WEBVTT - The Surprising Similarity Between the US and Chinese Internets

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy remember how

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 3>like in the late.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Nineties, like the Internet was starting to become a thing,

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 2>and people thought it would bring like liberalism and democracy utopia.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I totally bought into that, Like I you know, people

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 2>look back at that and like, oh, they were naive,

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't blame them, Like, I think I bought

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 2>into that too.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there was something very wholesome about the sort

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 4>of mid nineties internet culture where you could go to

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 4>everyone's like little individual blog and people were mostly talking

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 4>about their hobbies and things like that, or at least

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 4>that was my experience of it, probably colored by the

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 4>fact that I was in middle school at the time,

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 4>but it seemed very innocent.

0:00:58.320 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>It was very cool.

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>It was very decentralized, right, So now we associate the

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 2>Internet with a handful of tech oligarchs that control various kingdoms.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you could even say within the Internet, whether it's

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the medic Kingdom or the Amazon Kingdom or whatever. But

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>it was very decentralized. Everyone with their own little sites

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 2>cobbled together and so forth, and I totally bought that idea.

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 3>It's just like, Oh, we're all going to talk to

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 3>each other, we're going to work.

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Things out, and there's no way that authoritarian governments could

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 2>ever control this, and it will finally realize the true

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.919
<v Speaker 2>promise of democracy and all that stuff.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I totally bought into it.

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 4>Fast forward to twenty twenty six. How would you describe

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 4>the Internet now?

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the word that always comes to my mind,

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>and there are many words, is just this sort of

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>like sheer like sort of tribalism and conflictualism on every level,

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 2>right nationalism, racism, bigotry, anti semitism, sexism, et cetera. It's

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>just like riven with that, it's riven with conflict and

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>so forth. It's heavily centralized. All of the sort of

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>utilh and promise I'm like, didn't really pan out that way.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 4>I would say Cesspool one too. You have to try

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:11.399
<v Speaker 4>really really hard nowadays to find good and useful corners

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 4>of the Internet. I'm not saying that they're not out there,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 4>but it is interesting how far we've deviated from that

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 4>initial utopian premise of the Internet. The other thing that's happening.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 4>We're recording this on let's see January twenty seventh. What's

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 4>interesting is that we're starting to have even more discussion

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>about the power of the platform. So over the weekend

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 4>there have been some allegations that TikTok, for instance, is

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 4>censoring Minneapolis video or video of the Minneapolis shooting. And

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 4>that's just after the new ownership took control of the platform, right,

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 4>so they spun off the US business, and now it

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 4>has all these new owners and people are starting to

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.839
<v Speaker 4>talk about, well, maybe they're censoring or even if they're

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 4>not directly censoring some stuff, maybe the algorithm is influencing

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 4>what people see totally.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 2>And then there's one other dimension before we getting into

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the conversation that I think is very important here, which

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 2>is that the Internet is splintering geographically. Right, So we've

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>known for a long time. Of course, people talk about

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the firewall in China and the Chinese Internet, but it's

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:18.519
<v Speaker 2>not just China, right. We see the UK establishing its

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 2>own rules, We see Australia establishing its own rules. We

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 2>saw the thing a couple of years ago with Brazil

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>temporarily banning Twitter, et cetera. And so there's all these

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of intermingling of digital platforms and national sovereignty, and

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I really do believe to some extent that a lot

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 2>of the leaders around the world are looking at China

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and a seemingly more controlled Internet like with jealousy, right,

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>and oh, we would love to have this level of

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 2>control over our sort of town square, et cetera. And

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, some countries of the First Amendment, so that

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>makes it very tough, et cetera. But it really feels

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 2>like there's so many aspects of the Internet that are

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of not panning out, and people like, we want

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 2>to constrict what people could see, we want to tighten

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the algorithms, we want to curb some kind of discourse,

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 3>And I think this is going to be one of

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the biggest stories of our time.

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, with China specifically, there's still a big question, which

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 4>is whether or not the censorship of the Internet basically

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 4>allows it to act as a sort of like safety

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 4>valve that lets people, you know, blow off some steam,

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 4>but not enough steam to actually threaten the regime over there,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 4>or whether it's actually a tool or could be a

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 4>tool of social change. Because people are to some extent

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 4>allowed to say some stuff. I think that question is

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 4>like still kind of unanswered.

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm very excited to say.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 2>We really do have the perfect guest, someone who has

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>written a fascinating new book all about the Chinese Internet.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be speaking with Yiling Lui is the

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 2>author of the new book The Wall Dancers. Thank you

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 2>so much for coming on odd.

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 5>Lots, Thanks so much for having me.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 3>What is this book and why is it called The

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Wall Dancers?

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so the Wall Dancers. The comes from this term

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 5>in Chinese which is called dancing in shackles, and it

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 5>was first used in the early two thousands by journalists

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 5>to describe what it means to write and report under

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 5>state constraints, but slowly became viral as a term that

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 5>was used by I've seen like software engineers use it,

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 5>musicians use it, science fiction writers use it. And it

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 5>really resonated with me, this idea of the dance, because

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 5>it captured this idea that to live and navigate Chinese

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 5>society is a dance. It's this dynamic push and pull

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 5>between state and society. It means living in this place

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 5>that's on one hand rich with innovation and yet on

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 5>the other hand, rigidly constrained, and I came to see

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 5>that this dance was most dynamic on the Internet. What

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 5>we know is the space behind the great firewall, and

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 5>the people that I thought were really good and adept

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 5>at navigating this terrain, I came to know them and

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 5>call them dancers.

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 4>So this was the really interesting thing about your book

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 4>and the reason we wanted to talk to you. You

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 4>tell this story of the Chinese Internet through the perspective

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 4>of individuals, rather than say, the Internet platforms that have

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 4>come to dominate the space, or even from a sort

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 4>of state centric point of view. What do you get

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 4>out of interviewing or following individuals versus taking that other approach,

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 4>which you know there are plenty of books out there

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 4>about the rise of Wabo and stuff like that.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 5>I think the main reason behind this choice was if

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 5>you look at Western news headlines or headlines in general

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 5>about China and trades's technology, it almost always falls under

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 5>one of two binaries. It's reduced to very simple terms.

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 5>One is China the kind of sprawling economic juggernaut that's

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 5>building humanoids and high speed rail and it's place of

0:06:55.839 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 5>boundless opportunity. And then you have the like techno authoritary

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 5>and oppressive regime where mindless people have no agency of

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 5>their own. And I think the big issue here is

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 5>that the Chinese Internet is always framed through and seen

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 5>through the lens of American national security and economic interests.

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 5>And I wanted to force people out of these tropes.

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 5>And the way to see kind of China and the

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 5>Chinese Internet and all its complexity and contradictions is through

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 5>people and through individual lives.

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you start the book by telling the story of

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 2>a gay man who is able through the Internet to

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 2>build community, find people eventually at a time when, of

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 2>course there was extreme repression. Homosexuality was I think illegal

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>at the time. You know, again, this seems both in

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>China and the US what probably a lot of people

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 2>were very hopeful for with the Internet, this idea that

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>people were going to be able to find community, like

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>minded individuals find acceptance in these digital spaces. And I

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>suppose in many cases since this happened, But it is

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>interesting how in both the global context and the Chinese

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 2>specific context there were similar stories being told.

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 3>There were similar hopes.

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 5>Definitely, I think of the story of the Internet in China,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 5>at least as a romance. But I'm realizing, you know,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 5>as you discussed earlier, the story of the global Internet

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 5>was also a romance. The story of the World Wide

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 5>Web was also a romance. I certainly bought into the

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 5>narrative that you bought into. I thought we were on

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 5>this like teleological arc too, towards liberalization, and I think

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people bought into that narrative, this idea

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 5>that you know, the Chinese Internet, despite the fact that

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 5>the firewall existed very early, was going to push people

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 5>towards greater openness, greater freedom, greater connection, and it would

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 5>just keep going on from there and there.

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 4>So talk to us about what is and isn't allowed

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 4>on the Chinese Internet then, because as you say, it's

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 4>more nuanced than just like outright censorship in many ways,

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 4>although sometimes it is just out censorship and you can't

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 4>say a specific word like tan and men or something

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 4>like that. And I remember, actually now that i'm thinking

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 4>about it, in the early two thousands, when I was

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 4>in Beijing, like the censorship was very obvious, like certain

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 4>sites were just outright blocked. On TV, you'd be watching

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 4>CNN and suddenly it would go black during a news

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 4>story or you get newspapers delivered to you that had

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 4>literally physical like sentences crossed out with a black marker.

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 4>But what isn't isn't allowed.

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 5>I will start off by saying that if I could

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 5>answer that question really accurately, I would be a very

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 5>rich woman right now. I think the reason being, like,

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 5>the censorship ecosystem thrives off of vagueness, right the fact

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 5>that it's vague, the fact that there are no red

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 5>lines is what allows it to function so effectively. I

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 5>will say that it's changed quite dramatically over the last

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 5>few decades, especially since you were last Thera Tracy. So

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, back in the day, I would say the

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 5>lines were much clearer. A lot of people would say

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 5>things like no Tianan Men, no Tibet, no Taiwan. They

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 5>would call them the three t's. So censorship back then

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 5>was very much allowed about a dissent against the government,

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 5>criticism of the government, but most importantly, anything that would

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 5>provoke collective action. So if there was you know, news

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 5>of a protest or news of people gathering, or any

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 5>type of unease that might boil into something bigger and

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 5>bring people together into a physical town square, that got censored.

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 5>But over the years, I would say, particularly in the

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 5>mid twenty tens, that's come to encompass also anything that

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 5>veers from the party's ideological agenda. So this is where

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.239
<v Speaker 5>you have statements coming out saying we don't want unhealthy

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 5>marital values appearing on the internet, like we don't want

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 5>I think recently in twenty twenty one, sissy boys caught

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 5>added two things that got needed to be taken down

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 5>the Internet.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 4>No cissies allowed. I'm imagining like a hand drawn sign

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 4>on a tree house or something.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and you know, like everything that comes, you know,

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 5>everything that's part of its ideological agenda is now scrubbed off.

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 5>And another thing that to add on there is like

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 5>the excessive flaunting of wealth. You know, that's something that's

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 5>new that used to be all over the interest back

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 5>in the day.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 3>We need that here.

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 2>It's driving people crazy because they look on Instagram. And

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 2>I remember being, you know, during COVID, and I was

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 2>like in my house and seeing like all these people

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 2>like flying around.

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I got very resentful.

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 2>What about criticisms of the government, But not from an

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 2>ideological perspective per se, because sometimes you read a story

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 2>like someone will have gotten hit by a train or

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 2>a car and maybe the police like didn't do an investigation.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>You see this big uproar. Talk to us about what's

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.599
<v Speaker 2>allowed and how they how the managers of the firewall

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>are managers of the rules, not the firewall per se.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Think about these incidents like just yeah, criticism of government handling.

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 5>Of things again, like I can't say with you know,

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 5>definitively taken down and what's now taken down. I would

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 5>veer on saying that whenever there's any criticism of any

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 5>kind of local official, local government, that's technically looked on

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 5>with great caution and taken down. But how it actually

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 5>works behind the scenes is that some higher level top

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 5>regulators say that the Chinese Cyberspace Administration the CAC will

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 5>write a directive. So maybe there's local corruption in some

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 5>county and news starts spilling out, and whoever is part

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 5>of that regulatory committee will be writing a directive that says, hey,

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 5>downplay this, let's not have this appear on way BOA.

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 5>That will then get passed on to WAYBOS sensors who

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 5>then start scrubbing that off their newsfeed, or it happens

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 5>the other way where WAYBOS sensors aren't even receiving that directive,

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 5>but kind of proactively, like a student who is really

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 5>nervous about upsetting their teacher in advance will just go

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 5>and scrub that off even before receiving that directive.

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh interesting, so self censorship basically, yes, So how labor

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:11.599
<v Speaker 4>intensive is the censorship process nowadays? Because you know, I imagine,

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 4>as you said, directives get made and someone has to

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 4>enact them. But on the other hand, so much of

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 4>the Internet nowadays is ruled by algos and most recently

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 4>AI you could just you know, design an algorithm that

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 4>always downplays political scandal or something like that.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 5>I would say, hugely labor intensive.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Armies of wu maao, that's what they're called, right.

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So that specifically refers to the fifty cent army umao,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 5>but that specifically refers to not necessarily state sponsored actors

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 5>or not necessarily state paid individuals, but people who are

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 5>kind of pumping patriotic content.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 4>Hobbyist nationalists exactly exactly.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 5>So you know, there's actually not too much of a

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 5>difference between the wum maao and maybe some of the

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 5>patriotic trolls and insults that you see you next today,

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 5>right to what extent is are some of the people

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 5>who are posting like pro Trump propaganda on Twitter essentially

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 5>the same as Umao. There's this dynamic called flooding, which

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 5>refers to when in cells or a particular group of

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 5>online individuals are pumping just content onto a news feed

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 5>to try to get rid of news that they don't

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 5>want people to look at. And that takes place in

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 5>China all the time. But I think that's different from

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 5>actual employees who work at places like Waybul or Doeing,

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 5>who are just spending every single day deleting stuff off

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 5>the web. And you know, when I interviewed, actually for

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 5>the book, a censor for Wayboo and he started working

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 5>there in twenty eleven. I think he was one of

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and fifty employees. This is right when waybul

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 5>was founded, and he said, you know, by twenty twenty

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 5>he had left already. They're probably like ten thousand.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean this is sort of what I was

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 2>struck by reading your book, which is that you know,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:25.119
<v Speaker 2>you talk about these people who are maybe they're bots,

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe they're paid, maybe they're just naturally impelled to join

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 2>a mob and want to flood something. But some of

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>these patterns do not seem distinct to China. It's almost

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>like they're endemic to the Internet itself, regardless of what

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the official rules are.

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely right, we have no sense of whether or not

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 5>these are kind of homegrown, grassroots patriotic flames that are

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 5>just amplified. And you know when I say that, doesn't

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 5>that sound very similar to what's taking place on the

0:15:56.080 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 5>American Internet. I forget the name of that one in

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Twitter influencer who's kind of been talked about. It's Trump's

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 5>right hand women. Do you know who I'm talking about?

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Laura Lumer?

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Laura Lumer really isn't there.

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna say you have to be more specific because

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 4>there's quite a few nowadays.

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, Laura Lumer, you know when we read news

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 5>articles on her, it's is she being paid out? Is

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 5>she not being paid out? And you know, that very

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 5>much reminds me of the dynamic with a lot of

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Chinese patriotic influencers, Like they very much earnestly hold the

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 5>views that they're sharing, but is there a cut being

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 5>taken by amplifying those views and supporting those views?

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Since we've mentioned Wabo a couple times now and you know,

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 4>you just gave us that anecdote about the number of

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 4>sensors they had, and they have experienced phenomenal growth. One

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 4>thing I never understood about Wabo is the kind of

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 4>origins story, because my understanding is they were basically born

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 4>out of censorship. So there was unrest in a room

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 4>cheet I think it was, and so a bunch of

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 4>existing Internet platforms either got you know, repressed, or taken

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 4>down completely. And then the founder of Wabo was like,

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 4>I know, this is an opportunity for me to get

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 4>in and start my own platform. I never understood that mindset.

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 4>What was it that he thought he could do that

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 4>other platforms had failed to do.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So Wayble actually means little blog or microblog, and

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 5>Wabo is shorthand for Sino Weboa, which is the full

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 5>company's name. But before two thousand and nine, honestly, before

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 5>twenty eleven, there were many, many way boys, or there

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 5>were dozens of companies that were all trying to be

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 5>microblogging platforms. So there was a platform called Fanfu, there

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 5>was a whole bunch. There's a platform called renren which

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 5>was not really a micro bloging platform, is kind of

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 5>like a Chinese Facebook, so to say back people people right,

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 5>exactly exactly. And the founder of Sino Weibo actually founded

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 5>what is now known as Weboa in two thousand and nine,

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 5>and he did a sally the same thing as all

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 5>these other companies. He just did a better job of censoring.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 5>That's really what happened, as you mentioned during the protests

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 5>in Urumji in two thousand and nine. He just did

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 5>a much better job of scrubbing information off the wavebood

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 5>feed and the time and didn't get shut down where

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 5>all of these other companies got shut down.

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting hearing you describe.

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 2>We did an episode actually his last March with Kaiser

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Quo of the Seneca Podcast. We're talking a little bit

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 2>about how Chinese policy making works and this idea of

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 2>this sort of decentralized centralized like KPIs right. So Beijing, well,

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>this was in the industrial policy context. Beijing says we

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>want more solar production or more electric vehicle production, and

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 2>then all the provincial leaders figure out what that means

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 2>in the context of their region and then work closeta

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>autonomously to satisfy that. It sounds similar to some extent

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 2>with the rules around censorship, especially when you describe some

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>of that preemptive self censorship of everyone trying to figure

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>out the right level or approach that is consistent with

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:03.719
<v Speaker 2>the broader level mandate.

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 5>No, that's a really good point and definitely a parallel

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 5>that I would draw. You know, For example, if they

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 5>were to release industrial policy, a tech company ceo will

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 5>then like read that policy very carefully and be like, Okay,

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 5>how can we align our companies direction with the rhetoric

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 5>of this policy directive. The same goes with censorship, you know.

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 5>So one of the subjects that I profile is the

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 5>CEO or was the CEO of this skating dating app Blued.

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 5>And so if they release a censorship directive saying we

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 5>don't want cissy boys on our platform, he's going to

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 5>go and look very carefully at the platform and see

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 5>how are we going to make sure there are no

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 5>cissy boys on our app?

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 5>And so there is definitely this sense of I don't know,

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 5>if you have read Harry Potter, I never.

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Did, I did?

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 6>Did you not?

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I never did? I never did?

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 2>But Tracy will get listeners will get it.

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 5>This analogy really hit it home for me. But you

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 5>remember Dolores's umbrage.

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, oh, she was creepy.

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.239
<v Speaker 5>You remember how she would like post these decrees and

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 5>then all of the and she would just post them

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 5>on the wall and then they would be kind of vague,

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 5>and then students would freak out and scramble, and you know,

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 5>people like Malfoy would aggressively over and interpret that. I

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 5>think that's the dynamic.

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Think this is an underappreciated point sometimes, but like the

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 4>vagueness in the decrees is done on purpose, right, It's

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 4>so that like you're never really sure what is and

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 4>isn't allowed, and so you do start self censoring. And

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 4>also you know, if the government wants to go after you,

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 4>they can do it because the rule is purposely vague.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 5>And it also means that, like each of these companies

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 5>have these huge keyword databases of censored words, and those

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 5>are extremely valuable. They're like proprietary assets, where you know,

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 5>they that is how they keep their company alive essentially. Right,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 5>if you have a better keyword database than the company

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 5>down the road, you're gonna have a better chance of surviving.

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 4>So just on the keywords. This is one of the

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 4>most fascinating things about the Chinese Internet, and I think

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people know about it at this point.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 4>But you know, internet users are very creative in bypassing

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.239
<v Speaker 4>the sensors, so they're always coming up with codes, some

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 4>of which sound very funny if you don't know the context,

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Like isn't there one horse mud horse mud or mud

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 4>grass horse or something fighting a crab exactly the poo, Yeah,

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 4>there we go. Winnie the Pooh would be the obvious one.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.719
<v Speaker 4>This is sort of tangential. But do you think that,

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 4>I guess, do you think that kind of creativity or

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 4>like code wording, do you think that's related to the

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Chinese language itself and the fact that a lot of

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 4>the words are very literal and also you have a

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 4>lot of homonyms.

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Definitely, Like a huge part of it is like each

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 5>character can have multiple meanings. So for example, the most

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 5>famous one that you mentioned that emerged as early as

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 5>the early two thousands was this idea of the grass

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 5>mud horse, right, and so grass mud horse in Chinese

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 5>is tall nim mah and just depending on the tones,

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 5>you shift the tones, it becomes taalnima, which means basically

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 5>your mom, And so you know, it became this like

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 5>rally because ironic rallying cry pushing back against you know, authorities,

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 5>her being who overstepping their bounds. But it's funny and

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 5>punny at the same time.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>I do think even like on Twitter, you see certain communities,

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 2>particularly more extremist ones, like you see their esoteric communications

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 2>and you see their code words. But it does seem like,

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 2>especially with the prevalence of very subtle hominems, et cetera,

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the creativity for esoteric expression probably gets taken to.

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 3>The whole new level.

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Definitely, definitely. Though, an interesting dynamic that I'm now seeing

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 5>is that a lot of the terms that are being

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 5>used on the Chinese Internet are actually, you know, echoing

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the sentiment that of the terms that

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 5>are being used in the American Internet. One term that

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 5>I've noticed come up, it's not hugely viral in either

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 5>place yet, is this idea of the NPC? Oh yeah,

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 5>the non player character. And I didn't realize this was

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 5>like resonating on both sides.

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, yeah, that's interesting.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you know that when the big Chess party or

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 2>are you familiar with that term, or the three D

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Chess party or something like that.

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure There's.

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 2>One I like that I saw that I started using,

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 2>which is people who are so defensive of the leadership

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>that every everything they say, it's like, no, no, you

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 2>don't get it. They're playing five D chess, right, And

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>so I think the term was a big chess party

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 2>or something like that.

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 3>I think we need to we need to start incorporating

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 3>that war because.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 4>It's a good one.

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 4>But actually, on this note, how difficult is it to

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 4>keep track of all the different code words or to

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 4>learn the new code words? Because you know, on the

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 4>one hand, if you're saying Winnie the Pooh and instead

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.959
<v Speaker 4>of sheshin ping or something like that, it allows you

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:12.239
<v Speaker 4>to perhaps bypass censorship. But on the other hand, if

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 4>you're talking in code constantly, I imagine it means some

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 4>people like just aren't getting the message. It's not resonating

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 4>with a certain sector of society. So how difficult is

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 4>it and what are the pros and cons of having

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 4>to keep up with all these keywords constantly?

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I mean it's hugely difficult. It just means that

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 5>these words become more and more obscure. You know, I'm

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 5>someone who has made a career out of studying the

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 5>Chinese Internet, and I'll often read social media posts and

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 5>have no idea what's going on, and their entire teams.

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 5>There's actually this excellent team called China Digital Times, nonprofit

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 5>organization that they have a lex icon exactly exactly, and

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 5>I have to consult that because sometimes I'm reading stuff

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 5>and I have no idea what it's referring to.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 6>Huh.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 2>I want to get into more of this sort of

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:01.719
<v Speaker 2>like understand especially like how American or internationally we might

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 2>learn more generally about what's going on the Chinese Internet.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 3>But before we get to that, I.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Want to ask, there is this trope or this thing

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 2>that gets repeated a lot, and you heard it a

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>lot in the TikTok debates, and it's smacks of a

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 2>certain racism or exoticism or orientalism, et cetera, where people say, oh,

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 2>on American TikTok, they're all like, it's all a bunch

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of garbage and rage, bait and slop. But on the

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 2>equivalent in China, it's they're learning mathematics and learning how

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>to play violin and all these sort of stereotypical things.

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk to us just a little bit about

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 2>like how similar dissimilar. Do these platforms feel from a

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of day to day content standpoint setting aside sensitivity

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 2>is about politics.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean I'm like kind of torn about that

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 5>statement because on one hand, it kind of like glorifies.

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 5>I mean, depending on who you're like at who's saying

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 5>those statements, right, you're either glorifying and kind of like

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 5>projecting a lot to the Chinese. And it really reveals

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 5>more about I would say, like American conservative anxiety about

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 5>what's appearing on their own Internet and projections, because the

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 5>Chinese Internet is full of like crazy slop too, at least, is.

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 3>What I'm like get.

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 2>My assumption is that the gap is like massively overstated.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 2>But I've never you know, exactly seen whatever the Chinese

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 2>version the original tiktoge, so I just have no sense

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>like how real these stereotypes.

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 5>Are whatever exactly Like when a young student, you know,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 5>in China is just like scrolling through Doeing, They're not

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 5>just getting wonderful math content. It's going to like help

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 5>them excel at school. But what I will say is

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 5>that definitely within the Chinese censorship context, there is this

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 5>emphasis on what the party likes to call positive energy

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 5>so it is definitely much more sanitized than American social

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 5>media platforms, Like you are not going to see quote

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 5>unquote unhealthy marital values or like that is taken down right.

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 5>And so while on one hand, I don't want to

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 5>say like they're completely different, they definitely are different in

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 5>terms of, you know, what appears there and what does.

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 4>It Since you mentioned students, have we seen any efforts

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 4>by the party to I guess crack down on internet

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 4>use in general? And I'm thinking back to, you know,

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 4>the video game crackdown, where there was, you know, a

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 4>sense or a directive that kids were spending too much

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 4>time playing video games and they should be learning important

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 4>and useful things. Do you see a similar attitude towards

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 4>the internet just out of curiosity?

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 5>Not as much, but I would say the video game

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 5>piece is the one that you know comes to mind

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 5>when you bring it up. I think the issue being

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 5>the Internet is just such a vital part of daily

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 5>operation and just getting around. Like you can't really tell

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 5>a young person to get off we chat if that's

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 5>both how he communicates with his mom and his teacher,

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, and to buy basic goods. But you can say, well,

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 5>let's get rid of video games for X amount of

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 5>hours every weekday. Because that's clearly.

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 2>That if I spoke Chinese, could I open up a

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 2>Weba account from here? Would it be easy to just

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>start joining us posting with them?

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, definitely talk to.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 3>Us about I should do that.

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 2>That's a good reason to learn Chinese, which is one

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 2>of my twenty twenty six goals is to start taking lessons.

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 3>So thank you, thank you.

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about that five minute period in history

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>in which TikTok was banned in the United States and

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 2>suddenly there was a flood of American users to that

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>other red note or something like that.

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I forgot what was called.

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, talk to us about that experience and whether anything

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 2>interesting emerged from that. There was ten days where that.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Happened or whatever.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it was an incredible moment. I remember it very clearly.

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 5>But essentially there was news impending news that TikTok would

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 5>get banned in the US and all these teto.

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but in.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 5>Lead up to that, TikTok users were freaking out, and they,

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 5>essentially I think millions of American TikTok users started to

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 5>flood red Note or as it's known in China's Yahongshu,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 5>which is you know, people call it China's Instagram, but

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 5>that's not quite the right equivalent. It's almost this Instagram

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 5>meets Pinterest meets Yelp type social media platform mostly used

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 5>by young urban women. It has a slightly more liberal

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 5>bent to like catch up on lifestyle and news. Now

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 5>it's all kinds of news. But I was both on

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:50.479
<v Speaker 5>one hand, struck by the irony of the situation. You know,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 5>that the American Internet had somehow become so closed and

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 5>siloed and controlled that the way to escape it was

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 5>to then jump to argue because it's sort of like it.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Was sort of like a reverse Berlin Wall moment in

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 2>which the West, the West Germans were the ones flooding

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 2>into the other side after this, uh, I don't know,

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>something like that.

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 3>It was very yeah, exactly exactly right.

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 2>It's like these were the ones that had the restriction

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 2>placed on US America, and so then there suddenly like

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 2>we spill out, find a new hole in the wall

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 2>to spill over onto the other side.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 5>Exactly, which is why they were you know, like I

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 5>think American users were looking for their Chinese spies kind

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 5>of ironically and Chinese users were teaching them how to

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 5>get around red note sensors. But I think like key

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 5>to that was just like I felt a lot of

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 5>delight from that moment because it was the first time

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 5>there was this like really sincere and earnest exchange between

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 5>users on both sides of the Internet, and I hadn't

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 5>felt that and seen that in years, if not decades.

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 4>So one of the debates that's constantly ongoing when it

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 4>comes to TikTok is what the algorithm is doing and

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 4>what can it's actually surfacing. What are the like parallels

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 4>with I guess censorship in China or where do you

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 4>see key differences in terms of what the algo can

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 4>do to influence the general population.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 5>So you mean, like between the algorithm in China and

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 5>the algorithm in the US, I would say that, you know,

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 5>the algorithms, it's always really hard to say to what

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 5>extent the algorithm is playing a role in censorship censorship

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 5>of the content, right, And I think that's one of

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 5>the big issues or that the big criticisms it's playing

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 5>out right now with this TikTok sale. Even though vast

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 5>majority of the ownership is American, the algorithm is still

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 5>owned by Byte Dance. So to what extent does bite

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Dance still have influence over what American users are seeing.

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.479
<v Speaker 5>That's up to question. I think the difference is in

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 5>China there's just a lot more tools externally to kind

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 5>of control at what happens after that. It doesn't matter

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 5>how the algorithm is dictating what appears on the feeds.

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 5>You know, there's still content moderators who can come in

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 5>and deal with the content that is posted online after

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 5>you know it's already posted.

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Joe, I feel like I need to make a public

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 4>service announcement, actually a public service announcement recognizing someone for

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 4>their public service, which is Sam Row, who does the

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 4>dirty work of trawling through TikTok on a daily basis

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 4>and then cross posting the good videos onto Instagram for

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 4>everyone who doesn't actually have TikTok like.

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Me, people should follow him.

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 4>He'd genuinely a public service.

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Genuinely, I want to go back to this sort of

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of where we started at the beginning. But I

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 2>think it's a question of some pretty significant stakes, you know.

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 2>So you talk about the rise of the sort of

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 2>like very nationalistic impulse that you see on the Chinese

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Internet these days. She again very similar to here, And

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>I would say, and many people would agree that if

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you look at the US government right now, you're like

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the pathologies, the dysfunctions, et cetera. It's like almost downstream,

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 2>like the Internet has shaped the US government in many respects.

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Max Reid, who we've had on the podcast, who has

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 2>a really good newsletter, talked about how it's like the

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 2>comment section is one and all of the people who

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 2>are in power in the US government are the people

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 2>who like ten years ago were angry about having been

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 2>banned from the comment section, and now they have the

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>last laugh on everyone else because now they hold the

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 2>levers of power. Talk to us about the emergence of

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the sort of strong nationalistic undercurrent on the Chinese Internet.

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 2>When did that like start to emerge and how does

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 2>that sort of like reinforce the political direction of travel

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>within Chinese politics.

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would say, similar to what has happened in

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 5>the US, that patriotic undertone has always been there as

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 5>early as like the pre Internet period of like the

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 5>eighties and nineties of people who you know, perhaps we're

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 5>speaking of a patriotic China in the more a liberal sense.

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 5>They wanted strong men rule. They didn't want you know,

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the leftists in China, as we think

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 5>about them in China and not in the US, wanted

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, China not to be kind of swept up

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 5>by liberal influence. It needed a strong state to be

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 5>in charge of the economy. But I would say, similar

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 5>to the US, that nationalist voice was very fringe. It

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 5>was niche. It was kind of seen as radical. So

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, as early as two thousand and eight, for example,

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.760
<v Speaker 5>there where as you mentioned, like the fifty cent army,

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 5>but also what was known is like angry youth or finching.

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 5>So two thousand and eight was like a hugely pivotal

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.479
<v Speaker 5>moment for China in that the country was stepping onto

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 5>the world on the global stage as this international presence,

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 5>and it wanted to present itself as super liberal. But

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 5>at the time there were these like very angry youth

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 5>who were online and being like, look at how China

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 5>is being presented by CNN. We're being kind of smeared

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 5>by westerners. But they were small. I would say today

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese internet is largely fencing. They're no longer called that.

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.399
<v Speaker 5>But you know, I would say in twenty sixteen, there's

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 5>an emergence of what we now call Little Pinks or

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 5>self and Home, and it's like you merged the fencing

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 5>or you merged the patriot with the stan or the

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 5>online found where you know, like.

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 4>What they softer nationalism exactly or.

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Not even softer, but they use the tactics of online fandom,

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 5>so you know, like they use the same tactics of

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 5>like a group of Justin Bieber fans would do to

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 5>take down Justin Bieber's nemesis, where except they're doing that

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.399
<v Speaker 5>with maybe like Taigwan, who's the who was the leader

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 5>of Taiwan. And so I would say there's this like

0:35:54.760 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 5>fusion of online internet celebrity culture with online patriotism, and

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 5>you know it's not so much different from like the

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Reddit insult.

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it feels very similar. I just want to just

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 2>to go down this road a little bit further. Last

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 2>year I read Kevin Rudd's book about Shijinping, and one

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 2>of the points that he makes, you know a lot

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 2>of people think of, Okay, she gets into power and

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 2>then sort of takes this nationalist turn, and he makes

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the point that actually the sort of more nationalist turn

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 2>in Chinese politics, some of the anti liberal started under

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 2>the late Hu Jintao years, which makes me again wonder

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 2>whether there was this brewing force, partly cultivated by the

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Internet that was starting. You know that rather than okay,

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Shijhinping comes in and presses the button and turns the

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Internet in a more nationalist direction, that this was already

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 2>an emerging thing, and helps explain Hijinping's durability and ability

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 2>to consolidate power and so forth. That there's sort of

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 2>that it's a bottom up phenomenon is as much as

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 2>it is a top down thing.

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, And this is why I keep coming back to

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and eight, is this huge turning point. And Kaiser,

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 5>who's one of your guests, has made this point a

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 5>few times, which is, you know, in two thousand and eight,

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 5>I think the big thing that happened at the time

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 5>was a the Beijing Olympics and be the financial crisis.

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 5>So at this moment when you know, Chinese people were

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 5>standing up and for the first time, a lot of

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 5>like the Great Firewalls was getting taken down, so a

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 5>lot of Chinese Internet users in Beijing could see the

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 5>news for the first time. They were seeing two things

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 5>they were seeing CNN, you know, posting news about the

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 5>Tibet protests and not covering the Olympics, and they're also

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 5>seeing eventually news of the financial crisis. So there was

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 5>this sense of like, well, you know, we expected to

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 5>engage with the outside world, and instead the West is

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 5>criticizing China and can't get its own ship in order.

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 5>And so there is a sense both among kind of

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:59.919
<v Speaker 5>ordinary people of this growing patriotism but also the leader,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 5>which the leadership itself, because they were thinking, well, maybe

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 5>liberalization is not the way to go right, maybe like

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 5>liberalization leads to unruly financial markets, and we need to

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 5>steer this ship in a different direction. And so we

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 5>see both kind of a nationalistic turn but also in

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 5>a liberal turn, and that very much precedes Sejenpingg's rise

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 5>to power.

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 4>I think people forget what a huge moment the two

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 4>thousand and eight Olympics actually were, like actually physically changed

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Beijing and then also changed a lot of Chinese society.

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 4>But I'm still I'm still annoyed that they got rid

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.760
<v Speaker 4>of all the fake DVD stores because those were fun. Anyway,

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 4>we have to get in an ai question. So with

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 4>the advent of AI. A lot of the technology which

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 4>is coming out of China is very impressive. Does censorship

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 4>become easier?

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 5>I would say yes. I mean AI has always been

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 5>It has been long used in Chinese censorship capacity, not

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 5>just with the advent of generative AI. So, you know,

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 5>the sensor that I interviewed, he said that, you know,

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 5>before he even goes in and looks at what's being

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 5>taken down, a you know, automated process first flags all

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 5>of the sensitive words. I imagine that just makes that

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.720
<v Speaker 5>process significantly easier.

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Is there any way to gauge sort of public opinion

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 2>about the Internet or like, because I think there are

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people in the US again who would say, like, yes,

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.959
<v Speaker 2>this would be great. I would love to make rage

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 2>bait illegal. I would love it if people weren't flaunting

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 2>their wealth. I would love it if there were not

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 2>pornography easily available on the Internet, et cetera. I think

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people hear this and it's like, yeah,

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 2>sounds pretty good. Is there discontent with the state of moderation?

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Is there discontent with some of the restrictions? Is there

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.240
<v Speaker 2>no like, is there way to gauge some of these questions?

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.240
<v Speaker 5>They're certainly discontent, but I think it's just very hard

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 5>to gauge public opinion in China in general. I would say,

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 5>broadly speaking, there is like embrace of technological change and

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 5>embrace of technological progress that's more elevated in China than

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 5>in the US. But you know, there are people who

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 5>are unhappy with the censorship regime and people who like

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 5>having those controls. I will say, at the heart of

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 5>that kind of debate or that envy is just like,

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 5>what are the governance mechanisms that we can put in

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 5>place at this moment with AI? Right, I think everyone's

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 5>freaking out about this uncontrollable new technology. In China at

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 5>the very least seems to have a governance mechanism in place. So,

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 5>for example, there is a algorithm registry where essentially every

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 5>single company that has an AI tool needs to submit

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 5>their algorithm to authorities and that is then listed in

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 5>a public registry. And no equivalent of that exists in

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 5>the US. And that's actually I think, you know, that's

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 5>actually a pretty interesting form of governance and maybe something

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 5>that other countries can learn from.

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, people have criticized algoes here for being

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 4>essentially black boxes just coming. I guess, full circle back

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 4>to our intro. The surprising thing here is, you know,

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 4>the US and the Chinese Internet have followed a very

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 4>similar evolution, despite very different governance regimes. So I think

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 4>to some extent, you could imagine, all right, Chinese Internet

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 4>heavily censored. Obviously there's going to be a surge of nationalism, right,

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 4>whereas in the US. I guess maybe it's more surprising.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 4>But what's your overarching thesis for why we sort of

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 4>ended up in the same place despite having very different systems.

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean that's a good question. I would say, first,

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 5>we were pretty naive about the fact that technology even

0:41:57.719 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 5>moves in the direction of freedom, Right, that's kind of

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 5>like based on the assumption that's just the direction that

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 5>we're going to go in. I would say probably my

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 5>overarching thesis is that we've allowed too much of technology

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 5>to be centralized within the hands of a few people.

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 5>And it doesn't matter, you know, the US and American systems.

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 5>People often talk about the differences, but actually they're remarkably similar.

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't matter if it is government that has centralized,

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 5>it's you know, the power of technology in its hands

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 5>or as you mentioned like a handful of tech oligarchs

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 5>right at the end of the day. How different is

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk's control over x or Twitter different from you know,

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese government's control of Weiboa. The whims of one

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 5>man essentially dictates the way a platform plays out. And

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 5>I think that's the key problem, is that we've taken

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 5>this like decentralized technology and made it highly centralized and

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:58.760
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't matter under what political system that actually takes place.

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 2>One thing that I think anyone who again, the word

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 2>that always pops into my head, is sort of the

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:08.919
<v Speaker 2>tribalizing effect of the Internet. People start to they hate

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 2>each other, they hate start to hate people who aren't

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 2>exactly like them. Are there cleavages within Chinese society that

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 2>are deepening or widening because of everyone in the mix together.

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 2>Are there sort of demographic aspects or whatever in which

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 2>you could see these sort of team tensions build and

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of domestic stability, because I think you see that

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 2>all the time on the American Internet.

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 5>I think the biggest cleavage that I've observed is just

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 5>along the lines of wealth and inequality. And that's like

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 5>another parallel that I'm seeing today. And yeah, the biggest

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 5>parallel that I see is between those who are building

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 5>the new technologies and those who are using and being

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 5>used by it. So, you know, funnily enough, when I

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 5>visit China, I have a very similar experience of when

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 5>I visit Silicon Valley, where everyone who is talking about

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 5>or building or investing in these new AI tools are

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 5>really hyped or you know, like there there's like an

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 5>occasional doomer in the mix, but they're very excited about it.

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 3>They're to build it exactly.

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 5>Like, there's this sense of agency, there's a sense of competition,

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.320
<v Speaker 5>like we are the builders and makers of the future,

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:24.360
<v Speaker 5>whereas when you talk to just anyone who is just

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 5>using the technology is not aware of how it's built

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 5>or involved in that process. There's this kind of deep

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 5>sense of pessimism or a lack of agency, you know,

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 5>which brings me back to this like NPC meme, there's

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:38.919
<v Speaker 5>a sense of well, I don't actually have a role

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 5>in this process, like I'm a non player character and

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, I have no say, And so that actually

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 5>is the biggest cleavage that I'm seeing, both in China

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:50.240
<v Speaker 5>and in the US.

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Elinglu, author of The Wall dancers graduations. Phenomenal book,

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 2>and I really appreciate you coming on outlines.

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:11.440
<v Speaker 6>Thanks so much for having me, Tracy.

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoyed that conversation a lot, and it really

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 2>was not until.

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 4>I know you like talking about the Internet.

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love talking.

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 2>About the I love the Internet, even though it is

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 2>to your words, and I would agree in many respects Sussesspool.

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 3>But thinking about how.

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:29.919
<v Speaker 2>Similar the American and Chinese internets are despite ostensibly being

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 2>very different in this in the legal sense, is like

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 2>probably one of the more fascinating threads I've thought about

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 2>in a while.

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 4>I think, Yeah, I was thinking during that conversation, I

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 4>was going to ask what's scarier an army of Little

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:46.760
<v Speaker 4>pinks coming after you or an army of K pop fans.

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 4>And it's sort of a facetious question, but on the

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 4>other hand, it highlights this point, right, which is the

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Internet and the way people behave on the Internet has

0:45:56.120 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 4>been remarkably similar across geographies. It doesn't really matter like

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 4>what group you're in.

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 2>No, I think that's one hundred percent correct. And you know, again,

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 2>the K pop stands as their own tribe, but.

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Probably one of the less harmful ones, right, like probably.

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Like they are vicious when they want to be.

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Joe, I never write I actually I think I tweeted

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 2>about K pop once and I.

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Was like, I'm gonna mute never again.

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm muting this thread right away.

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 2>But this is what we do, right, I mean, it

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 2>feels like we as people naturally are drawn to this

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 2>sort of I would say mob behavior, right when presented

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 2>with these new technologies in which we can connect with

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 2>like minded people, whether they share or tastes for music,

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:42.359
<v Speaker 2>or whether they share sort of national impulses or whatever else,

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 2>this is what most people, a lot of people fall into, maybe,

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.839
<v Speaker 2>And so I think it's like really interesting that for all, yeah,

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 2>for all of this like talk of different rules and

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 2>so forth, that the patterns just sort of propagate everywhere.

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 4>The other thing that struck me, and this has come

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 4>up before in other episodes, but it's the sort of

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:07.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, people think about China as this big centralized entity,

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 4>and it is to some extent, but the way that

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:16.879
<v Speaker 4>centralized entity actually executes policy ends up being very decentralized. Yeah, right,

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's kind of underappreciated how much scope

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:27.399
<v Speaker 4>individual sensors or individual local governments have to enact specific

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 4>directives and how they go about doing it.

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that webo's competitive edge was essentially, yeah, being

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the best at censorship, right, and that was the one

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 2>that survived and sort of anticipating and so forth. And

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 2>so let's say I liked the decentralized internet. That was

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 2>fun going to different people's websites and seeing what they're

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:50.360
<v Speaker 2>all about. And you could theoretically still do it, but

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 2>it takes effort in a way that doesn't feel worth

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 2>it when you could just have an algorithm deliver straight

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 2>what your sort of ID peels to you, like directly

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 2>in the moment.

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 4>It was a great time. Late nineteen nineties were the

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 4>peak of humanity.

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 3>On ironically unronically.

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 4>That are you really going to learn Chinese?

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, one of my New Year's resolutions is to

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 2>take Mandarin classes this year, and I will do that.

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 4>I really liked learning Mandarin back way back in the

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 4>day when I did it, because there's very little grammar,

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 4>and I hate grammar because it's nice. I had to

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:26.720
<v Speaker 4>learn German and German grammar is the worst. And also

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 4>as you learn words, one thing I really like about

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:33.280
<v Speaker 4>it is it's very literal, so a lot of words

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 4>have meanings that sort of reflect the thing being talked about. So,

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 4>for instance, if you're talking about America, so America is maguo,

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 4>which means beautiful country. So that's sort of like interesting

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:53.280
<v Speaker 4>meaning is imbibed into these individual words. Or Austria because

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 4>that's my other half, is Audili, which means Eastern Empire,

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:02.240
<v Speaker 4>which you know, again descriptive of what you're talking about.

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Well it wasn't the German is right, Yeah, yeah, it means.

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 4>It's a literal translation.

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's interesting.

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, both of us are pretty big followings on

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 2>social media, particularly Twitter. Wouldn't it be fun as this

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 2>personal challenge? So like, let's start from zero again on

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Waibo and see if we could do it all over again.

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 2>It's like we weren't just lucky, we were really good.

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's start from zero and make names for ourselves on

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese Internet.

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 4>I think your definition of fun maybe differs from mine.

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Show it's like I need to.

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Prove to myself that it wasn't just luck, and I

0:49:34.640 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 2>need so I need to start from zero and try again.

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:40.759
<v Speaker 4>Oh man, do it in Mandarin, do a real challenge, do.

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 3>It on hard mode?

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, where I have to do it in a different language.

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, shall we leave it there?

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:48.400
<v Speaker 4>This has been another episode of the au Thoughts podcast.

0:49:48.480 --> 0:49:51.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Jill Wisanthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart.

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.879
<v Speaker 2>Follow ye Ling Lu. She's at yee Linglu ninety five,

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and definitely check out her new book, The Wall Dancer,

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Searching for Freedom and Connection on the Chinese Internet. Follow

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 2>our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand Dashel Bennett at

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 2>dashbot and Kelbrooks at Kelbrooks. And for more odd Laws content,

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:14.319
<v Speaker 2>go to Bloomberg dot com, slash odd Lots were at

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Daily Newsletter and all of our episodes, and you can

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 2>chat about all these topics twenty four to seven in

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 2>our discord Discord dot gg slash odlines.

0:50:22.960 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 4>And if you enjoy Oddlots, if you like it when

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 4>we talk about the Internet, then please leave us a

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 4>positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 4>you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 4>of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need to

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 4>do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:41.840
<v Speaker 4>follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 6>In