WEBVTT - DeBlasio Reveals Plans to Shut Infamous Rikers Prison (Audio)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Even if you don't live in New York, you probably

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:05.439
<v Speaker 1>know about Riker's Island if you watch Law and Order episodes.

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the jail complex that the prosecutors on the show

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>often threatened to send suspects to, and where they often

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>plea bargain with the incarcerated. It's also a jail notorious

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>for extraordinary violence and brutality. A report in April by

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>a federal monitor said guards use brutal force against inmates

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at an alarming rate, and the fights among inmates have grown.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>The city has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>improve conditions at Rikers to no avail now. After increasing

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 1>public and political pressure to close down Rikers, New York

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>City Mayor Bill Deblasio has come out with a plan

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to shut the jail down over a ten year span,

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but there are a lot of ifs to making it work.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>My guests are Michael Mushlin, professor at Pace University Law School,

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jonathan Blanks, a researcher at the Cato Institute. Let's

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>begin with both of your reactions to de Blasio's plan. Michael,

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 1>why don't you start? Sure? Well, I think it's a

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>very sensible plan that I think is in the interests

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of all New Yorkers. Rikers Island really has become a

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>notorious place. I called it an OpEd I wrote recently,

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>a devil's island. Uh. It's isolated, it's violent, it's it's

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it's wasteful. And I think the decision to close it,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>while it's very difficult to accomplishes, a very sensible one,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will benefit all of us. And

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the mayor's responding to a report of a

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>commission that studied this subject for a while, and that

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that was head but headed by the Chief Judge of

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the New York State, the ex Chief Judge of the

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>retired Chief Judge of New York State that recommended this,

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and um and uh, I think it's a uh. I

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>applaud the mayor for endorsing the report of the Litman report.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Jonathan, what's your reaction. I too was impressed

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>with the report. I think his plan is it correctly

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>identifies a lot of the problems with Rikers and Jail's

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>generally it's not a perfect plan, but the goals, the

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>goals that he lifted to, you know, find different ways

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the number of people that are going to

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>be in there in the first place is very laudable. Um.

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things that isn't quite mentioned

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in the plan, but I think people need to think

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about is using a cage as a remedy to socialis

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily the best thing. It should be the

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>last uh, the last remedy to UH for people who

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>commit crimes. If people can be released on their own

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>recognizance as the people are, that's good. But there's still

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a very large population there that are subject to these abuses,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think finding more and better ways, some of

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>which were outlined in his plan are is a very

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>good step forward. The plan calls for reducing the inmate

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>population down to five thousand. New York City had a

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>record low crime rate last year, So Michael, how will

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that be done? Well? First of all, I think that

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it's important to point out that most of the people

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on Rikers Island have not been convicted of any crime.

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>They're they're being held while awaiting trial. It's also important

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to note that that way, that's that over two thirds

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of them only spent about thirty days in Rikers Island.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>So the notion of this is we're not talking about

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a prison where people have been convicted and and they're

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>being sent to They're being sent to prison for rehabilitation,

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>for punishment, for for for safety of the community. So

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing to talk about. And so really the

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>way so and that short period of time that so

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>many people spend there may not seem that significant, but

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a highly disruptive, it's highly expensive, and we're punishing

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>people who haven't been convicted. Um. So it's really important

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to try to figure out smart ways to reduce that

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that um that population, and it can be done. There

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>really are three basic techniques that we've already begun to

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>implement and that have led to a significant reduction. At

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>its height, there were twenty thousand people that were held

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>on Rikers Island about twenty years ago and now we're

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>down to about ten thousand, and this plan is to

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>reduce it to five thousand. And the way to do

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that is to is to come up with alternatives to bail,

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to reform the bails system, to figure out rather than

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>putting a dollar amount on who who goes to prison,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>who goes to I'm sorry, who goes to jail, and

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>who goes to Rikers Island to make assessments, realistic assessments

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of really who is going to need to be detained

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>rather than just put a number on it. You know

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that the number is usually around two thousand dollars, and

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>if a person has that two thousand dollars, they buy

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>their way out. That that really doesn't make sense in

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>two ways. There are people that can't afford the two

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars and then they go to prison. They go

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to jail essentially because they're poor, or there are people

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>there's some people for whom we don't really we don't

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.559
<v Speaker 1>We don't want them to buy their way out because

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>they're either not going to come back to trial or

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>because maybe they posed a thread. I've been talking with

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael Mushlin, professor at Pace University Law School, and Jonathan Blanks,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>are researcher at the Cato Institute about New York City

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Build Blasio's plan to shut down Rikers Island Prison

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>over a ten year spam and there are a lot

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of ifs involved in this. Jonathan. An independent commission created

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>by the City Council that we were talking about before,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>call for state law reforms such as reclassifying criminal offenses

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>such as fair evasion, marijuana possession in public you and

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>gravity knives as civil offenses bill. The mayor has not

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>said has not approved that. Is that something that we

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>should be thinking about. Yeah, I mean, if you're going

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to think about changing in jail policy, you also have

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to think of the inputs enough going to be policing policy.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So when the police are out there giving summons is

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>or making arrests for whatever it is, you know, they

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>if they continue to use the criminal law to move

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>them into jail, that's just going There's nothing uh rockers

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>can do about that if they have to take them in.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So making these civil offenses can reduce the jail population,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>reduce the stress on trying to find places to house

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>these people. And Michael, is this really then a plan

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for criminal justice reform as well? Well? I I think

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>it is, and I think we could even make it

0:06:55.240 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>more so Actually, um um, when way I think we

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>could really make it much more comprehensive is if we

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>use if we use the land that is available on

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Rikers Island two to bring back people who are serving

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>prison sentences in far flung places in New York State,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of New York State, New York City people who are

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to prison are sentenced two hundred miles away from

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>New York. Many of those people are parents. There's a

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and five thousand children who have who have a

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>parent in prison. Uh. All the research shows that if

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>those people were held whole closer to the communities from

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>which they come, we would get far more benefit, uh,

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>far less recidivism, far more reintegration into the community. And

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>so I proposed, and I wrote an OpEd on this

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that was published by the Daily News about a month ago,

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that once we closed Rikers Island for preacher detainees, we

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>should seriously consider using that that location, which is remote

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for pre trial detainees, but is ironically not at all

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>remote for people who are serving New York City people

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>are serving prison sentences, to create to build prisons, to

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>use that space for for prisoners. Okay, speaking of prisoners, uh,

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan in new jails. The there's a question that maybe

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a hurdle, and that's building smaller jails in each of

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the boroughs to replace Rikers. And there are no specific

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>details on that in Doblasio's plan. Isn't that bound to

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>bring opposition from residents in those boroughs? Most certainly. I

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>mean would be sort of not in my backyard quintessential

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>example as jails. No one wants them in their in

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>their neighborhoods. But we really have to think about what

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do, what they're trying to do here,

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and that is, you know, trying to make community based

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>system for for rehabilitation and to just basically the community

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>takes care of its own people. And I think that's

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. I think it's going to be along um,

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, it's going to be a long haul trying

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to convince people that is the right thing to do.

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you can convey the benefits of

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily throwing people in cages, getting people into rehab

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>getting the mental health uh services that they need, that

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>communities may may become more open to these uh these

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>new buildings. And Michael, this also contains actually one billion

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars in capital improvements just to keep the infrastructure at

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Rikers over the next ten years. Is that a lot

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to spend on a prison that's going to be, you know,

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>not used any longer. Well, I think two things. One

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is I think that can fit into what I said

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>earlier that a lot of money to spend. But Riker's

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Island right now is really a very dangerous place where

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>people are really being harmed significantly, not only the people

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that are being held there, but the staff that works there.

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And so it's really imperative that we meet minimal constitutional

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>standards wherever we hold people. And so I think that

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 1>that spen, that that expenditure is essential, especially since we're

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about it at least a decade UH in the transition.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>But if we were to use that money to renovate

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>those facilities, we would then have places that we could

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>use for for prisoners. The other thing that I would

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>say about locating the jails that that are going to

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be UH needed in the in the boroughs outside of

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Riker's Island, I want to second what Jonathan said about

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that and also say we already have people in in

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>jails in the local boroughs, so this isn't a new thing. Also,

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we would we love locating them in areas near courts,

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's not talking about putting them into into purely

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>residential purely residential areas. And also the other thing to

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>say is that most of these people are non violent people.

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 1>So Jonathan, what is your opinion about whether the closure

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of rikers within ten years is likely to happen. Um, well,

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a ten years is a long time in politics shift

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and if there's like an increasing crime, or if there's

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, a new mayor that comes in it doesn't

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>want to do it, obviously, that's UH that that could

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>change things directly. I don't know how likely it is,

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>but I hope, I hope it happens. And I think

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>any any way to try and lower the number of

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>people in there is UH an attempt worth making. And Michael,

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>about a minute left, what's your opinion about whether this

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>can be done in ten years. I think it can

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely be done in ten years. I think it's going

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to take the will to do it. I it's really

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>so wonderful that we have an elected officials that that's

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>running the City of New York who has committed to

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>doing this, and the City Council is also on board,

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's gonna you know, I think if

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>we have a commitment to making a more sensible, safer,

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>SMARTYR system, one that really benefits the people of New York,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we've shown as a city we

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>can make these things happen. All right, Well, thank you both.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>That's Michael Mushland, professor at Pace University Law School, and

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Blanks, a research at the Cato Institute. That's it

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg Law. Will be back Monday

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>at one pm Wall Street Time, thanks to our producer

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>David Suckerman and our technical director Chris try Comey. Coming

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>up next Bloomberg Markets with Carol Masser and Corey Johnson. So, Corey,

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>what's coming up. We've got a really cool guest CEO

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>company called service Master. It's a five billion dollar company

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that does a lot of sort of disaster response, home warranty, residential,

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>commercial stuff. Really fascinating company. We're gonna talk about CEO

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>and just a little bit we'll be listening. That's Bloomberg

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Markets with Carol Masser and Corey Johnson. You've been listening

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Law. I'm June Grosso. This is Bloomberg