WEBVTT - Tighter Chip Curbs and NY Tech Week

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hyde Bloomberg's worldtad quarters in New York, and

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Med Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 2>coming up the US.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 4>It plans titan measures against China to restrict its access

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 4>to advanced chip technology. We're going to break down the

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 4>details and the market implications.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 2>And we have the latest updates from the Israel Hamass

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>war and discuss the role social media plays in delivering

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>up to date and accurate news.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 4>Plus, we're going to kick off the coverage of New

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 4>York Tech Week as industry titans gather in the Big

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Apple for a full week of panels, events and much more.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>The top story is Bloomberg reporting expanding technology export curbs

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 2>to China in the semiconductor's space. It had a pronounced

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>impact in markets in Asia and Europe, ovin Night, also

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>in US pre market. Actually a lot of those names

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>are now markedly higher. But pay attention to the chip

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>equipment makers because that is a focus of these curves.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the specifics and bring in Bloomberg's Mackenzie Hawkins,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 2>one of the reporters on that Bloomberg exclusive and Mackenzie

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg sources are telling us these chip curbs are going

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 2>to be expanded, how so in what ways?

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 5>So these chip curbs are building on initial restrictions that

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 5>the Biden administration posed in October of last year, and

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 5>there's a couple venues for the tightening. So first, we're

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 5>going to see some additional restrictions on graphics chips sales

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 5>to Chinese companies and advanced manufacturing equipment sales to Chinese companies.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 5>And we're also going to see some tightening on potential

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 5>attempts by Chinese companies to avoid country specific restrictions by

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 5>routing their shipments through other countries. And the last thing

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 5>to keep an eye on is adding Chinese chip design

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 5>firms to a US trade restriction list that basically requires

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 5>overseas manufacturers to get a license from the US government

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 5>before filling orders from those companies.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 4>McKenzie, what prompted this tightening? Is it well the Republicans

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 4>or is it Huawei? And late more recent events that

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 4>shows that maybe some of these cubs just all working.

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 5>So the US announced as initial rule in October of

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 5>last year and took a couple of months to get

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 5>key allies, particularly the Netherlands and Japan on board, and

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 5>they've been working on a final version of that rule

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 5>for a while. So this is not to be interpreted

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 5>as a reaction to the huge tech breakthrough in China

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 5>in August when Huawei released a smartphonem powered by an

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 5>advanced chip. But that has pretty much defined the conversation

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 5>in US China tech relations in the month and a

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 5>half since, and we'll be looking to the administration to

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 5>see what actions specifically they might take on Huawei and

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 5>its chip making partner.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Snick indeed keeping a close eye on the implications, and

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 4>so too will of course, the Chinese, who have notably

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 4>said that they don't want this to be weaponized or

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 4>indeed politicized when it comes to technology and trade. Mackenzie Hawkins,

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 4>great bit of reporting, me, thank you. Let's continue the conversation.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Joanne Phoenie's with US partner and portfolio manager at Advisor's

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Capital Management, with deep knowledge expertise when it comes to

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 4>semiconductors in the landscape and ultimately, is this ever an

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 4>efficient way of trying to curtail what is ultimately an

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 4>ability to make it home really advance chips in China.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 6>It's never going to be efficient, you know, let's not

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.119
<v Speaker 6>try to guess the ultimate goals of the US policy.

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 6>One effect likely though, is that it will slow down

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 6>China's ability to deploy really advanced chips for use in

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 6>AI oriented servers.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 7>So it will slow China down now.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 6>In the meantime, though it's harmful to to the US

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 6>companies that want to sell China those chips, you know,

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 6>potentially like in video that Fortunately, we're in a period

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 6>of time when there's such strong demand for AI capabilities

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 6>in servers that even if in Vidia loses some sales

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 6>in China because of more restrictions, it will likely be

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 6>able to sell them in the United States or someplace

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 6>else in the world.

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 7>So it'll slow China down.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.239
<v Speaker 6>But the horse has really left the barn in terms

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 6>of the ability of China to ultimately produce advanced chips.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.679
<v Speaker 7>They just can't do it in a lot of volume

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 7>right now.

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 6>But ultimately, over some years, you know, they'll be able

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 6>to do this because chip technology, you know, has reached

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 6>sort of the limits mostly of Moore's law, and so

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 6>it's hard for you know, our companies to stay ahead

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 6>when all China has to do is copy what we've

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 6>done so far.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Juanne, good to see you.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>We're just showing the names actually now moving to the

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 2>upside in video and a m D on the GPU

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 2>or graphics side, and then the chip equipment makers LAMB

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 2>PLA also positive. You said that this won't slow China down,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 2>but there's a refocus on the chip equipment makers, in

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>particular with those US based companies with exposure to China.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Is this more of a concern now than it was

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>to you yesterday?

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So you know, we've been avoiding exposure to most

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 6>of the equipment guys for a while because of these

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 6>tensions with China, and so you know, our position on

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 6>that hasn't really changed. We have some selective exposure, but

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 6>not to the major players like A Lamber applied. And

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 6>I think what happened earlier, right when when China saw

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 6>this coming, you know, and saw the timing of these restrictions,

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 6>they actually imported a boatload of equipment.

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 7>So they're pretty well positioned. You know. Again, it's going

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 7>to slow them down in terms of deploying.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 6>Really high end AI based servers because they're not going

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 6>to be able to get all those chips, but they

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 6>have a lot of equipment from lithography out of you know,

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 6>the metalin from ASML to the etching machines to the

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 6>deposition machines, right so they can do an awful lot

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 6>right now with the equipment that they have. There are

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 6>always ways to get the smaller and smaller future sizes

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 6>to those more advanced chips using the older technology. It

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 6>just takes many more steps to get there. It's much

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 6>more expensive. So your question earlier ed, is it efficient.

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 6>It's not going to be efficient for China to make

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 6>these advanced chips, but they're going to be able to

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 6>make almost everything with the equipment they have except for

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 6>the most the very most advanced ships. And that's where

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 6>US policy, I think wants to be binding, and it

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 6>will be for a while until China can make further

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 6>advances in their own deployment of equipment or refinement of

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 6>the equipment that they already have in place.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's reporting that these expanded restrictions could come early this week.

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 2>For what it's worth, the US Commisces Department and National

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 2>Security Council declined to comment on the story, but a

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman called this the US politicizing, instrumentalizing,

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 2>and weaponizing trade and tech issues. Our colleague me and

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Mackenzie Hawkins pointed out that this is not sort of

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>an escalation from the US, It's a rethink of a

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>year long policy. Where do you stand on what this

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 2>is or is not the US doing?

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 6>So you're asking me to sort of put on a

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 6>policy walk head.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 7>I'll do my best. I mean, clearly, the US wants

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 7>to slow.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 6>Down China's ability to use AI and to develop AI applications,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 6>particularly in the military, and so to the extent that

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 6>the US can succeed in that by restricting their access

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 6>to these most advanced chips and the equipment to make

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 6>the most advanced chips, the US will be successful. It's

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 6>not the first time that trade policy has been used

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 6>for things other than you know, tamping down illegal trade.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, clearly this is a political objective, not an

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 6>unfair trade practices response, and so you know, it's certainly

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 6>not something that's probably authorized under WTO rules. Nevertheless, under

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 6>national security reasons, clearly the US is pursuing the strategy

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 6>and it will be effective. It'll just slow China down.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 6>But as many have been saying, we have also it's

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 6>only going to accelerate China's own investments in developing their

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 6>own capabilities. Now, we think they're a long way off

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 6>from being able to replicate what ASML has done or.

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 7>What WEAM has done.

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 6>But again by repeating the processes that the intels and

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.239
<v Speaker 6>ibms and global founderies and tsmcs of the world used,

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 6>SMICK can get to pretty close to some of the

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 6>most advanced chips, as they've shown in that Huawei chip

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 6>for example.

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Joan, we ask you sometimes to put a policy hat on,

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 4>and to that point, do you try and take that

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 4>policy hat off when it comes to actually having exposure

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 4>to such companies? He said, how you've limited your exposure

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 4>to chip equipment makers because of some of the issues

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 4>with US and China. Well, what about an Nvidia that

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>at the moment can sacrifice Chinese sales? But ultimately do

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 4>you want to be out of companies that have such

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 4>exposure to China?

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 6>No, so right, So the investor hat, the portfolio manager hat,

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 6>requires that you look at policy.

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 7>Obviously, you need.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 6>To handle have a little bit what is going to

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 6>be in the US interests, what they're going to try

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 6>to do, as well as sort of the economic outlook.

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 6>So you know, at ACM, at Advisor's Capital, what we

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 6>do is both the top down macro and political situation,

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 6>and we then build up the bottom up analysis of

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 6>companies by companies.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 7>So in video is a great example, they have so.

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 6>Many different opportunities because demand is so strong right now

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 6>for AI capabilities in servers that.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 7>We think if they lose a little bit from China,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 7>they'll be able to make it up elsewhere. It looks

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 7>to us like.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 6>They have kind of a waiting list, if you like,

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 6>of companies that would like their most advanced chips. So

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, China could potentially hurt in the longer run

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 6>if China is able to replicate the level and quality

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 6>of chip that Invidia could otherwise supply. But if they can't,

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 6>and we don't think they'll be able to do that

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 6>for some years, China's going to have to be satisfied

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 6>with lower end graphics chips out of the likes of

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 6>Nvidia and amb So ultimately we don't think there's going

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 6>to be a big shift in spending by China, They're

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 6>going to have to be satisfied with lesser chips, even

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 6>more so than they were.

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 7>After last Octobers a level of.

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 6>Restrictions and Video will be able to sell again more

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 6>of its ultimately higher endships to US and European and

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 6>other Southeast Asian customers.

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 2>To FOMI partner and portfolio manager and advisors capital management,

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 2>but also just long, long time.

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Researcher in the field of semiconductors. Thank you.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of and sticking with chips in Video's H one

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred GPU has been one of the technology stories of

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 2>the year. Before the Israel hamass war broke out. The

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 2>chip giant had planned on holding its AI summit today

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 2>in Tel Aviv, with insight into its AI strategy expected,

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 2>but then canceled the event. Bloomberg Technology visited in VideA

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and took a look at what the H one hundred

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 2>GPU used to train AI models looks like in the

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>real world. This is an individual H one hundred GPU

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>or graphics processing unit in Videa's AI accelerator, but in

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 2>reality it's not just a chip that comes out of

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>a plant. When we talk about the H one hundred

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 2>GPUs training AI models. We're likely talking about dgxh one hundred,

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia's AI supercomputer. That's eight h one hundred GPUs combined,

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 2>capable of thirty two quadrillion floating point operations per second,

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 2>crazy computer performance. It's a server design, and this is

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 2>what it looks like under the lid. It starts with

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>an h one hundred GPU seen here in the form

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 2>of an SXM module. Eight individual sxms are topped with

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 2>heat six, designed to dissipate heat generated from running big

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>AI workloads. Those are connected on a single baseboard by interconnectors,

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>and that assembly alone weighs sixty pounds. Add CPUs and

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>other components, and a finished DGX system weighs almost three

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred pounds. But the scale in the real world is

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 2>bigger still. Some of the most powerful large language models

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>are trained on the Nvidia DGX super Pod, that is

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty two DGX eight one hundred systems combined into what's

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 2>called a scalable unit. At its absolute most mind modeling scale,

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 2>DGX Superpod can be up to sixty four scalable units.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 2>That's more than sixteen thousand individual h one hundred GPUs

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 2>an AI company may use several superpods to train their LLLM.

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 2>In the end, the DGX infrastructure sent out to the

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 2>hyperscale cloud providers to put in their massive data centers.

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to get my hands on an H one

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred Caroline, but it isn't just this little chip. That's

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 2>the reality of what we're talking about.

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 8>You happen to do squatz squats to be able.

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 2>To I just wanted to demonstrate that in the real

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>world sometimes you have to deadlift what we're talking about.

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 2>And I've already got a lot of flak for that

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 2>on the show, but check it out online. Really interesting

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 2>experience going down to Nvidia.

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 4>It's a great piece to just digest really what is

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 4>behind technology. We thank you for it. Meanwhile, coming up,

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 4>we are going to get serious and turn our attention

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 4>back to the latest in Israel and Hamas the war

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 4>and discuss the wall of social media during the times

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 4>of isis One. Next this is Bloombog technology.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Mid ongoing war between Israel and Hamas. President Biden is

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 2>weighing a visit to nation. Want to get more in

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the latest from the ground of bringing Bloomberg's Oliver Crook,

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 2>who's life for us in Tel Aviv. Biden's visit largely

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 2>speculative at this point. There are other leaders both from

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>North America and the EU coming to town.

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>What is the latest on the ground, Oliver.

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so let's talk for us about the military action.

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 9>Over the weekend, we got sort of confirmation from something

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 9>that we've widely anticipated, but basically Israel saying that the

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 9>next stage of this war is going to involve a

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 9>ground operation of some kind, and that was sort of

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 9>confirmed over the weekend. Their focus right now has been

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 9>on the aerial assault. They have been absolutely pummeling Gaza

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 9>for at least the last week. They've had a few

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 9>evacuation passages a few hours where they say they're not

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 9>going to bomb major arteries so that people can move south.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 9>We had one today, yesterday and on Saturday as well.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 9>And the main question on the ground there is a

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 9>question of AID. There is AID that is not really

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 9>being able to get through. There have been speculation all

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 9>day and reports about potentially AID being able to move

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 9>through the Egyptian border at the checkpoint at Rafa, but

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 9>that has not been.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 7>Confirmed by US.

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 9>In terms of the diplomacy side, yes, we're expecting all

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 9>Off Schultz, the German Chancellor, to arrive tomorrow, and whether

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 9>or not Biden comes, you know, to try to again

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 9>as a sort of deterrent, but also to show the

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 9>support of the United States for Israel, which has been

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 9>fairly vocal at this point.

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, I mean, you bring our attention to the human cost, Oliver,

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 4>and we appreciate it. Just talk to us about the

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 4>timing and time running out. According to Iran, at least

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Auran's foreign minister really talking about and if we're going

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 4>to avoid some sort of expungeon to the conflict.

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so this has been we've been hearing from Iran

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 9>kind of on the sidelines of this for the last

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 9>few days. On Friday was sort of the first kind

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 9>of ominous threat. And then we had the other foreign

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 9>ministries today saying that the time for the political the

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 9>political solution is running out and the expansion of the

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 9>war to other fronts approaching is inevitable, they said in

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 9>on An X And again, this is part of the

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 9>whole reason that Lincoln has been going to uh Qatar,

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 9>the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain. This is where he

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 9>has been because it's in one side to get sort

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 9>of the back channels communicating with Tehran, but also deterrence.

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 9>We also have a second aircraft carrier fleet that is

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 9>coming to the Eastern Mediterranean. This is all about trying

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 9>to provoke that sort of deterrence. But it's not just Iran,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 9>right So, just in the same way that the Israelis

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 9>saw all of the horror on their phones, they were

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 9>glued to it, the rest of the Arab world is

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 9>seeing the exact same thing on what's going on in

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 9>Gaza right now. And you've had protesters through the streets

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 9>throughout this process.

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 4>II thank you so much for most Oliver Krook there

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 4>with an latest on the ground from Tel Aviv, But

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean lot of it just painted the picture there

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 4>of how much everyone has turned to social media in

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 4>this moment, and indeed, well the Uranian foreign minister actually

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 4>posting on x You want to understand really how people

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 4>are using social media and what they should be looking

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 4>at if at all nor A Benavidez is with us

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 4>just free press and or are You're a senior counsel,

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 4>your director of Digital Justice and civil rights, and really

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 4>you run the organization's platform accountability, the digital civil rights

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 4>work there and how accountable ultimately are x, Meta, TikTok, Town,

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 4>and bike Dance. How much are they looking for this

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 4>moment of responsible nurturing of what's being put onto the

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 4>platforms right now?

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, thanks for having me, both of you. You know,

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 10>most of the major platforms have really failed the massive

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 10>stress test over the last week and a half. In particular,

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 10>Twitter or x now has created the perfect environment for

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 10>disinformation to thrive. And as your colleagues mentioned, people are

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 10>turning to social media now more than ever as their

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 10>primary way of getting rapid information. Most of us are

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 10>hungry to figure out what's going on on the ground

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 10>and whether it's family members, journalists, or others returning to

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 10>these platforms only to be met with a deluge of

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 10>mislabeled videos, images that are taken from other time places, regions,

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 10>et cetera. Ultimately, Elon Musk has shown that Twitter has failed,

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 10>I think with a kind of grandeur. You know, his

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 10>bad decisions have literally led us to this moment. He

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 10>gutted critical teams as other platforms have, like Meta and

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 10>TikTok and YouTube.

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 11>Elon Musk has also changed the blue check.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 10>Mark feature, which is in the scheme of all of

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 10>these swirling forces.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 11>One of the really big problems.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 10>It incentivizes people to now subscribe and they pay us

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 10>small fee, but their content gets boosted. So if you're

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 10>willing to pay that eight dollars, your content might be

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 10>featured in more people's feeds. He also needs add money

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 10>because advertisers have been fleeing the platform for a lot

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 10>of these reasons, and one of his incentives has been

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 10>to pay people for engagement and virality.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's crazy, Naura Nora. Just for our audience.

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 2>X's response to this has been to basically call an

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 2>all hands on deck situation. They've told us here on

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Limo Technology that all staff are focused on the Israel

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 2>hamass war. They've given us data on community notes action,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and for Meta's part, they have a special operations team

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 2>in place now with fluent Hebrew and Arabic speakers that

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 2>are basically working twenty four to seven to review content.

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 2>But at issue specifically seems to be video content, videos

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>purporting to show one thing when in reality they are another.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>What is your view on the role video is playing here?

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 11>Video is one of the last frontiers.

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 10>It's really very difficult to moderate video content, and frankly,

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 10>Elon Musk pointing to community notes as a way for

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 10>users to do his job is inadequate. It's also inadequate

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 10>that a week and a half after the conflict escalated,

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 10>now is the moment that social media companies are pulling

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 10>their rapid crisis centers together.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 11>That is days and days too late.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 10>Citing to the ability to remove hundreds of thousands of

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 10>posts is also inadequate, because we have to understand the

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 10>environment here is there are millions and millions of posts

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 10>going out every day about this subject, and billions of

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 10>active monthly users trying to get that content, and so

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 10>the lack of teams, the lack of policies in place,

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 10>the slow to respond crisis centers are just not enough

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 10>to rain in the level of toxicity.

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, Nora Benavidez a free Press thank you for

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 2>your time here on the show. This is Talking Tech

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 2>First up kPr raising seven hundred and twenty three million

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars in Japan's largest listing in nearly five years, that

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 2>of chip equipment maker Kokutse Electric Shares a expence to

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 2>begin trading on October twenty fifth, plus Indonesia's biggest tech firm,

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 2>go To, plunged it's most on record earlier today after

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>revelations of a stock sale by a co founder, which

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 2>ignited a selloff, but go To recovered after anlis argued

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the selloff was overdone and not some more supported by

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Fundamental School.

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology. I'm Caroline Hid in New.

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 2>York, Meed Lovelow in San Francisco, Cara A very quick

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 2>check in on the market. So we started the week

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 2>with the NASDA one hundred higher fi percentage point. Remember

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 2>we're coming off three straight weekly gains on the NAZAQ

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 2>one hundred amid all of the volatility of global markets,

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 2>worries about China's economy. We're ahead of earning season, but

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 2>two of those weeks we notched again of just like

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 2>a tenth of one percent, and that's inclusive of the

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 2>IPO window that we had, which hasn't done much to

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 2>give us sort of that much momentum to the upside.

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>This week's big a lot of FED speak.

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>We get China g GDP reading on Wednesday, but there

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 2>is a growing list of factors and if you read

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>that story about on the Bloomberg. A lot of hope

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 2>pinning on those big five megacap tech names this earning

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>season in terms of owning's growth to bring that positive

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>story back to tech, but also tech continuing to lead

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the way amid a broader market that's kind of not

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 2>sure where it stands.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 4>And that's in the public markets. Of course, this all

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 4>feeds into the private markets as well, and we're going

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 4>to be talking about both right here in New York

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 4>because it's Tech Week upon us officially kicking off in

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 4>the Big Apple with industry titans, startups gathering well basically

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 4>throughout the entire week for events, there's can be panels, conversations, breakfast,

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 4>much more, a week on blueing bog technology. Look, we're

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 4>going to be speaking with those founders, with those investors,

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 4>with those executives to discuss the tech ecosystem here in

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 4>New York City and why they choose to call it

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 4>home NYC. I please to say we're now joined by

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 4>two key players when it comes to investing in the area.

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 4>David Haber, General Partner Andrews and Horowitz, who focuses on

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>technology investments, particularly in financial services, and Julie You and

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 4>general partner in the bio and health team at Andrewson,

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 4>who needs investments in companies that are transforming how we access, pay,

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 4>and experience healthcare, a lot of which is an epicenter

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 4>here in New York. And David, I start with you,

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 4>because what do you see at the moment in New

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 4>York that is making more people put boots on the ground,

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 4>particularly Andrews and what You've got eighty plus New York

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 4>based employees, now you've got new office space.

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely why Yeah. Look, I've always believed that opportunities live

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 12>between fields of expertise, and I really enjoy exploring those intersections.

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 12>And I think it really is a metaphor for New

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 12>York City because technology has a tendency of cunning across industries,

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 12>and I think the companies that really represent New York

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 12>best are those really live at the intersection between technology

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 12>and many of the large incoming industries that exist here

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 12>in New York, whether that's media, advertising, fashion, or financial services.

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 4>And indeed healthcare. And it's interesting, Julie, that's the area

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 4>that you focus on, and how much are you seeing

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 4>that health is becoming some of the deals the checks

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 4>the VC count that so we're currently seeing a chart

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 4>just showing that about four hundred and three in the

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 4>third quarter is how many per metro area we've seen

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 4>the share of us VC deals, the count that is

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 4>in New York. How much of that as healthcare and

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 4>how much should it be?

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, I mean healthcare in many ways. When I started

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 3>investing here at the firm about four years ago, I

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 3>sort of likened it to the nineteen ninety nine of

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 3>the Internet era, and so I feel like we're really

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning of a dawn of this new digital

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 3>health era in domain.

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 13>And to David's point.

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe a little known fact about the New

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 3>York tech scene is that, whereas most people think about

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 3>fintech is really the biggest sort of cohort of startups

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 3>and venture capital activity, it turns out that depending on

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 3>what charge do you look at, health tech is also

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 3>number one or number two within the New York tech

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 3>scene as well, because of the incumbency. In the same

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 3>way that we have financial services, bank companies and such

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.719
<v Speaker 3>in the New York scene, we also have tremendously huge

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 3>healthcare companies, whether they be insurance companies, whether they be

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 3>biopharmaceutical companies, whether they be hospital systems also based in

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 3>that city, and it creates a really unique ecosystem for innovation,

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 3>and so we've really seen a ton of activity in

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:30.479
<v Speaker 3>recent years in that domain.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Julia, let's show that chart again, which is deal count

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 2>right in San Francisco or the Silicon Valley area has

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of led historically from a deal count even dollar

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 2>volume perspective. But if you extrapolate back, the gap in

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 2>terms of deal count and dollar volume is closing between

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 2>New York and San Francisco.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>What does that tell you?

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely.

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 3>This is one of the reasons that we've invested so

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 3>heavily in the New York tech scene is that healthcare

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 3>in particular has really seen a rise there. One of

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the feces that we have about why that's the case

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 3>is that we have this concept of what's called a

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 3>digital health native founder, someone who has actually grown up

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 3>in digital health companies that have been quite successful and

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 3>are now coming out and starting their own businesses and

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 3>really seeding the next generation of entrepreneurs. And many of

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>those companies, most of those companies, in fact, have actually

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 3>been based in New York. So we have the legs

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 3>of companies like Oscar Health, which is a publicly traded

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 3>insure tech business that has now spawned a number of

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.479
<v Speaker 3>entrepreneurs that we've backed that have again grown up in

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 3>a company that sits at the intersection of healthcare, technology

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 3>and financial services and can now take those skills into

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 3>the next wave of companies that are being built.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 2>David, the story in San Francisco Bay Area Silicon Valley

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 2>is well told, right, you have the Stanford Computer science

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 2>drop out and they start a company here because the

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 2>funding was here and the like minded people were here.

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And in some.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Sense that's still true, right, We talk about it on

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the show all the time.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>What is the equivalent story in New York?

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 12>Look, as I said, I think New York is such

0:25:57.920 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 12>a unique ecosystem.

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 8>I joined.

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 12>I first moved to New York City in two thousand

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 12>and nine in the wake of the financial crisis, you know,

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 12>and at the time, technology was sort of this cute

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 12>little underdog industry again in the shadows of you know,

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 12>many of the large kind of incoming industries here in

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 12>New York. As I mentioned, you know, bea media, you know, advertising,

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 12>you know, fashion, or financial services. And again, I think

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 12>the companies that are really sort of indicative of this

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 12>ecosystem are those that sort of intersect with those in industries.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 12>You know, obviously I'm quite biased, but fintech is you know,

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 12>a huge presence here in New York and it's really

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 12>a great place to become sort of bridge between the

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 12>startup ecosystem and a lot of these you know, decision

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 12>makers at a lot of these large companies.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 4>The reason, perhaps, David, that your bio hasaw that you

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 4>might say, is because you were a founder. Of course,

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Bond Street was brought by Goldman. It was all about

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 4>sort of growth financing to businesses. What is the financing

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 4>like right now for entrepreneurs who want to go and

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 4>build things, who want to be ensuring that they're bringing

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 4>together the large caps meet the startup ecosystem? Are you

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 4>writing checks? Is the see community energize right now to

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 4>write checks?

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely?

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 12>Again, just for context, you know, I joined in dres

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 12>and Horowitz in July twenty twenty one really to help

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 12>plant the flag here in New York City. At the time,

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 12>we were six people in New York. Today were over

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 12>eighty people in New York, which makes us likely one

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.719
<v Speaker 12>of the largest venture capital firms at least by headcount

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 12>here in New York City. So you know, we're incredibly

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 12>excited to be here and to be writing you know,

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 12>checks into the entrepreneurs in this ecosystem. And again we've

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 12>seen a lot of other large firms join, you know,

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 12>open up offices in New York in the last twelve months.

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 12>And so while the markets are challenging, I think there's

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 12>plenty of capital available for entrepreneurs starting new companies.

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Julie, You're academic background MIT both as an undergrad and

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>then have an MIT for masters. I believe how closely

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 2>as an expanded group of partners in New York City

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 2>in the East Coast do you track the academic basis

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 2>that talent can come from. You know, there's a lot

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>of emphasis here obviously on Stanford and Berkeley. Is there

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the same pool of talent being generationally created each year

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 2>out of the East Coast?

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely?

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think when you look at our portfolio,

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 3>roughly about half of our biown health portfolio is based

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 3>somewhere on the East Coast, whether it be in the

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Boston ecosystem largely biotech focused there. And then the majority

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 3>of my personal portfolio is actually based in New York

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 3>and hence I spend a ton of time there with

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 3>my partner David on companies that really sit at the

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 3>intersection actually of healthcare and fintech, where we see a

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 3>huge amount of opportunity. I think the other piece of

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 3>this David mentioned that he is a recovering fintech entrepreneur.

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm also a way of recovering health tech entrepreneur, and

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.239
<v Speaker 3>that's really where we see a huge advantage for our

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 3>team in that we have all been ex builders in

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 3>these domains, and really that's I would say probably more

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 3>where we focus is where the pools of talent that

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 3>have actually built businesses that are native to different industries

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 3>that can now come together and see these unique opportunities

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 3>at those intersections.

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Of course, you were only member of a software engineering

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 4>team that was eventually acquired by Oracle, so you know

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 4>how the exit route tends to look like, Julie, and

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested as to whether or not it's more diversity

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the founders that you see in New York.

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's always been this concern that you know,

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 4>when we are seeing it from the same pool of

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:10.959
<v Speaker 4>Mit and Harvard as you two sit in front of us,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 4>as there has been within that ecosystem not always as

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 4>much diversity as you'd like to see in terms of

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 4>people of color, women coming forward with businesses ideas.

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 8>How does that look at New York?

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think New York has always been a huge

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 3>exemplary sort of diversity pool in many ways, whether it

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 3>be culturally, whether it be based on background, and more importantly,

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 3>as we've talked about, in terms of the actual experience

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 3>set that founders are able to bring to this next

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 3>wave of startups. So we absolutely do see that in

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 3>the New York scene.

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 2>David, tell me what New York Tech Week looks like

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 2>for you. How many hackathons are you going to, how

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 2>many mixes, what kind of events? Seriously, that's what's going

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>on out here on the West coast. What's it like

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 2>on the East coast.

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we're really incredibly exciting to be here. You know,

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 12>as I mentioned in Reason has been hosting these tech

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 12>weeks in cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles. York City,

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 12>New York Tech Week stands to be our largest event ever.

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 12>We have three hundred and fifty different events hosted not

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 12>only by our firm, but by folks across the tech ecosystem,

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 12>which again, I think speaks to how dynamic this ecosystem

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 12>has become. So we're kicking things off with an event tonight,

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 12>which we're really excited about. And then Julie and I

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 12>are hosting an event again at the intersection of healthcare

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 12>and fintech and really excited to host you know a

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 12>number of entrepreneurs building at that intersection and I love it.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 4>David Haber, Julieu, thank you as your well Social Endeavors

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 4>pick up a please for this particular wig. We thank

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 4>you both from Andrews and Horowitz. And what else we've

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 4>got coming up.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, digesting recovering fintech entrepreneur, recovering health tech founder. What's

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 2>said about but coming up on the show talking targeted

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 2>advertising on your social media feeds and how it isn't

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>likely to change anytime soon. We're going to discuss this

0:30:52.600 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 2>is bloomber technology.

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 4>We want to do a bit of a deep dive on, well,

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 4>a certain business model at play at the moment, the

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 4>economics of zero ad versions on mainstream social media services.

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 4>They're not particularly likely to appeal to tech companies or

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 4>indeed their users.

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>It would seem.

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, targeted advertising it totally revolutionized the media business. May Meta,

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 4>for example, one of the most valuable companies in the world,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 4>A very own Bloomberg Max Chafkin writes in Today's Bloomberg

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Business Week, all about the pros and the cons You

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 4>join us now, and basically, why will they be ultimately

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 4>such a push against this unless they're regulated that way?

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 14>So, the big reason that this model is popular is

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 14>that it's extremely lucrative. Facebook Meta has built a very

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 14>large a business that generates more than one hundred billion

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 14>dollars a year serving these targeted ads to people. It

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 14>has a lot of power or over retailers anyone wants

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 14>to show sell products on the Internet, as well as

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 14>media companies because it's amassed this huge database essentially of

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 14>personal information about people that it can then rent to

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 14>third parties.

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 8>And in Europe right now, we have regulators pushing.

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 14>Back against aspects of that model, and metas sort of

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 14>turning around saying, well, Okay, if you don't like it,

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 14>you can pay us for Facebook and Instagram, pay us

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 14>a relatively high monthly price. It looks like they're talking

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 14>somewhere in the neighborhood of twenty dollars a month and

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 14>you'll see no ads at all, which you know, I

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 14>would guess that very few people will actually be willing

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 14>to pay for because you're talking about a price, you know,

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 14>that costs more than some wireless plans obviously costs more

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 14>than a lot of newspapers, Disney plus Netflix and so on.

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 8>It's a lot of money for social media.

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 4>It is, and it's also a lot of money for

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 4>people who don't make as money as others. And in

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 4>some way then means someone who is well has more

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 4>money to spend becomes able to pay for more privacy,

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 4>and that doesn't seem particularly fast.

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 14>So this is an argument that Mark Zuckerberg, under of

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 14>Facebook and Meta, has long used as an argument against this,

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 14>saying that it would be unfair, be unequal to allow

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 14>people to sort of buy their way out of ads.

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 8>What happened, you know?

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 14>Twenty eighteen, Europe passes the GDPR, this big privacy regulation,

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 14>and basically Facebook has been fighting.

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 8>Ever since over exactly how it.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:20.959
<v Speaker 14>Applies the company, and now this is kind of their

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 14>latest gambit to make the regulators happy. Yet to be

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 14>seen where the regulators will definitely sign off on this plane,

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 14>although it's looking certainly possible if not likely.

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Max, Let's look at the proposed subscription costs Facebook and

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Instagram versus everything else.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>There it is twenty bucks.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I pay for X premium for example, eight dollars a

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 2>month or eighty four dollars a year, depending how you

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 2>look at it. And I did that because I wanted

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.959
<v Speaker 2>to experience those additional features. But beyond price, what this

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.479
<v Speaker 2>chart illustrates is choice. Right, at some point, you're just

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 2>going to say this is a platform be it Facebook

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 2>or Instagram, that I don't need to have.

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, although the thing is you're not going to have

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 14>to make that choice, and that's the whole point of this,

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 14>because you will be allowed to continue looking at your

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 14>personalized ads. And I think that's the bet here from

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 14>from Mark Zuckerberg's standpoint that you know, most people are

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 14>going to look at twenty dollars and say, you know,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 14>heck no, I don't want to pay for that, and

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 14>they'll stay in the in the personalized advertising scheme, which

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 14>generates a ton of money. So the you know, average

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 14>revenue per user in the United States for Facebook is

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 14>something like two hundred more than two hundred dollars a year,

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 14>so they're totally happy to have you continue to experience

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 14>this free social network and for them to have you know,

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 14>a near monopoly or a doopoly, depending on how you

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 14>think about it.

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 8>On social ads, you know, on the internet.

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 2>The buzzword right now in tech across both social media

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 2>and a guess e commerce's personalization and meta's whole thing

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 2>has been taking data to make sure that what you

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 2>look at is relevant to you. How does a premium

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 2>subscription to impact that, Well, what.

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 14>They'll say is that you know, if you if you pay,

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 14>if you have no ads whatsoever, then it would be fine. Right,

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 14>You're still going to see the personalized feed you know,

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 14>your friends and and things that you're interested in. You

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 14>will no longer see personalized ads, which you know if

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 14>if you're talking to like their ad sales people. That

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 14>would be a huge problem for most people, it's probably

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 14>no big deal. The thing that they're really fighting against

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.439
<v Speaker 14>would be some kind of rule that would prevent them

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 14>or allow people to opt out of personalization, or make

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 14>it easy to opt out of personalization, because then they

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 14>would just have to serve you ads you know, based

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 14>on you know, your location or whatever. Some essentially use context,

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 14>like the way that Google does to serve you ads

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 14>rather than serving ads based on things it knows about you,

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 14>which from their point of view would be bad and

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 14>I think would certainly be less lucrative.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Ultimately, I mean, you can in some way pay for

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 4>what a blue take subscription subscription, I don't think it

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 4>seemed a subscription, but to be in some way anointed

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 4>someone that should be listened to on Meta and Facebook

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 4>in the same way that Twitter does a little bit.

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 4>But I think you actually have to take some bookses

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 4>and actually whether you're someone who needs to have that

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 4>privacy and needs to have it said that you are

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 4>whom you say you are and pay for it. So

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 4>how is that thing going that sort of whole experiment

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 4>the start.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 8>So and we.

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 14>Should say this is something that not just Meta is

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 14>playing with. TikTok is testing sort of paid paid experiences

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 14>with fewer ads or no ads. Snapchat has a no

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 14>ads paid experience that's piloting, and Twitter, of course x

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 14>has this you know, much vaunted blue.

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 8>Check system and might go to three. You don't level

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 8>and exactly.

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 14>And Linda Acarino is signal there's going to be a

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.240
<v Speaker 14>higher tier, you know, as EDG just said, the current

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 14>subscription costs between eight and eleven dollars, depending on where

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.439
<v Speaker 14>you buy it. You know, maybe the new one will

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 14>cost twenty dollars or something like that. For no ads,

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 14>we should say none of these have done very well.

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 14>Elon Musk has relentlessly promoted you know, this subscription thing.

0:36:56.239 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 14>We're talking about a tiny percentage of Twitter X's audio,

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 14>you know, a revenue stream that in no way replaces

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 14>the kind of revenue they were able to achieve from advertising.

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 14>I mean, the problem here isn't necessarily that people don't want,

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 14>you know, ad free experiences or premium social network experiences.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.720
<v Speaker 14>It's that online advertising is a much much better business

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 14>than that, and so companies that are looking to, you know,

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 14>change their business model would be giving up huge sums

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 14>of revenue, which something maybe Elon Musk can do, you know,

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 14>private company, and he's Elon Musk, but it's.

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 8>Going to be a lot harder for most public companies

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 8>to pull off.

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 13>All right.

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business Feed columnist Max Chafkin with the breakdown, Thank you.

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Apple's iPhone fifteen may not be as hot a commodity

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 2>on the smartphone market, at least in China. Data from

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Counterpoint Research estimates the iPhone fifteen sales are down nearbly

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 2>five percent compared to the iPhone fourteen after the first

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 2>seventeen days post release. However, the data does lump of

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 2>those phone fifteen models together in aggregate, joining us who

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 2>else Bloomberg's Mark Gum and chief correspondent Mark It's an

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 2>interesting data point because it's kind of counted to the

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 2>commentary that Apple gave us in earnings to the end

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 2>of the June quarter, right iPhone would accelerate.

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>We thought the iPhone fifteen be a hit. What have

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we learned?

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, these are a couple interesting data points.

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 15>They're pointing towards the iPhone potentially going down double digits

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 15>in recent weeks in terms of.

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 13>Sales in mainland China.

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.479
<v Speaker 15>Now, the June quarter was very strong for Apple and China,

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 15>one of their strongest in the company's history. But there's

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 15>been a few things that happened since then. There was

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 15>the launch of the Walway, the new mate phone. There

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 15>there was discussion of some government agencies banning the use

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 15>or expanding the banning of use of iPhones. There there

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 15>were some concerns around nationalism and potentially some consumers in

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 15>China souring on the iPhone.

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 13>Ahead of that launch.

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.439
<v Speaker 15>We saw when the new iPhone fifteens went on sale

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 15>in China that there was a tremendous amount of early

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 15>demand the credible lines for the iPhone fifteen in China.

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:04.320
<v Speaker 13>So these are two data points.

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 15>We won't necessarily know for sure what's going on with

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 15>the iPhone, not even this earning cycle. Right Apple reports

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 15>fourth quarter earnings November two. We're not going to get

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 15>a full picture of how the iPhone is doing in

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 15>China the latest model until the end of January or

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 15>early February when they report Q one sales. Obviously, the

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 15>fourth quarter only had about a week and a half

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 15>or so of iPhone sales, so we have to take

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 15>all these data points into consideration, probably have to wait

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 15>a few months to know the real story, but certainly

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 15>I am tending to believe that there is some decline.

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 13>There on the iPhone in China.

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 15>The good news is as you're seeing a tremendous increase

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 15>for the iPhone momentum in the United States and elsewhere,

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 15>so you're probably going to get a bit of an

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 15>offset there from going down in one country and significantly

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 15>up in the other.

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 4>And talk to us therefore about the US and the

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 4>executive team that they have based here, Mark, because you

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 4>wrote over the weekend that actually, well, amid sort of

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 4>these pushes and pulls glob there has been some more

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 4>elevated titles in VP land at least.

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, that's right.

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 15>So Apple obviously is run by Tim Cook, and under

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 15>him is what's called the ET. That's the executive team.

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 15>That's about eleven senior vice presidents. That's your head of hardware,

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 15>head of software, hed illegal, CFO, etc. But below all

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 15>of those people is a group called the top one hundred, right,

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 15>that is their vice presidents. The top one hundred actually

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 15>includes all of those people, but you have about one

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 15>hundred vps below them. They do promotions every October. They

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 15>lost about a dozen vice presidents over the last two

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 15>years or so, and so they're sort of refueling those ranks.

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 13>There's new vps for retail.

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 15>Actually three women have been elevated to the vice president

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 15>level in the retail organization, which is pretty significant for

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 15>the company in terms of the diversity efforts and putting

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 15>new lieutenants under their head of retail. There there are

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 15>new vice presidents in Operations, Product operations and product manufacturing,

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 15>and a few new vice presidents in software engineering, so

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 15>pretty significant elevations across the board at the company, sort

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 15>of creating this new generation of top executives at the Firm's.

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Mart Bogerman always with the best breakdown. We thank you

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 4>so much. Meanwhile, look, and that does it for this

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 4>edition of Bluebot Technology.

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, big thank you to those of you listening to

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the podcast. You can get it on all the bluebo platforms, Apple, Iheartspotify,

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 2>and we're also posting the show to YouTube from SF

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 2>in New York City.

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>This has been Bot Technology