WEBVTT - Target, Preferred Stocks, Trump, and Mortgage Rates

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven News.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>The retailers coming in with some numbers here today, Target,

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>TJ Max, we got Walmart tomorrow. Let's let's round table

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this thing with some smart folks. Jen Bartash is senior

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>industry an also with Bloomberg Intelligence and Bloomberg News. Jen

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>joins us via the cam from the Princeton office of

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. And then we got Simone Foxman. She is

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg reporter for Bloomberg Television, joining us here in studio,

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Jen Bartashes, Let's start with you. TGT Target stocks up

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>over five percent the market. What is it like here

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the Target results.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, when we look at Target, you know with the

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 3>market it likes is that margin is up and it's

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 3>up significantly over last year. At the same time, I

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 3>think everyone recognizes that it's a difficult operating environment, and

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 3>so even though target reduced, it's full of your guidance

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>for sales and for profit. I think that people are

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>encouraged by the the way that margins are responding even

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 3>in that environment.

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, So genders for our viewers on YouTube, I

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>want to point out that you have what is probably

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the best quote unquote office in Bloomberg. It is a

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a corner office. Now, no one, I mean

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>no one at Bloomberg has offices. We all sit at

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>our desks in kind of the bullpen style. But Jenna's

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>got bad as close as you can get to a

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>corner office. I just want to point that out now

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>because she's been running the Princeton office for decades. I mean,

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>she's basically the leader down there. So we were able

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to bring her to BI. So that's pretty cool.

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.919
<v Speaker 2>All right, Simone teach Simone Foughtsman sits near a window.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>She does sit near a window.

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 4>I also sit near the great Michael McKee, who's a

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 4>frequent Bloomberg radio. Yes, but I once had my own

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 4>office because I was the only correspondent in the country.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 4>So anyway, but yes, but you want to hear about

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 4>retail in the United States.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So what do you got here on our good

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>friends at TJMAX.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean beaten a raise really right across the board,

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 4>raising their outlook for the year, seeing compar bill sales

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 4>three to four percent. I mean, the idea value is

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 4>attracting customers. They're seeing increased traffic across all their major brands.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 4>According to the CEO, there even home Goods that was

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 4>not expected to do quite so well. Comp sales there

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 4>were expected to be slightly in the negative, but we

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 4>saw four percent year on year rise. So even though

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 4>consumers are looking away from their homes, they spent so

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 4>much time there, they've invested there during the pandemic, and

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 4>they are moving on, home goods is still able to

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 4>attract people. So a broadly very positive earnings report for TJX,

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 4>though I will say shares three points six percent higher,

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 4>not the five plus that we see.

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Into time high for TJX. I wild point that out

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>all time high for the stock.

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, are people stepping down? Are you starting

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 2>to see that?

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Jen?

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, for a long time we've been hearing guests

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 2>come in the studio and tell Paul and me that

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 2>people step down from target to Walmart. Are they stepping

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 2>down from Target to TJX.

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think across the board, you're talking about what

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 3>we consider to be a flight to value, and so

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 3>regardless of where your household income level lies, people are

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>increasingly seeing value. And that's one of the things that

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 3>makes TJX such a great opportunity for people, and that

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 3>it's there's something always new they go in there. It's

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>treasure hunt. And if you're talking about the Walmart's and

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 3>the Targets of the world, you're seeing consumers shift into

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>areas where they think there is value. So there are

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>some shoppers who have moved from Target to Walmart, especially

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 3>when you're talking about essentials, where Walmart's prices are just

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 3>generally very, very sharp. But we're all also seeing people

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 3>move from Walmart down to dollar stores. So it's really

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>that progression of the flight to value that is really

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>describing the current economic environment and the consumer environment that

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 4>And I think when you think about it too, you know,

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 4>the area we've heard folks across the consumer space be

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 4>really negative is those middle income consumers who want to

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 4>cut their discretionary spending, and TJX offers a bit more

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>of that discretionary spend. So instead of going to the

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 4>top line retailer, you have people going out and saying,

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 4>I want to do that treasure hunting. I think that

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 4>that is a better use of my wallet than just

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 4>simply going to a store where the kind of where

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 4>I don't have to do that, but I'm also going

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 4>to pay it.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And simone I noticed, you know, kind of what was

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>unusual for TJ Max here is okay, they beat the quarter,

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and but unlike the Target who was cautious in their outlook,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they boosted. TJ Max boosted their outlook here. So what's

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of the the.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 4>Extremely strong commentary saying that they're off to an incredible,

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 4>a very strong start, I believe is word for word

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>in the third quarter. So I think everyone very optimistic

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 4>there that this flight to value, as Jennifer was talking about,

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 4>will continue even if even if a recovery to some

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 4>degree materializes in the way that Target has been I

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 4>guess hoping and praying for on their call, Jen, what do.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 2>You hear about the excess savings? I heard someone this morning,

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I think carl Rickodonna on Bloomberg Surveillance say that carl

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 2>Rickodonna over at BNP, Perry of BA saying that at least,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>like you know, there's been a debate about whether or

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>not Americans still have excess savings left, but he says,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 2>one thing is for sure that the lower let's say

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 2>three quinn tiles have already blown through it and have

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 2>nothing left.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's that's what we're seeing too. And there's you know,

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 3>growing use of credit card that credit cards and is

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 3>a little bit on the rise, especially for those quintiles

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:09.799
<v Speaker 3>that he was talking about, and so those consumers are

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 3>really looking for where to spend that money. And I

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 3>think one of the other things to think about is

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>that the retailers in general haven't they still haven't gone

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 3>back to pre pandemic days of promotions and the same

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 3>types of levels of sales and discounts, and so although

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 3>they're offering value, that type of sales environment or promotional

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 3>environment hasn't yet come back. Now that maybe on the

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 3>horizon if things don't change soon. But I think it

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 3>also supports why we're seeing the popularity of things like TJX,

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 3>because people aren't getting those sales at the big box

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 3>retailers or some of the other retailers at the moment,

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 3>and so they're looking for where they can find some

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 3>of those key brands but at a much lower cost.

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Simon, what else are you looking at here in the

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>retail space as we get somebody's come to reporting earnings.

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean tomorrow we have Walmart. That's the big

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:04.119
<v Speaker 4>dog there. I think shares hit an all time high

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 4>earlier this week, and so I think expectations are very

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 4>high that they can do they can benefit from this

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 4>environment in a similar way to perhaps TJ Max. Is

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 4>that consumers are trading down, They're doing more of their

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 4>spending at Walmart. Walmart plus growing and increasing number of

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 4>subscribers that are using its food businesses and that sort

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 4>of thing. So that'll be an interesting data point to watch.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm also interested. You know, we heard from Target this

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 4>morning about the impact of student loan repayments kicking back up.

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Do we hear that from TJ Max? They have yet

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 4>to have their call, do we hear that from Walmart.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 4>We're just trying to get a sense of how much

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 4>this is actually going to weigh on consumers as we

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 4>head towards the fall, and then of course head towards

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:49.119
<v Speaker 4>the holiday season.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 2>You ever been a TJ Max Paul. Probably yes, I

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 2>have to say, I haven't been there in a while,

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>but when I when I would go, and still if

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I would go today, Jenna is right or I don't

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>know who said that about hunting for like, it is

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 2>an adventure to go in there because there's so much

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 2>stuff and you know you're gonna find like like three

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>cool polo shirts for twenty nine to ninety nine that

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 2>you would normally pay, like I don't know, one hundred

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 2>bucks for.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's how you can make sense of it, right.

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, when I was younger, I loved doing that

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 4>so much more.

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 4>And I think if my thanks Bloomberg for paying me.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 4>But I think if my pennies were tighter, I would

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 4>I would worry a little bit more about where each

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 4>dollar was going. Uh, And therefore I would feel like, Okay,

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 4>I've done. I've put in the hard work to go

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 4>and buy this handbag, even though you know, my dimes

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 4>are tight. Whereas Walmart, whereas whereas I guess you go

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 4>to Target, it's much everything's much more laid out for you.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, my point is it's actually a great way

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to spend an hour or two in the city, like

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 2>like going to a Barnes and Noble and.

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Just hanging out.

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 4>But this is why you come.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the great Matt Miller.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>When I was a kid, I used to do that.

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Far you fall and Jen Bartash is senior Industrial so

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg can tell and simoon Foxman from Bloomberg. She's reported

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>there joining us talking to us about all things retail.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the team Ken's are live program Bloomberg

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 5>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 5>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Next week, Jackson Hole, I am still searching my inbox

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for the invite Matt, and I'm just I know it's there,

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I just can't find it. But I don't know if

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be a big deal. Anyway.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I heard they disinvited a lot of people, Like remember

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 2>when the Soho House canceled all the bankers memberships. Yes,

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that's Jackson All did the same thing a

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago.

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's bring in Danielle di Martino Booth. She's

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the CEO and chief strategist at QI research. She joins

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio and

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. So that's even better, Danielle. I guess the

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>narrative now with our feter reserve and with rates is,

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, not how higher they go, but it could

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be how long are we going to stay here? How

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>are you viewing that part of the narrative.

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 6>So I think the higher for longer narrative is something

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 6>that markets do not want to accept. But we have

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 6>to bear in mind that Jay Powell started in January

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 6>of twenty twenty two kind of like Obi wan Kenobi,

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 6>this will happen, This will happen, this will happen. These

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 6>are not the droids you're looking for. And so he's

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 6>managed to really extend this narrative. And I think that,

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, if you look at what a lot of

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 6>people are starting to believe compared to twelve months ago.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 6>Now they're saying we might not see quantitative tightening stop

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 6>until the fourth quarter of twenty twenty four. That is

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 6>a form of higher for longer, even if we see

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 6>rate cuts in twenty twenty four.

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>All Right, A very smart listener of ours kind of

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>wrote in and asked about that the relationship between running

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>off the balance sheet and interest rates. You made a

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>comment the last time you were here about that. What

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>did you mean by that relationship?

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 6>So, I mean we are a nation that exists. Liquidity

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 6>is the lifeblood of the US economy. It's seventy percent consumption,

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 6>but so much of business investment, so much of consumption

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 6>is derived from credit. And when you're pulling liquidity from

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 6>the system, you end up seeing things like the New

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 6>York FEDS work that shows that that companies anticipate rejections

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 6>being at the highest level on record in the next

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 6>twelve months when it comes to a credit card, home loan,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 6>auto loans, and what have you. So that is a

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 6>reflection of a credit crunch, which I've learned to some

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 6>is a term that showed up in nineteen sixty six.

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 6>Oh two guys from Salomon Brothers created the term. They said,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 6>they said, a squeeze and a pinch. They might be

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 6>kind of friendly. A crunch is not. A crunch can

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 6>break a bone. And that's what we're in the midst of, quietly,

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 6>and that's what we're seeing with Moodi's and Fitch and

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 6>the warnings that we've got on banks.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 2>I love that. So what they these two guys of

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Solomon said, you used to be people would say credit

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>squeeze or credit pinch, but that was like too fun.

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 6>It was too fun. And so that's what happened in

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 6>nineteen sixty six. You had banks pull back on lending

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 6>while the US government had been spending a lot of money.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 6>I don't see any parallels here.

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 2>That's sarcasm for those of you who aren't watching.

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 7>And what did we see?

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 6>We saw a massive pullback. So there's something to be

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:12.599
<v Speaker 6>said for quantitative tightening directly influencing that flow of liquidity

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 6>or not into the system. It's something we see every

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 6>Friday afternoon aft the close. In the fed's h eight document,

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 6>you're seeing commercial and industrial lending negative.

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 2>How much does the treasury issuance sort of add to

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>that liquidity problem?

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, so the first three hundred billion or so, we're

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 6>kind of benign. You saw money move out of the

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 6>Fed's facility overnight facility. People were like, oh, look at this.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'm going to move it into into treasury bills,

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 6>money market funds. Where are we going going forward? I mean,

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 6>if inflation is as sticky as the inflation used to

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 6>say it's going to be. Then, if I'm a money

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 6>market fund, I'm going to say, wait a minute, I'm

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 6>not going to go into bills. If I think the

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 6>Fed's going to raise interest rates one more time in

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty three, maybe it's September, maybe it's December, then

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 6>I'll wait and I'll keep my money at the FED.

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 6>Meaning they're not going to naturally absorb all of this

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 6>treasury issuance, keeping that effect benign, and you end up

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 6>having quantitative tightening join with treasury built issuance, and you're

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 6>having a double pulling of liquidity out of the system.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, I consider myself a pretty good reader. That

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the nuns of Blessed Saque instilled that in me early age.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you what, I am not reading the

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>FED meeting minutes come out later today.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>That's why we have people like Danielle.

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That's why I have people like Mount Sacred Heart. So

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>we're like, okay, yeah, very good. So what will you

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 1>be looking for in these meeting minutes.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 6>The softer the landing narrative, the more they're gonna stick

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 6>with their higher for longer.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I.

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 6>Mean, look, minutes can be massaged. Janet Yellen said so

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 6>in two thousand and eight. She said, minutes can be

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 6>like any other tool in the toolbox. It's not like

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 6>the minutes from a corporate board meeting or something like that.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 6>In the three weeks that are that come in between,

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 6>the Fed can change what actually occurred inside that room.

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 6>It's kind of like magic. So if they want to

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 6>nod to retail sales being stronger than what was expected,

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 6>then you can have a more hawkish tone in these minutes.

0:13:58.800 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 6>And that's what I'm anticipating.

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 2>What about the difference between j Powell's standard line. You

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>know that we're going to keep rates higher for I

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 2>think last time he said for years or did so.

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, we get a dot plot, which

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I know is not a forecast from the Fed, but

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 2>it is each individual members essentially forecasts, right, that showed

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 2>at least one full percentage point of rate cuts next year.

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>How can he say We're going to keep rates at

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 2>this level for years and everybody, even you know, assuming

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming the voters are saying no, it's going to

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 2>come down one percent.

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 6>So it's kind of like if you ever heard one martini,

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 6>two martini three Martini's floor, so he can he can

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 6>withstand one or two descents and maintain his power base.

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 6>You start to get to a number like three, and

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 6>you start to say, is there a mutiny on the FMC.

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 6>So we might see descent next year from some of

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 6>the more dubbish contingency. He might want to hold out

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 6>for longer, and that might mean that we see his

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 6>first real dissent. And we have, I mean, we've seen

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 6>Neil Kashgari, who used to be the most delish person

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 6>on planet Earth, become like, you know, we're not finished

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 6>fighting Involution yet. So he's like very hellkish.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>And still and still says we're not done exactly.

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 6>It was just a few days ago.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Our good friends at Goldman Sachs, I guess, on Sunday

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>put out a note saying that they expect the rate

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>cut in the second quarter of next year. Was that

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>just to sell books or do you think there's something to.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 6>That talking a book at Goldman? My gosh, I've never

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 6>heard of such, just thinking. Look, Goldman tax has tremendous

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 6>influence on the New York Fed. The New York Fed

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 6>has a permanent vote on the Federal Open Market Committee,

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 6>this is a known known so it's I think Goldman

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 6>is definitely trying to control the narrative, and they've done

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 6>a very good job of that in the past, of

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 6>having you know, a very extra large influence on FED thinking.

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 6>But you know, Powell's not an academic. Powell was the

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 6>one who brokered the treasury scandal at Solomon Brothers with

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 6>Warren Buffett in nineteen ninety eight when he was just

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 6>a Treasury the secretary. Powell's not intimidated by bankers.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Sorry.

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, one of the things that you were telling us

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 2>about Palell around s and p you know, thirty seven,

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight hundred, was that he wants to break the FED. Put.

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 2>He wants to destroy the idea that the FED is

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>going to come to your rescue. Mister market. Every time

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the equity indexes fall now we're at forty five hundred,

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 2>he is that making it harder for him to succeed.

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 2>When the market just continues dully as they raise.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 6>No, it's making it easier for him. I mean, he's

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 6>basically shut down the commercial mortgage backed securities market. So

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 6>that's one corner of securitization that's vaporized into thin air.

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 6>When in March of twenty twenty, the entire commercial real

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 6>estate industry was like, hold on, we need a bail

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 6>out too.

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>But he's taken.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 6>He's actually created price discovery in a market where none existed.

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 6>There was a building that just sold for sixty seven

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 6>percent off of its prior appraisal in San Francisco a

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 6>few days ago. So he's slowly killing off lines of

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 6>speculation into the markets. I think the CLO market is next.

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 6>So let the stock market be as high it once.

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 6>It gives Powell license to continue depleting liquidity from the

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 6>system and taking out some of the most speculative forms

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 6>covers the word yeah, all right, So I mean this

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 6>in the nicest way possible, Danielle.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But you are that's data geek of the highest magnitude.

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>What data are you looking at that? Maybe we're not so.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 6>I follow two things very closely. The employee retention credit

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 6>it's advertised everywhere by a manage.

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 2>I mean we we.

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 6>It surpassed thirty billion for the first time in the

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 6>month of July, so on a twelve month run rate,

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 6>it's pumping four hundred billion dollars into the economy, very

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 6>real money. That's about one and a half percentage point

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 6>of GDP growth on an annualized basis. We're seeing that

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 6>manifest and much higher international travel. So it's going to

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 6>your kind of your top quintile of earners, if you will,

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 6>and that's being actively sold. So I'm paying very close

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 6>attention to active fiscal stimulus for billion dollars a year

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 6>is not nothing. In Daily Jobcuts dot Com, we've gone

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 6>from five business closings to nine from the summer months

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 6>after the debt sealing reserves into August. The founder of

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 6>the website said he's seeing a massive increase in companies

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 6>just closing up shop in August, saying I don't see

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 6>over the horizon the holiday season, holiday shopping season saving me.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 6>So I'm paying really close attention to main Street as well.

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Wow, very good, Daniel de Martinez to watch the fiscal side,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, because not a lot of fedgeeks do not

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>close enough attention to the fiscal highly relevant.

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 8>It's highly relevant.

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Daniel de Martinez Booth CEO and chief strategist at QI Research,

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>joining us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>which is always a treat.

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, against my better judgment, I'm told we got

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Washington and politics and all that stuff

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>that happens the making of the sausage. And if we're

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that, we're gonna go to our ace, and

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that is Nathan Dean. He's the senior policy Analyst US

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Latin America for Bloomberg Intelligence. Bloomberg Intelligence, we got people

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that just do everything, and we got a guy who

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is mister Washington, DC, and that's Nathan Dean. He joined

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Nathan,

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>where I want to start is kind of with President

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Biden last week seemingly getting a little tougher with China,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like you kind of pulled some punches there.

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about what Biden did via I think

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>executive order last week with China and kind of what

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it means.

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, exactly. So President Biden put out an executive order

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 9>essentially directing Treasury to limit or prohibit US investments, so

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 9>primarily private equity venture capital fund investment into China in

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 9>certain sectors like quantum computing, AI, artificial I'm sorry, semiconductors. Now,

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 9>this was a much narrower order than what had previously

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 9>been anticipated, so I think the markets were actually kind

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 9>of happy with that. We don't think there's going to

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 9>be that much of an impact here, you know, most

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 9>of I think if you look at the private equity

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 9>firms today, the big ones, they're about two percent below

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 9>in terms of total assets with exposure to China. So

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 9>this is really just a symbolism executive order. Now the

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 9>Treasury has to implement it, so things could change, and

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 9>with anything in the US China relations, you know, Biden

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 9>can always pull the plug if you know it suits

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 9>as well.

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 2>You did have the at the end of last month,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Oh

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 2>that's a Is that really the name? The House Select

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Committee on the Chinese Yeah, it's lucky they threw the

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 2>word communist in there, so we know how they feel

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 2>about them, right, that's a little bit loaded. They they

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 2>alleged that Blackrock is investing in Chinese companies acting against

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 2>US interest. Now I'm guessing this is a Republican controlled committee.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Obviously those guys don't like Larry Fink. He's like the

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 2>new George Soros for a lot on the right. But

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 2>we had a story by Sila brush Out yesterday. I

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 2>said Blackrock, MSCI and other firms are bracing for tighter oversight.

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that is that talk on Capitol Hill going after

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 2>these big, big Wall Street fund managers.

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, And to your point, it's actually a bipartisan committee

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 9>because being seen tough on China is good politics no

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 9>matter who you are. So you know, when President Biden

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 9>put out his order, we saw a statement from that

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 9>committee from both parties essentially saying that this could have

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 9>gone farther, and they wished it to have gone further. Now,

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 9>the question about Blackrock and the other firms is what

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 9>is considered oversight and what is actually going to happen.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 9>Now that committee cannot write legislation. They need other committees

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 9>to do that. And with a Republican House, a Democratic Senate,

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 9>and a president who also has to stare Juginepigi in

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 9>the face at certain you know events. You know, I'm

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 9>not sure there's actually going to be actionable concern for

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 9>those firms, So it's mostly headline risk. Just always keep

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 9>in mind that when it comes to China, Congress loves

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 9>to be tough, but it's the White House that actually

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 9>pulls things back and moderates it.

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, the White House, I mean Biden last week said

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>that the Communist Party are bad folks, right, he said

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 2>the best Elton wrote initiative, he called that the Debt

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 2>and News initiative.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 9>Well, there's a difference between calling somebody bad folks and

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 9>actually creating a trade deal or you know, sanctions and

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 9>so forth that actually, you know, changes what we here

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 9>in New York City are trading on.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>All Right, you're down in DC, better or worse, you're

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 1>in the swamp. You're part of it. Actually, quite frankly,

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, what is what is the feeling in

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>DC about China? How worried should the world be about

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>us and China? What's the feeling in DC?

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 9>So, you know, there was this thought of, you know,

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 9>will we get into a war over a Taiwan and

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 9>we have a national security analyst who has been writing

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 9>about this on the terminal.

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>The general thought on Washington is we're still years away.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean that this is not something that you can

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 9>anticipate will happen in the next few years, you know.

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 9>And when it comes to how do you approach this

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 9>in terms of a market perspective, you know, it's sort

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 9>of something that like everything that we've seen before has

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.479
<v Speaker 9>happened in the past. I mean, there's really you know,

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 9>there's not been a lot of actions from China that

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 9>haven't been actually done ten years ago, fifteen years ago,

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 9>so forth. So you know, we're just still in this

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 9>weight and see mode. I think most if you talk

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 9>to most Congress folks, they're just rather happy to blast

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 9>China and get the good politics from it.

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty excited because Ohio looks like it's going to

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 2>be the next state to legalize marijuana, and this is

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 2>something that we're following very closely. Right of course, for

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 2>recreational use, that would be the twenty fourth state now

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>still federally illegal. And Nathan, you follow closely the Safe

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:34.959
<v Speaker 2>Banking Act, which I think is actually moving slowly enough

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that following it closely is no problem, right, But the

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 2>cool thing about Ohio is Shared Brown is our senator,

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the Senator from the Great State of Ohio, and he's

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>also the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. So if

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 2>it's legal in his home state, does he have then

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 2>more I guess covered a push for broader legalization federally.

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. I mean, if Shared Brown wanted this thing done,

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 9>he could have it done today. I mean, there's nothing

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 9>that is prohibiting the Safe Banking Act other than Shared

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 9>Brown and a couple of other senior senators. I'm both

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 9>parties when it comes to the Safe Banking Act. The

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 9>problem they have is or the bill has, is timing

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 9>and the procedures. Now, there's a lot of people hoping

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 9>that the Safe Banking Act goes as part of the

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 9>funding bill that is going to come up to September.

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 9>Now that's most likely going to end in a government shutdown,

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 9>and Speaker McCarthy was talking about having a quick continuing,

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 9>continuing lose resolution into December. That means the Safe Banking

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 9>Act probably won't be assigned to that.

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Then you get into December.

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 9>There's only eight days where Congress is meeting per month, October, November, December,

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 9>and then we're in election season. So I just I'm

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 9>not sure the Safe Banking Act actually has a vehicle

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 9>to get the passage unless Shared Brown steps up and

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 9>says I want this done today. And I have not

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 9>seen anything that says that he's in. You know, he's

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 9>been a lot of he's been flirting a lot of yeah,

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 9>well I like this, but also this and so forth.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 9>And there's a whole issue right now on Senator Jack.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 9>It's been trying to negotiate with Republicans on and they

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:03.959
<v Speaker 9>haven't made any headway on that.

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>What are you focusing on down there in DC legislation

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>wise or otherwise that Matt and I are totally ignorant of.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, the shutdown, for one, I mean just said, yeah,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 2>that's big.

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 9>Well the shutdown is actually we you know, we dust

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 9>off our note every two years when this comes out,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 9>and when it comes to the shutdown, markets get scared

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 9>within the first two days, and then once they realize

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 9>that the economic impact of a short term shutdown isn't

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 9>all that great, markets actually go up. If you look

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 9>at the thirty day shutdown that happened under the President

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 9>of Trump administration, the markets actually were pretty much fine

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 9>with it. And if you're invested in the contractors. Well,

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 9>most contractors, at least the big ones, have eighteen months,

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 9>two year, two and a half year contracts. So the

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 9>only people that are harmed are the contractors work in Washington,

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 9>DC and those of us who can't take our kids.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 4>To the zoo.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>See I mean when Nake and Deane you can go

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>from China to the US government shutdown, to weed to

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the zoo, to the zoo all in one conversation.

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the Team canser Line program Bloomberg Markets

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 5>iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen on

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 5>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Joining us since Studios. Doug Baker, He's a portfolio manager

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>head of preferred Securities at Nouvene. Doug, I'm an issuer.

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Why would I consider issuing preferred stock? Sell me on it.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 8>It depends what geography you're talking about.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 10>It If you're talking about the United States, most SERI

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 10>issuances from the bank and the insurance sector. Those two

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 10>sectors banks in particular issue prefers primarily to meet capital requirements.

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 10>Insurance companies capital requirements, but more importantly, they use prefer

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 10>to help manage their ratings.

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm an investor, do I care if a

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 2>stock is preferred or not when I buy it?

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, I mean, because there are several components to the

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 10>capital stock, and as a preferred investor, you're actually senior

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 10>to the common investors, so that that's first off, So

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.479
<v Speaker 10>compared to the common shareholder, your senior.

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 5>But the.

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 10>Similarity with common stock is oftentimes the payments on a

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 10>preferred or considered dividends. So for individuals you get that

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 10>beneficial tax treatment a lot of instances. So so you're

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 10>you're kind of moving up the capital stack.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 2>You're a little you're safer in the event of a bust,

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 2>which hopefully doesn't happen.

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, you are. Arguably you are on paper you are.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 8>The reality is that it just depends on the situation.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Are most preferreds are they? Are they investment grading?

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, most of the issuers are in mosted issues. So

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 8>so here's how it works.

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 10>If you look at the issuers on average, you're going

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 10>to find that issuers are around.

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 8>A single a rated institution.

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 10>However, the preferreds on average are triple B rated, and

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 10>it's because they're subordinate in the capital stack the rating agencies,

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 10>because that subordination will knock the ratings down typically four

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 10>to five notches versus the senior ratio of that same issuer.

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 8>So you have exposure to investment grade rated companies.

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 10>However, the securities may not necessarily reflect that through their rating.

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we had the little mini bank crisis.

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>The big banks. Oh, everybody's going to pay the price

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with some I guess higher credit, I guess hire more,

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>more and more restrictions. How does that impact the preferred

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>market and their use of you know, the bank's use

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>of the preferred market.

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 10>So it's going to be, in our opinion, a lot

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 10>like two thousand and seven eighty nine, where horrible, horrible

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 10>situation right and earlier this year not as bad, but

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 10>still pretty traumatic. But looking forward, it's going to create

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 10>a great opportunity. We're going to see the regulatory environment change,

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 10>which is going to benefit the credit investor, which includes

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 10>the preferred investor. And one of the things that we're

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 10>seeing now is a big build in capital or likely

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 10>a big build in common equity capital going forward. So

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 10>it's going to be at the expense of the common shareholder.

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 10>It's going to dilute the return on equity, but it's

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 10>going to enhance the credit profile for the credit investor,

0:28:58.360 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 10>which includes the preferred investor.

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 2>So what do you like?

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 8>What do we like? We like the big banks.

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 10>We think that there are selective opportunities even in the

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 10>regional bank space. We know that that's kind of you know,

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 10>some people think that the regional banks just across the

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 10>board are.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 8>Risky area of our market.

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 10>But if you actually do the work, you do the

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 10>objective analysis, things like commercial real estate, while they're risks,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 10>a lot of these headlines that we had earlier this year,

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 10>you apply some analysis, you do some stress testing on it.

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 10>Indeed a risk, but more from an earning's perspective, right.

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 10>So we also like some of the spaces outside of

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 10>our larger sectors banks insurance, like aircraft lessors, So you

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 10>have aircraft leasing companies that are benefiting from this tremendous

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 10>boom in air travel and they're the ones that are

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 10>financing the airplanes. And so you do have some opportunities

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 10>in spaces outside of banks insurance companies to play the

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 10>preferred market. But at the end of the day, most

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 10>of your exposure and preferreds is going to be financial

0:29:58.800 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 10>services related.

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, So when I if I buy a preferred stock,

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I get a fixed rate a floating rate. He does

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it all work?

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 10>It depends what you buy, okay, And that's where I

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 10>think active management can really help out, because there are

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 10>preferreds out there that will just pay the same fixed

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 10>rate coupon over the entire life of the security.

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 8>And if that's a perpetual.

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 10>Security, a lot of investors don't realize they're taking a

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 10>lot of duration risks or interest rate sensitivity risk with that.

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 10>But there's also a large population of securities that they

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 10>may start out paying a fixed rate coupon, but down

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 10>the road that coupon can adjust, and not only does

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 10>that allow you to benefit from a rise and rate environment,

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 10>but it also helps you control that interest rate risk,

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 10>which is really I think the primary risk of those

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 10>fixed rate structures.

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So what's the risk to the preferred market here?

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess I got concentration risk with the financials.

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So that's the first one that we mentioned, and

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 10>then the second one we were just touching on to

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 10>interest rate risk. Okay, Now, in our opinion, we think

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 10>that the interest rate risk is probably the one that

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 10>we can map the best. Truly, though, when it comes

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 10>to financial service exposure, there's only so much we feel

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 10>you can diversify away from that, so we do oftentimes.

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 10>When we're having these these discussions with investors and they

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 10>like preferreds, they want to add preferreds, one of the

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 10>things that we ask them to do is, hey, check

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 10>the rest of your client's portfolio. See how much other

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 10>financial service exposure is there already, because you don't want

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 10>to have them take an unintended bet on a sector

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 10>unless they mean to do so.

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 2>How do you first get into this?

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Was it?

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Were you doing your CFA and you're like, hey, I

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 2>like this section.

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Well he went to the Here we Go University, Chicago

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Graduate School of the Business, which I love. The GSB Moniker.

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>They've now received the kajillion dollars from mister Booth, so

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a Booth School of Business.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But I'm a GS big guy. There's not a bum

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I've done like a dozen Chicago NBA guys. There's not

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a bumm in THEO.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 2>But they're they're all math people.

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, yeah, they're geeky that way the math even

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>our listen there are Bramowitz, who is super smart. She's

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>undergraduate at Chicago. So they're all good. So anyway, but but.

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Prefers, did you pick this or were you at Neuvien?

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>And they were like, somebody's got to do a preferred man,

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it's you.

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 10>I hate to say it, but it's the latter. So

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 10>when I first came into Nouvene, I was actually a

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 10>derivatives guy. Yes, would you sure? And I don't tell

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 10>many people this, but I was a derivative sales.

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 8>Guy at Lehman Brothers.

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that doesn't come up very often anymore, you know,

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you don't.

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:24.479
<v Speaker 8>That's awesome.

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm a banker, If I'm a banker and

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing a new issue for Wells Fargo, You're like

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>one of my first calls. Right, you're a big buyer

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace.

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 8>I would hope, I would hope we're up there. Yeah.

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 10>So we're typically having the conversations with syndicate desks in

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 10>advance of a deal coming.

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>They're whining and dining you. They're the guy. You're the

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>guy that they need to get to.

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeahs kind of gone the way of the dinosaur.

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 8>We don't get this. But what we do is we

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 8>give them the feedback.

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 10>We're going to be one of the largest typically players

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 10>in a book or in a deal for someone like that,

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 10>you know, so our larger competitors are gonna get the

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 10>phone call too. But the nice thing about that is

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 10>we get to help drive the terms of the deal

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 10>in favor of our investors.

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 8>So yeah, we're typically the.

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 10>Ones that will get, you know, the phone calls before

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 10>the deal really comes to market to get a you know,

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 10>temperature check of what we're looking for.

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 2>So when Paul was on the street, it was all

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure when you started as well, you were

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 2>flying everywhere twice a week, you were living out of

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 2>a hotel half the time, constantly face to face meetings.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 2>And now is it completely changed.

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 10>It's actually going back to that oh yeah, back, yeah,

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 10>So we're doing I mean, I think we're the virtual

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 10>you know kind of remote meetings are That's going to

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 10>be still a big component of it. But yeah, I

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 10>think feet on the ground and I think getting involved

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 10>with folks face to face in a room.

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:46.719
<v Speaker 8>Look, there's just better communication.

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 10>That way, and it also builds a level of trust

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 10>that Hey, you know, it's easy for me to say

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 10>on the phone, like, yeah, we're gonna have interest at

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 10>this type of level, but to do that in person,

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 10>I think there's just a different connection there. And I

0:33:57.360 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 10>think having that level of trust with you know, our

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 10>partners on the syndicate side, with our investors is truly important.

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 10>So that FaceTime, that in person travel has really picked up,

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 10>i would say, over the past years.

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So, how many new issues do you guys at Moving

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>buy like you for your preferred fund?

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 10>Like, there haven't been many lately, and this out this

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 10>is one of the technicals to our market that's been

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 10>incredibly supportive valuations and it's going to stay this way.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 10>We've had more preferreds redeemed this year than new issue

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 10>can keep up with. So yeah, and part of it

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 10>is that, you know, as the economy slows, our outlook

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 10>is banks aren't going to need as much capital because

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 10>they're balance sheet shrinks, right, not as many people want loans,

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 10>and if they're not making loans all, the size of

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 10>balance sheet shrinks, and their capital is measured as a

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 10>percent of their balance sheet. So we're seeing more redemptions

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 10>and we're seeing new issuance, but when new issuance comes,

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 10>use of proceeds as almost to refinance or to call

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 10>an existing preferred.

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 2>And it gets snapped up because people are looking for

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 2>the prefers. There's no supply.

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 10>They're looking to reinvest their cash, and luckily for them,

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 10>they're in this interest rate environment. The structures that we're

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 10>seen are very attractive, talking mid seven percent type coupons

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 10>with adjustable rate, you know, a component down the road

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 10>after the.

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 8>First call date. You know, it would be a little

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 8>bit more concerned if we.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 10>Were in a low interest rate environment and folks didn't

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.720
<v Speaker 10>have this attractive opportunity. We do think that the Yeffords

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 10>are coming to market today are going to be a

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 10>rare vintage because of these higher coupons.

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 8>He's attractive structure.

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 10>So so more often than not, we're participating in the

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 10>new deals that we do see.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Doug Baker, he is our go to preferred guy, right,

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>He's our go to preferred guy, portfolio manager, the head

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of preferred securities at NOVENE.

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape. Catch are live program Bloomberg

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio. The

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 5>tune in app Bloomberg dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get right to our next guest, Caroline Frederickson, Distinguished

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Visiting Professor at Georgetown Law. Caroline, thanks so much for

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>joining us. We love to start as it relates to

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>former President Trump and his legal challenges. Why maybe just

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of kind of where his greatest

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>exposure is with these four issues that he's facing. From

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, well, I.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 7>Mean, they're actually therefore prosecutions, but there are a lot

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 7>more than four issues, so you know, it looks I mean,

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 7>I guess I would. I would start by talking about

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 7>which are the most consequential. We could look at both

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:33.720
<v Speaker 7>the cases that are brought in DC. The federal case

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 7>focusing on January sixth, and the Georgia case is really

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 7>being central to the concern that we have about President

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 7>Trump allegedly trying to undermine our very democratic system. The

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 7>other two cases, albeit important, don't have the same kind

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 7>of real existential issues for the United States of America

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 7>continuing to exist as a democracy. Now in terms of

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 7>what the you know, sort of the ultimate greatest danger

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 7>is for Donald Trump. I mean, we'll still have to

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 7>see how this will unfold because we haven't seen either

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 7>of the prosecutors lay out their case. I think they're

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 7>There are a couple of different theories here, and one

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 7>is that the approach taken by the Department of Justice,

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 7>which has been not to name the the the so

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 7>far unindicted co conspirators, but to really move in a

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 7>different in a different and more focused way, is one

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 7>strategy to try and really focus the attention on Donald Trump,

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.479
<v Speaker 7>perhaps behind the scenes, to try and negotiate with those

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 7>who haven't been named yet in the federal lawsuit, to

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 7>include some of the same people who are actually named

0:37:55.200 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 7>in the Georgia State prosecution, the Fulton County prosecutor in

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 7>that case. You know, you have nineteen defendants and forty

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 7>one charges, and I think they're taking a very different strategy,

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 7>which is very narrative, which is telling a story and

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 7>working on the potential of the defendants. They're turning on

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 7>each other, some of them taking plea deals and so forth.

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 7>So they're both very consequential for the president. It's really

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 7>hard to say they have both significant prison time for

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 7>you if he is prosecuted.

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask Professor about something I saw on

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the Times over the weekend that I think a lot

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 2>of people probably read, bringing up the possibility that according

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 2>to the original meeting of the fourteenth Amendment, Donald Trump

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 2>is ineligible to hold government office. And there was a

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 2>paper written by a couple of a couple of I

0:38:56.440 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 2>guess attorneys that are or were associated with the Federalist Society.

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 2>So this is coming from a fairly conservative group, right,

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 2>in which they argue that because he essentially engaged in insurrection,

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 2>he is barred from holding office due to this amendment

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 2>that was put in place after the Civil War. Does

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 2>that hold any water do you think?

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a very strong argument. And first of all,

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:24.919
<v Speaker 7>i'd say they're actually law professors, one of them, Will

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 7>bode Is at the University of.

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Chicago exactly, and Michael Stokes Paulson from the University of

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Saint Thomas.

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 7>And they're very conservative, associated with the Federalist Society, as

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 7>you said, but also originalists. And I think in the

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 7>sense that they that they went back and they looked

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 7>through a lot of the documentation around the around the

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 7>debates around the amendments adoption, and it was clear they

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 7>were not just focused on of those who've been guilty

0:39:56.160 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 7>of treason during the Civil War the Confederates, but was

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 7>meant to be prospective and keep people who have taken

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 7>an oath of office to the United States from being

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 7>eligible to serve again in such positions of trust. There

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 7>has been one successful effort so far to put some

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 7>keep somebody off the ballot, and that was brought by

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 7>group called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington against

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 7>somebody who participated in January sixth insurrection, and they kept

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 7>him from being able to to get elected. So I

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:41.439
<v Speaker 7>think it's a very strong argument, and I think it's

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 7>going to We're going to see how that will play

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 7>out as election officials take action from parts of.

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.439
<v Speaker 1>The count Carolyn, what's your sense of the timeline here

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>with these four cases? When will the first one? I guess,

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I guess what's the timeline as you understand it?

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's very fluid right now. I mean, I think

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 7>the Special Prosecutor UH is trying to move forward as

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 7>expeditiously as possible, and it looks like they're going to

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 7>try and get that trial started before the end of

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 7>the year. I mean, these things are you know, UH

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 7>can keep changing. The mar Lago documents case looks like

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 7>it's going to start really underway in spring. The Fulton

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 7>County prosecution in Georgia. I think that's you know, they

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 7>have an interesting schedule that speedy trial rule that means

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:43.479
<v Speaker 7>that anyone of those defendants can demand speedy trial, which

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 7>can really accelerate the pace of this that prosecution, meaning

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 7>that it could even be starting or you know, mid

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 7>mid fall, you know, October, November and uh, and those

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 7>cases could be divided because they could because some of

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:03.879
<v Speaker 7>the defendant might commit you'll agree to a plea or

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 7>otherwise get severed.

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, well off the obviously fluid situation, as you mentioned,

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 1>will stay on top of it. Thank you very much

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 1>for your time, Caroline Frederickson Distinguish visiting professor at Georgetown Law,

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to give us a little bit more clarity as

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this legal issues of the former president continue.

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape Cat's are Live program Bloomberg

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about the housing market. The residential

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate market. US mortgage rate climbs to seven point

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>one six percent, matching the highest sense two thousand and one.

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 1>That gets your attention.

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Potentially have great credit. Yeah, and that's the gold standard

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 2>mortgage rate, because if you look at bank Rade, we're

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 2>already up over seven and a half.

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Yeah, that's right. So we need to figure

0:42:58.120 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>out what's happening out there and what it means for

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>this market. Lisa's a sturt event. She joins us. She's

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a chief economist at Bright MLS. Lisa, we had some

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 1>housing data come out today. Housing starts pretty strong, I

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>guess the housing industries, the homebuilders are trying to meet

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the demand out there. But what's going on in a

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>residential real estate market today? How would you characterize it?

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's such a strange market, housing market, isn't it.

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 11>It's housing has really confounded expectations in so many ways.

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:29.760
<v Speaker 11>You point to the homebuilder data this morning, New housing

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 11>starts are up from a year ago, up from last month.

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 11>We're seeing that home bolders are really responding not only

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 11>to the demand in the housing market, which has stayed

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 11>surprisingly resilient despite those higher mortgage rates, but they're really

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 11>responding to the fact that inventory is really at near

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 11>record lows and there really is so little for prospective

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:54.399
<v Speaker 11>home barers to choose from. Home builders are ramping up.

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 11>The amount of inventory that's accounted for by new home

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:01.800
<v Speaker 11>construction is at its highest level really in the last

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 11>couple of decades, and it's been a really strong housing market.

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 11>We may be, though, prepared to see some changes in

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 11>the market as we head into fall.

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 2>So what what do you think the catalyst for that

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 2>will be, Because I don't know what's going to move

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 2>us out of this stalemate that we're kind of in

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 2>right now. Owners who have low mortgages don't want to sell,

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 2>and buyers can't afford the high mortgages or the prices

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 2>right right.

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:31.359
<v Speaker 11>So you know, we sort of expected back a year ago,

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 11>when the Fed started raising rates and mortgage rates were rising,

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 11>that we would see a real strong pullback in demand,

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 11>maybe home prices would fall, but in fact, aside from

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 11>a slowdown late last year. We've seen buyers back in

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 11>the market in record numbers in the spring, primarily because

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 11>there's just such strong demand for home ownership. A lot

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 11>of folks have record levels of equity in their homes

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 11>that they're able to roll into a home purchase in

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:01.359
<v Speaker 11>a sense from buying down at higher rate. But as

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 11>you point out, the real reason why home prices have

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:06.959
<v Speaker 11>remained firm so far is inventory has been locked down,

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 11>as many homeowners are in those sort of golden handcuffs

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 11>of lower rates. But I think we're at a point

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 11>now where there's just a lot of fatigue in the

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 11>housing market, and rates surpassing seven or even seven and

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 11>a half percent could be what send us to a

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 11>much slower market in terms of transaction level here this fall.

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:30.359
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of folks are wondering, like myself, when

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates are going to decline it? And is there

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a level that once we get there, that I may

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>be free up some activity here? Is it five percent?

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Is it six percent? Is it four percent? Is there

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a rate where you think it would kind of thall

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>out this market?

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 5>Sure?

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, right, it's not going to be three percent, right,

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:50.359
<v Speaker 11>It's not going to be back to where we were

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:52.839
<v Speaker 11>during the pandemic. I don't think it has to come

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 11>down even to four or five percent to help free

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 11>up some sellers who may be waiting to move but

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 11>feeling that final pinch.

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 11>One thing that we're tracking really closely is the fact

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 11>that the spread between the yield on the ten year

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 11>Treasury and the thirty year fixed rate mortgage still remains

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 11>quite wide. So even though mortgage rates will remain relatively

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 11>elevated here in the latter half of twenty twenty three,

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:20.240
<v Speaker 11>if we do expect and I think we do expect,

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 11>that gap between treasury yields and rates to begin to narrow,

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 11>and we could see rates come down to below six

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 11>percent next year, which I think is what will be

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 11>enough to bring more sellers from the sidelines.

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.399
<v Speaker 2>What's an historical what's a rule of thumb in terms

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 2>of that spread? Where is it typically or has it

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 2>been over say, the last twenty years.

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we're typically around maybe one point eight two percentage points,

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 11>So we're now up at three percentage points.

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 2>Ah, So historically we should see mortgage rates about six, right,

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 2>and we're looking at a little bit more than seven.

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:56.919
<v Speaker 11>That's right, and so if you imagine sort of as

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 11>we move through the rest of the year that we

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 11>could we should expect rates to come down, maybe settling

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 11>around six and a half percent by the end of

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 11>the year, and continue to come down further as we.

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:07.879
<v Speaker 7>Head into next year.

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I guess I'm refinancing. I guess with

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a five handle.

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 2>So right, what about Paul top ticked the mortgage market,

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 2>but he got an arm so he's ready to move

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 2>in and pounds when they rates come back down. What

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 2>about new supply coming on the market, So we know

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 2>that there is there are very little transactions in terms

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 2>of previously owned homes. Our builders out there putting up

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 2>new supply like crazy so they can get them into

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the hands of home buyers who are willing to either

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 2>pay cash or go with a seven percent mortgage. Yeah.

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 11>You know, there's been a long period of time during

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 11>which homebuilders had a really tough time with supply chain issues,

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:49.359
<v Speaker 11>difficulty getting materials and labor. And now over the last

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:53.280
<v Speaker 11>few months, we've really seen homebuilders ramp up construction because

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 11>there's just simply no other inventory out there and they

0:47:56.719 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 11>are having to do things to entice buyers in though

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 11>we're seeing more builder financing.

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing the builder financing at lower rates, right, Lisa,

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 2>that's right, that's right.

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 11>I'm sorry, Billage offering financing at lower rates to help

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:14.760
<v Speaker 11>bring more buyers in. What we're not seeing is builders

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 11>dropping prices of new construction yet, and maybe they won't

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 11>have to as we head through the rest of the year.

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 11>But we are seeing, you know, some sort of give

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 11>backs in terms of upgrades and other things. But right now,

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 11>there are a lot of home buyers who are on

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:32.840
<v Speaker 11>the lots of new houses and they didn't expect to be,

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 11>but that's where they are because that's what's available for

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 11>saying I.

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Mean, why would you drop the price. You put up

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:41.360
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of McMansions and you know, Connecticut commutable area,

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 2>and then you can if you say, hey, we'll give

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:45.359
<v Speaker 2>you a four point nine to nine percent mortgage, people

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 2>are like, wow, okay, whatever you want.

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 11>Right, And it definitely is region specific.

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:50.839
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 11>We have some parts of the country we're not seeing

0:48:53.600 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 11>as much home building. Here in the Washington area, for example,

0:48:56.360 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 11>we're still seeing home prices of existing homes rising as

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 11>demand has slowed, and that's simply because we're not seeing

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 11>a lot of new construction that's been coming online.

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So when the home builders are out there building and

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>again building permits, housing starts up three three point nine

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:17.800
<v Speaker 1>percent month on month, much better than forecast here this morning.

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>What are they building? Are they building those McMansions or

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are they building what the market really needs, which are

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>starter homes.

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 11>Well, the market needs starter homes for sure, but it

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 11>has been a long time since we've seen new construction

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 11>really be the main supplier of starter homes.

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:33.959
<v Speaker 2>But what we are.

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 11>Seeing is a range of new construction activity in that

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 11>middle market as well as that luxury market, which then

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 11>allows the starter homes in the existing stock to be

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:47.399
<v Speaker 11>vacated where folks are able to move up. I mean,

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:51.320
<v Speaker 11>it's part of a whole housing ladder, right, But because

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 11>of the cost of materials, the cost of labor, the

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 11>cost of local regulation for home builders, it's really financially

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 11>challenging for a builder to build at very.

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:02.240
<v Speaker 7>Low home prices.

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:04.320
<v Speaker 11>So we really seeing sort of bin market and luxury

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 11>construction by and large.

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 2>What about multifamily.

0:50:08.719 --> 0:50:13.080
<v Speaker 11>Multi Yeah, the rental market has been certainly going like

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:16.720
<v Speaker 11>gangbusters in many markets. In fact, we've seen that rents

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 11>are beginning to come down year over year. On a

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 11>national basis, rents are down in many markets across the US.

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 11>This is all happening despite the fact that mortgage rates

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 11>are higher. We're seeing just more new rental construction coming online,

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 11>which is giving renters more options. So if we're looking

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:36.720
<v Speaker 11>for some sort of bright side in the housing market,

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 11>people who are in the rental market are finding more

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 11>options and are finding rents stabilizing, are coming down.

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Heylly, so thanks so much for joining us. I really

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting your thoughts here. Lisa Sturt, event chief e

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Commerce for Bright MLS.

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:50:56.600 --> 0:51:00.240
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:02.439
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.