there will

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 2>be losers. Let's start with the losers. Who are they

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be?

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I don't want to say losers. Nvidia is

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 7>not smiling today, and they are right because we are

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 7>now in this narrative of big technology companies, which actually

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 7>made up to fifty percent of its revenue last quarter,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 7>trying to build their own chips. So we're talking about

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 7>Amazon with their Trainium chips. Google came out with his

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 7>own I mean, everybody is up now building their own

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 7>chips in order to well cost efficient for cost efficiency reason.

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 7>So this means that Nvidia will have to replace these

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 7>big technology companies by other customers. Now, we know that

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 7>Jensen one didn't look worried at all up until now,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 7>but that's still a fly.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 2>So are you saying that that folks who have ridden

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 2>this high for Nvidia should be thinking about getting out

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 2>at some point soon.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, I want to say that right now, because these

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 7>worries of big technology companies that will start slowing their

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 7>spending has not materialized just yet, because earlier this week

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 7>we had TSM sales numbers for November and they actually

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 7>announced a thirty four percent growth in their sales in November,

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 7>which actually continues to back this narrative of robust AI

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 7>demand for Nvidia's chips. But it is a certainty that

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 7>this high concentration of big technology companies in their client

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 7>book is something to be watched.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we know you've mentioned in video and not a

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 2>company that should be smiling today Broadcom certainly one that is,

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 2>what are the other names that you're bullish on going

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>into twenty twenty five.

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, AMD is not smiling today, But we actually like

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 7>AMD for one particular reason, and is the fact that

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 7>AMD proposes cost efficient and more affordable but as efficient

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 7>as efficient, very efficient chips and that could actually be

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 7>interesting for those sectors and companies who do not necessarily

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 7>want the most premium chips out there, but who want

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 7>good chips sale for you know, doing their day to

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 7>day task with AI. And that's going to be very interesting.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 7>We think that there is an opportune to window for

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 7>AMD to get into this race more seriously and well,

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 7>question the the NVIDIAs or eat a part of mvda's

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 7>cake in the coming years.

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the exuberance around AI has certainly focused

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 2>on the chip companies, but what if we move beyond

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>those chip companies. Who else do you see as winners

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to this boom and AI.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, actually we see, for example, well we see all

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 7>the clients as winners because they are going to get

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 7>an important part of their important efficiency and cost efficiencies

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 7>in this process. So this is obviously one thing, and

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 7>this is why this whole thing is happening. But we're

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 7>also looking very closely to what's happening in the energy sector,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 7>and we think that the nuclear power providers are going

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 7>to be in a good position to benefit from the

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 7>ar really, given that it is clear right now that

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 7>the alternative energy sources like wind and solar are not

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 7>going to offer the enough scalability actually for satisfying all

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 7>these exponentially arising energy demands.

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Nuclear power so little intensive to develop, especially here in

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.479
<v Speaker 2>the United States, We've only had a couple new generators

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 2>come online over the last couple of decades. Who do

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 2>you think can pull this off in the next few

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 2>years or are we talking like a generational shift here.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, yes, you're right. It has been controversial as well,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 7>so it's here in Europe as well. We have been

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 7>closing the nuclear plans and not to the contrary. But

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 7>this year we have started seeing the mentality change a

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 7>little bit, especially when big technology companies started announcing that

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 7>they are going to be interested in using nuclear power

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 7>instead of while using fossil fuel or fossil well, actually,

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 7>excell as, it was saying that they are going to

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 7>offer gas for gas powered plans to big technology companies

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 7>that's going to be built in half time, like in

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 7>five years, and they're going to offer these companies and

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 7>after good energy source. But at the end of the day,

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 7>when we are talking about tackling climate change and offering

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 7>an alternative and clean energy source, well, today nuclear looks

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 7>like the only plausable option that could satisfy our increasing

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 7>and exponentially increasing needs.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 2>May pec Oscar Deshkaia, senior analyst at Swiss Quote joining

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 2>us from Geneva, thanks for standing up late for us.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Do appreciate that Jeff Bezos is expected to meet with

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 2>President elect Tromp to discuss Amazon's Project Kuiper. It's a

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 2>satellite Internet service that is facing delays and cost overruns.

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Bezos look into the new administration for help in the

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 2>space race against fellow cent a billionaire Elon Musk. Bloomberg's

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Bruce Einhorn joins US now Bruce. Project Kuiper supposed to

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 2>be this competitor to SpaceX's Starlink. Is it fair at

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>this point to even call it a competitor.

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, it aspires to be, but at the moment it's

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 9>not there yet. So Starlink has more than six thousand

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 9>satellites operating, providing high speed Internet service around the world.

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 9>Amazon wants Project hyper to do something similar. The original

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.359
<v Speaker 9>goal was to have the first batch of operational satellites

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 9>launch first half of this year, and by this time

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 9>they would have beta service starting. They've encountered delays though

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 9>in launching the satellites. They're now looking to launch the

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 9>first batch of satellites early next year and then have

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 9>service starting later in the year. The big problem for

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 9>them is, well, one big problem is that they do

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 9>have a deadline that they received from the Federal Communications

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 9>Commission when they first got the license for this back

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 9>in twenty twenty. They need to have half of their satellites.

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 9>It's over sixteen hundred satellites up and operating by the

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 9>middle of July, I mean by middle of twenty twenty six,

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 9>July twenty twenty six. They don't get that, then they're

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 9>going to need the FCC to give them an extension,

0:14:58.040 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 9>to give them a waiver.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 2>One challenge is get those satellites into orbit. Blue Origin

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 2>is certainly a possibility, but if they can't pull it off,

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>can they rely on SpaceX to do this? Would that

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 2>ever happen?

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 9>While they do have a contract with SpaceX to launch

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 9>on I think three SpaceX rockets, but that's just a

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 9>tiny part of their total launch needs. So for the

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 9>most part, Amazon is looking to new rockets from Blue Origin,

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 9>which is Jeff Bezos founded company, as well as europe

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 9>Arian Spots and United Launch Alliance, which is joint venture

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 9>between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The challenge though, is that

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 9>those three companies all have new rockets. Among the three

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 9>of them, those rockets have launched a total of three times,

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 9>so they don't really have a huge track record, and

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 9>it takes a while to get rockets up and going

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 9>to a frequent, frequent launch schedule. So it's a big

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 9>challenge that they face. On the other Cant of course,

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 9>has its own rockets. They don't have to worry about

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 9>it exactly. And it seems like, speaking of SpaceX, Elon

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 9>Musk and President elect Trump are extremely tight. After what

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 9>happened over the last few months and the more than

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 9>two hundred million dollars Musk spent to help get Trump elected.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 9>How bad is that for Jeff Bezos. Well, of course,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 9>Musk and the President elect are very close. President Trump

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 9>during his first term did have some run ins with

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 9>Jeff Bezos. There was some criticism from the president of

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 9>Jeff Bezos, who of course owns the Washington Post. Amazon

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 9>did go to court in the first Trump administration alleging

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 9>unfair treatment of the company, saying that they had been

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 9>cut out of a contract with the Defense Department. So

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 9>there is history there. More recently, we have seen pretty

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 9>upby comments from Jeff Bezos about the President elect and

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 9>the new administration.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Bruse ein Horn, thanks so much for joining us. Do

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 2>appreciate that today. Well, speaking of another story that we

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 2>are watching, Elon Musk looking to transform his SpaceX Star

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 2>based site into a new city. The site in Boca Chica,

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Texas currently the primary location for building and launching SpaceX's

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Starship Rockets, and it's created over three thousand jobs. Several

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.239
<v Speaker 2>steps need to occur before Starbase can be created as

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>a new city, including permission from local authorities. Coming up,

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 2>we'll discuss the intersection of AI and sports with the

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 2>CEO of VM. That's next. This is Bloomberg. A new

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 2>partnership could change the way millions of fans experience live

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 2>sports around the world. New York Islanders and Ubs Arena

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 2>have teamed up with VM to develop quick Q. It's

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 2>a tool that directs fans to the shortest lines so

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>then can get back to their seats as soon as possible.

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 2>The company putting AI into action and other industries too,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 2>including marine manufacturing, robotics, as well as food and beverage.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Here with us is Elliott Horow, a CEO and founder

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 2>at VM. Elliott, good to see you. I want to

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 2>get to the Ubs are in a partnership in a minute.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 2>But you co founded Mango dB. Before that, you co

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 2>founded shop Wiki. This is not your first rodeo. What's

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the problem that you identified that VM would solve?

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.719
<v Speaker 10>Well, thanks for having us, Tim So the problem that

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 10>I was focused on after I thus Mango dB, it

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 10>was all about physical.

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Devices in the real world. Right.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 10>We all live in the real world. We all want

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 10>to have the real world be better for us in

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 10>whatever way, and so we built VM to be an

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 10>engineering platform for physical devices.

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 10>And that's from air conditioners in your house to robots

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 10>on a factory floor.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 12>Right.

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 10>It's all about making it easier to build these products.

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 10>You need a lot of different engineering counts to make

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 10>that happen, from software engineers to mechanical engineers to AI engineers.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 10>So how do you make a platform that makes it

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 10>ten times easier to bring these products to life?

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's get to this UBS partnership. The idea

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 2>is you're watching an Islanders game, You've got to use

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the restroom. You can tell by opening the Islanders app

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 2>where to go and how long it'll take exactly right.

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 10>The Islanders, the Islanders ownership and you know John the

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 10>Decky who we partnered with, are all about fan experience, Right.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 10>How do you have the experience of going to an

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 10>Islanders game, going to any event at UBS arena be

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 10>as great as possible? And so the biggest problem with

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 10>one of the biggest problems with going to a game

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 10>is when do I go to the bathroom? How do

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.239
<v Speaker 10>I have to wait in line? And so you can

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 10>open up the Islanders app and see immediately which bathrooms

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 10>have the shortest line, if there's a line right now,

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 10>and so you can know when to go, where to

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 10>go and make that part of the experience much better.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 2>What's the hardware that has to be installed at ubs

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 2>arena in order to make this happen.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 10>So one of the great things we were able to

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 10>do was actually add almost no hardware. Right, We're able

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 10>to add this to the existing security cameras that they

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 10>already had in place, you know, just monitoring for security

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 10>and safety around the arena, and so to tap into

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 10>the existing cameras and just look at those cameras and

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 10>determine what the line was for the bathrooms.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 2>So what's the tech layer there?

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 10>So the entire tech layer is the existing security cameras

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 10>and then just VM outside of that, Right, So VM

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 10>is tapping into those existing cameras, looking at those feeds

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 10>in real time, doing AI actually in the arena itself,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 10>and then pushing that data to the Islanders up.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's talk fundraising here. You've raised just shy of

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>ninety million dollars at this point. How long does that

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 2>runway give you? When do you need to raise more money?

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 10>We're always talking to investors about raising more money.

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 10>One of the things about VM is we're not a

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 10>lacking ambition company, right. We're thinking about everything from in

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 10>your house again to arenas, lots of things we want

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 10>to do about fan experience and lots of arenas, but

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 10>then also everything to cleaning oceans, and so we will

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 10>be raising more money and we're doing a lot of

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 10>interesting projects all over the place.

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 2>Are you actively raising money at this point? Like, are

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 2>you out there talking to investors right now? I mean

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I talk to investors probably every week. Are they give

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>you are you getting incoming though? Are they saying, hey,

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 2>we want to give you money? Is that the environment

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>out there? There's a lot of you You have a

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 2>strong track record too, right, And there's a.

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 10>Lot of interest in physical devices, physical world and AI right.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 10>And we're taking a pretty unique approach, and we're really

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 10>focused on short term wins and how do people make

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 10>practical things better on an everyday basis?

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 2>What do you envision for the home. That really intrigues me.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>What's in your perfect world do you imagine happening with

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 2>VM in the home.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 10>I think a lot of people have something in their

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 10>house that is somewhat smart, right, Maybe it's an air

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 10>conditioning system that's supposed to adjust the temperatures, or lights

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 10>that are supposed to be smart, or even just devices

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 10>that aren't smart, like an old air conditioner. Most of

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 10>those aren't very smart and really aren't great user experiences.

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 10>Or the number of people who've come to me and said, yeah,

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 10>my air conditioner broke down in August, I'm like, why

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 10>did that happen?

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you know that it's going to break down?

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 10>When an air conditioner breaks, someone usually come to your house,

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 10>look at it, and then maybe go and get another part.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 10>Why can't they have a computer that's always attached to

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 10>the air conditioner, always monitoring the air conditioner, so they

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 10>know exactly what part they need, and we can tell

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 10>you ahead of time, like, Hey, it's getting noisier, it's

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 10>starting to rattle, it's probably going to break in two weeks.

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 10>Should we become fixed it before you're stuck with no

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 10>AC and it's one hundred degrees outside, right, those sort

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 10>of very practical, real world things that just get in

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 10>the way of day to day life.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 2>We had to get a new washing machine in dry

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and it's supposed to connect to the internet. It doesn't

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 2>even connect to the internet, right.

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 10>And this is what we hear over and over again

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 10>is that building devices right now is just simply too hard. Right,

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 10>It's too hard to connect these devices in your house

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 10>and in the real world to AI.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Elliott Horowitz, CEO and founder at VM joining us here

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 2>in New York. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Tim

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Stenevek in New York. Let's get a check on the markets.

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Taking a look at what's going on on a with Broadcom.

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Look at that shares up right now, close to twenty percent.

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Two hundred and fifteen dollars is where it's trading at

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 2>right now. WISES High is twenty two percent a little

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the session, surging today to a one trillion

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 2>dollar market cap for the first time ever. After predicting

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>a boom in demand for its AI chip. Sales of

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 2>AI products are going to gain sixty five percent in

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the fiscal first quarter. That's far faster than its overall

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 2>semiconductor growth of about ten percent. The chip maker also

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 2>predicting that the dressful market for AI components that it

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 2>designs for those data centers, those hyperscalers would reach as

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 2>high as ninety billion dollars by fiscal twenty twenty seven. Also,

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 2>let's take a look at what shares of Tesla not

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 2>just doing today, which yes, they're at a new record,

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 2>but over the last couple of months, they've almost doubled

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 2>in value since the election. Today's news is that the

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration transition team could scrap an order that requires

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 2>car makers to report crashes involving self driving systems that

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 2>coming from Reuter's a little earlier in the day. Certainly,

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 2>those who've bet on Tesla over the last couple of

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 2>months and even before that, have gotten big payoffs. Well,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 2>let's keep digging into the Musk trade now, because as

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned, those who've bet on Elon Musk's business empire

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 2>are closing out in the year with some hefty payoffs.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Nitsa Soakova looks into this for usdnitsa good to

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 2>see you give us an understanding of we've stuck by

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk over the past few years and how their

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 2>payoff looks at the end of this year.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, for sure. We have quite a few funds who

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 8>had placed big bets on in one Musk, which I

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 8>can imagine for the start of the year it wasn't

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 8>really a great performance, but now we're seeing really rapid

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 8>shifting fortituns. We of course love to talk about Destney

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 8>Tech one hundred, which is one of the few funds

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 8>who has so much exposure to SpaceX. That fund has

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 8>sold more than five hundred percent since the election. Just

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 8>incredible rally. This is both due to the price of

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 8>the underlying growing, but more importantly it's due to the

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 8>very big demand we're seeing from retail traders, and they're

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 8>paying ten times more than the actual price of the

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 8>underlying assets, so there is definitely a chase to do that.

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 8>We also have a few big names like traditional stock

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 8>pickers like Ron Barron, which famously bets on Tessa. He

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 8>invests in SpaceX, and he was actually flat on the year,

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 8>and just in a couple of weeks now he's up

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 8>forty percent on the year, So really massive change for

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 8>everyone who placed the boat bet on anything New and Musk.

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I wonder to what extent. This depends on a close

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 2>relationship with the president elect and what happens if this

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 2>relationship sours given the increase that we've seen in such

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 2>a short time, for sure.

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lot of the speculation, a lot of the

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>rally we have seen lately, it is based on the

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>new cycle we've seen. We've seen obviously SpaceX get a

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of its contracts, our government contracts, so you can imagine.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 8>People are quite happy with that. Even the elimination of

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 8>the tax credits for electric vehicles, which came as news,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 8>a lot of people are thinking that's going to be

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 8>favorable for tests. So a lot of the incoming administration

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 8>news cycles we have seen has been perceived to be

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 8>quite favorable for those companies. And you can imagine, like

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 8>more broadly, the rally, we're seeing a little bit of

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 8>a stop in the moment. We're seeing a lot of

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 8>the big company struggle. But Teslo continues to score gains,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 8>and the gains have been incredible. Tesso has added more

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 8>than five hundred billions. Is the election just incredible rallity?

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's pretty remarkable. And Elon Musk of course remains

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the world's wealthiest person. But sur past four hundred billion

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>dollars in net Worth just this week, Dniita Sikova. Always

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you joining us, Thanks so much well. Elon Musk's

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 2>influence looms large on the next administration, even heading the

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 2>newly created Department of Government Efficiency. Yes, we know what's

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 2>called DOGE. With the incoming Trump administration showing strong support

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 2>for crypto, let's bring in Aya Kantarovich, co CEO and

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>co founder of the digital assets management platform August for

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>her read on crypto markets in at twenty twenty five.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>So the amazing run up that we've seen in many

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 2>different cryptocurrencies, but namely Bitcoin, over the last few months

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 2>has been on hopes of a Trump administration that is

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 2>more lenient when it comes to regulations. So that's the hope.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Now the administration has to deliver. What do you want

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 2>to say, Yeah, you're absolutely right.

0:26:58.640 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 11>We even saw it yesterday with Trump at the New

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 11>York Stock Exchange. He mentioned that he wants the United

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 11>States to be the number one leader in cryptocurrency in

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 11>the world. That's a very different narrative than what we've

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 11>seen in the last four years. We've also seen the

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 11>Trump administration anchor on this one hundred and fifty k

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 11>bitcoin price, and so we've seen, you know, markets respond

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 11>to that. We've seen a lot of option call buyers

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 11>with March twenty twenty five expirees, and so really a

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 11>lot of people, as you mentioned, are kind of basing

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 11>their expectation on a much more favorable administration. Now that

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 11>can be you know, many subsets. We see Paul Atkins

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 11>coming in as the SEC Chairman and commissioner, and that

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 11>is going to be very positive for crypto companies that

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 11>are centralized. We still need to see what that means

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 11>for decentralized finance as well, especially as it pertains to

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 11>KISEE sanctions. But overall, it really does mean that the

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 11>narrative is front and center, and you're seeing that momentum

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 11>in ETF inflows.

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Does it seem like the wild like it could become

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 2>the wild West? To you?

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 11>We're very much hoping that we're actually going to get

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 11>very clear guidelines and I think that's one of the

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 11>main pieces of also having a role within the White

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 11>House that is focused on crypto. You know, you have

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 11>David Zachs who's going to be spearheading a lot of

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 11>that and what we're actually looking to get from that,

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 11>I mean, he's invested in a bunch of these companies,

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 11>is actually rules and regulations on what we need to do.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you see that as a conflict of interest that

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 2>he's invested in a lot of these companies, but he's

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 2>going to help advise the President and at least people

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>in the White House on making rules around these I.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 11>Think you could probably say that about you know, a

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 11>couple people that you know are advising in the administration.

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 11>But that said, you know, you still need to have

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 11>all of this get approved by Congress. You need to

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 11>have it approved also on a state level, and so

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 11>you're seeing a lot of states actually start to jumpstart this.

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 11>And so you're seeing states such as Texas most recently

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 11>this week, say that they want to have bitcoin as

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 11>a reserve currency for the state. The US has spoken

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 11>about it. You're seeing a number of states now four

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 11>actually say that they're going to go ahead and do that.

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 11>And so I think you'll see a lot of the

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 11>checks and balances on both a state and federal level,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 11>and we're excited to see that play out.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>And recent Horowitz is crypto policy lead Brian Quintez is

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 2>a top contender to lead the CFTC under President lex Trump.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>What kind of role do you see that he would

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 2>play in shaping cryptopolicy.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 11>He's been pretty favorable in both what he said very

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 11>publicly and also in the guidance that he's given for

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the A sixteen Z companies. For example,

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 11>UNISWAP is one of the largest ones that's a decentralized

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 11>exchange platform. It touches a number of users, and I

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 11>think what you'll see is that a lot of these

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 11>currencies will fall under the CFDC. CFDC has given very

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 11>clear guidelines and so we're very excited to continue to

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 11>push in partnership with them.

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Are you concerned that there could be clear winners and

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 2>losers here given that there are people from certain venture

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 2>capital firms who have the presidentallex Ear, Elon Musk has

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the president of x ear, but not everybody is going

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>to have his ear. Are there are there going to

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>be clear winners and losers as a result of who

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 2>has access.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 11>That's a very very good question, and I think it

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.719
<v Speaker 11>still boils down to what are the guidelines and rules?

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 11>So if you do pick, you know, call it a

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 11>clear winner based on someone's relationship with a specific company

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 11>or their previous investments. It really depends on why is

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 11>it a commodity? Is it a security? And then boiling

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 11>that down and then we can take that guideline and

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 11>apply that to many other winners as well.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Ayah, what happens if there is some sort of meltdown

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>akin to what we saw at FTX two years ago

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>in the coming years and you see a large number

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 2>of people who have holdings of cryptocurrencies get burned. Maybe

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>it's the result of a more lax regulatory environment. The

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 2>whole idea with regulations is these are supposed to be

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 2>guardrails and protect consumers. Does this whole thing backfire if

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 2>consumers get burned?

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 11>So my personal opinion, and I think that of the

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 11>industry is not a lot of the things that happened

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 11>with FTX were personal people issues and people management issues

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 11>and lack of operational back end systems in order that

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 11>you see both in traditional finance but also in centralized exchanges.

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>That may be true, but it didn't happen in a vacuum.

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 2>We saw the failure of a lot of crypto firms

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 2>during that time. We saw the real depression of many

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 2>crypto asset prices can one.

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 11>Hundred percent agree. We also saw that in traditional finance

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 11>with our Kegoes for example, and that took down Credit Suite.

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 11>So it's not unique to crypto. These are still financial

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 11>companies and they still require very clear guidelines on operations,

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 11>on people management, and on flow funds. And I think

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 11>what we're going to get from this administration is exactly

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 11>what that needs to look like in the United States.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 11>We can copypaste that into these companies and then we can,

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, with that clear guideline.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 12>That's the issue.

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 11>Since we don't have the clear guidelines, we don't really

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 11>know how and where to operate, and that creates more confusion.

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 11>Even with less regulation, as long as the guidelines are

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 11>very clear, we can operate within those, hire the right people,

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 11>whether it's for compliance or again back in operations and

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 11>continue forward.

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 2>What are you seeing on August platform right now, Like,

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 2>what's the activity that you see that you can tell

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>us about.

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 11>Yes, our volumes have really spiked tremendously. It's very very exciting.

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 11>You know, yields are spiking, and so we're seeing, for example,

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 11>our clients get yields over five percent on bitcoin and

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 11>majors on basis. Right now, we're seeing roughly eleven percent

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 11>for majors, over twenty five percent for some all coins,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 11>and then even for for example, lending rates for stable coins,

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 11>the seven day average is around sixteen percent. So it's

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 11>really tracting more capital on chain and we're excited to

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 11>continue to see that.

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I always get to see you. Thanks so much for

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>stopping by Bloomberg HQ. That's August CEO Aya Kantorovitch joining

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 2>us here at Bloomberg. Well, coming up, Archer teaming up

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 2>with Anderill. Archer CEO Adam Goldstein joins us. Next for more,

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg. Archer, the electric aircraft maker, has a

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 2>new partnership with defense tech firm Anderill to build a

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 2>hybrid at military aircraft. This as the company also announced

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 2>it has brought in four hundred and thirty million dollars

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 2>from investors including Stillantis and United Airlines. Archer CEO Adam

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Goldstein joins us now. Adam, I think a lot of

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.239
<v Speaker 2>people when they envision Archer, when they hear Archer, they

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 2>think of air taxis, they think of urban mobility. What

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 2>is the opportunity and defense for Archer?

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, well, I think it's quite common for aircraft manufacturers

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 12>to participate in both the commercial aspects of the industry

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 12>as well as the defense aspects. The commercial side of

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 12>Archer's business has become very mature, and the aircraft is

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 12>in the late stages of its development and certification program,

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 12>and so it was a great opportunity for us to

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 12>really extend and expand our capabilities and move into the

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 12>defense side. And of course partnering with Androl is an

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 12>amazing opportunity as they're the premier defense tech company in

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 12>the world.

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 2>So what does that product look like when it's all

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 2>said and done in partnership with Androl.

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 12>So we're building a hybrid electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft.

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 12>It will have a lot of the same capabilities that

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 12>you've seen on the commercial side. So these are vehicles

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 12>that can be produced at much lower costs. There are

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 12>vehicles that have low acoustic, low thermal signatures, and so

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 12>applications that will be very helpful towards defense vehicles. I

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 12>think it's also really important to the US Department of

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 12>Defense that we add new capabilities. There's this whole new

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 12>trend in affordable autonomous aircraft that can help bring new

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 12>capabilities but also at the same time dramatically lower costs.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 2>You've been working with the Department of Defense for a

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 2>few years, going back to twenty twenty one, but now

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 2>you're just creating this separate defense division. Why are you

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 2>doing it now and what's different about defense tech going

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 2>into twenty twenty five. Is this about a new administration?

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So Archer has a team of around one thousand people,

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 12>and we've been working for a long time on building

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 12>out the capabilities of our aircraft. As the aircraft matured,

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 12>it allows us to take that platform and build variants

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 12>of it that can be useful across different applications. You

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 12>combine that with the new administration and you have an

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 12>incredible opportunity for us to dramatically expand our business. So

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 12>on the commercial side, it can be certainly very big,

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 12>but it also is for some people hard to define.

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 12>On the defense side, it's very clear that there are

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 12>new needs that the Defense Department is looking for and

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 12>we can certainly fill those as well. So the opportunity

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 12>here really is pretty impressive.

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 2>What's the type of infrastructure that has to be in

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 2>place for the Defense Department at bases here and at

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>outposts around the world in order for this product to

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 2>succeed well.

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 12>The beauty is that they're vertical takeoff and landing aircraft,

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 12>which means we don't need runways. And so that's one

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 12>of the big benefits that you can have these aircraft

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 12>that could be utilized across many different applications. So you

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 12>can think about all things that helicopters do, and then

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 12>there's certainly things that you can envision that go beyond

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 12>those use cases. So when you don't need runways, you

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 12>need limited infrastructure.

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I look up at the sky in New York City

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 2>and I see airplanes from bowling In, Airbus and Breyer

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 2>and the like. I still don't see air taxis. When

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 2>will I see air taxis?

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 12>Well, the air taxis will come to the US as

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 12>soon as the regulatory pathway is clear. And one of

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 12>the benefits of the new administration is that they are

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 12>projecting that there will be an easier time to get

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 12>through some of the regulatory pathways. That being said, it

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 12>is still up to Archer to make sure that we

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 12>produce a safe aircraft, and that's where we really focus,

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 12>and I think you'll start to see things sooner than

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 12>you might expect.

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 2>What sooner than you and I expect. What does that

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 2>mean in terms of number of years? Am I counting

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 2>on one hand?

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 13>Oh?

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely.

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 12>Our goal is to have aircraft commercial in the marketplace

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 12>by the end of next year.

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 2>And where would that be.

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 12>Well, the starting point is in the UAE. So the

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 12>UE has created a framework for us to get to

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 12>market by the fourth quarter of next year, and so

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 12>we've been working very closely with the regulators there.

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 2>But I do think you'll start to.

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 12>See an increasing amount of excitement coming from the FAA

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 12>as these products get a lot of hours under them

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 12>in flight tests and really advanced in the certification programs,

0:36:57.960 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 12>And so my guess it will be a short time

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 12>after to just see these aircraft come to market in

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 12>the US.

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 2>And if they do come or when they do come

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to market in the US, give us a year that

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 2>you think it would happen if all goes according to

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 2>a plan from a regulatory perspective, and where we'll see

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>it in the US? What city, what state will this

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 2>happen first?

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So we've announced several key markets that are important

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 12>to US. LA is a fantastic market that are over

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 12>five million daily trips that take greater than an hour

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 12>by car going less than twenty miles. So when you

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 12>start to think about that, just the city of La

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 12>alone could be bigger than the entire aviation industry globally.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 12>And then you start to think about the other big

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 12>markets in the US that we concentrate on New York, Miami,

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 12>and so there's an amazing opportunity here. It's our job

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 12>to build safe aircraft and once the regulators d must safe,

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 12>and that's when we'll ultimately get to market.

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Archer CEO Adam Goldstein, Adam, good to talk to you.

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for checking in. Do appreciate it. San Francisco has

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 2>been at the center of the boom, yet the city

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 2>still running up against its issues. Locally, Carolin Hyde sat

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 2>down with San Francisco Mayor elect Daniel Lurie to discuss

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 2>the future of the city under the new age of AI.

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 2>This after he assembled a transition team that includes Open

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:16.919
<v Speaker 2>AI co founder Sam Alman. Check it out.

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 14>Sam Alman has been great as a transition code chair.

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 14>We are committed to leaning into being the home of AI.

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 14>We have historic investments already here in San Francisco. We're

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 14>going to continue to lean in not only AI, not

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 14>only technology, but really once again being the epicenter for

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 14>business again. There is no better place to do business

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 14>on the globe than San Francisco when we're at our best.

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 14>But it's not just about business. It's about bringing our

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 14>arts and culture back to San Francisco, because that's where people.

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 14>When people think of San Francisco, they think of culture.

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 14>They think that everything starts here. Yes, I started here

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 14>and we wanted to grow here, but we kind of

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 14>want the best of everything coming back to San Francisco.

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 15>I mean, you're someone who knows well how to make

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 15>cultural events bound together, big cultural movement benefit concert raise

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 15>seventeen million dollars. You've done other philanthropic work. But you're

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 15>also from a business dynasty of Levi and what parts

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 15>of industry do you want to cultivate here? You just

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 15>mentioned financial services there, you mentioned sports, but it's going

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 15>to be broader than that.

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 14>Absolutely, we are calling healthcare executives, biotech AI, we want

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 14>real estate thinking that San Francisco is a place that

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 14>they want to invest in again. Because when you get

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 14>these business leaders back, what that tells me is that

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 14>we get the small businesses back to San Francisco, back

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 14>thriving again.

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 2>That was San Francisco's Mayor elect Daniel Lurie with Caroline

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Hyde there and from San Francisco to Boston. Liquid AI

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and MIT spinoff designing AI systems inspired by the tiny

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 2>brains of a worm, set to raise two hundred and

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty million dollars in funding at a two point three

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar valuation Bloomberg. Sharen Gafari joins US now for

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 2>moreen neural networks. Typically they're modeled after, you know, the

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 2>old human brain. These things that have proved to work

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 2>really well. What's up with worm brains? Why is this

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 2>an exciting new frontier? That's right.

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 13>So the neural networks of power things like chat ship

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 13>tee that we all use are loosely modeled off of

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 13>a human brain. However, there's a lot of complexities there.

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:32.280
<v Speaker 13>The human brain has a lot of neurons. It's difficult

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 13>to understand. And so the idea is that a worm brain,

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 13>if you can still get some reasoning out of it,

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 13>might be simpler and actually more intuitive to study than

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:43.800
<v Speaker 13>a more complex human brain like system.

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 2>But I thought worms were again not here. Not to

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 2>be a biologist, but aren't worms the type of creatures

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 2>that are incredibly simple and don't necessarily have reasoning capabilities

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 2>akin to other animals let's say a pig, for example.

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Could a neural network designed after a worm brain actually

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 2>bring us in terms of AI?

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Look, it is still you know, experimental technology that

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 13>they're stealing up, but actually in some early research that

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 13>the founders did, they were showing that potentially this kind

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:17.720
<v Speaker 13>of tech could be used to steer self driving cars

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.479
<v Speaker 13>to help analyze that data. So there's big potential here

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 13>and you always have to be open to exploring you

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 13>and sometimes kind of almost incredible sounding models in AI.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 13>And I think this is a reflection of investor interest

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 13>in going beyond kind of the standard transformer neural network

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 13>type models that we use just.

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Envisioning a worm being driving a self driving car. But

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 2>that's neither here nor there. Some real money coming into

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 2>this in some established companies, not just vcs, but also

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 2>establish publicly traded firms that are betting big on this tech.

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 13>Who's there, that's right, So AMD is a lead investor,

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 13>and you know, again, I think this reflects sort of

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 13>the interests that we're seeing and going beyond what's been

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 13>out there for a while now, which are transformer based models.

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think what would be sort of the

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 2>test to see when this technology or if this technology works,

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 2>because this is such a hefty valuation for something that

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 2>at this point is in the early stages. Or does

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 2>that just show that there's so much exuberance for AI

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 2>out there.

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 13>I think the proof will be in the putting about

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 13>these models. You know, there are some early tests that

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 13>they've brun. These are you know, benchmarks that they do internally,

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 13>seeing that on certain tasks this is competitive with some

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 13>of the similar sized, more traditional models out there. But again,

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 13>you know, it's one thing to test something in a lab.

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 13>It's another thing when you go out there and get

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 13>this product in front of people. Is it actually providing value?

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 13>I think that will be the ultimate sign of whether

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 13>this is going to work on a bigger scale.

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Seren, always good to see you, Thanks so much for

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 2>joining us. Thank you, Bumberg Technology, Bloomberg. Serene Gafari here

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 2>in the studio that is going to do it for

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 2>this Faraday edition of a Bloomberg Technology. Don't forget to

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 2>check out our podcast. You can find it on the

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 2>terminal as well as online. On Apple, Spotify, and iHeart

0:42:57.520 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 2>this is Bloomberg.

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 13>Thank you wh