Speaker 1: Hour or two Sean Hannity Show, tolfree it is eight
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety four one, Shawn, if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. So the President drawing
Speaker 1: a very very straight line in the sand and taking
Speaker 1: on some Republicans in the US Senate, and what he
Speaker 1: is saying is crystal clear. He says he will not
Speaker 1: sign the PAISA bill unless the Save Act gets done.
Speaker 1: The Save Act voter integrity, proof of citizenship, voter ID
Speaker 1: I mean basic fundamental integrity measures that everybody should want
Speaker 1: because it brings integrity to the process so people have
Speaker 1: confidence in the results. Apparently there's a new Netflix film
Speaker 1: out and Hillary Clinton's still whining about losing in twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen and talking about what an abomination the electoral College is.
Speaker 1: Here is the President saying he won't sign FAIZA unless
Speaker 1: the Save Act gets done.
Speaker 2: Listen, it said a lot the Save America Act, and
Speaker 2: that can be passed anyway they want to pass it.
Speaker 2: But I'm not going to sign FISA unless it's and
Speaker 2: this was like a rush act America Act, and it
Speaker 2: was a rush act by the Democrats.
Speaker 3: A leader that's what.
Speaker 4: Being his leader, vet.
Speaker 2: Look, we have to be able to get proof of
Speaker 2: citizenship when you vote.
Speaker 3: Otherwise we don't have elections. We have to be able
Speaker 3: to get voter ID.
Speaker 5: So John is a leader and hopefully he can get
Speaker 5: the votes.
Speaker 1: All right, joining us now, Utah Senator Mike Lee, Senator
Speaker 1: Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, guys, welcome back both of you.
Speaker 1: Senator Lee, let's start with you. I have been frustrated
Speaker 1: many times throughout this process. To me, it's a no brainer.
Speaker 1: I don't know why we can't get that number.
Speaker 6: Yes, this is frustrating to many Sean including me, including
Speaker 6: many throughout our country who want and expect for us
Speaker 6: to do something to fix the problem. To make it
Speaker 6: easy to vote and hard to cheat. Existing law makes
Speaker 6: it far too easy well people to break the law.
Speaker 6: That's why we need to save Amyera to act, which
Speaker 6: is very simple. It makes it easy to vote and
Speaker 6: hard to cheat. Specifically, it would require proof of citizenship
Speaker 6: to register to vote and photo ID to vote in
Speaker 6: federal elections.
Speaker 7: Is right now.
Speaker 6: If you register to vote, as most people do, at
Speaker 6: a DMB and a form supplied by the Federal Motor
Speaker 6: Voter Law, all you have to do is check a
Speaker 6: box and sign your name saying yeah, I'm a US citizen,
Speaker 6: I'm otherwise entitled legally to vote, and the states are
Speaker 6: prohibited from doing any follow up work even if they
Speaker 6: have reasons to suspect you might not be a US citizen.
Speaker 6: That's a problem. That's why we need this law to pass.
Speaker 6: The American people overwhelmingly support it. I mean, it's hard
Speaker 6: to find something that unites this many people. We're talking
Speaker 6: about roughly three out of every four Americans Democrat or
Speaker 6: Republican who supports it, and it's much higher than that
Speaker 6: among Republican voters, but it gets out to about three
Speaker 6: out of every four voters. In this circumstance, it shouldn't
Speaker 6: be enough or us to just say, well, we don't
Speaker 6: currently have sixty votes. Yes, we're ten shy of the
Speaker 6: sixty vote culture standard. But there are other ways to
Speaker 6: work through a fellowbuster, including by matting a bill making
Speaker 6: clear that you're going to continue debating it until it
Speaker 6: has the votes to pass. That was used in the
Speaker 6: past to pass laws like the Civil Rights Act, and
Speaker 6: it could be used again. You can't do this every
Speaker 6: time because it's very time consuming, but we could and
Speaker 6: should it might view do it here what is.
Speaker 1: The leadership in the Senate telling you why they won't
Speaker 1: do that.
Speaker 6: Well, their assessment is, we just don't have the votes.
Speaker 6: They're correct in that we don't yet have the votes
Speaker 6: to achieve cloture, but we do have simple mands.
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, you mentioned the Civil Rights Act and
Speaker 1: the Voting Rights Act. How long were those votes kept
Speaker 1: open before they finally got the votes.
Speaker 6: In the case of the Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty four,
Speaker 6: it was about seven weeks that they kept it on
Speaker 6: the floor of the Senate. It came over from the
Speaker 6: House of Representatives in March of nineteen sixty four. They
Speaker 6: were thirty votes shy of cloture, thirty three zero are
Speaker 6: ten votes shy of cloture. And what they did is
Speaker 6: they made clear we're going to debate this week in
Speaker 6: and week out. They made them work through weekends in
Speaker 6: most circumstances during that time period, and if you want
Speaker 6: to fillibuster this, you're gonna have to hold the floor
Speaker 6: and speak. And what happened was the bill continued to
Speaker 6: get more popular. Those who were obstructing it through their
Speaker 6: filibuster were becoming less popular. So eventually what they do
Speaker 6: they negotiated it in exit ramp by negotiating some face
Speaker 6: saving amendments and some more substantive amendments that allowed them
Speaker 6: to vote for it, and the thing passed, but had
Speaker 6: then sent a majority Leader Mike Mansfield of Montana. Had
Speaker 6: he not been willing to do the courageous thing and
Speaker 6: bring this up, showing legislative courage to say we're going
Speaker 6: to debate this until it's done, it would never have happened.
Speaker 6: And that's the kind of, you know, somewhat unusual but
Speaker 6: aggressive and necessary posture that I've been advocating for.
Speaker 4: Here.
Speaker 1: Senator Turbervill, let's get your take on this. Where do
Speaker 1: you see this and do you have more hope than
Speaker 1: I've been having?
Speaker 4: I don't. Thanks for having me on, Sean. I think
Speaker 4: we have a lot of hope other than we've got
Speaker 4: one guy coming over to Mark. So I think I
Speaker 4: call it the day of reckoning. President Trump's coming to
Speaker 4: talk to the Senate Caucus, and I hope everybody's there,
Speaker 4: and I hope the ones that are not voting for
Speaker 4: this will stand up and give him a reason why.
Speaker 4: And we're having huge problems even in the South. I
Speaker 4: know people back in Alabama ask me every day that
Speaker 4: I go in to the state to campaign or whatever,
Speaker 4: they ask the coaches my vote will count. People never
Speaker 4: asked that before. But after the twenty twenty election, after
Speaker 4: now we've known we've lost six to twelve states blue
Speaker 4: states that will always be Democrat unless we change the
Speaker 4: voting rules, we have a huge problem. And so President
Speaker 4: Trump's got a problem. He says now he won't pass
Speaker 4: by FAISSA unless it's or sign it unless the Save
Speaker 4: America of actors on there. And we have this the
Speaker 4: House that has twenty two members says, we're not voting
Speaker 4: for anything unless y'all pass the Save America Acts. So
Speaker 4: we're looking down the barrel of a gun here, and
Speaker 4: we're looking at the future of our country. And Mike,
Speaker 4: Senator Lee got the idea, is probably the only way
Speaker 4: we could do this is to go debates. This what
Speaker 4: they used to do. But for some reason we can't
Speaker 4: get them to put it on the floor. And I'd
Speaker 4: be willing to go out there and stay with him
Speaker 4: weeks and weeks and weeks because this is the one
Speaker 4: bill they can save our country, because we have to
Speaker 4: have fair voting, because right now we know we don't.
Speaker 4: And at least a dozen states in the country.
Speaker 1: How ironic Senator Lee that I think it's on Netflix
Speaker 1: that Hillary is complaining. First of all, she's whining about
Speaker 1: the electoral College, but she has bitterly complained about her
Speaker 1: election loss, never has gotten over that Donald Trump beat
Speaker 1: her in twenty sixteen. So it's ironic that she's out
Speaker 1: there criticizing our electoral system. Both Republicans and Democrats have
Speaker 1: questioned integrity and our elections system. Both have complained bitterly
Speaker 1: Republicans and Democrats. Stacy Abrams comes to mind. We know
Speaker 1: of many instances. So my question is if all we're
Speaker 1: asking for here is proof of citizenship, voter ID signature verification,
Speaker 1: chain of custody controls, and limited mail in voting, which
Speaker 1: I think we should have. You make exceptions for the infirm,
Speaker 1: for the elderly, for the military, But the minute that
Speaker 1: those ballots hit the precinct, I think they should be
Speaker 1: under camera the whole time, updated voter rolls, partisan observers
Speaker 1: from any party that's on the ballot, watching the voting
Speaker 1: all day and then the vote counting all night. I
Speaker 1: prefer paper ballots. I think there's a reason a lot
Speaker 1: of European countries went back to paper ballots. I think
Speaker 1: we should do the same. Why would anybody be against that,
Speaker 1: because at the end of the day, both Republicans and
Speaker 1: Democrats would believe in the integrity of the system and
Speaker 1: then have confidence in the results and win or lose.
Speaker 1: It's going to be very straightforward and there's not.
Speaker 3: Going to be a lot of conflict out there.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 6: I agree with you completely, Sean. Look, the point is
Speaker 6: these are common sense measures that most Americans look at
Speaker 6: and say, yeah, that should already be the law. We
Speaker 6: should have that. And it's particularly clear with regard to
Speaker 6: the House passed version of the Save America Act. The
Speaker 6: actual Save America Act itself is very simple. It covers
Speaker 6: just two elements, proof of citizenship and voter ID in
Speaker 6: order to vote. That's the one that has a simple
Speaker 6: majority support within the Senate. We need to do that.
Speaker 6: And as far as the reasons why someone could be
Speaker 6: against that very simple piece of legislation that passed the
Speaker 6: Houser Representatives multiple times and that has simple majority support
Speaker 6: in the Senate, there is no legitimate reason to oppose it.
Speaker 6: I have, having authored this bill and having fielded questions
Speaker 6: on this for many months, intensively this year and for
Speaker 6: the last two years leading up to it. I can
Speaker 6: tell you I've never encountered a legitimate argument against it.
Speaker 6: So those arguments against the bill, against the built on
Speaker 6: the merits, really, I think amount to advocacy for the
Speaker 6: status quo. And we know that the status quo leaves
Speaker 6: us untenably vulnerable to manipulation, to voter fraud. Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 6: of all people, should be clamoring for this if she
Speaker 6: in fact believes that the twenty sixteen election was somehow
Speaker 6: tampered with of you that I do not share, But
Speaker 6: she talked incessantly for years about foreign election interference in
Speaker 6: connection with that. You know where foreign election interference is
Speaker 6: at its high point in America right now with this,
Speaker 6: with the ability to send swarms of people into this
Speaker 6: country who have no business voting because they're not US citizens.
Speaker 6: Some of them are illegal aliens, some of them are
Speaker 6: non citizens. Either way, it's illegal for them to vote
Speaker 6: in federal elections, but we've made it way too easy.
Speaker 6: That's foreign interference with US elections and we should not
Speaker 6: tolerate it.
Speaker 1: Tommy Tarboville, Senator, answer this question. How does the state
Speaker 1: of California, justify mailing a ballot to everybody that lives
Speaker 1: in that state, knowing a pretty significant portion of that
Speaker 1: population is not in the country legally.
Speaker 4: John, California, it's in their DNA now, the light sheet
Speaker 4: and steel, there's no doubt about that. And as I
Speaker 4: said earlier, there's probably ten to twelve states that have
Speaker 4: the same mantras. So that's the reason we need this.
Speaker 4: We need to get into the election process. Now, I
Speaker 4: will tell you this. I've heard and Senator Legal tell
Speaker 4: you this. We hear this from some of our senator
Speaker 4: colleagues in the Republican side that they do not want
Speaker 4: the federal government to get involved in state elections. The
Speaker 4: problem is, our country is not the same as it
Speaker 4: was ten fifteen years ago because they have taken over
Speaker 4: and they break rules and they know it's against the law,
Speaker 4: but they know they're not going to go to jail.
Speaker 4: And so that's the reason that we need to get involved.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 4: Now, I'm totally against federal government in anything. Look, we
Speaker 4: run the healthcare system, We ruin all kinds of things
Speaker 4: that we get involved in, but this is something if
Speaker 4: we don't get involved in it, we're going to lose
Speaker 4: any kind of control that we have in the future
Speaker 4: of this country's at stake.
Speaker 1: What is the leadership telling you? What is John Thune
Speaker 1: telling you? I'm sure, Senator Lee, you've spoken to him,
Speaker 1: of course.
Speaker 6: On more occasions than I can possibly counter over the
Speaker 6: last many many months I have. Now, I'll tell you
Speaker 6: what he has said publicly and privately, which is, you know,
Speaker 6: this is great, I support it, I'm a cost consor
Speaker 6: of it, and all that's true. But then he says,
Speaker 6: but we don't have the votes.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 6: Not having the votes is a little bit different than
Speaker 6: saying we don't have enough votes at the moment for cloture.
Speaker 6: The fact that we are not yet there, which regard
Speaker 6: to the culture vote, doesn't mean that there aren't other
Speaker 6: ways we could break through the filibuster. It doesn't mean
Speaker 6: that there's not a legitimate reason to get on the
Speaker 6: bill and to try to debate it, subject it to
Speaker 6: amendments and floor discussion, and you know, the prolonged debate
Speaker 6: like with the bill that I described earlier in this interview.
Speaker 6: Sean does have a way of focusing the attention of
Speaker 6: voters and focusing the attention of individual senators and sometimes
Speaker 6: what seems like an easy no vote or an easy
Speaker 6: signal to send in advance of a culture vote, I
Speaker 6: will impose culture on that bill. Sometimes that turns out
Speaker 6: not to be so insurmountable after all, when they realize
Speaker 6: they're going to have to sustain that debate for many weeks,
Speaker 6: taking a position that is untenable, taking a position that's
Speaker 6: increasingly unpopular with the American people, saying in essence, I
Speaker 6: don't care if we've made it too easy to cheat
Speaker 6: in our elections. I'm not allowing this reasonable reform. That's
Speaker 6: why I think this merits the unusual step. Normally, when
Speaker 6: we see there are not sixty votes, that is, in
Speaker 6: many instances, deterrent from taking something up or at least
Speaker 6: on a prolonged basis. This is an unusual circumstance where
Speaker 6: we need to have prolonged debate. That's the only way
Speaker 6: that we'll have a shot here, and that's what we're
Speaker 6: calling for.
Speaker 1: Well, the President addressed it today when he was in
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania addressing John Thune, saying we don't have the votes
Speaker 1: for the Save America Act, and the President said, be
Speaker 1: a leader and get them. That's what being a leader
Speaker 1: is about. We have to get proof of citizenship, otherwise
Speaker 1: we don't have elections. We have to get voter ID.
Speaker 1: John is a leader. Hopefully you can get the votes
Speaker 1: we have to pass it. Coach, you want to respond.
Speaker 4: To that, Well, I've said this all along that you
Speaker 4: know there should be pressure put on people for certain situations,
Speaker 4: and this is one of them.
Speaker 3: And if you want to.
Speaker 4: Be a leader, fan, but once you're a leader, you
Speaker 4: also got to lead. You got to take the bull
Speaker 4: by the horns, and you've got to do what's for
Speaker 4: the American people. And the thing that I see in
Speaker 4: most of the states that we represent as Republicans, conservative Republicans,
Speaker 4: they want to save America pasted. Even some of the
Speaker 4: ones that some of the senators voted against their state
Speaker 4: voted for President Trump. And so there needs to be
Speaker 4: people that pressure needs to be put on. I don't
Speaker 4: know whether it will help in the long run. You know,
Speaker 4: we barely passed the big beautiful bill at four in
Speaker 4: the morning, finally getting one more senator to vote on
Speaker 4: is you get to fifty one? We had people vote
Speaker 4: against that, and so this is going to be hard
Speaker 4: to get done. But again, it all goes back to leadership.
Speaker 4: You know, don't ask for what you don't want at the.
Speaker 3: End of the day.
Speaker 1: By the way, Coach, I think this is probably part
Speaker 1: of the reason the bureaucracy that you'd rather be governor.
Speaker 1: I'm just guessing, but I appreciate both of you. Coach,
Speaker 1: Tommy Tuberville, thank you, Mike Lee, thank you. I wish
Speaker 1: I had more time, guys. Keep up the good work.
Speaker 1: Keep us updated on this.
Speaker 9: Bad for America, CBSTV ED it's the news like nobody else.
Speaker 9: This is the Sean Hannity Show, The Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 9: a thermonuclear MMBA assault on fake news.
Speaker 8: Hannity's on right now.
Speaker 1: All right, let's go to Chrissy's in New York. Chris,
Speaker 1: how you doing? Could I talk to you? What's going on?
Speaker 10: I'm bit Are you missing New York at all yet?
Speaker 3: No? Do you want me to be honest? Do you
Speaker 3: want me to lie? I missed some of my friends.
Speaker 1: But the good news is, especially during the winter time,
Speaker 1: all of my friends come down here and I get
Speaker 1: to see him anyway.
Speaker 10: Okay, all right, good listen what I called for? Okay,
Speaker 10: we're running out of time with the election coming in November,
Speaker 10: ill hand Omar. She's a member of Congress and she's
Speaker 10: in our government, and she got there based on potential fraud,
Speaker 10: like she lied about she does immigration fraud. There's the
Speaker 10: possibility that she's involved in the in the you know,
Speaker 10: in Minnesota, with the healthcare money that was stolen. What
Speaker 10: are we waiting for to go after just to come
Speaker 10: out definitively and say, yes, she married her brother.
Speaker 4: No, she didn't marry her brother.
Speaker 10: No, she didn't make any money off of the fraud,
Speaker 10: the medicare fraud. What are we waiting for? We're running
Speaker 10: out of time. We can't do it in December. I
Speaker 10: think we're going to lose the midterms. But that doesn't
Speaker 10: matter what I think. What are we waiting for?
Speaker 1: By the way, I'm gonna encourage you do not give
Speaker 1: up on the midterms. I'm not these are uncharted waters.
Speaker 1: I'm just throwing that out there. The answer to your
Speaker 1: question is, I think we deserve answers. I'm not sure
Speaker 1: why it's taken so long to get them.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure.
Speaker 1: How you can go from you know, a cup ten
Speaker 1: thousand or thirty thousand dollars in net Worth, it balloons
Speaker 1: up in a year and a half to thirty million,
Speaker 1: and now we're back down to two hundred. Makes no
Speaker 1: sense to anybody, And so far I don't think the
Speaker 1: questions have been probative enough to satisfy me, and the
Speaker 1: questions I have, then, obviously you either the answer is
Speaker 1: I don't know what's taking so long.
Speaker 3: It's frustrating.
Speaker 1: I think we deserve answers, and hopefully they'll be forthcoming.
Speaker 10: If it gets October November, nothing's going to happen to her.
Speaker 4: Nothing.
Speaker 10: I mean, she's in our government based on fraud if
Speaker 10: she married her brother, Therefore, everything she's making rules that
Speaker 10: we have to live was that we have to live by.
Speaker 10: This is such an obvious thing. Either prove that she's
Speaker 10: legitimate or prove that she's illegitimate.
Speaker 4: We don't have time to wait.
Speaker 1: I agree, I agree, I agree completely, and you know
Speaker 1: you're actually inspiring me.
Speaker 3: I think I'm going to make some phone calls.
Speaker 1: I'm going to see what the status of this is,
Speaker 1: because I think every America needs to know, and we
Speaker 1: certainly need to know before midterm. And if there's been
Speaker 1: a cover up of any time at any point, I
Speaker 1: would imagine we'll get to the bottom of that too,
Speaker 1: what I would think anyway, Chris good, call man, hang
Speaker 1: in there. I'm going to try and get answers for you. Okay,
Speaker 1: thank you, Bude, Bye bye all. I appreciate it. Richard, Oklahoma.
Speaker 1: Next Sean Hannity Show. What's up Richard? How are you
Speaker 1: glad you called?
Speaker 3: Sir?
Speaker 7: How you do?
Speaker 11: Sean?
Speaker 8: Good to talk to you.
Speaker 11: I just had a brief question regarding this prime minister situation.
Speaker 11: On one hand, I hear that the King can select
Speaker 11: a new prime minister during these times. I also heard
Speaker 11: maybe the Labor Party can select a new one. Just
Speaker 11: how is there process? How does it work over there?
Speaker 11: Do they have advice that might step.
Speaker 1: Well, it's a parliamentary system. It's very different than what
Speaker 1: we have. A lot of countries have this system and
Speaker 1: you have you have main parties. You have you know,
Speaker 1: a Labor Party, a Liberal Party, have a Conservative Party
Speaker 1: and then you got the Reform Party that's Nigel Farage.
Speaker 1: I would say going into any new election, in light
Speaker 1: of all that has gone on in Great Britain, there
Speaker 1: seems to be some awareness now and maybe it was
Speaker 1: that incident in Ireland that happened and people now understanding
Speaker 1: they shouldn't have Sharia courts inside of Great Britain. Their
Speaker 1: economy has not been doing well, they've lost their moral clarity,
Speaker 1: they have surrendered on national security issues. They've adopted radical socialism,
Speaker 1: climate alarmism, and the worst thing they've done is they've
Speaker 1: had unfettered illegal immigration without assimilation, as evidence by nearly
Speaker 1: one hundred charier of courts and in other parts of
Speaker 1: Europe the continent, they have no go zones and there
Speaker 1: has been a fear among politicians as this population has grown.
Speaker 1: They don't want to alienate them. To me, the only
Speaker 1: person that I see on the horizon that might be
Speaker 1: trumpion and might be able to give a shot at
Speaker 1: fixing this would be Nigel Farage.
Speaker 3: That's the only one I see.
Speaker 7: I agree.
Speaker 11: Agree, yes, sir, Do you think he has a pretty
Speaker 11: good shot of getting in there as Prime Minister?
Speaker 3: I actually do.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, Linda, give Nigel a call,
Speaker 1: love to put him on the air. Absolutely, you got it, Boss,
Speaker 1: Thanks Boss. That's all Richard and Oklahoma, all you have
Speaker 1: to do, Ask and you will receive, Seek and you
Speaker 1: will find, Knock and the door shall be open. Just
Speaker 1: following the words of our Lord and savior. Appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Richard thanks Man eight hundred nine four one, Shawn on
Speaker 1: number A. Let's go to Tony in Florida, my free state.
Speaker 1: What's up, Tony?
Speaker 3: How are you?
Speaker 7: I'm fine? Thank you? And how are you doing?
Speaker 3: Thank God? All's good? What's going on?
Speaker 12: So?
Speaker 7: I was wondering and just a thought, is there any
Speaker 7: avenue for the victims or family members of victims that
Speaker 7: were killed or raped or injured by illegal aliens? Can
Speaker 7: they pursue any sort of civil charges in court for
Speaker 7: against the officials like the governors, the mayors, or judges
Speaker 7: that refuse to enforce those deportation laws or orders of deportation.
Speaker 7: And the reason for this thought is because, especially here
Speaker 7: in Florida, if two people commit a crime and one
Speaker 7: of them kills a victim, the other one is also
Speaker 7: charged with a murder even though they did not commit
Speaker 7: to shoot the person or kill them. So wouldn't there
Speaker 7: be some sort of liability for them not enforcing the law?
Speaker 7: That's my thought?
Speaker 3: Well, should there be liability? Yes? Should there be culpability? Yes? Accountability?
Speaker 7: Yes?
Speaker 3: Is there you usually no?
Speaker 1: You know I've said this many many times before, but
Speaker 1: you know, by granting sanctuary city and state status and
Speaker 1: using taxpayer money for people that didn't respect our laws
Speaker 1: and borders and sovereignty. We are aiding in a betting
Speaker 1: in the law breaking. I have brought this up with
Speaker 1: with one top ranking official after another, and they don't
Speaker 1: think that they can do much about it. However, I
Speaker 1: can tell you this, tony. If you go down to
Speaker 1: the border and you were to pick up in the
Speaker 1: illegal immigrant and you were to drive them anywhere in
Speaker 1: the country, I can pretty much assure you if you
Speaker 1: got caught, you would be arrested and prosecuted for human
Speaker 1: trafficking among and aiding in a betting and law breaking.
Speaker 3: So explain that double standard to me.
Speaker 7: Civil charges, not the government going after government. You know,
Speaker 7: the victims, the family victims, you know, civilly charge those
Speaker 7: people just asking.
Speaker 3: I mean, think about this.
Speaker 1: You don't think Linkeln Riley's family deserves compensation, or Joscelyn
Speaker 1: Nungary or you know Rachel Moore and the mother of five.
Speaker 3: I mean, they all do.
Speaker 1: And the problem is there's thousands of them, and the
Speaker 1: problem is they become forgotten and Democrats won't even ever
Speaker 1: mention their names. Look, I pointed this out in the beginning.
Speaker 1: This is why I keep saying keep hope and optimism alive.
Speaker 1: This is these are uncharted waters for a midterm election
Speaker 1: because the Democratic Party is so radical left, and in
Speaker 1: that sense, all of this now they will have to defend.
Speaker 1: They're going to have to defend Graham Platner, They're going
Speaker 1: to have to defend El Sayed. They're gonna have to
Speaker 1: defend Mam Donnie. They're gonna have to defend you know,
Speaker 1: sixth gender, God is non binary, tell Rico. They're gonna
Speaker 1: have to defend you know, Mom Donnie and all his
Speaker 1: radicals on the ballot today in New York City, and
Speaker 1: the squad in AOC, and then the silent Democrats that
Speaker 1: are complicit in their silence and basically putting their seal
Speaker 1: of approval on it. So, you know, this is the
Speaker 1: biggest choice election we've ever had. And there's never been
Speaker 1: a midterm that I can think of, or even an
Speaker 1: election that I can think of, where one party has
Speaker 1: gone that far over to a radical agenda as we're
Speaker 1: witnessing now, with a complete seal of approval, willingness, utter
Speaker 1: silence from the rest of the party, even with the
Speaker 1: guy with the Nazi tattoo. So you know, they're kind
Speaker 1: of making that they're putting us in a game that
Speaker 1: we normally would be way behind on.
Speaker 3: And so I'm cautiously optimistic. I don't I don't have
Speaker 3: a crystal ball.
Speaker 1: The only way we're going to win this midterm election
Speaker 1: is if all of you in this audience pledging your heart,
Speaker 1: mind and soul that it's important to you and you're
Speaker 1: gonna get out and vote.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I'm just surprised that there's no law firms that
Speaker 7: have taken up the that cause civilly. That's all you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there are firms that have been We've had some
Speaker 1: of them on the air. As these cases advanced through
Speaker 1: the courts, we will update you.
Speaker 3: I promised that part.
Speaker 7: Okay, sure, well, thank you for having me. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: All, right, Tony, God bless you. I appreciate you. Joe,
Speaker 1: New Jersey, Joe, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 8: Good afternoon, sir. It's an honor.
Speaker 3: Honor is all mine.
Speaker 8: If you ask you, she'll receive. I have a very
Speaker 8: big ask of you.
Speaker 3: Good we sir.
Speaker 8: Please. I honestly think the Republicans are being lied to
Speaker 8: when it comes to Puerto Rico and then becoming a state.
Speaker 8: I always hear that's the big concern. DC is going
Speaker 8: to be a state, Puerto Rico is going to be
Speaker 8: a state. I agree, d you see will be all Democrat,
Speaker 8: But I think Puerto Rico is getting its stakes. I
Speaker 8: do not think that they are a guinea that they
Speaker 8: are going to go Democrat. I just don't think they are.
Speaker 8: I think we're just I think what they think that
Speaker 8: might have happened many years ago, but with all that's
Speaker 8: happened in Argentina from twenty three, Latin America is getting
Speaker 8: freer by the day. Cubas on deck. It seems like
Speaker 8: the whole Hispanic community is changing. Their mindset is changing.
Speaker 7: I don't like that.
Speaker 8: I don't think they're getting a fair shot. And as
Speaker 8: far as I'm concerned, I believe they're good people. If
Speaker 8: they got the resources and the opportunities and the support
Speaker 8: from the United States, the president in charge is going
Speaker 8: to be the one that they're grateful for. And I
Speaker 8: think the Democrats know that, and I really think they
Speaker 8: don't want us to make Puerto Rico state.
Speaker 1: Ronald Roll, Listen, this is what they're saying. They're saying
Speaker 1: the quiet part out loud. They're saying they want to
Speaker 1: pack the courts. They are they don't want any integrity
Speaker 1: measures and elections.
Speaker 3: They're saying that part out loud.
Speaker 1: They're saying that they want DC in Puerto Rico's statehood.
Speaker 1: I don't think they'd be pushing for it, at least
Speaker 1: if in their own minds they didn't think it would
Speaker 1: benefit them. The fact is, I think all all political norms,
Speaker 1: if Democrats ever get back in power, will be eviscerated.
Speaker 1: And what they really want is power in perpetuity. Remember,
Speaker 1: all socialism is is democrats doing a simple mathematical equation.
Speaker 1: And they're looking at Oh, there are all these rich people,
Speaker 1: but there are many more people that are not wealthy.
Speaker 1: You elect us, you empower us. We'll take their money,
Speaker 1: we'll give it to you. We'll make lofty promises we'll
Speaker 1: never be able to fulfill, and now you will be
Speaker 1: dependent on us. That is what it is, and that
Speaker 1: is a prescription for unfulfilled promises and more poverty and
Speaker 1: a loss of freedom. And that's why we need our
Speaker 1: generations coming up to understand the profound nature of freedom
Speaker 1: and individual responsibility. All right, quick break right back to
Speaker 1: our phones eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn our number.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of the program as
Speaker 1: we can continue.
Speaker 5: Up next our final roundup and information overload hours.
Speaker 3: And let's go back to our busy phones.
Speaker 1: It's toll free eight hundred nine Sean, Mary Nevada and Mary.
Speaker 3: We have about a minute. It's all yours.
Speaker 12: Hey, thank you, Sean.
Speaker 7: Hey.
Speaker 12: I had a comment you were talking about Ronald Reagan
Speaker 12: yesterday saying one generation away from losing what we've built
Speaker 12: in America, and they're working very hard on accomplishing that
Speaker 12: by of all dumbing down our children, where American history
Speaker 12: is completely lost. Also, you have to bring in since
Speaker 12: you can't deport Americans out of the country, you need
Speaker 12: to saturate them with people who are glad to have
Speaker 12: income from the government, a house over there head and
Speaker 12: a cell phone along with a streaming service. And that's it.
Speaker 7: How do you do that?
Speaker 6: You get illegal.
Speaker 12: Immigrants to flood the country and you create a society
Speaker 12: that is one hundred percent happy to be reliant on
Speaker 12: the government. And that's what they were starting to do.
Speaker 12: The only thing left now is the re education of
Speaker 12: our children. For American government and history, and getting rid
Speaker 12: of our centralized schools being managed by well the government.
Speaker 1: Because I'm one o'clock, I'm going to give you two
Speaker 1: quick things. One under Ronald Reagan, they had a landmark
Speaker 1: study in Nation at Risk. They concluded, what has happened
Speaker 1: to our country's educationtional system, or it done by an
Speaker 1: outside entity or force, would be tantamount to an act
Speaker 1: of war. We pay more per capital per student than
Speaker 1: any industrialized country with the worst results. You can't make
Speaker 1: it any worse. For all those people that think they
Speaker 1: want to believe in the false security of socialism, you know, statism, redistributionism, communism,
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it.
Speaker 3: That is its history.
Speaker 1: It always fails, as evidence by Obamacare, a bankrupt system,
Speaker 1: and social security and medicare, broken schools and everything in between.
Speaker 1: So you know, you just hit the nail on the head,
Speaker 1: to be honest, that's the battle we are fighting right
Speaker 1: now for the heart and soul of the country.