WEBVTT - What Challenges Do the Chiefs Present? | Bucs Insider

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been learning. Good Morning Bucks fans, Welcome into Buccaneers

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Insider Live, presented by Miller Lyte Casey Phillips. Here was

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>senior writer and editor Scott Smith. This is where we

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>answer all of your questions. If you're not already watching

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>on their head over to Facebook. You can leave them

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in the comments section of the live video. That's how

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I will be finding all of the questions to ask

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>as we give people a chance to start asking some

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of those. Figured we'd start with the news about the

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame that came out yesterday. Yeah, this is

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the time of year when they pair the field down

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>from the original nominations I think thirty of them to semifinalists.

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>It didn't come as a shock really, but both John

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Lynch and Randee Barber made that cut. It's the ninth

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>straight year that John Lynch is a semifinalist. He's also

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>been a finalist for seven straight years, and then Rodney

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Barber has been a similar semifinalists for four years now.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping this is the year he breaks through to

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the finalist stage, which is fifteen players, and that will

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>happen somewhere around mid January. Uh, you know, we know

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>how close John Lynch has come over and over and again.

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>We always hope that this is going to be the year.

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Um Ran Day, I think is what hell deserving being

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a finalist, and I'm a little surprised it hasn't happened yet,

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully it's this year. Yeah, And I know we

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>usually talk about it in terms of who the other

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>people are on the ballot, and especially if there are

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>people at the same position, because we know they don't

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>tend to like to put in a lot of people

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the same position each year. And so there have

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>been times that we've looked at John Lynch and then

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>there's been other really great safeties that same year. Looking

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>at the field overall, and and the people that are

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>first time ballot people, how how likely or not are

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>there certain people we think of as threats to their cause?

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>How comfortable do we feel, Well, there's always two or

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>three guys Almost every year, there's two or three guys

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that you think our first ballot guys, and you just

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>have to account for that. Um And obviously Peyton Manning

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is on the ballot. Uh be ridiculous for him not

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a first ballot Hall of Famer. Charles Woods

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and strikes me as the same. Jared Allen may not

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>strike some people as a first ballot Hall of Famer,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but his stats are essentially the same as Jason Taylor's.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think Jason Taylor made it in and in

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>his first year. So there's always that obstacle. But the

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>first step is making that cut to fifteen, and the

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that there's a couple locks, probably for the class one,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really make it that much harder for John or

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Rondi to make it at least to that next cut,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and then we can start talking about their chances to

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>actually be in the Hall of Fame. Okay, And just

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>a reminder of the people tuning, and now we are

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>taking your questions over on Facebook in the live video

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>comments section. That's where I'll find all of your different questions. UM.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to hear your thoughts on second game in

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a row without Alan Mark pett in at offensive line.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>They had to move some things around, and then even

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Donovan went down for a little bit and a Q

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Shipley went down. There was there was several different combinations

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>used in that game. And you know, we knew that

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that Rams defensive line was was a potent one. So

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to hear um, how you felt like they

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>handled that channel inge, what we know about that offensive

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>line and and the the impact that Ali Marpett has

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and how they've been able to sort of try to

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>pick up that slack. Now, we're all very eager for

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Ali to feel better, um A first of all, and

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>then once we feel good about that, will be eager

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to get him back in the lineup. But you can't

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>say enough about how well Ryan Jensen and a Q

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Shipley have responded to this challenge of Ryan moving to

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>left guard to replace Ali and a Q Shipley stepping

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in there at center. I think the biggest thing you

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>can say about those two and the rest of that

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>line is, um, look at the defensive stat sheet from

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that game and try to find Aaron Donald's name. It's

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>not on there. Can you imagine before that game thinking

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald wouldn't record a single tackle, sack, quarterback, hit, anything. Um,

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>he's the most gun the third game and his whole

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>career that he's done that. That's incredible. I mean, he's

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the most dominant defensive lineman in the game and this

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change that, but in this particular game, the Buccaneers

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>handled him very well, and I think uh Tom Brady

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>was act once and hit five times. I'll take that

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>out of a game against the Rams. It really wasn't

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the protection. That wasn't the issue when it comes to

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>how the Bucks came up a little bit short. And

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we had a few different questions about the run game

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and why it wasn't more successful, especially after such a

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>huge performance against the Panthers uh the week before, and

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that how they were using Rojo versus

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for net Um, you know, third down catches. Just kind

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>of overall the way that the running backs were used,

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>why the running game didn't work as well um, and

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>then especially getting them involved in the in the passing

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>game and some of the struggles there. Well, the first

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thing you have to look at is the Carolina defense

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>versus the Rams defense. I mean, Carolina's defense was much

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>more susceptible to the run. The Rams have one of

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the best run defenses in the league. And it was

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear early on, and this is actually true on

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>both sides. It was pretty clear early on that the

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>running game wasn't working. And you can say, I want

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to establish the run. That makes our play action better. Etcetera, etcetera.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But if it's not working, at some point you stopped

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>bashing your head against the wall and you you turn

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to the things that you know, you think you can

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>be more successful with. And that's why the Buccaneers ran many,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>many more plays, a much higher percentage of plays and

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>three and four receiver sets in this game, as opposed

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>to the Carolina game, where it was pretty much an

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>even split between that kind of offense and too tight

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>end offense, because that's what was working against Carolina, and

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>they thought that would work against Carolina. Um, nothing really

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was working in the running game, whether it was Jones

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>or for net. As for the passing game, obviously, there

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>were well publicized struggles with passes that were incomplete to

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys, and and Bruce Arians spoke about

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that yesterday and said, you know, he kind of broke

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>down each one. Some of them weren't weren't perfect throws.

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Some of them, Uh, the play broke down a little

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>bit like the screen pass to Ronald Jones. Just the

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>throw came much sooner than it's designed to because there

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>was a free runner left on the other side of

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the formation, and and Britty had to get rid of

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the ball more quickly. So there's many reasons why those

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>plays can break down, and sometimes they are just straight

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>up drops, but in this case it was a bit

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of a mix. So you know, I know that um

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that Bruce arians still remains very uh comfortable with Leonard

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Fournande in particular in the passing game, and he's for

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the most part, caught the ball very well this year.

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And we had a question about it seems like we

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard Anton Winton Jr's name as much. Does that

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>mean he isn't playing as well or just hasn't made

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the kind of plays to get his name set as much. Yeah,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that's it's actually true. I've noticed that in the stat

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>sheet because it's been fun updating his game by game

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>stats this year because almost every game for a stretch there,

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>he had some kind of big play, and the last

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>few games his stats have been pretty minimal. But I

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's what happens, just sometimes with the safety. I mean,

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes the players are coming your way, the

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>ball is coming your way. Sometimes it's not. But I

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's been any lacking in his play, just

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been the opportunities for him to to rack up

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of tackles or or I guess also the

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to rush the quarterback. I'm not sure that we've

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>sent him on blitz is that much in the last

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of games. So, you know, stats aren't the whole story,

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>as most fans know. And Winfield hasn't had two bad games.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>He's just had two games with very little stats. And

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I saw a question about how I think the phrase was,

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>how we've been dinked and dunked on a lot this year,

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that these short little passes. We saw that a lot

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 1>from the Rams. I think Bruce said in his postgame

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>press conference that they didn't even attempt to pass more

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>than ten yards all first half. Um, what are some

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of the anecdotes to that on defense? You know now

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that we saw that that was pretty helpful, you know,

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the way the Rams did it for them, that it

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>proved to be problematic for the for the defense, What

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are some of the strategies there and just maybe the

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>strengths and weaknesses you've seen with this defense of the

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>type of offense that they're really good against. Yeah, I mean,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in today's NFL, if if a opposing team wants to

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>get rid of the ball quickly and throw a lot

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of short passes. They can generally succeed in at least

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>completing those passes. The problem for the Buccaneers was two things. Really. Um,

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the tackling wasn't very good in the secondary, so there

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>were plays that should have been stopped or drives that

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>should have been stops that that weren't because short passes

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>turned into longer gains and than they normally would. And

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>then also the Rams did a good job, and this

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is what they do when their offenses going well. They

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>did a good job of disguising plays and having misdirection

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in their their shifts and their motions and just getting

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.119
<v Speaker 1>especially those two guys Woods and Cup really wide open.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's a tough thing to defend. The

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers knew that going into the week. There was a

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk about I discipline, which means basically reading

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>your keys and and figuring out what the opponent is

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>going to do to you. And sometimes even with that,

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the other team wins. And the Rams have an offense

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that can do that on occasion, and it hurt the Buccaneers.

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They didn't handle it very well. And and that at

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>least for a good portion of the game, and that's

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>an issue going into the next name because the Chiefs

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>can do a lot of different things. To you. I mean,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that offense is the highest scoring in the league, and

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they have Patrick Mahomes and and all those incredible weapons,

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>but they also do shifts and motions quite a bit

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and and can disguise things. So it's another week that

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the Buckaneers will have to prepare for that, and it's

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a very tough challenge. Jim asked, what do you think

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>about the overall utilization of our tight ends so far

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and then the red zone and in particular overall. I mean,

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been pretty good. You've seen Cam break

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>getting involved um the last couple of weeks. I like

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that He's he had a couple of big third down catches.

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we had a little bit more trouble getting

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball to Rob Gronkowski in this last game, but

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we're trying. Um, you know, I think the tight end

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>position has never been one it's been terribly prolific in

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Arians' offense. But the two tight end set worked

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>very well against Carolina, and I think we're getting the

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>ball to those guys a decent amount of times in

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the red zone. Uh, you know, m um Gronkowski had

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown passing the red zone last week. Cam Brad also,

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe was that that game or was that two

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>games ago? He had the catch right along the goal line.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So we've got so many red zone weapons that you

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>can't expect those guys get touchdowns every week. But I

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think they're utilizing them enough in the red zone. And

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>then we'll close with this. Somebody asked about Scotty Miller

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that he hasn't been used as much

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>since Antonio Brown was brought on, and just the overall

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>way each of the wide receivers is being used. And

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>do we think we maybe need a little more Scotty

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Miller to try to have some of those deep balls

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>when he seems to be the one that Brady had

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the best connection with for those Yeah. Yeah, and they

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>did try. I mean they threw onto him that might

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have been completed, but it did draw like a thirty

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>yard pass interference penalty. Scotty was on the field more

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in this past game, uh, in some three and four

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>receiver sets than he had been that week a couple

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of weeks before. But I think it's probably pretty undeniable

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that the arrival of Tony Antonio Brown has eaten into

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>his snaps a little bit. Uh, the deep passing game,

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and it struggles have a lot more to do than

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>just with how Scotty Miller has been used in recent weeks.

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>It's been good three or four games now that the

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Buckaneers simply haven't been able to hit any deep balls,

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>and that was something that had been a strength for

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the first I don't know, six or seven weeks. We

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>hit a lot of them. I remember the the incredible

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>back corner passed from Brady to Scotty Miller in the

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>back of the end zone in Las Vegas. I mean

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>at that point we were talking about how he was

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>just so accurate still on deep balls, and it was

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it was one of the big storylines of the early season.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's been a struggle for the last three or

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>four games. So I don't know if it involves getting

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Scotty millermore involved, but somehow our know that the Buccaneers

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have to reconnect on those deep passes because that's a

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>big part of bruce Arians approach to offense. Al Right, Well,

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna do it for us. On this edition of

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers Insider Live presented by Miller Lite. Thank you so

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us, Thanks for those great questions. We'll

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>see you next week and have a great Thanksgiving