WEBVTT - Last verse, like the first

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of iHeartRadio. Good Morning,

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast. Today's

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>tip is that the last verse should be like the first.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Writing gets better when you repeat or invoke the beginning

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of the work in the end. This feels more satisfying

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>to the reader, or at least reminds them of what

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you said. This week, I am sharing several of my

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>favorite writing strategies. Even if you don't write for a living,

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you might need to write reports or emails or articles

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 1>for industry publications. A few strategies can help make all

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>writing more compelling and clear. Some writing feels more well

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>constructed than other work. You feel like the writer is

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in control and knows what they're doing. One of the

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>best ways to make readers feel this way is to

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>repeat or invoke something from the beginning at the end.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you are writing an article or op ed

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>that quotes people or tells stories, you could revisit the

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>opening anecdote in the conclusion. Even quoting the same person

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>can echo the beginning. If you're writing an email that

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>gave some bit of news or a particular greeting in

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>the opening line, you could mention that again in the

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>sign off. Using a few of the same words can

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>approximate this as well. It's not quite so obvious, but

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>this can still create a sense that you have come

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>full circle. There's a famous writing principle attributed to Chekhov

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that if you introduce a gun in the beginning of

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a work, then it needs to go off shortly thereafter.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that details aren't there for no reason.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Even if they're there mostly for color, they need to

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>do more work than just appearing Once. I tried to

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 1>take that to heart in a novel I wrote where

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a random item that the main character sees in an

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>antique store window and wonders who on earth would buy that,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>winds up with that item in the staged home that

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>she buys in the end. When the last verse is

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like the first, the reader knows that you thought about

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what you were doing. You thought about the beginning and

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>made sure to bring things full circle by the end.

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>When the reader knows that you thought things through, they

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>give your writing more respect. They are more likely to

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to what you have to say. Repeating the beginning

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is also just more sad us fine as humans like repetition.

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Now we don't like too much repetition. That's boring. But

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>when we come back to the same thing after a journey,

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we feel like we've come home. That's why some hymns

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>have first and fifth verses that are very similar. Now,

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I know that you are probably not writing hymns, But

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>if you are writing an email welcoming someone back from

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a vacation and getting them up to speed on something,

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>mention the vacation again in the closing line. If you

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>are writing a lighthearted email apologizing for something silly, you

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>might open with talking about how you have egg on

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>your face and then sign off with something like still

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>cleaning up the egg over here. People tend to remember

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the endings of things more than the beginnings. We put

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of effort into beginnings, but less into the end.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>By evoking the beginning at the end, not only is

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the end easier to write, people will remember what you said.

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>You've given them two opportunities, one to raise the idea

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and one to cement it. That helps make your point

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and just makes people enjoy your writing more. In the meantime,

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>this is Laura, Thanks for listening, and here's to making the.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Most of our times. Hey, everybody, I'd love to hear

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 2>from you. You can send me.

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Your tips, your questions, or anything else. Just connect with

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram at Before Breakfast Pod.

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>That's b E the number four than Breakfast pod. You

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can also shoot me an email at Before Breakfast Podcasts.

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>At iHeartMedia dot com that before Breakfast is spelled out

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>with all the letters. Thanks so much, should I look

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>forward to staying in touch. Before Breakfast is a production

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.