1 00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:04,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside 2 00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:06,920 Speaker 1: my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring 3 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along 4 00:00:11,520 --> 00:00:15,560 Speaker 1: with essential market moving news on the Bloomberg Markets Podcast 5 00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:18,439 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and 6 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:22,079 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com Slash Podcast. Lots of stuff to 7 00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:24,960 Speaker 1: get to with Alison Williams. She covers all the banks 8 00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:27,520 Speaker 1: for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's one of the best on wall streets, 9 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 1: so we love getting some of her time. Allison is 10 00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 1: a million ways week and go here. Let's start really 11 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:33,760 Speaker 1: easy with the with the easy stuff. I think Bank 12 00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:36,960 Speaker 1: of America. I thought the numbers looked pretty good. What's 13 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:41,680 Speaker 1: your takeaway? The numbers looked really good, and that interest 14 00:00:41,760 --> 00:00:46,159 Speaker 1: income the story for the quarter was very strong at 15 00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:49,800 Speaker 1: the bank, and there's upside to the fourth quarter. So 16 00:00:49,920 --> 00:00:53,880 Speaker 1: that's that's the good news. The consumer is healthy. Um. 17 00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:55,800 Speaker 1: And so now that we have you know, sort of 18 00:00:55,840 --> 00:01:00,520 Speaker 1: the four biggest diversified banks coming in uh, you know, 19 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:05,520 Speaker 1: charge offs came in better than expected. That's current credit trends. 20 00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:08,560 Speaker 1: So the banks did set aside um some money for 21 00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:12,320 Speaker 1: the future. But I would say, you know, generally modest 22 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:16,640 Speaker 1: compared to some concerns. So what I'd read a Brian 23 00:01:16,680 --> 00:01:21,959 Speaker 1: moynihan quote. He says UM spending levels, although the growth 24 00:01:22,040 --> 00:01:26,840 Speaker 1: is slowing, they're still growing, and that a consumer UM 25 00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:32,440 Speaker 1: deposits are still elevated. So the consumer really is healthy. UM. 26 00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:34,560 Speaker 1: We don't have to debate whether that's good or bad 27 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:36,880 Speaker 1: news for the market. But what does it mean for 28 00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:42,480 Speaker 1: UM the banks? It means that we're probably going to 29 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:45,560 Speaker 1: have UM again a strong fourth quarter. So I talked 30 00:01:45,560 --> 00:01:47,920 Speaker 1: about the net interest income, so part of that is 31 00:01:48,040 --> 00:01:51,760 Speaker 1: interest rate, and then part of that is that consumers 32 00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:56,040 Speaker 1: are spending UM. You know, the borrowing trends to us, 33 00:01:56,120 --> 00:01:58,440 Speaker 1: We feel like that bears watching because some of the 34 00:01:58,480 --> 00:02:01,160 Speaker 1: borrowings be healthy, but some of that borrowing could also 35 00:02:01,240 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 1: just indicate UM that investors are, you know, less able 36 00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:07,560 Speaker 1: to pay things out of their pockets. For the most part, 37 00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:11,160 Speaker 1: these things to focus on UM the higher end consumer, 38 00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 1: which generally is holding well UM, but in general health 39 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:20,040 Speaker 1: they spending. Credit card spending does tend to be the 40 00:02:20,080 --> 00:02:22,920 Speaker 1: strongest and loan growth best in the fourth quarters. So 41 00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:26,040 Speaker 1: that's all very supportive in your term as we look 42 00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:29,600 Speaker 1: into next year. You know, I'll circle back to my 43 00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:32,720 Speaker 1: mention of the provisions, just the fact that we're seeing 44 00:02:32,760 --> 00:02:36,680 Speaker 1: modest increases, and I think, um Jamie Diamond on Friday 45 00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:40,240 Speaker 1: also helped to put into context. Look, if we see 46 00:02:40,280 --> 00:02:43,000 Speaker 1: a five to six percent an unemployment rate, we're going 47 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:47,040 Speaker 1: to see you know, provisions building maybe six billion, So 48 00:02:47,160 --> 00:02:51,400 Speaker 1: that's above the one billion or so factored into estimates, 49 00:02:51,440 --> 00:02:55,679 Speaker 1: but certainly um well below the levels that we saw 50 00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:59,120 Speaker 1: during the pandemic. Hey, Alison, what's going on with Goldman Saxon? 51 00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:02,000 Speaker 1: I mean, I've got I think the third re org 52 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:04,840 Speaker 1: in four years. I mean, you and I have competed 53 00:03:04,840 --> 00:03:07,680 Speaker 1: against Goldman Sacks for decades and I'll speak just myself, 54 00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:12,359 Speaker 1: usually unsuccessfully, sometimes better than the worst, better, better, better 55 00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:14,160 Speaker 1: than others. But what's going on over the Goldman sax 56 00:03:14,240 --> 00:03:19,280 Speaker 1: It seems like a lot of instability there, so definitely 57 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:21,919 Speaker 1: some management changes. I would say that that would be 58 00:03:22,280 --> 00:03:25,400 Speaker 1: the most impactful thing for me as an analyst. I 59 00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:28,680 Speaker 1: like the changes because it lines up the bank um 60 00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:31,480 Speaker 1: in an easier way to compare them to some of 61 00:03:31,480 --> 00:03:33,920 Speaker 1: their peers. But for the most part, we could do 62 00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:36,040 Speaker 1: that anyway. We had the pieces of the investment bank, 63 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: we had the pieces of the trading. Now they're gonna 64 00:03:38,320 --> 00:03:41,640 Speaker 1: sort of put that together, um, similar to other banks. 65 00:03:41,720 --> 00:03:44,360 Speaker 1: And then you know, breaking up this uh you know, 66 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:47,520 Speaker 1: the reporting of the way that the consumer unit was reported. 67 00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:50,240 Speaker 1: They had sort of wealth embedded in that unit, so 68 00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:53,640 Speaker 1: maybe pulling that out. I think the most interesting thing 69 00:03:53,720 --> 00:03:56,240 Speaker 1: to me is the breaking out of the transaction bank. 70 00:03:56,680 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 1: You know, this is a business that we m have 71 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:04,360 Speaker 1: felt was a good fit for them. Now, as you said, 72 00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:06,600 Speaker 1: they they've made a lot of changes in the last 73 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:09,240 Speaker 1: few years, but they really, I think over the long term, 74 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:11,400 Speaker 1: are the most consistent in terms of who they are. 75 00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:14,720 Speaker 1: They're you know about a global investment banking and trading. 76 00:04:15,080 --> 00:04:17,920 Speaker 1: The transaction banking is something that they hadn't done before. 77 00:04:18,080 --> 00:04:21,080 Speaker 1: Just too explained that for a moment. You know that 78 00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 1: they're basically helping um, you know, companies with their cash management, 79 00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 1: and so that helps to give them a line into trading. 80 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:30,880 Speaker 1: And that's why we view it as positive. And I 81 00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:33,039 Speaker 1: think the fact that they're gonna be breaking that out 82 00:04:33,040 --> 00:04:36,360 Speaker 1: on a standalone shows that that effort is successful. What's 83 00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:39,760 Speaker 1: trading look like to you, um from here on out? 84 00:04:39,800 --> 00:04:43,680 Speaker 1: Because we've seen such choppy mark, so much volatility, so 85 00:04:43,760 --> 00:04:47,839 Speaker 1: much you know, gloom um is trading a business that 86 00:04:47,880 --> 00:04:51,279 Speaker 1: you want to be in this quarter, next quarter. This 87 00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:54,239 Speaker 1: quarter is probably you know, tends to be the weakest 88 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:56,760 Speaker 1: quarter of the year. UM, so we would expect to 89 00:04:56,760 --> 00:05:01,200 Speaker 1: see some seasonal moderation. UM could be some upside, as 90 00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:04,520 Speaker 1: you said, from all of the volatility. Where we thought 91 00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:08,159 Speaker 1: this past quarter was in the fixed income trade line. 92 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:12,640 Speaker 1: We expect that that continues. Equity trading is just sort 93 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:16,840 Speaker 1: of I think against a tougher comparison from a year ago. UM. 94 00:05:16,920 --> 00:05:18,400 Speaker 1: Keep in mind all those I p s and all 95 00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:22,560 Speaker 1: that activity also led to a lot of UM elevated trading. 96 00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:26,279 Speaker 1: But fixed income I think as as long as we 97 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:30,200 Speaker 1: continue to see volatility around the interest rates, volatility around currencies, 98 00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:32,920 Speaker 1: you're still going to get a left to that part 99 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:37,640 Speaker 1: of the income statement. All right. And last Alison credit Swiss, 100 00:05:37,760 --> 00:05:40,240 Speaker 1: my alma mater. We got the head of the investment 101 00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:42,479 Speaker 1: bank saying he's going to leave here. Are they even 102 00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:46,080 Speaker 1: going to have an investment bank going forward? Well, that's 103 00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:49,120 Speaker 1: the question that we'll find out next week. UM it 104 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:52,400 Speaker 1: should it be so investor, there's a Capital Markets Day 105 00:05:52,440 --> 00:05:55,440 Speaker 1: next week in the analyst day. Yeah. So so the 106 00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:58,440 Speaker 1: basically what they've said is when they report their earnings, 107 00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:01,960 Speaker 1: which is October, and they are also going to give 108 00:06:02,560 --> 00:06:05,599 Speaker 1: UM their strategy. So the big question are, you know, 109 00:06:05,640 --> 00:06:07,640 Speaker 1: what are they going to look like or in the 110 00:06:07,720 --> 00:06:10,880 Speaker 1: future what parts of the investment bank are they keeping? 111 00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:13,039 Speaker 1: You know, there's another story every day. Are they bringing 112 00:06:13,040 --> 00:06:16,400 Speaker 1: back first Boston? Are they going to sell parts of 113 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:20,640 Speaker 1: their Swiss unit? UM? You know, the Swiss bank UM 114 00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:23,080 Speaker 1: sales are interesting because maybe you can get a bit 115 00:06:23,160 --> 00:06:27,039 Speaker 1: better valuation UM. You know, granted it's a tough market everywhere, 116 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:30,440 Speaker 1: but securitized product group that we think they're going to 117 00:06:30,560 --> 00:06:33,600 Speaker 1: do something with UM, you know, theirn a tough spot 118 00:06:33,640 --> 00:06:37,000 Speaker 1: just given what evaluations are, and so there's going to 119 00:06:37,080 --> 00:06:40,400 Speaker 1: be changes there. And the question is will they raise capital? 120 00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:43,000 Speaker 1: All right, good stuff, I know I'm gonna I just 121 00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:45,360 Speaker 1: think the day I left it just went downhill from there. 122 00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:47,080 Speaker 1: I mean, I think, I think I think you can 123 00:06:47,120 --> 00:06:49,840 Speaker 1: just plot that on a graph. Alison Williams, senior banks 124 00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:53,719 Speaker 1: analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence, giving us the latest on all 125 00:06:53,760 --> 00:06:55,960 Speaker 1: things Wall Street. Bank of America's a pretty good numbers 126 00:06:56,000 --> 00:07:02,560 Speaker 1: coming out of via a some good stuff there, some big, 127 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:04,920 Speaker 1: big moves today and I'm just noting. So you got 128 00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:08,039 Speaker 1: the SMP up two points seven percent, the volumes about 129 00:07:08,040 --> 00:07:10,840 Speaker 1: seven percent higher than we've seen over the last thirty 130 00:07:11,040 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 1: days at this time. So a little bit of a 131 00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:14,760 Speaker 1: vine kind of backing up this move here. I want 132 00:07:14,760 --> 00:07:17,080 Speaker 1: to check in with somebody it does this stuff for 133 00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:22,760 Speaker 1: a living. Samir Samana, Senior Global market strategist at Wells Fargo. Samir, 134 00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:24,920 Speaker 1: thanks so much for joining us. I mean, we've had 135 00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:27,480 Speaker 1: such a volatility, we've had such a weak market in 136 00:07:27,560 --> 00:07:32,360 Speaker 1: two What do you make of today's trading just for example, 137 00:07:32,400 --> 00:07:34,720 Speaker 1: anything or is it just kind of another you know, 138 00:07:34,760 --> 00:07:38,280 Speaker 1: kind of two percent three percent moving the market. You know, 139 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:40,520 Speaker 1: I'll kind of pick up where you left off. Really, 140 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:43,040 Speaker 1: it's a volatility i'd like to see calm down to. 141 00:07:43,280 --> 00:07:45,000 Speaker 1: I don't take anything away from the down day. I 142 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:48,000 Speaker 1: mean last week was pretty pretty anxious, right with with 143 00:07:48,040 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 1: what was going on the UK and with the FED 144 00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:53,360 Speaker 1: and inflation prints. Um. But again, what I'd really like 145 00:07:53,400 --> 00:07:55,360 Speaker 1: to see is for this market to try and find 146 00:07:55,560 --> 00:07:58,000 Speaker 1: kind of a bottom and from that standpoint just maybe 147 00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:00,400 Speaker 1: even trade sideways for a few days. I think these 148 00:08:00,480 --> 00:08:03,360 Speaker 1: you know, constituted three up and down days. I think 149 00:08:03,360 --> 00:08:06,280 Speaker 1: you're continue to spook investors, and I think, really it 150 00:08:06,320 --> 00:08:09,240 Speaker 1: shows me that there's quite a bit of liquidity, quite 151 00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:11,680 Speaker 1: a bit of fragility out there. So I think maybe 152 00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:13,960 Speaker 1: the best course of action for for markets from here, 153 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:15,920 Speaker 1: given what the FEDS trying to engineer, is just to 154 00:08:15,920 --> 00:08:19,920 Speaker 1: go sideways for a few days. So, uh, is there 155 00:08:19,920 --> 00:08:22,000 Speaker 1: any evidence that we've hit a bottom here or do 156 00:08:22,040 --> 00:08:24,920 Speaker 1: you think we still have a ways to go? I 157 00:08:24,920 --> 00:08:27,120 Speaker 1: think we've got still yet, you know, maybe a little 158 00:08:27,120 --> 00:08:29,200 Speaker 1: bit more probing to do to the downside for know 159 00:08:29,280 --> 00:08:32,360 Speaker 1: other reason. Then again, these balances are very shallow, right. 160 00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,120 Speaker 1: The SMP hasn't been above its twenty day moving average 161 00:08:35,160 --> 00:08:37,560 Speaker 1: since the middle of August, so you're now two months 162 00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 1: where you haven't even able to get over a short 163 00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:42,520 Speaker 1: term moving average. I think that tells me that there's 164 00:08:42,559 --> 00:08:44,880 Speaker 1: just not a lot of interest at these levels. Again, Now, 165 00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 1: if you go sideways, you know, just by definition mathematically, 166 00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:50,240 Speaker 1: you start to go through some of these moving averages, 167 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:52,160 Speaker 1: and so that might start to bring some more people in. 168 00:08:52,559 --> 00:08:54,400 Speaker 1: But when you've got these big moves every day, I 169 00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:57,920 Speaker 1: think a lot of people are just staying away. So, Samir, 170 00:08:57,960 --> 00:09:01,560 Speaker 1: we're kind of getting into the teeth year of earnings 171 00:09:01,559 --> 00:09:05,440 Speaker 1: season here. What are you looking for? What you know 172 00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:07,199 Speaker 1: kind of what do you think you're going to hear 173 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:09,920 Speaker 1: from a lot of these companies. I think they're gonna 174 00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:12,760 Speaker 1: kitchen sink at this quarter. So you've got a strengthening dollar, 175 00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:15,960 Speaker 1: you've got weakening economic growth, you've got a consumer that's 176 00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:18,600 Speaker 1: on its back foot, you've got the seed continuing to tighten, 177 00:09:18,679 --> 00:09:20,960 Speaker 1: and and you know, cause the curve to to you know, 178 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:24,480 Speaker 1: stay and we're inverted. Um, all those different things should 179 00:09:24,520 --> 00:09:27,600 Speaker 1: put downward pressure on the earnings outlook. And then I 180 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:30,080 Speaker 1: think when you think about all the uncertainty and the volatility, 181 00:09:30,160 --> 00:09:32,360 Speaker 1: I think the multiple people are willing to pay for 182 00:09:32,520 --> 00:09:35,440 Speaker 1: those earnings, um, you know, just aren't all that high. 183 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:39,679 Speaker 1: So from that standpoint, we're hopeful that maybe this is cathartic, 184 00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 1: from the standpoint of people finally mark their estimates down 185 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:45,360 Speaker 1: to where reality is. But to the extent that hope 186 00:09:45,400 --> 00:09:49,680 Speaker 1: springs eternal, that earnings will magically grow in. That tells 187 00:09:49,679 --> 00:09:51,960 Speaker 1: me that that's another reason why we probably haven't seemed 188 00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:55,400 Speaker 1: the loaves one thing that seemed to me a bright 189 00:09:55,440 --> 00:09:57,320 Speaker 1: spot or dark spot depending how you look at it. 190 00:09:57,360 --> 00:10:02,440 Speaker 1: Was Brian moynihan talking about his consumer um okay, arguably 191 00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:08,080 Speaker 1: slightly wealthier than the average consumer, I'm not sure about that, 192 00:10:08,120 --> 00:10:12,360 Speaker 1: but saying that their account levels are still elevated, so 193 00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:16,200 Speaker 1: you know, they haven't spent their stimmies completely, or at 194 00:10:16,280 --> 00:10:18,880 Speaker 1: least they did some smart you know, Bank America customers, 195 00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:20,920 Speaker 1: is something smart with them? What do you think about that? 196 00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 1: The consumers in better shape? It looks like from these 197 00:10:22,760 --> 00:10:25,560 Speaker 1: bank earnings, and we might have thought, no, that's a 198 00:10:25,559 --> 00:10:28,000 Speaker 1: great point. I think the tricky part with this cycle, 199 00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:30,480 Speaker 1: or at least this downturn part of the cycle, is that, 200 00:10:30,559 --> 00:10:32,040 Speaker 1: you know, look, if the FEDS trying to get in 201 00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:34,080 Speaker 1: place under control, and if you're telling me that the 202 00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:36,960 Speaker 1: consumers in better shape, then then we had all hope 203 00:10:37,040 --> 00:10:40,120 Speaker 1: for Unfortunately, that makes the FEDS job harder, right, That 204 00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:45,240 Speaker 1: keeps demand you know, somewhat supported for goods, services, etcetera. 205 00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:47,400 Speaker 1: And I think unfortunately it makes the FEDS job a 206 00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:50,200 Speaker 1: lot harder, which is really the biggest heads for markets 207 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:54,400 Speaker 1: right now. Alright. Smear Uh as a former equity analyst, 208 00:10:54,480 --> 00:10:58,120 Speaker 1: I am a glass half full type of person by nature. 209 00:10:58,160 --> 00:11:01,760 Speaker 1: So if I'm thinking about kind of identifying, if not 210 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:04,080 Speaker 1: calling the bottom here to the market at some point 211 00:11:04,200 --> 00:11:07,560 Speaker 1: soon do I do I jump in on the cyclical 212 00:11:07,640 --> 00:11:09,720 Speaker 1: names that would work in a cyclical rebound? Where do 213 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:11,640 Speaker 1: I go back to what's always worked for me? It 214 00:11:11,679 --> 00:11:16,920 Speaker 1: seems since the Great Financial Crisis, which is just big tech. Yeah, 215 00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:18,679 Speaker 1: so we we've got quite a bit of conviction that 216 00:11:18,800 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 1: coming out of this downturn that the leadership will be 217 00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:25,120 Speaker 1: meaningfully different. We're finally going to see value continue to 218 00:11:25,160 --> 00:11:29,319 Speaker 1: outform growth because rates will remain elevated, commodity prices will 219 00:11:29,360 --> 00:11:32,040 Speaker 1: remain elevated. You could even see the dollar, you know, 220 00:11:32,080 --> 00:11:35,200 Speaker 1: at that point kind of resume. It's long, long term downtrend. Again, 221 00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:37,640 Speaker 1: not anytime soon, but you know, over the coming let's 222 00:11:37,679 --> 00:11:40,120 Speaker 1: say to three or five years. So the leadership probably 223 00:11:40,240 --> 00:11:43,560 Speaker 1: is I would argue, you know, your resource you know 224 00:11:43,640 --> 00:11:47,120 Speaker 1: based stocks like energy and materials, I think financials. Once 225 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:49,600 Speaker 1: the curve starts to steepens, you know, the short end 226 00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:52,960 Speaker 1: comes off. Um, I think you'll see industrials right with 227 00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:55,280 Speaker 1: defense spending, with you know, at some point having to 228 00:11:55,320 --> 00:11:57,560 Speaker 1: redo a lot of the supply chains, you know, that 229 00:11:57,880 --> 00:11:59,520 Speaker 1: area should do well. So I think it will be 230 00:11:59,520 --> 00:12:01,520 Speaker 1: a lot more cyclical. I think a lot a lot 231 00:12:01,559 --> 00:12:05,520 Speaker 1: more value oriented. I think where you've got concentration in 232 00:12:05,600 --> 00:12:09,920 Speaker 1: some of the growthier areas like consumer discretionary, like calm services. 233 00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 1: You know, they'll probably struggle a little bit because a 234 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:14,480 Speaker 1: lot of these companies traded valuations where it's not like 235 00:12:14,520 --> 00:12:17,400 Speaker 1: they're not making money. If anything, they're huge cash flow generators. 236 00:12:17,520 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 1: I think the palm is just gonna take them years 237 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:22,199 Speaker 1: to go into those multiples. All right, smir great, getting 238 00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:24,040 Speaker 1: you on. I have to have you back as soon 239 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:27,559 Speaker 1: as possible, smears Amon of their senior global market strategist 240 00:12:27,800 --> 00:12:31,480 Speaker 1: at Wells Fargo, walking us through his view of the markets. 241 00:12:34,840 --> 00:12:36,439 Speaker 1: I want to get to break to our next guest. 242 00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:41,040 Speaker 1: Hans DAWCC of Mitchell Madison Group joins us, and we 243 00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:43,200 Speaker 1: want to talk China a little. A lot of news 244 00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:45,680 Speaker 1: coming out of China over the weekend as the government 245 00:12:46,600 --> 00:12:50,760 Speaker 1: meetings take place, President G. G. Ping Uh getting we'll 246 00:12:50,760 --> 00:12:56,080 Speaker 1: be getting a third term presumably eight unprecedented third five 247 00:12:56,160 --> 00:12:58,920 Speaker 1: year term. Here, Hans, we had a lot of rhetoric 248 00:12:58,960 --> 00:13:02,720 Speaker 1: coming out of China over the weekend. What did you 249 00:13:02,760 --> 00:13:04,120 Speaker 1: take away? What are some of the things that we 250 00:13:04,160 --> 00:13:06,959 Speaker 1: need to be focusing on. Yeah, I think it's it's 251 00:13:06,960 --> 00:13:09,240 Speaker 1: pretty interesting. Thanks for having me. First of all, I 252 00:13:09,280 --> 00:13:12,320 Speaker 1: think what you're seeing in China is really a lot 253 00:13:12,360 --> 00:13:15,680 Speaker 1: of weakness, right, And I think you have um when 254 00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:18,080 Speaker 1: you go back to the basics looking back at what 255 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:22,120 Speaker 1: really explained explained China's growth in the past was really 256 00:13:22,480 --> 00:13:24,520 Speaker 1: a lot of things that had to do with extremely 257 00:13:24,600 --> 00:13:28,319 Speaker 1: favorable demographics. Right, So the dependency ratio was an all 258 00:13:28,360 --> 00:13:32,040 Speaker 1: time low. It went from you know, back in the eighties, 259 00:13:32,400 --> 00:13:36,560 Speaker 1: it was about and it's going to be about but 260 00:13:36,679 --> 00:13:39,440 Speaker 1: for a very bad reason. Right. The dependency ratio was 261 00:13:39,800 --> 00:13:42,959 Speaker 1: high because I had children, and the dependency ratio is 262 00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:45,920 Speaker 1: going to be very high because they have old people. Right. 263 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:49,480 Speaker 1: So demographics are always destiny, and you will see a 264 00:13:49,559 --> 00:13:52,959 Speaker 1: very very dangerous pattern in China where they simply are 265 00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:56,480 Speaker 1: going to have lose the economical bigger they're going to 266 00:13:56,559 --> 00:14:00,400 Speaker 1: lose all the innovation, similar to what happened in Japan 267 00:14:00,480 --> 00:14:02,920 Speaker 1: the nineties. So I think that's a big factor, right. 268 00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:07,480 Speaker 1: But why I don't understand why does she Jin ping 269 00:14:08,480 --> 00:14:11,240 Speaker 1: Um stick to this COVID zero policy That seems to 270 00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:15,319 Speaker 1: be the main thing that baffles all of US Westerners, 271 00:14:16,160 --> 00:14:19,360 Speaker 1: and I haven't heard a good defense of that yet. 272 00:14:20,520 --> 00:14:22,960 Speaker 1: I don't understand it either. I mean, the the only 273 00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 1: thing I can think of is that they have to 274 00:14:25,360 --> 00:14:28,040 Speaker 1: do that because they don't actually have a good vaccine, right, 275 00:14:28,080 --> 00:14:32,000 Speaker 1: so the Chinese vaccine isn't particularly effective. H But what 276 00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:34,680 Speaker 1: I mean, what happens if then they just let people 277 00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:38,120 Speaker 1: get COVID and the old ones that are so difficult 278 00:14:38,160 --> 00:14:41,040 Speaker 1: to pay for because they don't have enough young ones die? 279 00:14:42,680 --> 00:14:46,600 Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's horrible and callous, but it sets 280 00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:50,120 Speaker 1: the demographic shift straight. Yeah, it could be that. I mean, 281 00:14:50,200 --> 00:14:51,960 Speaker 1: I don't think the thing I think that's stuck on 282 00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:54,960 Speaker 1: this policy, and like with a lot of these you know, 283 00:14:55,440 --> 00:14:59,200 Speaker 1: um sort of semi dictator ships, they are stuck in 284 00:14:59,200 --> 00:15:01,120 Speaker 1: their way and they decided that they're going to do 285 00:15:01,160 --> 00:15:03,000 Speaker 1: that and they want to lose. They can't lose faith 286 00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:05,760 Speaker 1: now they can't. They can't turn around. It's a big mistake. 287 00:15:06,120 --> 00:15:08,600 Speaker 1: I totally agree with you, the huge mistaken I was 288 00:15:08,600 --> 00:15:11,600 Speaker 1: reading some of the reporting over the weekend about this 289 00:15:11,960 --> 00:15:14,840 Speaker 1: China Congress and some of the statements in it. If 290 00:15:14,960 --> 00:15:20,000 Speaker 1: it just feels like China is is, you know, setting 291 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:23,520 Speaker 1: itself up for a China against the rest of the world. 292 00:15:24,280 --> 00:15:28,000 Speaker 1: Is that you're reading as well. I think that's the possibility. 293 00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:31,640 Speaker 1: I do think that China, for like I said, demographic 294 00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:34,960 Speaker 1: reasons and a lot of discontent in the population. The 295 00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:37,680 Speaker 1: whole China dream thing doesn't seem to be working out 296 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:41,400 Speaker 1: so well. You know, today they delayed their GDP numbers. 297 00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:43,560 Speaker 1: That can't be a good sign. So I think that's 298 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:45,840 Speaker 1: just a lot of things going on that are very, 299 00:15:45,920 --> 00:15:49,440 Speaker 1: very negative for China, right. And I think in in 300 00:15:49,680 --> 00:15:54,880 Speaker 1: situations where you have weak countries or declining countries, that's 301 00:15:54,880 --> 00:15:57,440 Speaker 1: when the risk for confrontation is always the greatest. You 302 00:15:57,480 --> 00:16:00,600 Speaker 1: saw that in Russia. We've seen this all over world history. 303 00:16:00,640 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 1: I think it's a pretty dangerous situation. Yeah. On the 304 00:16:03,840 --> 00:16:07,600 Speaker 1: other hand, he didn't seem terribly hawkish ari E Taiwan. 305 00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:11,840 Speaker 1: I mean, he was, as I guess, um protective as 306 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:17,040 Speaker 1: you'd expect, but he seemed to indicate that the question 307 00:16:17,080 --> 00:16:20,520 Speaker 1: is still an open one. Yeah. I think the taiwan 308 00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:22,960 Speaker 1: Is situation is a very long term situation, and I 309 00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:28,800 Speaker 1: think everybody recognizes the tremendous mutual dependency between the West 310 00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:32,560 Speaker 1: and China, right, it would be an absolute catastrophe economically 311 00:16:32,640 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 1: for everybody. And the path in China between the regime 312 00:16:37,280 --> 00:16:41,040 Speaker 1: and the population is that there will be growth, right, 313 00:16:41,280 --> 00:16:43,920 Speaker 1: and if there's no growth then they have a trouble. 314 00:16:44,120 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 1: The problem is there or is there developing a technology 315 00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:54,720 Speaker 1: cold war between China and the West. Well, certainly the 316 00:16:55,240 --> 00:16:58,680 Speaker 1: West has recognized that they have some power over China, right, 317 00:16:58,760 --> 00:17:02,040 Speaker 1: interesting enough that Trump harvers were never removed. The Chips 318 00:17:02,080 --> 00:17:05,040 Speaker 1: Act is a good thing. The West is beginning to 319 00:17:05,359 --> 00:17:10,120 Speaker 1: throttle technology, advanced technology going into China and China it's 320 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:13,000 Speaker 1: clearly trying to build you know, their own stuff. But 321 00:17:13,119 --> 00:17:16,159 Speaker 1: you can also see it very interestingly h in the 322 00:17:16,440 --> 00:17:20,520 Speaker 1: the SML, the Dutch chip making equipment company, has record 323 00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:24,000 Speaker 1: orders despite you know, looming recession. Well why is that? Right? 324 00:17:24,560 --> 00:17:28,679 Speaker 1: Clearly the West is preparing to move to production out 325 00:17:28,720 --> 00:17:31,680 Speaker 1: of China and Taiwan in particular. So I think we're 326 00:17:31,720 --> 00:17:37,320 Speaker 1: beginning to play that card. Is UM is China happily 327 00:17:38,640 --> 00:17:41,639 Speaker 1: uh contributing to the formation of a new world order, 328 00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:45,680 Speaker 1: of a new global paradigm with UM the US on 329 00:17:45,680 --> 00:17:52,000 Speaker 1: one side and China allied with Russia and Iran, India 330 00:17:52,280 --> 00:17:55,639 Speaker 1: possibly the Saudis on the other. It seems like an 331 00:17:55,680 --> 00:17:58,359 Speaker 1: odd group, right, So, I think China is obviously trying 332 00:17:58,440 --> 00:18:02,040 Speaker 1: to rival Western liberal democracy, and it seems like we're 333 00:18:02,040 --> 00:18:05,960 Speaker 1: doing our best to appear confused and chaotic. But at 334 00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:09,520 Speaker 1: the at the core bit right, nobody except North Korean 335 00:18:09,560 --> 00:18:13,359 Speaker 1: wants wants to move to China. Culturally, they're not leading, 336 00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:16,760 Speaker 1: they have a lot of issues around the liberalization of 337 00:18:16,800 --> 00:18:21,520 Speaker 1: the economy, they have not good demographics. They're probably facing 338 00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:24,080 Speaker 1: a middle income trap, which is common for those kinds 339 00:18:24,080 --> 00:18:27,359 Speaker 1: of countries. And people have seen what they've done to 340 00:18:27,400 --> 00:18:30,480 Speaker 1: Hong Kong, right, and they don't like it. You look 341 00:18:30,480 --> 00:18:32,320 Speaker 1: at Hong Kong, it's a it's a great example what 342 00:18:32,400 --> 00:18:35,439 Speaker 1: happened under the China Chinese system. Yeah, I mean I 343 00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:36,920 Speaker 1: think you know, early in my career, back in the 344 00:18:36,960 --> 00:18:39,119 Speaker 1: eighties and nineties and two thousands, of Hong Kong was 345 00:18:39,720 --> 00:18:42,359 Speaker 1: just the posting to get if you were wanted to 346 00:18:42,400 --> 00:18:44,240 Speaker 1: be a global banker, because it was really just the 347 00:18:44,800 --> 00:18:48,639 Speaker 1: gateway to Asia. Now, it's just it's such a sad 348 00:18:48,680 --> 00:18:50,400 Speaker 1: shame to see what's happening in Hong Kong. I mean, 349 00:18:50,440 --> 00:18:53,440 Speaker 1: just you know, corporations pulling their people out of Hong Kong, 350 00:18:53,480 --> 00:18:56,160 Speaker 1: and you know, sending in the Singapore and elsewhere. Will 351 00:18:56,200 --> 00:18:59,800 Speaker 1: we see a Do you think we'll see there's the 352 00:19:00,000 --> 00:19:01,440 Speaker 1: reason I think that's going to change? Is there for 353 00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:05,439 Speaker 1: Hong Kong? I don't think so. Yeah, it's interesting. It's 354 00:19:05,480 --> 00:19:07,560 Speaker 1: really said. All right, Hans Dole, thank you so much 355 00:19:07,720 --> 00:19:09,879 Speaker 1: for joining us. Hans Dow he's the CEO of Mitchell 356 00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:18,280 Speaker 1: Madison Tim Craig. Yet he's Director Research, Senior European strategist 357 00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:22,360 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Intelligence. He is one of the co founders any builders, 358 00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:27,119 Speaker 1: of Bloomberg Intelligence. Uh. And he's built our business in 359 00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:29,720 Speaker 1: the US and in Hawkong. We we banished them to 360 00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:31,440 Speaker 1: Hong Kong for four or five years and he built 361 00:19:31,480 --> 00:19:33,040 Speaker 1: that business over there in Hong Kong. And now we 362 00:19:33,080 --> 00:19:35,800 Speaker 1: got like seventy five analysts just covering all of the 363 00:19:36,040 --> 00:19:39,040 Speaker 1: escaped Hong Kong. And now he's in London. And he 364 00:19:39,080 --> 00:19:41,119 Speaker 1: did a prior term in London when he was with 365 00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:44,040 Speaker 1: Goldman Sachs for like twenty years, so he's been around 366 00:19:44,040 --> 00:19:45,399 Speaker 1: the horn. Nobody wants to work with him, so we 367 00:19:45,480 --> 00:19:47,680 Speaker 1: just keep sending him around the world and he does 368 00:19:48,000 --> 00:19:50,639 Speaker 1: make him sound really old. That's right. Tim talked to 369 00:19:50,720 --> 00:19:53,840 Speaker 1: us about the UK you're based in London. What are 370 00:19:53,880 --> 00:19:56,320 Speaker 1: clients saying over there? What are you telling clients about 371 00:19:56,480 --> 00:19:58,199 Speaker 1: kind of how to invest in the UK and Europe. 372 00:19:58,840 --> 00:20:02,920 Speaker 1: So if you read the headlines, I assume in particular 373 00:20:03,080 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 1: from here, yes, it must sound like all of Europe 374 00:20:05,840 --> 00:20:09,679 Speaker 1: and in particular the UK is like on fire in 375 00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:12,919 Speaker 1: a bad sort of way. Um, boots on the ground, 376 00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:17,600 Speaker 1: it feels a lot less bad. People are still out there, 377 00:20:17,680 --> 00:20:22,560 Speaker 1: still about They're still doing their daily activity. Um. But 378 00:20:22,720 --> 00:20:28,200 Speaker 1: the politics make for all sorts of big headlines, no doubt. 379 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:31,119 Speaker 1: The energy crisis is a big deal. This winter is 380 00:20:31,160 --> 00:20:34,800 Speaker 1: going to be hard, um, and it depends on how 381 00:20:34,840 --> 00:20:37,520 Speaker 1: harsh the winter is much different than what you would 382 00:20:37,560 --> 00:20:42,160 Speaker 1: find here. But interesting enough, Um, you've got third quarter 383 00:20:42,200 --> 00:20:44,840 Speaker 1: earnings in the thick of things here right now are 384 00:20:44,960 --> 00:20:47,000 Speaker 1: starts over there over the course of the next week. 385 00:20:47,440 --> 00:20:51,920 Speaker 1: Earnings expectations are flat ish in the US for third 386 00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:58,040 Speaker 1: quarter earnings. Europe, Uh, thank you very much. A drop 387 00:20:58,080 --> 00:21:04,440 Speaker 1: of growth. Growth And if by chance you take energy out, 388 00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:06,800 Speaker 1: because that is a bigger deal in Europe than it 389 00:21:06,880 --> 00:21:12,280 Speaker 1: is here, it's twelve it's still twelve percent positive. Um, 390 00:21:12,320 --> 00:21:14,680 Speaker 1: I think that there is still that's the big question 391 00:21:15,040 --> 00:21:17,960 Speaker 1: is there earnings risk to come, but valuation is cheap. 392 00:21:18,600 --> 00:21:22,400 Speaker 1: Um earnings are been much better supported than what you've 393 00:21:22,400 --> 00:21:25,840 Speaker 1: seen here. It's just a really interesting compare and contrast. Well, 394 00:21:25,880 --> 00:21:30,000 Speaker 1: you do have big commodities companies, big energy companies. There's you, 395 00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:32,560 Speaker 1: as you pointed out here, where what very tech heavy 396 00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:37,280 Speaker 1: in the US UM totally different dynamic and a and 397 00:21:37,400 --> 00:21:39,239 Speaker 1: a and to you always point this out to me, 398 00:21:39,320 --> 00:21:43,320 Speaker 1: I mean the Footsie here to date rolling down six 399 00:21:43,800 --> 00:21:50,440 Speaker 1: whereas the sp So it's the it's the behn in 400 00:21:50,560 --> 00:21:55,760 Speaker 1: terms of if you've got sustained elevated energy prices inflation, 401 00:21:56,280 --> 00:21:59,560 Speaker 1: you want to be in value um, you want to 402 00:21:59,560 --> 00:22:05,600 Speaker 1: be in commodity producers as opposed to commodity buyers. And 403 00:22:05,680 --> 00:22:07,640 Speaker 1: the Footsie happens to have a chunk of that. Well, 404 00:22:07,720 --> 00:22:10,160 Speaker 1: you're only down six percent on the foot See if 405 00:22:10,160 --> 00:22:13,960 Speaker 1: you happened to have pounds previously invested in pounds and 406 00:22:13,960 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 1: you're looking at that investment now in pounds because Paul 407 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:20,360 Speaker 1: Sweeney had had bought the foot see in dollars, you'd 408 00:22:20,400 --> 00:22:22,840 Speaker 1: be down. Let me let me give you a for 409 00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:25,320 Speaker 1: instance on this really quick. You know how currency here 410 00:22:25,359 --> 00:22:28,080 Speaker 1: obviously it's super strong that's a headwind for you for 411 00:22:28,200 --> 00:22:30,560 Speaker 1: US earnings. That's part of the reason why earnings this 412 00:22:30,640 --> 00:22:34,920 Speaker 1: period are so bad. Sand Vic a lot of people 413 00:22:34,960 --> 00:22:36,920 Speaker 1: wouldn't have heard of it, but it's a military school 414 00:22:37,040 --> 00:22:43,040 Speaker 1: right at Sandhurst. UM. Sand Vic is a Swedish machinery company. 415 00:22:43,040 --> 00:22:46,800 Speaker 1: They make machine tools and they're used globally. It's a 416 00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:50,280 Speaker 1: it's a bell whether it's a substantial company UM. They 417 00:22:50,320 --> 00:22:53,560 Speaker 1: reported their earnings today. If anybody should be susceptible to 418 00:22:53,640 --> 00:22:57,919 Speaker 1: global um economic weakness, it's them. They're the canary and 419 00:22:57,960 --> 00:23:02,640 Speaker 1: the proverbial coal mine if you if you look x 420 00:23:03,200 --> 00:23:06,560 Speaker 1: f X X currency no currency issue and a Swedish 421 00:23:06,600 --> 00:23:11,200 Speaker 1: corona has gotten pummeled more so than the pound. Revenue 422 00:23:11,240 --> 00:23:16,160 Speaker 1: was up eight percent um EBIT operating profit up five percent. 423 00:23:16,359 --> 00:23:19,239 Speaker 1: It was a bit of margin compression in there, but 424 00:23:19,600 --> 00:23:26,080 Speaker 1: still at elevated I think record operating margins amazing. Put 425 00:23:26,119 --> 00:23:32,000 Speaker 1: in the currency eight revenue growth more than eight and 426 00:23:32,359 --> 00:23:36,800 Speaker 1: operating earnings up twenty five. That shows you the weak 427 00:23:36,840 --> 00:23:40,040 Speaker 1: currency how it's a benefit in Europe versus it's a 428 00:23:40,160 --> 00:23:43,440 Speaker 1: real headwind here in the US. Are you sensing that 429 00:23:44,119 --> 00:23:46,879 Speaker 1: people have allocated maybe more capital to the UK and 430 00:23:46,960 --> 00:23:51,280 Speaker 1: Europe visa other parts of the world. It's frankly, it's 431 00:23:51,280 --> 00:23:54,159 Speaker 1: hard to tell that if you look at E t 432 00:23:54,320 --> 00:23:56,280 Speaker 1: F flow, for example, as a finger on the pulse 433 00:23:56,320 --> 00:23:59,760 Speaker 1: of this UM, there is no doubt that you can. 434 00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:02,520 Speaker 1: Let's say, in the UK u K E t F 435 00:24:02,640 --> 00:24:06,600 Speaker 1: buyers UM have been putting money in the market. One 436 00:24:06,680 --> 00:24:12,359 Speaker 1: of the big two US UK US based u K 437 00:24:12,640 --> 00:24:15,080 Speaker 1: E t F s has seen a little bit about flow, 438 00:24:15,400 --> 00:24:17,760 Speaker 1: the other one's been in flow. So you know, I 439 00:24:17,760 --> 00:24:20,840 Speaker 1: think it's a mixed picture globally, but local markets are 440 00:24:20,840 --> 00:24:24,080 Speaker 1: putting money to work. So the bottom line is earnings 441 00:24:24,119 --> 00:24:27,000 Speaker 1: doesn't look so bad right now, but wait till this 442 00:24:27,080 --> 00:24:31,320 Speaker 1: winter when the weather and increased financing costs started to 443 00:24:31,359 --> 00:24:33,640 Speaker 1: hit that that's that's part of it. The other thing 444 00:24:33,640 --> 00:24:35,439 Speaker 1: I would have to say is, you know, you can 445 00:24:35,480 --> 00:24:38,000 Speaker 1: only put so much on the currency. But once there 446 00:24:38,080 --> 00:24:40,960 Speaker 1: is more of a risk on appetite back in global markets, 447 00:24:41,240 --> 00:24:43,959 Speaker 1: the dollar is going to come down, European currencies are 448 00:24:43,960 --> 00:24:46,840 Speaker 1: gonna go up, and that headwind tailwind relationship is going 449 00:24:46,880 --> 00:24:49,400 Speaker 1: to change. Bottom line, we think global markets are well 450 00:24:49,440 --> 00:24:52,679 Speaker 1: priced in for recession. Alright, good stuff. Tim Carrot, Director 451 00:24:52,720 --> 00:24:58,440 Speaker 1: of Research, senior European strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence, the tech 452 00:24:58,480 --> 00:25:01,359 Speaker 1: heavy Nashdack. It's up three point two percent today, So 453 00:25:01,400 --> 00:25:03,000 Speaker 1: I figured it's a decent time to check in with 454 00:25:03,040 --> 00:25:07,159 Speaker 1: men Deep saying he covers all things technology for Bloomberg Intelligence, 455 00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:09,680 Speaker 1: and Man Deep, let's he's phoning it in. By the way, 456 00:25:09,720 --> 00:25:12,560 Speaker 1: I'll just point out to everybody, Um, let's talk about 457 00:25:12,640 --> 00:25:17,200 Speaker 1: roadblocks working in the metaverse. Yeah, I guess whatever, Uh roadblocks? 458 00:25:17,280 --> 00:25:22,000 Speaker 1: What is it? And why is the stock up today? Well, 459 00:25:22,119 --> 00:25:25,560 Speaker 1: so I think Matt alluded to it, and uh, I 460 00:25:25,600 --> 00:25:28,840 Speaker 1: am you know in the Metal Words and the reason 461 00:25:28,960 --> 00:25:32,280 Speaker 1: why this stock is up is you know, this stock 462 00:25:32,800 --> 00:25:36,000 Speaker 1: is a pure play metal words company. There was this 463 00:25:36,040 --> 00:25:40,320 Speaker 1: news today about metal So losing engagement with its Horizon worlds. 464 00:25:40,400 --> 00:25:42,840 Speaker 1: And in the case of Roadblocks, they give you these 465 00:25:42,880 --> 00:25:47,440 Speaker 1: monthly metrics, so essentially their booking's guide is much better 466 00:25:47,480 --> 00:25:51,280 Speaker 1: than what Consensus has baked in for their three Q 467 00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:56,360 Speaker 1: and uh they're guiding to about you know, mid teens 468 00:25:56,440 --> 00:26:01,320 Speaker 1: growth and their engagement continues to be wrong. So net Net, 469 00:26:01,480 --> 00:26:06,040 Speaker 1: I think they were laughing tough comps and what we 470 00:26:06,080 --> 00:26:09,360 Speaker 1: are seeing now is the company clearly has a long 471 00:26:09,480 --> 00:26:12,679 Speaker 1: runway in terms of adding daily active users. Remember this 472 00:26:12,720 --> 00:26:15,520 Speaker 1: platform was all about the nine to thirteen year olds. 473 00:26:15,760 --> 00:26:19,760 Speaker 1: Now they're expanding their base to more, you know, the 474 00:26:19,960 --> 00:26:24,120 Speaker 1: seventeen plus users and more adult users, and uh they 475 00:26:24,119 --> 00:26:26,960 Speaker 1: continue to show both you know, user growth as well 476 00:26:26,960 --> 00:26:30,080 Speaker 1: as engagement growth. So are you a creator man? Are 477 00:26:30,119 --> 00:26:33,359 Speaker 1: you a Roadblocks creator? I am not, but I do 478 00:26:33,480 --> 00:26:37,200 Speaker 1: have the studio installed on my PC and I keep 479 00:26:37,280 --> 00:26:40,879 Speaker 1: looking at the amount of user generated content that comes 480 00:26:40,920 --> 00:26:44,440 Speaker 1: from this platform. It's just, uh, you know, amazing how 481 00:26:44,520 --> 00:26:47,480 Speaker 1: much content gets created. And that is the challenge that 482 00:26:47,560 --> 00:26:50,919 Speaker 1: Meta is facing is even though they have spent so 483 00:26:51,040 --> 00:26:54,679 Speaker 1: much money, they don't have that creative base. That's the 484 00:26:54,720 --> 00:26:58,800 Speaker 1: base they're looking for, which Roadblocks has, and right now 485 00:26:58,960 --> 00:27:03,280 Speaker 1: Meta is struggling to bring those creators to the Horizon worlds. Like, 486 00:27:03,400 --> 00:27:07,440 Speaker 1: think of all the metaversees as wall gardens, so everyone 487 00:27:07,520 --> 00:27:10,680 Speaker 1: is incubating their own wall garden. Obviously, Roadblocks as a 488 00:27:11,960 --> 00:27:15,480 Speaker 1: year old lead compared to you know, Horizon Volts, which 489 00:27:15,560 --> 00:27:18,800 Speaker 1: is fairly new. But that's what Meta needs to really 490 00:27:18,880 --> 00:27:23,199 Speaker 1: drive the adoption. So what does this mean? I guess um, 491 00:27:23,320 --> 00:27:25,760 Speaker 1: the reason for the increase is people are betting on 492 00:27:25,840 --> 00:27:29,600 Speaker 1: the future of the metaverse being I don't want to 493 00:27:29,640 --> 00:27:34,720 Speaker 1: say owned, but um dominated by roadblocks? Is that the case? Well, 494 00:27:34,800 --> 00:27:38,960 Speaker 1: so right now, if I had to pinpoint one platform 495 00:27:39,040 --> 00:27:42,560 Speaker 1: that has the most traction, it's Roadblocks and the second 496 00:27:42,560 --> 00:27:45,840 Speaker 1: one would be Epic Fortnite. Like those are the two 497 00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:49,080 Speaker 1: main uh kind of meta worse place. And then you 498 00:27:49,080 --> 00:27:54,440 Speaker 1: have Unity as a gaming engine. Remember Unity doesn't have uh, 499 00:27:54,480 --> 00:27:57,000 Speaker 1: you know, a meta worse platform. They just provide you 500 00:27:57,040 --> 00:28:00,320 Speaker 1: the gaming engine. But essentially these are the three it 501 00:28:00,400 --> 00:28:02,280 Speaker 1: what does the gaming engine is that like a chip 502 00:28:02,680 --> 00:28:06,480 Speaker 1: or what? No, No gaming engine is just uh, you know, 503 00:28:07,160 --> 00:28:11,960 Speaker 1: a middleware software that any contward us yes, so to 504 00:28:12,119 --> 00:28:15,320 Speaker 1: deploy a new games. So think of you know, Grand 505 00:28:15,359 --> 00:28:18,760 Speaker 1: Theft Auto or what Activision and EA have. Those are 506 00:28:18,840 --> 00:28:21,920 Speaker 1: like the big publishers, but the reason why they've been 507 00:28:21,920 --> 00:28:25,399 Speaker 1: struggling is because of all the user generated content in 508 00:28:25,480 --> 00:28:28,800 Speaker 1: gaming that you know, people have moved away or I 509 00:28:28,840 --> 00:28:31,240 Speaker 1: would say they're not spending as much time on Grand 510 00:28:31,280 --> 00:28:33,399 Speaker 1: Theft Auto as they used to because there's so much 511 00:28:33,440 --> 00:28:36,880 Speaker 1: other type of or red dead, redemption, call of duty. 512 00:28:36,920 --> 00:28:39,600 Speaker 1: I would have thought Fortnite loses out there too because 513 00:28:40,680 --> 00:28:44,840 Speaker 1: um or can you build your own worlds? In Fortnite 514 00:28:44,840 --> 00:28:48,400 Speaker 1: the way you can in Roadblocks, you can. Yes, So 515 00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:51,800 Speaker 1: that's the change that they've made is they have opened 516 00:28:51,880 --> 00:28:57,000 Speaker 1: up the platform for users to again build their own content. 517 00:28:57,160 --> 00:29:00,480 Speaker 1: They give you gaming engine, and so yes, they have 518 00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:04,160 Speaker 1: kind of opened it up for user generated content. All right, Man, 519 00:29:04,200 --> 00:29:09,040 Speaker 1: the Facebook a k A. Meta platforms. What's the current 520 00:29:09,200 --> 00:29:14,880 Speaker 1: market thinking on this company, on this stock, on this transformation, Uh, 521 00:29:14,960 --> 00:29:19,400 Speaker 1: you know, in the early stages. Yeah, So clearly market 522 00:29:19,520 --> 00:29:23,760 Speaker 1: isn't too excited about, you know, the kind of opex 523 00:29:23,800 --> 00:29:27,040 Speaker 1: they are spending on reality labs. And look, I think 524 00:29:27,080 --> 00:29:29,640 Speaker 1: it's a hard thing right now to pinpoint in terms 525 00:29:29,640 --> 00:29:32,920 Speaker 1: of what the company will look like five ten years downline. 526 00:29:32,920 --> 00:29:36,760 Speaker 1: But clearly the engagement is declining in their core apps 527 00:29:36,840 --> 00:29:40,760 Speaker 1: and reality labs isn't really picking up. Although I would say, 528 00:29:40,840 --> 00:29:44,120 Speaker 1: you know, if Apple enters this market, then we are 529 00:29:44,240 --> 00:29:46,760 Speaker 1: will be a big category. We know that the problem 530 00:29:47,240 --> 00:29:51,080 Speaker 1: for Meta or Facebook is nobody trust them right now. 531 00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:55,080 Speaker 1: So VR will involve capturing even more data than they 532 00:29:55,120 --> 00:29:58,440 Speaker 1: capture in their social media apps. And you know, when 533 00:29:58,480 --> 00:30:01,760 Speaker 1: you think about you know, the monetization will work, you know, 534 00:30:01,800 --> 00:30:05,280 Speaker 1: showing ads or some other form wolf uh kind of 535 00:30:05,320 --> 00:30:10,160 Speaker 1: token based monetization. It involves crunching that data, you know, 536 00:30:10,480 --> 00:30:15,360 Speaker 1: basically personalizing stuff, and uh, no one trust them even 537 00:30:15,840 --> 00:30:18,640 Speaker 1: you know when it comes to creators, they're developing all 538 00:30:18,680 --> 00:30:22,400 Speaker 1: these games on roadblocks because they feel that's a better platform. 539 00:30:22,440 --> 00:30:25,480 Speaker 1: Brands their platform, and and that's the challenge, bigger challenge. 540 00:30:25,560 --> 00:30:28,320 Speaker 1: I feel that Meta hats alright, interesting stuff. I'm looking 541 00:30:28,320 --> 00:30:30,160 Speaker 1: at Meta here. I mean, still a three or fifty 542 00:30:30,160 --> 00:30:34,320 Speaker 1: billion market cap company, but stocks down six zero percent, 543 00:30:34,880 --> 00:30:37,120 Speaker 1: so they got some work to do. Uh their Mendeve 544 00:30:37,200 --> 00:30:41,560 Speaker 1: singh Uh. He is a technology analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. 545 00:30:42,080 --> 00:30:43,680 Speaker 1: I think he's a three day a week guy. Is 546 00:30:43,840 --> 00:30:47,000 Speaker 1: how they get in on this? Well, yeah, he's look, 547 00:30:47,040 --> 00:30:49,280 Speaker 1: you can work, you can work. I know that's what 548 00:30:49,320 --> 00:30:51,000 Speaker 1: they say. But you should have come in today because 549 00:30:51,000 --> 00:30:53,000 Speaker 1: I think we get COVID shots today. You're getting your 550 00:30:53,000 --> 00:30:55,520 Speaker 1: COVID shot today. Next week, I think sometime coming up. 551 00:30:55,560 --> 00:30:56,960 Speaker 1: I don't know, we'll see, but I'm getting it though. 552 00:30:57,000 --> 00:30:58,920 Speaker 1: Why not jab me up? That's but we offer it 553 00:30:59,000 --> 00:31:01,040 Speaker 1: Mondays and Fridays so that people like me and Deep 554 00:31:01,080 --> 00:31:03,080 Speaker 1: come in on Monday or Friday. Let maybe I'll walk 555 00:31:03,080 --> 00:31:08,480 Speaker 1: down and check it out. Matt, you watched the show's succession. 556 00:31:09,880 --> 00:31:13,640 Speaker 1: I do not need to get on that. First of all, 557 00:31:13,760 --> 00:31:16,960 Speaker 1: I do want to, but second of all, it's loosely 558 00:31:17,120 --> 00:31:19,560 Speaker 1: not very I wouldn't even say loosely based, but but 559 00:31:19,640 --> 00:31:22,640 Speaker 1: loosely based on Rupert Murdoc and his faunily and his 560 00:31:22,920 --> 00:31:24,800 Speaker 1: company and all that kind of stuff. And you know, 561 00:31:25,320 --> 00:31:27,800 Speaker 1: recently or not recent bit, but years ago they separated 562 00:31:28,040 --> 00:31:31,480 Speaker 1: the slow growing print business into News Corporation, and then 563 00:31:31,520 --> 00:31:34,200 Speaker 1: they kept the fast growing cable networks and stuff like 564 00:31:34,240 --> 00:31:37,600 Speaker 1: that in Fox. Uh. They sold most of that cable 565 00:31:37,640 --> 00:31:40,480 Speaker 1: stuff to Disney I think, and now they're talking about 566 00:31:40,600 --> 00:31:44,479 Speaker 1: reuniting the two companies together. So other than the investment bankers, 567 00:31:44,480 --> 00:31:47,080 Speaker 1: I'm not not sure who wins here. But let's bring 568 00:31:47,080 --> 00:31:49,600 Speaker 1: in somebody who does this stuff as an expert. Either 569 00:31:49,720 --> 00:31:54,120 Speaker 1: Ranathan Bloomberg Intelligence. She covers all things media, t MT, 570 00:31:54,240 --> 00:31:57,040 Speaker 1: pretty much anything uh she wants. She's got that kind 571 00:31:57,080 --> 00:31:59,240 Speaker 1: of credibility on the streets. So Ethan, what is Rupert 572 00:31:59,280 --> 00:32:02,960 Speaker 1: Murdoc doing these days? Yes, so thanks Paul, thanks for 573 00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:05,800 Speaker 1: having me. So he is trying to again put these 574 00:32:05,840 --> 00:32:09,040 Speaker 1: businesses back together, very similar to what we've seen with 575 00:32:09,320 --> 00:32:13,280 Speaker 1: you know, Viacom, and CBS. Uh now kind of recombined 576 00:32:13,280 --> 00:32:16,400 Speaker 1: into paramount. These two businesses, though they're very very different. 577 00:32:16,440 --> 00:32:19,040 Speaker 1: As you rightly pointed out, Fox is you know, really 578 00:32:19,080 --> 00:32:22,480 Speaker 1: a TV pure play. News scope, on the other hand, 579 00:32:22,600 --> 00:32:26,840 Speaker 1: is really this very interesting mix of different assets. So 580 00:32:26,920 --> 00:32:29,400 Speaker 1: you know, obviously they have dow Jones. They also own 581 00:32:29,600 --> 00:32:32,480 Speaker 1: Fox Style, which is an Australian pay TV operator. They 582 00:32:32,480 --> 00:32:35,000 Speaker 1: have a book publishing business. They of course have all 583 00:32:35,040 --> 00:32:38,600 Speaker 1: of the newspaper businesses, and then most importantly they have 584 00:32:38,720 --> 00:32:42,840 Speaker 1: a big presence in digital real estate. So people really 585 00:32:42,880 --> 00:32:45,640 Speaker 1: at this point not kind of quite able to figure 586 00:32:45,680 --> 00:32:48,640 Speaker 1: out what is going to happen if he does indeed 587 00:32:48,720 --> 00:32:51,800 Speaker 1: put a very very diverse set of assets back together. 588 00:32:51,960 --> 00:32:55,000 Speaker 1: Hang on, did you say digital real estate? Yes? I did. 589 00:32:55,680 --> 00:33:00,840 Speaker 1: What are you talking about the metaverse? Litha doesn't do 590 00:33:00,880 --> 00:33:04,240 Speaker 1: the metaverse? What is that? Is it n f T s? 591 00:33:04,280 --> 00:33:07,040 Speaker 1: He has a bunch of n f T s. No, No, 592 00:33:07,120 --> 00:33:10,120 Speaker 1: it's what it really is, is you know, listings, property 593 00:33:10,200 --> 00:33:13,960 Speaker 1: listings on on websites like like a Move, like a Zillow. 594 00:33:14,720 --> 00:33:16,920 Speaker 1: So he owns actually some News Corp actually owns an 595 00:33:16,920 --> 00:33:19,600 Speaker 1: eight percent stake in move dot Com, as well as 596 00:33:19,600 --> 00:33:22,800 Speaker 1: a sixty percent stake in one of the online or 597 00:33:22,840 --> 00:33:26,320 Speaker 1: the leading online real estate Australian platforms, which is called 598 00:33:26,320 --> 00:33:29,640 Speaker 1: the r A Group. M So it's gonna be it's 599 00:33:29,640 --> 00:33:32,440 Speaker 1: gonna be a tough road ahead for those real estate companies. Yeah, 600 00:33:32,440 --> 00:33:35,080 Speaker 1: I think so. So you know, the stock of Fox 601 00:33:35,440 --> 00:33:38,040 Speaker 1: fox A it's trading down, the stock of News Corps, 602 00:33:38,240 --> 00:33:40,960 Speaker 1: the print assets, it's trading up. That kind of tells 603 00:33:41,000 --> 00:33:45,360 Speaker 1: you what the market thinks here. So is this I mean, 604 00:33:45,440 --> 00:33:48,760 Speaker 1: he controls both companies here, So does this have anything 605 00:33:48,800 --> 00:33:51,959 Speaker 1: to do with the family control in succession? To use 606 00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:56,000 Speaker 1: the term? I think so. I think he's definitely trying to, uh, 607 00:33:56,600 --> 00:33:58,840 Speaker 1: you know, kind of bring the band back together, if 608 00:33:58,840 --> 00:34:03,080 Speaker 1: you will. But it's also kind of an admission that, um, 609 00:34:03,120 --> 00:34:07,040 Speaker 1: you know, maybe the whole lean and mean strategy at 610 00:34:07,120 --> 00:34:09,920 Speaker 1: Fox is not really going to play out in the 611 00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:12,600 Speaker 1: long term. So I think why investors have kind of 612 00:34:12,640 --> 00:34:15,920 Speaker 1: really liked Fox so much is because the narrative is 613 00:34:15,920 --> 00:34:18,480 Speaker 1: so simple, right. They have a very pure news and 614 00:34:18,520 --> 00:34:22,880 Speaker 1: sports focus. They're heavily tied to the PayTV ecosystem, and 615 00:34:22,920 --> 00:34:24,680 Speaker 1: the good thing that investors have kind of liked is 616 00:34:24,680 --> 00:34:26,520 Speaker 1: that they have not been kind of bogged down by 617 00:34:26,520 --> 00:34:28,680 Speaker 1: these billions and billions of dollars that are required to 618 00:34:28,719 --> 00:34:31,799 Speaker 1: fight the streaming wars. But I think in the end 619 00:34:31,880 --> 00:34:34,480 Speaker 1: everybody is kind of realizing that you do need you 620 00:34:34,520 --> 00:34:36,040 Speaker 1: do need to have a presence. First of all, you 621 00:34:36,080 --> 00:34:38,640 Speaker 1: do need to have a digital presence um and then 622 00:34:38,680 --> 00:34:40,840 Speaker 1: you need to build scale in streaming. And so I 623 00:34:40,880 --> 00:34:42,960 Speaker 1: think what you know, Rupert MURDACU is trying to do 624 00:34:43,040 --> 00:34:45,640 Speaker 1: is kind of trying trying to get that digital exposure 625 00:34:45,800 --> 00:34:49,800 Speaker 1: back to Fox, uh, you know, under the combined umbrella. 626 00:34:49,880 --> 00:34:51,840 Speaker 1: But I'm not sure investors are really kind of buying 627 00:34:51,840 --> 00:34:55,759 Speaker 1: it just yet. So um, I mean, what's the deal 628 00:34:55,840 --> 00:34:59,120 Speaker 1: with Rupert? He was I think already running newspapers back 629 00:34:59,120 --> 00:35:02,000 Speaker 1: when Queen Elizabeth was born. I mean, this guy is 630 00:35:02,800 --> 00:35:06,600 Speaker 1: ninety one years old. Is he still making all of 631 00:35:06,640 --> 00:35:09,440 Speaker 1: these changes himself or is it you know, Lachlan and 632 00:35:09,520 --> 00:35:13,000 Speaker 1: James and the next generation that's doing it. I think 633 00:35:13,000 --> 00:35:16,080 Speaker 1: he is pretty much still very very much in charge. 634 00:35:16,160 --> 00:35:19,640 Speaker 1: But I think if the deal does go through, it 635 00:35:19,719 --> 00:35:22,719 Speaker 1: will be so Lachlan Murdoch right now is CEO of 636 00:35:23,280 --> 00:35:28,760 Speaker 1: Fox corp um And if if the recombination does indeed 637 00:35:28,800 --> 00:35:32,600 Speaker 1: go through, I think it does consolidate power in Lachland's hands. 638 00:35:33,120 --> 00:35:35,759 Speaker 1: All right, let's switch gears a little bit. Githa. Uh, 639 00:35:36,239 --> 00:35:42,080 Speaker 1: Netflix reports, I think earning exam for the close tomorrow. Boy, 640 00:35:42,080 --> 00:35:45,640 Speaker 1: this stock, it's it's down over the last year, although 641 00:35:45,640 --> 00:35:49,400 Speaker 1: it's up pretty significantly off of its low. What's the 642 00:35:49,400 --> 00:35:53,319 Speaker 1: market call on Netflix these days? Yeah, so, you know, 643 00:35:53,360 --> 00:35:57,640 Speaker 1: obviously the sentiment really soured after they reported subscriber losses 644 00:35:57,640 --> 00:36:00,520 Speaker 1: for the very first time I think their history. Um, 645 00:36:00,560 --> 00:36:03,000 Speaker 1: they lost about one point two million subscribers in the 646 00:36:03,040 --> 00:36:05,840 Speaker 1: first half of this year. I don't think the market 647 00:36:05,920 --> 00:36:08,279 Speaker 1: is too much focused on subscriber growth for the third 648 00:36:08,360 --> 00:36:10,799 Speaker 1: quarter itself, I think it's going to be pretty uninspiring. 649 00:36:10,800 --> 00:36:12,960 Speaker 1: Maybe they add about a million subscribers. I think what 650 00:36:13,040 --> 00:36:16,839 Speaker 1: we're really kind of looking for is really how much 651 00:36:16,960 --> 00:36:19,440 Speaker 1: can they boost their subscriber growth. And the big thing 652 00:36:19,480 --> 00:36:23,560 Speaker 1: that they're doing now is they're introducing a new ad 653 00:36:23,600 --> 00:36:27,120 Speaker 1: based tier. And what that does is it really kind 654 00:36:27,160 --> 00:36:30,680 Speaker 1: of makes Netflix accessible to a whole new market because 655 00:36:30,680 --> 00:36:33,520 Speaker 1: they're pricing it very, very attractively. It's a seven dollar 656 00:36:33,640 --> 00:36:37,080 Speaker 1: price point. The usual Netflix subscription typically cost you about 657 00:36:37,120 --> 00:36:39,160 Speaker 1: fifteen and a half dollars, so it's it's less than 658 00:36:39,200 --> 00:36:42,719 Speaker 1: half the cost um. So so the point is how 659 00:36:42,840 --> 00:36:45,760 Speaker 1: much can they really kind of boost the subscriber growth 660 00:36:45,760 --> 00:36:48,440 Speaker 1: with that new ad tier? And I think that's what 661 00:36:48,560 --> 00:36:50,560 Speaker 1: kind of you know, investors are kind of hoping to 662 00:36:50,640 --> 00:36:53,759 Speaker 1: hear when they report tomorrow how much I mean, are 663 00:36:53,840 --> 00:36:56,520 Speaker 1: you expecting because when you say less than half, that 664 00:36:56,600 --> 00:36:58,520 Speaker 1: sounds huge. But if you tell me I only have 665 00:36:58,600 --> 00:37:00,480 Speaker 1: to pay seven dollars a month to get rid of 666 00:37:00,480 --> 00:37:04,160 Speaker 1: the ads, you know, it doesn't seem like a big job. 667 00:37:04,719 --> 00:37:08,359 Speaker 1: So cannibalization is a huge problem, Matt. So you know 668 00:37:08,360 --> 00:37:10,080 Speaker 1: that there is this fear that you know, they are 669 00:37:10,160 --> 00:37:12,880 Speaker 1: kind of diluting the value of that of that Netflix 670 00:37:12,920 --> 00:37:15,279 Speaker 1: product because there might be a huge just kind of 671 00:37:15,280 --> 00:37:19,080 Speaker 1: given the recessionary environment inflationary pressures, we might have a 672 00:37:19,160 --> 00:37:21,800 Speaker 1: huge portion of the subscriber based kind of trading down 673 00:37:22,120 --> 00:37:25,400 Speaker 1: and so you're you're losing subscription revenue. But the upside 674 00:37:25,560 --> 00:37:29,200 Speaker 1: is that just kind of given Netflix is captive audience, 675 00:37:29,280 --> 00:37:32,440 Speaker 1: we know that subscribers typically spend about two two and 676 00:37:32,440 --> 00:37:36,280 Speaker 1: a half hours every day on this platform. The upside 677 00:37:36,320 --> 00:37:38,160 Speaker 1: is that they are going to be able to charge 678 00:37:38,200 --> 00:37:42,680 Speaker 1: advertisers a huge premium so we're looking at rates right 679 00:37:42,719 --> 00:37:45,360 Speaker 1: now that Netflix is charging that's almost three x to 680 00:37:45,480 --> 00:37:48,680 Speaker 1: four x the usual market value. And so the point 681 00:37:48,719 --> 00:37:50,160 Speaker 1: is that they're going to be able to make it 682 00:37:50,239 --> 00:37:52,440 Speaker 1: up the lost subscription revenue. They're going to be able 683 00:37:52,480 --> 00:37:54,960 Speaker 1: to make it up through advertising. So Kith it just 684 00:37:54,960 --> 00:37:58,480 Speaker 1: real quickly, what's the market's call on just streaming in general? 685 00:37:58,520 --> 00:38:01,080 Speaker 1: There was a time there when just adding subscribers was 686 00:38:01,160 --> 00:38:03,440 Speaker 1: all the stock needed to work, Like I'm thinking of Disney. 687 00:38:03,480 --> 00:38:07,440 Speaker 1: But have those days passed? Yeah, that that those have? Unfortunately, 688 00:38:07,520 --> 00:38:11,080 Speaker 1: now it's all down to streaming profitability, and so all 689 00:38:11,120 --> 00:38:13,840 Speaker 1: of these companies, I mean, we're we've moved past, you know, 690 00:38:13,840 --> 00:38:17,440 Speaker 1: that hyper focus on subscribers. We're really looking now at margins. 691 00:38:18,080 --> 00:38:21,080 Speaker 1: We're looking at free cash flow um, and so all 692 00:38:21,120 --> 00:38:24,040 Speaker 1: of these companies are now trying to, uh, you know, 693 00:38:24,120 --> 00:38:28,520 Speaker 1: figure out how to curtail their investments and still kind 694 00:38:28,520 --> 00:38:33,680 Speaker 1: of achieve good profitability metrics. Alright. Keith a great stuff 695 00:38:33,719 --> 00:38:36,480 Speaker 1: as always keither wrong or nothing. She covers all things 696 00:38:36,640 --> 00:38:40,799 Speaker 1: media on a global basis for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's one 697 00:38:40,880 --> 00:38:44,480 Speaker 1: of the founding analysts members of Bloomberg Intelligence, and she's 698 00:38:44,520 --> 00:38:46,560 Speaker 1: been She does a great job, so you can read 699 00:38:46,600 --> 00:38:48,680 Speaker 1: all of her research. If you have a terminal b 700 00:38:49,000 --> 00:38:54,960 Speaker 1: I go. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. 701 00:38:55,360 --> 00:38:58,560 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts 702 00:38:58,719 --> 00:39:02,640 Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm 703 00:39:02,640 --> 00:39:06,680 Speaker 1: on Twitter at Matt miller y three. On Fall Sweeney, 704 00:39:06,680 --> 00:39:09,360 Speaker 1: I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You 705 00:39:09,360 --> 00:39:11,759 Speaker 1: can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio