Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom huge first night of the
Speaker 1: DNCS of virtual debacle. Cuomo is writing a book on leadership.
Speaker 1: AOC has an idea to say the Post Office and
Speaker 1: a congressional ad goes viral that slams Baltimore Democrats. Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton mission coding the news and disseminating information. We have
Speaker 1: actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, America. You're a great American again.
Speaker 1: This is the buck Sexton Show. Puma CIA analysts again
Speaker 1: can speak to three hours without a phone call. Try
Speaker 1: doing that sometimes. No, we've done it right. We closed
Speaker 1: it up. We had the greatest economy in history. We
Speaker 1: closed it up. We understand the disease. Now, nobody knew.
Speaker 1: Nobody knew what was hitting us right. Nobody knew that
Speaker 1: old people would be very, very susceptible, especially if they
Speaker 1: have heart and diabetes problems and other problems. That all
Speaker 1: people would be very susceptible, and young people would be
Speaker 1: extremely good with it. If you look at the percentages,
Speaker 1: there are tiny percentages that have problems, especially the big problem.
Speaker 1: So no, I think that we're doing very well. We're
Speaker 1: on our way, and we're also opening up our economy
Speaker 1: and our economy is going to set records, and if
Speaker 1: stupid people aren't elected next year, we're gonna have one
Speaker 1: of the greatest years that we've ever had. Welcome to
Speaker 1: the box section and show everybody. Great to have you here.
Speaker 1: And I think that really gets right to it. We
Speaker 1: don't elect a bunch of dumbasses. We can have our
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen back. That's what I want. I want the
Speaker 1: country to just go back to twenty Twenty twenty has
Speaker 1: been bad. This has been a bad year. Nowhere around it.
Speaker 1: Let's just think twenty nineteen was pretty awesome. In fact,
Speaker 1: I am member in twenty nineteen sitting down and talking
Speaker 1: to family and just saying the country's good. I'm good.
Speaker 1: You know, nothing's perfect, but then this is a time
Speaker 1: to enjoy. I want that back. I want our peace
Speaker 1: and roaring economy, and I want sanity and public discourse,
Speaker 1: and I want safe streets. I want I want things
Speaker 1: that we got used to for three years of Trump
Speaker 1: and now are either under threat or have been taken
Speaker 1: away from us. All we have to do is stay
Speaker 1: the course. This is really the heart of the debate
Speaker 1: between the Democrats and the Republicans, as power will be
Speaker 1: up for grads. Remember it's not just the presidency, it's
Speaker 1: also the Congress and all the down ballot races in
Speaker 1: various states. So we've got this big national election coming up,
Speaker 1: and I want everyone to just be very clear eyed,
Speaker 1: full hearts, can't lose about what we're facing and what
Speaker 1: we're seeing here because this DNC, this virtual DNC that
Speaker 1: they've had, is just amazing. I mean, you know, it's
Speaker 1: not it's not even it's not even a question for
Speaker 1: me of why is it that the Democrats put forward
Speaker 1: candidates that they know that they know any sane person
Speaker 1: is going to immediately look at them, what are you
Speaker 1: guys doing? It's it's more that they're going to pretend
Speaker 1: right that they're going to act, like why Republicans are
Speaker 1: being so irresponsible by not wanting to vote for Biden
Speaker 1: and Kamala Harris. Until about a minute ago, they didn't
Speaker 1: want to vote for bi or Kamala Harris. Right, The
Speaker 1: reality here is that the Democratic Party is trying to
Speaker 1: hide what it has really become from the American voter.
Speaker 1: This is what always happens. Republicans go into elections and
Speaker 1: they're like, this is what we want to do, and
Speaker 1: then Democrats try to stop them from doing those things,
Speaker 1: and some Republicans has become a little weak need when
Speaker 1: they're in power and don't really follow through. But what
Speaker 1: Democrats do is act like they're going to be one
Speaker 1: thing for a certain period of time, right in the
Speaker 1: general election, not the primary, act like they're gonna be
Speaker 1: one thing, and then the moment they get into power,
Speaker 1: all of the radicalism of the left comes forward. What
Speaker 1: let's let's take a step back for a second. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna get into the DNC, which everyone is just having
Speaker 1: so much fun, trashic. I only saw some clips of it.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna watch that thing for three hours. I
Speaker 1: think it was five hours with the pre show. Come on,
Speaker 1: I mean, there's there are books to read, there are
Speaker 1: a podcasts to research, there's Call of Duty to play,
Speaker 1: there's stuff to do out there. Man, I gain it's
Speaker 1: been five hours with Oh, let's really watch it. Oh
Speaker 1: they all sit in clap. Oh. Bernie Sanders speech was
Speaker 1: so amazing. Oh my gosh. Michelle o'pama is the most
Speaker 1: gifted non politician politician in all history. I know what,
Speaker 1: we all know what they're gonna say before they say
Speaker 1: nobody's going to be convinced by any of this. The
Speaker 1: fun part of it, though, was that it did look
Speaker 1: like a telethon from circa nineteen eighty nine. I mean,
Speaker 1: it looked like something that I would have seen on
Speaker 1: a public access channel in my youth. Would they like,
Speaker 1: raise money to save this park? You don't want the
Speaker 1: park to be bulldozed? Raise money? You know? It really
Speaker 1: was something. It was just it was weak sauce. It was.
Speaker 1: The whole thing was so JV and I do worry
Speaker 1: a little bit. So I'm like, look, Republicans are going
Speaker 1: to be doing their version of it next week, and
Speaker 1: we are all having quite a laugh, quite a belly
Speaker 1: laugh at the Democrat's expense over this, and I'll get it,
Speaker 1: Like I said, I'll get into more details about some
Speaker 1: of the specifics and the speeches. And the best thing,
Speaker 1: I mean, I've just got, the best thing of all
Speaker 1: was the is it is it Credence? No? No, I don't,
Speaker 1: I don't know. And who does the song? You know?
Speaker 1: Something happening here? Stop? What's that sound? Everybody? Look what's
Speaker 1: going around? Producer Mark? Is that Credence Clearwater? I don't
Speaker 1: even know. I don't know it's a very famous song.
Speaker 1: A lot of you're yelling at me, I should know who.
Speaker 1: We got to look that up? Um, you know. Stop anyway,
Speaker 1: if you didn't see it, uh, you got to know
Speaker 1: right off the bat, Buffalo Springfield. There we go. Wait
Speaker 1: is that is that right? Yeah? Buffalo Springfield? I think, um, yeah,
Speaker 1: so wow. I've actually never even I can't even get
Speaker 1: mad at myself. I I'd never even heard of that
Speaker 1: band before. I know the song very well. Anyway, if
Speaker 1: you haven't seen the version of it the DNC played it,
Speaker 1: it's amazing. You've got to watch it. You've got You've
Speaker 1: got to watch it. It's awesome. It's a little bit
Speaker 1: like watching your your age thrice married boomer friend who
Speaker 1: has joined a band at like sixty five and grown
Speaker 1: out his hair really long and is throwing a party
Speaker 1: just to make everybody hear him in his new band.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm not talking about Joe Scarborough, though
Speaker 1: I guess I could be. It's a little bit like that.
Speaker 1: It's it's embarrassing. It's embarrassing. The whole the whole thing
Speaker 1: was absurd. And remember, democrats rely on being cool. That's
Speaker 1: such a big part of the brand. One of the
Speaker 1: points of appeal why you vote for these crazy libs
Speaker 1: is because they have all the celebrities and they had
Speaker 1: you know, Ava Longoria. Oh my gosh, I don't I
Speaker 1: care less than zero about what Ava Longoria thinks about anything.
Speaker 1: I can't. I can't believe that it's possible to be
Speaker 1: a well informed person of good judgment who thinks that
Speaker 1: any of these celebrities out there that are constantly staying
Speaker 1: the most inane, stupid lib things in public, had anybody
Speaker 1: ever listened to them? You know, some of the people
Speaker 1: out there, the actors that I like, I mean follow
Speaker 1: James Woods on Twitter. The guy's really funny and really
Speaker 1: clever and really good at political commentary. And there are
Speaker 1: other people in concern that other people who are conservative,
Speaker 1: who come from the true arts and entertainment background, who
Speaker 1: I list because they've earned they've earned the public's you know,
Speaker 1: spending some time viewing their thoughts, thinking about their ideas.
Speaker 1: Just because you're a big pop star or something doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that anybody should listen to you. There was a
Speaker 1: Cardi B, a Cardi B interview with Joe Biden. Why
Speaker 1: is Cardi B? Producer Mark do you have an answer.
Speaker 1: Why is Cardi b interviewing Joe Biden. I guess they're
Speaker 1: trying to get the younger audience. I don't know. And
Speaker 1: I did see the remix of the wet ass p
Speaker 1: word that was done last week, and it is or
Speaker 1: I mean it all thing is very funny. I sit here.
Speaker 1: I think this is what the Democrats offer. You know,
Speaker 1: you really step back at Trump's point. If we don't
Speaker 1: vote for idiots, things things are going to go really well.
Speaker 1: It's totally true. All the COVID cases are falling now, folks.
Speaker 1: It's not because of masking. It's not because we did
Speaker 1: the right thing. We rallied together. No public health authorities
Speaker 1: had really no mechanism whatsoever to protect us. You know,
Speaker 1: this comes down to individual immunity. This comes down to
Speaker 1: herd immunity. This comes down to travel patterns and lifestyle
Speaker 1: and aunt played out among hundreds of millions of people
Speaker 1: in this across this country. You know, population density, previous
Speaker 1: exposure to the virus, all kinds of things. Government has
Speaker 1: no real ability to stop this virus from spreading. I
Speaker 1: know at this point, but the country is starting to
Speaker 1: feel like things are things are coming back look at
Speaker 1: the stock market, look at spending levels. People are feeling like, Okay,
Speaker 1: we're getting close here, and we are supposed to have
Speaker 1: a vaccine they say, they hope before the end of
Speaker 1: the year. So with all of that happening, the choice
Speaker 1: is really going to be do you want to put
Speaker 1: in charge a Democrat party because you're voting for the
Speaker 1: party you're not. These candidates are irrelevant. Biden and Harris
Speaker 1: ultimately mean very little to the Democrat faithful. They're just
Speaker 1: the two people that happen to get the nod this
Speaker 1: time around. But no no one thinks that they're impressive.
Speaker 1: No one thinks that they're going to perfectly lead in
Speaker 1: any meaningful way. And if anything, I've told you, I
Speaker 1: believe that Biden's going to step aside and make room
Speaker 1: for Kamala Harris. And by the time of the mid
Speaker 1: terms if they win, if they win this election, Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris will be the President of the United States running
Speaker 1: for reelection in twenty four I really believe that. So
Speaker 1: with all that, you've got to say, what are they
Speaker 1: going to do that makes things better? They're going to
Speaker 1: raise taxes, They're going to pander to the environmentalist Left,
Speaker 1: which is a religious group pretending to be a science
Speaker 1: based policy initiative. With the climate change craziness and all that,
Speaker 1: they're going to go back to a mindset of America's
Speaker 1: kind of the bad guy in world affairs, and we
Speaker 1: need to bow and beg our enemies, bow to and
Speaker 1: beg for forgiveness to our enemies, and maybe do some
Speaker 1: military intervention somewhere on humanitarian under humanitarian guidelines. That has
Speaker 1: nothing to do really with US national security interests. I mean,
Speaker 1: just go down the list, raise your taxes, enlarge the government,
Speaker 1: more welfare, more bureaucrats. What are they going to do
Speaker 1: that makes anything better? I mean their healthcare plan. We
Speaker 1: went through all all this stuff with Obama Care really
Speaker 1: so that they could expand Medicaid, which is welfare, and
Speaker 1: take money from some people in the individual market to
Speaker 1: transfer it to other people with politely less money in
Speaker 1: the individual market, and then put some other mandates in place.
Speaker 1: And they didn't solve healthcare. And they've been saying they
Speaker 1: want to do Medicare for all. They're not going to
Speaker 1: get that through Congress, I don't think, but they'll keep
Speaker 1: saying the one radical transformation that I truly believe the
Speaker 1: Democrats will enact if they if Joe Biden wins in
Speaker 1: this election, I believe they will do an executive based
Speaker 1: amnesty similar to what Obama did with Think of it
Speaker 1: like an expansion of Dhaka right, which he Obama trying
Speaker 1: to do. Remember DACA deferred action for childhood arrivals. They
Speaker 1: tried to make it deferred action for the parents of
Speaker 1: the arrivals. And as I was saying at the time,
Speaker 1: just wait till they get the deferred action for the
Speaker 1: cousins of recent arrivals, and then it's deferred action for
Speaker 1: the friends the cousins. I mean, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: you're at everybody really all with a pen and a foam, right,
Speaker 1: remember pen and a foam. They're going to do amnesty.
Speaker 1: And then you're looking at an entire realignment of American
Speaker 1: politics because the socialist Democrat Party the party of the
Speaker 1: big state and of the redistribution of wealth and of
Speaker 1: identity politics, race based politics. That's what identity politics are
Speaker 1: that will become enshrined in America for generations to come.
Speaker 1: That will be the power structure in America. Socialism, race
Speaker 1: based politics, and an overwhelming overwriting state apparatus, big s state, right,
Speaker 1: the government Leviathan, That's what's going to happen. And I
Speaker 1: don't think there's any way for anybody to convince me otherwise.
Speaker 1: I believe that this is what's going to occur, and
Speaker 1: I think that the Obama administration really set the stage
Speaker 1: for this. So then you do have to ask what
Speaker 1: is it that would benefit what would be of benefit
Speaker 1: to people if Biden and Harris were to win It
Speaker 1: turned around and say, well, the only thing that is
Speaker 1: going to work here in the pitch for why you
Speaker 1: should vote for those two is that the countries in
Speaker 1: such bad shape. Things are so terrible that any change
Speaker 1: must be better. And right now the country's beginning to
Speaker 1: just peek out from being in hiding and feeling like
Speaker 1: we've all been under this rolling house arrest, panic, porn absurdity,
Speaker 1: largely because of the media, the Democrat Party and not entirely,
Speaker 1: but largely, and now it feels like maybe we're going
Speaker 1: to get through this. And the fundamental question I ask
Speaker 1: people it shouldn't be are you better off now than
Speaker 1: you were four years ago? It's do you want the
Speaker 1: America that you had in twenty nineteen before a global
Speaker 1: pandemic hit. Do you want that country back? Where everyone's
Speaker 1: getting wealthier, safety is on the rise, The government's doing well,
Speaker 1: We're getting great trade deals, we're securing the border. Do
Speaker 1: you want that country back or not? Because if the
Speaker 1: answer is yes, you want America twenty nineteen back for
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, for four more years, you are going
Speaker 1: to have to fight like heck, my friends for the
Speaker 1: next sixty days plus. Get ready for it. You're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: I think it would be in the United States' interest
Speaker 1: to rejoin the Iran Agreement, just as it would be
Speaker 1: to rejoin the Climate Agreement. We are now the only
Speaker 1: nation not in the Paris Climate Accord. But with respect
Speaker 1: to Iran, I think it's important for the United States
Speaker 1: to try to not only rejoin the agreement, but to
Speaker 1: try to put that lid back on the Iranian nuclear
Speaker 1: weapons program and keep it firmly on while trying to
Speaker 1: continue preventing a nuclear arms race with the Saudis or
Speaker 1: the Emirats or the Egyptians or whoever else thinks that
Speaker 1: if Iran has a nuclear weapon program, they should have
Speaker 1: one too. She's back what happened Hillary, Oh, yes, still
Speaker 1: still getting attention from Democrats. I'm telling you, she is
Speaker 1: the former Broadway star who's no longer an understudy. She's
Speaker 1: collecting tickets or sweeping up after the show, but she
Speaker 1: waits in the wings for that opportunity dollar. All right
Speaker 1: forward and all of a sudden be in the spotlighting again.
Speaker 1: But she is setting this up in a way that
Speaker 1: is useful for us to think about. She's saying that
Speaker 1: she would want the Iran deal back, the Paris Climate Accord,
Speaker 1: all this stuff that, let's really be honest about it
Speaker 1: is mostly beloved by liberals who don't understand any of
Speaker 1: these things. But the brand is such that they believe
Speaker 1: they're smarter for supporting the Climate change agreement in Paris.
Speaker 1: They think they're smarter because the Joint Comprehensive Plan of
Speaker 1: Action the JCPOA is something that the really smart Obama
Speaker 1: administration told them they should support. They're skipping past with
Speaker 1: all of this. Hillary is certainly skipping past that. The
Speaker 1: reason Trump got elected was because many of those things
Speaker 1: from the Obama era were not nearly as popular as
Speaker 1: Democrats tried to make everyone believe. And we've also seen
Speaker 1: the results of them. Think of all the fighting, all
Speaker 1: the back and forth battles over the constitutionality of and
Speaker 1: the implementation of Obamacare. Has Obamacare made your healthcare better?
Speaker 1: Has it really helped you? And is anyone listening to
Speaker 1: this like, yeah, because of Obamacare everything is great. It's
Speaker 1: just not true. And you look at the foreign policy
Speaker 1: of the Obama administration. It was an Obama nation and
Speaker 1: Hillary wants us to go back to that. No. Trump
Speaker 1: won because of what Obama did for eight years. And
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say it, Obama won in large part
Speaker 1: because of what Bush did. So why is it that
Speaker 1: we would think going back to what was rejected the
Speaker 1: last time around would be better for Democrats? I don't know.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's why the post office controversy comes in. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Remember, the Democrats are telling you that
Speaker 1: you should vote for them or not you if you
Speaker 1: listen to this show, they probably know you're you're a
Speaker 1: loss cause for them, but that Americans should vote for
Speaker 1: them because they are so much better, so much smarter,
Speaker 1: you know. I had a lawyer friend points something out
Speaker 1: to me yesterday. He said, do you know that Michelle Obama,
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, and Kamala Harris all with Well, Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: I forget where she went to law school. But Hillary
Speaker 1: went to Yale Law School, which is arguably the best
Speaker 1: law school in the country. Michelle Obama went to Harvard
Speaker 1: Law School, which is usually thought of as I think
Speaker 1: the number two law school in the country, and I
Speaker 1: Kamala went to like a state law school in the
Speaker 1: UC system, I believe, And you know, all three of
Speaker 1: them failed the bar exam on their first try. I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna go out a limit say, not a lot
Speaker 1: of people that in the in that era in particular,
Speaker 1: who went to Harvard Law or Yale Law fail the bars.
Speaker 1: Him and I, my friend told me, you know, this
Speaker 1: isn't just it's not a question necessarily of how smart
Speaker 1: an individual is. It's actually really about dedication and work
Speaker 1: ethic because if you study and you're a reasonable lawyer,
Speaker 1: you'll pass. And now you can say that's just a
Speaker 1: little minor thing. I think it's interesting because we're always
Speaker 1: told that these democrats are so so smart, and then
Speaker 1: look who they put forward First of all, the people
Speaker 1: that they tell us are so brilliant, like Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: are cunning. Hillary Clinton is conniving. But why is she brilliant? Exactly?
Speaker 1: She married a guy who threw a fluke, who was
Speaker 1: it was bright. But everyone's all Bill Clinton some kind
Speaker 1: of a genius. Now he's just good at walking around
Speaker 1: shaking hands and kissing babies and squeezing ladies bums at all.
Speaker 1: You know, the guy's not some genius. So much of
Speaker 1: this is just what people say to sound like they
Speaker 1: understand something up politics. If you were a casual reader
Speaker 1: of newspapers and you watched the occasional news broadcast in
Speaker 1: the nineties, you were trained to think that Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: was brilliant, Rhodes scholar, brilliant. And they'll throw out these
Speaker 1: credentialing programs as evidence of why the Democrat in questions
Speaker 1: so many you'll never hear that Donald Trump went to Wharton,
Speaker 1: arguably the best business school in the world. Right, They
Speaker 1: never talked. They don't bring that into the conversation, the
Speaker 1: same way that it didn't matter that Bush went to
Speaker 1: Yale and I think Harvard Business School didn't matter. He's
Speaker 1: a dumbass, they would say, right, but Democrats, it's oh,
Speaker 1: look at the fancy schools they went to. Well, Michelle
Speaker 1: Obama went to Harvard Law School and failed the bar exam.
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton went to Yale Law School and failed the
Speaker 1: bar exam. Kamala Harris went to a law school, failed
Speaker 1: the bar exam. It's interesting, isn't it. Those are some
Speaker 1: of the tope. We got the VP, the former First
Speaker 1: Lady well and the former first Lady and the former
Speaker 1: Secretary of State, in former senator. And we're always told
Speaker 1: that they're they're so brilliant, but then would you actually
Speaker 1: look at who's put forward. Look, there are, unfortunately plenty
Speaker 1: of brilliant Democrats. They tend to, you know, run enormous
Speaker 1: businesses like Amazon or work in Silicon Valley, and you
Speaker 1: know there are there are people who are super smart.
Speaker 1: Obviously there's half the country's Democrat. But I'm just talking
Speaker 1: about their leadership. I'm talking about who they elevate and
Speaker 1: who they're trying to elevate with this DNC convention. And
Speaker 1: I'm just not it's just not impressive. They're just not impressive.
Speaker 1: You look at this lineup of speakers, Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders Gretchen Whitmer. Oh gosh, yeah, have you left
Speaker 1: your house because you're not allowed? Oh no, oh, not
Speaker 1: allowed to leave your house. You're on your lockdown, sir.
Speaker 1: It's for your own good. We like to call it
Speaker 1: house arrest. How about a muffing? Uh yeah, No. I'm
Speaker 1: not impressed by any of this, but that's all part
Speaker 1: of the branding. I bring this up largely because I
Speaker 1: want you to be aware of the way the propagandist
Speaker 1: seeps in. You know, we're all always told, you know,
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton is so smart. I've met brilliant people in
Speaker 1: my life, and you know, they're brilliant very quickly. It's
Speaker 1: not hard to tell, not hard to figure it out.
Speaker 1: And I don't think Hillary Clinton's brilliant at all. I
Speaker 1: think she's ruthless and completely amoral and self interested in
Speaker 1: a way that is psychopathic. But but sure we can
Speaker 1: call her brilliant. You know, Michelle Obama gave a taped speech.
Speaker 1: I do five hours of extemporaneous radio every day. I'm
Speaker 1: supposed to be impressed by somebody reading off of a prompter. Okay,
Speaker 1: I mean I look, I know presidents of both parties
Speaker 1: do this, and it's standard but I'm starting to I'm
Speaker 1: starting to be a guy who just I can't be
Speaker 1: told these things that anymore, and not I mean, I've
Speaker 1: always thought it was nonsense, but I can't be told
Speaker 1: these things in me quiet, I can't be told that
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders, who's now just completely come on corporate, vote
Speaker 1: for vote for Biden. He's gonna make ths fantastic. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be great. He's gonna be the most progressive. Oh well,
Speaker 1: we'll here. You can actually hear it from the burden himself.
Speaker 1: He will get us to play clip fourteen. Please. Joe
Speaker 1: will also make it easier for workers to join unions,
Speaker 1: create twelve weeks of paid family leave, fund universal pre
Speaker 1: K for three and four year olds, and make childcare
Speaker 1: affordable for millions of families. Joe will rebuild our crumbling
Speaker 1: infrastructure and fight the threat of climate change by transitioning
Speaker 1: us to one hundred percent clean electricity over the next
Speaker 1: fifteen years. These initiatives will create millions of good paying
Speaker 1: jobs all across our country. We don't need these people
Speaker 1: to transition us to clean electricity. Is this is rooted
Speaker 1: in religious belief. There's there's no basis for this other
Speaker 1: than the completely absurd, the absurd position that the world
Speaker 1: is the world is going to start to melt, There's
Speaker 1: going to end unless we have a radical a great
Speaker 1: leap forward, or really feel like a great leap backward
Speaker 1: of renewable energy sources. We are already decarbonizing, and we
Speaker 1: have been for a long time in our energy sources.
Speaker 1: We're more and more efficient, more natural gas, less coal.
Speaker 1: This is this is already happening, but it's happening based
Speaker 1: on the marketing, based on technology. But that's not enough.
Speaker 1: Democrats have to create for a lot of people, especially
Speaker 1: those who have turned away from religion, spirituality, morality. Dare
Speaker 1: I say, they need a reason to exist, and that
Speaker 1: reason is the religion of climate change. But Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: is just willing to come out now and throw his
Speaker 1: whole weight behind Joe Biden. If I were a real
Speaker 1: Sanders bro, if I were one of the Bernie bros
Speaker 1: out there, there is no way, absolutely no way that
Speaker 1: I would accept what the Democrat Party has done here.
Speaker 1: Just wouldn't do it, couldn't do it right. They stole
Speaker 1: it from him in twenty sixteen, and they stole it
Speaker 1: from him in the twenty twenty election. For the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty cycle, the establishment was just like no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: it can't really be Bernie. That would have been an
Speaker 1: interesting campaign at least, I mean, to have an open
Speaker 1: socialist would have been really worthwhile. I would have really
Speaker 1: enjoyed watching those debates. But remember, no one really thinks
Speaker 1: Biden's going to do well in debates. No one thought
Speaker 1: that Bernie Sanders in a general election debate was going
Speaker 1: to look saying and no one's impressed by Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: This is the best. They can do a lot of things,
Speaker 1: a lot of places where you can criticize President Trump. Fine,
Speaker 1: but the guy is dynamic. He is fearless, He is
Speaker 1: unbelievably energetic, and he has a gut level instinct about
Speaker 1: politics and just about what's gonna work as a general
Speaker 1: as a general concept, what's real, what's gonna get it done.
Speaker 1: That makes him a very useful political figure. That makes
Speaker 1: him somebody who was able to create a one man
Speaker 1: movement without the party infrastructure behind him. In fact, the
Speaker 1: party infrastructure of the GOP was against him. The only
Speaker 1: person that was similar to that was Bernie Sanders. But
Speaker 1: he's a socialist and Democrats can't be too honest about
Speaker 1: what they really want to do and how they're really
Speaker 1: going to go. Speaking of too honest at this point,
Speaker 1: it's it's beyond parody. When you have these these former
Speaker 1: Republicans usually they're consultants and they I'm not going to
Speaker 1: name that because you know you don't well, none of
Speaker 1: you are going to listen. It's you know, there's the
Speaker 1: Linklin Project. These former consultant types out there who will
Speaker 1: make the conservative case they say, for abortion, or the
Speaker 1: conservative case for socialism, the conservative case for climate change
Speaker 1: based authoritarianism, whatever it is right. They will contort and
Speaker 1: distort conservatism and the right for their own near term
Speaker 1: financial benefit, and and do so while holding themselves up
Speaker 1: as as the truth tellers, the ones who who will
Speaker 1: speak truth to power. No, they are the quizlings. They
Speaker 1: are begging from the scraps from the Democrats table. It's gross.
Speaker 1: And you know who fits into that category is among
Speaker 1: the most the most distasteful, the most unlikable of all
Speaker 1: Republican politicians. I know, I'm not talking about mid Romney,
Speaker 1: although I could. Kik Kasik is out there stumping for
Speaker 1: Democrats now at this d NC speaking out against Trump.
Speaker 1: And there's other Republicans too. Let's hear from these clowns
Speaker 1: so we can knock them down. Play thirteen. I'm a
Speaker 1: lifelong Republican, but that attachment holds second place to my
Speaker 1: responsibility to my country. That's why I've chosen to appear
Speaker 1: at this convention. In normal times, something like this would
Speaker 1: probably never happen. But these are not normal times. I'm
Speaker 1: proud of my Republican heritage, just the Party of Lincoln,
Speaker 1: who reflected its founding principles of unity and a higher purpose.
Speaker 1: But what I have witnessed these past four years be
Speaker 1: lies those principles. I'm sure there are Republicans and independents
Speaker 1: who couldn't imagine crossing over to support a Democrat. They
Speaker 1: fear Joe may turn sharp left and leave them behind.
Speaker 1: I don't believe that, because I know the measure of
Speaker 1: the man. It's reasonable, faithful, respectful, and you know no
Speaker 1: one pushes Joe around. Joe Biden is a man for
Speaker 1: our times, times that call for all of us to
Speaker 1: take off our partisan hats and put our nation first
Speaker 1: for ourselves and of course for our children. Kasik is
Speaker 1: a slimy loser and I'm not sure that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: can tie his shoes, his own shoes or Kasic shoes,
Speaker 1: but sure, let's let's hear from Kasik on this one.
Speaker 1: I really despise the never Trump conceit that somehow they
Speaker 1: haven't fully morphed into Democrats because they are now Democrats. Well,
Speaker 1: you're for the Democrat party when you're raising money for it,
Speaker 1: when you're trying to help Democrats win, You're no longer
Speaker 1: acting on principle. You're acting on selfishness. You see. That's
Speaker 1: what's really motivating and hands all along the never Trump position.
Speaker 1: They are pawned. They are tools to be used for
Speaker 1: the benefit of Democrats, and to do so under this,
Speaker 1: under this guise, under this pretense of being people who
Speaker 1: are moral and ethical, and the real Republicans, the real
Speaker 1: Republicans want Democrats to win. That's their position. It's gross,
Speaker 1: but it is what they're saying. But let's move to now,
Speaker 1: shall we. Michelle Obama the keynote, if you will, of
Speaker 1: the first night of the DNC. Let's hear what Michelle
Speaker 1: Obama had to say about all of this. You're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom und This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: I know Joe. He is a profoundly decent man, guided
Speaker 1: by faith. He was a terrific vice president. He knows
Speaker 1: what it takes to rescue an economy, beat back a pandemic,
Speaker 1: and lead our country, and he listens. He will tell
Speaker 1: the truth and trust science. He will make smart plans
Speaker 1: and manage a good team, and he will govern as
Speaker 1: someone who's lived a life that the rest of us
Speaker 1: can recognize. Okay, what is the evidentiary basis for all
Speaker 1: of these claims? But it's essentially the real pitch that
Speaker 1: Michelle Obama made for Joe Biden last night. I'm sure
Speaker 1: you're going to hear it tonight and tomorrow night as
Speaker 1: this DNC debaco continues. What's the real pitch that he
Speaker 1: is such a great guy and is going to make
Speaker 1: such good decisions. Where's the evidence of that in his background?
Speaker 1: What can we point to or re say Joe Biden
Speaker 1: really took the reins there. He's a guy who gets
Speaker 1: things done with what exactly? I just want to know.
Speaker 1: His calling card used to be foreign policy. But when
Speaker 1: you ask, what is the foreign policy initiative or a
Speaker 1: plan that Joe Biden pushed for and turned out to
Speaker 1: make him look really prescient, really brilliant. What is it?
Speaker 1: I don't I can't think. I mean, I know that
Speaker 1: he's been wrong on a lot of stuff. He was
Speaker 1: wrong on matters of war and peace, he was wrong
Speaker 1: on matters of trade. He was pretty much just willing
Speaker 1: to do whatever he thought he should do at the
Speaker 1: time in order to keep getting reelected. The Senator from Delaware. Oh,
Speaker 1: and did the bidding of the credit card companies. Credit
Speaker 1: card companies which will I will remind you, and this
Speaker 1: is true on a bipartisan basis. Well, it's worse with
Speaker 1: Democrats like buying than anybody else. Were able to get
Speaker 1: away with things like moving due dates and playing games
Speaker 1: so they could jack up people's interest rates, things that,
Speaker 1: if it weren't carved out in the law for credit
Speaker 1: card companies other other places, other people with similar conduct
Speaker 1: would be considered fraud. So credit card companies have played
Speaker 1: very rough in the past and have gotten away with
Speaker 1: all kinds of stuff. But they've owned people in the
Speaker 1: Senate and the Congress, like Joe Biden. Where is this
Speaker 1: great ethical Oh didn't Joe Biden accuse Mitt Romney of
Speaker 1: wanting to put black Americans quote put y'all back in
Speaker 1: chains end quote, really a horrible smear of Mitt Romney
Speaker 1: and of the Republican Party, but willing to exploit any racial,
Speaker 1: racially based slander in order to try to take down Republicans.
Speaker 1: So he'll say whatever he has to say whenever he
Speaker 1: has to say. There's been no issue. I've seen Joe
Speaker 1: Biden crossed the aisle in my adult lifetime and be
Speaker 1: a meaningful, sober voice on something that mattered. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is the classic Democrat hack politician, But Michelle Obama doesn't care.
Speaker 1: Played twelve. Being president doesn't change who you are. It
Speaker 1: reveals who you are. Well, a presidential election can reveal
Speaker 1: who we are too, And four years ago, too many
Speaker 1: people chose to believe that their votes didn't matter. Maybe
Speaker 1: they were fed up, maybe they thought the outcome wouldn't
Speaker 1: be close, maybe the barriers felt too steep, whatever the reason,
Speaker 1: in the end, those choices sent someone to the Oval
Speaker 1: Office who lost the national popular vote by nearly three
Speaker 1: million votes. In one of the states that determine the outcome.
Speaker 1: The winning margin averaged out to just two votes per
Speaker 1: precinct two votes, and we've all been living with the consequences. Oh,
Speaker 1: so voter fraud could be a really big deal. Then,
Speaker 1: thanks Michelle. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. I appreciate Michelle Obama
Speaker 1: highlighting the very narrow difference between one candidate winning a
Speaker 1: certain state and another. So I'm glad that maybe now
Speaker 1: we can all get on the same page about how
Speaker 1: voter fraud, which is real and happens, is important because
Speaker 1: it could be the difference between one person winning the
Speaker 1: election and another person losing the election, as evidenced by
Speaker 1: the cases of voter fraud we've seen in the very
Speaker 1: narrow vote margin. You really want to see how close
Speaker 1: this stuff can be, go back and look at the
Speaker 1: Senate race with Al Franken and Norm Coleman, where it
Speaker 1: was down to the hundreds of votes, and there were
Speaker 1: people finding votes in the trunks of cars and all.
Speaker 1: It was a big mass. But the Democrats as soon
Speaker 1: as as soon as they send an opportunity, as soon
Speaker 1: as they see that blood in the water, they go
Speaker 1: all out. Whatever they got to do to get it done,
Speaker 1: doesn't matter what good faith is a banded what laws
Speaker 1: are broken. As long as they can get away with it,
Speaker 1: they'll do it now. The party that has no problem.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure I had nothing to say think about this.
Speaker 1: Did you hear anything? I didn't hear, and I didn't
Speaker 1: watch the whole thing. I didn't hear anything last night
Speaker 1: about how the Democrats are speaking out to shut down
Speaker 1: the rioters, the looters. The Democrats are saying, we disavow
Speaker 1: that that's not who we are. Knocked that crap off.
Speaker 1: You guys said anything about that now, of course not.
Speaker 1: Those are their shock troops, that's the Democrat base. Those
Speaker 1: are Biden voters, Kamala voters. They're not gonna upset them.
Speaker 1: So they drag people out of cars, beat them almost
Speaker 1: to death like businesses on fire, and might as well
Speaker 1: be all wearing Biden Kamla t shirts while they do it.
Speaker 1: Democrats don't have anything to say about that. No, No,
Speaker 1: much better to focus on how evil Trump is. This
Speaker 1: is all just a very standard referendum on whether or
Speaker 1: not Donald Trump should get four more years, based entirely
Speaker 1: on how many people they can convince to be Trump
Speaker 1: deranged and to hate Donald Trump, to think that he's
Speaker 1: been terrible when that's just not true. It's not true.
Speaker 1: What they said about him in the first three years
Speaker 1: was just laughable, right, they were completely insane. And now
Speaker 1: to blame all of the COVID crisis on him just
Speaker 1: would have you'd have to ignore what states have gone
Speaker 1: through where governors are making the decisions. Remember, Trump left
Speaker 1: it to that, he's such a tyrant, he's such an
Speaker 1: autocrat that he left it to governors like Cuomo, who
Speaker 1: will be talking about more, to run their own response.
Speaker 1: And now they want to tell us that he was
Speaker 1: Trump was not up for this. He doesn't have it.
Speaker 1: There's Michelle Obama again. Donald Trump is the wrong president
Speaker 1: for our country. He has had more than enough time
Speaker 1: but prove that he can do the job. But he
Speaker 1: is clearly in over his head. He cannot meet this moment.
Speaker 1: He simply cannot be who we need him to be
Speaker 1: for us. It is what it is. Why can't he
Speaker 1: meet this moment? But Joe Biden, who is clearly not
Speaker 1: up for holding any job really, let's be honest, not
Speaker 1: not any job with any real responsibility. Feeding the ducks
Speaker 1: in the park, you know, eating his TV dinner, going
Speaker 1: for a walk, with a blanket around his shoulders. You
Speaker 1: know he's up for those kinds of jobs. He's not
Speaker 1: up for beating leader of the Free world. He's just not.
Speaker 1: Why does he feel the need to do this because
Speaker 1: his whole life has been about the advancement of Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: while pretending it's about the advancement of the people who
Speaker 1: vote for him. This is just who is this what
Speaker 1: he does? Never time, I will say there is a
Speaker 1: there is a boomer phenomenon that we are all dealing
Speaker 1: with now because people live much longer they have. You know,
Speaker 1: the lifespan has increased dramatically, even just last few a
Speaker 1: couple of generations. There are boomers who just never, never
Speaker 1: want to stop working in their role professionally. They know
Speaker 1: they don't want to move on to something else. There
Speaker 1: are other things in life. There is family, there is introspection,
Speaker 1: there's religion, there is culture, there is leisure. There are
Speaker 1: all these things. Now, I know a lot of you
Speaker 1: are gonna say, buck, I'm a boomer, I'm retired. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about what I
Speaker 1: call the Larry King disease. Not the only guy who
Speaker 1: can do this. I gotta be no one doing it.
Speaker 1: Larry King was still advocating for himself to take over
Speaker 1: from Piers Morgan after Piers Morgan took his job. I
Speaker 1: want my job back. Hey, New York you're online one, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is crazy. You know, at some point
Speaker 1: it's time to think about other things. Biden's at that point.
Speaker 1: And look in seven or eight years, I'm sure Trump
Speaker 1: would be too. Right. It's just this is the natural
Speaker 1: life cycle. The same way that you can be too
Speaker 1: young to run for president, you can be too old
Speaker 1: and too infirm to run for president. And Biden is
Speaker 1: there and they all know it, and they're lying to you.
Speaker 1: They don't care. They were willing to say it a
Speaker 1: year ago when they were sure that Corey Booker or
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren or Helisabeth Warren. How old
Speaker 1: is Elizabeth? She's say so, she's got a lot of spunk,
Speaker 1: she's ready to go. Oh, she's feisty. I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: me up here. You know, you look at some of
Speaker 1: the younger Castro Bato bo Oh Rock, You look at
Speaker 1: some of the other people that were being held up
Speaker 1: by the media as the next great thing for the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, and they all kind of thought, the media thought,
Speaker 1: and of course they don't know anything. They also thought
Speaker 1: that Trump was a joke. They thought that somebody else
Speaker 1: would win, and so they were willing to say out
Speaker 1: loud what was so apparent to all of us, which
Speaker 1: is that Biden gets confused and is simply too old
Speaker 1: for this. But in that sense, he's also perfect for
Speaker 1: the Democrats, because not only will he just pass the
Speaker 1: torch to Kamala, so you'll get somebody that the Democrat
Speaker 1: apparatus with Kamala wants in power, but who the American
Speaker 1: people would not actually vote for. And I'm talking about Democrats,
Speaker 1: they'll get that, and all because they were able to
Speaker 1: fool people into thinking that Joe Biden is well, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is someone who is going to lead us into
Speaker 1: a better, brighter future. This is utter nonsense. I don't
Speaker 1: know how any person who takes himself for herself seriously
Speaker 1: can say it with a straight face, but they're doing it,
Speaker 1: and they're going to keep doing it. This claim that
Speaker 1: Biden is such a moral man again based on what
Speaker 1: I mean, his son. I guess we're not gonna talk
Speaker 1: about Hunter Biden anymore. Hunter. Biden is out there doing
Speaker 1: all kinds of shady stuff personally and professionally, and Joe Biden, look,
Speaker 1: I know, family dynamics can be complicated. I'm not blaming
Speaker 1: Joe Biden for the fact that his son is a derelict,
Speaker 1: but Joe Biden also enabled some of that behavior professionally
Speaker 1: for an adult, right, it's not like dealing with a
Speaker 1: wayward teenage son who I haven't done that yet, but
Speaker 1: I hear that can be a real handful. You know,
Speaker 1: Biden allowed all of that. Joe Biden has a history
Speaker 1: of lying. Joe Biden an those all park trump plies.
Speaker 1: This is what they always anytime you speak to a
Speaker 1: Trump hater about anything and they're caught, they always just
Speaker 1: go back to Trump liies. You're like, we're gonna do
Speaker 1: this again, trumplies. And he said there were good people
Speaker 1: on both sides. And the great irony, of course, is
Speaker 1: that they're lying when they say that, because that's not
Speaker 1: what he said. Well, that's made that's made it come
Speaker 1: back back. Joe Biden is a is an obvious and
Speaker 1: intense mediocrity, always has been. Guy's not a winner, as
Speaker 1: evidenced by the fact that when he tried for the
Speaker 1: big job, he was kind of a laughing stock, and
Speaker 1: he's tried several times in the past. It was like
Speaker 1: a joke. So now the guy who was a joke
Speaker 1: in the past when he ran a president, we're told,
Speaker 1: is the answer to our prayers because the Democrats don't
Speaker 1: have anything better on the cupboard or off the shelf.
Speaker 1: That's what we're being told. Well, I guess they might
Speaker 1: as well have some more musical numbers at the DNC
Speaker 1: to convinced us of all of this. I suppose it's outrageous, friends,
Speaker 1: it's just outrageous. But get ready for two more nights
Speaker 1: of it. I am so dedicated, it's so devoted to
Speaker 1: this show that I think I'm gonna watch the DNC
Speaker 1: tonight just so I can pick it all apart. But
Speaker 1: I also will tell you that none of you should
Speaker 1: waste your time. I'll do it for you because no
Speaker 1: one's even gonna remember in a week. There's not gonna
Speaker 1: be bounced coming out of this. There's not gonna the absence.
Speaker 1: There's a reason why pageantry and theatrics and politics are
Speaker 1: what they are because the visuals, the sounds, the feeling
Speaker 1: of these things matters obviously, Otherwise you would have been doing,
Speaker 1: you know, just a taped speech and you know, here
Speaker 1: you go, we'll be doing these virtual virtual conventions stretching
Speaker 1: back for a long time, and the lack of all
Speaker 1: those things, there's no it's impossible to manufacture excitement when
Speaker 1: it looks like I'm being told that we're, you know,
Speaker 1: raising money to save the double crested cormorant for being
Speaker 1: put on the you know, we're you know, endangered species
Speaker 1: lists or something. They're not endangered, but you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, we're trying to save the spotted owl. Then money,
Speaker 1: you're a gift of five dollars a month for the
Speaker 1: spot a owl. And like they got the phone bank
Speaker 1: behind them. That was what the DNC night looked like.
Speaker 1: They even had some of those production value issues where
Speaker 1: they're hey, Bernie, you're on You could hear them and
Speaker 1: he's like, here I am on TV, gonna talk to you.
Speaker 1: You know, it was like something it was also amateur issue.
Speaker 1: I will say though, I kind of like that from
Speaker 1: an analyst perspective, because so many of these people that
Speaker 1: you see out there that this stagecraft around them. You're
Speaker 1: always you're always seeing them on cable news. You're seeing
Speaker 1: them on and a literally elevated platform of a stage.
Speaker 1: You're seeing them under certain lighting. You're seeing them and
Speaker 1: even when they're doing them, you know, here I am
Speaker 1: just another guy shaking hands, eating pot pie, you know
Speaker 1: the whole thing. I don't know why everybody's burning all
Speaker 1: of a sudden. I just missed doing the Bernie Boys. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm like at an event. I'm like, I have a
Speaker 1: super rich wife, and I'm kind of like like a
Speaker 1: house dad who thinks you should be president. But you know,
Speaker 1: Betjo out there doing all the stuff that he does.
Speaker 1: You have all that going on. Now, when you see
Speaker 1: some of these Democrat candidates without that glitz and glamor
Speaker 1: around them, you go, this person, this is who I'm
Speaker 1: supposed to think is so, this is the person who's
Speaker 1: judgment is so fantastic. Remember our politics is now it's
Speaker 1: just a celebrity competition really, and yes we do have
Speaker 1: a guy who ran the Celebrity Apprentice as our current president,
Speaker 1: because that's really what this is. It is a celebrity
Speaker 1: popularity contest. The politicians are just a different kind of celebrity.
Speaker 1: That's why name recognition so powerful. That's why they're going
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden, because Obama Biden. Everybody knows the guy
Speaker 1: has universal name recognition. He can't recognize squat these days,
Speaker 1: but people know who he is. What the whole thing
Speaker 1: is such a cynical sham, the whole Democrat, the whole
Speaker 1: Democrat movement right now, and the pitch and the explanation.
Speaker 1: It's tough for me. I go between feeling like it's
Speaker 1: just absurd and hilarious to feeling like a little a
Speaker 1: little bit of terror from if these people get in
Speaker 1: power again, how else are they going to make my
Speaker 1: life more difficult? How else are they gonna make people miserable?
Speaker 1: I do worry about that. You're in the Freedom d
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Do these Democrat
Speaker 1: luminaries have good judgments? This wasn't from the actual DNC,
Speaker 1: but it was shared during it by none of them,
Speaker 1: mister James Woods, who I mentioned earlier on in the show.
Speaker 1: And here is here is Michelle Obama showing you what
Speaker 1: kind of judgment she has. Play five. I'm want to
Speaker 1: start by thanking Harvey Weinstein for organized this amazing day.
Speaker 1: This is possible because of Harvey. He is a wonderful
Speaker 1: human being, a good friend, and just a powerhouse. And
Speaker 1: the fact that he and his team took the time
Speaker 1: to make this happen for all of you should say
Speaker 1: something not about me or about this place, but about you.
Speaker 1: All right, everybody, we are here because of you. Yep,
Speaker 1: Harvey Weinstein, wonderful person, great friend. Thank you, thank you,
Speaker 1: thank you. Oh You're amazing, And make sure you give
Speaker 1: one of the Obama daughters an internship, which he did do. So. Look,
Speaker 1: I understand, you know, maybe she didn't know that the
Speaker 1: guy that she said was a close friend and a
Speaker 1: wonderful person was a rapist. But did you really not
Speaker 1: know that he was a disgusting and horrible human being
Speaker 1: based on the way that he interacted with pretty much
Speaker 1: everybody he dealt with professionally, always had no idea. Huh No.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that she's in any way blameworthy. I'm
Speaker 1: just saying, does Michelle Obama have good judgment? She didn't
Speaker 1: have good judgment about Harvey Weinstein's that's for sure, and
Speaker 1: oh I did. I wanted to get to this because
Speaker 1: I think it's important we remember who the Democrats put
Speaker 1: forward and that they are held to account. We haven't
Speaker 1: heard much from governor Governor Christie in a while. Well,
Speaker 1: he waited in on Chris Christie and here's what I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: he waited on John Kasick, I mean, and here's what
Speaker 1: he had to say. Play ten Chris Christie for four
Speaker 1: years ago, Megwetman, Christy tail Woman both endorsed Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: So how big a threat are these Republican endorsements tonight? Zero? Zero?
Speaker 1: I mean, they're meaningless. They were with her, they were
Speaker 1: with her four years ago. Now there with Biden, no surprise.
Speaker 1: And John Kaysy Just to show you where John Kaysy
Speaker 1: standing is in the Republican Party. When he was the
Speaker 1: only Republican governor left on the stage in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and John Kayson the three candidates left.
Speaker 1: Do you know how many Republican governors of his colleagues
Speaker 1: is sitting colleagues in time endorse John Kaysick zero. And
Speaker 1: the reason they did to endorse him is because he's
Speaker 1: a backstabber and he's an untruthful guy. And so tonight
Speaker 1: Republican is gonna look at that and go you can
Speaker 1: have him. Please believe me, give us a break, get
Speaker 1: him out of our party. You take him for a
Speaker 1: little while, because on top of all that, I've worked
Speaker 1: with John a lot. He's exhausting. Joe Biden's gonna getting
Speaker 1: calls from John Kaysick. He's gonna want to change his
Speaker 1: phone number. Christie does still throw a good punch, to
Speaker 1: give the guy credit, or maybe he's best when he
Speaker 1: jumps off the top turn buckle. Whatever, he knows how
Speaker 1: to take somebody out. He knows how to take somebody out.
Speaker 1: So I think it we should at least get a
Speaker 1: chance to hear. I get to hear about these Republicans
Speaker 1: that were turning, because that was a big part of it. Oh,
Speaker 1: even the Republicans. The Republican base is with Trump, you know,
Speaker 1: ninety seven, ninety nine to one or something like that.
Speaker 1: I mean, the Republican Party is firmly united beyond Donald
Speaker 1: Trump because he delivered on a lot of major promises.
Speaker 1: And more than that, your choices are the insane socialists
Speaker 1: who think that gender isn't real, who want to make
Speaker 1: all kinds of demands about race and affirmative action and
Speaker 1: not let you even talk about it. You just obey that.
Speaker 1: They want to spend the country into oblivion. They want
Speaker 1: modern monetary theory. They want open borders and amnesty and
Speaker 1: an increased welfare state. Laws to be applied based upon
Speaker 1: social justice categories, not upon our common humanity and the
Speaker 1: need for all people to be hound accountable for what
Speaker 1: they do. That's where the Democrats stand for it. Does
Speaker 1: that get anybody anybody? Except? Does that? I feel like
Speaker 1: that's republican to anybody. I just I would want to know.
Speaker 1: I'd want to answer to that question. But we're not
Speaker 1: going to get an answer that question because people are
Speaker 1: ultimately very selfish. Oh and here's Bernie's great burn, the
Speaker 1: Great Burn of Trump from the Burn Play twenty. As
Speaker 1: long as I am here, I will work with progressives,
Speaker 1: with moderates, and yes with conservatives to preserve this nation
Speaker 1: from a threat that so many of our heroes fought
Speaker 1: and died to defeat. This president is not just the
Speaker 1: threat to our democracy, but by rejecting science, he has
Speaker 1: put our lives and health in jeopardy. Trump has attacked
Speaker 1: doctors and scientists trying to protect us from the pandemic,
Speaker 1: while refusing to take strong action to produce the masks, gowns,
Speaker 1: and gloves our healthcare workers desperately neat Nero fiddled while
Speaker 1: Rome burned Trump golfs Oh, there it is Nero fiddle
Speaker 1: Walt Trump Well, well, Rome burned Trump golfs. Well, I meant,
Speaker 1: come on, I can't believe as many Democrats as did
Speaker 1: support of this guy, talk about a clown. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Like Biden, he doesn't know what to do.
Speaker 1: He doesn't come out because he can't. He doesn't take
Speaker 1: any questions from reporters. I keep saying, my people, you know,
Speaker 1: here I am getting getting bombs thrown at me every
Speaker 1: day by people that are totally, you know, frankly dishonest reporters.
Speaker 1: But I'm getting you know that they're espousing the view
Speaker 1: of the radical left. But here I have bombs every day,
Speaker 1: every day, every day, and do a good job in
Speaker 1: handling it. That's why my poles have gotten up ten
Speaker 1: or twelve points. I don't believe they were ever there.
Speaker 1: By the way, I think they're phony poles. I think
Speaker 1: the suppression poles. You know, these suppression poles are supposed
Speaker 1: to suppress your enthusiasm, but they make our people angrier.
Speaker 1: But this guy doesn't come out of his basement, and
Speaker 1: he hasn't taken one question. Somebody said yesterday, I don't
Speaker 1: know if this is so, but he hasn't answered one
Speaker 1: question and months and the media let him get away
Speaker 1: with that instead of every day saying wow, it seems
Speaker 1: really weird in an environment where the only way they
Speaker 1: will have your message reach voters is the virtual is
Speaker 1: to do interviews on TV, on the web, whatever. That's
Speaker 1: the only way you're not going out. You're not kissing
Speaker 1: the babies and shaking hands and traveling all over the country, right,
Speaker 1: You're not doing that. Biden's gonna answer any questions that
Speaker 1: prepared statements very controlled environments. This guy's been in politics
Speaker 1: for over forty years, folks, and they're they're babying him.
Speaker 1: They're babying him. It couldn't be anymore. You can see it.
Speaker 1: But this is this is where you have to remember.
Speaker 1: There is a gas lighting that is going on here
Speaker 1: that they will never deviate from. I will get the
Speaker 1: Democrats credit for one thing, one area in which the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party really does excel is they can get their
Speaker 1: team they can get their side to believe anything and
Speaker 1: forget anything. Has there been any sense from Democrats, as
Speaker 1: an example, that they're embarrassed about what happened with Russia collusion?
Speaker 1: They lied about this four years. Okay, they were telling
Speaker 1: us stuff for three years that turned out to be
Speaker 1: almost entirely well it was. It was a fabrication and
Speaker 1: couldn't have been more obvious than what was going on.
Speaker 1: Was in fact a political hit, right that that's what
Speaker 1: they were doing. So by way of review, there's there's
Speaker 1: no accountability for this at all, because even the most
Speaker 1: crazy conspiracy theory involving President Donald Trump will get traction
Speaker 1: among Democrats. Even the most so called sophisticated political minds
Speaker 1: will fall prey to the outlandish anti Trump fairy tales
Speaker 1: that are told. I first came Russia collusion. For three
Speaker 1: years of the Trump presidency, the news media ran wild
Speaker 1: with their theories of international scheming and traitorous undermining of
Speaker 1: American democracy. This scheme had its foundation in the report
Speaker 1: from remember Christopher Steele, sloppy British EXPI this guy dressed
Speaker 1: up gossip as inte reporting, duped an all two willing
Speaker 1: cabal at the FBI with Lord tales of golden showers
Speaker 1: and prostitutes in Moscow, among other outrageous charges that even
Speaker 1: sank to Come himself was willing to believe and go
Speaker 1: forward with and Clapper and Brennan. These people are idiots.
Speaker 1: They're not smart. That's the first thing you have to
Speaker 1: know about many of the people in politics that you
Speaker 1: are told that you have to listen to is that
Speaker 1: they claim the claim in the media is that they're
Speaker 1: so smart. They're not smart. You can't be that intelligent
Speaker 1: and have such bad judgment. You can't be that intelligent
Speaker 1: and be so easily fooled. Just gonna say it. This
Speaker 1: is one of the reasons Democrats are so insecure in
Speaker 1: their ideology because they one of the attractions of being
Speaker 1: a Democrat is that you get to think you're really smart,
Speaker 1: because that's what the smart people are. Never mind that
Speaker 1: it's stupid to believe that picking one of two major
Speaker 1: parties in a country three hundred twenty million people says
Speaker 1: anything about your intelligence level as an individual, But Democrats
Speaker 1: believe that it makes them smart. Republicans support it because
Speaker 1: they like the party. They don't think it means they
Speaker 1: have faster firing synapses. Well, let's go back to this
Speaker 1: Christopher Steel situation. Okay, so you got this spy xPy,
Speaker 1: which I mean, I'm an xPy. This is going to
Speaker 1: come on. This guy was a government bureaucrat who pedals
Speaker 1: this nonsense. And it was so silly that even a
Speaker 1: thriller writer would have passed on it as a plot
Speaker 1: for a novel. CNN and the national media though no
Speaker 1: such reservations. The Russia collusion line led to countless hours
Speaker 1: of media coverage, a year's long special counsel investigation, and
Speaker 1: now we know, beyond any reasonable doubt, the Russia collusion
Speaker 1: scheme was a fairy tale. The Muller probe confirmed it.
Speaker 1: The Durhmam investigation already racked up its first prosecution of
Speaker 1: a former FBI lawyer who was part of the fabrication. Nonetheless,
Speaker 1: the political maneuvering of the Russia collusion catastrophe served its
Speaker 1: purpose for a time. As I always tell you, my friends,
Speaker 1: you know what I'm gonna say, the process was the punishment,
Speaker 1: although they wanted more punishment than that too. Trump's administration
Speaker 1: spent enormous energy and resources defending itself from the fabrication
Speaker 1: of Hillary Clinton's Democratic Party and the handful of deep
Speaker 1: state plotters who were inside the federal bureaucracy. The idea
Speaker 1: of collusion also gave the Democrat base a comforting story
Speaker 1: to tell that absolved Hillary of losing, and it redirected
Speaker 1: its constituents anger. The Democrat faithful Russia collusion meant that
Speaker 1: Trump cheated, so he isn't really the president. Now the
Speaker 1: Democrats are running the same playbook for the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: election with this Post office nonsense. The Post Office conspiracy
Speaker 1: team is becoming the Democrats a new narrative, their secret weapon,
Speaker 1: if you will, to fire up the base and undermine
Speaker 1: any Trump victory before a single vote is cast. We
Speaker 1: talked about this yesterday, right. The new theory is that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's trying to defund or even eliminate the United
Speaker 1: States Postal Service in order to stop vote by mail
Speaker 1: operations across the country. The evidence for this ranges from
Speaker 1: the dishonest to the absurd. Remember photos appearing across social
Speaker 1: media over the weekend showing post office employees removing mailboxes
Speaker 1: from the street and also photos of locked mailboxes. Turned
Speaker 1: out all that was nothing, nothing nefarious or even unusual.
Speaker 1: Post Office is often a just dropbox location, didn't matter,
Speaker 1: story was too good for Trump to pass up. People
Speaker 1: already want to believe that the president is going to
Speaker 1: cheat in an election that hasn't happened yet. They are sure,
Speaker 1: they are sure that he must cheat this time because
Speaker 1: they're sure that they cheated last time, even though the
Speaker 1: evidence should tell them that that was all a lie.
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter. They believe what they want to believe. Democrat
Speaker 1: leadership like Nancy Pelosi Chuck Schumer going full throttle with
Speaker 1: these allegations against Trump, that he's undermining the post Office
Speaker 1: as a voter suppression scheme because he's not going to
Speaker 1: agree to what the twenty five billion dollars bailout check
Speaker 1: they want. Pop music star Taylor Swift, as we talked about,
Speaker 1: waited on this, saying on Twitter that Trump's calculated dismant
Speaker 1: to look at USPS proves one thing. Clearly, he is
Speaker 1: well aware all caps that we do not want him
Speaker 1: as our president. Maybe you don't, Ta Swift. I will
Speaker 1: never buy another t Swift album again. Look, these allegations
Speaker 1: against Trump are nuts. The Postal Service doesn't answer to Trump.
Speaker 1: It's funded until twenty twenty one. There's no danger that
Speaker 1: Trump can pull all the money from the Post office,
Speaker 1: and he's not even threatening to do so. In reality
Speaker 1: a place where Democrats are uncomfortable and refuse to live
Speaker 1: in reality. Democrats have decided they want universal mail in
Speaker 1: ballots for this election without anything near the logistical planning
Speaker 1: or funding surge necessary to prepare for that in something
Speaker 1: even approaching a reasonable fashion. It's also a massive invitation
Speaker 1: for voter fraud, which is likely to be in what's
Speaker 1: going to be a very tight election. And that's why
Speaker 1: when Michelle Obama says that it was just a couple
Speaker 1: of votes in some precincts that determine the winner exactly,
Speaker 1: voter fraud is real and we should be fighting against
Speaker 1: it without Democrats fighting against our efforts to make the
Speaker 1: election legitimate. Beyond that, the USPS, as we've discussed, is
Speaker 1: a poorly run entity. It's losing billions a year, right,
Speaker 1: seventy eight billions in two thousand and seven lost. Trump
Speaker 1: is advocating for changes to it, that it be pared
Speaker 1: down in streamlined. That's just common sense. But common sense
Speaker 1: is not only in short supply when it comes to
Speaker 1: Democrat policies. They are allergic to it. They don't like it.
Speaker 1: Instead of acknowledging the real problems the USPS has, Democrats
Speaker 1: have seized the moment or maximum political advantage. They're claiming
Speaker 1: Trump's refusal the cave to their every demand is tant
Speaker 1: him out to another Russia collusion election, theft twenty twenty
Speaker 1: election just weeks away. We can all see what's at
Speaker 1: play here. This Post Office conspiracy not only fires up
Speaker 1: the Democrat base, it also gives them that ready excuse
Speaker 1: just in case Trump wins, he's stole it will be
Speaker 1: the rallying cry of the resistance. And guess what we
Speaker 1: will all be worse off because of this lie but
Speaker 1: lies or what they are going to tell lies or
Speaker 1: what we should expect more of them than we've ever
Speaker 1: seen before. Oh and also, AOC has an idea for
Speaker 1: how to fix the post office. Get ready for it.
Speaker 1: You might want to save your brain. You might want
Speaker 1: to cover your ears so your brain doesn't turn into
Speaker 1: mush the moment you hear this, so you don't AOC
Speaker 1: if I your brain when you hear her idea play
Speaker 1: clip six. Hello everyone, I have been thinking about ways
Speaker 1: to help you help the Post Office, and I think
Speaker 1: I've got an idea and I'm interested in hearing your thoughts.
Speaker 1: So one of the best ways to support the post
Speaker 1: Office is to buy stamps. What do you all think?
Speaker 1: Would you guys be down and excited if I set
Speaker 1: up a national progressive pen pal program do all the
Speaker 1: work of connecting you to somebody else. We would offer
Speaker 1: maybe some conversation prompts or postcard prompts, and even like
Speaker 1: a principal postcard format, you just send it out. Would
Speaker 1: you guys be down? Do you like that idea? Now
Speaker 1: I don't like that idea, but let's talk about this
Speaker 1: for a second, because it's hilarious. A national progressive of
Speaker 1: pen pal program. It sounds like something that the commissars
Speaker 1: would have come up with, or that you would have
Speaker 1: pulled out of the pages of the Communist manifesto. But
Speaker 1: let's think about this first off, buying stamps not going
Speaker 1: to save the Post Office. Because let's say I buy,
Speaker 1: I don't know what it would be, a seven dollars
Speaker 1: book of stamps today, or you know, a ten dollar
Speaker 1: book of stamps today. I hold on to that I'm
Speaker 1: not using those stamps, and as I use them, I
Speaker 1: already have my postage for them. So whether I buy
Speaker 1: stamps today or buy stamps in in a few months,
Speaker 1: what difference does it make? Hillary could ask, right, what
Speaker 1: difference of the answers? Doesn't make any difference unless you
Speaker 1: want to start increasing the output of mail that you
Speaker 1: are sending. Okay, And I guess that's why she's saying
Speaker 1: we're gonna start a progressive pen pal program. Is you
Speaker 1: really thinking, I ain't gonna sign up for this, I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna send I don't know. Lives are crazy. Maybe
Speaker 1: this would work, Maybe this would work for some of
Speaker 1: the but you're just gonna start sending random postcards to
Speaker 1: people you've never met before. In an era when people
Speaker 1: have instantaneous not just text communication, but video and all
Speaker 1: these different social media platforms, you can talk to people
Speaker 1: all the time, all over the world as much as
Speaker 1: you want. Verna starts sitting down and telling people, do
Speaker 1: we even teach cursive writing in public schools anymore? I've
Speaker 1: I've heard that they're scaling way back on that you
Speaker 1: gonna have people write out in in old school block letters,
Speaker 1: a little postcards to each other. I know the post
Speaker 1: is gonna say too, we are like so scared of
Speaker 1: what's gonna happen because I've Donald Trump and like AOC
Speaker 1: is like our savior. I'm so upset because Trump is
Speaker 1: like worse than Hitler dot dot dot loving kisses your
Speaker 1: progressive penpal. I don't think that this is going to
Speaker 1: save the post Office. I think that the seventy eight
Speaker 1: billion dollars in the red that they've run up in
Speaker 1: the last ten years, it's probably not going to be
Speaker 1: not to be dealt with by AOC getting some people
Speaker 1: to start writing postcard to their progressive pen pal. This
Speaker 1: out of the country. You want to know where you
Speaker 1: can find progressive pen pals, turn on MSNBC. Okay, that's
Speaker 1: where all your progressive pen pals are. Oh gosh, it's
Speaker 1: so crazy, isn't It's so absurd, But that's how they
Speaker 1: do things. That's what they say. Got to bring it
Speaker 1: to you. You're in the Freedom hud. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh I almost forgot who
Speaker 1: else of the of the parade of horribles that we've
Speaker 1: had to go through with this DNC who has been
Speaker 1: left out of our discussion today. And he's someone who
Speaker 1: I need to spend more time listening to. So I
Speaker 1: can do a really good and very deeply mocking impersonation
Speaker 1: of it would be I know, see my al Gore
Speaker 1: sounds like or and that's not right. I can't do
Speaker 1: a good al Gore impersonation. But al Gore did appear
Speaker 1: all at the DNC, or has at least spoken? Was it,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark? Was this at the DNC or is he
Speaker 1: just talking? Yes, it must be at the DNC, or
Speaker 1: he just saying this al Gore? No, he was just
Speaker 1: on CNN. I think, oh, he's just on CNN. All right,
Speaker 1: Well that I didn't leave. I thought I left because
Speaker 1: I looked at the speaker's line up I don't remember seeing.
Speaker 1: I thought maybe he was, you know, maybe he was
Speaker 1: part of the pregame or whatever. Okay, so he's on
Speaker 1: CNN and he wants some attention because no one pays
Speaker 1: attention to al Gore anymore. IM already told us that
Speaker 1: the state of Florida is going to be underwater by now.
Speaker 1: Oops didn't end up happening. In fact, Producer Mark wants
Speaker 1: to move there, so it's clearly not underwater, not yet.
Speaker 1: Here's al Gore, though, doing his level best, doing everything
Speaker 1: that he can to get some attention for himself, including
Speaker 1: on shows like this one. I suppose I saying something
Speaker 1: really grotesque and reckless Play eighteen. I think he's kind
Speaker 1: of panic that the announcement of Kamala Harris went off.
Speaker 1: It was a ten out of ten. It was amazing,
Speaker 1: and he went to that stupid, ridiculous false birtha thing
Speaker 1: right away and then had to take it back and
Speaker 1: on the postal service. This is an act of desperation,
Speaker 1: and Americans understand Anderson that during a pandemic there are
Speaker 1: lots of older voters and voters of all ages with
Speaker 1: a pre existing condition who worry that they can't breathe
Speaker 1: safely ending in line to vote. So, in effect, by
Speaker 1: tampering with the postal service, he is, in effect putting
Speaker 1: his knee on the neck of American democracy and trying
Speaker 1: to make it impossible for people to vote by mail.
Speaker 1: He is putting his knee on the neck of American demand.
Speaker 1: I mean, come on, man, really we're talking about the
Speaker 1: postal service thing that he's just a George George Floyd
Speaker 1: friends that just really really get that CNN audience all
Speaker 1: fired up. That's the fascinating thing. I would love to
Speaker 1: have a have a sit down conversation with a focus
Speaker 1: group audience, focus group from CNN, and just ask them all,
Speaker 1: do you realize the people you're watching are a bunch
Speaker 1: of vein morons? That you're not getting smarter by watching this,
Speaker 1: You're actually getting dumber. Do you realize that I swear
Speaker 1: I don't know? CNN somehow endures despite the fact that
Speaker 1: it is such a trash sheep. It's such an embarrassment.
Speaker 1: But al Gore knows that audience. He knows what he
Speaker 1: has to say in order to get in the news
Speaker 1: cycle for another day. But I guess he's upset because
Speaker 1: he's not invited to the D and C. Yep, he's
Speaker 1: not invited because he's the worst. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. All
Speaker 1: you have to do is say the word. Every voter
Speaker 1: should ask themselves a simple question. Do you want the
Speaker 1: radical left policies of Chicago, Minneapolis, San Francisco imposed on
Speaker 1: the entire country? Look at Nancy Pelos. He San Francisco's
Speaker 1: going to hell, and she's in Congress saying what we
Speaker 1: should be doing. Look at the homeless problem in San Francisco,
Speaker 1: look at what's happening against San Francisco. And then she's
Speaker 1: telling us about the post office. She has no clue.
Speaker 1: And I must tell you this. Does she love our country?
Speaker 1: Does she love our country? I don't think so, to
Speaker 1: be honest with you, what she's done is a disgrace
Speaker 1: to our country, what she's done. And Schumer crying, Chuck crying, Chuck,
Speaker 1: he cries, whatever it's important to cry. Do you want
Speaker 1: the failed policies of Mayor Bill de Blasia, or Mayor
Speaker 1: Lourie Lightfoot Chicago, or Mayor Jacob Fry brought to every
Speaker 1: city in town in this nation? If left wing Democrats
Speaker 1: can't run a city wire on Earth, would you let
Speaker 1: them run your country? One would think that the results
Speaker 1: of Democrat rule would prohibit Democrats from ever running another
Speaker 1: city and certainly the country along with it. If you
Speaker 1: were judging Democrats by what their ideas lead to in
Speaker 1: places like Baltimore, New York, Los Angeles, and Francisco Chicago,
Speaker 1: you'd say, well, this is a disaster, and yet the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party has a stranglehold, has a total lock on
Speaker 1: political power in those places. In those cities, so much
Speaker 1: so that they don't even feel the need to condemn
Speaker 1: outright calling for violence from BLM protesters. They won't suffer
Speaker 1: the Democrats who run these cities. De Blasio Cuomo at
Speaker 1: the state level, other people across the country who are
Speaker 1: running Democrat hell holes, they they won't suffer any consequences
Speaker 1: for allowing stuff like what we see in Portland or
Speaker 1: Seattle to happen in their cities. There there's no impetus,
Speaker 1: there's no push for them to condemn this stuff. I mean,
Speaker 1: here you had this was in Portland over the weekend.
Speaker 1: Is making the rounds now A BLM quote protester, I
Speaker 1: think protest is far too generous a term telling us
Speaker 1: exactly how devoted to the cause she is and what
Speaker 1: she is willing to do. Play Clip one. I said,
Speaker 1: I will continue my mission were adjusted, but me think
Speaker 1: that I will continue my mission for justice to all
Speaker 1: pulling the gennible for murders and murderings are people by
Speaker 1: me calling Copps murderers, that's standard fair now for Democrats,
Speaker 1: that's might as We'll just sit back and watch the
Speaker 1: nn MSNBC. You can see them calling Copps murderers. All
Speaker 1: the time too. They have no problem with any of this.
Speaker 1: New York Times same thing. How many murders in the
Speaker 1: last thirty days have there been of unarmed black men
Speaker 1: in the United States, a country of three three and
Speaker 1: thirty million people by law enforcement and the answer zero. Oh,
Speaker 1: but it's a terrible plague that happens constantly in America.
Speaker 1: That's what the Lib media says. That's what they want
Speaker 1: you to believe. I would want to ask this BLM
Speaker 1: protester what does she mean by any means necessary? Because
Speaker 1: if we're basically gonna we've already seen in cities across
Speaker 1: the country, that would mean a willingness to burn down buildings,
Speaker 1: to pull people out of cars and beat them senseless
Speaker 1: and almost to death, to destroy stores, to loot, to
Speaker 1: rob to threaten, to engage in what the Mayor of
Speaker 1: Chicago has even said is organized criminal activity, any means necessary,
Speaker 1: she says. The BLM movement of the past. Remember this
Speaker 1: is the second time, this is the two point zero
Speaker 1: the first BLM movement from the second term of the
Speaker 1: Obama administration. After the lawful and justified shooting of Mike
Speaker 1: Brown by a police officer who did nothing wrong, the
Speaker 1: first generation of BLM fell apart. Why it's worth remembering
Speaker 1: because five members of the Dallas Police Department were murdered
Speaker 1: by a BLM supporter, and that came after two police
Speaker 1: officers in the NYPD, lou and Ramos, murdered in their
Speaker 1: car by another BLM supporter. And I know people would say, well,
Speaker 1: those individuals were deranged. Yeah, so are thousands of the
Speaker 1: people marching in the streets, lying down in front of
Speaker 1: cars and then mobbing them, pulling people out, punching them,
Speaker 1: attacking them, spitting at cops, throwing rocks at cops. That's
Speaker 1: all crazy too, because why are they doing this. What
Speaker 1: do they think they are accomplishing with this? They don't
Speaker 1: have any good answers for that, Any means necessary, that
Speaker 1: is what we're up against. Worth remembering it as we
Speaker 1: go into this election, and worth remembering at Democrats will use,
Speaker 1: will leverage, will exploit people who tell you straight up
Speaker 1: they will do whatever they have to any means necessary.
Speaker 1: Is the promise of the BLM movement and the shock
Speaker 1: troops of the Democrat Party, Antiphon and all the rest
Speaker 1: of it. Don't forget that. Don't allow them to pretend
Speaker 1: that's not a major part of this conversation. There's a
Speaker 1: video that is going very viral, a good video of
Speaker 1: Kim Klasick. Now I know Kim Klasick. She's a great,
Speaker 1: great lady. I've had her on my show before. She's
Speaker 1: I think, got a big future in politics, and she's
Speaker 1: very talented in media. She's a young African American woman,
Speaker 1: a mother, wife, and she's running for Elijah coming seat
Speaker 1: in Baltimore in Congress. She has made a video that
Speaker 1: does what you would think our mainstream media, if they
Speaker 1: were trying to actually do journalism, would have done so
Speaker 1: much nobody would pay any attention. She made a video
Speaker 1: where she just walks around Baltimore and shows you what
Speaker 1: it looks like, what's going on there, and then share
Speaker 1: some very basic but important statistics in facts about what's
Speaker 1: going on there and who's in charge. I can tell you,
Speaker 1: having been in some of those same parts of Baltimore,
Speaker 1: that you feel like, this can't be America. This can't
Speaker 1: be a major city on the East coast of the
Speaker 1: United States in twenty twenty. It's just not possible for
Speaker 1: there to be so much decay and despair and misery
Speaker 1: concentrated in one place. Here is the first part of
Speaker 1: this is Remember this is an ad for Congress. It's
Speaker 1: very effective, It's gone viral. Here's Kim Kai's first ad
Speaker 1: play clip three. Do you care about black lives? The
Speaker 1: people that run Baltimore don't. I can prove it. Walk
Speaker 1: with me. They don't want you to see this. I'm
Speaker 1: Kim Klaysick. This is Baltimore, the real Baltimore. This is
Speaker 1: a reality for Black people every single day. Crumbling infrastructure,
Speaker 1: abandoned holmes, poverty, and crime. Baltimore has been run by
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party for fifty three years. What is the
Speaker 1: result of their decades of leadership. Baltimore is one of
Speaker 1: the top five most dangerous cities in America. The murder
Speaker 1: rate in Baltimore is ten times the US average. The
Speaker 1: Baltimore poverty rate is over twenty percent. Homicide, drug and
Speaker 1: alcohol deaths are skyrocketing in our state. Do you believe
Speaker 1: black lives matter? I do. The vast majority of prime
Speaker 1: in Baltimore is perpetrated against Black people, who make up
Speaker 1: sixty percent of the population. So why don't we care
Speaker 1: about our community? The Democrat Party have betrayed the Black
Speaker 1: people of Baltimore. If the politicians walk the street sec
Speaker 1: I do, they would see exactly how their policies and
Speaker 1: corruption affects us. What is there that the Democrats in
Speaker 1: Baltimore can point to and say, see, we've made things better.
Speaker 1: Where where is the improvement? Decades in power, Failing schools,
Speaker 1: high poverty numbers, astonishing murder numbers, Burnt out buildings all
Speaker 1: over the place, trash, trash and more trash behind buildings
Speaker 1: and in between them. It's just people use these abandoned
Speaker 1: lots as landfills. It's on sanitary attracts, vermin all that's terrible.
Speaker 1: What goes on? What do Democrats point to as why
Speaker 1: they should be entrusted with more power. Oh, Trump's a racist,
Speaker 1: that's what they'll tell you. Democrats are four African Americans,
Speaker 1: Republicans are not. That's it. That's what they'll That's what
Speaker 1: you'll be told. That's the only answer. It's never about
Speaker 1: the results. Because the results in Detroit, in Baltimore, in Missouri,
Speaker 1: now results in San Francisco, in Portland, major Democrats that
Speaker 1: the results are appalled when they have this kind of
Speaker 1: unified control. Remember New York City was a terrible place
Speaker 1: under Democrat rule, and then a Republican came in and
Speaker 1: cleaned it up, Rudy Giuliani, and then a sort of
Speaker 1: Republican really an independent Bloomberg just kept the Giuliani stuff
Speaker 1: in place, and New York got a little bit lucky too.
Speaker 1: But it wasn't Democrats that cleaned up New York City.
Speaker 1: Democrats don't clean up cities. They ruined them. Trump knows this,
Speaker 1: which is why he's making that point. But then there's
Speaker 1: another part of this. Kim asks black residents of Baltimore
Speaker 1: on the streets, what do you think about defunding police?
Speaker 1: Which is a rallying cry for the Democrat base play
Speaker 1: for if they don't want to see it, they don't
Speaker 1: want you to see this. Go to any Baltimore neighborhood
Speaker 1: and asked this question, do you want to defund the police? No? No,
Speaker 1: absolutely nothing. All right. Dr Son is killed the Baltimore
Speaker 1: city and I think if we'd defunded polies offs from
Speaker 1: me worse than that. So no, I'm opposed to. Then
Speaker 1: what are you going to defund the police for? Why?
Speaker 1: How do you defend your city? Your community? Families are
Speaker 1: losing people. It's not just Baltimore. The worst place for
Speaker 1: a black person to live in America is a Democrat
Speaker 1: controlled city. It's twenty twenty. Name a blue city where
Speaker 1: black people's lives have gotten better. Try. I'll wait, look
Speaker 1: at this. How are children supposed to live here and
Speaker 1: play here? Democrats and black people are stupid. They think
Speaker 1: they can control us forever, that we won't demand better,
Speaker 1: and that will keep voting for them forever despite what
Speaker 1: they've done to our families and our community. Are they right?
Speaker 1: I'm complasic and I'm running for Congress because I actually
Speaker 1: care about black lives. All black lives matter, our communities matter,
Speaker 1: Baltimore matters, and black people don't have to vote Democrat.
Speaker 1: A very powerful ad from Kim Klasick. You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: The Governor of New York was also featured last night
Speaker 1: at the Democrat National Convention. Oh tonight, they're gonna have
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of other people. Yeah whatever. The Governor
Speaker 1: of New York was featured last night. This is outrageous. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is a guy who has the single worst record
Speaker 1: as a leader in politics when it comes to COVID
Speaker 1: of anybody sixty six hundred, more like eleven thousand. Now
Speaker 1: even Trump is going after this guy on this It's
Speaker 1: it's completely absurd, absurd that he is being elevated as
Speaker 1: somebody that should be listened to. He's writing a book
Speaker 1: on getting us through the COVID crisis. Cuomo writing a
Speaker 1: book on leadership during COVID. What's next? The Blasio writing
Speaker 1: a book on how to just say no to drugs.
Speaker 1: Hey unbelievable, unbelievable that this is what's going on. And
Speaker 1: here he is last night saying it play clip nine.
Speaker 1: Our nation is in crisis, and in many ways, COVID
Speaker 1: is just a metaphor. A virus attacks when the body
Speaker 1: is weak and when it cannot defend itself. Over these
Speaker 1: past few years, America's body politics has been weakened. The
Speaker 1: divisions have been growing deeper. The anti Semitism, the anti Latino,
Speaker 1: the anti immigrant fervor, the racism in Charlottesville where the
Speaker 1: KKK didn't even bother to wear their hoods and in
Speaker 1: Minnesota where the life was squeezed from mister Floyd. Only
Speaker 1: a strong body can fight off the virus. In America's
Speaker 1: divisions weakened. It Donald Trump didn't create the initial division.
Speaker 1: The division created Trump. He only made it worse. Our
Speaker 1: collective strength is exercised through government. It is, in effect
Speaker 1: our immune system, and our current federal government is dysfunctional
Speaker 1: and incompetent. It couldn't fight off the virus. In fact,
Speaker 1: it didn't even see it coming. The European virus infected
Speaker 1: the Northeast while the White House was still fixated on China.
Speaker 1: I mean, how many stupid things, how many lives in
Speaker 1: misdirections can one guy get into one speech. First of all,
Speaker 1: calling it the European virus is moronic, okay, I mean
Speaker 1: he just does this to try to antagonize Trump and
Speaker 1: Trump voters and hoping, you know, hoping to get some
Speaker 1: points with the left wing base with all this it's
Speaker 1: from China. Trump is right that it's from China. But
Speaker 1: Croma was also singing a very different tune. But a
Speaker 1: couple of months ago when he was saying that President
Speaker 1: Trump was very responsive, the federal government was on it
Speaker 1: or help. I remember all of that, and now sure
Speaker 1: enough he turns, He turns against everything that they had
Speaker 1: said before because the politics of the moment demanded. He
Speaker 1: even goes with the big lie of Democrats against Trump
Speaker 1: for the last four years. You know, he goes to
Speaker 1: the big lie against Trump, that he's the reason that
Speaker 1: all of our divisions have gotten worse. They told us,
Speaker 1: let's let's look at this for a second. Democrats have
Speaker 1: told us that there were there was a trader in
Speaker 1: the White House, that the President of the United States
Speaker 1: betrayed this country to work with Russia, a hostile foreign power,
Speaker 1: to steal the election. That was Democrat dogma for years.
Speaker 1: They completely believed it. The media was all about it
Speaker 1: a lie, and they want to lecture us about Trump
Speaker 1: lies all the time. Like I've always said, Trump lies
Speaker 1: about what he had for breakfast or how he's the
Speaker 1: greatest at something of all time, which isn't really a lie.
Speaker 1: It's just an opinion that can't be disproven. Cuomo lies
Speaker 1: about stuff. The fact that he's writing a book on
Speaker 1: how to respond to COVID nineteen just shows you the
Speaker 1: thermo nuclear level gas lighting that we should all be
Speaker 1: expecting from this. It's already happening, but it'll continue to
Speaker 1: happen going forward. As if he has something to teach
Speaker 1: any of us. New York is maybe now after what
Speaker 1: six seven months of lockdown, I'm still getting my Test
Speaker 1: and Trace Corp. Pretty scary. What do you think about
Speaker 1: a Test and Trace Corps sending me messages every day?
Speaker 1: Don't leave your house, not allowed to leave your house,
Speaker 1: don't go anywhere? Based on what if I tell them
Speaker 1: that I'm going to John Lewis's eighth funeral ceremony? Am
Speaker 1: I allowed to be outside? Is that okay? Because it's
Speaker 1: okay for Democrats? They can travel, waived all the restrictions
Speaker 1: on them. Can I say that I'm going to a
Speaker 1: BLM protest? Does that then mean that I get to
Speaker 1: break my this is home confined aiment. They might as
Speaker 1: well have an ankle monitor on me. Can't go out
Speaker 1: for two weeks, That's what they say. The Test and
Speaker 1: Trace Corps highly highly trained medical professionals. I'm sure people
Speaker 1: that have had this job for oh, I don't know,
Speaker 1: at least a couple of weeks. They probably had a
Speaker 1: solid hour or two of online trading before they're able
Speaker 1: to ask me all about my medical history and tell
Speaker 1: me what I can do with my life two weeks
Speaker 1: of lockdown? You know, Cuomo is really writing a book,
Speaker 1: which he allegedly is it should just be I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I'm such a blanking moron. That's not going to happen.
Speaker 1: Democrats are invested in pretending that the blue states, the
Speaker 1: biggest blue states, were not the worst in responding to
Speaker 1: COVID Florida, Texas way better with their red governors and
Speaker 1: either they're red or purple populations politically, way better dealing
Speaker 1: with COVID than Cuomo. But he's still out there pounding
Speaker 1: his chest telling everybody, Oh, he knows how to get
Speaker 1: it done. Sure, if catastrophe is the is the goal,
Speaker 1: he succeeded. Thanks for listening to The Busson Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app for
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, team, Buck, it's time
Speaker 1: for roll Call, Roll Call, everybody, get to it first. Boy,
Speaker 1: Let's just remind everybody go to Buxxton dot com and
Speaker 1: check out if you want to send us your thoughts
Speaker 1: on anything, you can do so a couple of ways
Speaker 1: one and hopefully we'll actually do it this week on Friday.
Speaker 1: You can call in eight four four nine two eight
Speaker 1: two five eight four four nine hundred Buck, Yep, that's
Speaker 1: the way. It's the way it goes eight four four
Speaker 1: nine hundred buck leave us a message. Producer Mark really
Speaker 1: likes it if you will sing. If you will sing
Speaker 1: a song to him, I think I have to get
Speaker 1: my resume ready again. I'm just saying, you know, in
Speaker 1: producer Mark's favorite thing. He likes sonnets, he likes poems
Speaker 1: of all kinds. If you send him a limerick, he'll
Speaker 1: get really excited. It's getting a little dusty him and
Speaker 1: have to start sending it out to people. Yeah. Eight
Speaker 1: four four nine hundred two eight two five is the
Speaker 1: voicemail box. If you want to send us written stuff
Speaker 1: which does not quite upset Mark the same way, you
Speaker 1: can do that at Facebook dot com, slash buck, sex
Speaker 1: at or teambucket. iHeartMedia dot com, PR things where you
Speaker 1: want me to have a guest on the show PR
Speaker 1: people out there who use our team buck email for
Speaker 1: that purpose, those get deleted. Don't do that. We don't
Speaker 1: like that. I'm sure they're listening. Well, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, Just just saying, just saying it gets a
Speaker 1: little frustrating, a little frustrating. Sometimes the funniest is when
Speaker 1: we get do you want this former Joe Biden made
Speaker 1: on I'm just like, do you know who you're sending
Speaker 1: this email too? Yeah? Well sometimes I want to be like, yeah,
Speaker 1: we should have him on, just to sort of see
Speaker 1: how quickly they would figure out what's happening. I think
Speaker 1: the second I emailed them back and they looked you up,
Speaker 1: but they'd realize how stupid they are. Yeah, Or they
Speaker 1: could try to come into Buck's Thunderdome and see what happens.
Speaker 1: Two men enter, one man leaves. You know it would
Speaker 1: be good. All right, I'll set that up. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: let's not the audience. I don't think you see, people
Speaker 1: always think they want to hear debate on the radio,
Speaker 1: But a debate on the radio gets very hostile, very quickly,
Speaker 1: and then people will crosstalk, and cross talk on TV
Speaker 1: is bad when people are trying to talk over each
Speaker 1: other and won't stop. A cross talk on radio just
Speaker 1: turns into noise. And I don't want people to switch
Speaker 1: from this show to you know, easy listening one nine
Speaker 1: point nine, you know, the the greatest hits of the
Speaker 1: late seventies or something, you know what I mean. We
Speaker 1: don't need that. Yeah, I mean, we like music, but
Speaker 1: after the Buck Sexton Show exactly you gotta listen to
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show first. Oh and to that end, the
Speaker 1: past the Buck campaign absolutely essential. We want people to
Speaker 1: please listen to the Buck Sexton Show on podcast because
Speaker 1: that way, no matter where they are across the country,
Speaker 1: even if they don't have one of our fantastic affiliates
Speaker 1: broadcasting the radio signal to them, they can listen on
Speaker 1: either the iHeartRadio app if they want, which is a great,
Speaker 1: very useful app, or they can just download the podcast.
Speaker 1: I think podcast The podcast interface on Spotify is really
Speaker 1: easy to use. Apple podcasts obviously a big thing. Still
Speaker 1: no one calls it iTunes anymore. What happened to that?
Speaker 1: It's not really a thing anymore. Yeah, you don't really
Speaker 1: buy things on the iTunes store. It'll kind of yeah,
Speaker 1: but it'll kind of always be iTunes to me, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean. That's how you know you're old. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's true. It's like I still call where the Mets
Speaker 1: play Schet Stadium. Hm. So now let's get into our Facebook. Wait,
Speaker 1: what it's not Shae Stadium? What is it? It's a
Speaker 1: city field. They built a new stadium in two thousand
Speaker 1: and nine. I was unaware of that, really, I mean
Speaker 1: I think I've heard of it, but I would if
Speaker 1: you would ask me, I would have said Shae Stadium. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that sounds about right now. Who who is the Shay
Speaker 1: of the schae Stadium? Was William A Shay? He was
Speaker 1: instrumental in getting the Mets to exist after the Dodgers
Speaker 1: and the Giants left to go to the West Coast.
Speaker 1: Very interesting, okay, Michael. While you consider the fraud in
Speaker 1: the Biden Harris ticket, is their promise of uniting this
Speaker 1: nation while the party seems to insist on keeping us divided.
Speaker 1: I view it as the Democrats holding this nation hostage
Speaker 1: and the hopes of getting their way, which might not
Speaker 1: be a genie, but they can put it back in
Speaker 1: the bottle. Riots Fields High I viewed as a Democrats
Speaker 1: holinessestion hossage. Okay, Michael, thank you for writing in. Karen
Speaker 1: hey Buck like you, I am not at Yes, Karen
Speaker 1: is not impressed. Remember that meme back of the day
Speaker 1: with the gymnast not impressed? I think it was Kayla
Speaker 1: is not impressed? Right? Was it a Kayla Moroney or
Speaker 1: mulroney or something? Hello, Yeah, the famous gymnast? Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: I don't remember her name. Off the top of my head.
Speaker 1: She's very good though, it's very good, but she was
Speaker 1: I think she got a silver medal, and she had
Speaker 1: this look on her face, like, you know, I everyone
Speaker 1: did the not impressed thing. Anyway, Karen is not impressed
Speaker 1: here with Joe Biden's doctorate in education. I have a
Speaker 1: master's degree in education. Most of the ED classes turned
Speaker 1: out to be more or less useless. The courses that
Speaker 1: are important are subject matter classes like physics if you're
Speaker 1: teaching physics, Spanish if you're teaching Spanish, etc. The only
Speaker 1: essential ED course is student teaching if you can work
Speaker 1: under someone who really knows his craft, which I was
Speaker 1: lucky enough to do. I couldn't even tell you anymore
Speaker 1: what most of the other classes were, except they were
Speaker 1: vapid and super easy. Karen, I really appreciate I really
Speaker 1: appreciate this, because, yeah, I mean, come on, does anybody
Speaker 1: who wants a doctorate in education fail? No? Does anyone
Speaker 1: who wants a doctor in education know anything at the
Speaker 1: end of it that they probably didn't know before? No?
Speaker 1: So why am I supposed to be impressed and call
Speaker 1: someone a doctor for that? I'm sorry, I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: fly I'm not gonna fly. So there you go, David,
Speaker 1: let's see here, thanks for getting Mike Slater to fill
Speaker 1: in the other day. I will add his podcast a
Speaker 1: list of people I listened to. I especially like his
Speaker 1: world history stories. What would producer market? What stories did
Speaker 1: he tell about history? I'm curious. I mean, he did
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff, so I can't really keep you
Speaker 1: off the top of my head wondering if you like,
Speaker 1: went into a story at a particular region. He actually
Speaker 1: did a whole hour on the Siege of Malta. I
Speaker 1: was gonna say, if you got him to do a
Speaker 1: Malta podcast, I'm gonna I'm gonna We're both gonna get
Speaker 1: a code red. He would totally do it, by the way.
Speaker 1: I was like, hey, yeah, can you can you do
Speaker 1: me a favorite? Could you do like a six hour
Speaker 1: long series on math this weekend. He'd be like, bro,
Speaker 1: absolutely happy to do it. Yeah. And he would do
Speaker 1: it incredibly well, and he could probably do it in
Speaker 1: an hour. He would probably do it by Monday. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I know, he's a very he's a very squared away guy.
Speaker 1: We should just add him to the podcast network and
Speaker 1: have him do the history podcasts there we go, he
Speaker 1: would totally do it. He'd be like, I just stay
Speaker 1: up till three am every night for three nights. I
Speaker 1: got two hours asleep, but totally worth it. So anyway,
Speaker 1: we got an idea. Maybe that's all, or maybe for
Speaker 1: Labor Day weekend. I don't know. People are gonna need
Speaker 1: someone to listen to. Maybe we put out a special
Speaker 1: podcast then, producer Mark, maybe I'm gonna surprise you with
Speaker 1: a plan. Zero chance. I just want to warn the
Speaker 1: listeners it's not going to happen. I don't want you
Speaker 1: to get your hopes. We'll see, we'll see. The more
Speaker 1: the more he the more he goads me team, the
Speaker 1: more likely it is that he'll get us. I know
Speaker 1: what I'm doing. David writes that Mike's worldview compliments your
Speaker 1: social view very well. You guys ought to consider some
Speaker 1: tag team broadcast. Well, David, that's why we have Mike
Speaker 1: fill in because we think he does such a good
Speaker 1: job on top of being a really good guy. So yeah,
Speaker 1: we're already working with him on stuff. It'd be fun
Speaker 1: to do attack me. He's happy on his show before
Speaker 1: and I really appreciate that. So he's on a great network.
Speaker 1: Out in San Diego that we are also on KFMB.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say KFMB, so, which is we are
Speaker 1: very thankful to be reaching that wonderful San Diego audience.
Speaker 1: That's a top tier radio station, so yeay, and Mike's
Speaker 1: on that one. We're on that one. And next up
Speaker 1: here we have Andrew Buck and producing Mark. I've been
Speaker 1: seeing so many out of state license plates here in
Speaker 1: Indiana near Fort Wayne, in Woa, Woa Land. It's a
Speaker 1: bit unsettling to see New York in New Jersey plates
Speaker 1: on cars slowly cruising through my quiet burb. I realized
Speaker 1: they want to flee the insanity, but don't bring those
Speaker 1: crazy policies to Miketown anyway. If the crazy lives are
Speaker 1: fleeing cities, causing prices on real estate to plunge in
Speaker 1: those cities, wouldn't this be a golden opportunity for more
Speaker 1: conservative home buars and businesses to consider snapping up the
Speaker 1: vacant areas. What if cities could go from deep blue
Speaker 1: to purple or even red. Insane mayors could even be
Speaker 1: replaced with sane ones. Just a thought shield tie from Indiana. Whoa, whoa,
Speaker 1: there we go, Fort Wayne, Indiana, another great heritage radio
Speaker 1: station that we are on and are very pleased to be.
Speaker 1: Let's see here, do we think we can flip some
Speaker 1: cities from deep, deep, deep blue to maybe a faint
Speaker 1: shade of purple. I don't know about that. I would
Speaker 1: love to say that. I think it's possible. In fact,
Speaker 1: what I would like to happen is I would want
Speaker 1: conservatives to This should be like a project. You know,
Speaker 1: instead of sending checks to a think tank, people should
Speaker 1: create some nonprofit that just says we're gonna take as
Speaker 1: many conservatives as we can. We're gonna take as many
Speaker 1: conservative as possible. We're gonna move them all to one city,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna have a conservative city where you're allowed
Speaker 1: owned guns, where your taxes are low, where law and
Speaker 1: order are enforced, and just to do it would be
Speaker 1: so powerful we could have that. I mean if, I
Speaker 1: but it's the mark if if we could take over,
Speaker 1: If you can make one city, not that it would
Speaker 1: be conservative and therefore more sane. Which if we could
Speaker 1: flip one city, read which one would it be for you?
Speaker 1: Other than New York, which is where we currently are.
Speaker 1: Take New York out of the equation. You know, I
Speaker 1: want to move away from New York. I want to
Speaker 1: move as far as humanly possible. M I'd have to
Speaker 1: think about that. Maybe somewhere in California, Maybe San Diego.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say, probably, if we could steal San
Speaker 1: Diego from the Libs, that would be wonderful. Maybe even Miami,
Speaker 1: something like that. Miami would be great. If we could
Speaker 1: steal Austin from the Libs, I'd be very excited. You know,
Speaker 1: if we get at the Red stronghold, the capital of Texas,
Speaker 1: that would be great. Even Dallas is majority Democrat now,
Speaker 1: which is so so sad, so sad. You know, Chicago
Speaker 1: is a great town out here, but yeah's too cold,
Speaker 1: too cold, freezing winters. Can't handle that stuff. I want
Speaker 1: better weather. You you gotta better weather. You get to
Speaker 1: be my age producer, Mark. And the bones start to
Speaker 1: hurt with the cold weather, and the shoulder gets a
Speaker 1: little creaky, and you know, I don't want to you
Speaker 1: that I get it. I'm twenty seven going on seventy five, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, or that you know, or they don't have
Speaker 1: those kinds of problems. Sunny southern Florida. I'll be there soon.
Speaker 1: M seven months left on my lease, John Buck, I
Speaker 1: live in Utah, where we do have of mail in ballots.
Speaker 1: I had to reregister to vote by going to the
Speaker 1: county office with my Social Security card and a certified
Speaker 1: birth certificate. The dude who said that Utah has a
Speaker 1: working system didn't mention the standards that require a voter
Speaker 1: to be more than breathing. Getting an absentee ballot when
Speaker 1: I was in the service is much easier. Well, Johnson,
Speaker 1: this is this is what I'm saying. It's disingenuous to pretend,
Speaker 1: and this is what all the liberty is doing to
Speaker 1: pretend that it's the same thing to be absentee ballot
Speaker 1: and also universal mail in ballot. It's not the same thing. Okay,
Speaker 1: not the same thing. So that's just untrue. The media
Speaker 1: keeps pretending, and I'm here to tell you what's what?
Speaker 1: Is there a huge question mark over the degree of fraud. Yeah,
Speaker 1: of course, but the degree of fraud in a close
Speaker 1: presidential election is something we should be doing everything we
Speaker 1: can to work against. You know, Democrats will embrace this
Speaker 1: if it saves just one life in public policy argument
Speaker 1: when it suits them. Well, what do we what are
Speaker 1: we willing to do to if it saves just one election,
Speaker 1: which affects a whole lot of lives and the future
Speaker 1: of this country. And you'd think that they would if
Speaker 1: they were being honest about any of this, they'd be
Speaker 1: willing to admit that election security is really important. But
Speaker 1: election security does not matter to them. They wanted to
Speaker 1: be loose and lax and easy. That's what they want.
Speaker 1: That's the purpose, that's the point. So yep, let's see
Speaker 1: who's next, Tier Thomas. If Nancy Pelosi succeeds in getting
Speaker 1: the members of the House to return to DC on Saturday,
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy should make the motion on the floor to
Speaker 1: remove Pelosi from office. She's no longer capable of conducting
Speaker 1: a rational process of legislation. Republicans should walk out as
Speaker 1: soon as pelusi pelusi whoops Pelosi attempts to address voting
Speaker 1: for any legislation directed at the USPS without proper committee discussions,
Speaker 1: formal legislation for the issue, seventy two hours for the
Speaker 1: public to respond to their representatives. Those are the procedures
Speaker 1: institutionalized by Pelosi and Obama. They have not changed. This
Speaker 1: insanity has to stop. We can't afford Congress anymore shields high. Okay,
Speaker 1: Thomas Thomas, I feel like knows a lot about this
Speaker 1: issue and has thought about it very deeply. He seems
Speaker 1: like a very smart fellow. So I'm just gonna say, cool,
Speaker 1: thank you. I I like we your heads at You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Next up in Roll Call and Hey Bucking,
Speaker 1: producer Mark, a co retiree of mine with the USPS,
Speaker 1: run up the point that he has been USPS retired
Speaker 1: for over sixteen years after nearly thirty four years of service.
Speaker 1: I myself have been retired almost two years after thirty
Speaker 1: two years of service. He doesn't remember in his lifetime
Speaker 1: Congress coming off recess to conduct business regarding the post Office.
Speaker 1: In fact, unless it was to their advantage politically, he
Speaker 1: doesn't remember any of them giving a rats patuit. Producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: you heard that word before. It's a nice way of
Speaker 1: saying the other word, Yeah, a rats patut about the
Speaker 1: post office or those employed there. Ever, I can say
Speaker 1: I totally agree with my former co worker, and I'm
Speaker 1: sure any other postal workers listening will agree. Also, Congress
Speaker 1: has never been given this much attention to the postal
Speaker 1: has never given this much attention to the postal service.
Speaker 1: Congress is a big part of the reason the post
Speaker 1: Office is in debt due to Congress requiring the USPS
Speaker 1: to pre fund healthcare for retirees. And listen to kfaby Omaha.
Speaker 1: Ve iHeartRadio, love your show, Shield tie well and thanks
Speaker 1: for listening on kfaby Omaha. Apreciate it. Great to have
Speaker 1: you as part of the team, and thank you for
Speaker 1: bringing some real insight and expertise to the issue of
Speaker 1: the post Office and postal workers. So thank you so
Speaker 1: much for that. Joseph hey Buck really enjoy listening to
Speaker 1: the show. I keep hearing about voter fraud and whether
Speaker 1: it is a serious problem. YadA, YadA, YadA. Voting by
Speaker 1: mail presents other problems besides fraud. I've heard of ballots
Speaker 1: getting lost, misplace, et cetera. Technically that's not always fraud,
Speaker 1: but it sure sounds unacceptable to me, and we lead
Speaker 1: to an inaccurate tally of the votes in a timely manner. Also,
Speaker 1: how can they certify to a person that his or
Speaker 1: her vote was counted and that the privacy of his
Speaker 1: or her vote was protected. How does that happen. I
Speaker 1: have seen how they do that in my polling place,
Speaker 1: in person voting, and it looks pretty secure. And then
Speaker 1: he just added admit Romney as an embarrassment. Joseph certainly
Speaker 1: correct on that last one. And as for the voting procedures, yeah, man,
Speaker 1: it's kind of byzantine and arcane and complicated, and there's
Speaker 1: a lot of ways that it can go south. So
Speaker 1: I'm making it more complicated and more difficult. Probably not
Speaker 1: a good idea, but the Libs want to do it
Speaker 1: because disruption and dishonesty or the water in which they swim.
Speaker 1: That's it for the day. Everybody, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Back tomorrow, pass the buck. Get someone to listen to
Speaker 1: this podcast this week. Please someone you know in your
Speaker 1: life until tomorrow she'll tie