WEBVTT - Computer, Mathematical Workers Remain at Home

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. A lot to get through,

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Tim and I just talking about Michelle A. Cortez who's

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>got this story about the world may never reach herd

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>immunity against COVID. Meantime, New York cities, museums and cultural

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>institutions they're going to require visitors and staff to be vaccinated.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>We got that from Mayor Bill de Blasio. Uh. And

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>then we've got fives from BioNTech saying they have submitted

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>tim phase one trial data to the US FDA for

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>third dose of their COVID nineteen vaccine. There's a lot

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>still going on. Yeah, they're showing that a third dose

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccine led to higher levels of protective antibodies

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>when given eight to nine months after the original regiment.

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's get right to it with Dr Tom McGinn, executive

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>vice president at Common Spirit Health. Common Spirit Health has

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred forty hospitals and more than one thousand care

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>sites across twenty one different states. Dr McGinn, it's it's

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>great to have you on the show. Give us an

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>update about what you're seeing in Common Spirit Health hospitals

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. What's what's what's the what's the view on

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Thanks Tim, and thanks Charlos, thanks for having

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>us having me on. Well, the view on the ground

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is that we are seeing as no actual you know,

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>new news to you is that we're seeing a resurgence

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in our hospitals in almost every market now. Uh. You know,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>it was isolated, you know, in some of our regions

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>in the Southeast and Texas, but now we're seeing it

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Northwest. Our hospitals are reaching you know, some

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>some real critical moments, but I think we're managing it well.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>But we're now seeing pockets in California, in all of

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the southeast in all of the Texas area, and now

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing it in the Pacific Northwest. So you know,

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we are controlling it, we're managing it, we're you know,

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we're a lot more nimble. We have a lot more

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>algorithms and treatments that we can offer folks as they

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>come to the hospital. This is fundamentally a hospitalization of

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the unvaccinated. While about ten percent are vaccinated, many of

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>those folks are folks with underlying medical conditions and things

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to that effect. So really, what we're seeing in the

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>severe cases is a resurgence across the board of the unvaccinated.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>So let me make sure we have this right because

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>data is really important here. Of the hospitalization is roughly

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're seeing in your hospitals across the country. Those

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>are people who have not been vaccinated approximately. I mean,

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it could vary from seven to fifteen or seven to

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent, But fundamentally, I just said, let's for simplicity sake,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say, are they younger, are they older? Who are they?

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>What are the demographics? Well, you know they are the

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>hospitalization rates are much higher. The numbers are a little tricky.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing an uptick from baseline of the young folks,

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it's increase of those getting hospitalized who are young in children,

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>but however, the baseline was very low. Still, the vast

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>majority of folks are older. Um many of them are,

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, with chronic illnesses, the diabetes, the hypertension, all

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the things that we learned. I was in New York

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for the beginning of this phase of the pandemic and

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of work on the early predictors of

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>who would have severe COVID. So it's that story still

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>plays itself out. What we're seeing is an uptick of

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>hospitalizations among young people, no question. We spoke earlier about

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that vaccines still aren't available as we go

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>back to school around the country to people who are

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>under the age of twelve, what's what's the best way

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>for those young kids to stay safe, the best way

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>for parents to think about risk factors and are we

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing different data play out with younger people under the

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>age of twelves. We can't be vaccinated, so you know,

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the real challenge. I I heard you speak earlier,

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm in agreement that we need to get the

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>kids back in the schools and I'm working with several

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>schools across the country, and I think we need to

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>just good old fashion and now what we call old

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>fashioned methods of mask wearing, social distancing, um, you know, handwashing,

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>all the things that we did uh early in that pandemic.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But having kids in the classroom, I think that you know,

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we can get through this if we continue to follow

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the basic rules of engagement around mask wearing, that that

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>really is going to be the key to success as

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we go back into schools. I think as you and

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I talked about this, and as a primary care physician,

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I can see the stress, the anxiety, and all the

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>issues that we're creating by not going back to school.

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.559
<v Speaker 1>So I really think we all need to just face

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the facts. Kids are gonna need to wear masks if

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they're unvaccinated, which they are, and we're gonna have to

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of the same social distancing and careful

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>uh you know approach to this as we move into

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the fall. And I also just want to mention that

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this fall and excuse me, no, no, no, sorry, Carol,

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that one thing we have to think about,

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm preparing for this across Common Spirit is the sniffles. Okay,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we are coming into what will likely be a regular

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>cold season, whether or not the flu. Remember, the flu

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and the cold are two separate things. We've seen an

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>uptick in RSD virus, which is a specific virus that

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is a harbinger for common colds. So we're anticipating a

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of colds and sniffles mixed in with the potential flu,

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>mixed in with the potential covid. So how do we

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>test for that? How do we carefully, you know, manage

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>that situation is something we are all preparing for right now.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>So I just wanted to put that into think of

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the child showing up at school with the runny nose,

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>wiping their nose in the middle of the fall. What

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? How do we manage that and that

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff we were all trying to figure out. Now you

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>call it a twin demic or potentially a twin demic season, correct, Yeah,

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, we you know, we could

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>see if influenza comes up, we will see that will

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>be a stress on our hospitals. But I think even

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>beyond flu, I mean people very confused. I thought, oh

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I had a bad flu, what they really means sometimes

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I had a bad cold, and a cold can mask

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and look a little bit like mild COVID. So how

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are we going to distinguish that? Um, So we need

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to really ramp up our testing strategies, particularly in primary

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>care sites, our strategies that are schools, you know, all

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>across the country. Do we have the equipment, Do we

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have the supplies to do all that right? And that

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we're all working on. Hey, sit tight for

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a second, um, Dr McGain, We're going to come back

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and continue the conversation. I also do wonder if we

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>just put masks on again to him down. Many companies

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>doing it right now. You have many companies saying wait

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a second, even if you're fully vaccinated, if you're coming

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>back to work, uh, you have to wear a mask again, right,

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and that'll keep hopefully maybe cold to own regular flu down,

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>keep it all down. Yeah. I mean, it doesn't matter

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's a small bike shop. I was in one

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>yesterday where they're requiring employees to be vaccinated and wear masks,

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>or one of the big banks that announced in the

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks, even if you're vaccinated, wear that mask.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>All right. We're gonna come back to Dr Tom McGain

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he's executive ep a physician enterprise of at Common Spirit Health.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Will continue right here on Bloomberg Radio. Let's get right

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.679
<v Speaker 1>back to it with Dr Tom McGain, executive vice president

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at Common Spirit Health. He joins us on the phone

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>from here in New York, a dark Common Spirit Health

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>operates a hundred and forty hospitals and more than one

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand care sites, this across twenty one states. Dr Dr

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>McGinn um. I want to have a realistic, uh idea

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of how we're going to be living with COVID for

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the rest of our lives. Is this is this something

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that we get inoculated against each and every year, like

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the flu, and it fades into the background. Yeah, well,

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think obviously we will learn, but I

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>do feel that's where we're heading. I think that as

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we increase our vaccination rates, as we look the variants

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and we adjust, uh you know, these vaccines, that we

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>will end up learning to live with COVID, just as

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we learned to live with influenza. But we we are

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>getting better at this, I don't you know. I think

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us can get caught up in in

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of this is never going to go away. But

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we are managing it. We are learning more every day

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think when this servige goes down, we will

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>continue to be prepared for it and if we need

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to live with it, we will learn to live with it. Right.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>As our synthir Coon wrote for Business Week last week,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it on Friday. The vaccine, folks, it works.

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we need to be reminded with all of

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>these you know worry where some headlines that the vaccine

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it actually works. Having said that, um Dr McGinn. Do

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to be smart because as you said, you

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>know we're going to be dealing with colds and the

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>regular flu and COVID come fall that by wearing a

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>max mask excuse me, can we mitigate much of the

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>risk from those three? Well? It was amazing fall last year,

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it? The fact that we saw almost no flu.

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean many of us reflect back, Wait a minute,

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really have a cold lest floor. How does

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that happen? Uh? You know? And I think a lot

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of it came from the mask wearing, the social distancing,

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think as we go back to school again,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I don't I'm avoiding the whole discussion

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of the political mandate of a mask, But it really

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>will get these kids through a false season that I

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>guarantee will be complex, and we are preparing for it

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and we'll manage it. But I do think the mask

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>will reduce cold costs, flues and COVID, so it will

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have a multiple effects that will be positive. It's hard

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to think about this as the parent of a two

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half year old though, as I am, because

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, he wears a mask for five minutes and

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you know he's been he's been like chewing on it

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>versus a nine year old who could totally keep a

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>mask on when when inside. So how do you make

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>sense of that? No, Well, first of all, I have

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, ChIL John, I have you know

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>two girls there older now their college age, and so

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that has its own inherent issues. But I I'm amazed

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>as I work with many schools and watch kids walk

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>around Manhattan with their masks on. Now as you get

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>below you know, three years old, it gets complicated and

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:14.719
<v Speaker 1>you do the best you can. I mean all we're

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>asking people to do. Let's do the best you can.

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is not you know, something where we're

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>going to force people to do things. You do the

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>best you can under the circumstances. Try to put the

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>mask on, try to be socially distant, try to be

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>smart about it. On our side, on the public health side,

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on the health system side. You know, we're a common

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>spirit dedicated to provide care and test and treat and

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccinate in every community throughout this very diverse country that

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we live in. And that's our job to figure out,

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.719
<v Speaker 1>how do we test these kids when they have the sniffles,

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>how do we get them easy access to vaccinations when

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they're available for the young kids, which I hope will

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>becoming sometime late in the fall, maybe early next year.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you do the best you can with

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the mask and all of those efforts mitigate every little

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>thing we do mitigates that's bread by a little bit. Well,

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that's helpful when you edit up hey just quickly thirty seconds.

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you anticipate that in terms of an additional booster

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for the general public, Does that happen before the end

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I do think we're going to see

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that and come out in a process that we just

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>saw some folks who are mean compromise. I would assume

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers sometime soon we started hearing. Hey, they were

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the first ones back then, they're on the front lines.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Do we give them the booster. I think it's going

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to roll itself out gradually over time. Absolutely. Hey, listen,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Really appreciate it, and I hope

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we can get you back real soon. Dr Tom Again,

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Executive Vice President Common Spirit Health, on the phone from

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Are you going back to some of

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that we were doing before we got the vaccine? Um, yes,

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I am. I'm wearing a mask now in source. You know,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I was to the point where I would go and

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>pick up food and go to the I was always

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>wearing the grocer in the grocery store, I was wearing

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a mask. But yeah, even around here in the office.

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Public transportation, oh yeah, I'm still taking public transit, but

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing a mask. You have to yeah, no, yeah,

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to. I would. This is Bloomberg Business

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. So I see it, I hear about it.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>We know what's happening that despite some of the slowdowns

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in an office reopenings because of the delta variant. There

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>are still tim a lot of us back in the office,

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and yet for a certain subset of the workforce, they're

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>clearly staying at home. Justin Fox is a columnist for

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion. He writes about it in the upcoming issue

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. You can read it now

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg and at bloomberg dot com slash business Week.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So Justin who as people some reluctantly go back to

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the office, UM State Street employees, notwithstanding, we should know,

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>correct in New York, I should say, who's staying home?

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>What did you What does the data tell you? UMS?

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>The group that is most stuck at home is UM

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>people in computer and mathematical operations, which is basically software engineers,

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>data analysts, that whole world. And it's on level. We

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>know this because it's the Silicon Valley companies, the tech

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>companies that are sort of being the slowest to come back.

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>But these people aren't just working in tech companies. They're

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>at all different kinds of companies, and it just seems

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like more than any else, it's it's as of July

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of them reported that they were still working remotely at

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>least part of the time because of the pandemic. But

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't reflect people who were already working remotely before

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. Or you hear a lot about, especially in tech,

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>people getting hired completely remotely. Now. I don't know if

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 1>they get asked by the Census Bureau whether they're working

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>at home because of the pandemic, they may say, no,

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just working at home, dude, Right, that's how I

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was hired. Hey, Jill Weber's with us of course, editor

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg business Week magazine, and Joe it is, you know,

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting on a daily basis, we are kind of parsing

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>out what's going on, who's coming back to work, who is,

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>and who can go back to work who can't? Uh,

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And love that you guys are highlighting this. Well. When

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw um Justin's draft, it reminded me of the

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>ending of Point Break. Uh and if you can place that,

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the quote is he's not coming back, And that was

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>totally how I felt about exactly. Oh, you've come out

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of you and watched Point Break. You know, you're just justin.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a fantastic one. Oh man, I just want to

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>slap you from here. So you need to be in

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the office, dude, the virtual slap. I think that the

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>story revealed to me again, but there are certain workers

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and certain career paths that have ended up kind of

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>being able to rise above the fraight. So to me,

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as much as anything, this is a story about this

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>wealth inequality and wealth disparity because obviously these are high

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>paying jobs right justin yeah, I mean that's part of it.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And more broadly, you know, white collar workers have been

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>more able to work remotely than everybody else. But it

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like with this p particular group, yes, they're highly paid,

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's also just kind of the way they do

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>their work has even before the pandemic, been getting increasingly

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of distributed, and lots of times when there's any

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>big sort of software related project, there are teams all

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>over the world working on it. There's already been a

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of outsourcing to freelance workers all over the place.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So it just sort of feels like this is a

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>particular area where you know, the default going forward maybe

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>doing it remotely. Well, we were talking with the CEO

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of Mozilla to who said, we've been doing this for years,

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>like this isn't new to us, but increasingly as every

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>company we're a high tech company, where a media company,

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but where a lot more than that obviously, But each company,

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>UM justin often has a huge tech component to it.

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>They've got a lot of software engineers, people who are

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>writing code for one reason or another. Pick your industry,

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>pick your company. Yeah, No, it's spread all over the place.

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the BLS does this annual sort of accounting

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of where people in every pretty arrow occupation, UM, what

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>industries they work in. And so I was going through

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the list for computer and mathematical operations and I think

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I found like a Mason reconstruction doesn't have any UM,

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>but bars. There were fifty of them listed as working

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in the bar industry can conclude, you know, like a

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>chain of bars or something. Aren't many of those shipping

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>liquor to all of us at home exactly? So it's yeah,

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all over the place. And you know, obviously that

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>will differ by industry. Some industries, you know, another oil

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and gas industry has tons of UM computer and mathematical occupations.

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It's going to vary by industry how much they stay

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>at home. But I just feel like that particular kind

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of work is going beyond where a lot of the

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>other things that what color people do are going. Okay,

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>justin help us think through some implications of this. Does

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it Does it mean that companies will save money by

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>having to pay employees who don't live in the Bay

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Area or in Los Angeles or New York as much money?

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Does it mean that, you know, so called in putting

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this in quotes and air quotes, the second tier, third

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>tier cities are going to see some sort of resurgence

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>because you're gonna have people moving there because the quality

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of life is higher. I mean, I think what we've

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>seen so far in terms of where people are moving,

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like, yes, more people are moving to Austin, then

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>also Phoenix. They're not moving to Cleveland or other They're

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>not moving to the second tier cities where you actually

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>get a really big jump up in the kind of

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>house you can buy and the quality of life. So

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>it is. I don't think it's going to be some

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>great equalizer. It's just gonna shift the inequality sort of.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's gonna make things a lot worse in

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a few towns in Montana um and then in the

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>rest of the country. It's not going to change things

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that much. But I think in again, in the computer

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and mathematical um occupations, it's also just gonna be and

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this was again already happening, but it's just gonna increase

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the tendency to think globally. And you're trying to staff

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>up something and and you know, even if companies aren't

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>able to push through that, hey you have to take

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>less pay. If you lived in Bend, Oregon, then if

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you live in Silicon Valley, they can probably get away

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with it saying yes, you take less pay. If you

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>live in Ukraine, then if you live in the US,

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know Bend Oregon long ago, justin at the early

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>days of the pandemic, as an Oregon I woke up

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>one morning and in that like little hazy spot before

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>your brain is fully awake, I was like, where in

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the world would I work if I could work anywhere?

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And Bend Oregan was the spot that popped into my

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>brain in that hazy hour. But uh, I also just

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>want to bring up another point that you raised in

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>your story here, which is like, you know, one other

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>element of this work from home conversation with this particular

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>category of jobs is like jobs here are really scarce

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>in this field. Right even before the pandemic, this has

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>been some of the most desirable workers in career path.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>The workers are scarce, the jobs are not scarce. The

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>workers are exactly right. And and so I'm wondering as

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>as the pandemic actually exacerbated that, because it's not like

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline has been robust and growing right right, and

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and there hasn't been any you know, like overall employment

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is still down something like four percent in the computer

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and mathematical occupations, it's it's up, but not by a

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>huge amount. But they're they're basically other than really temporarily

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>right at the in the middle of the lockdowns, there

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was no real decline and employment in the in that area,

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and no definitely no decline overall in demand for people

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to do those kinds of jobs. Yeah, and these guys

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>are getting paid well. The meeting hourly wage for all

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>computer and mathematical occupations of almost forty four dollars. Computer

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>and information research scientists had the highest meeting wage at

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>almost sixty hour perhaps in surprising why you saw a

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of this workout source early for the pandemic. Exactly

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>good stuff, Thank you so much, justin really appreciate it. Yeah,

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you bet. Check out this. It's a column on the

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>back page of the upcoming issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine.

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Jil Webber and Bloomberg opinion columnist Justin Fox in our studio.

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is the Big Take, the best

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg's in depth, original reporting from around the globe. Well,

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to make sure we do as the economy.

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>What covers is what cut. The data kind of broken

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>down a bit. It's fun to becoming more and more

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>expensive to be looking at for shipping billion dollars for

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the red entry levels. There's been ways of immigration that

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have taced a lot of resistance, a lot of color

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes in a great untold story. How did

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Bezos really come out on top? It's the cover, says

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Wins. He always seems to win the Big Take

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. All right, this time for the Bloomberg

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Big Take. Happens to be one of our most read

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>stories too on the Bloomberg because you put anything about

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>taxes and the headline in the Bloomberg story and it's

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>among the most red tips, and for good reason, because

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it is a fantastic deep dive into taxing the rich,

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>winning at poles, but falter us to fix global housing.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now is Natalie Obiquo Pearson, Vancouver bureau chief

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, joining us on the phone from our

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Vancouver bureau. Natalie, take us through globally what's happening with

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>governments trying to disincentivize people from leaving apartments empty? Sure,

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>so what do What we tried to do in the

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>story was we did a deep dive into a couple

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of cities, Vancouver and Melbourne, that imposed empty homes taxes

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>quite early on, so if if property owners left their

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>places empty, they had to pay an annual tax. And uh.

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>The reason this is important is because a few of

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>other cities around the world who are similarly facing affordable

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>housing crunches, are looked to be potentially following in their footsteps.

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles is planning to put a vacant homes tax

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot. For Hong Kong officials are considering taxing

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>condo developers to deter them from hoarding new You and

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>It's Ireland is looking at a couple options, and Barcelona

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>has even gone so far as to threaten to seize

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>landlord's empty apartments. So it's very sort of you know,

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of the day, all right, So of the day, does

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it really make a difference? I mean, if we start

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>doing this, are you telling me that we could knock

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>down those really wealthy homes and then all of a

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sudden you'd put in lower income housing there. I mean,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is that really? Is this? Are we really getting at

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the root of the problem, I guess is what I'm asking. Yeah,

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question, and I think a really tricky

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>one because some degree you can understand why municipalities do this,

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and when you have an affordable housing crunch, to see

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>empty homes just not being used as of course you know,

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very difficult for residents to see. But on

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, I think, you know, Melvern and Vancouver

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>provide some early lessons and I think the takeaway might

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>be they deal with the symptoms of a housing crisis,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>but they're not gonna there and there are no panacea.

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>They are not going to fix it. And um by that,

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, uh, you know, I'll take is free. What Vancouver,

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>which was the first municipality in North America to implement

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>attacks like this, has seen so to some degree, the

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>tax did seem to encourage condo owners, for example, to

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>put their units into the long term rental supply. So,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, units that might have been on the airbnb

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>market before had been placed back into long term rentals.

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Um and uh. You know, the city has also managed

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to raise a lot more money than it originally expected.

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's partially because the homes that were less empty

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>were the most expensive homes. Um And I suppose to

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>some degree that doesn't surprise because somebody who can live

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>forward to leave their house empty probably is wealthy to

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>begin with. Those aren't exactly hitting the rental market right exactly,

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Like a thirteen million dollar mansion is probably not something

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that we have more than that like so um so yeah,

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>so you do manage to raise is Vancouver did manage

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually raise a lot more money than it ever expected,

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and that has gone towards affordable housing initiatives like building

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>rental housing for lower income families. But the vacancy rate

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in the city is still below one percent. It's been

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>stuck there for years and rents have continued to rise. Well,

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you do think about that the wealthier are able to

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>invest in real estate, right and there are tax, you know,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>positive tax implications or benefits to them by being able

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to do so that a lot of other people aren't

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>able to tap into. So you do wonder about We'll

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, are we are we really using our

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>land and property in the right way, especially when there

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are so many people who need it. Having said that,

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>things like interest rates, um policy, housing policies, um bank

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>access from more, I mean, there's other things that really

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 1>are at play here that could really move the needle

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to fixing some of our global housing problems, right,

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's essentially lee it. I mean, both

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne and Vancouver have been seeing an almost unbroken run

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>up in housing prices for two decades and that's very

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>much been tied to things like interest rates, uh, you know,

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>strict zoning laws and restrictions that keep the supply from

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>being built as quickly as it should be. And so

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>those are the real levels that are that are that

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you need to sort of work with to to to

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>cure the housing crisis, or at least to alleviate it significantly.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just to put this in perspective, right, Vancouver

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>expected ten thousand properties to be empty in the city

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in the first three years of the tax, I think

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred and some were moved back into the

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>rental supply. I mean that's that's you know, that's a

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>drop in the bucket in a housing market of two

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand properties. So, Natalie, just in the last fifteen

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>seconds that we have do based on your reporting, do

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>you anticipate that this type of policy will continue to spread?

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.239
<v Speaker 1>As you point out Lela's planning to put vacant home

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>tax on the ballot for even though the data show

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's not necessarily working. I think one thing we

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>think it's one thing we can stay safely is that

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>for policy makers, if it's politically popular, then it probably

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>will come in. And it just there is a lot

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of public support for these types of taxes. So probably yes,

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna run. Hey, thank you so much.

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Vancouver Bureau chief Natalie Obiko joining us on

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the phone in Vancouver, our Vancouver bure out. This is

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio for just coming over a

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>peak of the day, but just off our best levels

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of the day and we've got another record for the

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred. I believe it's the forty

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>nine record on the S and P that we've seen

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in So we continue that grind higher. Let's get to

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the close. Alan Zaffron is back with us,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>founding partner in co c I CEO at I e

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Q Capital. He's back with us, Tim on the phone

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in Foster City, California. So Alan, it seems like the markets,

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 1>just when you think they're getting a little tired, a

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>little weary, here we are grinding to another record. Carol

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and Tim, ain't it amazing? So much capitalist flash in

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. You can throw COVID fed, tapering tax pikes, uh,

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>diplomatic missteps potentially or arguably in Afghanistan. The market nevertheless

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>looks past all that. I think it's still being driven

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>by Tina. There is no alternative when bonds and cash

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>shields so little, it's still the cult of equities that's

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.479
<v Speaker 1>going to prevail. And that is what we are watching.

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>All risk ansts go up when conventional safe places like

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>cash and bonds paste a little, and capital continues to

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>flow into places to try and find a higher return

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>on that invested capital. That's the story of this year.

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Alan do the high price is do earnings justify the

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>high prices? I actually think they do. Again. The complication

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>here is people will argue if we just take the

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>SMP five index, it's traded about sixteen times it's forward

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>looking learnings than the last twenty five years, and if

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you look right now, depending on how much forecast you know,

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we're probably trading at about twenty two times forward earnings.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge premium. The challenge is twofold one. We're

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>in a world much lower interest rates now than we've

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>historically been over the last twenty five years. And secondly,

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the world today at the SMP five is comprised of

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>companies that are far less capital intensive and generate higher

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>profit margins. The X on mobiles and a T and

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>T s in general, motors of twenty five years and

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.959
<v Speaker 1>ago are now Facebook and Apple and Amazon, and so

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>arguably a world of better quality, higher profitable businesses in

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a world of lower interest rates. Merits are higher than

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>historically average p multiple. Of course, it's aren't more than science,

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>so we don't know exactly what that light multiple is,

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's far less overvalued than what people

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>would try and argue when they make historical comparison. It

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is a market that has a scratching our heads. I mean,

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wilson just came out with this chart of the

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>day and he talks about how financials have you know,

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be our best performing group now in

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of our eleven main industry groups in the SMP

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>five hundred years a date, which has you scratching your head.

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Considering the low rate environment, that is not typically what

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you see. So I mean, how do you explain that.

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Are there disconnects or does it all make sense to you? Uh? Well,

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense and like like the world, it makes

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>sense for two reasons. One is you have to look

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>where you started from. Financials were pretty beat up in

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Financials are basically a leverage bet on economic recovery. So

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you went from COVID and it disaster's economy to where

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>leveraged businesses like financials would do better out of a recession.

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, it's a bit forward looking. You're hopeful if

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the economy strengthens, interest rates go up a bit, and

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>those financials are probably forecasting implicitly a somewhat. I don't

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>overstate it, but a somewhat more steep yield curve over

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the next six to twelve months, and hence financial stocks

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I think are going up in advance of that base

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>case most likely outcome for the old curve looking forward,

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So an anticipation of a more favorable rate environment exactly. Hey, Alan,

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you you said the acronym tina there is no alternative,

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>but but you do think there is some alternative right now,

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>right for for where you're putting money, Well, I think

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>there are. I mean, so as an example, I'm just

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about rates. Reets are really stocked, but

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>they're tied to real estate, and real estate is another

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>form of income generation besides bond So it's not that

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>much of a stretch to argue if you're a long

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>term investor, and if you're willing to look aside from

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>short term price volatility, which I define as months and years,

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not days or weeks, as one example, freaks, whether it's

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>in a public or a private format, or another form

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of tax efficient income that I think if you have

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>enough long enough time frame, the likelihogens will generate higher

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>rates return to conventional bonds. You can make the same

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>analysis for individuals who are willing to go far enough

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to look at privately issued senior floating rate debt. Sounds

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>very complicated, but basically, if you're the senior lender to

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a company and you have a floating rate debt, surprisingly

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you can earn without leverage around a six percent return

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>tied to lie Bold typically, and with some leverage you

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>might even get as much as an eight or nine

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>percent return. Leaves room, although historically have not been allot

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of defaults, and even leaves room for some handfuls of

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>businesses to default on their debt payments and still earn

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>more than what a conventional bond does. When an investment

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>grade bond is paying you two percent the bars load

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>den why money scoring strategy? Well, I'm looking at two

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>uh dad John's equity Total Return Index. It's up almost

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>year to date, up about th uh in the past

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty two weeks. I that's the one area the commercial

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>real estate or real estate generally. I am surprised that

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been Alan Moore fallout. Why hasn't there been? Well?

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Twofold again, what one is? I would argue that you

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly do need to be selective about what kinds of

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>real estate you're investing. Is a big difference between industrial

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>warehouse is servicing Amazon and ups and set X versus

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>your urban office building where half the building is now

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>vacated or we're going to be less occupied. So I

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>get that, but but i'd also argue again, when you

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on one, you're back those those those rates were really

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>beaten up, and so some of that is bounced back.

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>And then the other issue is I think the demise

0:32:55.800 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of real estate is actually overstated. I think i'd rid world,

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be a hybrid world, but you're still going

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to have even people occupying businesses, occupying offices, They're still

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to pay for the rent, even if they're

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>only in there three days a week. I don't think

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an all or non proposition. It's interesting that you

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>say that because just today and among the most read

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal, and we were talking about this

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier with State Street closing, it's abandoning its New York

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>City offices, and look, it's not based in New York.

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But do you think that's an exception rather than the

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>norm moving forward? I think it is an exception because

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think everybody has the capacity to with state

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>streets has done. I definitely think there's diminished demand to

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a degree for office space, but to a degree to

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>which prices fell overstates the degree on a on a

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>national basis. Just with that demise and the diminishment of

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>cash flows will be so again, when I'm buying GEFs,

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for sustainable dividends, and I suspect even when

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I have reduced office demand, because that's really where the

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>pressure is hotels in office, there's going to be enough

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>cash flows still remaining to more than offset them out

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bo which prices have fallen. I wouldn't put all my

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>money in there. But when my again my investment great

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>bond has given me a two percent return and attack

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>eve them bonds is less than one percent, I can

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>afford handfuls of defaults or missteps and still beat those

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>via comfortable margins. That's why the capital is flowing there.

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting way to think about it in terms

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of the equity market. What do you like within the

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>equity space right now? Well, I do actually still think

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we are in a slower than average grinding economic economy,

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>which we're going to get up right where we were

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>before COVID. In fact, COVID may even persist this. You

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>have to look at growth. You have to stick with

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the businesses that have high quality earnings generation. They can

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>grow in a low economic growth environment. So the cult

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of growth equities outperforming value stocks that is likely to persist.

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:55.479
<v Speaker 1>And so that's sort of a coded way of saying technology, biotechnology,

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>other businesses that have persistent competitive barriers of entry and

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>real mean business models that are really able to sustained

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth, How capital will continue to be there? How

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>long does that persist for? Probably until we get through

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the next recession, because I just don't see how we're

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>going to grow our economy quickly. If anything said is

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be taking the set on the sort off

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the pedal economic growth will again slowed down again the

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>seat of not going to ramp it up again until

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you go through another recession cycle. And I don't think

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>there's at seven A recession cycles coming anytime since. But

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think growth stocks will persist out performance probably for

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of years. How much are you starting

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>to think about what comes out of Jackson Hole? And

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I bring that up because we did see uh Dad

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Jones reporting about how FET officials are nearing agreement to

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>begin scaling back their easy money policies in about three

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>months if the economy recovery continues. It doesn't feel like

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to me that that's a lot of new messaging, because

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>that's I feel like it's safe to say that that's

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>what the FETE has been saying all along. J. Powell

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and others. They're watching the data points in particular, and

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>if things you know, significantly and substantial really improve on

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>an economic basis, well yeah, they're gonna pull off, right. Yeah. No,

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I think about it a lot. And the reason I

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 1>think about a lot is I work with a lot

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of human beings as clients, and no matter how much

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I argue be long term investors don't time the market.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Inevitably everybody wants an entry point, so inevitably everybody wants

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to hold back from cash and wait for the pullback

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that just does not happen. And so I'm kind of

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this is sound ironic in a way. I'm hoping the

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>said comes out and surprises people and says they're gonna

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>paper bond purchases and raise rates more quickly the inspect

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and create this ten percent hope for pullback, which will

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>let all of my clients cash magically flow into the

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>stock market at the perfect time. Of course, probably won't happen,

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think about it constantly because I sit and

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think about what's going to cause the correction. And the

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 1>problem is, you and I both know the things that

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>can cause a correction and higher tax rates, Afghanistan, fed papering, COVID.

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But you and I both know it's what we don't

0:36:56.080 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>know that actually happens that will cause the correction. So

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I worry about it. I can't control it, and I

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it's going to do. I think the

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>FEDS and everything they can to signal their intentions, and

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>now the market will have to digest it as best

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it can. Alan Why do you think the market, at

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>least the equity market hasn't has ignored the spread of

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant because I was a twofold one. As

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe everyone's looking at the charts and thinks our

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>pattern of experience on the delta variant is gonna parallel

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>things that happened like in the UK, where it looks

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>like if you match what's happened in caseloads here in

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the UK, we've already peaked right about now, the market

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>already looking path what's already the peak of this variant.

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>There might be another variant to follow. That's part of it.

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is, I think there's a belief we're

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to shut down the economy again barring something extraordinary,

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>and so the actual economic impact is a lot less

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>significant than what we experienced back in February March of

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty. People are adapting, we have better information today,

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>more people are vaccinated, and so I think the belief

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is there's a much lesser economic hit so the U.

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>S economy in particular, than we witnessed a year and

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a half ago. And so I just don't think, I

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>hate to say it this way, from a pure stock

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.479
<v Speaker 1>market perspective, it's not a big enough event to matter,

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>right unless we see a retrenchment in the economy, like

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think about this alan. You know, people can't

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>travel again just as we were starting to reopen. That's

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have an economic impact. Disney right their second quarter,

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it was streaming, but it was also the theme parks

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>which came roaring back in a big way, and that

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>stock just took off on a tear. So if we

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>start to see a retrenchment again where people aren't traveling

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so much. Southwest warned about travel they I think, are

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the biggest carrier that goes into Orlando. So there are

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>there are little pieces out there. The Chinese ports shutdown,

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>They're just little pockets that remind us that, yes, we

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>know how to deal with this, right, we have the

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>playbook that we didn't have a year year and a

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>half ago. But nonetheless, if I'm not out there going

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>back to store, shop being, my husband will be happy.

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it means that's economic momentum that's not happening.

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>If we're not getting on planes, we're not doing business traveling,

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing you know, the New York Auto Show got canceled.

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Like there are big events that would normally attract a

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that creates an economic momentum that's not happening. Um,

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that's got to be something though that could start to

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>weigh on companies again and impact some of the top

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and bottom lines and certainly impact some of the economic growth.

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with to jazz Fest in New Orleans,

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>one of my scarest events has been canceled as well.

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 1>What I'll tell you this though, the things you're talking

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about travel, uh, leisure, they comprise it actually a somewhat

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>smaller portion of the stock market than technology companies and

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>companies that actually can thrive in an environment that's modestly

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 1>shut down. What COVID has done is it accelerated the

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 1>use of technology and productivity in years, in many years

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of not decades, and that's part of what we're witnessing. This.

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>We are in the midst of some industrial revolution which

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>probably started with the Internet way back when, or even

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the creation of the semiconductors, depending how far back you

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>want to measure this. COVID has just re accelerated this

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>process and what you're seeing is durable, sustainable and accelerated

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth. As a consequence, what you're describing tarol can

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact sadly happen. It's going to marginalize again restaurant owners.

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>It's going to marginalize travel agents. It's gonna marginalized resort hotels.

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But they don't make up the SMP five under an index.

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>But it isn't. It is. It's going to hurt spending

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in the short run. But like other waves, I hate

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to say it this way because it's truly a humanitarian crisis,

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but from a pure financial economic perspective, it's a bump

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the road, and the road has just accelerated the

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>speed of which the cars can move because of all

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the productivity enhancements. So, if you're going to take a

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>long enough point of view, whatever happens won't be good.

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 1>But we've actually set ourselves up for faster, more productive, better,

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>more robust and sustainable economic growth going forward. It's a

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>terrible humanitarian crisis in between. But to get to the end,

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>get to the end game economically, we're going to be

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in better shape. Ironically, to state this way, five year

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>swords like Darwinianism, we forced ourselves to be a more

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>productive economy, right we listen. We've had tons of conversations

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>with CEOs and other individuals about how the pandemic accelerated

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>trends that you know, institutions, companies were gonna put in

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>place maybe over the next three to five years, and

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden they're like, bam, we got to

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>do it now, and so you don't go back. There's

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.240
<v Speaker 1>no going back, and that certainly has a lasting impact

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>on our world. So what worries, what what what keeps

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you up at night when it comes to investing and

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>investors portfolios. Well, I actually think the past events of

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the past week have kind of humiliated humiliated the United

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:54.479
<v Speaker 1>States in the country a bit, and we're perceived maybe

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the world's a little less safe for a number of reasons.

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>What's going on in Afghanistan. I actually think candid some

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>degree impact the legislative agenda of the current administration. It

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>might change the dynamics of the political election new year

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>from now. But I also think you could end up

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>with unintended consequences geo politically, and things like that have

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a funny way of creating sentiment overhangs on the stock market.

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we actually are in somewhat of a implicit

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>tacit club war with China in a ran with all

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the cyber securities wars back and forth, things like this

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:28.479
<v Speaker 1>are going to come up. I can't tell you when

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>or what or how or why, but that's how you

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>get these intermittent ten percent corrections, which are usually just

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>corrections that keeps me up at night. That keeps me

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>up at night, right, But we haven't had a five

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 1>percent correction since late last year, so it's been a

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>long time. Allan, thank you so much. We always are

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>grateful when we get some time with you. Alan Safran,

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 1>he's founding partner in co CEO at I e Q Capital,

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Foster City, California. A great conversation,

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>always great when Alan joins us. And and look, Carol,

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>going into today, I thought, hey, this is going to

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>be a day that's actually not a record day. And

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we look at the SMP five hundred and then down

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>they're eating out games late day rallies exactly. Thanks for

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News