WEBVTT - Middle-Income Families Facing Financial Challenges

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>gloom O Business Finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Week Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Crowns.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>The eleven Meet joke gets to the right here. I

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have Saga in the medal of You.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, just an absolutely perfect guest, kind of really given

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 3>our conversation that we just had with our TV team

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer about the consumer and inflation, because the theme of

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 3>the past two months or so and kind of feels

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>like the theme of my life because it's all I

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 3>talk about every single day is that inflation has moderated.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>After all, financial markets are betting that the tough part

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>of the Fed's job is behind it, and the FED

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 3>is going to cut rates six times next year. All

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>that said, our next guest says, middle income families are

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 3>still feeling the squeeze. Glenn Jay Williams is CEO of

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the financial services company Primerica. It's a firm that specializes

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>in serving middle income households in the US, Canada and more.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 3>The companies out with a new report called Perception Versus

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Reality examining Middle Income Households Financial Outlook heading into twenty

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty four. Good to have you with us, Glenn. How

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 3>are you doing great?

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Tam? How about you?

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're doing really well. Thanks so much for joining

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>us today. Before we get to the report, just give

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 3>us an idea of that. The types of households that

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 3>you serve at Primerica, you call them middle income households,

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 3>But how do you define that?

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 2>We do, Tim.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 4>We define those households as having household incomes between about

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 4>thirty and one hundred and thirty thousand dollars a year.

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 4>That takes up about fifty six percent of US households.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's a pretty it's a pretty wide cut. Clearly,

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 4>there are households that are earning less than that and.

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Struggling even more.

0:01:58.200 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 4>We deal with a few of those, and we deal

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>with quite a number above one hundred and thirty thousand mark.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 4>But the vast majority of the families that we're advising

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 4>or are in that thirty to one hundred and thirty

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 4>thousand a year range.

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>And what's so important about this? These tens of millions

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 3>of households, these tons of millions of families, these customers

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>that you have is that inflation hits these folks harder

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 3>than it hits people who make more money because a

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 3>larger portion of what these people earn goes to gas,

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 3>goes to food, goes to childcare. So talk to me

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 3>a little bit about what you're seeing going into next year,

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 3>given that we are seeing actually inflation moderate. But as

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Steve Williams told us earlier in the day, you know,

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 3>if you're still paying more, you know, twenty or thirty

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 3>percent more for something than you did in twenty nineteen,

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't really feel like prices are coming down.

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 4>That is the challenge, Tim, As you've described it, these

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 4>families have every dollar in play at all times, and traditionally,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 4>because they have smaller amounts to invest, smaller to purchase

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 4>financial service is with they tend to be somewhat ignored

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 4>by the industry, who by and large has moved up scale.

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 4>And so we feel a special responsibility to these families

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 4>because we can access them, we can serve them, and

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 4>they are under stress.

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>They don't have extra dollars.

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 4>In the best of times, much less in times like these,

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 4>And as you point out, it's the compounding effective inflation

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 4>over time. You know, our studies and the household Budget

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Index indicates that the average middle income family has a

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 4>deficit from the last of twenty thirty months of almost

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty five hundred dollars. And so while maybe the whole

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 4>is not getting any deeper, they're down there pretty deep

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 4>already and we've got to help get them out.

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 2>And that's the challenge these families face.

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 5>What can you tell us about what their spending habits

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 5>are starting to look like over the Christmas holidays and

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 5>what are the concerns that they're expressing to you, Because

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 5>i mean, Tim makes a really good point that you know,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 5>we've seen that inflation's moderating, but it's still going to

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 5>feel pretty hard for consumers. And so by the same token,

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 5>it sounds like perhaps some of these folks they've still

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 5>got their jobs, they might still have a little bit

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 5>of investment to look at, and it looks like there's

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 5>some good feeling there with a lot of green in

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 5>the stock market over this year. So what's your take

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 5>on how they're feeling about this holiday season and spending

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 5>going into next year.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Give Jennifer, you're right, there are some positives going on.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Clearly employment strong, more people do have their jobs. We're

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 4>seeing incomes in freesome as well as well as the

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 4>slowing of inflation. So there's some positive things happening as well,

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 4>but by and large, most families are struggling. They're pretty

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 4>scarred financially and in some cases emotionally by what they've

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 4>been through the last couple of years, and so we

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 4>are seeing them reporting slowing down their spending this holiday

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 4>versus past holidays, but in reality that's very difficult to do.

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 4>And what's really concerning is that we're seeing more and

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 4>more families that are relying on credit cards and even

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 4>withdrawals from those savings that you mentioned to take care

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 4>of months to month expenses in normal months, particularly when

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 4>expenses go.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Up due to the holidays.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 4>And of course, overuse of credit and taking money out

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 4>of savings that's designed for long term goals like retirement

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 4>just has a terrible impact over time. They lose the

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 4>time value of money, the compounding of returns on their investments.

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 4>The opposite is happening if they're using credit cards with

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>very high interest rates and if they're not paying their balances,

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 4>those are compounding, and so the alternatives to cutting back

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 4>spending are very difficult from middle income families, and that's

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 4>why they're struggling. And that's why in many cases we

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 4>see in our surveys are are qualitative surveys that they're

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 4>struggling financially and emotionally at the same.

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Time, Glenn, does all of this, taken together at all,

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 3>paint a picture of a recession next year? Is this

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 3>recessionary to you?

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I think for these families it feels like it.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's a tough question We've been trying to

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 4>get the answer to for a number of years now,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 4>but I think these families feel like that.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, relief is not just around the corner.

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>But the reason I ask is is because if consumers

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>pull back on spending, and consumer spending powers this economy,

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 3>and the families that you serve account for more than

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 3>half of the households in this country, if they're pulling

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>back to a certain extent, does that mean the economy

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 3>is going to go into recession?

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 2>I believe we're certainly close to the age.

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 4>It's you know, we've seen spending be unusually strong overall,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 4>and we've had a lot of discussions about the consumer

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 4>spending that hasn't slowed as much as we would expect.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't sound consistent with what we're hearing and seeing in

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 4>the middle market.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 2>So maybe it's being driven outside the middle market.

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 4>But we're clearly seeing these families slow down, and enough

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 4>of that will lead to recessionary pressure if it continues

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:43.239
<v Speaker 4>long enough.

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 5>I wonder if you think policy makers and indeed Wall

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 5>Street traders are really alive to the risks here of recession,

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 5>because there's just so much talk about a soft landing.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 5>And then we were talking earlier on the program about

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 5>the last few holdouts on Wall Street, the bare case

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 5>for the United States, And I wonder if you do

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 5>start seeing a real pullback and spending from the kinds

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 5>of consumers you serve, if this will just pass the

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 5>rest of the economy. I mean what I mean by

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 5>that is the wealthier part of the economy, if it'll

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 5>pass them right by, because the macro numbers will hold

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 5>up because their spending will continue.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's always a danger that Wall Street is disconnected

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 4>from Main Street, for sure.

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know the answer that.

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't know whether the middle income challenges are going

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 4>to be large enough long enough to overwhelm the other

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 4>pressures maybe that are moving in a more positive direction.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 4>It's clearly a tug of war going on, and the

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 4>longer it continues, the risk here it gets. I think

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 4>those that are planning for the future should clearly be

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 4>taking this possibility into consideration and their planning, because there

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 4>is a reasonable enough possibility of it that you've got

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 4>to plan around it. You've got to say, what happens

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 4>if the spending slows so much, so rapidly, for so

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 4>long that it starts to send us in the drain

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 4>of a recession. And those that are planning for their

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 4>finances for both families and for the rest of our

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 4>country certainly need to keep that in the back of

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 4>their mind. I don't know where it's going to go yet.

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't think anyone does, but it's clearly a risk.

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Hey, I just wanted to starry interrupt, Jennifer. I just

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 3>wanted to let our audience know that shares of Nike

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>are bouncing around the after hours, moving higher and then

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 3>moving lower after the company reported its results just a

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 3>couple of minutes ago. Earnings per share for the second

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>quarter came in way above estimates at a dollar and

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 3>three cents per share versus that stimates of eighty five

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 3>cents a share once again, though shares in the after

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 3>hours are kind of bouncing around a little bit.

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 5>Glenn, thanks so much, just real quick, I just want

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 5>to get back to you on one point about the

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 5>kinds of customers that you do serve. Do you see

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 5>that there's a big difference between the top end and

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 5>the bottom end? Is it really quite tight for people

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 5>at the lower end, but maybe at the top end

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 5>it's a little bit easier. And part of the reason

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 5>why I asked that is because maybe at the top

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 5>end they've got a little bit more wiggle room to

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 5>cope in case the Fed delays it's move on the

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 5>rate cuts.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, the thirty two, one hundred and thirty thousand is

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 4>a wide range, and so we do see families with

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 4>tighter buzz budget, smaller incomes at the lower end struggling more.

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 4>At the same time, you hear more and more every

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 4>day about people that are making six figures in their

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 4>household and they feel like they're.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Living paycheck to paycheck.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 4>So yes, absolutely, it is more severe at the lower

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 4>end of the range, but there's a lot of pressure

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 4>throughout the range from thirty to one thirty.

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Glenn, really appreciate you joining us. You got to

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 3>come back in the early part of next year because

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 3>this is a really, really fascinating report that you and

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the team over at Primerica have put together. Once again,

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 3>it's the Perception Versus Reality report that examines middle income

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 3>households financial outlook heading into twenty twenty four. That's Glenn

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Jay Williams, CEO of the financial services company Primerica, joining

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 3>us on Zoom from Duluth, Georgia. Shares a Nike right

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 3>now moving lower by about three point eight percent in

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the after hours. The company says it's stream streamlining the organization.

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 3>It sees pre tax charges of between four hundred million

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 3>and four hundred and fifty million dollars. The company also

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 3>says that looking ahead to a softer second half revenue outlook,

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 3>we're going to continue our coverage with Nike. And in

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.599
<v Speaker 3>just a few minutes, you're listening to watching Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>app or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>We're continuing with Nike and our coverage around Nike's latest

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 3>quarterly report. Shares, as Charlie just mentioned, down about four

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 3>point seven percent in the after hours worth repeating some

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 3>of these headlines. Certainly, the company is saying that it's

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 3>streamlining in the organization and sees pre tax charges of

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 3>between four hundred and four hundred and fifty million dollars.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 3>The company says that charges are to be likely recognized

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 3>in the third quarter of fiscal year twenty twenty four.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 3>For more, let's go to Bloomberg News Earnings reporter Red Brown.

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 3>He joins us on Zoom from New York City. He's

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 3>had about ten minutes to look at these numbers.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Read.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing the way that investors are reacting in the

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 3>after hour, sending shares down about four and a half

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 3>percent as we speak. What sticks out to you about

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Nike's report.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 6>I think that the number that's really jumping off the

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 6>page for me is the results in China. So they

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 6>missed sales there, reporting around one point eight billion when

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 6>Wall Street was expecting somewhere closer to two billion. Actually,

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 6>and the reason I think that this number is so important.

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 6>Is that Nike's been kind of playing this dangerous game,

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 6>if you will, where a lot of their growth is

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 6>really heavily reliant on on China, when their sales in Europe,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 6>their sales in America, their bigger markets have really slowed down.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 6>So with those sales numbers in China coming in a

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 6>little bit below expectations, I think that is a little

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 6>bit of a worry for the company when they do

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 6>have such an outsized importance for Nike, there.

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 5>Is there the prospect for those numbers to turn around

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 5>in China or is it better for Nike to think

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 5>a little bit more and focusing on the US in Europe,

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 5>where we've got the prospect at least in the US

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 5>of lower borrowing costs potentially spurring some consumer spending there.

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 6>No, I think it's a it's a good point just

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 6>because of the volatility of the Chinese economy. Obviously that's

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 6>well outside of Nike's control, and there might be a

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 6>potential for them to want to shift their focus back

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 6>to these markets where, you know, I don't want to

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 6>go too far on a limb here, but maybe the

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 6>economic picture is starting to clarify a little bit more,

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 6>especially here in America. So I think that could be

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 6>something that we might want to get a little bit

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 6>more clarity from the company on during the earning's call.

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Hey, speaking of clarity, I do want to make a

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 3>quick correction to something I said earlier. Revenue missed the

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 3>average analyst estimate just slightly came in at thirteen point

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 3>three nine billion dollars, which was up zero point five

0:12:57.920 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 3>percent year of a year. The estimates that were for

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 3>three teen point four to six billion dollars. Okay, red,

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 3>We talked about China, but it also seems like what's

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 3>getting a lot of attention right now is the company

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 3>announcing this reorg, this two billion dollars in cost savings

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 3>that they're looking to find. They said that they're going

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 3>to be pre tax costs around four hundred to four

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty million. When it comes to employee severance,

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 3>i e. They're doing a reorg, they're gonna have to

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 3>pay out employees who they end up firing or laying

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 3>off as a result of this big picture what's going

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 3>on at Nike right now.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think Nike is not immune to a

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 6>lot of the pressures that retail has been going through

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 6>over the past few years. As we're coming out of

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 6>the pandemic still, I think it's the effects of that

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 6>sort of you know, real shock to retailers is still

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 6>something that they're working through. So if you look in

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 6>recent orders over the past about two years, Nike has

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 6>been seeing some pretty significant slow down in their earnings

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 6>for share numbers. So strategic shift has kind of been

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 6>been coming. I guess you could say for them, while

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 6>they need to find some way to improve their margins,

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 6>they can't keep offering the promotions that they have been

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 6>in the past to continue to kind of juice the

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 6>top line, So they're looking for new ways and significant

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 6>ways to continue to kind of get more out of

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 6>their business model, you know.

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 5>Just to follow up on that point in the statement,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Nike pointed out that some areas of potential savings include

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 5>increasing automation and use of technology. Can you talk a

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 5>little bit about what Nike's play there is in terms

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 5>of the technology.

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm a little bit unfamiliar with what they could do,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 6>but you know a lot of retailers will will point

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 6>to things like that if there's anywhere in their supply

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 6>chain that they can maybe automate a little bit more

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 6>anything in their warehousing that they can make a little

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 6>bit more advanced technologically, that's obviously an option for them,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 6>especially as we see some supply chains starting to shrink down.

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 6>Could be another area for them to maybe shave a

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 6>few points. I'm going to add a few points to

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 6>their margins.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Red I always like to take a look at what's

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 3>going on with foot Locker when Nike reports, and indeed

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing shares a Footlocker down about three percent in

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the after hours. Because Nike is such an important company

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 3>for foot Locker and vice versa Footlocker and important sales

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>channel for Nike, how should investors in Footlocker read into

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 3>these results.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 6>Well, just to take a step back from that, we

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 6>did hear from Nike last quarter during their call that

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 6>they're working to kind of reset that relationship. One thing

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 6>to key in on on this report still while we're

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 6>still waiting to hear some more color on the call,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 6>is that their wholesale channel sales in general declined this quarter.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 6>That's the third quarter in a row. So I think

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 6>what locker investors are probably reacting to that number to

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 6>seeing a further slow down within that channel in general

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 6>is I think probably a little bit got them, got

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 6>them a little bit scared.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, we know Nike has done a really good job

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 3>over the last decade in building out its relationship with

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 3>individual consumers and getting people to buy stuff directly from

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 3>its website at Nike dot Com. So is it okay

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 3>that wholesale is declining if a direct sales relationship is

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 3>higher margin for Nike?

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 6>Uh, you know, it's it's kind of hard to say.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 6>It's it's it does seem like, you know, like like

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 6>to your point, they have been really emphasizing Nike dot

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Com and the gap between those two sales channels continues

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 6>to get smaller and smaller. But I think the other

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 6>side of that coin for Nike is we have seen

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 6>consumers behavior shifting back to in person shopping to prefer

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 6>that experience still, so I think that's the sort of

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 6>the balance for Nike. I don't think they're going to

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 6>be able to just fullsale, ditch brick and mortar and

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 6>stop investing in those relationships as well with people like

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 6>retailers like foot Locker. So it's still kind of a

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 6>little bit too soon to say. Maybe for Nike in

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 6>terms of the long term vision of which sales channel

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 6>maybe is a higher priority for them.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 5>Oh interesting, I mean, getting away from the point of

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 5>the sales channel and looking at its various product lines,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 5>are you able to give us any kind of a

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 5>big picture story about what is the winner and loser

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 5>here for Nike at this point?

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 6>I do think it's interesting that we know we're kind

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 6>of just on the cusp of Christmas shopping right the

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 6>period ended at the end of November, and it doesn't

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 6>seem like there's really an area of strength besides their

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 6>equipment in terms of actual growth. Both apparel and footwear,

0:17:54.800 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 6>which would probably be the more likely categories for holiday shopping,

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 6>are really kind of tepid in terms of growth. So yeah,

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't know how much of a driver equipment sales

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 6>is going to be for the company going forward. A

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 6>lot more of their business does come from those other

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 6>two categories, So yeah, again, I think this is just

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 6>an overall sort of a little bit of a negative

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 6>picture for Nike, and I think the sale excuse me,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 6>the shares are kind of reflecting that at the moment.

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's a really good point, right, Hey, Red,

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 3>I want to let you catch your breath and look

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 3>at your screen for a minute while I go through

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 3>the press release and read a couple of quotes from

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 3>John Donaho, the president and CEO of Nike. In addition

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 3>to that, just a little more color on these cost savings.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>H Johnahoe saying in a statement that the quarter showed

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 3>strong execution by our team as we focus on our

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 3>winning formula of innovative product, distinctive storytelling, and differentiated marketplace experiences.

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 3>He said that the second quarter results showed that the

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 3>company is getting back on their front foot. The company

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 3>also saying in a statement that it's identifying opportunities to

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 3>deliver up to two billion dollars in cumulative cost savings

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 3>of the next three years, simplifying product assortment, increasing automation

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 3>and the use of tech, and streamlining the organization. Read

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 3>I want to give you the last word here and

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 3>just give us your takeaways as we As you continue

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 3>to and wait for the call, what would you ask

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 3>on the earnings call today if you could.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think we've kind of covered the major topics.

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 6>I think one thing that has been a topic of

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 6>interest for me with Nike is the increasing amount of

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 6>competition that they're facing in in their sort of bread

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 6>and butter product line is running shoes. You know, that's

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 6>kind of where Nike came from. We saw a kind

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 6>of a small analysis coming out of Morgan Stanley earlier

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 6>this month where they just did a small sample just

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 6>here in New York City of what shoes people were wearing,

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 6>and it was you know, these alternative brands are really

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 6>gaining a lot of ground on Nike. So I would

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 6>want to know kind of what the company's plans are

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 6>to combat that there's eroding and their rooting market shop.

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I remember that report. It's like Hoka and on

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 3>running hey shares a Nike down about five point six

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 3>percent is wait for this call.

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App and YouTube. You can also listen

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Stay alive. That's apparently what we're going to be doing

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 3>later and later, for longer and longer. Well, according to

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 3>some models, half of today's five year olds in the

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 3>wealthiest countries are projected to reach one hundred years old.

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 3>That comes despite gun violence and epidemics of obesity, diabetes,

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>and opioids, and it accounts for disparities when it comes

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 3>to race, gender, and income. Life expectancy in the US

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 3>is still going up. Here's the problem, though, society is

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.479
<v Speaker 3>not set up to handle people living routinely into their eighties,

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 3>nineties and beyond. We're not invested in technologies and therapies

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 3>to help people stay healthy and independent as the age,

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 3>and we haven't really considered how to adapt work so

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 3>companies can make better use of the skills and experiences

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 3>of older employees. Karen Breslau writes all about this in

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the new issue of Bloomberg Business Week. It's on newstands now,

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 3>already online at Bloomberg dot com, slash business Week and

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 3>on the Bloomberg terminal. She joins us from California this afternoon.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 3>She's California Bureau Chief. Also here is the editor of

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Business Week, Joel Webber. He joins us on zoom

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 3>from Brooklyn this afternoon. Joel, this is a really cool story,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.719
<v Speaker 3>and it's one that's actually a couple years in the

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 3>making give us kind of the backstory here.

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, this issue was one that we became really interested

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 7>in doing earlier in the year, especially off of some

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 7>other recording that we had done that clearly struck a

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 7>chord because the reader appetite for anything about longevity. We

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 7>just noticed that it it was insatiable. So as we

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 7>started to kind of sketch together what this longevity issue

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 7>that Business Week published this week could look like, we

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 7>put out our typical kind of feelers throughout the newsroom,

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 7>and one that came back was really interesting because I

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 7>wasn't expecting it.

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I had met.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 7>Karen Breslaw, who had recently started at Bloomberg, and it

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 7>turned out that prior to working at Bloomberg, she worked

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 7>at the Stanford Center on Longevity. And we were like, Karen,

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 7>what did you learn while you.

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Worked That's what I meant by a couple of years,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 3>and that's what I meant by a couple of years

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 3>in the making.

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, yeah exactly so.

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 7>So so Karen, back back to you, what did you

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 7>learn at the Stanford Center on Longevity while you while

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 7>you worked there?

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 8>Well, I've I learned so much, Joe, it's hard to

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 8>sum it all up. One of the first things I

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 8>learned is that, you know, longer life spans are happening.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 8>It is a trend that started in the twentieth century.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 8>And you know, sant patient medical advances, universal primary education

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 8>for children, when kids go to school instead of factories

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 8>low and behold, they live longer. But one of the

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 8>first things I learned was to distinguish between aging, which

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 8>is this cellular process that we're all obsessed with, and longevity,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 8>which looks at the entire lifespan. It looks at the

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 8>entire human experience. And the folks there at the center

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 8>said the founder or Carsonsen, said, you know, we're a

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 8>center on longevity, not a center for longevity. We're not

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 8>promoting you know, this therapy or that potion. What we're

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 8>promoting is a way of looking at life and really

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 8>redefining our culture to so that people can live these

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:53.239
<v Speaker 8>long lives and thrive and you know, be vital and

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 8>engaged and productive for much longer than they are now.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 8>So it was a was a head shift, It was

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 8>a mind shift.

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 7>The other thing that I think it's worth mentioning is

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 7>how how the physical magazine issue kind of came together

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 7>and how we structured it, so we put Karen's story

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 7>as the the introduction to the whole issue, because ultimately,

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 7>what Tim, I think you said there at the top

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 7>was you take a bunch of five year olds that

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 7>are alive today. They're going to be living probably longer,

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 7>more of them past one hundred than you know, any

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 7>generation ever before. And as I think, Karen, you get

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 7>to it's you know, the world's not ready for that.

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 7>But Tim, just in the structure of the book and

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 7>Jennifer like this came first and then it culminates later

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 7>at the end of the book with stories that are

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 7>more geared towards end of life. So we sort of

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 7>had a cradle to grave approach. But let's stick with

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 7>the cradle part for just a second longer. Karen, when

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 7>when you were working there, you know, talk to us

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 7>more about these five year olds and what this will

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 7>distinguish them and what they will probably encounter in their lifetime.

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 8>Well, first of all, those five year olds are going

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 8>to have options. The lucky half, the lucky one half,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 8>the fortunate one half are going to have options that

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 8>really have never existed before for humans. I mean, for

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 8>you know, most of our lives are front loaded because

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 8>with education, with entering the workforce, with family formation, because

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 8>people just didn't live that long even you know, in

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.719
<v Speaker 8>nineteen hundred, life span was around forty seven and then

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 8>it left in the twentieth century to about seventy. So

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 8>these kindergarteners are going to have several careers. They may

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 8>not have a front loaded formal education which sees them

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 8>either entering the workforce at twenty or twenty one or

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 8>you know, getting their diploma. They may dip in and

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 8>out of the workforce. They may dip in and out

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 8>of earning and non earning years. It's not going to

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 8>be just this linear three after progression of education, work retirement.

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 8>It's it's going to be a very curvy road of life.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 8>And at Stanford, at the Center Longevity, they called it

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:17.239
<v Speaker 8>the New Map of Life, which includes lifelong learning. I mean,

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 8>the emphasis is on lifelong learning. You cannot front load

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 8>and education in twenty or twenty two years for someone

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 8>who may still be in the workforce at eighty And

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 8>I don't mean you're going to be you know, sitting

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 8>in the toll booth or you know, doing a job.

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 8>You know that existed in the twentieth century. You know,

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 8>for knowledge workers, there there are going to be so

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 8>many chapters and decades of work, and so there have

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 8>to be ways for people to dip in and out

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 8>of learning chapters and upskilling. And about something called midlife ships.

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, internships are not only for you know, for

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 8>for the young, they're for people in midlife and and

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 8>even in the you know, senior workers. But to see

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 8>seventy and eighty year olds who are productive, who are alert,

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 8>who are great problem solvers, have high emotional intelligence, bring

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 8>a lot to the workplace, you know, things that we

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 8>just simply can't imagine today. We just discount the older

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 8>workers as dead, would I mean that, which is really

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 8>inaccurate and will become more so. So they are going

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 8>to be great shifts in education, in lifelong learning, and

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 8>in the workplace.

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 5>Can we dig in a little bit on this turnt

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 5>you're making about education, because I mean, the story is

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 5>fascinating and I'm particularly taken with this idea of a

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 5>mid life shift. And as you're talking about knowledge workers,

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 5>but you're also talking about how society isn't set up

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 5>to handle the changes that need to be made in

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 5>order to reflect the fact that we're going to be

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 5>living to one hundreds. So can you put these two

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 5>things together for me? What is it that society is

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 5>not getting about the mid life shift? Is it something

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 5>that knowledge workers can't afford because of the way lending

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 5>and retirements plans are structured. What's the problem there?

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 8>There are many problems, but most of them are systemic,

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 8>and they you know, if we look at our if

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 8>we look at our entitlement programs, if you look at

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 8>Social Security or medicare these all assume you know, a

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 8>one way progression through the three chapters into retirement or disability.

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 8>Very often workers will enter a phase of life, perhaps

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 8>in their fifties or sixties, where there are there may

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 8>be temporary health setback, or more likely there are caregiving obligations,

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 8>often for very elderly parents. And these are people who

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 8>just need They might need a few months, they might

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 8>need a period to adjust or to arrange for a

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 8>care plan or to give care. And what happens is

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 8>there's just not en a flexibility in and out of

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 8>the workforce, in and out of the paid workforce. So yeah,

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 8>there will have to be policy changes. They're going to

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 8>need to be new financial products that allow people to

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 8>save not only for retirement, you know, through a four

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 8>to one K, but for a midlife transition or several transitions.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 8>We might see more glide paths to retirement where it

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 8>isn't you just flip off the switch and you go

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 8>from being you know, employed full time to mallwalking or

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, playing pick a ball. But you may become

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 8>an older person, an older worker may become a consultant,

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 8>They may become a workplace sage and elder. They may

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 8>become a mentor somebody may have great contributions to make

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 8>for twenty or twenty five hours a week rather than

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 8>forty or fifty. And so some of the workplace shortages,

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 8>some of the labor shortages that we're seeing among the

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 8>labor among the knowledge worker pool, could be alleviated by

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 8>creating more options for these older workers. Now, if you're

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 8>talking about people who who work in a very demanding

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 8>physical occupation. If you if you like, are a pile driver,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 8>if you operate a jackhammer, if you are a construction worker,

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 8>or if you are a you know, a first responder,

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 8>you know, those are jobs obviously where people can't be

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 8>asked to remain you know, you know, in tip top

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, strength and agility and reflexes you know, into

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 8>their seventeen eighties. But they may be great trainers, they

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 8>may have several more careers in them. We need to

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 8>normalize those kinds of shifts through uh, you know periods

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 8>of life, you know, basically gap years for grown ups.

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 7>Karen, I want to ask you, you know, in addition

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 7>to the challenges, one challenge that you know we face

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 7>a journalists when we cover anything around longevity is how

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 7>things can turn into science fiction real quick, right, and

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 7>we have to kind of approach the field with a

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 7>certain amount of skepticism. And I'm just curious, like, as

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 7>you worked in this, and you have that great sort

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 7>of preface about how the Center approached longevity, but I'm curious,

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 7>like what already feels like a swing and a miss

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 7>based on what you've got to observe and where things

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 7>have already started to head.

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think one of the most promising work is

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 8>and Ashley Advance, you know, writes about this and the

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 8>issue is is cellular reprogramming we really can? I mean,

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 8>there are just great advances in decoupling the progression of

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 8>disease in cells. Right, So we so often we assume

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 8>aging itself is a disease.

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 7>It isn't.

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 8>It's a natural biological process that happens to you know,

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 8>correspond you know to there are correlations with all kinds

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 8>of age related diseases, neuro degenerate diseases or heart disease.

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 8>We can actually uh you know, there are therapies that

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 8>can that can re engineer cells, and so that is real,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 8>it's happening. I think, I think the miss is that

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 8>is uh is the notion, uh, you know, of of immortality.

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, life has a beginning and an end, and

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 8>and nobody at the center of longevity. Uh, you know,

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 8>advocated for changing that that progression. It you know, the

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.959
<v Speaker 8>the notion of immortality. It's it's tantalizing, you know, it's mythic,

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 8>but you know, reality is that, you know, life, life

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 8>does have an end. And one of the things, one

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 8>of the curious phrases that stuck in my mind while

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 8>I was I was working there was the compression of morbidity,

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 8>which basically means live long, live well, and die fast. Uh,

0:32:54.720 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 8>so that there aren't years of infirmity, pain and loss

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 8>of mobility and engagement and dignity that you really you

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 8>just you just live full on until you don't. And

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 8>and that was I thought that was a great model.

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.719
<v Speaker 8>And I think it is entirely within reach that people

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 8>will live longer and fuller and healthier lives. And uh,

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, the notion of a health span is vitally important,

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 8>and it does start at birth, and it starts with

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 8>those kindergarteners. You know, are they out playing, are they

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 8>eating good food? Are they exposed to toxic stress? What?

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 8>What is their climate? You know, what are the climate

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 8>conditions for their lives? So so that those are really

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 8>lifespan issues that have nothing to do with immortality, but

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 8>they have a lot to do with life.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's a great story, Karen. I encourage everybody to

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 3>check it out. It's in the new issue of Bloomberg

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Business Week. It's the Longevity Issue. It's on newstands now.

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 3>It's already online at Bloomberg dot com, slash Business Weekend

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 3>on the Bloomberg terminal. Karen Breslaus, California br chief for

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News, joining us from San Francisco. Joe Weber is

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the editor of Bloomberg Business Week, joining us from Brooklyn.

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg.

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast of a Little

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcast.

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us live every

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.720
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal