WEBVTT - Bucs Insider Live, Oct. 16

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Buccaneers Insider Live presented by Miller. Like Casey

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Phillips and Scott Smith here and plenty to talk about

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this week. We know you have tons of thoughts, comments, questions,

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>all of that. Make sure you head over to the

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers Facebook page leave all of your questions underneath our

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>live video. That's where we would be pulling them from

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the time before people get a chance to submit

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>some of those. I just wanted to hear your thoughts

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on we found out the big news yeshay, Mike Smith

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>being released and you have now Mark Duffner being promoted.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So what do you feel like this does for the

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>team right now? And how does something like this you

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>get employed? Even? I mean, what are the tangible effects

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of something like this? Well, first of all, before I

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>directly answer that, I just want to say, and I

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>know it, it's not really critical to this decision. It's,

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>as coach would say, it's a production based business and

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily something that fans care that much about.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>But Mike Smith is a wonderful guy. We all really

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>loved him. Um, just one of the nicest guys you

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>ever gonna want, every gonna want to meet upbeat all

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the time, and I'm sure it was very, very difficult

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>for Coach Cutter, who's known him for a long time,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>to make that decision, which he said was his decision.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Coach Coach Cutter said, so uh so that being said again,

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it is a production based business, and when something is

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>going as badly as our defensive results have been for

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the last two seasons, really, um, it's not a shocking

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>move and certainly something that fans had been predicting for

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit for a little while to make that move.

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>The question is what what's the impact going to be? Right, Because,

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>as as almost always the case, when you let go

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of a coordinator in the middle of the season, you

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>promote somebody from within, and that's something in this case

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>is Mark Duffner. And this is a man who's been

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>working under Mike Smith for the last three seasons, and

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they've been working in tandem, you know, with all the

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>other coaches trying to get this right, and so it's

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they're cut they're coming from the same system, you know

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. So I imagine that there are ways

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that Mark duffer is going to make changes, but it's

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>not immediately obvious. In so we see it in actually

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a few times what those are going to be. And

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>there's only so much you can do because you're not

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna make any substantive changes in personnel in the middle

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>of the season. So there can be some changes in approach. Um,

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, just from the most simplistic ways of putting it,

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe he would press more or press less, or

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>blitz more, blitz less. And you know, from standpoint of

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>coach Duffner, what the players were saying yesterday, Lavante in particular,

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is that he's really very energetic, enthusiastic, uh, excited guy

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on the field, and Lavante thinks that could make a

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>difference in terms of getting that to all three levels

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of the defense, not just the linebackers. So that's true,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, I think that was what was interesting

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>is before when coach had been asked about letting him

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.839
<v Speaker 1>go after the Chicago game, he said, okay, and now

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what So that really had been the big discussion, and

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>how just changes in general in the middle of the

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>season it can can be tough. So what what do

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you feel like the effect could be of, you know,

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>when there are changes, what this team is going to

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>need to do to make sure that that doesn't derail

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>what they're wanting to do. Well. I mean, on one hand,

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I could see like you said, Coach Cutter said, and

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>then what right? But at some point you decide, well,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>something needs to change and this isn't guaranteed to work,

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but maybe it will help. And sometimes when you're making

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a change, especially like you know, if you've had a

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>team Bucks only done this once in team history. But

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>if you change head coach before the season is over,

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that's generally a season that's already off the rails. Right.

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>That's far from the case here with the Bucaneers. Yes,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks have lost three in a row and now

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we're two and three, but really it's far from over.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>We're two games out of first there's eleven games left.

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>We still got four games against our division points, three

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of which are at home, and we have a really,

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>really good offense. So this team, even two of the

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>three games we've lost, came right down to the wire.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's the way it is in the NFL. And

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that happened to the Buccaneers repeatedly last year, and they

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't win many of those games and ended up what

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>were we five and eleven? UM and and Coach Cutter

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>said that many times, look at all the games we

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>lost by three points or less and one score or less,

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we flip a few of those around. So

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're talking about here. We're talking about a

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>relatively thin margin that the Buccaneers are on here on

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>winning or losing. And if you can make any bit

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of difference on the defense side of the ball. Now,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>nobody really expects the Buccaneers to turn into one of

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the best defenses in the league at this point, right,

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be very surprising, but they don't have to

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>be to compliment this really good offer. Yeah, that's an

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting point. So looking at you said two and three,

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely not over yet, and that's a really huge thing

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to emphasize when there is a change like that. You're right,

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it gives people sort of this idea that,

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, you know what's going on to the team.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So how big now do you think this makes this

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>weekend's game to essentially, you know, after coming you know,

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>three game losing streak, just overall the mentality of the team,

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the feel about it. Do I mean, we never like

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to say that one game is must win or a

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>huge deal, But I do feel like this game has

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of significance. Yeah, before this last game, I

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>think you're asked me a similar question. My opinion on

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the matter was that the Buccaneers had more to gain

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>from winning than they had to lose from from losing, right,

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't I say that? Because if you had gone to

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.559
<v Speaker 1>three and two and you were one game out of first,

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and you had two division wins already in your pocket,

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>both of them on the road, that's a really good

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>position to be in. Falling to two and three where

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they have isn't isn't good, of course, but it's not disastrous.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Now you have a chance to get back to three

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>with Cleveland here. Cleveland is definitely an improved team, but

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>now you're at home and they are one of the

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, after playing this pretty difficult start to the

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>season on paper, this is a I don't want to

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>use the word easier, but kind of easier matchup. And

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>again you're at home, the offense is still clicking under

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston. So it is an opportunity to get back

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>on track, and and I do think that's big. Falling

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to two and four would be worrisome, particularly because that's

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>four losses in a row, and as Jeff Ryan likes

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to say on our SELFI dogs podcasts all the time,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that's when things start. It's not losing one game, it's

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>when one turns into two and then that turns into three.

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Same thing happens on the winning side. If we can

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>get there. Yeah, both winning and losing is contagious, and

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you definitely don't want to get that four. With four

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>straight losses, we wouldn't be able to sit here next

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>week on the same show and say, yeah, everything's still

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>We're still in good spot. Right. Let's at that point

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll be saying it's not over, but we got a

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>hold of day out. Yeah, that's very true. And uh,

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the odds of being able to turn around

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the ship, Jarrett said, there's no way that Baker Mayfield

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>comes to Tampa and drops five tds, right, So I

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>think that it's this idea of we've played some prolific offenses.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So yes, the defense knows they have not been playing

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>how they need to. But you know, we've gone against

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Drew Brees and Ben Roethlisberger and Matt Ryan,

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and I mean it's it's a tough We've talked all

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>offseason about that tough beginning stretch. So, um, do you

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like now, regardless of any changes even being made

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with Mike Smith and Mark Up, that already the defense

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>has the potential to have a much better game simply

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>because you're not going against a potential future Hall of Famer.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a pretty big Baker Mayfield fan, and I think

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got a lot of really good days ahead of him,

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and I personally think it's possible he could have a

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>big game it happens, you know. I mean, you said

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>all the great quarterbacks we faced, but it was Mitchell Trabiskie,

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>who didn't exactly have a good track record, who's that

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>very best day maybe against. So I don't I don't

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>say that because I anticipate that happening, but it certainly can. Uh.

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, if the defense, like last week, we were

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>coming off that horrible Chicago game and then through the

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>by and we're hoping, as coach Cutter said when he

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was explaining why he didn't make the Mike Smith decision

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>then but then he did this week, they were hoping

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that the changes they made in the game plan they

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>came up with would produce better defensive results and you

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have to do something drastic and then that didn't happen.

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So um, if you could just make a small improvement

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>before the Cleveland game, the you know, like you're saying,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's an opportunity for the defense to make a small

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>step forward and that's enough to probably get a win. Okay,

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And Kevin wants to know, do you see us making

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>any trades to help the secondary? Yeah, I'm just gonna

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have to say the same thing I say whenever these

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>trade questions come up. It's possible, but they it's just

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>look back in history. How often has it happened. It's

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't happen that often. There's not a lot of

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>guys that are going to be difference makers that are

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>being traded now. I know there are rumors out there

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>about certain players being available, which we can't really address

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>directly because they're under contracts other teams. Right And as

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll go in and addressing you, we had Paul asked

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>us about Patrick Peterson because we we see your comments

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and questions, but unfortunately that's just not something we can

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>really get into. I just go back to history. It's

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just getting an impact player on either side of the

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>ball at the trade deadline in the NFL is so

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>rare that I just never count on it. If it happens, great,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's rare, right. Um. We also had a question

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>from de Kwan actually about the radio show last night

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>where um, I got to talk with JPP for an hour,

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>which was amazing. He's he's great. He is very candid,

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>very insightful. Um, so passionate about football in this team. Uh,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>de Kwan wants to know our what the impression of

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>his answer. Somebody called in and asked about seeing some

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of the defensive guys dancing on the sideline after they

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>had stopped on a third down, and people were saying

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't like how it looked because it was

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>just a stop on they're down there acting like they've

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>done something more, and so JPP was asked his thoughts

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on it, and he was just kind of I think

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember the essence of what he said,

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>but basically the idea of that he felt like, yeah,

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like we need to be more accountable for our behavior

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. He seemed to believe that, yeah, we need

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to take things a little bit more seriously. I don't

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>know I wasn't as offended by it because I'm a

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>big I'm a big advocate of supporting when you do

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>something well and celebrating it because then that can be

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>especially on defense, you've got to have that attitude of

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>getting excited and getting rolling, and you've got to be

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>fired up, and especially when you don't have the home

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>crowd behind you. I and maybe I'll just sound like

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a Homer here saying this, but I I was not well.

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But I did think Jpp's answer was interesting. That he's

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just big on individual accountability. I think was what he

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>was saying, of taking care of who you need to

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>be on the field, and he didn't sound like he

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>really made a judgment on them one way or the other.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But well, I would draw a distinction between some bits

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>of celebration and others, and I think that thing tends

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to bother fans. I think, like I've seen people they

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>hear about the players laughing on the plane flight back

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.599
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. And your tendency sometimes as a

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>fan after things go badly, is to want everybody to

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>suffer and willow and suffering for as long as possible,

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And at some point it's just human nature. You get

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.719
<v Speaker 1>excited about things that go well. I would say it's

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a case by case basis. If you're losing forty two

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>nothing to the Titans and in Austin, Soferian Jenkins is

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>high stepping it into the end zone after a touchdown,

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that's bad. But if in the NFL you said it

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, don't you want your defensive players to

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>be fired up and having fun. They talked about that

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>all the time. They're just hanging their heads after stuff.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to start turning things around. If you

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>make a big play, you're going to celebrate it. And

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that game was never completely out of hand now, so

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>there was really if you get a big stop, you're

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to celebrate. And sometimes, as we've talked about

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it here before, even when your defensive results overall aren't

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>very good, you win the game sometimes just because you

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>get one or two key stops that could have been

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a very important play. I'm not familiar with the player

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, but it could have been a key

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>play in the game. So that one from your description

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't buy on me at all. Karl wants to know

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>when Kindle back with is coming back. Well, he'll be

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>eligible to come back starting this week. However, when asked

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>about that last week, coach Cutter definitely did not define

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that would be this week. He left the door open eligible,

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, you don't. You've got about a three week

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>window to do something, and if you don't put him

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>back on the active roster by the end of that window,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>then he's just basically on I R for the rest

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>of the year. So definitely, from the tone of his answer,

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it didn't sound to me like he'd be back this

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>week even though he could, so I guess you just

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>crush your fingers and hope it's in the two weeks

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>still exists. Andrew said, what can Dufner do different to

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>improve the defense that Mike Smith wasn't doing? Well, That's

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>an excellent question, and that's really the question, right And

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's a fantastic answer to it,

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:50.719
<v Speaker 1>because presumably you're not overhauling the playbook. You have your

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>same package of the things that you do. You could.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>To me, the only answer is you emphasize certain things

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you and de emphasize other things because it's all coming

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>from the same place. I guess he could make some

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>personnel changes, but what would those be You know, we're

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of with Chris Conti and Vernon Hargrave's both out,

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a lot of leeway from making changes

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>on defense right Um, with maybe with more the defensive

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>line getting healthy, and that will depend up a little

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of how Jerald McCoy is feeling. You could get back,

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you could finally get to that deeper rotation that you

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to have at the beginning of the year. You

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>could blitz more, you could blitz less. We did blitz

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in Atlanta, and it was with

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>mixed results. You have to blitz more effectively. It's not

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just blitzing, as we talked about before the game. I

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>think going into that game. I looked this up before

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the Planta game because I knew people were talking about, hey,

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we need a blitz more because we're not getting there. Well,

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we were giving up a one point eight passer rating

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>on place when we blitzed, So there's no point in

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>blitz and all the time if it's not working. Uh,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of this, this kind of goes to that

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>same point. Chad said, well, our defense be more aggressive,

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a lot of ways you can

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>take the idea of more aggressive, whether you mean the

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>type of cover that your corners are playing, you know,

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>at the line of scrimmage versus blitzain versus. Yeah, so well,

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>how would you take that question of how what are

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the ways you potentially could see them being more or

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>less aggressive? Yeah, that's about it, really right. You can

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>play more aggressive coverages. I guess somebody could say that

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>playing man is a more aggressive way playing defense and

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>playing zone. Um, so I guess you could play more

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>man to man courage, you play more press coverage, you

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>could blitz more often, And that's really about it. And

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Nick had asked do you think that we'll see more

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>press coverage? He said he's tired of seeing the drop

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>off of the five to ten yard off coverage. I

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people have been asking you for that,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>especially since Carlton Davis was drafted. But of course he

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a probably the best press corner, but he wasn't

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>available exactly. So um, yeah, that could happen. Sure, Okay,

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Um And then Mark asked, are there any

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>updates on Hargraves and Davis? I know one of those.

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>We definitely have an update, well, not an update but

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we just know, Yeah, well, except for the fact that

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you can come back from my r R. That's it

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed to me that the sentiment when Hargraves went on

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>injuries or was his injury was not likely to be

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>one that he could come back from this season. And

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>then Carlton Davis was, you know, he's been more of

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a day to day thing. I think he was right

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>up to game time decision in a couple of games

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this week, and then the last one it was it

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was decided he couldn't go. He's got a couple of

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>things going on because he's had the groin injury I think,

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and then or was his knee. He had the groin

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and then he had the tweaked Yeah, so that was

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the different That was the thing is that it was

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it looked like he was going to be fine, and

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a second. Yeah. The same thing happened to

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Whitehead the previous week. So we've had some bad

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>luck on the practice field because it's usually if you're

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're getting guys hurt with little nagging injuries on

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the practice field, it's usually you're like thirty four year

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>old veterans, not your rookies. You know why we've been

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>having such poor luck in that regard. But I don't

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>think he's got anything that's long term, so hopefully he'll

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be back this week. Okay, well, it's going to do

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>it for us on this edition of Buccaneers Insider Live

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>presented by Miller Lite. Thank you so much for being

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>with us. We'll be back here every week on Tuesday,

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so make sure you're here to send all of your

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>question thoughts and comments. We'll see you next time.