WEBVTT - Surveillance: Greenwich Economic Forum

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg's Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane along

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownowitz Jaily. We bring you

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Yeah, Fed Lamont,

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic governor from a Connecticut who has been in

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>office is two thousand nineteen. Thank you so much for

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us. And there are a lot of people who

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>live here. It was really easy for them to come

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>to this conference, many of them who lived in New

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>York City prior to the pandemic. Many people who have come,

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>including businesses. How do you, as the governor, plan to

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>keep them considering the poll the lure of low tax dates.

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we have one of the great education systems

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in the country, so a lot of people want to

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>come here for their families to start things up. Stanford

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Greenwich has become a real financial center, fintech center, you know, cryptocurrency,

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 1>financial services. Obviously, we've got the insurance capital of the world,

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>so there's a great ecosystem and base for finance. And

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of We've had a lot of

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>finance companies come up to Connecticut over the last few years,

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and we've noticed that right with all of them moving

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>their headquarters to both Connecticut and also to Florida because

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a low tax state. You're running against Bob Stefanowski,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're about thirty days left in this election cycle.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>He's been espousing lowering taxes. You've previously raised taxes. How

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do you sort of speak to this issue given that

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the education system, you talk about some

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of the services that cost money. Well, to be exact,

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>we inherited a two billion dollar budget deficits as far

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as the eye could see, and we balanced that by

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>holding the line on spending. It was the first governor

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in thirty years not to raise income taxes, and this

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>last year we put in place the biggest middle class

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>tax cut there is. But um making life a little

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>more affordable in this inflation every time, but bigger. You're right,

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten place of rainy day fund. I'm gonna hear

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>from the finance people here today whether I'm aeryl on

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the side of caution, I hope i am, But I'm

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be ready you said that you're gonna be listening

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to Ray Dalio talk about how the world's about to implode,

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you're gonna sit there and hide under your

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>chair as you try to prepare your budget. How do

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you plan to uh really with withstand whatever is to

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>calm given the negativity out there, and given that it

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is hard to borrow right now with rates where they are. Well,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>two things. I've got a fifteen percent of our budget

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>set aside in cash. We call it the rainy day funds.

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>So if capital gains start slipping, which it already has,

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll be ready. I don't have to raise taxes.

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to cut education, you know, funding going forward.

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I budgeted very conservative for this fiscal year. I think

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>we could see sort of the storm clouds out there.

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I assumed we were going to have less revenues this

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>year already, so I think we're ready for what may

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>be coming. I go back to the election cycle, because

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the midterm election cycle, as I'm sure you

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>are more aware of than anybody else. In Bob Safinowski,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>your opponent, does keep talking about the importance of keeping

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the businesses here to keep the revenues. How

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>do you balance lowering taxes to be competitive with states

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that have really drawn a lot of Wall Street businesses

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>if you think the money to actually make the state livable. Look,

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we had a couple of fortuneies move into the state.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>We had dozens of other companies, but Lisa, more importantly,

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our local companies are growing and expanding

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>big time. We had new more new business startups than

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>ever before. You know, I've often said I don't want

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>more taxes, but I don't mind more taxpayers. Our economic

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>pie is growing and that's why we have a surplus.

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So your tone has shifted a little bit in the

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>election cycle, with more focus on just get out and vote.

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Why is there the emphasis on getting people to vote?

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that there is something that will keep

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Democrats home? I think anger sometimes motivates people. I'm more

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>optimistic believe in the state. I've got to make people

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>believe we're turning things around. We're making progress every day,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want people to be complacent. I want

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you to have a stake in this election. So yeah, vote,

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all right? So going forward, how I'm concerned are you

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>about some of the businesses that have been leaving. Given

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the low tax issue, and given the fact that some

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the revenues are going to be strained for possibly

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>years if what Ray Dalio says comes to pass. I

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the companies that are coming to

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Connecticut and staying in Connecticut a respect tax stability. They

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>know that for the first time in years, we have

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not raised taxes. That makes a big deal, but it's

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's bigger than that. Again, they love the best education

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>system in the country. They love the fact that we

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>provide job training so they'll get the people they need

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and the skills they need. Do you feel like there's

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a shift right now? And we talk about this all

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the time on Bloomberg Surveillance about how there is constraint

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>on the fiscal response to crises at this moment, because

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>when you're dealing with inflation, you're dealing with the situation

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>where you cannot borrow money in the same in kind

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of way. How are you preparing for that with the

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>lack of ability to plug gaps with simply selling bonds. Hey, look,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a big macro economic world out there and we're

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a small piece of it. We get buffeted by international

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>and national things all I can do is prepared, and

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I've prepared by you know, making sure we have a

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of dry patterns they suggested before billions of dollars

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>set aside. I can't go out and borrow my way

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>out of this. Maybe that's a little game they play

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. You can't do that at the state level.

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And when you look out today and you hear all

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of these executives of major alternative investment firms, many of

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>which including Apollo. We're gonna be speaking with Apollo coming up,

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have moved recently to Connecticut. What are you listening to?

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>What if you heard from them that you find most

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>compelling to sort of shape your narrative going forward. I

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think they like being here. They don't necessarily have to

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>be in New York City or Boston, depending of you know,

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>five days a week, maybe it's one or two days

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a week. Otherwise, I think they like the lifestyle here,

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>They like the coach system. They like the fact we

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have a very well trained, smart educated workforce helps them

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>grow and expand right here. Do you have more tax

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>hikes planned for anyone? I know that there were tax

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>hikes overall, perhaps not for the middle class, but overall

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>there were some tax hikes that you did with your

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>first budget. Do you plan on doing that again or

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was that a one time thing? No, we didn't. We

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't do that. As I said, I was the first

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>guy not to raise the income tax, you know, on anybody,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're not doing that. People want tax stability. They

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>want to say, what's the state not only look like now,

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>but what's it gonna look like in five years? They

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>can plan according to Look. I come out of the

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>business world. I need to know what the world's gonna

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>look like in a few years so I can put

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>together my projections and make them happen. Why are you

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a Yankees fan? They like to win, blow, blow anything,

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.679
<v Speaker 1>And we are looking at a situation after the Mets

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>going on, and you've been trying to encourage CVI Cohen,

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>who is also a resident of your state, to buy

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>your local team. Is that correct? Yeah, we have the

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>yard Goats. It's an amazing minor league baseball team up

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at Hartford, and uh I doting thought, boy, if you

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>want to get a foothold here bigger in Connecticut buying

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the yard Goats and make them a Mets franchise. So

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that's your pitch to him. That's why is he so

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>give us the inside scoop? Is he going to buy?

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he plays his cards pretty close to the best.

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think so too, Ned Lamont, thank you so much

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for being with us, Governor of Connecticut, here with us

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in Greta. Right now, we have someone who has been

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in the bond market for decades, Jim Zelter, co president

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of Apollo Global, who has really helped found the entire

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>credit business which now has more than three fifty billion

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars of assets under management. And as John's been talking

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>about all morning, this was the day of bond vigilantes.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the year of bond vigilantes, and this is

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>raising so much fear among people who have gotten used

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to zero rates over such a long period of time.

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you more nervous today or more excited? Well, you

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta respect it. Um. First of all, nice to be

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>here this morning. Um. You know, certainly there's a big

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>paradigm ship going on right now, and you have to

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>respect the markets. As you said, the body vigilantes, they'll

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>get rates where they should be, more so than the

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Fed or the central banks. But um, it's an interesting

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>paradigm shift where you see where rates have been, and

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we've been in this period where uh there's been an

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>undoe focus on low rates and it's put valuations very

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>very high. So it's a period of transition. You have

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to respect it, but also you want to be on

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>your front foot, which we've been able to do over

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the last several months and will continue to do. So

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean, Well, what it really means is

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if you've been proved in the last decade and not

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not been over your skis and valuations and have been

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful about what you put on the books. There's a

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>very interesting time. The cost of capital now matters, purchase

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>price matters, and those who have capital and have a

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of flexibility in their toolbox, you will find many

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting companies from which to give capital to. Are you

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>taking more risk right now or less risk than you

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>are a month ago? You know, we were measured. We

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>run a very very large platform, as you said, over

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>five fifty billion and aggregate over almost four billion in debt.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>You really can't pick the bottom um, it's really impossible

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to predict. You can prepare along the way, but we

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 1>are we are methodically putting opportunities to work. Um, We've

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>been active in the CLO market. We've been active in

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>working with some of the banks on the large stocks indications,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Citrix in particular. So, you know, I think I have

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a healthy respect for what's going on, but I don't

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>think we are in the corner of cowering by any means.

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I love the sanitized language that you're using. And then

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I think about some of the stories that we've written,

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>including you're talking about clos. We've worked with banks, We've

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>helped them. You made incredible amounts of money, especially recently

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with UK c ls in the wake of some of

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the volatility with citrics. The banks that are all with

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>all of these hung Bridge loans, right commitments that they

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>made to finance mergers and acquisitions that are perhaps not

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>priced the way that they were at the time of commitment.

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>How many opportunities do you have to go in and

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>buy some of these assets for the banks. Well, if

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>you just put today in context with a decade or

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so ago in the in the GFC, the banks were

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>arguably long five plus billion of loans and high yield.

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Today that number is circa eighty to a hundred billion,

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's a much smaller opportunity set uh, and much fewer,

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, not not as many names. So we we

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>have a constant dialogue. We're a very active trader with

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the banks, you know, no permanent friends, no permanent enemies.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>You know. We we act, We act very very in

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>great dialogue with them, but uncertain names. We will we

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>will partner um in many regions, especially in the US

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and Europe, with the large banks. Are they willing to

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>sell well, I think I think it's it's you. You

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have to have a realistic dialogue, and it's it's a

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a challenging position. I think they want to move on,

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.080
<v Speaker 1>they want to get back in business. I mean, the

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>reality is the high yield financing markets are arguably shut

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>down right now, um and I think that they would

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like to be in addition to be able to make

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>new loans at appropriate levels and get paid fairly for those.

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to be an interesting period of transition

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>between now and the end of the year. Traditionally, alternative

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>asset managers, including Apollo have lights investing in credit that

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is not traded very often. Right, you invest in a company,

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you get more control, you also have higher yield. Is

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that the same now or do you find more opportunities.

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>And the public credit markets, given that yields are now

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>north of ten percent in many cases and arguably north

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of eight percent even for pretty high rated credits, well,

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of a lot you brought up there, Um.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>In our credit business, we are really a performing investor.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>We're looking to extend, extend capital the companies that are

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>growing and get paid back. So there's not really a

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>distressed angle in our typical credit business, um to you,

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>as you raised, um, there are when you had the

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>dislocation we've had thus far, there are opportunities in the

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>public markets, within the investment grade market with low dollar price,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>long duration assets, pretty interesting opportunities. And the private markets,

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, new capital is coming with better terms and

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>better pricing. So you're at this unique period right now

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>where there's actually opportunities and the higher end of both

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 1>of those markets. It's interesting. High yield on a yield

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>basis is somewhat attractive on a spread basis is sort

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of historical levels, and you know the the spreads this

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>morning or mid five hundreds approaching six hundred, that's typically

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a time when when you get interested in high yield.

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the yields are approaching ten percent, which is

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>a very attractive number. So you know, it's our it's

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>my view that, you know, having done this for a

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>few decades now, things are happening faster and faster and faster.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>The rate rise in the US and globally in the

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>last you know, six months has been historic in only

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the space speed which has happened, but also the amount

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and in the past that might have happened over twelve, eighteen,

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four months. So it's my suspicion that by the

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>time we really are officially in a recession in twenty

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>three or twenty four, the opportunity to buy paper will

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>some of it will have evaporated. So you have to

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>be measured in patient along the way. Do you think

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a default cycle a kin Toy

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>saw in two thousand and eight or even some of

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the prior ones into the early two thousands. Yes, you

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>will see some degree of a default cycle when you

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't slow down the economy with the breaks that

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the the monetary policy is leading to today without expecting

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>some accidents, it's going to happen. Reside reside mortgages have

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>gone from the low to mid two is the north

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of six percent. There's going to be a default cycle.

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>It may not be as pervasive, it may not be

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>as wide and deep, but there will be some companies.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And also not only the amount of debt, but the

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>actual interest costs have have have increased dramatically on a

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>floating rate basis. What's more attractive to you at this

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>point looking for those idiosyncratic companies where you want to

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>invest in or investing in niche investors UH actually going

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to other asset managers and saying we'll give you money,

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll give you a stake in our assets and go

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>at it. Well, my answer us obviously both. Um. You

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>know you're alluding to our recent announcements in Diameter, in Sofa, Nova,

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in Havevelli. These are all great managers that are proven

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>their their wisdom and their judgment over time in their

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in their strategies. We're providing capital for them to grow.

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, we're very active on our own accounts,

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so you know we have we have a large platform,

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>We're connected to a lot of folks, Um. But I

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think from us you'll see a strategy of being able

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to do both of those in concert you mentioned clos

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and I mentioned the United Kingdom. I know that that

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>has been a public issue in terms of how much

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>money you made buying clos at the right time and

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>then seeing a policy response from the Bank of England.

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>How much are you playing in the UK market right now? Well,

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think from our perspective, the UK market, you know,

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it is a robust economy going through some great challenges,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we were very active in post the

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>GFC in the resi market place over there. I suspect

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in the residential market, in the commercial real estate market,

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you'll see us active over the next couple of years

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>as they go through their challenges in the economy. Um,

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it's earlier, you know, really our activity in the celo

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>market was really US and raw the Europe, with some

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. UM. But as you said earlier, like

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the cello market right now, if you look at the

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>most senior tranches, um, it's a pretty draft coney assumption.

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>They're assuming ten plus percent defaults for the next five years,

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>which we think in some cases an opportunity to be

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a buyer. And is in Europe a similar story kind

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of taking place or is that yes? I means well

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in my view, Europe is a bit behind the US

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of it's always um a bit tighter when

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the market's tight, and it and its accentuates the wides

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and courage of volatility. So there's plenty for us to

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>focus on right now in the US. I think Europe

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and the UK will be a twenty three and twenty

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>four opportunity set, but certainly the US is our primary

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>focus right now. When we talk about investing alongside some

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>smaller niche investors, do you have any interest in a

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>big European bank that might be going through some distress,

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that might be splitting up certain aspects of its business.

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Would you ever be interested in acquiring certain aspects of

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that business? Well, you know, over the as I said,

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>since since I weight or nine, there's been many instances

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twelve and two thousand fifteen where we

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>had strategies that really partnered with the banks or we're

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>an off tank for the banks, whether it was credit

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>card subsidiaries in Spain and Ireland, whether it was for

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>real estate portfolios in in Germany and in the UK.

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>We were always there as a partners like we were

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in O eight O nine for the U S Bank.

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So if there's a global bank and they are considering

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>large scale strategic transactions, we certainly expect to be part

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of those dialogues. How much does your base case include

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>four to four and a half percent fed funds rates

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>for perhaps a year or even two, you know, I

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's got to be the base case. You were

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in a higher rate regime that has shocked the system,

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and the monetary policy makers are trying to really shock

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the economy on this on this nasty concept of inflation.

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So you have to expect we're in a higher rate

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>period for some period of time. We're not macro investors,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You've got plenty of other folks that can come up

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>here and talk to you, but we're certainly in a

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>higher rate regime for some period of time, and that's

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely shaping this view in terms of what's required in

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of payment from a lot of these companies. Jim Selter,

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for taking the time a co

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>president of Apollo Global. Lucky this morning not just because

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:05.959
<v Speaker 1>we have Muhammed our area around the table with us,

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but also because we joined by Naria Calvino, the Deputy

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of Spain, mad and Vice President, fantastic to

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have you with us in the building. Thanks for having me.

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's start here. The prospect of joint debt to do

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>something about the energy crisis in Europe. Is that something

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you think we can find agreement on at the European level. Well,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>when we were hit by the pandemic, Europe reacted in

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a very decisive manner on the basis of unity and solidarity.

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that now this time around, that we're faced

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>with global challenges again, a war at the DOORSEP of Europe,

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we should react with the same principles. You know. Whether

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that entails additional debt, isissuance or not, we will see.

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>But in any case, we should act, you know, together

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in a decisive manner to tackle these challenges based on

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>preliminary discussions. Would say the Germans, if they conveyed to

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you that that's something they would support. We were with

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Actually we had the bilateral summits between Spain and Germany

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this last week and we had an exchange with the ministers,

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>also with with the Chancellor Shoals. He was one of

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the persons that was behind the issues of joint debt

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to address and to tackle the challenges from the pandemic.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>We didn't go into into the details, but I am

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>quite sure that German is aware of the need to

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>react in a manner which makes us stronger and allows

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>us to to face the current challenges in the best

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>possible manner for our populations. To your excellency, there was

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a market consensus developing that this is going to be

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult winter for Europe. It winter that may

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>see Europe fall into recession. What's not clear is the

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>length and depth of this potential recession. Do we have

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>any indicators of what happens if indeed Europe falls into

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>recession this winter? But I think what what what will

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>happen will depend on what we do. That is something

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we have learned in the last three years.

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So I am not really deterministic in the sense of

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this is what's going to happen. We need to now

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>take the right decisions to avoid this situation arising. Where

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>mid in this work in the in the World Bank

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and I m F annual meetings. This is a very

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>challenging and delicate point in time. The global economy is

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>slowing down, inflation is is increasing in some Western economies.

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But I hope that we are able to make the

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>right decisions to avoid these scenarios to arise in practice.

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>And what do we say to people who say the

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>initial conditions are such that there's almost no policy flexibility. UM,

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the ECB has to address inflation, UM, fiscal space is

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>limited and if you go too far, the bond vigilantes

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>may come in. Just look at what has happened to

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the UK. And the reality is that even if governments

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>wish to move, the amount of measures available to them

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is much more limited than in the past. It is

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>indeed tricky. It's not easy to to articulate economic policy

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>these days. I think that one basic principle is a

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>good coordination of monetary and fiscal policy. From the perspective

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of Spain, just to give you an example, we're very

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>strongly committed to pursuing the path of deficit and dead reduction,

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is going along and helping monetary

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>policy implementation in the EU. I I do hope that

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we find the right balance, you know, between fighting inflation

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and not endangering growth, because if we want to pursue

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>as fiscal responsibility, growth and job creation is a necessary

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>function for it to be sustainable. Let's talk about the

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>growth forecast from both the Banker Spain and from the

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Spanish government. The Banker span understand for twenty three is

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>at one point four pc, your government at two point

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>one pc. Do you think that articulates to the Spanish

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>people just how much pain the economy is about to

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>go through. One thing that's been thrown at this federal

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>reserve is that their forecasts have been unrealistic, that they've

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>been too aspirational. Is that realistic correspirational? No, it's realistic absolutely.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>In you know, we had very strong growth in twenty

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, around five point five percent. We're having very

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>strong growth in twenty twenty two around four point four percent,

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's a quite prudent forecast. And what we anticipate

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is a slowdown of growth in twenty twenty three. Obviously,

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the European economy is very much affective by

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>what happens in Germany, so it would be unrealistic, you know,

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>not to think that there will be a slowdown, But

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>all institutions, national, public, private, international, they foresee the Spanish

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>economy to continue to grow in twenty twenty three. And

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>there are some elements that make it particularly resilient and

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>strong at this point in time, whether it's the FEDS

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>aggressive interest rates hiking cycle, or the strength of the dollar.

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>There's a perception that a lot of people are going

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to be going to Washington and talking to the American

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>authorities and saying what you do here has major repercussion,

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>not just for Neurope, but beyond that, especially in the

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>developing world and US. You must have a global perspective.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's even a realistic conversation to have

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. These days? I do think they

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are well aware of the impact of their decisions throughout

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the world. You know, just like putting actions in Ukraine

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>are having a worldwide impact, which is not only having

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to do with security, defense, not only having to do

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>with inflation. Also, food security is a key issue that

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>we will certainly be talking about in the course of

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this week. I do think that the U S authorities

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>are well aware of the impact of their decisions on

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>emerging economies and on on inflation throughout the world and

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>growth throughout the world. Of course, do you think they

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>should snap back from this tiny cycle? Well, you know,

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I would never there to to say anything to a

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy authority. I am, I am. I hope that

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>they will get it right. You know, both in the

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>US and and in Europe. I mean, the sources of

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>inflation are very different on both sides of the Atlantic.

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a demand driven as well as supplied driven inflation.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>In the case of the US, it is really a

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>supply side shock you were talking about in just a

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>moment ago. It's it's energy prices going up. Is the

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>underlying course of inflation in the EU that would call

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>for a differentiated monetary policy. But as you were rightly saying,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>interests exchange rates are very very sensitive and very important

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in these regardens, so that that is driving the relationship

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>between monetary policy in different parts of the world. I

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>really hope they get it right. How clue me is

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this going to be in a couple of days? Dan

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in Washington? How a pressing is this meeting going to be? Well?

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're quite used to tackling and dealing

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>with crisis. Since you were referring to two thousand and seven,

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, I was already around at the

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>time dealing with financial regulation. I think, you know, ever since,

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we haven't really left a very complex scenario where multiple

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>inter relationships are hitting each other and having an effect,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>you know. So I think that it's good we have

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the G twenty. It's good that we're meeting this week,

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and I hope we do have a good outcome in

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of articulation of a good economic policy at this

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>point in time. Let's do that against so diplomatic as

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I would expect. Thank you, now you're calving another Deputy

0:24:53.840 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of Spain, Vice President, Thank you, yeah, Gandray Holden,

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>host of City Joint just right now, the chief US

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Economists and you. Let's start to have why another seventy

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>five for you in the next month. So I think

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it really goes back to what you were just discussing

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.959
<v Speaker 1>that the FED has two issues here. One is an

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>economic fundamentals issue, and there that's right. There's been a

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of progress in terms of tightening financial conditions, probably

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>further to go, a lot of that's already priced in.

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>But then they also separately have a communication issue, and

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what they're managing, and that's what you've

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>see in some of those comments from Evans and from

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Brainerd where yes, of course interest rates get higher and

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you get into a range that may be more restrictive.

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You start thinking about should you slow down, should you pause?

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.479
<v Speaker 1>The issue is from a communications perspective, how do you

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>explain to markets in the public that you still have

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>resolved in fighting inflation. If you're slowing down rate hikes,

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you're pausing rate hikes. And it ultimately is back to

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the data. Is the data going to give the FED

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>flexibility to do that when we see CPI slowing down,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>when we see a job market that's loosening. Um, So

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what they're really watching. Now Are we

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing any of those things? Are the two things that

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned. I think you can argue in labor markets

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe saw the first sign of some loosening and you

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>heard Vice share Brainer talk about this yesterday. Um, where

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.239
<v Speaker 1>we had job openings come off meaningfully. So we had

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>a ratio of about two job openings to every one

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>unemployed individual. Historically normal ratio would be maybe one one

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>point one. That came down now to one point seven

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>openings to everyone unemployed individual. So it's moving in the

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>right direction for the FED if they want to see

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>some of that excess demand coming off. However, that the

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>level one point seven openings to everyone unemployed individual. I mean,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just intuitively, that's a lot of excess demand for labor

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that's still out there. And uh, Andrew, we have a

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>big release this week cp I UM is there a

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>level that you think shape markets confidence one way or

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the other. So consensus, I think is eight point one annualise?

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Is there a one number or do we need several

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers of a certain trend to really kind of move

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>fed rhetoric? Yeah, Hi, Greg, I think it really is

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>going to come down to where does that core monthly

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation number come in. That's what we saw last month

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>where it was a stronger core reading, and Brainer talked

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>about this yesterday. Core goods in particular stays strong. There's

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>a pretty broad consensus that core goods prices should be

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>coming off. Until recently, at least, we had commodity prices

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that we're moving lower, used car prices that look like

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they should move lower. We've seen that in the wholesale prices.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're really watching that core goods component in the

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>release to see if that slows down. Right now, we

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>look at that that core CPI inflation month on month,

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we have that at city at zero point five percent.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Month on month consensus around zero point four percent month

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on month, you saw that slow down to a zero

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>point two or even as zero point three, that would

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>be a signal to markets that maybe you're getting some

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>easing and price pressure. Um. I think though the risks

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>are actually still to the upside that you know, maybe

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see that zero point four even zero point five

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>like we're projecting. Andrew picked up on that quote as

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>well from Vice champ Raina. She said there was ample

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>room for marching recompression to outpreduce goods inflation as demand calls,

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>supply constraint, seas, and imagries increase. Andrew tell me the

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>pot of inflation that's actually going to be stick here,

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and then Greg and I can have a commis sanction

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>about what that means for corporate profits. So I would

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>take this back to the labor market. I think, like

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, there are reasons to think that core

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>goods inflation might slow down a bit if I look

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>at services, labor intensive services, and then I go back

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to that job market where we have one point seven

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>job openings for every one unemployed individual. We have wage

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>growth according to the Atlanta fit Wage Tracker. That's still

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>running upwards of six point seven percent year on year

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>average early earnings a little bit slower, but still well

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>above levels that would consistent with two percent inflation. That's

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>where I really worry about persistent inflationary pressure. You'll have

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.479
<v Speaker 1>some pressure in rents, also in shelter prices, that's basically

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>lagged effects from price increases that we've seen in the

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>fast but in the past. But really non shelter services

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and the tight labor market is where I would be

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>most concerned about persistent inflationary pressure. Greg we often talk

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>about the SMP five hundred and whether the federals F

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>has a price target. I wonder if I've got an

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>EPs target because right now you've got the vice chair

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>nd of guess that there's ample room for marching recompression.

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that basically the FED sounding the earnings in corporate

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>America are going to come down. Yes, But she's not

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong either, because you're looking at record profit margins right

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>well above anything we've seen on a long term trend basis,

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and so there is ample room, right and so um,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, our expectation is profit margins to come down.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying that for over a decade now. But

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you know from labor costs increases, just input costs generally

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>U on the rise and revenues slay to come down.

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And keep in mind onhan that corporates have put on

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>all this low cost debt, that that's a good news

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>bad news store. The good news is when you know

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the operating leverage is working in your favor, you you

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>have ample profits. Uh. And when that reverses, it goes

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the other way. So I think there's more of a

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>downside deceleration or acceleration to the downside than anticipated. And

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you just find a question from me to you, this

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy basis point hike in November, is that the last

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the sinko? It? Maybe? It maybe? And that's

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>where it comes back to does the FED get that

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>flexibility from the data? I think if if you see

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>margin compression like you were just talking about, if you

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>see goods inflation that's slowing, if we see a job

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>market that looks like it's showing some signs of loosening,

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that would give the FED the at least the signs

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that it needs to see to start that process of

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>slowing down. If you don't see those things and I

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's the risk we could get another seventy five

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>basis points that your subsequent meetings. I'm sure at the

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>market will price to pivots somewhere in between at some

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>point in our future. Andrew, thank you. Andrew Hollin host

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Ifer City, looking for seventy five for the FED next month.

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg