WEBVTT - Why Can't Dogs Eat Chocolate?

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Science Stuff production of iHeartRadio. I'm Hora

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Cham and today we are answering the question why can

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>dogs eat chocolate? Will a Hershey's kiss be the kiss

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of death for your pooch? Or will a roller bar

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>make your dog roll over into the grave? How toxic

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is chocolate to dogs? Why is it toxic? And when

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>do dogs evolve this intolerance. We'll talk to a couple

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of veterinary toxicologists and to one dog geneticis to get

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to the nougat center of this question. So come along

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>as we answer the question why can dogs eat chocolate?

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I promise the answer won't be rough.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Hi.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Everyone, you've probably heard that eating chocolate is bad for dogs. People,

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems, can eat a lot of chocolate and chocoholics,

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at you, but it seems to be dangerous

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>or even potentially deadly for dogs. Now, most people seem

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to think that's because chocolate has a chemical in it

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that is uniquely toxic for dogs, but that is perfectly

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>safe for humans. But as we'll learn today, that's not

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>really true. First, we'll talk about how serious it is

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>if a dog eats chocolate. Then we'll talk about what

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>chocolate does to dogs, and in the last segment, we'll

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>ask an evolutionary biologist to tell us when scientists think

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>this sensitivity evolved in dogs and spoiler alert, it may

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>be some humans's fault. Okay, the first topic is how

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>serious is it if a dog eats chocolate? So the

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>first thing I did was call an emergency hotline, not

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>because my dog had eaten chocolate, but to talk to

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>one of their experts. So here's my chat with doctor

0:01:50.600 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Renee Schmidt. Thank you for calling Pet Poison Helpline, a

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to seven animal poison control center.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 3>If you are a pet owner, please press one.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you doctor Schmidt for joining us.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thank you so much for having me. I'm doctor

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Rene Schmid with Pet Poison Helpline. I'm the director of

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Veterinary Medicine and senior veterinary toxicologist, so I help educate

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 4>pet owners as well as venary professionals on anything toxin related,

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 4>as well as working with our staff internally.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 2>Amazing.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us about Pet Poison Hotline.

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 4>We are a twenty four to seven animal poison control

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 4>center and so pet parents as well as veterinary professionals

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 4>can call us, and if an animal has been exposed

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 4>to something that may be toxic, we can assess it

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 4>to determine if the exposure is going to be a

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 4>concern for that animal or not. While the vast majority

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 4>of calls we receive are end dogs and cats, so

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 4>we can help with any species of animal and with

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 4>anything that they get into. So we had a sloth

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 4>that's got into a cleaning chemical. We had a goose

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 4>not too long ago that got into marijuana. You name it,

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 4>and we've probably gotten a call on it. And we're

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 4>staff twenty four hours a day.

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And you said you're all over the country, so we.

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 4>Take calls all over the country and really all over

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 4>the world. So the vast majority of our calls are

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 4>from the United States and Canada. We also take calls

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 4>from the Caribbean and Hong Kong and other countries throughout

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 4>the world.

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, And how do you cover twenty four hours?

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you just constantly on calls.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we're a busy place. It's amazing how many

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 4>animals get into things that they couldn't. We have employees

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 4>who have ships throughout the day and evenings so that

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 4>we always have veterinarians and technicians who are on and

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 4>ready to take calls at any time.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>How often do you get calls about dogs eating chocolate?

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 4>It's our number one call, It's our most common call.

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 4>I've been here for twelve years, we've been in business

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 4>for twenty one years, and it's been our number one

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 4>toxin every year since we've been keeping track. We always

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 4>look back the year prior to see what was our

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 4>top toxins, and chocolate always I always say it takes

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 4>the cake. It's always number one. You know, if you

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 4>think about it, so many households have chocolate in them.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Maybe we're cooking with it, we're buying it in different

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 4>products or candy and chocolate itself, or maybe it's in

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 4>brownies and cookies for the holidays, we're gifting it, and

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 4>so maybe it's under the tree, or it's sitting out

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 4>at parties and you know, activities and social events. So

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 4>it's something that is really a commonplace in so many

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 4>households that it smells good, it tastes good, so dogs

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 4>are naturally kind of drawn to it.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 2>You say it takes the chocolate cake.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's right, it takes the chocolate cake, for sure.

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, there are a lot of dogs out there

0:04:55.600 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>eating chocolate. Another animal poison control center would run by

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>or ASBCA, reported that they receive about seventy six calls

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a day of dogs eating chocolate, which translates to about

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven thousand, seven hundred and forty cases a year. Next,

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I ask sector SMIT, what happens if a dog eats chocolate?

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the symptoms dogs might exhibit if

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they eat it.

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so symptoms are similar to over simulation. So they

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 4>might be a little bit restless, they might be pacing,

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 4>panting that maybe agitate a little bit. They can have

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 4>a high heart rate, They can have a high blood

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 4>pressure depending on how much they ingest. They can have

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 4>heart abnormalities in rhythm abnormalities. Vomiting is certainly a common one,

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 4>as well as maybe some loose stool, and in some

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 4>cases it may not even be a toxic amount that

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 4>they get into. The can have a risk for pincreatitis,

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 4>which is just that inflammation of the pancreas when they

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 4>get a high fat meal, and because of the richness

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 4>of the chocolate, product itself, it could be enough to

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 4>cause that to flare up. So thinking about our dogs

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 4>that are more sensitive to pincreatitis, So the miniature Schnauzers

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 4>and Yorky's some of those breeds, that may be something

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 4>we have to be even more concerned about, even if

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 4>they didn't get into enough to cause a toxic concern.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, it's also the fat content.

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sure can be. So it depends on the amount

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 4>that they get into. Dogs can tolerate a hershey kiss,

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 4>but who wants to stop it just one? And so

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 4>it's you know, when they get into that large handful

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>or the bag, that can definitely be more problematic and

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 4>cause that flare up.

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Now would you see that immediately or is that more

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>of a long term concern.

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 4>So stomach sign so vomiting and diarrhea and loose stool,

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 4>that's something that we can see within a few hours,

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 4>the true and a development of pancreatitis might actually be

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 4>seen maybe later on twelve to twenty four hours or

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 4>even a day or so later.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Eating chocolate can be serious for dogs. It can cause

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>heart problems, high blood pressure, it can affect the nervous

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>system and even cause seizures. According to the Cornell College

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.559
<v Speaker 1>of Veterinary Medicine, drinking as little as half a cup

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of chocolate milk can be deadly for an average chihuahua,

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But according to doctor Schmid, not every call they get

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is life threatening. You said it's your number one call.

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess how would you break down those calls? Are

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>most of them pretty serious? Are some of them like, oh,

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they ate a kiss or a small bar and they're

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>probably okay? How would you break that down?

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 4>That's a great question, And I would say that it's

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 4>really fairly evenly spread out to being not really an issue. Fortunately,

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 4>so many pet parents understand that chocolate is concerning to

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 4>their pet and they shouldn't get into it. So I

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.679
<v Speaker 4>would say that it's a really pretty fairly evenly spread

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 4>between a mild or low concern. Maybe they just ingested

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 4>one chocolate chip cookie, and it's a labrador, it's a large,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 4>free dog, and so probably not going to be a

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 4>big issue. But then we get this past Halloween, we

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 4>had a dog that ingested over six and a half

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 4>pounds of chocolate in one setting.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, how did that dog get into six

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>pounds of chocolate? Was it they just had a chocolate factory,

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or they had.

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Their Halloween A family had their Halloween candy out because

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 4>it was Halloween Day or the day before, and it

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 4>was in an area that the dog was able to

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 4>get to and the owners weren't home at the time,

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 4>and he helped himself.

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, it just opened up all the wrappers and everything.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 4>He ingested a lot of the rappers. A lot of

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 4>the rappers were ingested and chewed him and kind of

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 4>broke them open.

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, oh my goodness, yep, dogs love chocolate. Don't

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>even eat the wrappers, all right. This made me curious

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>if doctor Schmid ever gets calls about other animals getting

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>poisoned by chocolate. You mentioned other animals. Do you get

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>calls about other animals like cats? And what are some

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>unusual animals that you've had calls about chocolate?

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 2>So we do.

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 4>We get calls on every species, and the vast majority

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 4>of the calls we receive are going to be dogs

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 4>and then cats, And it makes sense because they're around

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 4>humans more. They just have more access to the things

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 4>in the household. We certainly get calls from chocolate on

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 4>other species of animals to you know, usually something like

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 4>a rabbit or a ferret, or maybe a chinchilla.

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>That's incredible. It's a little bit ironic that you would

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have a bunny getting poison patrol call about chocolate.

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah right, Hopefully that rabbit didn't eat any of the

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 4>chocolate bunny at easter.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>So chocolate effect other animals too, including cats and rabbits.

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you search the scientific literature, you'll find reports

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of chocolate poisoning in cows, bears, and even coyotes. So

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here? What is it about chocolate that

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>makes it so harmful to so many animals except apparently humans.

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we'll talk to another expert on

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what it means for something to be toxic and how

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that affects what your pet can eat.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us, we'll be right back. Welcome back. Okay.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>We learned that dogs definitely like chocolate, but that it's

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>not good for them. We also learned that it's not

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 1>good for other animals like cats and rabbits and even bears,

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and yet people seem to be fine with it. In fact,

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>some of us eat it a lot. So what's going on?

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>To answer this?

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I reached out to doctor Bob Poppingaate, a professor of

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>veterinary toxicology at the University of California at Davis who

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>runs the toxicology lab at the California Animal Health and

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Food Safety Laboratory. He was just a few days from retiring,

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but he took the time to talk to me. So

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>here's my conversation with doctor Bob Poppingate. Well, thank you

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>doctor popping Gate for joining us.

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 3>Pleasure to be here.

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.839
<v Speaker 1>So today we're trying to answer the question of why

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>dogs can't eat chocolate, and I thought maybe we would

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>start by taking a step back, giving people a general

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of what it means for something to be toxic

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to an animal or to us.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, pretty much anything is toxic. Key is how much

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 3>is actually ingested. One of the tenants is that dose

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 3>makes the poison, So it's all about the inherent toxicity

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 3>of a compound, and also how much is actually ingested

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 3>by a dog or a person or a child, whatever.

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Some things are more toxic inherently. If you ingest enough water,

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 3>that can be toxic.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, According to doctor Popingay, there are two variables here,

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>how inherently toxic something is, In other words, how bad

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it is for you and how much of it you eat.

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>For example, cyanide is bad for you even if you

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>only eat a little of it, But water, which is

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>normally good for you, can also be deadly if you

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>drink enough of it. Here's how doctor Popingay explains it.

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean by everything can be toxic?

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, it gets back to the inherent toxicity of a compound. So,

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, there are certain vitamins that are required. We

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 3>ingest a certain amount of vitamin E or vitamin D

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 3>per day, but in excessive doses of vitamin E can

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 3>cause adverse effects. So it just depends on the individual compound.

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 3>But in sufficient doses, anything can be toxic to our bodies.

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, what makes something more inherently toxic than others?

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, it gets back to sort of the unique

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:04.119
<v Speaker 3>characteristic of a compound and our ability to handle that compound.

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>These things do they generally interfere with how the body works.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Are these things burning a hole in my stomach or well.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of different ways that a given chemical

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 3>can cause toxicity or adverse effects. You know, it can

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 3>affect our enzyme systems, it can affect neurotransmission, the neurotransmitters

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 3>that are released by our nervous system. It can block

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 3>certain body signals. It can damage cell membranes through what's

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 3>called oxidative damage, some things like corrosives. It's going to

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 3>cause damage to the mucosa, the upper gi track. So

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different ways that chemicals can cause adverse effects.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, it seems that almost America, we can eat anything,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, So something can be toxic for lots of reasons.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>There are almost endless ways in which chemicals can mess

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>with the signals in our bodies or directly damaged cells

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>or membranes. So now the question is what makes chocolate.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So then specifically for dogs, how bad is chocolate for dogs?

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, that is very common intoxication in dogs. It's one

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 3>of the top things that veterians have to deal with.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 3>But dogs can tolerate a certain amount of chocolate. The

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 3>chemicals in chocolate that cause problems, they're related and they're

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 3>called methyl xanthines. One is called theobromine, the other's caffeine.

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 3>So people are probably more familiar with caffeine, which is

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>also in chocolate, so we have both. People are less

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 3>familiar with the theobromine, which is related to caffeine has

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>the same effects, but the theobromine is at higher concentrations

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 3>in chocolate products. Those are the two compounds that cause problems.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is kind of a key point. The ban

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>chemicals that make chocolate bad for dogs are caffeine and theobromine,

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>which is basically another form of caffeine. It's not some

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>exotic toxin or chemical. It's basically what we all drink

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>every day when we drink coffee or tea. Now does

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>caffeine or theobamine have some kind of special effect on

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>dogs that they don't have on us? Not really, Okay,

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So then what do these compounds do to the dog.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's say a dog eats a bunch of the baking

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>chocolate or stip some coffee.

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>What is it going to do to their.

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Body once it's absorbed. The theobromine caffeine effect the cardiovascular

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 3>system and the nervous system. So you know, if you

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 3>drink three or four cups of coffee in the morning,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 3>you get a little bit nervous, your heart rate can

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 3>go up. These compounds are also diuretics, so you increase

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>your own production. That's why you have to go to

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the bathroom after a few cups of coffee. But the

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 3>primary adverse effect is on the nervous system and our hearts.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 3>So the heart rate goes up, you get a little

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.479
<v Speaker 3>bit excited. With a really large dose, you could have seizures.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 3>The most serious consequence is cardiac a arrhythmius, so your

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>heart rate changes. Of the dogs, the dogs are people

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 3>or any other species or animal that get into a

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 3>sufficient amount.

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Like the same effect caffeine has in us it's having

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on the dog. In other words, caffeine and theobromine have

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the same effect on us as they do on dogs.

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>These chemicals are as toxic to them as they are

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to us. But we drink coffee and eat chocolate all

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the time. So how does that make sense. Well, the

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>answer is that while humans and dogs react to caffeine

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and theobromine in the same way, there are differences that

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>affect our exposure to them. The first one is that

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>dogs are smaller than us.

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, it gets back to how much the dog actually

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 3>ingest on a body weight basis, So we could be

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 3>intoxicated by these products as well if we ate enough

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 3>of them. These compounds can't be toxic to us, So

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 3>if a child got into baking chocolate and ingested half

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 3>a package, you might have a very sick child.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so most dogs are smaller than us. For example,

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a tiny shoe walla weighs about four pounds, so a

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>cup of chocolate milk to them would be the equivalent

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of an average American eating ninety spoonfuls of cocoa powder

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in one city. If you did that, you'd be pretty

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>sick too. The second difference that affects how much chocolate

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>dogs eat if the dogs don't seem to have a

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of self control.

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 3>The other thing about dogs, why it's a problem. If

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 3>you have a dog, you know, they're very indiscriminate eaters.

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 3>They eat things and then ask questions later. If it's edible,

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be very attractive for a dog. So

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 3>if they have access to a pan of brownies, they're

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 3>not going to stop with one brownie. You know, they're

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 3>going to clean up the entire pan of brownies. So

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 3>cats are about as sensitive to the chemicals and chocolate

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 3>as dogs are. But cats are not going to sit

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 3>there and eat a whole package of baking chocolate. Dogs

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 3>if they have access to something, they don't have any

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 3>self control, so they will eat everything there that's in

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 3>the package, whereas a person. You know, baking chocolate is

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 3>fairly bitter, so maybe a child might taste a little

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 3>bit of it, but they're not going to sit there

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 3>and eat the whole package.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I know there's some chocoholics who might dig into that

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>whole bag, right right, Okay. The last difference between people

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and dogs is the dogs don't metabolize theobromine as well

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>as humans. Here's how doctor Schmid explains it.

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so in toxicology, we talked about a half life,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 4>and the half life is the length of time it

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 4>takes the body to rid itself of half of the

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 4>amounts of that toxic component or what substance or drug

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 4>or what have you. And so the half life, the

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 4>amount of time it takes for dogs, in particular, to

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 4>rid the body of the theobromine, is much longer. In dogs,

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 4>it's about seventeen and a half hours, whereas in humans

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 4>it's just a few hours. And that definitely contributes to

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 4>the toxic effects that we see in dogs, and it

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 4>also contributes to the length of time that we see

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 4>or the duration of time that we see those effects.

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>So there is a difference between dog and human biology.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>In terms of chocolate, the abromine and caffeine have the

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>same effect on us, but it takes longer for dogs

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to break down those chemicals, so the effects last longer. Now,

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>most articles you read online will tell you this is

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the main reason dogs can't eat chocolate, but actually both

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>experts agree that much bigger factors are a that dogs

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are smaller and b that they can't stop themselves and

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>will eat huge amounts of chocolate if they have access

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>to it. Okay, the last question I asked doctor Poppingay

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was now, why can't dogs metabolize these compounds as well

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>as humans? What's the difference?

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 3>They have different enzymes in their liver that break down compounds.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Every species says a little bit different. A good example

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 3>of a species difference is cats. You should never give

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 3>a set of metaphen or tilen all to a cat

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 3>because they can't metabolize the compound like we can or

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.959
<v Speaker 3>dogs can. So cats are very sensitive to the adverse

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 3>effects of a set of menifin.

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I see, so it's genetic.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 3>It's genetic in the sense that it's a species difference.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think there are these differences in species.

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Ah, that's a good question. That's kind of a evolutionary question,

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 3>and it probably goes back thousands, if not tens of

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 3>thousands of years.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, when we come back, we'll actually try to answer

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>this question by going back in history with a dog

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>geneticis to where dogs came from. Don't go anywhere, we'll

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>be right back.

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 2>And we're back. Okay.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>The last person I talked to was doctor Maya Arrand,

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a professor at the University of Copenhagen. Here's what she does.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 5>So my name is my aunt, and as well as

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 5>being a vet with a specialty and oncology, I'm also

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 5>a researcher in genetics and focus a lot on comparative genetics,

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 5>looking at genetics between humans and animals. And then I've

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 5>also worked a lot with dog evolutions, looking at bay

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 5>see how wolfs goot domesticated into dogs as we know

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 5>them today.

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, the reason I talked to doctor Arrand is that

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to know why dogs can't process chocolate as

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>well as people can. And it turned out that doctor

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Aaron can paint a pretty interesting picture of why dogs

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>might have ended up that way and spoiler alert, it

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>might all be our fault.

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I started off by asking her to recap what we

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>know about where dogs come from. So can you give

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>us a brief history of dogs, like where did they

0:21:58.520 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>come from?

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 5>So dogs really originated from the gray wolf and they

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 5>were domesticated, well, actually, no one really knows exactly, but

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 5>as early as forty thousand years ago. Some say, oh,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 5>it's definitely just one event that happened twenty three thousand

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 5>years ago in Siberia, but there's also suggestions that dog

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 5>domestication has been happening several places around the world. Somewhere

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 5>along the time, there's been some wolves that were maybe

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 5>less fearful of humans and have sort of been more curious,

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 5>and those are the ones that have sort of been

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 5>closer around humans. There's also a theory that they have

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 5>maybe been interested in scavenging, so scavenging around the places

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 5>where humans have lived, and these factors sort of led

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 5>to humans and wolves being in closer proximity. And then

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 5>the exact sort of domestication, if it's been humans taking

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 5>wolf puppies because they look cute or how this happened

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 5>is not exactly sure.

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Interesting so at some point. The first dogs were just

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>domesticated wolves, and so they look like wolves, but now

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they look like Chihuaha's and poodles.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so there has been a lot of heavy selection

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 5>towards the dogs that we known in today, and yes,

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 5>originally the dogs that existed many thousand years ago, they

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 5>have looked or resembled much more the gray wolf as

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 5>we know it today. But what really happened is, obviously

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 5>people have selected for dogs to be used for different purposes.

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 5>They have chosen dogs that fitted to a certain purpose

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:25.479
<v Speaker 5>and tried to breathe these together.

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so only up to about twenty to forty thousand

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>years ago, there were no dogs. There were just wolves.

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And then one or two kinds of wolves started hanging

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>around people and a best friendship was born. So every

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 1>dog today signed this belief came from those first wolves

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that were friendly to humans. So how do you go

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>from a huge, fierce looking gray wolf to poodles in chiwalas?

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.479
<v Speaker 5>Significantly? I think around two hundred years ago, aways sort

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 5>of the first kennel clubs we're established, and their people say,

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 5>now we're going to create these different breeds of dogs,

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 5>and we have to have pedigrees so we can sort

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 5>of be sure that we're only breeding dogs from the

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 5>same breed, and there we've sort of selected very stringently

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 5>towards the breeds that we have today. This has had

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 5>some consequences, and it doesn't mean that there is a

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 5>lot of inbreeding within certain dog breeds. And there's also

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 5>been some sort of negative health consequences that we don't

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 5>really see in their ancestors, as in the gray wolf.

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh so the big diversification that we've seen dogs today

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>only maybe mostly happen in the last few hundred years.

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you look at sort of old paintings,

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 5>you can definitely see there's sort of different dog phenotypes.

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 5>But now we have these really different breeds. That's really

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 5>something that's only happened very recently. And what happens every

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 5>time you sort of do this selection is you create

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 5>what we call a genetic bottleneck, is where you have

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 5>only a small amount of genetic material that goes further

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 5>to great and new population. And this does I mean

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 5>that you will have a lot of sort of inbreeding

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 5>within different dog breeds.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>What you're saying makes me wonder if one of those

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>negative consequences could have been an intolerance for chocolate.

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 5>So that's a really interesting question why dogs don't tolerate

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 5>chocolate very.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, Okay, this is where it gets interesting. Doctor arend

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>has been a part of several teams that have sequenced

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the dog genome. That means they catalog the genes in

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>dog DNA, and there are two studies that tell an

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting story about dogs and potentially chocolate. In the first study,

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor Aren't and other researchers compared the DNA of dogs

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to the DNA of wolves. Here's how she describes it.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so that's really my favorite part of my research

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 5>because it was such a clear signal we saw some

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 5>years ago. We decided to look at the differences between

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 5>wolves and dogs. So basically, sequence the pool of different

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 5>wolves from different parts of the world, and then sequence

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 5>of different dog breeds and then try to look at differences.

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 5>And what we could see is, obviously we found a

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 5>lot of signals that were related to newer developments. So

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 5>this suggests that obviously there's difference in behavior and how

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 5>the brain functions between wolves and dogs.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>All Right, the first difference they saw between dog and

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>wolf DNA was in genes related to their brains, and

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>this makes sense because we know that one big difference

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>between dogs and wolves is that they behave differently. Wolves

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>are wild and dogs are domesticated. But then they saw

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>another clear difference.

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 5>But one of the sort of really strikingly clear signals

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 5>we also saw was related to the digestion of starch.

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 5>We know that wolves are really cardivores, so they tend

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 5>to eat meat only. So there are hunters in the

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 5>wildlife and they will mostly eat and hunt different types

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 5>of prey. And we look at dogs, it seems like

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 5>they are sort of closer to on their wards, so

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.679
<v Speaker 5>they can also tolerate other substances, or they can also

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 5>sort of feed on starch containing foods.

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what they saw was that the genes of dogs

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>were also more adapted to eat starches, meaning that when

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>they were wolves they only ate meat, but once they

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>became dogs, their digestive system changed so they could eat

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>basically carbs like rice and wheat. What does this mean?

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 5>So what we could see in our research was we

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 5>really found relatively strong signals that suggested that dogs have

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 5>not only been domesticated sort of in relation to their

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 5>behavior to living humans, but actually they also seem to

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 5>have adapted to the diet that we eat.

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that dogs can digest sugars more?

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Yes, that's definitely our theory.

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>What doctor rn is saying is that as dogs became

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.959
<v Speaker 1>dogs and started living with humans, they adapted to our

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>or diet, and that meant being more omnivorous and being

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>able to eat a wider range of foods, including perhaps chocolate.

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if this adaptation being able to eat more

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>sugars has made them more prone to eating the chocolate

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we leave around, Meaning like, if I leave a chunk

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>of chocolate with a wolf, would the wolf want to

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>eat this? Maybe not because it wouldn't taste good or

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have that drive to eat it.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 5>So that is a really good question. One of the

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 5>things we did see in our data originally was some

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 5>of the taste receptors in the tongues, and there potentially

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 5>could be some differences there, But it's definitely something that

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 5>would make sense that as part of this adaptation, that

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 5>maybels actually think that this chocolate didn't taste good and

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 5>dogs would be more sort of interested in it. But again,

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 5>that would be a very theoretical question. I don't think

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 5>anyone's sort of shown that.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>The second interesting thing doctor arn has found when looking

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>at the DNA of dogs is that actually dogs do

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have a gene that can help them metabolize chocolate or theobromine.

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 5>One of the interesting things we saw in our new

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 5>reference genome was we found a duplication, So that means

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 5>that instead of just having one copy of a gene,

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 5>you can have multiple of a gene called SIP one

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 5>A two, and that is a gene that encodes enzyme

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 5>that's important for digesting what called cenobiotics, for instance, theobromine

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 5>that the body doesn't produce itself. And we can see

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 5>that based on the twenty seven other dogs we had

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 5>in our data set, that some dogs have two copies

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 5>of the SIP one A two and then some dogs

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 5>would have up to five copies.

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So dogs have multiple copies up to five of a

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>gene that would produce an enzyme that would help them

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>break down theobromine, the chemical in chocolate. They can make

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>them sick, but for some reason the gene doesn't get used.

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 5>Specifically, it's SIP one two that's been associated with theobromine digestion.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 5>And then there's actually also one that's called sip to

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 5>E one I believe, which also been linked to theobromin digestion.

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 5>And the dogs have both of these genes, so it's

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 5>not like they're missing one or it doesn't exist. And

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 5>that's why, Well, if they have the genes that required,

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 5>why do we eat then see that they get this

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 5>chocolate toxicos is more frequently than you would see, you know,

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 5>the species, And that's maybe down to the way the

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 5>genes are expressed, so that maybe just not expressed in

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 5>a high enough amount.

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So they have the gene to process theobromaine. We just

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know why they don't express it enough to help them.

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I guess that would be the theory that they're

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 5>not expressing it high enough or fast enough as they

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 5>are in humans.

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Doctor arn says that a possible theory is that dogs

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>have the genes to break down the chemicals and chocolate,

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but maybe changes in other parts of the DNA are

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>preventing these genes from expressing themselves to actually make the

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>enzymes to digest chocolate. One potential source of these changes

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>could be the interbreeding that's happened in dogs over the

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>last few hundred years.

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 5>So there have been people showing that there have been

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 5>two sort of small genetic variants in the SIT one

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 5>agen that we can see that occurrent dogs, and they

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 5>have hypothesized that these genegrants made the one A two

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 5>gene function worse, so when it was translated into enzyme,

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 5>that enzyme wasn't as good as digesting deobromine.

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like maybe a possible picture. We can't

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>say anything for certain, but a possible picture is that

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>dogs adapted to human diet, but something happened along the

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>way that made them not adapt to theobromaine digestion, which

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of puts them in this bad spot where they're

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>adapted to eating our food, but just not this one

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>particular food. And so that's why it's such a problem today.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think probably that is pretty correctly.

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Put In other words, it's because of us that dogs

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>can and want to eat foods like chocolate, but along

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the way they might have lost been able to digest

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the chemicals and chocolate maybe also because of us and

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>all the interbreeding we've done to them. So maybe the

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>problem is we need to give more chocolate to dogs.

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Yes, tell us, I said evolution doesn't happen over time,

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 5>and for that selection to happen, there will be a

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 5>lot of dogs that would not do well. Yeah, so

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 5>I think the better idea is probably not to give

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 5>dogs chocolate.

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'd better for humans just to stop eating chocolate,

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>or at least humans with dogs.

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 5>Well yeah, I'm not sure if humans should completely stop

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 5>eating chocolate, but they should be more careful lenient around

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 5>where dogs can get access to it.

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 2>That makes total sense, all right.

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>To recap, the answer to the question why can't dogs

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>eat chocolate seems to be mainly the dogs are smaller

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>than us, and they are which makes it easier for

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>them to overdose on the caffeine, the bromine and fad

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in chocolate. And on top of that, they've lost the

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>ability to quickly break down some of these chemicals, maybe

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>because of us. So if you own a dog, be

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sure to put away or eat all your spared chocolate.

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's just dogon good advice.

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us, See you next time you've been

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to science stuff. The production of iHeartRadio written and

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>produced by me or Hey Cham, edited by Rose Seguda,

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Executive producer Jerry Rowland, and audio engineer and mixer Ksey

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Pegram and you can follow me on social media. Just

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 1>search for PhD Comics and the name of your favorite platform.

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to subscribe to sign stuff on the iHeartRadio app,

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts, and please

0:33:53.480 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>tell your friends we'll be back next Wednesday with another episode.