Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. We got a freestyle
Speaker 1: Friday under way. MSNBC can't math good. Trump town Hall
Speaker 1: on Fox News lays down a lot of important stuff
Speaker 1: for us. The administration is going to withhold funds from
Speaker 1: sanctuary cities. Bernie Sanders pushed really hard for Soviet propaganda
Speaker 1: to work better than he thought it would. And also
Speaker 1: breaking down the latest on the jobs report and Michigan.
Speaker 1: Will that be the place where the Sanders campaign ends?
Speaker 1: We get that a more coming up. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to
Speaker 1: decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American.
Speaker 1: Here a great American Again the Buck Sexton Show begins.
Speaker 1: Remember he's a great No. Welcome to the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show, everybody. And it has been quite a week.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, this is one of these weeks
Speaker 1: that I feel like we've all been through it. I
Speaker 1: can't really explain why we got coronavirus fears all over
Speaker 1: the place. Every time I open up the Drudge Report,
Speaker 1: it's like the Drudge Report has turned into the guy
Speaker 1: pushing around a shopping cart with a sign that says,
Speaker 1: you know John three sixteen and then another sign that
Speaker 1: says the world is ending tomorrow. You know, like, I
Speaker 1: don't know what's going on here, but they need to
Speaker 1: calm down a little bit. We're going to be okay.
Speaker 1: This is a problem, We're on it. We're gonna work together.
Speaker 1: We're gonna figure this out. There's no need to panic.
Speaker 1: I'm reminded of Will Farrell in old school when he
Speaker 1: starts banging on the lockers seag We're gonna keep our composure.
Speaker 1: We have to keep our composure here. It's gonna be fine.
Speaker 1: I'll have some updates for you on that later. I'm
Speaker 1: also trying not to make every day. I think this
Speaker 1: is journalists become lazy with this. I'm not a journalist.
Speaker 1: I'm in media, but people that do media content that's
Speaker 1: based on news become lazy because just every day, oh
Speaker 1: we got at a Corona count every day. Another thing
Speaker 1: gotta tell you, you don't have to know every little
Speaker 1: detail about every place all over the world where there's
Speaker 1: been another person with Corona that's said I'm not about
Speaker 1: to get on a cruise ship anytime soon. Plane fine.
Speaker 1: I was on a plane last weekend cruise ship. I'm
Speaker 1: just not a cruise ship guy proser Mark and I've
Speaker 1: talked about this. It's not something that gets me excited.
Speaker 1: I'm not somebody who of course I'm sitting here. I
Speaker 1: touch my face as I'm talking about this. That's the
Speaker 1: one thing you're not supposed to do. But I'll have
Speaker 1: some worthwhile coronavirus updates, just a few of them for
Speaker 1: you later on in the show. And I'm gonna try
Speaker 1: not to make this every day just an ongoing oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, oh my gosh, coronavirus COVID nineteen. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of other stuff to talk about, and since it's Friday,
Speaker 1: I wanted to start with one of my favorites there.
Speaker 1: You know, the media is something that I enjoy talking
Speaker 1: to you about because I've been really a super consumer
Speaker 1: of news media for decades now. It's something that I've
Speaker 1: always been fascinated in. The first job I ever had,
Speaker 1: I guess if you want to call an internship a
Speaker 1: job ever was not including hourly stuff like tutoring and
Speaker 1: things to make some money. When I was in high school,
Speaker 1: was working at CBSCV News with Dan rather as an intern.
Speaker 1: And that was great because I just remember walking around
Speaker 1: and being like Okay, I was only eighteen. Nobody here
Speaker 1: seems to be really that smart. Everyone here is very
Speaker 1: stressed out and just constantly on each other about very
Speaker 1: minor things. And they all seem highly replaceable and overly
Speaker 1: anxious to me, including Dan Rather, who would show he
Speaker 1: had the greatest job I'd ever seen. He would show
Speaker 1: up at I don't know, four p three thirty four pm,
Speaker 1: read through his lines, get his hair done, thirty minute broadcast, boom,
Speaker 1: seven million dollars a year. Of course, you need somebody
Speaker 1: who can look into the camera and sound like this,
Speaker 1: and it's ridiculous, it's absurd. The whole thing was that's
Speaker 1: a joke. I mean, it's an old model out with
Speaker 1: with the boomers now, you know, not as completely dominant
Speaker 1: about all media decisions. They're still dominant, but this old
Speaker 1: model is changing the silent generation. The boomers think that
Speaker 1: having one person not all of you. If you're listening
Speaker 1: to this and your boomer you're obviously a more sophisticated
Speaker 1: news consumer. But if the old model is to have
Speaker 1: these people that would go on TV and they sound
Speaker 1: the part and they look the part, and that's the
Speaker 1: news for today, and everyone goes, oh, Okay that that
Speaker 1: sounds like objective news. I'm informed now false. And you
Speaker 1: have some of these vestiges, some of these holdovers from
Speaker 1: the news business that you see that are from that
Speaker 1: old model. And perhaps the single greatest example as Brian Williams,
Speaker 1: a guy with no discernible skill or talent other than
Speaker 1: just sort of looking and sounding like the guy that
Speaker 1: you should be listening to on the news, and then
Speaker 1: we found out that he was somebody who had told
Speaker 1: lies many many times over, not as many lies, I think,
Speaker 1: as we've already established, Joe Biden has told in real
Speaker 1: ways that he will not be able to run away from.
Speaker 1: And just remember that you've been lectured about how trumplies
Speaker 1: trumplies for years, and they're putting forward a liar, a
Speaker 1: straight up liar, in Joe Biden against Donald Trump, and
Speaker 1: I have the evidence will play someone for you. We're
Speaker 1: gonna keep running this. Just remember all their principles. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's really just the Trump lies. I mean, I had
Speaker 1: to deal this to Bill Mars show everything. I tried
Speaker 1: to say, Well, hold on a second, what's going on
Speaker 1: with the coronavirus response that you don't like trumplies well, okay,
Speaker 1: I mean, there are working on an accelerated vaccine schedule.
Speaker 1: So one Trump says that, why is that? Trumplies. That's
Speaker 1: the only thing they say. Trump lay. This has become
Speaker 1: like a like the bleeding of the stupid sheep from
Speaker 1: Animal Farm. Four legs good, two legs mad. That's what
Speaker 1: they're doing. They don't even think about it anymore. But
Speaker 1: Ben Biden lies all the time. They don't care. He's
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. You can trust Joe Biden. I mean, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden really reminds me a lot of the Bill Paxson
Speaker 1: character in the Rip, a very good actor by the way,
Speaker 1: in the movie True Lies. You know, he's like, you know,
Speaker 1: I've got a few other interested buyers. I mean, Joe
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is the politician version of Bill Paxson and
Speaker 1: True Lies. I wish I could do more of the
Speaker 1: lines from that, but some of them would not be
Speaker 1: acceptable for radio. This is my way of telling you
Speaker 1: that some of the most prominent journals out there are
Speaker 1: ones that think they should tell you what to think,
Speaker 1: how to vote, how to behave what you can say.
Speaker 1: Are really not intelligent. They're just not very bright people.
Speaker 1: They're actors who got their way, who found their way,
Speaker 1: worked their way into a journalistic establishment of some kind.
Speaker 1: And all that really takes is a few corporate execs
Speaker 1: in these places because their legacy institutions, places like NBC
Speaker 1: News also MSNBC. These are really just versions of each other.
Speaker 1: NBC is the slightly more corporate friendly, slightly watered down
Speaker 1: version of the truly left wing insane asylum that is MSNBC.
Speaker 1: But MSNBC can math goodm Nope, they've got problems over there.
Speaker 1: And here you have Brian Williams, who I just before
Speaker 1: hold on a sec prison mark before we get to
Speaker 1: this amazing clip, and it's one of the greatest news
Speaker 1: clips I've ever heard. I mean, it's it's that good.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm starting the show with it. Before I
Speaker 1: get to that with you, let's just remember that Brian
Speaker 1: Williams before he was found, and it was just found
Speaker 1: by Internet comments on posts about him before and it
Speaker 1: wasn't like, you know, MSNB or NBC did some big
Speaker 1: interview interview with him or investigation and figured this out.
Speaker 1: Brian Williams was the heir apparent to everything going on
Speaker 1: at NBC News. He was the guy he was going
Speaker 1: to be the one, and they were paying him I
Speaker 1: think fifteen million dollars a year, and then we're about
Speaker 1: to pay him even more than that in a big
Speaker 1: contract before this whole controversy came out, and he was
Speaker 1: supposed to be the most trusted Brian Williams could get
Speaker 1: an interview with any politician, anybody in the country anytime,
Speaker 1: most trusted voice in the country. And he's sitting down.
Speaker 1: I gotta set the context for us. He is sitting
Speaker 1: down with a member of the New York Times editorial
Speaker 1: Board named Mara Gay. And you would think the New
Speaker 1: York Times Editorial Board, you know, they they would uh,
Speaker 1: they would sneer at submissions from real conservatives. Oh, that's
Speaker 1: not up to our standards. You know, they have all
Speaker 1: kinds of political bias going on. But they think of
Speaker 1: themselves even though they publish people like Charles Blow, Charles
Speaker 1: Blow Krugman and others. They think of of themselves as
Speaker 1: intellectual elites. And yet you know, Charles Blow Krugman, I'm
Speaker 1: trying to think of who is some of the worst,
Speaker 1: you know, Brunei, Thomas Friedman. But they still hold to
Speaker 1: the center and they're referring. So you have a top
Speaker 1: anchor formerly of NBC now MSNBC because of his problem
Speaker 1: with the truth, talking to a New York Times editorial
Speaker 1: board member about a tweet from somebody who is a
Speaker 1: Washington Post contributor, somebody who writes frequently has in her
Speaker 1: byline the Washington Post and her contributions to it. This
Speaker 1: is how they math good play at producer Mark. You
Speaker 1: see it as a possibility. If he wants to spend
Speaker 1: a billion bucks beating this guy, he could do it. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: Somebody tweeted recently that actually, with the money he spent,
Speaker 1: he could have given every American a million dollars. Let's
Speaker 1: put it up. When I read it tonight on social media,
Speaker 1: it kind of all became clear. Bloomberg spent five hundred
Speaker 1: million on ads, us population three hundred twenty seven million.
Speaker 1: Don't tell us if you're ahead of us on the math.
Speaker 1: He could have given each American one million dollars and
Speaker 1: I've had lunch money left over. It's an incredible way
Speaker 1: of putting it. It's an incredible way of putting it.
Speaker 1: It's true, it's disturbing. It does it does suggest you
Speaker 1: know what we're talking about. Here, which is there there's
Speaker 1: too much money in politics. Oh god, that is my favorite.
Speaker 1: That is my all that might be. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: a top ten TV news clip. That is absolutely fantastic.
Speaker 1: You cannot make this up. That's rights. They think that
Speaker 1: because Bloomberg spent five hundred million dollars and the US
Speaker 1: popular the US population is three hundred and twenty seven
Speaker 1: million dollars, he could like easily give each American a
Speaker 1: million dollars cash and have lots of money left over
Speaker 1: from what he spent on the campaign. Now, I make
Speaker 1: fun of things like Joe Biden saying that one hundred
Speaker 1: as he did without correcting it. It wasn't misspeaking. He
Speaker 1: said it, and he let it stay out there. Joe
Speaker 1: Mine said one hundred and fifty million people have been
Speaker 1: killed in gun violence in the last ten years. There
Speaker 1: are three hundred and twenty million people in America, probably
Speaker 1: more like three thirty now a lot of the legal aliens.
Speaker 1: Five hundred million dollars divided by three hundred and twenty
Speaker 1: seven million dollars is nowhere near a million per person.
Speaker 1: And yet you have to remember this isn't just something
Speaker 1: that was said, because look when you're doing a math
Speaker 1: under pressure. One of the reasons people go into TV news,
Speaker 1: into acting. I'm just telling you the truth. Other people
Speaker 1: won't tell you, you know, university teaching and get a
Speaker 1: PhD in the humanities because they can't do math. It's true.
Speaker 1: If I was better at math, if you think, I'd
Speaker 1: be sitting here, probably be working at some hedge fund
Speaker 1: slapping producer Mark with a thousand dollar bills. But he
Speaker 1: wouldn't care because he'd be my right hand man at
Speaker 1: the hedge fund and he'd be driving around in a
Speaker 1: brand new portion nine eleven. You know what I mean.
Speaker 1: He'd be fine with it. But that you know, if
Speaker 1: I was good at math, we'd probably be doing something else.
Speaker 1: I'm better at math than these people, though, that I
Speaker 1: can tell you. Brian Williams of NBC New York Times
Speaker 1: editorial board member, referring to a tweet put out by
Speaker 1: somebody from the Washington Post. I mean, these are three
Speaker 1: of the most elite media institutions you could find anywhere,
Speaker 1: and none of them picked this up. And you have
Speaker 1: tosend this was a tweet they put on the screen,
Speaker 1: so they chose that this was prepared be forehand. Producers
Speaker 1: at NBC or MSNBC. This was at ms which is
Speaker 1: the same thing. Producers at MSNBC saw this tweet. They
Speaker 1: saw it and they thought, Yeah, that really nails it.
Speaker 1: That really makes the case about how Bloomberg. They take
Speaker 1: the exact wrong lesson. By the way, the lesson of
Speaker 1: Bloomberg is that you can't buy an election, But their
Speaker 1: lesson that they take from this instead because they like
Speaker 1: just the virtue signal if we don't want money in politics,
Speaker 1: is Bloomberg somehow shows us how corrupt elections are because
Speaker 1: he spends so much money and got nothing, zippo nowhere.
Speaker 1: But put that aside for a moment. Yes there is,
Speaker 1: and it's important. And this is part of the rethink
Speaker 1: of the ruling class in this country that has been
Speaker 1: going on as a result of Trump's rise. Those who
Speaker 1: see to rule over us are media overlords, the people
Speaker 1: in positions of authority in government, in media. In so
Speaker 1: many ways, a lot of them got there for reasons
Speaker 1: that have I would argue most, I would argue a
Speaker 1: vast majority have very little to do with intelligence or ability.
Speaker 1: A lot of them just played politics well, understand the system,
Speaker 1: work the system, and in journalism in particular, are just ruthless,
Speaker 1: ruthless and sociopathic. That's how they get where they are.
Speaker 1: But there are many, many, many sheer and utter. And
Speaker 1: I'm not saying this for a laugh line. It's true.
Speaker 1: There are dumb asses all over the mainstream media, complete dumbasses.
Speaker 1: And you need to remember that. It's not that there,
Speaker 1: it's not that I just don't like some of their policies,
Speaker 1: because there are smart libs. I'll sit here all day
Speaker 1: if you want, I'll tell you the smart libs are.
Speaker 1: There are smart libs, no question. I think they're wrong
Speaker 1: on stuff, but they're still very bright. There's also a
Speaker 1: lot of dumb asses, though, And this is just another
Speaker 1: example of I mean, what a what a what a
Speaker 1: stuffed shirt phony Brian Williams is I mean not just
Speaker 1: because of this, it's everything you look at everything. This
Speaker 1: is a guy who just really mastered sounding a certain
Speaker 1: way and looking into the camera a certain way. He's
Speaker 1: not learned, he's not insightful. It was all in act.
Speaker 1: I can't even I don't even know Mara Gay is there,
Speaker 1: honestly never even heard of her before, but clearly not
Speaker 1: very good at math, and the person who's tweet they
Speaker 1: referred to who writes for Washington Post. I don't know who.
Speaker 1: I've never heard her name either, But this was amazing.
Speaker 1: The Eleventh Hour put out this tweet tonight on air.
Speaker 1: We quoted a tweet that relied on bad math. We
Speaker 1: corrected the error, We apologized for the air. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: that's about as much as you can do. They're all
Speaker 1: math good over at MSNBC. Nope, they got they got
Speaker 1: problems over there. That's that's amazing. But go to them.
Speaker 1: Listen to them about what you should do in the
Speaker 1: stock market, Listen to the I'm about coronavirus, who you
Speaker 1: should vote for. These people are brilliant. They know more
Speaker 1: than you. They think really hard all the time about
Speaker 1: all the important things you're in the Freedom Hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast Team one. One more
Speaker 1: point I wanted to make here about the most amazing
Speaker 1: MSNBC clip, which is saying a lot because MSNBC has
Speaker 1: some great moments that are unintentionally hilarious. I mean, MSNBC
Speaker 1: is a joke. It's to think of this as a
Speaker 1: news network is laughable, but it is what it is.
Speaker 1: There was one point here that I think a lot
Speaker 1: of people are going to skip past. And that is
Speaker 1: also yeah, okay, we're making fun of them at math.
Speaker 1: And look, I'm not somebody who's great at math on
Speaker 1: the fly. I'm not gonna pretend that I am better
Speaker 1: than these people, but not gonna pretend like I'm good
Speaker 1: at math. There's also a reason why they would believe
Speaker 1: this though, and I really mean this. They've convinced themselves
Speaker 1: it is now liberal orthodoxy. They have convinced themselves that
Speaker 1: it is possible to just take money from billionaires and
Speaker 1: pay for everything. They think this is true. They believe
Speaker 1: the Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren Reddick. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: a real political point about how you can have such
Speaker 1: a colossal and stupid mistake on TV. It's because everybody
Speaker 1: that everybody there has been hearing from all these Democrat
Speaker 1: candidates like Sanders and Warren and others. You know, the
Speaker 1: millionaires and the billionaires will pay, and people think, oh, okay,
Speaker 1: all they gotta do is tax the billionaires a little
Speaker 1: more and we all have great free healthcare. This is
Speaker 1: a huge, a monumental, blatant, obvious lie. But they believe it.
Speaker 1: They believe it so much that they think, yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: you know, if you just took with Bloomberg spending the campaign,
Speaker 1: you could probably pay off the national debt or something.
Speaker 1: I mean they think things that no reasonable person could
Speaker 1: because the propaganda about how billionaires could pay for everything
Speaker 1: in this country has seeped so far into their brains.
Speaker 1: This is real. Thanks for listening to The bus Esson
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Don't listen to him.
Speaker 1: He was on I think Fox yesterday or something. It's
Speaker 1: heelling people go to work. It's nothing if you don't
Speaker 1: feel good. I mean, don't listen to Joy Bha either.
Speaker 1: Please don't listen to Joy Beaha about anything speaking about
Speaker 1: people who are dumbin on TV. Who she's she's top ten.
Speaker 1: She really, she's in a special category. It's like, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, why do we have to listen to Trump?
Speaker 1: The President is trying to calm people down and tell
Speaker 1: people to keep going about their business. He's right to
Speaker 1: do so. There's clearly a merger now between Trump derangement
Speaker 1: syndrome and what we see going on with coronavirus coverage
Speaker 1: in the media. The more negative it is, the more
Speaker 1: they want to tie it to Trump. The more they
Speaker 1: can tie it to Trump, the more negative they want
Speaker 1: it to be. It becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. It's
Speaker 1: a cycle. And yet they want to pretend that they're
Speaker 1: doing this because they have your best interest at heart.
Speaker 1: Do you not listen to the crazy media about this stuff?
Speaker 1: All right? Listen to people that you know and that
Speaker 1: you trust and that are trying to approach this with
Speaker 1: the first priority. And this is what I try to say. Again.
Speaker 1: I keep referring back to last week. I mean, I
Speaker 1: was honestly stunned, and some of you have asked me
Speaker 1: about the billmar appearance. I was stunned by how dishonest
Speaker 1: and how obtuse and just honestly dumb. So much of
Speaker 1: the commentary around me was I should have expected. The
Speaker 1: only thing I blame myself for with that is that
Speaker 1: I should have expected it a little bit more because
Speaker 1: I know how libs are. But I thought, it's not
Speaker 1: like we were just talking about you know, Trump on
Speaker 1: the boarder. You know that I'm always ready for that.
Speaker 1: You're gonna get trumps? Are you know? Trump's a racist?
Speaker 1: I thought on coronavirus IRUs. And this is my mistake,
Speaker 1: this is my era error, that there should be some
Speaker 1: sense of responsibility in coming together, and we really don't
Speaker 1: want this to become a major problem. No one wants
Speaker 1: us to become a major problem, because if it does,
Speaker 1: it means that there will be large numbers of seniors
Speaker 1: in this country. You know, our moms and dads, grandmas
Speaker 1: and grandpa's, you know, friends and neighbors. There'll be large
Speaker 1: numbers of seniors who could fall victim to this, and
Speaker 1: that should bring us together, that that mission of protecting
Speaker 1: our seniors, because they're by far, as as has been
Speaker 1: said by all responsible parties all along, they're by far
Speaker 1: at the greatest risk. Here I mean the numbers in
Speaker 1: terms of fate immortality for people over seventy who get
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen versus people below fifty. I mean below fifty
Speaker 1: unless you're severely immunosuppressed, which I would know. It also
Speaker 1: means that you are every single year having to do
Speaker 1: with the possibility of getting a fatal flu if you're
Speaker 1: really that immunosuppress. So that's just to say that those
Speaker 1: people already understand they have to be very careful very
Speaker 1: vigilant and always will and always have been. But I
Speaker 1: thought that on this we could approach this like it
Speaker 1: was a foreign invasion, but a pathogenic foreign invasion into
Speaker 1: this country, and that that would bring us together. There'd
Speaker 1: be a little bit of a post nine to eleven effect,
Speaker 1: which was a real thing, not with the whole left,
Speaker 1: but with some Democrats, you know, in large numbers of Democrats.
Speaker 1: I'll be honest about it. I always will be honest
Speaker 1: with you. You know, there was a sense the country
Speaker 1: was united against a common enemy. Our common enemy here
Speaker 1: is a pathogen. And yet the way that this is
Speaker 1: being reported on and talked about that the real enemy
Speaker 1: is Trump's response to the pathogen. And I should have known.
Speaker 1: I should have known that even now, with lives at
Speaker 1: stake here at home, their primary focus is not on
Speaker 1: educating and forming and preparing the public for this and
Speaker 1: bringing us together for the most effective government response. Their
Speaker 1: primary goal is to use this as a weapon against
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. It's the truth, and it's actually it feels
Speaker 1: kind of gross to say it, but it is the truth.
Speaker 1: I mean, it makes me feel bad about the state
Speaker 1: this country's in. And so that was mine because after
Speaker 1: my whole experience trying to talk to mar and that
Speaker 1: panel it sort of felt ikey, and I was like,
Speaker 1: what is wrong with these people? I mean, it really was,
Speaker 1: and it was in that sense very important for me
Speaker 1: going into as I talk about being a wartime conservative,
Speaker 1: and you've got to be a wartime conservative now on
Speaker 1: everything at all times, because the left will see no
Speaker 1: common ground to you. There's no principles that they will
Speaker 1: not violate. They're in a total, a total berserker mode
Speaker 1: trying to re establish power and control. They'll do anything,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. So lesson learned. I'm always learning. I
Speaker 1: learned from all of you as you write in and
Speaker 1: as we continue this conversation how many years in. That
Speaker 1: was a lesson for me. Another lesson is Joy Behar
Speaker 1: is an idiot. Don't listen to her. And if my
Speaker 1: words on this aren't enough for you, here's what she
Speaker 1: had to say about AOC running for president Play fifteen.
Speaker 1: So Aocwood it would be actually a good choice, except
Speaker 1: that she's a Bernie person, doesn't not old enough. Well,
Speaker 1: she's not as the vpail for a president, and it's
Speaker 1: conceivable that the vice president is going to be president.
Speaker 1: And now I know, people could say, well, maybe she
Speaker 1: could be in the VP slot, but then she couldn't arise.
Speaker 1: But then why do you have a VP who couldn't
Speaker 1: rise me president? Right? Somebody might try to make that
Speaker 1: argument as why Joy Behar made that mistake. But Joy
Speaker 1: Beha had no idea that there was an age age
Speaker 1: requirement for presidency none zero, And she's informing people across
Speaker 1: the country every day. Um. I was told by somebody
Speaker 1: who knows that she makes two to three million dollars
Speaker 1: a year, do that show to be a total utter buffoon?
Speaker 1: ABC News. ABC News would would think that Joy Behar
Speaker 1: acceptable for their brand. They wouldn't let me on. No,
Speaker 1: no, no no, you can't have the political science. A guy
Speaker 1: from amhurs to work the CIA, A couple of war
Speaker 1: zones of blah. No, no no, no, that's m that's a
Speaker 1: little outside the maintream. Let's have Joy Behar on. It's amazing, right,
Speaker 1: it's amazing. This is what we're up against the But
Speaker 1: then again, I mean liberal. The only people who are
Speaker 1: dumber than mainstream media talking heads as a general rule,
Speaker 1: are the mainstream media corporate executives that put them in
Speaker 1: these positions. They're even dumber and more like shameless and
Speaker 1: reckless and self interested in everything else. So you've got it.
Speaker 1: You've got to keep that in mind. So I'm glad
Speaker 1: we've had a little bit of a deep dive here
Speaker 1: into the stupidity of the media. Now I want to
Speaker 1: take you into which is a very real thing. Oh wait,
Speaker 1: I didn't mention this before the Bloomberg you know, and
Speaker 1: they're talking about this. We got into this because of
Speaker 1: the Bloomberg money that was spent in the campaign, and
Speaker 1: now it's coming out. You know. I was making these
Speaker 1: jokes at Producer Mark, like can we can we just
Speaker 1: wear like a Bloomberg T shirt show up at a
Speaker 1: rally and eat the Wagu beef sliders and the little
Speaker 1: Fuagra terrenes and whatever else they've got yet the Bloomberg rallies.
Speaker 1: You know, is that it turns out that people who
Speaker 1: worked for the Bloomberg campaign are now saying that it
Speaker 1: was a grift that a lot of them were actively
Speaker 1: campaigning for Bernie Sanders while on the Bloomberg campaign payroll.
Speaker 1: They did the absolute bare minimum of work. Those who
Speaker 1: even believed in Bloomberg a little bit essentially changed their
Speaker 1: minds after his admittedly disastrous debate performance. You know, I
Speaker 1: had people sign DA's and I didn't want to let
Speaker 1: them out. How much money do I have to pay
Speaker 1: you to get you to stop asking about the and DA's.
Speaker 1: You know, Elizabeth warren Man, she went after him. She
Speaker 1: went after him big time. Yeah, so that's she may
Speaker 1: have buried the hatchet, but not before she used it
Speaker 1: against Mike Bloomberg. And you know, this is this is
Speaker 1: just what we all expected that Bloomberg came in with
Speaker 1: all of this money. But politics is about more than
Speaker 1: just money. The left doesn't want to learn that very
Speaker 1: clear lesson from this process because they'd prefer to keep
Speaker 1: They've created this perception that the right is where all
Speaker 1: the money is in politics somehow, even though if you
Speaker 1: look at like the ultra billionaires in Silicon Valley at
Speaker 1: they're liberals. They're liberals. So that's one thing about the
Speaker 1: Bloomberg campaign that I wanted to get to. Now, now
Speaker 1: we have to look at what's going on with Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: He is able to possibly finish off Bernie Sanders in Michigan,
Speaker 1: depending on how Michigan goes. I'm already seeing poles in
Speaker 1: Florida where Apparently it is not a popular position to
Speaker 1: take that. You know, Castro did some good things. They
Speaker 1: don't like hearing that. In Florida, there's a whole community
Speaker 1: of folks down there who really don't appreciate always looking
Speaker 1: for the bright side of Castro's prison state. So Bernie
Speaker 1: is in really bad shape in the Florida polls. So
Speaker 1: he's toast there against Biden, but Michigan might might end
Speaker 1: him even before that. And I say end him. He's
Speaker 1: going to take it all the way to the convention,
Speaker 1: but he'll be far behind in delegates. Everyone's going to
Speaker 1: know that Biden's the the real front runner. So we
Speaker 1: have to dig more into Joe Biden because some you've
Speaker 1: seen a little bit of this. There are some liberals
Speaker 1: out there who are honest about how Joe Biden isn't
Speaker 1: what they thought they would end up with. After a
Speaker 1: year of a Democrat primary. Think about all the candidates,
Speaker 1: all the excitement around Kamala and Bet and Buddha Judge,
Speaker 1: and there were like four or five people who were
Speaker 1: excited about Julian Castro, and you know, I mean, like,
Speaker 1: think about all these different folks. Or was it Joaquin No,
Speaker 1: it was Julian Joaquin's twin brother. I forget it was
Speaker 1: one of the Castro brothers. So with all of that,
Speaker 1: they end up with the least exciting, second oldest, and
Speaker 1: arguably just like the most boring white dude on the planet,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. That's what the Democratic Party after all, after
Speaker 1: all the diversity, all the female candidates, everything, they end
Speaker 1: up with a guy that if you were casting somebody
Speaker 1: to be the quintessential machine politician, it would be big, grinning, handshaking,
Speaker 1: baby sniffing, woman grabbing Joe Biden. That's what you did.
Speaker 1: That's what you would have I mean, especially if you
Speaker 1: were doing a comedy and corn pop. And now I
Speaker 1: took the chain man and I had a ray and
Speaker 1: I made it rusty, and I was gonna go out
Speaker 1: there and rumble with corn Pop because the hair on
Speaker 1: my legs were blond, and I was like, hey, look
Speaker 1: at the sun glistening through my leg. Here's kid, this
Speaker 1: isn't weird. I'm just telling you a story. I think
Speaker 1: it's a little weird. Here's Biden's promise, though. He says
Speaker 1: that he's gonna win, and that's been the promise all along.
Speaker 1: Play clip ten. Look I think the one thing the
Speaker 1: president one does want to do from the very beginning
Speaker 1: is face me because I will beat him, period, period.
Speaker 1: He has done everything in his power. He's even risked
Speaker 1: his presidency because he doesn't want to face me. A
Speaker 1: rhetorical question, have you ever ever seen a city president
Speaker 1: gets so involved in a Democratic primary and focus so
Speaker 1: much attention on not wanting a single person me to
Speaker 1: become the nominee. The president does not want me to
Speaker 1: be the nominee. I think this is going to work
Speaker 1: out very well. I think Joe Biden, everyone has realized
Speaker 1: for a long time, has been propped up by the machine.
Speaker 1: They tried to do this with Hillary in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: They are you know, the definition of insanity is trying
Speaker 1: the same thing and expecting a different result. That's that's
Speaker 1: saying they're doing. They're running the same election they did
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen. They're expecting a different result. Do we
Speaker 1: really think that Joe Biden is a more inspiring, more
Speaker 1: effective candidate than Hillary Clinton? Now? I think that Hillary is.
Speaker 1: I had a lot of problems, but Democrats love her.
Speaker 1: They do. The Democrat establishment loves Hillary Clinton. That's why
Speaker 1: they went to bat for her against burning the first place.
Speaker 1: That's why the deep state covered for her with the
Speaker 1: email fiasco. I mean, there was so much that you
Speaker 1: look at here that they did, and the media was
Speaker 1: just all in against Trump in favor of Hillary, and
Speaker 1: it wasn't enough. They think that it's going to be
Speaker 1: enough for Biden. Let's unpack that theory together a little bit.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom huh. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. And for folks in the working class they're
Speaker 1: below four hundred, they will, in fact will increase their
Speaker 1: their premiums. The public option will be available on my plan.
Speaker 1: We'll make sure it's not a quality. We'll make sure
Speaker 1: it's only affordable. We'll make sure it's not quality. It's
Speaker 1: not quality, it's but only affordable. What you're gonna have
Speaker 1: a lot more of this, Joe Biden. For a man
Speaker 1: who effectively makes his living speaking publicly, that's really what
Speaker 1: his job is. He's made millions of dollars as a
Speaker 1: paid public speaker since leaving the Vice President's office, millions
Speaker 1: of dollars. We're also going to learn more and more
Speaker 1: about the millions of dollars that his son and brother
Speaker 1: and other people around him made just because they happen
Speaker 1: to be friends with Joe Biden. Interesting. Burisma is not
Speaker 1: the only thing that people are going to be poken into.
Speaker 1: But Biden's gaffs are one thing. And the media is
Speaker 1: going to tell you, I already know what. They're gonna
Speaker 1: just say, oh, everybody makes mistakes, and you'll start to
Speaker 1: see clips of Trump, you know, speaking off the coff
Speaker 1: where he stumbles on something, and they're gonna try to say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's all the same and he's not senile and all that. Well,
Speaker 1: you got you got two big problems here for Biden
Speaker 1: that are on the on the style side of things,
Speaker 1: not looking so much at the at the substance of
Speaker 1: what he stands for, but more of Joe Biden the
Speaker 1: person and stylistically how he has as a politician. You
Speaker 1: have the gaffs, the misspeaking, which is not really a
Speaker 1: big issue except people honestly think that he might be
Speaker 1: in the early stages of dementia, and I think that
Speaker 1: that's a fair discussion to have given some of the
Speaker 1: things that he says. But then there's also that Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: As as I told you beginning the show, Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is a huge liar. He has a long established history
Speaker 1: of lying about things publicly and on the record. This
Speaker 1: was just an old news report circulating right now about
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. I think is back in the eighties when
Speaker 1: he was running for president the first time around. This
Speaker 1: is going to come back to haunt this guy. Pay
Speaker 1: twenty three. They do question stim from the hay Fred
Speaker 1: of Marts Biden during in April the campaign affairance in
Speaker 1: New hampshireholders. I went to law school on a full
Speaker 1: academic scholarship, the only one in my class that have
Speaker 1: a full academic scholarship. Went back to law school and
Speaker 1: in fact ended up in the top half of my class.
Speaker 1: I was the outstanding student in the political science department
Speaker 1: at the end of my year. I graduated with three
Speaker 1: degrees from undergraduate school in one hundred and sixty five credits,
Speaker 1: only need one hundred and twenty three credits. Biden now
Speaker 1: concedes he did not graduate in the top half of
Speaker 1: his law school class, that he does not have three
Speaker 1: degrees from college, and that he was not named outstanding
Speaker 1: political science student in college. This Week says Biden actually
Speaker 1: went to school on a half scholarship, ended up near
Speaker 1: the bottom of his class, and one only one degree,
Speaker 1: not three. Joe Biden ranked seventy sixth in a class
Speaker 1: of eighty five at the University of Securities, Syracuse Law School.
Speaker 1: I mean, this guy comes off this whole thing as
Speaker 1: a flyway and al Biden says a week's right. His
Speaker 1: memory had failed out, his memory had failed him. My friends,
Speaker 1: I am honored every day by this audience giving me
Speaker 1: their time. I mean, I really do. I love all
Speaker 1: of you, even though I've only met a handful of
Speaker 1: you in person. If if I ran around saying that
Speaker 1: I was a Harvard educated Rhodes scholar who also won
Speaker 1: like a Westinghouse Prize in science and it turned out
Speaker 1: that no, like I just went to undergrad somewhere and
Speaker 1: got a degree like everybody else. Would anybody believe that
Speaker 1: that was just my memory? But this was in the eighties,
Speaker 1: he wasn't super old. Anybody believe that that would be okay,
Speaker 1: I'd get a passion on that one. Three degrees, no
Speaker 1: one degree, full scholarship, no partial scholarship, top of his class,
Speaker 1: no bottom of his class. Joe Biden is a consistent
Speaker 1: and continuous liar. Some people might even say pathological thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. I will also say, guys, that it
Speaker 1: is I think that we all know. And this election
Speaker 1: cycle in particular has also presented very legitimate questions about
Speaker 1: the challenges of women running for president of the United States.
Speaker 1: What do you say, though, well, it's obvious, just look
Speaker 1: at what's happened. Look, it's what's happened. There are no
Speaker 1: women currently in this race, and I you know, we
Speaker 1: can have a longer discussion about it. But the reality
Speaker 1: is that there's still a lot of work to be
Speaker 1: done to make it very clear that women are exceptionally
Speaker 1: qualified and capable of being the commander in chief of
Speaker 1: the United States of America. Gender in this race, you know,
Speaker 1: that is the trap question for every woman. If you say, yeah,
Speaker 1: there was sexism in this race, everyone says bliner. And
Speaker 1: if you say no, there was no sexism about a
Speaker 1: Brazilian women, think, what planet do you live on? I
Speaker 1: promise you this. I don't have a lot more to
Speaker 1: say on that subject. Later on, I'm sure she will.
Speaker 1: She was like, a, here's the reason that I not
Speaker 1: gonna be given the nuclear codes on the biggest job
Speaker 1: in the country is people just won't vote for a
Speaker 1: woman prison. Oh, it's not true. And also, let's just
Speaker 1: step back for a moment, as Kamala Harris that we
Speaker 1: had Kamala and Warren, we could play. Others too are
Speaker 1: complaining about how we don't we don't have a woman
Speaker 1: presidential well presidential contender. First of all, it's not true.
Speaker 1: Tulsi Gavard is still running for president. And I also
Speaker 1: think it's so interesting that the way this is framed
Speaker 1: is immediately like skips past, it immediately jumps beyond. This
Speaker 1: is a Democrat primary, So is the Democratic Party full
Speaker 1: of sexists? Is the Democrat Party full of people that
Speaker 1: are unwilling to vote for a woman to be president?
Speaker 1: Because I can't blame this one on Republicans. It's not
Speaker 1: a Republicans thing. So and also this is just why
Speaker 1: it is whining. It's whinning. Elizabeth Warren is not a
Speaker 1: strong candidate. She didn't win her own home state, for
Speaker 1: heaven's sakes. She came in third in Massachusetts behind Biden
Speaker 1: and Bernie Sanders. She had the most bizarre political self
Speaker 1: inflicted wound I've ever seen what they're like. Oh, I'm
Speaker 1: one run thousand and twenty fourth Native Americans, see I win?
Speaker 1: Who wants some pow wow chow. No no, no, no,
Speaker 1: we're not just gonna pretend that that didn't happen. And
Speaker 1: if you remember, because liberals like to tell us about
Speaker 1: this all the time, Hillary Clinton actually got more on
Speaker 1: the popular vote than Trump, even though that's not the
Speaker 1: contest that's being run, and that I can't emphasize. I
Speaker 1: don't have a lot of people that live in California
Speaker 1: and New York State don't vote for Republicans because they
Speaker 1: know they're gonna not it's the vote's gonna go to
Speaker 1: the Democrat. A lot of campaigning is focused on battleground
Speaker 1: states that is not focused on getting the vote out
Speaker 1: of you know, that's not the contest that's being run.
Speaker 1: So it's a stupid point. But in terms of the
Speaker 1: willingness of people to just in general cast votes for
Speaker 1: a female to be president, I mean, we've already run
Speaker 1: the experiment plenty. People are willing to vote for a
Speaker 1: woman to be president, and I think a lot of
Speaker 1: people would like, you know, it feels good. There's all
Speaker 1: this research that social scientists who aren't really scientists, but
Speaker 1: they call themselves that, you know, political scientists. Again, not science,
Speaker 1: its politics. But they'll look into this. And by polling
Speaker 1: and by the studies, people vote. A lot of why
Speaker 1: they vote is a result of how it makes them
Speaker 1: feel to cast that vote. What does it say about
Speaker 1: me to vote for this person or to vote for
Speaker 1: this proposition, if it's some kind of a referendum, right,
Speaker 1: how do I feel about myself when I do that?
Speaker 1: And this is why, you know, we kept hearing about how, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, Obama had to overcome so much racism in
Speaker 1: the president you know, to become president. No, people were
Speaker 1: excited in general at the prospect of voting for the
Speaker 1: first African American president. It made them feel good. Anybody
Speaker 1: who was ideologically open to Obama's agenda felt great voting
Speaker 1: for the first first African American president. And a lot
Speaker 1: of people who were you know, independent minded, however, they
Speaker 1: probably voted for Obama in part because they wanted to
Speaker 1: vote for the first African ranger. The same thing would
Speaker 1: be true voting for the first woman president. You want
Speaker 1: to be on that groundbreaking history making victory train, right,
Speaker 1: but you don't want to do it if you think
Speaker 1: the person who you're voting for happens to be terrible.
Speaker 1: That's just the case of its with Warren. People don't
Speaker 1: like her. Yeah, the media can maybe push her far
Speaker 1: enough so that she can continue to be a Senator
Speaker 1: from Massachusetts, but it just doesn't have national level appeal.
Speaker 1: And she's somebody who there's nothing about her that you
Speaker 1: can point to and say, yeah, that feels like it's
Speaker 1: really authentic and really good. In fact, the best stuff
Speaker 1: that she's done in the past, you know, her book
Speaker 1: on the two income trap is very interesting, and I
Speaker 1: think that that's something that does deserve more public discussion.
Speaker 1: Why is it now? Why is it now the standard
Speaker 1: that so many people, particularly in urban areas, right in cities.
Speaker 1: It is expected in our culture generally some of you,
Speaker 1: of course you're gonna say, no, it's not. But if
Speaker 1: you live in New York, if you live in California,
Speaker 1: you live in a lot of a lot of these
Speaker 1: blue strongholds. Two parents working, even with small kids at home,
Speaker 1: that's the expectation. Why is that it was not always
Speaker 1: the case? That has changed now? And there's a there's
Speaker 1: a lot of complicated reasons We could cite for why
Speaker 1: that is some of them economics, of them, our social
Speaker 1: but it has certainly changed this country in ways that
Speaker 1: we haven't really fully come to grips with yet. She
Speaker 1: wrote a book on that, she had interesting ideas on that,
Speaker 1: but now she's all she's like Burnie Light. She's the
Speaker 1: female Bernie who's a little more palatable to the establishment,
Speaker 1: and so that was what she was going for. And
Speaker 1: I just think it it actually damages the future prospects
Speaker 1: of other women on either side of the aisle who
Speaker 1: had vote for president to have this consistent Oh it
Speaker 1: was sex Orsum No, we make fun of everybody who
Speaker 1: runs for president, male, email, you name it. We make
Speaker 1: fun of every candidate. We judge every candidate based on
Speaker 1: who they are, what they stand for, what they say.
Speaker 1: And there's really I just don't believe this myth that
Speaker 1: lives tell themselves that it's because Hilary was a woman
Speaker 1: that she didn't win, and she's she of course has
Speaker 1: blended on sexism. It's sour grapes. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: sore loser stuff. It's sore loser stuff from from Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren to be sure. Um, I mean this Pelosi says
Speaker 1: the same thing. Play she's She's going on Pelosi play seventeen.
Speaker 1: But I do think there's a certain element of misogyny
Speaker 1: that is that is there, and some of it isn't
Speaker 1: really mean spirited. It's just isn't their experience. Many of
Speaker 1: them will tell you they had a strong mom, they
Speaker 1: have strong sisters, they have strong daughters. But but they
Speaker 1: you know, they had their own insecurities. It's just a
Speaker 1: cheap shot, is it based on what? Why is she
Speaker 1: saying this? There are insecurities that people would not vote
Speaker 1: for a woman president. Maybe it's just not a good candidate,
Speaker 1: you know. I think what's going to happen. By the way,
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna put this out there. I think you're
Speaker 1: gonna have and I'm not gonna name. I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: I'm on that prediction business in politics for at least
Speaker 1: the next couple of weeks, because it looks like Biden
Speaker 1: is going to be the nominee. Whoops. But I think
Speaker 1: you're going to have the first president of the United
Speaker 1: States be a Republicans who's a female. I think you're
Speaker 1: gonna have the first female president of the United States
Speaker 1: be a Republican and that will be a fascinating test
Speaker 1: of liberals who claim that you're shattering the ultimate glass ceiling,
Speaker 1: and because they've created this whole identity, which I know
Speaker 1: we talked a lot yesterday about this, and it was
Speaker 1: kind of an intense first hour of the show. But
Speaker 1: I think it's an important and intense topic and we
Speaker 1: have to speak honestly about it. When you have women
Speaker 1: shrieking and screaming on the steps of the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: about how proud they are of their abortions, I almost
Speaker 1: want to I honestly, I almost want to cry for them,
Speaker 1: Like it made I tear up thinking about what they've
Speaker 1: done to those unborn babies and to themselves and to
Speaker 1: their souls in the process. But you know, we have
Speaker 1: to we have to move on to other topics. Today.
Speaker 1: Liberal women, though, have adopted this mentality that they're to
Speaker 1: be the first of all, I got so much today,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I just came in. I came into
Speaker 1: work today is ready to fire on all cylinders. First
Speaker 1: of all, liberal women have a difficult time now accepting
Speaker 1: the progressive agenda because or they should have a difficult
Speaker 1: time with it, because it doesn't really allow for a
Speaker 1: clear definition of what a woman is really mean that
Speaker 1: what is a woman? According to libs, it's not a
Speaker 1: biological state. It might be a psychological state, but it's
Speaker 1: not a psychological state that anybody could particularly explain. You know,
Speaker 1: they'll say, and there's a lot of incoherence here too.
Speaker 1: You know, they'll say that boys and girls don't like
Speaker 1: young boys and girls don't play with different toys because
Speaker 1: of biology. But then the moment somebody says that they're
Speaker 1: trans picture, if it's a boy who thinks he's a
Speaker 1: girl who's you know, eight or nine years old, they
Speaker 1: want to start dressing it and dressing him like a girl,
Speaker 1: playing with girl toy. They want all the trappings of
Speaker 1: female stuff. But but but there's no biological connection between
Speaker 1: these things. I'll tell you. So then why the big
Speaker 1: push to have the kid playing with the female stuff
Speaker 1: and dressing as a female. It's incoherent. You can't make
Speaker 1: sense of it. You can't. They can't define what a
Speaker 1: woman is. But here is what they will define for you.
Speaker 1: The left believes that to be considered a woman to
Speaker 1: be in good standing with the female gender slash whatever
Speaker 1: that includes, that's not actually female. Now you have to
Speaker 1: adopt certain political positions. And if you do not adopt
Speaker 1: those political positions, internalize them, fight for them, believe them.
Speaker 1: You know, shriek about equal pay when it's a myth.
Speaker 1: You know that the pay gap is because of sexism.
Speaker 1: It's just not true. Economists have looked at it over
Speaker 1: and over. Every time they come back it's not true,
Speaker 1: but they say it. Claim that men and women are equal,
Speaker 1: claimed that there's no important biological difference between male and
Speaker 1: female strength and endurance and other things. So that you know,
Speaker 1: we need to have women and forward combat roles, even
Speaker 1: if they can't actually meet the standards. We need to
Speaker 1: have men competing in women's sports, all these different things.
Speaker 1: You have to accept all of that. But but this
Speaker 1: single most important thing to be a woman, if you're
Speaker 1: going to be considered a real woman by the left,
Speaker 1: by the Democratic Party in American today, you must be
Speaker 1: absolutely devoted to abortion as a as a fundamental female right.
Speaker 1: And if you're not, you're not actually anymore. And we
Speaker 1: will see this play out when if we do have
Speaker 1: a female Republican candidate for the presidency. And there are
Speaker 1: a few that come to mind that I think are
Speaker 1: gonna after Trump hopefully wins reelection. But there are a
Speaker 1: few that I think we could all point to and
Speaker 1: say that would be probably a formidable Candida candidacy. You
Speaker 1: will see the media without without even batting an eyelash,
Speaker 1: without even a second thought, start running with well, it's
Speaker 1: they're not really this isn't really a win for women
Speaker 1: because this this Republican presidential contender isn't really a woman
Speaker 1: because she believes in oh, I don't know a traditional
Speaker 1: family and male and female roles and his pro life.
Speaker 1: That's pretty much. If you answer yes to those things,
Speaker 1: you're not really a woman according to Democrats. You're you're
Speaker 1: a traitor, You're you're outside. You have female biology, but
Speaker 1: not a not the female you know, membership card or whatever.
Speaker 1: That's where we are in America today. It's pretty upsetting,
Speaker 1: it's pretty absurd, but that's the truth. You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show Podcast.
Speaker 1: The best estimates now of the overall mortality rate for
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen is somewhere between point one percent and one percent. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's lower than you heard probably in many reports. Why
Speaker 1: is this number one is because many people don't get
Speaker 1: sick and don't get tested. So probably for this reflects
Speaker 1: the overseas experience. So probably for every case there are
Speaker 1: at least two or three PAER cases that are not
Speaker 1: in the denominator. So I just want to sort of
Speaker 1: scale that it's certainly could be higher than normal fluid.
Speaker 1: Probably is, but it's not likely in the range of
Speaker 1: two to three percent. Who does that sound like? I mean,
Speaker 1: who's been telling you that? You might say, buck, Is
Speaker 1: that just some random person? Though? That's the Assistant Secretary
Speaker 1: for Health, Admiral Brett jeer War at the Department of
Speaker 1: Health and Human Services. That's exactly what I've been telling you,
Speaker 1: because I've read about previous outbreaks of particularly dangerous influenza
Speaker 1: in the last twenty years, and the initial the initial
Speaker 1: panic is always accompanied by an initially much higher mortality rate.
Speaker 1: And yet sometimes a mortality rate is higher in general
Speaker 1: when they finally crunch all the numbers properly than standard
Speaker 1: flu strains, but it's less than when the initial panic happens.
Speaker 1: And that's a big difference. Right. If I'm about to
Speaker 1: start doing I learned from MSNBC you don't do math
Speaker 1: on the fly. But the difference between a point one
Speaker 1: percent mortality rate and a two percent mortality rate is
Speaker 1: when you're talking about playing that math out over perhaps
Speaker 1: millions and millions of people is enormous. That's a very
Speaker 1: very big difference. So that's why when people start talking
Speaker 1: about the Spanish flu, a five percent mortality rate is
Speaker 1: really scary, right. That means you're you're losing for every
Speaker 1: one hundred people that are getting infected, five people are dying.
Speaker 1: And you play that out every thousand people, you know,
Speaker 1: fifty every doing a lot of math down the show.
Speaker 1: I did not learn my less from MSNBC. But that's
Speaker 1: that's where we are. That's the true number is going
Speaker 1: to be less than the two to three percent that
Speaker 1: you've heard. Based on all the data we've seen so far.
Speaker 1: Because we know about all the mortalities where there are
Speaker 1: proven cases, we don't know about all the people who
Speaker 1: have been exposed, that number is going to get bigger.
Speaker 1: So I wanted to share that with you. I just
Speaker 1: wanted to say, stop panic buying everything, folks, Okay, this
Speaker 1: is not this is not helpful. It's not like I
Speaker 1: know you're not doing this. I mean, look a little
Speaker 1: bit of preparedness. I think it's going to be prepared
Speaker 1: in general. So I'm not saying don't have two weeks
Speaker 1: of a food on hand. I think that's a good
Speaker 1: idea period I do. I could live out of my
Speaker 1: freezer alone, assuming the power stays on. But I can
Speaker 1: live out of my freezer alone as long as I
Speaker 1: had running water and electricity for probably I'd say two
Speaker 1: or three weeks just out of my freezer, never mind
Speaker 1: the fridge or the pantry. Bruster Mark, if you had
Speaker 1: to in in Castle and Castle de Mark, you and Ariel,
Speaker 1: how long could you last with what you've got already
Speaker 1: access to food wise? Right now? Not a lot because
Speaker 1: I'm moving, that's right, So well when you move into
Speaker 1: the place, would you please, I'll feel better if I
Speaker 1: know you and Ael you guys need you need like
Speaker 1: two weeks a grub? Yeah, I mean we usually have
Speaker 1: a full freezer. Yeah, that's what I'm saying, have that freezer.
Speaker 1: And you know soup Campbell soup. I should have known
Speaker 1: that Campbell soup have been a great buye. I should
Speaker 1: have thought of this. That's the main soup. That's the
Speaker 1: main soup people go to a lot of them have gluten.
Speaker 1: So I can't do that, but there are other soups
Speaker 1: I like, but that's you know, some canst off and
Speaker 1: freezer and you're good. Now the freezer obviously, if we
Speaker 1: if we if we get to dogs and cats living
Speaker 1: together Massesteria, the power goes out, you gotta eat that
Speaker 1: freezer stuff pretty fast. But assuming that that's not the case,
Speaker 1: but there might just be shortages in stores or you know,
Speaker 1: you're you're gonna be in good shape. You're gonna be
Speaker 1: in good shape. I've been in that situation after hurricanes
Speaker 1: when the power goes out. Where were you for Hurricane Sandy?
Speaker 1: For Sandy, I was in Queens, so it wasn't that bad,
Speaker 1: but I was down. I lived down in Florida for
Speaker 1: her middle school in high school, so I went through
Speaker 1: a couple of hurricanes. Yeah, did you ever have to
Speaker 1: like kind of rely on what was just in the
Speaker 1: house for a few days. There were a couple times
Speaker 1: where the power was out for a few days and
Speaker 1: we lost all the food because we couldn't cook it either. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so that was always tough. Yeah, I mean I remember
Speaker 1: I was actually staying It's a long story how I
Speaker 1: was staying in a hotel in New York City, even
Speaker 1: though I lived here during Hurricane Sandy, and I went
Speaker 1: up to the roof while the hurricane was going on
Speaker 1: the roof of this hotel. The hotel maintained power. Three
Speaker 1: blocks from us blackness power went out. I was just
Speaker 1: above where the power outage was, and I went to
Speaker 1: the roof the night of the and I could see
Speaker 1: all of southern Manhattan and you could see the blacked
Speaker 1: out areas, and I gotta tell you, that was spooky stuff.
Speaker 1: It was spooky to see a huge section of New
Speaker 1: York City and pitch blackness, a pitch black at night.
Speaker 1: And then the next morning we had all these people
Speaker 1: coming up because we were one of the first places.
Speaker 1: The hotel is actually very good. They're giving them a
Speaker 1: coffee and donuts and please use our power like they were.
Speaker 1: I was impressed. This was a nomad hotel in New
Speaker 1: York City. A great hotel by the way, but yeah,
Speaker 1: there were people walking up and they were The thing
Speaker 1: that really freed people out was if you lived on
Speaker 1: like the thirty eight or fortieth story of a building.
Speaker 1: The power went out a lot of those buildings. Internally
Speaker 1: in the stairs, there's no there's no windows, and there
Speaker 1: they didn't have emergency lighting and you had to walk
Speaker 1: down the walk down the stairs. So people are using
Speaker 1: their phones as flashlights. Thanks for listening to The Bus
Speaker 1: Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcast. Well,
Speaker 1: I think people are viewing us as having done a
Speaker 1: very good job. What we have to do is do
Speaker 1: a very professional job. Nobody is blaming us for the virus. Nobody,
Speaker 1: I mean, I haven't heard that, even from some of
Speaker 1: the so called enemies or whatever you want to call them.
Speaker 1: Then I'm blaming us. Just started in China. How it
Speaker 1: started as questioned, but thousands and thousands of cases in
Speaker 1: China and it infiltrated to almost a hundred countries right now.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, but I'm just asking about, you know, in
Speaker 1: terms of things you can't control, right the impact on
Speaker 1: the economy, and that potentially, you know, that could if
Speaker 1: people feel like the economy is turning around, that that
Speaker 1: could be an election issue as you go into it. Well, look,
Speaker 1: we were set to hit thirty thousand on the day.
Speaker 1: This is a number that nobody ever even came close to,
Speaker 1: and already we have the number and even though it's
Speaker 1: down ten or eleven percent, that's still the highest it's
Speaker 1: ever been by far. It certainly might have an impact.
Speaker 1: At the same time, I have to say, people are
Speaker 1: now staying in the United States, spending them money in
Speaker 1: the US, and I like that. You know, I've been
Speaker 1: after that for a long time. You know that, I've
Speaker 1: been saying, let's stay in the US, spending money here,
Speaker 1: and they're doing this. They're sort of enforced doing that.
Speaker 1: We met with the airline companies yesterday. They're doing a
Speaker 1: fantastic job and they're just not flying to areas that
Speaker 1: have a big problem. So it's going to all work out.
Speaker 1: Everybody has to become it's all going to work out.
Speaker 1: I think that's the message, and I agree with the
Speaker 1: President here on that. Now, I do disagree that people
Speaker 1: aren't blaming the president. Well they're not blaming him for
Speaker 1: the existence of coronavirus. But I've been on the receiving
Speaker 1: end of psycholibs saying that the President is not doing
Speaker 1: a good job on this, that we're you know, we're
Speaker 1: all at risk because of him, and there's a lot
Speaker 1: of that. I mean, it obviously knows that, but clearly
Speaker 1: there's No, there's no one who's blaming him for this.
Speaker 1: I think it is interesting. Now. Look, I know it's
Speaker 1: a conspiracy theory that's out there without there's no evidence yet,
Speaker 1: and there's also no one who really knows yet. Epstein
Speaker 1: didn't kill himself. No, I'm just kidding. That's a different thing. Uh,
Speaker 1: there is a conspiracy theory out there that the open
Speaker 1: that the open air market where they think this thing
Speaker 1: started in Wuhan, Wuhan City, which I believe is in
Speaker 1: Hu Bay Province. My Mid East geography is phenomenal, my
Speaker 1: China specific internal geography. I got the major cities and
Speaker 1: I know where the Muslims are and uh, that's a
Speaker 1: pay it out. I know where the Shaalan monks are
Speaker 1: and after that, I get a little shaky. I'm not
Speaker 1: a lot I'm not. I'm not an Asia specialist by trade.
Speaker 1: I was a Mid East guy. So when I when
Speaker 1: if I ever mess up, you know now, I'm all
Speaker 1: I'm all like nervous that after making fun of MSNBC,
Speaker 1: MSNBC for being so stupid, you also had Anna Navarro
Speaker 1: that one of the dumbest, if not the dumbest, political
Speaker 1: analyst at CNN come out to say that she was
Speaker 1: in Arkansas and she just doesn't understand how people from Arkansas,
Speaker 1: who are seemed pretty nice could have given someone so
Speaker 1: terrible like given us someone so terrible like Jeff Sessions,
Speaker 1: because you know, Arkansas and Alabama totally the same. Anyway,
Speaker 1: the theory that they have about the virus in Wuhan
Speaker 1: is that it came from some these open air markets.
Speaker 1: They call them wet markets. I think they've stopped calling
Speaker 1: them that, but there's video of it. You see it,
Speaker 1: You're like, wow, I can't believe people actually this is
Speaker 1: where they go to get animals to eat. But it
Speaker 1: was that it was bats. Initially, bat soup was getting
Speaker 1: a lot of a lot of attention that it turned
Speaker 1: out they said it was a pangol in, and let's
Speaker 1: be honest, all of us were like googling once a pangolin.
Speaker 1: I think I'm pretty good with animals, and I had
Speaker 1: to think about what a pangolin looked like before for
Speaker 1: a moment before I could figure that one out. And
Speaker 1: now they're not, you know, they don't really know. But
Speaker 1: there's also it is a coincidence. I'm not but there
Speaker 1: is a a virology bioweapons lab very close to where
Speaker 1: this where this outbreak happened. That is just an interest.
Speaker 1: It is just an interesting coincidence. I know they've said
Speaker 1: it's a debunk theory or you know, people put it
Speaker 1: out there early on. Okay, but we really I mean,
Speaker 1: China is a very big place with a lot of people.
Speaker 1: The one place that I know of that I've read
Speaker 1: about where they do biological weapons research in China. Unless
Speaker 1: I'm missing something that the virus would have popped up
Speaker 1: for the first time within a matter of miles of
Speaker 1: that place, it seems notable. That's all. It just seems notable.
Speaker 1: I can't it can make it a claim about where
Speaker 1: it came from. This just I got thinking about this
Speaker 1: because yes, they're not blaming Trump for the existence of
Speaker 1: the virus, but they're look, they're rooting against America. And
Speaker 1: this is pretty pretty frightening to think about. But there
Speaker 1: are a lot of people on the left who are
Speaker 1: are clearly, in my mind, okay, with this becoming a
Speaker 1: big desire as long as the means Donald Trump doesn't
Speaker 1: get to continue to be president. And let's actually play
Speaker 1: this out for a second. If you believe the rhetoric
Speaker 1: of the Libs. They say that Donald Trump is a traitor.
Speaker 1: They say that Donald Trump is a threat, a clear
Speaker 1: and present danger could lead us into, say, a nuclear
Speaker 1: war with North Korea. These are all things they've said.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm not that none of those are exaggerations.
Speaker 1: Prominent people in the media and politics have said that
Speaker 1: about this president. If you believe that, and you know
Speaker 1: that in a bad flu season, eighty thousand Americans might
Speaker 1: die anyway, if you're leaving it up to the left,
Speaker 1: to the Libs to make this determination, do they think
Speaker 1: that it is now? I don't think that they're actively
Speaker 1: trying to make things worse. But if they were offered
Speaker 1: a choice between a future in which America suffered, let's say,
Speaker 1: a total of under a thousand deaths from coronavirus but
Speaker 1: Trump wins, or fifty thousand deaths from corona virus but
Speaker 1: Trump loses. I do believe that there are leftists, and
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about just crazy people living in basements
Speaker 1: writing comments. I do believe it there are Democrats and
Speaker 1: liberals who would prefer the latter outcome. That is the
Speaker 1: degree of Trump derangement syndrome that exists in this country.
Speaker 1: And I'm not saying they're working toward that outcome. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying they're trying to, you know, spread, I'm just
Speaker 1: saying if you ask them which future they would prefer
Speaker 1: less than a thousand dead from coronavirus in America and
Speaker 1: Trump is president for four more years or fifty thousand
Speaker 1: dead from coronavirus, but Trump is guaranteed to lose. I
Speaker 1: don't think I'm alone here. I think I think a
Speaker 1: lot of people would agree with me that there are
Speaker 1: libs out there who would say that the second one
Speaker 1: is more important for America. That's a better future for America.
Speaker 1: That's terrifying. It's terrifying, but it's the truth. And I've
Speaker 1: always promised you that I'll speak the truth to you
Speaker 1: no matter what, no matter what comes from it, no
Speaker 1: matter what happens. And that's really what I learned when
Speaker 1: I was out in California. That's what I learned from
Speaker 1: being on the Bill Mars Show. That's what I see
Speaker 1: day in and day out now with a lot of
Speaker 1: the truly Trump to arrange, there are something. There are
Speaker 1: Democrats who clearly would reject this and say no, no, no,
Speaker 1: life is I'm look, I'm not somebody thinks, so all
Speaker 1: Democrats are bad. I have a lot of Democrat friends.
Speaker 1: I'm not one of these people, but there is this
Speaker 1: this crazy sort of Bolshevik fringe in the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: that's very powerful. So they may not be a large number,
Speaker 1: but they're very influential. And I think that they would
Speaker 1: they would make that that choice in a way that
Speaker 1: is deeply disconcerting if they were given that option, And
Speaker 1: it's a it's a thought experiment that's worth doing for us.
Speaker 1: So we really understand who they are, I mean, who
Speaker 1: the political opposition to Trump really is what they're all about.
Speaker 1: You know who definitely agrees with me about how we
Speaker 1: have to get serious about this. You've probably heard of before,
Speaker 1: Prucer Mark. Would you play clip nineteen for me please?
Speaker 1: And that's how Poland survived a thousand years of invasion.
Speaker 1: You either start protecting yourself or you die. You either
Speaker 1: fight or die. And that's why folks as a lot
Speaker 1: of changes around here. Because I'm in war moat and
Speaker 1: nobody in a fight is gonna grab me like a
Speaker 1: woman by the hair and slam my head in the
Speaker 1: ground like I'm They're gonna get nothing but pure war
Speaker 1: because the season of war is now upon US information war,
Speaker 1: culture war, spiritual war. Sky is I don't even know
Speaker 1: what to say. I saw that clip making the rounds.
Speaker 1: We are in a political war right now. That is true.
Speaker 1: But some of the other stuff that he said, I
Speaker 1: was like, Oh my gosh, good heavens, where do they
Speaker 1: where do they find this fellow? You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. You are a
Speaker 1: self proclaimed germophobe. In the campaign. Before the campaign, you
Speaker 1: didn't like to shake hands. You change that? What did doctor?
Speaker 1: I'm not thrilled. Yeah, yeah, you're not thrilled. What did
Speaker 1: doctor say to you? Have you changed anything in the
Speaker 1: way that you operate? So, yeah, it's a great question
Speaker 1: because I've always felt, you know, I don't know, from
Speaker 1: the time I was a young guy. You know, I've
Speaker 1: always felt the concept wasn't good. Then you'd read a
Speaker 1: lot of medical reports. Is not good now, especially they're saying,
Speaker 1: by the way, if there was ever a time then
Speaker 1: you could convince people not to shake hands. This could
Speaker 1: be it. Okay, this could be at Elbow And you
Speaker 1: know what I did? You know what I did? I
Speaker 1: really I love the people of this country. You can't
Speaker 1: be a politician and shake hands. People come in. When
Speaker 1: I leave, I'll be shaking hands with people. They want
Speaker 1: to shake your hands, they want to say hello, they
Speaker 1: want to hug you, they want to kiss you. I
Speaker 1: don't care. It doesn't mean you have to do that.
Speaker 1: If I went around, I don't shake it. Can you
Speaker 1: imagine I'm going to speak with a group of people
Speaker 1: and they like Trump and they come up, sir, thank
Speaker 1: you everybody. I don't shake hands. It's over. I don't
Speaker 1: care how nicely you say that. The bottom line is
Speaker 1: I shake anybody's hand. Now. I'm proud of it. They're
Speaker 1: people that I love, the people that I want to
Speaker 1: take care of. This is why Donald Trump is where
Speaker 1: he is and why he is probably well, I won't
Speaker 1: get ahead of ourselves, but this is why Donald Trump
Speaker 1: has been successful as a politician with the establishment completely
Speaker 1: deadset against him, because he understands people, because he and
Speaker 1: he actually likes people. I think Elizabeth Warren is a fraud.
Speaker 1: I think Elizabeth Warren, if she has she had her way,
Speaker 1: she would just hang out with people from the Harvard
Speaker 1: Faculty lounge and you know the people that are of
Speaker 1: her similar socioeconomic, you know, echelon, and that that's it.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't think that Elizabeth Warren wants to
Speaker 1: spend a lot of time around people that she doesn't
Speaker 1: that that you know, aren't her. Are her cup of tea?
Speaker 1: You could say, and people cup on this. This is
Speaker 1: one the one thing I've always I've always known, I've
Speaker 1: always seen this and you're you know, you're aware of this. Uh,
Speaker 1: those of us who see everybody else as a person.
Speaker 1: You know, there's somebody who's who speaks to whether it's
Speaker 1: the guy you know, delivering the pizza, or the person
Speaker 1: cleaning you know, cleaning the pipes for your toilet, or
Speaker 1: whomever it may be. People might try to be polite,
Speaker 1: but you can always tell the people that have a
Speaker 1: conversation that's just polite with those individuals versus the people
Speaker 1: that have that conversation and they just see them as
Speaker 1: a person. They want to talk to them. They like them,
Speaker 1: They like people and everywhere. They just like people as
Speaker 1: a general thing. They like other human beings. Donald Trump
Speaker 1: has that. This is why, you know, whether he's talking
Speaker 1: to the CEO of a company or he's talking to,
Speaker 1: you know, a construction team, that's sitting on the sidewalk,
Speaker 1: you know, with their lunch pails eating, you know, eating
Speaker 1: a sandwich. He likes them, and that comes across, you know,
Speaker 1: I think as much as he he's unmessed in a
Speaker 1: lot of other ways. I think Bill Clinton does like people.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's an ego mamiac, and he's a liar,
Speaker 1: and he's a sexual assault allegations against him, a lot
Speaker 1: of bad stuff. But I think Bill Clinton does like people,
Speaker 1: and that always came across from everyone I know who's
Speaker 1: interacted with them and deal with them. He's you know,
Speaker 1: he likes himself more. But look, Trump has a healthy
Speaker 1: ego too. Some of these politicians he put forward. Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders doesn't like people. Elizabeth Warren doesn't like people. I
Speaker 1: think Joe Biden has spent his entire career really honing
Speaker 1: at least the appearance of just liking people. And if
Speaker 1: I'm I'm gonna try to be fair here, I think
Speaker 1: I think I think he actually does at some level.
Speaker 1: You know, I think he likes people more than Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren does. And this is one of the this is
Speaker 1: a version of that Oh when somebody was running for office,
Speaker 1: do you want to have a beer with them. Well,
Speaker 1: what are you really talking about there? It's not are
Speaker 1: they going to really entertain you? Are they gonna be hilarious,
Speaker 1: or are they gonna agree with all of your positions?
Speaker 1: The do you want to have a beer with this
Speaker 1: person thing is do you get the sense that this
Speaker 1: person just has a warmth in their approach to other
Speaker 1: human beings and just comes to every meeting with another
Speaker 1: person from a place of basic Hey, I'm glad to
Speaker 1: be here, good to know you, and you know, want
Speaker 1: the best for you. I think that's an energy that
Speaker 1: that's a mindset that people have whenever they meet with
Speaker 1: other human beings, or they could have the end here.
Speaker 1: I am fine, Okay, yes I will talk to poor
Speaker 1: people today because like I'm running for president. But I
Speaker 1: mean that was the way that was Bloomberg's approach didn't
Speaker 1: warrant out very well. Elizabeth Warren always tries to oh,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm from Oklahoma and I was a single
Speaker 1: mother and i was fired from a job as a teacher,
Speaker 1: and oh bah broh all this stuff, and a lot
Speaker 1: of people will hear that and just sort of say, yeah,
Speaker 1: but it sounds like you're trying to sell me on
Speaker 1: why you like me as a person or you like people,
Speaker 1: instead of just show me. Just be normal, like I
Speaker 1: don't know how else to say this sometimes and then
Speaker 1: just be cool, you know, just be good to people.
Speaker 1: They pick that up no matter what someone's level of
Speaker 1: education is, no matter what background somebody has. One of
Speaker 1: the universal human constants I think is people can pick
Speaker 1: up when other people actually just kind of like people.
Speaker 1: And for politicians it's a very powerful, a very powerful
Speaker 1: trait to have. In fact, some people might argue, especially
Speaker 1: in the pre you know, internet and pre mass media
Speaker 1: age is a critical one, right, I mean the feeling
Speaker 1: that you give to people when you meet them. And
Speaker 1: I think it's it's not impossible to fake. I you know,
Speaker 1: I think Biden's a little bit a faker, but he's
Speaker 1: gotten pretty good at it. It's something though, that if
Speaker 1: if you're dealing with the person who's reasonably well attuned,
Speaker 1: they won't they won't be able to pull off seeming
Speaker 1: like they like people when they really don't, when they're
Speaker 1: really just could care less. So that's how I feel
Speaker 1: about that. Trump shaking people's hands, even though he's a germophobe,
Speaker 1: is kind of an example of how he understands that
Speaker 1: this is what he's got to do, this is the
Speaker 1: job he's in for. I would also know we are
Speaker 1: going to be in a little bit of a strange
Speaker 1: position because we're an election year where presidents. We are
Speaker 1: gonna have two presidential contenders who are older, white males,
Speaker 1: who if we have this COVID nineteen thing spreading in
Speaker 1: mass fashion, which could very well happen, Let's let's be
Speaker 1: clear about this. I mean the president and also the
Speaker 1: contender against him, Joe Biden, mean they are in high
Speaker 1: risk categories. I don't know. I'm assuming that they're just
Speaker 1: going to continue business as usual and go to huge
Speaker 1: events and shake people's hands. And but this is a
Speaker 1: I think from an epidemiological standpoint, you have to think
Speaker 1: of This is a this is a real concern. This
Speaker 1: is a real thing that we have to be aware of.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that the president's out there calling people. It's
Speaker 1: okay that he's calming the nation as much as he
Speaker 1: can while being responsible about taking the proper precautions. And
Speaker 1: I just think that if you had a different president,
Speaker 1: the media would be helping him with this instead of
Speaker 1: constantly trying to undermine this message. I mean, here's this
Speaker 1: is all from the Fox News town Hall last night
Speaker 1: with Martha Mcaluman, Brett Bear play play eight. I think
Speaker 1: the country is far more united than people think. And
Speaker 1: ultimately what's uniting the country is success, and we're having
Speaker 1: more success than we've ever had. We got hit with
Speaker 1: a virus really three weeks ago, if you think about it,
Speaker 1: I guess that's when we first started really to see
Speaker 1: some possible effects. But even despite that, the country we
Speaker 1: are having. The greatest year we had last year was
Speaker 1: the greatest year we've ever had economically, and I think
Speaker 1: the way we unite is really through success. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. And people don't like it. People don't want
Speaker 1: to me. He was talking about Lizabeth Warren. It's like,
Speaker 1: I'm not mean, she's mean. He's a mean person. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, she's she went after Mike Bloomberg, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: I mean, that was really the only thing that she
Speaker 1: did in the campaign. Anybody's gonna remember she decided to
Speaker 1: just rhetorically knife Bloomberg on that stage in front of everybody.
Speaker 1: I mean she went, she went brutus on Julius Caesar.
Speaker 1: She was going right after him. It was rough. It
Speaker 1: was rough stuff, to be sure. But you know, Trump
Speaker 1: does like people. As I was saying to you, I
Speaker 1: hope that little rant about that all all held together
Speaker 1: and made sense because it is. It is how I
Speaker 1: feel about this. I think it's one of the one
Speaker 1: thing about him that's very underrated by his opponents. They
Speaker 1: keep thinking he's a billionaire, he's dated, you know, pin
Speaker 1: up girls, and you know, blow all this other stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but he just also likes people, and a lot of
Speaker 1: a lot of smug libs out there. Look, there's also
Speaker 1: there are Republicans. I don't think mid Romney likes people
Speaker 1: very much. I think Mitt Romney likes to think he
Speaker 1: likes people. But Romney's a very he likes to hang
Speaker 1: out very rarefied circles, I think. Um speaking of which,
Speaker 1: as if his little vote against Trump in one of
Speaker 1: two areas on the impeachment wasn't annoying enough. Now he's
Speaker 1: he's the go to for the mainstream media trying to
Speaker 1: let us know that we shouldn't we shouldn't find out
Speaker 1: anymore about what really happened with Biden and Barisma Play sixteen.
Speaker 1: There's no question but that the appearance of looking into
Speaker 1: Barisma and Hunter Biden appears political. And I think people
Speaker 1: are tired of these these kind of political investigations and
Speaker 1: would hope that if there's something of significance it needs
Speaker 1: to be evaluated, that it will be done by perhaps
Speaker 1: the FBI or some other agency that's not as political
Speaker 1: as perhaps a fake committee of our of our body.
Speaker 1: Why can't they look into this? They just impeach the president?
Speaker 1: Was that was that political? Mit? Because you were a
Speaker 1: part of that? But this would look political. They're just
Speaker 1: gonna try to find out the truth, right, Isn't that
Speaker 1: what they're supposed to do in Congress? Isn't that why
Speaker 1: they have these oversight committees. Isn't that why they have
Speaker 1: the powers they do of subpoena and all. Then the
Speaker 1: Democrats just weaponized all that crap against Trump. We know
Speaker 1: you helped them out, gave them cover, although nobody was
Speaker 1: really going to remember Mitt Romney really just debased himself
Speaker 1: in that whole process and trying to elevate himself. He'd
Speaker 1: debased himself. But Trump isn't letting this one go. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's a very interesting stuff in this Fox News town
Speaker 1: hall last night with Trump. Trump's like, look, Biden's overseas
Speaker 1: business dealings. That's a thing that's fair game. It's going
Speaker 1: to get talked about. We're going to talk about it.
Speaker 1: Play clip one. Look at the sun. Here's a guy
Speaker 1: didn't have a job, was unfortunately sadly the military was
Speaker 1: a very sad experienced for him. He goes out, he
Speaker 1: gets three million dollars plus one hundred eighty three thousand
Speaker 1: dollars a month to be a board member of a
Speaker 1: company that a lot of people said was corrupt, worse
Speaker 1: just as bad China. I just made a great China deal.
Speaker 1: China's panned, has billions and billions of dollars because of
Speaker 1: what I did to them with tariffs, billions of dollars.
Speaker 1: I mean to a point where my farmers are in
Speaker 1: love with me because I took some of that money
Speaker 1: gave it to them. But his son walks out of
Speaker 1: China with a billion and a half dollars for a fun.
Speaker 1: Now a billion and a half dollars for a fun.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's going to make hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: dollars a year and much more than that. Everyone thinks
Speaker 1: that's what, that's okay, that's normal, supposed to just let
Speaker 1: that go and pretend that it's not. Doesn't look super corrupt,
Speaker 1: it doesn't look like it's a complete and utter payoff,
Speaker 1: a scam. Corruption. But you know, the media they've tried
Speaker 1: so hard to cover for Biden on this one, They're
Speaker 1: not going to able to do it. We're gonna find
Speaker 1: out more, you know. I know Rudy Giuliani has been
Speaker 1: over there looking into this and others. Do they have anything.
Speaker 1: We'll find out, and we should find out. We have
Speaker 1: the right to know the truth about what really went
Speaker 1: on there, especially after being lectured about how oh Trump
Speaker 1: and is doing Russia's bidding. Yeah, what was what was
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden doing with connections to his dad in Ukraine?
Speaker 1: We should find out. I want to know what those
Speaker 1: answers are, all right, So I did previous at the
Speaker 1: top of the show, and I skipped past it just
Speaker 1: because Bernie Sanders is not getting as much attention right
Speaker 1: now as Biden. Because Bernie is gonna We're gonna lose.
Speaker 1: And I think we all know that. Now, there's this
Speaker 1: term that the Soviets used to use, useful idiots. It
Speaker 1: was a person who didn't realize that they were being
Speaker 1: helpful to the Soviet Union and the cause of communism.
Speaker 1: But they were, and the Soviets loved it. And there
Speaker 1: were a lot of them in this country. There were
Speaker 1: a lot of them in journalism, in academia, and even
Speaker 1: some in government who were doing who were carrying water
Speaker 1: for the Soviets. And even if they weren't doing it
Speaker 1: in as a form of specific loyalty to the Soviet Union,
Speaker 1: they were useful to the Soviet Union. Here is, for example,
Speaker 1: Trump talking about how he was all ready to go
Speaker 1: with as he says, communist, but I love it. As president,
Speaker 1: thank Heavens, he speaks about things the way he does
Speaker 1: and just doesn't go through the filter of the media.
Speaker 1: Play clip too. Okay, I was all set for Bernie
Speaker 1: because I thought it was going to happen. You know,
Speaker 1: we get ready for things, right, So mentally I'm all
Speaker 1: set for Bernie Communists. I had everything down, He's act.
Speaker 1: I was all set, and then we have this crazy
Speaker 1: thing that happened right on Tuesday, which he thought was Thursday,
Speaker 1: but He also said one hundred and fifty million people
Speaker 1: were killed with guns and he was running for the
Speaker 1: United States Senate. Support me. I'm running for the United States.
Speaker 1: There's something going on there. But I was all set.
Speaker 1: I was all said, and you know, when I focus
Speaker 1: and we all focus, sometimes you do well and some
Speaker 1: people choke. I watched Mini Mike joke when Minnie Mike
Speaker 1: was hit by a very mean woman. He said, getting
Speaker 1: me off this stage, just getting me off, And that
Speaker 1: wasn't a pretty sight to be a way. But I
Speaker 1: was all set to take on Bernie, all set to
Speaker 1: take on Bernie the Communist. Can you imagine what it's
Speaker 1: going to be like when this guy and Joe Biden
Speaker 1: are going after it? I mean, do you wanted this? Democrats?
Speaker 1: You want it, You're gonna get it. Democrats you want it,
Speaker 1: You're gonna get it. This is where we are. Commie
Speaker 1: Bernie piece in the New York Times. Now it's safe.
Speaker 1: Now it's safe because the party has decided. The decision
Speaker 1: has been made really by the DNC insiders, by the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party apparatus, that it's gonna be Joe Biden. It's
Speaker 1: not gonna be Bernie. Standers so now they'll start printing
Speaker 1: stuff like this New York Times. Now now they can
Speaker 1: pretend to put their journal hats back on. As Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders pushed for closer ties, Soviet Union spotted opportunity. Previously
Speaker 1: unseen documents from a Soviet archive show how mister Sanders
Speaker 1: worked to find a sister city in Russia when he
Speaker 1: was mayor of Burlington, Vermont in the nineteen eighties. Moscow
Speaker 1: saw a chance for propaganda. Let me just read you
Speaker 1: a little bit of this piece. This is great. The
Speaker 1: mayor of Burlington, Vermont wrote to a Soviet counterpart in
Speaker 1: a provincial city that he wanted the United States and
Speaker 1: the Soviet Union to live together as friends. Unbeknownst to him,
Speaker 1: his desire for friendship meshed with the efforts of Soviet
Speaker 1: officials in Moscow to reveal American imperialism as the main
Speaker 1: source of the danger of war. That mayor was Bernie Sanders,
Speaker 1: and the story of his nineteen eighty trip to the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union has been told before, but many of the
Speaker 1: details of mister Sanders Cold War diplomacy before and after
Speaker 1: that visit, and the Soviet effort to exploit mister Sanders
Speaker 1: anti war agenda for their own propaganda purposes have largely
Speaker 1: remained out of sight until now. Bernie was a useful idiot.
Speaker 1: That's what Bernie Sanders was for the Soviet Union in
Speaker 1: the nineteen eighties. They're like, we're gonna use this guy's
Speaker 1: clear affection for socialism and communism, clear affection for the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union. He came back, I've played you the audio.
Speaker 1: Look at great trains, look at great schools, healthcare for everybody,
Speaker 1: to all this stuff. Right. He liked the sol He
Speaker 1: went there, he saw it and he thought it was
Speaker 1: a good idea. This guy's the number two right now
Speaker 1: the Democrat primary in this country. And Democrats get so
Speaker 1: angry when we say they're socialism soon. Yeah, it's a
Speaker 1: socialist party. This is a question of how much socialism
Speaker 1: and how fast they want to give it to us.
Speaker 1: The Democrats are a socialist party. Now, there's these eighty
Speaker 1: nine pages of letters and telegrams and other things from
Speaker 1: internal Soviet government documents that look at this whole process.
Speaker 1: And they were exploiting this idiot mayor from Vermont, Bernie Sanders,
Speaker 1: for their own purposes of propaganda that America the imperialist
Speaker 1: war machine of America. See even this mayor knows that
Speaker 1: America is the bad guy. Bernie Sanders, I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: I mean people that really think that this guy. Sure,
Speaker 1: he's authentic. He's an authentic Marxist that somehow has been
Speaker 1: overlooked in much of this conversation. An ideology that has
Speaker 1: immiserrated hundreds of millions, perhaps billions of people when you
Speaker 1: add it all up, an ideology that was the primary
Speaker 1: ideological force that sought the destruction of this country and
Speaker 1: the free world for what fifty years or so. Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders was like, yeah, I kind of I kind of
Speaker 1: like the way they do things over there. We should
Speaker 1: do more of that. And now that we finally defeated
Speaker 1: that evil empire of the Soviet Union, thank you, Ronald Reagan,
Speaker 1: we're supposed to have Bernie import some of the failed
Speaker 1: ideology that he's been supporting his whole life. That was
Speaker 1: the primary ideology of our opponents in the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the system. Pretty scary stuff when
Speaker 1: you think about it. I mean that when I say scary,
Speaker 1: I mean that this is that he's an individual that
Speaker 1: wins California. I mean California. What is wrong with the
Speaker 1: Libs in California. Why are they so crazy? Why are
Speaker 1: they so nuts? Do they not read anything? Do they
Speaker 1: not understand anything? And a lot of them claim to
Speaker 1: be so educated and they work on the you know,
Speaker 1: the university system there, or they're people in media, or
Speaker 1: they're in Hollywood, are super rich, or they're in Silicon Valley,
Speaker 1: and they think that, you know, because they're good at
Speaker 1: being computer engineers, the rest of the world should listen
Speaker 1: to them about everything else. It's very poor judgment with
Speaker 1: someone like Bernie Sanders, very poor judgment to support an
Speaker 1: individual like this. And as much as I'm a little
Speaker 1: bit disappointed that we're not going to have the throwdown
Speaker 1: a Trump clearly was disappointed. I'm not going to have
Speaker 1: a throw down between Sanders and Trump that perhaps we
Speaker 1: could have, I do think that as we look at
Speaker 1: this now, maybe you know, maybe it's for the best
Speaker 1: that we didn't have the propaganda effect of a socialist
Speaker 1: running around as the Democrat. Although this is not going away.
Speaker 1: AOC is every bit the socialist that Bernie Sanders is,
Speaker 1: and they're going to have her run. She's going to run.
Speaker 1: She's going to run for Senate she's going to run
Speaker 1: for president. You watch, it's going to happen. So we
Speaker 1: haven't won this, but that's why I thought maybe better
Speaker 1: to have a repudiation of Bernie on the national stage,
Speaker 1: because there's this ideology has real So it's not just
Speaker 1: Ernie Sanders, he's just the figurehead for it within the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. The Democratic Party has incubated this now it's
Speaker 1: been there for well, what really happened, and I could
Speaker 1: tell you take you in the history here the twentieth century,
Speaker 1: is that the American Socialist Party, the American Communist Party,
Speaker 1: merged into the Democratic Party, and it has been a
Speaker 1: something of a trojan horse. It's been getting bigger and stronger.
Speaker 1: It's been getting more powerful in Democrat circles. That's what's happened.
Speaker 1: That's why there is no American Socialist Party anymore. There was.
Speaker 1: It now just is what was initially a parasite and
Speaker 1: is now increasingly engorging itself on the host of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. That's what it is. That's where it went.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Got a special treat for you on this Friday,
Speaker 1: my friends, Eddie Scary is with us now. We actually
Speaker 1: started together way back in the day at the Blaze,
Speaker 1: and he has been lighted up over at the Washington
Speaker 1: Examiner as a columnist. He's also got a new book out,
Speaker 1: Privilege Victims, and he wants to tell us about it. Eddie.
Speaker 1: Great to have you, Hey, happy to be here, and
Speaker 1: thanks for bringing up the good old days. Yeah, man,
Speaker 1: and it was. You know, it's almost ten years buddy,
Speaker 1: you feel an old yet? Uh yeah, I'm getting there. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that makes two of us, all right, tell us read
Speaker 1: the book Privileged Victims. Who's privilege and who's the victim? Well,
Speaker 1: even though we have that's the dynamic that's set up
Speaker 1: within our culture now in every part of our culture, Hollywood,
Speaker 1: the national media, academia especially, this is this kind of
Speaker 1: where it all comes from. But then also our politics,
Speaker 1: particularly with regards to the Democratic Party, they say it's
Speaker 1: the privilege versus the victim. That's kind of the power
Speaker 1: dynamic that we're always looking at. But in that power dynamic,
Speaker 1: I've noticed that there's a new class of people born out.
Speaker 1: They are the privileged victims, people who claim to have
Speaker 1: been oppressed, aggrieved, victimized always on account of their gender,
Speaker 1: their race, or their sexuality, and regardless of whether it's
Speaker 1: true or not, oftentimes it's not or they haven't been
Speaker 1: oppressed or victimized. But that comes with a lot of
Speaker 1: special privileges. Now you can advance a lot of your
Speaker 1: own interests, whether that's you want more money from somebody,
Speaker 1: you want national at tension, you want to become famous,
Speaker 1: you want a job, any number of things. You can
Speaker 1: get these things simply, and you can get on the
Speaker 1: fast track to those things simply by claiming to have
Speaker 1: been oppressed, agreed, or victimized again on the basis of
Speaker 1: your race, gender, or your sexuality. And I'll just give
Speaker 1: you the ultimate example, but there are many many in
Speaker 1: my book because it's again it touches on every part
Speaker 1: of our culture, and so many people I've figured out
Speaker 1: that this is the fast track to um advancing your
Speaker 1: your own interests. But the ultimate example was Justice Smollett.
Speaker 1: Chicago police and two grand juries now have said he
Speaker 1: wanted more money for his Fox show Empire, and he
Speaker 1: wanted to get more famous. While he knew because this
Speaker 1: is the culture we live in now, to get those things,
Speaker 1: he just had to say, oh, I've been I was
Speaker 1: attacked for being black and I was attacked for being gay.
Speaker 1: I'm oppressed, I'm a victim. I'm agreeede according to police
Speaker 1: and learning the two grand juries. Now, he made that up,
Speaker 1: But why would you make it up? Because he sees
Speaker 1: the pattern. He sees the pattern. I thought that if
Speaker 1: you just claim these things, makes the claim, fake it,
Speaker 1: fake it to make it um. That's all it takes anymore.
Speaker 1: That's that's the new class of people we're looking at.
Speaker 1: That's why I call them the privilege victims. If you're
Speaker 1: claim victimhood, you get all these privileges with it. Now
Speaker 1: do you think that this is ever going to change?
Speaker 1: Because I feel like we all this is now something
Speaker 1: we have to accept. It's part of corporate culture. If
Speaker 1: you challenge any of this, you get shouted down, you
Speaker 1: get chased out of the public square, you could lose
Speaker 1: your job. It feels like it's this this issue of
Speaker 1: victims using their their perceived victimology to advance their careers.
Speaker 1: It's a more powerful tool than it's ever been. It's
Speaker 1: a very powerful tool. And that's why other interviews that's
Speaker 1: an asked, why why is it? Why is it working?
Speaker 1: How is this possible? Well, how did we get here. Well,
Speaker 1: because most normal, ordinary kind American people, which is the
Speaker 1: vast majority of it, no one, none of us want
Speaker 1: to be called racist, none of us want to be
Speaker 1: called exist, bigoted, homo fold, so we will oftentimes it's
Speaker 1: back down. The normal person does not want to not
Speaker 1: want to be called those things, doesn't want to have
Speaker 1: a confrontation over these things. And I also may very
Speaker 1: well feel, oh I must have missed something, maybe I
Speaker 1: did do something offensive. That is the power of the
Speaker 1: social justice movie, because that's what powers this dynamic. It
Speaker 1: comes from the social justice ideology. There is an entire
Speaker 1: chapter in my book that goes into the entire chapter
Speaker 1: of my book Privileged Victims, that goes into social justice ideology.
Speaker 1: Where that comes from. It's basically the left, every one
Speaker 1: of the left bad ideas dating back to probably the fifties, communism, Marxism, feminism, socialism,
Speaker 1: Cleano theory, all of these things. And how does it change. Well,
Speaker 1: we have seemed fine, that there is some fight in people.
Speaker 1: I point to the election of Donald Trump. I think
Speaker 1: fifty percent of the reason why people chose him was
Speaker 1: because he said, look, I don't care if you call
Speaker 1: me sexists. I don't care if you call me racists.
Speaker 1: This is how I see it, and I believe this
Speaker 1: thing to be sure, whether he was talking about anchor babies, immigration,
Speaker 1: any number of things. And then also the confirmation of
Speaker 1: Brett Cavanaugh. The me too movement movement has been entirely
Speaker 1: effect effected by the social justice ideology, seized by the
Speaker 1: social justice mob. That's where why we're seeing so many
Speaker 1: ridiculous claims and trying to roll it into oh that's
Speaker 1: another me too, well, there's another me too. Well. You know,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump stood behind Brett Cavanaugh. Brett Cavanaugh fought it.
Speaker 1: You had the the Republicans on the Senate Judicial Judiciary Committee.
Speaker 1: And by the way, that was that was another thing.
Speaker 1: If you remember, leading up into before we even got
Speaker 1: to the to the hearings, the media's main um disqualification
Speaker 1: of the whole thing, to say the whole thing is
Speaker 1: a sam is oh this is run by old white men.
Speaker 1: That was just an automatic doc against them you couldn't trust,
Speaker 1: unlike unlike Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, who are youthful and vigorous.
Speaker 1: Any we have to unfortunately, we have to leave it
Speaker 1: there for now, but everyone should hear obviously you got
Speaker 1: a lot to say. They should, they should hear more
Speaker 1: about this. Read more about this with Privileged Victims on Amazon,
Speaker 1: available wherever you get books any Gary of the Washington Examiner,
Speaker 1: thanks for joining us, Eddie, thanks, thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Team bugging,
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call, some jazzy roll call to
Speaker 1: set you off on your weekend. Hope everything is going
Speaker 1: to be fantastic for your team. We've got some of
Speaker 1: your wonderful comments to get to today. We got the
Speaker 1: Penalty Box ready to rock with producer Mark. He'll be
Speaker 1: chiming in as he tends to do with his wisdom.
Speaker 1: And yeah, I'm just I'm another week man. Another week's
Speaker 1: quite a time. It's gonna be quite a year that much.
Speaker 1: I am very confident about all right. Facebook dot com,
Speaker 1: slash buck Sex and if you want to me a
Speaker 1: message on Facebook, also team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com
Speaker 1: if you want to send me an email. Sorry, don't
Speaker 1: know why I'm starting to I'm starting to pull Joe
Speaker 1: Biden over here. Producer Mark my legs. I got some
Speaker 1: sun at California that turn a little blonde. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: have people look at my leg hair. You're a line
Speaker 1: dog face pony soldier. He's got me on that one,
Speaker 1: all right, Adam, first up here book for the climate
Speaker 1: change nickname. I think climate cultist rolls off the tongue
Speaker 1: and it's about as short as I think you can get. Um.
Speaker 1: Climate cultist is actually a little tough to say, I think, Adam.
Speaker 1: But I appreciate your point, and I think that you're
Speaker 1: as as content or as as something that is trying
Speaker 1: to describe the situation. I think that that certainly works.
Speaker 1: So yeah, there we go. We can we can do that.
Speaker 1: We can check that one out. I appreciate that, Elvin,
Speaker 1: cool name. I started listening to you since the Glenn
Speaker 1: Beck days, but I lost track of your whereabouts for
Speaker 1: some time. Whoever, thanks to the magic of the podcast,
Speaker 1: I am back on the team. I enjoy your serious
Speaker 1: take with the funny twist to the daily events. My
Speaker 1: teenage son and daughter are also warming up to your show.
Speaker 1: Oh well, glad to have you back on the team, Melvin.
Speaker 1: And please, if you know anybody else that knows me
Speaker 1: from the old days when when I was found lost
Speaker 1: puppy in a back alley, about to go get a
Speaker 1: graduate degree. Good heavens, oh, good heavens. Instead I went
Speaker 1: to work in media. But yes, please do spread the
Speaker 1: word past the buck. Tell people that they can find
Speaker 1: me on podcasts. Our podcast numbers are growing. I am
Speaker 1: so thankful about this. I really mean this to all
Speaker 1: of you that gets one to listen. We see every
Speaker 1: single time you get an initial proper we can see
Speaker 1: every every download. So when you get your friend to listen,
Speaker 1: that is showing up. It's like a vote for the show.
Speaker 1: And we tally up all the votes every month, and
Speaker 1: it's what keeps the lights on up. You Ramer, Proucer Mark,
Speaker 1: This guy just got married. He's moving to a house
Speaker 1: in Jersey. Bruster Mark needs a new pair of shoes,
Speaker 1: probably a new lawnmower. Probably you know, a nice a
Speaker 1: nice handbag for for missus. Mark known as Ariel. I
Speaker 1: didn't realize that apartments need lawnmowers. Now you moved in
Speaker 1: an apartment. Yeah, but you're moving to a house. No
Speaker 1: money got optated. Now it seems like I don't even
Speaker 1: know what I'm gonna but I'm talking about over you
Speaker 1: think I have that kind of money. I don't know
Speaker 1: what houses cost a lot of money. Yeah, yeah, so
Speaker 1: you're you're moving alike like urban n J. Kind of.
Speaker 1: There's an apartment right Mexas Toicogo's Junction. Okay, it's gonna
Speaker 1: be close though, which is great because now I was
Speaker 1: gonna have to get him a little caught for the
Speaker 1: freedom hup and out prucer Mark and basically live here.
Speaker 1: See he'll see missus Mark on the weekends. Ariel, she'll do.
Speaker 1: She said she's a good cook, right, what's what's the
Speaker 1: go to cook? She doesn't really have a go to
Speaker 1: just anything. She does pretty good. Yeah that's nice. Um, well,
Speaker 1: I'm excited for you to have your new place. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you that your commute will be shorter than mine.
Speaker 1: Oh well, about that you will spend less time daily commuting.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, see that's for a different that's our different reason. Yeah,
Speaker 1: gotta through radio shows every day. All right, Alvin, thank
Speaker 1: you so much, Isaac hey Buck. We all love Producer Mark.
Speaker 1: Both of you do a great job. I really enjoy audiobooks,
Speaker 1: and I'll grab your book regardless of what form it's in. However,
Speaker 1: I'm curious to know if you're going to release it
Speaker 1: as an audiobook. If so, are you going to read
Speaker 1: it yourself. I've always been slightly disappointed when I hear
Speaker 1: an audiobook written by someone who speaks for a living,
Speaker 1: only to find a surrogate narrator Isaac. It's it's gonna
Speaker 1: be released by my friends at Stansbury Research. It's a
Speaker 1: joint project with them. So I wrote this book, but
Speaker 1: they're gonna be putting it out. There'll be a website
Speaker 1: for it, and I'm not exactly sure when we're gonna
Speaker 1: have that up, but it'll be. It's a matter of
Speaker 1: a few months now, so it's coming. David hey buck
Speaker 1: Love listen to the show. I'm not a doctor or
Speaker 1: health professional of any kind, but I feel the common
Speaker 1: cold is there to keep our immune system in check.
Speaker 1: Beside getting a serious illness, the cold helps our immune
Speaker 1: systems stay healthy. You can stay healthy all the time,
Speaker 1: shield Side, Thanks for doing what you do. Thank you
Speaker 1: David for writing in. I don't know if that's from
Speaker 1: a medical standpoint, really a factual thing that seems to me,
Speaker 1: I think we could be fine without because your body
Speaker 1: is fighting off there there's a constant war. We're in
Speaker 1: war mode, war mode, you're you're there's a constant war
Speaker 1: going on of the various microbes. Five pounds of microbes
Speaker 1: is what you actually have in and on your body
Speaker 1: at any point in time. That's the estimate, and they're always.
Speaker 1: You know, you have right now bacteria on your skin
Speaker 1: that would be scary to hear about. You know you
Speaker 1: have staff bacteria, most likely staff lococcus on your skin.
Speaker 1: You have other kinds of bacteria that you know are
Speaker 1: in and around your body, but they're not at pathogenic levels,
Speaker 1: or they're not at levels that would make you sick.
Speaker 1: So I don't know if you need to get a
Speaker 1: cold for your immune system, but you do need to
Speaker 1: be exposed to germs to keep your moods, and which
Speaker 1: just means like live your life, live your life, eat
Speaker 1: healthy food, limit your vices, limit your drinking you're smoking,
Speaker 1: your super sugary foods, and get enough sleep. Sleep is
Speaker 1: essential for immune I can't tell you how many times
Speaker 1: I miss a night or two of sleep, usually because
Speaker 1: I'm out partying and you know, producer Mark has to
Speaker 1: pick up the pieces in here, and I'll get sick afterwards.
Speaker 1: Because your immune system. If you overtax your immune system
Speaker 1: when you this Israel, this is this is hashtag science
Speaker 1: or actually just science. You need enough sleep for your
Speaker 1: immune system to be functioning. So do not think that
Speaker 1: getting like four or five hours for a few nights
Speaker 1: in a row is something that you can get away
Speaker 1: with it. You're gonna get sick. David. Oh no, we
Speaker 1: already to David. Sorry, Jake Bukapalooza, Hey man, what's up, cheek?
Speaker 1: I think Tulsi situation is a perfect microcosm for the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party for all intents and purposes, she should be
Speaker 1: their poster child. She's double, intersectional, is articulate, has far
Speaker 1: left leaning views, would be the first female president, has
Speaker 1: a record of sorts in government, and is an example
Speaker 1: of legit girl power as a major in the Hawaiian
Speaker 1: National Guard. And she presents well if you catch my meaning,
Speaker 1: we catch your meaning, Jake. So what if they preach
Speaker 1: what was actually believed? They would embrace her. So why
Speaker 1: no traction? Why no love? The reason is the big
Speaker 1: media hasn't given her the spotlight. The establishment picks the
Speaker 1: winners and spoon feeds the media. The media is the
Speaker 1: X factor for all libs that have a voice. Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton doesn't like Tulsei, so Tulsi gets the cold shoulder.
Speaker 1: Talk about election meddling, Jake, I think your analysis about
Speaker 1: the media's treatment of Tulsi Gabbard is true. They don't
Speaker 1: like her, but the reason they don't like her is
Speaker 1: that she is out of step with them on the
Speaker 1: Democrat establishment on foreign policy. That's why you hear all
Speaker 1: this stuff about it. Oh, she's like a puppet of
Speaker 1: a saw. That was the big hitter. You haven't heard
Speaker 1: that in a while. By the way, that was the
Speaker 1: big hit on her for a long time. And she
Speaker 1: is She loves the military, and I think that she
Speaker 1: wants to be respectful to Republicans and to Trump supporters.
Speaker 1: That doesn't fly. He can't be respectful to Trump supporters
Speaker 1: if you're a Democrat these days, if you want to
Speaker 1: if you want power in the Democratic Party, you have
Speaker 1: to sneer at Trump supporters. You have to think Trump
Speaker 1: supporters are are, you know, odious people deserving of no respect?
Speaker 1: So yeah, I think that's where it is with Tulsa Abert.
Speaker 1: And look, she's very far left. I don't agree with
Speaker 1: her a lot of things, but she doesn't strike me
Speaker 1: as a shameless, pandering, hateful politician. And that's what does
Speaker 1: really well in the Democrat Party today. That's what you
Speaker 1: really need to be. I don't know if I guess
Speaker 1: this is I don't know if this is Robbie or
Speaker 1: a Robi and the way it's spelled. When I hear
Speaker 1: clips these celebrate oh whoa sorry, hold on, let me
Speaker 1: let me redo this one. When I hear these celebratory
Speaker 1: baby butchers, I'm reminded of a scene from the movie Legion.
Speaker 1: An old woman is okay, Robbie, I'm gonna skip this one.
Speaker 1: It's pretty intense. Thank you, though, for writing in Laurie.
Speaker 1: Have you considered a side career in political comedy? Is
Speaker 1: there such a thing? Because I think you would be fantastic. Seriously,
Speaker 1: you can make a script and do a show with
Speaker 1: all your voices. I can hardly stop laughing when you
Speaker 1: imitate these different political figures. I just love your impersonations.
Speaker 1: Shoot during the election season, it would be a perfect
Speaker 1: time for a debut. Keep your fabulous impersonations coming. Thank you, Laurie.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna remember Laurie. Sometimes, like people wrote in Look,
Speaker 1: I just like when you're doing the serious analysis, save
Speaker 1: the country, leave the comedy to other people. I get that.
Speaker 1: Sometimes I was like, oh, excuse me, I like I
Speaker 1: like Laurie's approach more Laurie. I don't know, I really
Speaker 1: I've talked so much about bringing back an old character
Speaker 1: from the Blaze days called Commy Bear. I've I've really
Speaker 1: thought about it, and you know, now that we have
Speaker 1: the Pluto TV, it'd be more fun to do. Maybe
Speaker 1: we could just do like a graphic with comedy Bear
Speaker 1: behind me or something and have his little mouth move.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but I do like doing the comedy.
Speaker 1: I think we need to mix it up, especially those
Speaker 1: of you who do me the great honor of spending
Speaker 1: all three hours of radio with me every day or
Speaker 1: money through Friday. You know, I want you to I
Speaker 1: want her to move quickly. I want you to have
Speaker 1: you know. I want them to be intense, learning and
Speaker 1: fighting for what we believe in terms of principles. But
Speaker 1: I also want there to be fun stuff too. I
Speaker 1: want people to enjoy their time they spend with me.
Speaker 1: It really matters to me. So I like the political
Speaker 1: comedy aspect of it. And that's why you know, I
Speaker 1: never I never get sore never get my nose out
Speaker 1: of joint. When Producer Mark is getting salty over there,
Speaker 1: you know, when he's being crowd show Mark, and I'm like,
Speaker 1: it's okay, He's allowed to be a little salty sometimes.
Speaker 1: He's also keeping the trains on track here and the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt Darby. Hey, I remember Darby. I han't heard
Speaker 1: from a wild Shields. I your brother from Dallas here.
Speaker 1: I haven't heard anyone point out that the abortion industry
Speaker 1: in America is basically a huge money laundering scheme. Congressmen
Speaker 1: and women voting give Planned Parenthood millions planned parent who
Speaker 1: then makes huge donations to politicians. It's a self looking
Speaker 1: ice cream cone. Keep up the five, brother, Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I've talked to I mean, the abortion lobbies probably among
Speaker 1: the very most powerful lobbies in the United States. They
Speaker 1: always talking about the NRA. NRA has got nothing on
Speaker 1: the abortion lobby. And I unlike the NRA, the abortion
Speaker 1: lobby actually kills people every day. You're in the Freedom Hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, our
Speaker 1: role call is continuing her wait, but before we get
Speaker 1: to roll call, Producer Mark, did you see this this
Speaker 1: pole they did of people that were asked what video
Speaker 1: game they would like to see made into a movie,
Speaker 1: and the winner was pac Man. What is wrong with people? Like?
Speaker 1: There are so many great options out there? Man, I
Speaker 1: mean Hackman. I don't know how you make it a movie.
Speaker 1: Did they already make it a movie or is there
Speaker 1: already like there was a cartoon or something? Yeah, do
Speaker 1: you have one if you if you had to make
Speaker 1: a yeah, you had to make a video game into
Speaker 1: a movie, is there one that you would? I mean
Speaker 1: Grand Theft Auto comes to mind, but that would be
Speaker 1: just that would be insanely gross. Probably for some people.
Speaker 1: I'd enjoy it. They had they couldn't do, like the
Speaker 1: really gross stuff. Yes, I remember I played that game
Speaker 1: for a little bit. I never got that good at
Speaker 1: it though, I never there were some games that I
Speaker 1: really leaned into and became like like Ninja Level and
Speaker 1: that was not actually good at them. The game Teken,
Speaker 1: which was an old ninja video game, would be a
Speaker 1: cool movie because it's like ninja stuff but also works
Speaker 1: in like Japanese. Um, how do I like the mystical
Speaker 1: and you know, like like demons and monsters and stuff
Speaker 1: kind of too or or Ninja Guide in I don't
Speaker 1: know if you ever remember that the video game. Obviously,
Speaker 1: I'm really into the Ninja thing right now, but I
Speaker 1: I grow I watched so many Ninja but I love ninjas.
Speaker 1: I watched I just what Hey, I just watched a
Speaker 1: little bit of the Tom Cruise movie because it's on
Speaker 1: Netflix now. The Last Samurai. The only part of that
Speaker 1: movie that I really want to watch. I just skip
Speaker 1: to the middle where they had the Ninja seat. That's
Speaker 1: the best scene in the whole movie by far. How
Speaker 1: do you just watch the middle of a movie? You
Speaker 1: just get Netflix? I've seen. I know how you do
Speaker 1: it physically, but why why would you do that just
Speaker 1: because that seems really cool and you can skip right
Speaker 1: to it. I'm sure it's on YouTube if you really
Speaker 1: just want to. I've done that scene. Yeah, yeah, it's
Speaker 1: that's a good scene though. Okay, I'm just saying whatever.
Speaker 1: They made some movie years ago, like Ninja something or
Speaker 1: other and it was unwatchable, trash. I can't remember. It
Speaker 1: was supposed to be about ninjas in like the contemporary context.
Speaker 1: I was very disappointed in it. I need to make
Speaker 1: the Ninja movies. What needs to happen. Sure, we'll get
Speaker 1: right on that. Yeah, paul Itt, Hey buck faithful rather
Speaker 1: addicted listener who used to believe of what you say.
Speaker 1: Until this week, I wasn't convinced that people connect your
Speaker 1: name with the adult film industry. This week I was
Speaker 1: talking about your show to a male employee who suddenly
Speaker 1: looks up and ask if I said Buck Sexton. I
Speaker 1: affirmed that indeed I had. He then asked me a question,
Speaker 1: Is that like a porn star? I immediately said, yes,
Speaker 1: yes it is. I enjoy spending my five day a week,
Speaker 1: two hour commute listening to a porn star. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: let him think that for another week, because I'd rather
Speaker 1: enjoy the looks he keeps giving me when he doesn't
Speaker 1: think I can see him. Next week, I'll give him
Speaker 1: a load down to the Freedom Under, hopefully get you
Speaker 1: a new listener. Much love to you and produce your
Speaker 1: mark shields high gentlemen. Yeah, thank you, paul At. This
Speaker 1: is the jokes that This is the joke that very
Speaker 1: not funny people keep making. I mean, I tell my parents, like,
Speaker 1: why do you guys have to give me such a
Speaker 1: weird name? They gave me this name. I didn't choose
Speaker 1: his name. That's one of my favorite emails, because like
Speaker 1: that person isn't doing it to mock you, Like he
Speaker 1: doesn't know your Republican commentator. He just legitimately heard the
Speaker 1: name and thought you were a porn star. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: maybe it's a porn star is a great podcast, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe a porn star is very very very well read
Speaker 1: to be one out there. Oh, there's gotta be a guy.
Speaker 1: There's gotta be a male adult film star who male
Speaker 1: a female, There's gotta be I'm a dude, but yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, there's gotta be one. Is you know?
Speaker 1: Actually you know who actually um like some of my
Speaker 1: tweets is the very very famous former adult film star
Speaker 1: Jenna Jamison, who is a conservative. Maybe we'll get her
Speaker 1: on that actually be really interesting. I would, I would.
Speaker 1: I would. Bill Riley had her on years ago. I
Speaker 1: remember that interview. That was probably for different reasons. I
Speaker 1: just remember Bill Riley had her on, but it would
Speaker 1: be interesting. I would. I would gladly have her on
Speaker 1: to hear about her politics. So, okay, at some point
Speaker 1: she's she's definitely a right wing. I'm not sure she's
Speaker 1: like James Woods level right wing, but she's definitely a
Speaker 1: right wing. We gotta have Woods onto. He's been great
Speaker 1: on Twitter. Greg, Hey, Buck, you said Braveheart is the
Speaker 1: greatest movie of all time. I agree. Let's not forget
Speaker 1: that Mel Gibson is also the greatest actor of all time.
Speaker 1: He should still be making movies on that level to
Speaker 1: this day. But the Hollywood left ruined him. It's extremely
Speaker 1: sad in a way. She'll tie Greg Um. I mean,
Speaker 1: I agree with that obviously. If I'm about Braveheart. I
Speaker 1: think mel Gibson has to take a lot of a
Speaker 1: lot of responsibility for ruining mel Gibson, if we're really
Speaker 1: gonna be honest here. But I appreciate you writing in
Speaker 1: my man, and yeah, I think Brave Brave Heart's just
Speaker 1: like as a special place in my heart, isn't. I
Speaker 1: remember my mom took me. I saw it with my
Speaker 1: mom back when it came out when I was in
Speaker 1: high school I think senior in high school maybe, And
Speaker 1: I came out of there and I was just like,
Speaker 1: I want broad sword, load, where is me broad sword?
Speaker 1: I want to want to kill. I want to go
Speaker 1: fight English, you know, the whole thing. And yeah, that
Speaker 1: would have been very cold, you know, and wet a
Speaker 1: lot at that part, in that time and in that
Speaker 1: part of the world. So I don't like being cold
Speaker 1: and wet. Chopper, hey book. In regards to children at restaurants,
Speaker 1: I mean, do people tell him get to the chopper? Probably? Right.
Speaker 1: A general rule I've always practiced is the minimum age
Speaker 1: of the child is determined by the cheapest entree on
Speaker 1: the menu seven dollars age seven minimum seems a great
Speaker 1: way for everyone involved. I could I could coach onto that.
Speaker 1: What do we think? I like it? Yeah, it's not bad, John,
Speaker 1: right Buck, Thank you for having the courage talk about
Speaker 1: the atrocity of abortion. I find it's strange the same
Speaker 1: people who want abortion for nine months will protest drinking milk.
Speaker 1: I'm misguided, John, appreciate you writing in. I feel like
Speaker 1: whenever I talk too much about that, there are people
Speaker 1: in different stations who probably think that it's hurting the ratings.
Speaker 1: But I think it's important I talk about what matters,
Speaker 1: and I hope you all respect and appreciate that. But
Speaker 1: always let me know your thoughts. Team, you have a
Speaker 1: fantastic weekend, please, That's what I would ask for all
Speaker 1: of you. Rest, recoup, regroup, do all the things you
Speaker 1: gotta do. Try to tell somebody about the Buck Saxon Show.
Speaker 1: Tell them to subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts
Speaker 1: or on the iHeart app until Monday. Shields High