WEBVTT - Tech News: Nuclear Sabotage and Pizza Robots

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And this is the

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Tuesday, April twenty one. Let's get started.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>The Guardian has a pretty incredible piece about a former

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook data scientist named Sophie Jong and her attempts to

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>bring attention to state backed misinformation campaigns that used Facebook

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>as a platform. She was fired from Facebook allegedly due

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to poor performance, though Young says that it was because

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>she was spending so much time trying to show how

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>organized groups were creating propaganda campaigns on Facebook, so she

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't able to spend as much time on her normal duties.

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>However you want to frame that that was why she

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>was fired. And she wrote a farewell post, which is

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>common practice at Facebook, and it was nearly eight thousand

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>words long, which is not common practice at Facebook, and

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of to make her case. She created

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a separate website as well and published her farewell post

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>there because the original one was on an internal Facebook forum.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>She wanted to make sure it existed in a separate

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>location because she suspected that perhaps the company would delete

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>her post. It did, in fact deleted the post, at

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>least temporarily, and then allegedly Facebook pressured the hosting service

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that Jong was using for her website to take that

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>post offline too, which is a big yikes from me.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>But now Jong is coming forward and supplying various news

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>organizations with information about how state backed efforts pushing propaganda

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>were relying on Facebook and how Facebook leadership kind of

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed it to have open and did not make any

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>significant moves to stop it until it became, you know,

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of politically necessary. Her argument is that these actions

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>or in actions from you know, Facebook management, strengthened authoritarianism

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in multiple parts of the globe. Jong says that the

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>incident that kind of started this all off and alerted

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>her to the problem was with Facebook pages that were

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>supporting the President of Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernandez. She said

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>that over the course of six months, his posts had

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>received more than fifty nine thousand likes, but upon closer inspection,

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>she saw that nearly eighty percent of those likes were

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>from accounts that didn't represent real people. Instead, somebody presumably

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on her. Nandez's team had created hundreds of Facebook page accounts.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So Facebook pages are meant for organizations and businesses, right,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>They don't represent a person so much as an entity,

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and a single administrator was overseeing hundreds of these pages

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>and use them to boost likes on posts because Facebook

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>pages can interact with posts the same way that normal

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Facebook accounts can. And then they also would post things

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that were praising her Nandez on that Facebook page and

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have other Facebook pages within that big network boost that

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>particular post, giving it lots of likes and thus elevating it.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And the effect was kind of a rising tide. It

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>lifts all disinformation as Facebook's algorithm concludes that this is

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>material that's driving engagement. You see a lot of likes

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and shares and stuff that shows engagement. Now, granted that

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>engagement is coming from a bunch of Facebook pages that

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>are run by the same person, but on surface, it

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's leget That meant that Facebook would then

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>serve that up to an even wider audience. While she

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>initially faced relucts from Facebook's management regarding taking any action

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>towards this, ultimately the company would remove lots of accounts

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and admitted that Joan was correct to push for it.

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>But despite that progress, she discovered that she often encountered

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>opposition or at the very least, apathy when it came

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>to addressing similar problems in lots of other countries. She

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>saw that this was not unique to Honduras. It was

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>happening in lots of places, particularly places with more authoritarian

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>leaders in power. So she found instances in which these

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>various regimes were using Facebook pages to heap criticism and

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>abuse on political opponents, not just boost their own message,

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but to degrade anyone who opposed them. She advocated a

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>change in the company's rules to close this sort of

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>loophole that Facebook pages created for these different people. And

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>as it stands, you can still make as many Facebook

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>pages as you'll like, and they still interact with other posts,

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>just like a normal Facebook account would. She noted that

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for poorer countries with smaller numbers of Facebook users, she

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>rarely got very much support in doing anything about the problem.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>She said it was pretty clear that if the country

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>were wealthy, then the company was more likely to do

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>something about it. If the country had a larger number

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of people using Facebook, then it was more likely to

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>do something about it, but it wasn't the same across

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the board. I really recommend reading the article. It is

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>titled How Facebook let Fake Engagement Distort Global Politics? A

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>whistleblowers account. It's by Julia Carey Wong, and like I said,

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's at the Guardian. It's a very good read. I've

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>only given a tiny summation of some of the stuff

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that's in that article, and it is fascinating and infuriating.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>In similar news, the Guardian also reports that Facebook, after

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of pressure and more than a year

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of delays, removed more than sixteen thousand groups that were

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>posting fake reviews for products and services. Essentially, what it

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>sounds like is that these groups were outright buying positive

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>reviews for their own products and sometimes buying negative reviews

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for competitors, so paying someone to leave various reviews to

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>try and boost numbers. It's pretty schevy stuff. This all

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>came out of the UK. I mean that should be

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously with the Guardian, but the UK's Competition and Market

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>authority pushed Facebook to act on this way back in January.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>But clearly since I reporting on it, and we're now

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in April of one, you could say that Facebook failed

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to act in a timely manner. The CMA released a

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>statement that said, quote after we intervened again, the company

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>made significant changes, but it is disappointing it has taken

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>them over a year to fix these issues. End quote.

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I might have to do a full episode of out

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.679
<v Speaker 1>fake reviews and followers and such in a future tech Stuff,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so stay tuned for that. You know. Back in two

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the Natan's nuclear reactor facility in Iran was hit with

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a specific type of malware called stucks net. We actually

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>did a tech Stuff episode about it. So this malware

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>had a very specific goal. It was to change the

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>rotational speeds of centrifuges at the nuclear power plant, and

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of those centrifuges was to refine uranium. Refined

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>uranium is the fuel for nuclear power plants, but if

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you refine it enough, you could potentially use that uranium

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to make a nuclear weapon. And it turned out that

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the CIA and Israel had collaborated on creating and deploying

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>this malware, finding a way to get installed in the

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>facility despite the fact that the facility had an air gap,

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that is the facilities, critical systems did not connect out

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to the internet. Stucks net would spread far beyond Iran though.

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>It kind of just that dormant everywhere else because it

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>had that specific purpose, and it set the Iranian nuclear

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>program back a few years. Okay, but what does this

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>have to do with today? Well, if you flash forward,

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like Israel has had a hand in another

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>tech attack designed to disrupt the Natan's nuclear reactor. This time,

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians report that someone carried out a cyber attack

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that sent the Natan's facility into a blackout, and it's

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a move that the Iranian officials say also caused extensive

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>damage to the electricity grid. As I record this, Israel

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>hasn't denied involvement in what Iranians are calling sabotage. Israel

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and Iran have been hostile to one another for a

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>very long time, with both countries striking out against the

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>other for several years. Speaking of nuclear power, the Natan's plant,

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like all practical nuclear plants that are commercial facilities today,

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>runs on nuclear fission. That is the process that we

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>rely on to generate electricity. Boils down to heavy atoms

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>get split apart and they release a lot of energy,

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>which is then used to generate electricity. I won't go

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>into the full detail that it's an episode all by itself,

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but there are scientists working hard to create practical nuclear

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>fusion reactors which would take to light atoms like as

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in lighter ones on the lighter into the elemental table

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and then fuse those two light atoms together, which also

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>releases a lot of energy. And what's more, you're not

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about the dangerous radiation that you would get with

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>fusion reactors, Like the material you're using isn't radioactive in

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that sense, then you're not generating radioactive waste. It could

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>lead to some transformational changes in the way that countries

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>meet their energy requirements. With working fusion reactors, a country

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>could conceivably go entirely independent for its energy needs, which

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in turn really boosts national security. You're not dependent upon

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>on some other nation for say oil. But fusion reactors

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>require a lot of energy just to get started, and

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you're typically talking about pumping in energy that is equivalent

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to millions of degrees of heat. And that means that

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>while scientists have created fusion reactors that can produce energy

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>from fusion reactions, the big barrier is that it took

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>as much or nearly as much energy to start the

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>reaction as you get out of that reaction. Now, that

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of ratio clearly doesn't work, and it doesn't work

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>if you want to produce electricity at any real scale.

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're pouring in as much energy as you're getting out,

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>then you're not really achieving anything. But a company called

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>t A E Technologies says that it anticipates a working

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>commercial fusion reactor by the end of the decade. That

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is exciting stuff. And yeah, it's still several years away,

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>but considering the amount of energy and computing power needed

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to get this just right, it's still really impressive. My

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>hope is that T A E. Technologies is absolutely right

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>about this, and that by we see fusion reactors transform

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>how we get our electricity, it could really make an

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>enormous contribution to countries that are trying to leave fossil

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>fuels behind, and it could power all those companies that

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it plans to go carbon neutral or carbon negative in

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the near future. Microsoft is buying a company called Nuance,

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>which is in the AI and speech recognition industry. Nuance

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>produces a type of software called Dragon, which uses machine

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>learning to tweak itself as it interacts with a particular

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>speaker as a person who is speaking. So, in other words,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a speech recognition approach that improves the more

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>someone works with it. The system comes to recognize that

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>person's accent, their speech patterns, pronunciation, etcetera. Apple's serri relies

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in part on the Dragon software, though to what degree

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>remains Apple's secret sauce or secret Apple sauce, Secret Apple Sauce.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting off track, sorry. Microsoft is paying nearly twenty

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars princely some for Nuance. The only acquisition Microsoft

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>has paid more for was linked In back in that

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>set them back around twenty six billion bucks or so.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>What does Microsoft plan to do with Nuance? Well, I

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>imagine we'll see some tight integrations of Dragon software with

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>other Microsoft products such as Office three. Perhaps will see

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>more speech to text applications. If those are good enough,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll just dictate my notes to my computer instead

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of you know, typing them all out. But then I'll

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have to say the same stuff twice, with the second

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>time being you know, on Mike for recording. Maybe I

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>should think that through again. But seriously, this could be

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>an evolutionary step in accessibility, and it could really bolster

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the features found in other Microsoft products. So I'm very

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>curious to see how it gets integrated moving forward. Mark

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>German of Bloomberg reports that Apple is working on a

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>smart speaker product that will have an iPad as a display.

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>So I guess it's a home pod with a view.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Home Pod, in case you don't know, is Apple's smart

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>speaker they launched that they have since discontinued the original

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>home pod, that the HomePod many still exists, I think.

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>The German says that at least one of the concepts

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for the new speaker included away for the screen the

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>little iPad on it to rotate around the top of

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the speaker so that the screen can always face you.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So they imagine around speaker with a screen attached to it,

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and as you move from one side of the room

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to the other, the screen actually rotates around the speaker

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to always face you. Um. Sounds kind of creepy. Really,

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>also sounds very similar to the Amazon Echo show Tin,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>which I admit was a product that I didn't even

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>know existed until I was looking into this. German says

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Apples also working on a sort of Apple TV

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>slash soundbar type device that also has a camera incorporated

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in it. So it makes me think of a kind

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of a combination of things. Parts streaming media service, kind

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 1>of like a Roku, part sound system, so like your

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>traditional sound bar, and part video interface like the old

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Connect. Though reportedly this camera would be used for

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff like making video calls, but not you know, gest

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>your controls necessarily. I'm not super deep in the Apple ecosystem,

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so while I think these technologies are kind of cool,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that I have a place for them

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in my life. But they do sound really neat. What

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm really waiting on to learn more about is Apple's

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>augmented reality technology that's been in development for a while.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting to see more about that. That's what has

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>me excited. If you're keeping track of all the services

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and apps that Google has introduced and then subsequently abandoned,

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>get ready to add another one. The company has confirmed

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it will shut down the Shopping app on iOS and

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Android devices by eight June, with much of that functionality

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>closing down in the weeks leading up to that. If

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you've never used the Shopping app, it's an app that

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>tells you where you can shop for specific products. The

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>app leveraged Google's search to come through online stores and

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>pulling up results that hopefully are relevant to whatever it

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is you're searching for. Google will continue to support the

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Google Shopping website, which you know does the same thing,

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and you could just access that using a browser on

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>your smartphone and bypass the app entirely. We're also likely

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to see the shopping features included into other Google products,

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you were to just search for a specific

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>item on a Google phone, for example, you might get

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a shopping link pop up as one of your potential

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, search results in that respect. But yeah, iOS

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and Android shopping app from Google is going out of business.

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>If you live in Houston, Texas, and if you order

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a pizza from Dominoes, there's a chance your pizza will

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>arrive at your front door courtesy of a robot. Domino's

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>has partnered with a startup company called neuro in u

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>r O to test this out in a pilot or

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess technically a pilot less program. The robot looks

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a manature van or bus. It is autonomous.

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>It's called R two, which is cute. It has cameras, radar,

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and thermal imaging to help detect its environment and let

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it get around, and the robots precious cargo is protected

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>by an electronic lock which can be disengaged if you

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>type in the proper pen which is good because I

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>know that here in America robots traveling by themselves don't

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>always do so well. Rest in peace, Hitchbot gone, but

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not forgotten. And this is not going to be a

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>citywide program either. It's not like if you live in

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Houston you're going to be able to access this. It's

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>actually a very small experiment. Only the Domino's p It's

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a joint in Woodland Heights on Houston Avenue is participating

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in this experiment so far. And even then, the robot

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>will only be delivering during certain times on certain days.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>But on those days and during those times, residents of

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Woodland Heights and Houston might be able to get up

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>piping hot zo delivered courtesy of a robot that almost

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't wish to conquer the planet, assuming of course,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that the annoid hasn't found a way to compromise the robot.

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up the news for Tuesday A one.

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>If you have suggestions or topics I should cover in

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff, let me know. Reach out via Twitter. The

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is Text Stuff hs W and

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:49.959
<v Speaker 1>now I'll talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Th