WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off August 5th, 2022 (Ep. 568)

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in friendos to leaning off on Fantasy pros. I

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>am Chris Welsh and joining me today is all of

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>the energy. It is going to hit you like a

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of bricks. He is mister energy. Mister Michael Govier

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is in the house, sitting in the co host seat

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>with me.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 2>What's up, Michael Welsh?

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 3>How you doing? My friend?

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 4>We cut it closer this morning, but it's morning for you.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 4>We've hitting noon on the East Coast, and I'm feeling good.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm ready to rock. I want to talk baseball with you.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think there's anything else I'd rather be

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 4>doing right now. Maybe taking a nap, but I can

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 4>always do that later because you're come first.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in the chat, I said top of the morning

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to everybody, or as we would say on the West coast,

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>good afternoon, because it's nine am here you guys over

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on your East coast, you're having lunch and you're doing

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>all that type of stuff. I don't want to touch

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>any food you guys are having all of that. Yeah,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>And as Kobe I was mentioning cutting a little short,

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>it was about twenty seconds before.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>But I believe you just moved. I believe you just

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 2>moved to Did you move to the Canada? Did I

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>hear you?

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Know you?

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Usually those of you that know me, if you've never

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 4>seen me before, honey, how you doing. But those that

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 4>have seen my show, the plots of podcast or seen

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 4>me elsewhere, Ah, he's got top notched background. So I

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 4>always make sure I got the green screen rolling with

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>quality lighting because that's just what I do. But I

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 4>am doing my very first show ever from the great

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 4>country known as Canada.

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>It's right, I am in Canada right now.

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Wow, you're from the Canada right now.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Also, big news if you guys don't follow Michael on Twitter,

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>MJ Govier Michael, it was just announced yesterday that is

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>joining FTN. So he's got his own podcast, a Plaza podcast,

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>but also going to be over with FTN. So congratulations,

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>my friend. I think you're going to be doing a

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of football content. So the baseball people will boo

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and hiss at you here.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know, you'll probably have some baseball content

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>in there.

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 3>No, baseball is very much a part of it. It is.

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 4>That's like I'm doing college football stuff as well, but

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 4>baseball was the main thing to our main man's lad Settler.

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 4>He really wants to grow the baseball product there and

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 4>we're all about baseball there, so that will definitely be

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 4>a focus there.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>You go, Well, Michael and I are going to go

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>through all the motions with you, as we've had a

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>star studded lineup the entire week of everybody from Mike

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Kurlin to Nick Pollock to the debut of the Wonky Penguin.

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 2>I hope you guys have been injoying it.

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But let's get into baseball and we've got all the

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>things under the sun. And number one, the Los Angeles

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Angels hit seven solo home runs last night, two by Otani,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and they lost eight to seven. Magnificent. That's a piece

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of artwork right there, Mike. I have a couple notes here.

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>These are both from Kodify and I found these fascinating.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Sho Heo Tani became the first Angel ever to hit

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>multiple home runs in three differ differ games that the

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>team lost in one season. Codify then doubled down the

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>most multi homer games that resulted in losses in twenty

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. Shoho Tani is the leader with three. As

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned there, were thirty six other batters that

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>had one. I don't know if you've looked at the show.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Have you looked at the show sheet yet?

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I certainly have. Yes.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 2>All right, then you know because.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Number two on that list Kyle Schwarber. So Kyle Schwarber

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>had two that multi homers that resulted in losses. Thirty

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>six other show HEO Tani three. That is a spectacle

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that I think is hard to defeat and also brings

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>up a question to me, Michael, we have spent so

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>much time on this show throughout the season, me and

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>PS and PA talking about Shoho Tani and the MVP odds.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you think things like.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>These are going to swing the pendulum back? You know,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we had Judge and then we had Tani come in

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like a fury take over the lead. I'm actually gonna go, look,

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I haven't see what the odds are, but do you

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>think I'm not sure where you stand on the MVP

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>race in the al in general if it is Aaron

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Judges Shohio Tani. But is this the type of stuff

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that you think that is gonna make him fall off

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of this lead?

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Boy?

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I thought Judge would tank second half. In fact, at Fantrax.

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 4>We did these quick hitter fun clickbaity posts, So, hey,

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 4>who is the guy who's gonna fall apart as an

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 4>outfielder or who's the hitter?

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 3>You're fading in the second half?

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 4>And I chose Aaron Judge as a hitter to fade

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 4>just because he was so good that I couldn't believe

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 4>he could continue that pace. Sometimes that's all it is

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 4>to me. I just think when a player does something

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 4>so poorly, they're not gonna be as bad as they

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 4>looked either. You know, I never believe it'll go for

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 4>that long. But Judge continue to kick it in the

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 4>second half. But what Otani has done is so legendary.

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 4>And I've been sticking with Otani to win the MVP

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 4>no matter what, because he is two in one.

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 3>He is both sides of the Oriel.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Cookie, you know, and you get the fun, You get

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 4>all of it with Otan.

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 5>It's so incredible that even my words of me getting

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 5>louder and getting more passionate about it still will not

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 5>tell you or allow me to express how incredible it

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 5>is what Otani does as a pitcher who's dominant and

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 5>a hitter who's dominant.

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 4>It's amazing. I'm staying with Otani all the way. I

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 4>don't care what the yards are. He's gonna win the

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 4>MVP unless unless Judge hits a really high home run

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 4>mark that we haven't seen in a minute, and that

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 4>might be the only thing that changes it. But otherwise

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 4>it's Otani's game.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Like, yeah, pretty much what he's doing.

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye, Yeah, well that's true. Yeah, he is.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Exactly what he's doing.

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>So I looked at the odds, we're back into just

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>fun land here on DraftKings.

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Is just what I happen to pull up. Aaron Judge

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>is the.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Current favorite at minus one seventy five and Otani is

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>now plus three point fifty. So this is swam the

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>last week and a half where you're getting three and

0:05:57.960 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a half to one back on your odds on Atani

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>because the struggles are real. The offensive output is kind

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of tapered back a little bit. Pitching has been okay,

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but you haven't seen the dominant performances.

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>And it also what I think it's.

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting is it shows the market where Otani is

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the leader when he is doing unhuman like things. When

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>he has four straight games of ten strikeouts, he immediately

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>jumps back. But as soon as that goes away, as

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>soon as he becomes human again and he struggles on

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>any point, it immediately is going back to Judge. Now

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>where the vote ends up.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:34.799
<v Speaker 2>Going is going to be really interesting.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>But for the first time, I do kind of wonder

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>if Judge hits sixty and Otani keeps kind of struggling

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>with this Angels team that's falling apart, would voters really

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>turn it over at this point just out of like

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this very early on, because we just can't

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 2>We just can't keep giving it to this guy for

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the next.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Five or ten years. The odds have jumped. If you're

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>still an Atani believer, three and a half is a

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty good number that you guys can still get on

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>if you would like two and you know, I'm a

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit curious. I'm gonna text Joe, I'm gonna we'll

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>get to check it next week if he's turned anything

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. A couple other headline pieces, Edwin Diez gets

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a six out save versus the Mets as they beat

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>their I'm sorry as they beat with the Mets. They

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>beat the Brave six to four, and we had that

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>note there yesterday about he could have the highest k

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.119
<v Speaker 1>per nine in all of baseball, which is a Bonker's number.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>This and we've got a question or a thing that's

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna come up here in just a tiny bit, Justin

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Verlander pitched six innings, giving up zero runs, two hits,

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.679
<v Speaker 1>one walk, five strikeouts. He reached the one and thirty

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>innings mark, which triggered a twenty five million dollar player

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>option for twenty twenty three.

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Go Via.

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was.

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Looking at a lot of just the pitcher numbers, and

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as I've done my redraft ranks here, one of the

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>things that stood out to me is I feel like

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to be weird about Verlander, Like I don't

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>want to put him like crazy high.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>But when you look at the fifteen win total of

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>the sub to.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Era on the season, how high is verse as far

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as ranks go, rest the season sps like you get

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Jacob de gromdback Sandyo. I mean him and Sanio Contray

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the only two guys with the sub to era right now.

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You know Verlander, he's older, He's on a great team,

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is it? It is obviously trustworthy, But where does he

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>sit on the pantheon of other SPS right now.

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Coming out of the All Star Gate. There in the

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 4>second half, I did some show. I can't remember what

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 4>it is.

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm so busy, I have so many shows.

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 4>To do, guys, sir, I can't remember where I was.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 4>But there was talk about, hey, Verlander, is this fluke?

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Was this real? Are you fading him? The second half?

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 4>And I was buying him all the way back to

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 4>the preseason. I didn't get enough shares because his stock

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 4>started to really rise too quickly, and I was like, ah,

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 4>I was getting a little too high. But when he

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 4>was around EIGHTYP one hundred earlier in the draft season,

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 4>I was all for it because as a Tigers fan,

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 4>I've seen this guy in his mechanics and his delivery,

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 4>and they're so effortless. They're so smooth that even though yes,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 4>he's thirty nine, he's coming off to you. I wasn't

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 4>worried about it, Chris, I really wasn't, because this guy

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 4>takes care of himself too, and due to those natural mechanics.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 4>I just felt that the way things are now, you

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 4>could pitch in your forties and it's happened in the past.

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 4>Nolan Ryan was a fluke, obviously, but I'm buying Verlander.

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 3>All day long. I'm not fading him, and I think he's.

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 4>I think he's right there, Top twelve starting pitcher rest

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 4>of season. The Astros are competing big time World Series aspirations.

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 3>They need him.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 4>He wants those opportunities. He's always been a clutch pitcher.

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 4>I loved when he would destroy the Yankees back in

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 4>the day when he was a Tiger in the playoffs.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Those were some of my favorite moments ever.

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 2>Used to do.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's amazing, So I'm all about it. Top twelve easy, yeah, yeah.

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And the better way to have asked that question is

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>really like where does he sit? That would have pay

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on a better way for me to phrase it, because

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like, obviously we're in and everything like that.

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 2>It's just like when I was doing my ranks.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>You've got your top two tiers, which I think are

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>quite to like roughly your top ten overall sps.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 2>But like the grouping I have him in is out.

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 2>You know what, Let's do this real quick. Let' see

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>if you can do it really quick.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Al Contra, de gram Otanizer and Verlander, those are five.

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I have those five in a grouping. How would you

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>rank those. I actually just gave everybody that's that is

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>my current setup before I released my Redraft rank update.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But al Contra, de Gram, Otani Verlander that is my

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>five of that grouping.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 2>How would you how would you rank those.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Contra? I think I'm going al contra one. Okay, he's

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 4>my guy, He's to be more my guy. Now I'll

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 4>start saying everyone's my guy. By the end of the show,

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 4>it'll be kind of ridiculous, will be nobody left.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 3>But it's a contra.

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Schurzer Otani de Gram and then yeah, yeah, I think, Yeah,

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 4>I think.

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And Verlander fifteen wins currently over on the betting odds

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>here too, he is the lead over McClanahan and it's

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>minus one thirty four Cy Young plus two hund two

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to one with Shane McClanahan. The more that I look

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>at it, you have a sub, I don't think anything

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>else matters, Caper nine anything. If you have close to

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty wins and you've got a sub to Era, you're

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>just gonna take it home. And that's where he's at.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Joe is gonna be absolutely unreal. Thank god,

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not here to have to listen.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>To that a fun thing. In the NL.

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>The gap is quite a bit larger, al Contra minus

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>two thirty with Burns at plus.

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Seven fifty, so seven and a half. So that has been.

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>All but locked up. As far as the UH, the

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>betting market goes, Wow.

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 4>It's crazy, are that against Burns? Burns fallen that much

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 4>this year? I mean, I know he hasn't been as

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 4>dominant as he was.

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Recently, but he's still really good, isn't he.

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, but but I don't. That's not

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 2>a marker of him not being good.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just a it's just a dictation that al Contra

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is so much better than everybody else in.

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>The NL that it's not remotely close.

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>As far as the top ten pitchers on ERA, you've

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>got four coming from the NL, and number two is

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>al Contra with a one eight eight ERA. Corvin Burns

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>has got a two four nine. Burns doesn't have the

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>wins al Contra does. He doesn't have close to the innings.

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>What he does have is the strikeouts. So you have

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a two and a half ERA with the strikeouts, but

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>al Contras in the double he's got double Digi's on

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the wins and he's got a Supreme Era four to

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>two war I think, which is highest of any pitcher currently.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Is double digit's gone double digit's and Corvin Burns a three,

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>so he's almost got a one and a half higher

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>war than him. So that's why the market is just

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>so done and over and it's al contra big time

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>injury front, Kyle Tucker was scratched from Thursday's lineup speaking

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>the Astros with an illness, but he should be returning

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. Actually, i' gonna get this one out of

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the way. Cole calhountin day al fine. Clayton Kershaw left

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Thursday's start the fifth inning with back tightness. He's gonna

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>undergo test on Friday, LBA. The trade deadlines for Fantasy

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>might just they'll be looming. Can you trust Clayton Kershaw

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of this year? Would you be in

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>any way okay to buy? And if you owned, would

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you be getting out as.

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Quick as possible?

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Out. Don't want him, don't have him, I don't. I

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 4>don't have a single share. I don't roster him in

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 4>any league. I can't trust him. He's been he's been alright,

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, he does what he does still, but the injury,

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 4>especially when you hear the back, Chris, you know that's

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 4>bad news. We know the back history with that man

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 4>in LA, so I'm not wanting to do anything with him,

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 4>especially down the stretch.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 3>I try to sell.

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 4>If somebody's like, hey, I believe in him, go make

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 4>a move, even if it's half priced.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Get out of it now.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 4>If you're in a head to head situation where you

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 4>need a lock in a roster to make a playoff push,

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't think you could trust Kershaw right now.

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 3>He won't be there for you.

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 4>And you're gonna need pictures that you can rely on

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 4>post trade deadline because it'll be no more moves for

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 4>you to make. You'll only be able to rely on

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 4>the waiver wire. Depending how big or small your league is,

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 4>it could be, you know, difficult to find someone that's

0:13:58.880 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 4>gonna be useful.

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 2>What's gonna be.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting is if this team a decides to go

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to a six man rotation.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm gonna be really curious about.

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna go back to stretching them out and b

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if Kershawn's out, what is the full move that they

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>do because you have Dustin May who's getting close. Dustin May,

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, is going to have to rehab starts more.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's gonna go full games. I

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>think they would limit his innings the rest of this year.

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Coming off of TJ.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You've got Walker Buehler that is in the wings here

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, and then you've got Bobby Miller. Bobby

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Miller top prospect they ended up not trading, who has

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>been phenomenal this year. I do think in the short

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>term Bobby Miller could be an option as I'm looking

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>through this, because Dustin May is probably still a week

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half before he comes back, and Bueller's a

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. But when you get those guys back healthy,

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this team moves to a six man rotation.

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Bueller on the back end and Dustin May plays a

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>bullpen roll. And what you can do is they could

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>piggyback and they could limit Kershaw's innings, or.

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>They could just hold him back a little bit.

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>So I still have some trust in Kershaw, but it's

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>not in that I'm gonna get full, big, deep games

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>where I'm gonna get a bunch of starts the rest

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of the way through. I think it's gonna be relatively

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>short termed. I think the Dodgers are gonna start manipulating

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on the back half of the year to make sure

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>everything's okay because they have so much depth. Like I said, yeah,

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you literally have what team wouldn't kill to get Walker, Bueller,

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Dustin May, and Bobby Miller into a rotation. And these

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>are like at this point would be six, seven and

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>eight for them.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 4>So can we trust Bueler laugh? Are you confident that

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 4>he's gonna be ready to roll?

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>No, But see that's the thing is I think with

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>all of these guys, they're gonna eat It's gonna they're

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna eat each other up. Like Buehler, you don't want

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to go and have one hundred you know, uh any

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>any pitch games. You don't want to one hundred pitch games.

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to have Dustin May go deep. You're

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna want to have Kurshaw go deep. So

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you could have guys piggybacking on each other

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>six men rotation to lower them. They're just gonna monopolize

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>each other, which is the So could you maximize it

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>if you were in a league that had like maybe

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>minimal starts per week or minimal innings per week. I

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>actually think that Kershaw could still have some value in

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that if you're if you're in that limit when he's

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>out there. But the problem is is I just don't

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>know how trustworthy it's going to be. And uh, he's

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not a trade four. I don't know if I would

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>completely trade off of just for like seventy cents on

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, but I would look to move off of him.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But you're gonna probably have to wait till he returns

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and that that pass. That's that's the trick here. He

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>might allow for bus grade.

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Deadlines are done.

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah for the Dodgers.

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I got a trivia question, and I'm gonna throw

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it out to everybody and then we're gonna.

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Keep moving here.

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>So talking about this era, run two players currently in

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball qualified pictures have an under two ERA.

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>One of those is as old as me, thirty nine

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>years old.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's your trivia question.

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Who are the only pitchers in the al NL modern

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>era since nineteen to post an ELRA under two that

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>qualifies for the league lead at the age thirty nine

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>or older. That's weird how they say that at age

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine or older. I will give you guys the

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>answer here in a little bit go via. You can't

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>answer because he has the sheet. But again the question

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is just since two thousand, thirty nine years or older,

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>who has had.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 2>A sub to era. There are two pitchers.

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>That qualify on that. Justin Ferlander is doing it currently.

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>He will not qualify for this answer. Love to know

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>what you guys think, and I will give you all

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of those. This day in Baseball, nineteen twenty nine, radio

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>station Katie Ka An announcer Harold Arlind provided the first

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>broadcast of a Major League game ever. First broadcast nineteen

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine. Do you ever get like where I see him?

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Like your brain just fries? You're like, oh, they were

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting games in nineteen twenty one, Like I can't even

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>fathom the broad Okay, oh right.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Well I bet I want to help you out here

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 4>because you said nineteen twenty nine, twice twenty one.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's what I thought, all right. I want to

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 3>be clear, Yeah I do.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 2>In nineteen twenty one, I apologize either way.

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>In the nineteen twenties, the thought of anybody like sitting

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in there like.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 3>And there gets to the back like the.

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Thought of like the old timey radio with baseball. Can't

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 2>like one hundred years, that's so cool.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 4>Katie Ka was always something that stood in my mind

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 4>because it was the first radio station that went live period.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, it was the station at the time, and

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 4>baseball was on it and people were sitting in like

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 4>no air conditioning, there was no minimal amenities.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 3>It was dusty. Oh man, wow.

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 2>It's right around prohibition too, was probably no, oh.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was even Yeah, we got bootlegging, we got

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 4>a shy lah boof and Tom Hardy and his boys

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 4>a running liquor across Virginia lines back in the day.

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Philly and Murphy over on across the Pond with the

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>peaky blinders.

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh peaky freakin' we do know.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't get into the twenties, like thinking of

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff, like that they would all wear

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like suits. It would be something that you would be

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like really important, like we're we're on like a live

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>broadcast for a big corporation talking fantasy and wearing T

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>shirts and hoodies, and like they would go through a

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>baseball game and they're wearing suits and cumber buns and

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they're just like.

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, welcome to the game. Welcome to the game.

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Let's hair shay.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we did have one person get one of the

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>answers correct, and let's see dad.

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 2>That was Wonkee Wonky came in. Roger Clemens is one

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 2>of them.

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>He had a one in seven era in two thousand

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and five at the age of forty two. But I

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>don't see anybody. Some good guesses in here. You have

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>sashel Page which was in there. No, this is since

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety. Like I'm sorry, nineteen hundred, nineteen hundred. I've

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>been this last couple of days. I've been such a

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>mushmouth of uh just jumbling words.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 2>But nineteen hundred.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I love you. But you said nineteen ninety

0:19:59.200 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 4>the first time.

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll give people a little bit more here nineteen hundred,

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's I won't give you quite the answer. Yeah

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you got a little bit longer, but I mean the truth.

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're going a little bit deeper. So obviously

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I screwed that up.

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 2>But we had all right, Dicky guesses Kershaw.

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So nineteen hundreds was the full one, and we'll come

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>back to it.

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's go through some stat heroes.

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Clayton Kershaw, he went six, struck out five, giving up

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>only I'm sorry, Justin Verlander kershawsk in my brain. I'm

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>telling you, dude, yesterday I called may Or Nate. I

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>did this on our secret show. I jumbled every single

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>word to another degree. Just I'm gonna slow it down,

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Justin Verlander. Six innings, five strikeouts. Jose Kintana we really

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>liked yesterday as a play, went six, gave up one

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and run struck out seven. We had Nick Pollock on

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and he did tweet out that he was a

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>little worried about where that change up was going and

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. Maybe something that the Cardinals can

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>continuously work through, but that was someone I really liked.

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Springs six innings, six strikeouts, and I believe he

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was one of the top k props on the market.

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it was four and a half and he

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>got to six. Sonny Gray struck out five and five

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>innings and Chris Bovic six with six strikeouts, tour and runs,

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>four hits, go Ba. What was your favorite move of

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the trade deadline for pitchers?

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Did you love Kitana? Did you love Molly?

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there were a lot of really good moves

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>as far as fantasy value, Kitana was one of those

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>really sneaky ones in my mind, and I think he's

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a really good cheap play. Of all of them,

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he's one of them that's actually like out there and available,

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think for some people in leagues. But what was

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>your favorite impactful fantasy pitcher move from the deadline?

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, when Katana was moved from the Pirates to

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 4>the Cardinals, I thought, eh, well that's underwhelming because I

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 4>wasn't buying Kinana this year. I've had a lot of

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 4>people DM me, hit me up, Hey Katana, shuld pick

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 4>him up, sh.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I roll this, And I just was like, what, No,

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 3>this isn't real. I don't like what I I know.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 4>When he was a Pirate, I didn't believe it. But

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 4>now he's a Cardinal. The Cardinals, they get a lot

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 4>out of their pitching, especially they're starting pitching most of

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 4>the time Jordan Hicks has had injuries. There's always exceptions,

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 4>but gosh, that's not my favorite deal. But maybe it

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 4>is going to be the most under the radar.

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Hey, that's a smooth move.

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Because when I was on the trade deadline show that

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 4>you were on the other day with Joe Urco for

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 4>Sports Ethos.

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 3>There was a lot of talk about, boy, the Cardinals

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 3>really are not doing much here.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 4>It seemed like it was, and that was right before

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 4>the Jordan Montgomery trade, just to be clear, to give

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 4>you a chronological view of what was happening. But I think,

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 4>by uh, I think the best pitcher trade are the

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 4>most enjoyable, one most introtriguing. One that I find interesting

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 4>is probably Riise el Iglesias to Atlanta, because I did

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 4>not see that one coming, because particularly to Atlanta, because

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Aja Mentor for the most part, has been really really

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 4>good this year. I know Kelly Jansen has been up

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 4>and down. He said the heart thing was there too.

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 4>It's always going to be there, and they've got a

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of arms of that pen that they could rely on.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 4>But if Ryce Elle is not closing, will he be happy?

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Because you know, Mike Kurlin pointed this out to me

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 4>after the deadline. Rizella had been verbal in the past

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 4>about the fact that he didn't like not being the

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 4>closer and if he's not in the headspace where it's

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 4>good for him, that's gonna be a waste of time

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 4>for the Braves.

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 3>So I find that to be the most.

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.959
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, intriguing one that want I'll be watching the most.

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>King Tana had ten swing and misses that in that

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the two double head kept getting screwed up.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at the matchups forgot they had the

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>double header yesterday in our infamous battle of home run calls.

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Bull crap we had yesterday. But King Tana had ten

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>swing and misses, a beautiful forty three percent whiff rate

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on the curveball yesterday twenty.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Four on the fastball.

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>He had an uptick of almost a mild pro hour

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>on the fastball and the sinker, and he registered only

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>one of his pitches over a thirty csw but it

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>was a curveball, which he threw thirty one percent of

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the time, so really hitting his points. Great defense offense

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>behind him. King Tana is just a.

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Great second half guy. That's cheaper than any of the

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 2>other big names like Malley and stuff. They're not out there.

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give the answer before I get too far ahead,

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>since I had screwed up. Oh and I see someone

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>got it right here, Sables Goggles got it Cy Young,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That is correct the two modern era. I did say

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that when I originally set up, but then I screwed

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>up and said nineteen ninety. But the modern era of

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>pitchers with an under two era that are thirty nine

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>years or older.

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Cy Young had.

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.479
<v Speaker 1>A one nine to nine era in nineteen oh seven

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>at forty and a one two six at nineteen oh

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>eight at forty one years old. So Cy Young, Roger

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Clemens your answers to that trivia question. So good job

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to everybody was able to get that is very, very

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>deep appreciable.

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Went to Michigan, by the way, just that's why I

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 3>was doing this, So.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I forgot you're a Michigan guy.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>On the Hitters, the big positive Hitter Front show you

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Tani we talked about he had two bombs going three

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for five. Ryan McMahon had a homer with five RBI,

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Seth Brown two for two of the homer. Tyler Naquin

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Now with the Mets, he had two homers two RBIs. Yes,

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>they're getting a lot out of their new acquisitions and

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Vogolbach and Naquin I was very critical of like everything

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that they were willing to do and trying to do.

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>And then it was kind of a whimper of Vogelbach

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>and Taylor Naquin. But they're getting a lot out of

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>these guys right now.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 3>You will be mistaken.

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 4>My friend Tyler Naquin is gonna be that move that

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 4>is not that big, but it's gonna be so clutch.

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 4>I see him already as a series MVP. Seriously, he's

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 4>gonna be the NLCS MVP. He'll come out and do

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 4>what he does because he's so streaky and when he

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 4>gets rolling, he can match the ball and he might

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 4>usurp a job there flat out. I know eduard O

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 4>Escobar is gonna have his role reduced a bit here.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 4>There's opportunity for Niquin to just be a starter. I

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 4>actually held on to him in a twelve team league

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 4>despite the trade, even though I was bummed when I

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 4>initially saw the deal, I thought about it and I said,

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 4>you know what, I like this offense. I like Naquin.

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm not bailing here, so I'm hanging in there, and

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 4>I think you guys would be wise to do the

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 4>same good stuff.

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>On the couple other big positive Ramon Lariano didn't get

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>traded at a homer four RBIs, Brandon Lao had a

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>bomb with three RBIs Hoskins homer Salvi Homer, Maldonado Homer.

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Some stat zeros. Kyle Wright gave up.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Four homers unfortunately six earned runs in his last start.

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Musgrove big extension, not break out a big output

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>four and two thirds, six earned runs, six strikeouts. Jason

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>junk got lit up a spinel lit up five earned runs.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Paul Blackburn, I know Mike Mayer wherever he is right now,

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is excited four and runs in five, and Poli sack

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. On the hitter front, Sea Suzuki in the

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>doubleheader had four strikeouts, going one for seven. Trent Grisham,

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Matt Chapman, Hapscope Yelich, and Tim Anderson all with three strikeouts.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim Anderson with an zero for five performance. No bueno, Hey, friends,

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>how about some home run calls and an updated home

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>run leader board. Bam right there, that is what I

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>was talking about yesterday. We have got a race going.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Would you look at that? Dee Blum and High Cobby

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>with thirty seven bombs tied at the top Night King

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of the North thirty six. Mike Mayer is right on

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>their tails. You've got a whole bunch of other guys

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>in here that are chomping just biting at the ankles

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to get up on the board.

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 2>But yesterday was the slow day.

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we only had one person on the front

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>here board actually get a Homer Trey Turner. I was incorrect,

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know, what the hell did I even have yesterday?

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>After all that stupid cardinal drama. Can't do doubleheader d

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So I went with Matt Olsen. He didn't hit anything,

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>even though Goldie did hit one. But what does that

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>matter because our dear friend Nick Pollock nailed it with

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Mooki Betts, so we got that on the board. So

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>good luck today with your home run calls. Let's do

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a few little bets here go via and I'm gonna

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>throw some out. Tell me if you like any of them.

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>This is by our friends over at bet MGM, which yes,

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys can see.

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 3>It right below.

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>If you use the promo code leading Off right over,

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like under Govie.

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Just go check them out.

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Under leading Off use a promo code, you can get

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a one thousand dollars free risk free bet over at

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM. And they got some pretty good odds over

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>there as well on a lot of their props, So

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>go and check them out today, download the app, go

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to the website, doesn't matter, just use promo code leading

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>off the top two bets on the Betting Pros cheat sheet.

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>If you guys, go and go betty pros dot com.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Check out the mlbprop cheat sheet, which I think even

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>if you don't use it, it is such a cool tool

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>because it's going to identify their projectional differences that you

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:18.479
<v Speaker 1>can then go and study.

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I've been saying that for a long time.

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But they're top two bets of the day for total

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>bases mookie bets. They've got at one and a half

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>on DraftKings. It's a little bit, not a ton of juice.

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>It's almost even money minus one fifteen. They got to

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>projected over three mookie bets total bases. Who's our home

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>run called yesterday? And I Anderson on strikeouts, but it's

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's low. It's only three and a half versus

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the Mets, and it's minus one ten on DraftKings.

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 2>He's projected at five. My two that I dig. But

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I gotta tell you, I am ice cold. I could

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 2>not be cold.

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I am Bobby Drake, I am the Iceman. Just go

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.239
<v Speaker 1>against me. You should for the last two weeks. I

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>could not be colder. Horrible decision. Just bet against me,

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you're gonna play out. I don't know when

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it'll change. Maybe it's today, it was not yesterday. Outside

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of the goldie home run call Tyler Malley, I like

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on strikeouts he has at five and a half. They

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>project him just a tiny bit over, but it's big

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>plus money at one twenty with his new team with

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota going up against Toronto, which can get strikeout happy.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And then I like the Schwarbs.

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Schwarber total bases is also plus money today. These

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>are both on the sugar House going up against Josiah Gray.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>He's leading off projected three total bases one and a half.

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Those are my two favorite Schwarber and Malley. You saw

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the other two from betting pros. What do you think,

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael or any of these you dig?

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I like the Ian Anderson call because I think he's

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 4>gonna be much better in the second half. We saw

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 4>a nice performance recently. I think he had nine k's

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 4>in that outing where he's like.

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow, look at that.

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 4>He mixed more of his he changed out pitch, mixed

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 4>a bit, and I was like, Okay, this is good

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 4>because I've been hoping that Ian Anderson would stay true

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 4>to himself from last year. He was now a dominant

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 4>strikeout picture. Last year, I think it was a hair

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 4>under ninek's per nine.

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 3>But I like that prop. I'm all about that. Let's

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 3>do it.

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Do that one, Donnie.

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I can promise you next week, the Princess Tiara will return.

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't have Joe's crown.

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>My Princess Tiari is here, not in the mood to

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>do it today, but I will bring it back next week.

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I promise Wonky as well.

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And at the end, I'm going to tell you we

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>got the schedule up for next week of all of

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>our great guests. We're going to get into more of

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a regular schedule for everybody. But the Princess Tiara will return, Donnie.

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So don't you worry, my friend. Thank God, Thank God.

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Right quick DFS stuff. Just letting you guys know some

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting numbers. Frama Valdez nine to nine on DK, Eric

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Lawer eight thousand, and Tyler Miley eight point seven. If

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for some pictures on Fandel Framber's ten to four,

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Eric Lawer's nine to seven, and some the only implied

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>run totals over today. You got three teams Philly, Houston,

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and Milwaukee if you want to take advantage.

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Are you a big DFS guy? I never remember, goviare you?

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Actually, I'll be doing like daily picks for Baseball Props

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 4>on FTN, so that's gonna be something I'll be doing

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 4>on the RAG, which I haven't been posting publicly, but

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 4>I do dabble a bit. But I was DFS heavy

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 4>last year, learned a lot of harsh lessons. I even

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 4>bade like a two hundred dollar subscription for some website.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 4>I was so in im like all right, I'm gonna

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 4>pay this and I'm gonna be the DFS master. And

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 4>there was one night I remember very much, in particular

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Alex Kiroloff and Alejandro Kirk. This was last year when

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 4>they were still playing in Danied in the Blue Jays,

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 4>and they each had double dong nights and I started

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 4>both of them, and I was.

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Like, oh my god, this is my big moment. I

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 3>played in like a bigger tame alive. I know I

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 3>was playing in a bigger GPP too.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 4>I could have won like a thirty thousand dollars prize

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 4>and I still didn't even place.

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 3>It was very sad, and that's how I remember my

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 3>DF experience.

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Baseball is brutal DFS, big, big NFL DFS, gouy, but

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 4>baseball it's a lot more challenging.

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, it's a rough go home run calls

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for the night. Oh would you look at this mayor?

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Me and him are on the same one. I want

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to point out to the crowd that I put my

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>home run call before him.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with Kyle Schwarber today, who I talked about,

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>got a couple.

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Of bombs as far as history goes more at bats

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>at the leadoff spot. Gimme, gimme Kyle Schwarber, and Mike

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Maher is doing the same thing.

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Not that I was going to catch him.

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I though, did pick up two homers this week. The

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>wonkiest of Penguins is going with Jordan Alvarez. Michael Gobi,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a home run call today? We did

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>have two of the four guests this week I think

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>have had and hit home run calls. So would you

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like to make it an over five hundred for the

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>guest spot this week?

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 4>I absolutelyely would love to make a home run call here.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 3>And that's vlyball de bla Phil. This one is god.

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 4>See there's my home run call. I'm hilarious. But how

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 4>about I know, I don't know how I do it.

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 4>It's incredible. I'm going with Patrick Wisdom today against the

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 4>returning Edward Crabera coming off the il first start.

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Is he healthy? Will he be good?

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Max Meyer only lasted ten pitches, so we'll see. But

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 4>I think at Wrigley, I don't know how much the

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 4>wind is blown. I would like to know that, but

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 4>that's my call. Patty Wisdom. He crushes the baseball and

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 4>he's gonna go yambo today.

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I think I had some personal issues that he was

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 2>gone as well.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael Govie on Twitter Mjgovier Any last things to plug?

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, you're gonna be over at FTN coming

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>here now, so probably just follow the Twitter. You can

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>check out the Plazo podcast. Anything else to plug?

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, we got a free discord. It's fun too.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.479
<v Speaker 4>You guys have home run calls. That's a great idea.

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 4>I wish I had thought of that myself, but we

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 4>still have a lot of fun.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 3>We do have a channel dedicated exclusively to the movie Heat,

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 3>also a movie. It was just so stupid. We haven't

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 3>own channel exclusively for people who love Russell Crow.

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 4>So there's also baseball stuff mixed into the Discord's free

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 4>check it out. It's all pinned at the top of

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 4>the plaza podcast Twitter, two l's, two z's that's how

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 4>you know how to find it. And Yes, FTN network,

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm going strong. There'll be some football stuff tonight too.

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 4>Me and Blatt Seddler doing a live football thing tonight

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 4>at eleven thirty pm. If you're interested in the football

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 4>side of things, Beat the Gut tonight at eleven thirty.

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Fun stuff friends. I'm gonna go reset. My brain for

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the week unbelievable. I mean, like we started pretty strong

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and then my brain just shut.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Down at the back half of the week.

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But we are gonna reset and we got a strong

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>one coming up next week. We've got Wonky back. I

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>think Kelly is gonna be on pretty much all Wednesdays.

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Bubba is gonna be my Tuesday guy. We got a

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>couple new faces in there. Chris Clegg I think is

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>our Friday guy. He'll be coming on. Schefter who I've

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>actually never even chatted with, will be on Monday, and

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>David Mendelssohn. Mindy is gonna be on with me on Thursday,

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>not the regular schedule, but we're gonna get into a

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>regular schedule next week with a bunch of great guests,

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully you guys are gonna come and hang out.

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for putting up with me all week.

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is week one in the books without

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Joe Pi Zapia, but hopefully I did you right. Outside

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of my completely shutting down friends, have a fantastic weekend.

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week to do it all over again.

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 2>It's leading off. That's Govie. I'm Welsh Peace friends.

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye,