WEBVTT - Short Stuff: Look-Alike Old Couples

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the short Stuff. There's Jerry, Chuck me.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Josh is short stuff. This is short go. And we're

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>all starting to look alike here on our eleventh anniversary.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>We really are. We've all kind of morphed into this

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>weird like, um, well this is a morphous blob. How

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>about that we don't even look like we've actually physically

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>merged together. Yeah. So do old people look alike old couples?

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>That is right? Right, that's a big one, because yes,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there's probably some old people you could find randomly in

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>the crowd and be like this kind of looks like

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.279
<v Speaker 1>this person, and we probably old people anymore either, right,

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we should probably say seniors. Yes, elderly elderly, senior adults,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I think is what it is actually a good call.

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm right around the corner from being the right,

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>so I'm like, I don't like saying old people, right exactly.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Um so, okay, so senior adults anyway, an older couple,

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're gonna say. A couple that's lived together,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>married or in some sort of partnership, romantic or otherwise

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time. They do tend to start

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to look alike. The older they get, and there's actual

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>science to to back this up. This isn't just some

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, random hilarity there. They've actually done studies about this.

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Because it's kind of a weird thing if you think

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. We take it for granted, but the idea

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 1>that two people who are not related should should come

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to like look like one another over the years, it's

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a little odd, even though you know it seems like, yeah,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of course that's what happens. But why, Chuck, Why is

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the big question? Well, first of all, I have a

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>question for you. Have you noticed this? Do you think

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing, because I've never really noticed this. Um, yeah,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I have. Actually, there's I've seen some couples that I'm like,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you guys are brother and sister, and it's

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a little unsettling because they usually seem happy and they're

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>holding hands. But it's uh no, I have definitely seen

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it before. I don't know. I'm just trying to think

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in my life, like my grandparents didn't look alike, and

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'm trying to piece it together. I

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>do like the science here, because not much of the

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>science really points to like necessarily looking like one another,

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but let's talk about it, okay. So, and I think

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>also just to kind of clarify your point, it's not

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's an inevitability, sure, but it does happen, and

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it does happen still raises the question why. Yeah. So, Uh,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a study called Personality and Individual Differences or

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that was the magazine that was published in

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>the rag that you can find on news stands all

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>over the country, right. Uh, and they serve a twenty

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>They got twenty two people, Um, I guess, eleven men

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and eleven women who participated in the study. And they said,

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>look at these hundreds. He married couples, but you know

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they're separate. You don't know like who's in a couple,

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and then tell us what you think, go right right?

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>It was it was um who who looks alike? Um,

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>who's married to who? And what they found was that

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>people tended to pick married couples out even though they

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>weren't showing pictures. And since they've shown the men's pictures

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're showing the women's pictures, that was basically like

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>put them together, and people tended to do that. Also. Um.

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>They also judged them based on attractiveness, and they the

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>people also tended to be rated along the same line,

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>so like a seven typically was paired up with a seven.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that the fact that the fact that

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you could, um, you could you a random stranger could

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>pick these couples out and and more often than chance

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>get it right. Put pairing who was married who just

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>based on looks definitely suggests that there's something there, and

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>there's something there that they believe that is really behind

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it is mostly genetics, yeah, I mean there is non

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>genetically speaking. I do think there is something to the

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>fact because they make a point in this article that, like,

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, if your personalities are similar, which is probably

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you generally seek out someone who you think

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>with jibe personality wise, you may end up being a

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>couple who just laughs a lot and enjoys life, and

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that would affect the same facial muscles and things like that.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Or if you look at any picture like pre nineteen sixty,

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>all you see is two dour looking senior adults standing

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>next to each other, so they may look a little

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>bit more like although I think we've done something on

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>people smiling and pictures, or maybe we just talked about

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it briefly, but that'd be a good shorty, I think, yeah, surely.

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall that at all, Like it was the

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>first goon who put on a big smile in a

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>photo and everyone's like, what did you just do? What

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is that You're supposed to frown in pictures? Young man?

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Can I subscribe to your newsletter? But uh, as far

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>as um genetics go, and we've talked about a lot

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of this here and there on the show, about people

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>seeking out for life partners and sexual and reproductive partners,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>people that are more uh similarly similar genetically as themselves,

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>right right, which makes sense. The idea, the whole premise

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is that we would seek those people out because our

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>genes have kind of co evolved together, so they fit together,

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they work together more readily, um, which is uh you know.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So some people would say, okay, well you should stick

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>with your own kind and and and not marry outside

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of your own group or whatever. But the opposite of

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that is when you get too much homogeneity, the gene

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>pool starts to really really suffer. So it's good to mix,

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, we seem to be geared,

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>at least according to this school of thought toward seeking

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>out mates that we we might be able to genetically

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>be more genetically compatible with the question is this though

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>beyond say, something glaringly obvious is somebody saying, like, um,

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, just sticking to their ethnic group or racial

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>group or something like that to to marry and have

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>kids with. How else would you, like, if you're not

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.559
<v Speaker 1>doing that, how would you possibly pick out somebody based

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>on genetics? Like? How would you know how someone's um

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>compatible with you genetically? This is like, so there's we've

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>got the question of how to old I'm sorry, senior

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>adult couples start to look alike. But then if it's genetics,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>how do we find that out? You know, like, what

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>are we doing? All Right? That seems like a good

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>spot for a break, and we'll come back and talk

0:06:36.560 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>about sexual imprinting right after this. So I promised talk

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of sexual imprinting about sixty seconds ago. And there's this

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>thing and and it's not just like something people say,

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it's there's a real thing where they've done studies and

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>found that women, Um, I was gonna say generally, but

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>studies indicate that women, if they if they have fathers,

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that they were close to and that they love that,

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they will seek out adult relationships with men who are

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like their fathers, and then includes looking like their fathers,

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>looking like their father's, behaving like their fathers, Like if

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>their father was stern but kind, you know, they will

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>probably look for that and a mate if their father

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, hey you, you do you. But the the

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>key seems to be that the father and the daughter's

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>bond and relationship is is very strong, and the stronger

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it is, the more of this sexual imprinting there is.

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And so rather than like the girl, you know, secretly

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>having the hots for her dad or something like that,

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>not that, no, But but it's what that gets confused

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for is it's actually the father has provided a model saying, hey,

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm genetically related to you. You turned up pretty good,

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>We have a pretty good relationship. Find a guy who's

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of like me, and you can't miss the genetic crap. Shoot. Yeah,

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and not even genetically, because the same has held true

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>through adoptive fathers and daughters they found in studies as

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>well well. No, I think they were saying adopted daughters

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>imprint on their genetic fathers. Oh no, I thought, I said,

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought I read it as they still I got you,

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I got you. Yeah, you're right, that would be the case.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>But then that kind of undermines the genetic basis of it,

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it a little bit. But that's the nature nurture thing,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, well, this whole thing is one big

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>question of like nature nurture. Yeah, I don't know. I

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't think that's a that's an interesting can

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of worms there that we're not going to completely open. Okay,

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, UM, so are some other things that we

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.599
<v Speaker 1>can so that. That's one that for women in particular,

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the sexual imprinting on the fathers one way that they

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>are guided toward mate selection. Right. There's also UM personalities

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>another one. There's a genetic basis for that behavior's traits. UM.

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>There's all sorts of stuff that you can pick up

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>in somebody's face, UM, in their body shape, their body

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>style that suggests not necessarily that their genes are going

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to mix well with your particular genes, but that they

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>are UM genetically sound I guess in one way. And

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the big ones is symmetry. Both body symmetry

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and facial symmetry is a classic UM standard for for

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>just universal beauty. Symmetry tends to be equated with beauty

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and attractiveness. Yeah, we've talked about this quite a bit

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the past two Um, they've done studies and test

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>subjects kind of roundly rate symmetrical men and women as

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>not only um like just better looking, more attractive to them,

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but potentially healthier. And they say that the whole you know,

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary basis of a lot of this is, whether we

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>know it or not, we're technically probably seeking out people

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that we think are healthy and have good chains, and

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>women are seeking women who can carry their child and

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they even have It's such a gross term, but um, supposedly,

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've done studies where men prefer women with

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>a waste to hip ratio a point seven, which sounds

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>just like, I don't know, this sounds like something some

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>creep would carry around like a notebook and like some

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>calipers or something like that. Yeah, and be like, you're

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>really nice and funny at all, but you're waste to

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>hip ratio is not quite right for me. Well, it

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>goes both ways too. There's a preferred waste to hip

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>ratio ratio among men for women or women that women

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have for men and supposedly that sounds really bizarre, but um,

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that has a lot to do with fat deposits. Where

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>fat gets deposited around your hips depending on your sex

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and x is driven by hormones, and especially fat deposition

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>and where it goes is driven by hormones. So if

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you have your fat building up in all the right

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>places according to your sex you were, you were basically

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting that you are quite fertile and feaking and ready

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>to raise ten kids and start a farm. Let's do

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this is what your hips are shouting. Well, what you're doing.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>What you want is to seek someone out that you

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>can raise, uh, have a lot of and raise future

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>little employees. Basically, yeah, exactly Uh. And back to the

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>symmetry thing. Um. They have found also in studies that

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the more symmetrical you are, um, you're also gonna have

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>more sex and more sexual partners in your life, especially

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're a man, or particularly if you're a man. Yeah. Yeah, um,

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So it does seem to come down the answer to

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this question why senior adult couples uh can sometimes start

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to look like one another is that they are probably

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>genetically similar to begin with. Yeah, and then they go

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>through life experiences together that shaped them together. So you

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>put all that together, you've got an older, senior adult

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>couple who looks like brother and sister and they still

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>kiss in front of people. Yeah, you put that all together.

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Throw them both in lavender track suits, which always helps.

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>There is that thing too, where couples inadvertently I guess

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>start to dress or maybe very purposefully start to dress

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a like. I got no problems with that, baby, uh.

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And then dog look alikes we should finish with, because

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone loves those great listicles photos of people that look

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like their dogs, and that is a thing that can happen. Uh.

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>And they did a study in two thousand four. I

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know how this got funded, um, but it apparently

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>indicated that people who shop for pure bred dogs uh

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>tend to look for dogs that look like them. Yeah.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I want I want to see my face looking back

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>at me in my dog's face. Yeah, I've seen it.

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But they say that it's pure bread. Is only people

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>who like rescue, you know, MutS from shelters or they're

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>like whatever, I just like, how your your personality? I

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>guess that's right. So, um, there you go, there you

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>have it. I guess that means chuck. Then short stuff

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is a way Stuff you Should Know is a production

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of iHeart Radios How Stuff Works. For more podcasts for

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.