WEBVTT - Why It's Time To Be More Optimistic On EM Assets: PGIM's Rajan

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P M L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Global

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>trade wars, strength of the US dollar strikes in Argentina.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about emerging markets with Arvin Rajan, Managing Director

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and the head of Global and Macro at p JIM

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Fixed Income, helping to manage more than seven hundred billion

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars of customer assets. Are Vin a pleasure to have

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you with us. Give us your thoughts right now on

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>what is going on with emerging market investments. Yeah, thank

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you for having me on TIM. It's it's a fascinating

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>time and markets because um as often happens during periods

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>of tightening global liquidity and global votility. Emerging markets have

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.559
<v Speaker 1>been taking it on the nose. So we have had

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>nine consecutive weeks of outflows. We've had a bit of

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a slow lead, but there's not yet a total capitulation.

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>In terms of emerging assets UM. In fact, you know,

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's countries with which have current account deficits that have

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>actually sold off the most, because those are the countries

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that benefited the most from YEO chasing inflows. We've had elections,

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, just now in Turkey, but looming in Mexico

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and Brazil. Trade wars obviously are taking a tool, and

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical issues and idiosyncratic problems in EM. But I want

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.279
<v Speaker 1>to tell you why I still like EM in spite

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of all of this, and it is somewhat of a

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>falling knife. I don't think the sell off is necessarily

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>over yet, but I see several bright spots here, so

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>emerging market debt in particular, all right, So is it's

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>idiosyncratic bright spots where you're looking at specific countries and

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>UH specific companies and emerging markets or is it is

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it more broad than that. It's actually a bit of both.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So the on the broader side, i'd say that the

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>assets are now much cheaper, So we've had a five

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to eight percent sell off in depth hard currency as

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>well as local currency, and I believe that the leverage

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>cycle broadly speaking and emerging markets is not as scary

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>as it was in the past, a more diverse group

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of investors today than than in the past, stronger reserves

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>and strong commodities UM, and so far pretty healthy China.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, obviously a China US trade war could

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>challenge that last point. UM. What I'd say basically is

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that idiosyncratically, there are a couple of things going for

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>e M. I mentioned commodities, and that helps the commodity exporters,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but also there's policy responses to the volatility. So emerging

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>market policy makers, I'm not sitting by idly as global

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>markets are pushing their assets down. They're responding with interest

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>rate increases and with macroeconomic. Macroeconomic responses that would strengthen

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>these countries just have to break in there. Because we

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>saw that Argentina raised interest rates to three times in

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>one week, and we saw Turkey try also to raise

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and markets weren't budging, they weren't buying it,

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>they were not getting control over their currencies. A lot

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of people are speculating that in an emerging markets that

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>some of these central banks have lost control. Do you disagree? Yes,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I do disagree. I think that in certain individual cases,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think you might have vargued for a for

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a response that came sooner rather than later. So UM,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's true that I think, in the case of Turkey

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in particular, that the policy response has been lagging. It

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>now remains to be seen whether after the election and

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Duane's confirmation for another term, that he uses that consolidated

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>power to take more definitive economic reform actions and policy actions. Um.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>In Argentina's case, as you know, they have actually gone

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>ahead and applied for a fifty billion dollar loan program

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>with the I m F and other multilateral lenders. So

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that with that in their pocket and with

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the determination to do better on current account deficits, Argentina

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is um, you know, doing appropriate things. You know, from

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the policy standpoint, it is true that markets are never

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>fully in sync with these markets are off often evaluating

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>whether these policy responses are adequate at the moment that

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>they're announced. But these panics when they are often in

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets and opportunity to buy cheap assets. And I

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>think that this is not an exception to the twenty

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>years so sell offs that we've seen in emerging markets

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>over the last twenty years, each of which in many

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>cases has mean reverted, you know, back to to higher

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>prices in subsequent months. Are are there specific companies that

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you have on a list that when they fall in

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>value you say, these we got to scoop up or

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to add to a bigger position. So UM,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak about individual company investments, but I can

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you that there are different opportunity sets when it

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>comes to hard currency, that the currency itself and local rates,

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and we tend to think about those three in separate mentions.

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>And the fourth dimension is, of course corporate debt, and

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>corporate debt has actually been least impacted of these four

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>asset classes this year. I see the best opportunity set

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for investors in EM away from equities because we don't

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>do equities, but we see that in hard currency debt

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>because that has been taking it really on the nose,

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's because of investor related portfolio outflows. It is

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>true that some of these countries have two large a

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>percentage of their markets owned by foreigners, and I think

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's h exacerbated volatility. I'd say countries such as Mexico,

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>which is about to have its election, Brazil where there's

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty around the election outcome Indonesia UM, where the ownership

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of foreign assets has created a lot of voulatility in

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>spite of decent economic management. Our ex amples of places

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>where we might find really good UM investments that are

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that are now presenting value, Just real quick, in about

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds, I'm wondering a The m c I index

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of Developing nation currencies is down about half a percent today.

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's its worst performance on a Monday since August twenty sixteen.

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that these e M currencies are poised

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to rally or do you think that they're going to

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>deteriorate further as the dollar strengthens. I think tactically we

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about those currencies. I think that you know,

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>while the dollar is on a strengthening spree as it

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is today, it is definitely a falling knife. UM. That said,

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say that if you took a somewhat longer horizon,

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like one to three years, that these currencies are actually

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>looking starting to look really cheap, both on a nominal

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>as well as on a real effective exchange rate basis UM.

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.679
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why is because global growth we expect

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>will be come most sunchronized over the rest of this year. UM,

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we do think that inflation pressures will not really in

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the base case increased significantly. So that said is roughly

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>priced in for eight and the rally and the dollar

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>overall should therefore come to an end, and in turn,

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the pull of capital out of emerging market

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>countries should abate. Aranjan, thank you so much for being

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>with us. Arjen Managing director and head of Global and

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Macro at PGIM Fixed Income, talking about why he likes

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets fixed income. From here, could the United States

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>prevent Chinese companies from investing in US companies and what

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>could be the effects. Brooks Southerland, Bloomberg opinion writer for

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Deals and Industrials, joins us now about potential curbs on

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Chinese investments. Brooke, what have you learned in terms of

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>detail about what the president is proposing? So? I think

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the most significant thing here is he's looking to use

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this sort of antiquated and not very commonly employed tactic

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of invoking a national economic emergency to justify stricter controls

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>on Chinese investments in the US. And then they're also

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at export controls of key US technologies. Now, I

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>will note it's not like Chinese companies have been making

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a ton of takeovers in the US. As it is,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's already a significant deterrent in place, given

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>how the number of deals that Cyphius has already cracked

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>down upon and sort of the rhetoric coming out of

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration, we've seen deal activity really slow to

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a trickle. And that's not just takeovers, that's investments, that's

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>joint ventures. You're just really not seeing that deal flow.

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So does that rise to the level of a national

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>economic emergency? I would argue know that there's already a

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>deterrent in place for these deals. So there is a

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>real question about how President Trump is going about implementing

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>some of these directives, rules, orders, and I'm not sure

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>exactly how they will be implemented. But then there's a

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>question of what they mean. I mean, investments is pretty

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>ambiguous and uh, you know, really important sort of central

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>areas to the US. What does what does that mean?

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what break this down for US? What are

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we talking about here? Well, the hard thing about national

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>security is, as we've seen, the Trump administration has really

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>used this to justify all kinds of things that are

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>not actually national security. Risk, Like, does a car imported

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>from Germany really pose a dangered America and its citizens? No,

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's just so much flexibility, so much latitude once

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you start talking about national security, that you could really

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>be talking about a very broad swath of the economy.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So going back to this idea of export controls, the

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal has reported this would be targeting technologies

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that China is looking to uh, you know, elevate through

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>its initiative. That includes aerospace, that includes clean energy, cars,

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that include semiconductors, advanced materials. I mean, you start talking

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>about this, you're really a number of companies can be impacted,

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not exactly clear how this would work, but

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>even taking away a decent chunk of any of these

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>companies businesses to China would be very painful, especially for

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody like Boeing well and bowing shares down today. Right,

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So I have to wonder just to push back a

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit and play devil's advocate here. You know, some

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>may argue China has been stealing intellectual property from the

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>US for a long time. It entices companies to come

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>over to that nation and then basically copies the different

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>trademarks that they have and then pumps out their own stuff.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.479
<v Speaker 1>And this is President Trump trying to curtail that activity

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and say, you guys can't do that ahead of your

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Belt and Road initiative. Uh, you know, five understood. But

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>what was interesting to me about this is it's not

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going after deals that have already been done. It's not

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>seeking to undo transactions. It would just be limiting future investment.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So at that point, these investments, these joint ventures that

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>exists that have supposedly been facilitating this transfer of US

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>technology to Chinese firms, technically those relationships would be allowed

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to continue. And I don't know that you know, limiting

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>US exports of technologies is necessarily going to have the

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>impact that's desired. You start broadening this out and making

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>this such a wide definition of key US technology, I

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think that may ultimately end up being more painful for

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>US companies. I mean going back to Boeing, so they're

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>really trying to ramp up their China investment. That's a

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>huge market for them, a huge source of growth. But

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>China is already developing its own domestic plane manufacturer that

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>could be a real threat to Boeing. As it is,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you limit Boeing's exports ahead of that. I mean, you're

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about a really potentially painful loss of market share. Okay,

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But just to continue Leasa's point, I mean, if the

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:06.479
<v Speaker 1>United States is going to secure its UH physical security

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and military security, um, can it be argued that you

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>can't have it both ways and that you're going to

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>have to sacrifice profits in order to protect the national

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>interests of the country. And that would mean limiting the

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>transfer of technology that is sensitive and that could be

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>used eventually to supplant US companies such as Boeing like

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you just described, and that what is happening now is

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>something that while it may be quote too late, it

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is at least an effort on the part of the

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>administration to protect the national security interests of the nation.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>But they're also trying to make the argument that this

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>makes America more hospitable for businesses. They're trying to sales.

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's the marketing. That may be the marketing

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>around it, but but in terms of the actual you know,

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>being able to transfer military technology or technology that could

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>be used in a military setting, or anything that's sensitive that,

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as Lisa said, is pretty well known that Chinese companies

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>in many companies can just copy sure, and I think

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a valid argument for paying close attention to that

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and trying to limit those instances when they do happen.

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I will, you know, point out that CIFIAS has already

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>been rather active on this front. President Obama prevented a

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese own company from building a wind farm because it

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was too close to a Navy base in Ohio. So

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>there are already these considerations underplay. There's a bill in

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>front of Congress right now that would tighten cifius is

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny of these investments, give them more ammunition to go

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>after these types of deals in a broader range of

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>industries and a broader range of scenarios. I would argue

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that that's probably a more powerful way to actually curb

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this than just invoking national economic emergencies and taking a

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>unit lateral approach to this. Brook Sutherland, Bloomberg, Opinion, Deals

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in Industrial Calumnists. Thank you so much, as always for

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>your insights. How do small towns attract bigger businesses to

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>their shores or to their lands in order to drive

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>up economic activity. This is the question at the heart

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of an article that Craig Torus wrote that I found

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>truly compelling. Craig tourists, economy and Federal Reserve reporter for

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. He joins us now from our Bloomberg Unit

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and One Studios in d C. Craig talk to us

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>about Greenville and why you decided to focus in on

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this particular city for a story. Okay, so high Lisa

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Hi pim Uh I worked with one of our data scientists,

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Katerina Sa, and we start looking at where has new

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>business growth occurred in the context and of overall slumping

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>new business growth, and we found that Greenville stood out

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>among regional piers and was kind of keeping up with

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the national average and even kind of competing with bigger

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>cities like Boston in terms of new business activity. So

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we went down there to take a look. So what

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>did you find. In addition to Michelin which has the

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>North American headquarters, they're also Lockeed Martin's got a big

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>presence because the old Donaldson Air Force Base is now

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a technology center. Also General Electric has has business operations there.

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So what we found was a community and I mean

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody very focused on startups. Um they could be technology startups,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>they could be biotech startups. They could be companies like

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Boyd Cycling, which makes high end road bike wheels in

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a warehouse on the side out of town. As long

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>as it was new and innovative. Both the civic leaders

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in Greenville and other businessmen were very interested. And to me,

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Pim and Lisa, the key ingredient was a big Angel

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>network willing to fund new ideas right there in a

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>corner of South Carolina. So here's what I'm struggling with.

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's a cultural issue, and I'm wondering

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>how many other small towns have the Angel money to

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>pour into this, or could they do something similar simply

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with tax cuts and other benefits. I'm glad you raised that.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Probably U, I and most people listening to this have

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>driven through a city, no matter what state, and asked

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>ourselves what happened here? And as you know, this is

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>shaping politics and policies as we put in place tariffs

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and immigration. So what can they do? In the story,

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we visited Danville, Virginia, which suffered tremen and this loss

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>through exitive textile and tobacco. And I'm glad to use

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the word cultural, Lisa, because that's what they talk about

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we need cultural change. How do we bring innovators to

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this city. It's not easy. Incentives play a big role,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>for sure, But instead of looking for one big answer

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>like Amazon HQ two, what they really want are small

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>cells of innovation that feed on each other. Well, what's

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 1>an example, I mean, give us tell us some of

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the startups and how it works, because uh, you know,

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the culture. It's one thing to have

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the culture, it's another thing to have the money to

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>actually fund these things. Okay, So one of the one

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.479
<v Speaker 1>of the secret weapons that Danville has is the region

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>sold off a health system, giving them about a quarter

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to start putting incentives into community development. And

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I found the people who run it um very interesting.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>So obviously when you have that much money and that

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of corner of the state, you get a lot

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of asks. And they don't give money just to anybody.

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>They give money to change agents that's there. That's their standard,

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and a change agent could be a social change agent.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Like they built a brand new y m c A

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>right on the river. It was the first building on

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the riverfront and maybe years and like they told me,

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's very racially integrated. Which is an important achievement down

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>there in terms of business. Uh. What they're doing is

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to convince UM high tech manufacturers that their community

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>college has a special program that a third year program

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that imitates workplace environments with cut topics like conflict resolution,

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and they can provide the human capital for that kind

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>of operation. And they've had a cup bull of successes

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>recently Kaio, Sarah and a biotech company called Panaceutics. Are

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>there any other cities like this? A lot of cities

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are visiting Greenville trying to find out what the secret

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>sauces UM. You've probably heard of places like Boise and UM.

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think uh Nashville as having some success with startups. UM.

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you used the word city because it does

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>take single minded civic focus that this is what we

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>want to do. We don't want to just create a

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>number of low skilled jobs. We want high skill, high

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>talent jobs. And if I may, I'm going to give

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you an example. Okay, there's a company in Greenville called

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>kaya Tech. UM. It's a biotech company. They're doing something

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>very disruptive. They're testing cancer drugs on live patient cells.

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>The company was welcomed into the local healthcare system. Their

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>lab sits in the cancer ward of Greenville Hospital. The

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>state is both an equity partner and a grant tea

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to this company. And you gotta ask yourself, why did

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they did do this? This is not going to generate

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of jobs. It's a long term bet that this

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>disruptive technology well somehow spin off even more companies and

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>more jobs. I found that very progressive. Thanks very much,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>very interesting story I recommended to all of our listeners.

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Craig Tours is our Economy Federal Reserve reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You can follow Craig on Twitter at c torres Reporter

0:21:41.000 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can check out his story on Bloomberg dot com.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Just minutes ago, a Treasury Secretary Stephen Manuchin tweeted out

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of President Donald Trump, the stories on investment

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>restrictions in Bloomberg and Wall Street Journal are false, fake news.

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>The leaker either doesn't exist or do the subject very well.

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Statement will be out not specific to China, but to

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>all countries that are trying to steal our technology. We

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>will bring you more as we get it, But this

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of course is referring to the to the topic that

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about the last segment about these

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>restrictions that President Trump plans to put out there under

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>using or incurring the scipious rule to do it. We

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>will bring you more right now. I want to bring

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in Peter Kenny, founder and owner of Strategic Board Solutions,

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>also founder and owner of Kenny and Co. Coming to

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>us from New Jersey. Peter, Uh, you know, this is

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>just just one little snapshot of the back and forth

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that we keep getting with respect to trade. Is there

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>anything that we've gotten so far that would cause you

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to change your recommendation as to what investors ought to

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be buying or selling right now. Because of the lack

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>of clarity, and because of the number of variables, and

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking really large, large global variables, it's difficult to

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>say anything other than be cautious. And we're seeing that

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in the flattening Yelker. We're seeing that in the tenure today.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>For example, I mean treating a two point eight seven yield.

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>That's telling us that investors are cautious all the one second.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry to break in here, but the idea of

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>caution at a time when you are seeing inflation pickup

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>and you are seeing the Federal Reserve hiking rates isn't clear.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>What does expressing caution mean in markets today? Well, what

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's what we're seeing is a flattening Yelk curve and

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>the fact that investors are looking to hedge their bets.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing your to date return on the SMP five,

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the Dow Jones, which is largely flat to negative. We

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>have seen that performance by the NASDAC. But there's clearly

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>caution in the market. And that is in spite of

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what you just you know, just mentioned, which is clearly

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the fad is going to be raising rates as many

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>as four times over the next twelve months. So we're

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at a it's a very odd point in time for

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>markets and investors because we are seeing really great earnings,

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>great guidance, rising rates, healthy inflation, and yet we're seeing

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>very little in the way of positive traction for equity. So,

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a conundrum. The bottom line is caution

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>seems to be ruling the day, and we're seeing that

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in the treasure yields and we're seeing that in equity prices. Well, Peter,

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is this the time to be cautious when everybody else

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, don't you want to be buying when

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>people are not interested in buying and you want to sell. Yeah,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>so what would you be looking at right now? All right?

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, if you don't want to take too

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>much of a chance, what do you go out and buy? Well,

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you know my from my perspective, we're going to continue

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to see some really solid earnings and great economic data.

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Those two functions are the drivers of equity prices, and

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>as a result, I do think that the bias remains very,

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>very positive. As a result of that, I still like

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the financials, primarily because of the fact that we're going

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>to see rising rates and that related to expansion of

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>an interest margin. I also like to see homebuilders in

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>spite of the fact we're seeing some some asset bubbles there. Um.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's the demand for housing is absolutely

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>through the roof. We're seeing that in the dislocation and pricing.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But housing and financials continue to be and will be

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion second half and well into next year.

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Leaders Peter, how shall we think about oil because amid

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the trade talk, we're getting the OPEC agreement

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to raise output, but that is sort of offset by

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the issues that we are seeing in Venezuela with oil

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.479
<v Speaker 1>output really dramatically declining there, and of course the tensions

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>rising in Libya, and then I ran, I mean, how

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about the direct prices? Super super interesting, UM,

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, crude US is just such an interesting

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>topic because it's so topical relative to economic growth. The

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Opaque announcement on Friday was frankly, yes, a cut, but

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it was so nominal and so confusing that it really

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't act to allay the fears of rising of rising

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>energy prices. So we saw that huge spike up five

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>point over five in one day, best one day performance

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for the for w t I CREWDE in six months.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Today we're seeing a largely flat move marginally fractionally higher.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>The bottom line is on Saturday the Opaque Minister UM

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>from Saudi Arabia said we're going to do whatever it

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>takes to keep energy and oil prices stable, which is

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>an indication that there's more room for accommodation, an indication

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>that there's more room for production increases, which is why

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing any followed through from Friday's move higher.

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think that we're probably very close to a

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>new turn top in CREWDE prices, But I think the

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>downside is limited because of the global growth, the global demand,

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and because of those three factors that you just mentioned.

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Venezuelle as implosion, concerns over Iran and um Iraq, met

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole Middle East, you know, matrix, and the fact

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that there really is an awful lot of instability in

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of the producers and what they can produce. For example,

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>there's really only three major Opeq and non Opeque aligned

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>producers who can really move on increasing production. They can substantially,

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>so that matters a lot. But many of the OPEC

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>members really are at full production right now. All right,

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we gotta leave it there. I want to thank you

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>very much for joining us. Peter Kenny, founder a strategic

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>aboard A Solutions that talking about the current investment climate,

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh here joining us now to talk about the

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>current tweeting environment. When it comes to Treasury Secretary Stephen

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Manuchin is our own Salija Motion who co wrote the

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>story about the US planning curbs on Chinese investments, this

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>citing a security risks as the reason. Selia, what do

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you make of the Treasury Secretary's response to this reporting? Yeah,

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, he always speaks very very carefully. UM. I

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting that he said quote the statement will

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>not be specific to China. So there's a statement and

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>then there's a lot of other matter that would go.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a public side of any report and

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a private side. So our sources have told us

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that the research that's being done in the administration has

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to do with China. We have White House, the top

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>economics sorry, top trade advisor Pierre Navarro, who has laid

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the groundwork for such actions, specifically towards China, with a

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty six page report that he put out last week

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that is all about China and China's economics aggression. Uh.

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think Manuchia using the opportunity to refer just

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to his statement, uh and maybe not directly to what

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>goes behind that. Just real quick here, you've got about

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a mint left. Is this unusual for Secretary Treasury Secretary

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Munition to take to Twitter to respond to something? He

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>does follow in the President's footstep with a lot of

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>these things, and not footstep, but take lead from him.

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It is rare for him to call out a specific

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>media report at the same time he is probably hearing

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>from investors from market participants and even Chinese officials for

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>more details, and so I actually wonder if part of

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the message is to go to allies or specifically to

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>China or markets on this. We will of course be

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>waiting to hear more news from the Treasury Secretary and

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>look forward to getting that the news release. I want

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to thank you very much Selia Molson for your story

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>well worth reading on Bloomberg dot com Treasury Department planning

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to heighten security of Chinese investments in sensitive US industries

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>under an emerging see law, and we'd wait to hear

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>if there's any update on that. Much appreciated for your reporting.

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio