WEBVTT - NFC Least

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>here's your host, Paul. It's a combined edition kind of

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasy Football Weekly on Paul Charchie and my host

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson. Hello, what's up charge? I wish I was

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>at the combine with How was it? I was there midweek?

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It was It was great. It was very busy. It

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>was just like the old combines and in many ways

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>even busier than the previous ones. And I thought maybe

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>COVID and everything, and I knew a bunch of people

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>who weren't going. A lot of my industry friends weren't there,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's really weird. There wouldn't be a lot of

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>people there, but they were there. There was There was

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>great overall from a just speaking about, you know, fantasy

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>relevant rookies. How excited are you for this class, because

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like six months ago it was No,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not a great class. I'm a little more excited

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>than I was a few months ago. There are some

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.919
<v Speaker 1>good receivers, and we're gonna break these down really into

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>into April. We've already got all planned out April. We're

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be breaking down with the positions. Some really good receivers,

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think tight ends, pretty bad quarterbacks, pretty bad running backs. Okay,

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and we'll we'll have plenty of guys that we can

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, in those about those positions when

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the time comes. But yeah, I got some good dirt

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, some insight into a few things, and

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, it's it's always fun. But the focus of

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this show, like the focus of the last show, is

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we go back through one of the divisions and we

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>highlight key elements for every player in that division. And

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this week NFC East. Now, the goal here is not

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to recap the season you already know, because you already

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>know about that, but hopefully to shed some insight that

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know when you're deep in the weeds playing

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it every week, there's some stuff that you just maybe

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>don't realize uh is happening in how you have you

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>chance to reflect on a full season with all these

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>players and speculate a little bit into what's going on

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>next season. Let's do it let's begin in the end.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>We're doing the NFC East this week, the NFC least. Yeah,

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it really is. There's some bumber teams in here. That's

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the reality football. There's plenty of good fantasy stuff. Yeah, exactly.

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the Philadelphia Eagles. Yeah, start when the

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Eagles will start with their quarterback as of right now,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts. Rumors always seem to be swirling like he's

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna get traded or they don't trust him as their starter.

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>But they shouldn't trust him yet he has not earned

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>trust yet. I don't know. I'm with you there. Um,

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>one player has amassed four thousand passing yards and one

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand rushing yards through their first twenty career starts. I

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.119
<v Speaker 1>want to guess that is Apparently it's it's Jalen Hurts.

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, He's only started nineteen games too. So

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I finished his QB ten last year with basically just

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>one wide receiver. It was a rookie, Devanta Smith. We'll

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about him in the second. Uh. You also have

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the fifth most rushing touchdowns with ten, and that's among

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Uh. So Philly Shirley will pad the receiver

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.399
<v Speaker 1>position through free agency, the draft, or both. So I'm

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>buying Jalen Hurts. I think he can get better. I

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's peaked. I don't know. I know you're

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>as as my worry is as a passer, I don't

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>know how much better he can get, and hopefully he

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>can um. But if he doesn't, man, I'm just I'm

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>nervous about his his long term prospects of just even

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>retaining the job if his passing doesn't get better. True,

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but I mean in fantasy football though, that rushing floor

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it was so safe and give him such a high ceiling.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm still in on Jalen Hurts. It is not

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a guy who I'll be fading. Uh. Speaking of that

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>one wide receiver we mentioned, Davante Smith led all rookie

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in airy yards per reception last year over

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty three His a dot average depth of target was

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a massive fifteen point two yards, nearly one and a

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>half yards more than Jamaar Chase. So big play potential,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sir there for Smith. On the downside, he didn't give

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you the big play. Yeah, he had some very bad weeks,

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>which makes him more appealing in best ball formats. But

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we do see some more consistency this season,

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if Philly or when Philly brings in fresh blood

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>at wide receiver. I don't think that's gonna hurt Devanta Smith.

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's only gonna help him more. And of

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>course it all depends on the arm of Jalen Hurts.

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>But uh again, I for one think he can improve

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>as a pass or so Davante Smith. Another guy I'm

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be targeting in draft this year, but not as

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>much as I'll be targeting tight end Dallas Goddard, who

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't post eye popping numbers last year, but he had

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Zach Hurts for six seven weeks in there as well,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and he was He was hurt a little bit, missed

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of games, but the underlying metrics very impressive.

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>For Goddard average two point two yards per target in

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>PPR leagues. He was second in yards per per reception

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen, first in yards per route run. He led

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>all tight ends and completed area yards per target. The

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>only problem was he only saw seventies targets. That's why

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the numbers weren't there. But again, there was the Earth's

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>effect um and even and what but what if this

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>team gets better at wide receiver in the off season,

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which I think there's a good chance they do, I

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>think that can really only help Godard maybe because I

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>mean he was probably the primary focus for defenses, either

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>him or Vante Smith. So and you know when and

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>when zach Ertz got traded, Yeah, that cleared up targets

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>for Goddard. But it kind of it's a shock to

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that offensive system, I would think, because they were really

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>like a two tight end offense and all of a

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>sudden they were one tight end offense. So now they

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>got all offseason too kind of build their offense around

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Goddard hopefully, who again only at seventy six targets when

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about guys like Mark Andrews and Travis Kelsey,

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>they saw twice that, if not more, and all those

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>metrics I just mentioned, he was well ahead of Travis

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey and Mark Andrews and all those crazy at tight

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>end seven. Right now, I'm where he's roughly getting drafted

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. I'm big on Goddard, who has the top

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>three tight end potential this year if he sees the volume.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'm liking Goddard, but not like in the running

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>game too much in Philly. Miles Sanders, Kenneth Gainwell. We'll

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about these two really quick disaster season for Sanders

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:12.679
<v Speaker 1>last year less than one thousand combo yards, zero touchdowns UM,

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but he only played twelve games. He was dinged up

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard and Boston Scott altered lots of opportunities, especially

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>line um. So I don't know Miles Sanders, he's fallen

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>into in these very early drafts, like the ninth tenth

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>round range. So he's kind of a nice some value there, yeah,

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in both redraft and dynasty formats. But don't sleep on

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Gainwell, who certainly flashed at times last year. Not

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.799
<v Speaker 1>you did score five rushing touchdowns on just sixty eight attempts,

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>average four point three yards per carry. He's kind of

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the go to receiving back as well, and that offense.

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So runners, runners have an opportunity to get better in

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>year two. And we've seen it a lot where you know,

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there are rookies that come out at running back and

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>they don't they don't do much, and you're two. You's

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>usually you know, that's where you see for most backs,

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's sort of your your last chance to really

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>show in the NFL, although there are exceptions, and it's

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>an offensive line. Philly, they got a good old line,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so uh yeah, that's the Eagles, and people are asking

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>what about Jalen reagor, don't ask about he is dead,

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>although it'll be his third year, right, and sometimes receivers

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>come to come to life in the third year, but

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>usually usually not when they're as dead as he's dead.

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>The Washington Commander's first time I've talked about the Commanders

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the Commander. Yeah, it still feels weird, and it's such

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a bad name. Man so uninspired. Look at what the

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Kraken did by going an offbeat, unique name. People

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are like, you can't. They've they've selling the most merchandise

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in the NHL because they have a cool logo and name.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go on a real quick mini rant. Not

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not the Commander's logo, but like their crest that will

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>be on they put for the Super Bowls they won.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>They put the year where the game was played Sea,

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>which is not how anybody acknowledges there are Super Bowl wins,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and the fans are upset. I mean, it was such

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a massive oversight that that is weird. Isn't it. I'm

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>not even a fan and it bothers me, But yeah,

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>people are pissed in U in the belt Way about that.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's start at the quarterback position. Taylor Heinik had zero

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>or one touchdown pass in eleven games, and he was

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly ineffective after Week four. Once defensive coordinators got some

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>good tape on him. He had a pretty nice little

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>run in like weeks one, two, three, four, and then

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just the wheels came off and he was a very

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>ineffective quarterback. After week four he was Fantasy quarterback twenty one,

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 1>which meant that, you know, most weeks you were by

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>a mile better off not starting him than somebody else.

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>His scrambling, he's he's got, he's got pretty good wheels,

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>but he scrambling was very anemic. The average just seventy

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>yards and zero rushing touchdowns after week four. Um, he's

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a free agent. Ran Fitzpatrick won't be retained

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>and Washington is clearly in the market for a new

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback next year. Russell Wilson DeShawn Watson in play draft

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in a rookie, We're gonna go one of those. The

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>problems gonna be Washington might be the least compelling destination

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for any free agent quarterback who can control his own

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>destiny because of all the turmoil with that team right now, Well,

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's willing to go there like well, that's the word.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not defendive. I don't know about that. I don't

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>think I don't think anybody wants to go to Washington

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. All right, let's talk about Terry McLaren, who

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>suffered under Heineke. He slumped all the way to wide

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>receiver thirty seven after week five. From week five forward

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver thirty seven, he scored just two times the

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way, and that put him behind guys

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>like Kendrick Bourne and Devanta Smith and Marquez Callaway. Come on,

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you're Terry McLaurin. His stats from last year weren't that

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>different than the year before in total stats. But we

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>all expected him to do far better and really improve

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on year two into year three, and it just didn't

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>come together without Stuberd there and Taylor Heineke throwing him wobblers,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and it just never it never really came together. Still,

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>McLaren's obviously got loads of talent, and if the commanders

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>can find themselves a quarterback, then there's some real upside

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to be had in McLaren. Next year, mclauren's in that

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like cursed group of like Andre Johnson and Alan Robinson,

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>still amazing great receiverscking right, uh, And there's no other

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>good receivers on this team. Diamie Brown was a total

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 1>washout in his rookie season, just twelve catches. Maybe he

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>sparks next year, but we got nothing from him this year.

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Kurt and they didn't even put him on the Brown

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>he was on the field. He was inactive most many games.

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel injured throughout the entire season, starting in training

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>camp and lasting all year or long. It was this

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>last year. It was his first year into his thirty

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>four million dollar deal. Oh, he caught just six passes.

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Six passes for Curtis Samuel. He was hurt a ton though,

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>he was hurt a ton. So I mean to me,

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, like last pick of your draft, you could

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>throw a dart at him and see what happens. I've

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>got I've got interested in the later rounds if they

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>upgraded quarterback, if he stays healthy, I think he could there.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But there's there's still I gotta believe there's still some

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of the talent that we saw in his last year

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in Carolina. Alright, Logan Thomas tight end injured all season.

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Just a reminder if you forgot, he tore his A

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>c L and m c L in December, So we

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if Logan Thomas is gonna be ready

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for Week one or what point during the season he

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>would come back and be effective there. Um Ricky Seals

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Jones is a free agent, but they like their other

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>their rookie from last year, John Bates, who flashed a

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit when Seals Jones was hurt and Logan Thomas

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>was hurt and they had to go to Bates give

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>him more time. He flashed a little something. I think

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll let Seals Jones walk and assume Bates can can

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>fill in and be the backup if it turns out

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas isn't ready to go. But I liked about

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas when he was healthy. Was he was playing

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>literally the snaps with a tight end. Yes, the healthy one.

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>So if if he can stay healthy, he's another guy

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>who's got undervalued. Right now, let's go to the running backs.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Intonio Gibson. He had a hundred yard ten touchdown season.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>When I say d yards and ten touchdowns, you're like, hey,

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a pretty good year. But why didn't it

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like Antonio Gibson had a better season. It's because

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>he was an erratic performer and unpredictable, and it was

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>very hard to know when you were safe putting him

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup and when not to. He succeeded against

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>some very hard run defenses when some people reasonably would

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>have benched him, and he flopped against some really bad

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>run defenses. And the past catching really never developed like

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>we thought it would in the off season. We had

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>spent much of the offseason talking hawking ourselves into a

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>reduced role for j D. Mckissa, for a guy who

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>knew increase a wide receiver basically in college too. We

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>thought we we thought he'd come together more. He hit

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred rushing yards just once, and one of them,

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, just two times, and one of them was

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in Week eighteen when nobody was playing fantasy football. That's Gibson,

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and four of his ten touchdowns were scored in December,

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and at that point you may not even been in

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. He did have a shin injury. He played

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>most of the season on that shin injury, and he

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>never really this season looked his dynamic and elusive as

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>he had in twenty the year before. Brian so Gibson,

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I think, um is, I believe he will fall out

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of the top two rounds in many drafts next year

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>based on what we saw last year. Yeah, he's going

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>from what I've seen, it's literally, of course late second release,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>he's going. He's more of a mid mid three. I

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>think that sounds right. JD. McKissick was a spot starter,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you know he was a spot fantasy starter,

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>not starter for their team. He may not remember he

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>finished with a concussion of Week twelve and that was

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of his season. And I you know, I

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you never knew what to do with mckissa He was

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just like a dark throw by week guy. And um,

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see whether or not they decided

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to retain his services. Let's go over to the Cowboy Cowboys,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. It looks like we're gonna have a little

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>shake up at the wide receiver position. Yeah we will.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll get there in a minute. Let me just get

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>let's make it a dack out of the way. We

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have to dive too deep into dak Uh somewhat

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of it down here for him statistically, but he was

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth h fourth most passing touchdowns with thirty seven, the

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>same amount as Patrick Mahomes and Aaron Rodgers. Uh. He

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>did go under underwent shoulder surgery this pass offseason, but

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not his non throwing arm should be fine. They're

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>roughly going around QB six and drafts right now, but

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>still has that quarterback one potential even if the Cowboys

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>offense undergoes a bit of a makeover, which it likely will.

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that and then in just a minute.

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But uh, let's talk about a guy who will definitely

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be a Cowboy this year. Mass Ceedee Lamb. Even though

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>there was some Arizona rumors swirling a week or two ago.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>You didn't buy into that either. Uh speak down years,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>oh Lamb. People were expecting a top five of top ten.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I was, and I think I think I had him

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>ranked right around ten going into the season. Yeah, wide

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver twenty in PPR. So he he under exceeded everyone's expectations. Now,

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>can you under exceed when like, am I making this word?

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But it makes sense, it does um. But you know,

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Ceedee Lamb could be this year's version of

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup. Now he's not getting drafted as late as

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Cup was getting drafted last year, but he's still falling

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>into the late second, early third round right now. But

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that's still good value for a guy with overall wide

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver one potential. But here's the key for him to

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. They gotta use him in the slot more. Um.

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>He checks all the boxes outside that He's got the size,

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to speed, the talent, a good quarterback got off a

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>good offensive line. Lamb only took a third of his

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>snaps from the slot last year, and I'm saying we

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>at least double uh those snaps from the slot of

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>him this year because his biggest games came when he

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>saw at least sixteen snaps from the slot. Uh nine

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>catches a hundred forty nine yards, two touchdowns against New England,

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns against Atlanta, seven for one oh four and

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown against Tampa Bay. This is are in games

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>where he was seeing significant snaps from the slot, and

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of that tied to win. Gallup was

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>healthy or not. You know, Gallops much is was traditionally

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>more of an outside guy, and they would move Lamb

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>more into the slot when Gallup was on the field.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But Gallup missed most of the season or half the season,

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>so that was that ended up pushing Lamb outside more.

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm with you, I just think he's a natural

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>slot received. Yeah, I'd like to see him using the

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>slot a lot more because hey, that's where Cooper cup plays,

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>right for the most part. Um, speaking of Michael Gallup, Uh,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and Mark, let's talk about tomorrow. Cooper, right, so he's

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>basically gone. It's not even a rumor. It's just there's

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a fact they can't afford. And I caught him. They

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>mismanaged that this all goes to Zeke's contract. That's like

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>ruined everything. Like but now they're just gonna let Cooper

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>walk when they could have at least tried to trade him.

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, they tried to trade him. They were

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>no takers. I'm sure they were. Their offers are They're

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>asking price was way too high? Remember what they gave up?

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Was it not two first rounders to get him, Marie Cooper?

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it was two first rounders? Yeah. Jones is

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not very good in the front office, So we're gonna assume,

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>not even assume Cooper is gone. But that's gonna clear.

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And Michael Gallup is an unrestricted free agent as well,

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so Cedric Wilson, Uh yeah, I think Wilson is going

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to be there. Um Gallup kind of on the fence.

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The weird thing with Gallup is he he blew out

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>his knee late in the season. He waited like a

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>month to have the surgery. He just had the surgery

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, so I don't know if

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be ready for the start of the season.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't an a c L, was it. There was

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>mcl okay, a c L is worse, right, But either way,

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>he waited like six weeks, which was kind of bizarre.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like, just get it over with. But really, I'm

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>most excited about Cedric Wilson knowing that Cooper is pretty

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>much gone. I don't know if Gallops could be ready

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to start the season. And Wilson look great when given

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity. Forty five catches, six hundred and two yards,

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>six touchdowns on just sixty one targets. Yeah, that's those

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are hundred twenty, which is viable or feasible for a

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>wider season starting We're talking a thousand yards and potentially

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>double digit touchdown. So Wilson is a guy going very

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>late right now. I think he's gonna be climbing round

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>by round as we go up. Months like that comes

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>through the seasons, especially if Gallop is not going to

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be a factor next year either or not on the

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 1>team or because of because of the knee, and now

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>because of the cap crisis in Dallas. Another guy who

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>might not be Cowboy next year's tighten Tighten or this

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>year tight end Dalton Schultz. But I think now that

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>with the the Cooper news, I think they retain Dalton

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Showed Schultz and hopefully they do because he thrived in

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a full time role in Dallas. Was one of three

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>tight ends with at least eight hundred yards and eight touchdowns,

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the other two Travis Kelsey, Mark Andrews. Schultz was one

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of six tight ends the top a hundred targets, finished

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>third and catches at the position with seventy eight, so

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he looked great. He's comfortable in that offense. And as

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>for Blake Jarwin, not a concern when it comes to

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Shultz is playing time. He's the guy now. The Cowboys

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>actually are saying they have concerns about Jarwin the hip surgery.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Had he's the first pro football player to ever have it.

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>They're saying only hockey and basketball players who knows how

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>he reacts to hip surgery. So don't be concerned with

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the Blake Jarwin. If you're rolling up wanting to roll

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>into two with Dalton Shultz as you're tight end one,

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>he's another guy I'm liking. If you have, you fade

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the big name tight ends in your draft. All right,

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the running backs because we have it's

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be frustrating a lot of talking Ezekiel Elliott and

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard. Will this be the year that Tony Pollard

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>finally usurps? I'm done thinking that the Cowboys will do

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the right thing here because we've been asking for it

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for two years and it hasn't happened here. And we

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>all know Zeke is on the climb. But here's a

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>very very alarming stat. Elliott had fifteen carries of twenty

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>plus yards into fifteen carries of twenty or more yards

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in what year? So all the way back to rookie year. Yeah, okay,

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's three carries in that that year. But since

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>he's had seven four carries, he's only had ten carries.

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Of yards is gone, totally gone. On the other hand,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>hell yeah, average five point five yards for carry per

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus. He graded better than Elliott as a rusher, receiver,

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and pass blocker man and pass blocking was always one

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>of the big catches for him, for he was not

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a good pass block The only reason they keep giving

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Zeke more run is because they're paying him so much.

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It's all about the money. So when Pollard saw ten

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>plus opportunities last year that's carries and targets, the Cowboys

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>were nine in one. When his opportunities were in the

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>single digits. Dallas was one in five. I mean, he's

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>there in front of you is to start Tony Pollard,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully they do. That's it for Dallas. We'll take

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>a break. When you came back, we'll talk through the

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants with a new head coach, find out

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>back end. Oh yeah, and general manager and they both

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have Bill's roots. Well, we'll talk through that team in

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>just a moment. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Chargie

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson with you New York Giants. Knett coaches

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Brian Dable, who teams up with the Bill's former assistant

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>general manager Joe Sheen, who now runs the Giants as

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>their general manager. First order of business is Daniel Jones,

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like they're gonna give Jones yet another

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in a series of final opportunities to prove himself as

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>an NFL quarterback. But here's why I'm kind of intrigued.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>What if they us What if Brian Dable just runs

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>him like he ran Josh Allen? Brian, doesn't that get interesting? Now?

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones is not nearly as good of a runner,

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's not bad. He's not bad. He's not a

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>bad runner. What if they give him, well, unless he

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>runs like more right, he goes boom. What if they

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>give Daniel Jones six seven eight design runs a game? Yeah,

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean that could be good for fantasy purposes, but like,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to respect his arms as much as

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to respect Josh Allen's. Well, so I don't know,

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you might see that coming a little more, even though

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows Josh Allen's we run the ball. But I

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know I'm still soft on Jones. I'm not. I'm not.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm given where you'll have to where you'll take him,

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and he will go undrafted in many leagues. Um, he

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>will go, you know, round thirteen fifteen as my third quarterback.

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested in Daniel Jones from just that angle,

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and then if the rushing doesn't materialize, I'm just gonna

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>cut him and I don't care, I'll move. We won't

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>spend too much time on this, but I have heard

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Giants in the DeShawn Watson conversation, and they could

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe Daniel Jones would certainly be part of that trade package,

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So that would be interesting to see. All right, let's

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>go over to the too. Kenny Golladay, his absurd seventy

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>million dollar contract, just pounding the final nail in Dave

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Gettleman's career as general manager. So many nails pounded into

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>so many cuts, and he's the guy who set up

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>every one of those nails and pounded him in. Um,

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't. I remembered his season with him being hurt

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Dude played a lot. He only missed

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>three games. He was on the field for fourteen games.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>This year, and he was so bad. He did not

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>score in the fourteen games. His average game two and

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a half catches for forty five yards. That's not even

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>an average game. And in the other sense of the word, no,

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not start of receiver. He finished his wide receiver

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>hold one next to Josh Reynolds and DeAndre Carter. I

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what team DeAndre Carter is on, Washington, Washington,

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think about that for Kennedy seventy million dollars, so Holiday,

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously they he will. He will almost certainly be back

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on the team. They don't have a choice. They can't

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>even work around the contract right now. He'll be back

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Giants. He'll have to be a dramatically better

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and more improved version. But I gotta believe that there's

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a ton of wariness since it's been two

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>seasons or two full seasons removed from him having a

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>meaningful fantasy. We could do a draft of bad contracts

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC East. I think Holiday would be your first.

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Then there's this guy who would be in the conversation,

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd, who has reportedly been asked to take a

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>pay cut, which tells you plenty about the season that

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>he's coming off of. He's slated to make twelve and

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a half million this year. They can cut him and I,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>as memory serves, that will not get that'll it'll his

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>cap impact will be about half if they caught him.

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he will take the I think he will

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>end up having to renegotiate his deal. He missed half

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the season. Shepherd hasn't played a full season since. He

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>was questionable constantly. He and every Sunday you didn't know

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 1>if Sterling Shepherd was actually gonna play or not. And

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>every Sunday morning you're like, Oh, he's in, but I

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>don't trust a lot of times he was out though,

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of feel like you would play exactly. So get

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>this on Sterling Shepherd Week one, seven catches, hundred thirteen

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown. Oh yeah, you looked like the

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>steel of your draft that point, You're like game on.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>After that, his average game forty two scoreless yards. Sterling

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd didn't score again and didn't have another one hundred

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>yard game the rest of the year. Ka Darius Tony

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is the better talking point out of the wide receivers,

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but even he was frustrating. He erupted in weeks four

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and five, and if you combine those two weeks together,

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Brian sixteen catch is for two hundred sixty seven yards.

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>He looked slippery, almost unguardable after the catch, and somehow

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the Giants never went back to him again. In the

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of his games other than Week four and five,

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he averaged three catches for Tony and he never scored

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown all season. Darius Tony, Yeah, he he did

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>look special though when he was playing his hand. Now

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>he suffered a hamstring injury, a thumb injury, a shoulder injury,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>quad injury, oblique injury, and an ankle injury. He got

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:38.719
<v Speaker 1>COVID twice. So if you take all that o ay,

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you figure, if he can go through next season healthy,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>if Daniel Jones and Brian Dable can stoke up something

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>resembling an NFL passing game, Tony's got some real upside

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to him. And maybe last season with all those maladies,

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the bad play, a coaching staff that was about to

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>get fired, you know it's gonna suppress his draft value.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>You and now, if you want to go roll the

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>dice on kid Darius Tony as your wide receiver four

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in the eleventh round. You could do it. You don't

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>like having COVID prone players. We have, we've had injury prone,

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>but he's like the most COVID prone player in NFL history.

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Blue won't have any of those. Evan Ingram's headed a

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>free agency and he will be gone. He's gone. Former

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>first round pick don Sa Kwon Barkley is the last

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>guy I want to talk and Kyle Rudolph they let

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>him go, so they got a wide open uh, which

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>which is intriguing. I would see who lands there. Uh.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, Table did good stuff with Dawson Knox eventually, eventually, eventually. Yeah,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>all right, so let's talk s Kwon Barkley. UM general

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>manager Joe Shan says he's willing to trade Barkley after

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>an unproductive season last year. In the last season before that,

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Barkley slated to make seven point two million this year

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's that fifth year of your rookie deal where

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>if they lock you in, which gentleman did it this

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 1>time last year he locked in the fifth year on

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>st Kwon Barkley. Now they're obligated to pay him seven

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>point two million dollars. And now the new GM wants

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>out on that. Barkley, needless to say, had a bad season, Uh,

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in part because the offensive line's had good there right

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty first and run blocking by Pro Football Focus. But

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>even so, the explosiveness, the elusiveness. Man, I was watching

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the se Kwon Barkley highlights his front while

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I was at the combine, his combine runs his rookie year.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Dude was insane. He was so good. I will say

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this blew out his a c l in like in

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>week two. So historically they say, you know, running backs,

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>even young running backs, takes like two years to like

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>fully come back. So and when he got hurt last year,

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it was like a fluke ankle roll like he rolled,

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he like stepped on his teammates, you know, something dealt

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>with for a lot of the year. People are pegging

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>him his injury prone, not COVID prone, but injury prone.

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So I don't I think that's unfair. So I am

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>buying low Barkley's falling into like, oh, I'm sure second,

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>late second, early mid third round, and it's that high. Yeah,

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and taking him in the second round by that, But

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if he stays healthy and they improve that line,

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>which they can only improve. I think you still got

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that top. I mean he was RB one in his

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>rookie season. I think you can still get back there.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening Fantasy Football Weekly. Next week, free

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>agency is getting here soon, by the way, where you

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>have two weeks removed from free agency. Uh So, next

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>week we'll run through the a f C South the

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>notable players there. Week after that free agencies game on,

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll be talking about that so plenty more to get to.

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for continuing to listen, subscribe, rate, and review

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Talk to you in a week, everybody.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of I Heart Radio.

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen to

0:29:52.640 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows. A sight farn