Speaker 1: All right, thank you Scott Shaddon, Thanks to all of
Speaker 1: you for being with us. Right down our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number you want to be a part of the
Speaker 1: program at eight hundred nine one Sean if you would
Speaker 1: like to join us. I can't help it. I cannot
Speaker 1: help it. I am obsessed with why we don't have
Speaker 1: answers about these drones now? Now they're flying over New Jersey, Connecticut, reports,
Speaker 1: New York, and even Pennsylvania. We had drones, apparently, according
Speaker 1: to reports, Pentagon has not disclosed the possible origin multiple
Speaker 1: drones spotted forty nine in a day last Sunday. Here
Speaker 1: we are it is November eighteenth, was the day of
Speaker 1: the first spotting. What's today the thirteenth? We nearly a
Speaker 1: full month in and you know twenty however, many days
Speaker 1: into this quote phenomenon, the Pentagon, the FBI, Biden Harris
Speaker 1: may Orcis, nobody has a single answer about the origins
Speaker 1: of these mysterious drones. You know, the only answer we
Speaker 1: got is from this idiot National Security advisor John Kirby,
Speaker 1: and he just brushed the whole thing off and even
Speaker 1: basically suggested, you know, don't believe you're lying. Eyes don't
Speaker 1: believe the videos, don't believe eyewitness testimony. Look, you can
Speaker 1: say a lot of things about people from New Jersey.
Speaker 1: I have a lot of friends in New Jersey. However,
Speaker 1: all these people and all these videos and all these pictures,
Speaker 1: I don't think that.
Speaker 2: I don't think they're lying.
Speaker 1: I think there's one or two things going on here.
Speaker 1: Either the government doesn't know where these drones originated, from,
Speaker 1: where they were launched from, who's operating them, what their
Speaker 1: capabilities are like, are they surveillance drones or are they
Speaker 1: drones that have a military payload of some kind. Do
Speaker 1: they represent a clear and present danger to the country?
Speaker 1: But you know, now the Pentagon and John Kirby, you know,
Speaker 1: is the only thing they're saying.
Speaker 2: We have not been able to.
Speaker 1: And neither have state and local law enforcement authorities, corroborate
Speaker 1: any of the reported visual sightings. Why so, are you
Speaker 1: suggesting that all of these these people, all of these photos,
Speaker 1: all of these videos are one big lie because I
Speaker 1: don't believe you. I don't believe the people that lied
Speaker 1: about the Chinese fire balloon. I don't believe the people
Speaker 1: that for four years lied about Joe's cognitive state. I
Speaker 1: don't believe the people that lied and said the border's
Speaker 1: secure and the border's been closed, when our eyes showed
Speaker 1: us something very differently. And now we have terrorists, cartel members,
Speaker 1: gang members, murderers, rapists, more fentanyl than ever before, other
Speaker 1: violent criminals all in the country. So I just, you know,
Speaker 1: a saving for somebody who wants to, you know, buy
Speaker 1: a bridge that doesn't exist somewhere, but you do have
Speaker 1: the I think he's an idiot, but Governor Murphy even saying,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, they're highly sophisticated and as soon as you
Speaker 1: put eyes on them, they go dark, all right, So
Speaker 1: even the governor, even all these elected representatives in New
Speaker 1: Jersey either they've been bamboozled also into what a mirage
Speaker 1: or imaging. Here's here's why I'm suspicious. It's one or
Speaker 1: two things here. It's either they don't know, and that's
Speaker 1: the scarier scenario for me. And it's the scarier scenario
Speaker 1: because if the United States of America since November eighteenth
Speaker 1: and it's December the twelfth, doesn't know what the hell
Speaker 1: is going on, and we're describing drones the size of
Speaker 1: school buses that make very loud noises and like the
Speaker 1: sound of a Harley Davidson engine, and that they're flying
Speaker 1: at low altitudes and they're flying over sensitive areas and
Speaker 1: they don't know. That is the scarier scenario to me.
Speaker 1: If they really truly don't know, now, they may end
Speaker 1: up being nothing. It may end up being something that
Speaker 1: they themselves are involved in, and maybe they want to
Speaker 1: keep it top secret. I can't imagine any scenario where
Speaker 1: they would be flying these things over populated areas though
Speaker 1: no reason at all whatsoever. There are places the government
Speaker 1: tests such things as this, usually in private, top secret.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat, he's saying these drones, but we've
Speaker 1: been saying, should be shot down. He said this in
Speaker 1: an interview. He said intelligence analysis is needed on the
Speaker 1: drones and that the US US to act more aggressively
Speaker 1: against the sightings that have been reported. We should be
Speaker 1: doing some very smart intelligence and analysis and take them
Speaker 1: out of the sky, especially if they're flying over airports
Speaker 1: or military bases, and by the way, reports of both.
Speaker 1: They should be shot down if necessary, because they're flying
Speaker 1: over sensitive areas. He's a Democrat Connecticut. He's not wrong.
Speaker 1: Now they're flying in his state. Also, the mayor of Belleville,
Speaker 1: New Jersey, telling Fox News that a drone had crashed
Speaker 1: in his area. Anyway, the guy's name is Michael Melham.
Speaker 1: I was interviewed by Harris Faulkner, my colleague and friend
Speaker 1: of Fox and he reported that a drone had crashed
Speaker 1: in the vicinity of his town. On my way here.
Speaker 1: I was on the phone with my Office of Emergency
Speaker 1: Management team and we now have guidance from the state,
Speaker 1: and that guidance has two different things. First of all,
Speaker 1: there is a down drone in our vicinity and we
Speaker 1: were told to call the bomb squad in our county.
Speaker 1: And second, our fire department has been instructed to make
Speaker 1: sure that they wear hazmat suits.
Speaker 2: He didn't elaborate.
Speaker 1: Newsweek has a report on what sounds like the same
Speaker 1: drone crash they reported Quota drone has crashed into the
Speaker 1: ground in New Jersey amid a repeated you know, reported sightings. Again,
Speaker 1: we do have pictures and videos on top of the
Speaker 1: sidings of these unmanned flying devices along the East coast
Speaker 1: and a police scanner report.
Speaker 2: We'll play it later in the program.
Speaker 1: At of Morris County, New Jersey indicated a drone had
Speaker 1: crashed in the area on Friday morning, with one officer
Speaker 1: reporting that more remote controlled aircraft were spotted in the
Speaker 1: sky around the scene of the crash. By the way,
Speaker 1: eighty plus percent of these drones come from China. That raises,
Speaker 1: you know, my eyebrows. And all of this news comes
Speaker 1: after a surge in these sightings. It has baffled apparently
Speaker 1: law enforcement. The FBI has no answers. Law enforcement has
Speaker 1: no answers. And then we have a pull on denial
Speaker 1: by Biden's by Biden's own national security advisor, there's no
Speaker 1: evidence at all that this is any of this is true.
Speaker 1: Well then are you are you accusing the people in
Speaker 1: these that have these videos of being liars, because that's
Speaker 1: what they're saying here. You know, he said, it's rampant speculation.
Speaker 1: He goes upon review of available imagery, it appears many
Speaker 1: of the reports of sightings are actually manned aircraft and
Speaker 1: are being operated lawfully. We have no evidence at this
Speaker 1: time that the reported drone sidings pose a national security
Speaker 1: or a public safety threat, or have a foreign nexus.
Speaker 1: But the keywords there are no evidence at this time.
Speaker 1: But the fact is, he's basically, you know, downplaying it
Speaker 1: denying it, and I find that part and the lack
Speaker 1: of urgency, the most infuriating part of it. I want
Speaker 1: a definitive answer. We deserve a definitive answer now. If
Speaker 1: they don't have the capability of getting a definitive answer,
Speaker 1: that scares me even more because I know we have
Speaker 1: the technology and the ability to do it, and or
Speaker 1: the just flat out line to us, and that pisses
Speaker 1: me off. But it's certainly better than the alternative, and
Speaker 1: that being that they don't know. Multiple mystery drones spotted
Speaker 1: flying over the New Jersey Naval Weapon Station, according to
Speaker 1: ABC News, Multiple instances of drones entering the airspace at
Speaker 1: a Navy weapon station in New Jersey. According to officials, there,
Speaker 1: concerns continue to grow over widespread drone sightings in the region.
Speaker 1: Naval Weapon Station EARL, located in Coltsneck, New Jersey, that
Speaker 1: they were aware of the sightings in the region. They
Speaker 1: continue to closely coordinate with federal and state agencies to
Speaker 1: ensure the safety of their personnel and operations. We can
Speaker 1: confirm multiple instances of unidentified drones. Will somebody tell Kirby
Speaker 1: in the Biden White House entering the airspace above the
Speaker 1: Naval Weapons Station Earl. According to Bill Addison, public affairs
Speaker 1: officer at the naval station, the base remains prepared to
Speaker 1: respond to any potential risks, leveraging robust security measures and
Speaker 1: advanced detection capabilities. And by the way, Senator Andy Kim,
Speaker 1: who was sworn into office just this week, spent Thursday
Speaker 1: night in hunter in A County which is next to
Speaker 1: Somerset County, where he said he saw dozens of drones
Speaker 1: in a two hour period. As John Kirby suggesting he
Speaker 1: is lying, people deserve answers, he said to reporters after
Speaker 1: his visit to the county. We don't need conspiracy theories
Speaker 1: or conjecture. We need assurances that the people charge with
Speaker 1: keeping us safe are on top of the issue, and
Speaker 1: a line of communication so that the people feel their
Speaker 1: government is taking it seriously.
Speaker 2: Is not wrong?
Speaker 1: Just give us a definitive answer, and if you don't
Speaker 1: know the answer, take one of the damn things out
Speaker 1: of the sky. What is so hard about this? This
Speaker 1: is not that complicated. But I'm telling you it's either
Speaker 1: one or the other. They either know and are lying,
Speaker 1: or they don't know, can't figure it out and are
Speaker 1: just putting their head in their sand and the sand
Speaker 1: and just you know, living in La La Land, you
Speaker 1: know the idea that the White House, you know, is
Speaker 1: security officials just dismiss it. I mean, we're talking about
Speaker 1: politicians and every quote legacy media outlet reporting it. Marjorie
Speaker 1: Taylor Green said, it's total bs. We're all in danger, right.
Speaker 1: I hope Marcherie's wrong on this one. The drone mystery.
Speaker 1: New Jersey homeowners are threatening to take matters into their
Speaker 1: own hands if the government's not going to act. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're putting people in a position where they feel that,
Speaker 1: you know, they're so frustrated with the lack of answers
Speaker 1: regarding you know, the dozens of potential drone sightings and
Speaker 1: sightings above their own homes. Now people are threatening to
Speaker 1: take action on their own if the government won't start
Speaker 1: providing answers. Have one real term in the Jersey Shore.
Speaker 1: Sharing a video on Facebook, he said he showed the
Speaker 1: suv sized drones above Island Beach State Park, taken on Sunday.
Speaker 1: It's difficult to judge their size in this clip, anyway,
Speaker 1: he said. Dozens of suv sized drones in all directions.
Speaker 1: He said emerging at the same time, flying over the
Speaker 1: ocean and heading in different directions. What do you think?
Speaker 1: And he showed the videos of it. Look, you know,
Speaker 1: something's going on. I don't know what's going Maybe it's nothing.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's our own government. But that would not make sense,
Speaker 1: would it. Maybe it's a dry run of an enemy
Speaker 1: and they just don't want to want to tell us
Speaker 1: the truth, you know, or they don't know. That don't
Speaker 1: know part is the one that scares me the most.
Speaker 1: Don't know part is the worst part. They don't know
Speaker 1: part means that they are absolutely just incompetent. Beyond words,
Speaker 1: we've got a lot of other news to get to
Speaker 1: interesting and we'll get into great specificity in detail with
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan in the program later. But former January sixth
Speaker 1: Committee chairman Benny Thompson said he'd accept a preemptive pardon
Speaker 1: from Biden. There's a lot of talk of preemptive pardons
Speaker 1: for people like Anthony Fauci and Liz Cheney and Benny Thompson,
Speaker 1: other Biden family members. Maybe even Biden will pardon himself.
Speaker 1: But we'll get into what they this This is something
Speaker 1: really so wrong in what this committee did. We need
Speaker 1: a prime time truth telling, you know, counter narrative and
Speaker 1: let the American people the high level of lying that
Speaker 1: went on about January sixth and what they didn't tell you,
Speaker 1: what they selectively edited out, and why has all of
Speaker 1: this information gone missing? Apparently nobody knows where it is.
Speaker 1: Jonathan Turley wants to know why the FBI informants who
Speaker 1: trespassed on the Capital property during the January sixth riot,
Speaker 1: why weren't they prosecuted? And this is a denial that
Speaker 1: went on for a very long time. We'll get into
Speaker 1: this with Jim Jordan as well, but we learned from
Speaker 1: an IG report at the DOJ yesterday that they were there.
Speaker 1: In fact, we're twenty six confidential human sources another word,
Speaker 1: spies that were at the rally for the FBI in
Speaker 1: January sixth, seventeen, entering restart stricted areas or entering the Capital.
Speaker 1: Three specifically deployed by the FBI to be at the rally.
Speaker 1: Two were paid by the FBI. What a shocker. They
Speaker 1: didn't get arrested. They weren't authorized to break the law
Speaker 1: eight hundred ninety four one, Shawn or number. If you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. We'll get
Speaker 1: into all of this and much much more, Sow Petty,
Speaker 1: you know, beyond the lunatics that have no problem, you know,
Speaker 1: praising and honoring the alleged assassin of the United Healthcare CEO.
Speaker 1: Now we have, according to foxnews dot Com, a number
Speaker 1: of DC dining establishment waiters, waitresses, bartenders vowing to discriminate
Speaker 1: against Trump officials by doing everything they can to make
Speaker 1: their dining experience miserable. Maybe the owners of these fine
Speaker 1: establishments should ferret out any of these Trump hating staff members. Anyway,
Speaker 1: food workers in DC have pledged to refuse service, cause
Speaker 1: other inconvenie from members of the incoming Trump administration when
Speaker 1: they dine out over the next four years. That means
Speaker 1: bartenders servers in the Capitol telling the Washingtonian that resistance
Speaker 1: to Republican figures in the progressive city was inevitable in
Speaker 1: a matter of conscience. Well, you're pretty stupid if you
Speaker 1: do that, with all due respect, but that doesn't surprise me. Now,
Speaker 1: if I owned a restaurant i worked again as a
Speaker 1: bartender as I did, and a waiter whatever, I'd be
Speaker 1: glad to have liberals come in and spend their money.
Speaker 1: You know why, because that makes me money. Back to
Speaker 1: this story on foxnews dot com food workers in DC
Speaker 1: pledging to refuse service and cause other inconveniences for members
Speaker 1: of the incoming Trump administration when they dine out. I
Speaker 1: did have an experience, a bad experience once years ago
Speaker 1: for the sake of nice, although I have no reason to.
Speaker 1: I won't go into the graphic details, but some idiot
Speaker 1: I went to a restaurant. It was a steak house.
Speaker 1: I had a stake that night, and a person that
Speaker 1: apparently did serve me it turned out, went online. This
Speaker 1: is early in the online era, and uh kind of
Speaker 1: bragged about what they did to my food. Not exactly comforting,
Speaker 1: not a fun experience. And you know, the person got fired.
Speaker 1: There was a police involved, there could have been charges.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to tell you how it ended. It
Speaker 1: ended with me being way more way nicer than I
Speaker 1: should have, because it's pretty horrible that people do that. No,
Speaker 1: you remember the old story of who was it that's
Speaker 1: spitting somebody's food and like bragged about it. There's some
Speaker 1: famous person I don't remember. So, yeah, the bartenders and
Speaker 1: people that work in the service industry work in restaurants
Speaker 1: and they are now promising to shun certain officials or
Speaker 1: employ other small acts of resistance against these figures who
Speaker 1: quote take their power back.
Speaker 2: What does that even mean? How do you get power back? Now?
Speaker 1: If I own a business and I worked in the
Speaker 1: restaurant business, I've told the story many times. When I
Speaker 1: tell my kids, they.
Speaker 2: Roll their eyes.
Speaker 1: But I was twelve years old washing dishes every Friday, Saturday,
Speaker 1: Sunday night in a very busy restaurant. You know, by hand.
Speaker 1: They didn't have dishwasher machine at that point. I mean,
Speaker 1: most busy restaurants have the machines.
Speaker 2: That makes it much.
Speaker 1: Easier and probably makes the dishes a lot cleaner. I
Speaker 1: mean that water would get pretty dirty and I just
Speaker 1: keep going and just wipe them dry when it was done.
Speaker 2: But I was doing the best I could. It was
Speaker 2: so busy.
Speaker 1: I had to move fast, and then you have to
Speaker 1: scour these pots and pans, and I did it at.
Speaker 2: Twelve years old.
Speaker 1: I was paid like two dollars and fifty cents an
Speaker 1: hour or something like that, and the owners were great.
Speaker 2: They were nice people, and uh, it was kind of cool.
Speaker 1: At the end of the night, me and a friend
Speaker 1: of mine he at the time was the bus boy.
Speaker 1: We didn't have a Saint poly Girl beer or two
Speaker 1: at the bar. We're only twelve thirteen years old, and
Speaker 1: you know then we'd fly home on our bicycle and
Speaker 1: it just was a different error. I mean, my parents
Speaker 1: were working, they had no idea where it was. When
Speaker 1: I got off the school bus, i'd you know, dropped
Speaker 1: my bag and run out. And if I wasn't delivering papers,
Speaker 1: I had paper routes all the time. I hated them.
Speaker 1: And anyway, but I did like working in the restaurant
Speaker 1: then before I was fourteen. When I was thirteen, this
Speaker 1: guy Hans on Thanksgiving quit he was the chef.
Speaker 2: He throws me the apron. But you know, think of
Speaker 2: what I learned.
Speaker 1: I learned how to cook steaks and burgers and food
Speaker 1: froudy alblo and live stuff, lobster, what else, fetchini, alfredo,
Speaker 1: spaghetti carbona. I learned how to cook all of that.
Speaker 1: And you know, I learned, and I loved it. I'd
Speaker 1: build up a big sweat. I'd have to move fast.
Speaker 1: I loved jobs. You have to move fast. And at
Speaker 1: another point, I was a busboy in a very busy
Speaker 1: restaurant and a waiter for a short period of time.
Speaker 2: I didn't love being a waiter. I loved being a bartender.
Speaker 2: That was fun.
Speaker 1: It was a very busy pub, had three separate dining
Speaker 1: rooms and even later an outdoor dining room in warmer weather.
Speaker 1: And then they were known for their frozen drinks, and
Speaker 1: they didn't have those drink machines that they have today,
Speaker 1: so you had to do everything by hand. Banana dakeries,
Speaker 1: melon dakeries, strawberry dakeries, peanut colatdas, Margarita's frozen margheritas, I mean,
Speaker 1: and you had to move because you had the Usually
Speaker 1: there were two bar tender, so you know, you had
Speaker 1: to work the service bar, which is you know, getting
Speaker 1: drinks to the customers in the restaurant. And then I'm
Speaker 1: busy nights like Friday and Saturday, you know the bar
Speaker 1: before five deep, and it was a long bar and
Speaker 1: I'd run the whole night. It was great though. I'd
Speaker 1: come home with a lot of money and I just
Speaker 1: I love working there. So the idea that these bartenders
Speaker 1: waiters somehow are going to get their power back and
Speaker 1: are pledging not to serve Trump officials, well that would
Speaker 1: be called discrimination. But that's a separate issue for another day.
Speaker 1: But you know, this person theoretically has power to take
Speaker 1: away your rights, but I have the power to make
Speaker 1: you wait twenty minutes to get your entree. They quote
Speaker 1: this woman, Nancy, a fine dining bartender, telling The Washingtonian,
Speaker 1: there's lots of opportunities for us as workers to feel
Speaker 1: like we are getting our power back while not necessarily
Speaker 1: ruining someone's life. Giving them a subtle inconvenience feels like
Speaker 1: a little bit of a win for us. And she
Speaker 1: said she would refuse service to certain Trump officials if
Speaker 1: her employer tried to force her. She claims she would
Speaker 1: quit on the spot. Well, if I'm the owner of
Speaker 1: that restaurant, I want her to quit ahead of time.
Speaker 1: Let's let's pass, go collect two hundred and get out
Speaker 1: the door. Because your job is to give the best
Speaker 1: service possible to people, your customers. I mean, for example, everybody,
Speaker 1: I don't care what business you're in, You're in a
Speaker 1: service business. And I've gone through this before. I would,
Speaker 1: you know, try to explain to my kids when they
Speaker 1: were young that everybody is in the service business. And
Speaker 1: then I explain all the people that go into bringing
Speaker 1: them whatever food they ordered. When we'd go to a restaurant,
Speaker 1: somebody see you at a restaurant. Somebody comes and fills
Speaker 1: your water glass at a restaurant. Then somebody comes by
Speaker 1: a waiter and takes your drink order and goes and
Speaker 1: gets your drink order and brings that to you. Then
Speaker 1: when they go to the bar, the bartender makes the
Speaker 1: drinks or the soft drinks, whatever you're ordering, and then
Speaker 1: the waiter will will you'll order, maybe we'll order an
Speaker 1: appetizer or appetizers, and then well, that order is brought
Speaker 1: back to the kitchen, and then somebody will cook it
Speaker 1: and they'll put it on a plate.
Speaker 2: Then the waiter will bring it to you.
Speaker 1: And then somebody will come usually a bus boy, bus girl, whatever,
Speaker 1: and they will take that plate and they will bring
Speaker 1: it to the back to the kitchen, and they will
Speaker 1: give it to the dishwasher, and the dishwasher will clean
Speaker 1: that dish, and the same with the entree, same process,
Speaker 1: and then when you leave, somebody's going to clean up
Speaker 1: your table. Those are all people involved in serving you
Speaker 1: in a restaurant. And I think that human beings we
Speaker 1: have to provide services for other people. We're not designed
Speaker 1: to be kings and queens. And I can't think of
Speaker 1: a more boring, dull, you know, insane existence. Then you know,
Speaker 1: having people you know, weight handover foot over you all day.
Speaker 2: I just I couldn't imagine, nor would I ever want that.
Speaker 1: And you know, I don't care if you're if you
Speaker 1: collect people's garbage, you're a garbage man. We're all pieces
Speaker 1: of garbage according to Joe. But you know what a
Speaker 1: service they're providing. If somebody is an electrician, a plumber
Speaker 1: or contractor, if they're an architect, if they're a landscaper,
Speaker 1: if they're a nurse, a doctor in orderly at a hospital,
Speaker 1: I don't know if they call them orderlies anymore, nurse assistant,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure.
Speaker 2: If you're a lawyer, I don't care.
Speaker 1: If you are a personal assistant, I don't think you
Speaker 1: use the word secretary, flight attendant.
Speaker 2: You can't say stewardess anymore, or a steward. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Uh, it's hard keeping up with all these name changes,
Speaker 1: I will say that, but you get my point. Everybody's
Speaker 1: providing a service, and then grateful for people that provide
Speaker 1: good service. Now, this is how stupid and short sighted
Speaker 1: they are because if I get bad service, I do
Speaker 1: tip well. Number One, I can afford to tip well.
Speaker 1: And I just think of my father who waited tables
Speaker 1: on a weekend to supplement his income. Every time I
Speaker 1: go to a restaurant, and I just I just know
Speaker 1: how important the money, the tip money that waiters and
Speaker 1: bartenders and how important it is in their life. So
Speaker 1: I've all my adult life I try to tip well,
Speaker 1: and I just I feel kind of compelled to do it,
Speaker 1: to be honest, and I worked in the industry myself.
Speaker 1: I used to love it if somebody gave me an extra,
Speaker 1: really good tip if you get lousy service. There has
Speaker 1: been a rare occasion where I'll just leave the twenty
Speaker 1: percent and that's like my minimum if it's the worst service.
Speaker 2: But I probably shouldn't do that.
Speaker 1: I mean, if somebody's that bad, I should probably just
Speaker 1: walk away, just say here, I'm paying the bill, and
Speaker 1: just walk out. But I personally would refuse to serve
Speaker 1: any person in office who I know as being a
Speaker 1: sex trafficker or trying to deport millions of people. What
Speaker 1: the hell is this person talking about? A server manager
Speaker 1: at a saloon on Capitol Hill also vowing to refuse
Speaker 1: service to Trump officials whom she felt had moral views
Speaker 1: that opposed her own. Again, that's all published in the Washingtonian, Like,
Speaker 1: you gotta be kidding me. It's not, oh, we hate Republicans.
Speaker 1: It's that this person has moral convictions that are strongly
Speaker 1: opposed to mine. If I was still back in the
Speaker 1: like for example, if you're a liberal and you're listening
Speaker 1: to this show, thank you for listening. If you voted
Speaker 1: for Kamala and you watch my TV show, thank you
Speaker 1: for watching. And I want to put on a good
Speaker 1: show every day. And one of the differences between my
Speaker 1: show and fake New CNN and MSDNC, Legacy Media, ABC,
Speaker 1: NBCCBS is we often get it right. By the way,
Speaker 1: you heard about the woman in the Duke of Cross
Speaker 1: case admitting that she lied what is it eighteen years
Speaker 1: later she should be put in jail. Well, we happened, well,
Speaker 1: so many in the media, So many of those professors
Speaker 1: got that story wrong, and they rushed to judgment. I
Speaker 1: actually took the time to meet with the families, some
Speaker 1: of the families of these young men that were being accused,
Speaker 1: and I learned meeting them that there was going to
Speaker 1: be exculpatory evidence that would come out, and I was
Speaker 1: able to go hard on the air that I didn't
Speaker 1: believe it, and that until I not rushed to judgment.
Speaker 2: We did that.
Speaker 1: In the George Zimmerman case, I was told by people
Speaker 1: that there would be eyewitness testimony that Trayvon Martin was
Speaker 1: doing a ground and pound of George Zimmerman's head in
Speaker 1: the cement and that would likely impact the verse, and
Speaker 1: it did.
Speaker 2: I knew.
Speaker 1: I was in Atlanta during the Richard Jewel time, during
Speaker 1: the when the Olympic bombing took place and I was
Speaker 1: on the air, I didn't know Richard Jewel was listening.
Speaker 1: He fits the profile of the lone bomber, after all,
Speaker 1: he lives with his mother. They got that wrong. You know,
Speaker 1: all these sanctimonious, self righteous liberals, they get everything wrong.
Speaker 1: Legacy media gets everything wrong. I don't know. They got
Speaker 1: Ferguson Missouri wrong, Uva wrong, they got read the Russia
Speaker 1: hoax wrong, they got the they never got to the
Speaker 1: dirty disinformation dossier, which was the basis for four PISA applications.
Speaker 2: They get all that wrong. Legas.
Speaker 1: That's why Legacy media, if you're going to be successful
Speaker 1: in new media. One of the criterias is going to
Speaker 1: be stop lying to your audience. And this is the
Speaker 1: lesson that none of these networks, none of these newspapers,
Speaker 1: none of these cable channels have learned from this election.
Speaker 1: You know, one of one truth here is everybody is angry, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, at the healthcare industry. But there's a poll
Speaker 1: out yesterday that showed sixty five percent of Americans that
Speaker 1: are happy with their healthcare plan. One thing I would
Speaker 1: inform everybody and you need to do this. Know what's
Speaker 1: covered before something happens. And if you have gaps in
Speaker 1: your coverage, if you can afford it, you might want
Speaker 1: to get a catastrophic plan to cover those gaps. Betsy McCoy,
Speaker 1: a healthcare experts, use to carry the Obamacare bill around
Speaker 1: with her. She knows it inside and out, and she
Speaker 1: rightly points out health insurance claim denials exploded in the
Speaker 1: decade since Obamacare was implemented. And she pointed out that
Speaker 1: you know, it's roughly ten times what it was a
Speaker 1: decade ago. And she pointed out back then, insures seldom
Speaker 1: rejected claims. United Healthcare next one point one percent, a
Speaker 1: one point nine at a one point five in twenty thirteen.
Speaker 1: By twenty twenty two, major insurers were refusing to pay
Speaker 1: on average fifteen percent of claims on a national average,
Speaker 1: and that number keeps going upwards. Now, why is that
Speaker 1: it shoots up with companies denying almost half their claims
Speaker 1: according to researchers at the Kaiser Family Foundation. Well, the
Speaker 1: Affordable Care Act of twenty ten requires the Department of
Speaker 1: Health and Human Services to monitor claim denials and provide
Speaker 1: information to the public. But the ACA plans on average
Speaker 1: Obamacare plans, in other words, the Affordable Care Act plans
Speaker 1: refuse to pay seventeen percent of their claims and for
Speaker 1: forty plus percent of the country, that is their one
Speaker 1: Obamacare exchange option. By the way, the Ducal Lacrosse woman,
Speaker 1: her name was They're still magnum, and she finally confesses
Speaker 1: she lied by the way she made these accusations in
Speaker 1: two thousand and six. They trusted me that I wouldn't
Speaker 1: betray their trust, and I testified falsely against them by
Speaker 1: saying that.
Speaker 2: They rape me when they didn't, and that was wrong.
Speaker 1: And anyway, she told an independent media outlet, let's talk
Speaker 1: with kat At at the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women.
Speaker 1: I made up a story that wasn't true, and she
Speaker 1: said she wanted validation from people, not from God anyway.
Speaker 1: I hope they can forgive me. I want them to
Speaker 1: know that I love them. They didn't deserve that. I
Speaker 1: hope they can forgive me. It was bad at the time.
Speaker 1: It was really bad at the time.