WEBVTT - BI Weekend: US Earnings, Morning Consult Poll

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steinah and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 4>These are two.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhall and Paul'sweenye on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big business

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Today, well, look at why fast food chain McDonald's experience

0:00:57.960 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 2>its first sales drop in four years.

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Plus, plainmaker Boeing has a new CEO. We'll discuss that

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>in the company's second quarter earnings.

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 2>But first we will begin with the big tech earnings

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 2>and Microsoft. Microsoft reported fourth quarter earnings and revenue the

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 2>top analysts expectations.

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 3>But the company's Azure cloud competing service posted a slow

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 3>down in growth last quarter, and this comes as investors

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 3>are anxious to see a payoff from huge investments in

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 3>AI products.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by Anna Agrana, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 2>technology analyst.

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Animog for his key takeaways from Microsoft results.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 4>When Microsoft keep guidance for rasher last quarter, they said

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 4>growth rate of thirty to thirty one percent in constant currency,

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 4>and boy, they didn't hit thirty one.

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 5>They hit thirty.

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 4>People got disappointed, but they did a good job of

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 4>explaining what's happening on the conference called at the end

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 4>of the day, they are adding more capacity for their

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 4>data centers, and the growth rate of the cloud, still

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 4>very strong, will slow down slightly because of capacity issues

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 4>and not demand issues. And as they get more data

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 4>centers up, growth will accelerate.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, So to be clear, then they're saying, look,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 3>it's on us to build out all this stuff and

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 3>then all of a sudden, the revenue will accelerate. This

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>and not like a trend of slowing cloud revenue growth

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 3>because of demand.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Just to clarify for me, yes, absolutely. In fact, and

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 4>the cloud growth is driven in part or I would

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 4>say largely by AI bookloads because of their relationship with

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Opening Eye. That really is the biggest driving factor. And

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft has an edge there over others because of that

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 4>unique relationship that I mentioned. So I think Microsoft remains

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 4>the primary beneficiary on the software side, similar to what

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia has on the chip side.

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 2>So an rag part of the discussion I guess probably

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 2>over the last month or month and a half about

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 2>AI has been Okay, I understand the spending aspect of it,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to build out capacity, to build out you know, whatever

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>I need. Remind me once again, what's the return on

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 2>that investment? So there's been some questions about the returns.

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 2>How do you answer that question?

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.119
<v Speaker 4>So you know, if you were in the semiconductor world,

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 4>your return is pretty quickly because the people are going

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 4>to buy chips immediately. But if you're in the software world,

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 4>first you're going to get those chip, create a data center,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 4>add more servers, and then create your software products that

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 4>which you're going to sell. Now, that thing's going to

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 4>take time, whether it's going to take six months, twelve months,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 4>two years, and then you're going to realize that AI

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 4>revenue and that's where the entire rest of the world is,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 4>whether it's on the software side or the services side,

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 4>and people need to have a very good understanding of it.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Otherwise they keep on harping on this capex issue, which

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 4>is going to get much bigger, and which is why

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 4>the chip stocks are doing very well because Microsoft communicated

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>that they're going to increase their capex even.

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 5>More this year.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 4>So this is really where people need to understand this

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 4>and otherwise this confusion is going to continue going in

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 4>a next quarter as well.

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Then to that point, you know, we got AMD boosting

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>at sales forecast for AI at the same time Intel's

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 3>cutting thousands of jobs. Where is Intel in this party?

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think the biggest party player really is

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 4>in video with their GPUs that are truly required for

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 4>these workloads, and AMD is also benefiting a little bit

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 4>from that. Intel, I think is needs to do a

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 4>lot more work before they can capitalize on this particular trend.

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 3>So Intel's in like the quad, like not even not

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 3>even closed to coming into the frat house. Basically, can

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>we look at it that?

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 5>Exactly?

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>How else in your space an A rag what else

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>looks attractive here.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 4>I think the fun is going to be tomorrow evening

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 4>when Amazon reports and they start talking about their AI strategy,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 4>because remember they do not have a relationship with open ai,

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 4>but they are still the largest cloud infrastructure vendor and

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 4>have more services than anybody else. They will come out

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 4>and give the message that listen, it's not just OpenAI,

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 4>but other large language models as well that people are using,

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 4>and they're using AWS services for that. You know, whether

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 4>that's anthropic or whether that's meta. All these companies have

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 4>their models as well, and people should be trying that.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>And before I let you go, what I also found

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 3>interesting was that eight percentage points of the increase in

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 3>as your revenue and cloud revenue was attributable to AI.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 3>That was up about seven percentage points. How do you

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 3>think that winds up looking like, are we going to

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 3>start to see like double digit increases here? Is it

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 3>going to be a slow grind higher?

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 4>I think over time it will be double digits, But

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 4>again the timing is difficult. When we extrapolated this number,

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 4>we are coming to somewhere around one point four billion

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 4>in this quarter. That's over ten times in just one year.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 4>It was, you know, it was roughly around one hundred

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 4>plus million a year ago. This is all the AI

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 4>workloads from open Ai, So I mean it is really

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 4>a big number frankly. But over time what will also

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 4>happen is there's going to be a blending between the

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 4>workloads on AI and the non AI workloads. And for us,

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 4>the net beneficiary are the three biggest cloud vendors, and

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 4>in fact, even Oracle is going to benefit from this.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to anorog Rana Bloomberg Intelligence technology analyst, take.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 3>A look at the latest Bloomberg News Morning Console poll.

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 2>It shows a Kamala Harris has wiped out Donald Trump's

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 2>leader across seven battle ground states as a vice president,

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 2>rise a wave of enthusiasm among young, black and Hispanic voters.

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>For more, we are joined by Laura Davison, Bloomberg Politics editor.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>We first asked her for her key takeaways from this pole.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 7>This is the best that the Democratic challenger to Trump

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 7>has ever done. You know, this is the first time

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 7>we have polled Harris. It's a statistical tie essentially between

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 7>the two candidates. She's technically up one percentage point, but

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 7>that's within the margin of air. The other key takeaway

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 7>here is that black voters, young voters, Hispanic voters are

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 7>much more likely to vote now that Harris is on

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 7>the ticket. So this is, you know, been something that

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 7>that the Trump campaign has created their strategy around of

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 7>trying to get you know, pull away at the margins

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 7>and black voters and Hispanic support. But this would indicate

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 7>that perhaps the tides are shifting in Harris's favor on

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:51.119
<v Speaker 7>that front.

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, that was sort of one of my questions too.

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 3>Are these voters that are switching or are they new

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 3>voters that are swinging these poles.

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 7>So we don't yet know what that is based on

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 7>how the poll works, but what we see is that

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 7>voters who are unsure if they're going to vote are

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 7>now saying they're much more likely that they're going to vote.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 7>So these may be people who voted in twenty who

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 7>were not enthused by either candidate, who are going to

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 7>stay at home, or people who maybe have never voted.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 7>But you know, a turnout election is expected to help

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 7>Harris on this front versus Trump. You know, the Trump

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 7>folks were you know, sort of hoping to pull away

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 7>particularly black men Hispanic men, but you know, we're not

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 7>hoping to see a big surgeon turnout that you know,

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 7>really helped Biden in twenty twenty and could potentially help

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 7>Harris in twenty four.

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Or you know, as a former Wall Street person, I

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 2>tend to follow the money and Vice President Kamala Harris

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>has had a pretty good run here in the last

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>week or so raising money. Do we know where that

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>money's coming from.

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So, her campaign says they've raised about two hundred

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 7>million dollars and that's in the first week or so

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 7>of the campaign. This is largely from small dollar donors.

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 7>These are people who are going and giving online and

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, increments of you know, anywhere from you know,

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 7>just a couple of dollars to you know, up to

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 7>a couple thousand dollars. We've also known that her super Pack,

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 7>this is the group that can accept money in unlimited amounts,

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 7>has gotten one hundred and fifty million in commitments since

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 7>Biden has dropped out of the race. These big dollar donors,

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 7>people who give millions of dollars, had decided to withhold

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 7>a bunch of contributions, you know, in order to sort

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 7>of pressure Biden to get off of the ticket. So

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 7>now that money is coming back into the fore just

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 7>for you know, kind of some in comparison here of

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 7>Harris when she inherited the Biden campaign accounts that had

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 7>about one hundred million dollars. Since then, she's raised another

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 7>two hundred million dollars, So these are really big sums.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 3>How much of this could be also attributed just to momentum,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>as in, when you have the RNC, the candidate gets

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 3>a boost, the DNC provides a boost. This is an

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 3>unprecedented moment in political history, so no doubt the candidate

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 3>would get a boosed.

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 7>Yes, and the timing year is all really interesting because,

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 7>of course Biden has dropped out two days after the RNC,

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 7>so Trump was expecting to see a big polling boost

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 7>coming out of that. Of course, just a week prior

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 7>that had been the assassination attempt. Leaving the RNC, Republicans

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 7>were very confident about their chances, and you know, even

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 7>Republican operatives were saying one of the things they needed

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 7>to be cautious of is that they weren't overconfident. Of course,

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 7>that all switched, you know, just a couple of days later.

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 7>What the Trump team is saying is, look, this is

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 7>a Harris honeymoon. This is a surgeon momentum that will

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 7>just be a flash in the pan and won't last

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 7>until November. That's really what what we'll be looking for

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 7>in the next couple weeks, if you know, is she

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 7>able to maintain both this fundraising edge as well as

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 7>this polling edge, or do we revert to where you know,

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 7>the Biden Trump race was just with Harris on the

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 7>ticket in a couple of weeks.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 3>What do we make about the situation in Israel and

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 3>how that is polling for Kamala Harris, Because clearly there's

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 3>a huge section of voters that is very unhappy of

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in Gaza right that we're maybe not voting

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 3>at all for President Biden, But are they coming back

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 3>in now? Do we know anything along those lines?

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So what this poll shows is that people who

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 7>are very concerned about the Israel Gaza war, and particularly

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 7>young voters for whom this is a bigger issue, are

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 7>more likely to vote for Harris. She's taken a softer

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 7>tone on this and is you know, just doesn't have

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 7>quite the same negatives on this issue that Biden does.

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 7>You know, one of the things, you know, particularly just

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 7>with the you know events of late of you know,

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 7>kind of there being more unrest in the Middle East.

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 7>Is you know that the Biden administration is still pushing

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 7>for a ceasefire. Harris is still pushing for a ceasefire.

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 7>Democrats really want this to be an issue that is

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 7>working towards a resolution versus, you know, an issue that's

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 7>flaring up, particularly as students go back to college campuses

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 7>in a couple of weeks. They don't want to see

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 7>the protests that we saw last spring.

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Did the Republicans have buyer's remorse for JD.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Vance.

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm seeing some reporting all along those lines.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 7>Yes, there's there's a lot of conversations on that, even

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 7>on a Bloomberg television mcmulvaney, who's a Trump ally, came

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 7>on earlier this week and said, no, they're not looking

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 7>to replace JD. Vance. But of course, if you're being

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 7>asked about this, this means that this is at least

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 7>a conversation that is circulating. You know, Vance has had

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 7>a rough rollout, you know, just in about the you know,

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 7>two weeks or so that he's been on the ticket.

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 7>You know, some past comments he's made, you know, sort

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 7>of degrading childless cat ladies have come up. He has

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 7>had had some jokes on the campaign trail that have

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 7>come across as crass and haven't really landed. So this

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 7>is a conversation that's happening on the upon the sort

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 7>of Republican elite to the mainstream Republican class, but isn't

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 7>really reaching the Trump campaign. They have continued to say

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 7>JD is our guy, and we're going to stick by him.

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Lard Davison, Bloomberg Politics Editor.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we're going to break down why wireless carrier

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 3>Team Mobile added more subscribers last quarter.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing inft

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies and one hundred

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I go on the terminal.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm Paul Sweeney and am Alex Steele, and this is Bloomberg.

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo car Playing and

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Broud Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Move next to the aerospace industry and Boeing. This week,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Boeing announced its appointing Kelly Ordberg as its next CEO,

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 3>replacing Dave Calhoun.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Bobbing made the announcement as it reported burning through more

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 2>than four billion dollars in cash last quarter. Well more

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and all this. We were joined by George Ferguson, Bloomberg

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 3>He first asked, George, if it's new CEO, is the

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 3>guy that Boeing needs to turn things around?

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 8>Not so sure. I think it's the guy that Boeing

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 8>needs for a small period of time, right because he

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 8>was already retired, right, he has you know, he's a

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 8>great career in aerospace working to Collins, help him put

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 8>Collins into RTX, I mean, a great experience. He's sixty four,

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 8>So my guess is he doesn't have a lot of

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 8>runway to work at Boeing. I think it'd have been

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 8>nicer to see a CEO that could have put I

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 8>don't know, five, seven, ten years into Boeing. But look,

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 8>I think the job is very difficult, and so I

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 8>think it's going to take a lot out of the

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 8>next CEO. And so maybe this is an interim as

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 8>they continue to develop internal candidates for the job. Maybe

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 8>it's very pretty difficult to recruit somebody into this job

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 8>right now. Could be an interim because of that as well.

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 8>So again, you know, the strong aerospace background at the

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 8>component at the you know, parts maker level, but doesn't

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 8>look like someone's going to be around for the next

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 8>five seven years.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, George, all right, so that's the CEO. How

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>about on the fundamentals here, I'm looking at the second

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 2>quarter negative adjusted free cash slow four point three billion dollars.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 2>You can't like that. Talk to us about kind of

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 2>the cash flow, the dynamics and what they need to do.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 8>So we kind of expected that four point three billion

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 8>dollars to be really honest, I'm not totally sure why

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 8>the stock is up. I don't think it's Kelly because

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 8>Kelly News started the day out and bowing anchors up

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 8>about one so post earnings were up. You know, we've

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 8>done this pop. I mean, you know, we heard from

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 8>CFO Brian West during the call. He told us Burn

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 8>was going to be pretty strong in three Q two,

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 8>and then some the analysts tried to box him in

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 8>on what Burn was going to be for the year.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 8>One said would be closer to five billion or ten billion.

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 8>He said he wasn't. I think his quote somebody got,

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 8>I'm not smart enough to tell you at this time.

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 8>So there's just a lot of variability right now. That look,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 8>Boeing has to keep taking inventory, taking ship sets from

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 8>their supplier base to keep their supplier base in business

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 8>while they ramp up builds. And they had some good

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 8>commentaries and builds. They talked about the factory kind of

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 8>putting out twenty ish I think was the number, and

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 8>I think total deliveries in the thirty ish range for

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 8>seven thirty sevens rising to thirty eight shutting down those

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 8>shadow factories. It's the factories that they have the inventoried airplanes,

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 8>a lot of seven three sevens, some seven eight sevens

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 8>in shutting them down by the end of the year.

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 8>That was I think, great commentary. You know, we got

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 8>to the commentary about what's going to go on with

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 8>the union negotiations. Those are coming up in September. Dave

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 8>Calhoun kind of told us he I think wasn't totally

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 8>focused on that right now, or didn't have couldn't give

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 8>us PU and takes there that's incredibly important. Right, So

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 8>if we get into a situation where the union shuts

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 8>this company down in September, the cash burn this year

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 8>looks looks horrible. Their back going to capital markets looking

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 8>for a bond raise, which I think everybody on the

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 8>bond side is scared to death about because they don't

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 8>want to see a fall to investment grade, or they're

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 8>going to the equity side, which the equity guys don't

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 8>want to hear about, right, because that's dilution, you know.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 8>So I think again commentary was good around deliveries and

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 8>things like that, but a lot of variability coming, you

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 8>know here around this cash flow burn, and it's super important.

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to George Ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence senior Aerospace, Defense and

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 2>airlines analysts.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 3>We move next to earnings from Training Technologies, the maker

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>of heating and cooling systems. So the company posted better

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 3>than expected earnings in the second quarter and raise it's

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 3>full your forecast.

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 2>From Morewood, joined by Train's CEO Dave REGNERI. First the

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>asked David why the company had such positive results.

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 6>As far as what's driving our growth? You know, I

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 6>always tell people we have a system of things that

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 6>makes Train Technology is a great company. And whether it's

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 6>the way we operate our facilities, through our business operating

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 6>system ways, whether it's the way we innovate our new products,

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 6>or whether it's our direct salesforce. Those are a system

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 6>of things that make us a great company. And we

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 6>have a service business that's a third of our company

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 6>that's performing extremely well. In the second quarter, our service

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 6>business was up mid teens from a growth perspective, and

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 6>we have a culture that's you know, we believe in

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 6>challenging what's possible and innovating for a sustainable world.

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 3>So based on that, it's great to chat with you.

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I love love talking to you, because

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 3>you have such a great read on the residential and

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 3>commercial businesses. Basically a commercial HVAC unit and a near

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 3>term residential HVAC unit, and of course that's heating, ventiletion,

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 3>air and cooling. Where's the strength, where's the growth, where

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 3>are the weak points?

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'll start with residential. We had a very strong

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 6>quarter in the second quarter or revenue was up low teens,

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 6>but that our residential business for the prior I'll say,

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, three quarters had really been struggling with a

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 6>refrigerant change that wasn't clear. That's been clarified. It was

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 6>really struggling with excess inventory kind of a hangover from

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 6>the COVID days that was in the channel. Those both

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 6>correct it, and we're off to a very warm start

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 6>to the cooling season, which should have us all concerned

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 6>for a different reason as the climate continues to increase

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 6>in temperature. But I would tell you that it's a

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 6>very strong start of the year, so very strong and residential,

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 6>our commercial business really broad based growth. You know, certainly

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 6>the high growth verticals like data centers. We do very

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 6>very well in our education or in healthcare, but we

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 6>had broad based growth in the Americas. We track fourteen

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 6>different verticals and we were hard pressed to find a

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 6>vertical that we were not strong in. So it was

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 6>just it was a very strong quarter for Trained Technology.

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm very proud of what the team's been able to accomplish.

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm reading the Bloomberg Intelligence research note on your earnings.

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>North America's sixteen percent organic growth was much greater than

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the ten percent consensus.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 3>What drove that?

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, really two things. Our residential business perform better. Okay,

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 6>we thought that was going to be. You know, in

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 6>the beginning of the year, we thought our residential business

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 6>would below single digits. We came in you know, low

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 6>teams in the quarter, so we significantly outdrove that. And

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 6>then our commercial HVAC business just continues to operate at

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 6>a very high level.

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 5>And like I.

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 6>Said, services was up in the high teens actually in

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 6>the Americas, and their equipment business just continues to exceed

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 6>our customers' expectations. So very strong quarter. You know, I

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 6>was listening to your show earlier. You were talking about sustainability,

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 6>and I would tell you that Trained Technologies our purpose

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 6>is built around sustainability. And what people are talking about

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 6>right now as you're hearing a lot about, you know,

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 6>how much power is going to have to be generated

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 6>to meet the demand that's coming, and you'll hear a

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 6>lot about data centers using a lot of the electricity.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 6>What nobody is talking about is the amount of power

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 6>that's being generated that's being wasted. And I would tell

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 6>you we call it demand side management. And we know

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 6>because we've done hundreds of thousands of energy audits and

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 6>buildings that most buildings operate about thirty percent inefficiently So

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 6>just think if we could solve that problem, and if

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 6>we can make buildings perform the way they were designed

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 6>or assets performed the way they're designed. Just think about

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 6>the amount that we could save and the energy that's

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 6>being produced and which was obviously has a trickle effect

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 6>to the carbon footprint. So that's what train technology is

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 6>all about. People always ask me, where do you see

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 6>the growth coming from. It's going to be on the

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 6>demand side, management side, all.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, thanks to train Technology CEO at Dave REGNERI.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 2>We move next to earnings from the wireless carrier T Mobile.

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 2>The company reported new monthly mobile phone subscribers that exceeded

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>analys estimates.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 3>For more on this, we were joined by John Butler,

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Telecom analyst, and we first asked John

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 3>why T Mobile did have such a successful quarter.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 9>You know, it just boils down to this. They lead

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 9>in five G and for any wireless carrier, the lifeblood

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 9>of the network, the speed of the network, that download

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 9>speeds that you get on your phone is dictated by

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 9>how much spectrum you own. In plain English, how fat

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 9>are your air waves? And the great news for T

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 9>Mobile is they have the most spectrum of any of

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 9>their competitors, and they have the right amount of spectrum

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 9>for five G and we're now seeing it translate into

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 9>better results.

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 2>And I'll note that our own Charlie Pellett is a

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 2>very happy T Mobile customer.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 5>Oh I'm okay, very good.

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 2>I didn't really know any You're probably the only two

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I know, which says something about the circles I run in,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 2>John Butler, So is this just a share game?

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 8>John?

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, everybody's got a cell phone's got a cell phone?

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 2>So is this just a share game between AT and T,

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Verizon and Timo?

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 9>It is, Paul. You know, it's really in a way

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 9>become a zero sum game. In some ways, there's natural

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 9>organic growth as you know, young kids get phones, older

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 9>people who have been getting phones post pandemic here. I

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 9>think that really shook up enough of the market to

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 9>lead to that little bit of growth on the edges.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 9>But the bottom line is it's a very slow growth market,

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 9>and so it's all about not only protecting your share,

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 9>but taking it away from your competitors. And T Mobile

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 9>has you know, people forget that. Really wireless is almost

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 9>a retailing game, right, So it's all about branding and

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 9>T Mobile has done a brilliant job manufacturing a brand

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 9>image that's all about being consumer friendly and low prices,

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 9>and so quarter and in quarter out they tend to

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 9>lead their peers at and Team Verizon in terms of

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 9>net new subscriber growth, and this quarter, in my mind,

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 9>they really hit the ball out of the park on

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 9>that front.

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 3>At some point, will I also get my Internet from

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Team Mobile? Like, is this the next area that they

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 3>can just start gobbling up share?

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 9>Possibly? Actually, if you live in New York, I would

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 9>say a definite. Maybe. They've been very cautious in terms

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 9>of managing expectations for where their broadband business is going

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 9>to go. But T Mobile offers both over the air

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 9>broadband called fixed wireless access. You basically put a modem

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 9>in your window. It talks to the wireless network and

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 9>provides you broadband that way. It's a real set it

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 9>and forgeted thing. It's been a major hit with consumers.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 9>Verizon is also a major player there. But Tea Mobile

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 9>is also getting into fiber broadband. And when you think

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 9>the future of broadband and where it's headed, it really

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 9>is going to come down to fiber in the long run.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 9>So I think they're placing the right bets. They're moving

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 9>ahead with fixed wireless access for now because they have

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 9>excess capacity on the network, but they're reluctant to really

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 9>ramp up expectations there because broadband eats up a lot

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 9>of that spectrum we were talking about on the network,

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 9>So they don't want to endanger their core wireless mobile

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 9>business by rolling out too much in the way of

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 9>broadband over the air. But I think Fiber hedges their

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 9>bets there, and by the way, they over index in

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 9>New York. They really have great share in New York

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 9>in mobile, so I think broadband is their next foray

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 9>for that market.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.959
<v Speaker 2>All right, Thanks to John Butler, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior TELECOMMENTA.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>List coming up on the program, a look at quarterly

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 3>earnings from it again.

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data two thousand companies in one hundred

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via Bigo

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 2>on the terminal on Paul Sweeney.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 3>And am Alex Steele and this is Bloomberg.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecard Play and Android

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 3>We move next to the fast food chain McDonald's. This week,

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the burger chainsaid it experienced its first sales drop in

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 3>four years when it reported second quarter results.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 2>This comes as a company has pledged to launch new

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 2>promotions to help offset a decline in customer visits, and

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 2>this includes a five dollar value meal deal launched in

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 2>the final week of last quarter.

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 3>For more on all of this, we are joined by

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Michael Hale and Bloomberg Intelligence senior restaurant and food service analyst.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Michael first key takeaways for McDonald's earnings.

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 10>The biggest takeaway is that they still have work to do.

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 10>I guess results and as bad as expected. You know,

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 10>July data that we've seen is pretty bad, so the

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 10>fact that they're still negative isn't really surprising, but they

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 10>definitely still have work to do. The five dollars meal

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 10>deal seems to be bringing in some traffic. They're hopeful

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.959
<v Speaker 10>that you know, the sales will follow, but it hasn't

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 10>happened yet, you know, And they talked about the US

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 10>really needing a revamp of its one two three dollar

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 10>value meal. This company has scale that nobody else does.

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 10>They can offer price points that nobody else can. They

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 10>have a ton of marketing might So for those reasons,

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 10>in this really competitive market where where chains are fighting

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 10>hard to track low income consumers, you know, McDonald's definitely

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 10>has the tools.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 5>To be in.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.959
<v Speaker 2>For me, the McDonald's experience was always an airport experience

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 2>because I always say I could justify it per say, hey,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm rushed for time to gonna make my flake hid

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 2>something quick. But now all the new airports and like

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the renovated Newark Airport, there's no fast food in those

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 2>things anymore. You have to sit down and order and

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 2>do all that kind of stuff. So that's why that's interesting.

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 3>Isn't there fast food? But you it's like nice stuff

0:25:57.920 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 3>like wraps.

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Well you get that stuff to go, But I mean

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 2>you could always get like some fast food, serious fast food.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 2>So, Mike, so what's the story for McDonald's here. Do

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>they open stores, do they rationalize their footprint, what's kind

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 2>of the strategy there? In terms of managing their footprint

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 2>these days.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well they're there and they're investedtily. Late last year

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 10>they pushed for more aggressive store openings, right, and so

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 10>that's going to continue to be the focus. They're going

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 10>to push hard to grow internationally. China obviously is a

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 10>big point of focus for them. But yeah, it's going

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 10>to be to open stores. But in order to motivate

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 10>their franchisees to open stores, they're going to have to,

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 10>you know, have a strong marketing program that's going to

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 10>pull people into the restaurants, the existing restaurants, grow same

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 10>store sales, improve profitability, and make it just a more

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 10>attractive proposition for their international and US franchisees to open

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 10>new stores.

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 3>Didn't they unveil like a five dollars meal thingy, But

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 3>that was at the end of the quarter, right, so

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 3>we don't really know the full impact of that for McDonald's.

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 10>Yes, yes, so on the call, management said that it's

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 10>driving traffic but not sales yet. So it seems like

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 10>there's some trade down from current customers saying, you know,

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 10>well five dollars, I get a lot of food for

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 10>that five dollars, So maybe instead of getting a big McNeal,

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 10>I'll get this five dollars meal deal. But so it

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 10>hasn't really impacted results yet, but they said that, you know,

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 10>historically traffic comes before the sales boosts, and so they

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 10>seem positive on it in this near term. You know,

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 10>they said ninety three percent of franchisees in the US

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 10>have agreed to extend this offer deeper into the summer.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 10>So they seem positive on it. But their real focus

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 10>is going to have to be on the one, two,

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 10>three dollars value menu. That menu isn't resonating with customers, right,

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 10>and it seems like a full revamp is in the cards.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, they've they've received a lot of.

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 10>Shade on social media that you can't find anything on

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 10>that menu for a buck, right, and so some reengineering

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 10>is going to be necessary here in the United States.

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 2>All right, dumb question of the day comes from me.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Never at McDonald's, Burger King, even Starbucks, the drive through

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 2>line or the twenty cars deep. I walk inside, I

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>walk right up to the counter and boom, I'm served.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 2>And if I'm a McDonald's, isn't that a source of

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for me to figure out how to get them

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>through faster.

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I guess we're lazy.

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 10>That's that's the problem, right, But uh no, to your point,

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 10>you know, a big percentage. You know, historically the counter

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 10>was like say fifteen percent of a drive through restaurant sales,

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 10>and historically that's really just been used when the drive

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 10>through line is too long and people say, you know,

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 10>I don't want to wait that long. I'm gonna go

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 10>inside and pick up my stuff. So there is an opportunity,

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 10>there's and it's a it's a point of focus for

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 10>all of the quick service restaurants we cover. Everybody is

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 10>constantly trying to improve their throughput, you know, decrease the

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 10>time waiting in line, because they know, if there's you know,

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 10>at a certain number of cars for McDonald's, historically it's

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 10>been you know, say five or six cars in the

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 10>drive through, people will either you know, drive past the

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 10>restaurant or maybe they'll say, you know what, I'll park

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 10>and come in. But uh that's that's potentially business loss.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 10>So you know, improving throughput at the drive through, in

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 10>at the counter is constantly a point.

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean in theory, right, you get like an I

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 3>thing to do the drive through, right, But that has

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 3>been really tough to manage right now, right, it's not

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 3>really the best.

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:18.719
<v Speaker 5>It's not working.

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 10>I mean, people have they're having a lot of trouble

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 10>with accents, not only from you know, international customers, but

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 10>also dialects across the United States, so voice ordering and

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 10>a lot of these AI initiatives. You know, there's a

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 10>lot of potential with them, but they haven't been able

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 10>to really pay dividends just yet.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, So what is the investment call here, Mike

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>for some of these fast service McDonald's, Burger King, what's

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 2>the investment call here for these names?

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 10>Well, they're looking at you know, it's interesting because the

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 10>year over your comparisons, base effects get easier into the

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 10>second half, but the consumer's weakening, right, and so you

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 10>know McDonald said they expect you know, more consumer weakness

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 10>over the next few quarters, right, And so there's definitely

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 10>concern about about restaurants spending here in the second half.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think I mentioned it at the top.

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 10>McDonald's is well positioned though in you know, periods of distress.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 10>You know, during the Great Recession, they outperform by offering

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 10>value that competitors couldn't match, right, and so it's a

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 10>very tough environment. But we think McDonald's is positioned pretty

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 10>well for such a tough environment.

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 3>In the value war where everyone's chasing a smaller part

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 3>of everyone's wallet. How do these guys remain profitable? I'm

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 3>not saying McDonald's, but like all its competitors too, like

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 3>it's sort of a race to the bottom to some perspective,

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>how does that play out?

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 10>It's not just a race to the bottom. So in

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 10>terms of the loan, they're trying hard to keep that

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 10>low income consumer business, and there's no doubt that that's

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 10>a big focus right now, but they're also bringing in

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 10>you know, middle income and higher income consumers into the fold, right,

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 10>So you also get this traded down effect where you know, yes, sure,

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 10>low income consumers are trading down into grosser restore, but

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 10>McDonald's and some of their competitors, Jack in the Box

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 10>being one, you know, Chipotle, have been able to attract

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 10>these higher income consumers that actually come in and buy

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 10>premium items and spend more when they come. The problem

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 10>is they're just a much lower percentage of the of

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 10>the overall traffic. But that's what we've seen over the

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 10>last year and a half or so's chains that have

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 10>been able to attract these higher income consumers are definitely outperforming.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 2>So where in your overall space there mic on the

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 2>restaurant side is the best place to be these days.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 10>It's companies that provide a lot of value and a

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 10>very good price point, right and so, you know, like

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 10>most earning seasons and industries, you know, a lot of

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 10>the top performers end up reporting earnings first, and we've

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 10>seen that Chipotle and Texas Roadhouse are two They outperform

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 10>everybody on seamsore sales over the last five years and

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 10>it's not even there's not even a close second. And

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 10>a big reason why they've outperformed by so much is

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 10>that customers see a lot of value on that plate

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 10>for the price that they pay right and there, and

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 10>they're provided a pret good customer experience, and that's what's

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 10>bringing people in the door. If you're providing very strong

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 10>everyday value and a good in restaurant experience, you know,

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 10>clean restaurants, good service, when everything that that entails, then

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 10>you're winning, all right.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Michael Halen, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior restaurant and food

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 3>service analyst, we next.

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Take a look at earnings from the Dutch brewer Heineken.

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 2>This week, the company report a quarterly profit and revenue

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 2>that fell short of analyst expectations.

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Heinegansited a nine hundred and forty nine million dollars hit

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 3>as at stake in China's largest brewer has fallen in value.

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 3>For more on this, we were joined by Duncan Fox,

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence consumer staples analyst.

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Duncan to take us through the laundry

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>list of things that were a problem for Heinegen.

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, I suppose the main one was consumer sentiment was

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 11>still quite weak, so what they were hoping for was

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 11>a bit of a bounce back in Europe for volume

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 11>with the euro twenty four, but unfortunately the weather was

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 11>just again four in northern Europe, so that was a

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 11>his In China, it's just that China Resources a share

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 11>price has been below the price they bought it for

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 11>about four or five months now, and the accounting system

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 11>means they have to take that hit. So if if

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 11>that share price goes back up again whenever the Chinese

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 11>economy recovers, then they'll get some sort of recovery from that.

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 11>But I can't tell you when that will be, so

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 11>it's just double consumer.

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 2>So what is Heineken saying about just underlying demand in general?

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 2>What are they saying about the consumer and is there

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 2>regional differences?

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 11>I guess basically the consumer's been hit by inflation curvac

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 11>years from double digit pricing, and I think they're just

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 11>pairing back. The big problem is that people are not

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 11>really going to the partner as much the entrade that's

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 11>where they make great profit. Well in Europe, it's certainly

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 11>been the case in places like Africa where you've had

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 11>devaluation as well. You've just got a working way through

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 11>that and they've done a very good job actually, but

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 11>you still have short term issue where you know, Nigeria

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 11>is a big, big market for them and you get

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 11>a massive devaluation and so they're just working their way

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 11>through all these issues. They're doing actually quite a good

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 11>job on the ground. But weather was the real thing

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 11>that was a surprise. I mean, the upgraded guidance a little,

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 11>but I think people are expecting a bit more because

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 11>of the Euro twenty four.

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 3>So Paul brought up sort of those mixed infused cocktails

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 3>and stuff. I can get the mimosa in a can.

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 3>It's not terrible at all. Does Heineken have exposure to

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 3>that kind of stuff and is that sort of eroding

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the appeal of beer at all?

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 11>Well, beers getting it from each from every angle really,

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 11>because you're seeing a lot of these new odd drinks.

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:41.919
<v Speaker 11>I probably grew with.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 8>Poorn and that once.

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 11>Some of them are a bit weird. But they've got Desperado,

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 11>which is a spirit tasted beer, tequila based beer, which

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 11>is doing very well. So they have got things that

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 11>they can attack these products with. But you need to

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 11>keep basically innovating with new things all the time. You know,

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 11>Diazu're doing a pretty good job on trying to do that.

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 11>But the problem is some of these don't last very

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 11>long the eighteen months and then things sort of fall

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 11>off a cliff, So you've got to sort of keep

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 11>replacing them otherwise you're getting to a bit of trouble. Actually,

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 11>the Hearneken one's doing well, but they just haven't come

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 11>up with innovation in that area. It's probably not their

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 11>key area for them.

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Is Hanegan calling out different regions of the world behaving

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 2>differently as the US market stronger than the European.

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 3>If you have a nice beach, your sales are up exactly.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 11>Well, certainly it's the suns out. They're not that big.

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 11>In the US Latin America, they're big, and they've they've

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 11>been they've taken quite a lot of costs out. They

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 11>were importing bottles to Brazil, for instance, which is a

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 11>huge market for them, so they've taken the cost down.

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 11>So it's not particularly great consumer environment there, but the

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 11>profits are improving because you know, they've realigned their cost space.

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 11>In Asia, they're bouncing back from a really horrid time

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 11>last year where.

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 6>The economy is.

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 11>Vietnam in particular, had a terrible time in sort of

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 11>Q two and Q three last year. That's bouncing back.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 11>I wouldn't say the beer market because of regulation, is buoyant,

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 11>but they're gaining share and they've done innovation on the beer.

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 11>Beer market there there seems to be working very well.

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 11>So there are a few issues in Asia that they've

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 11>still got to overcome. China some quite a chunky bit

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 11>of their market now, so they need to see that

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 11>economy improved. Places like Cambodia have got a bit of

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 11>an issue in the short term because of the economic growth.

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 11>So just a case of good old policies from governments

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 11>turning the economies around. I'm surely get a bit happier

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 11>with book. We'd life and people then go out and

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 11>buy beer.

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Duncan Fox, Bloomberg Intelligence Consumer Staples Analyst.

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, by

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the Pie and anywhere else you will get your podcasts.

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Listen live each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the IR Radio app, tune In, and

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal