1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,800
Speaker 1: All right, let's get our next guest. We joined by

2
00:00:01,800 --> 00:00:05,960
Speaker 1: Derek Scissors, chief economists at China Beige Book, and they're

3
00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:08,480
Speaker 1: discussing that slew of economic data that we got out

4
00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:11,160
Speaker 1: of China by surprise yesterday and what comes next after

5
00:00:11,480 --> 00:00:14,920
Speaker 1: Chinese president and chuging things security a third term. First

6
00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:18,960
Speaker 1: of all, the data itself sort of perhaps belied that

7
00:00:19,480 --> 00:00:24,000
Speaker 1: speculation that it was delayed simply because it was bad,

8
00:00:24,079 --> 00:00:27,360
Speaker 1: because GDP was better than expected, and we had other

9
00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:29,400
Speaker 1: bits and bombs of data which were better than expected.

10
00:00:29,400 --> 00:00:32,440
Speaker 1: Apart from, of course, retail sales. That gives a sense

11
00:00:32,440 --> 00:00:36,680
Speaker 1: what the picture it drew for you. I do think

12
00:00:36,760 --> 00:00:38,360
Speaker 1: the second quarter the third quarter was better than the

13
00:00:38,360 --> 00:00:40,640
Speaker 1: second quarter. I don't think that's unreasonable. Second quarter was

14
00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:44,280
Speaker 1: terrible due to the Shanghai lockdown that was mentioned earlier,

15
00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:47,600
Speaker 1: among other things. I do think also that the data

16
00:00:47,640 --> 00:00:49,880
Speaker 1: has been massage to make it look a little better

17
00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:53,600
Speaker 1: than it actually is. I think the three third quarter

18
00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:58,639
Speaker 1: GDP growth is probably off by half percent or more.

19
00:00:58,760 --> 00:01:00,360
Speaker 1: Maybe it's more in the low three. He's on the

20
00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:05,000
Speaker 1: high threes. That is an effect on on annual TDP growth. Um.

21
00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:07,400
Speaker 1: I think even you know the retail sales are the weakness.

22
00:01:07,520 --> 00:01:09,680
Speaker 1: They were reported as gaining three point five percent in

23
00:01:09,720 --> 00:01:11,800
Speaker 1: the third quarter, but import growth to the third quarter

24
00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:15,200
Speaker 1: was below which is pretty hard to reconcile with with

25
00:01:15,280 --> 00:01:18,920
Speaker 1: stronger consumption from the second quarter. UM, So I think

26
00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:22,040
Speaker 1: the data. I think it's legitimate for China to say, hey,

27
00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:23,720
Speaker 1: the economy got better in the third quarter. I think

28
00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:26,119
Speaker 1: it did, but I also think that it was puffed

29
00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:28,479
Speaker 1: up a little bit for the Party Congress and still

30
00:01:28,600 --> 00:01:31,360
Speaker 1: plenty of issues from Maine. So we've had this route

31
00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:33,680
Speaker 1: in Chinese assets, and you do have some like Marko

32
00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:36,640
Speaker 1: Kolanovich and and others as well saying that this could

33
00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:40,560
Speaker 1: be an opportunity that doesn't support the fundamentals. But but

34
00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:42,600
Speaker 1: I think we do need to say that it could

35
00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:44,880
Speaker 1: be different this time. I mean, we may not get

36
00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:48,960
Speaker 1: a bounce because President she he's not going anywhere, and

37
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:53,000
Speaker 1: he hasn't shown um the likelihood to change very much.

38
00:01:53,040 --> 00:01:55,640
Speaker 1: And so the campaign to reign in the private sector

39
00:01:55,720 --> 00:01:58,640
Speaker 1: maybe with us for a long time. Yeah, I think

40
00:01:58,680 --> 00:02:01,120
Speaker 1: that's the right take. I mean, we've seen Wall Street,

41
00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:04,880
Speaker 1: including JP Morgan say again and again and again, Okay,

42
00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:07,280
Speaker 1: you know, now China is going to turn around and

43
00:02:07,360 --> 00:02:10,440
Speaker 1: it doesn't. I suppose if you make the prediction ten times,

44
00:02:10,480 --> 00:02:12,120
Speaker 1: you're gonna be right once and then say, look, I

45
00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:14,520
Speaker 1: was right. But the key point is what you raised,

46
00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:17,840
Speaker 1: which is fundamentals include policy. They include the development model

47
00:02:17,880 --> 00:02:20,440
Speaker 1: that you're that you're trying to implement, and China is

48
00:02:20,480 --> 00:02:22,560
Speaker 1: not trying to implement a development model that a lot

49
00:02:22,600 --> 00:02:25,120
Speaker 1: of people want them to implement. Uh. They want to

50
00:02:25,320 --> 00:02:27,840
Speaker 1: turn back to growth and to think that more prosperity

51
00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:30,600
Speaker 1: for private business is really important. And that's just it

52
00:02:30,639 --> 00:02:32,480
Speaker 1: hasn't been the case. It hasn't been the case before

53
00:02:32,520 --> 00:02:35,880
Speaker 1: COVID shooting, paying attack the private sector in China. Before

54
00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:38,680
Speaker 1: COVID started, he wasn't exactly pro private sector before that.

55
00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:42,560
Speaker 1: So I think saying the fundamentals in China are good

56
00:02:42,840 --> 00:02:46,560
Speaker 1: misses a policy environment where China is not trying to

57
00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:49,120
Speaker 1: do with a lot of foreign observers wanted to do.

58
00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:52,400
Speaker 1: It's instead trying to make itself more independent, which is

59
00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:55,920
Speaker 1: a very different thing than growing quickly. This is it,

60
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:58,440
Speaker 1: isn't it. I mean, it's meant to be about qualitative

61
00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:01,400
Speaker 1: and not quantitative growth right now. But you know that's

62
00:03:01,440 --> 00:03:04,720
Speaker 1: one way of looking at it. I suppose I mean,

63
00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:06,960
Speaker 1: you know, if you depends on what you mean by qualitative.

64
00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:09,040
Speaker 1: I do think there's less pollution in China, so that

65
00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:11,960
Speaker 1: that's a positive. They do want to have better jobs,

66
00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:14,880
Speaker 1: not not make shift construction jobs the way that they

67
00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:18,280
Speaker 1: were creating when when the labor force was expanding really rapidly.

68
00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:21,120
Speaker 1: But another element of quality for Shijing Ping, I think

69
00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:23,760
Speaker 1: it's pretty clear is if we're less dependent on the

70
00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:25,359
Speaker 1: rest of the world and the world rest of the

71
00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:28,800
Speaker 1: world is more dependent on us, that's good growth. I'd

72
00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:32,120
Speaker 1: rather have three percent growth like that than six or

73
00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:36,440
Speaker 1: seven percent growth where I fear my political opponents overseas,

74
00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:39,280
Speaker 1: for example in the United States, have more leverage, So

75
00:03:39,320 --> 00:03:42,760
Speaker 1: that's another element of quality for him. Quality growth is

76
00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:46,440
Speaker 1: a political term as well as an economic and environmental term. Well,

77
00:03:46,520 --> 00:03:49,960
Speaker 1: let's talk about quality of policymaking, because you know, that's

78
00:03:50,040 --> 00:03:51,880
Speaker 1: one of the reasons why we've seen the sell off

79
00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:54,960
Speaker 1: in Chinese assets is that it's it's not just that

80
00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:58,120
Speaker 1: all the power rests with shijin Ping, it's that some

81
00:03:58,160 --> 00:04:00,880
Speaker 1: people will be appointed into position ends out of loyalty

82
00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:05,480
Speaker 1: rather than out of the quality of management. I think

83
00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:09,920
Speaker 1: that's that's reasonable. I don't know how important it is. Um,

84
00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:12,720
Speaker 1: did the people who were in these positions before have

85
00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:17,360
Speaker 1: any discretion? I don't. I almost hesitate to name people's names.

86
00:04:17,360 --> 00:04:20,960
Speaker 1: But the current I think did. Right. Lee Ka Chong

87
00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:24,320
Speaker 1: sort of stood up to President she in some ways

88
00:04:24,680 --> 00:04:29,120
Speaker 1: uh and actually changed the policy making a structure at

89
00:04:29,160 --> 00:04:33,839
Speaker 1: the State Council. Uh. He didn't. He wasn't able to

90
00:04:34,279 --> 00:04:37,359
Speaker 1: modify zero COVID. Um. He didn't stop the attack on

91
00:04:37,360 --> 00:04:40,800
Speaker 1: the private sector in two thousand nineteen. Um. You know,

92
00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:43,240
Speaker 1: there are a lot of examples. You may be right,

93
00:04:43,360 --> 00:04:45,800
Speaker 1: don't get me wrong. I I'm not saying that, Oh,

94
00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:47,880
Speaker 1: we know what really goes on behind the scenes, and

95
00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:50,960
Speaker 1: maybe Lee Ka Chong had more influence than we think.

96
00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:53,120
Speaker 1: But if he did have more influence than we think,

97
00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:57,080
Speaker 1: imagine how bad in terms of of you know, growth

98
00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:01,320
Speaker 1: model China would be following. Because things have not been

99
00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:05,280
Speaker 1: good in terms of Chinese economic policy maximizing prosperity. It's

100
00:05:05,320 --> 00:05:08,880
Speaker 1: accomplished other goals, but not maximizing prosperity. If Lee has

101
00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:11,800
Speaker 1: been able to modify that, yes, then we're heading for

102
00:05:11,839 --> 00:05:15,159
Speaker 1: big trouble. But I don't think it's because of quality.

103
00:05:15,279 --> 00:05:18,360
Speaker 1: I think it's because who has influence over she I

104
00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:21,039
Speaker 1: think that's the question more than well. And I think

105
00:05:21,040 --> 00:05:23,880
Speaker 1: that the general gist of the question was that policymaking

106
00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:27,000
Speaker 1: may not get better from here. Oh I don't just

107
00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:29,720
Speaker 1: thank that. No, there's no reason to think that it would.

108
00:05:29,760 --> 00:05:31,440
Speaker 1: I don't know why anyone would have thought that a

109
00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:35,839
Speaker 1: week ago exactly as the point it could get, it

110
00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:39,760
Speaker 1: could get worse, depending upon I suppose you know what

111
00:05:39,839 --> 00:05:44,360
Speaker 1: you think. Um, you know the the dividing line is, Derek,

112
00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:47,440
Speaker 1: we're out of time. Unfortunately. Derek Scissors, chief economist at

113
00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:48,240
Speaker 1: China Bag Book