WEBVTT - Inflation, Regional Bank Earnings, Cannabis, & Nickel

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's get to Danielle

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>d Martino Booth. We're very fortunate to have her in

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>our studio again today because she's based in Dallas, so

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>when she comes to New York, we say, please stop by.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Danielle d Martino Booth, CEO and chief strategist for Quill Intelligence.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, Danielle, we haven't chatted with you for a

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>little while here. What is your view about what our

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>federal Reserve is going to do here? Given all the

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>economic data that we've got today and the recession yesterday

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>and the recession called they used the R word. Yes, wow,

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>they're being so forthright. But to Matt's point, we're like

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in a time compression chamber. Everything's happening so much more

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>quickly than it used to. I mean, we we've got

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation expectations that are collapsing, lapsing among households. Forget the cps,

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>forget the pipe. Dude, you are doing the Tesla story yesterday. Yeah,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I know you're saying right, Tesla buyers are now going

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>to wait and see when the next price cuts come.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And the mindset among you as households has done a

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>complete one complete one eighty. Cox's Automotive came out and

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>said that in the first week of April, applications to

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>finance a car loan we're down twenty three percent year

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>over year. I mean, this is happening so fast, and

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's what we have to appreciate about

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>how aggressive and fast the FED was. So you're long

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and variable, it's like short and sweet. Yeah. By the way,

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>on the loan front, I've been hearing the word credit

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>crunch more and more often. I think Neil cash Car

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>he said it on one of the Sunday shows a

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, and now everybody's starting to use

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that phrase. I've all seen seen some survey data that

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>shows consumers aren't getting loans, not because rates are too high,

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but because the banks are being tighter and tight up

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>with the money. Is that is that true. Are you

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing that in the data? CarMax came out yesterday, CarMax

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was, it was on the terminal. CarMax

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>came out yesterday, and they were like, we're not gonna

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>make as many loans. Our standards are tightening quickly. Capital

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>One pulled all of its floor lines for for dealers,

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>so you know, used card dealerships are going to start

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>dropping like flies because they paid up in January. They've

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>paid up in February at auction, which Mannheim Data told us,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>and then income tax refund season for US households was

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. Ye, So you're you're down eleven percent year

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>over year and people don't have as much cash as

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they thought they were gonna have. Now we're gonna start

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 1>seeing income receipts, which Janet Yellen is praying please bring

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the receipts in because the nation's checking account is down

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>to like one hundred billion. It's like, you know, she's

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>getting calls saying, you know you've hit your minimum balance?

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Are we really? Because Steve Rattner rode An op ed

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in The New York Times a couple of weeks ago

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>saying he wants people to come back to work and

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you should really do it, you know, twelve hours a day,

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>sixties and an MD at Goldman, Sorry, but only mds.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, what does that mean for the non MD

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>The one thing he one, well, that means they're they're

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna make those kids come in. The one thing that

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought the most interesting takeaway was that at least

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in his estimate, there's still a lot more money in

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>UM consumers bank accounts, checking accounts then there was, you know,

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>prepen heavily concentrated among the older and the wealthier. Okay,

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point, you the burn rate for people making

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy five thousand dollars fifty thousand dollars, that burn rate,

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>they burned through the cash. In fact, if you look

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at the fiscal impulse, it turned negative in a big

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>way in the fourth quarter of twenty twenty two, and

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal impulses continued to get lower. And remember they

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>your average American family that was getting receiving food stamps

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was cut by two hundred and thirty three dollars a month.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And you have seen there is really good granular data

0:03:54.720 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that shows that grocery shopping receipts are collapsing. People are

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot less at the grocery store. This is like,

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this is before you were born, Matt. But you remember

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Hamburger Helper. Sure, And this was the thing in the

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>late seventies and eighties. It's that people switched away from

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>steak to ground beef, and how can I make ground

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>beef interesting for the family. We're seeing that in grocery stores.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing. Ever since I grew this beard, people think,

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, I'm a lot younger than I am.

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I look so much younger with the beard, but I

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>was actually born in nineteen seventy three. Believe I can

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>go on with my day now. Yeah, I've got a listener,

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>an investor, a Bloomberg client who writes in. And first

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of all, he hasn't said it, but I know he

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>has seen you speak before and he's a big fan,

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's a b. He's got a question for you.

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Why does the market interpret a FED cut in late

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty three as a positive and not as the negative

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that it is supposed to be viewed as rate cuts

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>mean bad things with the economy. Yet SMP forty one

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred teams like no one cares and stunks. Yeah, it's

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a direct look at the VIX. I mean it's it's

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't all all is good here. I'm not so old

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that I look at the visail well, I look at

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>zero dated zero days. So these two exoptions, right with

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>with deference to the individual asking the question, I think

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what people need to be prepared for is that the

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>last rate hike on May third does not mean that

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>quantitative tightening ends. So I don't think that. I don't

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe Powell. I believe Powell in saying there's no

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>rate cut in twenty twenty three. He doesn't care what

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>markets are pricing in. He has talked markets back off

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of their cliff over and over and over again. People

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are like, but the markets pricing it in, And I'm like,

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just wait from to open his mouth. And he's done

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this since March of twenty twenty two. Nobody realizes that,

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we just had the largest draw down of

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's balance sheet in the most recent week in

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the history of mankind. That's how many treasuries rolled off

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>so QT and you know, it's it's what Mike McKee,

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like the Super Bowl every Thursday afternoon and every

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Friday afternoon, waiting for everybody knows what the H four

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and the H eight are. Now it's like, how did

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what is four? And I know the weeds. I know

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>about the Fed's balance sheet. You know, I know what

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>about bank balance sheets. But everybody's watching it so closely

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>because the credit crunch is happening way fast. Commercial lending

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is more than ever before. You know, we we we

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>used to interview company CEOs on bloomber TV. We used

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about company stocks. Now it's just fed from

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>daybreak to sunday. You know. It's what company CEOs want

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to know is why they can't get the CNI loans

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that they want. Remember, we're in an inventory correction. So

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in most operation managers lives, it's been just in time

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>inventory and now it's just in case. So they're sitting

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>on an inventory that's that is the shortest rate you

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can possibly name. Operating expensive companies don't know what to do.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I would not want to be a CFO right now.

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So is a recession now in I think we are

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>in recession recession. I think we are in a receptive

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I think when it goes is it deep? Is it

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>because it well, well, the FETE says it's going to

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>be mild, right, right, I just how can we be

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in a recession with three and a half percent unemployment

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and use cars still going from like new car prices

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>plus new car prices are unaffordable for everybody but the

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>top like three percent. That's very true. But we have

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>seen new car prices fall below MSRP for the first

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>time in twenty months. New car prices have come down

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>three months in a row, and judging by how buyers

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>view car prices, we ran it in this morning's data.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It's Mary Barra's promise to maintain profit margins and hold

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>up high prices and not do incentive spending. That might work,

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's not gonna work for her competitors. She's holding

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the line, but Ford is following Tesla and cutting thank you, yeah, yea,

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So all right, so fed raises here May third, and

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>then is are you kind of with everybody else that

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>they're just gonna kind of hang and see what happens

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and look at the data. They're gonna hang and roll

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>their balance sheet down. There was a report that came

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>out of the New York Fed a few days ago

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that said, well, the balance sheet, we expect the balance

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>She's gonna be six trillion dollars in twenty twenty five.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, incorporate that into your thinking. The New York

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Fed thinks that quantitative tightening is going to continue for

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the next two years. The market is saying zero interest rates,

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>zero bound. They're not talking about cute little twenty five

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>bases point rate cuts. They're talking about gwen to the

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>zero bound immediately and restarting quantitative easing. That's what the

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>market wants. The market just doesn't believe the FED put

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is going away. The market is like your kids, Paul.

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>You've cut them off the payroll. It's been a couple

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of years, but they know the worst comes to worse

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>when the s hits the fan. They can still go

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the bank of Dad. When they mean absolutely

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they have that back. Now. I'm trying to cut that

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>off right down. Yeah, they're good though it I mean

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't, they don't come. It's it's it's pretty good

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>so far, all right, So because they have jobs, because

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>everybody has wait until these FED rate hikes put those

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>kids out of jobs and then all of a sudden,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a new roommate in summit or done.

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Any what you're seeing I mean, you're the entire Northeastern

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>corridor has rising jobless claims from Maine to Pennsylvania. The

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>entire Exceller route. That's my that's my top of my

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>feather tomorrow. The entire exceler route is seeing rising initial

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>jobless claims. And so it's like the recession recognition is

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>coming hard and fast, and it goes right along with

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>what you were saying right before I came on with

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea of long and variable labs being really short. Yeah,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, So I guess is inflation. I mean, what's

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest concern for you out there in this economy? Right? Yeah,

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 1>if inflation is coming down, although at this morning and

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the sticking around these levels, uh, if inflation is coming down,

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and if unemployment is still you know, at a record low. Um,

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this recession feels okay to me. How long is it

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna last? It's gonna last until your neighbor loses their job,

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>right yep? And then and and and that's why I

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>think that we're not really prepared. I think we're going

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to see an unemployment rate shock because everything seems to

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>come like like a with with a bullet. Everything's so

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>dramatic that when it happens. I mean, if we looked

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>at realtors realature's income in the PPI report this morning,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like hockey stick going up and it

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's just collapsed coming down. Yeah, I believe that,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and sold so many at high prices last year exactly,

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's just except for Paul's house on the shore,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's welcome. And then we saw, yeah, the consumer price

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in next Hi, what was the data we saw I did.

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>What was the data we saw um Personal health up

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>six point eight percent in the CPI yesterday? Child that

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>was childcare. Childcare costs are sore. I'm here to tell

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you as a man with a two and a half

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>year old kid. Look, I just came back from Berlin,

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>where childcare is luxurious and free. I did not expect

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it to cost me the average American way. Look at

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>where we look at where the job openings are still

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>really strong, childcare, nursing homes, home healthcare workers. Those individuals

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>are coming back into the labor force, but for now

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>there's still there's still a deficit of these workers. So

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you pay through the nose for childcare. Those apps and jewels, Yes,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, this was an extended block. We're really appreciate

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you taking the time. Danielle Danielle di Martino Booth. She's

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a CEO and chief strategist at Quill Intelligence. Highly recommend

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>follow the Dallas fed You store Dallas fed fed Up,

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>fed Up still my favorite. Great follow on Twitter, even

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>though I'm off Twitter, but great following Twitter. Some good

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 1>stuff committed Twitter side. Yes after Facebook. Yeah, I'm done. Done.

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Team Cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am easting on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>I Heard Radio app and the Bloomberg Business App. We're

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. Right now

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>when you want to talk about these markets here, we're

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring in a professional, Phil Tase. He's a CEO

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of Tay's Asset Management. He joins us here in our

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Phil, the last time I think

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw you, or maybe maybe the time before that,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>we have in our notes ninety percent of the terms

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>assets were in cash, with the remaining ten percent in

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>defensive fixed income. Is that still the case for you, guys,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not. It was a great place to be in

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, but it is it has not this year.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So our algorithms bar trend following funds moved us back

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>into the markets the beginning on January the eighteenth, and

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>then we came fully back in over the next couple

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of days. We had one brief period when we're out

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>just harshly in March for a couple of days, but

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>we've been just enjoying the rally. So let's talk about

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>your new fund. It's the Tay's Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF.

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>And tell us first of all, what it does. Okay,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's a different way of trying to address risk

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>than leaving the markets. And what it is is it's

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>an SMP five hundred type of ETF, but it has

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>full notional options for tection on a leap that's two

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>years out that we buy every year in December. Here's

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what's super important. If all you're doing is buying the

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>equities market, but you're and hedging but not figuring out

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a way to pay for that, you're going to give

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>up most of the above inflation gains. And that's why

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so few people end up doing options over the long term. Well,

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>so what we also do. Inside of that ETFs, we

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>sell shorter dated calls sixty and ninety days out about

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>five percent above the market. We also sell some put

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>spreads and that brings in a premium each month that

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>helps pay for that put protection. Now, the other important

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>component of this, the way this works is that options

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>need to be dynamically managed. So if we have that

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>leap and it's at the market and the the markets advanced

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>ten or twenty percent in the year, you need to

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to roll that price up to the market

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>so you can bring your protection higher. Here's another super

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>important point. If the market plummets, we can roll the

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>leap down and monetize it. So the key to success

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with options when you're in the equities market is figuring

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>out a way to both pay for the protection but

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>also monetize and when you have wins when the market

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>move lower. I gotta say it for I feel like

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for me and Paul, we need illustrations options. I'm just

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of lost there. But what I do know

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is that on you know, in money markets, in short

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>duration treasury ETFs, you're getting four or five six percent, right,

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So what kind of returns can you get in something

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>like the agility Shares Managed Risk ETF well, so over

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>its history we have around a seventy percent capture and

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a forty percent down capture. But if the market would

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>enter into free fall, which we didn't really see in

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, we think you could have more offsetting

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciation in those puts and less market down capture than

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>forty percent. So I'll summarize it. It's a way to

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be in the market with potentially dramatically less risk on

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the downside and a way to pay for that risk protection.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, So mr SK is the ticker, yes, and

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just kind of summary. The holdings are mostly options M

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>risk managed risk. So actually no, the holdings are mainly

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>just the S and P five hundred, okay, using options

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to both you know, address the possibility of it down

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, options to help pay you for that. So,

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>so what is your view of the market. We've had

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole slew of economic data just recently on an

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation front suggesting that may be cooling. We're gonna have

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>earnings kicking off tomorrow with some of the banks. How

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>are you guys viewing this market, which, by the way,

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>we should point out, you know yesterday's CPI and today's

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>PPI as fascinating. Well as boring as yesterday's CPI was

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and as fascinating as today's PPI was, they're not really

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>moving the markets, right, We're still up year to date

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on the S and P seven and a half percent, right, right, Okay,

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give you two views. One is short term.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Over the short term, markets are like teenagers, and sometimes

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be like a group of teenagers. And if

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you get a momentum driven equity market that's higher than

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like a group of teenagers with beers, right, it's

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>not it's not rational, it doesn't make sense. Over the

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>longer term, they're buying ripped genesre ripped genes again. So

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>over the longer term, we have a lot of challenges.

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>One thing that's not talked about at all that I'm

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in the process of right the paper right now is

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the global debt situation unprecedented. The consequences I think will

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be significant. That's more than we have time for in

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this segment. But also we've addressed that though in the past. Okay,

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it's nuts. So especially when you look at I thought

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent interest rates would have been unbearable in the eighties,

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and someone reminded me, we had a debt to GDP

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>back then, have like twenty or thirty percent. Now five

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>percent hurt just as much because we have debt to

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>GDP of like one hundred and twenty percent exactly. And

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the last time we had one hundred percent of debt

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to GDP was after World War Two. The thing that

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>saved us then was GDP growth, where we grew for

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty years at eight percent a year. That's not going

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to happen right now. So we have all the kinds

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of other outcomes. But you know, I was listening to

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>your conversation earlier about the potential for a recession, and

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you still have this enormous wealth effect. So

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>even though we may enter into a recession, we can't

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ignore the fact that everyone has so much money. Wealth

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to GDP is near record levels in the US. Well,

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Danielle is saying that that's pretty skewed, like the wealthy

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>have so much money. That's true. That is true. So

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that it's going to be a

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>grind down, but longer term, looking at where valuations are,

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately it's not a great story, So we're

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>still looking at potentially you know, I was just listening

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to clip again of Mike Wilson. We might agree with

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>him sort of over the next twelve to eighteen months

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>where we think we've got a tough slog, big baby.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>So last year you were in so much cash, do

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you envision kind of getting back to anything close to that? Yeah? Totally,

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And what would push you there? Just were we used

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>We follow trends. So the reason we're in is because

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the market has begun to move up, and so we

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>try to buy in in the early stages based on

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>how our systems are built and so then that allows

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>us to participate. But if the market turns down, I

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>was just looking now, if the market moves down only

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>about like about one and a half percent, we're going

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to sell range again. So it won't take a lot

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for us to sell. Sometimes there are false signals right

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>where we can come out and then back in again.

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But the key is if that happens, you know, the

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>world is long, right, the world is betting on fam

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>of French they're scared to do anything but just be

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in the markets. But most investors they really can't afford that. Oh,

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the mean works. They need to worry about their own

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>specific lives and address risk, all right, So with that

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in mind, other than managed risk, what else are you buying?

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>What else do you want to own right now? Well,

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so we are specialists in just owning indo season figuring

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>out ways to hedge that risk, right, So we do

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>have a strategy that So basically MRSK is your wheel

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>house MRSK or we have you know, a couple of

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>other funds THHLGX, THHSMX funds. Those are our trend following

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>algo funds and those will move into cash inside the

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>funds themselves. So we just like right now being in

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the markets. I mean, you know, we thought small cap

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was going to do well. Now we've seen that sort

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of fall off a ledge recently, so we haven't seen that.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But just own the market broadly right now, we think.

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But the most important advice I would give to investors

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>is that you need to figure out a way to

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>address contingencies. Right don't bet for markets are going to

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>move higher or betas are going to move lower. Bet

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>since stay with the markets, but figure out a way

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to address the possibility. We think it's a significant possibility

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that markets are going to move lower. So do you

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>even care? Given you your style and kind of the

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>way you guys do things, you care about earnings, you're

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna pay attention to that stuff. Yeah, yeah, Well we

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>not actually not really no, because we're just gonna follow

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>trends one way or another. We keep hoping someone's going

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to care about earnings. Really does in terms of the

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>ETF business, I mean we've seen it now grow to

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>what ten trillion dollars globally, I mean across the industry, right,

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and people will continue to convert mutual funds into ets,

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>people continue to bring out new products. Last year was

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>amazing and they're still You've just brought out a new

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>product yourself. How do you see this market growing? Yeah,

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I just think that ETFs are going to grow because

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>they have lower expense racers. There's a lot of stuff

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that goes on with some of these custodians, big custodians

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>where they charge sort of users fees to mutual funds

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that live there. So there's incentive to convert over to

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ETFs and avoid all those fees. Plus they can trade

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>them for free. So I think that all is just

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to the movement over there. But the

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>one thing about that most of these ETFs are just

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>buy and hold the market and own it forever and

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>their inb indussees you know that has worked extremely well

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>for the last twenty years. But is active is very hot? Right? Well?

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, I honestly who cares, right because

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>active or beta, if the market falls off a cliff

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and move down twenty or thirty percent, you're gonna be

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about being down twenty eight percent versus thirty two, right.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you need things that can really address risk.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I think and people the thing that people

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't thinking thinking about is the possibility of multi year declines.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>The longest decline we've had in the last twenty years

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>has been the great you know, the financial crisis, and

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that was about a sixteen month decline. People aren't thinking

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>about the possibility multi year declines, and those are going

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to hit in disease hard. All right. It's making my

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>stomach hurts. You can't come in again. There's a lot

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of risk out there that's multi year declines. Yeah, I

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's I thought that was over. That was

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>generations again ago, exactly good right now, And so let's

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>just enjoy it for the moment. Okay, Yeah, that's my strategy,

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, Phil Tas, thank you so much for joining us.

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Phil Tas, CEO of Tay's Asset Management, joining us live

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>here on our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Again, kind of

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at the markets here, Matt just kind of s

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and p up about a half of one percent, so,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little bit of a lift off of

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that PPI data. But maybe we thought we might have

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>gotten a little we might have gotten a little bit more,

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see. You're listening to the Take cancerre Live

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>from our flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven thirty. Now, we were kind of bummed out

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>yesterday because we talked to Morgan Paxia, who runs the

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Poseidon Investment management firm. They have a weed etf the

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>ticker is PSDN. But we only got a few minutes

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with them, and also it was raining and in Miami.

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah then, which makes it even worse. He's there at

0:21:55.840 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the Benzinga. I guess it's a weed conference down there.

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 1>We got him back on the line, and I'm glad

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to spend some time Morgan. Thanks so much

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for coming back and joining us again. I was kind

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of joking around that you were harsh and my mellow

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and you needed to reach for some sativa yesterday. And

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we do kind of tend to joke around about smoking

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>weed on this show, but there are serious there are

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>important reasons for marijuana use, legalization and use. You and

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:30.959
<v Speaker 1>your sister started this investment management company because of a

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>difficult time losing your father in the nineties, and you

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>realized I guess then that you know, if we'd had

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>been legal and hadn't had as much of a stigma,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it would have been easier for him to go through

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to the next phase. So talk to us about that

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and how successful you've been. That's right, Well, thank you

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>for having me back. Today is a much sunnier day

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>after one and one thousand year rain event we had

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>down here in Florida, so pretty pretty wild times. But yes,

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for Emily and I was certainly was a passion project

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>initially just seeing that firsthand, what could have happened I

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>guess so to speak, right, where where do you want

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to see someone find some comfort in their final days

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and just not even having something that should be readily

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>available as an option not be and actually be thought

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of in a negative way. You know, that just all

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>seemed very wrong. And I'll tell you you know, we've

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for ten years now, and the amount

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of people we've talked to over the years that came

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to this industry with that same familial kind of experience

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>where they had a family member that was sick, they

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>saw benefits, right, So we actually got to see the

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>positive sides for so many people. And that's how it

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>changes a stigma, is when you get that firsthand experience

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, a great thing about this industry as

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different applications. Sure you have that

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>wellness perspective, and we're even seeing people that do find

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially some medicinal benefits for it. But it

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>just should be a legal, regulated option for people instead

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of pushing it to the illicit market. That just doesn't work, right.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>We've learned this over again. Hey Morgan, you know Matt

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and I have you know kind of learned a lot

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.719
<v Speaker 1>about the business of cannabis over the last several years

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>as more and more states have legalized it. One of

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that we've come to understand from speaking to

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>people like you is just the whole financial side of

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>funding the cannabis industry. Talk to us about what you're

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing there. I can't imagine some of the banking stresses

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen over the last several months or several

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks with some of these regional lenders can be very helpful.

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the banking side. Sure, yeah, So

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>banking has been an ongoing challenge in our industry where

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>though people have access to deposit, that's really it. So

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>there's been a big growth of In the earlier days,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we had very strong equity support right where you could

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>raise rounds of equity venture capital that we've done private

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>rounds or even when when these companies got public, you

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>know you could do secondaries and then debt financing from

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>private groups or the riis became very prevalent. But all

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of that has been very tight and I think when

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you when you look at these when these banks now

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>are are just really pulling back, retrenching on lending um

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>that just raises risk, the price of risk and the

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>availability of it right becomes even more scarce. And I

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>think that's certainly is the case for our industry. But

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we're two years into a very tight capital market, so

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>our industry has had to find its own way. Regardless

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of this, banking progress has not been happening. Right. We

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>thought we were actually close to seeing some banking reform

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>late last year, but it didn't happen, and so our

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.959
<v Speaker 1>industry has had to focus on being self funding, becoming

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>cash generative businesses. Well, Morgan, I've been thinking about this

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>for a while because of the Safe Banking Act, and

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we've been following the progress in Washington, DC, or lack thereof, right, right,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought that's what was holding back Weed stocks. But

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>then we got till Ray results and you and I

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about this briefly yesterday. Why would a company like

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 1>that have a drop in revenue year over year? I mean,

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't this a burgeoning business? Isn't this I mean I

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have to imagine that weed sales across the country every

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>year just climb and climb and climb. Are they stagnating? Well,

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Tilray doesn't do business in the US They are a

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Canadian company. They're listed in the US, but they're and

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they have you know, they have their Canadian business, but

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they also have European business, and they do a lot

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in alcohol now too. They're almost more of a beer

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>company than they are a cannabis company. So there's some

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>specific things within their business. Okay, peculiarly Cresco. I don't

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>know who makes the Kiva things, but they're brilliant. I mean,

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't these sales off the hook? So what's happening is

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you have unit growth, but because there was an overbuilt capacity,

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we had a lot of price compression, and so even

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>though positive unit growth, the total dollars in certain markets

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>were actually down. But we're getting through that process, right,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>capacity is being rational, lies we're seeing continued demand and

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>more access, so it's rebalancing that whole issue of oversupply

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and price compression. So with that unit growth. But I mean,

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like Michigan, as I mentioned, I think yesterday for or

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>actually came out afterwards. Michigan in two hundred and fifty

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in legal sales in the month of March,

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and they've had some of the most aggressive price compression

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last year, so they're actually overcoming that price

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>compression with such strong unit growth, and that's we look

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at both, right, and you know, we're big investors in

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a data company called Headsets, so we're constantly looking at

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>these trends and looking at data across all these different markets.

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>But like legacy markets like California, we've seen that very

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>significant price compression and so it's been more flat. So

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>once we get through that phase, we think we'll start

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to see much more attractive top line growth. Businesses are bored. Yeah,

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds left, Morgan, what's the next big thing

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking out for that maybe you're looking to

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>invest in. We're still very much focused on cannabis. We

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of opportunities. Yeah, within the cannabis space.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>What's the next we should be looking for? Yeah, So

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we think states like Missouri are doing great job. There's

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:06.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of movement in the South, so we think

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>those are really interesting markets. So we're still doing work

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on the operating side, but we're also very passionate and

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 1>see opportunity on the technology side, so we're doing work

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>with private companies on the tech side. There's really not

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>much yet in the public markets that we find very

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>attractive on the tech side, that is, so you know,

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>if you look at our et F there's really not

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>much there yet, but always looking, always looking, because we

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of return there. All right, Morgan,

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for taking the time to come back

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to us today. I know we did. We got cut

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a little short yesterday, so we had so much more

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we want to cover with you said, thanks for making

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the time there. Morgan Paxi East co founder along with

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>his sister, and he's managing partner of Poseidon Investment Management

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that Poseidon Dynamic Cannabis ETFs tickers p S d N.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you want some some exposure to the cannabis business,

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the ways to go. This is Bloomberg.

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the team. Ken's herline program Bloomberg Markets

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten, AMI's Daring on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I Heard Radio app and the Bloomberg Business App. We're

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>listening on demand wherever you get your podcast got big

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>earning starting tomorrow. But let me ask one of our

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite professionals out there kind of what they're looking at.

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Lizan Son, there's chief Investment strategists from Charles Schwabs. She's

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>got experience, she's got perspective and money at Schwab's got

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of shekels under assets. How many trillion dollars

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Lizan does of assets under manage? Seven trillion dollars? Tiny

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>little seven trillion? Wow, that's amazing. So jeez, all right, Lizanne,

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what are you focused on? Are you focused on the

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Eco screen on the Bloomberg terminal that gives you all

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the PPI and CPI data and all the kind of stuff?

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>What are you really focused on here? So? I you know,

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important. You've seen the needle move a

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit in the last couple of days with regard

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to expectation for whether the set's going to go twenty

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>five on May sir, recent high it was about seventy

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>two percent likelihood with the batch of data that's dropped

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to about sixty six, but clearly still in that direction. Yeah,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everything in both the CPI report was either

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in line or better than expected. It just does show

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the important deceleration, the fact that headline inflation dropped a

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>full percent in terms of CPI. I'm what, I'm sort

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of grappling with is from an equity market perspective, how

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>much of the rally is simply due to the notion

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of a pause or is it a belief in a pivot?

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And I just think that the Goldilocks scenario that seems

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to be part of that narrative of a pivot doesn't

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>make sense because the FED is not going to pivot

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to rate cuts unless you either have much more serious

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>stress in the banking system than what we're seeing now

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and or a much more significant deterioration in the economy

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and specifically the labor market. This notion that the FED

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>would pivot to cuts a pause makes sense. I think

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll do it sooner read them later. But a pivot

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to rate cuts with inflation nowhere near their target, you know,

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be such a hit to their credibility.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And this year luzianne I mean, I had a listener

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>right in earlier he made the point that it doesn't

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>make any sense that the market interprets a FED cut

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three as a positive, because if the

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>FED needs to cut this year, after Jerome Powell has

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>assured us all over and over and over again that

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the FED is not going to cut this year. That

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>would mean something very big has broken or they just

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have no credibility right then it's a credibility problem. I

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>think they understand that the credibility problem pre existed even

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the fall of best feed be Given that they concede,

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they probably waited too long to come off the zero

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>bound and start shrinking the balance sheet. So I just

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I kind of square the whole circle

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of optimism in the equity market unless it's

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>purely a function of just a pause. But as history

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>shows that a pause is not necessarily green light for

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the market, you've got a really mixed bag Historically, post pause.

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, post pause is often when the bigger sort

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of part of a crisis unfold, like was the case

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in O eight. Hey, Luzanne, I'm an old equity analyst.

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Earnings matter to me, so I'm going to be paying

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>attention to this earning cycle that season, even if most

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>others aren't. What are you looking for? What do you

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>expect to see? What are you looking to see out

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of this earnings over the next several weeks. I think

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what's less important in this earning season are the stats

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like the beat eight percent by which companies beat. I

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's the outlook and obvious specificity coming from the

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>financial on what they're seeing across the spectrum of you know,

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>demand outflows, credit tightening, loan demand continuing to come down,

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>net interest margin pressures. But I think it's also the

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>case that analysts are sort of this narrow window they've

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>been operating under in terms of adjusting estimates. Not because

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they're being lazy or they just don't have the foresight,

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just companies are providing less precision and guidance not

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>quite as dire as with the situation during the worst

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the pandemic, when a record percentage of companies

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>just said, we're not just gutting down, we'll withdrawing guidance

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>all together because you know, we have no idea. It's

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten better, but it's still not the kind of clarity.

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So analysts sort of have this, all right, maybe I'll

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>make an adjustment out the next quarter or two, but

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>then wait until we get the current core or commentary

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe make adjustments to the out year. So

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this idea of you know, negative year every year in

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter, in the second quarter, that makes sense.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's still a little bit too high, but then

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 1>you get back into positive territory and the third quarter

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and consensus is that you're back in double ditch a

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 1>growth territory. About the fourth quarter, that's where I think

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>it's the path of leisure. Distance may still be down,

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think we'll have a bit more color on

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that forward twenty twenty three guide and so maybe even

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four that can help with the whole valuation analysis.

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, the recession worries I think really kicked off

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in earnest with SBB and signature. At least I was having,

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, slight heart palpitations, and we did see across

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>banking money move from deposits to money market funds to

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>short term treasury ETFs. I feel like its Schwab. You know,

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a little bit of worry, but the you

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have the real benefit that you have those you know,

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>broker dealer assets, so people who had money could stay

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>inside Schwab. What do you see in terms of the

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>flows there, Well, I don't comment on our stock on

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of internals of what's happening at Schwab. That's

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>you know what that ends are enters our CEO if

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>your corvids are CFO, so I but I think there

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>has been a lot of information and yes, um, you

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>know you're you're quoting what I hope we now all

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>know isn't a firm like ours. It stays you know,

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>within the mothership. So well, that's the benefit. And I

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to ask you about the business of SCHWAB.

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I just mean to ask you know what you're seeing

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:43.919
<v Speaker 1>because you're in you have such an advantageous view over

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>seven trillion dollars in assets. You know, have they come

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit from short term treasuries and money

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>market funds or I mean, what we're seeing in terms

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of flows broadly in the mutual fund space, in the

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>ETF space is consistent with what data from the likes

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of the icies of the world, so broader overall industry

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>data is pretty consistent. There's clearly been a bias toward

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not just cash, higher yielding type investments, but fixed income.

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>There's income and fixed income again, and you've seen those

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>flows on the fixed income side. Obviously, you've also seen

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>flows up the cap spectrum on the equity side, and

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>some renewed interest on the international equity side, which has

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>been a recommendation of ours for some time, not so

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>much sell US by international, but a lot of investors,

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>either because they didn't rebalance or just had a home

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>country bias, let portfolios get a bit over bias toward

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>US over international. So we are seeing a shift there

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>on the equity side to international. But it's you know,

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's as you would expect and somewhat consistent with what

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing with broad industry data. Hey, listen, you know

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 1>so many investors in this marketplace they you know, all

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they've really known over the last ten, twelve, fourteen years

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>has been Tech has been the leader of this market.

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that still the case or they've given up their

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>mantle too. I don't know what industrials are something else.

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you need to see tech leading this market to

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have a broad rally? Not necessarily. In fact, in this

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>particular environment, I think you need to see some stabilization

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and improvement in financials given what that's at the heart

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of in terms of the inner workings of the economy

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. And I think there is this misperception that

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>without tech that you can have a market that does well.

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>We also have to think about how a lot of

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>people think of tech like lowercase T. For instance, you're

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>to day people think, oh it's been a big tech rally. Well,

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>communication services is the best performing sector this year, So

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>there's that kind of trio of sectors comm services, consumer discretionary,

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>where a stock like Amazon falls into consumer discretionary, not tech.

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's these sort of techie companies, and they did

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>represent the lockdown era's kind of defensive names, but they

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>represented the only ecosystem in which we're living. The more

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 1>recent pushback into those names, some of it I think

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is short covering, but some of it I think is

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in this higher interest rate, higher inflation environment, with the

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 1>woes in the banking system and the credit contraction we're

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to see. I think investors are saying, I want

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>big companies that are shorter duration in nature, meaning they

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have cash flows and earnings in here, and now they've

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>got ample cash on the balance sheet, they don't need

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to go to credit markets or the banking system to

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>funder operations. So I think the fundamentals behind the move

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this time are different from what was the case three

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Lizzie, thank you so much for joining us.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate it. As always. Lizzie Saunders, Chief investment strategist

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 1>at Charles Ruff. You're listening to the Take kens are

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Line PROGRAMM Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, the tun in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live on

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty Looking at gold today, up

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>another one point two percent, two thou thirty eight for

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>gold near an all time Hi, what is going on there?

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Will mcdonnegh, He's the CEO and lead portfolio manager at

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 1>EMG Advisors. Boy, the goldbugs are out in force here. Well,

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with that precious metal gold? Well, you know,

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>as we always see in times where markets are you know, volatile,

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>people go to flight to quality. They go to gold,

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and they go to base metals that they take confidence in.

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, they go to the assets that are fixed

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or diminishing supply because you know, US dollars and the

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like are clearly worthless day over day, and so we'll

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to see action towards gold and other precious metals.

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But where's the demand actually coming from? Is this a

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of simply market move this is how you head

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio bid or is there physical demand that's driving

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>this as well? Yeah, there's not physical demand. I think

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>that's what's funny is people just don't know any better.

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just what people have been been doing for a

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>long time is thinking, when I want to be safe,

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I go to gold. But gold doesn't even you know,

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>make fake teeth anymore. Gold isn't used in society. World

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>uses copper, lithium, nickel, cobalts. Those are the base metals

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that we focus on. I have no interest in holding

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>gold for the long term because there's less and less

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>use cases for gold day over day, in year over year.

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>You know. I want fixed supply assets that actually have

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>demands and not just from you know four one ks

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that pivot to that when they want to lessen their

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>SMP exposures. But isn't that a pretty bold call. I'd

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>say the power of the Chinese an Indian consumer who

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>primarily use gold from a consumption purpose. Yeah, I think

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that the future of demand there is not gold. I

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 1>think that the future is more so copper. It's more

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 1>so all these green energy metals that have massive rising

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 1>demand and have more and more volatile supply chains. And yes,

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:22.879
<v Speaker 1>gold is still relied on in different parts of the world,

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but less and less day over day. What's the supply

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>picture for gold? I never think about it that way.

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of think about it with the you know,

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the price on my screen here, But what's the supply

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>situation look like? Yeah, we all take that stuff for granted,

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And the truth of the matter is nobody really wants

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it because it's not pretty. You know,

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>gold comes from largely non democratic parts of the world

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that don't have e S or G compliance and you know,

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>so nobody wants to talk about that. They just want

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to see it on their screen and they don't want

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to think about what it's going to take to actually

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>get it. But then also, the volumes that trade in

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>gold are largely by people who have no capacity to

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>take physical delivery of the metal itself, and so it's

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>just more screen the screen as you reference, than it

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is people that are actually utilizing the underlying metal. And

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that's why you know, I have concerned for that over

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the long haul. Well what does it then mean for Well,

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>we got to bring it back to central bank policy specifically,

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>how is the Federal Reserve or the Bank of England.

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Looking at what these gold prices are doing. We always

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>ask our guests, what is the bond market telling you

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>about the FED? What is the gold market telling you

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>about the Fed? Well, I think it's telling us that

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>people don't trust the FED and that, you know, the

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money that's been pumped into the system.

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think it was nineteen seventy two that

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the US government depegged the US dollar from its gold reserve.

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Ever since that day, you know, gold and the underlying

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>price of it has had really no bearing on the

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 1>value of the US dollar or of global currencies. Sadly,

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and because of that, we find ourselves in environments like

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>we're in today, where you know, they can just print

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>as much money as they choose to to calm and

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>satiate the markets, and less and less is that correlated

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 1>to two golds. So more so gold is rising as

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>something that people perceive to have fixed supply or more

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>finite supply than US dollars have or will have. And therefore,

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you see when people, you know, find volatility in those markets,

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna they're gonna drive to those base metals and

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>those fixed supply assets just because you know there's nobody

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:34.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting at the helm that can just press a button

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and create more of them overnight. So another story here

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>will that got my attention here just in the metal

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>space is JP Morgan. You know, they're the biggest players

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:48.439
<v Speaker 1>in trading metals globally. It kind of feels like maybe

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're cutting back a little bit. They're cutting back

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on some of their bonuses, they cut back on their

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>roster of clients they'll deal with. I know they were

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:58.479
<v Speaker 1>had some bed uh, you know, exposure to the nickel

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 1>market last year and that short squeeze. What do you

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>take from when you see something like JP Morgan say

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're gonna pull back our exposure to commodities. Yeah,

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, that disappoints me. And I think there's two

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>angles to it. One is when Silicon Valley Bank goes

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 1>under and regional banks find a lot of pressure, the

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>big banks who have consolidated those assets now all of

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, they don't have to take as much risk,

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.320
<v Speaker 1>right because they don't have as much competition. And so

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>when you have a zero risk environment, you know where

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you can buy treasuries that give good yields. JP Morgan

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>ironically also announced today that they're in emerging market debt

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>because they can get teams like returns. You see people

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>going into the debt markets for high single digit and

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>low double digit returns and not needing to take Chinese

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>counterparty risk, Russian counterparty risk, and trade in some of

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>these more esoteric markets. So it's net negative for all

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of us because the big banks aren't innovation and putting

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>more risk assets into play. It's net negative for the

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>global commodities markets because you have one less player. But

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>what that's going to result in is less competition for

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the same underlying assets, which is arguably going to drive

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>pricing up. I think you just see JP Morgan throwing

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>their hands in the air and saying, we clearly aren't

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>good at this. This isn't our expertise. You know, we

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>don't need to be taking these risks and we got

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to leave this to the experts, which is good for

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, EMG and good for my business because you

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>know that happens to be where we focus. So where

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 1>are you guys other than gold? Where are you guys,

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing some work these days? Where you guys active?

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>We are most active. We have an ETF on the

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange called charge HRG, which is purely copper, lithium, nickel,

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and cobalt, giving investors exposure to the future price activity

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and exploration of the future you know, price hopefully increase

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of the base metals necessary for solar wind ev all

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of that adoption. You know, we're very heavily allocated to

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 1>copper today because copper is needed for all solar, all

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:10.919
<v Speaker 1>wind all or ev all charging infrastructure for any ev

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So no matter who wins the race between GM FORD, TESLA, RIVAN,

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't really care. They all need the same base metals,

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and so we give investors a pure allocation to that,

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, through the New York Stock Exchange under CHRG.

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder about then, the actual I guess safety of

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the trade you mentioned JP Morgan. Recently they've talked about

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:33.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting into trouble with a nickel trade in

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:35.800
<v Speaker 1>which the nickel wasn't actually there was there was no

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>physical supply to back up the contracts that they were pushing.

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Does that then have a little bit of a kind

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:46.359
<v Speaker 1>of risk factor for other investors, maybe not the biggest banks,

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, do we really want to get involved

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in the commodity trade to begin We've always already seen,

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, in oil prices that open interest is completely dropped.

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Are we seeing that in the metals? You are for

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>sure you're seeing less players in the term open interest

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is an important one, and I know you know the

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:05.439
<v Speaker 1>space well. I've followed you tracking it for a while

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 1>and I think you do a good job covering it.

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, people more and more are realizing that you

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>need to have deep industry expertise to trade in these markets,

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a lot of offscreen trading that occurs

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 1>between counterparties like miners and like the consumers or the producers. Sadly,

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, China, to their own benefit, have gone out

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade and secured off take agreements and

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:34.279
<v Speaker 1>locked up you know in Nickels specifically, I think they

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>have thirty five percent of the global processing capacity is

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 1>in China. So they've gone out and locked in. They

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>locked in these off take agreements from the physicals all

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>across the world, and now we're hoarding and creating a

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>bottleneck in the processing capacity. So that results in less

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>open interest because there's less parties trading and a more

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 1>controlled environment, which is bad because you know that arms

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>priced tocovery, and therefore you know it is going to

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>result in higher pricing because there's less counterparties to create competition.

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just looking at this HRG. You your ETFE,

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 1>where's the biggest swing factor for that ETF. You know,

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we've taken the position that you know, the four trillion

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars that have been committed to going green and carbon

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:26.439
<v Speaker 1>neutrality global over the next ten to fifteen years, which

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:28.959
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is more money than every other human

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>endeavor ever undertaken, which is from the World Bank, that

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>demand curve and that pull with stimulus from global governments,

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 1>with top ten car companies committing to only selling evs,

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with the EPA yesterday coming out and saying it's going

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to be harder and harder for people to get combustion

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:53.320
<v Speaker 1>engine vehicles approved because of their emissions, we think that

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that demand curve is going to be way outpacing the

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>supply capacity for the existing infrastructure, and therefore we think

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that the price of those base medals is going to

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:07.280
<v Speaker 1>increase in these coming years, and that's why we built

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the product. It's also very hard, as you reference to

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>trade futures. Yeah. I used to work at Goldman Sachs

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and my old desk turned me down there when they

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>said unless you have passed on the pause that you

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 1>can't trade. And yeah, all right, well we're gonna have

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to have to leave it there just because of time.

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Will mcdonea CEO and lead portfolio manager for EMG Advisors.

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the tape cancer O Live program Bloomberg

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 1>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:45.320
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Pandu shahre joins us. He is COCO of Indie's Capital.

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:55.359
<v Speaker 1>He is Indonesian Coal Mining Association. He's the chairman there,

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so he can really talk to us about Indonesia. Pan

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>do thanks so much for taking the the time here.

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us kind of if you will. Let's

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>start us off with the elevator pitch for Indonesia from

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>an investment perspective. Yeah, sure, thank you. Thank you for

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>having us Indonesia as a member of the g TWNT.

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.839
<v Speaker 1>We hosted the gun last year. You know, we've been

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>growing at about five six percent per clip, and in

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the next seven years, most people expect that will be

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the G seven as the seven largest economy

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And a lot of it is actually

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 1>driven by energy transition and a lot of it is

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>related to nickel. You are here, I'm in the US

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:37.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, Washington, d C. What's so interesting is that,

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, majority of cars motorcycles will be mainly be

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:46.080
<v Speaker 1>driven by electric vehicles, and a lot of it will

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:48.959
<v Speaker 1>come the battery source will come from nickel, and maybe

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:51.239
<v Speaker 1>for some of your listeners that know or don't know,

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 1>majority or a quarter of those supply will come from Indonesia.

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia's the largest nickel producer and now just leader supplier

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And you know there's a lot of

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>activities happening between America and Indonesia. So, you know, happy

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk more about what's going on in our part

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Yeah, that's interesting, So talk to us

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about just the energy pivot you're talking about. I know

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you're involved or have been involved in the coal industry.

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about just Indonesian general that switch. Yeah,

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:23.280
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the switch happened I think the last

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>two three years where you know, we are the largest

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>coal producer and exporter in the world, and you know,

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>our president essentially says we have to switch and we're

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 1>moving away from just crossing raw materials and moving into

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the downstream industry and nickel it's one of the main

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 1>market that we're focusing on. And what's interesting in Indonesia

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>today it can go from a raw material of nickel

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the battery creation and now creating

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the motorcycle and what is it called cars. An example,

0:51:56.760 --> 0:52:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Yanda just finished the largest car manufacturing facility in Indonesia

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for all of its four wheeler for Southeast Asia. Soon,

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Ford just sign an MoU last week in

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Jakarta to build a facility too in Indonesia using nickel

0:52:14.880 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully soon I think. I'm sure you've heard it

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg about Tesla as well. You know, for ourselves

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we're building two wheelers motorcycle. Indonesia's the second largest motorcycle

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world right because a massive market. You know,

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about per industry thirty to forty billion per anna.

0:52:32.880 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So in in Indonesia here talk You talk a lot

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>about the nickel and how important that is. Is it

0:52:38.440 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is that sourced in Indonesia. Has that always been a

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 1>mineral available? It's always it's always been a middle available

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in Indonesia, but most people don't know what to do

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with it right now, with technology and obviously the amount

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of demand for ev Indonesia has become the battleground for

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>most car manufacturers because essentially all the car manufacturers in

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the world today has become mineral specialists. And you're seeing

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this globally, right And if you talk about alternative I

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:12.840
<v Speaker 1>would say supply chain, Indonesia today has become one of

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the most important places globally for car manufacturers. So if

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:20.719
<v Speaker 1>i'm if it Indonesia, give us a sense of the

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:24.319
<v Speaker 1>business climate there, particularly on on the venture capital side.

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it sounds like, obviously resource rich nation, is

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:32.160
<v Speaker 1>how easy or how supportive is the environment to kind

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of build businesses there? Create? Oh venture amazing? I think,

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you for asking this question. I think venture capital

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Indonesia's stopped five in the world after America.

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Obviously China is a big market, then it's actually India

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and Indonesia those are the key growth markets globally or

0:53:50.960 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 1>venture related businesses, and as you know, the big side

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and venture is outside of AI. I think AI is

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:00.280
<v Speaker 1>very big here in the US. Number two is related

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to energy transition, so things related to the carbon credit,

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:08.320
<v Speaker 1>anything related to how how do you create more renewable

0:54:08.480 --> 0:54:11.920
<v Speaker 1>energy sources? What are you doing with processing of raw

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:16.280
<v Speaker 1>materials and creation of batteries. I would say Indonesia stopped

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:19.799
<v Speaker 1>for in the world of amount of venture capital investment

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 1>going into these sectors. Talk to us a little bit

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>about China here. So much change, you know over the

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:29.480
<v Speaker 1>last several years. Give us just a sense historically how

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia's interacted with China and maybe how that is changing

0:54:34.160 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>from a you know, both as a customer and as

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:42.399
<v Speaker 1>a source and trade in general, things are changing a lot.

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I know Bloombergers in the middle of this too, But

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia has been you know, we're good friends with everyone.

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 1>China is a big trading partner. But again, you know,

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just win win, right with a US too. There's

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 1>been significant amount of new investment coming in especially the

0:54:57.239 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months, and outside of Nickel, there's a lot

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of investment coming up in digital infrastructure and things related

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to renewable energy. And that's why we're all here in

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington and after this we're going to New York. Is

0:55:08.960 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 1>because to engage a lot with both the public and

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the private sector anything to do with energy transition, you

0:55:15.040 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 1>have to manage both the public sectors as well as

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the private sectors. So is that how I mean? I

0:55:20.520 --> 0:55:22.759
<v Speaker 1>think what we're learning in order at least the folks

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that are really focusing on the energy transition is a

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:29.400
<v Speaker 1>private public partnership. The government can't do at all. Private

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 1>companies and venture capitalists can't do it all. It's got

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to be some type of Is that the kind of

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the model you're following in Indonesia? I think so we are,

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're learning a lot the way things work in India,

0:55:40.719 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, that's a good example. I think it is

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:45.960
<v Speaker 1>halfway between the US and Indo. A government place a

0:55:46.000 --> 0:55:49.800
<v Speaker 1>significant role from a policy perspective to encourage people to

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:53.879
<v Speaker 1>switch behavior. So there's a certain critical mass where things

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>switches and everybody start using it. A good example is

0:55:56.880 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the usage of electric vehicle. Right today, we used yourtional

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 1>means for cars. You need to have incentive programs, so

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in a good example incentive program where people can buy

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and get a discuss with you buy EV. So the

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:13.960
<v Speaker 1>regulation nesia has happened two weeks ago. It's probably the

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:17.920
<v Speaker 1>most aggressive across all the Nation States and Assam. And

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this will help encourage further investment into the

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>EV sector as well as building the manufacturing in Indonesia.

0:56:24.560 --> 0:56:28.120
<v Speaker 1>So ponder what's a lot of tailwinds of course for Indonesia.

0:56:28.200 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the biggest challenge for Indonesia to achieve? Kind of

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:35.839
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the opportunities. Yeah, I think there's

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just two. I mean, we're in such a good momentum

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>today because now we've entered the global stage as we

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>host the gpuenty last year well and this year we're

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:46.760
<v Speaker 1>hosting the Assam Sement. I think it's more about execution,

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>continuously execute, execute. And second, obviously we're next year is

0:56:51.239 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 1>election years, similar to here in the US, so continuity

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>will be top of mind for any investors. So how

0:56:57.520 --> 0:57:02.040
<v Speaker 1>do you continue the policy of of creating what's called

0:57:02.040 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a stable environment? So politics also played croll in that. Pondu,

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:08.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for taking a time to join

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:10.080
<v Speaker 1>us from glad we had had the chance to have

0:57:10.200 --> 0:57:13.959
<v Speaker 1>this conversation Pendu Shahre, He's COCO of Indies Capital, really

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:19.800
<v Speaker 1>involved all across the public private partnerships across Indonesia. He's

0:57:19.800 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>been called one of the you know, the leading venture

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:24.280
<v Speaker 1>capitalists in Indonesia. So we're just trying to get you know,

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:26.320
<v Speaker 1>get more educated on that part of the world, and

0:57:26.360 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're starting to do more and more

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of that. Is a lot of folks look to say, hey,

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:34.440
<v Speaker 1>where else can we source part of our products and

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>services other than China? As China's you know, kind of

0:57:37.440 --> 0:57:40.320
<v Speaker 1>backing off a little bit again people talking about India,

0:57:40.440 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, but Indonesia a definitely in the center of

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that conversation as well. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:57:55.680 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three, pen

0:57:59.240 --> 0:58:02.400
<v Speaker 1>On Falswhinnie on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:58:02.480 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.