WEBVTT - Feb. 15th, Hour 2: Fantasy baseball players we love, #LABR, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guessed Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Let me just

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>become best friends. Fantasy best Friends Forever. Welcome back to

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>our two of Fantasy best Friends Forever. Frank Stample joined

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>live in studio by Andy Singleton. Make sure you give

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>him a follow on Twitter at People's ten, People's to

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the Z right there in the middle. No, normally this

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is the time frame where you would come and watch

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Football Frenzy. So for anyone tuning in who

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>might be looking for the Fantasy Football Frenzy, that show

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is not gone for good. It is unfortunately just gone

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for now. I've already shared all my thoughts on quarter

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>parts and the Fantasy executive early on in the show.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You go back, you can watch that or you can listen. Um,

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I've I've spoken mc coorey. He's a good buddy of mine.

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>We're friends. It's nothing but love. But you know, we

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we've we've got to move on here. Uh And unfortunately

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk fantasy baseball for the next hour. We're

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna have fun. Um, That's that's really what it comes

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>down to. You know. Look, we've been talking about some

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>some players that we love for the upcoming season. Yesterday

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it was Valentine's Day, so we thought we'd work that

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>in there a little bit. Just had Tim McLeod on.

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>He drafted out of the two hole this week in

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the labor Mixed Draft. So we're gonna continue talking about

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>some of this stuff. I didn't want to get some

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>random baseball news if that's cool you Andy, that I

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>noticed over here, I pull up rotal World. See what's

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>going on in the baseball world. With that right behind

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you there there are two silhouettes and two names, one

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of which is yours, none of which a mind. So

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to do here is I'm a nice guy, Andy,

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you know I want to keep you in mind. I'm

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>not just gonna you know, I'm I'm just a film BFF.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>So whatever you want to do, I'll go with him. Man,

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a third BFF, you're you know, four or fourth

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>outfield of fourth BFF, whatever you want to be. I

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>see this report here. John Hayman of LB Network reports

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Angels are showing interest in Mike Mustock. Is

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting here because Michael Mustocks, to me, strikes me

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>as a guy who's undervalued every single season and you

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>can't land work. I mean, I understand that it's a

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>slow moving free agent market right now, Like all right,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about not moving not finding work, you know,

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Harper and Manny Matado are are the head of that,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think it's a case that they can't

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>find work. It's just there's a lot of moving parts

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>between those two guys trying to find context tracks right now.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>They want to make three million dollars. They want to

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>get you know, they want ten year contracts, So it's tough.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mustock is to me, he's not looking for that.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the guy you know wants to get paid,

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a one on two year, three year, three

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>year deal, and I think he deserves it. Andy Uh

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>moving over too if he can sign on with the

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Angels here, I'm in um yeah. Like I know, it's

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>not the greatest hitting environment out there in Los Angeles,

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's produced thirty plus home run seasons in Kaufman

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Stadium and in Kansas City, so that's not a great

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>better hitter's ballpark either. If he joins the lineup with

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Trout and you know Otani whenever he's back, and

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>justin Upton and all right, Albert Pools isn't the player

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that he once was, but I can get on board

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>with that man. I like Moustaks. I don't dislike him.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to wrap my head around where where

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>does he play? Because I think the big achilles Heel

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Angels is having Albert pool Holes and your

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>d H spot is gonna be locked up. So he

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>went and you got Zach Cozart last year. You still

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have Simmons there. So where does Moustakis exactly fit into

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the equation? I think he would probably move that Cosart

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the second base. As of right now, they have David

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Fletcher in there, okay, and he makes a lot of contacts.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>You also got and they don't have the best farm system,

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but one of the more exciting guys in their system

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is Louis Regifo, who's coming up as a shortstop, who

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, you might be able to plug in the

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>second and get some speed and some average out of

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>that and and you know, juice up the the fan

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>base if you will. Um. So you know, if you

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna move now cos art the second you

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of you kind of stall that progress from happening

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is basically ready to come to the majors. But like

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, you still got Simmons there, so he's he's

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna supplant him a short I don't dislike

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Mustakas in any lineup. I mean, given what we've seen,

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it can be. But I just feel like he's kind

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of like what they already have there. Um, maybe better

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>than what they have there, but not so much better

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>that it's worth adding the headache of Okay, how do

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we how do we you know, how do we make

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this line of work? Now? Well, it's better than him

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>going back to Milwaukee, right, Like, that's the only thing

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen. If he goes back to Milwaukee, it's

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a great hitters park. But then what do we do?

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Are we really doing Travis Shaw at second base every day? Again,

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is that what they're gonna do? If they If if Milwaukee,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>then the San Diego Padres and the Angels are really

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the only three teams that I've actively heard come out

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and have interest in Michael Stokis. I don't really get

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it because I think he's above average defender as well. Yeah,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>and and again, like I said, it could make the

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>lineup better, But how much better are we talking? We're

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about it going from you know, like I'm looking

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>at that thirty eight home run season with Kansas City, Yeah,

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>two years removed from that though last year, right, and

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>that was I think I think that I think that

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>he could be a thirty home run bad he's a

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty home run guck. You're getting him at a pretty

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>good price right now. I mean, let's look at where

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you went in this. In the labor draft, he went

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in the eleventh round. He went at pick four. You know,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>he went behind I know, you like Raphael dead Verse.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>This year he also went after Justin Turner and match Having,

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>but those guys went two rounds earlier. The next third

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>basement that went after him was Eduardo Escobar and that

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>was two rounds later, So I think I think you're

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have met a pretty good value right now. That's

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Michael stock Is, who's going in the eleventh round before

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we get before we get back into this labor draft. Well,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll do that a little bit later on the show.

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn want to touch on a few more of

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>these players Andy, that we had that we had touted

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>as our Valentine's Day are are sweethearts, the guys that

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we that we love heading into the season. If you

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>watched the Fantasy Best Friends Forever or listened over the

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>past couple of years, you know that I have been

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the front of the bandwagon when it comes to Joe Muskro.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe Musgrow is my guy. We've chanted, We've hit him

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>up to try and get him on the show. Unfortunately declined.

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>He actually never answered, so I can't say that he

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>did that. He declined, but everyone's kind of buying in

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>on Joe must Grow, and I just wanted to be

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>known that I was one of the first ones there.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>But in Pittsburgh, I think that there was a lot

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that we saw last year to be excited about Andy.

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I know Matt Modica is also on Joe Muscrove. I

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people are buying in here. He's

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>always had elite control, elite command. He doesn't walk a

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys, and I think we saw in the

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>second half last year he started to miss a few

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>bats as well. He started to miss some more bats

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and get that strikeout right up a little bit. I

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he's ever going to be a strikeout

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for any kind of guy, but I think that he

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>could be between eight and nine case per nine and

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>give you good to command and also get grabbing balls.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>He throws like three or four different types of fastballs.

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>He also worked in He worked in a cutter last year.

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>That was that was That was pretty awesome. He has

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a changeup. So I'm I'm excited about Joe muscro Man.

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, we spoke about Soroka. I

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>think Joe Musgrove was another one of these guys that

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>has top thirty starting pitcher upside yes, So I want

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to definitely want to get into must Grove, and we

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have to get into his teammate Josh Bell, who they're

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they're begging for us to touch on in the comments action,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get to that as well. But one last

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>point about mustakas before we put him to rest. One

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that really adds to his his profile. Mustaka is

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>going back to him instruction being the third basement is

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the left handed bat, which can help any lineup. So

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that that works in his favor as you're

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about anywhere and any team that signs was gonna

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>be better for it. But how he fits into that lineup? Um, anyway,

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>going back to must Growth, this guy is he's a

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>big dude and he throws throw something like six pitches.

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I know he's you know, settled in on on you know,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>his main arsenal and staple. But this is the guy

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was really excited about when the Pirates got him in

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the return for Derek Cole. I love him in Houston

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. He's kind of that mid

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>rotation bullpen kind of you know, the long the long

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>role in Houston. Then moves to Pittsburgh and seemingly should

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have a spot in the rotation. The one question I

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>have about Pittsburgh, and all my way over to the

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>studio today, tweeted this out. Everybody seems to be high

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on the Pirates rotation from Archer to Tay on too

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>must Grove to Trevor Williams, to Kingdom to to niche

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Keller to I mean, I just named six pictures that

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the Pirates have that people are enamorate, and four or

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>five of them are getting drafted the majority of draft.

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But where is the offense coming from. I'm really concerned

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>about this. The run support for these Pirates pitchers. M

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this when we covered Jamison tayan in in

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>our Baseball Show preview. I love what they can do individually,

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but I've a huge the Grand fan as people know,

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and I've just seen it too many times with Jacob

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to Graham that the guy goes out and throws the

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>gym and then the team just doesn't give him any

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>run support and lets him down. I'm not I'm not.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Yank, I know I'm wearing at colors, but anyway, um,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that really that really has traumatized me when it comes

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to starting pitchers and seeing I don't you know tayan

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>could go out and throw eight innings and give up nothing,

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.719
<v Speaker 1>but other Pirates gonna even score one run for him.

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Where You're getting great stuff from that picture, but is

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it enough? And and the margin for error is so

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>slim that it's scaring me away from pirates pictures, and

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and it goes back to about must Grove. What's his uh,

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>what's his ADP right now? No, must Groves ADP right

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>now is to nin nineteen. I mean at that at

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>that price, like you, you have to. He's climbing draft boards.

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>People are getting excited about Joe Musgrove. He's going how

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 1>about this, he's going right after, He's going right around

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Forest Whitley. How many endings as Forest Whitley gonna give

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you this year? Wow? I mean he he's he's got

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to lead stuff. I can't deny that. Well, we're talking

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about hot but realistically, how how many endings is he

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you? We're talking about sus Lazardo before and

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and wondering when he's gonna come up for ast Whitley's

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in that same range. Let's say they both come up

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>May first. I think Whitley's gonna give you more than Lozardo,

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think Lozardo will likely get you more innings.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that Whitley factors in. I mean, you

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the other guys the Astros have with Josh

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>James and not to get off on a tangent here.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, they have Josh James, they signed Wade Miley,

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they still have Colin mqugh. They're starting, They're they're trying

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to stretch out Brad Peacock as well. They have a

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of options in Houston. Yeah, so I I agree it.

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So when are you talking about the startable must Grove right? Um?

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah to nineteen? How can you not? But again I

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>worry about that pirate staff. My my logic with Musgrove

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>would be these who draft him, hope he gets off

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to a good start and then try to move him

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>and and cash. No, yes, no, we draft Joe must Grove.

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't draft, trade Joe Mustgrove, draft in trade, not

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>draft in all, draft and trade. It's not trade Joe

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>mustgro Draft Joe muskgro and then trade him and then

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>trade him. Look, if Pittsburgh is one of these organizations

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>where I feel like their lineup ever looks that great,

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>but they just kind of figure it out. No, if

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>you didn't think they have Adam, this is what roster

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Resource has. Adam Fraser, Starling, Marte, Corey Dickerson, Francisco Savelli,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Colin Moran, Josh Bell, Lannie chose in't Hall Lannie Baseball

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and Eric Zalaz. It's not great. And they have Jungle

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Gan on the bench. And you know, actually, I'm really

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>excited about Elias t S. I was hoping that they

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>would trade away Francisco Savelli so that Elias T. S

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>would would have the opportunity to start every day. See

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>those those are words that should not be uttered in

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Baseball preview show. I was excited about Elias

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>d and two catcher leagues. It's it's a terrible position.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>You just mentioned, though you weren't who wants to walk

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the pirates lineup? Never really got you excited. If that

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>was the case. Polanco will be back at some point, right,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But if that was the case, this is even worse.

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>This is even worse than what has been and and

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it didn't get you excited in the past. And we're

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about uh, you know, when McCutchen was there, and

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and and Plancos. They find Bells there. They wanted us

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Bell. So let's get into Josh Bell.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's he's actually uh, he's a favorite. He's the first

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>base breakout candidate for our own Christmas venture. Your boy

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>he loves Josh Bell because he he also plays in

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>points leagues and he's looking at the plate discipline and

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>look at look at Josh Bell, and in his major

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>league career he is a twelve percent walk. Great, the

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>guy has a great eye. He doesn't strike out all

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that much for points leagues. I can get behind it, sure, Rodo.

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know what the heck of the

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>guy is gonna give you, to be honest, because he's

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a two sixty batting average guy. He gave

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you twenty six home runs in seventeen. He only gave

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you twelve last year. The twelve last year is actually

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot closer to what his minor league profile suggested

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that he was gonna be. Was that he was gonna

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be a line drive hitter. He was gonna be doubles,

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he was gonna walk a lot, he was gonna give

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you good plate discipline, he whin was gonna strike out.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>The twenty six home runs in to me kind of

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>stands out as an outlier because that didn't really mesh

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>with his minor league profile very much. So if I

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>were just projecting Josh Bell for this year, I would

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>say two sixty to seventy batting average with a very

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>good ov P, you know, three sixty three seventy ov P,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I think it's ov P is gonna be upwards

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred point higher than his batting average. But

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the counting stats home runs, seventy five runs scored, seventy

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>five r bi. Is that a fair projection for Josh Bell?

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It is? And and the problem with Josh Ball is

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned the walk right. He has and multiple seasons

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>walked more than he struck out, which is great. You

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>love to see that, but it's almost like it works

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>against him, like he's too patient. He's six four to

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty five. I want to see that guy swinging about

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Joey vatdo for how many years now? But Joe Vaddo

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>will put the ball in play as well. I mean,

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>he had he disciplined. It seems like he wants to

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>get a walk more than he wants to try to

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>get wood on the ball, and and that goes against him.

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So I want to see him swinging bat more. I

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>gladly take a few more strikeouts to see if he

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>can get the bat on the ball and put it

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>out of the park with that huge frame, he's got

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that's it just makes no sense. He's in an enigma

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and with that plate discipline, you'd think the average would

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>be higher. It was great in the minors, he was

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a three. It just hasn't translated. So uh he he,

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, he might be one of these late bloomers.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>We talked about Luke Voit yesterday at great length and

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>how he kind of, you know, was a quad A

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>guy where he's great a triple A and it wasn't

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so great. Well, this guy's had the opportunity. Maybe maybe

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a little too young, maybe he's twenty six this year.

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not totally off Josh Bell. I know Matt Moldiica

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a good friend of the show. You've mentioned him several

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>times today. Uh, he's big on Josh Bell in the

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>later rounds, just as a as a late stash guy.

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh thinks he you know, he's he's gonna put it

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>together this season. I'm not totally off that because he's

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>not gonna kill he's not gonna hurt you. But um

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as on your betch he's not gonna hurt you on

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>your beat as my starting c I like, I don't

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>want him as my starting corner. Infielder. If there was

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>ever an age where he can do something that we

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't really and if we can't really project, it would

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be twenty six. It would be like right now. Two

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>years ago he hit twenty six runs. He had a

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>home run the ball ratio, and his other two uh

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>seasons that he's been in the major leagues he's had

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a nine point four percent home run the flyball ratio

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and a nine point two percent home run to flyball race. Shoot.

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So you tell me which one is the outlier. Well,

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>listen season when he hit six home runs. I'm gonna

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>keep repeating it over and over and over again. First

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>base is weak. He's the twenty six first basem being drafted.

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>He's going right around Tyler White. I'd rather have Tyler White.

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have Josh Bell come on, playing time, playing time,

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>playing times there. But talent always wins out too. I'll

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>take the talent. I'll take. Look, you're bashing the Pirates

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>line up. I'm taking the Astros lineup here, you're right there.

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually probably take Peter Alonso, who's going right after.

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>He was the name that I saw. You've you've worked

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot with you know, trying to project prospects and stuff,

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>doing everything that they could to block Peter Alonso. Uh,

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna be up May one? I don't know

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>who knows what the Mets are gonna do. I think

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he's I think Tim Tebow might be up before Peter Alonso.

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he's up May first. I think he's up

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>May first, think Alonso. Yeah, but you mentioned projecting prospects

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and Josh Bell, wh who they started with. He's a miss.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a clear miss. All signs pointed to Josh Bell.

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Be somebody with that frame, that plate discipline, was gonna

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>be somebody who's gonna get you twenty five homers at

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>minimum in the two north average he did in seen.

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Is it impossible for him to get back to that.

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. But you know, he's he's got

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to lift the ball a little bit more. He's gotta

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more aggressive. He's gotta swing the back.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So the average also dropped. He was we come back.

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll continue talking about some players for the upcoming fantasy

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>baseball season. It's the Fantasy Best Friends Forever. Fantasy Sports

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Radio Daily Rhodo dot Com learned from the game's best

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 1>DFS players We don't just give you premier advice. We

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>play every day, all major sports, all year round. We

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:46.239
<v Speaker 1>never stop. Industry leading DFS tools and custom projections, and

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>now the Daily Rodo dot com optimize her in minutes,

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>building optimized line up for cash games and turneys learned

0:17:53.760 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. Joined Daily Rhodo dot com.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>My name is Lily. My mom and dad used to

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>fight about money all the time. Then one day I

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>heard them talking about this guy, some uncle I never knew,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>called Uncle Sam. Well, they say, this Uncle Sam guy

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted them to pay him like a gazillion dollars, and

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have a gazizillion dollars. So they called this

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>company they heard on the radio called the tax Doctor.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And the tax Doctor worked with Uncle Sam's people. I

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>think they're called the I R S. And they're able

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to work it out, so my mom and dad didn't

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>have to pay Uncle Sam very much money at all.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>So now mom and dad are happy, and I'm happy

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to thanks Tax Doctor. If you owe ten thousand dollars

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or more to the I R S or state, call

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>now and pay less eight hundred to one five one,

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>seven to seven eight hundred to one five one seven

0:18:54.200 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to seven. That's eight hundred seventy seven scout Fantasy Sports.

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the girls that I've dated are not

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>bigger a social media either, but some are. Some put

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the life on the social media. It's disgusting. I don't

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>need to know what you eat for breakfast. You know,

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>people put like their entire meals they're all day long

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and what they do. Why are you documenting your whole

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>life for and some people, Oh, I'm a vacation of

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>away for week. Thanks, No, I'm gonna rob your house.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are you guys doing? Holy you would

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>think that way? Week days to the four pm Eastern

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Network and on your popular podcast

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>providers joined the Experts live on the air every day

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>by calling in at April four, six, seven nine to

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>join the Fantasy Sports Network. Welcome back to the Fantasy

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>best Friends Forever. Franks dam Will joined live and studio

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>by Andy Singleton. Makes sure to give them a follow

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at People's and keep with a z in there.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sus have been out this week. I would like

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to say that he's enjoying Florida, but at this point

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know. Got out to Greg's cousin, by

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, who responded, I posted this to read it

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and uh Beg's cousin feeted in. I can't believe

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>my my cousin show, I said another standfull, He said no.

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Other host said another, yeah, so early different last name.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>How so how does the Fantasy Baseball read it? Because

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I've always kind of wanted to join the community. I

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>want to get in there, and the community is great.

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You post off and then they bash you for it.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like everything else that I always do involving

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the BFS. Right, we hate your singing and we hate

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>your dancing, but it's great. And what happened to do?

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Do do? Here's what, Here's what it comes out to you.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna sing or dance with that without Greg.

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Most of the time, I know, I did like the way, oh,

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you try to get me to singing dancer.

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You and I should kind of put on the spot there.

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know it's tradition. Every Friday we like to

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>do we like to do the why oh, we like

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>singing like dance. But I'm not gonna I'm not gonna

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>go solo singing without Greg I can't do I mean,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>he's the he's got the raspiness, he's got like the yeah,

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean he you know, he carries the singing. I

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>can't do it without him. And I'm a big Metallica guy.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just like Bavona, load up as much a

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Taica as you possibly can. I'll be good. Have you

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>do you like Metallica? I mean you're kind of default

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have to like Metallica if you're a Yankees fan. Right,

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it's an answer saying man, Mariann Rivera. I think if

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you grew up in America, you can't have to go

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>anywhere for that matter, you have to kind of like Metallica.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, you know I am envious of

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you for multiple reasons, but the main reason being that

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you grew up in the era that I'm most likely

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to grow up in. Everyone will always ask, you know,

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>if you could choose an era to grow up in

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or be this age, now, what error would you choose?

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people fifties, sixties, seventies. Yeah, that that's

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>what I would say. If I could choose any era,

0:21:55.600 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I would have been like my early twenties, in the

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>late eighties, early nineties, like that would have been my time.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>To me, there was like so much going on. I'm

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>sure it was a great time to party and be alive.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, I mean there was just the

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>inception of so many different things at that point in time,

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>like you would have seen and I always go back

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to these three things. You would have seen the inception

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of Metallica, you would have seen the inception of Fresh,

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Prince of bel Air, one of my favorite shows, and

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>just Will Smith in general, I guess, and Michael Jordan's

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>what more can you ask for? And I had tapes,

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>had cassettes worn out, consetts of of of of everything

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you just made and what are cassettes? What's the what's

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the vhs? Right? Right? Like, who's going to know what

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a Blu ray was in a couple of years? Rights that?

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>That that's short lifespan? Well watch the Goldbergs. That's a

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a great show. And it makes me feel nostalgic

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>every time I watch it because they just referenced everything

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>from the eighties that was. You know, I clearly remember

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I remember that toy, I remember that TV show, I

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>remember I remember this happening right, everything, everything that's on

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that show, so good Good Times of reminisce. If you're

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>getting myself in trouble, get myself in trouble here, Andy,

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen in Talk Alive? I have not.

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Would you be opposed to it? I would not. Do

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you have tickets? No? I don't. Are they going on tour?

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>If they are, let's go. I'd love to get some

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>tickets every time that they've gone on tour for the

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>past right if you're watching, we know you're not doing

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>anything right now. So it's Matthews Band. Let's be serious.

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Can you name a song by Dave Matthews Band. I

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like I should be able to say yes. No.

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>The answer is always no. With anything involving Dave Matthews Man,

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the answer is always no. Andy. You're gonna make me

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>think by default now of Greg Susman. Every time I

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>hear Dave Matthews I'm gonna confuse the tool. It's gonna

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>be the Greg Susman. You have to guess how many

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>times Greg has seen Dave Matthews Band live. What would

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you say? Seventy three? Why are you doing that? Andy?

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Way too high? He's seen them like over thirty times.

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But to me, like it's not horrible. I've seen Metallica

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight times in my life, and to me,

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a lot. It seems like a lot

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to see a band. I'd see it. I don't know.

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I've seen them over thirty times. How many times can

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you hear the same? Oh? Good violin and whatever? The dude?

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't even name a song like tailgame though, being

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a season ticket holder, he's he's a Dave Matthew season

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>tickets supposed to be t g I f thank god

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it's Friday. It's not supposed to be pissed frank off

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Friday talking about Dave Matthews band. Here. You know what, Andy,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually I got some reads I gotta do. I

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>thought about this right now, the daily Rodo. No, that's

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the wrong one at the game. Just got a good feeling,

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>no problem. Now you can bet from anywhere, anytime with

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the all new my Bookie Mobile betting platform. With the

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>my Bookie Mobile platform, you enjoy the safety and convenience

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>of at home betting when you're when you're on the go.

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I gotta rewrite this promo. Try it out today and

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you'll never miss another winning bet. Head on over to

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>my Bookie dot a G and open an account with

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the promo code f n t A why, and my

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Bookie will match your deposit up to one thousand dollars. Yes,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that's right, one thousand dollars. That's my Bookie dot a

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>G promo code f n T s Y. You can

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>bet from anywhere you want on the go. All right, Andy,

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>let's get back into some players here. Um, let's answer

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>some questions first. Let's let's uh, let's go to the chat.

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the chat. Let's answer the people. Let's

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>help the people. Andy, Yeah, we happened to the Malex

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Smith question first because the second one. Uh, probably spend

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more time on that one. Malex Smith,

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I believe we got a question about him dealing with

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>an injury. I actually have to look this up during

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the break because I don't even know it came out today.

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>At the Road of World Update February fift at eleven

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>am per Ryan Devish on Twitter, Maleix Smithem will be

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>held out of early defensive drills due to a right

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>elbow injury. Andy, Malex Smith is one of these guys

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>where if you want to attack speed later on in

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the draft in the middle rounds. He's a popular breakout

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>candidate in the speed to I mean, someone that can

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>give you a pretty good batting average. He's not gonna

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>tank you there, give you to eight plus. He has

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the legs to legitimately give you, you know, forty fifty

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>plus stolen basis this year. But now he's dealing with

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the right elbow injury. How much is something like this

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>were are you? It really doesn't because it has nothing

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>really to do with his game, um from you know,

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to be on the field, of course, So

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's gonna prohibit him from doing that, from throwing

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a ball, etcetera. From swinging a bat, yeah, of course

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't like it. But until more comes out and

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I hear more about what this injury is, I'm not

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>overly concerned about it. Mentioned he's a left handed swinger,

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>so uh, you know, I don't think it's affecting his

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>swing or his power, which there's really none of to

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>begin with. The thing I love about Malex Smith done

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this has been one of my favorite players, and hopefully

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>hopefully he gets to stay in one city and for

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>more than season, more than a couple of months, and

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>build a career this guy is a legit hitter. He's

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>been a three hitter in his career in the minors,

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and then he comes up and he's now shown he

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>could be that at the majors. He's a he's a

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>free runner, if you will. We like to say some

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>guys with the bat free swingers. He's a free swinger

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. He strikes out probably more than you want

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to above doesn't walk as much as you want. He's

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>under temper cent in that category, but he does put

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball in play, and then he does use his

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>legs to get on base. So he's gonna get you

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that three average, and then he's a free runner in

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of that. He got great speed. He's gonna get

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 1>caught a bunch of times, but the volume is going

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to be there that he's also going to finish as

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw last year with forty. He's that's his baseline,

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully he gets every day at bats now being

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle, and he can be a hundred and sixty

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>game player, get you fifty plus deals and give you

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a two nine or better batting average, which means that's happening.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm saying he's gonna be close to scoring a

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred runs. I'm not expecting anything in the power department

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>r B I included. So if he can give me

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>three out of five categories though at a week outfield position,

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it every day. Yeah. Alex Smith one of

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>these guys that's kind to bounce around a little bit.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>He's been looking for a place that he can call home.

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It seems like Seattle might be that opportunity. They finally

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>gave him an opportunity last year to play a lot.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You saw a career high five forty four played appearances,

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 1>played in a career high one forty one games, and

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned that they're just gonna let him run. They're

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna let him run, run and run some more be called.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Last year at forty basis he had twelve caught stealing,

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So they let him run fifty two times on the

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>base pass last year and as of right now, Rosster

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>resource has n't projected to that first in the lineup.

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what they could do if they have Malex Smith

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Gordon back to back. That's pretty crazy. Man. We get

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot, we get a lot of double steals out

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there in Seattle this year. But this is definitely something

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that you do want to monitor the right elbow injury

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>for Malex Smith. Andy, I know you had another question,

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'll let you, uh, I'll let you prop that

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>one up and also give your side of if your

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>take on it. It's very simple. So one of the

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>questions was Carlos Correa or Reese Hoskins points league, And

0:28:57.920 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier if you've been listening to the whole time,

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what from the last segment of two

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>segments ago, but I mentioned Carlos Carrey is my early

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>bold prediction at the a L m v P for

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he comes back fully healthy. I think he

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to prove and I think he's capable

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of proving it. So he's he's one of those guys

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you can get at a slight discount this year. I

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>think he's going on around the third fourth round. Um,

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that's my early pick for m v P. So how

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can I go against that and take somebody else? So

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Correa over Reee Hoskins for me. Carlos Correy going

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to pick fifty one point six in NFPC ADP in

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the month of februinary. So you're getting him, You're getting

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>him in the fourth round of fifteen team leagues. Here, Andy,

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I love you, buddy, but you didn't watch last week

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>when when when Dr A was on talk about Carlos Correa. Okay,

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>he's very worried and very worried about Carlos Correa because

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Correa, this back injury, poor injuries. I know we're

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>getting all the reports on say Carlos Correa, these are

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>things that could very quickly turn into chronic injuries. And

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>just giving that the torque that Carl's corea swings the

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>bat with, he's been right around a hundred and ten

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>games played each of the past two seasons. Look, it's

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a bold prediction. So I'm not gonna I'm gonna kill

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you for you know your a l m v P

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>pick as a bold prediction. But I'm worried, man, I'm

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>worried about Carlos Correa. And I realize you're getting you're

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>getting him at a discount because you know, when when

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he's good, when he's healthy, everything's good to go. He's

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a borderline first round pick and that's where he was

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>going last year. Now you're getting him in the fourth round. Yeah,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And I totally get that, and it sound like a

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>hypocrite if I didn't think the back played apart, especially

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>when I've been saying for years now that it makes

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.959
<v Speaker 1>me stay away from Kershaw on any format, in addition

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to just not taking starting pitchers early. But the back

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>would really worry me so for a batter, for an

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>everyday player, even more so. But he's twenty four, he'll

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>be uh twenty five at the end of the season

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in September. He's the face of the organization. I mean,

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy's is legit superstar. Uh. I'm believing everything he's saying.

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm buying into the offseason workout videos that I've

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>seen posted of him lifting and working out. I I

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>think he's smart enough to realize, um, you know that. A.

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a little become a little mature being

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the first pick in the overall in the draft, everything

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that's gone on in the island of Puerto Rico and

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>feeling like, you know, he's he's holding a nation, you know,

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>playing for them. Everything, Like all the off field stories

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that contribute to who Carlos Korea is. I think he

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>embraces them. I think he welcomes them. I think it's

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at a level of maturity to him. So I say

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>all that because it's a typical year old is gonna

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>be trying to lift everything in sight and and you know,

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>blow the roof off the gym. I think he's realizing

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and recognizing who he is. I'm not a bodybuilder. I'm

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a shortstop and I have to have that flexibility. And

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to try to hit fifty home runs.

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I can hit thirty and help my team. I miss

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>being on the field last year. I feel like I

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>let us down. I want to play every game this year.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to be back, and if I have to

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>adjust my workouts, if I have to adjust my training,

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>my diet, whatever it comes down to, and I'm really

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>buying into that for Carlos Correas. So with all those

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>things considered, I do think the health is back, and

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I do think he'll be back on the field. And

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>if he's on the field every day and in that capacity,

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe it's not gonna be the elite numbers

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that we wanted, but I think they're gonna be consistent.

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna give you across the board five categories, maybe

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe four. We'll say four, because I'm not sure that

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the speed will be there, but I'm all in on

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Correa. And a lot has to do with this

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>draft price. And I'll say this is upside is higher

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>than a guy like Reese Hoskins. I'm not gonna deny that,

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's downside is also lower than a

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>guy like Reese Hoskins in the Points League. I'm gonna

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to hammer this home. I like durability. I like

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>guys that are gonna play every single day, Guys that

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about platoons. That's definitely not

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the case with Carlos Correa. But the durability, the injury concerns,

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that is something that you do have to worry about.

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And Reese Hoskins, I also really do like the fact

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that he walks a lot. You know, thirtcent walk great

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>last year in twenty seventeen and fifty games, had a

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>seventeen percent walk great last year. Around this time, I

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>was saying, Reese Hoskins, if you look at his minor

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>league profile, really reminded me a lot of Anthony Rizzo.

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Rizzo was also a guy that walked a lot in

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the miners. He had some pop I see the same

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>things in Reese Hoskins Double A. He had thirty eight

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>home runs, twelve percent walk rate in seventeen Triple A

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>before he was called up, twenty nine home runs, thirteen

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>percent walk grate. So you're asking me in a points league,

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>am I taking Reese Hoskins or Carl's core. I'm taking

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Reese Hoskins because he's gonna walk a lot. He's gonna

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>hit a lot of home runs, like he had thirty

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>four home runs last year. I think he actually built

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on that. I think the Phillies line up is better.

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if to add a guy like Bryce Harper or

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Manny Matado, so that mix as well. They all they

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>already traded for JT. Real Muto. They signed Andrew McCutcheon. Again,

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the upside for Korea is higher, downside for me is lower.

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll go somewhere in between and I'll take Ree Hoskins. Well,

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>here's here's a couple of negatives against Hoskins for me.

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Are we assuming that he projects to hit more home runs?

0:33:58.200 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you see the fifty games sample he hit

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the eight team. We know the power, we saw the

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>batted ball profile, and I would he had thirty four

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>home runs last year, I wouldn't project for him to

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>hit more than that, Okay, I think he'll be in

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>like the thirty two to thirty five range. Okay, so

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty two to thirty five. He didn't even top seven

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Davis in batting average. He was at six. He's not

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>stealing anything, so you think you could be better than two.

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:25.919
<v Speaker 1>He's literally just giving you power. And it's not even

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>elite power. If you're telling me thirty thirty five, I

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>mean it's great power, don't get me wrong. It's above

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>average power, but it's not it's not elite power. And

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for him to be getting drafted, where's he going, He's

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>going on forty one overall, he's going, he's going a

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit ahead of Right now, you're paying for premium.

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 1>But if you're just asking me Corea versus Hoskins, which

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>was the original question, right right, But I'll give you

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the negatives, I guess Hoskins, why I'm you're supposed to

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>be for the back and up my my conviction in

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Correa, Uh, you're paying too much of a premium

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>for above average You're you're paying paying premium dollars for

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>above average production. I'm looking at the runs in the

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>RBI production though too. I mean, eighty nine runs last year.

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get on base, so he's gonna score runs.

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>He hits in a great hitters environment in Citizens Bank Park.

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I've already mentioned what they've done to the lineup. They

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>added McCutcheon, So he's does that make his batting average it?

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's You don't think he's a better

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>hitter than two six whatever he was that last year.

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he's better than that. Okay, So to sixty,

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>which is what he hit his first year, and you

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the minor league numbers, the batting averages were

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot better. I'm I'm there with you. But we

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 1>were talking about eighty one. We're talking about Josh Bell

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>being a three and the miners and then not translating.

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>So my only concern with that is what would you

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>say would be the high side of optimism for batting average.

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>He's had to seventy if everything broke right, to see

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>everything broke right for Korea. I hear what you're saying.

0:35:55.200 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>He can hit, okay, so to seventy give you the

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty five to seventy, he's gonna come close to a

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred runs in RBIs. Okay, he's gonna do that. Who's

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>going gonna be in the lineup every single day? Okay?

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>So eighty nine runs last year, ninety r BIS and

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the and the lineup only got better in Philadelphia. So

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>now I'm looking Chris Davis is going after him. So

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we know we're getting to we know we're getting to

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.760
<v Speaker 1>forty seven, we know we're getting forty homers. Here's the problem, NFBC.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Chris Davis with a K is utility. Only I see that.

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I see that. I'm just looking another guy's Cody Balingers

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>going after because outfield eligibility and he's gonna play first

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>basis here, so he's gonna have dual Elgebild, So does

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Cody Balance helps, so does Cody baling Cody Balance is

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna give me the same number of homers and giving

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>me speed. What Balinger is a tough one. He's tough

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to figure out. I take I take Balaner over Hoskins

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>nine out of ten times. What are Balinger to me

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is tough to figure out? I would just I don't know, man,

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I think there's a lot a lot more

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>underlying numbers with Cody Balance, I think I'm gonna try

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and hit away from players who hit a lot of

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>infield fly balls because those are guaranteed out. Booty Bellinger

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is the guy who has a lot of infield fly balls,

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and last year it was something that I was trying

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>to overlook with Rathbael Devor's because I was all over

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Devors and he let me down. He has a lot

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>of infield flyball. They're gonna have to go first base

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>overall in our draft with d Alright, I'll talk about

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Cody Bellinger. Fantasy Best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network is hitting you from all angles

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>with the best fantasy sports and betting analysis. You can

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>catch the latest programming on so many platforms. There's no

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>way you'll miss out on any of the award winning

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>programming we pump out every single day. You can listen

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>through the f t s Y Radio app, iHeart Radio,

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>tune in Radio, Stitcher, download our podcast through iTunes, Google Play, Spotify,

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Audio Boom, and you can watch select programming on the

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>fan t s Y YouTube channel. Fantasy Sports Network your

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>only source for fantasy sports and wagering anytime and anywhere games.

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm decisions the President's Day, President's Day, I forgot I

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>see the President's Day sales at Buffalo. At the at

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the Mattress Guy, they're having a real Mattress Wars game.

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 1>But Costello and the other sleep guys they're getting really

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of the campaigns are getting a little angry or too

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like presidential campaigns, like taking cheap shots at

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the other mattress guy at president Matchess sales. The Mattress

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Wars and the Mattress Wars are a hot near Buffalo

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>week days, four pm Eastern one Hecam Pacific only on

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Maurice Sale two thousand and fifteen,

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousands and sixteen, European Long Drive Tour Champion two

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, World Number one. Me personally, I keep my

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of the bucker, leaving the range or even leaving the parts.

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to bays Grooming dot com from

0:38:56.360 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs. The

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.919
<v Speaker 1>morning after one of the very few guys that would

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>have had the opportunity to prove everybody wrong or an

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to go. Well, I'll show you if another NFL

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>tea to play Joe. You know that. Well, that's my

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>point is that he's a bigger celebrity as he is

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>now that he never would have been as a free

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>loss to job paying. It's not about playing because if

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you and I game, we had to jump at that

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to stick it right up. Roger Dedell's ass week

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Days Not Ammy, starting on F and T, s Y

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Radio and on your popular podcast providers. Welcome back to

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy as Friends Forever. I am Frank Standfeld, joined

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in studio by any singleton you can follow on Twitter

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 1>at People's Pen, People's with a Z talking a little

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>bit about Cody Bellinger before the freak. I know you

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>want to get to flyerty in Mankato will do that

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>as well here in the final segment. But I can't

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>believe it's the final segment already. Yeah, man, two hours

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and flying. Is everybody enjoying the show? Anybody's watching the show?

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>You guys enjoying this. I'm enjoying it. I don't know

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>how much that that matters. I'm enjoying it. Chris ba

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Bone is enjoying it. Downstairs. I see I see Chris Ventra,

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the closer in the chat, timing in a little bit

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. I know he's a he's a big yo

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>on Mankada guy, So maybe he'll chime in from from

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>downstairs and give us some of his Mankata thoughts when

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 1>we get to him. But I wanted to get into

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Cody Bellinger a little bit here because for me, he's

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of tough to figure out this year Andy, And

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe I'm making it tougher than it

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>should be because look, it's a it's a twenty three

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 1>year old who you know, he's gonna turn twenty four

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>throughout the season. He already has the thirty nine home

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>run season under his belt when he was a rookie,

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And what do he regrets last year he had twenty

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>five home runs. Um, the hard hit rate came down,

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the home run the flyball ratio came down, the flyball

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>rate came down, his infield flyball rate again. Infield flyball

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>rates is something I don't want to focus a little

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more on this year because they're guaranteed out. These

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:59.320
<v Speaker 1>are gonna hurt your batting average. They're gonna hurt you

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>big time last year sixteen and a half percent in

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>field fly ball rate. That was nearly double from the

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>year before in his rookie year when he was amazing,

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>when it was eight point four percent. Something I'm also

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at with Cody Bellinger is he struggled against lefties

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 1>big time last year. The year before he was much better.

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>He he hit like two sixty seventy against lefties, and

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.399
<v Speaker 1>that kind of gave me confidence in him heading into

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the twenty eighteen season because I said, all right, you

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>know he's not gonna platoon. He's gonna play every single day.

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>He held his own against lefties. You look into his

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>minor league numbers two and they're very mixed. Some at

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:38.399
<v Speaker 1>some levels he was all right against lefties. In some levels,

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>he was very bad against lefties last year to six

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:48.839
<v Speaker 1>o ps versus left handed pitching. I'm worried, man, I'm

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a little worried about Bellingers. I'm gonna tell you why

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>he shouldn't be. So you look across the board at

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the profile. The one thing that jumps out and the

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>big difference to me was the soft contact increase last year.

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>The nfield fly rate roughly been his whole career last year,

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>not just I'm sorry two years ago seventeen was at

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a career low, was under ten percent for the first

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.240
<v Speaker 1>time on his career, going back to the minors and everything.

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's something that's been there, that's not something that was,

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of a sudden. He can you can

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>look at and say that's an outlier. You can look

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>at the goodness and say it was a positive outlier,

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>whereas it's not really in line with his his career.

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>The soft contact, though, is what worries me a little

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>bout last year. Now, let's go take it back to

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>last segment when I was talking about Carlos Correa. Take

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 1>it back to yesterday when I'm talking about the psychology

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of things and off the field and everything you mentioned.

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Cody Bellinger's is what twenty three, He'll be, uh, twenty

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>four in July, same age roughly as Carlos Correa. And

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I talking about the maturity with Carlos Correa. Not to

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>say that Bellinger's immature. I think he's you know, pedigree

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>comes from his father being a pro ballplayer, everything like that.

0:42:56.200 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>The genes are there. Um, I think his mature he's

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>there as well. I think last year he was never

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the big power guy throughout his come up. Through the

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues, he became the big power guy. He was

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the launch angle revolution and then jacked all

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>these and the Dodgers are at the forefront of that revolution, right.

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So he comes up, he come out, buys fully into it,

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>has this immediate success. A season for the Ages, a

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 1>rookie season for the Ages. I think about a little

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>bit too much into that. I think he's gonna go

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>back to his roots. I think he's gonna get back

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to being fundamental in his roots. He's not gonna be

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that forty guy. Maybe he will, because we see what's

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 1>going on with the with the way the balls are

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>flying out of park now. But I think thirty home

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>runs is fine for me. I think he's back to

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that to seventy average. He gives you speed at a

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>position that doesn't really offer speed other really than engulgchment.

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 1>He can give you double digit steels fifteen, maybe even

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>flirt with twenty. He gives you the outfield eligibility as well.

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I am not worried at all. I think he's young

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>enough to figure it out, and I think he will

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>figure it out, just because of who he is and

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>how you come up and and the pedigree and everything

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like that, so you put it all together. I think

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>the corrections to his game are there. I think he

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>humbles himself and I think he gets back to being

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 1>who he is and not what we wanted him to be. Andy.

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I like what you did there, because I like this

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot about you know, your breakdown of players is

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe sometimes I look too much just into the statistical evidence,

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and you look a lot at the personal side of things,

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the mental side of things, And I do want to

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>try and factor that more into my analysis because I

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think he made some good points last year. I I

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 1>evaluated a player like Javier bay Is solely based on

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>statistical evidence, and I hated him because he swung him

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:40.919
<v Speaker 1>in this too much and he struck out a lot

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't walk and I didn't see how, you know,

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>his batting average was going to be sustainable, and then

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>he went out and made me look completely foolish people.

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And maybe when it comes to players that have this

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of prospect pedigree, they're this young, you just kind

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 1>of buy into the fact that they're gonna progress and

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:01.839
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be better, and Okay, Yeah, there was some

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>statistical evidence that showed that, you know, they backtracked a

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit last season. But failure is a great motivator

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>or anything in life, and especially you know in sports

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 1>at the at the at the major league level. You know,

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Cody Balinger, you mentioned he was humbled a little bit

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 1>last year. So maybe that's something that I should look into.

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I have is my projection for toft home

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>runs eighty runs scored, ninety RBI, tend stolen basis. Now

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's conservativeative. My projection four to fifty thirty two

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 1>home runs, eighty five runs, ninety rb I five stone basis.

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I take ballingers and in both of those scenarios, vatting

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a marriage is not gonna be far off. I think

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Reece Hoskins is a little safer for the home runs.

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 1>I think the runs will be close. I think the

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 1>RBIs will be close. I might actually give a slight

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>favor to actually Reee Hoskins. Uh, Cody Baling is probably

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you a couple more stone basis. He's gonna

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>give you, you you know, five to ten more stone bases

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>at least at least, which is a big difference, especially though,

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the fact that they're going this close

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a bad it's like a bad take

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>by the fantasy baseball industry. I think they should be

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>going this close. Absolutely, it should be. But I definitely

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.240
<v Speaker 1>think that my money would be on Bellinger over Hoskins

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're given the choice of the two and and

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:15.719
<v Speaker 1>just one other player. I wanted to kind of point

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to in what you were saying about, you know, being

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>young enough to figure out you know, penalized for the

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>past season a kind Gary said, it's still being the

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>first catcher taking off the board because the position is

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is so depleted. Right, he had an awful His upside

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is to seventy to eighty hitter with thirty runs from

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the catcher position is the upside, right, But that's here

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>where he was last year, saw his downside, but it

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't it didn't affect him in any way, shape or

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>form and how people are drafting. So why would you

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>do that for other players like Bellinger. I'm not saying

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you in particular, I'm saying hypothetically, why would you He's

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 1>going in the third round right now, right Bellinger? Last

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>year he was going in the second That he hasn't

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't fallen that that was a bad example. But

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>if if you know, if we're using the argument against Hoskins,

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you can relate what you're saying right now to a

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:11.240
<v Speaker 1>guy like Joann Mancada, who you wanted to talk about.

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Because for me, statistically, there's a lot of bad with

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Moncada because he strikes out a lot. He swings and

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:24.319
<v Speaker 1>misses thirty three percent strikeout right last year. I mean,

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just bad, this is really bad. Like we're

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about one of the worst in all baseball. He

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 1>has swinging miss issues. Like he he swings extremely hard.

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.880
<v Speaker 1>He made hard contact and that's why you see his

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 1>batting average is too thirty. It would be even lower

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>if if it weren't for the quality of contact that

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 1>he makes. Because whenever he makes contact, you know he

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>has high battis. He can sustain that because he hits

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball as hard as he does. But he has

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a thirty three strikeout right and it worries me. There's

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>nothing that I can look at statistically, Andy, that would

0:47:56.760 --> 0:48:00.479
<v Speaker 1>allow me to project Joan Moncada to have anything higher

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>than a two forty batting average. There's nothing there's nothing

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>statistically because I looked at every single monthly breakdown. I

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>looked at his splits by month. I looked at first

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>half for a second half. It didn't get better. His

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>plate discipline. His plate discipline is not bad. Let me

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not say it that way, because he walks a lot,

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.879
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of strikeouts, it did not get better.

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 1>So the only way that I could project for you know,

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>if you are on the optimistic side of projecting you

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on Mancady, you might say he has the upside to

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>hit two fifty two sixty with thirty home runs and

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty stone basis. Maybe that's like, is you know, his

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>top percentile outcome this year for you on Moncada. But

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the path to him getting there would be him doing

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 1>something that we've never seen him do before Andy, which

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is which comes back to statistical evidence that I have

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>from him versus a maybe what you're about to say,

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he has the prospect pedigree. It's not

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>just the prospect pedigree. And I hear all the arguments

0:48:57.680 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 1>against Mancada. I mean, he led the league last year

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.919
<v Speaker 1>and strike outs with to seventeen. The argument is already

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 1>strikes out too much. Yes, he does, but I'll get

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 1>into that in a moment. The other argument is he

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>can't get lefties. It splits are bad, but which is

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 1>weird because you have a switch hitter. Yes, and and

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 1>people say that he should just pick a side and

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>stick to it. But here's the other thing with that.

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>The sample size might be small prior to last year.

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 1>You only have fifty four games in seventeen, just a

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:22.640
<v Speaker 1>handful at eight. You know when he when he was

0:49:22.640 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 1>still a Boston in sixteen, So it's not what he

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>was last year with a undred forty nine. But if

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the splits against lefties, that was really

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>last year. It's not last year injected, I should say, um,

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>career wise, it looks bad, But if you go back

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to seen he was pretty even split right these first lefties.

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think last year was really true representation of

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>what he is as a hitter. I think the handstring

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 1>issues plagued him as well. I think when you talk

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 1>about a guy who has speed in his game and

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 1>then you take that away, you're an unfamiliar territory, You're

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you're you're in uncharted waters, like where you don't have,

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 1>you don't feel you have your full compliment. Think about

0:49:57.840 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 1>when you wake up in the morning and you have

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 1>a slight headache, it's not a pounding headache. I got

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a call out of you know, call sick out of

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>work over I drink. I drank a couple of beers, right,

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and you don't feel yourself. You feel like, as somebody

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 1>asked me to do this, I can do it, but

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 1>not how I feel comfortable doing it. I think when

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you take a speed guy like Moncada and you take

0:50:15.719 --> 0:50:17.799
<v Speaker 1>away his hamstring and his ability to feel comfortable with

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that speed, I think it changes the outlook. And this

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 1>was his first full season. Now we're talking about the strikeouts.

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 1>He hit uh little put my number here? Um, where

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>were where is it? He had a strike at rate,

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:35.240
<v Speaker 1>but he batted three O nine over the final twenty

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>five games of the season, and that was still striking

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>out thirty percent of the time. Point of the quality

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of contact that he makes My point with that is

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the high average eggs of velocity. I don't care about

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the case as much. He can hit three hundred while

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>striking out thirty percent of the time, He's probably he

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>could do it. I know it's a short period of

0:50:50.120 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 1>games a month whatever. We're talking to a whole different thing.

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a D fifty games. Can you strike out thirty

0:50:56.680 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time and hit three d as? I think, no,

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:04.399
<v Speaker 1>you can't hit three. But he would be Aaron Judge, right,

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge who strikes out percent of the time but

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>maintains a to eight batting average because he hits the

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:14.879
<v Speaker 1>ball as hard as he does. I could see Monk

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:16.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting to that point, but he still needs

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to drop it at least a little bit. It can't bet.

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up Judge and and I'll say why.

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And we're talking about this with Bellinger, and it's about

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 1>players making adjustments. I think the biggest adjustment Judge made

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to bring him to m v P levels was saying,

0:51:32.239 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a home run hitter. I'm I'm a gap

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to gap doubles hitter, like a Michael Confordo. And he

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:38.759
<v Speaker 1>stopped trying to hit the ball out of the park.

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And just because he's so big, he started making better

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:43.439
<v Speaker 1>contact and the ball would travel out of the park.

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.919
<v Speaker 1>That's what changed for me and Aaron Judge's game. I'm

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hoping Mancata can makes similar changes and strides He's not

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a high average guy. He showed he could be in

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the minders, but this is this is an elite pedigree

0:51:56.080 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of player. He's still just twenty four years old. He's

0:51:57.920 --> 0:51:59.879
<v Speaker 1>got the power, he's got to speak combo. But I'm

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>looking forty from him, not this year at least maybe

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe if he can put it together this year and

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 1>give me and I think he can do that, and

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>let's move out right, and if you're getting him where

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you're getting him, that is that is maybe arguably hands

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:17.279
<v Speaker 1>down the best value in drafts. If he turns in

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a two fifty two sixties season at second base, you're

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>probably winning majority of your league's for for where you're

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:30.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna draft him. He's going to pick one sixty three

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:34.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. The second baseman that are going just ahead

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of him, or I mean, i'll include you know what,

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they're actually pretty far ahead. Ryan Dozer is going thirty

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 1>spots ahead of you a Mancata should they be that

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:47.799
<v Speaker 1>far apart. He is a starting second baseman for me,

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>which means he'd be in the top twelve. We're looking

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 1>at the standard twelve team league. He's he's currently the

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth second baseman. Guys, right, in front of him, Brian Dojer,

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I can't stand um nothing personally, just you know, as

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:00.759
<v Speaker 1>far as let's say, what did he do? Did you like?

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:04.839
<v Speaker 1>As far as fantasy baseball player, I can't stand the guy.

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think his two good seasons were the outliers for him.

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 1>If you look at his career, he had two good seasons,

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>one really good one. He's always like either a first

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 1>or second half guy. To Dojer like, he goes on

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>these amazing runs and like his end of season numbers

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>look pretty good. I'm with you, man, like I don't

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 1>want anything to do with Brian Doeser. I don't think

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the second base position is very good Ryan Dozer than Scope.

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:25.879
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are gonna look at these guys

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:29.759
<v Speaker 1>as bounce back Cane that it's I'm not really in Moncada.

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you go back and forth because I drafted

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 1>him last year and he burned me a little bit.

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, you gotta be able to erase that

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>from your mind. You gotta be able to say, all right,

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a new year prospect pedigree, Like I think you

0:53:42.040 --> 0:53:44.279
<v Speaker 1>know he has league winning potential. I feel like a

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:46.880
<v Speaker 1>second base in that I am on is rugnett O Door, like,

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that's the guy that I'm gonna be on because he

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>made conscious adjustments last year and we we saw but

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you get the same thing from Moncata and only thirty

0:53:56.040 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 1>spots later, So that's a full two round. I've seen

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>o Door hit thirty home runs, but you know what

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, he's done it twice. I hear you. But

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe okay, all right, So I mean like right now

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>o'dor is going on and Mankad is going one sixty three.

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But again o'door, I've seen him hit thirty home runs

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and that. But with this new approach, if he's a

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit more patient, maybe he's not trying to just

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 1>hit home runs all the time. Even if Odor hit

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to fifty with twenty five home runs and fifteen stolen bases,

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I think he could get there because you know, we've

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>already seen him hit the thirty home run park and

0:54:28.760 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>he made you know, he made conscious adjustments last year.

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>So but the guy that I'm on at the average

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one from two seventy one to two oh four, two

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 1>O four, I mean that was two years ago, right

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in twenty years seven second thirty home run season two

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 1>oh four I mean, and though that's an outlier in

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Odoor's career, everything else is higher than that. But he's

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:50.920
<v Speaker 1>probably in that year, not in the lineup if the

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Rangers are doing anything. I mean, the fact of the

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>matter is they weren't competitive. So yeah, we can afford

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to row this guy out and just let him swing

0:54:56.560 --> 0:54:58.359
<v Speaker 1>for the fences. We don't care if it's two oh

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 1>four or one ninety six, like it didn't matter at

0:55:00.760 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that point. Um, you're right, though. The second base position

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:05.799
<v Speaker 1>is another one that I don't feel is particularly deep.

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:08.800
<v Speaker 1>It's why jose Al two of it for me is

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:11.200
<v Speaker 1>still you can argue first round there. I know he's

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:12.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of slipped out of the first round, but I

0:55:12.840 --> 0:55:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have enough time knowing what he's giving. Yeah, I'm not

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 1>on all astros not named Tyler A Night or Alex Bregman. Well,

0:55:20.800 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm how to even even get into my my Flaherty

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>uh Rant. Why he's my first picture of it. We'll

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:27.319
<v Speaker 1>have you on again before the seasons. We'll see what

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 1>happened abut it real quick. We do have Stephen Massachusetts.

0:55:30.000 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we have enough time. We have

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:33.560
<v Speaker 1>two minutes, Steve, can you make it quick? For us

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:37.279
<v Speaker 1>A four four three six seven nine, Stephen, Massachusetts. If

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you can make it quick, we will be able to

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:42.560
<v Speaker 1>answer your question here. What's going on? Man? That was

0:55:42.560 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty fast, Steve, Uh, what what do you What do

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys think about him? Uh? In the two minutes

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that you have left? Who was that? We didn't We

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't Yo see Yo see Kukushi the guy from Seattle,

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese guy that just picked up. What do you

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>guys think about him? We actually spoke about him earlier

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on in the show. You go back and you can

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>get a more extensive breakdown of how we feel about him. Uh.

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:07.279
<v Speaker 1>And he actually really likes him a lot. He's gonna

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have a one fifty one hundred sixty ennings cap this year.

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 1>But we do think that in those endings pitched, he's

0:56:13.239 --> 0:56:14.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a pretty serviceable pitcher. I don't know that

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I want him as one of my top three pitchers

0:56:17.360 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy right around that market. Anything after that, like

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 1>is my sp four. I don't I don't hate it

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:24.719
<v Speaker 1>right around that mark. But Steak, thank you for the call,

0:56:24.840 --> 0:56:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and and we are up against the time. But if

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 1>you go back, I forgot what segment is. Maybe the

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>second segment. Go back to the beginning of second We

0:56:31.680 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>sent a lot of great things today two hours. Really

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:37.239
<v Speaker 1>does I hope you had fun the past few days? Man?

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I did? I did? I think it was a little circumstances.

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Did I think we did not? Right? I walked into

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the gauntlet? But you know it was, it was? It was.

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Today was a little better. We have you on again too.

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll have you on with Greg. I mean, Greg's probably

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:51.880
<v Speaker 1>not gonna listen to this, so between me and you,

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we can make fun of him for being a Dave

0:56:54.040 --> 0:56:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Matthews band. So next time, double team. We're gonna double

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:01.440
<v Speaker 1>team Greg, Dave Matthews Tailgator. Want to thank Andy Singleton

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 1>mom man follow m on Twitter at People's paying People's

0:57:04.080 --> 0:57:06.279
<v Speaker 1>with a Z for joining me in studio the past

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:07.960
<v Speaker 1>few days. It's been a lot of fun man. Thanks

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:12.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for everybody at home, Thank you for watching

0:57:12.120 --> 0:57:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and listening. Remember, stay classy, fancy, honest,