WEBVTT - The Astrologer Who Managed The Reagan Presidency

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome back to Behind the Bastards, the

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>show where we tell you everything you don't know about

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the very worst people in all of history. I'm Robert Evans.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>My guess this week are Amalia Lambert and Tess Lynch

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>from the wonderful podcast Night Call. They're also writers and

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>people about Town is His's Golden Gloves Boxers. I think

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we settled on just more accomplished people than me, is

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what's important for you to know for your purposes. And

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>this week we are talking about someone who might be

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>controversial on this podcast, So I want to lead in

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>here before we introduce the subject by talking about my methodology,

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>because we're about a dozen episodes or so. In so far,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the focus on this podcast has always been the worst

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>people in history, which I define as the shittiest one

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>percent of human beings who have ever lived. Now, there's

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>about one hundred and seven billion people in the total

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>estimated human population, which gives us a big pool to

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>draw from, which is how I can internally justify covering

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Adolf Hitler one week and Harvey Weinstein the next, even

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>though they're not, you know, quite on the same spectrum

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of awfal. So our next subject today hasn't killed anybody,

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>she didn't cause a genocide, she's not a mass rapist.

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I still think I can justify putting her in that

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>top one percent, although she's probably near the bottom of

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that one percent. Have y'all ever heard of a lady

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>named Joan Quiggly? No, sounds familiar, But I don't know why.

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were going to say, like Margaret Thatcher. No,

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>because she's got blood on her Yeah, she said in

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the one percent. I was like, there's

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>totally a Margaret Thatcher episode. But she's more in the middle, right,

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>She's up there, Joan Quiggly, Joan Quiggly. Now, Joan Quigley

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>does have a little bit of a connection to Margaret

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Thatcher because Joan Quigley has a very deep connection to

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan because Joan Quigley was Ronald Reagan's astrologer. Really yep, yeah,

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait. We're in so. I we were talking

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>about it today because I read her book and it

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>made me really hate her, And I don't know, some

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>people may disagree that she's terrible, So we'll get into

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that too. Part of this podcast will be y'all telling

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>me if I'm a crazy person judging her unfairly, or

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>if you guys think she's awful too. But regardless of

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>what we conclude, I've named this episode Joan Quiggly History's

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>greatest monster. So let's dive into it. Joan Cecil Quigley

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>was born in Kansas City, Missouri, on April tenth, nineteen

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, at four to seventeen PM. That time is

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>critical because if you don't know the exact minute of

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>someone's birth, you can't properly cast their horoscope. This is

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 1>something I learned by reading four hundred pages of Joan Quigley.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Explain astrology to me. You read the whole thing? Oh yeah, no,

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I have. Of course she a good writer. No, oh,

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>she's not. I'll give it in fairness, she's not like

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>bad like it's not. I'm not. I was never distracted

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>by the writing quality of the book. How did you

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>decide to read that? I realized that Ronald Reagan's astrologer

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>had written a book, and then I bought it. How

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>did you find out Ronald Reagan had an astrologer? I

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was drunk and browsing the internet at some point, and

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>like I came across some little listical article talking about

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>like wacky facts about US presidents. I think that's I

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>remember that. She was also an astrologer to several other

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>notable people. Was she an astrologer to the stars? Yes,

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>oh yes, yes, yeah, I know, I know a little bit,

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know enough. Keep telling us. Yeah, well yeah.

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>So Jones' father, John was a former lawyer who moved

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco and bought a fancy hotel. His wife

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is named Zelda, which is like, if you know the

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties, that's like the name to have if you're

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a rich lady. It's like, that's like Jackson is today,

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Jackson. Oh god, yeah, just jack Like they're all

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>club promoters. Okay. Yeah. So he and his wife Zelda

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>raised their daughters as high society ladies. They had a

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>penthouse on Knob Hill in San Francisco and went to

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a private school. The Quigly Girls, as they were known,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>had chauffeurs to take them to school. Parties generally enrolls royces.

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>In her obituary, The Los Angeles Times said that she

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>had quote come from the Creme de la creme of

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, gentility and her fancy, rich lady bonafides would

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>prove critical in earning her Nancy Reagan's trust. Joan went

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to Vassar. She got a degree in art history. Her

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>mom was apparently an astrology nerd, and that's where Joan

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>caught the bug. She spent a year as a secret

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>apprentice to a soothsayer named Jerome Pearson. Her dad hated astrology,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and so she had to hide her chart making and

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>star watching while publicly doing normal aristocratic stuff like whatever

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Junior League is. I don't know what the junior

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>League is. Probably you dance with people, dance with other

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>rich people, like Catilians, but with a sportier sounding name. Yeah,

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that's my guess. Katillion is the only word that came

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>into my mind when I read Junior league. I don't

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>even know what one is. It's a club for rich people.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's only women. Like the picture in

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>my head is that scene from Gone with the Wind

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>where the lady in the big dress descends the staircase. Yeah, yeah,

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>something rich people do so they can hang out and

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>wear fancy clothes. Do you have to wear a bustle? Ye?

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It's probably kind of racist. Oh, definitely, there's no Yeah, yeah, okay.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So once Joan is out of college in junior league

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever and moves out of her dad's house, she

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>starts writing an astrology column for seventeen magazine, which I

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize went back that far. And what year is this?

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>Like the forties? Yeah, this is in like the forties seventeen,

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>which back in the forties. Yeah, yeah, because they had

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>just invented teenagers, right, yeah, they're like, now they need

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a magazine. Oh, people who live in past twelve. I

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>guess we gotta figure the thing out. Her gig at

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>seventeen didn't last long, though, because she didn't like writing

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>horoscopes for tabloids. She runted to read the stars of

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the rich and famous and was kind of disgusted by

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea that poor people might use astrology. I should

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>ask you this point, are either of y'all into astrology?

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, tangentially. We've done a couple of night calls

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>where we talked about astrology a bunch and sort of

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>why it's interesting whether you believe in it or not.

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I personally do not believe in it, but I've also

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>said it's probably some of a a virgo and the boring

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 1>is and I love virgos, and I specifically aimed for

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a virgo with one of my kids. Got locked down

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that ago very please, how do you aim for that?

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You know? Noulate, N Well, it's really more like ten.

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, what do you think about astrology? I'm not

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>into astrology, but I like a good friend of mine

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for back home in Texas who's like an accountant, is

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>really into astrology. It's just one of those grounded people

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I know. So I don't think an issue. Well, what's

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>your sign's entertaining? If I may, I don't. I don't know.

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>What's your birthday? March? March? What? Twenty second? I think

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you're a Pisces. Maybe I'm wrong. I have no true

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>astrology nerd would know. I know, but I you know,

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this, liked it. It's like, even though

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe in or like astrology, especially if you

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:39.799
<v Speaker 1>live in Los Angeles, you meet a lot of people

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but maybe are into astrology. There's also a thing I

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>don't like where people are sort of like misogynistic about like, oh,

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>women are so dumb they believe in astrology. Plenty of

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>men believe in astrology. There's plenty of dumb men who

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>believe in astrology. There's plenty of dumb men who believe

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in it, like trickle down economics. I think it's like

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like sports or something. It's just like a thing

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to keep life more entertain than it is. I'll tell you,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe in it way more than I believe in chakras.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>When people get and I'm just like, Wow, they took

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you for a fool, because astrology you can, you know,

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>entertain yourself with for free, so it can't actually be that. Yeah,

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I think so we've decided as soon as you're spending

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>money on it, then it's a day. Yeah. Yeah, And

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's kind of how I feel about it. Like

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any issue and I I like, I

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>tried to as I edited this podcast make sure that

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I was not just attacking people astrology, because like, it's

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever you get do to get through the day. I've

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been superstitious about stuff when I've been in whatever,

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.559
<v Speaker 1>when you need it. Sometimes, yes, life, anything you're into.

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing it for Ronald Reagan, you're on the

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>wrong side of amen, Well that may be one. And

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm also I'm trying to be fair to the Reagan's

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in this, although I'm not a Ronald Reagan fans. You

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>do a history podcast about history, A's greatest monster we're

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>going to cover. We're going to hit on the Reagans

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on this, but I think they're I think they're victims

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of Joan Quickly in this, and we'll get to that

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in a second. Like we like Joan Quickly, Now, yeah,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>who scams the scammers? Ye? This is a complicated one.

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>If it was just one other person sitting here, that

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't but two other people, I feel like we can

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>make the historical judgment. I think I didn't finish school,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know how historians make judgments, but I

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>think this is it. I'm absolutely positive that this is

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly how it should be done. Fantastic. Okay. So Joan

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't like doing horoscopes for poor people, and didn't like

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>doing horoscopes for anyone who could just afford to buy

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a magazine. Her obituary in The Economist notes that quote

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>she did not make forecasts or cast up horoscopes for

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>ordinary people, only for corporate figures, celebrities, and those who

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>guided the destinies of nations. I wish the economist was

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>exaggerating about that. The sad truth is that Joan Quigley

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>was probably the most influential astrologer of the twentieth century. Now,

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Donald Reagan was Ronald Reagan's Treasury Secretary starting in nineteen

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>eighty one and the White House Chief of Staff from

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty five to eighty seven. And it's real funny

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Reagan worked so closely with Ronald Reagan. Were

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 1>they related? So their last names are spelled differently? What

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Reagan is ourg Donald Reagan? Yeah, Donald Reagan. I'm

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna call him Donald. Yeah, I should call him Donald Reagan.

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Still yeah, still confusing. So yeah, Donald Reagan was the

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>chief of staff, which is like, that's a big job.

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>That was Steve Bannon's job until like a year ago. Now,

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ, Okay, So Donald Reagan was the White House

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Chief of Staff from eighty five to eighty seven. He

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was a big trickle down economics guy. He was very

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>importantly the administration. But he was forced to resign in

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven because he couldn't protect the President from

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the fallout of the Iran Contra affair. So in nineteen

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight, he published a memoir called for the Record,

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>where he revealed to the world the White House's quote

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.359
<v Speaker 1>most closely guarded secret. No, not Ronald Reagan's growing senility.

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Not the fact that we've been selling missiles too. Iran

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>joan quickly, this is a quote from Donald Reagan. Virtually

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>every major move and decision that Reagan's made during my

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>time as White House Chief of staff was cleared in

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>advance with a woman in San Francisco who drew up

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>horoscopes to make certain that the planets were in favorable

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>alignment for the enterprise, can tinued, would that there had

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>been some other explanation, But there wasn't astrology, was it.

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a daily, sometimes hourly factor in every decision

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>affecting the President's schedule. What what I didn't know anything.

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I love this. I didn't know the depth of this.

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Was she like living at the White House? Or was

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>she just was he calling from San Francisco? It was

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Nancy who would call, Yeah, and we'll well, we'll get

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit about how it worked. But yeah,

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>like she notes a number of times in her memoirir

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and Donald Reagan backs it up. She had absolute control

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of her when Air Force one took off and landed,

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>she could make it circle in the sky if she

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted it to land at a different time, because the

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>stars said that was better. Well, hey, she went to Vassar,

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>she had her art history degree. She obviously knew a

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>thing or two. Yeah, yeah, no, the am Vassa is

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>famous for its air force. That's what I meant undergraduate.

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, strategy sounds like a nightmare. But

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>also I'm like, wow, I didn't know the Reagans had

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like a restputant. Yeah, it's very rare, like a lady Rasputant.

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm also maybe I like respect her as a

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>history scammer. If Joe had moved to d C and

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>been fucking all I guess the husbands in DC of

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>all of the powerful government people like Resputant did to

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the ladies in the noble court in Russia, this would

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>be a very different podcast. In fact, she had to

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>do so much less work working remotely. You know, you

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 1>can't be understated how great they draw up the stars.

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, and she was not shot and drowned in

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the Volga, which is spoiler, sorry, but you probably should

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>have been. Yeah, it wouldn't have been the worst thing

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>so far. I'm not really hating this lady. But let's

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>keep going. Let's let's get into a little bit. So

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald notes that nobody other than some people very close

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to the president knew about this relationship, including his Secret

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Service detail. He even sort of mentions that he thinks

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they'd be kind of pissed to realize that, after all

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>their years of carefully guarding the president, like Nancy, had

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>been talking about his moves ahead of time with this

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>astrologer over an unsecured phone line. He said, quote, surely

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>they would think that posed a security risk, which it did,

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and that'll be a thing later. It actually kind of

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>led to a grand Soviet US astrology duel. But that's

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a moment for I'm yeah, that's for later in the podcast.

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting out of myself. Yeah, So, when mister Reagan

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>dropped the truth about President Reagan's astrologer, it hit Capitol

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Hill like a bomb. The story sort of faded to

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>just a general political fable. Now, like I think most

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>people vaguely hear that the Reagans were into astrology, but

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't know much about it. But at the time

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it was as huge as story as it would be now,

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>although now it would only be a story for a

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>day and a half that best, maybe not even that.

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So Nancy Reagan insisted that it hadn't been a big deal.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>She claimed that her use of Joan had just been

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>a silly affectation, nothing serious. This made Joan very angry

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>in her mind. Not only had she not hurt the Reagans,

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>her astrology had been the secret power behind the throne.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So Joan decided to write a memoir of her own,

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and on March first, nineteen ninety, she published what does

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Joan Say? My seven years is White House Astrologer to

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Nancy and Ronald Reagan. This is the book that I

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>read for this podcast, What does Jones Say? What does

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Jones John? About three hundred something pages, had a lot

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to say. I don't think it sold well. I wound

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>up having to order a very old hardcover copy of

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it that had never been opened. There's no kindle edition

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of it, so I had to underline the words the

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>old fashioned way. It was terrible taking notes on books

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>before Kendall's strenuous Yeah. Anyway, Joan made me work because

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>her book wasn't a success, and I may hate her

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>for that. She opens her memoir by saying, this is

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a book I never thought I would write, which I

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>think is a lie because she published it really quickly

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>after Nancy Reagan's memoir. Joan claims that when Donald Reagan

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>spilled the beans on her existence quote, I rejected all

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>suggestions that I document my Reagan years. I said as

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>little as possible to the media. I tried above alt

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep from damaging the president I had admired and

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>served for seven years with total dedication. But then she

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>claims that Nancy Reagan's memoire, My Turn, forced her to reconsider.

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>She said it reads like fiction, and much of it

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>as evasive. That is the beginning of what would become

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>several hundred pages of throwing shade at Nancy Reagan. To

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>my eyes, Jones memoir serves two purposes. Number one to

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>allow her to take credit for every achievement of the

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Reagan era, and number two, to shit on Nancy Reagan. Now.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I know at this point you might be wondering how

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>credible is this lady, and obviously she's an unreliable narrator,

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but multiple people do back up the fact that she

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not only advised the president, she was actually the arbiter

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of his schedule. Donald Reagan, who was again chief of

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>staff and would know, admitted in his memoirs that Joan

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>had total control over win Air Force one took offen landed.

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>He wrote that he, or in this case, she, who

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>controls the president's schedule, controls the workings of the presidency,

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>which seems accurate. In his book The Acting President, CBS

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>correspondent Bob Scheffer related a story that also backs up

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Jones's importance. This is Bob Sheefer. The only real hitch

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the campaign team had to deal with during those weeks

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of planning in the fall of nineteen eighty three was

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a conflict over when the president should formally declare his

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Candidacylee Water in particular, wanted it done right away, but

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>he was repeatedly told that Miss Reagan did not feel

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the time for that announcement was propreties. I think it's propitious, propitious,

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you. That baffled him, and when he finally continued

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to press for an explanation, Michael Deaver took him aside

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and disclosed that Nancy's reluctance was based on the astrologer's warning.

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot a number of people. You can

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>find stories of saying that, like, yeah, we had to

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>change the time at the last minute, or we had

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to do something at like midnight or three in the

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>morning or whatever, and when they would trace it back

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>because Nancy Reagan said, no, he can't go out at

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that hour, like he has to go out now, or

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>he has to do this now. Was this because Joan

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was insinuating that he would be assassinated if he Okay,

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>bingo boiler, Sorry no, no, no, this is this is

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like immediately the next paragraph. So no, you landed on it.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to get into how this weird little

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>relationship started. It kicked off in the nineteen seventies because

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Joan was on the MURV Griffin show. Murf Griffin was

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I be fair to call him like a late light host, right, Yeah,

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like Jimmy Fallon of his era, but probably more talented. Yeah,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry if there's Jimmy Fallon fans out there,

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's history's greatest monster yeah at this point. Yeah,

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, MERV Griffin, you know, was one of those

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>really connected people. So he liked Joan quickly, and she

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>did his astrology a bunch, and he also knew an

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>actress named Nancy Reagan, and he knew wh her back

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>when she was an actress and her husband was an actor,

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and then he continued to know them after her husband

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>became the governor of California. Mervy knew that Nancy believed

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in astrology. Joan claims he asked if he could give

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>her number to Nancy, and she said yes. This is

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>from Joan. The first time Nancy consulted me mostly about

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>personal problems. She had given me her exact birth time,

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so doing her horoscope was easy. I remember I described

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to her in detail the matter that she intended asking

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>me about before she asked it. From the beginning, my

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>accuracy impressed her. So Joan did her work on Nancy,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and Nancy was astonished at you know, how well it

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>worked or whatever, And so they had a little relationship

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>going on for a while. The Reagan's had always superstitious.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen sixty seven, when Ronnie was inaugurated as governor,

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>his inauguration was scheduled for twelve ten am in the

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>morning at the advice of a different astrologer. So like

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this has been a thing in their life for a while.

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So in nineteen eighty Reagan ran for president. One. In

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>her memoire, Nancy claims that Joan volunteered her services, which

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just amounted to a few phone calls and advice on

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>wind to time certain events. Joan, however, claims that she

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>advised the Reagans extensively, particularly during then candidate Reagan's first

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>presidential debate with a guy named John Anderson. Anderson has

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>been forgotten and buried in history, as we all will

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>be someday, but he was Ronald Reagan's opponent in his

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>first debate, and this was important because Ronald Reagan was

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a very old presidential candidate. No one had ever been

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine and running for president before, so it was

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>important that he looked good and not seem old. Joan

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>took great care in timing their debate. She also claims

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>that she warned Nancy that the stars had told her

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that someone was going to tamper with Ronald Reagan's microphone,

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and apparently, according to Joan, Nancy found that the microphone

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>had been tampered with and turned down, and Jones says

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that if Ronald had used the microphone without fixing it,

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>he would have sounded weak and therefore old what it

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>makes sense? Yeah, yeah, I mean it's kind of age

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>shaming to say that that weakness and age are correlated.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>But I guess she's not necessarily wrong. I mean, we

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>also saw how that can be wielded very powerfully in

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>a presidential campaign. Weakness and age and you know, fallibility. Yeah,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like that's that. This is one of the ones where

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to like attack her, but she may not

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>be wrong about it, right, I kind of think she's

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But also, like, what if the mic wasn't turned down

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and they just turned his mic up? You know, so

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he was allowed to me to be a smart move.

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>That's still a smart move. Yeah, And this is Nancy

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't say anything about this, so I don't. It's we're

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to take Jones's word that this microphone

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>thing happened. She does, however, take credit for Ronald winning

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>his debate against Carter, or rather, she says, I cannot

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>claim any credit for his winning the Carter debate. However,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I was definitely responsible for Carter's losing that crucial contest,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>because she claimed she picked an astrological time that made

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it impossible for Carter to win. Is sort of the

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>inauguration of her taking credit for everything that happens during

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>this time. So Ronald Reagan was elected, and Joan stopped

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>hearing from Nancy Reagan because at this point, you know,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan's the president, and all the president's advisors are saying,

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>don't associate with astrologers. That's going to end badly for

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>us politically. If you know we're people, find out that

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you're consulting an astrologer on things, it's just not going

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to be good. But then on March thirtieth, nineteen eighty one,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>some guy shot President Reagan in a vital area his body.

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 1>President Reagan nearly died. I don't really like Nancy Reagan,

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 1>particularly her involvement in the War on drugs, but one

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>thing you can say for her and her husband is

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>that they were very much in love. By the reports

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of everybody who knew the two of them, the assassination

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>attempt sort of broke Nancy Reagan. Most people would turn

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to something comforting, either drugs or God or drugs made

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>out of God. After that kind of shock, Nancy turned

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to astrology. So this is where we get into the

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think makes Joan kind of a monster.

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And so we're going to delve into that. But first,

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>do you guys like products and services? Who does it them? Oh? Man?

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>In currency? Oh yeah, Well, we're gonna sell some things

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to you for you to spend your currency on ad

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>break and we're back. So it has been a long

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>opening so far. Nothing bastardy inherently about what Joan Quigley's done.

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>She's just been doing astrology for people who like having

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>astrology done. You know whatever, It's fine, We're getting to

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>wear I think she does something awful. So Ronald Reagan

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is shot on March thirtieth, nineteen eighty one. Nancy Reagan

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>freaks out in exactly the same way anyone who's spouse

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>gets almost assassinated would freak out. Now, both Nancy Reagan,

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>because I read Nancy's memoo, or at least the chunk

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that deals with this. Both Nancy Reagan and Joan agree

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that the aftermath of President Reagan getting shot is when

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>their working relationship in the White House started. Okay, they

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>both have a different recollection of how that happened. So

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to read excerpts from both jones memoir and

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Nancy's memoir, and y'all can tell me which seems more

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>credible to you. All right, So I'm going to start

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>with Joan. It's gonna be quick. Okay, this is what

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>she's said that day. I remember it verbatim. First she asked,

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>could you have told about the assassination attempt? Yes, of

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>course I could had I been looking. However, I haven't

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>been following your charts or tracking the mundane material for Washington.

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Had I been looking, I would have warned you.

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>She then said, and she's this is Nancy talking to her.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting terrible press. It's so unfair. I'm really a

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 1>very nice person. Can you tell me what to do?

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to pay you. So. In Jones's version of events,

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Reagan asks, because you have predicted my husband's assassination attempt,

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and then immediately asks after that, can you make me popular?

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>All right? So that's Joan's recollection. Here's Nancy Reagan in

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>her memoire, my turn, and now it is her turn.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>That joke wasn't even a joke. I said it, and

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't take it back. Here's Nancy Reagan. I remember,

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>as if it were yesterday, my reaction to what MERV

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>told me. On the phone MERV Griffin he had talked

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to Joan, who had said that she could have warned

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>me about March thirtieth. According to Mirv, Joan had said

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the president should have stayed home. I could see from

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>my charts that this was going to be a dangerous

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>day for him. Oh my god, I remember telling MERV

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I could have stopped it. I hung up the phone,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>picked it up again and called Joan. MERV tells me

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you knew about March thirtieth. I said yes, She replied,

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I could see it was a very bad day for

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the president. I'm so scared. I told her. I'm scared

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:49.959
<v Speaker 1>every time he leaves the house, and I don't think

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I can breathe until he gets home. I cringe every

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 1>time we step out of a car or leave a building.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid that one of these days somebody is going

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to shoot at him again. So what do you guys,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Who do you guys think is credible here? Which story

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>do you believe? I mean, so, Joan is basically like,

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't looking, so I don't know. So I didn't

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>know ahead of time, right, And then Nancy kind of

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>comes back at her, being like, well, I'd like you

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to sign on for my own purposes to give me

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>better publicity, you know, to kind of milk the stars,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>if you will, forge and try to get stop my

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>husband from getting shadow again. Meanwhile, Yeah, and then Nancy

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is like she just wants to protect her husband. She'll

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>do anything. Joan saw it coming reached out via merv exactly.

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I find Nancy's more credible. And if it depends on

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>how much money Joan was making, I think if Joan

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>needed the income from Nancy Reagan, then I kind of

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>believe in her reaching out. But if she was really

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>doing fine, it sounds like maybe she had a trust fund.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know why she would, especially because even

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>though I do like astrology, I wouldn't put any stock

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in it. It seems like a big risk for her

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to take, you know, I think, and I get the

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>feeling from the memoir and from the stuffing the end

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to I think Joan wanted to feel close to power. Yeah.

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what it is is. Joan wanted to

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>be influential. She wanted to use her powers to direct

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the progress of history. And what I think is if

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Reagan's version of things is true and MERV Griffin

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't counter her at least when she recalled this. Then

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this lady reached out to MERV because he knew that

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>MERV was going to talk to Nancy. Joan reached out

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to MERV and said, oh, I predicted what happened to

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>President Reagan. I saw it coming in which case? So

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in which case, one of two things is true. Either

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>astrology does work, and this lady legitimately saw that President

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Reagan was in mortal danger, had the first lady's phone

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>number and didn't reach out and call her, or astrology

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work that way. And Joan just lied to MERV

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Griffin because she knew Nancy would hear from him. Wasn't

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>she just saying I could have predicted it if you

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.719
<v Speaker 1>had had me on the job already. That's what her memoir.

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>That's what Joan says in her memoir. Nancy's like saying

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that Joan called MERV Griffin and was like, I could

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>have stopped it. Yeah, according to what MERV said to

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Reagan, Joan told MERV the president should have stayed home.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I could see from my charts that this was going

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a dangerus day for him. I'm going to

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and believe Joan. Yeah, me too, because really, yes,

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think that it's way more credible that she

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>would say I wasn't looking. If I had been, then

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I could have predicted it, because why would you know? Yeah,

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's way more likely because if she

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>had known, she would have also tried to reach out

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>because she because it would have achieved the same purpose.

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But Okay, the reason I believe Nancy's account is because

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they both admit that Nancy stops calling Joan after Ronald

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>wins the presidency. But after the assassination attempt, wouldn't you

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>think that Nancy would kind of start reaching out. But

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Nancy would start reaching out if one of

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>her friends says this astrologer tells me she predicted I

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think Nancy was probably just looking for clues. She was

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>admittedly in freak out mode. She was admittedly in freak

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>out mode. But it also she she's presented with a solution,

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>which is that this lady predicted the assassination, and I

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>could have stopped it if I'd kept talking to her.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>But don't you think that it also makes Nancy seem

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>like a more reasonable person if she claims that, well,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Ben Merv, who everyone loves, called me and said, you know,

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>like astrology's not bullshit as opposed to having to admit

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I was so freaked out that I reached out to

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>my old astrologer that I only had to drop because

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it was like kind of tacky. Well, she doesn't say

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.479
<v Speaker 1>that she dropped Joan because it was kind of tacky.

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>She's actually totally positive about Joan, like Nancy Reagan's never

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>anything but nice, like the bodies are buried. Yeah, I

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>mean I don't know, like Joe never. Joe never talks

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>about the bodies being buried. Joe she got paid off

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to just take this money for this memory invited to

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>pro Joan people. Oh yeah, this is what I want,

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>because I can't be mad at somebody for like scamming

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Reagan, because Nancy Reagan sucks so bad that like

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>she but but tell us more. If there was only

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>money at stake, I'm just I wouldn't care if it

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>turns out that Joan was like Nancy Reagan, Like the

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>stars say, you should like pretend the AIDS crisis isn't happening,

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Like then I'll turn on Joan again. Not quite that,

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but it does tie the war on drive. I think

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>some of that is just Nancy Reagan. Yeah, that's yeah,

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>some of that's Nancy Reagan. I feel like I think

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>she called MERV so that she could get Nancy because

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 1>she knew that if Nancy heard from her, like she

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>would like be like, oh, I could have stopped this,

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Like like that rings truer to me. The Nancy Reagan

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>calling Joan and being like could you have predicted it?

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And can you make everyone love me? I still believe Joan.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I know people who are very obsessed

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>with their astrologers, and I think some that's true that

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>they'll get sort of like not great readings and then

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>something scary happens and they reach out almost like a therapist.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>That is plausible too. I just have trouble believing number one,

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that the conversation immediately swung from can you stop my

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>husband from dying? To can you make America love me? No,

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I think they're the same thing, because

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>she's like, if my husband dies, I'm not first lady anymore,

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>so like I both need my husband to stay alive

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and then to be the most you know, because she's

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>an actress. She just wants to be playing the part

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of the first lady that everyone loves. Yeah, I guess

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>part of it comes down to whether or not you believe.

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And she's a shitty actress, which is why Well and

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Ronald wasn't a great actor. But they are both not

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>good actors, which is why they're not believable. I mean,

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in fairness, they were like two good actors back then. Yeah,

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but they were the not good actors who snitched on

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>people at the Blacklist trials. So we knew that we

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>been knew there about it. Yeah, I don't know, So okay,

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>so we're you guys are coming down on Joan was

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just responding to a legitimate job offer. And I'm thinking

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Joan was trying to like sneak her way back into

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the Reagan's life by taking advantage of an assassination attempt.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's where we are right now, all right, So

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see where everyone's opinions line up at the end

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of this story. So I should probably note right now

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of completion, Joan does claim at another

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>point in her memoir to have foreseen something terrible and

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>not told Nancy Reagan about it. She claims that she

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>predicted Nancy Reagan's cancer and said nothing. Nancy's horoscope had

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>indicated to me months in advance that she would develop

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>breaths cancer. I didn't want to alarm her by coming

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>right out and telling her I knew well too well

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>with a warrior she was, so I did what I

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>always do in such cases. I advised her to have

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>monthly checkups and frequent mammograms, certain that the doctors would

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>discover it the minute it developed, which strikes me as

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a dick move, But I don't know,

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's astrologer's standard practice. I mean, the odds of

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 1>it of getting breast cancer if you're a woman are

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>so high that it's a pretty safe bet to say

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>at some point you'll get cancer. But I mean, if

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>she told Nancy Reagan, I see that you're going to

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get cancer, what could Nancy Reagan have done other than

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly what she advised her to do. I mean, what

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>can you do if you know you're about to get

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>cancer other than see a doctor. Yeah, And I think

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this again may tie back to the fact that I

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think she foresaw any of this, and she's just

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>claiming later after the fact. To have foreseen someone's cancer

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to make her sound good doesn't make her sound good though, No,

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it makes her sound terrible. There's no way to say,

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I knew you were going to get cancer, didn't tell you.

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>But again, I'm not like surprised that the Reagans would

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>take all their advice from like an amoral scammer, because

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what they are. Yes, and we'll we'll, I mean, yeah,

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we're we're in that all moral California scammers. I also

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like they were coming from like California, where it's

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>like nineteen eighty, like who doesn't have a personal skeletrap? Well, yeah,

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>which is part of the thing. Like they're like one,

0:30:58.040 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>she's always got these she's got all these pictures in

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the book where it'll be like someone some senator or whatnot,

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and she'll be like, Senators such and such didn't have

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>an issue with my astrology because he had an astrology. Okay,

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>if she had had like a like a priest on

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>call or whatever. Yeah, it seems like it's kind of

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Yeah, I mean, maybe more acceptable to

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Middle America if she's got a priest than if she's

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>don't They love horoscopes, Yeah, who doesn't. Evangelicals might not. Yeah,

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And I would say the difference between a priest and

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a horoscope is that a priest And I'm not into

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>religion either, but a priest doesn't claim to be predicting

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the future for you. A priest can just be like

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>like the priests the most presidents talk to. They're not

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>like being like, hey, what time should I take my

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>plane off? Like should I do this meeting? They're like,

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what does God say about bombing people in the Sudan

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>or whatever? And apparently God's fine with it. But yeah, anyway,

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we've we've gotten past the assassination attempt and Joan's prediction

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of Nancy Reagan's cancer. So yeah, after the assassination attempt, Joan,

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, gets the offer to become the astrologer for

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Reagan White House and she decides to take it on.

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>She says that, you know, she knew that if she

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>took the Reagans on quote, I would be giving up

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>all my time and effort, like those who take part

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in any administration, sacrificing the rewards they command in the

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>private sector in order to serve their country. Was she

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>exclusive to the Reagans. No, oh no, she's this is nonsense.

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>This is just one of their client and she was

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>paid extraordinarily wealthy. You know how much do you know? Yeah,

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>three thousand dollars a month in nineteen eight, which is

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>today nine thousand dollars a month. What who else were

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>her clients? That's what I want to know. She doesn't

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>go into much detail. MERV. Griffin was definitely one of them,

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but she was like a lot of famous San Francisco

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>socialites and stuff, wealthy people. And this, this is a

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>big trend in the book, is Joan bragging about how

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>selfless she is for working for the Reagans. She claimed

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that Nancy begged her to take them on for free

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>because the Reagans didn't have much money, but they eventually

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>settled on a sum, which, again Joan claims were basically

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>poverty wages, but which was about nine grand a month

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in modern money, which is in my mind, a lot

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of money. She remarks regularly, like pretty much every chapter,

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>how heroic she is for taking just this pittance. Quote.

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I charged Nancy a monthly fixed fee because she needed

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>much more of my time than she could afford. This

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was very generous. On my part because I often worked

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>longer than full time for a while, when an emergency

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>would arise, I was working as long as nine hours uninterrupted.

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh my good, Oh my god. Yeah, And this is

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess another call out to the Dorito's people. If

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>they want to sponsor the podcast, I will work nine

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>hours uninterrupted on a Dorito's themed monster podcast. We're trying

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to get the Dorito's people. Though Doritos comes through, Yeah,

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they're the perfect chip for dictator based comedy.

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We do. Moncho's might be in the running, but I

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>think Dorito's is more of like the you know from

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>De la crame as you might say, Yeah, yeah. Someone

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter came up with a great hashtag Nachos not Nazis,

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>which I think, yeah, yeah, we can, we can sell

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>some Dorito's. Anyway, back to the Reagans, so yeah, in

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Nancy's version of events, which again, nobody's credible here, which

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is why I'm grateful to have y'all's perspective on the matter,

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 1>because I just wound up hating Joan in this book.

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, Nancy Reagan does not deserve to be

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>taken seriously or literally at her own word either. So

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Nancy claims that Joan became a crutch and something of

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a therapist, but nothing more. You know, she would call

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>her when she was anxious about something or a meeting

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that Ronnie was going to have. And I can't not

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>call him Ronnie now because I read that a thousand times,

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that Nancy is lying about this. I

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think she's lying about using Joan as a therapist.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That does not seem out out of the pale at

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>all for me. But I do think that Nancy's fibbing

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about Joan not having a big role in the administration

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>because Donald Reagan's account backs up Joan's claim that she

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>was important and she was making major calls. It is

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me that Nancy's only nice to Joan in

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>her memoir. She says Joan was and emotionally supportive and

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>expresses admiration for how she handled the press when the

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>story broke. It's interesting to me that Joan spends her

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>whole book attacking Nancy Reagan and making her look like

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a monster with quotes like Nancy was almost totally innocent

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of history. I was often surprised by how little she

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>knew about it. She was in no way an intellectual

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>or deeply reflective, which I don't disagree with, but is

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 1>not a nice way to refer to the person who's

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the only reason that you're noteworthy. Well maybe she thinks

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not the only reason she's noteworthy. Yeah, And also

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>is the difference between a politician and a psychic. Yeah,

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a plain dealer. Yeah. Yeah. And Joan makes a

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>big point about how much Nancy Reagan hated Eli with Sell,

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the Holocaust survivor and author, and what he won. Was

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it a nobel I think? Yeah. She says that Nancy

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Reagan hated elizzl because of he made a big fuss

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>when Ronald Reagan laid a wreath at a cemetery where

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Nazis are buried, which is a reasonable thing to be

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>angry about if you're a Holocaust survivor. When Roselle became

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 1>vocal about it and sparked an out cry, Joan claims

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>that Nancy said, he acts like he's crazy. It's his fault.

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a fanatic. And after this point Joan chimes in

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to say that she doesn't think Nancy was a racist

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in the most racist way possible. To be fair, Nancy

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was not a religious bigot. She liked her wealthy Jewish

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>friends as well as her friends of other religions. Ooh

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>oh no, but is that a way to know it's

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 1>just terrible. It's terrible. And that's one where I feel

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like Nancy's I'm sure Nancy's awful about this. Well, I mean,

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing is I'm like, is she just trying

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to like call attention to how awful Nancy is while

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>still rottin. I think she recognizes it. I think she

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>legitimately she probably doesn't know anyone that isn't an anti Semite,

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>so she's like on a scale of aism, this was

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just you know, she just hated him, but you know,

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>her her wealthy Jewish friends. As long as you're rich. Yeah,

0:36:57.719 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think Joan Quickly ever talked to anyone

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>who wasn't rich. And that's what I'm saying. So she's

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>never met a non racist person in her life, yeah,

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>because I mean it's telling that she doesn't consider the

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Reagans to be rich, right, because like they had a

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>ranch in Santa Barbara, but they're not old money. Yeah, yea.

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>She that's the line for her because she's you know,

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco old money, and I'm sure some East Coast

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>people would be like, well, that's California, right, right, Yeah,

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:26.959
<v Speaker 1>the astors are really raking her over the coals, and

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they're all making fun of the Reagan being president is

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so good, the talk of the Junior League. Yeah, exactly.

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of the Junior League, I am pretty sure those

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>wealthy Jewish families aren't allowed at the Cotillions. Yeah. I

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say, they're definitely not allowed in the Junior League. Yeah,

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>so yeah. Joan quickly claims her first big job was

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to make Nancy Reagan likable. Nancy was being pilloried by

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the press from the White House China. She planned to

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>buy to her expensive clothes. Her every movement was ridiculed

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and criticized. Everywhere she said brought more public disapproval. So

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Nancy was embarrassed at being a political liability and begged

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>for Jones help. I want everyone to love me. Where

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Nancy's first words after I agreed to work with her

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on a professional basis. I had to smile. The words

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>were so typical of a person with her kind of horoscope. Dude,

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>want now, I'm going to go home and look up

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>like what Nancy Reagan's sign was. Because based on that,

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 1>what am I thinking? Scorpio, I'm gonna find out why? Yeah, okay, research,

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>This is important, extra research that I didn't do because

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a hack and a frog. Yeah. So Joan claims

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that she asked Nancy what charities Nancy wanted to work for.

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Nancy kind of vaguely expressed an interest in drug rehabilitation

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>programs in the Foster Grandparents program, and Joan claims that

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>she's responsible for focusing Nancy Reagan. I told her that

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>these two charities would be what she would be known

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>for from now on, that she would talk about them

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>whenever she granted interviews and make them her personal crusade.

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 1>She must be a kind of ministering angel of mercy,

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a sort of supernational mother figure. I told her to

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>set her staff to ferreting out appealing letters from children,

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>for instance, and make a point of answering them. Or

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>she could respond to some needy person, making sure this

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 1>same time that the story would be well publicized in

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the media. Oh man, which is such a rich person?

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Right about needy person? Like, what do you mean by needy?

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>That was the foster grandparents thing too. I wonder, I

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>mean that sounds like I guess it's a program to

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>help like connect underprivileged kids to like older men and

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>women who could be like So she really wanted to

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just focus on issues that you can put on a mug. Yeah. Yeah,

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it is only superficial things that she could be beloved for.

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And Joan Quigley was like, yes, but you can't be

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>casual about it. If you're going to talk about drugs,

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be a drug warrior. You've got to

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>be like lecturing the nation and claims basically to be

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>why Nancy Reagan became the face of the war on

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>drugs during the nineteen eighties, Well, apparently Nancy was a cancer,

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>just like oh, that's for sure. Ronald was the Aquarius,

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the age of Aquarius. I mean the cancer's cancers are.

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>So they're water signs and they're very they do need

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of approval and they're very sensitive to being

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>reject So there are two water signs together. We water

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>signs together. Well, water signs are you know, they're fluid,

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like there's you know, I'm just now I'm speaking personally

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>about the water signs. I know, but they're kind of mercurial,

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>like their temperament can change on a dime. They have moods.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>They're moody people. Molly and I are Earth's signs around.

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that you say that water signs are fluid

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>because Nancy Reagan, the water sign was a major factor

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in the escalation of the War on drugs, which is

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>why so many people have to take pissed tests to

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>prove their sobriety. WHOA, and while you were all reeling

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>from that connection, we have to break for some more ads,

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so please pull out your credit cards and spend some money.

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:52.360
<v Speaker 1>We're back and we're talking about Joan Quiggly, History's greatest monster,

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>or maybe not. We'll be deciding that by the end

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast. One way or the other. It fits

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>into the behind the Bastard's theme. Either Joan Quiggley's a

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 1>bastard or Ronald Reagan the bastard behind the bases, which

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way makes her less of a bast I mean,

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like, still, she's the power behind the throne, and

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the throne is evil, so I mean the war on

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>drugs thing I don't love. Right now, Nancy Reagan is

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>remembered for like just say no, yeah, she's you know,

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>criminalizing all that stuff, and also for being a horrible homophobe, Yes,

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>super homophobic. And there's because Joan is very conservative that

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>comes across and this thing. So I like, she doesn't say.

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 1>There's not a word about gay people in this. There's

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not a word about the AIDS crisis in this, So

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I like, I can't say anything about that because Joan

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't consider it worth talking about what they did. Yeah,

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you're an astrologer and you saw the AIDS

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>crisis coming and did nothing, then I'm going to go

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead and say that's what I'm saying. She's a monster too.

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And again, if you're like taking all the credit for

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>making Nancy Reagan the person she is, then like you're

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.439
<v Speaker 1>taking credit for a lot of garbage. Actually, I'll say

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>this in Jone's defense. I don't think she could have

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>predicted the AIDS crisis because that would have been doing

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the horoscopes of a bunch of low income gay people,

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and Joan quickly did not work for port. But astrology

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>too is seeing world trends. Yeah, you know, you can

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 1>focus on an individual chart, or you can focus on

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the planetary alignments, and she she throughout her book she's

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>very inconsistent about what astrology can do, because sometimes she'll say,

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>when something goes badly for Reagan, she'll say, like, the

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>stars were just so fucked up with that thing that

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>there was no way that anything anyone could have done,

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>no intervention. But she'll also claim that, like, you can

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>make anything successful if you pick the right time. That's all,

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>which is it, Joan, That's all New age bullshit, is

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's infallible except sometimes yeah, but in this case

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 1>nothing could be right. Yeah, So there's there's a lot

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of inconsistencies within it. But again, I don't have any

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 1>issue with astrology until you start determining when the president

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:54.800
<v Speaker 1>speaks to national tragedies. From which point made me start?

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys think Alex Jones is the Joan Quigley

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump administration? Oh shit, you know that's not

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>a bad point. I saw him give a speech at

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the Republican National Convention, like outside of the main convention floor.

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I have never seen a human being get that red

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>because he's screaming, and it's like it was terrifying. But

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like with Trump too, it's like he also

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>like he cribbed so much from Reagan, and he also

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.760
<v Speaker 1>does so much based on what he sees on TV. Yeah,

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>he's also the president who just watches TV all day

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's superstitious. Yeah, he's definitely supersticititious. And I'm sure

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they've got Alex Jones on a hotline. And I gotta

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>say I'm glad that Trump does not have one thing

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan had is personal charisma. Like if you ever

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to anyone, even people who didn't like him, who

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 1>had face to face conversations, he was very good. He

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 1>was he was fun. He was good at charming people. Right.

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>That's so weird because I never got that from him

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>ever when you guys hung out, when we hung out

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 1>stories when he got shot and he was like dying

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and being wheeled in for Sara, Like he like looked

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>up at the surgeon and he said, oh, I sure,

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>hope you're a Republican. It's like like little folk like

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not funny Trump would, is it. I think it's

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>endearing in the moment. I don't think. I don't know.

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, he's not as bad as Trump. I

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>think in terms of interpersonal relationship, I think Trump Reagan

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to me, like his charisma is I don't know. I

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think it was more like the same thing with like

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>George W. Bush. It was like people were like, oh,

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>his folksy charisma, and I was like, what are you

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about? Like, I don't see that. He just seems

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like an idiot. But I think Reagan was more like George,

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:34.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, he he seemed like like an old man

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>who used being old to like fake convey stateliness to

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be that's an aspect of it, like one thing old

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>white man. It's hard to say how much of Trump's

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>unpopularity is due to the media cycle, and like if

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump had been president in nineteen eighty one, would he

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be more popular because we just wouldn't have as much

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>focus on it. But Reagan was more popular than Trump, right,

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>which I don't know. I mean imagine Reagan though, that

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>was I mean, that's one of the things about you know,

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>making a very like vanilla joke of like I hope

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>you're a Republican as opposed to like firing off some

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>crazy ass tweets where you're just so offensive exactly. Well,

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's more like if Reagan were president now,

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>he'd be tweeting some crazy racist shit all the time.

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I know what I mean. It would be because he

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't know how to use Twitter because he's too old.

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he might be mutton dressed as lamb on Twitter.

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying he at least for sure was saying

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:32.919
<v Speaker 1>crazy racist, homophobic shit behind closed doors, behind closed doors.

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's the I mean, not that it

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>makes it any better, but that it makes it easier

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to be a charming person. Ye fit in the you know,

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that's like what people think is charming about you, which

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is obviously Donald Trump's voters are like, I love when

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>he talks about a politics. He grabs them by the

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>pussy and that's what I like, you know, But I

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:54.240
<v Speaker 1>do think there's different kinds of racism and they're all toxic.

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 1>But like with Trump, you've got this more like I'm

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be like, but news organizations are still like

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>a racially charged incident, you know, like they still won't

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>say he's being a racist, even though he's like using

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>racist terms and saying racist things. People still are like,

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's the president, so we're going to treat it

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with like the import of like the president saying something

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's all the same platforms the Republican Party has

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>always had, which are like homophobia, racism, and like hating

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 1>poor people. Well, and I think more to the point,

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting at, which which is interesting in that

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it ties in here is one of the things that

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>has been so dangerous in regarding the intersection of the

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 1>press and this presidency, is that we traditionally treat the

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>presidency as this August position. There's like something special about

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the president, like that there's a certain level of respect

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 1>that you should have for the president. And that's obviously

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 1>nonsense as it occurs to Donald Trump, because he's just

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>an asshole on Twitter. Well, it's nonsense in general. It

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 1>was nonsense then, yeacause this guy had a fucking astrology

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>telling his plain to ser full in the sky. The

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>stars weren't and all like the great presidents of history

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>were like slave owners, so like they were not keeping

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>their racism secret, you know, or rampaging alcoholics or too

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>fat to get out of a bathtub, like they're just

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>what they're just doing, which is just disgusting, right, And

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing about Reagan was it was like

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we're casting a guy who looks like he should be

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the president to play the president on television, but he

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually like know or care. Well, that's where the

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>astrologer becomes an important That's where the astrologer but comes

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>back in let's get back to let's get back to astrologer.

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>When we were last talking about the astrology stuff, we

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 1>were getting into the fact that, yeah, Joan quickly insisted

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:46.439
<v Speaker 1>that Nancy Reagan make drug policy be like her big thing,

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and of course Nancy becomes the face of the just

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Say No campaigns. You know, during the Reagan administration, the

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>number of people behind bars for nonviolent drug offenses increased

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:59.359
<v Speaker 1>from like fifty thousand to several hundred thousand, like four

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen ninety seven. So, yeah, Nancy Reagan wasn't making

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:06.399
<v Speaker 1>policy on that, but she was the face of it,

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and she had a significant role in setting public opinion.

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And some of that's on Nancy, and some of that's

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 1>on Joan Quigley, some of that's on Ronnie. Yeah, most

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of it's on Ronnie because Joan and Nancy weren't making policies. Well,

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's also it's always like frowned upon

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for the president to like listen to his wife, you know,

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and make policy based on that. But she gets her

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 1>little pet projects right, but like incarcerating drugs, incarcerating everybody, yeah,

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the homie things, yeah uh so yeah. In addition to

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:39.319
<v Speaker 1>urging Nancy to make anti drug policy a cornerstone of

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:42.399
<v Speaker 1>her first ladyship, Joan insisted that Nancy avoid doing any

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>interviews with fashion magazines. I think she mainly includes this

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 1>part so that you can take another shot at Nancy

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>or another shot at seventeen magazine. She doesn't mention in

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>magazine by name. It's just like screw magazines, magaziness. Poor

0:48:54.840 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 1>people go to form those only read gold. Yeah. She

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 1>says that not talking to fashion magazines was quote the

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>hardest thing for her to give that up. She tried

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to wheedle me into letting her do it, but I

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>was firm. Joan claims at the time she picked for

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Nancy to do her public appearances and her anti drug

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>speeches and stuff for as perfect as possible. She's very

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 1>proud of this work and says it's the reason that

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Miss Reagan's reputation improved throughout her husband's time in office.

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Here's Joan again, quite typically, when Nancy thanked me for

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 1>turning her image around, I said, and it was something

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>she was already aware of. Nancy Joe Kennedy paid between

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one and two million dollars in nineteen sixty for what

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I have done for thousands. In nineteen eighty one, she

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>claims Joe Kennedy had to pay publicists to make Jackie

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh popular. Wish Oh. Come on, everybody would have loved

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Jackie no matter what she did. She was fucking Jacklino

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Nasis like, go to hell, John quickly. And then she

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>said to Nancy, really, you must admit it has been

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a present. And again she was getting nine thousand dollars

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a month in modern dollars. It's so hard because when

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you're paying for astrology, any number seems both ludicrous and

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 1>completely safe. You know what I mean, nine thousand. If

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you're if someone's giving you nine thousand dollars for this,

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems easy to argue that that's a tiny amount.

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>And they're saying, I'm the only person who can give

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you this information right also, I mean it. Joan Quigley

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:15.439
<v Speaker 1>does not sound like a feminist, but in a way

0:50:15.560 --> 0:50:18.840
<v Speaker 1>advising the first lady to not push her cause in

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>fashion magazines is kind of a feminist stamp, and it

0:50:22.040 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>would be taken way more seriously if you avoid that

0:50:24.600 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>channel entirely. Like I'm kind of behind that. Yeah, I'm

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not against that part. But also I'm like, Nancy Reagan

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to be in fashion magazines. That's how she

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be first Lady, so she could be on

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the cover of Vogue or whatever. And if she'd just

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:37.479
<v Speaker 1>been on the cover of Vogue and not been talking

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:39.799
<v Speaker 1>about drugs, yeah, maybe would be in a better place

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:43.319
<v Speaker 1>in the country. Should have stuck to fashion. Yeah, and more,

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess more to the point, what irks me is

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>just like I'm sure that to Joan Quiggly, nine thousand

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month was a pittance, but like that's just

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:54.520
<v Speaker 1>further makes me dislike her, because it's like, like three

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>families could have lived on what you just for this one.

0:50:57.280 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Joe Gurritos wants to pay us all to do astrology. No,

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, as horrible as Joan Quigley is, is

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:07.799
<v Speaker 1>as good as cool ranch Dorito's taste after a hot

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>day not eating doritos. Okay, let's let's move back on.

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Can we co opt this for our podcast? So now,

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I like really wanted to if you guys get a

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Dorito sponsorship, I just got to say, super, We're going

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to try our best. I interviewed an influencer and I

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>was like, how do you get brands to sponsor you?

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And she was like I just like at them and

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, hey, sponsor me. And I was like that works,

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was like I'm going to start. Yeah, now,

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>brands all the time listening this should hashtag at Dorito's

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in the podcast and try to try tos for putting

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 1>us in this whole world where we all need to

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 1>be sponsored by brand to exist. Hell world, don't you

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:49.239
<v Speaker 1>mean na choantastic world? I mean a cool a cool

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ranch where it is a cool ranch. Well, Santa Barbara,

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you brought it back there before. Yeah, I salute you

0:51:58.160 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for that. Uh So Yeah. She own claims that her

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 1>advice made Nancy Reagan more popular, and it's hard to

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 1>argue with that, at least in the fact that Nancy

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Reagan did get a lot more popular. She started with

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>like a fifty seven percent approval rating after her first year,

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 1>but rose to seventy one percent by nineteen eighty five.

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So whether or not it was Jones doing Nancy Reagan

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was a lot more popular by Ragie. She was right

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:22.400
<v Speaker 1>about not doing the fashion magazines too, because the fashion

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 1>magazines would have just been a list of like what

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:28.239
<v Speaker 1>expensive things she was doing exactly and wearing. But also

0:52:28.239 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 1>as the eighties, I thought that's all anybody wanted. No,

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean, I think she's trying. I think

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Joan was trying to create the illusion of substance where

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>she found none. Well, you know, the main way, that's

0:52:37.520 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what Jane would say, Yeah, right, true, big way to

0:52:40.000 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>create the illusion of substance is to not talk that much. Hmm,

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>that's true, or to just appear. I mean when she

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:49.600
<v Speaker 1>had Nancy kind of choose her projects and then mention

0:52:49.760 --> 0:52:53.160
<v Speaker 1>those all the time. She's also kind of editing out

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 1>anything else Nancy might want to say, totally go over

0:52:56.000 --> 0:53:00.399
<v Speaker 1>way less. Well, she's giving her talking points. Yeah and yeah,

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and Joan work started with Nancy Reagan's image, but it

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 1>did not end there. As the months and years went on,

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Nancy came to rely on Joan more and more. It's

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:09.879
<v Speaker 1>hard to say what influenced her husband's worsening health had

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on this, but Joan's involvement in the Reagan administration became extensive.

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's a quote from Joan. I was responsible for timing

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 1>all press conferences, most speeches. The State of the Union

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>addresses the takeoffs and landings of Air Force one. I

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 1>picked the time of Ronald Reagan's debate with Carter and

0:53:23.120 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the two debates with Walter Mondale, all extended trips abroad,

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as the shorter trips in one day excursions.

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:30.359
<v Speaker 1>In other words, Reagan did not leave the White House

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:32.879
<v Speaker 1>without Jones say so. She also helped the Reagans make

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>major health decisions. Quote. I delayed President Reagan's first operation

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for cancer from July tenth, nineteen eighty five to July thirteenth,

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and chose the time for Nancy's mistectomy. So she's got

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable amount of influence. Did anyone think it was

0:53:47.719 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 1>weird that they were having like press conferences at like

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve twenty five or something, you know, they did? There

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 1>were like that's one of the quotes from earlier as

0:53:56.560 --> 0:53:58.480
<v Speaker 1>people talking about it, it it was weird the times they

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:01.439
<v Speaker 1>would set for things, and nobody really knew exactly why,

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>but there would be myths, like Nancy said, this isn't

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:07.319
<v Speaker 1>a good time. That seems like like some smoking gun

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of that. Yeah, that Joan was picking the times that

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they were weird times. No, it's one of those things.

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Like it's definitely like no one who is who is

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>close to the administration is refuted any of this. Like

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Nancy said, it wasn't that big idea. It's true, but

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Reagan's like, no, like the thing, Yeah, it sure

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>was a thing. It's important that you understand. Joan quickly

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:29.640
<v Speaker 1>never claimed to be clairvoyant, which is how Donald Reagan

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>described her. I don't think Donald Reagan was an astrology guy.

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:35.240
<v Speaker 1>She claims that a clairvoyant is a mystic or a psychic,

0:54:35.239 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 1>while Joane sees herself as basically a scientist, and this

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is her view of astrology. I based my astrological analysis

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>on the data provided by astronomers and charts calculated by computers.

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 1>My conclusions are based on this accurate scientific material, in

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:49.759
<v Speaker 1>the same way your doctor supports his diagnosis by the

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>laboratory reports, or an economist bases his predictions on statistics.

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So Joan didn't have a computer of her own, this

0:54:57.239 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was the eighties. She would send a lot of the

0:54:59.040 --> 0:55:02.400
<v Speaker 1>information that she was calculating off to third party companies

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 1>who had computers, which means that in addition to the

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:08.399
<v Speaker 1>unsecured phone call she was having with Nancy Reagan about

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the president's secret schedule, she was also sending off that

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>information to strangers. Was she saying in her was she

0:55:14.760 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 1>like sending postcards basically saying the President wants to have

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Air Force one launching it to this place on this

0:55:21.480 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>date at this time. All she says is that no

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>one could have figured out what they were talking about

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 1>based on the info she gave those people. But we're

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 1>having to take her word from it, right right, So

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just setting that up that there's a severe breach

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:37.279
<v Speaker 1>in the President's information security as a result of this

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 1>astrology thing that's going on. So Joan is a serious lady.

0:55:42.480 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>She had nothing but contempt for astrologers who write for

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 1>newspapers and magazines like she used to do when she

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 1>was young and needed the money. She rages that there

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>are at present no forced standards for astrologers and that

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 1>unworthy people cannot be prevented from assuming what should be

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a respected title. So she's very angry about popular astrology,

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:03.720
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, the astrology that people can afford

0:56:03.719 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 1>if they can afford a newspaper. Miss quickly spent a

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:09.279
<v Speaker 1>large chunk of her book trying to convince us that

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:14.480
<v Speaker 1>astrologers have been historically necessary in government. She points out

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that most great kings had astrologers, that Isaac Newton believed

0:56:17.200 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in astrology, that Einstein believed in astrology. So like, she

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:22.759
<v Speaker 1>spends a lot of her book trying to convince you

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's fine for an astrologer to be advising the president. Now.

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 1>In her view of the world, every achievement of the

0:56:29.640 --> 0:56:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Reagan era, and also every human achievement in general, was

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:34.920
<v Speaker 1>made possible by the combination of the stars being in

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the right position. She credits the miracle of flight to

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Neptune and Pluto were together in the

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:43.839
<v Speaker 1>air sign of Gemini in the early nineteen hundreds. That's true, Okay, good,

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:47.080
<v Speaker 1>good to know. I thought it was like people, Oh yeah,

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody met the air and dying until they got it right.

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:54.879
<v Speaker 1>But no, it's good. That's magnets, yeah, stars. I could

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:58.240
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth about like all the different things

0:56:58.400 --> 0:57:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Joan believed. I wound up putting a lot more of

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that in the first draft of this that I trimmed

0:57:02.320 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>out just because, like, let's keep it to the Reagans.

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 1>It is important. You know that. She claims to put

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in a huge amount of work to the charts that

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 1>she was doing so. For example, exact birth times are

0:57:10.800 --> 0:57:13.839
<v Speaker 1>necessary for good horoscopes. Since Ronald Reagan was born back

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 1>in the olden times before people kept track of when

0:57:15.760 --> 0:57:18.680
<v Speaker 1>babies were born, Joan had to rectify him, which is

0:57:18.720 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the term she uses for some reason for figuring out

0:57:21.120 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 1>someone's birth time using backwards math. So she claims to

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have calculated both Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan's birth times. Did

0:57:30.200 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe tell me tell you how what backwards math is? Like,

0:57:33.280 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm dying to know about back It's a little bit

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of magic, are you? I got that quote? When you

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:40.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know what time of day an individual was born,

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and for serious astrology, the exact birth time is indispensable.

0:57:43.840 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You must figure it out from such clues as the

0:57:45.960 --> 0:57:48.919
<v Speaker 1>known events of that person's past, their appearance in psychological

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and physical characteristics, not already explained by the other factors

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in their horoscope. Oh it's not math at all. No, no, no,

0:57:58.640 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 1>she claims to know the exact manner. Oh so it's

0:58:00.880 --> 0:58:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like reverse. She's like, oh, he seems like he was

0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:07.280
<v Speaker 1>born in around twelve twenty five, so exactly, it seems

0:58:07.280 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 1>like an afternoon or yeah, seems like a fourth using

0:58:10.760 --> 0:58:14.960
<v Speaker 1>personality to be like okay, yeah, sure, yeah yeah, And

0:58:14.960 --> 0:58:16.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone who could have proved her wrong on this has

0:58:17.000 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 1>been dead for decades because Ronald Reagan was born in

0:58:19.280 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>like the teens. Yeah, you know clocks then either, So

0:58:24.000 --> 0:58:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to cut for some what are those things

0:58:27.040 --> 0:58:30.000
<v Speaker 1>where people sell stuff and other people learn about products

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and service Doritos. We're having a Dorito's break now, so

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys have a crunch tastic time listening to these

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 1>taste ads, and we're back. So we were just talking

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 1>about how Nancy Reagan figured out what she claimed to

0:58:48.880 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>be Ronald Reagan's exact time of birth, uh, and also

0:58:52.240 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Gorbachov's exact time of birth so that she could do

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:57.280
<v Speaker 1>their charts, which which comes up later. But let's let's

0:58:57.400 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>veer back right now and talk about the Challenger Space

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>shuttle disaster. I ran across some Twitter, unverified Twitter comments

0:59:04.640 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 1>by people claiming that Ronald Reagan's astrologer had picked the

0:59:07.680 --> 0:59:10.520
<v Speaker 1>time for the Challenger Shuttle launch. I found no evidence

0:59:10.520 --> 0:59:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of that, but Joan does claim that she's the reason

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the President ordered an investigation of NASA after the Challenger disaster.

0:59:20.400 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 1>According to Joan, the President had Nancy ask her whether

0:59:24.800 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 1>or not the stars said NASHA should be investigated after

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>seven astronauts died in an explosion, which, yes, regardless of

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 1>what the stars say, someone should investigate. But yeah, Joan

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:38.680
<v Speaker 1>says that she analyzed the charts for the launch and

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the astronauts and said that there ought to be an investigation.

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>The Twelfth House indicated that sabotage, at worst or at

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>least inexcusable negligence had been involved in the crash, which

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:54.760
<v Speaker 1>was obviously true because space shuttles aren't supposed to explode.

0:59:54.880 --> 0:59:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That seems like a like a like an easy get

0:59:57.200 --> 1:00:00.440
<v Speaker 1>for for Where was Joan before the Launch's interested in

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>right in flight? Now? Yes, well get close to the stars. Yeah,

1:00:05.160 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it's weird that she didn't call that one right the

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>same time, but she doesn't know when bad things are

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. She also she only knows that she

1:00:12.600 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>could have predicted them. Yeah, if she. If only I

1:00:15.880 --> 1:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been doing if only you gave me more money,

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I would have known. Yeah, that this what happened. Yeah,

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, she's the reason there was an investigation in

1:00:23.560 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>an assa after this. Now, older listeners may remember that

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan was known as the Teflon President because many

1:00:29.120 --> 1:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>many scandals during his presidency didn't seem to stick to

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>him up until you know the very end. John quickly

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>claims credit for this too, in a chapter of her

1:00:36.400 --> 1:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>book titled Astrology. Was the Teflon and the Teflon Presidency beautiful?

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>It's great, It's a work of art. Really, here's Joan.

1:00:44.320 --> 1:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>For almost six years, the president dominated his press conferences,

1:00:47.120 --> 1:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>partly because he was well prepared, and finally because the

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>times I chose for his press conferences enabled him to

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>appear at his best. She repeatedly insists that my control

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>over the departure times at Air Force One when the

1:00:57.200 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>President was aboard were absolute. Her most vivid story of

1:01:00.920 --> 1:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of deflecting a scandal for the President came during

1:01:03.640 --> 1:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the run up of his trip to Germany in nineteen

1:01:05.440 --> 1:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>eighty five. He was going to help shore up Helmet Cole,

1:01:08.000 --> 1:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the German Prime Minister in a reelection campaign. There was

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a big photo op opportunity that was supposed to be

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>important to the German public. Where the two men were

1:01:16.280 --> 1:01:18.439
<v Speaker 1>going to go to a cemetery in Bittberg where they'd

1:01:18.480 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>lay to rest a wreath commemorating the dead of World

1:01:20.520 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>War Two. It was a lovely gesture, but the President's

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>team failed to account for the forty nine dead Waffen

1:01:24.960 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ss men buried there. This became a huge issue in America.

1:01:29.400 --> 1:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I just talked about kind of Illeisel was very angry

1:01:31.640 --> 1:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about it. People marched in the streets. Israeli and American

1:01:34.440 --> 1:01:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Jewish leaders were outraged, but Helmet Cole insisted the visit

1:01:37.000 --> 1:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>was necessary, and most Germans seemed to agree. Ronnie needed

1:01:39.920 --> 1:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to support Cole because his re election was critical to

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:44.439
<v Speaker 1>write Reagan's Cold War strategy, something about where he wanted

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to put missiles. So bereft of good options, Ronald Reagan

1:01:48.000 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>turned to Joan Quigley. She claims to have suggested that

1:01:50.920 --> 1:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the administration basically make a visit to bergen Belsen concentration

1:01:54.680 --> 1:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>camp before going to Bittberg, and that they would publicize

1:01:57.200 --> 1:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that a lot more. She also claimed that the timing

1:01:59.560 --> 1:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>on when they visited Bitberg was critical, so she picked

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>an exact like minute and like this is the minute

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that Air Force one has to land. And what mattered

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>was not the context of the president's visit or that

1:02:11.000 --> 1:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>he was laying a wreathit a cemetery that included dead

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>asss men. What mattered was that astrologically the right time

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>was chosen. Jones time didn't work out with the president's

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:23.479
<v Speaker 1>existing plan. They're supposed to have a picnic or something,

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>so she canceled the picnic, and then she had the

1:02:26.680 --> 1:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Air Force One fly around in circles for as long

1:02:28.880 --> 1:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as it had to in order to land at Bitberg

1:02:30.640 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>at her chosen time. So she just had the Air

1:02:33.560 --> 1:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Force One just circling for hours, waiting for the right

1:02:36.400 --> 1:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>astrological time, burning jet fuel. How did the public receive

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this visit? They didn't know. I don't know. It was

1:02:42.200 --> 1:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>actually a disaster. This is Michael Moore. One of the

1:02:45.560 --> 1:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>first times he shows up on TV is as at

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a crowd of protesters at Bitburg. Hold. Yeah, yeah, but

1:02:51.200 --> 1:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Helmet Cole was re elected in the controversy did eventually fade,

1:02:54.280 --> 1:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>which Joan credits to the fact that she had Air

1:02:57.000 --> 1:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Force one burn enough fuel that yeah, they were able

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and at her specifically chosen astrological time. So again, people

1:03:05.600 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>noticed at the time that the Reagans had really weird

1:03:08.520 --> 1:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>timing issues because there were like White House correspondents that

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>had worked with other presidents who didn't use astrologers. Joan

1:03:14.520 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>notes that like or who did with their astrologers, gave

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>them like times, you know, hour normal people till Yeah,

1:03:20.280 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>because Joe, it's always like twenty minutes past the Yeah

1:03:22.200 --> 1:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with you, because that's how you make it seem like

1:03:23.800 --> 1:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a special time. Yeah. No, twelve twenty five. Yeah.

1:03:26.680 --> 1:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>I keep feel like we all keep saying twelve twenty five,

1:03:29.280 --> 1:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Well there's probably an astrological Yeah, it's when the seventh

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>house is in the night House. Yeah. Well it's also

1:03:35.040 --> 1:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Christmas when the moon is in the seven twelve twenty

1:03:37.160 --> 1:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>five wait what oh yeah wow yeah, yeah, that's when George,

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you should be an astrologer. Because you just did a

1:03:45.920 --> 1:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>whit on me. I was like, why I played it

1:03:48.560 --> 1:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>being an astrologer on AOL instant messenger when I was

1:03:51.760 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in like junior high almost got to charging people money,

1:03:54.560 --> 1:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, no, I can't do this. Well,

1:03:56.680 --> 1:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>stream of Bay, I know you could be that kind

1:03:59.000 --> 1:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of astrologer, not this president but I'm saying, what if

1:04:02.520 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you did and then you like were able to bring

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it down, you know, because if you have that much power, right,

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you could be like, you know, serious saying I'm in

1:04:12.120 --> 1:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the wrong. Oh so definitely. Donald Trump reads everything on

1:04:14.840 --> 1:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the teleprompter like an anchorman. You know, you could just

1:04:17.240 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>get him to say anything. Yeah. So I'm just maybe

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I should be the presidential astrologer. Yeah, as long as

1:04:22.440 --> 1:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't listen to this podcast, you can't get that

1:04:24.680 --> 1:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>job here, I know. Yeah. There's a quote in Jones

1:04:28.680 --> 1:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>book from Bill Plant of CBS which is fascinating to

1:04:32.080 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>me because he was basically talking about how the White

1:04:34.920 --> 1:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>House correspondence would always wonder why the timing was so weird.

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We wondered if there was any strategy involved, and we

1:04:40.200 --> 1:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>were relieved to learn that the obvious reason was astrology.

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Keep being quotes. It's like, why were you relieved at that?

1:04:46.040 --> 1:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Like what was going on in the eighties could be

1:04:49.040 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>something even weirder. Yeah, yeah, god, yeah, you're right. Just

1:04:54.600 --> 1:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would have just assumed panic attacks, like

1:04:56.760 --> 1:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>every time someone's late, I'm like, oh, it's a panic attack,

1:04:59.440 --> 1:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>or I would have it was like to throw off

1:05:01.840 --> 1:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the rhythm of the press Corps or something to keep

1:05:04.960 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>people on their toes. Yeah, but you make people wait,

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like a power move. Yeah. So yeah. Joan takes

1:05:11.400 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>credit for being the Teflon in the Teflon presidency. She

1:05:14.320 --> 1:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>also takes credit for the being the only reason that

1:05:16.840 --> 1:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan stayed alive through his term. Quote, the fact

1:05:19.920 --> 1:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that the cancer did not reoccur is due to the

1:05:21.640 --> 1:05:24.439
<v Speaker 1>excellent time I chose astrologically. So she claims to have

1:05:24.880 --> 1:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>been the reason his cancer didn't come back, which I

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>would give to the doctor, but whatever. She also takes

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>credit to the fact that Ronald Reagan was not assassinated

1:05:32.720 --> 1:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>during his time in office. While Reagan had times where

1:05:35.640 --> 1:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he could have been assassinated, I was always able to

1:05:37.640 --> 1:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>protect him by warning him not to appear in public

1:05:39.640 --> 1:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>at vulnerable times. Now I'm angry at her for stopping

1:05:42.200 --> 1:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan from being and save your assassination wants for

1:05:47.360 --> 1:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>other more worthy people. You know, there's a lot of people.

1:05:50.360 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I got so into just hating her in the book

1:05:52.600 --> 1:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that I was just angry at her for taking credit

1:05:54.520 --> 1:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>for everything. Yeah. But again again, right, she's taking credit

1:05:57.960 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for like was that, Well, it's just it's like she

1:06:01.560 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>talks about like the invasion of Grenada, and like there's

1:06:03.760 --> 1:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>no discussion about like whether it was morally right or

1:06:06.400 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>like the people who died. It was all about like

1:06:08.760 --> 1:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I had to make sure Air Force one landed at

1:06:10.760 --> 1:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the right time. When he gave his speech about like

1:06:13.080 --> 1:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the Grenada invasions, like that's not the thing to be

1:06:15.840 --> 1:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. Joan quickly, well, that's varsity league. She's in

1:06:18.840 --> 1:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>junior league. It's totally different to handle different things, you know.

1:06:22.320 --> 1:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>It's very frustrating. So yeah, Joan takes credit for everything

1:06:25.360 --> 1:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>good that happened during the Reagan administration. The only mistake

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>she admits to making is in picking the time for

1:06:30.360 --> 1:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Reagan's first debate with Walter Mondale during his nineteen eighty

1:06:33.000 --> 1:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>four re election campaign. Mondale is generally seen as winning

1:06:36.000 --> 1:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that debate, but Joan actually kind of takes credit for

1:06:38.480 --> 1:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>this too. So when she was charting it, she put

1:06:41.200 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>his son in a prominent position in the location chart

1:06:44.160 --> 1:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for the time and place in the debate. A reason

1:06:46.680 --> 1:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that he had so little charisma and personality that the sun,

1:06:49.160 --> 1:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>normally indicative of these traits, would simply emphasize his deficit. Characteristics. Unfortunately,

1:06:54.800 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>she claims that putting the sun in that position in

1:06:57.760 --> 1:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>his chart in the time she picked actually made Mondale

1:07:01.320 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>unstoppably powerful in the first debate, which is why Reagan lost.

1:07:05.680 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's good to know for Walter Mondale, if he's

1:07:08.440 --> 1:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>listening to this podcast, he had an even more powerful astrologer. Yeah,

1:07:13.280 --> 1:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you know who just died before the second debate wis Yeah,

1:07:18.720 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>well we're gonna get to some dueling wizards a little

1:07:21.080 --> 1:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>bit here. Well, maybe she's also responsible for hiding President

1:07:24.960 --> 1:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Reagan from the public during the days after his biggest scandal,

1:07:27.520 --> 1:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Iran Gate broke. For those of you who don't know,

1:07:29.800 --> 1:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the Iran Conscious scandal started in nineteen eighty five when

1:07:32.240 --> 1:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a group called Hesbalah and Lebanon kidnapped seven Americans. America

1:07:36.480 --> 1:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>went to Iran and was like, hey, could you guys

1:07:38.960 --> 1:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>get hesbel At a chill out for like and give

1:07:41.520 --> 1:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>us these guys back, and if you do, we'll give

1:07:43.360 --> 1:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you missiles which you can use to shoot at Iraq.

1:07:45.520 --> 1:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Iran in Iraq were war at the time. We were

1:07:47.360 --> 1:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>also giving a Raq weapon so that they could shoot Iran.

1:07:49.760 --> 1:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>But President Reagan was like, why not arm both sides

1:07:52.400 --> 1:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the conflict and free some hostage at the same time.

1:07:55.080 --> 1:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So we had Israel sell weapons to Iran, and then

1:07:58.120 --> 1:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we paid back Israel in more way weapons, and then

1:08:01.800 --> 1:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>there wound up being a bunch of extra cash leftover

1:08:04.000 --> 1:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>after this. And a guy named Alie North was like, oh,

1:08:07.440 --> 1:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got all these far right wing rebels

1:08:09.720 --> 1:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in Nicaragua fighting the socialist government there. And there's an

1:08:12.680 --> 1:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Act of Congress called the bowl In Amendment that says,

1:08:15.200 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we can't give the contras more money, but what if

1:08:19.439 --> 1:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we just keep selling more missiles to Iran and give

1:08:23.080 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the money to the Contras now? And so anyway, that's

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>what they did, and it's different from what gangs do

1:08:27.760 --> 1:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>because everyone wore suits. So that's the Iran Contra scandal

1:08:31.240 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in a nutshell. The story broke in late nineteen eighty

1:08:33.320 --> 1:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>six and Americans got very angry that the president and

1:08:36.000 --> 1:08:38.439
<v Speaker 1>his men had illegally funded a terrorist group linked to

1:08:38.520 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred attacks. Joan claimed that the stars were too

1:08:42.439 --> 1:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>bad for her to help with this scandal. The major

1:08:45.360 --> 1:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>cosmic forces had so turned against Reagan that what I

1:08:47.640 --> 1:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>had been able to do earlier was impossible for me

1:08:50.040 --> 1:08:52.599
<v Speaker 1>to do. Then, so she just advised Nancy Reagan to

1:08:52.640 --> 1:08:55.759
<v Speaker 1>not have the president talk to anybody, and Donald Reagan

1:08:55.800 --> 1:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>criticizes her during this for limiting the president's exposure to

1:08:58.960 --> 1:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the media and the public. This period, people were yelling

1:09:02.080 --> 1:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>basically for President Reagan to say something about this gigantic scandal,

1:09:05.360 --> 1:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and he wouldn't say a word, which apparently all due

1:09:07.840 --> 1:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>to Joan Quickly saying don't talk to anybody, which I

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Maybe President Reagan would have made the choice

1:09:13.960 --> 1:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>to shut up no matter what, but I'm sure Joan

1:09:15.720 --> 1:09:17.519
<v Speaker 1>telling him it was too dangerous for him to talk

1:09:17.560 --> 1:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>to the press about all these missiles he had sold

1:09:19.439 --> 1:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>people did not help matters. So I think that goes

1:09:24.080 --> 1:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Joan Quickly bad pile, if you're keeping track.

1:09:27.479 --> 1:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, like, if he had said something, we

1:09:29.760 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 1>don't know what he would have said, sorry, would have

1:09:32.520 --> 1:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>been nice. Maybe she knew him so well at that

1:09:36.560 --> 1:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>point that she knew that what he would say would

1:09:39.360 --> 1:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>be even worse than just nothing. Yeah, And the way

1:09:42.560 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Joan puts this is the media was crying out for

1:09:44.520 --> 1:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>press conferences, which in my opinion, would have been disastrous

1:09:46.960 --> 1:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to the president's interest in during which he would have

1:09:48.800 --> 1:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>been at a disadvantage, which again she doesn't express any

1:09:52.000 --> 1:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>care for the nation's interests or for the fact that

1:09:54.040 --> 1:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>an actual crime had been committed. It's just this is

1:09:56.640 --> 1:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>bad for the president, right, and that's my only concern.

1:09:59.320 --> 1:10:02.479
<v Speaker 1>And he's famous and that reflects on me, right. Yeah. Well,

1:10:02.479 --> 1:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>no one knew about her at this point, right, But

1:10:04.439 --> 1:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to her, she knew she was the power. Yeah. Yeah,

1:10:06.760 --> 1:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>she didn't want it to go bad. She also claims

1:10:09.360 --> 1:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to be responsible for beginning the end of the Cold War. Uh. Yeah, no,

1:10:13.000 --> 1:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a big one to say, credible. Yeah, I was

1:10:15.640 --> 1:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>heavily involved in what happened in the relations between the superpowers,

1:10:18.600 --> 1:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>changing Ronald Reagan's evil empire attitude so that when he

1:10:21.280 --> 1:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>went to Geneva, so that he went to Geneva prepared

1:10:23.400 --> 1:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to meet a different kind of Russian leader and one

1:10:25.160 --> 1:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he could convince of doing things our way. See. Joan

1:10:27.840 --> 1:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>claimed she did Gorbachev's chart and figured out his birth

1:10:30.439 --> 1:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>time and figured out that he and Ronald had the

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>potential to be best friends and bring peace to the world.

1:10:35.439 --> 1:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Best friends. Yeah, best friends, Reagan and Gorbachev. You remember

1:10:39.720 --> 1:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>when they brought world peace? Yeah? Where we have world peace.

1:10:42.280 --> 1:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It's now. Yeah, it's great, fair, that's perfect now. Yeah.

1:10:45.360 --> 1:10:47.599
<v Speaker 1>So Jones saw that there was the potential for an

1:10:47.600 --> 1:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>incredible collaboration between these two. She just had to cool

1:10:50.400 --> 1:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan's hot heart. So she incepted the idea of

1:10:54.160 --> 1:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>peace with the USSR into Ronald Reagan by bringing the

1:10:57.400 --> 1:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>idea up to Nancy Reagan. I'm going to read this

1:11:00.040 --> 1:11:03.519
<v Speaker 1>orbatim because it's just just charming. Do me a favor.

1:11:03.560 --> 1:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I told Nancy Ronnie can be so charming and persuasive.

1:11:06.880 --> 1:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Get him to exercises super salesmanship ability on Gorbachev. Get

1:11:10.400 --> 1:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>him to sell arms reduction, democracy, human rights, and free

1:11:13.240 --> 1:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>enterprise to the Secretary General. She added, it only makes

1:11:17.720 --> 1:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>sense for both sides to agree to reduce the grandiose

1:11:20.280 --> 1:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>military expenditures that are causing the national debt to rise

1:11:22.880 --> 1:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in the USA and the Soviets and abysmal standard of living.

1:11:25.680 --> 1:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie will be able to reason with Gorbachev and convince

1:11:27.880 --> 1:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>him of doing things our way, you know, freedom and

1:11:30.120 --> 1:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>free enterprise. Which, yeah, I wait, am I siding with

1:11:35.240 --> 1:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Joan because she wants to curb military Sunday? I mean,

1:11:37.760 --> 1:11:41.479
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just the way she phrases it. It's a

1:11:41.560 --> 1:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>goof just get him to sell arms reduction. It's like

1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>how she says it, like it's a horoscope though. Yeah, yeah,

1:11:47.640 --> 1:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like don't go on a trip tomorrow. Yeah, no, I

1:11:52.120 --> 1:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>don't disagree with like, I mean, that's obvious. It's the

1:11:55.640 --> 1:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>only good policy thing she said so far. Yeah, I'm

1:11:59.000 --> 1:12:03.479
<v Speaker 1>not that good, like better than that in the fashion magazine. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

1:12:03.520 --> 1:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's not bad. I have trouble believing that.

1:12:06.320 --> 1:12:11.479
<v Speaker 1>That's what convinced Ronald Reagan to deal with Do you

1:12:11.560 --> 1:12:14.799
<v Speaker 1>find it difficult? But you know, freedom and free enterprise.

1:12:14.960 --> 1:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>You have to give her the wins along with the lawsuits.

1:12:17.560 --> 1:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>You're right, you're right, You're right. That's fair. So Joan

1:12:21.120 --> 1:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>wound up had there was a big secret meeting in

1:12:23.360 --> 1:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Rekkievic between Grbachav and Reagan. It was a big deal

1:12:25.720 --> 1:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know, fucking cold, what is like red dawn

1:12:28.080 --> 1:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>yere So the fact that they were actually sitting down

1:12:29.840 --> 1:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and talking was a big deal. Joan did this in

1:12:32.800 --> 1:12:34.479
<v Speaker 1>spite of the fact that she had no idea where

1:12:34.479 --> 1:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Reikievic was. Nancy mentioned their meeting to her and asked

1:12:37.479 --> 1:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>if the president should go and Joan's first question was

1:12:40.280 --> 1:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>where on earth is Reikievic and how do you spell it?

1:12:42.479 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Which maybe ought to be like your your sign that

1:12:46.040 --> 1:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be weighing in on this, But there, what's

1:12:49.080 --> 1:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that Jay doing in there? It's true, it's a confusing

1:12:51.600 --> 1:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>ass Jay, and the why is a little weird too,

1:12:55.600 --> 1:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>But Joan still did the work. And while the Reikievic

1:12:59.040 --> 1:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>meeting didn't end with any conclusive because President Reagan wasn't

1:13:02.160 --> 1:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to give up his Star Wars missile defense plan,

1:13:04.560 --> 1:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it was a big step towards thawing in the Cold War,

1:13:06.560 --> 1:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and it led eventually to the signing of the Intermediate

1:13:08.960 --> 1:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Range Nuclear Forces Treaty or the IF Treaty. This treaty

1:13:12.640 --> 1:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>basically pulled a lot of short range nukes out of

1:13:14.400 --> 1:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Europe and led to the elimination of something like twenty

1:13:16.360 --> 1:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>six hundred missiles, which, regardless of your politics, is a

1:13:18.880 --> 1:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>good thing. Twenty six hundred less nukes in the world

1:13:21.360 --> 1:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>because of this treaty. So negotiations for the inf actually

1:13:24.960 --> 1:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>had been ongoing through back channels and shit since like

1:13:27.080 --> 1:13:29.519
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty one, but by nineteen eighty seven, Gorbachev was

1:13:29.520 --> 1:13:31.799
<v Speaker 1>ready to fly over to America and sign the treaty.

1:13:32.120 --> 1:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>The decision for whden where to host the meeting, of course,

1:13:34.240 --> 1:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>was Jones, so she plotted everything out and sent her recommendations.

1:13:37.320 --> 1:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>The Russians agreed at first, but then they kept switching

1:13:40.280 --> 1:13:42.479
<v Speaker 1>around the times and changing their plans, often at the

1:13:42.560 --> 1:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>last minute, until the dates for the summit and the

1:13:45.320 --> 1:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>times for the signing were fixed at, according to Joan,

1:13:47.880 --> 1:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>close to the worst possible astrological time to do it. Oh,

1:13:51.479 --> 1:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>this is probably not a coincidence. In fact, it was

1:13:53.680 --> 1:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly the result of a great untold duel between

1:13:56.400 --> 1:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a US astrologer and the Soviet Union. Nancy had been

1:14:00.240 --> 1:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Joan for years at that point, informing her about secret

1:14:02.280 --> 1:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>meetings with Soviet premiere months before they actually happened. There

1:14:05.320 --> 1:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>was zero informational security in this meeting. So not only

1:14:08.400 --> 1:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>is Joan sending off information about this to random computer

1:14:12.520 --> 1:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>people to have it computed, but like they're talking on

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>an unsecured line. They did sometimes talk through the White

1:14:17.960 --> 1:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>House switchboard and gonna I'm gonna quote from Joan's recollection here.

1:14:23.360 --> 1:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Nancy always chided me for refusing to leave my full

1:14:25.920 --> 1:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>name and number with the switchboard. I told her it

1:14:28.160 --> 1:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>made me uneasy. I told her operators talked. She said

1:14:31.080 --> 1:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I was silly to worry about something like that. I know,

1:14:33.280 --> 1:14:36.559
<v Speaker 1>She said, all White House operators are secretive and reliable.

1:14:37.000 --> 1:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Nancy told me she would give me an assumed names

1:14:38.920 --> 1:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that I could always get through to her through the

1:14:40.320 --> 1:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>White House switchboard. She would choose the assumed name for

1:14:42.920 --> 1:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>me and put it on a list. This would automatically

1:14:44.920 --> 1:14:47.799
<v Speaker 1>give me access. The name she chose was Joan Frisco

1:14:48.240 --> 1:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Ha. Ha Ha was from San Francisco. So Joan is convinced

1:14:56.040 --> 1:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that their conversations were intercepted by the Soviet Union. The

1:14:58.800 --> 1:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Union changed the time times of the treaty meeting

1:15:01.280 --> 1:15:04.559
<v Speaker 1>in order to favor themselves and hurt Ronald Reagan as

1:15:04.600 --> 1:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>much as possible. Very well, maybe what happened now Astrology

1:15:07.680 --> 1:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>was illegal in the Soviet Union? Really Yeah, well they were.

1:15:11.560 --> 1:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Religion was illegal. So they're not big on superstition in

1:15:15.439 --> 1:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union, so I think they are, which is

1:15:17.680 --> 1:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>why it has to be banned. Yeah yeah, yeah, well

1:15:19.920 --> 1:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you forget astrology science. Well I was saying, maybe Resputant

1:15:22.920 --> 1:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was still alive. Well, I think it does tie back

1:15:24.840 --> 1:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to resputing. Yeah. I think that's probably a big part

1:15:26.880 --> 1:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of why it was. So it seems like one of

1:15:29.760 --> 1:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the two. Either the Soviets found an astrology they hadn't

1:15:32.880 --> 1:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in prison and had that person pick the worst times,

1:15:35.240 --> 1:15:37.439
<v Speaker 1>or they just made sure to always fuck with the

1:15:37.479 --> 1:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>timing once that Reagan said it, because they knew that

1:15:39.760 --> 1:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it would upset him that he wasn't doing that. I

1:15:41.840 --> 1:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's what happened. But it's funner to think of

1:15:45.120 --> 1:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it as like a I could sell a screenplay on

1:15:47.080 --> 1:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>an astrology duel. But yeah, definitely in the United States,

1:15:50.240 --> 1:15:53.439
<v Speaker 1>so there's any producers on them, or if Dorito's wants

1:15:53.479 --> 1:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to back the first Dorito's feature film original content, Yes,

1:16:00.000 --> 1:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite streaming platform this is. This is going to make

1:16:04.200 --> 1:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>us a lot of money. I'm so exciting, Okay, I

1:16:08.160 --> 1:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>hope so yeah, I mean that would just be a pittance,

1:16:11.040 --> 1:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but I'll take it. I'll do that work on Yeah.

1:16:17.400 --> 1:16:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh damn it, watch out, we're gonna take your sponsorship. No,

1:16:20.479 --> 1:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you're so much better at this than me. Yeah. So

1:16:23.520 --> 1:16:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Joan blames the information leaking on Nancy's cunning ruse, calling

1:16:27.760 --> 1:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>her Joan Frisco. I think it's just as likely that

1:16:30.320 --> 1:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it happened because she was they were talking on home

1:16:33.040 --> 1:16:35.639
<v Speaker 1>phone lines or she was sending stuff off to computer people.

1:16:35.920 --> 1:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Either way, clearly wasn't a secure situation. Joan found the

1:16:40.960 --> 1:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>best time of day to do the signing, even with

1:16:42.960 --> 1:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>all of the Soviet fuckery, and she warned Nancy Reagan

1:16:45.280 --> 1:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that since they weren't signing in a great day, she

1:16:46.840 --> 1:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>had to be super careful to use the exact time

1:16:49.640 --> 1:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that Joan suggested for the day that they did sign it,

1:16:52.400 --> 1:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but Nancy messed up and they signed like twenty minutes later.

1:16:56.360 --> 1:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Joan suggests this is because Nancy had just said cancer surgery,

1:16:59.439 --> 1:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know from the case answer that Joan claims she

1:17:01.000 --> 1:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>foresaw it didn't warn Nancy about, and then adds, under

1:17:04.080 --> 1:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>such circumstances, she can't be blamed for not arranging the

1:17:06.720 --> 1:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>signing with her usual foresight and precision, which is nice.

1:17:09.400 --> 1:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the only break she gives Nancy Reagan in her

1:17:11.840 --> 1:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>whole book. So the IONF Treaty is probably one of

1:17:15.400 --> 1:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the most inarguable accomplishments of the Reagan era. Thousands of

1:17:19.240 --> 1:17:21.559
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons were destroyed. Both sides were allowed to send

1:17:21.560 --> 1:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>advisors over to inspect the process. The whole world was

1:17:24.200 --> 1:17:26.519
<v Speaker 1>made a little bit safer by the implementation of this treaty.

1:17:27.000 --> 1:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Here's what Joan said about it. The execution of the

1:17:29.439 --> 1:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>if treaty signing time was flawed. The exact time I

1:17:31.920 --> 1:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>had asked for would have had the effect of filling

1:17:33.680 --> 1:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>up a tea cup nearly to the brim at the

1:17:35.280 --> 1:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>same time ensuring that the tea cup would not fill

1:17:37.360 --> 1:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>up too fast or spill over. Then Joan mixes the

1:17:40.160 --> 1:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>shit out of her metaphors. What we now had, in

1:17:42.640 --> 1:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>effect was a car whose brakes had failed, checked through

1:17:46.000 --> 1:17:51.559
<v Speaker 1>crowded intersections, just a classic filled tea cup car speed

1:17:51.680 --> 1:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>through an intersection. So Joan claimed that either the treaty

1:17:55.400 --> 1:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was going in disastrously for the world, because she wrote

1:17:58.000 --> 1:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this in nineteen ninety before all the effects, the treaty

1:18:00.400 --> 1:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>was going to end disaster, or it was going to

1:18:02.080 --> 1:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be like a thoroughbred racing unchallenged towards the finish lines.

1:18:05.080 --> 1:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome. She only hedges her bets when she's talking

1:18:07.479 --> 1:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>about the future. Whenever she talks about a prediction she

1:18:10.400 --> 1:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>made in the past, it was always very clear to her.

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But Joan's not consistent. Is what I'm saying here, So yeah,

1:18:18.120 --> 1:18:19.799
<v Speaker 1>to this day, I don't know how safe that treaty

1:18:19.880 --> 1:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is for us or the world. I haven't had the

1:18:21.400 --> 1:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>heart to progress that signing chart as I did the

1:18:23.479 --> 1:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>other it was fine. I haven't had the heart and

1:18:26.240 --> 1:18:28.839
<v Speaker 1>alsor they're not paying me anymore. They're not paying me anymore.

1:18:29.360 --> 1:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Joan quickly wasn't sure that the IF treaty

1:18:31.840 --> 1:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>was a good idea, but she's damned sure that Nancy

1:18:33.680 --> 1:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Reagan is a monster. At times, she writes about Nancy

1:18:35.960 --> 1:18:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Reagan like Nancy was a vampire. Basically, I mean, is

1:18:39.520 --> 1:18:44.759
<v Speaker 1>she wrong again? I guess not. No, she's not wrong.

1:18:45.000 --> 1:18:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Two people can both be monsters. Yeah, two people can

1:18:47.680 --> 1:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>both be monsters. She claims that Nancy grew stronger as

1:18:51.439 --> 1:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan grew weaker, as if she was like feeding

1:18:54.000 --> 1:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>off of Ronald's essence again, you know, like a vampire.

1:18:57.280 --> 1:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she knows she was close to Nancy. Yeah. When

1:19:01.360 --> 1:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I say she knows where the bodies are buried, I

1:19:03.400 --> 1:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mean she was. She's a vampire. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I guess.

1:19:09.200 --> 1:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Like to me, I get frustrated because I'm like, even

1:19:13.280 --> 1:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're within an awful administration, you got to be

1:19:15.200 --> 1:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>loyal to the people who are the only reason that

1:19:17.000 --> 1:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you're noteworthy, and like Nancy Reagan is the reason you

1:19:20.000 --> 1:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>got it brought into this. She was very nice to

1:19:21.960 --> 1:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>year in her shitty memoirs. You should be not a

1:19:25.000 --> 1:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>monster to her. But again, the astrologer's job is to

1:19:28.439 --> 1:19:31.599
<v Speaker 1>tell the truth and the politician's job is to, you know,

1:19:31.760 --> 1:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>try and make everybody happy. And that's that's fair because

1:19:35.280 --> 1:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly Nancy Reagan doesn't deserve any equivocating here, that's right. Yeah, yeah, Okay,

1:19:40.080 --> 1:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it's be real about Nancy Reagan. And she's polite but bad. See,

1:19:43.400 --> 1:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I get too drawn in when I read someone's terrible memoirs, yea,

1:19:46.960 --> 1:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And I don't. I don't hate Nancy Reagan as much

1:19:49.400 --> 1:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>as I ought to because her memoirs are better written.

1:19:51.200 --> 1:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Probably she had more money for a good ghost write. Ah,

1:19:53.280 --> 1:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that's why. Yeah. So I don't want to defend Nancy

1:19:57.160 --> 1:19:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Reagan anymore. I do want to make it clear that

1:20:00.200 --> 1:20:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Quigley was terrible at predicting the future, because while she

1:20:03.280 --> 1:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>usually equivocated between you two points and would say like, oh,

1:20:07.080 --> 1:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the treaty is either going to be a disaster or

1:20:09.200 --> 1:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>fine to kind of like sometimes she did make specific

1:20:12.120 --> 1:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>predictions in her memoirs about things that were going to

1:20:14.080 --> 1:20:16.719
<v Speaker 1>happen in the future, and they are all wrong. Here's

1:20:16.760 --> 1:20:20.479
<v Speaker 1>one aiding the Contras wasn't popular in many circles. History

1:20:20.520 --> 1:20:23.759
<v Speaker 1>will one day prove that Ronald Reagan was strategically correct.

1:20:24.439 --> 1:20:26.519
<v Speaker 1>The Contras signed a peace treaty with the government in

1:20:26.560 --> 1:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven. The leader they were fighting, Ortega, is

1:20:28.960 --> 1:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>still in charge of Nicaragua. Joan Quiggley said that if

1:20:32.360 --> 1:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>this remained the case, all of Latin America would fall

1:20:34.920 --> 1:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to communism, still waiting on that. She also includes the

1:20:39.160 --> 1:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>text of a letter she sent to Ronald Reagan saying

1:20:41.160 --> 1:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>that development of SDI the Star Wars Strategic Defense initiative,

1:20:44.920 --> 1:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>was a brilliant strategy. So he said he would go

1:20:47.160 --> 1:20:49.599
<v Speaker 1>down in history with Lincoln and Roosevelt as the best

1:20:49.600 --> 1:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>American presidents, but he would be known as the greatest

1:20:53.320 --> 1:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of America's presidents because while Lincoln just solved slavery and

1:20:56.960 --> 1:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Roosevelt just solved World War Two, Donald Reagan would quote

1:21:01.560 --> 1:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>bring peace to the world. Oh man, what if if

1:21:04.920 --> 1:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>only she'd been right. Yeah, Well, she wasn't right about

1:21:08.320 --> 1:21:10.559
<v Speaker 1>any of that, because the Strategic Defense initiative was scrapped

1:21:10.560 --> 1:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety three for being expensive nonsense. World peace

1:21:13.479 --> 1:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>still has not happened. Yeah, but also Trump brought up

1:21:16.360 --> 1:21:19.839
<v Speaker 1>the Star Wars thing like yesterday. Definitely made an impression

1:21:19.840 --> 1:21:23.559
<v Speaker 1>on him. Yeah, yep, so she did say conduct the

1:21:23.960 --> 1:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>course of history. Yeah. Well, in a way, she was

1:21:27.160 --> 1:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a Charlatan, but she was working for Charlatan's Yeah, so

1:21:31.520 --> 1:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he'd been working for the good guys. She probably would

1:21:34.240 --> 1:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have done good guys stuff. I mean, just anything to

1:21:36.760 --> 1:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>advance her own interest, right, Yeah. She just seems like

1:21:40.040 --> 1:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a self interested person. Yeah, that's she's definitely a self

1:21:44.360 --> 1:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>interested person. Most of my distaste for her comes from

1:21:47.880 --> 1:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like she was taking advantage of a scared

1:21:51.479 --> 1:21:53.559
<v Speaker 1>lady whose husband had just gotten shot. Yeah, but who

1:21:53.600 --> 1:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>cares if it's Nancy Reagan. Yes, you takes just a

1:21:56.200 --> 1:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>scared lady. Yeah. Maybe that's why Nancy got so bad. No,

1:22:01.520 --> 1:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it was bad, she was bad. I mean, I think

1:22:04.080 --> 1:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of it probably comes from the fact too,

1:22:06.040 --> 1:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that if you don't view astrology as any in any

1:22:09.920 --> 1:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>way legitimate, which I'm barely saying I even I do.

1:22:14.320 --> 1:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Rob is an aries not a Pisces,

1:22:17.120 --> 1:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just to make that clear. But he is on the cusp,

1:22:19.400 --> 1:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>so I wasn't that far off. But uh, I mean,

1:22:21.760 --> 1:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easy to see people who do believe

1:22:24.080 --> 1:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in astrology or who charge to make astrological predictions as manipulative.

1:22:28.720 --> 1:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And but I mean they're different than clairvoyance. It's true

1:22:32.080 --> 1:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're actually looking at something that they believe they can. Yeah,

1:22:35.720 --> 1:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at math, and they're trying to apply logic

1:22:39.200 --> 1:22:42.479
<v Speaker 1>to an insane world to make people comforted by the

1:22:42.520 --> 1:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>idea that there's like a structure and a float of

1:22:44.680 --> 1:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>things and that you can predict what it'll be. I

1:22:46.640 --> 1:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think they believe in their own abilities. Well yeah, And see,

1:22:49.000 --> 1:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the things that I question is

1:22:51.160 --> 1:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not because Joan isn't entirely consistent number one

1:22:55.000 --> 1:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in her claims about what astrology can do, because there

1:22:57.000 --> 1:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>will be times when she was like, there's nothing that

1:22:58.800 --> 1:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>could have changed the outcome this, and there's other times

1:23:00.920 --> 1:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>where she's like, you can guarantee the success of any

1:23:03.400 --> 1:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>endeavor if you do this and this and this. She's

1:23:06.640 --> 1:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a scammer, But she wasn't like giving the advice she

1:23:10.280 --> 1:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was giving them was mostly about what time to do

1:23:12.360 --> 1:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the bad things they were going to do, as opposed

1:23:14.080 --> 1:23:16.479
<v Speaker 1>to being like, do this thing. Yeah, they were like,

1:23:16.880 --> 1:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>when you make the announcement about the horrible thing you're doing,

1:23:20.640 --> 1:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>do it at twelve twenty five. The only thing she

1:23:23.120 --> 1:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>claims that she was specifically giving advice that went beyond

1:23:26.880 --> 1:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>timing is for Nancy Reagan's war on drug stuff. Yeah.

1:23:30.360 --> 1:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you've done a great job of

1:23:32.800 --> 1:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>convincing me again that Nancy Reagan is one of his

1:23:36.439 --> 1:23:40.519
<v Speaker 1>greatest monsters and we're getting behind a bastard here for Yeah.

1:23:40.600 --> 1:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think also she really used the fact

1:23:43.200 --> 1:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that she was like, you know, the first lady to

1:23:45.880 --> 1:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>hide the fact that she was a horrible person and

1:23:50.280 --> 1:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>should be remembered as such. And just because she was

1:23:53.000 --> 1:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>insecure doesn't mean that she didn't I mean, everything she did. Yeah.

1:23:57.320 --> 1:24:00.479
<v Speaker 1>The Reagan's legacy has benefited so much from the nostalgia

1:24:00.560 --> 1:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with conservatives that they look back on it as like

1:24:02.640 --> 1:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the last great time. They were all in coke at

1:24:05.000 --> 1:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that time too, for sure, And also we know people

1:24:07.080 --> 1:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>were maybe like not so cogent during points of the

1:24:10.600 --> 1:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>presidency and somebody maybe it was all over North, you know,

1:24:13.439 --> 1:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody was in their ear being like, do this horrible thing,

1:24:17.200 --> 1:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and they were saying yes. So you know, you still

1:24:20.000 --> 1:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have the the president you can say like no, I

1:24:21.920 --> 1:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to. Yeah. So I don't think we should

1:24:25.080 --> 1:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>put too much on the people that influenced the Reagans.

1:24:27.360 --> 1:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we should really just lay the blame at

1:24:28.960 --> 1:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the feet of the Reagans for being such assholes. Well,

1:24:32.520 --> 1:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a lot of blame to go around for

1:24:34.280 --> 1:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the Reagans, I guess might I don't think Joan was

1:24:36.760 --> 1:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the I don't think she's the one to blame. I

1:24:39.000 --> 1:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>think if we're gonna blame anyone, let's blame Aliver North.

1:24:41.840 --> 1:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I think she gets some blame, though, cause I think

1:24:44.520 --> 1:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>number one just for the war on drugs, not just

1:24:47.200 --> 1:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>for the war on drugs. I still think that Nancy's

1:24:52.720 --> 1:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>recollection of how Joan came back into her life rings

1:24:56.680 --> 1:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>truer to me than Jones does. And I think that

1:24:59.040 --> 1:25:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Joan was taking advantage of that. And I also think

1:25:03.600 --> 1:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Joe knew that she was not as I

1:25:09.640 --> 1:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>think whether and I think she must have believed in

1:25:11.840 --> 1:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>astrology to some extent, obviously, but I think she knew

1:25:15.400 --> 1:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was not as cut and dry and clear

1:25:18.160 --> 1:25:21.360
<v Speaker 1>cut as she claims in her book, and I think

1:25:21.439 --> 1:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>getting involved in global geopolitics to the extent that she

1:25:24.840 --> 1:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>did with no qualifications. Yeah, but again that's what the

1:25:28.960 --> 1:25:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Reagans did. That's a good point, you know, I mean,

1:25:31.680 --> 1:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>especially Nancy. He definitely for Nancy. He'd been a governor

1:25:35.080 --> 1:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>at that point, but he wasn't a good governor, and

1:25:37.400 --> 1:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>he got cast in the role because he was like

1:25:39.800 --> 1:25:41.799
<v Speaker 1>someone you know, he was like Trump. He was somebody

1:25:41.840 --> 1:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that really evil. People were like, this guy will make

1:25:44.360 --> 1:25:47.559
<v Speaker 1>a good face for our evil white supremacist and he

1:25:47.600 --> 1:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>seemed able to be manipulated, and he was able to

1:25:50.200 --> 1:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be manipulated, which made him a good you know. And

1:25:53.040 --> 1:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I think people do kind of use the excuse of like, oh,

1:25:55.680 --> 1:25:58.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe he was senile, And there's rumors he had Alzheimer's

1:25:58.360 --> 1:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point in the presidency. Definite. But again

1:26:01.160 --> 1:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like he still thought it was a good idea

1:26:04.280 --> 1:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to be president. He wasn't like, hey, maybe I'm not

1:26:07.040 --> 1:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the most qualified person. He like, let all those people

1:26:09.720 --> 1:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>gas them up. To be fair, if you have Alzheimer's

1:26:12.760 --> 1:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>or your senile, you're not going to be you can't

1:26:14.800 --> 1:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be held accountable for your decisions, even if they're terry. Right.

1:26:17.280 --> 1:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying, don't thinking had Alzheimer's when you became governor.

1:26:19.520 --> 1:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>I think you had ambitions. But you know, if your

1:26:22.520 --> 1:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>ambitions are like I'll do whatever it takes to stay

1:26:24.640 --> 1:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in power and get into power, you probably shouldn't be

1:26:27.000 --> 1:26:29.599
<v Speaker 1>in power. I don't disagree with that when it comes

1:26:29.640 --> 1:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to Ronald Reagan or for Nancy. But I don't think

1:26:32.160 --> 1:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that the fact that a number of unqualified people got

1:26:35.960 --> 1:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>into national leadership excuses what Joan did either. But I don't,

1:26:40.160 --> 1:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I just think if you're scamming the Reagans,

1:26:43.080 --> 1:26:45.479
<v Speaker 1>like the Reagans deserve to be scammed, you know. And

1:26:45.520 --> 1:26:48.759
<v Speaker 1>when I added up, it's like she she's mostly culpable

1:26:48.840 --> 1:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>for like being a bad friend. Yeah, as opposed to

1:26:52.720 --> 1:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>she's a bad friend, and you're not really someone's friend

1:26:55.200 --> 1:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if they're paying you to be their friend. But it's

1:26:57.240 --> 1:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like compared to Info Wars, for instance, I mean, when

1:26:59.920 --> 1:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you when you think about the statements she was actually

1:27:02.200 --> 1:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>making and the way that she was wielding the power

1:27:04.360 --> 1:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that she had, she could have been so much worse.

1:27:06.360 --> 1:27:07.559
<v Speaker 1>She could have been so much worse. She was saying

1:27:07.600 --> 1:27:09.599
<v Speaker 1>what time to land the plane? She wasn't saying, like

1:27:09.680 --> 1:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody who you think is like a child in a

1:27:12.200 --> 1:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>cage is an actor. That's true, and like that person

1:27:16.240 --> 1:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is in the ear. But ive Donald Trump, and he

1:27:18.840 --> 1:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>believes that stuff even though he's making the policy which

1:27:21.680 --> 1:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is like more insane. Well, I will say, though, if

1:27:24.040 --> 1:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you start comparing people from anyone from the Reagan administration

1:27:27.640 --> 1:27:30.599
<v Speaker 1>to anyone from today's administration, all the people from back

1:27:30.600 --> 1:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>then are going to look better. We know, what did

1:27:32.200 --> 1:27:34.479
<v Speaker 1>she do? But what did she do that was so bad? Bad?

1:27:34.560 --> 1:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Just because the gloves are off, they were doing the

1:27:36.680 --> 1:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>same shit. It's just Nancy was going to choose a

1:27:39.840 --> 1:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>bad policy to get behind. And I think that Joan

1:27:42.560 --> 1:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was correct in saying that the war on drugs was

1:27:45.320 --> 1:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a way to play the public and to create a

1:27:48.240 --> 1:27:51.559
<v Speaker 1>cause and fabricate a solution that wouldn't be effective but

1:27:51.600 --> 1:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>would have the illusion of being this really incredible, like

1:27:55.840 --> 1:27:57.759
<v Speaker 1>we're all going to be so happy this was passed.

1:27:57.960 --> 1:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But what if Nancy Reagan, what if she was like,

1:28:00.360 --> 1:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, choose like a b C and everything was

1:28:03.320 --> 1:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>even worse. But what if Nancy had just done a

1:28:05.680 --> 1:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>bunch of fashion magazine interviews and nobody she'd never gone on.

1:28:09.080 --> 1:28:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Well that's stupid, though, why should she? She was the

1:28:11.560 --> 1:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>first lady? Because I think that what Joan was saying

1:28:14.160 --> 1:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is that people need to take you seriously. You don't

1:28:16.160 --> 1:28:19.479
<v Speaker 1>have the knowledge, You don't have the gravitas to be

1:28:19.560 --> 1:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>able to make people like you, because they're just gonna

1:28:21.920 --> 1:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>think you're and also because you're a bad person who

1:28:24.439 --> 1:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>has no substance and you're just like a homophobic, horrible socialite.

1:28:31.160 --> 1:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it bad to tell someone who has no substance

1:28:34.920 --> 1:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and horrible opinions on things to make their opinions count

1:28:39.000 --> 1:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>by becoming ac she was already Yeah, but she just

1:28:42.960 --> 1:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about fashion. Well, that wouldn't have ever

1:28:46.520 --> 1:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>made her possul being first ladies to talk about fashion

1:28:49.360 --> 1:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and also pretend to care about some pet issue. It's

1:28:53.120 --> 1:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like being a socialite on a super scale. So it

1:28:55.880 --> 1:28:58.439
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that a socialite would have the best advice

1:28:58.520 --> 1:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on how to be like a socialite. Yeah, well I

1:29:02.920 --> 1:29:05.559
<v Speaker 1>guess this. This, this, this is not something we're gonna

1:29:05.560 --> 1:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>settle to either of our anyone's mutual agreement. I think

1:29:11.760 --> 1:29:15.599
<v Speaker 1>she took advantage of Nancy Reagan in a moment of

1:29:15.680 --> 1:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>weakness and light about having predicted her husband's assassination. Y'all

1:29:21.080 --> 1:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>are on a different side of that, and think that

1:29:23.439 --> 1:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Nancy probably just called her up, called her up. I

1:29:26.960 --> 1:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say. I think our side, our platform is

1:29:30.160 --> 1:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>fuck Nancy Reagan. I don't disagree with fun Nancy Reagan.

1:29:33.720 --> 1:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But I add John quickly to that. John gets as

1:29:37.160 --> 1:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>scot Free. We're pro Joneses. You the listeners at home,

1:29:41.400 --> 1:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>will have to decide for yourselves who you think the

1:29:43.600 --> 1:29:45.439
<v Speaker 1>bastards in this story were. But I think we can

1:29:45.479 --> 1:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>all agree there were a lot of bastards everyone's talked

1:29:48.160 --> 1:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>about today. And Donald Reagan, by the way, is also

1:29:51.080 --> 1:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of a dick, but we'll get into that. Yeah,

1:29:52.720 --> 1:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we should be the people whose names we

1:29:54.479 --> 1:29:57.519
<v Speaker 1>don't know yet. Yeah, those are the real Yeah, we

1:29:57.560 --> 1:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't even watch Ollie North should take a lot more,

1:30:00.439 --> 1:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. And if we're gonna blame someone

1:30:03.080 --> 1:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Reagans, that's not the Reagans. It ain't the psychic.

1:30:06.520 --> 1:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Not the psychic I mean, but she's not. She's not

1:30:08.320 --> 1:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a psychica. She's astrology, a planetary scientist, maybe the stars.

1:30:14.240 --> 1:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the stars were misaligned and that's why they were

1:30:16.120 --> 1:30:19.519
<v Speaker 1>all such terrible people. Yeah, true, because she's definitely it's

1:30:19.720 --> 1:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>just the way she writes things. I'm not saying she's likable.

1:30:22.680 --> 1:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying she's not as bad as the Rigans.

1:30:24.960 --> 1:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And maybe maybe I'm not saying she's as bad as

1:30:27.320 --> 1:30:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the Reagans. I am saying she's history's greatest monster. Okay,

1:30:32.640 --> 1:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this has been enlightening, and I'm glad y'all had a

1:30:35.240 --> 1:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>different opinion on all of this than me, because it's

1:30:38.920 --> 1:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to have much perspective after three hundred

1:30:41.280 --> 1:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>pages of the Twelfth House and the Seventh by the

1:30:44.120 --> 1:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>way I should, I want to add one last thing.

1:30:46.160 --> 1:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So the end of Joan Quigley's book is just a

1:30:47.920 --> 1:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>bunch of stuff on how astrology works in politics, and

1:30:50.760 --> 1:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>so she talks about all the different houses, which I

1:30:53.000 --> 1:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>don't understand what any of that means. But there's like

1:30:55.720 --> 1:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the twelfth House in politics is apparently all the poor people,

1:31:00.680 --> 1:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>but also journalists and saboteurs and like poor people, the homeless,

1:31:07.400 --> 1:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>drug addicts and journalists and the same a lot. No,

1:31:11.840 --> 1:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>she's the right astrologer for the Reagans for sure. Anyway, Uh,

1:31:16.960 --> 1:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys want to plug your pluggables? Yeah, sure. Come

1:31:19.320 --> 1:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>listen to Night Call. It's on the Audio Boom network

1:31:22.040 --> 1:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of podcasts. And if you have a question, a comment,

1:31:25.520 --> 1:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>an astrological prediction, you can give us a call at

1:31:27.920 --> 1:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>two four oh four six night You can also text

1:31:30.320 --> 1:31:32.479
<v Speaker 1>us at the same number, or you can email us

1:31:32.479 --> 1:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>at Night Call podcast at gmail dot com. Yeah, and

1:31:34.760 --> 1:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we can do like some cross coverage. If you've got

1:31:37.080 --> 1:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about the Reagans and astrology, you send them to

1:31:40.080 --> 1:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Night Call and we will talk about them there too.

1:31:42.400 --> 1:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for having me. Thank you so

1:31:44.080 --> 1:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>much for fun. Thank you guys for being on you

1:31:47.040 --> 1:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>listeners at home. If you have an opinion over whether

1:31:49.200 --> 1:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>or not Joan Quickly is history's greatest monster, or if

1:31:51.840 --> 1:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm being too hard on her, drop us a line

1:31:54.280 --> 1:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>at at Bastard's pod on Twitter and either yell at

1:31:57.680 --> 1:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>me or agree with me, whichever is your preference. You

1:32:01.280 --> 1:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>can also find us on the internet at behind the

1:32:03.080 --> 1:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Bastards dot com. We'll have some pictures up there. Joan

1:32:05.880 --> 1:32:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Quigley commissioned a drawing of like a presidential seal with

1:32:08.479 --> 1:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>astrological symbols on it. That's super kooky. We'll get a

1:32:11.320 --> 1:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>picture of that for you. So yeah, I'm Robert Evans.

1:32:14.000 --> 1:32:15.799
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at I write Okay,

1:32:16.360 --> 1:32:19.599
<v Speaker 1>please check us out. We're back every Tuesday. So next

1:32:19.600 --> 1:32:22.519
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday we will be talking about someone probably with millions

1:32:22.560 --> 1:32:24.679
<v Speaker 1>of deaths on their hands. Hey, when are you gonna

1:32:24.680 --> 1:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>get to some Freemasons? Yeah, they're all Freemasons. All right.

1:32:30.320 --> 1:32:32.839
<v Speaker 1>This has been behind the bastards. I have been Robert Evans,

1:32:33.520 --> 1:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and I love like forty percent of you.