WEBVTT - Lagging Demand for Nvidia and Apple's M&A Slowdown (Podcast)

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Jacket, San Francisco, and this is

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. In video

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>misses on revenue by more than a billion dollars, assigned

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>demand for PCs, gaming consoles and other electronics might be

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>drying up after a two year pandemic boom. We'll talk

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>about just how long the slump could last. Plus, Apple

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is being picky when it comes to M and A,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>why the iphonemaker has slowed down its buying spree despite

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a one seventy nine billion dollar war chest. And is

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook really the underdog now or are we underestimating it

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>will count the way in which TikTok still doesn't even

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>come close to Meta. All of that in a moment,

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but first, sticking with in video, the graphics chip giant

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>missing its own quarterly revenue projections by more than a

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars evidence that demand for electronics components is drying

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>up after a two year pandemic boom boom. Brooks I

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 1>and King, who covers all things semiconductors, joins US now

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and wow, a billion dollars miss is not something you

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>normally associate with Jentsen Wong and in video what happened? Yeah,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's not a surprise that it happened,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>given what Intel had said, what am D had said,

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>what other PC related kind of components make as it said.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think the extent to which they fell short

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of rapidity with which demand has obviously

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>fallen away has obviously caused a lot of concern. And

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what the analysts and investors have been talking about today.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Why did they get their own projections so wrong? Yeah,

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they said, oh, it just happens, how quickly

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it fell off, so so rapidly that we didn't see

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>this coming. The concern, or, if you like, the underlying

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>fish is that it's not just consumers and not just

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>gaming related, but also this crypto dependency that they said

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that they've shared, Our chips aren't good for crypto mining anymore,

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to worry about that. But then we

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>see cryptocurrency has obviously been to a rough time, no

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>reason to be mining in a lot of situations. Now,

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe those cards are coming back into the gaming market.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>They also pre announced. I mean, how unusual? Is this

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>relatively unusual? But again, to be fair to Nvidio, at

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 1>least they did. One of the big themes on Intel's

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of disaster at call last week was why didn't

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you pre announce when it was so bad? You know,

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>investors don't like surprises. The fact that they did is,

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>as you say, unusual. But at least they're being forth

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>right and they're being given some credit by at least

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the analysts for doing that. So are they

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>clearing inventory? And is this something that will be cleared,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, say by the next quarter. That's that's the

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>positive scenario. The positive scenario says, this is what the

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>chip industry does. They over build, They get it wrong.

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>They can't match these supply with short term demand movements.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>As soon as we clear out the inventory, we're back

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to normalize situation. Everything's okay. That's a positive picture. The

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>negative is like consumer demand. Meantime, they've been investing in

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the server market and that's actually helped kind of cushion

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the blow. Right, Yeah, no, absolutely right. That's why they're

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the world's most valuable chip company because they've built this

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>incredible service business. But even that missed today. So what

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 1>does they say about the broader state of the chip industry.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, did anybody expect the pandemic boom to to

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>last indefinitely? I mean, come on, you're remembering it perfectly.

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>How many times, right did we talk about this? How

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>many times did chip an industry CEOs tell you things

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>are different now? The PC market is a much higher level.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Everything's okay. Every household needs three or four PCs. Everything's

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>going will be okay. And here we are in the

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>middle of two two saying that's absolutely not true. All right,

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and King, thank you for all the extra details there.

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll be watching shares of Galaxy Digital rising Monday despite

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>reporting a five million dollar loss. Bloomberg Shinneli Bassa and

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Caroline I spoke with Novegrats about the state of the

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>crypto winter. Take a listen. We've had one credit loss

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in the history of our company, and uh, you know,

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I disclosed the name today. It's a manageall lost relative

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to our balance sheet, relative our credit business. Our credit

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>business actually was profitable on the on the quarter. I

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about that. What we saw away from

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>us was huge concentration in this one name, which created

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the systemic risk that we saw. Uh,

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and the and the cascading of bitcoin all the way

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thousand um. You know, I I don't have a

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>crystal ball when I add up the total planes that

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>people filed. Uh, it doesn't feel like there'll be a

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>lot comes back in that case. You know, you've got Celsius,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got Voyager, You've got lots of other places where

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>both institutions and retail lost a lot of money, and

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>there will be a business for that where people are

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>bidding up. I want to double down on retail because

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>you brought it up. You know, you mentioned earlier that

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>your skeptical of a soft landing, and to the extent

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that means you mean there's a recession coming that it

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>will be a hard landing. How much money will there

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>really be on the sidelines to put into crypto, let

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>alone any risk asset. Listen, you know, the FED increased

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>money to supply at a rate that we've never seen before,

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're slowly withdrawing that. There's still a ton of

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>money in the system, right There was excess savings in

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>retail that's getting worn down some. But there's monster casualties.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>People got really nervous, and we had a pretty dramatic

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>sell off in the first half of the year. And

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think we're going to see what we

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>saw last year when money is flowing in and it's

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>all it's all booming. But I don't think it's armageddon

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>here yet either. Uh And so again I I, you know,

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>will Bitcoin get through thirty thousand on this move up,

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. I'm doubtful. I think we're gonna probably be

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in this range now. I'm quite frankuively be happy if

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we're in a a you know, twenty two thousand or

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand thirty thousand range for a while. With the

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>next move breaking up, hearium has got a little bit

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>more juice at the top of its range. It can

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>be you know, makes out, it could go higher. That's

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>got a real story. But I don't see, you know,

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>the mania that we saw in one or twenty seventeen reigniting. Listen.

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope are wrong. Galaxy Digital CEO Mike novograts there. Meantime,

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Apple used to acquire a company every three to four weeks,

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's dramatically slowed. It's dealmaking in the last two years.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple spent one a app billion dollars on payments tied

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to acquisitions in fiscal year twenty, but just over two

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars in the last ten months. Brig Smart

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>German here to discuss. So why is Apple slowing down

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the pace of deal Smart that's a good question. Well,

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>when you look at this chart, when you think about it,

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the first two things you might you know, the reasons

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you might propose as one, COVID Right, COVID messed up.

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>You know everyone's business plan. You have to tear it

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>all up and start over. Right. The second is regulation.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you have the FTC going after in video Microsoft deals,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the act Division deal for nearly seventy billion dollars,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you have Meta Amazon, all these players spending so much

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>money and the regulators assuming them and trying to get

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in their way. And so maybe Apple is fearful of that,

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>as a new note inside of the regulatory filings to

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the SEC may suggest. But I think it's really neither

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of those, because you look, that was really the height

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic. In that year they spent more than

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they had since right. I also think that Apple is

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>not spending amounts of money that necessarily would lead to

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny from the FTC. You know, their government's globally right,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is a matter of fact of

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>their product development schedule. One, two investing in other areas,

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and three maybe they're trying to go at it more alone, right,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>without needing to acquire companies. But at the same time,

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>this is extremely odd. I would bet that most people

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know that Serie face, I D Touch, I D

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple Music, Apple News, the weather app. I could sit

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>here for ten minutes giving you a list of iPhone

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>features that we all use every day. Those all stemmed

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>from acquisitions, and so buying smaller companies and startups and

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>core technologies and engineering teams has been core to the

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple development process ever before, since Steve Jobs even returned

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to the company in the late nineties. That's interesting because

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple has never been one to make big acquisitions, certainly

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not to the scale that Mark Zuckerberg has. For example,

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>How how is them not making these smaller acquisitions over

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>at least the last year going to impact the product

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>development cycle? You know, I would look at it this way.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that these acquisitions have helped Apple get to

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 1>where they want to get much more quickly, right and

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>at lower costs, you know, per se Right, I'll give

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you my favorite Apple acquisition is probably authentic back in right,

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they bought that company, and all that company did was

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>make very secure and reliable fingerprint scanners, right, and that

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that led to touch I D on the iPhone five s.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Remember how cool that was? Right? And so those little things,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>even though they're not big deals, led to some pretty

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>cool features that have helped them sell new phones. Right.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And to answer your question, I think they should really

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>be snapping up autonomous car companies, car companies in general

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>car manufacturing to really bring that Apple car closer to fruition.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Remember when Elon Musk said that Apple buying Tesla on

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the table for a market cap around sixty billion, was

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>on the table about five years ago before the Model

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>three came out. Imagine if Apple would have bought Tesla

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>back then, how different the our industry would look today

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for just a sixty billion dollar deal. And when I say,

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just if you compare a sixty billion dollar deal compared

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to Apple's cash balance over the last decade or so, right,

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it is small potatoes. So I think their acquisition strategy

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>has paid off in a lot of ways, but we're

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>seeing some changes here, at least for the last two

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>fiscal years. All right, Mark German and Ali, Thanks Mark

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>as always. Thanks all right. Coming up digital rights in

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a post row world. How to navigate what can and

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>can't be used against you when it comes to your

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>web searches. That is next. This is Bloomberg. Their companies

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>provide a very important service that allows people to access

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>information about their healthcare. Tech companies could choose to uh

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>provide that information, provide free security services to websites disseminating

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that information so they're protected from vigilante hackers. The other

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>things that tech company can do is become very prepared

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.599
<v Speaker 1>to go into court and actually pushed back against the

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>requests that they get from law enforcement. They have enough

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>data on all of us to serve their business model.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 1>They don't need data about people's private health choices in

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 1>order to make money. And if they are disregarding the

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>rights and welfare of the people that they are serving

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>through the technologies that they provide, those people are going

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to be less and less able to participate. As abortion

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>restrictions tighten in various states across the United States, questions

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>remain about privacy. How will new laws be enforced in

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the digital age. Privacy advocates warn that location and other

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 1>kinds of data could be used to track individuals who

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>visit abortion clinics or travel across state lines. Joining me

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>out to dig deeper into this is Alexandra Gibbons, President

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Center for to Democracy and Technology. Alexandra, thank

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. So what's not being

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about? Um when we think about the power that

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>these companies have and that the threat that our information

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>could be used against us. I think this really is

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>a wake up moment for the tech companies to think

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>about the sheer amount of information that they have and

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to know that their users want that information to be protected.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So we need companies thinking about just how much data

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they collect, how long they store it for, where they're

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>sharing it with, and getting really smart about how they

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>respond to law enforcement requests as well. What kind of

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>data are you most worried about that these companies have.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 1>So right after the news of the overturning of rovi

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>weight came out, there was a big conversation about period

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>tracking apps and that matters. But users need to realize

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot more they should be focused on.

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about your browser information, what websites you visited,

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>your search history, your online purchases of some he purchases,

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>medication that could be used in the case of an abortion,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and then also the subject matter of your texts and emails,

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and finally your location information, which we can be collected

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>by your phone, by apps on your phone, and also

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>by your Internet service provider as well. How should tech

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>companies prepare themselves to deal with this? They need to

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 1>think about a couple of different things. One is just

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>their data collection practices. In the first place, we're about

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 1>to enter a world where law enforcement is asking these

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>companies to hand over their customers most sensitive information for

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>prosecutions that are wildly unpopular when you look at the

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>broader American public. So companies need to think about what

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>they're collecting, how long they're keeping it for, and then

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>also how they are responding to these law enforcement requests.

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>If they get them. They need to be requiring a warrant.

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>They need to be fighting to make sure that those

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>warrants are narrowly tailored. They need to be pushing back

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>for law enforcement doing overbroad phishing expeditions, and they need

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to be telling users about the request that they're getting

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>so we can have more transparency in the space. You've

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>also talked about how worried you are about a chilling

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>effect on free speech when it comes to information around abortion.

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain that there's a big conversation to be

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>had here around online content moderation, So how companies can

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they're helping people get access to reliable,

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>accurate information about abortion services, pushing away miss and disinformation,

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and then also just pushing back on the growing number

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of state laws were likely to see of state legislatures

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it illegal to post online information about

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>how to access reproductive care. So we need the companies

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to be thinking about what they're curating, what are the

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>signals they can put online to help give access to

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>good health care information fairly similar to what they've had

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to do under COVID really um and also make sure

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that they are not, you know, falling for these statutes

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that try to access limit access to good information about

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>reproductive air. Are there ways that big tech companies could

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>help women wanting to make this choice or who feel

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like they have no choice but to make this quote

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>unquote choice. Yeah, I mean, it's all about knowing your options, right.

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>It's about a woman being able to understand the circumstances

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that she's in and make an informed decision. And so

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that we've seen companies do which

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I admire and like, is, for example, of a person

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>searches for abortion services, what are the ads that can

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>come up against that search, you know, down the bar

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on the side of your search engine. How do we

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>make sure that those are from certified providers, They are

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>trusted ads, They're not from places that actually are trying

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to trap people that are seeking information about abortion care.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And we have reason to believe in this climate, the

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>crisis pregnancy centers, which come from the anti abortion movement

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>might well be trying to target people who are running

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>those searches. So there are things like that, What are

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the indicators for trusted information that platforms can do? And

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>then how can they really quickly respond to fraudulent websites,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>websites that are trying to entrapt people seeking information for

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>care and d escalating the spread of viral miss and

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>disinformation about abortion services as well. What are your biggest

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>fears about how technology could potentially be used against us.

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they're starting to become true already, which is

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the care of the fear that these are going to

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>be used in prosecutions. And also when you look at

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these state statutes, it's not just law enforcement

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>prosecutions against people who are seeking or providing reproductive care,

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but there are some statutes out there that authorized individual

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>citizens to go out as private bounty bounty hunters and

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>follow their own lawsuits against people that they suspect of

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>aiding and abetting abortions. That's really dangerous because it creates

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>this incentive system for you know, the Wild West, for

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>lone rangers to go out there be tracking down information

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about their neighbors, bringing these lawsuits with the promise of

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the state paying them a ten thousand dollar bounty if

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they do so. That is a really worrying environment for

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>people's privacy and ability to access good information online. So

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that is the type of landscape that the tech companies

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>just should not want to get themselves in the middle of.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>And that is why we need the tech companies really

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>limiting their collection of sensitive health information that could be

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>used to create an inference that somebody has accessed abortion

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>services or any other type of reproductive care that could

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>expose them to litigation or prosecution. It's potentially very terrifying.

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen any particular examples, UM, where this has

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>happened or where this is happening already? So there have

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>already been cases, even before the overturning of Roe v. Wade,

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there were women who were being prosecuted for their pregnancy outcomes,

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>being accused of self inducing miscarriages late in their term.

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And what was used in those prosecutions where people's browsing histories,

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>their online purchase history evidence that they had purchased certain

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>medications online. And then even in one case, the subject

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and the contents of a woman's text messages with a

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>friend as she was trying to get it vice on

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>what to do. So we've seen already in these cases

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>that digital evidence can be used in evidence against you.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And so that's a reason why users need to be

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>careful and why the companies really need to be watching

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>us as well. Chilling indeed, Alexander Gibbons, thank you for

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>shedding light on this issue. Really appreciated. President of the

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Center for Democracy and Technology, UM, thank you for stopping by.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomer Technology, and Emily Check in San Francisco.

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>SoftBank says it will sell some or all of its

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>shares in so far reported holdings equivalent to a nine

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>percent steak. Soft Bank reporting a record net loss as

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a self and Global Tech Stocks continues to hammer its

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Vision Fund portfolio. I want to get back to markets now.

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Shares of EV makers and clean energy companies jumping after

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the US Senate passed a landmark bill on climate or

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>at Ludlow back with the movers. Yes, So the bill

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>moved those you'd expect them to a lot of EV

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>main names. Three seventy four billion dollars of energy and

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>climate spending is ear marks. You look at names like

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Tesla actually been up much higher around five percent, but

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>closing up eight tenths of one percent, and some of

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>these smaller EV makers and legacy names like GM and Ford.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It ends the per manufacturer limit on the seventy dollar

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>tax credit, which is something we'd expected, had been negotiated

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>for many months, and of course that scene as a

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>tail wind for demand. But there are price limits. Anything

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>over fifty five dollars for an evy car or sedan

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>is not eligible, and anything over eighty dollars for a

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pickup or suv is not eligible. But this is what

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we've been waiting for the government to kind of give

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this industry a bit of a push get it going.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Not done much for the stock so far this year, though,

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at the performance of Tesla versus legacy names

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>like G and Forward year to date, there's still under

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>pressure and we're still seeing different declines. But I walk

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>over to this side of the screen and you do

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>see Forward in particular closing that share gap on tests

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>or in terms of year to date performance because they

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>are starting to ramp up their own activity, and again

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>with government support, there is hope that they'll see more.

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just evs as well. There are measures within

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the bill for support for renewable energy, not just in

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the form of solar, but also in hydrogen plug in

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as well, and you see some names here across solar

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>moving pretty significantly on the back of that bill being

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>negotiated overnight. Not all the way there goes to the

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>House next for the expectation, even though this is trimmed

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>out down from where we started a year ago, is

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>that this is a really big play ultimately to reduce

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>common mission from where we were in two thousand five.

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Interesting development, All right, thank you well. Mark Zuckerberg's new

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>narrative from matter has consistently involved pitching Facebook's platforms as

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the underdog, especially when it comes to regulation and competition.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But Facebook may be in a better position to take

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok than Zuckerberg is leading the public to believe,

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>according to Bloomberg Business Weeks Max Chaffkin, in a different

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment, Zuckerberg might simply try to buy TikTok. That's

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>not possible at the moment. Thus his strategy is evolving.

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Max Chafkin joins me, Now, so does anybody really believe

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg when he says Meta is an underdog? Well,

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've seen, uh yeah, a bunch of raft

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of stories all about the the you know, existential challenges

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>facing Facebook, and of course investors have sent the stock

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>down something like since February, so so they're definitely people

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>out there with concerns, and I think what's happening is

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that Zuckerberg is kind of leaning into them. So you

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>do have um economic challenges, right, So Facebook really benefited

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>from COVID stay at home orders and the sort of

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>explosion of e commerce shopping that's all gone away, and

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>then you do have this kind of cultural challenge where

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is, you know, getting a lot of mind here.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a lot of the younger people, of course,

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>are are into TikTok. They're not into Facebook. And Z

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>were using that and saying, you know, we're we're really

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. We need to We're gonna have this intense period.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of rattling the saber in terms of hiring,

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>telling employees you know, they shouldn't take vacations and and

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>you know they need to weed out the bad performers.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is as you say, it's strategic. Um,

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it's both an effort to try to get more productivity

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>out of his staff um, and also kind of a

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>positioning thing because Facebook faces um serious and I trust

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny on a couple of different fronts, and playing up

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>challenges from competition is of course one way to uh

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of diffuse a situation. How would you assess

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook position of power with respect to TikTok? You know,

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>what does Facebook have on TikTok and what is TikTok's

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>actual advantage. Yeah, so Facebook, it's really easy to to

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of forget this. But Facebook is like way, way,

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 1>way bigger than TikTok. We we don't know, uh, exactly

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>how much money TikTok is making, but you know, independent

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>estimates put it at at four billion dollars in revenue

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>in and so on. Facebook, you know, is something like

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred billion dollars right there. They're making like

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:18.239
<v Speaker 1>eight times TikTok's revenue in profit for the year. Now,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok could you know, and and there is a lot

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of chatter about this. You know, TikTok gonna sort of

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>turn on the cash machine and and it's going to

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>find ways to make money. But but they haven't done

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that yet. And there's really no reason to think that

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they will be any better at monetizing than Mark Zuckerberg is.

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Because what Facebook is, Bill, is this kind of incredible

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>cash machine for turning online attention into into revenue. And

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>he has, as you know, has been well documented, basically

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly on on social media advertising, and TikTok is

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly eating into that. But but really it's a very

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>long way away from um, you know, eating Mark Zuckerbook's

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>lunch that said, TikTok does seem to be way way

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>way inning the attention war with Facebook, or is that

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>also a misperception. Well, I think that's absolutely true, but

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to forget that lots of other companies have

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>won this attention word Facebook. You know, there's been a

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have pointed out that Facebook's kind of

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>lost it's cool or something like that. But what that

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of overlooks is it's lost it's cool for like

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years, right, Facebook lost its school first

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to Instagram. Uh there was you know, Twitter was the

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>hot thing for a while, and over time Mark Zuckerberg

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.959
<v Speaker 1>has found ways to maneuver the company. And now there

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is one important difference. Whereas in the past, you know,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>he would have just bought TikTok, right, that is not

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>possible because of FTC scrutiny. You know, he could try,

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>but it seems almost certain that the government would try

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to block it, given that they're trying to block this

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>much smaller acquisition. So that's something that is not available

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to him. But what is available to him is copying,

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing Facebook do that with its reals product

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and with these efforts to to have more you AI

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>driven discovery, basically a TikTok like intervace. Those are the

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>complaint that that's what led to all these complaints from um,

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Instagram influencers and Kardashian adjacent UM types. UM. Now,

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, we know this is working in

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>part because Facebook has said one reason their revenue is

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>lower has been lower, is because they're driving users into

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>these TikTok like platforms which do not monetize as well.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So they're making a choice. They're choosing, you know, copying

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>TikTok versus driving revenue. And on one hand, you can say,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>well that that bodes ill, right, that that suggests they're

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>not monetizing. Well, on the other hand, it does look

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like they're making progress in terms of this copycat approach.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And again I don't don't see any reason to think

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that it won't work. It's worked, you know, many times

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>before in the history of this company. All right, great

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>piece by you, UM Bloomberg Business Week, Max Chafkin as

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>always great to have you come up. Bitcoin and coin

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>based both rallying is winter getting a little warmer? F

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>t x U S president Brett Harrison joins to weigh

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>in on that question. Next, this is Bloomberg coin Bay

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>shares rallied for a fifth straight day as investors continue

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to pile into the largest US crypto exchange following news

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of its partnership with black Rock to help institutional investors

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>manage and trade bitcoin. This as Bitcoin also rallying breaking

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>above the dollar mark. Welcome news for the crypto platform

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead of its second quarter results after the close of

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>market later this week. Here to discuss what's happening this winter,

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in f t x U S

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>president Brett Harrison for his read on this and much

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>more so, what do you make of this coin based

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>black Rock news, Brett? So, it does seem to be

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that the winter is starting to though here. Um, you know,

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>prices are obviously rising, and what's what are we actually

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing here? A lot of these forced liquidations in the market,

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>they're start they're starting to come to an end. Um,

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>No more news about different either exchanges or lending platforms

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>going under, voyagers returning funds, large undeployed, bigger capital starting

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to be deployed again. And then of course this news

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>coming out with coin base and with black Rock, showing

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that the institutional demand to be able to trade crypto

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>through some of the more traditional huge players in the

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>market is not slowed down, and in fact, as the

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>saying goes that this is the time to build, people

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are obviously building now, and as we start to come

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>out of this win term, people are trading again the

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>tools the capital will be in place to do so.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>And of course all of this against the backdrop of

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>more progress in Congress uh Savan now Boosmen coming out

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>with their big crypto bill, a lot of positive signs

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>around that, all in bringing positive sentiment to crypto markets

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and to the equity markets that are relating to crypto. Still,

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got coin base and robin Hood slashing their head count.

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>What mistakes do you think these companies made when they

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>were scaling? You know, looking across the growth text sector,

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>there are so many companies talking about either layoffs or

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>hiring freezes. I mean everything from guest coin based in

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood, but also Google and Microsoft and Tesla. I

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's a real lesson learned here, which is that

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>these growth companies, which typically have operated under the model

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that headcount growth is a sign of company growth, are

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>realizing that actually sometimes headcount growth can get in the

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>way of company growth. If you don't have a lean

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>staff where you can prioritize the most important buildouts, where

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you can get things done, you can move nimbly. With

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a market that moves extremely criply, like crypto, it's going

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to be difficult to keep pace. And when there's a

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>winter and things are slowing down, retail volume is drying up,

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and you have to focus on the most important things.

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>That means will have to pull back on those employees,

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>which can be devastating to build up this giant workforce,

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and that have to lay those people off who have

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>worked so hard for their company. I mean, that's why

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that companies like f t X, but of

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>course you're not the only company to do this. Showing

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that you can operate with a leaner model, with a

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>smaller team and really be able to focus on the

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>highest priority items of all time and get things done

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is super important for me. Be able to weather even

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the downturns in the market. F t X has been

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>really inquisitive through this winter, and I wonder if winters

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>start starting to thaw, how does that impact your strategy

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>around deals. Do you expect valuations to stay low or

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>start to creep up. And could that mean less opportunities. Yeah, absolutely,

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as you said, you know, during this past

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>let's say a couple of months, there have been a

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunities presented to us as far as potential

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>deals with you know, other companies that are looking for

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>capital injections. UM, they need help, you know, getting back

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in business. There's possible merger opportunities, lower private equity valuations.

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And yes, as as investor confidence starts to come back

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>into the sector, I mean those opportunities will start to

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>dry up as you know, these companies will start to

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>get their volumes back, they'll start to get revenue again.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Don't want to be able to increase their existing pipeline

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of projects and capital in the same way they were before. Um.

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's still plenty of opportunities in the market, and

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly ones that we're looking at. Ft X is expanding.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It's no stock trading fee to all of its US users,

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>including non crypto investors. What's the end game here? Is

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood a competitor or still a potential target for

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>some kind of stake. I mean, it's certainly the case

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're a competitor. I mean, they've been a competitor

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>for a while when they started out in the stock

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>trading business and then they added crypto the odd of

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the ability to trade bitcoin neither on their platform. They've

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>since been adding more and more assets. I think just

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>today they added Avalanche, and so they have realized that

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>their customer demand for retail crypto trading is incredible, and

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so they've been a competitor ross for quite some time.

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>What we've realized is that we can do a great

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>job providing a stock trading platform to our users as well.

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>We can do so without relying on payment for order flow.

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>We can get people more advanced analytics and tools to

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to make smarter investment decisions. We want to

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>make our platform more one that is involved with educating

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>our users and how to make um you know, how

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to do trades in a responsible way as opposed to

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>being more kind of gamified. And so in that sense,

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we think that we have a good shot at competing

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with them on this platform, and we're pretty excited about

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>all of the initial user growth that we've seen in

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>trading stocks in f t x US. You've also, you know,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>made a number of different sports partnerships your name is

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on some arenas now partnership with Major League Baseball. How

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>much are these sports partnership sponsorships actually paying off. Yeah,

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to put a quantification on that number of

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly how much it's paid off. We think that from

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a qualitative perspective, it's been tremendously important for our brand.

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Think about that one year ago, almost no one in

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the US had heard of f t x U S.

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>We were going up against you know, uh coin based

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and Cracking and Gemini and different companies that have been

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>around for a day gade, and in an industry that

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>requires the trusts in your brands that cryptocurrency does. With

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>all the noise out there, with exchanges going down, with hacks,

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with the scams, you have to establish that brand presence,

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>especially in the United States, and for us, doing things

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like partnering with the major Major League Baseball or you know,

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>putting our name in the text arena basically catapulted us

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>into the public consciousness in a way that you know,

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>going to more traditional advertising routes such as Google ads

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or Facebook ads wouldn't have been able to achieve in

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>such a short period of time. All Right, Brett Harrison

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>president of f t x U S always going to

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>have you, Brett. Thank you for Stoff and my hook.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>As families ease into the back to school season throughout

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the country, let's take a look at trends in the

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>world of education technology. Dual Lingo, for one b analyst

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>estimates during its second quarter earnings report last week even

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>boosted its revenue guidance for the year. I want to

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about this and more with Dual Lingo C and

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>co founder Louise foun On. So going into a new

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>school year, Louise, is the pandemic boom has that been

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping up or is it starting to wane? Well, you know,

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. The pandemic was interesting for us. It wasn't

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a crazy boom. I mean, we we did benefit a

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit from the pandemic, but we have been growing

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>steadily since before the pandemic. And you know a lot

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of people have asked us if if afterwards our users

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>went down or anything, but we didn't see any of that,

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's just because we you know, we

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we have used this in every single country in the world,

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in every associomic, the whole part of

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the economic spectrum so what are the most interesting themes

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>going into this particular year. Now that schools generally have

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>been basically open for about a year since COVID. I

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things that it's interesting is that

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we schools in general have just adopted educational technology a

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>lot more, and we're going to continue seeing that. So

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we're we're expecting a big back to school bump. We

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>usually get it around this year. You know, dual linguists.

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It is used by about half of all schools in

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the United States for teaching fore languages, and so we're

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>very excited about that. I think. I think generally educational

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>technology is just scariest thing. You've actually been leaning into

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>TikTok when it comes to add spend. Talk to us

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that and why, well, it's actually

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not at spend. We we have been leading into TikTok.

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But but it's all organic. I mean, really, the spend

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that we have on our TikTok is really the salary

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of of uh, you know, our our employees who who

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>run the account. We're blessed that we have a very

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>lovable mascot dual ing with the dual the owl, and

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we make all these videos that that go viral. Um,

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some of them have them, you know, are massbot dancing, etcetera.

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's what felt really well for us. UM. You know,

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's approximately it's about ten percent of our users in

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the US new users in the US come from from TikTok,

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's been very efficient. I mean, again, the

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>main spend there is just the salary of a couple

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of people that run it. Interesting because we were talking

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 1>about TikTok versus Facebook and Instagram earlier, and I'm curious

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>how you would assess the impact and power of both.

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you see TikTok as more powerful or

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially a lot more powerful than the other two platforms. Well,

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>for us, TikTok has just been significantly more powerful. Um.

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I think some of it I

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>just has to do with the fact that that it's

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on these days. It's kind of the cool thing. But

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it's also you know, the algorithm really rewards content that

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is that is enjoyable, and I think we've managed to

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.919
<v Speaker 1>create very enjoyable kind of viral content that has worked

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>out very very well for us. To a Longo is

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>back in China's app stores after a one year hiatus

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>talked to us about the impact of the crackdown and

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and how much did that set you back? Yeah, well, China.

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>China is a very interesting market for wellfore generally for

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>for everything, but for language learning. Is the largest language

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>learning market in the world. But for US, the Chinese

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>market has always been relatively small. It's only about one

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>percent of our our revenue and also of our daily

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>active users. About about nine months ago, so UM, we

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>got taken down from the app stores, which what it

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>meant is are all the users that already had to

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>do a lingual could continue using us, but new users

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>could not get in there. UM. And and you know,

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about a month ago or so we were reinstated UH

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and we started growing again. Um. And at this point

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we're back to the traffic levels that we had before

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we we got taken down. But for us, even though

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a very interesting market. We also know

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>that Western companies UH usually don't do super well in China.

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, it's an interesting market, but but

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's only about one percent of our of our revenues. Now,

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're no question we're facing a difficult macro

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>environment inflation. You know the R word we're hearing over

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 1>and over again. Sometimes it's you know, more impending than

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>than than not. Um, how are you expecting that to

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>impact your business and the at tech market in general?

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Is this a discretionary market where you know, if companies

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:52.399
<v Speaker 1>or customers are gonna have to choose, they'll spend less year. Um, well,

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen any kind of weakness in our numbers.

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean we you know we we we beat our

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>our estimates, We increased our guidance for the quarter, and

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I think some of it it just has to do

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that we're still pretty early in our journey.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Language learning is a is a very large market. It's

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>about sixty billion dollars a year, but most of it

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is still offline. So if you think about language and

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the language learning market, most of it is kind of

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>people learning English in night school in Brazil or something

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like that, and and it's shifting online like you know,

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the way dating shifted online over the last twenty years.

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Language learning is still kind of shifting online. So we're

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>still in the in the early parts of our growth

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of user growth and also in terms of

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth. So so we just haven't seen any weakness

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in our numbers. Um. You know the other thing about

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is we have a freemium model where uh, you know,

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>people can learn as much as they want on dueling

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>entirely for free and then they can they can actually

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>turn turn off the ads if you know they pay.

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So so far we just you know, this just hasn't

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>affected us at all. Interesting, all right, Weles found On

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>CEEO and co founder of Dual Lingo. Thank you so

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us and giving a snapchat of what's

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>going on in your industry. That does it for this

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology. Later this week Tuesday, we've got

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Lemonade CEO Daniel Schreiber with us to talk about their results,

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.359
<v Speaker 1>plus how inflation is weighing on consumers. And don't forget

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to check out our podcast wherever you get your podcasts.

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco.